mfp manipulations thru march 2009

8/14/2019 MFP Manipulations Thru March 2009

1/20


2/20

September 8 After a high-level meeting, Dunlavey circulates a new draft of the

MFP, indicating that the Changes includeshifting Janney addition out to 2014.

September 9 -- DeGuzman questions this change: why has the addition been

moved to 2014? Schools with lesser space needs have leapfrogged them. Thiscontradicts the guiding principles. Dunlavey responds that it was made per

DME (Victor Reinoso).

September 10 The draft MFP is released with Janneys addition at the very end

of the line (2014) and scheduled to take place after Janneys renovations.

October 10 and 24 ANC 3E Commissioner Anne Sullivan and the Janney PTA

and SIT submit Testimony to the DC Council challenging Janneys placement at

the end of the modernization queue.

November 25 Andrew Smiles, providing the Facilities Committee Report to the

Janney SIT, noted that according to Anthony DeGuzman at DCPS Janneys place

in the MFP is likely to be advanced, regardless of the outcome of the PPP. But no

promises or stipulations were officially made. The Freedom of Information Act

documents obtained by the ANC meant downtown got called on Janney students

needs not being prioritized in the MFP placement according to guiding principles

of DCPS assessments.

http://www.janneyschool.org/PTASITPPP/SIT_Minutes/SIT%20Fall2006-

2009/2008_Nov_SIT_minutes.pdf

March 3, 2009 -- OPEFM submits a revised MFP schedule to the DC Council. In

this schedule, Janney's addition is restored to its original slot in 2010, only now a

footnote states "Janney schedule is predicated upon a successful partnership

between a private development company and the District of Columbia with respect

to the redevelopment of the former Tenley/Friendship library site. Interestingly,

another section of the MFP (Priorities) contains the same scheduling information

without the footnote.
http://www.janneyschool.org/PTASITPPP/SIT_Minutes/SIT%20Fall2006-2009/2008_Nov_SIT_minutes.pdfhttp://www.janneyschool.org/PTASITPPP/SIT_Minutes/SIT%20Fall2006-2009/2008_Nov_SIT_minutes.pdfhttp://www.janneyschool.org/PTASITPPP/SIT_Minutes/SIT%20Fall2006-2009/2008_Nov_SIT_minutes.pdfhttp://www.janneyschool.org/PTASITPPP/SIT_Minutes/SIT%20Fall2006-2009/2008_Nov_SIT_minutes.pdf


3/20

file: I I C: N sers/Suzette/Documents/j ann ey%2}ppp I deguzmanoh

From:Sent:To:Subject:

I of 1

DeGuzman, Anthony D. (OOC)Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1.:32 PMLerum, Eric (EOM)Facilities

Per our conversation earlier today below are some thoughts on the potential right-sizing effort that should helpshape some scenario planning.

Taft - Based on preliminary projections, Taft's PK-B renovation may cost $22,923,448 to prepare for August 08.This total is being refined and will likely decrease when a tighter building scope is completedReceiving Schools that are pending modernization, or have been moved up in the modernization schedule, thatwill also receive some "receiving school treatment" like a Blitz.. MacFarlarnd is slated for a modernization on site. Ron Brown's modernization schedule has been accelerated.

' Consider doing a "super" blitz instead of a full scale modernization.Other accelerated modernizations:r Stoddert. Janneyo EasternNew Modernizations:o Shawo StantonOther major cost levers:o Francis - PK-8 renovation - preliminary projection is $10,654,691o Browne PK-B renovation - preliminary projection is $24,447,941I have a call in to Jason requesting a copy of his analysis.AnthonyAnthony deGuzmanOffice of the Chancellor825 North Capitol StreetM: [email protected]

1211012008 3


4/20

March6thCommunityMeetingNotesPage5

What is your setback?

15-20 feet for UniDev. LCOR doesn't know.

Design process for renovation of Janney starts in 2010 under DCPSs new draft Master Facilities Plan.How can you beat that? Also access/egress off Wisconsin is really dangerous without a light (and you

won't get one). Access/egress off Albemarle Street at 8 am = equally disastrous. (Residents leaving forwork, kids headed toward school simultaneously.) Library gets pedestrians from Janney, Wilson, Deal won't adding 150 cars entering/exiting block be really problematic?

