menc: the national association for music...

12
MENC: The National Association for Music Education Performing with Tape: Music for Clarinet and Electronics Author(s): F. Gerard Errante Source: Music Educators Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3 (Nov., 1985), pp. 49-51+60+63-69 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of MENC: The National Association for Music Education Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3400538 . Accessed: 22/09/2013 15:28 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Sage Publications, Inc. and MENC: The National Association for Music Education are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Educators Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • MENC: The National Association for Music Education

    Performing with Tape: Music for Clarinet and ElectronicsAuthor(s): F. Gerard ErranteSource: Music Educators Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3 (Nov., 1985), pp. 49-51+60+63-69Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of MENC: The National Association for Music EducationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3400538 .Accessed: 22/09/2013 15:28

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Sage Publications, Inc. and MENC: The National Association for Music Education are collaborating withJSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Educators Journal.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sagehttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=menchttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3400538?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • y the end of World War II, the tape recorder had developed to a degree that composers in France began creating compositions containing exciting new timbres. These were

    produced by a variety of rather simple tech- niques: alteration of tape speed, addition of reverberation, filtering, F. Gerard Errante, professor of music at Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia, is a past-president of ClariNetworks InterNa- tional and an internationally known recitalist. This article was made possible by a grant from the National Endowment for the Hu- manities to attend a seminar on "Music and Technology" at Dartmouth College, Hano- ver, New Hampshire, during the summer of 1984. It is adapted from an article being serialized in ClariNetwork, beginning with the Fall 1984 issue. Photographs are courte- sy of Reynold Weidenaar; works pictured are published by Magnetic Music, 5 Jones Street #4, New York 10014.

    mixing of sonorities, and splicing. As important as the new timbral resources was the rhythmic control made possible by this new medium. The composer, with a ruler and splicing block, could piece together passages of great rhythmic complexity that would be absolutely accurate with every "performance." This leads to another fundamental principle of tape music: without an intermedi- ary performer, the composer is in direct contact with the listener. As

    Elliott Schwartz has observed, "A composer in a tape studio can, if he wishes, stand in the same relation- ship to the stuff of his art as the painter or sculptor, molding and shaping his material into a finished product."

    To be sure, this was an exciting prospect to many composers ... but among performers there was great concern. In 1960, Elliott Carter, dis- cussing the issue of electronic mu- sic doing away with the performer, wrote, "electronic music ... allows boundless technical and imagina- tive freedom and eliminates a very costly element in music making."2 1. Schwartz, Electronic Music. A Listener's Guide, revised edition (New York: Praeger, 1975), 8--9. 2. Elliott Carter and Vladimir Ussachevsky, "Reel vs. Real," American Symphony Orchestra League Newsletter 2, no. 5-6, 1960, 8.

    MEJ/November '85 49

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • t There followed a period of ex- !travagant claims by proponents of the new electronic medium and de- fensive cries from detractors that "technique was strangling and dehumanizing art." In retrospect, the period from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s saw many naive and amusing charges and counter- charges as to the validity of the medium. The American Federation of Musicians was naturally con- cerned about the apparent threat to the live performer. Articles such as "How's Petrillo Gonna Collect AFM Dues from RCA's Electronic Toot- er?" appeared in the trade paper Variety. 3

    The medium as master As it turned out, the "infinite pos-

    sibilities" promised by adherents of electronic music have not yet ar- rived, even in today's era of sophis- ticated technology. One of the seri- ous questions, still very much a concern today, is who is in control: How much influence does the tech- nology have over the art? When one hears a piece of music in this medi- um, one often is inclined to ques- tion whether the composer was controlled by the technology avail- able to him or whether he was able to integrate the technology into his own aesthetic and thereby shape a meaningful work of art.

    There continue to be constant advances in technology, creating in- creasingly sophisticated means of producing absolutely any sound imaginable. Ironically, this creates a difficult situation, since it is rare to find a creative composer who also possesses the background and ex- pertise to plumb the depths of the latest technology. As Jon Appleton and Lars-Gunnar Bodin recently have written, regarding the preoc- cupation with technological ad- vances, there is a "lack of time to do more than the most superficial work since no sooner has one piece of equipment been delivered than the next is already on the drawing board."4

    3. Variety 197, 2 February 1955, 55. 4. "Disposable Music: Observations Concerning 'Aesthetics' of Electroacoustic Music as Viewed by Composers vs. Listeners," unpublished paper, 7 June 1984, 2.

