memorandum january 10, 2018 - alamo area · pdf filetransportation policy board january 22,...

This agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours prior to the meeting.

To: All Members, Transportation Policy Board From: Kevin Wolff, Chair and Sid Martinez, Director Subject: Transportation Policy Board Meeting Notice and Agenda

The next meeting of the MPO Transportation Policy Board is scheduled for Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

at the VIA Metro Center Community Room located at 1021 San Pedro. The following agenda items will be discussed and action will be taken as appropriate.

Items may be taken out of the order shown.

Citizens to be Heard: Speakers will be allowed up to three (3) minutes each to address the Transportation Policy Board on any one specific agenda item. While speakers who have signed

up may donate their time to another speaker, the maximum time allowed for any individual speaker will be nine (9) minutes. Speakers who wish to address the Board on multiple items or on items not listed on the agenda must do so under Citizens to be Heard. All speakers must

sign the register and state their names and any organizations they represent.

Agenda: 1. Roll Call 2. Director’s Report – MPO (Martinez)

a. The May Transportation Policy Board meeting will be held on Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at the VIA Metro Center located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX 78212

b. May is National Bike Month; the Walk&Roll Rally will be held on Friday, May 4th at 8:00 a.m. at Main Plaza, San Antonio; Walk & Bike Night will be held on Tuesday, May 15th from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at Confluence Park located at 310 W Mitchell St, San Antonio, TX 78204

c. The MPO Office will be closed on Friday, April 27th for the Battle of Flowers Holiday and Monday, May 28th for Memorial Day

3. Citizens to be Heard

MPO meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. To arrange for special assistance or an interpreter, please call 210-227-8651 or TDD 1-800-735-2989 (Relay Texas) at least five working days in advance.

Las reuniones son accesibles a personas con discapacidad. Si usted necesita asistencia especial o un intérprete, llame al (210) 227-8651 o al TDD 1-800-662-4954 (Relay Texas) con cinco días hábiles de anticipación.

Please provide any written comments on any agenda items within three days prior to the meeting, to the MPO at:

825 South Saint Mary’s Street • San Antonio, Texas 78205 (210) 227-8651 (210) 227-9321 TTD 1 (800) 735-2989

www.alamoareampo.orgor

Memorandum April 12, 2018

April 23, 2018 AAMPO Transportation Policy Board Meeting package: of 321

Transportation Policy Board April 23, 2018 Consent Agenda: All items under the Consent Agenda are acted upon collectively unless opposition is presented, in which case, the contested item will be considered, discussed and appropriate action taken separately. 4. Approval of the March 26, 2018 Meeting Minutes 5. Action on Required Certifications – MPO (Martinez)

a. MPO Self-Certification b. Project Selection Procedure c. Internal Ethics and Compliance Program d. Lobbying Certification e. Debarment Certification f. Procurement Procedures

6. Action on the Memorandum of Understanding between the MPO, TxDOT and Public

Transportation Providers as required under the FAST Act – MPO (Martinez)

Items for Individual Discussion and Appropriate Action: 7. Distracted Driving Safety Briefing – MPO (Alvarado-Vela) 8. Action on the MPO’s Fiscal Year 2017 Audit Report – Garza/Gonzalez 9. Presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Rapid Transit Corridor Study – VIA 10. Action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program and Corresponding

Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan – MPO (Geiger)

a. Action on VIA Metropolitan Transit’s STP-MM Funding Request b. Action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program

c. Action on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

11. Presentation on the Region’s Air Quality Status – AACOG (Rath)





www.alamoareampo.orgo


Transportation Policy Board April 23, 2018

12. Monthly Status Reports

a. Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (Renee Green) b. Air Quality Issues (Diane Rath) c. City of San Antonio (Mike Frisbie) d. San Antonio Mobility Coalition (Vic Boyer) e. Texas Department of Transportation (Mario Jorge) f. VIA Metropolitan Transit (Jeff Arndt) g. Others

13. Executive Session - Pursuant to Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Texas Government Code

At any time during the meeting of the MPO Transportation Policy Board, the Board reserves the right to adjourn into executive Session at any time to discuss any of the matters listed on the posted agenda, as authorized by Texas Government Code Section 551.071 (consultation with attorney), Section 551.072 (deliberations about real property), Section 551.074 (personnel matters), and Section 551.086 (economic development)

14. Adjourn





www.alamoareampo.orgo



1. Roll Call

Commissioner Kevin A. Wolff (Chair) Bexar County 210-335-2613 Councilman Rey Saldaña (Vice Chair) City of San Antonio, District 4 210-207-7281

Ms. Rebecca Cedillo Advanced Transportation District 210-299-5858

Mr. Michael J. Lynd, Jr. Alamo Regional Mobility Authority 210-335-7065

Commissioner Tommy Calvert Bexar County 210-335-2614 Commissioner Sergio “Chico” Rodriguez Bexar County 210-335-2611

Ms. Renee Green, P.E. Bexar County 210-335-6700 Councilman Ron Reaves City of New Braunfels 830-221-4000

Councilman Greg Brockhouse City of San Antonio, District 6 210-207-7065 Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales City of San Antonio, District 5 210-207-7043

Councilwoman Ana Sandoval City of San Antonio, District 7 210-207-7044

Mr. Michael S. Frisbie, P.E. City of San Antonio 210-207-8140 Ms. Bridgett White City of San Antonio 210-207-0147

Mayor Don Keil City of Seguin 830-303-7333 Commissioner Kevin Webb Comal County 830-221-1100

Mayor Chris Riley [Leon Valley] Greater Bexar County Council of Cities 210-684-1391 Judge Kyle Kutscher Guadalupe County 830-303-8857

Councilman Ron Cisneros Kendall County Geographic Area 830-249-9511

Councilman Kevin Hadas [Selma] Northeast Partnership 210-651-6661 Mr. Mario Jorge, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation 210-615-5803

Dr. Richard Gambitta VIA Metropolitan Transit 210-299-5858 Ex-Officio Members Mr. Greg P. Wood Federal Highway Administration

Mr. Nick Page Texas Department of Transportation Mr. Jeff Arndt VIA Metropolitan Transit Ms. Diane Rath Alamo Area Council of Governments Mr. Vic Boyer San Antonio Mobility Coalition



2. Director’s Report

a. The May Transportation Policy Board meeting will be held on Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at the VIA Metro Center located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX 78212

b. May is National Bike Month; the Walk&Roll Rally will be held on Friday, May 4th

at 8:00 a.m. at Main Plaza, San Antonio; Walk & Bike Night will be held on Tuesday, May 15th from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at Confluence Park located at 310 W Mitchell St, San Antonio, TX 78204

c. The MPO Office will be closed on Friday, April 27th for the Battle of Flowers

Holiday and Monday, May 28th for Memorial Day



3. Citizens to Be Heard



4. Approval of the March 26, 2018 Meeting Minutes Issue

The March 26, 2018 meeting minutes are attached for your review. Action Requested

A motion to approve the March 26, 2018 meeting minutes.


. 1. Roll Call Members Present:

Ms. Rebecca Cedillo Advanced Transportation District Commissioner Tommy Calvert Bexar County Commissioner Kevin Wolff (Chair) Bexar County Ms. Renee Green, P.E. Bexar County Councilman Ron Reaves City of New Braunfels Councilman Greg Brockhouse City of San Antonio Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales City of San Antonio Councilman Rey Saldaña City of San Antonio Councilwoman Ana E. Sandoval City of San Antonio Mr. Mike Frisbie, P.E. City of San Antonio Ms. Bridgett White City of San Antonio Ms. Betty Ann Matthias City of Seguin Commissioner Kevin Webb Comal County Mayor Chris Riley Greater Bexar County Council of Cities Judge Kyle Kutscher Guadalupe County Councilman Ron Cisneros Kendall County Geographic Area Councilman Kevin Hadas Northeast Partnership Mr. Mario Jorge Texas Department of Transportation Dr. Richard Gambitta VIA Metropolitan Transit

Members Absent:

Mr. Michael J. Lynd, Jr. Alamo Regional Mobility Authority Commissioner Sergio “Chico” Rodriguez Bexar County Others Present:

Mr. Frank Garza Davidson Troilo Ream & Garza

Mr. Isidro “Sid” Martinez Metropolitan Planning Organization Mr. Vic Boyer San Antonio Mobility Coalition

Mr. Jeff Arndt VIA Metropolitan Transit

Commissioner Wolff called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.

Transportation Policy Board Meeting Minutes March 26, 2018


Transportation Policy Board March 26, 2018

2

2. Director’s Report

a. The MPO’s annual audit will be conducted from March 19 - 30, 2018 and the report is scheduled to be presented at the April TPB meeting

b. The Walk & Roll Rally will be held on Friday, May 4th at Main Plaza in San Antonio c. Update on the Capital-Alamo Connections Study d. The MPO Office will be closed on Friday, March 30, 2018 for Good Friday

3. Citizens to be Heard

There were none. 4. Approval of the January 22, 2018 Meeting Minutes

Ms. Rebecca Cedillo moved and Ms. Renee Green seconded the motion to approve the January 22, 2018 minutes. The motion was unanimously approved.

Public Hearing: Time Certain 1:40 p.m. In accordance with the Alamo Area MPO’s adopted policies, amendments to the Transportation Improvement Program and/or Metropolitan Transportation Plan requesting quick action due to federal or state requirements or deadlines (or for other reasons deemed in the community’s best interest) may be accomplished by a 75% vote of the Transportation Policy Board quorum present to waive the routine two-step process. In these cases, the Transportation Policy Board will hold a special public hearing within the normal meeting agenda to specifically solicit public comment on the proposed amendment. 5. Action on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the FY 2017-2020

Transportation Improvement Program Commissioner Kevin Webb moved and Mayor Chris Riley seconded the motion to enter into a public hearing. The motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Chris Riley moved and Councilman Rey Saldaña seconded the motion to approve the amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program. The motion was unanimously approved.



3

Items for Individual Discussion and Appropriate Action

6. Discussion and Appropriate Action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program and Corresponding Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

a. Presentation of the Draft FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program

b. Action on STP-MM Funded Projects in Support of the Development of the 2019-

2022 Transportation Improvement Program Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales moved and Judge Kyle Kutscher seconded the motion to approve the recommended STP-MM Funded Projects as presented. The motion was unanimously approved.

c. Presentation of Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

7. Discussion and Appropriate Action on a Resolution of Support for Autonomous Vehicle

Lanes on IH 35 North

Councilman Rey Saldaña moved and Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales seconded the motion to approve the Resolution of Support for Autonomous Vehicle Lanes on IH 35 as presented. The motion was unanimously approved.

8. Presentation on the FY 2019 Unified Transportation Program For information and discussion only. 9. Monthly Status Reports

a. Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (Renee Green) b. Air Quality Issues (Diane Rath) c. City of San Antonio (Mike Frisbie) d. San Antonio Mobility Coalition (Vic Boyer) e. Texas Department of Transportation (Mario Jorge) f. VIA Metropolitan Transit (Jeff Arndt) g. Others

For information and discussion only.



4


This item was not considered.

11. Adjourn

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m.

__________________________________________ Councilman Kevin A. Wolff, Chair Transportation Policy Board



5. Action on Required Certifications Purpose

Each year the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is required to certify compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations. This agenda item outlines each of these requirements.

Issue

a. MPO Self-Certification

The MPO and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are required to certify that the transportation planning process is in compliance with all applicable federal requirements. Enclosed in your package is the certification statement to be signed by the MPO Chairman and the TxDOT District Engineer. Also enclosed is a memorandum that discusses each of the applicable requirements and how the local process complies with those requirements.

b. Project Selection Procedure

Each year the MPO, with TxDOT and VIA Metropolitan Transit, must establish a procedure for implementing projects programmed in the Transportation Improvement Program. Enclosed for your review and approval is the Project Selection Procedure. The enclosed procedure is consistent with the procedure that has been in place over several years and allows the implementing agencies sufficient flexibility to move projects forward.

c. Internal Ethics and Compliance Program

Each year the MPO certifies that it has adopted and enforces an internal ethics and compliance program that is designed to detect and prevent violations of law, including regulations and ethical standards applicable to this entity or its officers or employees and that the internal ethics and compliance program satisfies the requirements of by 43 TAC § 31.39. “Required Internal Ethics and Compliance Program” and 43 TAC § 10.51 “Internal Ethics and Compliance Program” as may be revised or superseded.



d. Lobbying Certification

Each year the MPO must certify to the Federal Highway and Federal Transit Administrations that federal transportation planning funds have not and will not be used for the purpose of lobbying federal agency employees and members of Congress. Enclosed for your review and approval is the MPO’s Lobbying Certification Statement.

e. Debarment Certification

Each year the MPO must certify to the Federal Highway and Federal Transit Administrations that it is not barred, suspended, or ineligible to receive federal transportation funds. Enclosed for your review and approval is the MPO’s Debarment Certification Statement.

f. Procurement Procedures

In June 1994, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) approved the MPO’s Contract and Procurement Procedures. In accordance with TxDOT requirements, the MPO is to certify that the MPO remains in compliance with the adopted procedures.

Action Requested

A motion to certify that the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Transportation Planning Process is in compliance with all applicable Federal requirements; move to approve all certifications as presented; further authorize the MPO Chair and others to sign the required certifications as necessary; and MPO staff to submit them to the appropriate State and Federal officials.


MPO Self - Certification In accordance with 23 CFR Part 450.334 and 450.220 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), the Texas Department of Transportation, and the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Antonio urbanized area, hereby certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan planning area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: (1) 23 U. S. C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart; (2) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), and 49 CFR part 21; (3) 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex,

or age in employment or business opportunity; (4) Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-357) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the

involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in DOT funded projects; (5) 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on

Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; (6) The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49

CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; (7) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis

of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (8) Section 324 of title 23, U.S.C., regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and (9) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding

discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Witness these signatures this 23rd day of April 2018. Texas Department of Transportation Alamo Area San Antonio District MPO Transportation Policy Board _____________________________ __________________________________ Mario Jorge, P. E. Kevin Wolff District Engineer Chair __________________________ _______________________________ Witness Witness


11

Certification of Planning Process Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, §450.334 mandates that the State and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) certify that the planning process is consistent with the requirements of 23 USC §134; and 49 USC §5303, and 23 CFR 450 subpart C – Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming. The requirements of this certification and the actions(s) taken by the Alamo Area MPO to comply with those requirements are discussed in the following sections. Federal Regulations 23 CFR 450, 23 USC 134, and 49 USC 5303 Federal regulations require the urban transportation planning process to include activities to support the development and implementation of a long range transportation plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and a short range transportation plan, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and subsequent project development activities. While all of the activities programmed in the MPO’s Budget Document, the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), contribute to those requirements, the following lists some of the more recent efforts:

Program Support Public Involvement Activities including social media, meeting hosting and

facilitation, and development of outreach materiald Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach Geographic Information Systems Activities including transportation-related data

collection and continued refinement of the MPO’s online mapping application, iMap

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities including the Bike Share Master Plan Study, Walk & Roll events and Walkable Community Program and Safe Routes to Schools workshops and activities

Traffic Safety Planning and Crash Data Analysis Air Quality Planning Congestion Management System/Process to include the Regional Thoroughfare

Plan Study Support for the Transportation Improvement Program including public outreach

and document development Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan including development of

demographics, travel demand modeling, public outreach and document development

23 CFR 450.306: Scope of the metropolitan planning process The MPO’s metropolitan transportation planning process is continuous, cooperative and comprehensive and provides for the consideration and implementation of projects, strategies and services that address the adopted ten planning factors listed below:

Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;


22

Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

Increase accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the

quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;

Promote efficient system management and operation; Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system; and reduce or

mitigate the stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and Enhance travel and tourism.

23 CFR 450.308: Funding for transportation planning and unified planning work programs The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is developed cooperatively with the State, the MPO, recipients of FTA Section 5307 funds (VIA Metropolitan Transit) and participating local governments. Currently, the UPWP is developed and maintained on a two-year cycle. 23 CFR 450.310: Metropolitan planning organization and redesignation The MPO, a Transportation Management Area, continues to be designated by the Governor with the concurrence of the State and local elected officials. The Transportation Policy Board (i.e., the MPO) consists of elected officials and staff of general purpose governments. The MPO was redesignated in April 2014 as a result of a boundary expansion and the assumption of transportation planning and programming activities in a portion of the San Marcos urbanized area located within Guadalupe County. 23 CFR 450.312: Metropolitan planning area boundaries The MPO boundary is in effect through an agreement between the MPO and the Governor. 23 CFR 450.314: Metropolitan planning agreements Responsibilities for transportation planning are cooperatively determined by the State, the MPO, VIA Metropolitan Transit and participating local governments. 23 CFR 450.316: Interested parties, participation and consultation

The MPO utilizes a proactive public involvement process that provides complete information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and supports early and continuing involvement of the public in developing plans and TIPs. The MPO’s public involvement process meets the necessary requirements and criteria. The MPO Public Participation Plan was updated in December 2017 to align with new federal requirements.


33

23 CFR 450.320: Congestion management process in transportation management areas The MPO’s transportation planning process incorporates a functioning congestion management process. 23 CFR 450.322: Development and content of the metropolitan transportation plan The year 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) was approved on December 8, 2014. The recommendations within the MTP were formulated in accordance with the planning requirements of 23 U.S.C Section 135 and 49 U.S.C. Section 5323. The 2040 MTP covers all of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe counties and a portion of Kendall County. The MPO is on the process of developing the 2045 MTP. 23 CFR 450.324: Development and content of the transportation improvement program At least every two years, or as required by the State of Texas, the MPO has prepared and adopted a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which:

covers a period of not less than four years;

includes realistic estimates of costs and revenues consistent with estimated funding available;

is submitted to the Governor for approval, and to the Federal Transit

Administration and the Federal Highway Administrator through the State;

provides required information for all projects, including total project

cost and year of expenditure project construction cost. Section 134 of Title 23, U.S.C. and Section 5303 OF Title 49, U.S.C. These requirements are "...development of transportation systems embracing various modes of transportation in a manner which will efficiently maximize mobility of people and goods within and through urbanized areas and minimize transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. To accomplish this objective, metropolitan planning organizations, in cooperation with the State, shall develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State. Such plans and programs shall provide for the development of transportation facilities (including pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) which will function as an intermodal transportation system for the state, the metropolitan areas, and the nation. The process for developing such plans and programs shall provide for consideration of all modes of transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of the transportation problems". Long range land use plans and overall development objectives are a functional

responsibility of local governments. As long range needs are evaluated, consideration is given to their relationship and impact on overall development objectives of local governments. (Geographic Information Systems Activities;


44

Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Public Involvement Activities; Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

Social, economic, and environmental affects of transportation improvements are

considered in environmental studies for individual projects. These factors were considered in the overall comparison of alternatives and the selection of projects in the MTP. (Air Quality Planning; Geographic Information Systems Activities; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

System performance is considered both in the evaluation of alternatives in the

development of the long range plan and in technical studies analyzing existing needs for highway, street, and/or transit improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; Congestion Management System/Process; Traffic Safety Planning Studies; and Transportation Data Collection and Management System, [iMap])

Alternative transportation systems management strategies are considered as an

integral part of short range planning efforts to address existing problems in both highway/street and transit. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; VIA Origin and Destination Survey; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; and Traffic Safety Planning Studies)

Alternative investment strategies are considered in the economic/financial

analysis of transportation improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and Transportation Improvement Program Development)

Plans are developed for modes utilizing travel forecasts based on the same

demographic projections and the impact of modal recommendations on different modes is analyzed prior to a final recommendation being formulated. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning)

Transportation planning and the development of transportation plans and

programs have been done on a continuous basis since the mid-1960s. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Tansportation Improvement Program Development; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

The process maintains a cooperative relationship between the agencies in

planning through agency interaction and review at the technical committee levels and direct staff contacts. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and study oversight committees)

The planning process is comprehensive through the use of local-government

developed demographic forecasts and the consideration of their overall development objectives. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning)


55

42 U.S. Code 7504, 7506(c) and (d); The Clean Air Act, Section 174 and 176(c) and (d) The counties of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe were designated as “Nonattainment/deferred” with an effective nonattainment date of September 30, 2005. This meant that these three counties were within an Early Action Compact area that does not meet the 8-hour ozone standard, yet which the Environmental Protection Agency as determined to have complied with the March 2004 Early Action Compact milestone for submitting State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to the State. The San Antonio region met all milestones associated with the Early Action Compact and, based on monitor readings for three years, was designated “attainment for ozone” effective April 15, 2008. As of April 2018, Bexar County is not meeting the 70 ppb threshold to be in compliance with the October 2015 ozone standards. Non-attainment designation for ozone has not yet occurred. Priority for project implementation is normally determined by funding restrictions and decisions by local officials. Should this area fail to meet national ambient air quality standards, the air quality impact of proposed projects in the TIP would be a determining factor by local elected officials in developing priorities for implementation. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI requires that programs supported by Federal assistance do not discriminate and Federal grant recipients must prepare and follow a program which effects such assurances. A Title VI program has been developed and is updated as required. Title VI Assurances Filed By State These assurances apply to highway project funding in the same manner as the above section applies to transit projects. The Alamo Area MPO complies with the requirements of Title VI through the Title VI Program and the requirement that all subrecipients contractually comply with the requirement of Title VI. Assurances are filed by the State. Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-357) This section deals with the requirement that, except to the extent the Secretary of Transportation determines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated under other Titles of MAP-21 shall be expended with small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. To comply with this requirement, the MPO includes in all agreements with the agencies that receive funds from the MPO a clause requiring that Minority Business Enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds. The MPO has established an overall disadvantaged business enterprise participation goal of 25% in all of its third party contracting opportunities. The MPO regularly exceeds this 25% goal. In addition, VIA (a recipient of funds from the MPO) has an adopted Minority Owned/Women Owned Business participation goal for all Federal funds received by them which they normally achieve and/or exceed.


66

49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38 (Americans with Disabilities Act) Part 27 requires compliance with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) including the regulations of the Department of Justice implementing Titles II and III of the ADA (28 CFR Parts 35 and 36) and the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission implementing Title I of the ADA (29 CFR Part 1630). The Metropolitan Planning Organization meetings are held in accessible facilities and meeting notices contain the following:

Meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. To arrange for special assistance or an interpreter, please call (210)-227-8651 OR TDD 1-800-735-2989 (Relay Texas) at least five working days in advance.

Parts 37 and 38 require compliance with the accessible transportation and related provisions of Title II and III of the ADA. VIA Metropolitan Transit indicated full compliance with the ADA Paratransit Service Criteria in January 1995 (ADA Paratransit Plan - Third Annual Update). All of VIA's newly procured transit vehicles are accessible. 23 USC Section 324, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794 and 49 CFR part 27), 42 USC 6101, and 49 USC 5332

The Metropolitan Planning Organization is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, gender, or disability. Conclusions and Recommendations The transportation planning process for the Alamo Area metropolitan area is consistent with all applicable Federal requirements. It is therefore recommended the Transportation Policy Board approve the attached MPO Self-Certification for submittal to the State of Texas, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration.


Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Project Selection Procedures - FY 2019 In accordance with Section 134(h)(2) of Title 23 U.S.C. as amended and Section 8(h)(2) of 49 U.S.C. 1601 as amended, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Policy Board hereby approves the following Project Selection Procedures: 1) The approved Transportation Improvement Program shall be utilized for

programming projects within the metropolitan planning area. 2) Any project listed in the first year of the approved Transportation Improvement

Program shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and funds are appropriated.

3) Should any projects not be implementable from the first priority, then projects

should be selected from the second, third or fourth years which shall be considered the second priority, and those projects may be implemented as plans are completed and funds are appropriated.

4) Any projects listed in the second, third or fourth year of the Transportation

Improvement Program may be accelerated to the first year of the Transportation Improvement Program as soon as plans are complete, including right-of-way and utility adjustments, and funding is available.

5) Projects with “statewide” or “grouped” CSJs will be implemented as outlined in

the MPO’s Policy 6: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Transportation Improvement Program.

This procedure was developed cooperatively between the Texas Department of Transportation, VIA Metropolitan Transit and the MPO, signed this the 23rd day of _April_2018 . ____________________________ _______________________________ Kevin Wolff Mario Jorge, P.E. Chair San Antonio District Engineer MPO Transportation Policy Board Texas Department of Transportation _____________________________ Jeffrey Arndt President/CEO VIA Metropolitan Transit


Certification of Internal Ethics and Compliance Program

I, Kevin Wolff, a duly authorized officer/representative of the Alamo Area Metropolitan

Planning Organization, do hereby certify that the forenamed MPO has adopted and

does enforce an internal ethics and compliance program that is designed to detect and

prevent violations of law, including regulations and ethical standards applicable to this

entity or its officers or employees and that the internal ethics and compliance program

satisfies the requirements of 43 TAC § 31.39. “Required Internal Ethics and

Compliance Program” and 43 TAC § 10.51 “Internal Ethics and Compliance Program”

as may be revised or superseded.

Kevin Wolff Chair MPO Transportation Policy Board Date: April 23, 2018 Attest:

___________________________________ Name ___________________________________ Title


Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements

The undersigned certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that:

1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee or Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification, of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid

to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included

in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclosure accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Kevin Wolff Chair MPO Transportation Policy Board Date: April 23, 2018


Debarment Certification (Negotiated Contracts)

1. The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) as Contractor certifies to the

best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:

a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;

b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or

had a civil judgement rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public * transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;

c) Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a

governmental entity * with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 1. b) of this certification; and

d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one

or more public * transactions terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the Contactor is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such Contractor shall attach an explanation to this certification.

* federal, state, or local Kevin Wolff Chair MPO Transportation Policy Board Date: April 23, 2018


Contract and Procurement Procedures Certification of Compliance

I, Kevin Wolff, Chair , a duly authorized officer/representative of the Alamo

Area Metropolitan Planning Organization do hereby certify that the contract and

procurement procedures that are in effect and used by the forenamed MPO are in

compliance with 49 CFR 18, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and

Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments,” as it may be revised or

superceded.

April 23, 2018 Date Kevin Wolff MPO Chair Attest: Name Title



6. Action on the Memorandum of Understanding between the MPO, TxDOT and Public Transportation Providers as required under the FAST Act

Purpose The purpose of this agenda item is to take action on a Memorandum of

Understanding that includes roles and responsibilities for conducting the metropolitan planning process for the MPO, the State Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the public transportation providers (VIA Metropolitan Transit and Alamo Regional Transit), as required under the FAST Act.

Issue

The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (or FAST Act) was signed into law on December 5, 2015. One of the requirements of the Act is the need for a written agreement between the MPO, the State DOT and providers of public transportation within the metropolitan planning area, for conducting the metropolitan planning process. Specifically, the MPO, State and public transportation providers are to jointly agree on and develop specific written provisions for conducting the metropolitan planning process including performance based planning. The deadline for executing the MOU is May 27, 2018. TxDOT provided an MOU template to all the Texas MPOs. MPO staff edited that version, as appropriate, to reflect the region’s needs. The draft MOU is attached for your review and action.

Action Requested

A motion to authorize the MPO Chairman to execute the Memorandum of Understanding outlining roles and responsibilities for conducting the metropolitan transpor-tation planning process.


1

;

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ("AAMPO"),

ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ALAMO REGIONAL TRANSIT (“ART”), TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("TxDOT") AND

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT (“VIA”)

WHEREAS, the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) promulgated regulations 23 CFR 450.314, and WHEREAS, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (“AAMPO”), the State (Texas Department of Transportation, “TxDOT”), and the Public Transportation Operators (Alamo Area Council of Governments Alamo Regional Transit (“ART”) and VIA Metropolitan Transit (VIA) are required by 23 CFR 450.314 to cooperatively determine their mutual responsibilities in carrying out the metropolitan transportation planning process, and WHEREAS, these responsibilities shall be clearly identified in written agreements among the AAMPO, the State, ART and VIA serving the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), and WHEREAS, to the extent possible, a single agreement between all responsible parties should be developed, and WHEREAS, the federal regulations require the written agreement to include specific provisions for cooperatively developing and sharing information related to the development of financial plans that support the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and development of the annual listing of obligated projects. WHEREAS, the federal regulations require that the A A MPO, State DOT, ART and VIA shall jointly agree upon and develop specific written procedures for cooperatively developing and sharing information related to transportation performance data, the selection of performance targets, the reporting of performance targets, the reporting of performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of critical outcomes for the region of the AAMPO, and the collection of data for the State asset management plan for the National Highway System (NHS). NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose.

It is the purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to make provision for cooperative mutual responsibilities in carrying out the Metropolitan Planning Process and Performance Based Planning and Programming in the MPA and to provide a single agreement between the State of Texas acting through the Texas


2

Department of Transportation (TxDOT), AAMPO, ART, and VIA, in accordance with current Federal Legislation and as required by 23 CFR 450.314.

2. Responsibilities of all parties.

All parties will:

a. Cooperatively determine their mutual responsibilities in carrying out the metropolitan transportation planning process in a performance based planning format and final form. Decide upon and adopt performance targets for this planning process in accordance with Federal and State requirements and guidance.

b. Make provisions for cooperatively developing and sharing information related to

the development of financial plans that support the MTP and TIP.

c. Ensure TxDOT, ART, VIA and the AAMPO cooperatively develop a listing of projects that comprehensively address the transportation system within the A A MPO boundaries. Identified projects shall include both roadway and transit initiatives, including but not limited to investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities for which federal funds were obligated in the preceding fiscal year.

d. Ensure that the UPWP will detail and document these responsibilities, deliverables and associated costs.

3. Performance Based Planning & Programming

a. Developing transportation performance data

i. TxDOT will provide the A A MPO with a subset for their MPA of the state performance data used in developing statewide targets.

ii. If the AAMPO chooses to develop their own target for any measure, they

will provide TxDOT with any supplemental data they utilize in association with the target-setting process.

b. Selection of transportation performance targets

i. TxDOT will develop draft statewide federal performance targets in

coordination with the applicable MPOs. Coordination may include in- person meetings, web meetings, conference calls, and/or email communication. MPOs shall be given an opportunity to provide comments on statewide targets one month prior to final statewide targets adoption.


3

ii. If the A A MPO chooses to adopt their own target for any measure, it will develop draft AAMPO performance targets in coordination with TxDOT. Coordination methods will be at the discretion of the AAMPO, but TxDOT shall be provided an opportunity to provide comments on draft AAMPO performance targets prior to final approval.

c. Reporting of performance targets

i. TxDOT performance targets will be reported to FHWA and FTA, as applicable. The A A MPO will be notified when TxDOT has reported final statewide targets.

ii. MPO performance targets will be reported to TxDOT.

1. For each target, the A A MPO will provide the following information no

later than 180 days after the date TxDOT, ART and VIA establish performance targets, or the date specified by federal code:

a. Written agreement to plan and program projects so that they

contribute toward the accomplishment of TxDOT, ART and VIA performance targets, or;

b. Written notification that the A A MPO will set a quantifiable target for

that performance measure for the A A MPO's planning area.

i. If a quantifiable target is set for the A A MPO planning area, the A A MPO will provide any supplemental data used in determining any such target.

c. Documentation of the A A MPO's target or support of the statewide or

relevant public transportation provider targets will be provided in the form of a resolution or meeting minutes.

iii. TxDOT will include information outlined in 23 CFR 450.216 (f) in any

statewide transportation plan amended or adopted after May 27, 2018, and information outlined in 23 CFR 450.218 (q) in any statewide transportation improvement program amended or adopted after May 27, 2018.

iv. The AAMPO will include information outlined in 23 CFR 450.324 (g) (3-4)

in any MTP amended or adopted after May 27, 2018, and information outlined in 23 CFR 450.326· (d) in any TIP amended or adopted after May 27, 2018.

v. Reporting of targets and performance by TxDOT and the AAMPO shall

conform to 23 CFR 490, 49 CFR 625, and 49 CFR 673


4

d. Reporting of performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of critical outcomes for the region of the A A MPO

i. TxDOT will provide the A A MPO with an update of the subset for their

MPA of the state performance data used in developing statewide targets including prior performance data.

e. The collection of data for the State asset management plans for the NHS

i. TxDOT will be responsible for collecting bridge and pavement

condition data for the State asset management plan for the NHS. 4. Responsibilities of the MPO

The AAMPO will:

a. Work in consultation with ART, VIA and TxDOT in developing the financial plan for the MTP.

b. Work in consultation with ART, VIA and TxDOT in developing the financial

plan for the TIP.

c. Conduct Technical Committee and Policy Board meetings as required and necessary.

d. In consultation with ART, VIA and TxDOT, update the MTP and TIP in

accordance with State and Federal laws.

e. Invite Transit Districts to participate in all public participation processes.

f. Conduct comprehensive, cooperative and continuous transportation planning for the MPA.

g. Establish necessary transportation performance targets, share information

related to the performance data, and document the reporting of performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of critical outcomes within the AAMPO MPA, if the AAMPO elects to develop quantifiable targets for performance measures for the AAMPO's planning area.

5. Responsibilities of the Public Transportation Operators

The Public Transportation Operators (ART and VIA) will:

a. Work in consultation with the AAMPO in developing short-range and long-range plans for transit for inclusion in the MTP.


5

b. Assist in validation of data used as input into the transportation plan.

c. Work in consultation with the A A MPO and TxDOT in developing the

financial plan for the MTP.

d. Work in consultation with the A A MPO and TXDOT in developing the financial plan for the TIP.

e. Provide the AAMPO with the annual list of transit obligated projects.

f. Serve on the AAMPO Technical Committee and Policy Board as applicable.

g. Notify the AAMPO of changes to projects that would affect the MTP or TIP.

h. Invite the AAMPO to participate in all public participation processes.

i. Establish transit asset management performance targets and share with the AAMPO and other interested parties.

6. Responsibilities of TxDOT.

a. Work in consultation with ART, VIA and the AAMPO in developing the financial plan for the TIP and MTP

. b. Assist in the validation of data used as input into the transportation plan.

c. Provide the AAMPO with the annual list of obligated projects.

d. Serve on the AAMPO Technical Committee and Policy Board.

e. Notify the AAMPO of changes to projects that would affect the MTP or TIP.

f. In consultation with the AAMPO, ART and VIA update the MTP and TIP in accordance with State and Federal laws.

g. Work in consultation with the AAMPO, ART and VIA in developing short-range

and long-range plans for transit for inclusion in the MTP and TIP. 7. Term. This Memorandum shall become effective as to each Party when fully

executed by all parties. It shall remain in full force and effect until such time it is terminated in writing by one or all of the parties. Notice of termination must specify an effective date of termination, which shall be not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of receipt of the notice. If the notice does not specify a date of


6

termination, the effective date of termination shall be thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the notice.