Unidev can't predict DCPS. We're sensitive to the need to get planning process started sooner. But ourproject won't set pace for DCPS. You're certainly better off with DCPS under the new regime than youwere a year ago. Our housing probably won't produce 120 new cars drop in the bucket on WisconsinAvenue during those hours. "Right turn only" onto Wisconsin. Need to do a traffic study.

Bev Sklover (questioner): Will Mangan (sp?), advisor to Allen Lew (OPEFM) gave me that date. Becausetheyre closing 20+ schools, the date of modernization of Janneys facilities has moved from 2013 to2010.

LCOR trip generation. Metro will have a positive impact. Not everyone will drive. Lots of things can bedone speed bumps, parabolic mirrors. We've already started doing site planning. Glad to hear DCPS ismoving school up. They can start building in 2010. We might start then as well.

Is this the best use of public land? Not a question for developers but let's recognize it hasn't been asked.Fenty told TNA he'd bring the community together to decide whether or not to do PPP. Five fireengines plus an ambulance may be needed for emergency response. Child protection will FBI cleareveryone involved in construction to keep kids safe. How protect residents from kids and kids fromresidents?

LCOR: good question re public lands. Community's decision it's public land, I respect that. Will try tokeep alleys free from conflicts. Barrier, maybe? Two parts to question about separation (of kids andadults) during and after construction. Won't have FBI checking everyone. People who live in buildingwill want to live in a quiet, safe place. Residents don't want kids bothering them either. Entry to

apartments will be on Albemarle, library entrance on Wisconsin. That should establish that they areessentially two different buildings. Apartment building will have security/concierge. During constructionphases, we'll have ID badges, security guards, orientation re working on a school project.

UniDev Careful separation of facilities. Should be a way to link school and library. Campus isn't just anenclave kids are members of community. This is an urban site commercial/retail and residential usesright nearby. A hundred construction workers won't be changing things that much.

Library users want lots of light. Higher ceilings. Green roof. Want green space. And DCPL actually hasdesigned a library with high ceilings, lots of natural light, green roof. Are you building a troglodyte library(mostly underground because of grade change)? What size is your soccer field? What are you doing forblacktop?

UniDev our site plan doesn't match library design but it's not far off. Nothing envisioned on top of the11,000 SF space reserved for library. Entrance on Wisconsin (could be Albemarle). Lots of blacktop.Soccer field moved but still about the same size. More formal space in SW corner. Conceptual only.Plan could change.


5/20

3Pt (t>,su,l-l^a^i3 ^Kcar c:ns.t ^Y in s.n*, n*"SIan uategory Proposed (Revised)Action FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 201 1 FY 2012

Brightwood Elementary SchoolDealMiddle SctloolH.D. Cooke Elementary SdoolH.D. Woodson High SchoolHardy Middle ScnoouFillmore ArtsPhelps High School (Phelps/Spingam)Randle Highlands Eementary SchoolSavoy Elefilentary SchoolScitoolWO Walb HQh SchoolSouffi Middle SdloolWheatley Ebnntary School

In ConsfuctionIn C,onstructionIn ConstruclionIn C,onstruclionln Constuc{ionIn Consbucti.cnh Cdnstructionln Conslructionln ConsuucfionIn C,onsbuclionIn Consfuolion

5,086,08035,776,1 8414,441.36011,362,24929,822,38661,928,6s2

352,06319,112,778

1 1,376,093

1 1,861,87714,910,99754,858,647 $

7,723,377 $1 6,1 50,65012,899,339 $

26,759,862

13,928,483

22,636,031

$$$

$

$

19,834,181 11,814,424

Reno and / or Addition

Reno and / or Addition 1 5,1 50,996

Reno and I orAddition

Reno and / or Addition

Reno and I or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or Addition

Reno and / orAdditionReno and / or Addition

26,41 3.1 57Reno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or Addition

Jr., Martin Luther Elem. School Reno and / or AdditionReno and / orAdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and i or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and i or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and / or AdditionReno and I or Addition

Reno and / or AdditionReno and I or AdditionReno and I orAdditionReno and i or Addition

Reno and / or AddittonReno and / or AdditionReno and / orAddition


6/20

c.r lTtl ile in s.r'*r H.r.u-un uaregory Proposed (Revised)Action FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2412

FY SpendingTotal Spending

$ 192,446,526 $$ 3,088,663,110

178,772,0U $ 252,712,883 $ 355,363,392 $ 126,053,318

Prcisls progres*d beyond the point of smpe rsonsideratjons without significant budget exposures.Prcjecls wih smpes of work that can be rsonsidered although tT e budget h6 been approved.