    Since one of the most appealing aspects of electro-acoustic music is the supposed direct contact be- tween composer and listener, it is no wonder that performers some- times feel threatened by and hostile to this medium. In the early days of electronic music, performers feared they would be put out of work, much in the same way that many musicians lost their jobs with the advent of the film sound track in the late 1920s. (Today, especially in commercial music, this remains a very real threat.) Even composers are not immune from concern for their usefulness; John Eaton, in speaking about the Synket synthe- sizer, wrote, "one real danger of the Synket is that it sometimes writes its own music so beautifully that a composer is led to wonder if he is really necessary."5

    It is unusual, however, for com- posers to be so candid and ego-less. The main concern remains whether the performer is outmoded, given the extent of recent technological advances. Samuel Pellman, in his excellent thesis on the performance of electronic music, speaks in de- fense of the performer. He says, while it is true "the performer may be technically or intellectually inca- pable of realizing the composer's wishes," there are subtleties that arise from the human performance of music that often do not emerge from tape. Pellman goes on to say, "many composers have objected to the possibility of deviations engen- dered by a performer's exercise of his interpretive liberties, or to the risk of having their ideas grossly distorted by an inept performer. Some of these composers have seized upon electronic music be- cause they feel that by putting the sound on tape themselves, they can bypass that third party, the per- former."6

    In fact, what happens at this point is that the composer becomes performer and, as Edward Cone has pointed out, the composer may not

    5. "A Portable Electronic Instrument." Music Jour- nal 24, 1966, 54-56 6. "An Overview of Current Practices Regarding the Performance of Electronic Music," master's thesis, Cornell University, 1978, 42.

    always be the best performer of his own music:

    Composers may on occasion prove to be the best performers of their own music, but it is by no means logically necessary that they always must be.... Because of their intimate association with their own works, composers often fail to appreciate the way these will sound to those less familiar with them; hence they are by no means ideal judges of performances of these works-whether by others or by them- selves. Their own performances, for ex- ample, may understate points that need to be emphasized for the sake of the listener, while devoting great care to subtleties that may not really be heard. Such a performance may teach a lot to one who already knows the composi- tion well; but in the case of electronic music it is the only performance of a work for which there is often not even a readable score.7

    There is no end to this argument. On one hand, technology may give the composer total control of his musical material, to the extent he can master his equipment. Theoreti- cally a "perfect" performance of a composition can be realized. Fur- thermore, this composition can contain timbres impossible to pro- duce by any other means, and the level of complexity can be enor- mous. On the other hand, the ab- sence of a performer presents cer- tain difficulties and drawbacks, es- pecially in a concert setting.

    Jon Appleton, writing in a recent issue of Computer Music Journal, has stated, "It has always been the opinion of this author that the limit- ed public comprehension of elec- troacoustic music was due in part to the absence of performers." He continues, "even the cognoscenti seem restless at tape music con- certs these days."8 There seems to be little doubt that the "sense of occasion" of attending a concert demands interaction with a live per- former. If even the cognoscenti seem restless, perhaps it is because the excitement of being present at an event as it is unfolding, of sens-

    7. Musical Form and Musical Performance (New York: W W Norton, 1968), 36. 8. "Live and in Concert: Composer/Performer Views of Real-Time Performance Systems." Com- puter Music Journal 8, no. 1, 1984, 48-51.

    50 MEJ/November '85

    T-

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ing the "tenseness of the artist as he establishes communication with his public,"9 is lacking from a taped concert. As Elliott Schwartz has observed:

    What would concert-going be without "mistakes," deviations, and variations from evening to evening? It is intrinsic to the notion of public spectacle that we observe the human animal, singular or plural, confronted with overwhelm- ing challenges and meeting these with varying degrees of success.10

    Matching ear to eye In addition to the sense of imme-

    diacy of a live performance, the visual aspect is of great signifi- cance. For many listeners, the asso- ciation of sound with gesture is important. In pure tape music, in- stead of a solo performer or ensem- ble, the listener sees "motionless speaker baffles and a tape machine which runs the tape through with a continuous, efficient, and undiffer- entiated precision, regardless of whether the music is turbulent or tranquil, chaotic or meditative."" This incongruity between what is seen and what is heard presents difficulty for many listeners.

