Dr. Norm Friesennfriesen@tru.ca

Athabasca, AB 11/12/09

Metadata Possibilities: from the Metadata Possibilities: from the IEEE LOM through Dublin Core to IEEE LOM through Dublin Core to

…the “Cloud”?…the “Cloud”?

Photo: EssjayNZ

Overview

• What is a standard & how can it be evaluated?• Standards to consider for metadata for online

learning resources:– Learning Object Metadata (IEEE LOM)– Dublin Core– ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 “Metadata for Learning

Resources”

• A case for a “new” approach

What is a standard?• "documented agreements containing technical

specifications or other precise criteria to be used consistently as rules, guidelines, or definitions of characteristics, to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose"

• Fit for Purpose: discoverable, reusable, interoperable, adaptable, accessible

• De facto / de jure standards: complex relationship• E.g. Dublin Core, folksonomies, etc.

Standards are “Living” Documents: They have a 5-7 Year Lifecycle

Three Standards for Educational & Generic Resource Metadata

IEEE Learning Object Metadata• Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; Standard

released in 2002; renewed in 2009; CanCore as documentation

ISO Dublin Core (OCLC –Online Computer Library Centre)• American (ANSI/NISO) Standard in 2001 (Z39.85-2001)• ISO Standard 15836:2009• IETF RFC 5013 of August 2007

ISO/IEC JTC 1 Learning Resource Metadata (will be standardizing IMS Content Packaging and SCORM)

• 2009/09 (framework); 2010/03 (Dublin Core elements)

IEEE Learning Object Metadata

• 1484.12.3: Standard For Learning Technology-Extensible Markup Language (XML) Schema Definition Language Binding For Learning Object Metadata (2005)

• “On 13 May 2009, the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved the reaffirmation of LOM. That means that LOM has entered its second 5 year period of being an active standard.”

LOM Basics: 76 Elements

• General (10)• Lifecycle (9)• Meta-metadata (10)• Educational (11)• Technical (12)• Rights (3)• Relation (7)• Annotation (4)• Classification (9)

2 types of elements:• Ones containing others• Ones containing data6 types of data: • CharacterString• LangString (value,

language indicator)• DateTime, Duration• Vocabulary• vCard

How elements & data work together<general> <identifier> <catalog>CAREO</catalog> <entry>632844</entry> </identifier> <identifier> <catalog>URI</catalog> <entry>http://www.pcc.edu/dl/idea.html</entry> </identifier> <title> <string language="eng">Idea: The Inter…</string> <string language="fra">Idea: la base…</string> </title>

Complex structures: classification, lifecycle, technical <contribute>

<role> <source>LOMv1.0</source> <value>editor</value> </role> <entity>BEGIN:VCARDVERSION:3.0N:Smith;John;W.;Dr.;FN:Dr. John W. SmithORG:Open Learning AgencyEND:VCARD </entity> <date> <dateTime>2003</dateTime> </date> </contribute>

How are these Elements used?International Survey from 2006

5 Sets of records varying in size from 75 to over 3000; 50 randomly selected from each (n=250):

• ARIADNE Project (EU) • the LTSN (UK)• Metalab (France)• CELTS (China)• CAREO (Canada)

Frequency of Element Use

0102030405060708090100

6.3:

Des

crip

tion

5.5:

Inte

nded

:End

:Use

r:R

o

9.2.

2.1:

Id

4.2:

Siz

e

5.1:

Inte

ract

ivity

:Typ

e

6.2:

Cop

yrig

ht:a

nd:O

ther

:

3.3:

Met

adat

a:S

chem

a

6:R

ight

s

1.5:

Key

wor

d

3.4:

Lang

uage

2.3.

3:D

ate

3.2:

Con

trib

ute

3.2.

1:R

ole

3.2.

2:E

ntity

3:M

eta-

met

adat

a

2.3.

2:E

ntity

4:T

echn

ical

4.3:

Loca

tion

2.3:

Con

trib

ute

9:C

lass

ifica

tion

9.2.

2.2:

Ent

ry

1.4:

Des

crip

tion

1.1:

Iden

tifie

r

1.1.

1:C

atal

og

1.1.

2:E

ntry

9.2:

Tax

on:P

ath

9.2.

1:S

ourc

e

9.2.

2.:T

axon

5.2:

Lear

ning

:Res

ourc

e:T

2.3.

1:R

ole

5:E

duca

tiona

l

2:Li

fe:C

ycle

1.3:

Lang

uage

4.1:

For

mat

1.2:

Titl

e

9.1:

Pur

pose

Frequency of Element Use

The most frequently used elements (not container elements;

%-tage): • Title, Description, Keyword• Format (e.g. .html, .jpg, .doc)• Language (human)• Author• Learning Resource Type (simulation, exercise, etc.)• Subject Classification (Purpose=Discipline)

0

50

100

150

200

250

FN

OR

G

EM

AIL

BD

AY

TE

L

TE

L.x

EM

AIL

.Typ

e

MA

ILE

R

TIT

LE

RO

LE

LOG

O

KE

Y

KE

Y.T

ype.

x

X-x

How are used elements populated?