8. Validity and Enforceability. If any current or future legal limitations affect the

validity or enforceability of a provision of this MOU, then the legal limitations are made a part of this MOU and shall operate to amend this MOU to the minimum extent necessary to bring this MOU into conformity with the requirements of the limitations, and so modified, this MOU shall continue in full force and effect.

9. Governing Law and Venue. This MOU shall be governed by the laws of the

State of Texas. Venue for an action arising under this MOU shall lie exclusively in Bexar County, Texas.

10. Severability. If a provision contained in this MOU is held invalid for any reason,

the invalidity does not affect other provisions of the MOU and can be given effect without the invalid provision, and to this end the provisions of this MOU are severable.

(SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW)


7

EXECUTED by the parties hereto, each respective entity acting by and through its duly authorized official as required by law.

Chairperson of the AAMPO Transportation Policy Board

Date: _____ _ _

Alamo Area Council of Governments Executive Director

Date: _

VIA Metropolitan Transit President/CEO

Date: _

Texas Department of Transportation District Engineer Approved as to Content: Director Metropolitan Planning Organization

Date: _


8

Appendices:

A. Safety Performance Measures B. Highway Safety Improvement Program C. FHWA Pavement and Bridge Performance Measures

D. FHWA System Performance Measures a. NHS b. Freight c. CMAQ

E. FTA Transit Asset Management

F. FTA Agency Safety Plan



7. Distracted Driving Safety Briefing Issue

Alamo Area MPO staff will provide a short presentation on distracted driving. Action Requested

No action is requested on this item.


Drive with CareStay Aware


Dist

ract

ed d

rivin

g Last year, distracted

driving crashes killed 444 Texans and seriously injured 2,889

1 in 5 crashes in Texas involve distracted driving

Texting while driving is now banned statewide. Local laws ban all hand-held cell phone use –even at a stop light


Wha

t is

it? Distracted driving is any

activity that could divert your attention away from the primary task of driving:

Texting and talking on a mobile phone

Eating and drinking

Putting on makeup Programming a

navigation system Watching a video

Adjusting the radio


5 seconds How long your eyes are off the road when reading a text

At 55 mph, that’s long enough to cover the length of a

Did

you

know

?

Football field


Always give driving your full attention

Put your phone away when getting behind the wheel

Activate Do Not Disturb while driving

Pull off the road to talk or text

Spread the word about the dangers of distracted drivingHo

w d

o yo

u en

d di

stra

cted

driv

ing?


I pledge to JUST DRIVE for my own safety and for others with whom I share the roads.

I COMMIT TO AVOID the following distractions while driving and encourage my friends, family, and colleagues to do the same:

Take

the

pled

ge



8. Action on the MPO’s Fiscal Year 2017 Audit Report Purpose

The purpose of this agenda item is to receive a presentation and approve the MPO’s FY 2017 Audit Report as prepared by Garza/Gonzalez & Associates.

Issue

Enclosed for your review and approval is the Report on Conduct of Audit and the Annual Financial and Compliance Report as prepared by Garza/Gonzalez & Associates. The audit was for the time period October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017. A representative from Garza/Gonzalez & Associates will make a brief presentation and be available to answer any questions you may have.

Action Requested

A motion to approve the Audit Report for Fiscal Year 2017 as presented.


ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

San Antonio, Texas

ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

For The Year Ended September 30, 2017



San Antonio, Texas

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Independent Auditor’s Report .................................................................................................................... 1-3 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) .............................................................................. 4-10 Basic Financial Statements

Statement of Net Position ..................................................................................................................... 11 Statement of Activities .......................................................................................................................... 12 Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds .................................................................................................. 13 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds

Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ............................................................................... 14 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance –

Governmental Funds ........................................................................................................................ 15 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues,

Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance to the Statement of Activities .................................... 16 Notes to Financial Statements .......................................................................................................... 17-30

Required Supplementary Information

Schedule of Changes in Net Position Liability and Related Ratios ....................................................... 31 Schedule of Employer Contributions .................................................................................................... 32 Notes to Required Supplementary Information ..................................................................................... 33

Supplemental Information

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures By Grant and Other Sources ................................................ 34 Schedule of Line Item Expenditures By Agency and Subrecipients ..................................................... 35

Federal Awards Section

Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance And Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ....................................................................................... 36-37

Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and on Internal Control

Over Compliance Required by the Uniform Guidance.............................................................. 38-39

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs .................................................................................... 40-41

Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings ......................................................................................... 42

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ....................................................................................... 43

Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ......................................................................... 44


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT Members of the Transportation Policy Board Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization San Antonio, Texas Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and the general fund of the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO), as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the AAMPO’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the AAMPO’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the AAMPO’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.


We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and the general fund of the AAMPO, as of September 30, 2017, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis and the pension-related information, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the AAMPO’s financial statements. The schedule of revenues and expenditures by grant and other sources; and, schedule of line item expenditures by agency and subrecipients, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards is also presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, this information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.


Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 23, 2018, on our consideration of the AAMPO’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the AAMPO’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. March 23, 2018


The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) presents the following discussion and analysis of the AAMPO’s financial performance as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017. This discussion and analysis is intended to assist readers in focusing on significant financial issues and changes in the AAMPO’s financial position. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our financial statements and supplementary schedules provided in this report. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The assets of the AAMPO lagged its liabilities by ($374,580)—net position. Of this amount, $78,705 reflects the portion of the net assets that the AAMPO has invested in capital assets. The ($453,285) deficit unrestricted net position is comprised of ($70,954), which represents the AAMPO’s compensated absences liability balance at September 30, 2017. A significant note is that the funding for the compensated absences liability is fully accounted for and available in the current Unified Planning Work Program. The remaining ($382,331) deficit represents the net impact to net position to record the AAMPO’s net pension liability for Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements No. 68 and No. 71 discussed further below.

The AAMPO’s general fund, which is the AAMPO’s only governmental fund, reported a zero fund

balance since grant funds are received on a reimbursement basis and revenues are therefore reported to the extent of expenditures incurred, which is consistent with the prior year.

The AAMPO reports their proportionate share of net pension liability of the Texas County and District

Retirement System’s (TCDRS) pension plan. The AAMPO recognized $790,677 in long term liabilities for its share of the net pension liability; $446,417 in deferred outflows of resources, and $38,071 in deferred inflows of resources. The net pension liability increased by $53,592 from the prior year balance.

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The AAMPO’s annual report consists of two parts – management’s discussion and analysis (this section) and the basic financial statements. The basic financial statements include two kinds of statements that present different views of the AAMPO and the related notes to the financial statements:

The first two statements are government-wide financial statements that provide long-term and short-term information about the AAMPO’s overall financial status.

The remaining statements are fund financial statements that focus on individual parts of the government, reporting the AAMPO’s operations in more detail than the government-wide statements. The governmental fund statements tell how general government services were financed in the short term.

The notes to financial statements provide additional information that is crucial in understanding the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements.


Government-Wide Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the AAMPO’s finances, in a manner similar to private-sector business financial presentation. The statement of net position is a presentation of the AAMPO’s assets and liabilities, including capital assets, and long-term liabilities. This statement reports the difference between assets and liabilities as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the AAMPO is improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information regarding changes in the government’s net position for the fiscal year. Changes in net position are recorded when the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs regardless of the timing of the cash flows. Therefore, revenues and expenses reported in this statement for some items will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., due from the Texas Department of Transportation and accrued leave payable). The AAMPO’s revenues consist of program revenues from operating grants and local revenue provided by the City of San Antonio. The government-wide financial statements include only governmental activities since the AAMPO does not have any business type activities. Fund Financial Statements The accounts of the AAMPO are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Fund financial statements are used to present financial information detailing resources that have been identified for specific activities. The AAMPO uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with requirements placed on resources. The AAMPO currently only maintains a general fund, which is a governmental fund. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported in the governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. The AAMPO’s basic services are included in governmental funds, which focus on (1) how cash can be converted to cash flow in and out and (2) the balances left at year-end that are available for spending. Consequently, unlike the government-wide statement, governmental fund financial statements provide a detailed short term view that may be useful in determining whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the near future to finance the AAMPO’s programs. Because this information does not encompass the additional long-term focus of the government-wide financial statements, we provide a reconciliation for both, the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance to explain the relationship (or differences) between governmental funds and governmental activities.


Other Information The Transportation Policy Board (TPB) approves the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), which includes the program budget for a two-year period from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, including the AAMPO’s operating budget. The AAMPO’s annual line item operating budget is approved by the TPB separately. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE AAMPO AS A WHOLE Net Position Net position may serve, over time, as a useful indicator of a government’s financial position. The AAMPO’s combined net position at September 30, 2017 was ($374,580). Of the ($453,285) total deficit unrestricted net position balance, ($382,331) represents the net impact of adjustments to net position to record the AAMPO’s net pension liability, in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statements No. 68 and No. 71. The remaining ($70,954) deficit unrestricted net assets represents the AAMPO’s compensated absences liability balance at September 30, 2017. A significant note is that the funding for the compensated absences liability is fully accounted for and available in the current Unified Planning Work Program. See Table A-1 for a summary of the AAMPO’s statement of net position. The largest portion of the AAMPO’s combined net position is the line item captioned net investment in capital assets. This amount reflects the AAMPO’s investment in capital assets (i.e., software licenses and furniture and equipment). These capital assets are used for the operations of the AAMPO and are not available for future spending.

2017 2016 Change

Current and Other Assets 851,751$ 704,825$ 146,926$ Capital Assets (Net) 78,705 35,768 42,937 Total Assets 930,456 740,593 189,863 Deferred Outflow Related to TCDRS 446,417 497,247 (50,830) Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 446,417 497,247 (50,830) Current Liabilities 851,751 704,825 146,926 Long-Term Liabilities 861,631 809,337 52,294 Total Liabilities 1,713,382 1,514,162 199,220 Deferred Inflows Related to TCDRS 38,071 29,370 8,701 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 38,071 29,370 8,701 Net Position: Net Investment in Capital Assets 78,705 35,768 42,937 Unrestricted (453,285) (341,460) (111,825) TOTAL NET POSITION (374,580)$ (305,692)$ (68,888)$

Table A-1Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Net Position

Governmental Activities


Changes in Net Position At the end of the current fiscal year, net position totals ($374,580), which is a decrease of $68,888 from the prior fiscal year. This change includes the adjustments made to decrease deferred outflows of resources by $50,830, record an increase in deferred inflows of resources by $8,701, and record AAMPO’s proportionate share of various expenses by $53,592 to calculate the ending net pension liability for GASB Statements No. 68 and No. 71. An increase occurred in the net investment in the capital assets category. This increase is attributable to the current year depreciation expense of $29,385 being less than the current year capital asset additions of $72,322 by $42,937. The AAMPO retired furniture and equipment (i.e., 4 computers, 5 server appliances and 1 HVAC unit) that was fully depreciated in the amount of $46,557. The retired equipment was due to non-functionality and outdated items not eligible for warranty extensions. Governmental Activities The AAMPO’s total revenues were $2,621,538 (See Table A-2). Total revenues were reported as program revenues from operating grants and contributions of the general government. In the current fiscal year, the AAMPO entered into a Professional Services Agreement with the City of San Antonio to receive funds up to the amount of $7,700 to fund the Street Skills Bicycle Safety Program. During the year, the AAMPO expensed $7,365 of that amount for the purchase of helmets and light sets. Expenses for the AAMPO totaled $2,690,426 with the more significant expenses as follows: 60 percent representing personnel salaries and fringe benefits, 12 percent representing professional services, 5 percent representing building rental, and 5 percent representing indirect, which decreased due to the decrease in the rate as established by our fiscal agent, Bexar County.


2017 2016 ChangeRevenues:Program Revenues:

Operating Grants and Contributions 2,613,689$ 2,234,588$ 379,101$ City of San Antonio Grant 7,365 7,700 (335) Other Local Revenue 484 17,280 (16,796)

Total Revenues 2,621,538 2,259,568 361,970

Expenses:Personnel Salaries 1,154,015 1,045,282 108,733 Fringe Benefits 448,952 333,433 115,519 Indirect 142,249 181,690 (39,441) Travel, Local Mileage 2,987 3,541 (554) Travel, Professional Training 31,723 33,336 (1,613) Equipment: Non-Capital 31,593 17,530 14,063 Computer & Communications 608 598 10 Copier Rental & Maintenance 8,305 9,024 (719) Electric & Gas 12,076 11,769 307 Telephone Usage 21,321 10,099 11,222 Insurance 4,521 6,553 (2,032) Postage 6,868 6,594 274 Public Notice (Ads) 6,601 20,411 (13,810) Books & Periodicals 3,604 2,954 650 Printing & Binding Services 3,003 5,673 (2,670) Office Supplies 11,809 12,780 (971) Other Supplies 7,365 7,700 (335) Office & Other Equipment Repairs 1,012 2,445 (1,433) Building Rental 142,806 134,278 8,528 Buildings & Grounds Repairs 18,875 11,338 7,537 Storage Rental 6,000 5,580 420 Cost of Meeting Space 10,231 9,849 382 Internet Services 7,500 7,500 - Janitorial Services 12,240 12,240 - Water & Sewage 1,920 1,795 125 Garbage Disposal Services 2,297 2,359 (62) Pest Control Services 660 660 - Computer Services 48,260 41,066 7,194 Auditing Services 24,095 24,045 50 Professional Services 334,670 287,487 47,183 Contract Labor 30,929 12,948 17,981 Contractual Services - Subrecipients 121,946 27,524 94,422 Depreciation/Amortization Expense 29,385 21,072 8,313

Total Expenses 2,690,426 2,311,153 379,273 Change in Net Position (68,888) (51,585) (17,303) Net Position - Beginning (305,692) (254,107) (51,585) Net Position - Ending (374,580)$ (305,692)$ (68,888)$


Changes in Net PositionAlamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Table A-2


The total cost of programs and services increased by $379,273, or approximately 16 percent, from the prior year. The majority of the increase is due to increased expenditures in Personnel Salaries, Fringe Benefits, Equipment: Non-Capital, Professional Services, Contract Labor, and Contractual Services-Subrecipients in the amount of $108,733, $115,519, $14,063, $47,183, $17,981, and $94,422, respectively. The increase in Personnel Salaries represents merit increases and compensation plan related adjustments. The increase in Fringe Benefits relates to an increase in health benefits and, ultimately, the aforementioned salary increases raise retirement contributions. The increase in the Equipment: Non-Capital is attributed to the purchase of Apple iPads and related equipment used at public meetings. The increase in Contract Labor is associated to temporary staffing services, Walk & Roll Rally Day activities, and labor associated with upgrading server equipment. Moreover, Contractual Services – Subrecipients increased due to the increased expenditures from Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG). In addition, Professional Services increased due to the addition of the Micro-Model Study and the retainage payout on the Regional Multi-Model Study. However, the amount expended in the Professional Services line item tends to fluctuate each year based on agency and regional needs, therefore, there is no established pattern as indicated below. Five-year trend of professional services expenditures:

FY 2013: $160,241 (2nd Year of UPWP)

FY 2014: $578,280 (1st Year of UPWP) FY 2015: $547,257 (2nd Year of UPWP)

FY 2016: $287,487 (1st Year of UPWP) FY 2017: $334,670 (2nd Year of UPWP)

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The general fund is the AAMPO’s only governmental fund and is used to account for all financial resources. At the end of the current fiscal year, the governmental fund reported a zero fund balance, which is consistent with the prior year, since grant funds are received on a reimbursement basis and revenues are therefore reported to the extent of expenditures incurred. Revenues from the general fund totaled $2,621,538 which is an increase of $361,970 or 16 percent, from the prior year. CAPITAL ASSETS The AAMPO’s investment in capital assets for its governmental activities as of September 30, 2017 amounts to $78,705 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes software licenses and furniture and equipment. (See Table A-3).


The increase in furniture and equipment is the net effect of the purchase of four computer replacements in the amount of $10,996, and server upgrade computer equipment in the amount $54,006 and the disposition of furniture and equipment and software in the amount of $46,557. In compliance with GASB Statement No. 34 requirements, the AAMPO is required to compute depreciation on all applicable capital assets. The current year depreciation expense of $29,385 combined with the deletion of $46,557 for the amount related to the assets disposed brings the accumulated depreciation balance to $460,894 and also increases the historical cost of capital assets.

2017 2016 Change

Software Licenses 247,966$ 247,966$ -$ Furniture and Equipment 291,633 265,868 25,765 Totals at Historical Cost 539,599 513,834 25,765

Total Accumulated Depreciation (460,894) (478,066) 17,172 Net Capital Assets 78,705$ 35,768$ 42,937$

Table A-3Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Capital Assets


Additional information on the AAMPO’s capital assets can be found in Note III Section B in the notes to the financial statements. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the AAMPO’s position for all those with an interest in the organization’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Public Information Officer, 825 South Saint Mary’s Street, San Antonio, TX 78205.


BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


San Antonio, Texas

Primary GovernmentGovernmental

ActivitiesASSETS

Current AssetsCash with Fiscal Agent 1,693$ Due from Texas Department of Transportation 846,529 Due from City of San Antonio 3,529

Total Current Assets 851,751

Noncurrent AssetsCapital Assets

Software Licenses 247,966 Furniture and Equipment 291,633 Less Accumulated Depreciation (460,894) Total Capital Assets (net of accumulated depreciation) 78,705

Total Noncurrent Assets 78,705

Total Assets 930,456

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCESDeferred Outflow Related to TCDRS (Pension) 446,417

Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 446,417

LIABILITIES Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable 114,930 Accrued Wages 29,363 Due to Fiscal Agent - Bexar County 621,566 Due to Subrecipients - AACOG 84,199 Unearned Revenue 1,693

Total Current Liabilities 851,751

Noncurrent LiabilitiesNet Pension Liability 790,677 Compensated Absences 70,954

Total Noncurrent Liabilities 861,631

Total Liabilities 1,713,382

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCESDeferred Inflow Related to TCDRS (Pension) 38,071

Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 38,071

Net PositionNet Investment in Capital Assets 78,705 Unrestricted (453,285)

Total Net Position (374,580)$

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

ALAMO AREA

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

11


ALAMO AREAMETROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

San Antonio, Texas

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

Net (Expense)Revenue and

Program Changes in NetRevenue Position

Operating Primary Gov.Grants and Governmental

Functions/Programs Expenses Contributions ActivitiesPrimary Government:

Governmental Activities:Personnel Salaries 1,154,015$ 1,154,015$ -$ Fringe Benefits 448,952 337,127 (111,825) Indirect 142,249 142,249 - Staff Training 31,723 31,723 - Travel, Local Mileage 2,987 2,987 - Equipment: Non-Capital 31,593 31,593 - Copier Rental & Maintenance 8,305 8,305 - Electric & Gas 12,076 12,076 - Telephone Usage 21,321 21,321 - Insurance 4,521 4,521 - Postage 6,868 6,868 - Public Notice (Ads) 6,601 6,601 - Reference Books 3,604 3,604 - Printing & Binding Services 3,003 3,003 - Office Supplies 19,174 19,174 - Office & Other Equipment Repairs 1,012 1,012 - Building Rental 142,806 142,806 - Building & Grounds Repairs 18,875 18,875 - Storage Rental 6,000 6,000 - Cost of Meeting Space 10,231 10,231 - Internet Services 7,500 7,500 - Janitorial Services 12,240 12,240 - Water & Sewage 1,920 1,920 - Garbage Disposal Services 2,297 2,297 - Pest Control Services 660 660 - Computer Services 48,260 48,260 - Computer & Communications 608 65,610 65,002 Equipment: Capital - 7,320 7,320 Auditing Services 24,095 24,095 - Professional Services 334,670 334,670 - Contract Labor 30,929 30,929 - Contractual Services - Subrecipients 121,946 121,946 - Depreciation/Amortization Expense 29,385 - (29,385)

Total Governmental Activities 2,690,426$ 2,621,538$ (68,888)$

Change in Net Position (68,888)

Net Position—Beginning (305,692)

Net Position—Ending (374,580)$


12



San Antonio, Texas

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

GeneralFund

ASSETS:Cash with Fiscal Agent 1,693$ Receivables:

Due from Texas Department of Transportation 846,529 Due from City of San Antonio 3,529

Total Assets 851,751$

LIABILITIES:Accounts Payable 114,930$ Accrued Wages Payable 29,363 Due to Fiscal Agent - Bexar County 621,566 Due to Subrecipients - AACOG 84,199 Unearned Revenue 1,693

Total Liabilities 851,751

FUND BALANCE: Unassigned

Reported in General Fund -

Total Fund Balance -

Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 851,751$


13


San Antonio, Texas

Total Fund Balance--Governmental Funds -$

Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported in governmental funds. At the beginning of the year, the cost of these assets was $513,834 and the accumulated depreciation/amortization was ($478,066). In addition, long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period; and, therefore are not reported as a liability in the funds. At the beginning of the year, the compensated absences long-term liability was ($72,252), the net pension liability was ($737,085); and, the net related deferred outflows and inflows of resources were $467,877. The net effect of including the beginning balances for capital assets (net of depreciation/amortization), compensated absences, and the net pension liability in the governmental activities is to (decrease) net position. (305,692)

Transactions related to current year capital outlays and changes in compensated absences are necessary to convert from the modified accrual basis of accounting to the accrual basis of accounting, as follows:

- Acquisition of capital assets totaled $72,322- Deletions of capital assets were ($46,557) with related accumulated depreciation of $46,557- Change in compensated absences was $1,298

The net effect is to increase net position. 73,620

Transactions in the current year related to the AAMPO's TCDRS pension liability are as follows: - Recognize the AAMPO's proportionate share of the net pension liability in the amount of ($53,592). - Recognize a net increase in deferred inflows of resources in the amount of ($8,701). - Recognize a net (decrease) in deferred outflows of resources in the amount of ($50,830). The net effect is to (decrease) net position. (113,123)

The 2017 depreciation/amortization expense increases accumulated depreciation/amortization. The net effect of the current year's depreciation/amortization expense is to (decrease) net position. (29,385)

Net Position of Governmental Activities (374,580)$



RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET TO THESTATEMENT OF NET POSITION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

14



San Antonio, Texas

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCEGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS


GeneralFund

REVENUES:Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 1,769,670$ Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 844,019 City of San Antonio - Street Skills Bicycle Safety Program 7,365 Local Revenue - Donations 484 Total Revenue and Donations 2,621,538

EXPENDITURES:Personnel Salaries 1,154,015 Fringe Benefits 337,127 Indirect 142,249 Staff Training 31,723 Travel, Local Mileage 2,987 Equipment: Non-Capital 31,593 Copier Rental & Maintenance 8,305 Electric & Gas 12,076 Telephone Usage 21,321 Insurance 4,521 Postage 6,868 Public Notice (Ads) 6,601 Reference Books 3,604 Printing & Binding Services 3,003 Office Supplies 19,174 Office & Other Equipment Repairs 1,012 Building Rental 142,806 Building and Grounds Repairs 18,875 Storage Rental 6,000 Cost of Meeting Space 10,231 Internet Services 7,500 Janitorial Services 12,240 Water & Sewage 1,920 Garbage Disposal Services 2,297 Pest Control Services 660 Computer Services 48,260 Computer & Communications 65,610 Equipmet: Capital 7,320 Auditing Services 24,095 Professional Services 334,670 Contract Labor 30,929 Contractual Services - Subrecipients 121,946 Total Expenditures 2,621,538

Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures -

Net Changes in Fund Balance -

Fund Balance - October 1 (Beginning) -

Fund Balance - September 30 (Ending) -$


15


San Antonio, Texas

Total Net Change in Fund Balance--Governmental Funds -$

Transactions related to current year capital outlays and changes in compensated absences are necessary to convert from the modified accrual basis of accounting to the accrual basis of accounting, as follows:

- Acquisition of capital assets totaled $72,322- Deletions of capital assets were ($46,557) with related accumulated depreciation of $46,557- Change in compensated absences was $1,298

The net effect is to increase net position. 73,620

Adjustments necessary in the current year to record the AAMPO's pension liability were as follows: - Deferred inflows and outflows of resources were expended in the net amount of ($59,531) during the current measurement period. - The AAMPO's proportionate share of various expenses in the amount of ($53,592) were used to calculate the AAMPO's ending net pension liability. The net effect is a (decrease) to the change in net position. (113,123)

Depreciation/amortization is not recognized as an expense in governmental funds since it does not require the use of current financial resources. The net effect of the current year's depreciation/amortization expense is a (decrease) to the change in net position. (29,385)

Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities (68,888)$



RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES


16


I. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

On March 24, 2014, the San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization was renamed the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) to reflect the expansion of the AAMPO’s planning area: Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, and a portion of Kendall counties. The AAMPO is the metropolitan planning organization responsible for conducting a cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive transportation planning process for its study area. The AAMPO prepares its basic financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) promulgated by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).

A. Reporting Entity

The Transportation Policy Board (TPB) is the AAMPO’s governing board. The TPB is comprised of fourteen elected and seven appointed officials representing the State; Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, and a portion of Kendall Counties; the City of San Antonio; VIA Metropolitan Transit; suburban cities; and, the Advanced Transportation District. There are also six non-voting members on the TPB. The TPB oversees the continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative transportation planning process conducted for the metropolitan area, selects or must approve all transportation projects in the region for federal funding, and appoints the Director. Therefore, the AAMPO is a financial reporting entity as defined by GASB Statement No. 14, “The Financial Reporting Entity”, and is not included in any other governmental reporting entity.

B. Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements

The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities are government-wide financial statements that report information on all of the AAMPO’s activities. Governmental activities include programs supported by grant and other revenues.

The net position is segregated into net investment in capital assets and unrestricted.

The Statement of Activities demonstrates how other parties or entities that participate in programs the AAMPO operates have shared in the payment of the direct costs. Thus, it shows the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program revenues are comprised of operating grants, which include amounts paid by organizations outside the AAMPO to help meet the operational requirements of a given function. Examples include grants under the Texas Department of Transportation.

The fund financial statements provide reports on the financial condition and results of operations for governmental activities.


I. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation

The government-wide financial statements use the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flow. Grants are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.

Governmental fund financial statements use the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. With this measurement focus, only current assets, current liabilities, and fund balances are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present net increases and decreases in current assets (i.e., revenues and expenditures).

The modified accrual basis of accounting recognizes revenues in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period. For this purpose, the AAMPO considers all revenues available if they are collectible within 60 days after year end. Expenditures generally are recorded in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable. However, expenditures related to compensated absences are recorded only when payment is due.

Grant funds are considered to be earned when the related program expenditures are incurred. Accordingly, when such funds are received, they are recorded as unearned revenue until related and authorized expenditures have been made. Funds expended but not yet received are shown as receivables.

Pensions: The fiduciary net position of the Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS) has been determined using the flow of economic resources measurement focus and full accrual basis of accounting. This includes for purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pension expense, and information about assets, liabilities and additions to/deductions from TCDRS’s fiduciary net position. Benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.

D. Fund Accounting

The AAMPO reports the general fund as the only governmental fund and it is therefore reported as the AAMPO’s major fund. The general fund is the AAMPO’s primary operating fund that is used to account for all financial resources. The Texas Department of Transportation grants are AAMPO’s major revenue source. Expenditures include all costs associated with the daily operations of the AAMPO.



E. Fiscal Agent

The AAMPO obtains fiscal management assistance through an agreement with Bexar County. As part of the agreement, Bexar County is required to maintain one or more trust accounts under the supervision of the County Auditor for use by the AAMPO. All warrants issued to Bexar County on behalf of the AAMPO are deposited in an AAMPO account and all the AAMPO expenditures are paid by Bexar County from this account. The AAMPO is responsible for the legal and proper expenditure of funds and the preparation of requests for reimbursement. Bexar County accounts for all the AAMPO transactions in an agency fund and is paid an indirect cost for providing such assistance. The indirect cost rate of 9.22% for the period from October 2016 through April 2017, and 16.23% for the period from May 2017 through September 2017 were applied to AAMPO’s total salaries billed, to compute the amount of $142,249 paid to Bexar County for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

F. Subrecipients

The financial statements include revenue earned and expenditures incurred by the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG), the AAMPO’s subrecipient.

G. Use of Grant Funds

The AAMPO first utilizes the Federal Transit Administration Section 5303 grant fund allocation amount before utilizing the Federal Highway Administration grant funds.

H. Fund Balance

Since the majority of AAMPO’s revenues are comprised of only operating grants that are received on a reimbursement basis, revenues are reported to the extent of expenditures incurred. As a result, the governmental fund (general fund) reports a zero fund balance at September 30, 2017.

I. Other Accounting Policies

1. Capital Assets

Capital assets, which include software licenses and furniture and equipment, are reported in the governmental activities column in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined as assets with an initial, individual cost of $1,000 or more and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation.



The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized.

When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related costs are removed.

Software licenses and furniture and equipment are depreciated/amortized using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Asset Class Estimated Useful

Lives (Years) Software Licenses

1-3

Furniture and Equipment 3-15

Assets purchased by the AAMPO under the custody of subrecipients are included in AAMPO’s capital assets.

2. Compensated Absences

The AAMPO allows employees to accumulate compensatory time and vacation and sick leave in accordance with Bexar County policies. Employees may accumulate from 6.67 to 12 hours of vacation leave, depending on their length of employment, and 8 hours of sick leave per month. At termination or retirement, the AAMPO pays up to 240 hours of accumulated vacation leave and after five years of employment, fifty percent of accumulated sick leave, not to exceed 240 hours (30 days). Non-exempt employees may accumulate up to 40 hours of compensatory time and any time accrued in excess of these amounts, per pay period, are paid to the employee. At termination or retirement, the AAMPO pays non-exempt employees up to 40 hours of accumulated compensatory time. During the year, the AAMPO pays for compensatory time and vacation and sick leave costs from the general fund.

3. Net Pension Liability

GASB Statement No. 68, as amended and clarified by GASB Statement No. 71 requires State and local government agencies to display the actuarially determined net pension liability in its financial statements. The required disclosures for the pension plan, in accordance with GASB Statement No. 68, are included in Section III, Note E.



4. Deferred Outflow and Inflow – TCDRS Pension

Deferred outflows of resources represent a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. Deferred inflows of resources represent an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time.

These amounts result from contributions made by the AAMPO to TCDRS, its defined benefit pension plan, after the measurement date of the net position liability as well as changes in the net position liability not yet reflected in pension expense. Changes in the net position liability not yet reflected in pension expense include differences between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments, expected and actual experience with regard to economic or demographic factors, and changes in assumptions about future economic or demographic factors. Differences between projected and actual earnings (investment gains/losses) are recognized in pension expense over a period of five years; while, other changes are recognized in pension expense using a systematic and rational manner over the average remaining service life for all active, inactive, and retired members.

II. BUDGETARY DATA

On June 22, 2015, the TPB adopted the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), which was amended through January 23, 2017. The UPWP includes the budget for the period of October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, and also provides the activities to be accomplished, funding requirements, and the agency responsible for accomplishing the tasks included in the UPWP.

The AAMPO’s annual operating budget, exclusive of consultant services and amounts provided to subrecipients, is approved by the TPB. The Director is authorized to approve line-item budget amendments; however, amendments that change the total budget amount require TPB approval.

III. DETAILED NOTES

A. Cash with Fiscal Agent

At September 30, 2017, the AAMPO had a cash balance of $1,693 held in a Central Depository account (a demand deposit account) owned by their fiscal agent, Bexar County. The bank deposits of the Central Depository account were covered at and during the year ended September 30, 2017 by FDIC insurance or by pledged securities in Bexar County’s name.


III. DETAILED NOTES (Continued)

B. Capital Asset Activity

Capital asset activity for the governmental activities for the year ended September 30, 2017, was as follows:

Beginning Balance

Additions

Retirements

Ending Balance

Capital Assets, Being Depreciated/Amortized:

Software Licenses $ 247,966 $ - $ - $ 247,966 Furniture and Equipment 265,868 72,322 (46,557) 291,633 Total Capital Assets, Being Depreciated/Amortized 513,834 72,322 (46,557) 539,599 Less Accumulated Depreciation/Amortization for:

Software Licenses (247,944) (2) - (247,946) Furniture and Equipment (230,122) (29,383) 46,557 (212,948) Total Accumulated Depreciation/Amortization (478,066) (29,385) 46,557 (460,894)

Total Governmental Activities Capital Assets, Net $ 35,768 $ 42,937 $ - $ 78,705

Depreciation/amortization expense for the current year was $29,385.

C. Changes in Compensated Absences

The change in compensated absences for the year ended September 30, 2017 was as follows:

Beginning Balance, October 1, 2016 $ 72,252 Additions 93,074 Deletions (94,372) Ending Balance, September 30, 2017 $ 70,954

D. Operating Lease

The AAMPO entered into an operating lease for office facilities. The term of the original lease was for 60 months, which commenced August 1, 2012 and ended July 31, 2017, with a monthly base rent of $10,552. On December 6, 2016, the AAMPO extended their lease agreement to cover an additional 60 month period, which covers the period of August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2022, starting with monthly base rent payments of $12,209, and increasing annually by $3,855 each year for the duration of the lease. The total lease expense was $142,806 for the year ended September 30, 2017; which, in accordance with the lease agreement, includes twelve base rent payments and a payment of $12,867 for the increase in property taxes.



Future lease payments are as follows:

Year Ending September 30,

Amount

2018 $ 147,152 2019 151,007 2020 154,863 2021 158,718 2022 134,942 Total $ 746,682

E. Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Plan Description

The AAMPO participates in the statewide Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS) through its fiscal agent, Bexar County. The AAMPO provides retirement, disability and death benefits for all of its full-time employees through a nontraditional defined benefit pension plan in the TCDRS. The Board of Trustees of TCDRS is responsible for the administration of the statewide agent multiple-employer public employee retirement system consisting of 738 nontraditional defined benefit pension plans. TCDRS, in the aggregate, issues a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) on a calendar year basis. The CAFR is available upon written request from the TCDRS Board of Trustees at P.O. Box 2034, Austin, Texas 78768-2034.

The plan provisions are adopted and may be amended by the governing body of Bexar County within the options available in the Texas state statutes governing TCDRS (TCDRS Act). Members can retire at ages 60 and above, with 8 or more years of service, with 20 years of service regardless of age, or when the sum of their age and years of service equals 75 or more. Members are vested after 8 years of service but must leave their accumulated deposits in the plan to receive any employer-financed benefit. Members who withdraw their personal deposits in a lump-sum and who are not eligible to retire are not entitled to any amounts contributed by their employer.