    Tape music, then, is perhaps not best suited for the concert hall and may be better presented by phono- graph recordings or tapes played in the home. The problem inherent with recordings-and, of course, with all tape music-is that it is fixed and never varies. Roger Ses- sions has said:

    We can listen to a recording and derive a maximum of pleasure from it just as long as it remains to a degree unfamil- iar. It ceases to have interest for us, however, the instant we become aware of the fact of literal repetition of me- chanical reproduction-when we know and can anticipate exactly how long a given fermata is to be held, exactly what quality of accent or articulation, of acceleration or retard, will occur at a given moment. When the music ceases to be fresh for us in this sense, it ceases to be alive, and we can say in the most real sense it ceases to be music.'2

    9. Jack Bornoff, Music and the Twentieth Century Media, (Florence: Leo. S. Olschki, 1972), 89. 10. Schwartz, 156. 11. Pellman, 70. 12. The Musical Experience of Composer, Per- former, Listener, (Princeton, New Jersey: Prince- ton University Press, 1950) 70-71.

    ithout an intermediary performer, the composer is in direct contact

    Perhaps Sessions is overstating the case here, and some observers have pointed to the fact that a painting or a piece of sculpture never varies yet retains its vitality. Nevertheless, it currently appears to be the feeling of most observers that the presence of a live perform- er or performers in a concert set-

    (Continued on page 60)

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC

    Charles H. Webb, Dean

    Where Teaching is a Performing Art

    offering

    Graduate and undergraduate programs in Music Education Internationally renowned faculty in all performance areas

    Extensive performance opportunities, including band, orchestral and choral

    An unparalleled combination of academic excellence and applied music studies

    Study leading to Bachelor's, Master's and Artist's Diploma

    Scholarships and Assistantships available

    For further infor- mation, contact:

    Charles H. Webb, Dean

    School of Music Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405

    I. Opera Theater production of Carmen

    IU Opera Theater production of Carmen

    TAKE YOUR PICK! X CD9 * * * * *

    HOHNER Y) IU S YAMAHA A quality recorder program begins with quality instruments, and at West Music, you can choose from the best.

    HOHNER 9509 (one piece recorder with plastic bag and swab) ............................... $2.35

    YAMAHA 24BA (three piece recorder with plastic bag ...................................... $3.20

    AULOS 803S (one piece recorder with plastic bag and rod) ................... .. ............ ... $2.50

    AULOS 103J (two piece recorder with plastic bag and rod) ...................................... $3.50

    At West Music we offeryou the best in recorders and methods - name brands whose quality and peformance are proven in schools throughout the country. We offer excellent school discount prices, and fast dependable service.

    \] USlr mcompany J ~~I \^\?PO Box 5521 Coralville, Iowa 52241

    (319) 351-0482

    1

    PERFORMING WITH TAPE (Continued from page 51)

    ting is preferable to a setting in which only electronic devices are present. Music is an art existing in time, and a live performer can best unfold, manipulate, and decorate that time.

    Electronics and the clarinet In the past several decades, clari-

    net repertoire has increased enor- mously. Many pieces have been written, especially for solo clarinet, that explore the wide range of tim- bral effects developed in the late 1950s and 1960s. This interest in timbre is due in large measure to the explorations taking place in the area of electronic music. Compos- ers, hearing the rich new sounds emanating from various electronic studios around the world, began to look to conventional instruments for similar effects. Often, they en- countered cooperative performers desiring to try something new, and the collaboration led to exciting discoveries. Another development was the return of the composer- performer, which had been the rule until the late nineteenth century. And so a number of performers began writing pieces as vehicles for themselves, while composers pol- ished their performing skills so they could play their own works.

    The clarinet is particularly well suited for this sort of experimenta- tion. It is an instrument of great range, capable of subtle dynamic nuances throughout its entire regis- ter. Its flexibility allows for a wide variety of effects, including all man- ner of multiple sonorities, micro- tones, timbre trills, air sounds, per- cussive sounds, and the like.

    At the same time so many works for solo clarinet were being written, the world of electronic music was expanding rapidly. The develop- ment of the tape recorder, synthe- sizer, and computer took place in rapid succession, leading to the cre- ation of an enormous body of litera- ture. These tape pieces were in vogue about twenty-five years ago, but interest waned as it became apparent that the live performer was still an important, if not essen- tial, ingredient in satisfying the needs of the concert-going public. This desire for live performance led to the development of a genre of

    (Continued on page 63)

    60 MEJ/November '85

    I L I I _ 111 _ I I i ? I I I I I 0

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • PERFORMING WITH TAPE (Continued from page 60)

    works for live performer and elec- tronics. The electronics can take the form of prerecorded tape or, as has recently become more com- mon, live modification of the sound. The latter is often referred to as electronics in "real time."

