meningoencephalitis

2
and unfamiliar categories as relevant to the emergency preparedness, and evaluate the relative importance of each category according to their perceived influence on the emer- gency preparedness. We believe that all elements of infrastructure and equipment are important to assure preparedness to manage pandemic influenza, and that the parameters which were validated by the modified Delphi method should be implemented as part of the contingency plan for pandemic influenza. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the identification of benchmarks in the infrastructure and equipment required for managing an outbreak of pandemic influenza and for evaluating the level of preparedness of hospitals. It would appear that the initiative and leadership taken by the MOH in requiring hospitals to develop pandemic influenza preparedness programmes, in conjunction with the ongoing evaluation process of and the level of emergency preparedness, encourages and motivates the maintenance of a high level of hospital preparedness. The significant relationship between maintaining stockpiles of antiviral medications for patients and staff and performance in an avian flu drill emphasises the importance of procuring effective functional stockpiles in accordance with the relevant threats and risk assessments in order to assure emergency preparedness. Competing interests: None. Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1. Scharoun K, van Caulil K, Liberman A. Bioterrorism vs. health security-crafting: a plan of preparedness. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2002;21:74–92. 2. Lillibridge S. New developments in health and medical preparedness related to the threat of terrorism. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003;7:56–8. 3. Kenar L, Karayilanoglu T. Medical preparedness against chemical and biological incidents for the NATO summit in Istanbul and lessons learned. Prehosp Disaster Med 2006;21:268–71. 4. Duley MG. The next pandemic: anticipating an overwhelmed health care system. Yale J Biol Med 2005;78:355–62. 5. Salinsky E. Will the nation be ready for the next bioterrorism attack? Mending gaps in the public health infrastructure. NHPF Issue Brief 2002;12:1–19. 6. Wilgis J. Strategies for providing mechanical ventilation in a mass casualty incident: distribution versus stockpiling. Respir Care 2008;53:96–100. 7. Roberge RJ. Effect of surgical masks worn concurrently over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: extended service life versus increased user burden. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14:E19–26. 8. Swaminathan A, Martin R, Gamon S, et al. Personal protective equipment and antiviral drug use during hospitalization for suspected avian or pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1541–7. 9. Gomersall CD, Loo S, Joynt GM, et al. Pandemic preparedness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13:742–7. 10. Imai T, Takahashi K, Todoroki M, et al. Perception in relation to a potential influenza pandemic among healthcare workers in Japan: implications for preparedness. J Occup Health 2008;50:13–23. 11. Adini B, Goldberg A, Cohen R, et al. Relationship between standards of procedures (SOPs) for pandemic influenza and level of performance in drill. Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:223–9. Winged scapula as the presenting symptom of Guillain–Barre ´ syndrome An 18-year-old British girl with long-standing traumatic wing- ing of the scapula on the right side (from a sports injury) noticed spontaneous winging of the scapula on the left side with no other associated symptoms. The following day she developed left upper limb weakness, which then progressed to weakness of her other limbs. Her weakness was more pronounced in the upper limbs. All limbs were more weak proximally than distally. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed raised protein (0.5 g/l) and electrophysiological studies showed findings (absent F waves) consistent with Guillain–Barre ´ syndrome. She was treated with 5 days of intravenous immunoglobulins and an extensive physiotherapy programme. She made a full recovery in 8 weeks with complete resolution of the winging of the scapula on the left side. Physicians must be aware that Guillain–Barre ´ syndrome can rarely present with winging of the scapula as the first symptom/sign. M Sivan, A Hassan Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK Correspondence to: Dr M Sivan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK; [email protected] Competing interests: None. Patient consent: Obtained. Accepted 2 October 2008 Emerg Med J 2009;26:790. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.066613 Figure 1 The photograph taken during the rehabilitation phase shows the prominent traumatic winging on the right side and the resolving winging (caused by Guillain–Barre ´ syndrome) on the left side. Images in emergency medicine Original article 790 Emerg Med J November 2009 Vol 26 No 11

Upload: galuh-kresna-bayu

Post on 18-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

gkb

TRANSCRIPT

  • and unfamiliar categories as relevant to the emergencypreparedness, and evaluate the relative importance of eachcategory according to their perceived influence on the emer-gency preparedness.