Benefit amounts are determined by the sum of the employee’s deposits to the plan, with interest, and employer-financed monetary credits. The level of these monetary credits is adopted by the governing body of the employer within the actuarial constraints imposed by the TCDRS Act, so that the resulting benefits can be expected to be adequately financed by the employer’s commitment to contribute. At retirement, death, or disability, the benefit is calculated by converting the sum of the employees’ accumulated deposits and the employer-financed monetary credits to a monthly annuity using annuity purchase rates prescribed by the TCDRS Act.

At December 31, 2016, the following Bexar County employees, which include AAMPO employees, were covered by the benefit terms:

Inactive employees or beneficiaries receiving benefits 2,441 Inactive employees or beneficiaries entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 3,234 Active employees 5,199

Total 10,874



Funding Policy

Bexar County has elected the Annually Determined Contribution Rate plan provisions of the TCDRS Act. The plan is funded by monthly contributions from both employee members and the employer based on the covered payroll of employee members. Under the TCDRS Act, the contribution rate of the employer is actuarially determined annually. The AAMPO contributed using the actuarially determined rate of 13.08% of covered payroll for the months in calendar year 2016 and 13.21% of covered payroll for the months in calendar year 2017.

The deposit rate payable by all employee members for the current fiscal year is 7%, as adopted by the governing body of Bexar County. The employee deposit rate and the employer contribution rate may be changed by the governing body of the employer within the options available in the TCDRS Act.

The TCDRS board hires independent outside consulting actuaries to conduct an annual valuation to measure the funding status and to determine the required employer contribution rate for each employer plan. In order to calculate the employer contribution rate, the actuary does the following:

1. Studies each employer’s adopted plan of benefits and the profile of its plan participants, and uses

the assumptions established by the board to estimate future benefit payments.

2. Discounts the estimate of future benefit payments to the present based on the long-term rate of investment return to determine the present value of future benefits.

3. Compares the present value of future benefits with the plan’s assets to determine the difference

that needs to be funded based on the funding policy.

Net Pension Liability

The AAMPO’s net pension liability was measured as of December 31, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The AAMPO’s proportionate share of the net pension liability was computed by Bexar County to be .44% of the total actuarially determined net pension liability. The .44% represents the ratio of AAMPO’s payroll costs to Bexar County’s total payroll costs. The total pension liability in the December 31, 2016 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement:

Inflation 3.00% Salary Increases 3.50% Investment Rate of Return 8.10%



Mortality rates for service retirees, as well as the beneficiaries of both service and disability retirees were based on the RP-2000 Combined Male Table with an age set forward of one year and Projection Scale AA for Males, and the RP-2000 Combined Female Table with no age adjustment and Projection Scale AA for Females. For disabled retirees, the RP- 2000 Disabled Male Table with no age adjustment and Projection Scale AA for Males, and the RP-2000 Disabled Female Table with an age set forward of two years and Projection Scale AA for Females are used.

The actuarial assumptions that determined the total pension liability as of December 31, 2016 were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2012, except where required to be different by GASB 68.

The long-term expected rate of return on TCDRS assets is determined by adding expected inflation to expected long-term real returns, and reflecting expected volatility and correlation. The capital market assumptions and information shown below are provided by TCDRS' investment consultant, Cliffwater LLC. The numbers shown are based on January 2017 information for a 7-10 year time horizon.

The valuation assumption for long-term expected return is re-assessed at a minimum of every four years, and is set based on a 30-year time horizon; the most recent analysis was performed in 2013.

Asset Class

Target Allocation

Geometric Real Rate of Return

U.S. Equities 13.50% 4.70% Private Equity 16.00% 7.70% Global Equities 1.50% 5.00% International Equities – Developed 10.00% 4.70% International Equities – Emerging 7.00% 5.70% Investment-Grade Bonds 3.00% 0.60% High Yield Bonds 3.00% 3.70% Opportunistic Credit 2.00% 3.83% Direct Lending 10.00% 8.15% Distressed Debt 3.00% 6.70% REIT Equities 2.00% 3.85% Master Limited Partnerships 3.00% 5.60% Private Real Estate Partnerships 6.00% 7.20% Hedge Funds 20.00% 3.85%



Discount Rate/Depletion of Plan Assets

The discount rate is the single rate of return that, when applied to all projected benefit payments results in an actuarial present value of projected benefit payments equal to the total of the following:

1. The actuarial present value of benefit payments projected to be made in future periods in which (a) the

amount of the pension plan's fiduciary net position is projected to be greater than the benefit payments that are projected to be made in that period and (b) pension plan assets up to that point are expected to be invested using a strategy to achieve the long-term rate of return, calculated using the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments.

2. The actuarial present value of projected benefit payments not included in “1” above, calculated using

the municipal bond rate.

Therefore, if plan investments in a given future year are greater than projected benefit payments in that year and are invested such that they are expected to earn the long-term rate of return, the discount rate applied to projected benefit payments in that year should be the long-term expected rate of return on plan investments. If future years exist where this is not the case, then an index rate reflecting the yield on a 20-year, tax-exempt municipal bond should be used to discount the projected benefit payments for those years.

The determination of a future date when plan investments are not sufficient to pay projected benefit payments is often referred to as a depletion date projection. A depletion date projection compares projections of the pension plan's fiduciary net position to projected benefit payments and aims to determine a future date, if one exists, when the fiduciary net position is projected to be less than projected benefit payments. If an evaluation of the sufficiency of the projected fiduciary net position compared to projected benefit payments can be made with sufficient reliability without performing a depletion date projection, alternative methods to determine sufficiency may be applied.

In order to determine the discount rate to be used by the employer, TCDRS used an alternative method to determine the sufficiency of the fiduciary net position in all future years. The alternative method reflects the funding requirements under Bexar County's funding policy and the legal requirements under the TCDRS Act.

1. TCDRS has a funding policy where the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) shall be

amortized as a level percent of pay over 20-year closed layered periods.

2. Under the TCDRS Act, the employer is legally required to make the contribution specified in the funding policy.

3. The employer's assets are projected to exceed its accrued liabilities in 15 years or less. When this point

is reached, the employer is still required to contribute at least the normal cost.



4. Any increased cost due to the adoption of a COLA is required to be funded over a period of 15 years, if applicable.

Based on the above, the projected fiduciary net position is determined to be sufficient compared to projected benefit payments. Based on the expected level of cash flows and investment returns to the system, the fiduciary net position as a percentage of total pension liability is projected to increase from its current level in future years.

Since the projected fiduciary net position is projected to be sufficient to pay projected benefit payments in all future years, the discount rate for purposes of calculating the total pension liability and net pension liability of the employer is equal to the long-term assumed rate of return on investments. This long-term assumed rate of return should be net of investment expenses, but gross of administrative expenses for GASB 68 purposes. Therefore, a discount rate of 8.10% was used. This rate reflects the long-term assumed rate of return on assets for funding purposes of 8.00%, net of all expenses, increased by 0.10% to be gross of administrative expenses.

Changes in the Net Pension Liability

The following table includes the information for the AAMPO’s proportionate share of the net pension liability, as provided by TCDRS. The AAMPO’s net pension liability was computed to be $790,677 which represents .44% of Bexar County’s total net pension liability.

Increase (Decrease)

Total Pension Liability

(a)

Fiduciary Net Position

(b)

Net Pension Liability / (Asset)

(a) – (b)

Balances as of December 31, 2015 $ 5,281,827 $ 4,544,742 $ 737,085 Changes for the year:

Service Cost 154,810 - 154,810 Interest on total pension liability 443,645 - 443,645 Effect of plan changes - - - Effect of economic/demographic gains or losses (18,767) - (18,767) Effect of assumption changes or inputs - - - Refund of contributions (14,330) (14,330) - Benefit payments (245,465) (245,465) - Administrative expenses - (3,825) 3,825 Member contributions - 77,195 (77,195) Net investment income - 317,484 (317,484) Employer contributions - 143,953 (143,953) Other - (8,711) 8,711

Balances as of December 31, 2016 $ 5,601,720 $ 4,811,043 $ 790,677



Sensitivity Analysis

The following table presents AAMPO’s net pension liability, calculated using the discount rate of 8.10%, as well as what the AAMPO’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage point lower (7.10%) or 1 percentage point higher (9.10%) than the current rate.

1% Decrease

Current Discount Rate

1% Increase

7.10% 8.10% 9.10%

Total Pension Liability $ 6,615,260 $ 5,848,465 $ 5,210,520 Fiduciary Net Position 5,057,788 5,057,788 5,057,788

Net Pension Liability $ 1,557,472 $ 790,677 $ 152,732

Pension Expense / (Income)

The AAMPO’s proportionate share of the effects on pension expense for the period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 were as follows:

January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

Service cost $ 154,810 Interest on total pension liability 443,645 Effect of plan changes - Administrative expenses 3,825 Member contributions (77,195) Expected investment return, net (383,289) Recognition of deferred inflows/outflows of resources

Recognition of economic/demographic gains or losses (10,999) Recognition of assumption changes or inputs 10,318 Recognition of investment gains or losses 102,130

Other 8,711

Pension expense/(income) $ 251,956



Deferred Inflows / Outflows of Resources

As of September 30, 2017, the AAMPO’s proportionate share of deferred inflows and outflows are as follows:

Deferred

Inflows of Resources

Deferred Outflows

of Resources

Net Amount

Differences between expected and actual experience $ (38,071) $ 879 $ (37,192) Changes in actuarial assumptions - 30,955 30,955 Net difference between projected and actual earnings - 300,254 300,254

Totals as of the measurement date (December 31, 2016) (38,071) 332,088 294,017

Contributions made subsequent to the measurement date - 114,329 114,329

Totals as reported at September 30, 2017 $ (38,071) $ 446,417 $ 408,346

Amounts currently reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, excluding contributions made subsequent to the measurement date, will be recognized in pension expense as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

Net Deferred Outflows (Inflows)

of Resources 2017 $ 101,449 2018 101,449 2019 88,601 2020 2,518

$ 294,017

Annual Pension Cost

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, the actual contributions made by AAMPO’s employees were $77,195 and those made by AAMPO were $151,870 which were the required contribution amounts.



F. Other Postemployment Benefits

The AAMPO participates in Bexar County’s single employer defined benefit post-employment healthcare plan (the Plan) that covers qualified retired employees and their dependents and active employees. Participation in the Plan is elective by each retiree. Healthcare benefits include, but are not limited to, prescription drugs, hospitalization, and preventive care. To be eligible, the retiree must meet the requirements for retirement from TCDRS (see note E) and have enrolled in the Bexar County healthcare plan for the year in which they retire. The Plan provides medical, dental, vision, and basic life insurance benefits to plan members. The benefits provided are not guaranteed. Additionally, the benefit provisions are subject to change at any time and subject to annual appropriation of funds by the Bexar County Commissioner’s Court.

Bexar County provides the Plan’s benefits for the AAMPO retirees; however, there currently are no AAMPO participants in the Plan.

G. Risk Management

The AAMPO is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; business interruptions; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and, natural disasters, for which the AAMPO carries commercial insurance. Settled claims resulting from risks of loss have not exceeded commercial insurance coverage in any of the past three fiscal years.

H. Net Position

Of the ($453,285) unrestricted net position, which is reflected as a deficit in the government wide financial statements, ($70,954) represents the AAMPO’s compensated absences liability balance at September 30, 2017. In accordance with guidance provided by the Department of Transportation, although funding for compensated absences is available, it cannot be requested until the expenditure is incurred, which is upon separation of employment by an employee from the AAMPO. The remaining ($382,331) represents the net amount of the net pension liability and the related deferred outflow and inflow of resources related to pension.

I. Commitments and Contingencies

The AAMPO participates in federal grant programs, which are governed by various rules and regulations of the grantor agency. Costs charged to the respective grant programs are subject to audit and adjustment by the grantor agency; therefore, to the extent that the AAMPO has not complied with the rules and regulations governing the grants, refunds of any money received may be required. In the opinion of the AAMPO, there are no significant contingent liabilities relating to compliance with the rules and regulations governing the respective grants; therefore, no provision has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements for such contingencies.

In addition, since the AAMPO receives all its revenues from federal sources, it is economically dependent on those grants.


REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION



San Antonio, Texas

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS

September 30, 2017

Plan Year Ended Plan Year EndedDecember 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Total Pension LiabilityService cost 154,810$ 136,804$ Interest on total pension liability 443,645 401,246 Effect of plan changes - (27,442) Effect of assumption changes or inputs - 49,290 Effect of economic/demographic gains or losses (18,767) (36,712) Benefit payments/refunds of contributions (259,795) (229,987) Net change in total pension liability 319,893 293,199 Total pension liability, beginning 5,281,827 4,988,628 Total pension liability, ending (a) 5,601,720 5,281,827

Fiduciary Net PositionEmployer contributions 143,953 132,569 Member contributions 77,195 70,541 Investment income net of investment expenses 317,484 (23,915) Benefit payments/refunds of contributions (259,795) (229,987) Administrative expenses (3,825) (3,290) Other (8,711) (2,415) Net change in fiduciary net position 266,301 (56,497) Fiduciary net position, beginning 4,544,742 4,601,239 Fiduciary net position, ending (b) 4,811,043 4,544,742

Net pension liability / (asset), ending = (a) - (b) 790,677$ 737,085$

Fidcuiary net position as a % of total pension liability 85.9% 86.0%

Pensionable covered payroll 1,099,486$ 1,005,835$

Net pension liability as a % of covered payroll 71.9% 73.3%

31



San Antonio, Texas

SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS

September 30, 2017

Fiscal Year Ended September 30,

Actuarially Determined Contribution

Actual Employer Contribution

Contribution Deficiency (Excess)

Pensionable Covered Payroll (1)

Actual Contributions as a % of Covered Payroll

2017 $ 151,870 $ 151,870 -$ $ 1,153,678 13.16%2016 136,312$ 136,312$ -$ 1,039,155$ 13.12%2015 127,084$ 127,084$ -$ 962,708$ 13.20%

(1) Payroll is calculated based on contributions as reported to the Texas County and District Retirement System (TCDRS).

NOTE: The 10-year required information will be presented as the information becomes available.

32


Valuation Date

Methods and Assumptions used to determine contribution rates:

Actuarial Cost Method

Amortization Method Level percentage of payroll, closed

Amortization Period in Years 13.5 years (based on contribution rate calculated in 12/31/16 valuation)

Asset Valuation Method 5-year smoothed market

Inflation 3.00%

Salary Increases Varies by age and service. 4.9% average over career including inflation.

Investment Rate of Return 8.00%, net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation.

Cost-of-Living Adjustments

Retirement Age

Mortality

Changes in Plan Provisions Reflected in the Schedule

ALAMO AREA

San Antonio, Texas

NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Year Ended September 30, 2017

Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of December 31, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which the contributions are reported.

No assumption for future cost-of-living adjustments is included in the funding valuation.

Members eligible for service retirement are assumed to commence receiving benefit payments based on age. The average age at service retirement for recent retirees is 61.

In the 2015 actuarial valuation, assumed life expectancies were adjusted as a result of adopting a new projection scale (110% of the MP-2014 Ultimate Scale) for 2014 and later. Previously, Scale AA had been used. The base table is the RP-2000 table projected with Scale AA to 2014.

No changes in plan provisions are reflected in the Schedule of Employer Contributions.

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Entry Age

33


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION



San Antonio, Texas

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURESBY GRANT AND OTHER SOURCES


FHWA & FTAStreet Skills Bicycle

Safety Program Local Revenue TotalREVENUES

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 1,769,670$ -$ -$ 1,769,670$ Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 844,019 - - 844,019 City of San Antonio --

Street Skills Bicycle Safety Program - 7,365 - 7,365 Local Revenue - Donations - - 484 484

Total Revenue and Donations 2,613,689 7,365 484 2,621,538

EXPENDITURESPersonnel Salaries 1,154,015 - - 1,154,015 Fringe Benefits 337,127 - - 337,127 Indirect 142,249 - - 142,249 Staff Training 31,723 - - 31,723 Travel, Local Mileage 2,987 - - 2,987 Equipment: Non-Capital 31,593 - - 31,593 Copier Rental & Maintenance 8,305 - - 8,305 Electric & Gas 12,076 - - 12,076 Telephone Usage 21,321 - - 21,321 Insurance 4,521 - - 4,521 Postage 6,868 - - 6,868 Public Notice (Ads) 6,601 - - 6,601 Reference Books 3,604 - - 3,604 Printing & Binding Services 3,003 - - 3,003 Office Supplies 11,325 7,365 484 19,174 Office & Other Equipment Repairs 1,012 - - 1,012 Building Rental 142,806 - - 142,806 Building and Grounds Repairs 18,875 - - 18,875 Storage Rental 6,000 - - 6,000 Cost of Meeting Space 10,231 - - 10,231 Internet Services 7,500 - - 7,500 Janitorial Services 12,240 - - 12,240 Water & Sewage 1,920 - - 1,920 Garbage Disposal Services 2,297 - - 2,297 Pest Control Services 660 - - 660 Computer Services 48,260 - - 48,260 Computer & Communications 65,610 - - 65,610 Equipment: Capital 7,320 - - 7,320 Auditing Services 24,095 - - 24,095 Professional Services 334,670 - - 334,670 Contract Labor 30,929 - - 30,929 Contractual Services - Subrecipients 121,946 - - 121,946

Total Expenditures 2,613,689 7,365 484 2,621,538

Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$

34



San Antonio, Texas

SCHEDULE OF LINE ITEM EXPENDITURES BY AGENCY AND SUBRECIPIENTS


Alamo Area Council of

Governments AAMPO* TotalEXPENDITURES

Personnel Salaries 66,919$ 1,154,015$ 1,220,934$ Fringe Benefits 23,234 337,127 360,361 Indirect 13,783 142,249 156,032 Release 8,030 8,030 Staff Training - 31,723 31,723 Travel, Local Mileage 171 2,987 3,158 Equipment: Non-Capital - 31,593 31,593 Computer & Communications - 65,610 65,610 Copier Rental & Maintenance - 8,305 8,305 Electric & Gas - 12,076 12,076 Telephone Usage 3,369 21,321 24,690 Insurance - 4,521 4,521 Postage - 6,868 6,868 Public Notice (Ads) - 6,601 6,601 Reference Books - 3,604 3,604 Printing & Binding Services 1 3,003 3,004 Office Supplies - 19,174 19,174 Office & Other Equipment Repairs - 1,012 1,012 Building Rental 6,437 142,806 149,243 Building and Grounds Repairs - 18,875 18,875 Storage Rental - 6,000 6,000 Cost of Meeting Space - 10,231 10,231 Internet Services - 7,500 7,500 Janitorial Services - 12,240 12,240 Water & Sewage - 1,920 1,920 Garbage Disposal Services - 2,297 2,297 Pest Control Services - 660 660 Computer Services - 48,260 48,260 Equipment: Capital 7,320 7,320 Auditing Services - 24,095 24,095 Professional Services 2 334,670 334,672 Contract Labor - 30,929 30,929

Total Expenditures 121,946$ 2,499,592$ 2,621,538$

* Includes AAMPO operations, professional services and miscellaneous expenditures, funded by FHWA, FTA, the Street Skills Bicycle Safety Program, and local revenue.

35


FEDERAL AWARDS SECTION


INDEPENDENT AUDTIOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT

OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Members of the Transportation Policy Board Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization San Antonio, Texas We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities and the general fund of the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO), as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the AAMPO’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated March 23, 2018. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the AAMPO’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the AAMPO’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the AAMPO’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the AAMPO’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.


Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.

Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the AAMPO’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Other Matters We noted a certain matter that we reported to the AAMPO’s management in a separate letter dated March 23, 2018. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the AAMPO’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the AAMPO’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. March 23, 2018


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE

REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE Members of the Transportation Policy Board Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization San Antonio, Texas Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (AAMPO) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the AAMPO’s major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2017. The AAMPO’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management’s Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the AAMPO’s major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and, the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the AAMPO’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the AAMPO’s compliance.


Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the AAMPO, complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2017. Report on Internal Controls Over Compliance Management of the AAMPO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the AAMPO’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the AAMPO’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. March 23, 2018


SECTION I --- SUMMARY OF AUDITOR’S RESULTS

Financial Statements

Type of auditor’s report issued on GAAP financial statements:

Unmodified

Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified?

Yes

X No

Significant deficiency(s) identified not considered

to be material weaknesses?

Yes

X None Reported

Noncompliance material to financial statements noted?

Yes

X No

Federal Awards

Internal control over major programs: Material weakness(es) identified?

Yes

X No

Significant deficiency(ies) identified not considered

to be material weaknesses?

Yes

X None Reported

Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance for major

programs:

Unmodified

Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be

reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.516(a)?

Yes

X No

Identification of Major Programs

CFDA Numbers(s)

Name of Federal Program or Cluster

20.205 20.505

Federal Highway Transportation Cluster: Highway Planning and Construction (FHWA) Metropolitan Planning – FTA (Section 5303)

Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B

programs:

$750,000

Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee?

X Yes

No


SECTION II --- FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS There were no financial statement findings required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. SECTION III --- FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS There were no federal award findings and questioned costs required to be reported by the Uniform Guidance.


There were no prior audit findings reported.



San Antonio, Texas

SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS


Federal GrantorPassed-Through Grantor Grant Federal Grant Federal Grant

Program Title CFDA No. Number Award Amount Expenditures

Department of Transportation

Pass Through - Texas Department of Transportation

Highway Planning and Construction (FHWA) 20.205 PL-112 5,708,098$ 1,769,670$

Metropolitan Planning - FTA (Section 5303) 20.505 FTA-5303 844,019 844,019

Total FHWA & FTA 6,552,117 2,613,689

Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 6,552,117$ 2,613,689$

43



San Antonio, Texas

NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS


1. The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. The Governmental Fund types are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus. All Federal grant funds are accounted for in the General Fund which is a Governmental Fund type. With this measurement focus, only current assets, current liabilities and the fund balance are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of these funds present increases and decreases in net current assets.

The modified accrual basis of accounting is used for the Governmental Fund types. This basis of accounting recognizes revenues in the accounting period in which they become susceptible to accrual, i.e., both measurable and available, and expenditures in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for compensated absences, which are recognized when the obligations are expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources.

Federal grant funds are considered to be earned to the extent of expenditures made under the provisions of the grant; and, accordingly, when such funds are received, they are recorded as unearned revenues until earned.

2. Expenditures reported for the FTA grant represent the authorized grant award amount since it is the

AAMPO’s practice to first utilize FTA grant funds before utilizing the FHWA grant funds.

3. The AAMPO did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided by the Uniform Guidance.

4. During fiscal year 2017, the AAMPO passed through $121,946 in FTA and FHWA grant funds to its

subrecipient, the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG).



San Antonio, Texas

REPORT ON THE CONDUCT OF AUDIT

For the Year Ended September 30, 2017


Members of the Transportation Policy Board Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization San Antonio, Texas We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities and the general fund of the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) for the year ended September 30, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated March 23, 2018. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), and that we also communicate to you other information related to our audit. Such information is provided in the following sections of this report:

the conduct of our audit (Parts I – VIII), internal control and other matters (Part IX),

This letter does not affect our report dated March 23, 2018, on the financial statements of the AAMPO. Our comment and recommendation, which has been discussed with management, is intended to improve the internal control structure to ensure compliance with federal requirements. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the members of the Transportation Policy Board and management of the AAMPO and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the courtesy and assistance extended by the personnel of the AAMPO during the course of our audit. March 23, 2018



San Antonio, Texas

REPORT ON THE CONDUCT OF AUDIT

For the Year Ended September 30, 2017

PAGE I. Auditors' Responsibility Under U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards,

Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance ................................................... 1 II. Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices ................................................................................ 1-2 III. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit ........................................................................... 2 IV. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements ...................................................................................... 2 V. Disagreements with Management .................................................................................................... 2 VI. Management Representations .......................................................................................................... 2 VII. Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants .................................................. 3 VIII. Other Issues ...................................................................................................................................... 3 IX. Internal Control and Other Matters .................................................................................................. 4


I. The Auditor’s Responsibility Under U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, Government

Auditing Standards, and Uniform Guidance

As stated in the audit contract, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express opinions about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities.

Our responsibility is to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit involved judgment about the number of transactions examined and the areas tested.

In planning and performing our audit, we considered the AAMPO’s internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. We also considered internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the AAMPO’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit. Also in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, we examined, on a test basis, evidence about the AAMPO’s compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement applicable to each of its major federal programs for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the AAMPO’s compliance with those requirements. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the AAMPO’s compliance with those requirements.

We are responsible for communicating significant matters related to the audit that are, in our professional judgment, relevant to your responsibilities in overseeing the financial reporting process. However, we are not required to design procedures specifically to identify such matters.

II. Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices

Accounting Policies Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the AAMPO are described in Note I to the financial statements.

We noted no transactions entered into by the AAMPO during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance of consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period.

Financial Statement Disclosures The financial statement disclosures, as included in the financial statements, are neutral, consistent, and clear.


Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the AAMPO’s financial statements are depreciation, compensated absences, and the net pension liability. Following are the bases used by management on such estimates:

Depreciation is based on estimated useful lives of the respective capital asset class. Compensated absences is based on the hours accrued as of September 30th and related pay for

each employee. Net pension liability was computed as .44% of the AAMPO’s fiscal agent’s, Bexar County,

actuarially determined total net pension liability. The .44% represents the ratio of the AAMPO’s payroll costs to Bexar County’s total payroll costs.

We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

III. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit

We encountered no difficulties in performing and completing our audit. IV. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements

Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has adopted all adjusting journal entries to convert the AAMPO’s cash basis records to the accrual basis of accounting.

V. Disagreements with Management

For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit.

VI. Management Representations

We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated March 23, 2018.


VII. Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants

In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the AAMPO’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us or determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.

VIII. Other Issues

Matters Discussed with Management Prior to Reappointment We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to reappointment as the AAMPO’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention.

Required Supplementary Information We applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion and analysis, and the pension information, which are required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.

Supplementary Information With respect to the supplemental information and schedule of expenditures of federal awards, as listed in the AAMPO’s Annual Financial and Compliance Report’s table of contents; and, accompanying the financial statements, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period; and, the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled such supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.

Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements We are not aware of any other documents that contain the audited financial statements and the auditor’s report thereon. If we become aware that such documents were published, we would have a responsibility to read such information, in order to identify material inconsistencies, if any, with the audited financial statements.


IX. Internal Control and Other Matters

CURRENT YEAR COMMENT

Uniform Guidance – Written Policies Relative to Federal Awards In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly called "Uniform Guidance"), all non-federal entities (i.e., the AAMPO) are required to implement internal controls for the administration of their federal grants by developing written policies and procedures that document grant activities; such as, how allowable costs and purchases are determined.

Our testing indicated that although the AAMPO has not formally documented their policies and procedures, there are internal controls; informal procedures; and, practices in place, to ensure compliance with grant activities that are direct and material to the AAMPO.

Recommendation We recommend that the AAMPO develop written policies and procedures to document the internal controls that have been implemented for the administration of their federal grants.

Management’s Response

Management agrees with recommendation and will have written policies and procedures to document the implemented internal controls for the administration of its federal grants before the next audit.



9. Presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Rapid Transit Corridor Study Purpose

The purpose of this agenda item is to receive a presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis.

Issue

The VIA Board of Trustees unanimously approved VIA’s Vision 2040 Long Range Plan in December 2016. Vision 2040 identified key travel corridors where transit reliability improvements can improve the region’s transportation choices. From VIA’s project website at http://www.viavision2040.com/rapid-transit-corridors/

UNDERSTANDING THE NEED

Our region is growing and will face significant travel challenges in the future. Vision 2040 identified a system of Rapid Transit Corridors as areas of opportunity where transit can play an increased role in supporting our transportation system.

IDENTIFYING A RANGE OF SOLUTIONS

The Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will identify a range of transit solutions to serve our region’s busiest and most vibrant areas of activity, employment and housing. The analysis will research various modes of transportation, and design alternatives to best meet the regional and neighborhood transportation needs.

EVALUATING COMMUNITY OPTIONS

By engaging the community, the Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will work to evaluate all alternatives and identify a preferred option that meets the transit needs of today and tomorrow. The preferred recommendation could result in bus rapid transit, light rail transit, express bus services, or other innovative transportation solutions.

DEFINING PROJECTS & PLANS

One significant outcome of Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will be a set of projects and plans to be added to the existing capital plan, VIA SmartMove. VIA’s short-term investments will be consistent with the purpose and need identified throughout the process of the Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis.

Action Requested

For information and discussion only.



10. Action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program and Corresponding Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

Purpose

The purpose of this agenda item is three fold: a) take action on VIA’s request for STP-MM funding, b) take action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program, and c) take action on corresponding amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.

Issue

a. Action on VIA Metropolitan Transit’s STP-MM Funding Request For this call for projects, VIA Metropolitan Transit submitted a request for

$15,000,000 for a Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Study that would include the development of the NEPA document, identification of a dedicated transit lane in one of VIA’s seven priority Rapid Transit Corridors, with sufficient information to submit an application request to the Federal Transit Administration for New Starts funding. See attachment.

At their meeting on March 9th, TAC recommended VIA be allocated $7,500,000 in STP-MM funding for their project. At their meeting on March 19th, the Executive Committee pulled VIA’s request and asked VIA to resubmit for an allocation from the $20,000,000 that has been programmed for “plans, projects and programs associated with multimodal transportation solutions in the Austin-San Antonio Corridor.”

VIA has resubmitted their request, which is also attached. The planning study underway that leads to this effort is being presented in agenda item 9. At their meeting on April 6, 2018, the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee unanimously recommended allocating, to VIA, $10,000,000 in STP-MM funding for continuation of planning studies.

Action Requested

A motion to approve VIA Metropolitan Transit’s $10,000,000 STP-MM funding request.


Miles Feet

Percent:

n/a

Yes

Yes

Submitting agency: VIA Metropolitan Transit

$25,000,000

Clay Smith, [email protected], 210-299-5903; Timothy Mulry, [email protected], 210-299-5918

Contact person name, e-mail and phone number:

0

Has the implementing agency previously successfully completed an MPO project?

Pedestrian component costs:

VIA Local Annual Budget

Federal Amount (80%):

Limits to:

$2,000,000

Agency overall priority: High Agency category priority:

Additional local contribution

The Advanced Project Development will include the planning of dedicated transit lanes:1.In the NE Corridor that connect to the Randolph Park & Ride & will be a tie to future improvements to IH 35 between San Antonio-Austin & 2.Other rapid transit corridors that systematically connect to the NE Corridor and are strategically located to support the population growth of San Antonio & transportation connections for commuters in the IH 35 San Antonio-Austin corridor. This work will be performed in concert with the City of San Antonio's "Mobility Corridor Planning" project.

Construction/Activity Cost Information

VIA Vision 2040; SA Tomorrow (City of San Antonio); SA2020 goal to increase public transit use; Mobility 2040 (AAMPO); Transportation Conformity (AAMPO)

Add'l local contribution source:

Project construction/activity cost from itemized cost estimate:

Project justification:

Federal functional classification: Primarily 'Other Principal Arterial' and 'Minor Arterial' (corridors include but not limited to Broadway, San Pedro, Fredericksburg, Commerce, Roosevelt, Zarzamora, Bandera)

Project construction/activity cost minus additional contribution:

1

$8,000,000

68.0%

Note: all project development costs and cost overruns are the implementing agency's responsibility


Surface Transportation Program - Metro Mobility FundingProject Submittal Form

Other, advanced project planning

The Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Planning can potentially leverage FTA New Starts funding. The FAST Act specifies that proposed New Starts projects must be new fixed guideway projects for the exclusive use of public transportation. The FTA encourages project sponsors to perform work deemed necessary in advance in order to complete the New Starts Project Development phase.

0.00

VIA Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Study

FY 2019 - 2022 Transportation Improvement Progam

Please complete the shaded portions only and do not exceed the space provided:

Eligible project category:

Description of work:

Project length:

VIA Service BoundaryVIA Service BoundaryLimits from:

Project/Roadway name:

For construction projects: Please include a project location map with adjacent land uses shown, a typical cross section for the submitted project, an itemized project cost estimate, signed project understanding form, and

commitment of local match (and additional local contribution, if appropriate) with this submittal form.

10

Known environmental issues:

Local Match (20% required):

$10,000,000

Known drainage and utility issues and requirements:

The advanced project planing will additionally include an assessment of drainage concerns in older sections of the city, utility conflicts, as well as pedestrian and ADA gaps.

$15,000,000

Does the implementing agency have an adopted ADA Transition Plan? (for informational purposes only)

What adopted plans and/or policies does this project help to implement?

Local match source:

Bicycle component costs: n/a

The advanced project planning will include identifying potential historic structures/sites, environmental justice concerns, and necessary right-of-way to complete a fixed guideway project



b. Action on the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program

The draft FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program is attached for review. This document is still subject to revision as necessary.

The draft document includes:

FY 2018 roadway projects that are not expected to let this fiscal year and will be carried over to FY 2019

Roadway projects in fiscal years 2019 and 2020 of the current FY 2017-2020 TIP

Roadway projects in fiscal years 2021 and 2022 of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

Transit projects for fiscal years 2019 -2022 Transit project detail for fiscal years 2019-2022 Introduction that outlines the public outreach conducted for the TIP,

the STP-MM project selection process and compliance with federal regulations

Financial tables (placeholders until final action is taken) Required certifications and policies

The STP-MM projects (new and previously programmed) have been distributed by fiscal year in the attached DRAFT spreadsheet. This spreadsheet shows the STP-MM projects financially constrained by year. These projects have been incorporated into the FY 2019-2022 TIP document.

At their meeting on April 6, 2018, the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee unanimously recommended approving the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program. A brief presentation is attached.

Action Requested

A motion to approve the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program.