    Humanizing the tape deck The combination of live perform-

    er with electronic tape seems to be a happy union of resources. The audience can respond to an individ- ual "making it happen," and a sense of spontaneity is restored. Further- more, all the resources of the ever- expanding world of electro-acous- tic music are available.

    The medium is not without its problems, however, and the great piece for clarinet with electronics has yet to be written. Often there is a lack of coordination between the live and tape parts. This may result in what seems to be a conventional clarinet piece with electronic sound effects in the background. There are notable exceptions; David Olan's Composition for Clarinet and Tape, Oily Wilson's Echoes, and the opening section of Roger Han- nay's Pied Piper are examples of successful integration of live clari- net and electronic tape parts.

    Another means of integrating the clarinet with tape is the so-called "live-ensemble" piece. This in- volves the recording of one or more tracks by the performer prior to the performance. During the concert, the performer performs live against his recorded background. As Samu- el Pellman points out, "this situa- tion exploits one of the most idiom- atic features of the tape recorder- its ability to bring the Past into the Present, and the resultant juxtapo- sition can be a fertile source of compositional ideas."13

    Elliott Schwartz, in describing this type of composition, says: "Electronic" parts don't necessarily have to be synthesized or even proc- essed from natural sources.... using....the live performer and the tape together (the composer can) create an aura, an ambience, that neither could accomplish separately....It enables us to hear the sound of one soloist magni- fied many times, playing in ensemble with himself, being heard from as many spots in the hall as there are loud-

    13. Pellman, 114.

    CONCERT VIDEOS by Reynold Weidenaar

    Love of Line, of Light and Shadow: The Brooklyn Bridge (1982) for Clarinet, Color Video, and Electronic Sound (11 min.)

    Grand Prize, Tokyo Video Festival, 1983

    Night Flame Ritual (1983) for Clarinet, Pitch Transposer, Digital Delay, Color/B&W Video, and Electronic Sound (6 min.)

    Golden Athena Award, Athens Video Fesitval, 1984

    The Stillness (1983) for Alto Saxophone, Color Video, and Electronic Sound (13 min.)

    Gold Award, Philadelphia Film Festival, 1985 Each work $65 complete, plus $4 shipping. Specify 3/4" or VHS HiFi Cassette. N.Y. State residents add sales tax.

    Send for further information and prices:

    Magnetic Music Publishing Co. (ASCAP) 5 Jones St. #4, New York, N.Y. 10014 (212) 255-8527

    r

    I

    You will recognize this kid... He (or she) is an outstanding player. He is also a whiz at math and science.

    He will probably not choose music as a career... and you hesitate to push the issue.

    There is a solution: Consider the Bachelor of Recording Arts and Sciences

    Degree at The Peabody Conservatory. He will earn a Bachelor of Music at Peabody. He will study Electrical Engineering at The Johns Hopkins University. Both will support an intensive program of recording theory and

    hands-on experience with up-to-the-minute facilities. When he (or she) graduates, he will be at home wherever technology is used to create, support, or preserve music.

    p

    The Bachelor of Music in Recording Arts and Sciences

    For further information, contact: OFFICE OF ADMISSIONS

    The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University

    One East Mt. Vernon Place, Baltimore, Maryland 21202

    Telephone 800/368-2521 Toll Free 301/659-8110 in Maryland

    I

    MEJ/November '85 63

    --l-

    s _ _~~~~~~~~~nomt.

    q

    7

    I

    I

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • PERFORMING WITH TAPE

    T op American prize winner at the Tchaikovsky Competi-, tion in Moscow, Stephanie ~E

    Chase is a member of the ' L dynamic artist faculty of the Bos-

    ! ,

    ton Conservatory where her stu- dents are the real winners.

    STEPHANIE CHASE, Violini The Boston Conservatory

    MUSIC o DANCE o THEATER 8 THE FENWAY BOSTON MA 02215

    (617)-536-6340 Contact the office of admissions for a free prospectus.

    speakers. Or we can hear the past re- captured, a passage previously played live now "echoed" over the sound sys- tem against something new.14

    Successful examples of this type of composition for clarinet and self- prepared tape are For Lady Day by Edward Diements (for any instru- ment and tape), Phoenix-Wind by Joseph Kasinskas, and Soundspells No. 6 by Meyer Kupferman.

