methods for developing and applying screening criteria for
TRANSCRIPT
byRobin V. Davis, P.G.Project ManagerUtah Department of Environmental QualityLeaking Underground Storage [email protected] 801-536-4177
24th Annual
September 16-18, 2013
Methods for Developing and Applying Screening Criteria for the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway
National Tanks ConferenceDenver, Colorado
OBJECTIVES
• Understand causes of PVI
• Understand why there are so many petroleum LUST sites, yet petroleum vapor intrusion (PVI) is very rare
• Petroleum Vapor Database compiled from basic field data routinely collected at LUST sites plus soil vapor data
• Show characteristics, mechanisms, magnitude of petroleum hydrocarbon vapor biodegradation and attenuation vertically and laterally
SCOPE
• Work Groups, literature research, publishing, field data compilation to an empirical petroleum vapor database, EPA OUST peer-review and publishing as national guidance
• Apply Screening Criteria using basic site data to screen out (exclude) low-risk sites from PVI pathway, and avoid unnecessary, costly soil vapor/air sampling
Causes of Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Based on Field Evidence
Preferential pathway: sewer line as conduit for vapors to enter building. Natural conduits include fractured or karstic rocks.
Preferential pathway: sump or elevator shaft draws LNAPL/high dissolved into building
High-strength source (LNAPL, high dissolved & adsorbed) in direct contact with building
KEY POINTS:
Vapor intrusion caused by:
Groundwater-Bearing Unit
BUILDING
Unsaturated Soil
Affected GW
LNAPLLNAPL
LNAPLLNAPL
41
3
LNAPLLNAPL
High-strength source (LNAPL, high dissolved & adsorbed) in close proximity to building
2
Drawing after Todd Ririe, 2009
� High-strength sources in direct contact or close proximity to buildings
� Anthropogenic & natural preferential pathways
5-6 feet
• Aerobic biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors is a robust, rapid process, and occurs over short distances.
Slide courtesy of Lahvis et al 2013 GWMR; Matt Lahvis & Ian Hers et al, Battelle, June 2013.
CAPILLARY ZONE
a) LNAPL SOURCE
UNSATURATED ZONE
SATURATED ZONE
sharp
reaction
front
O2
VOCs
b) DISSOLVED-PHASE SOURCE
CAPILLARY ZONE
UNSATURATED ZONE
SATURATED ZONE
high massflux
limited mass flux
sharp
reaction
front
constituent
distributions
O2
VOCs
constituent
distributions
• Key Need: Sufficient oxygen supply relative to oxygen demand, which is a function of PHC source strength and contaminant mass flux.
8-15 feet
KEY POINTS:
• Vapors associated with dissolved sources attenuate in shorter distances than for LNAPL due to source strength & contaminant mass flux.
Conceptual Characteristics of Subsurface Aerobic Biodegradation and Relative Distances of Attenuation
UST system
Dissolved contamination
Clean soil
Contaminated soil & LNAPL
High vapor concentrations from LNAPL & soil sources
Low vapor concentrations from
dissolved source
• Define extent & degree of soil & GW contamination (Title 40 CFR Part 280)
• Construct Conceptual Site Model
• Apply Screening Criteria
Gas Station
Building
Characterize Site
Contaminated soil
Petroleum Vapor Database
# Geographic Locations (sites) Evaluated
# Paired concurrent measurements of benzene subsurface soil vapor & source strength
56
MAP KEY
112/608Perth
304
2/13
56/304
Sydney
Tasmania
Compilation of Paired, Concurrent Measurements of Contaminant Source Strength & Soil Vapor Data
Canada
United States
Australia
(EPA Jan 2013, 510-R-13-001)
(Wright, J., 2011, Australian data)
(Davis, R.V., 2009, updated 2011)