CSJ Roadway Const Cost Cat 7 TotalCat 12 STP-MM Reconciliation

Other Funding Limits From To Description

FY 2019

0915-12-543 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2018)

0915-12-546 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2019)

0915-12-550 Austin Highway/Harry Wurzbach $17,177,000 $17,177,000 Harry Wurzbach at Austin Highway Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway

0915-12-585 Blanco Road $14,661,235 $13,631,235 $1,030,000 West Oak Estates Borgfeld Drive Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks,curbs and drainage

0915-12-509 Bulverde Road $8,097,480 $8,097,480 Marshall Road Wilderness Oak Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction, and drainage improvements

0915-12-579Citywide San Antonio Pedestrian and

Bicycle Improvements$2,000,000 $2,000,000 - -

CoSA Bike/Ped Improvements $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Various . Construct bicycle and ped bridge on Roosevelt and ped improvements on Fredericksburg Road

CoSA Multimodal Corridor Study $1,000,000 $1,000,000

0915-12-578 E. Aviation Blvd $8,632,561 $7,444,174 $1,188,387 SH 218 (Pat Booker Road) Cibolo Creek Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, drainage, left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk

0915-12-544 Galm Road $7,323,351 $6,293,351 $1,030,000 FM 471 (Culebra Road) Government Canyon State Park Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities

0915-12-602Intelligent Transportation Systems -

Congestion Management$4,000,000 $4,000,000 - - TransGuide Upgrade (add project with funding from CSJ 0915-12-577 and 0915-12-580)

0915-12-601 ITS - Enhancements $1,500,000 $1,500,000 - - Upgrade traffic signal controllers (add project; funding taken from CSJ 0915-12-580)

0915-12-580 ITS - Enhancements $1,500,000 $1,500,000 - Reduce project cost from $4M to $1.5M

0915-12-603 Judson Road $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Independence IH 35 Construct sidewalks on the west side of Judson Road

0915-12-514 Leon Valley Hike & Bike Trail $933,000 $933,000 SH 16 - Bandera Road Crystal Hills Park Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek

0915-12-576 MyLink Pedestrian Conn/ Safety $8,000,000 $7,200,000 $800,000 Various locations on the state roadway system - Construct curb ramps, landing pads, sidewalks and other pedestrian infrastructure; construct improvements to North Star Transit Center intersection for improved transit access

0915-12-520 Quintana Road $7,800,000 $7,800,000 Harmon Avenue McKenna Avenue Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements

Smart Signal Upgrade $2,017,950 $2,017,950 Various . Install advanced controllers, networking equipment, and control software for 179 traffic signals

0915-12-562 Watson Road $4,886,116 $4,886,116 FM 2790 - Somerset 0.8 Mi East to Watson Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities

$91,728,693 $87,680,306 $2,060,000 $1,988,387

2018 UTP Allocation $43,420,000 $1,030,000

Plus Carryover $67,852,612 $1,030,000

Balance $23,592,306 Legend: Carryover projects from FY 2018 to FY 2019

New STP-MM projects

VIA / Austin-San Antonio Corridor recommendation

FY 2020

0915-00-195 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 - - Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2020)

0658-01-044 FM 1535 (NW Military Highway) $7,500,000 $7,500,000 Loop 1604 1 mile north of Loop 1604 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

IH 410 $8,100,000 $7,080,000 $1,020,000 Old Pearsall Road Valley Hi Construct operational improvement to include ramp reversals and intersection improvements

0016-08-034 Loop 368 (Broadway) $14,000,000 $9,000,000 $5,000,000 US 281 interchange Mulberry Street Construct separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities between US 281 and Cunningham and intersection improvements between Cunningham and Mulberry

7774-01-001 PA 1502 (Wurzbach Parkway) $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $1,000,000 Lockhill-Selma Lockhill-Selma & NW Military Highway Intersection and operational improvements

Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Various Implement SSP on on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties

SL 337 Overpass $10,400,000 $10,400,000 at River Road Construct grade separation

0915-12-581 Talley Road $20,917,924 $19,417,924 $1,500,000 Wiseman Blvd Tamaron Pass

0915-00-xxx VIA Multimodal Corridor Study $2,000,000 $2,000,000 . VIA Multimodal Corridor Study

$76,517,924 $67,997,924 $1,020,000 $7,500,000

2018 UTP Allocation $45,290,000 $1,020,000

Plus Carryover $23,592,306

Balance $884,382

FY 2021

0915-00-196 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 - - Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2021)

CoSA Bike/Ped Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Various . Construct bicycle and ped bridge on Roosevelt and ped improvements on Fredericksburg Road

CoSA Multimodal Corridor Study $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Multimodal Corridor Study on four corridors

0658-01-045 FM 1535 (NW Military Highway) $6,500,000 $5,480,000 $1,020,000 Huebner Road Loop 1604 Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

1433-01-028 FM 2252 $4,200,000 $4,200,000 at Evans Road - Construct operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek bridge


0915-12-604 Presa Street $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $1,000,000 West Boyer Street SE Military Drive Corridor enhancements (bike and ped) to create Complete Street environment to the extent that ROW allows0915-12-582 Rocket Lane $5,430,481 $5,430,481 Bridge Loop 1604 Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes

0915-46-045 Rudeloff Road $6,316,658 $6,316,658 SH 46 Huber Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane and bicycle and pedestian facilities

Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Various Implement SSP on on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties


$48,047,139 $45,527,139 $1,020,000 $1,500,000

2018 UTP Allocation $45,870,000 $1,020,000

Plus Carryover $884,382

Balance $1,227,243

FY 2022915-00-197 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 . . Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2022)

0915-12-584 Crestway Road $7,791,571 $7,791,571 Kitty Hawk Road Gibbs Sprawl Road Revise operational aspects of roadway to add a 6' sidewalk and 6' bike lanes in each direction

2230-01-020 FM 1560 $12,100,000 $10,580,000 $1,520,000 FM 471 Galm/Shaenfield Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

0215-09-029 FM 725 $10,600,000 $10,600,000 County Line Road Zipp Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bicycle lanes

IH 410 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 Blanco Road US 281 Construct operational improvement to include rampand intersection improvements

Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Various . Implement SSP on on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties


$67,091,571 $45,571,571 $21,520,000

2018 UTP Allocation $46,490,000


Balance $2,145,672

FY

201

9 -

2022

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

nSurface Transportation Program - Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) Projects Only


CSJ Roadway Const Cost Cat 7 TotalCat 12 STP-MM Reconciliation

Other Funding Limits From To Description

Surface Transportation Program - Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) Projects Only

FY 2023

Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 . . Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2023)

CoSA ITS Enhancements $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Various . Implement communication network improvements

FM 1518 $25,280,000 $12,280,000 $13,000,000 IH 10 FM 78 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median/TWLTL, bike lanes and sidewalks

0465-02-027 FM 1518 $19,500,000 $9,500,000 $10,000,000 IH 10 FM 78 Construct operational improvements

FM 1560 $19,750,000 $14,750,000 $5,000,000 Galm Road SH 16 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks



$75,130,000 $46,730,000 $28,400,000



Balance $2,495,672

FY 2024

Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 . . Alamo Area MPO Commute Solutions Program (FY 2024)

FM 3351 Bridge $11,900,000 $11,900,000 at Cibolo Creek . Rebuild bridge over Cibolo Creek (also widen from 2 to 6 lanes)

Loop 368 (Broadway) $14,000,000 $10,000,000 $4,000,000 Burr Road New Braunfels Construct Complete Streets improvements for multimodal users

0915-00-172 VIA Multimodal Corridor Study $2,000,000 $2,000,000 . VIA Multimodal Corridor Study

Zarzamora/Frio City RR Overpass $19,500,000 $19,500,000 US 90 Walton Avenue Construct grade separaton at railroad tracks

$47,500,000 $43,500,000 $4,000,000



Balance $6,665,672

FY 2025

Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program (FY 2025)

0915-00-173 Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects . Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transporttaion solutions

FM 2696 Blanco Road $16,791,743 $16,791,743 Borgfeld Bexar/Comal County Line Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided roqadway with a raised median, bikelanes, sidewalk, curbs and drainageRudeloff Road $12,000,000 $12,000,000 Huber Road SH 123 (at FM 20) Construct new alignment 4 lane roadway with center turn lane and bicycle and pedestrian facilities

S. New Braunfels Extension $19,500,000 $9,500,000 Lyster Road Loop 410 Construct roadway extension on new alignment with multiuse path and sidewalks

$58,391,743 $48,391,743



Balance $6,483,929

Met

ropo

litam

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

n


FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement ProgramTransportation Policy Board MeetingApril 23, 2018


Transportation Improvement Program: Overview

• Covers a time period of four years

• Formally updated every two years

• Financially constrained

• Developed cooperatively among the partner agencies

• Approved TIP is tentatively due to TxDOT in May 2018


• Introduction/draft financial tables/draft required certifications/policies

• FY 2018 projects that may not let in FY 2018 and are being carried over to FY 2019 ($87.2M)

• Roadway projects in FYs 2019 and 2020 of the current FY 2017‐2020 TIP ($700M)

• Roadway projects in FYs 2021 and 2022 of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan ($750M)

• Transit projects (and detail) for FYs 2019‐2022 ($384M)

Transportation Improvement Program: Contents


• The STP‐MM projects selected in March 2018 have been incorporated into the TIP document by fiscal year

Transportation Improvement Program: Contents


Final action on the TIP document is scheduled for

April 23, 2018

Transportation Improvement Program: Action


Timeline

6

July 26, 2017


DRAFT FY 2019 – 2022

Transportation Improvement Program



ii

FY 2019 – 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Opportunities for Public Comment

Public Meeting Dates All meetings were similar in content and format

and were held beginning at 6:00 p.m.

Bexar County: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at VIA Metropolitan

Transit, located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX 78212. This meeting was also livestreamed via the MPO’s website at www.alamoareampo.org for individuals who were not able to attend in person.

Guadalupe County: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at the Seguin Public

Library located at 313 W. Nolte Street, Seguin, TX 78155

Kendall County: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at Kronkosky Place located at 17 Old San Antonio Road, Boerne, TX 78006

Comal County: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at the New Braunfels Civic

Center, 375 S. Castell Avenue, New Braunfels, TX 78130

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Dates

Presentation: Friday, March 9, 2018

Action: Friday, April 6, 2018

Transportation Policy Board Meeting Dates

Presentation: Monday, March 26, 2018

Action: Monday April 23, 2018



iii

Table of Contents Page

I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 II. Definition of Planning Area ................................................................................... 1 III. Public Involvement Process ................................................................................. 2 IV. Performance Measurement .................................................................................. 4 V. STP-MM Project Selection Process ...................................................................... 7 VI. Air Quality Issues .................................................................................................. 8 VII. Americans with Disabilities Act ............................................................................. 9 VIII. Funding Categories ............................................................................................ 10 IX. Progress from Previous Year .............................................................................. 10 X. Funded Highway Projects ................................................................................... 11

Fiscal Year 2019 Projects ........................................................................ 13 Fiscal Year 2020 Projects ........................................................................ 23 Fiscal Year 2021 Projects ........................................................................ 29 Fiscal Year 2022 Projects ........................................................................ 34

XI. Funded Transit Projects ..................................................................................... 39 Fiscal Year 2019 Transit Projects ............................................................ 41 Fiscal Year 2020 Transit Projects ............................................................ 45 Fiscal Year 2021 Transit Projects ............................................................ 49 Fiscal Year 2022 Transit Projects ............................................................ 53

XII. Financial Plan ..................................................................................................... 57 Roadway Financial Summary .................................................................. 59 FY 2019-2022 Distribution of Category 2 Funding .................................. 60 Transit Financial Summary ...................................................................... 61

Appendix A Certifications .................................................................................. 63 MPO Self-Certification .............................................................................. xx Project Selection Procedures .................................................................... xx

Appendix B Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects ................................................................ xx

Appendix C “Grouped” or “Statewide” CSJ Project Listing ................................. xx Appendix D Environmental Clearance Projects .................................................. xx Appendix E. Transit Project Detail ....................................................................... xx Appendix F Policy 2: Public Participation Plan ................................................. xxx Appendix G Policy 3: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the

Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program .................................................................. xxx



iv

This page intentionally left blank.



1

I. Introduction

Transportation is an important factor in all our lives. How well we get to and from work, school, hospitals, shopping centers and recreational facilities is important to us all. The ability to travel affects our socio-economic well-being. On a larger scale, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s regional economy and environment depend heavily on the condition and efficient performance of our regional transportation system. Appropriate transportation planning, recognizing the mobility needs and identifying the available resources allow for the maintenance and improvement of our transportation system, therefore affecting our economy and quality of life.

As part of the urban transportation planning process, the Transportation

Improvement Program (TIP) addresses federal regulations administered by the United States Department of Transportation. It is required, as a condition of the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, to maintain the transportation system covered by the continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning process. Essentially, the TIP is developed to ensure that imple-mentation of the transportation plan is done in an orderly manner.

The TIP outlines a financially constrained program of federally assisted

transportation projects that will be implemented over a four-year period. Projects not included in the approved TIP are ineligible to receive federal transportation assistance. The TIP consists of projects that are to be implemented over the next four fiscal years. Priorities are demonstrated by grouping projects into the one-to-four year time frame. Also included in this document are realistic estimates of project costs and revenues for the four-year time period.

The construction and improvement of roadways and transportation

facilities listed in the TIP will have a positive impact on safety, mobility, and connectivity throughout the region. Some improvements will affect conditions only within the area in which they are located, yet the impact of others will extend far beyond their immediate locations. These transportation improvement projects can be expected to decrease fatal and serious injury crashes, provide travel options, reduce congestion, improve air quality, conserve energy, enhance quality of life and maintain a transportation system beneficial to the entire region.

II. Definition of Planning Area

Figure 1 shows the study area which encompasses over 2,770 square

miles and includes Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties and a portion of Kendall County. San Antonio is the major population and employment center in the region, the second largest city in Texas, and the third largest metropolitan area. Like many large urban areas, rapid growth and development have contributed to ever-increasing needs in transportation.



2

Projects included in the TIP are consistent with the MPO’s long range transportation plan “Mobility 2040” and other planning efforts such as the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority’s Strategic Plan, the City of San Antonio’s SA Tomorrow Plan, VIA Metropolitan Transit’s Vision 2040, and TxDOT’s Unified Transportation Program.

III. Public Involvement Process

The MPO’s Public Participation Plan provides for the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties in the development and periodic update of the FY 2019-2022 TIP. The MPO wholly supports early and continuous public involvement, reasonable public access to technical and other information, open public meetings, open access to the transportation planning and decision-making process, and effective involvement processes that are designed to be responsive to local conditions.

All meetings of the MPO Transportation Policy Board and Technical

Advisory Committee are subject to the Texas Open Meetings Act and are open to the public. Meeting notices are sent to the Texas Secretary of State, published in the Texas Register, and posted at the Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall

Figure 1. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area



3

County Courthouses and at the MPO offices in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act. All MPO meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities.

The public was afforded the opportunity to comment on all projects

proposed for inclusion in the TIP. Public comments were accepted during the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee meetings, which were held on March 9, 2018 and April 6, 2018, and the MPO Transportation Policy Board meetings, which were held on March 26, 2018 and April 23, 2018.

Additionally, the MPO held four public meetings to allow citizens

opportunities to comment on proposed projects and learn more about the transportation planning process. The public meeting dates, time and locations are provided below:

Bexar County: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at VIA Metropolitan

Transit, located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX 78212. This meeting was also livestreamed for individuals who were not able to attend in person.

Guadalupe County: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at the Seguin Public

Library located at 313 W. Nolte Street, Seguin, TX 78155

Kendall County: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at Kronkosky Place located at 17 Old San Antonio Road, Boerne, TX 78006

Comal County: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at the New Braunfels Civic

Center, 375 S. Castell Avenue, New Braunfels, TX 78130

All meetings began at 6:00 p.m. and were similar in content and format. Generally each meeting consisted of an overview presentation and an audience participation exercise to gather input on projects.

To advertise the public meetings, newspaper ads were run in the San

Antonio Express-News, La Prensa (local Spanish language newspaper), The Observer, the San Antonio Current, New Braunfels Herald, Seguin Gazette and Boerne Star. The public meetings were also advertised through the MPO’s bi-weekly e-newsletter, “Fast Track”, on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. All public meeting handouts, displays, and surveys were posted on the MPO’s website.

For individuals not able to attend a public meeting in person, the MPO

provided a virtual meeting process online at www.alamoareampo.org/yourmove. The online public input ran from Monday, February 19 through Wednesday, February 28. All materials were also provided in Spanish.

Other public input methods during the TIP development process included comment cards at public meetings, the participation exercise, and e-mails, letters and speaking opportunities at TAC and TPB meetings. The comment cards allowed for input on the transit and roadway project lists as well as the



4

effectiveness of the public involvement process itself. All input and other comments received were provided in writing to the Technical Advisory Committee, the Executive Committee and the Transportation Policy Board. MPO staff also visited English as a Second Language classes in late February to gather input specifically from non-English speaking participants.

Projects in other funding categories were selected by the State (TxDOT)

or the transit operator (VIA Metropolitan Transit). The Transportation Policy Board reviewed the projects and, by adoption of this document, concurred with the selection of those projects. MPO staff also provided opportunities for the public to review the roadway and transit project lists and supporting information on our website, at www.alamoareampo.org and comment on these items electronically at their convenience.

IV. Performance Measurement The United States Department of Transportation recognizes that it is

important to continuously monitor the performance of the nation’s transportation improvements and programs to determine if the nation is achieving its national goals and objectives related to transportation. Monitoring progress towards achieving these goals and objectives is accomplished through the use of performance measures. Performance measurement provides various transportation agencies with a better ability to identify and mitigate issues with their respective transportation networks. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

On July 6, 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act

(MAP-21) transportation bill was signed into law, creating a streamlined, performance-based, multimodal program in an effort to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. In relation to performance management, MAP-21 aims to increase the accountability and transparency of Federal highway programs by improving transportation investment decision-making through performance-based planning and programming. Furthermore, the Act states: “…Performance management will transform the Federal-aid highway program and provide a means to the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds by refocusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improving project decision-making through performance-based planning and programming…” As a result of MAP-21, performance measures to chart progress toward accomplishment of national goals established in MAP-21 include safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays as outlined below:



5

1. Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

2. Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset

system in a state of good repair. 3. Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion

on the National Highway System (NHS). 4. System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface

transportation system. 5. Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national

freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development.

6. Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the

transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.

7. Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote

jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices.

Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015, or FAST Act, was signed into law on December 4, 2015. The FAST Act provides for new planning requirements such as providing for the development and integrated management of intermodal facilities that support intercity transportation; encouraging consultation with State agencies that plan for tourism and natural disaster risk reduction; planning for system resiliency and reliability and reducing storm-water impacts of surface transportation; and improving freight mobility.

The FAST Act continues MAP-21’s overall performance approach, and

ensures that State DOTs and MPOs invest in projects that collectively make progress toward the National Goals that were established by Congress.

The FAST Act also allows MPOs serving a transportation management

area to voluntarily develop a Congestion Management Plan that shall include regional goals to reduce vehicle miles traveled during peak commuting hours and improve transportation connections between areas with high job concentration and areas with high concentrations of low-income households.



6

Performance Measures and Targets

Currently, under the FAST Act, State DOTs and MPOs are required to establish performance targets and report on the progress made toward achieving each of these performance targets for the following performance measures:

Safety

The Texas Department of Transportation has officially established targets

based on five-year rolling averages for five Safety performance measures:

Performance Measure 2018 Statewide Target (Expressed as Five-Year

2014-2018 Average)

Total number of traffic related fatalities on all public roads 3,703.8

Rate of traffic related fatalities on all public roads per 100 million VMT 1.432

Total number of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads 17,565.4

Rate of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads per 100 million VMT 6.740

Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads 2,150.6

These targets were developed using a data-driven, collaborative process during the update of Texas’ 2017-2022 Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The targets are aligned with the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Plan and reflect a 2% reduction from the original trendline projection for 2022. When a trendline is decreasing, the target mirrors that projection.

On January 22, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Transportation Policy Board adopted TxDOT’s Safety targets within the Metropolitan Area Boundary. The Transportation Policy Board commits to supporting, planning and programming projects that contribute to the accomplishments of said targets and the MPO will monitor the established targets and report achievements to the Transportation Policy Board in Fall 2018.

Numerous projects adopted in the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program support achieving the targets established for safety: stand-alone safe bicycle and pedestrian projects and Complete Streets projects; added capacity and operational projects that also include safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities; conversion of frontage roads from two-way to one-way;



7

intersection improvements; grade separated overpasses; and Intelligent Transportation Systems projects.

Transit State of Good Repair

VIA Metropolitan Transit has adopted targets for four Transit Asset Management Performance measures for:

1. Equipment State of Good Repair: rehab or replace equipment based on

the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better

2. Rolling Stock State of Good Repair: by June 2018, replace 270 fixed route buses with an age of 14 years or greater

3. Infrastructure State of Good Repair: zero, no passenger rail infrastructure; and

4. Facilities State of Good Repair: rehab facilities based on the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better On January 22, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Transportation Policy Board adopted VIA Metropolitan Transit’s performance measurement targets. The Transportation Policy Board commits to supporting, planning and programming projects that contribute to the accomplishments of said targets.

Numerous transit projects adopted in the FY 2019-2022 Transportation

Improvement Program support achieving the targets established for transit state of good repair, including the: purchase of maintenance tools and equipment; purchase of revenue vehicles; purchase of replacement components for revenue vehicles; new and upgrades to existing passenger facilities; and upgrades to the operational facilities.

V. STP-MM Project Selection Process In support of the development of the FY 2019-2022 Transportation

Improvement Program, an agency call for Surface Transportation Program – Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) funded projects was announced in March 2017. Presentations to the MPO’s Committees on STP-MM project selection process occurred as follows:

April 7, 2017: Technical Advisory Committee April 12, 2017: Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee April 19, 2017: Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee April 24, 2017: Transportation Policy Board



8

On May 22, 2017 the Transportation Policy Board took action on the TIP development process and schedule and the STP-MM Call for Projects began on June 1, 2017. On July 26, 2017 the MPO and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) jointly hosted two workshops (9:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.) that were similar in content and format. The purpose of the workshops was to provide information and support to agencies submitting projects for STP-MM funding consideration.

Between June and November 2017 agency staff followed their internal

project selection processes, developed projects and secured the commitment of local match and project development costs. The agency project submittals were due to the MPO on December 4, 2017. Throughout December and January 2018, MPO staff compiled information (i.e., crash rates, and current and future congestion levels) used to technically score projects. On January 10, 2018 a multi-agency work group met to score the stand alone bicycle and pedestrian projects and on January 19, 2018 a multi-agency work group met to score the added capacity and operational improvement projects. As noted above, in late February 2018, the MPO hosted four public meetings and provided online opportunities for persons to provide comments in lieu of attending the meetings. All public input was due to the MPO by midnight on February 28, 2018.

On March 9, 2018 the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee met in an

open meeting to develop an initial recommendation for funding projects submitted for STP-MM funding. The MPO’s Executive Committee met on March 19, 2018 to review the Technical Advisory Committee’s recommendation and forward a recommendation on for the full Board’s consideration. The MPO Transportation Policy Board took action on the STP-MM list of funded transportation projects at their meeting on March 26, 2018. The Technical Advisory Committee made a favorable recommendation for adoption of the TIP at their meeting on April 6, 2018. The complete document was adopted at the April 23, 2018 Transportation Policy Board meeting. All of these meetings allowed additional opportunities for public comment on the document and project lists.

The MPO’s adopted project selection procedures state that any project

listed in the first year of the approved TIP shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and funds are appropriated. Should any projects not be implementable from the first priority, then any projects listed in the second, third or fourth years of the TIP may be accelerated to the first year of the TIP as soon as plans are complete, including right-of-way and utility adjustments, and funding is available.

VI. Air Quality Issues

The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) study area has three continuous air monitoring sites (CAMS). All of the sites, San Antonio Northwest (CAMS 23), Camp Bullis (CAMS 58), and Calaveras Lake (CAMS 59), are maintained by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and



9

are regulatory CAMS. CPS Energy also maintains three monitoring sites during the ozone season: Heritage Middle School (CAMS 622), Pecan Valley (CAMS 678) and Government Canyon (CAMS 1610). In addition, the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) operates six ozone monitoring sites across the region during the ozone season. These are: Elm Creek Elementary (CAMS 501), Fair Oaks Ranch (CAMS 502), Bulverde Elementary (CAMS 503), New Braunfels Airport (CAMS 504), City of Garden Ridge (CAMS 505), and Seguin Outdoor Learning Center (Cams 506). The locations of ozone monitoring sites in the area are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. San Antonio Area Ozone Monitoring Sites

Currently the San Antonio region is exceeding the ozone standard but formally

remains in “attainment” for ozone. On October 1, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone from 75 parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb. Since observations at ozone regulatory monitors in the San Antonio area do not meet the current 70 ppb during that time period, the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA (or other local geography boundary deemed appropriate by the EPA) is at risk for a nonattainment designation. In December 2017, the EPA invited Texas to submit additional information on air quality within the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA. A final designation is expected and expects to promulgate a final designation in Summer 2018.



10

VII. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)

Many of the projects in the TIP include enhancements to make the various transportation amenities accessible to the disabled. All federally funded transportation projects will be developed in compliance with the ADA.

VIII. Funding Categories

The categories for funding state and federal transportation improvements are as follows:

Category 1 Preventative Maintenance & Rehabilitation

Category 2 Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects Category 3 Non-Traditional Funding Category 4 Statewide Connectivity Corridor Category 5 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Category 6 Structure Rehabilitation Category 7 Metro Mobility (Surface Transportation Program – Metro

Mobility or STP-MM) Category 8 Safety Category 9 Transportation Enhancements Program Category 10 Miscellaneous Category 11 District Discretionary Category 12 Strategic Priority Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Grant

Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5309 (Capital Grant Program, New Starts;

Small Starts)) Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 (Elderly and Disabled Transportation

Assistance Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities Program)

IX. Progress From Previous Year

Roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian and other projects annually let to contract from FY 2004 through FY 2017 can be found on the MPO’s website at http://www.alamoareampo.org. This item will continue to be annually updated on the website. To request a copy please contact the MPO staff by telephone at 210-227-8651, by fax at 210-227-9321, by mail or in person at 825 S. St. Mary’s Street, San Antonio, Texas 78205, or by e-mail to [email protected].



11

Funded Highway Projects



12




TIP PROJECTS FY 2019-2022

2019FY

TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

City

Updated: April 12, 2018

DRAFT

Bexar15 - San Antonio

Description:

VA C CoSA 5536.1

Limits From: In San Antonio

Limits To: at various locations along San Pedro

Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %):

ROW Purchase: $0

Construction Cost: $1,000,000

Construction Engineering $60,000

Contingencies: $70,000

Indirect Costs: $50,000

Preliminary Engineering $49,000

Other Field $40,000

$1,269,000

Type of Work: Bike/Ped

Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000

Authorized Funding by Category/Share

San Antonio

Cost of Approved Phases:

$1,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal

ContribStateFederal LocalFunding

Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - funded through the 19-22 STP-MM Call for Projects

Last Revision Date: 7/2018

0000-00-000

Construct ADA Compliant sidewalks on San Pedro Avenue

Bexar,Com15 - San Antonio

Description:

VA C TxDOT 5539.0

Limits From: In Bexar and Comal Counties

Limits To: Various locations


ROW Purchase: $0


Construction Engineering $0

Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0

Preliminary Engineering $0

Other Field $0

$0

Type of Work: ITS

Total Project Cost:

$2,017,950


Other


$2,017,950

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,017,950

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,614,360 $403,590 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,614,360 $403,590 $0 $0 $2,017,950

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Install advanced controllers, networking equipment and control software for 179 traffic signals


Description:

VA C CoSA 5545.1


Limits To: at various locations


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$0

Type of Work: Planning

Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000


San Antonio


$1,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Partnership with VIA for a planning study on one multimodal arterial roadway

13Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW




2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT

Comal15 - San Antonio

Description:

IH 35 C TxDOT 5339.0

Limits From: Hays County Line

Limits To: 0.5 Mi S. of Hays County Line


ROW Purchase: $0




Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $69,360

$1,420,200

Type of Work: Operational

Total Project Cost:

$1,200,000


Other


$1,200,000

12 - Strategic Pri

Other

$1,200,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,080,000 $120,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,080,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 4/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 6/16 - Austin TxDOT District to develop, fund and let to contract in Hays County


0016-04-113

Revise ramps and convert frontage roads from two way to one way operation


Description:


Limits From: LP 13

Limits To: IH 410


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $167,620

$3,598,610


Total Project Cost:

$2,900,000


San Antonio


$2,900,000

3 - BC Local

11 - Distr Discr

$2,175,000

$725,000

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,175,000

$652,500 $72,500 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$652,500 $72,500 $0 $2,175,000 $2,900,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 10/15 - add project


0073-08-183

Construction of a partial frontage road, ramps, and intersection improvements


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5372.0

Limits From: Ingram Rd

Limits To: SH 151


ROW Purchase: $0


Construction Engineering $2,000,000

Contingencies: $3,500,000

Indirect Costs: $1,000,000

Preliminary Engineering $2,450,000

Other Field $2,000,000

$60,950,000

Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll

Total Project Cost:

$50,000,000


San Antonio


$50,000,000

12 - CL

Other

$50,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2019; 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project


0521-04-204

Expand from 8 to 10 lane expressway





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5373.0

Limits From: at SH 151

Limits To: Interchange


ROW Purchase: $0







$48,760,000

Type of Work: Interchange

Total Project Cost:

$40,000,000


San Antonio


$40,000,000

12 - Strat Pri

Other

$40,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$36,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$36,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0521-04-275

Reconstruct interchange - Phase 2


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5374.0

Limits From: SH 151

Limits To: US 90


ROW Purchase: $0







$12,190,000


Total Project Cost:

$10,000,000


San Antonio


$10,000,000

12 - Strat Pri

Other

$10,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$9,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0521-04-279

Expand from 6 lane to 8 lane expressway


Description:

CR C ARMA 3988.0

Limits From: On Bulverde Road from Marshall Road

Limits To: Wilderness Oak


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $0

$9,914,555

Type of Work: Maint/Rehab

Total Project Cost:

$8,097,480


Other


$8,097,480

7 - STP-MM

Other

$8,097,480

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0 $8,097,480

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 1/17 - move from 17 to 18; 4/15 - move from 15 to 16 and update description; 1/14 - move from 14 to 15; 4/13- move from FY 13 to FY 14 and revise funding categories; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-509

Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and drainage improvements





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CS C LV 3992.0

Limits From: SH 16 - Bandera Road

Limits To: Crystal Hills Park


ROW Purchase: $0

Construction Cost: $933,000





Other Field $0

$1,168,116


Total Project Cost:

$933,000


Leon Valley


$933,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$933,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$746,400 $0 $186,600 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$746,400 $0 $186,600 $0 $933,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2019; 10/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2017 and revise limits; 4/14 - revise limits and move from FY 2014 to FY 2015; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-514

Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek


Description:

CS E,R,C Port SA 4005.0

Limits From: On Quintana Road from Harmon Avenue

Limits To: McKenna Avenue


ROW Purchase: $1,600,000






Other Field $0

$8,636,100


Total Project Cost:

$7,800,000


San Antonio


$5,846,800

7 - STP-MM

Other

$7,800,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0 $7,800,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 1/16 - move from FY 16 to FY 17; 1/14 - included PE and ROW as funded phases; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-520

Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements

Be,Co,Gu,K15 - San Antonio

Description:

NR C AAMPO 5102.0

Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal

Limits To: Guadalupe & partial Kendall County


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$100,000

Type of Work: Rideshare

Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-12-543

Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2018





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CS C BxCo 5105.0

Limits From: On Galm Road, from FM 471 (Culebra Road)

Limits To: Government Canyon State Park


ROW Purchase: $0







$8,818,779


Total Project Cost:

$7,323,351


Other


$7,323,351

7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$6,293,351

$1,030,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,034,681 $0 $1,258,670 $0

$824,000 $0 $206,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,858,681 $0 $1,464,670 $0 $7,323,351

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/16 - revise funding; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-544

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities


Description:

NR AAMPO 5103.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$100,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$100,000

Authorized Funding by Category/ShareCost of Approved Phases:

$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-12-546



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5101.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$267,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-12-547






2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CS C CoSA 5110.0

Limits From: Harry Wurzbach

Limits To: at Austin Highway


ROW Purchase: $0







$20,841,000


Total Project Cost:

$17,177,000


San Antonio


$17,177,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$17,177,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0 $17,177,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 4/17 - rev limits and funding; 1/17 - move from 19 to 18 and rev funding distr; 4/16 - comb with new STP-MM project and rev match (EDCP project); 10/15 - rev funding; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-550

Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway


Description:

CR C BxCo 5106.0

Limits From: On Watson Road from FM 2790-Somerset

Limits To: 0.62 Mi East to Watson Road


ROW Purchase: $0







$5,956,175


Total Project Cost:

$4,886,116


Other


$4,886,116

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,886,116

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,908,893 $0 $977,223 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,908,893 $0 $977,223 $0 $4,886,116

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-562



Description:

VA C TxDOT 5316.3

Limits From: Various locations in Bexar County

Limits To: on state system


ROW Purchase: $0







$9,706,400

Type of Work: Pedestrian

Total Project Cost:

$8,000,000


Other


$8,000,000

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$7,200,000

$800,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,760,000 $1,440,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $800,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,760,000 $1,440,000 $0 $800,000 $8,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2022 to FY 2019; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-576

Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CS C UC 5325.0

Limits From: In Universal City, on E. Aviation

Limits To: Houston Drive to Aztec Way


ROW Purchase: $0







$10,473,886


Total Project Cost:

$8,632,561


UC


$8,632,561

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$7,444,174

$1,188,387

Other $0

Other $0

$5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,188,387

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $1,188,387 $8,632,561

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/17 - revise limits and description; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-578

Widen to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage


Description:

VA C CoSA 5305.0

Limits From: In City of San Antonio

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $75,000

$2,427,000

Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrain

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


$2,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 10/17 - reduce project cost by $1M to fund 0915-12-603; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-579

Construct citywide pedestrian and bicycle improvements


Description:

VA C CoSA 5306.0


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $90,000

$1,873,500


Total Project Cost:

$1,500,000


San Antonio


$1,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 10/17 - reduce cost from $4M to $1.5M and move from FY 2020 to FY 2019; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-580

Intelligent Transportation System - Enhancements





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CR C ARMA 5317.0

Limits From: In Bexar County, on Blanco Rd

Limits To: From West Oak Estates to Borgfeld


ROW Purchase: $0







$17,788,477


Total Project Cost:

$14,661,235


Other


$14,661,235

7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$13,631,235

$1,030,000

Other $0

Other $0

$10,904,988 $0 $2,726,247 $0

$824,000 $0 $206,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$11,728,988 $0 $2,932,247 $0 $14,661,235

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - revise funding; 1/17 - TIP: add project; MTP: move from FY 2023 to FY 2019; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-585

Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs and drainage


Description:

VA C Converse 4972.0

Limits From: In Converse, from Converse Park N

Limits To: to FM 78


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $79,900

$1,703,225

Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian

Total Project Cost:

$1,382,725


Converse


$1,382,725

9 - TA

3 - LC

$1,365,440

$17,285

Other $0

Other $0

$1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $0

$0 $0 $0 $17,285

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $17,285 $1,382,725

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 6/17 - add TA project


0915-12-594

Construct multi use path


Description:

VA C SARA 4977.0

Limits From: in San Antonio, from Lombrano St

Limits To: Laredo St


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,390,800


Total Project Cost:

$6,000,000


San Antonio


$6,000,000

9 - TA

3 - LC

$3,125,000

$2,875,000

Other $0

Other $0

$2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,875,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $2,875,000 $6,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-595