    There are further advantages to the combination of live instrument and tape. Economic factors, unfor- tunately always a consideration, come into play. It is certainly less expensive to present a concert, for example, for clarinet and tape than it is to present one for clarinet and piano. And there are no worries about dealing with an accompanist who hasn't learned the part or is reluctant to rehearse.

    The recorded juggernaut On the other hand, there are obvi-

    ous disadvantages. Since the tape part is fixed, there is no true inter- action between the live performer and the electronic portion. Obvi- ously, the tape cannot bend and shape phrases or participate in a contest or struggle in any way. But a creative composer can work with this dichotomy. A notable example is Jacob Druckman's Animus III, where the clarinetist is finally driv- en from the stage after battling with the speakers throughout the com- position. On the other hand, the clarinetist is victorious in Tom Johnson's For Clarinet and Tape (adapted by this author from For Piano and Tape), as he cuts the speaker's cord at the end of the work.

    Since there is no variance in the electronic portion, coordination with the tape on the part of the soloist is crucial. There is no stan- dard notation of electronic mu- sic... nor is there likely to be one, given the enormous variety in the medium and the vagaries of the composers working within it. How- ever, several standard practices for coordinating the live instrument with tape have emerged. One is a time line, so that by using a stop-

    14. Schwartz, 114-115.

    64 MEJ/November '85

    St

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • watch the performer can coordi- nate events precisely with the tape. One of the drawbacks of this meth- od is the slight variance in speed from tape recorder to tape record- er; it is not uncommon to be several seconds off by the end of even a short work. This can be catastroph- ic if precise synchronization is re- quired. The best solution seems to be a time line in conjunction with some sort of notation for the tape portion. Depending on the nature of the electronic sounds, this notation can be conventionally or graphical- ly represented.

    Michael Horvit's Antiphon II is an example of a work that uses both graphic and conventional no- tation. While it does not employ a time line, timings are given for some individual sections. Several hearings of the tape with a score will be sufficient to familiarize the performer with the simple graphics employed. Perhaps the best exam- ple of a composition using carefully conceived graphic notation is Ger- ald Plain's Showers of Blessings.

    Some compositions use a variety of devices to assist the performer in coordinating with the tape. For ex- ample, Olly Wilson's Echoes em- ploys a time line along with both conventional and some graphic no- tation of the tape part. Should a time line be used, it is best that it be continuous throughout the piece. Echoes uses a time line, with a few exceptions, of fifteen seconds for each line of score. Since each line begins on one and goes to fifteen, it becomes confusing if the player is using a stopwatch. It would be sim- pler to mark line two "16-30 sec- onds," the third "31-45 seconds," and so forth, instead of "1-15" for each line. In this work, however, the tape part is notated so clearly that after a number of practice ses- sions the stopwatch should not be necessary.

    The only constant about the prac- tice of indicating the coordination of live and electronic portion is that there is no consistency. Composi- tions such as Vladimir Ussa- chevsky's Four Studies for Clari- net and Electronic Valved Instru- ment are in effect duets for clarinet and a monophonic line on tape and thereby notated as any standard duet would be; Stephen Dembski's Digit is notated much in the same manner. David Olan's Composition for Clarinet and Tape, though us-

    /

    Send check or mrontey order to:

    PDT P() Box 1068 Cathedral Statio)n New Y)ork, NY 1QQ)R

    The Musician's

    Practice Log B by Burton Kaplan

    *A completely new way to increase your practice effectiveness.

    *Makes your practicing pay off! ----_-----------------------------------

    Please send me copies of The Musician's Practice Log at $6.95 each. Shipping and handling: $2.00 for the first book and $.50 for each additional book. (NY residents add local sales tax.)

    Name

    _ Address

    l City State Zip School Affiliation

    MEJ 1185

    MEJ/November '85 65

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • Are you planning a tour? Call the professionals...

