metaheuristics genetic algorithm

18
METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm Jacques A. Ferland Department of Informatique and Recherche Opérationnelle Université de Montréal [email protected]

Upload: zena

Post on 06-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm. Jacques A. Ferland Department of Informatique and Recherche Opérationnelle Université de Montréal [email protected]. Genetic Algorithm ( GA ). Population based algorithm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

METAHEURISTICSGenetic Algorithm

Jacques A. FerlandDepartment of Informatique and Recherche OpérationnelleUniversité de Montréal

[email protected]

Page 2: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Genetic Algorithm (GA)

• Population based algorithm

• At each iteration (generation) three different operators are first applied to generate a set of new (offspring) solutions using the N solutions of the current population:

selection operator: selecting from the current population parent-solutions that reproduce themselves crossover (reproduction) operator: producing offspring-solutions from

each pair of parent-solutions mutation operator: modifying (improving) individual offspring-solution

• A fourth operator (culling operator) is applied to determine a new population of size N by selecting among the solutions of the current population and the offspring-solutions according to some strategy

Page 3: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Two variants of GA

• At each iteration of the Classical genetic algorithm:

- N parent solutions are selected and paired two by two

- A crossover operator is applied to each pair of parent-solutions according to some

probability to generate two offspring-solutions. Otherwise the two parent-solutions become their own offspring-solutions

- A mutation operator is applied according to some probability to each offspring-solution.

- The population of the next iteration includes the offspring-solutions

• At each iteration of the Steady-state population genetic algorithm:

- An even number of parent-solutions are selected and paired two by two

- A crossover operator is applied to each pair of parent-solutions to generate two offspring-solutions.

- A mutation operator is applied according to some probability to each offspring-solution.

-The population of the next iteration includes the N best solutions among the current population and the offspring- solutions

Page 4: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Encoding the solution

• The phenotype form of the solution x є ℝn is encoded (represented) as a genotype form vector z є ℝm (or chromozome) where m may be different from n.

• For example in the assignment type problem:

let x be the following solution: for each 1≤ i ≤ n,

xij(i) = 1

xij = 0 for all other j

x є ℝnxm can be encoded as

z= [j(1) , j(2) , …, j(i) , …, j(n)] є ℝn

where zi = j(i) i = 1, 2, …, n

i.e., zi is the index of the resource j(i) assigned to activity i

Page 5: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Selection operator

• This operator is used to select an even number (2, or 4, or …, or N) of parent-solutions.

• Each parent-solution is selected from the current population according to some strategy or selection operator.

• Note that the same solution can be selected more than once.

• The parent-solutions are paired two by two to reproduce themselves.

• Selection operators:

Random selection operator

Proportional (or roulette whell) selection operator

Tournament selection operator

Page 6: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Random selection operator

• Select randomly each parent-solution from the current (entire) population

• Properties:

Very straightforward

Promotes diversity of the population generated

Page 7: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Proportional (Roulette whell) selection operator

• Each parent-solution is selected as follows:

i) Consider any ordering of the solutions z1, z2, …, zN in P

ii) Select a random number α in the interval

[0, ∑1≤k≤ N ( 1 / f( zk) )]

iii) Let τ be the smallest index such that

∑1≤k≤ τ (1 / f( zk ) ) ≥ α

iv) Then zτ is selected

1 / f( z1 ) 1 / f( z2 ) 1 / f( z3) 1 / f( zN)

| | | | … | |

τ

α

The chance of selecting zk increases with its fittness 1 / f( zk)

For the problem Min f (x)where x is encoded as z 1/f (z) measures the fittness of thesolution z

Page 8: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Tournament selection operator

• Each parent-solution is selected as the best solution in a subset of randomly chosen solutions in P:

i) Select randomly N’ solutions one by one from P (i.e., the same solution

can be selected more than once) to generate the subset P’

ii) Let z’ be the best solution in the subset P’:

z’ = argmin z є P’ f(z)

iii) Then z’ is selected as a parent-solution

Page 9: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Elitist selection

• The main drawback of using elitist selection operator like Roulette whell and Tournament selection operators is premature converge of the algorithm to a population of almost identical solutions far from being optimal.

• Other selection operators have been proposed where the degree of elitism is in some sense proportional to the diversity of the population.

Page 10: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Crossover (recombination) operators

• Crossover operator is used to generate new solutions including interesting components contained in different solutions of the current population.

• The objective is to guide the search toward promissing regions of the feasible domain X while maintaining some level of diversity in the population.

• Pairs of parent-solutions are combined to generate offspring-solutions according to different crossover (recombination) operators.