Extend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

VA C CoSA 5425.0


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $90,000

$1,873,500


Total Project Cost:

$1,500,000


San Antonio


$1,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/18 - update project description; 10/17 - add project; created from 0915-12-580


0915-12-601

Intelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements - Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5426.0


Limits To: at TransGuide Center


ROW Purchase: $0







$4,996,000


Total Project Cost:

$4,000,000


San Antonio


$4,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,200,000 $800,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,200,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 10/17 - add project; created from 0915-12-577 ($3M) and 0915-12-580 ($1M)


0915-12-602

Upgrade TransGuide Facility


Description:

CS C CoSA 5428.0

Limits From: In San Antonio on Judson Road

Limits To: from Independence to IH 35


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $60,000

$1,249,000


Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000


San Antonio


$1,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 10/17 - add project; configured from $1M from 0915-12-579


0915-12-603

Construct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT

Guadalupe15 - San Antonio

Description:

CS C Schertz 4975.0

Limits From: in Schertz on Woodland Oaks Dr,

Limits To: Savannah Dr & Live Oak Rd


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $67,000

$1,426,966


Total Project Cost:

$1,158,266


Schertz


$1,158,266

9 - TA

Other

$1,158,266

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$926,613 $0 $231,653 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$926,613 $0 $231,653 $0 $1,158,266

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-17-065

Construct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail


Description:

CS C New Braunfels 4973.0

Limits From: In New Braunfels on San Antonio St,

Limits To: Walnut, McQueeney, near Seele Elem


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $87,700

$1,868,311


Total Project Cost:

$1,516,711


New Braunfels


$1,516,711

9 - TA

Other

$1,516,711

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,213,369 $0 $303,342 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,213,369 $0 $303,342 $0 $1,516,711

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 6/17 - add TA project


0915-17-066

Construct sidewalks, ramps & other pedestrian related infrastructure


Description:

VA C Seguin 4976.0

Limits From: in Seguin from Vaughan Bridge

Limits To: to Max Starcke Park East


ROW Purchase: $0







$3,450,646


Total Project Cost:

$2,801,246


Seguin


$2,801,246

9 - TA

3 - LC

$2,773,234

$28,012

Other $0

Other $0

$2,218,587 $0 $554,647 $0

$0 $0 $0 $28,012

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,218,587 $0 $554,647 $28,012 $2,801,246

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-46-046

Extend Walnut Springs multi use trail, including retaining walls, hand and guard rails and below grade crossing





2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

FM 1560 C TxDOT 3997.0

Limits From: SH 16

Limits To: Loop 1604


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $0

$15,040,244


Total Project Cost:

$12,325,004


San Antonio


$12,325,004

7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$11,070,000

$1,030,000

1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $225,004

Other $0

$8,856,000 $2,214,000 $0 $0

$824,000 $206,000 $0 $0

$180,003 $45,001 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,860,003 $2,465,001 $0 $0 $12,325,004

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from 18 to 19; 4/17 - move from 17 to 18; 4/16 - move from 16 to 17; 4/15 - move from 15 to 16; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


2230-01-013

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, bike lanes and sidewalks

Medina15 - San Antonio

Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3152.0

Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471, N

Limits To: FM 471 (Culebra Rd)








Other Field $0

$6,497,971


Total Project Cost:

$4,400,000


Other


$4,400,000

3 - PTF

Other

$4,400,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,400,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2016; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12


3544-03-002

Construct two lane rural highway on new location


Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3153.0

Limits From: FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 MI

Limits To: Medina County Line








Other Field $0

$10,367,681


Total Project Cost:

$7,000,000


Other


$7,000,000

3 - PTF

Other

$7,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-04-002






2019FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3154.0

Limits From: Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N

Limits To: Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471


ROW Purchase: $700,000






Other Field $0

$3,889,710


Total Project Cost:

$2,600,000


Other


$2,600,000

3 - PTF

Other

$2,600,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,600,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,600,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-05-001



Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3155.0

Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N

Limits To: Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957








Other Field $0

$6,029,926


Total Project Cost:

$4,100,000


Other


$4,100,000

3 - PTF

Other

$4,100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,100,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,100,000 $4,100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-06-001






2020FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5542.0

Limits From: Old Pearsall Road

Limits To: Valley Hi Drive


ROW Purchase: $0







$10,278,900


Total Project Cost:

$8,100,000


San Antonio


$8,100,000

7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$7,080,000

$1,020,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,664,000 $1,416,000 $0 $0

$816,000 $204,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,480,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $8,100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct operational improvements, ramp reversals, intersection improvements


Description:

SL 337 C TxDOT 5543.0

Limits From: at River Road

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$13,197,600


Total Project Cost:

$10,400,000


New Braunfels


$10,400,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,400,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $10,400,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct grade separation

Be,Co,Ke15 - San Antonio

Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.1

Limits From: Various locations

Limits To: within Bexar, Comal and Kendall counties


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


$4,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Implement the Safety Service Patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties for 3 years





2020FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

VA T VIA 3768.1

Limits From: VIA Multimodal Corridor Study

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$2,000,000

Type of Work: Passenger Rail

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


$2,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from 18 to 20 and split off $2M; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency,descr; 4/15 - move from 16 to 17, correct limits; 1/13 - move from 13 to 15; fixed amount; portion of $20M for Pass Rail


0915-00-172

VIA Multimodal Corridor Study


Description:

SL 368 C TxDOT 5313.0

Limits From: Burr Road

Limits To: IH 35


ROW Purchase: $0







$16,986,200

Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian

Total Project Cost:

$14,000,000


San Antonio


$14,000,000

7 - STP-MM

1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab

$9,000,000

$5,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$7,200,000 $1,800,000 $0 $0

$4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - revise funding; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0016-08-034

Roadway rehabilitation and complete streets improvements


Description:

FM 1535 C TxDOT 5310.0

Limits From: 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604

Limits To: Lp 1604


ROW Purchase: $0







$9,099,750


Total Project Cost:

$7,500,000


San Antonio


$7,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$7,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0658-01-044

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks





2020FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

NR C AAMPO 5301.0

Limits From: Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal



ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-00-195



Description:

CS C BxCo 5304.0

Limits From: In Bexar County on Talley Road

Limits To: From Wiseman Blvd to Tamaron Pass


ROW Purchase: $0







$26,544,924


Total Project Cost:

$20,917,924


Other


$20,917,924

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$19,417,924

$1,500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $1,500,000 $20,917,924

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 and 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection processes


0915-12-581

Widen to provide operational improvements including a continuous left turn lane; construct 10 ft. shared use path


Description:

CS C CoSA 4974.0

Limits From: In San Antonio, on Zarzamora

Limits To: From Fredericksburg Rd to Loop 13


ROW Purchase: $0







$6,159,000


Total Project Cost:

$5,000,000


San Antonio


$5,000,000

9 - TA

3 - LC

$4,500,000

$500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $500,000 $5,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-596

Construct sidewalks, remove unused utility poles, and implement pedestian detection ITS





2020FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

FM 1103 C TxDOT 4970.0

Limits From: IH 35

Limits To: Guadalupe C/L








Other Field $56,100

$2,689,950


Total Project Cost:

$1,500,000


Other


$1,500,000

1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab

3 - LC

$1,000,000

$500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $200,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $200,000 $0 $500,000 $1,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



1268-01-013

Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes


Description:

FM 1103 C TxDOT 4971.0

Limits From: Comal C/L

Limits To: Rodeo Way









$30,584,250


Total Project Cost:

$22,500,000


Other


$22,500,000

1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab

11 - Distr Discr

$9,134,352

$5,900,000

3 - LC $7,465,648

Other $0

$7,307,482 $1,826,870 $0 $0

$4,720,000 $1,180,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $7,465,648

$0 $0 $0 $0

$12,027,482 $3,006,870 $0 $7,465,648 $22,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2020 and revise funding; 1/17 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019 and revise funding; 10/15 - add project


1268-02-027

Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes


Description:

SL 1604 E,R,C ARMA 3913.0

Limits From: SH 16

Limits To: US 281


ROW Purchase: $0







$609,246,922

Type of Work: Added Capacity: Toll

Total Project Cost:

$507,705,768


San Antonio


$507,705,768

2 - Metro Corridor

3 - LC

$127,889,394

$379,816,374

Other $0

Other $0

$102,311,515 $25,577,879 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $379,816,374

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$102,311,515 $25,577,879 $0 $379,816,374 $507,705,768

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - revise limits, descr, cost (has $398.3M in Cat 2: '17-'24); 4/14 - rev year ('15 to '20), description and funding distribution; 7/13 - project had $53M in Category 2 funding (yrs 2016-2020)


2452-02-083

Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes; including managed lane direct connectors at IH 10





2020FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

SL 1604 E,R,C TxDOT 3786.0

Limits From: US 281

Limits To: Redland Road


ROW Purchase: $0







$57,370,607


Total Project Cost:

$47,808,839


San Antonio


$47,808,839

3 - LC

Other

$47,808,839

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $47,808,839

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $47,808,839 $47,808,839

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - revise cost; 4/14 - rev limits, year ('15 to '20), description and funding distribution


2452-03-113

Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes


Description:

PA 1502 C TxDOT 5315.3

Limits From: Lockhill Selma Road

Limits To: FM 1535


ROW Purchase: $0







$10,971,000


Total Project Cost:

$9,000,000


San Antonio


$9,000,000

7 - STP-MM

2 - Metro Corridor

$8,000,000

$1,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$6,400,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0

$800,000 $200,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$7,200,000 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise CSJ from 1502-03-003 and decrease cost; 4/17 - move from FY 18 to FY 20, revise funding and limits; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


7774-01-001

Intersection and operational improvements





2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

VA C CoSA 5536.2




ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $80,000

$2,538,000


Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


$2,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct bicycle and ped bridge on Roosevelt Ave


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.2




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


$4,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000



Description:

VA C CoSA 5545.2




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$3,000,000


San Antonio


$3,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$3,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $3,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Partnership with VIA for planning studies on three multimodal arterial roadways





2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:


Limits From: Guadalupe River

Limits To: Hays/Comal County Line


ROW Purchase: $0







$91,425,000


Total Project Cost:

$75,000,000


Other


$75,000,000

4 - Connectivity

Other

$75,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$67,500,000 $7,500,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$67,500,000 $7,500,000 $0 $0 $75,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 1/18 - move from FY 2022 to FY 2021 and increase cost from $50M to $75M in Cat 4; 4/17 - add project


0016-04-112

Operational improvements including ramp revisions and intersection improvements - convert frontage road to one way


Description:


Limits From: Loop 1604

Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line


ROW Purchase: $0







$208,449,000


Total Project Cost:

$171,000,000


Other


$171,000,000

12 - Strat Pri

Other

$171,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$153,900,000 $17,100,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$153,900,000 $17,100,000 $0 $0 $171,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - move from FY 2029 to FY 2021 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP


0025-02-215



Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5371.0

Limits From: at IH 10 E

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$121,900,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000,000


San Antonio


$100,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

4 - Connectivity

$50,000,000

$25,000,000

12 - Strat Pri $25,000,000

Other $0

$45,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0

$22,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0

$22,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$90,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $100,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project


0521-06-138

Construct direct connectors: Phase 1 - Priority Connectors





2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

FM 1535 C TxDOT 5323.0

Limits From: Lp 1604

Limits To: Huebner


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,886,450


Total Project Cost:

$6,500,000


San Antonio


$6,500,000

7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$5,480,000

$1,020,000

Other $0

Other $0

$4,384,000 $1,096,000 $0 $0

$816,000 $204,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $6,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0658-01-045

Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks


Description:

VA T VIA 3768.3


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$2,000,000


Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


$2,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - new project created from 0915-00-172


0915-00-xxx



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5302.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; fixed amount


0915-00-196






2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5316.1




ROW Purchase: $0







$5,092,400


Total Project Cost:

$4,000,000


Other


$4,000,000

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$3,500,000

$500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$2,800,000 $700,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,800,000 $700,000 $0 $500,000 $4,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 1/17 - revise description and reduce cost from $5M to $4M and move $1M to 0915-12-586; 3rd Qtr 16 - new project in FY 2017-2020 TIP


0915-12-574



Description:

CS C Converse 5319.0

Limits From: On Rocket/Schaeffer, from E. Norris

Limits To: Lp 1604


ROW Purchase: $0







$6,588,804


Total Project Cost:

$5,430,481


Converse


$5,430,481

7 - STP-MM

Other

$5,430,481

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0 $5,430,481

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-582

Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes


Description:

CS C CoSA 5434.0

Limits From: in San Antonio on Presa Street

Limits To: from W. Boyer to SE Military Drive - Lp 13


ROW Purchase: $0







$12,490,000


Total Project Cost:

$10,000,000


San Antonio


$10,000,000

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$9,000,000

$1,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2021; 10/17 - add project per CoSA, funding is from 0025-02-204; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-604

Bike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to create Complete Streets





2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

CS C Seguin 5322.0

Limits From: In Seguin, on Rudeloff Rd.

Limits To: From SH 46 to Huber Road


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,664,000


Total Project Cost:

$6,316,658


Seguin


$6,316,658

7 - STP-MM

Other

$6,316,658

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$5,053,326 $0 $1,263,332 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,053,326 $0 $1,263,332 $0 $6,316,658

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-46-045

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane, bicycle and pedestian facilities


Description:

FM 2252 C TxDOT 5329.0

Limits From: Evans Road

Limits To: Comal/Bexar County Line


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,314,000


Total Project Cost:

$6,000,000


San Antonio


$6,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$6,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$4,800,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$4,800,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - move from FY 2027 to FY 2021


1433-01-028

Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk


Description:

FM 2252 C TxDOT 5324.0

Limits From: at Evans Road

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$5,095,860


Total Project Cost:

$4,200,000


Other


$4,200,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,200,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,360,000 $840,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,360,000 $840,000 $0 $0 $4,200,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/17 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2021 and revise funding; 1/17 - revise funding distribution; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


1433-01-029

Construct intersection operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek bridge





2021FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

FM 2252 C TxDOT 9115.0

Limits From: Bexar/Comal County Line

Limits To: FM 3009


ROW Purchase: $0







$23,161,000


Total Project Cost:

$19,000,000


Other


$19,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$19,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$15,200,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$15,200,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $19,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - reverse limits and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2021; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP


1433-02-044

Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk





2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5537.0

Limits From: Blanco Road

Limits To: US 281


ROW Purchase: $0







$38,070,000


Total Project Cost:

$30,000,000


San Antonio


$30,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0

$16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$24,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $30,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct operational, ramp and intersection improvements


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.3




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


$4,500,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000



Description:

VA T VIA 3768.4


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$2,000,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


$2,000,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx






2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

SH 46 C TxDOT 9114.2

Limits From: US 281

Limits To: Bentwood Dr


ROW Purchase: $0







$17,066,000


Total Project Cost:

$14,000,000


Other


$14,000,000

4 - Connectivity

Other

$14,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP


0215-01-044

Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL


Description:

SH 46 C TxDOT 9114.1

Limits From: Farhills Dr

Limits To: US 281


ROW Purchase: $0







$31,694,000


Total Project Cost:

$26,000,000


Other


$26,000,000

4 - Connectivity

Other

$26,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP


0215-07-027

Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL


Description:

FM 725 C TxDOT 5308.0

Limits From: Comal/Guadalupe County Line

Limits To: Zipp Rd


ROW Purchase: $0







$12,860,980


Total Project Cost:

$10,600,000


New Braunfels


$10,600,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,600,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$8,480,000 $2,120,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,480,000 $2,120,000 $0 $0 $10,600,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0215-09-029

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bike lanes





2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5376.0

Limits From: at US 281/San Pedro

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$29,256,000


Total Project Cost:

$24,000,000


San Antonio


$24,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$24,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$19,200,000 $4,800,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$19,200,000 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $24,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - increase cost and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project


0521-04-285

Interchange improvements


Description:

FM 471 C TxDOT 5377.0

Limits From: Old FM 471



ROW Purchase: $0







$25,599,000


Total Project Cost:

$21,000,000


Other


$21,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

3 - LC

$10,500,000

$10,500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$8,400,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $10,500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,400,000 $2,100,000 $0 $10,500,000 $21,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution


0849-01-055

Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks


Description:

FM 471 C TxDOT 5378.0

Limits From: Medina County Line

Limits To: SH 211


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field $15,000

$457,000


Total Project Cost:

$375,000


Other


$375,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$375,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$300,000 $75,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$300,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $375,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution


0849-02-045






2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

NR C AAMPO 5303.1




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


$100,000

7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-197



Description:

CS C BxCo 5318.0

Limits From: In Bexar County, on Crestway

Limits To: From Kitty Hawk Rd to FM 1976


ROW Purchase: $0







$9,453,513

Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian

Total Project Cost:

$7,791,571


Other


$7,791,571

7 - STP-MM

Other

$7,791,571

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,233,257 $0 $1,558,314 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,233,257 $0 $1,558,314 $0 $7,791,571

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-584

Widen to provide operational improvements including bike lanes; construct 6 ft. sidewalk


Description:

FM 1516 C TxDOT 5379.0

Limits From: FM 78

Limits To: IH 10


ROW Purchase: $0







$28,646,000


Total Project Cost:

$23,500,000


Other


$23,500,000

2 - Metro Corridor

3 - LC

$11,750,000

$11,750,000

Other $0

Other $0

$9,400,000 $2,350,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $11,750,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,400,000 $2,350,000 $0 $11,750,000 $23,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project


1477-01-043






2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

SL 1604 C TxDOT 9110.1

Limits From: IH 35 S

Limits To: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536


ROW Purchase: $0







$17,066,000


Total Project Cost:

$14,000,000


Other


$14,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$14,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$11,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $14,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP


2020-02-031

Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided


Description:

FM 1560 C TxDOT 5311.0

Limits From: Galm/Schaenfield

Limits To: FM 471


ROW Purchase: $0







$14,680,930


Total Project Cost:

$12,100,000


Other


$12,100,000

7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$10,580,000

$1,520,000

Other $0

Other $0

$8,464,000 $2,116,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,520,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,464,000 $2,116,000 $0 $1,520,000 $12,100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



2230-01-020



Description:

SL 1604 C TxDOT 9110.2

Limits From: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536

Limits To: US 90 W


ROW Purchase: $0







$31,694,000


Total Project Cost:

$26,000,000


Other


$26,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$26,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$20,800,000 $5,200,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise project; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP


2452-01-066

Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided





2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT


Description:

SL 1604 C TxDOT 5332.0

Limits From: at FM 2696 - Blanco Road

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$52,417,000


Total Project Cost:

$43,000,000


San Antonio


$43,000,000

2 - Metro Corridor

Other

$43,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$34,400,000 $8,600,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$34,400,000 $8,600,000 $0 $0 $43,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 3/18 - increase cost from $30M; 10/17 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022; 4/17 - TIP: add project; MTP - move from FY 2027 to FY 2020; 4/16 - funded through 17-20 TIP Call for Projects (P1/P7); temporarily placed in FY 2027


2452-02-117

Intersection operational improvements





2022FY


Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


DRAFT




39

Funded Transit Projects



40



Transit Project Listing2019Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program

San Antonio TxDOT District YOE=Year of Expenditure

FY

DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018

Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit

Section 5309 ID #: N/A

Project Phase: C

TDC Awarded: $0TDC Requested: $0

MPO Project Number: 10207

Transit: Service Vehicles

See Appendix for Project Detail

Federal Funding Category: FTA - NoneFederal (FTA) Funds: $0State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $216,000

Total Project Cost: $216,000Project Description: Fiscal Year Cost: $216,000

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE)

Date TDC Awarded: N/A

Apportionment Year: 2019



Project Phase: C



Transit: Operational Facilities


Federal Funding Category: FTA - NoneFederal (FTA) Funds: $0State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $6,035,000

Total Project Cost: $6,035,000Project Description: Fiscal Year Cost: $6,035,000






Project Phase: C



Transit: Rapid Transit Project









Project Phase: C



Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment







41Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number.




FY




Project Phase: C



Transit: Replacement Components forRevenue VehiclesSee Appendix for Project Detail








Project Phase: C



Transit: Computer Hardware/Software









Project Phase: C



Transit: Joint Development









Project Phase: O



Transit: Operating Expenses

Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive Maintenance

Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307Federal (FTA) Funds: $31,900,000State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $7,975,000









FY




Project Phase: O



Transit: JARC Expenses

VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services








Project Phase: O



Transit: AACOG Operating Projects

Transportation Services for New Braunfels, Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc

Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307Federal (FTA) Funds: $475,000State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $475,000







Project Phase: C



Transit: Passenger Facilities


Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307Federal (FTA) Funds: $4,400,000State Funds from TxDOT: $16,993,273Other Funds: $4,155,410







Project Phase: O



Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Personswith DisabilitiesOther Programs Pass through to Subrecipients

Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,600,000State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $400,000









FY




Project Phase: A



Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Personswith DisabilitiesProgram Administration

Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310Federal (FTA) Funds: $160,000State Funds from TxDOT: $0Other Funds: $0







Project Phase: C



Transit: Paratransit Facility

Paratransit Facility










FY




Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C



Transit: Administrative Facilities











FY




Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C



Transit: Replacement Components forRevwnue VehiclesSee Appendix for Project Detail








Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C














FY




Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O













FY




Project Phase: A











Project Phase: C



Transit: Paratransit Facility

Paratransit Facility

Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339Federal (FTA) Funds: $6,326,000State Funds from TxDOT: $796,673Other Funds: $0







Project Phase: C














FY




Project Phase: C



Transit: Revenue Vehicles









Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C





Federal Funding Category: FTA - NoneFederal (FTA) Funds: $0State Funds from TxDOT: $460,268Other Funds: $966,640







Project Phase: C














FY




Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C











Project Phase: C














FY




Project Phase: C












Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O














FY




Project Phase: O











Project Phase: A











Project Phase: C



Transit: Capital Projects

Paratransit / Operational Facilities










FY




Project Phase: C





Federal Funding Category: FTA - NoneFederal (FTA) Funds: $0State Funds from TxDOT: $394,515Other Funds: $1,224,220







Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C













FY




Project Phase: C












Project Phase: C












Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O














FY




Project Phase: O












Project Phase: O











Project Phase: A











Project Phase: C



Transit: Revenue Vehicles











FY




Project Phase: C













57

Financial Plan



56



Highway Financial Summary - Year of Expenditure Cost

Funding by Category Revised April 23, 2018

Category Description Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized

1 1Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

2M or 2UUrban Area (Non- TMA) Corridor Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

4Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5 CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5 Flex Map21 Flex $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

6 1 Structures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

7 (UTP) Metro Mobility & Rehab $0 $43,420,000 $0 $45,290,000 $0 $45,870,000 $0 $46,490,000 $0 #VALUE!

7 Unspent Prev Yrs STP-MM $0 pending $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE!

7 Total STP-MM Available $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE!

8 1 Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

9 Enhancements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

9 Flex TAP $0 $3,180,000 $0 $3,180,000 $0 $3,180,000 $0 $3,180,000 $0 #VALUE!

9 Flex Unspent Prev Yr TAP $0 pending $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE!

9 Flex Total TAP Available $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE!

10 Supplemental Transportation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

11 1 District Discretionary $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

12 Strategic Priority $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

12C Strategic Priority RECON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

12S Strategic Priority RECON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

SBPE Strategy Budget PE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

SB 102 Strategy 102 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE! $0 #VALUE!

FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2452-02-083 $398,300,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: $398,300,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

CAT 3 - Regional Toll Revenue (SH 130 Concn) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

CAT 3 - Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

CAT 3 - Texas Mobility Fund

Notes: 1 at TxDOT's direction, grouped project CSJs, primarily funded under these categories,

are not to be included in the financial summary.

2 Category 2 funding is shown per FHWA's direction

The MPO's allocation of Category 2 funding is allocated for years 2019 through 2024 for the following projects in the amounts shown below:

Loop 1604 from SH 16 to US 281

Funding Participation Source

Total FY 2019- 2022

Total

CAT 3 - Prop 12 (US 281)

CAT 3 - Prop 14

CAT 3 - Pass Thru Toll Revenue (SH 211)

Cat 3- Prop 14 SB

Other - Strategy PE Budget

Other - Strategy 102 Budget

Source

Local Match

Federal

State

CAT 3 - Local Contributions (incl SIB/TIFIA)

This table uses the FY 2018 UTP for Category 7 STP-MM and Category 9 TA funding levels.

The Category 2 funding amount is shown for the 'let' year only and does not reflect payout over time. The table on the following page shows the tiered funding levels for years 2017 through 2024.

Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization - District 15FY 2019 - 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022

59


All Figures in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars

FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021

Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total

1 Sec. 5307 - Urbanized Formula >200K $37,875,000 $30,698,683 $68,573,683 $35,148,750 $10,027,500 $45,176,250 $36,217,126 $9,839,814 $46,056,9402 Sec. 5307 - Urbanized Formula <200K $0 $0 $0

3 Sec. 5309 - Discretionary $0 $0 $0

4 Sec. 5310 - Elderly &Individuals w/Disabilities $1,760,000 $400,000 $2,160,000 $1,848,000 $420,000 $2,268,000 $1,940,400 $441,000 $2,381,4005 Sec. 5311 - Nonurbanized Formula $0 $0 $0

6 Sec. 5316 - JARC >200K $0 $0 $0

7 Sec. 5316 - JARC <200K $0 $0 $08 Sec. 5316 - JARC Nonurbanized $0 $0 $0

9 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom >200K $0 $0 $0

10 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom <200K $0 $0 $011 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom Nonurbanized $0 $0 $0

12 Other FTA $8,120,000 $6,475,000 $14,595,000 $8,400,000 $5,560,626 $13,960,626 $3,693,375 $923,344 $4,616,71913 Regionally Significant or Other $29,171,565 $29,171,565 $31,325,110 $31,325,110 $14,653,582 $14,653,582

Total Funds $47,755,000 $66,745,248 $114,500,248 $45,396,750 $47,333,236 $92,729,986 $41,850,901 $25,857,740 $67,708,641

Requested $0 $0 $0 Awarded $0 $0 $0

FY 2022 Total

Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total

1 Sec. 5307 - Urbanized Formula >200K $38,027,982 $10,331,803 $48,359,785 $147,268,858 $60,897,800 $208,166,658 2 Sec. 5307 - Urbanized Formula <200K $0 $0 $10,027,500 $0

3 Sec. 5309 - Discretionary $0 $0 $0 $0 4 Sec. 5310 - Elderly &Individuals w/Disabilities $2,037,420 $463,050 $2,500,470 $7,585,820 $1,724,050 $9,309,8705 Sec. 5311 - Nonurbanized Formula $0 $0 $0 $0

6 Sec. 5316 - JARC >200K $0 $0 $0 $07 Sec. 5316 - JARC <200K $0 $0 $0 $08 Sec. 5316 - JARC Nonurbanized $0 $0 $0 $0

9 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom >200K $0 $0 $0 $010 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom <200K $0 $0 $0 $011 Sec. 5317 - New Freedom Nonurbanized $0 $0 $0 $0

12 Other FTA $3,878,044 $6,590,305 $10,468,349 $24,091,419 $19,549,275 $43,640,69413 Regionally Significant or Other $48,083,735 $48,083,735 $0 $123,233,992 $123,233,992

Total Funds $43,943,446 $65,468,893 $109,412,339 $178,946,097 $205,405,117 $384,351,214

Requested $280,000 $280,000 Awarded $0 $0


Transportation Development Credits

Transportation Development Credits

Transit Program

All Figures in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars

Transit Financial Summary

FY 2019 - 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Transit Program

Current as of 4/23/2018

61



63

APPENDIX A

Certifications



64




65

Self - Certification



66



MPO Self - Certification In accordance with 23 CFR Part 450.334 and 450.220 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), the Texas Department of Transportation, and the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Antonio urbanized area, hereby certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan planning area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: (1) 23 U. S. C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart; (2) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), and 49 CFR part 21; (3) 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex,

or age in employment or business opportunity; (4) Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-357) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the

involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in DOT funded projects; (5) 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on

Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; (6) The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49

CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; (7) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis

of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (8) Section 324 of title 23, U.S.C., regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and (9) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding

discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Witness these signatures this 23rd day of April 2018. Texas Department of Transportation Alamo Area San Antonio District MPO Transportation Policy Board _____________________________ __________________________________ Mario Jorge, P. E. Kevin Wolff District Engineer Chair __________________________ _______________________________ Witness Witness



68



11

Certification of Planning Process Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, §450.334 mandates that the State and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) certify that the planning process is consistent with the requirements of 23 USC §134; and 49 USC §5303, and 23 CFR 450 subpart C – Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming. The requirements of this certification and the actions(s) taken by the Alamo Area MPO to comply with those requirements are discussed in the following sections. Federal Regulations 23 CFR 450, 23 USC 134, and 49 USC 5303 Federal regulations require the urban transportation planning process to include activities to support the development and implementation of a long range transportation plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and a short range transportation plan, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and subsequent project development activities. While all of the activities programmed in the MPO’s Budget Document, the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), contribute to those requirements, the following lists some of the more recent efforts:

Program Support Public Involvement Activities including social media, meeting hosting and

facilitation, and development of outreach materiald Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach Geographic Information Systems Activities including transportation-related data

collection and continued refinement of the MPO’s online mapping application, iMap

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities including the Bike Share Master Plan Study, Walk & Roll events and Walkable Community Program and Safe Routes to Schools workshops and activities

Traffic Safety Planning and Crash Data Analysis Air Quality Planning Congestion Management System/Process to include the Regional Thoroughfare

Plan Study Support for the Transportation Improvement Program including public outreach

and document development Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan including development of

demographics, travel demand modeling, public outreach and document development

23 CFR 450.306: Scope of the metropolitan planning process The MPO’s metropolitan transportation planning process is continuous, cooperative and comprehensive and provides for the consideration and implementation of projects, strategies and services that address the adopted ten planning factors listed below:

Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;


22

Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

Increase accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the

quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;

Promote efficient system management and operation; Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system; and reduce or

mitigate the stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and Enhance travel and tourism.

23 CFR 450.308: Funding for transportation planning and unified planning work programs The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is developed cooperatively with the State, the MPO, recipients of FTA Section 5307 funds (VIA Metropolitan Transit) and participating local governments. Currently, the UPWP is developed and maintained on a two-year cycle. 23 CFR 450.310: Metropolitan planning organization and redesignation The MPO, a Transportation Management Area, continues to be designated by the Governor with the concurrence of the State and local elected officials. The Transportation Policy Board (i.e., the MPO) consists of elected officials and staff of general purpose governments. The MPO was redesignated in April 2014 as a result of a boundary expansion and the assumption of transportation planning and programming activities in a portion of the San Marcos urbanized area located within Guadalupe County. 23 CFR 450.312: Metropolitan planning area boundaries The MPO boundary is in effect through an agreement between the MPO and the Governor. 23 CFR 450.314: Metropolitan planning agreements Responsibilities for transportation planning are cooperatively determined by the State, the MPO, VIA Metropolitan Transit and participating local governments. 23 CFR 450.316: Interested parties, participation and consultation

The MPO utilizes a proactive public involvement process that provides complete information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and supports early and continuing involvement of the public in developing plans and TIPs. The MPO’s public involvement process meets the necessary requirements and criteria. The MPO Public Participation Plan was updated in December 2017 to align with new federal requirements.


33

23 CFR 450.320: Congestion management process in transportation management areas The MPO’s transportation planning process incorporates a functioning congestion management process. 23 CFR 450.322: Development and content of the metropolitan transportation plan The year 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) was approved on December 8, 2014. The recommendations within the MTP were formulated in accordance with the planning requirements of 23 U.S.C Section 135 and 49 U.S.C. Section 5323. The 2040 MTP covers all of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe counties and a portion of Kendall County. The MPO is on the process of developing the 2045 MTP. 23 CFR 450.324: Development and content of the transportation improvement program At least every two years, or as required by the State of Texas, the MPO has prepared and adopted a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which:

covers a period of not less than four years;

includes realistic estimates of costs and revenues consistent with estimated funding available;

is submitted to the Governor for approval, and to the Federal Transit

Administration and the Federal Highway Administrator through the State;

provides required information for all projects, including total project

cost and year of expenditure project construction cost. Section 134 of Title 23, U.S.C. and Section 5303 OF Title 49, U.S.C. These requirements are "...development of transportation systems embracing various modes of transportation in a manner which will efficiently maximize mobility of people and goods within and through urbanized areas and minimize transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. To accomplish this objective, metropolitan planning organizations, in cooperation with the State, shall develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State. Such plans and programs shall provide for the development of transportation facilities (including pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) which will function as an intermodal transportation system for the state, the metropolitan areas, and the nation. The process for developing such plans and programs shall provide for consideration of all modes of transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of the transportation problems". Long range land use plans and overall development objectives are a functional

responsibility of local governments. As long range needs are evaluated, consideration is given to their relationship and impact on overall development objectives of local governments. (Geographic Information Systems Activities;


44

Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Public Involvement Activities; Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

Social, economic, and environmental affects of transportation improvements are

considered in environmental studies for individual projects. These factors were considered in the overall comparison of alternatives and the selection of projects in the MTP. (Air Quality Planning; Geographic Information Systems Activities; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

System performance is considered both in the evaluation of alternatives in the

development of the long range plan and in technical studies analyzing existing needs for highway, street, and/or transit improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; Congestion Management System/Process; Traffic Safety Planning Studies; and Transportation Data Collection and Management System, [iMap])

Alternative transportation systems management strategies are considered as an

integral part of short range planning efforts to address existing problems in both highway/street and transit. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; VIA Origin and Destination Survey; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; and Traffic Safety Planning Studies)

Alternative investment strategies are considered in the economic/financial

analysis of transportation improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and Transportation Improvement Program Development)

Plans are developed for modes utilizing travel forecasts based on the same

demographic projections and the impact of modal recommendations on different modes is analyzed prior to a final recommendation being formulated. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning)

Transportation planning and the development of transportation plans and

programs have been done on a continuous basis since the mid-1960s. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Tansportation Improvement Program Development; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach)

The process maintains a cooperative relationship between the agencies in

planning through agency interaction and review at the technical committee levels and direct staff contacts. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and study oversight committees)

The planning process is comprehensive through the use of local-government

developed demographic forecasts and the consideration of their overall development objectives. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning)


55

42 U.S. Code 7504, 7506(c) and (d); The Clean Air Act, Section 174 and 176(c) and (d) The counties of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe were designated as “Nonattainment/deferred” with an effective nonattainment date of September 30, 2005. This meant that these three counties were within an Early Action Compact area that does not meet the 8-hour ozone standard, yet which the Environmental Protection Agency as determined to have complied with the March 2004 Early Action Compact milestone for submitting State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to the State. The San Antonio region met all milestones associated with the Early Action Compact and, based on monitor readings for three years, was designated “attainment for ozone” effective April 15, 2008. As of April 2018, Bexar County is not meeting the 70 ppb threshold to be in compliance with the October 2015 ozone standards. Non-attainment designation for ozone has not yet occurred. Priority for project implementation is normally determined by funding restrictions and decisions by local officials. Should this area fail to meet national ambient air quality standards, the air quality impact of proposed projects in the TIP would be a determining factor by local elected officials in developing priorities for implementation. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI requires that programs supported by Federal assistance do not discriminate and Federal grant recipients must prepare and follow a program which effects such assurances. A Title VI program has been developed and is updated as required. Title VI Assurances Filed By State These assurances apply to highway project funding in the same manner as the above section applies to transit projects. The Alamo Area MPO complies with the requirements of Title VI through the Title VI Program and the requirement that all subrecipients contractually comply with the requirement of Title VI. Assurances are filed by the State. Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-357) This section deals with the requirement that, except to the extent the Secretary of Transportation determines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated under other Titles of MAP-21 shall be expended with small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. To comply with this requirement, the MPO includes in all agreements with the agencies that receive funds from the MPO a clause requiring that Minority Business Enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds. The MPO has established an overall disadvantaged business enterprise participation goal of 25% in all of its third party contracting opportunities. The MPO regularly exceeds this 25% goal. In addition, VIA (a recipient of funds from the MPO) has an adopted Minority Owned/Women Owned Business participation goal for all Federal funds received by them which they normally achieve and/or exceed.