    Exchanges * Study Tours Homestay Programs ' Concert Touring * Festivals

    18th Christmas Festival of Choirs (Bethlehem, Israel)

    14th Harrogate International Youth Music Festival 8th Shrewsbury International Music Festival

    Bristol International Music Week Festivale Musicale di Roma

    Gospelfest at Norfolk, Virginia

    Concertword Ltd. 25 South Riverside PO Box 388 Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520 Telephone (914) 271-9051 Telex 9965 10

    Concertworld (UK) Ltd. 180 High Street

    Beckenham, Kent BR31 EW England

    Telephone 01-658-0121 Telex 897286 CWORLD

    II

    HARTIT: AUDITIONS 1985-1986 Audition Schedule: Undergraduate Talent Scholarships, Graduate Assistantships

    * On Campus: November 9 January 18 January 25 February 3

    * Off Campus: January 9-1 1 February 17 February 18 February 20 February 22 February 25 February 26 February 27

    March 17

    February 15 March 1 March 8 April 5

    All State Convention, Tampa FL \ Buffalo Convention Ctr. Buffalo NY Kennedy Center, Washington D.C. Settlement Music School, Philadelphia, PA Carnegie Hall, New York City, NY Heinz Hall, Pittsburgh, PA Music School Settlement, Cleveland, OH Interlochen Arts Academy, Interlochen, MI Classical Symphony Orchestra Rehearsal Hall, Chicago, IL

    James Jacobs, Director of Admissions, Hartt School of Music University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT. 061 7, 203/243 - 4465

    UNIVERSrTY o A MhAw FHFARTmORD School of Music

    PERFORMING WITH TAPE

    ing an involved electronic score re- alized at the Columbia-Princeton studio, is pitch-oriented. Therefore the notation of the electronics can be indicated as precise pitches, and coordination is critical. On the oth- er hand, there are works such as Fur Goethe by Jude Quintiere in which coordination with' the tape is much less crucial, so rather vague instructions are provided.

    Real-time electronics One of the most exciting alterna-

    tives to tape music, either by itself or in conjunction with a live per- former, is what is usually referred to as "live-electronics," or electron- ic sounds happening in "real time," as opposed to those created in an electronic studio. (For an overview of developments, see Gordon Mum- ma's "Live Electronic Music" in The Development and Practice of Elec- tronic Music.) Recent develop- ments in technology, along with the apparent increased interest in see- ing live performers playing electro- acoustic music, bode well for the future of this medium.

    Two especially exciting additions to the live-electronic clarinet reper- toire are Love of Line, of Light and Shadow: The Brooklyn Bridge and Night Flame Ritual by Reynold Weidenaar. These are works utiliz- ing live processing of the clarinet along with computer-processed vid- eo. Night Flame Ritual was specifi- cally designed to be performed with an MXR Delay System II and a pitch transposer; Love of Line ... can be performed with any delay system. The video, altered by the use of digital processing devices including a Z-2 computer with a CAT-100 frame buffer, is stunning. The audio portion has been processed by means of a Fairlight CMI, a digital synthesizer designed for composing and performing. These works cre- ate a powerful effect due in part to the relative novelty of the medium. It is expected that other composers will begin combining processed vid- eo with live performance. Here the visual aspect of the presentation is brought to a maximum, but it is important that these pieces can stand on their own as purely aural experiences.

    The demands of the technology in some pieces using live electron-

    66 MEJ/November '85

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ics can become burdensome. Stock- hausen, in two of his compositions for unspecified solo instrument, Solo and Spiral, requires an enor- mous array of equipment. Anyone attempting these works would need assistance from at least one techni- cian-Solo, in fact, requires four assistants to perform. Less compli- cated is Jonathan Kramer's Rena- scence, but his 1974 version of this piece is still quite involved and re- quires a tape delay system and a prerecorded tape, both operated by an assistant. Not every musician has access to this equipment or to an assistant with the expertise to run it, thereby making performance difficult. In 1977, Kramer devised a method where this work can be performed as a straight tape piece with the performer listening to a click track over headphones.

    Of works involving tape delay, Kramer's piece is one of the more difficult. Simpler arrangements of two or three tape recorders that record and then play back the live player are used on William O. Smith's Soliloquy, Edward McGuire's Solo for Clarinet(s), and Paul Steinberg's Micro-Electroecho. Elliot Schwartz' Dialogue No. 2 is another interesting work requiring a self-prepared tape that is altered during the course of the perform- ance. This requires an assistant for performance, and the clarinetist will probably want to use a good sound studio to prepare the tape.

