discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of california which fit within the morphologic variation of s. spec-...

23

Upload: others

Post on 08-Mar-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 2: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 3: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 4: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 5: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 6: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 7: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 8: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 9: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 10: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 11: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 12: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 13: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 14: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 15: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 16: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 17: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 18: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 19: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 20: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 21: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 22: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman
Page 23: discovery.ucl.ac.ukments of California which fit within the morphologic variation of S. spec- tabiLis, and therefore must be considered synonymous. These are: S. californica Cushman