66

49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38 (Americans with Disabilities Act) Part 27 requires compliance with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) including the regulations of the Department of Justice implementing Titles II and III of the ADA (28 CFR Parts 35 and 36) and the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission implementing Title I of the ADA (29 CFR Part 1630). The Metropolitan Planning Organization meetings are held in accessible facilities and meeting notices contain the following:

Meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. To arrange for special assistance or an interpreter, please call (210)-227-8651 OR TDD 1-800-735-2989 (Relay Texas) at least five working days in advance.

Parts 37 and 38 require compliance with the accessible transportation and related provisions of Title II and III of the ADA. VIA Metropolitan Transit indicated full compliance with the ADA Paratransit Service Criteria in January 1995 (ADA Paratransit Plan - Third Annual Update). All of VIA's newly procured transit vehicles are accessible. 23 USC Section 324, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794 and 49 CFR part 27), 42 USC 6101, and 49 USC 5332

The Metropolitan Planning Organization is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, gender, or disability. Conclusions and Recommendations The transportation planning process for the Alamo Area metropolitan area is consistent with all applicable Federal requirements. It is therefore recommended the Transportation Policy Board approve the attached MPO Self-Certification for submittal to the State of Texas, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration.



75

Project Selection Procedure



76




Project Selection Procedures - FY 2019 In accordance with Section 134(h)(2) of Title 23 U.S.C. as amended and Section 8(h)(2) of 49 U.S.C. 1601 as amended, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Policy Board hereby approves the following Project Selection Procedures: 1) The approved Transportation Improvement Program shall be utilized for

programming projects within the metropolitan planning area. 2) Any project listed in the first year of the approved Transportation Improvement

Program shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and funds are appropriated.

3) Should any projects not be implementable from the first priority, then projects

should be selected from the second, third or fourth years which shall be considered the second priority, and those projects may be implemented as plans are completed and funds are appropriated.

4) Any projects listed in the second, third or fourth year of the Transportation

Improvement Program may be accelerated to the first year of the Transportation Improvement Program as soon as plans are complete, including right-of-way and utility adjustments, and funding is available.

5) Projects with “statewide” or “grouped” CSJs will be implemented as outlined in

the MPO’s Policy 6: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Transportation Improvement Program.

This procedure was developed cooperatively between the Texas Department of Transportation, VIA Metropolitan Transit and the MPO, signed this the 23rd day of _April_2018 . ____________________________ _______________________________ Kevin Wolff Mario Jorge, P.E. Chair San Antonio District Engineer MPO Transportation Policy Board Texas Department of Transportation _____________________________ Jeffrey Arndt President/CEO VIA Metropolitan Transit



78




79

Appendix B

Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle,

Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects



80



MPO Project Number

Project NameLimits From:

Project Description

FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFTAlphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects

To: Construction Cost

Fiscal YearTxDOT Project Number Responsible Agency

ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018

5101.0

Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program

Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $100,000

FYAlamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2017

0915-12-547 AAMPO

2019

7/2018

5102.0




0915-12-543 AAMPO

2019

7/2018

5103.0




0915-12-546 AAMPO

2019

7/2018

5301.0




0915-00-195 AAMPO

2020

7/2018

5302.0




0915-00-196 AAMPO

2021

7/2018

5303.1




0915-00-197 AAMPO

2022

7/2018

4977.0

Alazan Creek Hike and Bike Trail

Lombrano Street Laredo Street $6,000,000

FYExtend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System

0915-12-595 SARA

2019

7/2018

5317.0

Blanco Road West Oak Estates Borgfeld Rd $14,661,235

FYExpand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs and drainage0915-12-585 ARMA

2019

7/2018

5313.0

Broadway Burr Road IH 35 $14,000,000

FYRoadway rehabilitation and complete streets improvements

0016-08-034 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

3988.0

Bulverde Road Marshall Road Wilderness Oak $8,097,480

FYReconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and drainage improvements0915-12-509 ARMA

2019

7/2018

4972.0

Converse Greenway Park Converse Park North FM 78 $1,382,725

FYConstruct multi use path

0915-12-594 Converse

2019

7/2018

5318.0

Crestway Road Kitty Hawk Rd FM 1976 $7,791,571

FYWiden to provide operational improvements including bike lanes; construct 6 ft. sidewalk

0915-12-584 BxCo

2022

7/2018

5325.0

E. Aviation Blvd. Houston Drive Aztec Way $8,632,561

FYWiden to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage

0915-12-578 UC

2019

7/2018

4970.0

FM 1103 IH 35 Guadalupe County Line $1,500,000

FYExpand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes

1268-01-013 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

1


MPO Project Number


Project Description





4971.0

FM 1103 Comal C/L Rodeo Way $22,500,000

FYExpand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes

1268-02-027 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

5379.0

FM 1516 FM 78 IH 10 $23,500,000

FYExpand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks

1477-01-043 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5311.0

FM 1560 Galm/Schaenfield FM 471 $12,100,000

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks2230-01-020 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

3997.0

FM 1560 SH 16 Loop 1604 $12,325,004

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, bike lanes and sidewalks

2230-01-013 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5324.0

FM 2252 at Evans Road . $4,200,000

FYConstruct intersection operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek bridge1433-01-029 TxDOT

2021

5/2017

5329.0

FM 2252 Evans Road Comal/Bexar County Line $6,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk1433-01-028 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

9115.0

FM 2252 Bexar/Comal County Line FM 3009 $19,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk1433-02-044 TxDOT

2021

2/2018

5377.0

FM 471 Old FM 471 Medina County Line $21,000,000


0849-01-055 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5378.0

FM 471 Medina County Line SH 211 $375,000


0849-02-045 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5308.0

FM 725 Comal/Guadalupe County Line Zipp Rd $10,600,000

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bike lanes

0215-09-029 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5105.0

Galm Road Ph III Culebra Road Government Canyon State Park $7,323,351

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities0915-12-544 BxCo

2019

7/2018

5110.0

Harry Wurzbach at Austin Highway . $17,177,000

FYConstruct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway

0915-12-550 CoSA

2019

7/2018

3992.0

Huebner Creek Hike/Bike Trail SH 16 (Bandera Road) bridge Crystal Hills Park $933,000

FYConstruction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek

0915-12-514 LV

2019

7/2018

5396.0

IH 10 Loop 1604 Guadalupe/Bexar County Line $171,000,000

FYExpand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway

0025-02-215 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

2


MPO Project Number


Project Description





5375.0

IH 35 Guadalupe River Hays/Comal County Line $75,000,000

FYOperational improvements including ramp revisions and intersection improvements - convert frontage road to one way0016-04-112 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

5339.0

IH 35 Hays County Line 0.5 Mi S. of Hays County Line $1,200,000

FYRevise ramps and convert frontage roads from two way to one way operation

0016-04-113 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

4969.0

IH 37 LP 13 IH 410 $2,900,000

FYConstruction of a partial frontage road, ramps, and intersection improvements

0073-08-183 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5542.0

IH 410 Old Pearsall Road Valley Hi Drive $8,100,000

FYConstruct operational improvements, ramp reversals, intersection improvements

0000-00-000 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

5537.0

IH 410 Blanco Road US 281 $30,000,000

FYConstruct operational, ramp and intersection improvements

0000-00-000 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5428.0

Judson Road Independence IH 35 $1,000,000

FYConstruct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road

0915-12-603 CoSA

2019

7/2018

9110.1

Loop 1604 IH 35 S 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 $14,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided

2020-02-031 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

9110.2

Loop 1604 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 US 90 W $26,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided

2452-01-066 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

3786.0

Loop 1604 US 281 Redland Road $47,808,839

FYExpand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes

2452-03-113 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

3913.0

Loop 1604 SH 16 US 281 $507,705,768

FYExpand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes; including managed lane direct connectors at IH 102452-02-083 ARMA

2020

7/2018

5332.0

Loop 1604 at FM 2696 - Blanco Road . $43,000,000

FYIntersection operational improvements

2452-02-117 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5371.0

Loop 410 at IH 10 E . $100,000,000

FYConstruct direct connectors: Phase 1 - Priority Connectors

0521-06-138 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

5374.0

Loop 410 SH 151 US 90 $10,000,000

FYExpand from 6 lane to 8 lane expressway

0521-04-279 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5372.0

Loop 410 Ingram Rd SH 151 $50,000,000

FYExpand from 8 to 10 lane expressway

0521-04-204 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

3


MPO Project Number


Project Description





5376.0

Loop 410 at US 281/San Pedro . $24,000,000

FYInterchange improvements

0521-04-285 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5373.0

Loop 410 at SH 151 Interchange $40,000,000

FYReconstruct interchange - Phase 2

0521-04-275 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5545.1

Mobility Corridor Planning Citywide . $1,000,000

FYPartnership with VIA for a planning study on one multimodal arterial roadway

0000-00-000 CoSA

2019

7/2018

5545.2

Mobility Corridor Planning Citywide . $3,000,000

FYPartnership with VIA for planning studies on three multimodal arterial roadways

0000-00-000 CoSA

2021

7/2018

4973.0

New Braunfels Pedestrian Connectivity

On San Antonio Street, Walnut Avenue, and McQueeney Road and Seele Elementary $1,516,711

FYConstruct sidewalks, ramps & other pedestrian related infrastructure

0915-17-066 New Braunfels

2019

7/2018

5323.0

NW Military Highway Lp 1604 Huebner $6,500,000

FYConstruct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

0658-01-045 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

5310.0

NW Military Highway 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604 Lp 1604 $7,500,000

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks0658-01-044 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

5536.1

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements

Various . $1,000,000

FYConstruct ADA Compliant sidewalks on San Pedro Avenue

0000-00-000 CoSA

2019

7/2018

5536.2

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements

Various . $2,000,000

FYConstruct bicycle and ped bridge on Roosevelt Ave

0000-00-000 CoSA

2021

7/2018

5434.0

Presa Street West Boyer Street SE Military Drive (Loop 13) $10,000,000

FYBike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to create Complete Streets

0915-12-604 CoSA

2021

7/2018

4005.0

Quintana Road Harmon Avenue McKenna Avenue $7,800,000

FYRehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements

0915-12-520 Port SA

2019

7/2018

5319.0

Rocket Lane E. Norris Drive Loop 1604 $5,430,481

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes0915-12-582 Converse

2021

7/2018

5322.0

Rudeloff Road SH 46 Huber Road $6,316,658

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane, bicycle and pedestian facilities

0915-46-045 Seguin

2021

7/2018

5544.1

San Antonio Region Safety Service Patrol

Various . $4,500,000

FYImplement the Safety Service Patrol on controlled access highways in Bexar, Comal and Kendall Counties for 3 years0000-00-000 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

4


MPO Project Number


Project Description





5544.2


Various . $4,500,000


2021

7/2018

5544.3


Various . $4,500,000


2022

7/2018

4975.0

Schertz Pedestrian and Bike Improvements

Woodland Oaks Drive, Savannah Drive, a Live Oak Road and off road trail $1,158,266

FYConstruct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail

0915-17-065 Schertz

2019

7/2018

3155.0

SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957 $4,100,000

FYConstruct two lane rural highway on new location

3544-06-001 BxCo

2019

7/2018

3152.0

SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Bexar CL, 2.0 MI S of FM 471, N FM 471 (Culebra Rd) $4,400,000


3544-03-002 BxCo

2019

7/2018

3154.0

SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 $2,600,000


3544-05-001 BxCo

2019

7/2018

3153.0

SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 Mi Medina County Line $7,000,000


3544-04-002 BxCo

2019

7/2018

9114.2

SH 46 US 281 Bentwood Dr $14,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL

0215-01-044 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

9114.1

SH 46 Farhills Dr US 281 $26,000,000

FYExpand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL

0215-07-027 TxDOT

2022

7/2018

5543.0

SL 337 at River Road . $10,400,000

FYConstruct grade separation

0000-00-000 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

5539.0

Smart Signal Upgrade Various . $2,017,950

FYInstall advanced controllers, networking equipment and control software for 179 traffic signals0000-00-000 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5304.0

Talley Road Wiseman Blvd. Tamaron Pass $20,917,924

FYWiden to provide operational improvements including a continuous left turn lane; construct 10 ft. shared use path0915-12-581 BxCo

2020

7/2018

5305.0

VA In City of San Antonio . $2,000,000

FYConstruct citywide pedestrian and bicycle improvements

0915-12-579 CoSA

2019

7/2018

5316.1

VA Various locations on the state roadway s . $4,000,000

FYConstruct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure

0915-12-574 TxDOT

2021

7/2018

5


MPO Project Number


Project Description





5316.3

VA Various locations on the state roadway s . $8,000,000

FYConstruct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure

0915-12-576 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

5306.0


FYIntelligent Transportation System - Enhancements

0915-12-580 CoSA

2019

7/2018

5425.0


FYIntelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements - Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers

0915-12-601 CoSA

2019

7/2018

5426.0

VA In San Antonio at TransGuide Center $4,000,000

FYUpgrade TransGuide Facility

0915-12-602 TxDOT

2019

7/2018

3768.1

VA VIA Multimodal Corridor Study . $2,000,000

FYVIA Multimodal Corridor Study

0915-00-172 VIA

2020

7/2018

3768.3



0915-00-xxx VIA

2021

7/2018

3768.4



0915-00-xxx VIA

2022

7/2018

4976.0

Walnut Springs Trail Extension Project

Vaughan Bridge Max Starcke Park East $2,801,246

FYExtend Walnut Springs multi use trail, including retaining walls, hand and guard rails and below grade crossing0915-46-046 Seguin

2019

7/2018

5106.0

Watson Road FM 2790 (Somerset Road) 0.62 Miles East to Watson Road $4,886,116

FYExpand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities0915-12-562 BxCo

2019

7/2018

5315.3

Wurzbach Parkway Lockhill Selma Road FM 1535 $9,000,000

FYIntersection and operational improvements

7774-01-001 TxDOT

2020

7/2018

4974.0

Zarzamora Street Fredericksburg Road Loop 13 $5,000,000

FYConstruct sidewalks, remove unused utility poles, and implement pedestian detection ITS

0915-12-596 CoSA

2020

7/2018

6



87

APPENDIX C

“Grouped” or “Statewide” CSJ Project Listing

In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, the Texas Department of Transportation developed statewide programs identified by statewide CSJs to maximize the provisions for grouping projects that are not determined to be regionally significant in one line item, as allowed for in Title 23 USC Section 135 Statewide Planning. A table of the eligible funding categories and corresponding CSJs can be found in this section. The use of statewide CSJs for these categories provides a more efficient method of programming and letting projects and decreases the necessity for TIP/STIP revisions. By adopted policy, the Alamo Area MPO will not have any Category 2 Metro Corridor of Category 7 Surface Transportation Program – Metropolitan Mobility projects listed in this section of the TIP. A listing of the grouped CSJ projects eligible to be let during the FY 2019-2022 timeframe can be found in this section. Grouped CSJ projects are financially constrained at the state level.



88



Table 1 GROUPED PROJECT CSJsDefinition of Grouped Projects for use in the STIP

Revised August 4, 2015

PROPOSED CSJ

GROUPED PROJECT CATEGORY

5000-00-950 PE-Preliminary Engineering

5000-00-951 Right of Way Acquistion

5000-00-952

5000-00-957

5000-00-958

5000-00-953Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation

5000-00-954 Railroad Grade Separations

5800-00-950 Safety

DEFINITION

Preliminary Engineering for any project except added capacity projects in a nonattainment area. Includes activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as planning and research activities; grants for training; engineering to define the elements of a proposed action or alternatives so that social, economic, and environmental effects can be assessed.

Right of Way acquisition for any project except added capacity projects in a nonattainment area. Includes relocation assistance, hardship acquisition and protective buying.

Projects to include pavement repair to preserve existing pavement so that it may achieve its designed loading. Includes seal coats, overlays, resurfacing, restorationand rehabilitation done with existing ROW. Also includes modernization of ahighway by reconstruction, adding shoulders or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing, non-added capacity) or drainage improvements associated with rehabilitation.

Projects to replace and/or rehabilitate functionally obsolete or structurally deficientbridges.

Projects to include the construction or replacement/rehabilitation of guard rails,median barriers, crash cushions, pavement markings, skid treatments, medians,lighting improvements, highway signs, curb ramps, railroad/highway crossing warning devices, fencing, intersection improvements (e.g., turn lanes), signalization projects andinterchange modifications. Also includes projects funded via the Federal Hazard Elimination Program, Federal Railroad Signal Safety Program, or Access Managements projects, except those that result in added capacity.

Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation

Projects to construct or replace existing highway-railroad grade crossings and torehabilitate and/or replace deficient railroad underpasses, resulting in no addedcapacity

1 of 2


Table 1 GROUPED PROJECT CSJsDefinition of Grouped Projects for use in the STIP

Revised August 4, 2015

PROPOSED CSJ

GROUPED PROJECT CATEGORY

DEFINITION

5000-00-956 Landscaping

5800-00-915Intelligent Transportation System Deployment

5000-00-916 Bicycle and Pedestrian

5000-00-917Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations

5000-00-918 Transit Improvements and Programs

Note 2: Projects funded as part of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) consistent with the revised grouped project category definitions may be grouped. RTP projects that are not consistent with the revised grouped project category definitions must be individually noted in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

Projects include the construction and improvement of small passenger shelters andinformation kiosks. Also includes the construction and improvement of railstorage/maintenance facilities bus transfer facilities where minor amounts ofadditional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users. Also includes transit operating assistance, acquisition of third-party transit services, and transit marketing, and mobility management/coordination.

Note 1: Projects funded with Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Transportation Enhancement, and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding require a Federal eligibility determination, and are not approved to be grouped.

Project consisting of typical right-of-way landscape development, establishmentand aesthetic improvements to include any associated erosion control andenvironmental mitigation activities.Highway traffic operation improvement projects including the installation of rampmetering control devices, variable message signs, traffic monitoring equipmentand projects in the Federal ITS/IVHS programs.

Construction or rehabilitation of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths and facilities.

Construction and improvement of rest areas, and truck weigh stations.

2 of 2


MPO Project Number

Project NameProject Limits From: and To:

Project Description

FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement ProgramTxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number

Construction Cost

Fiscal YearTxDOT Project Number County

5163

$649,474

FYIntersection Operational Improvements0016-08-036 2019

Bexar

SL 368 at N. New Braunfels intersection -

5192

$218,364

FYImprove traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection0016-08-037 2019

Bexar

SL 368 at Casa Blanca -

5193

$193,261


Bexar

SL 368 at Eleanor -

5474

$609,960

FYReplace bridge and approaches0016-08-039 2022

Bexar

SL 368 at Salado Creek and Ira Lee Road .

5477

$5,700,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings0017-01-900 2021

Bexar

SL 353 IH 35 SL 13

5194

$141,920

FYWrong way driver advanced technologies0017-10-277 2019

Bexar

IH 35 SL 353 (Nogalitos) McCullough Avanue

5478

$205,200

FYWrong way driver advanced technologies0017-10-283 2020

Bexar

IH 35 1.161 Miles SW of IH 410 0.153 Mi South of IH 410

5479

$10,664,576

FYReplace NB and SB Bridges and Approaches0017-10-284 2020

Bexar

IH 35 0.2 Miles South of AT&T Center Parkway at UPRR

5480

$1,376,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings on EB frontage road0024-08-134 2021

Bexar

US 90 0.10 Miles West of Hunt Lane West Military - LP 13

5481

$2,752,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings on EB frontage road0024-08-135 2021

Bexar

US 90 0.2 Miles East of IH 410 0.4 Miles East of South Acme Road

5482

$8,200,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings on mainlanes0024-08-900 2021

Bexar

US 90 IH 410 SL 353

5196

$2,090,928


Bexar

SS 371 Billy Mitchell Road US 90

5483

$7,596,000

FYBase repair, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings on FR0025-02-214 2020

Bexar

IH 10 South Hackberry Street Loop 13 - WW White

5484

$1,800,000

FYClean and paint steel truss, bridge repair, mill, overlay and pavement markings0025-02-217 2019

Bexar

IH 10 .IH 10 Northbound FR at Cibolo Creek ..

1Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document.


MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5197

$222,184


Bexar

FM 78 at Foster/Rittiman -

5489

$5,160,000


Bexar

SL 345 IH 10 Callaghan Road

5199

$222,854


Bexar

SL 345 at Cinnamon Creek Drive -

5490

$6,500,000


Bexar

SL 345 IH 10 IH 410

5180

$6,159,325

FYMill, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings0072-12-191 2019

Bexar

IH 10 0.1 Mile East of Hildebrand IH 35

5491

$3,500,000


Bexar

IH 10 0.1 Mile East of Hildebrand IH 35

5493

$1,000,000

FYIntersection operational improvements0073-02-071 2019

Bexar

US 281 at FM 1937/Del Lago Parkway .

5202

$229,079

FYImprove traffic signals, interconnect signals and safety lighting at intersection0073-12-012 2019

Bexar

US 181 at Old Corpus Christi Highway -

5494

$474,825

FYImprove traffic signals, interconnect signals0100-02-065 2019

Bexar

US 181 at Loop 1604 .

5182

$2,867,700

FYRestore existing roadway0143-01-055 2019

Bexar

US 87 IH 10 Rigsby

5203

$218,364


Bexar

US 87 at FM 1628 -

5209

$3,382,752

FYSurface and pavement markings0291-10-103 2019

Bexar

SS 421 IH 410 Sunshine Drive

5210

$240,201


Bexar

SH 16 at Guilbeau Road -

5211

$218,364


Bexar

SH 16 at Tezel Road -



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5212

$218,364


Bexar

SH 16 at Mainland Drive -

5498

$660,000

FYReconstruct existing culvert0291-10-110 2019

Bexar

SH 16 at Cedar Trail .

5213

$411,384

FYInstall raised medians with actuated ped symbols0291-11-021 2019

Bexar

SS 421 0.1 Miles West of Goodrich 0.1 Mile East of Hamilton

5215

$1,642,284


Bexar

FM 1518 FM 78 Schaeffer Road

5508

$218,364

FYImprove traffic signals and safety lighting at intersections0521-02-040 2019

Bexar

SL 13 at Somerset Road .

5509

$3,500,000


Bexar

SL 13 SL 353 IH 35

5510

$5,497,910

FYBase repair, mill, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings0521-03-060 2019

Bexar

SL 13 US 90 Leon Creek

5511

$3,500,000


Bexar

SL 13 Leon Creek SL 353

5512

$2,064,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings on frontage roads0521-04-280 2021

Bexar

IH 410 US 90 SH 151

5513

$386,162

FYSeal coat and pavement markings on frontage roads0521-05-147 2019

Bexar

IH 410 SH 16 Pearsall Road

5514

$1,061,716

FYSeal coat and pavement markings0613-01-062 2019

Bexar

SH 16 IH 410 Atascosa CL

5219

$394,964


Bexar

FM 1535 at Loop 1604 -

5217

$227,766


Bexar

FM 1535 at West Avenue -

5218

$242,448


Bexar

FM 1535 at Lockhill Selma -



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5515

$394,964

FYImprove traffic signals and safety lighting at intersections0658-01-043 2019

Bexar

FM 1535 at Loop 1604 .

5220

$214,545


Bexar

FM 471 at Heath Road -

5516

$3,996,435

FYConstruct grade separation0849-01-053 2022

Bexar

FM 471 at SH 211 .

5172

$568,704

FYReplace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence0915-00-183 2020

Bexar

VA Various bridges on IH 35 in Bexar and Atascosa Counties

5187

$757,656


Bexar

VA Various bridges on IH 10 in Bexar and Kendall Counties

5244

$500,000

FYReplace bridge and approaches0915-12-531 2020

Bexar

CR Old Seguin Road at Salado Creek -

5245

$5,837,642

FYRehab bridge and approaches0915-12-532 2020

Bexar

CS N. Walters Street at UPRR and Larry Street -

5173

$1,717,816


Bexar

VA Various bridges on IH 410 in Bexar County

5222

$261,256


Bexar

VA Various bridges on IH 35 and US 281 in Bexar County

5247

$260,304


Bexar

VA Various bridges on IH 37 and IH 410 in Bexar County

5248

$102,410

FYSeal coat various roads, parking lots and campsite pullouts within the park0915-12-563 2020

Bexar

VA Government Canyon State Natural Area

5225

$222,184


Bexar

CS Marbach Road at Horal Drive

5226

$209,460


Bexar

CS On New Braunfels Avenus at Steves Avenue

5228

$222,184


Bexar

CS On Wurzbach Road at Bluemel Road



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5519

$313,426

FYImprove traffic signal0915-12-587 2020

Bexar

CS On Pleasanton Road at Formosa

5520

$313,426

FYImprove traffic signal0915-12-588 2020

Bexar

CS On Vance Jackson at La Manda Blvd

5521

$313,426

FYImprove traffic signals0915-12-608 2019

Bexar

CS on Military Drive at Brownleaf

5230

$2,578,842


Bexar

FM 2252 Evans Road Stahl Road

5093

$18,973,819

FYRehab and wide narrowroadway to add shoulders1890-01-046 2019

Bexar

FM 1876 Woodlake Parkway Loop 1604

5234

$218,634


Bexar

FM 1976 at Bentley Drive -

5236

$222,184


Bexar

FM 1976 at Montgomery Road/Eaglecrest Blvd -

5237

$49,589


Bexar

FM 1516 at FM 1976 -

5241

$222,184


Bexar

FM 1957 at Richland Hills -

5473

$5,200,000

FYOverlay and pavement markings on frontage roads0016-04-900 2021

Comal

IH 35 SL 337 FM 306

5475

$7,526,000


Comal

BI 35-H Gruene Road S. Peach Avenue

5476

$138,380


Comal

FM 482 0.4 Miles SW of Krueger Canyon IH 35

5204

$63,377

FYInstall flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersection0215-01-047 2019

Comal

SH 46 at FM 311 -

5205

$63,377


Comal

SH 46 at Cranes Mill -



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5495

$1,376,000


Comal

BS 46-C SL 337/SH 46 0.3 Miles West of W. San Antonio Street

5507

$61,832

FYInstall flashing beacon and safety illumiination at intersection0511-02-021 2019

Comal

RM 32 at RM 484 .

5523

$155,056

FYProfile edgeline and centerline markings1272-01-019 2019

Comal

FM 1101 SH 46 Guadalupe CL

5229

$63,376


Comal

FM 1102 at Hunter Road -

5524

$240,509


Comal

FM 1192 FM 2439/Watson Lane FM 306

5525

$177,364


Comal

FM 311 US 281 SH 46

5238

$1,180,756


Comal

FM 1044 IH 35 Guadalupe/Comal County Line

5239

$63,377


Comal

FM 1044 at Schmidt Avenue -

5242

$1,078,392


Comal

FM 2673 Satler Road, east intersection FM 306

5527

$137,004


Comal

FM 2673 RM 2722 FM 306

5504

$900,000


Comal

FM 3351 Kendall/Comal CL Stephanie Way

6013

$4,493,110

FYRehabilitate bridge and approaches8408-15-006 2019

Comal

MH in New Braunfels on San Antonio Street at Comal River

5485

$59,004

FYOverhead flashing beacon0025-03-098 2019

Guadalupe

US 90A .at Saunders Street .

5198

$4,963,910

FYSpot base repair, overlay and pavement markings0025-10-092 2019

Guadalupe

FM 78 0.2 Miles East of Gembler Road 0.1 Miles West of Westgate Drive



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5486

$50,425


Guadalupe

FM 78 FM 3009 West side of LP 539

5487

$162,090


Guadalupe

FM 78 East side of LP 539 Santa Clara Creek

5488

$39,611


Guadalupe

FM 78 West side of LP 539 East side of LP 539

5207

$3,800,000

FYRehab and widen to provide operational improvements0215-09-028 2022

Guadalupe

FM 725 Zipp Road FM 78

5208

$2,622,691

FYMill, overlay and pavement markings0216-02-062 2019

Guadalupe

SH 46 CH Matthies Jr 0.7 Miles East of FM 467

5496

$178,630


Guadalupe

FM 466 SH 123 FM 1117

5497

$138,487


Guadalupe

SH 80 IH 10 Gonzales County

5499

$525,636


Guadalupe

SH 123 at US 90 .

5500

$59,004

FYOverhead flashing beacon0366-02-092 2019

Guadalupe

SH 123 at Dennis Drive .

5214

$2,995,272

FYMill, overlay and pavement markings0366-12-028 2019

Guadalupe

BS 123B 0.2 Miles North of US 90 Guadalupe River Bridge

5505

$61,832

FYInstall intersection flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersectons0366-12-029 2019

Guadalupe

BS 133B at Continental Drive .

5506

$1,090,820


Guadalupe

BS 123B 0.4 Miles North of US 90 0.2 Miles North of US 90

5517

$199,800


Guadalupe

FM 775 FM 2538 Guadalupe/Wilson CL

5518

$101,590


Guadalupe

FM 465 FM 78 IH 10



MPO Project Number


Project Description


Construction Cost


5522

$222,740


Guadalupe

FM 775 IH 10 FM 2538

5523

$106,852


Guadalupe

FM 1150 US 90A FM 1104

5233

$1,501,164


Guadalupe

FM 1518 Maske Road FM 78

5526

$59,004

FYInstall intersection flashing beacon1898-03-011 2019

Guadalupe

FM 1979 at CR 244A - Lehmann Road .