7/20

Fw: Support for the Tenie-v PPP

Madigan, Sean {EOM)

Page 1 of2

From: Cheh. Mary {COUNCIL) [[email protected]]Sent: Saturday, July 12, 20BB 11:37 AMTo: Albert, Neil{EOM)Subjeet: Fw: Support for the Tenley PPP

These are all very good suggestions which I hope you rvill co-ordinate with those responsible and pursue. Aud, in general.there is a need for as mucir comrnunication as possible to counter the misinformation being spread ou there .ThanksMary.Mary M. ChelrCouncilrnerlber for Ward 3Council of the District of Columbia1350 Pennsl'tvania Avenue. N.W. Suite 108Wasliington, DC 20004'fel: i202) [email protected],,"vw.rn arlch eh.conr-Sent using BlachBerry

----- Original ivlessage -----From: ai lisonfeenev:@stalporver.net To: Cheh, Mary' (COI.|NCIL)Sent: Sat Jul 12 I I:07:06 2008Sub.iect: Support for the TenleS.' PPP

Council l\4erlber - Councii OfEce Vlary Chel:ij-50 Pennsvlvania Avenue" NWWaslr ington. DC ?0004-3003Dear Counci] Merrlber - Council Office Cheh^Thank you for moving ahead with the Tenlel, Library privatepublic parlnership. -fhis decision for amired use projectdernonstrates the fonvard thinkins thal $'e celebrate for ourneighbolhood.I believe that there are a couple of statenents that the citl,could issue that rnight help the conrmunitl come together insuppon ofthe project:I was told by Eric Scofi that Allen Le',t"s shop u,ili becornpleteiy responsible lbr Janney's modernization. that LCORr.r'ill not be responsible lor deterrninirg the desigti and prcrgrani.If this is true" and this lact was rnade public. I'm sure thatwould ease the concem oimany in the community-.To quell rhe concern that economic factors afe driving thisprocess" it ri'ouid be beneficial for the Ma-u"or to announce thatthe Deputy l..{ayor for Education *'ill be as involved in ihe

9l?t2008


8/20

Frv: Suppol't lbr the Tenle,v PPPprocess as the Deputr' Mayor for Planning and EconomicDeveloprnent. Reinoso is riell trr"tsted in Ward 3 and that r.vouldhelp assure the comnrunit-v that the school's needs will be rvellrepresented in the process.ANCiE is selectivell' leaking out a 3i3 l;'08 draft oithe MFP thatshows Janney as +8 for modernization.

'lhey- interprei tliisdocument to mean that Janney' rvas being noved up anlttvay or hasalready been mor,ed up arrd nill necessaril;' star' ntoved up. Youcertainly rnust reaiize that if the coirmun;|.' could kill the PPPand have Jannev remain in the +8 spot) most in the contnrunitt'uould choose that optionl I believe that this is another caservhere the ODN4PED or Malor has to come out and state (iitrue)that Janne!' rvill onlv move up if the PPP happens. Norv tliat thisdocument has been circulated, it is no longer good enough to sa1,it the other wav rounel.I thank 1.ou for moving fbnvard on this Partne-rship, and Icertainly. hope to hear increased arid irnproved cornmunication fromthe DC Covernmenl as the proiect evolves.