• Contributor Types • Info about contributors

0

20406080

100120140160180

Aut

hor

Pub

lishe

r

Val

idat

or

unkn

own

initi

ator

term

inat

or

valid

ator

edito

r

grap

hica

lde

sign

erte

chni

cal

impl

emen

ter

cont

ent

prov

ider

tech

nica

lva

lidat

ored

ucat

iona

lva

lidat

or

scrip

t w

riter

inst

ruct

iona

lde

sign

ersu

bjec

tm

atte

r

Conclusions: Elements and Values Selected Frequently

• The LOM is used to describe intellectual content of resources:– General: Identifier, Title, Description, Keyword– LifeCycle.Contribute (role = Author and publisher)– Classification (Purpose=Discipline)

• The LOM is used to describe file and media characteristics:– Technical.Format, Technical.Size, Location– Educational.Learning Resource Type (text,

hypertext, notes, etc.)

Conclusions: Elements and Values Seldom Selected

• LOM use does NOT emphasize description of an educational context or level:– Educational.Semantic Density 0%– Educational.Context <20%– EndUserRole 40%

• LOM is NOT used to describe resources in terms of software objects:– Structure, Version (i.e. Alpha, Beta), Status <18% – Aggregation level <27%– Contribute.Role="terminator" “technical

implementer/validator“ 0%

“De facto status” of IEEE LOM

“De facto status:” LOM vs DC

Criticisms“The “industrialist” Learning Objects approach has run

out of steam” (OLCOS Roadmap, 2007)Keep it simple (stupid!) E.g., see Wilson 2005:• notepad test - can you create a valid data instance in Notepad

in less than 4k? • reading test: can you read and understand the basics of the

specification in less than one hourr?

• scripting test - can you script a simple client or service provider in one day?

Embed in html; realize value with small investment; compatible with “Web 2.0” technologies & practices (interactive information sharing; collaboration; distributed)

Dublin Core

• ISO Standard 15836-2003 of February 2003– 2nd edition available as of 2009-02-18

• ANSI/NISO Standard Z39.85-2007 of May 2007

• IETF RFC 5013 of August 2007• OCLC• As a de facto standard?

15 Elements in the DCES

• Contributor• Coverage• Creator• Date • Description• Format• Identifier• Language

• Publisher• Relation• Rights• Source• Subject• Title• Type

Expressing Dublin Core Description Sets using XML (for title)

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <dcds:descriptionSet

xmlns:dcds="http://purl.org/dc/xmlns/2008/09/01/dc-ds-xml/">

<!-- Description Element --> <dcds:description> <dcds:statement dcds:propertyURI=“...dc/terms/title"> <dcds:literalValueString>DCMI Home Page </dcds:literalValueString> </dcds:statement> </dcds:description> </dcds:descriptionSet>

RDF: "The resource (example.org) has the subject 'Ornitology' from the vocab: …/taxonomy/MyVocab"

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"xmlns:ex="http://example.org/taxonomy/"xmlns:dcam="http://purl.org/dc/dcam/">

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/123"> <dcterms:subject> <rdf:Description> <dcam:memberOf

rdf:resource="http://example.org/taxonomy/MyVocab"/> <rdf:value>Ornitology</rdf:value> </rdf:Description></dcterms:subject></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>

What does RDF in particular enable?• "a recommended best practice for exposing,

sharing, and connecting pieces of data, information, and knowledge on the Semantic Web using URIs [Web addresses] and RDF."

• “The properties and classes of DCMI Metadata Terms have been defined for compatibility with Linked Data principles”

• “Over the past two years, vast amounts of commercial and public-sector data have been added to a growing to a linked data cloud.”

Where do metadata live?

In centralized or distributed Learning Object Repositories

Free in the Web

Who contributes metadatafor a learning resource?

Courtesy Gilles Gauthier

E.g. Searching in Wikipedia vs. DBpedia

Wikipedia Article: Max Schreck

http://wiki.dbpedia.org/OnlineAccess#h28-3

DC: Levels of Interoperability

• Level 1: Shared Term Definitions -based on shared natural-language definitions

• Level 2: Formal Semantic Interop: based on the shared formal model via RDF & linked data

• Level 3: Description Set Syntactic Interop: share abstract syntax for validatable metadata records

• Level 4: Description Set Profile Interop: shared vocabularies & view of world

Metadata for Learning Resources

• ISO/IEC 19788-1 ITLET – Metadata for Learning Resources –Part 1: Framework 2010-09

• ISO/IEC 19788-2 ITLET – Metadata for Learning Resources – Part 2: Core Elements 2011-03

• “The DC-Education Community is working with the ISO Metadata for Learning Resources group to ensure compatibility of the DC-Education Application Profile Module and the ISO MLR-5: Educational Elements standard. We will be attending ISO MLR webconferences on 16 November 2009 and 18 December 2009, in preparation for the group's big meeting in Osaka in 2010.”

MLR – Characteristics

• Multilingual capability: for element contents, for documentation and support

• Accessibility: one part of the standard will be devoted to accessibility; accessibility experts have been providing input throughout

• Compatibility: with the IEEE LOM (as an application profile), with Dublin Core (very directly), with Dublin Core RDF

• Support: implementation guideline(s) planned

MLR Part 1

Courtesy Gilles Gauthier

MLR Part 2: Dublin Core Elements

• “This Part is provides full Dublin Core interoperability for this Standard. This is achieved through the description of each Dublin Core element using the MLR data element specification template provided in the MLR Part 1 Framework. In addition, Dublin Core definitions were reviewed in order to level out interpretation [and] ambiguity[,] and best practice guidance is provided in notes.”

How RDF works

Oval = Resource (URI)

Rectangle = Literal (String)Courtesy Gilles Gauthier

References

• ISO SC36 Livelink: http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=806742

• Dublin Core http://dublincore.org/• My blog: http://learningspaces.org/n/node/34