5240

$1,020,180


Guadalupe

FM 1044 Comal/Guadalupe County Line 1.0 Miles North of Klein Road

5501

$187,546


Guadalupe

FM 725 FM 78 FM 467

5200

$861,761

FYProvide additional paved surface width0072-10-006 2019

Kendall

FM 289 1.1 Miles Northwest of IH I0 IH 10

5201

$49,589


Kendall

US 87 at SH 46 -

5492

$160,000

FYLandscape Development0072-14-030 2019

Kendall

US 87 Richter Avenue E. San Antonio Avenue

5502

$1,064,868


Kendall

FM 3351 Winchester Road SH 46

5503

$2,484,888


Kendall

FM 3351 SH 46 Comal/Kendall CL




99

APPENDIX D

Environmental Clearance Projects



100



Project Name Limits From:

Project Description

FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement ProgramAppendix D - Environmental Clearance Projects - PLACEHOLDER

To:

Loop 1604 NE IH 35 North IH 10 East

Expand to 4 lane expressway (construct 4 new managed lanes)

Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/23/07

Loop 1604 West US 90 SH 16

Expand to 6 and 8 lane expressway (construct 2 to 4 managed lanes)


Toepperwein Crossbow Peak FM 1976

Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane sidewalks and bike lanes) to align with South Seguin Road (FM 1516)


101



105

APPENDIX E

Transit Project Detail



106



VIA Metropolitan Transit

2019 Capital Spending Plan

MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals

10207 Service VehiclesCars 161200 21,000 Trucks 161201 195,000 Total Service Vehicles 216,000

10208 Passenger FacilitiesRobert Thompson Transit Center 161301 4,000,000 Brooks Transit Center 161302 1,775,000 IH10 Park & Ride 161304 2,531,500 SH 151 Park & Ride 161305 2,910,000 Northeast Park & Ride 161306 2,665,000 Naco Pass 161308 1,075,000 SW High-Capacity Transit Phase 1 161309 2,220,000 Bus Stop Improvements Additional 161310 335,410 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds 161311 891,773 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities 161312 250,000 Randolph Park & Ride 161400 6,245,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation 161403 150,000 5 Points Intersection Reconstruction 191300 500,000 Total Passenger Facilities 25,548,683

10209 Operational FacilitiesFacility Upgrade/Renovation 161600 150,000 Existing Paint Facility Upgrade 171602 1,600,000 Garage Floor Repair & Coating 171603 500,000 Purchase Artic Bus Repair Facility 171604 500,000 VMF-ERU Condensate Capture and Storage 171605 100,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs 161610 100,000 Madla Training Center Add Restrooms (SGR) 161612 100,000 VMC Office Remodel 161614 150,000 Office Furniture 161616 200,000 Improvements to Expanded Bus Yard 171613 700,000 Rework HU Yard Sump/Separator System 181601 800,000 Replace VMC Roof 191600 475,000 DAF Unit Replacement 191601 300,000 Maint Bldg HU Sump Fill In 191602 35,000 Insp Steamroom Renovations 191603 150,000 Heavy Unit Sky Light Replacement 191604 25,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks 181607 150,000 Total Operational Facilities 6,035,000

10210 Rapid Transit ProjectHigh Capacity Transit Project 171300 12,000,000 Total Rapid Transit Project 12,000,000





10211 Maintenance Tools & EquipmentPurchase New Equipment to Service Buses 161800 100,000 Mobile Bus Lifts 161802 50,000 Inground Brake Testor 171806 300,000 Tools & Equip. for New Paratransit Shop 171808 2,000,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 2,450,000

10212 Replace Components for Rev. VehiclesRecondition Engines and Transmissions 161900 429,165 Hybrid Bus Batteries 171900 600,000 Electric Bus Batteries 181900 300,000 Diesel Particulate Filters 161901 160,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 1,489,165

10213 Computer Hardware/SoftwarePark -n-Ride Network Upgrades 172101 40,000 New Computers for Police Cars 192100 65,000 Computing Devices 162102 200,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr 162105 200,000 Disks and Tape Drives for Backup 162107 144,000 P25 Radio System Upgrade/Replacement 162109 1,400,000 MS Office and Share Point Ugrades 192102 130,000 ERP System - BRP, Technical Specs 162116 100,000 ERP System 172102 3,838,400 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) 162118 65,000 VMC AV Replacement 162121 5,000 MAC for Graphic Designer/Illustrator 162127 9,000 Cloud Migration & Build Out Svcs 172105 90,000 Wireless Network 162131 5,000 Fiber Build Out (Grand, GCS, VMC) 172106 150,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks 182100 40,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 6,481,400

10214 Misc. (Facilities, Equipment, Other)Joint Development 193103 500,000 Total Miscellaneous 500,000

GRAND TOTAL 54,720,248





10307 Service VehiclesCars 161200 21,000 Trucks 161201 356,000 Total Service Vehicles 377,000

10308 Passenger FacilitiesRobert Thompson Transit Center 161301 1,000,000 SH 151 Park & Ride 161305 500,000 Northeast Park & Ride 161306 820,000 Bus Stop Improvements Additional 161310 277,685 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds 161311 460,268 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities 161312 250,000 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) 201300 500,000 MyLink (TAP) (CoSA) 201301 500,000 Randolph Park & Ride 161400 2,280,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation 161403 150,000 Northstar Refurbish 201302 100,000 Total Passenger Facilities 6,837,953

10309 Operational FacilitiesFacility Upgrade/Renovation 161600 150,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs 161610 100,000 Madla Training Center Upgrades 171609 180,000 Office Furniture 161616 50,000 Garage Heater Replacement 201600 400,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks 181607 30,000 Total Operational Facilities 910,000


10311 Administrative FacilitiesAdministration Bldg Backup Power Generation 181700 800,000 Total Administrative Facilities 800,000

10312 Maintenance Tools & EquipmentPurchase New Equipment to Service Buses 161800 100,000 Mobile Bus Lifts 161802 50,000 In Ground Chassis Dyno 171807 500,000 AC Recovery Machines 171809 32,000 Transmission Dyno 171810 200,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 882,000





10313 Replace Components for Rev. VehiclesRecondition Engines and Transmissions 161900 286,110 Hybrid Bus Batteries 171900 800,000 Diesel Particulate Filters 161901 160,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 1,246,110

10314 Computer Hardware/SoftwarePark -n-Ride Network Upgrades 172101 40,000 Computing Devices 162102 85,000 ArcGIS for Engineering 162103 35,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr 162105 255,000 Replace Printers 162106 25,000 P25 Radio System Upgrade/Replacement 162109 1,400,000 Telephone System Upgrade/Replacement 162111 400,000 MS Office and Share Point Ugrades 192102 130,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) 162118 65,000 VMC AV Replacement 162121 5,000 Wireless Network 162131 5,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks 182100 40,000 IT Security/Network Security 182101 125,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 2,610,000







10413 Revenue VehiclesParatransit Vehicles - 62 211101 8,092,772 Total Revenue Vehicles 8,092,772

10408 Service VehiclesCars 161200 63,000 Trucks 161201 211,000 Other Misc Serv Vehicles 181200 50,000 Total Service Vehicles 324,000

10409 Passenger FacilitiesBus Stop Improvements Additional 161310 341,300 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds 161311 460,268 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities 161312 25,340 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) 201300 400,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation 161403 200,000 Total Passenger Facilities 1,426,908

10410 Operational FacilitiesFacility Upgrade/Renovation 161600 200,000 Office Furniture 161616 50,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks 181607 30,000 Total Operational Facilities 280,000


10412 Maintenance Tools & EquipmentPurchase New Equipment to Service Buses 161800 100,000 Mobile Bus Lifts 161802 50,000 Floor Scrubbers 161803 40,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 190,000

10413 Replace Components for Rev. VehiclesRecondition Engines and Transmissions 161900 267,902 Hybrid Bus Batteries 171900 600,000 Diesel Particulate Filters 161901 80,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 947,902





10414 Computer Hardware/SoftwarePark -n-Ride Network Upgrades 172101 40,000 Computing Devices 162102 220,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr 162105 255,000 Replace Printers 162106 25,000 Maintenance Diagnostic Laptops Upgrade 162117 65,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) 162118 65,000 VMC AV Replacement 162121 5,000 Wireless Network 162131 5,000 Software Development Tools 172107 12,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 692,000







10506 Revenue VehiclesParatransit Vehicles - 60 221100 7,988,349 Total Revenue Vehicles 7,988,349

10507 Passenger FacilitiesBus Stop Improvements Additional 161310 224,220 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds 161311 394,515 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) 201300 800,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation 161403 200,000 Total Passenger Facilities 1,618,735

10508 Operational FacilitiesFacility Upgrade/Renovation 161600 200,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs 161610 200,000 Office Furniture 161616 50,000 Other & Tire Shop Pit Repair 161620 2,000,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks 181607 30,000 Total Operational Facilities 2,480,000


10510 Maintenance Tools & EquipmentPurchase New Equipment to Service Buses 161800 100,000 Mobile Bus Lifts 161802 50,000 Replace Parts Washers, Pressure/Steam Cleaners 171805 250,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 400,000

10511 Replace Components for Rev. VehiclesRecondition Engines and Transmissions 161900 200,000 Hybrid Bus Batteries 171900 600,000 Diesel Particulate Filters 161901 80,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 880,000

10512 Computer Hardware/SoftwarePark -n-Ride Network Upgrades 172101 40,000 Computing Devices 162102 225,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr 162105 250,000 Telephone System Upgrade/Replacement 162111 300,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) 162118 65,000 Wireless Network 162131 90,000 Operating System Licenses 172110 175,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks 182100 40,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 1,185,000





105

APPENDIX F

Policy 2: Public Participation Plan



106



Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization |Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 1

Policy 2: Public Participation Plan This text is the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (AAMPO) plan to involve the public. It is called a Public Participation Plan (PPP) and is required by law. People were able to comment on the plan for 45 days. This comment period took place prior to adoption of the plan.

Purpose of the Public Participation Plan This plan provides a guide for how MPO staff can involve the public. It includes goals, procedures, and tools the MPO will use. It also includes metrics used to measure and evaluate plan performance.

AAMPO’s Commitment to Public Participation People should have a say in transportation decisions that affect their lives. To help make this possible, the AAMPO commits to:

1. Welcome all people into the planning process. 2. Identify people affected and involve them in the process. 3. Get people involved early and keep them involved throughout in the process. 4. Provide people with a variety of ways to participate. 5. Hold meetings at convenient dates, times, and locations. 6. Hold meetings at accessible places (see attachment 1). 7. Make meetings accessible for people with disabilities. 8. Provide interpreters (spoken or sign) if requested at least five (5) working days in

advance of a meeting. 9. Use information and graphics that are easy to understand. 10. Talk to people and record their comments. 11. Consider comments in the planning process.



Public Participation Goals

• The MPO will engage people in the transportation planning process. The MPO will do this according to the goals in this plan and applicable laws.

•Goal 1

• The MPO will keep people informed of transportation news.•Goal 2

• The MPO will encourage the everyone in the study area to get involved. This includes those traditionally underserved.

•Goal 3

• The MPO will strive to improve public participation.•Goal 4

• The MPO will work closely with other transportation agencies.

•Goal 5



Federal and State Requirements This plan reflects the AAMPO commitment to the public. It also outlines their role in the regional planning process. It follows the federal and local laws listed below.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Federal rules for metropolitan transportation planning (23 CFR 450.316) and FHWA guidelines say that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) shall develop and use a documented participation plan. The plan defines a process for providing citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and other interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in the metropolitan transportation planning process. AAMPO complies with the ten MPO requirements listed in 23 CFR 450.316.

Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) The current transportation bill is the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. It was passed by Congress and signed by President Obama on December 4, 2015. The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion nationwide over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for transportation spending. It is the first law enacted in over ten years that provides long-term funding certainty for surface transportation.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) stipulates involving the community, particularly those with disabilities in the development and improvement of services.

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act prohibits recipients of Federal financial assistance from taking actions that result in denying or limiting services or otherwise discriminating based on age.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI states that “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefit of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” Title VI serves as the legal foundation for what is today referred to as environmental justice. AAMPO adheres to Title VI and environmental justice principles.

Executive Order 13166 – Limited English Proficiency Executive Order 13166 was created to "... improve access to federally conducted and federally assisted programs and activities for persons who, as a result of national origin, are limited in their English proficiency ..." Federal agencies were directed to provide guidance and technical



assistance to recipients of federal funds as to how they can provide meaningful access to limited English proficient users of federal programs. Consistent with Executive Order 13166 and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) guidance, AAMPO has developed a Limited English Proficiency Plan ) in order to ensure meaningful input opportunities for persons with limited English proficiency. The AAMPO LEP plan is available on the AAMPO website (www.alamoareampo.org) and calls for translations of vital documents, such as public notices, into Spanish. AAMPO may, at its discretion, translate documents into additional languages if the nature of the document and the character of the document’s target audience justify additional translation. The LEP plan provides further guidance for serving limited English-speaking populations.

Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice This order was signed by President Clinton in 1994. It reinforced the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that focused federal attention on the environmental and human health condition in minority and low-income communities:

Each federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.

Executive Order 13175 – Consultation and Coordination with Tribal Governments Executive Order 13175 states that “in formulating or implementing policies that have tribal implications, agencies shall establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates upon Indian tribes.”

At least one American Indian tribe has expressed an interest in being notified of activities throughout the state of Texas. Though there are no tribal governments located in the Alamo Area MPO study area, the MPO will actively seek to keep tribal governments informed of major decisions affecting the region. The MPO will continue to communicate with Native American Indian tribal leaders on an ongoing basis to identify issues of common concern.

Disclaimers In order to share appropriate requirements with the public related to various laws and regulations, the MPO regularly uses the following disclaimers. Their purpose and use is described below.

American’s with Disabilities Act Statement The following disclaimer will be included on public meeting notices as appropriate:

All MPO meetings will be conducted in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and are accessible to persons with disabilities. Arrangements for special assistance or an interpreter can be made by calling the Metropolitan Planning Organization office at (210)-227-8651, or Relay Texas at 1-800-735-2989 at least five (5) business days in advance. The meeting facilities will also be within a reasonable distance of a transit route in counties where transit service is readily available.



Title VI and Environmental Justice Statement The following MPO Title VI and Environmental Justice Nondiscrimination Statement will be included in informational items and collateral materials as appropriate:

The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), as a recipient of Federal funding and under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and related statutes, ensures that no person shall on the grounds of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, age or disability be excluded from participation in, denied benefits of, or otherwise discriminated against by any MPO program or activity.

Report Language The following language shall be included in all reports published by the MPO:

Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration.

This language shall be displayed on the interior front cover page in a place of prominence in accordance with the contract between TxDOT and the Alamo Area MPO.

Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Language For newspaper ads in support of the development of the Transportation Improvement Program, by agreement with the transit provider, the language shown below must be included in the ad text itself:

The TIP development process is being used to satisfy the public hearing requirements of FTA’s Section 5307 program and this public notice of public involvement activities and time established for public review and comments on the TIP will satisfy the FTA Program of Projects requirements.



Target Audiences The MPO takes great pride in working with people and other agencies. The AAMPO strongly believes that people should have a say in decisions that impact their lives. The AAMPO staff keeps a contact list on a continuous basis. People and groups that AAMPO targets are listed below. This list is not exclusive. The AAMPO also reaches out to the public at large.

Target Audiences Airport operators Board and committee members Business and trade organizations Citizens expressing an interest in transportation planning City and academic libraries Civic and public interest groups Community-based associations Commuters Disabled populations Elected local, state and federal officials Emergency response agencies Environmental groups Faith-based organizations Freight shippers Higher education faculty, staff, and students Homeowner, neighborhood and resident associations Local media outlets Military Bases Natural disaster risk reduction agencies Private transportation organizations and employees Providers of freight transportation services Public agencies and staff Public health organizations Public ports Public transportation School districts Social service organizations Tourism industry Traditionally underserved populations (described in greater detail in the following section) Transportation advocates Tribal governments Users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities Users of ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft Any other interested parties



Diversity and Inclusiveness AAMPO commits to engage traditionally underserved groups. These groups include low-income and minority populations. Federal laws protect more groups. The AAMPO also protects two more groups. All protected groups are listed here.

Protected Categories Both Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and Executive Order 12898 (EO 12898) on Environmental Justice (EO 12898) are specific in the description of the populations they protect. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, color and national origin. EO 12898 protects minority and low‐income populations. Discrimination against persons based on gender, age, and disability are addressed by other nondiscrimination statutes. Collectively, these populations are often referred to as “traditionally underserved” in the transportation planning process.

Minority Persons considered minorities are identified by the U.S. Census as people of African, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, or Alaskan Native origin. Executive Order 12898 and the DOT and FHWA Orders on Environmental Justice consider minority persons as persons belonging to any of the following groups:

Black – a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Hispanic – a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other

Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Asian – a person having origins in the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent. American Indian and Alaskan Native – a person having origins in North America and

who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition.

Low Income A person whose household income (or in the case of a community or group, whose median household income) is at or below the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. The national poverty guidelines are issued annually by the Department of Health and Human Services and are available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/poverty.shtml.

Elderly Any persons over the age of 65.

People with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a qualified individual with a disability is a person that 1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; 2) has a record of such an impairment; or 3) is regarded as having such an impairment.



Limited English Proficiency People who do not speak English as their primary language and have a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English may be considered limited English proficient.

Additional Categories Additionally, AAMPO includes low-literacy populations and those without personal transportation as traditionally underserved populations, although they are not protected by either a federal act or an executive order.

Low Literacy People who have difficulty using certain reading, writing, and computational skills considered necessary for functioning in everyday life may be considered to have low literacy. Persons with low literacy are generally defined as having less than fifth‐grade reading and comprehension skills.

Zero Car Households Households without cars or access to one.



Board and Committees The AAMPO board and committees provide one of the most regular and consistent ways for public involvement. Following is a list of committees supported by MPO staff. The table below identifies the day of the month, time, and location of their meetings.

Committee Date/Time Location Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) *

First Friday of the month at 1:30 p.m.

TxDOT District Office Building 2 Hearing Room 4615 NW Loop 410 San Antonio, TX 78229

Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) *

Second Wednesday of the month at 9:00 a.m.

MPO Conference Room B 825 South Saint Mary’s Street San Antonio, TX 78205

Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC) *

Third Wednesday of the month at 3:30 p.m.

MPO Conference Room B at 825 South Saint Mary’s Street, San Antonio, TX 78205

Transportation Policy Board (TPB) *

Fourth Monday of the month at 1:30 p.m.

VIA Metro Center Community Room 1021 San Pedro San Antonio, TX 78212

* Meeting dates and locations are subject to change. The BMAC and PMAC committees hold joint evening meetings several times a year. Some committees choose to cancel meetings in July and December. For the most current information, please visit www.alamoareampo.org/calendar.

MPO meetings are open to all. For special needs or translator, call 210-227-8651. You can also call TDD 1-800-735-2989 (Relay Texas). Please call at least five working days before the meeting. Meeting dates, times, and locations may change. You can call 210-227-8651 to confirm the meeting. The table below lists the timing of information on the website.

Materials What is available on the web? When is it posted on the web? Meeting agendas and packets

Transportation Policy Board www.alamoareampo.org/Committees/TPB/ Technical Advisory Committee www.alamoareampo.org/Committees/TAC/ Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee www.alamoareampo.org/Committees/BMAC/ Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee www.alamoareampo.org/Committees/PMAC/

One week prior to the meeting



Materials What is available on the web? When is it posted on the web? Meeting Information

Board and committee meeting dates and times www.alamoareampo.org/Calendar/

Online calendar is posted and updated throughout the year, along with board/committee web pages. Meeting information pages updated monthly.

Livestreaming Transportation Policy Board meetings only www.alamoareampo.org/mpolive

Listen or watch the Transportation Policy Board meetings live or in a searchable archive available 24 hours after the event.

News releases News and media items, published or broadcast www.alamoareampo.org/news/

Review news releases after sending to the media. Timing of the news release varies depending on the news item or event.

Meeting Notices The Texas Open Meetings Act requires notice of any public meeting where a decision could be made or that may be attended by more than one elected official. The MPO regularly posts MPO Transportation Policy Board (TPB), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) and Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC) meetings in the Texas Register, at the Bexar County Courthouse Bulletin Board, and with Comal and Guadalupe counties.

Public Comments The MPO accepts public comments at every regular meeting of the board and committees. Comments can be spoken or in writing. Com



Public Participation Toolbox The MPO communicates with the public in a variety of ways. Information shared covers the MPO’s programs, projects and studies. MPO information materials display the MPO logo and include contacts. This section describes some of the communication tools the MPO uses.

Philosophy of External Communications Guiding principles for external communications include:

Informative: The MPO will provide information. The MPO does not advocate on issues. Concise: The MPO will provide clear and concise information. Clear: The MPO will use easy to understand text and graphics. Engaging: The MPO will hold meetings that are fun, interactive, and meaningful.

The MPO uses the “Spectrum of Public Participation.” It was developed by the International Association of Public Participation. The spectrum helps identify when to use tools in the process.



The table shows different communication tools. The last column shows the level of participation. It corresponds to the Spectrum of Participation. Some strategies, such as outreach tools, are solely informational. Others can include multiple points on the spectrum.

Meetings/Events/Speaking Engagements Type Description Level of

Participation Project Workshops/Open-Houses

This type of public meeting is open and more informal. Team members interact with the public on a one-on-one basis. Short presentations may be given at these meetings. They will be followed by small group exercises or exhibits that people can visit on their own.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

MPO Exhibit Tables MPO staff attend other agency events and man tables or booths. These include activities, maps, charts and informational brochures. Exhibit tables may also be used at malls or other public venues.

Inform

Consult

Small Group Meetings

During projects such as planning studies, meetings are held with small groups that have an interest in the project. Meetings could be with homeowners or neighborhood associations, civic groups, special interest groups, or other groups of affected or interested parties.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Advisory committee meetings

The AAMPO staff supports four committees and several subcommittees. These groups provide input, advice and recommendations to the planning process. Committees work to build consensus on their recommendations before sending them to the board.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Transportation Policy Board

The board is made up of elected officials and representatives from the various cities, counties, and public agencies within the MPO study area. It is the sole decision-making body within the MPO process.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Empower



Online/Electronic Tools Type Description Level of

Participation AAMPO Website The website was established in 1998 with basic

information about the MPO process, members, meeting times and contact information. The site has been expanded to include information about specific projects undertaken by the MPO. Bicycle, pedestrian and trails information and event schedules are also included. Work products such as the UPWP, TIP and MTP are available from the website. The site provides many links to other transportation related sites from the local to national level. The site is continually maintained and updated by MPO staff and is used to promote regular and special meetings, planning studies, bicycle and pedestrian events, publications and work products.

Inform

FastTrack E-Newsletter

The MPO publishes an electronic newsletter on a bi-weekly basis and distributes it according to the database e-mail list. Citizens are added to the distribution list at their own request. Opportunities to be added to the list occur during public meetings hosted by the MPO, during public events attended by the MPO, on the MPO website, and when citizens contact MPO staff. Each issue of the newsletter includes staff contact information, upcoming meeting schedules, the MPO website address, project highlights, and current planning project status reports. Information regarding significant transportation issues, MPO awards, and other one-time activities are also included.

Inform

Consult

Social Media The MPO will utilize appropriate social media avenues to post pertinent information and notices on a frequent basis. This also provides another opportunity for the public to provide public input to the MPO’s on-going planning process.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Project-specific Web Sites

For individual projects, project-specific websites may be used. These sites are used when project information is too extensive to be included on the MPO site. Project websites can contain study area maps, meeting announcements, descriptions of alternatives, comment forms, user surveys and project team contact information. Links to project sites are provided from the MPO site.

Inform

Consult

Involve



Online/Electronic Tools Type Description Level of

Participation Crowdsourcing The MPO will utilize different online tools to solicit input,

ideas, and suggestions from the public. This could be in the form of comments on a map or submitted via an online form.

Inform

Consult

Online meetings The MPO will provide online participation opportunities as appropriate. These opportunities will include webinar options for participation during the day or virtual public meetings. These will be advertised at the same time as the public meetings.

Inform

Consult

Involve

Public Notice Delivery Tools Type Description Level of

Participation US Postal Service Traditional mail service is used for formal public hearing

notices, as well as to publicize public meetings/workshops.

Inform

Email Email blasts are used in addition to traditional mailing to stakeholders and community members. Recipients have previously opted in to communications by providing their email addresses.

Inform

Consult

Location Placement Meeting notices are posted in high-traffic gathering places, including but not limited to: schools, parks, libraries, community centers, and other such gathering places.

Inform

Transit Meeting flyers and related collateral material may also be available on buses, notifying riders of upcoming meetings.

Inform

Print and Broadcast Media Tools Type Description Level of

Participation Display Ads These ads are used to promote meetings that are not

regularly scheduled, such as corridor or subarea workshops, project specific meetings, open houses or

Inform



Print and Broadcast Media Tools Type Description Level of

Participation hearings. They are published in local/regional newspapers that provide the best coverage at an economical price.

Press Releases Formal press releases are sent to local media (newspaper, TV and radio) to announce upcoming meetings and activities and to provide information on specific issues being considered by MPO committees.

Inform

TV and Radio Public Affairs Shows

MPO staff will solicit radio and talk show appearances to provide information or to promote events and topics as appropriate.

Inform

Video and Audio Public Service Announcements

MPO staff will produce audio and video public service announcements for selected events and distribute them to the appropriate metro area radio, TV and cable stations.

Inform

Multimedia Tools Type Description Level of

Participation Printed Newsletter The MPO publishes a quarterly hardcopy newsletter that

is mailed to the contact mailing list and e-mailed to the electronic contact list. Included are feature stories about the transportation planning process as well as ongoing studies, projects and issues. A Spanish version is also available upon request.

Inform

Project Newsletters For individual projects, such as corridor or subarea studies, that are typically performed using consulting services, newsletters are often used to address specific project issues. These newsletters are mailed to targeted residents, businesses and property owners in the area affected by a particular study. Information regarding upcoming project meetings, alternatives being proposed in the area, and other project news is reported in these newsletters.

Inform

Other Newsletters When project-specific newsletters are not used, articles may be prepared for publication in other newsletters produced by municipalities, homeowner associations,

Inform



Multimedia Tools Type Description Level of

Participation church groups, civic groups, or others that may have an interest in the project. These articles are subject to the publication dates and space restrictions of publishers.

Video Blogs

On a monthly basis, the MPO produces, in English and Spanish, a brief video blog called V-News. V-News highlights upcoming meetings of MPO standing committees, special project meetings or public events being undertaken by the MPO, and may include useful information related to various planning issues, such as air quality, safety, and transportation options.

Inform

Flyers, Posters and Fact Sheets

To provide summary information regarding MPO policy, programs and projects, flyers, posters and fact sheets may be distributed at public meetings, posted on the MPO web site, and displayed in public places such as libraries and community centers. Individuals and special interest groups can also request fact sheets directly from the MPO staff office.

Inform

Bus Placards The MPO will use advertising space in VIA buses whenever possible as provided by VIA Metropolitan Transit for various MPO events.

Inform

Banners The MPO will consider using banner advertising such as physical street banners and internet page banners as appropriate for MPO events and activities.

Inform

Partner Agency Collaboration MPO staff will attend and participate in as many transportation partner public participation activities as is feasible to enhance public consideration of transportation issues, plans, and programs and to reduce redundancies and costs.



Public Participation Procedures The MPO generates major planning documents that require public input and community consensus. As a result, they are made available for public comment using various outreach strategies. Members of the public can view all of the required documents, and any amendments, on the MPO website at www.alamoareampo.org or call 210-230-6929 to receive a copy. Following is a list of the major planning documents produced by the MPO.

Metropolitan Transportation Plan, or long-range plan Transportation Improvement Program, or short-range plan Unified Planning Work Program Public Participation Plan Performance Measures Report Transportation Conformity Document (if/when needed)

The Transportation Policy Board has set different approval processes depending on the item agendized for action. The two-step approval process is for new TIP, MTP and Transportation Conformity documents, as well as amendments to the TIP and MTP. The two-step process means that items will be presented to the Transportation Policy Board one month with action scheduled for the following month, allowing for an approximate public comment period of 30 days.

The MPO also has a process for an expedited, or one-step process for TIP and MTP amendments, that allows the board to hear the item presented and take action within one meeting.

Other items such as amendments to the Unified Planning Work Program, consultant contract awards and resolutions of support, as examples, are acted upon by the Transportation Policy Board in a one-step approval process.

Below, please find a description of the two-step and expedited one-step processes. The following page identifies the planning steps required for each planning document produced by the MPO along with the minimum outreach strategies recommended for each. Whenever possible, the MPO will strive to go beyond the minimum outreach strategies.

Two-Step Approval Process 1. Present, for informational purposes, the Proposed Action to the Technical Advisory

Committee/Transportation Policy Board in month one 2. Present, for Action, to the Technical Advisory Committee/Transportation Policy Board in

month two

Expedited One-Step Approval Process (for TIP and MTP Amendments only) Transportation Policy Board hears a presentation and takes action at one meeting as

opposed to two board meetings



Reserved for items requiring quick action due to impending federal or state requirements or deadlines (or for other reasons deemed in the community's best interest)

Requires a 75% vote by the Transportation Policy Board to enter into a time certain public hearing and the Board will solicit input into the amendment(s) prior to taking action

Approval Process Minimum Outreach Activities

Two-

Step

App

rova

l Pr

oces

s

One

-Ste

p A

pp

rova

l Pr

oces

s Ex

ped

ited

One

Ste

p

Proc

ess

w/

75

%

Boa

rd V

ote

for

pub

lic

hea

ring

3

0 D

ay

Com

men

t Pe

riod

4

5 D

ay

Com

men

t Pe

riod

6

0 D

ay

Com

men

t Pe

riod

Part

ner

Ag

ency

C

oord

ina

tion

New

s re

lea

se

New

spa

per

Ad

s

Soci

al m

edia

E-ne

wsl

ette

r

Vid

eo

Nei

ghb

orho

od

pre

sent

atio

ns

TIP/MTP Development Process & Adoption of the TIP/MTP

Routine amendments to the TIP/MTP occurring between annual updates

Expedited process, urgent amendments to the TIP/MTP

Adoption of the Unified Planning Work Program

Amendments to the Unified Planning Work Program

Public Participation Plan

Consultant Contract Award

Performance Measures and Targets

Transportation Conformity

Note: this list is illustrative and may not reflect all the items the Transportation Policy Board may consider for action.



Monitoring and Evaluation This PPP will be reviewed and adopted, with revisions if necessary, at least every three (3) years. The following performance measures will be recorded by staff on a continuous basis to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of participation strategies. Where appropriate, the Deputy Director and the Planning/Public Involvement Program Manager will set yearly targets. Adjustments to strategies will be made as needed to meet the public involvement plan goals.

Goals Addressed Public Involvement Tool Evaluation Method Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Public Participation Plan To be reviewed every three

years Goal 2 AAMPO Website Number of New Users

Number of Returning users Page Views Sessions

Goal 2 FastTrack E-Newsletter Number of Subscribers Number of Emails Accepted Unique/Total Views

Goals 1, 2, and 3 Open Houses, Meetings, Workshops, and Public Hearings

Number of Attendees

Goals 1, 2, and 3 Newspaper Advertisements Sign-in sheets – “How did you hear about this meeting?”

Goals 1, 2, and 3 Direct Mailings Distribution Goals 1, 2, and 3 Press Releases Press Mentions Goals 1, 2, and 3 Surveys Number of Responses Goals 1, 2, and 3 Facebook Likes

Total Daily Reach Total Daily Impressions

Goals 1, 2, and 3 Twitter Followers Impressions Retweets Likes

Goal 2 Instagram Followers Goal 2 YouTube No measure required Goals 1, 2, and 3 Webstreaming Number of people watching Goal 5 Attend Partner Agency Events Number of Events

In addition to the measures listed above, the MPO will provide meeting evaluation forms at public meetings, workshops, and hearings to collect qualitative feedback from participants that can be used to improve meeting processes for future events.



Revisions and Amendments This Public Participation Plan reflects the current policies of the Alamo Area MPO. At a minimum, these policies will be reviewed, revised if necessary and adopted every three (3) years.

Administrative amendments to the PPP include changes to the public involvement tools and strategies, revision of references to applicable regulations, misspellings, omissions or typographical errors. Staff performs these updates, with no notification required.

Amendments to the Participation Plan include any other changes that do not fit the administrative definition above. A two-step process and 45 days of public comment are required before adoption. If the document changes significantly due to public comments, an additional 45-day comment period is required.

Development of a new Public Participation Plan follows a two-step process and requires a 45-day comment period.

Enclosure 1: Sample Checklist for Planning an Accessible Meeting Enclosure 2: Limited English Proficiency Plan Enclosure 3: Social Media Plan Enclosure 4: Brand Standards

Adopted: December 4, 2017



121

APPENDIX G

Policy 3:

Guidelines for Programming Projects in the

Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the

Transportation Improvement Program



122



5

Policy 3: Guidelines for Programming Projects

in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program

This document constitutes the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s process for programming projects in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program. When considered for amendment, this document shall be subject to a public comment period of approximately 30 days prior to adoption by the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board.

A. Purpose

The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) develops a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that programs projects for a minimum of the following four (4) fiscal years. The TIP is forwarded to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for inclusion into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. The TIP project selection process begins with the long-range Metropolitan Transportation Plan process. The public is invited to fully participate in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan development process thus assisting in the selection and prioritization of transportation improvement projects. Implementing agencies which include the Alamo Area Council of Governments, Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, cities and counties within the MPO study area, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), and VIA Metropolitan Transit, participate in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan development process with one of the final products of the process being a prioritized list of transportation projects to be eventually considered for inclusion in the TIP.

Projects in the TIP are either selected by the Transportation Policy Board in consultation with the State (TxDOT) and transit operator (VIA) or selected by the State (TxDOT) in cooperation with the MPO. Projects selected by the Transportation Policy Board are those that are to be funded with Surface Transportation Program - Metro Mobility (STP-MM), Transportation Alternatives (TA) , Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ), and any other future U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) or TxDOT funds suballocated to the local level.

B. Project Funding Categories

Project funding categories in the TIP and MTP include but are not limited to:

Category 1 Preventative Maintenance & Rehabilitation Category 2 Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects Category 3 Non-Traditional Funding Category 4 Statewide Connectivity Corridor Category 5 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) 1

Category 6 Structure Rehabilitation

1 The Alamo Area MPO does not currently receive this type of funding.


6

Category 7 Surface Transportation Program – Metro Mobility or STP-MM Category 8 Safety Category 9 Transportation Alternatives

Category 10 Miscellaneous

Category 11 District Discretionary

Category 12 Strategic Priority

Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program)

Federal Transit Administration Section 5309 (Capital Grant Program)

Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 (Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program)

C. Use of ‘Grouped’ Control Section Job (CSJ) Numbers

A CSJ (Control Section Job number) is an identifying project number used by the Texas Department of Transportation. The MPO will use ‘Grouped’ CSJs for the following types of projects:

Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Railroad Grade Separations SafetyLandscaping Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations Transit Improvements

Projects that fall within these categories will be listed in an appendix of the Transportation Improvement Program. Generally these Grouped CSJs will be used for projects funded under Category 1 (Preventive Maintenance & Rehabilitation), Category 6 (Structure Rehabilitation), Category 8 (Safety), and Category 10 (Miscellaneous). These projects are initially included in an Appendix of a new TIP and are revised or amended administratively as allowed in Section G Administrative Revisions.

Grouped CSJs will not be used for wholly or partially funded Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor), Category 5 (CMAQ, when allocated), Category 7 (STP-MM), or Category 9 (Transportation Alternatives) projects.


7

D. Use of Appendix D - Projects Undergoing Environmental Assessment

The purpose of Appendix D is to identify projects that are undergoing preliminary engineering and environmental analysis (PE/EA) consistent with early project development. The Federal Highway Administration allows these projects to be referenced in the current Transportation Improvement Program in order to facilitate the feasibility and PE/EA phases. This Appendix contains projects that are scheduled for implementation beyond the four years of the TIP time frame, and it in no way implies that these projects are programmed in the TIP. Cost estimates are preliminary and do not represent any commitment of construction funding. Consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan will be verified as alternatives are examined in studies or environmental clearance efforts.

Projects listed in Appendix D will include, at a minimum, MPO ID number, county, sponsoring entity, street name, project limits, project description, estimated let date and preliminary project cost.

E. Quarterly Review of Projects

Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor) Projects

The implementing agency will submit amendments to the Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor) projects to the MPO in writing. For cost increases greater than 10%, the implementing agency will also submit to the MPO justification for the cost increase and the funding source of the additional amount. For new projects being amended into the TIP that are not part of the current Unified Transportation Program, the implementing agency will also submit to the MPO which other Category 2 projects are being amended to allow for the inclusion of the new project unless the new projects are funded using additional allocation.

Category 7 (STP-MM) and Category 9 (TA) Projects

Every three (3) months, a detailed review of Category 7 (STP-MM) and Category 9 (TA) funded projects in the TIP will be conducted. These projects will be reviewed for progress towards their letting (contract) dates, cost estimates, description and limits. If warranted by the detailed review, projects may be re-prioritized at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board.

If the quarterly review warrants amendment(s) to the TIP, such amendment(s) will be presented to the Transportation Policy Board for consideration in sufficient time to allow the amendment(s) to be incorporated into the next regularly scheduled quarterly amendment of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program.


8

F. Amendment Process

The following changes will require an amendment to the TIP and MTP:

Adding or deleting project(s) Revising the project scope of work Revising the project cost Revising funding categories Revising the phase of work (ex: from P.E. to construction) Revising project limits

Amendments to the TIP and MTP require a two-step process. To permit adequate public review and comment, amendments to the TIP and MTP will be presented at a Transportation Policy Board meeting with action on the amendment occurring at the following Transportation Policy Board meeting (approximately 30 days after initial presentation). TIP and MTP amendments are provided in the meeting package which is posted on the MPOs website a week prior to TAC and TPB meetings. Amendments to both the TIP and the MTP may be initiated concurrently.