Sincerel,v,Allison Barnald Feeney'4519 Chesapeake Street NWWashinston. DC 20015

PageZ of2

e2i2aa8


9/20


10/20

subject: FW: Revised DRAFT crPAllLatest crP, changes summarized below.' sequenc'in!' page) for presentat'ion .chri schristopher S Dunlavey, ArApresi denterailsford & Dunlavey, rnc1140 connecticut Avenue, NWwash'i ngton , Dc 20036Tel: 202 266 3402Fax: 202 289 646t

sullivan vr

this needs better formatting (especially the

From: chris Dunlaveysent: ttonday, september 0B, 2008 9:47 PMTo: 'Lew, Ailen (operu)'; 'Graves, warreneschm'i dt@fhai . comCc: parti n4@netzero. net; Wi 11 tvtangrumsubject: Revised oRart ctPnllen and all -

(oprru)' ; nobi nson, Tony (oPePu) ;

peal additional classrooms in 09addition out to 201-4 (year 5, if you count 201-0 as year 1)now show all the current modernizat-ions on the same page asthey're al'l shown together. r have added total # ofbottom.

Rttached

1_.2.

rncl udi ng Al i ceshi ft'i ng Janney

is the draft crP, revised per comments todaY. Changes include:

3. As requested, rthe future projects, soprojects per year at theplease advise if this meets with your approval and r will forward to DME,chancellor's office, and city ndministrator's office.

eage 93


11/20

sullivan vrSee the list below.-----ori gi na1 Message-----From: Lerum, Eric (eou) lmailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 l-1:04 AMTo.: ,Decuzman, Anthony D. (ooc)subject: Re: More crp edits neededYup, thought so too.eri c

original Message -----From: Decuzman, Anthony D- (ooc) To: Lerum, Erig (FoM); Gottfredson, rathi:rin6 (eorq)sent: Tue Sep 09 1_1:01:40 2008subject: FW: More crp edits neededthat call went well. thanks.Anthony

From: Decuzman, Anthony D. (ooc)sent: tuesday, september 09, 200g 10: 36 arvrTo: 'chris Dunlavey'; '[email protected]'; Gottfredson, ratherine (Eotu); 'Edschmi dt 'subject: More Crp Edits neededAll,r went back to take a closer look at the crp that came out a few hours ago and foundseveral questions and things that require some cl'tangeiZeoiti.'Fi"ur" revrew the listbel ow.Anthonv

Remaining CIp questions

" ldilson sHS - does the sqlllg,footage in the_plal_meet the square footagerequirements of the school. rhe aoort'ron seems smiit-siiti---;' Deal - r assume the 5,000 sq/ft represents the in-fill classroom expansion:.^ -^^, :l"lP:-!"alth - Doesn't seeni'to thb cost out to represeni*i6irg"ii"ifi=-;lvwe need to justify the proqram. Am r wrono?i. MacFarland in 2010-- what ig the [rojected 34,000 sq/ft comprised of?' Jannev - 2 i ssues . Fi rst, -why has' th6 addi ti on-u"en'inou"j-t6' idiiz"s.hoot swith lesser s-pace needs have leaprrogged them. rtrii ioniiiljilii-tr'e quidinoprincipies,. ggggnd, thgrg is no alloEition for the moderniiaiion-of ih;ii"ilain(extsting building) which also needs work.eage 83


12/20

Subject: RE: More sullivan vrCrP Edits neededlhanks Chris. overall looks pretty good. Please see my comment in green. ed thereare a couple of clarifiers for you.Anthony

From: chris ounlavey lmaisent: ruesday, septemberTo: Decuzman, Anthony D.schmi dtcc:' PArtin4@Netzero, net'Subject: RE: More crP EdiAllA revised draft crP isAnthony's questi ons .review to ensure I have

I to : cdunl avey@faci I i typl anne rs . coml09, 2008 3 :00 pl',t(ooc) ; eri r. I erum@dc. gov; Gottf redson, Katheri ne (Eotrl) ; edts needed

attached, refiecting Kate & will's revisions and responses toStill not a pretty enough presentation format, but p'leaseresponded to your input appropriately.Kate & vvill, please be advised - sert t'4olina has recommended that the fundingsources be reduced to show less excess. He has not yet seen your & will's revisionsfrom this morning, but note that Anthony's input reduced costs (and created moreexcess funding) as we moved into the out years. Please review and determine whetheryou'd like to adjust any of the revisions you made, as r'm sure Bert's input will befor us to reduce-fundinb to eliminate all i:xcess over some buffer amount hround $20million.Specific responses to Anthony's questions and comments are provided below in RED.chri schristopher S Dunlavey, AIApresi dentgrailsford & ounlavey, rncl-140 Connecti cut Avenue, NWwash'i ngton , Dc 20036.rel: 202 266 3402 eage 18