    We believe that all elements of infrastructure and equipmentare important to assure preparedness to manage pandemicinfluenza, and that the parameters which were validated by themodified Delphi method should be implemented as part of thecontingency plan for pandemic influenza.

    CONCLUSIONSThis study contributes to the identification of benchmarks inthe infrastructure and equipment required for managing anoutbreak of pandemic influenza and for evaluating the level ofpreparedness of hospitals. It would appear that the initiativeand leadership taken by the MOH in requiring hospitals todevelop pandemic influenza preparedness programmes, inconjunction with the ongoing evaluation process of and thelevel of emergency preparedness, encourages and motivates themaintenance of a high level of hospital preparedness. Thesignificant relationship between maintaining stockpiles ofantiviral medications for patients and staff and performancein an avian flu drill emphasises the importance of procuringeffective functional stockpiles in accordance with the relevantthreats and risk assessments in order to assure emergencypreparedness.

    Competing interests: None.

    Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    REFERENCES1. Scharoun K, van Caulil K, Liberman A. Bioterrorism vs. health security-crafting: a

    plan of preparedness. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2002;21:7492.2. Lillibridge S. New developments in health and medical preparedness related to the

    threat of terrorism. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003;7:568.3. Kenar L, Karayilanoglu T. Medical preparedness against chemical and biological

    incidents for the NATO summit in Istanbul and lessons learned. Prehosp Disaster Med2006;21:26871.

    4. Duley MG. The next pandemic: anticipating an overwhelmed health care system.Yale J Biol Med 2005;78:35562.

    5. Salinsky E. Will the nation be ready for the next bioterrorism attack? Mending gapsin the public health infrastructure. NHPF Issue Brief 2002;12:119.

    6. Wilgis J. Strategies for providing mechanical ventilation in a mass casualty incident:distribution versus stockpiling. Respir Care 2008;53:96100.

    7. Roberge RJ. Effect of surgical masks worn concurrently over N95 filtering facepiecerespirators: extended service life versus increased user burden. J Public HealthManag Pract 2008;14:E1926.

    8. Swaminathan A, Martin R, Gamon S, et al. Personal protective equipment andantiviral drug use during hospitalization for suspected avian or pandemic influenza.Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:15417.

    9. Gomersall CD, Loo S, Joynt GM, et al. Pandemic preparedness. Curr Opin Crit Care2007;13:7427.

    10. Imai T, Takahashi K, Todoroki M, et al. Perception in relation to a potential influenzapandemic among healthcare workers in Japan: implications for preparedness. J OccupHealth 2008;50:1323.

    11. Adini B, Goldberg A, Cohen R, et al. Relationship between standards of procedures(SOPs) for pandemic influenza and level of performance in drill. Ann Emerg Med2008;52:2239.

    Winged scapula as the presentingsymptom of GuillainBarre syndrome

    An 18-year-old British girl with long-standing traumatic wing-ing of the scapula on the right side (from a sports injury) noticedspontaneous winging of the scapula on the left side with noother associated symptoms. The following day she developedleft upper limb weakness, which then progressed to weakness ofher other limbs. Her weakness was more pronounced in theupper limbs. All limbs were more weak proximally than distally.Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed raised protein (0.5 g/l) andelectrophysiological studies showed findings (absent F waves)consistent with GuillainBarre syndrome. She was treated with5 days of intravenous immunoglobulins and an extensivephysiotherapy programme. She made a full recovery in 8 weekswith complete resolution of the winging of the scapula on theleft side. Physicians must be aware that GuillainBarresyndrome can rarely present with winging of the scapula asthe first symptom/sign.

    M Sivan, A Hassan

    Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

    Correspondence to: Dr M Sivan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, ChapelAllerton Hospital, Leeds, UK; [email protected]

    Competing interests: None.

    Patient consent: Obtained.

    Accepted 2 October 2008

    Emerg Med J 2009;26:790. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.066613

    Figure 1 The photograph taken during the rehabilitation phase showsthe prominent traumatic winging on the right side and the resolvingwinging (caused by GuillainBarre syndrome) on the left side.

    Images in emergency medicine

    Original article

    790 Emerg Med J November 2009 Vol 26 No 11

  • Copyright of Emergency Medicine Journal is the property of BMJ Publishing Group and its content may not becopied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express writtenpermission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.