    One of the more involved pieces to use clarinet with live electronics is Dodgson's Dream, by the Austra- lian composer Martin Wesley- Smith. This work uses prerecorded tape, live processing of the clarinet sound, and two slide projectors. The clarinet sound is fed into a dissolve unit triggered by pitch- the Electrosonic ES 69 unit works on this principle-which in turn controls the projectors. For the per- formance, the clarinetist, wearing white, stands in front of a screen on which slides are projected. The clarinetist controls the changing of the slides through what he plays- high pitches trigger one projector, low pitches the other. It is possible with some multiple sonorities to turn both slide projectors on simul- taneously. This piece is a fine exam- ple of technology combining with live performance to produce a co- hesive whole.

    Other notable compositions that

    STOCKING STUFFERS FOR MUSIC LOVERS!

    "So that's why they call it the glee club"

    Notable Quotes Vol.111 o,os f2 4,t

    Ask for them at any Waldenbooks or B. Dalton Booksellers

    THREE hilarious paperbacks stuffed with musical laughs. 1. NOTABLE QUOTES (Vol. 1) 2. ENCORE! (Vol. II) 3. AMUSING ARRANGMENTS

    (Vol. III) Only $5.95 ea + $1.50 postage & handling. Send check, money order, VISA, or MasterCard with expiration date to: RUBES PUBLICATIONS Dept. A 14447 Titus, Panorama City, CA 91402 Call or send for free catalog (818) 782-0800 Ca. residents add 6% sales tax

    SKIDMORE COLLEGE ANNOUNCES

    THE FIFTH ANNUAL FILENE FOUNDATION MUSIC COMPETITION

    The Lincoln and Therese W. Filene Founda- tion Music Competition has been established

    ) at Skidmore College to provide gifted young musicians the opportunity to further their musical talents through study within a liberal arts college framework.

    AWARDS: Four $20,000, 4-year scholar- ships; annual scholarship award of $5,000.

    ELIGIBILITY: The Competition is open to all prospective freshmen vocalists and in- strumentalists who meet the criteria for ad- mission to Skidmore College. Students are not required to major in music.

    ~| (Tape deadline January 15)

    For more information ask your guidance counselor, music director, or write: Filene Competition, Admissions A, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

    I Phone: 518-584-5000 ext. 2604

    Skidmore College does not permit illegal discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, age, national or ethic origin in the admission of students.

    MEJ/November '85 67

    _ _l

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • PERFORMING WITH TAPE

    Name Title

    ISchool

    Address

    City State Zip

    IPhone( - _ ,- _ --I -BKJJ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ __

    use live electronics are Morton Su- botnick's Passages of the Beast and Marilyn Shrude's Drifting Over a Red Place. Subotnick's work uses a "ghost box," which must be rented from the publisher. The clarinet sound is fed into this box, and a signal within the box triggers vari- ous processing devices, thus avoid- ing the necessity of an assistant. In Marilyn Shrude's piece, a dancer dressed in white improvises in a performing space illuminated by a series of slides of an abstract ex- pressionist painting by Ohio artist Dorothy Linden. The clarinetist per- forms a series of events that are then processed by a delay system. The nature of this delay is left to the discretion of the performer. In re- cent years the digital delay has be- gun to replace the somewhat cum- bersome tape delay. With technolo- gy advancing so rapidly, much equipment becomes obsolete rather quickly. At this writing, the MXR Delay System II has proven to be an excellent piece of equipment, espe- cially for live performance. It has a maximum 3.2 second delay and very clean sound reproduction far superior to tape delay using two tape recorders. It is easy to operate and involves virtually no set-up time.

    Compositions involving live elec- tronics are limited only by the imagination and energy of their cre- ators. Often presentations of these works take on the aura of a "hap- pening" and can only be produced by an involved collaborative effort. An example of this type of presen- tation using clarinet in a solo capac- ity was an event coordinated in 1979 by Wesley-Smith to commem- orate the hundredth anniversary of a national park in New South Wales, Australia. This outdoor pre- sentation involved film, slides, dancers, mimes, puppets, scuba div- ers, solo clarinetist, an instrumental ensemble, and a variety of synthe- sizers. It was a joy to be part of such a unique experience and hear the processed clarinet sound pro- jected across the Australian bush. Live electronics, albeit usually on a smaller scale, appears to be a major direction of electro-acoustic music.

    Working with electronics It is apparent that the extrava-

    68 MEJ/November '85

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • gant claims made for electronic mu- sic in its early years were exagger- ated. The infinite possibilities promised in the early 1950s never really materialized. Perhaps this will always be the case, but we now appear to be on the threshold of a new era of increasingly sophisticat- ed technological advances. The ability of digital synthesis to pro- duce amazing sounds is already with us, and future advancements will no doubt proceed at a rapid rate. While this technology may supplant the live performer in re- corded, commercial music, it is un- likely to do so in a concert setting.