(Lahvis et al 2013, GWMR)
1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04 1.E+06 1.E+08
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20
Benzene (ug/m3)
De
pth
, ft
O2 & CO2 (% V/V)
Coachella, CA COA-2(Ririe, et al 2002)
1.E+001.E+021.E+041.E+061.E+08
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Benzene (ug/m3)
Salina Cash Saver VMW-1(UDEQ 7/27/07)
OA
IA
LNAPL
LNAPL
1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04 1.E+06 1.E+08
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25
Benzene (ug/m3)
De
pth
, fe
et
be
low
gra
de
O2 & CO2 (% V/V)
Beaufort, SC NJ-VW2(Lahvis, et al., 1999)
Oxygen
Carbon Dioxide
Benzene
Benzene in GW16,000 ug/L
• Typical O2, CO2, PHC vapor profiles: petroleum vapors naturally biodegrade & attenuate with sufficient thickness of clean vadose zone soil
• 1000’s of such measurements yield consistent, predictable results
Signature Field Characteristics of Subsurface Aerobic Biodegradation and Actual Distances of Attenuation
KEY POINTS:
• Extent & magnitude of vapor attenuation can be quantified, & Screening Criteria developed & applied
• Determine thickness of clean overlying soil required to attenuate vapors associated with:
Developing Screening Criteria
• Petroleum Vapor Empirical Database
- Dissolved sources- LNAPL & soil sources
- High-quality field data peer-reviewed & QA/QC’d by EPA (EPA 2013)
- Measurements of concurrent source strength & vapor concentrations
- Plot data, evaluate trends
Method for Determining Thickness of Clean Soil Required to Attenuate Vapors Associated with
Dissolved Sources
1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04 1.E+06 1.E+08
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25
Benzene (ug/m3)
Dep
th, fe
et
bls
O2 & CO2 (% V/V)
Santa Clara, UT(UDEQ #6-046, IVB)VW-4 1/19/2009
4 feetBenzene in GW 3180/ ug/L
Formula: Distance between top of dissolved groundwater source and deepest clean vapor point = thickness of clean soil (feet) needed to attenuate vapors
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20 25
Benzene (ug/m3)
Dep
th,
feet
bg
s
O2 & CO2 (% v/v)
Jackson’s, UTUDEQ #3-098, LVOVMW-4 9/29/08
Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, %
Benzene, ug/m3
Benzene in GW 12,000 ug/L
4.94 feet
Near-Slab Multi-Depth, Sub-Slab
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 100 10,000 1,000,000
TPH, dissolved, ug/L
Th
ick
ne
ss
Cle
an
So
il R
eq
uir
ed
to
A
tte
nu
ate
TP
H V
ap
ors
, fe
et
TPH: Soil Vapor & Dissolved Paired Measurements
All Soil Types
TPH: 73 exterior/near-slab + 24 sub-slab = 97 totalBenzene: 199 exterior/near-slab + 37 sub-slab = 236 total
(Exterior + Sub-Slab)
Analysis of Petroleum Vapor Database for Dissolved Sources
5-6 feet CLEAN overlying soil attenuates vapors associated with
dissolved benzene 1,000-5,000 ug/L, TPH 10,000-30,000 ug/L
LNAPL PHC INDICATORS (EPA 2013; Lahvis et al 2013)
11
LNAPL INDICATOR MEASURES AND SCREENING VALUES
Current or historic presence of
LNAPL in groundwater
Visual evidence in field and/or laboratory: sheen on groundwater
and in soil, measurable thickness in groundwater wells, filter,
shake & dye tests, fluorescence
Groundwater : concentration of PHCs
>0.2 times effective solubilities
(Bruce et al. 1991)
Soil: concentration of PHCs
>effective soil saturation (Csat)
Groundwater (dissolved-phase concentrations)
Benzene >3-5 mg/L
TPHg >20-30 mg/L
TPH-d >5 mg/L
Soil (adsorbed-phase concentrations)
Benzene: >10 mg/kg
TPHg: >250-500 mg/kg
Organic vapor analyzer (PID, OVM)
field measurements of soil cores
Gasoline-contaminated soil: >500 ppm-v
Diesel-contaminated soil: >10 ppm-v