13/20

Sul l'i van vIFax: 202 289 646IFrom: Decuzman, Anthony D. (OOC) [mailto:[email protected]]sent: tuesday, september 09, 2008 10:36 AMTo: chris ou-niavey; eri [email protected]; Gottfredson, Katherine (eou); Ed schmidtsubject: More crP Edits neededA1 1,r went back to take a closer look at the CrP that came out a few hours ago and foundseveral questions and things that require some changes/edits. Please review the listbel ow.Anthony

Remai n"i ng CIP questi ons

'. Wilson SHS - does the square footage in the plan meet the square footagerequirements of the school. rhe addition seems small still - rhe addition is 8,000SF for 12 additional teaching spaces. This is not the 24,000 that t,vMC hasidentified in its plan but it is the addition that we believe is requi red andconsistent with th'is new "phelps"-type modernizat-ion approach." Deal - r assume the 5,000 sq/ft represents the in-fill classroom expansion -actua1ly, that's $5 million, not 5,000 sF, which t have now refined to match ouractual i:stimate of $4.448 million. Yes, this is for the in-fill classroomexoansi on .* sharpe Health - Doesn't seem to the cost out to represent doing it the waywe need to jirstify the program. Am r wrong? - r followed uir w'ith claud6 who proviiJedme the estimatinq based on Samaha's work. and he prov'ided the 57.2 million fiqure(18,000 sF at a iery healthy $400 / sr) which r ain now using in the crPr' MacFarland in 201-0 - what is the projected 34,000 sq/ft comprised of? we nowassume the auditorium is being renovated, plugged at 10,000 SF to total $300,000,t' Janney - 2 issues. First, why has the addition been moved to 2074? schoolswith lesser space needs have leapfroqoed them. This contradicts the quidinoprinciples. sbcond, there is no alloEition for the modernization of their frain(ex'isting buildinq) which also needs work. The first item is at d'irect'ion from DME(reduced to 12,000), the second was mistakenly om'itted and has now been included at43.400.ror all of the questions below, please note - we have adopted a basic approach thatall of th'is summer's Phase r Receiving schools do not appear on this crp (with 2exceptions) since the phase r modernizat-ion is completed at that school and shouldnot be re-v'isited during this p1an. phase rt Receiving schools are included at 50%of their total square f5otage to represent the completion of phase r-level work atthose schools, The exceptions are Ron Brown and MacFarland, two Phase I schoolswhich we concur need more work. Therefore, the response to each of Anthony'squestions now incorporated into the model are as follows:" Amidon - althouqh we d'idn't do the entire buildinq this summer. we did aeage 19


14/20

sullivan vrrhis.message i.s intended.only tor the attention of the addressee(s). rt may containprivileged and confidential information as well as copyrighted material. rt also maybe protected from disclosure on other grounds. rf you'hav6 received this message in'error, please delete it'immediately and reply to the sender. while erailsford dDunlavey considers its information sources to be rel'iable and virus-free, theintegrity, accuracy,. or completeness of any e-mails, information, or attiched filescannot be guaranteed by gra-ilsford & DunlaVey or its employees.