    If more electro-acoustic works were performed, an air of excite- ment and adventure could return to what often have become dull and predictable recitals. This will help create a more informed audience. Without either alienating or cod- dling audiences, it should be possi- ble, with performers, composers, and technicians working together, to revitalize and coalesce what ap- pears to be a rather fragmented and occasionally apathetic music pub- lic. A creative fusion of art and technology could possibly lead the way to making music a vital force in the lives of all of us. As computer music specialist John Chowning has said, we now have a "window on the infinite." By working togeth- er we can help make that window an open door.

    Selected readings Ernst, David. The Evolution of Electronic

    Music. New York: Schirmer, 1977. Griffiths, Paul. A Guide to Electronic Music.

    New York: Thames and Hudson, 1979. Mumma, Gordon. "Live-Electronic Music." In

    The Development and Practice of Elec- tronic Music, edited by Jon H. Appleton and Ronald C. Perara. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1975, 286-335.

    Neubert, David. "Electronic Bowed String Works: Some Observations on Trends and Developments in the Instrumental/Elec- tronic Medium." Perspectives of New Mu- sic, Fall-Winter 1982, Spring-Summer 1983, 540-566.

    Schrader, Barry. Introduction to Electro- Acoustic Music, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1982. Ai

    Editor's note: A listing of over one hundred compositions for clarinet and electronics, either recorded or real time, is available from the au- thor at 4116 Gosnold Avenue, Nor- folk, Virginia 23508. Please enclose $1.50 to cover copying and postage costs.

    Announcing . . .

    THREE IMPORTANT PUBLICATIONS

    encompassing the music of

    -* ThWilliam Grant Still "Still is one of our greatest American

    composers. -LEOPOLD STOKOWSKI

    ? A new compelling biography- IN ONE LIFETIME by Verna Arvey, University of- Arkansas Press, 1984.

    ? The premiere recording of Still's "Third Symphony" the "Sunday Symphony" (1958), and selected chamber works Maestro Carton Woods conducting the North Arkansas Symphony. 12" stereo.

    * Glendale Records' new historical document, "William Grant Still Conducts William Grant Still." The composer's performance of the brilliant "Lenox Avenue" suite, and excerpts from the "Symphony in G-Minor." A 12" long-playing record of previously unreleased performances from 1937 and 1940.

    ORDER FORM (Mail check or money order to William Grant Still Music,

    26892 Preciados Drive, Mission Viejo, CA 92691-9107). ITEM COST POST. & HANDL. TOTAL

    Book. In One Lifetime, hardbound first edition S20.00 $3.00

    Record. Third Symphony and selected works S 9.00 $1.50

    Record, William Grant Still Conducts . 9.00 $150

    All three items together S35.00 $4 00

    Purchase Total

    PLEASE PRINT

    Calif. Residents add 6% Tax:

    Amount Enclosed:

    NAME:

    ADDRESS:

    ZIP (Allow 4 to 6 weeks for delivery)

    MEJ/November '85 69

    II L - L

    This content downloaded from 216.87.207.2 on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:28:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    Article Contentsp. 49p. 50p. [51]p. 60p. 63p. 64p. 65p. 66p. 67p. 68p. 69

    Issue Table of ContentsMusic Educators Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3 (Nov., 1985), pp. 1-80Front Matter [pp. 1-44]Overtones [pp. 4]News Brief [pp. 6-7]Bulletin Board [pp. 10-11+13]Floppy DiscographyReview: untitled [pp. 14-17]

    Market Space [pp. 19]Applying Learning Theory to Musical Development: Piaget and Beyond [pp. 22-27]Bob Dorough: Academic Hipster Mixes Math and Music [pp. 28-30]Make Mainstreaming Work [pp. 31-32]Point of View: Should Elementary Choruses Be Select or Nonselect? [pp. 33-36+45-48]Performing with Tape: Music for Clarinet and Electronics [pp. 49-51+60+63-69]How to Keep Your Upright Sounding Grand [pp. 52-56]MIOSM '86-Sooner than You Think [pp. 57-59]Book ReviewReview: untitled [pp. 70]

    Book Browsing [pp. 71-75]The Last World [pp. 80+79]Back Matter [pp. 61-78]