Page 11: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

One point crossover

• The one point crossover generates two offspring-solutions from the two parent-solutions

z1 = [ z11, z2

1, …, zm1]

z2 = [ z12, z2

2, …, zm2]

as follows: i) Select randomly a position (index) ρ, 0 ≤ ρ ≤ m. ii) Then the offspring-solutions are specified as follows:

oz1 = [ z11, z2

1, …, zρ1, zρ+1

2, …, zm2]

oz2 = [ z12, z2

2, …, zρ2, zρ+1

1, …, zm1]

Hence the first ρ components of offspring oz1 (offspring oz2) are the corresponding ones of parent 1 (parent 2), and the rest of the components are the corresponding ones of parent 2 (parent 1)

Page 12: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Two points crossover

• The two points crossover generates two offspring-solutions from the two parent-solutions

z1 = [ z11, z2

1, …, zm1]

z2 = [ z12, z2

2, …, zm2]

as follows: i) Select randomly two positions (indices) μ,ν, 1 ≤ μ ≤ ν ≤ m. ii) Then the offspring-soltions are specified as follows: oz1 = [ z1

1, …, zμ-11, zμ2, …, zν2, zν+1

1, …, zm1]

oz2 = [ z12, …, zμ-12, zμ1, …, zν

1, zν+12, …, zm

2]

Hence the offspring oz1 (offspring oz2) has components μ, μ+1, …, ν of parent 2 (parent 1), and the rest of the components are the corresponding ones of parent 1 (parent 2)

Page 13: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Uniform crossover

• The uniform crossover requires a vector of bits (0 or 1) of dimension m to generate two offspring-solutions from the two parent-solutions

z1 = [ z11, z2

1, …, zm1] , z2 = [ z1

2, z22, …, zm

2] :

i) Generate randomly a vector of bits, for example [0, 1, 1, 0, …, 1, 0] ii) Then the offspring-solutions are specified as follows:

parent 1: [ z11, z2

1, z31, z4

1,…, zm-11, zm

1]

parent 2: [ z12, z2

2, z32, z4

2,…, zm-12, zm

2]

Vector of bits: [ 0 , 1 , 1 , 0 , …, 1 , 0 ]

Offspring oz1 : [ z11, z2

2, z32, z4

1,…, zm-12, zm

1]

Offspring oz2: [ z12, z2

1, z31, z4

2,…, zm-11, zm

2]

Page 14: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Uniform crossover

• The uniform crossover requires a vector of bits (0 or 1) of dimension m to generate two offspring-solutions from the two parent-solutions

z1 = [ z11, z2

1, …, zm1] , z2 = [ z1

2, z22, …, zm

2] :

i) Generate randomly a vector of bits, for example [0, 1, 1, 0, …, 1, 0] ii) Then the offspring-solutions are specified as follows:

parent 1: [ z11, z2

1, z31, z4

1,…, zm-11, zm

1]

parent 2: [ z12, z2

2, z32, z4

2,…, zm-12, zm

2]

Vector of bits: [ 0 , 1 , 1 , 0 , …, 1 , 0 ]

Offspring oz1 : [ z11, z2

2, z32, z4

1,…, zm-12, zm

1]

Offspring oz2: [ z12, z2

1, z31, z4

2,…, zm-11, zm

2]

Hence the ith component of oz1

(oz2) is the ith component of parent 1 (parent 2) if the ith

component of the vector of bits is 0, otherwise, it is equal to theith component of parent 2 (parent 1)

Page 15: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Ad hoc crossover operator

The preceding crossover operators are sometimes too general to be efficient. Hence, whenever possible, we should rely on the structure of the problem to specify ad hoc problem dependent crossover operator in order to improve the efficiency of the algorithm.

Page 16: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Recovery procedure

Furthermore, whenever the structure of the problem is such that the offspring-solutions are not necessarily feasible, then an auxiliary procedure is required to recover feasibility. Such a procedure is used to transform the offspring-solution into a feasible solution in its neighborhood.

Page 17: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Mutation operator

• Mutation operator is an individual process to modify offspring-solutions

• In traditional variants of Genetic Algorithm the mutation operator is used to modify arbitrarely each componenet zi with a small probability:

For i = 1 to m

Generate a random number β є [0, 1]

If β < βmax then select randomly a new value for zi

where βmax is small enough in order to modify zi with a small probability

• Mutation operator simulates random events perturbating the natural evolution process

• Mutation operator not essential, but the randomness that it introduces in the process, promotes diversity in the current population and may prevent premature convergence to a bad local minimum

Page 18: METAHEURISTICS Genetic Algorithm

Hybrid Methods

• Hybrid methods specified by combining two or more heuristic methods to improve their efficiency

• For instance, using a Neighborhood Search Technique as the mutation operator of a Genetic Algorithm to improve the offspring-solutions.

This is a good strategy since it is well known that in general, Genetic Algorithms (and population based algorithms in general) are very time consuming and generate worse solution than NST

• Strength of hybrid methods comes from combining complementary search strategy to take advantage of their respective strength. For instance,

- Intensify the search in a promissing region with the NST

- Diversify the search through the selection operator, crossover operator

of the GA