mho study forum
DESCRIPTION
MHO STUDY FORUM. 4 th October 2012. Why would anyone want to be a Mental Health Officer? The challenges that keep us going!. Day 1. Out Patient appointment – allow to try voluntary treatment despite history – named person feeling they can cope - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MHO STUDY FORUM
4th October 2012
Why would anyone want to be a Mental Health Officer?
The challenges that keep us going!
Day 1
Out Patient appointment – allow to try voluntary treatment despite history – named
person feeling they can cope
Out Patient notes make clear that if any further concerns should be detained
Day 1
Restricted information relating to police involvement / child protection information
from another local authority
Day 20
Concerns reported by Children and Families Team
GP advising client to go to hospital
A+E informed patient that they could be brought back by police
Police returning client to hospital with police escort
Day 20
Duty doctor following information on TRAK to detain
Visit to named person by DASAT (Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault team, Police)
Day 21
Phone Call from police (Public Protection Unit / DASAT) and Team Manager Mental Health
Phone call from RMO to duty MHO for assessment under Section 44 MH(C+T)(S)A
Phone call to Named person to request their views re possible detention under Section 44
Day 25
Appropriateness of named person
Information provided by named person confirmed significant risk to others
Day 26
Phone call from police – no locus for further involvement
Day 32Meeting with client including questioning him
regarding information obtained from named person
Day 40
Mental Health Tribunal Hearing under Section 50 (Patient’s right to apply for revocation of short-term
detention certificate )
Application not upheld
Day 42
Threats of harm made by client to female nursing staff
Day 43 CTO application completed including
information from named person
Day 52
Named person has legal representation – named person saying they had not requested
this
Preparation for tribunal
Day 53
Mental Health Tribunal – request by named person’s lawyer for interim order – named person present
Interim CTO hospital based granted
Information re past history from client’s lawyer
Day 54
Discussion with RMO and AWI and MHO manager re application under rule 68 (Excluding persons from hearings in
exceptional circumstances)
Day 57
Named person reporting client no longer making statements that would support risk to named
person
Day 62Discussion with named person’s lawyer – not
willing to continue acting if change of instruction
Day 76
Mental Health Tribunal hospital based CTO granted
Major faux pas – not checking source of evidence – not in nursing notes
Day 112
Named person reporting unhappiness at any discussion of client’s past behaviour
Day 127Named person reporting that she would inform
staff that client’s passes home were going well even if they were not
Day 144
Client discovered to have been going home without agreement of RMO
Named person not reporting this to ward staff