metadata & standards in scholarly communication

22
Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication A Voyage Frankfurt Book Fair – Hot Spot October 14 2015 @RinggoldInc

Upload: ringgold-inc

Post on 12-Apr-2017

465 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

A Voyage

Frankfurt Book Fair – Hot SpotOctober 14 2015

@RinggoldInc

Page 2: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication
Page 3: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication
Page 4: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

What problems did this lack of standardization cause?

• Economic• Logistical• Military

People were unable to move freely about, or to capitalize on new markets

Places were disconnected from each other, and some towns became known as “break of gauge” hubs, the place where railway systems met up.

Things – goods – could not move freely about, be sold into new markets. Conversion technologies needed to be developed, such as special dual gauge railcars were developed.

Result: Added expense, time, and inefficiency.

Page 5: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Solution: Conversion to a Standard

• May 31, 1886• 36 hours• 3 inches• 11,500 miles of track across

the southern United States

Result: Unified infrastructure to move goods & people

Page 6: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Infrastructure for the new age of Scholarly Communications

Page 7: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

What are we trying to connect?

People: Authors, Members, Editors,

Readers, Researchers

Places: Licensees, Publishers, Funders,

Intermediaries

Things: Ideas, Content, Research

data, Grants, Citations

Page 8: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Where are we trying to move our ideas & our information?

• Around our company• To/from external partners• To/from scholars around

the globe• Into the great unknown

Page 9: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

What problems are we facing?• Entity management: Jens-Peter Mueller or J-P. Müller?Uni Hannover or Hanover College?

• Discoverability: Users, librarians, researchers, students.

• Interoperability: Systems, languages, data silos based on functions.

Page 10: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Recommendations for a Smooth Journey

Improve your infrastructure

RinggoldClean Data. Confident Decisions.

Page 11: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Your passport to the world of institutions

• More than 400,000 institutions playing roles in scholarly communications• Disambiguate: Ringgold ID• Describe: Up to 25 pieces of

structured metadata about each one• Link: Organized hierarchically

Problems solved: Entity management & interoperability

Page 12: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Identify Data Elements• Ringgold Identifier• Name: official & alternatives• Location• URL/domain• Size metrics• Tier assignments: JISC, Carnegie,

Ringgold• Authentication: Athens, IPs• Ringgold Type: sector & subject• Links: Hierarchical & consortia

• ISNI matched to each Identify record• Expanded descriptive metadata: • Granular subjects• Reach, sites• Economic model, governance• Level within hierarchy• Mission, description• Activity status

Page 13: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Prepare your published content for the journey

• Structured metadata• Descriptive abstracts to drive

discovery• Professionally written• Systems-agnostic delivery• Broad licensing

Problem solved: Discoverability

Page 14: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

ProtoView Data Elements• Ringgold ID & ISNI for publisher• Abstract for book and chapters• Bibliographic info• URL of work• Ringgold Subjects• TOC• DOIs• Chapter titles and page ranges• Cover image

Page 15: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Bon Voyage: Journeys in Scholarly Communications

Three examples of institutional identifiers & structured data in action

Page 16: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Taylor & Francis: Normalizing in-house data

• Challenge: Overworked customer service, licensees frustrated• Underlying cause: Duplicate and

inaccurate customer records• Solution: Applied Ringgold

Identifiers to sold-to and licensed-to accounts

"If we still had all the previous problems, we'd need a customer service team that is double the size.”

--Sarah Wright, Customer Services Director

Results:

Page 17: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

ORCID: Joining people + places

• Joining People + Places

Page 18: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

ORCID: ResultsStats: As of September 2015:

• 340,00+ ORCID records with educational affiliation• 327,000+ ORCID records with employment affiliation

Benefits already being realized:

• Linking researchers to their thesis ID and degree-granting higher education institution• Tracking grantees and researchers across their research career• Supporting access to institutional resources• Enabling access to research findings supported by public funds• Providing unambiguous affiliation data during manuscript submission or grant

application• Enabling credit to be given for peer review and other contributions

ORCID sees a future where additional identifiers and registries are linked together, further advancing the potential for connections.

Page 19: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Aries + Copyright Clearance Center

Connecting multiple organizations & data sets

Challenge: Correct application of APC rules & discounts

• Multiple systems & data sources involved• Complex criteria + complex institutional

relationships

Solution: Get everyone speaking the same language

Page 20: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Solving the challenge of APC discounts

Publisher identifies

institutions eligible for discount

Holds & administers pricing rules

Author affiliation entered in

EMRinggoldID 12266

Page 21: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Where are we going? Everywhere.

Ringgold’s Mission

To provide identifiers and structured data to power the

efficient exchange of information throughout the

scholarly research community.

Page 22: Metadata & Standards in Scholarly Communication

Thank youChristine Orr

Sales Director

www.ringgold.com

Clean Data. Confident Decisions.

Jay Henry

CMO