This message is int_ended only for the attention of the addressee(s). rt may containpriv-ileged and confidential information as well as copyrighted material. rt also maybe protected from disclosure on other grounds. rf you hav6 received this messaqe'in'error, p'lease delete it immediately and reply to the sender. while Brailsford &oun'lavey considers its information sources to be rel'iable and virus-free, theintegrity, accuracy, or completeness of any e-mai'ls, information, or attached filescannot be guaranteed by erailsford & ounlavey or its employees.From: Lerum, Eri c (rou) [rri c . Lerum@dc .gov]Sent : tuesday, September 09, 2008 3 : 11 pl,tTo: smi th, Rbi gai l (ooc) ; Rhee, Mi chei l e (ooc) ; nuda, , Li sa M. (ooc)cc: Decuzman, Anthony D. (OOC)subject: RE: MFPNo, not exactly. we don't really say specific years for phase r to begin in thenarrative, but we refer to the stabilization initiat'ives as somethinq that has beencomplete-d (through october 2008) and that Phase r begins next. rt would take qujtea bit of editing to change that now and r believe it's go'ing to print. rs this'adetail that we can clqtify in the hearings and-in the final draft - does it reallymatter since it's still a'S-year plan foF 99.9%? (only Spinqarn and Dunbar arebeing finished then, and Janney's addition happens in 20L4. Everything else iscompl eted i n 2013) .From: smi th , nbi gai I (ooc) [mai I to: Abi ga.i 1sent: tuesday, september 09, 2008 3:05 pltTo : Rhee , vt'i chel I e (ocps-ooc) ; Ruda, Li saCct Decuzman, Anthony D. (oces-ooc)subject: RE: MFPEL-Does this reflect what's in there?Fromt Rhee, uichelle (ooC)sentr tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:To: Ruda, Lisa wt. (ooc)cc.: . Smi th , nbi gai'l (ooc) ; Decuzman ,SUblECt: RE: MFP

. smi [email protected]. (DcPS-ooC); Lerum, Eric (rou)

32 PMAnthony D. (ooc)

we said that this vear will be the 2ndofficiaily begin next year. oK?one other thino.iiiit-iii" r',rii; *ii ieage 7L

stabi I i zati on vear so


15/20

1l ozJ&t0tdEJ(]IlJFUI

07ilq',< a.,^f lr4F ( lssF UT;"i ffi 5f Q i", g ru{ tr FC&. el nii n i,r eciPhase 1 Modernizations

2009clP

2010Year 1

201 1Year 2

Erent Burrville AdamsBurroughs AmidonStoddert Ferebee-Hope EmeryTubman Hart Houston

JO Wilson KenilworthMacFarland KetchamMalcolm X LeckieMarshall Maury

McGogney SeatonML King ShaedMoten SimonNalle Stanton

River Terrace Stuart HobsonRon BrownTruesdell

TurnerTyler


16/20

f31***

-

nPhase 1 Modernizations

2012Year 3

201 3Year 4

2014Year 5

Aiton GibbsHendley Hamilton

Kramer CW HarrisMann

Draper Marie Reed

Shepherd Garrison PlummerHearst

Kimball WinstonLafayette

Ludlow-Taylor

Shadd


17/20

*

Modernizations Currently Underway2012Year 3

n

General Modernizations - High Schools2012Year 3

201 3Year 4

2014Year 5

Spingarn Spingarn

BallouBanneker

Ellington

Selected Additions, De-Massing, and Demolition2At2Year 3

2013Year 4

2014Year 5Janney +

Dunbar Dunbar Dunbar


18/20

z{JrU]rJIlJF

f+arch U07 dn^{t s-e .l*-^

DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS MASTER FACILITIES PLAN 2OO84.1.1 project Schedule: Current Modernizations, High School Modernizations, and SelectAdditions and New Construction

2010 2011 2012 2013Current Modernizations

AddisonAlice DealH.D. CookeH.D. WoodsonSavoy I BirneySchool Without WallsWheatley / Webb

High School ModernizationsEasternAnacostiaWilsonSharpeRooseveltCardozoEllingtonCoolidgeBallouSpingarnBanneker

Select Addition / New ConstrustionE

Bruce MonroeBurroughsStoddertAlice Dealj Janney"Bunker HillWilsonShawDunbarHearstMannMurchWest

Emtre- m rere rEn E

Certain schedules are contingent upon agreements with private partners'lanney schedule is predicated upon a successful partnership between a private development company and theDistrict of Columbia with respect to the redevelopment of the former Tenley / Friendship library site.


19/20

ll".A z-oo1 dn Pr,-, { < r S


20/20

M',.rJ^ 7oo1

FUTURE SEQUENCING, ccntinued

2010Year 1

5eo{7P-,^zJ0-U)tdFfll.tlJFt) Phase 1 Modernizations2009

ctP201 1Year 2

Brent Burrville AmidonBurroughs Drew EmeryTubman Ferebee-Hope Houston

Hart Janney