Soil Gas: PHC vapor, O2 and CO2
profiles
PHC vapor and CO2 soil gas concentrations show no decrease
and O2 shows no increase with increasing distance from source
Soil Gas: elevated aliphatic soil gas
concentrationse.g., Hexane >100,000 ug/m3
VW-7
6/26/07
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20
O2 & CO2 (% v/v)
De
pth
fe
et
bg
s
1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04 1.E+06 1.E+08
Benzene (ug/m3)
Oxygen
Carbon Dioxide
Benzene
Hal’s, Green River, VW7, 6/26/07
Utah (UDEQ)
LNAPL & contaminated
soil/smear zone
FORMULA
Distance between deepest clean vapor point (top of contaminated soil) and shallowest hot point
= 15 ft top contaminated soil –11 ft deepest clean vapor point
= 4 feet CLEAN soil needed to attenuate vapors
4 feet
Method for Determining Thickness of Clean Soil Required to Attenuate Vapors Associated with
LNAPL & Soil Sources
Near-Slab Multi-Depth, Sub-Slab
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Th
ick
ne
ss
of
Cle
an
So
il O
ve
rly
ing
LN
AP
L
Re
qu
ire
d t
o A
tte
nu
ate
Va
po
rs,
fee
t
TPH SV Sample Event over LNAPL & Soil Sources
Near-Slab Multi-Depth, Sub-Slab
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Th
ick
ne
ss
of
Cle
an
So
il O
ve
rly
ing
LN
AP
L
Re
qu
ire
d t
o A
tte
nu
ate
Va
po
rs,
fee
t
Benzene SV Sample Event over LNAPL & Soil Sources
Benzene TPH
8-15 feet CLEAN overlying soil attenuates vapors
associated with LNAPL and Soil Sources
48 exterior/near-slab + 23 sub-slab = 71 total 17 exterior/near-slab + 19 sub-slab = 36 total
1 Refinery Site
Sites Sites
(Exterior + Sub-Slab, all soil types, UST and non-UST sites)
Analysis of Petroleum Vapor Database for LNAPL & Soil Sources
NEW !
http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/pvi/PVI_Database_Report.pdf
Jan. 2013
NEW !April 8, 2013
PVI draft
SCREENING CRITERIA FOR THE PVI PATHWAY
* Vertical separation distance is the thickness of clean soil
(TPH <100 mg/kg) required to attenuate vapors associated
with the various media source strengths.
Notes
- Vertical distance from source to receptor expected to apply
in lateral direction from source edge.
- Source edge defined by concentrations shown above, or
other state-specific regulatory requirements.
(EPA OUST PVI draft PVI guide, April 2013)
NO FURTHER PVI PATHWAY
EVALUATION NECESSARY
SITE SCREENING PROCESS FOR THE PVI PATHWAY
Precluding Factors
present? (e.g., preferential pathways)
Buildings within lateral
inclusion distance from source edge?
Buildings within vertical
inclusion distance from
source?
Further PVI investigation or vapor control required (e.g., further site investigation, soil
vapor sampling, modeling)
No acute exposure emergency, or
explosive conditions
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Utah DEQ LUST
program will use
this decision-
making process
when the EPA
OUST guide is
finalized
�5-6 feet clean soil overlying:
Benzene <1-<5 mg/L
TPH <10-<30 mg/L
�8-15 feet clean soil overlying top of LNAPL smear zone & soil sources
Dissolved Sources
• No further PVI investigation necessary
when the following conditions apply:
LNAPL & Soil Sources
“Clean” Soil
�TPH <100-<250 mg/kg contains sufficient oxygen needed to support aerobic
biodegradation of PHC vapors
Soil Vapor Sampling
�Petroleum vapors are attenuated below the receptor
� If measuring soil vapor, analyze all petroleum COCs, O2, CO2, methane, N2,
others (TPH fractions)
�Oxygen to Carbon Dioxide ratios demonstrate petroleum biodegradation
Conclusions• One empirical database was analyzed using different methods, and
results of criteria for screening sites for the PVI pathway are similar
THANK YOU