Amendments to the TIP or the MTP requiring quick action due to impending federal or state requirements or deadlines (or for other reasons deemed in the community's best interest) may be accomplished by a 75% vote of the TPB quorum present to waive the routine two-step process. In these cases, the Transportation Policy Board will hold a special public hearing within their normal meeting agenda to specifically solicit public comment on the proposed TIP or MTP amendment. These actions will be emphasized on the meeting agenda that is both mailed and e-mailed out ten (10) days prior to the Transportation Policy Board meeting. This will alert the public and permit special attendance to comment on the action prior to adoption by the Transportation Policy Board.

Governing bodies of the sponsoring agencies will promptly notify the MPO in writing of any currently programmed projects that are proposed to be deleted from the TIP. The governing body of the sponsoring agency shall state its preference for project replacement in the written notification. The Transportation Policy Board will provide direction and/or may consider action at the next appropriate meeting with respect to amending the TIP.

To the extent possible, any project amended outside the timeframe of the current TIP due to funding limitations will have priority consideration in being amended back into the TIP when additional funding becomes available.

G. Administrative Revisions

The MPO Director is authorized to approve certain “administrative changes” to the TIP with the notification of such to the appropriate transportation planning partners. The intent of this section is not to circumvent the public process for amending the TIP, but to allow for minor corrections to the TIP that do not materially change a project’s function including minor revisions to project limits, scope or cost.


9

H. Category 7 (STP-MM) Projects

Basic Requirements for STP-MM Projects

All projects submitted for consideration for funding through normal Category 7 (STP-MM) program allocations will compete through a standard project call when a new TIP is being developed. The Transportation Policy Board will approve a schedule, parameters and project selection criteria prior to the formal project call. Submitted projects must meet the following basic requirements:

1. Projects will be submitted to the MPO through an implementing agency (Alamo Area Council of Governments, Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, Texas Department of Transportation, VIA Metropolitan Transit and cities and counties within the MPO Study Area) and appropriate commitments of local match shall be made. Approval of the commitment of the local match from the Texas Department of Transportation District Engineer or the policy body of the local agency submitting the project for consideration will be obtained and submitted to the MPO. An ‘in-kind’ match is not allowed for construction projects.

2. All submitted projects shall be developed in accordance with minimum standards as defined by AASHTO and/or NACTO, as applicable.

3. Each implementing agency is encouraged to address Title VI and Environmental Justice considerations in submitting projects to the MPO for consideration.

4. Agencies should consider the transit service area when submitting projects.

5. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be included in all future transportation improvement projects. Any exceptions will need to be adequately justified by management of the implementing entity. Bicycle and pedestrian components included in a funded project may not be deleted from the project at a future date.

6. Funded STP-MM projects will also be included in the MTP. Note: Amendments to the MTP and the TIP are made through the amendment process at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board. Amendments to the MTP and TIP, can be made simultaneously.

7. A roadway project submitted for consideration in the TIP must be on a functionally classified facility as defined by the MPO and approved by Federal Highway Administration through the State. Roadway projects on facilities classified as a local street or minor collector do NOT qualify for Federal funding.

8. All deadlines set by the MPO are firm.


10

STP-MM Call for Projects Process

Prior to each STP-MM project call, MPO staff will develop the schedule, submittal form and call for projects process, to include workshop(s) jointly hosted by the MPO and TxDOT. These items will be reviewed and acted upon by the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC), Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC), and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with final action by the Transportation Policy Board.

MPO staff will be responsible for assembling data for the technical scoring process. A subcommittee of BMAC and PMAC will score standalone bicycle and pedestrian projects. A subcommittee of TAC will score added capacity and operational projects.

STP-MM Project Selection

The TAC will review the technical scoring, public input, project readiness and agency priorities and make a recommendation to the MPO’s Executive Committee on a slate of projects to be funded. The Executive Committee will make a recommendation to the Transportation Policy Board. The TAC may request presentations by implementing agencies.

STP-MM Project Implementation

1. Unless allocated a fixed amount, each STP-MM project will have a cost figure in the approved TIP that is an estimate. This TIP “Estimated Construction Bid” shall include all construction costs at 100% and shall designate what percent match is required by the local agency.

“Estimated Construction Bid” is defined as all anticipated bid item costs of the improvement project, other than for right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, change orders and construction engineering. The amount programmed as the “Construction Cost” in the TIP shall equal the “Estimated Construction Bid”.

2. Unless allocated a fixed amount, each selected STP-MM project may be adjusted when bids are approved.

a. If bids are higher than the TIP Construction Cost, the TIP estimate shall become a fixed construction funding cap.

b. If the Approved Construction Bid is lower than the TIP Construction Cost, the TIP shall be administratively revised by MPO staff to reflect the approved Construction bid (excludes any right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, and construction engineering)


11

c. Following the establishment of the project construction amount in items 2a and 2b above, the sponsoring entity is then eligible for up to 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding towards eligible change orders and up to 11% of STP-MM project funding towards eligible construction engineering and construction management costs. An under run in contingency cannot cover an over run in construction engineering/construction management and vice versa.

As these eligible change orders and eligible construction engineering costs are potential costs, they are not specifically programmed in the TIP towards the STP-MM. These costs, if incurred, would impact future fiscal allocations and it must be acknowledged that this could require the delay and/or re-scoping of existing TIP projects to remain fiscally constrained by fiscal year.

3. Once a project is included in the TIP, TxDOT and the local governmental entity (implementing agency) shall execute a Funding Agreement.

a. Prior to letting, the executed Funding Agreement will be based on the Estimated Construction Bid (identified as Construction Cost in the TIP) and reflect:

Estimated Construction Bid + maximum 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding for eligible change orders + maximum 11% of STP-MM funding for eligible construction engineering and construction management costs.

b. Post Letting, if the Approved Construction Bid (excluding any right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, and construction engineering) is lower than the TIP Construction Cost, the Funding Agreement will be amended and re-executed to reflect:

Approved Construction Bid + maximum 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding for eligible change orders + maximum 11% of STP-MM funding for eligible construction engineering and construction management costs.

4. Owner requested change orders will be covered 100% by the local agency. Owner requested change orders are the result of changes requested by the local agency, not included in the original TPB approved scope of work.

I. Category 9 (TA) Projects

Basic Requirements for TA Projects

The MPO will hold a competitive call for projects for TA funding. The Transportation Policy Board will approve a schedule, parameters and project selection criteria prior to the formal project call. Submitted projects must meet the following basic requirements:


12

1. Projects will be submitted to the MPO through an implementing agency and appropriate commitments of local match shall be made. Approval of the commitment of the local match from the agency submitting the project for consideration will be obtained and submitted to the MPO. An ‘in-kind’ match is not allowed for construction projects.

2. All submitted projects shall be developed in accordance with minimum standards as defined by AASHTO and/or NACTO, as applicable.

3. Each implementing agency is encouraged to address Title VI and Environmental Justice considerations in submitting projects to the MPO for consideration.

4. Agencies should consider the transit service area when submitting projects.

5. Funded TA projects will also be included in the MTP. Note: Amendments to the MTP and the TIP are made through the amendment process at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board. Amendments to the MTP and TIP, can be made simultaneously.

6. All deadlines set by the MPO are firm.

TA Call for Projects Process

Prior to each TA project call, MPO staff will develop the schedule, submittal form and call for projects process. These items will be reviewed and acted upon by the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC), Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC), and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with final action by the Transportation Policy Board.

MPO staff will be responsible for assembling data for the technical scoring process. A subcommittee of BMAC and PMAC will score TA projects.

TA Project Selection

BMAC and PMAC will review the technical scoring, public input, project readiness and agency priorities and make a recommendation to the Technical Advisory Committee on a slate of projects to be funded. The TAC may request project presentations by implementing agencies and will make a recommendation to the MPO’s Executive or Transportation Policy Board, as directed by the approved call for projects process.


13

J. Public Involvement

The MPO commits to a public involvement process that includes the provision of timely information, provides reasonable public access to technical and policy information, provides adequate public notice, seeks out and considers traditionally underserved populations, and documents significant comments. Please see the MPO Policy 2: Public Participation Plan for additional information on public involvement.

Adopted: December 4, 2017



c. Action on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan

In order to keep the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and TIP

consistent, revisions to projects and new projects added to the TIP will also need to be made to the MTP.

All new or revised roadway and transit projects considered under agenda items 10a and 10b will be incorporated into the TIP and MTP under this agenda item. At their meeting on April 6, 2018, the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee unanimously recommended approving the amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan that reflect action taken in agenda items 10a and 10b.

Action Requested

A motion to approve the projects approved in agenda items 10a and 10b into the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.



METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN "Mobility 2040"

2019FY

TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase Project SponsorMPO Proj ID

No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost

THIRD QUARTER 2018 AMENDMENTS

City


Description:

VA C CoSA 5536.1


Limits To: at various locations along San Pedro


ROW Purchase: $0


Construction Engineering: $60,000



Preliminary Engineering: $49,000

Other Field: $40,000

$1,269,000


Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal

ContributionStateFederal LocalFunding

Categories

Totals


Revision Date: 7/2018

0000-00-000

Construct ADA Compliant sidewalks on San Pedro Avenue

$1,000,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - add project


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5539.0

Limits From: In Bexar and Comal Counties

Limits To: Various locations


ROW Purchase: $0


Construction Engineering: $0

Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0

Preliminary Engineering: $0

Other Field: $0

$0

Type of Work: ITS

Total Project Cost:

$2,017,950


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,017,950

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,614,360 $403,590 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,614,360 $403,590 $0 $0 $2,017,950

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Install advanced controllers, networking equipment and control software for 179 traffic signals

$2,017,950



Description:

VA C CoSA 5545.1




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Partnership with VIA for a planning study on one multimodal arterial roadway

$1,000,000






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:


Limits From: Hays County Line

Limits To: 0.5 Mi S. of Hays County Line


ROW Purchase: $0




Indirect Costs: $0



$1,420,200


Total Project Cost:

$1,200,000


Other


12 - Strategic Pri

Other

$1,200,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,080,000 $120,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,080,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 4/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 6/16 - Austin TxDOT District to develop, fund and let to contract in Hays County


0016-04-113

Revise ramps and convert frontage roads from two way to one way operation

$1,200,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019


Description:


Limits From: LP 13

Limits To: IH 410


ROW Purchase: $0







$3,598,610


Total Project Cost:

$2,900,000


San Antonio


3 - BC Local

11 - Distr Discr

$2,175,000

$725,000

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,175,000

$652,500 $72,500 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$652,500 $72,500 $0 $2,175,000 $2,900,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0073-08-183

Construction of a partial frontage road, ramps, and intersection improvements

$2,900,000



Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5372.0

Limits From: Ingram Rd

Limits To: SH 151


ROW Purchase: $0


Construction Engineering: $2,000,000



Preliminary Engineering: $2,450,000

Other Field: $2,000,000

$60,950,000


Total Project Cost:

$50,000,000


San Antonio


12 - CL

Other

$50,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$40,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $50,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0521-04-204

Expand from 8 to 10 lane expressway

$50,000,000






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5373.0

Limits From: at SH 151

Limits To: Interchange


ROW Purchase: $0







$48,760,000


Total Project Cost:

$40,000,000


San Antonio


12 - Strat Pri

Other

$40,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$36,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$36,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $40,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0521-04-275

Reconstruct interchange - Phase 2

$40,000,000



Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5374.0

Limits From: SH 151

Limits To: US 90


ROW Purchase: $0







$12,190,000


Total Project Cost:

$10,000,000


San Antonio


12 - Strat Pri

Other

$10,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$9,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0521-04-279


$10,000,000



Description:

CR C ARMA 3988.0

Limits From: On Bulverde Road from Marshall Road

Limits To: Wilderness Oak


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$9,914,555


Total Project Cost:

$8,097,480


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$8,097,480

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,477,984 $0 $1,619,496 $0 $8,097,480

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 1/17 - move from 17 to 18; 4/15 - move from 15 to 16 and update description; 1/14 - move from 14 to 15; 4/13- move from FY 13 to FY 14 and revise funding categories; 4/12


0915-12-509

Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and drainage improvements

$8,097,480






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

CS E,R,C Port SA 4005.0

Limits From: On Quintana Road from Harmon Avenue

Limits To: McKenna Avenue








Other Field: $0

$8,636,100


Total Project Cost:

$7,800,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$7,800,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $0 $7,800,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 1/16 - move from FY 16 to FY 17; 1/14 - included PE and ROW as funded phases; 4/12


0915-12-520

Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements

$7,800,000



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5102.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP MM project selection


0915-12-543


$100,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost


Description:

CS C BxCo 5105.0

Limits From: On Galm Road, from FM 471 (Culebra Road)

Limits To: Government Canyon State Park


ROW Purchase: $0







$8,818,779


Total Project Cost:

$7,323,351


Other


7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$6,293,351

$1,030,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,034,681 $0 $1,258,670 $0

$824,000 $0 $206,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,858,681 $0 $1,464,670 $0 $7,323,351

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/16 - revise funding; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-544


$7,323,351






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

NR AAMPO 5103.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$100,000


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-12-546


$100,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - change agency and reduce cost


Description:

NR C AAMPO 5101.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$267,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 funded through


0915-12-547


$100,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019, change agency and reduce cost


Description:

CS C CoSA 5110.0

Limits From: Harry Wurzbach

Limits To: at Austin Highway


ROW Purchase: $0







$20,841,000


Total Project Cost:

$17,177,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$17,177,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $0 $17,177,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 4/17 - rev limits and funding; 1/17 - move from 19 to 18 and rev funding distr; 4/16 - comb with new STP-MM project and rev match (EDCP project); 10/15 rev funding; 4/14


0915-12-550

Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway

$17,177,000






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5316.3




ROW Purchase: $0







$9,706,400


Total Project Cost:

$8,000,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$7,200,000

$800,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,760,000 $1,440,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $800,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,760,000 $1,440,000 $0 $800,000 $8,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-576


$8,000,000



Description:

CS C UC 5325.0

Limits From: In Universal City, on E. Aviation

Limits To: Houston Drive to Aztec Way


ROW Purchase: $0







$10,473,886


Total Project Cost:

$8,632,561


UC


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$7,444,174

$1,188,387

Other $0

Other $0

$5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,188,387

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,955,339 $0 $1,488,835 $1,188,387 $8,632,561

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/17 - revise limits and description; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-578

Widen to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage

$8,632,561



Description:

VA C Converse 4972.0

Limits From: In Converse, from Converse Park N

Limits To: to FM 78


ROW Purchase: $0







$1,703,225


Total Project Cost:

$1,382,725


Converse


9 - TA

3 - LC

$1,365,440

$17,285

Other $0

Other $0

$1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $0

$0 $0 $0 $17,285

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,092,352 $0 $273,088 $17,285 $1,382,725

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-594

Construct multi use path

$1,382,725






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA C SARA 4977.0

Limits From: in San Antonio, from Lombrano St

Limits To: Laredo St


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,390,800


Total Project Cost:

$6,000,000


San Antonio


9 - TA

3 - LC

$3,125,000

$2,875,000

Other $0

Other $0

$2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,875,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,500,000 $0 $625,000 $2,875,000 $6,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-595

Extend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System

$6,000,000



Description:

VA C CoSA 5425.0


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$1,873,500


Total Project Cost:

$1,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,200,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $1,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 1/18 - update project description; 10/17 - add project; created from 0915-12-580


0915-12-601

Intelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements - Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers

$1,500,000



Description:

CS C CoSA 5428.0

Limits From: In San Antonio on Judson Road

Limits To: from Independence to IH 35


ROW Purchase: $0







$1,249,000


Total Project Cost:

$1,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$1,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$800,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2019; 10/17 - add project; configured from $1M from 0915-12-579


0915-12-603

Construct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road

$1,000,000






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

CS C Schertz 4975.0

Limits From: in Schertz on Woodland Oaks Dr,

Limits To: Savannah Dr & Live Oak Rd


ROW Purchase: $0







$1,426,966


Total Project Cost:

$1,158,266


Schertz


9 - TA

Other

$1,158,266

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$926,613 $0 $231,653 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$926,613 $0 $231,653 $0 $1,158,266

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-17-065

Construct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail

$1,158,266



Description:

FM 1560 C TxDOT 3997.0

Limits From: SH 16

Limits To: Loop 1604


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$15,040,244


Total Project Cost:

$12,325,004


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$11,070,000

$1,030,000

1 - Prvnt Mnt/Re $225,004

Other $0

$8,856,000 $2,214,000 $0 $0

$824,000 $206,000 $0 $0

$180,003 $45,001 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,860,003 $2,465,001 $0 $0 $12,325,004

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from 18 to 19; 4/17 - move from 17 to 18; 4/16 - move from 16 to 17; 4/15 - move from 15 to 16; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


2230-01-013

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, bike lanes and sidewalks

$12,325,004



Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3152.0

Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471, N

Limits To: FM 471 (Culebra Rd)








Other Field: $0

$6,497,971


Total Project Cost:

$4,400,000


Other


3 - PTF

Other

$4,400,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,400,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,400,000 $4,400,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-03-002


$4,400,000






2019FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3153.0

Limits From: FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 MI









Other Field: $0

$10,367,681


Total Project Cost:

$7,000,000


Other


3 - PTF

Other

$7,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-04-002


$7,000,000



Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3154.0

Limits From: Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N

Limits To: Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471








Other Field: $0

$3,889,710


Total Project Cost:

$2,600,000


Other


3 - PTF

Other

$2,600,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,600,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 $2,600,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-05-001


$2,600,000



Description:

SH 211 C BxCo 3155.0

Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N

Limits To: Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957








Other Field: $0

$6,029,926


Total Project Cost:

$4,100,000


Other


3 - PTF

Other

$4,100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,100,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,100,000 $4,100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



3544-06-001


$4,100,000






2020FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5542.0

Limits From: Old Pearsall Road

Limits To: Valley Hi Drive


ROW Purchase: $0







$10,278,900


Total Project Cost:

$8,100,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$7,080,000

$1,020,000

Other $0

Other $0

$5,664,000 $1,416,000 $0 $0

$816,000 $204,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,480,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $8,100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct operational improvements, ramp reversals, intersection improvements

$8,100,000



Description:

SL 337 C TxDOT 5543.0

Limits From: at River Road

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$13,197,600


Total Project Cost:

$10,400,000


New Braunfels


7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,400,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,320,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $10,400,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct grade separation

$10,400,000



Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.1




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000


$4,500,000






2020FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA T VIA 3768.1


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$2,000,000


Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from 18 to 20 and split off $2M; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency,descr; 4/15 - move from 16 to 17, correct limits; 1/13 - move from 13 to 15; fixed amount; portion of


0915-00-172


$2,000,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - move from FY 2018 to FY 2020 and split off $2M


Description:

FM 1535 C TxDOT 5310.0

Limits From: 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604

Limits To: Lp 1604


ROW Purchase: $0







$9,099,750


Total Project Cost:

$7,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$7,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$6,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $7,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0658-01-044


$7,500,000



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5301.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - change agency and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount


0915-00-195


$100,000






2020FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

CS C BxCo 5304.0

Limits From: In Bexar County on Talley Road

Limits To: From Wiseman Blvd to Tamaron Pass


ROW Purchase: $0







$26,544,924


Total Project Cost:

$20,917,924


Other


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$19,417,924

$1,500,000

Other $0

Other $0

$15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,500,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$15,534,339 $0 $3,883,585 $1,500,000 $20,917,924

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 and 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection processes


0915-12-581

Widen to provide operational improvements including a continuous left turn lane; construct 10 ft. shared use path

$20,917,924

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - increase cost





2021FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA C CoSA 5536.2




ROW Purchase: $0







$2,538,000


Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct bicycle and ped bridge on Roosevelt Ave

$2,000,000



Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.2




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000


$4,500,000



Description:

VA C CoSA 5545.2




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$3,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$3,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,400,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $3,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Partnership with VIA for planning studies on three multimodal arterial roadways

$3,000,000






2021FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

FM 1535 C TxDOT 5323.0

Limits From: Lp 1604

Limits To: Huebner


ROW Purchase: $0







$7,886,450


Total Project Cost:

$6,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

12S - STP-MM Rec

$5,480,000

$1,020,000

Other $0

Other $0

$4,384,000 $1,096,000 $0 $0

$816,000 $204,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$5,200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $6,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0658-01-045

Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

$6,500,000



Description:

VA T VIA 3768.3


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$2,000,000


Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$2,000,000



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5302.0




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-196


$100,000






2021FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

CS C Converse 5319.0

Limits From: On Rocket/Schaeffer, from E. Norris

Limits To: Lp 1604


ROW Purchase: $0







$6,588,804


Total Project Cost:

$5,430,481


Converse


7 - STP-MM

Other

$5,430,481

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$4,344,385 $0 $1,086,096 $0 $5,430,481

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-582

Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes

$5,430,481



Description:

CS C CoSA 5434.0

Limits From: in San Antonio on Presa Street

Limits To: from W. Boyer to SE Military Drive - Lp 13


ROW Purchase: $0







$12,490,000


Total Project Cost:

$10,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$9,000,000

$1,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$7,200,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2019 to FY 2021; 10/17 - add project per CoSA, funding is from 0025-02-204; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process


0915-12-604

Bike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to create Complete Streets

$10,000,000






2022FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

IH 410 C TxDOT 5537.0

Limits From: Blanco Road

Limits To: US 281


ROW Purchase: $0







$38,070,000


Total Project Cost:

$30,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0

$16,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$24,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $30,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct operational, ramp and intersection improvements

$30,000,000



Description:

VA C TxDOT 5544.3




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000


$4,500,000



Description:

VA T VIA 3768.4


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$2,000,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$2,000,000






2022FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

NR C AAMPO 5303.1




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000


Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-197


$100,000






2023FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

FM 1560 C TxDOT 5530.0

Limits From: Galm Road

Limits To: SH 16


ROW Purchase: $0







$25,062,750


Total Project Cost:

$19,750,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

3-LC

$14,750,000

$5,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$11,800,000 $2,950,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $5,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$11,800,000 $2,950,000 $0 $5,000,000 $19,750,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

$19,750,000



Description:

FM 1518 C TxDOT 5531.0

Limits From: FM 78

Limits To: IH 10


ROW Purchase: $0







$32,081,000


Total Project Cost:

$25,280,000


Schertz


7 - STP-MM

3-LC

$12,280,000

$13,000,000

Other $0

Other $0

$9,824,000 $2,456,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $13,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,824,000 $2,456,000 $0 $13,000,000 $25,280,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median or 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks

$25,280,000



Description:

VA C CoSA 5540.0




ROW Purchase: $0







$5,710,000

Type of Work: ITS

Total Project Cost:

$4,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$4,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$3,600,000 $0 $900,000 $0 $4,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Implement communication network improvements

$4,500,000






2023FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA T VIA 3768.5


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$2,000,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$2,000,000



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5303.2




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - add project


0915-00-xxx


$100,000



Description:

FM 1518 C TxDOT 5309.0

Limits From: FM 78

Limits To: IH 10


ROW Purchase: $0







$23,659,350


Total Project Cost:

$19,500,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$8,480,000

$10,000,000

Other $1,020,000

Other $0

$6,784,000 $1,696,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $10,000,000

$816,000 $204,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$7,600,000 $1,900,000 $0 $10,000,000 $19,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0465-02-027

Intersection and operational improvements

$19,500,000






2023FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA C TxDOT 5316.2




ROW Purchase: $0







$4,853,200


Total Project Cost:

$4,000,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

3 - LC

$3,600,000

$400,000

Other $0

Other $0

$2,880,000 $720,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $400,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,880,000 $720,000 $0 $400,000 $4,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-12-575


$4,000,000






2024FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

LP 368 C TxDOT 5535.0

Limits From: Burr Road

Limits To: New Braunfels St


ROW Purchase: $0







$17,766,000


Total Project Cost:

$14,000,000


Alamo Heights


7 - STP-MM

3-LC

$10,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $4,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 $14,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct Complete Streets improvements for multimodal users

$14,000,000



Description:

CS C CoSA 5538.0

Limits From: In San Antonio at Zarzamora/Frio City Road

Limits To: From US 90 to Walton Avenue


ROW Purchase: $0







$24,745,000


Total Project Cost:

$19,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$19,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$15,600,000 $0 $3,900,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$15,600,000 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $19,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct grade separation at RR tracks

$19,500,000



Description:

FM 3351 C TxDOT 5541.0

Limits From: at Cibolo Creek

Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0







$15,101,000


Total Project Cost:

$11,900,000


7 - STP-MM

Other

$11,900,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$9,520,000 $2,380,000 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,520,000 $2,380,000 $0 $0 $11,900,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Rebuild bridge over Cibolo Creek widening from 2 to 6 lanes

$11,900,000






2024FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

VA T VIA 3768.6


Limits To: .


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$2,000,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$2,000,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

Other

$2,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$1,600,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $2,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$2,000,000



Description:

NR C AAMPO 5303.3




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$100,000






2025FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

FM 2696 C BC 5532.0

Limits From: Borgfeld

Limits To: Bexar/Comal County Line


ROW Purchase: $0







$21,308,743


Total Project Cost:

$16,791,743


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$16,791,743

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$13,433,394 $0 $3,358,349 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$13,433,394 $0 $3,358,349 $0 $16,791,743

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Expand from 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with a raised median, bike lanes, sidewalk, curbs and drainage

$16,791,743



Description:

CS C Seguin 5533.0

Limits From: In Seguin on Rudeloff Road

Limits To: From Huber Road to SH 123 (at FM 20)


ROW Purchase: $0







$15,228,000


Total Project Cost:

$12,000,000


Seguin


7 - STP-MM

Other

$12,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$9,600,000 $0 $2,400,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$9,600,000 $0 $2,400,000 $0 $12,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct new alignment 4 lane roadway with center left turn lane and bicycle and pedestrian facilities

$12,000,000



Description:

CS C CoSA 5534.0

Limits From: In San Antonio on South New Braunfels

Limits To: From Lyster Road to IH 410


ROW Purchase: $0







$24,745,000


Total Project Cost:

$19,500,000


San Antonio


7 - STP-MM

3-LC

$9,500,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$7,600,000 $0 $1,900,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $10,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$7,600,000 $0 $1,900,000 $10,000,000 $19,500,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0000-00-000

Construct roadway extension on new alignment with multiuse path and sidewalks

$19,500,000






2025FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

NR C AAMPO 5303.4




ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$100,000

Type of Work:

Total Project Cost:

$100,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$100,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$80,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $100,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals



0915-00-xxx


$100,000



Description:


Limits From: Guadalupe/Comal County Line

Limits To: FM 1103


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$116,178,000


Total Project Cost:

$116,178,000


Other


3 - LC

Other

$116,178,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $116,178,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $116,178,000 $116,178,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2025 (out of TIP); 10/13 - revise description; 4/13 - add project to MTP (Env document)


0016-05-111

Expand from 6 ln to 10 ln expy - add 4 new managed lanes

$116,178,000



Description:


Limits From: Bexar/Guadalupe County Line

Limits To: Guadalupe/Comal County Line


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$259,546,500


Total Project Cost:

$259,546,500


Other


3 - LC

Other

$259,546,500

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $259,546,500

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $259,546,500 $259,546,500

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2025 (out of TIP); 10/13 - revise description; 4/13 - add project to MTP (Env document)


0016-06-047

Expand from 8 ln to 12 ln expy thru FM 3009 and 6 ln to 10 ln expy from FM 3009 to Comal CL - add 4 new managed lanes

$259,546,500






2025FY


No.

Year of Expenditure

Cost


City


Description:

IH 35 North C ARMA 3477.0

Limits From: IH 410 N

Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$617,968,000


Total Project Cost:

$617,968,000


Other


3 - LC

Other

$617,968,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $617,968,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $617,968,000 $617,968,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2025 (out of TIP); 10/13 - revise limits and description; 04/13 - revise limits


0016-07-113

Expand from 8 ln to 12 ln expy - add 4 new managed lanes - including managed lane conns at Loop 1604

$617,968,000



Description:

IH 35 North C ARMA 61.2

Limits From: IH 410 S

Limits To: IH 410 N


ROW Purchase: $0






Other Field: $0

$568,530,500


Total Project Cost:

$568,530,500


San Antonio


3 - LC

Other

$568,530,500

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$0 $0 $0 $568,530,500

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $568,530,500 $568,530,500

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2025 (out of TIP); 10/13 - revise description; 4/13 - revise limits and description


0017-10-168

Expand from ln 8 to 12 ln expy - add 4 new managed lanes incl managed lane conns at IH 410 N & IH 410 S

$568,530,500



Description:

VA C,E,R AAMPO 3768.2

Limits From: Austin-San Antonio Regional

Limits To: Corridor Project


ROW Purchase: $0



Contingencies: $0

Indirect Costs: $0


Other Field: $0

$0


Total Project Cost:

$10,000,000


Other


7 - STP-MM

Other

$10,000,000

$0

Other $0

Other $0

$8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

$8,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $10,000,000

TotalLocal


Categories

Totals

Project History: 4/18 - split project into 4 projects, reduce from $16M to $10M; 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency, descr, and move from 18 to 20; 4/15 - move from 17 to 18 and correct limits; 1/13 move from 14 to 16;


0915-00-173

Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions

$10,000,000

Remarks: 3rd Qtr 18 - split project into 4 projects, reduce from $16M to $10M




11. Presentation on the Region’s Air Quality Status

Issue

Diane Rath, Executive Director of the Alamo Area Council of Governments, will update the Transportation Policy Board on the region’s air quality status. The presentation is attached.

Action Requested

No action is requested on this item.


presented by

Diane RathExecutive Director

April, 2018

EPA Comments on Ozone Designation


• The Federal Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment.

• EPA has set NAAQS for six principal pollutants. (One is ozone)

• The Clean Air Act requires primary standards to be “requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety,” including the health of groups of people considered more at risk.

• The Clean Air Act bars EPA from considering cost in setting the NAAQS.


• November 6, 2017 – EPA Administrator Pruitt releases attainment designations – San Antonio MSA counties are not on the list

• December 22, 2017 – EPA releases additional designations for areas NOT in attainment. Bexar region is not on the list. State has until Feb 28, 2018 for additional information to be submitted to EPA for Bexar.

• The 8 county San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA is only region in country without a designation.


• January 19, 2018 – EPA files Supplemental Status Report in relation to active lawsuit with a timeline for designations

• February 28, 2018 – Governor submits additional information & data regarding Bexar County (transport, cost impact, significant improvement demonstrated, photochemical modeling for 2020 & 2023)

• March 12, 2018 – U.S. District Court, Northern District California, orders EPA to promulgate final designations for San Antonio area not later than 127 days from date of order.


March 19, 2018 – EPA writes Governor indicating intent to designate, “at best”, parts of Bexar “unclassifiable”. 60 days for additional info to support “Attainment” classification (May 11, 2018)

Indicates intent to designate the other 7 counties in MSA as in attainment.

March 30, 2018 – EPA publishes in Federal Register

July 17, 2018 – Final Ozone Designations


• Governor Abbott’s letter to EPA Feb 28, 2018

• EPA letter to Governor Abbott of March 19, 2018

• EPA Federal Register notice


• Support designation of 7 outer MSA counties as in attainment (Kendall, Comal, Guadalupe, Wilson, Atascosa, Medina, Bandera

• Bexar County should be in attainment! In 2017, 38% of the Ozone is foreign transport and by 2023, this is projected to increase to 46%.

• The MSA only produced 21% of the ozone locally in 2017and 18% projected in 2023


2017 Contribution to Local Ozone in the San Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA, Maximum 8‐hour Ozone on Days > 60 ppb of Ozone, 2017

Region C23 C58

ppb Percentage ppb PercentageSan Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA 11.94 20% 12.86 21%All Other Regions 49.28 80% 49.75 79%Total 61.22 100% 62.61 100%

Contribution to Local Ozone in the San Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA, Maximum 8‐hour Ozone on Days > 60 ppb of Ozone, 2017

Region C23 C58

ppb Percentage ppb PercentageBoundary and International 23.02 38% 24.05 38% Texas 22.54 37% 22.93 37%Other US States 15.66 26% 15.64 25%Total 61.22 100% 62.61 100%


2023 Contribution to Local Ozone in the San Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA, Maximum 8‐hour Ozone on Days > 60 ppb of Ozone, 2023

Region C23 C58

ppb Percentage ppb PercentageSan Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA 9.55 17% 10.30 18%All Other Regions 47.87 83% 48.24 82%Total 57.42 100% 58.54 100%

Contribution to Local Ozone in the San Antonio‐New Braunfels MSA, Maximum 8‐hour Ozone on Days > 60 ppb of Ozone, 2023

Region C23 C58

ppb Percentage ppb Percentage Boundary and International 23.78 42% 25.73 46% Texas 16.88 30% 19.84 35% Other US States 15.35 27% 12.00 21% Total 56.01 100% 57.57 100%


Why I JOINED AACOG



12. Monthly Status Reports

Purpose

The purpose of this agenda item is to provide information on several important issues.

Issue

Reports will be presented as follows:

a. Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (Green)

b. Air Quality Issues (Rath)

c. City of San Antonio (Frisbie)

d. San Antonio Mobility Coalition (Boyer)

e. Texas Department of Transportation (Jorge)

f. VIA Metropolitan Transit (Arndt)

g. Others

Action Requested

For information, discussion and action as necessary.


Air Quality and Regional Planning Efforts in the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA Alamo Area Council of Governments

EPA Letter to Governor about Intended Designations for San Antonio and Federal Register Publication On March 19, 2018, in a letter to the governor, the EPA revealed its intended designations for the 8-county San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA. Atascosa, Bandera, Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall, Medina, and Wilson Counties are intended to be designated attainment/unclassifiable, while “all or portions of Bexar County” are intended to be designated, “at best, Unclassifiable.” The intended designations were published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2018, which initiated a public comment period that will end on April 30, 2018. The AACOG Board of Directors plans to vote on a comment letter to EPA at its April 25 meeting. U.S. District Court Order on San Antonio Designations On March 12, 2018, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, ordered the EPA to promulgate final designations for the San Antonio area no later than 127 days from the date of the order. This includes a seven-day period to release initial area designations and a 120-day period which includes a public comment period before designations become final. This means the EPA has until March 19, 2018 to notify the state of its intended designation for the San Antonio area, with those designations becoming final no later than July 17, 2018 – nearly a month earlier than the EPA recommended in the January 19 Supplemental Status Report. Governor’s Letter to EPA In a letter to the EPA dated February 28, 2018, the State of Texas argued in favor of an attainment/unclassifiable designation for the San Antonio region on the following grounds. First, the region has a history of decreasing ozone levels in the last two decades despite large population increases. Second, the region is projected to attain the standard by 2020, according to photochemical modeling efforts conducted by AACOG. Finally, modeling suggests up to 32% of San Antonio’s ozone is caused by foreign emissions and international ozone transport, which are out of the region’s control. EPA Final Rule: Nonattainment Classification Thresholds On March 1, 2018, the EPA issued a final rule establishing the air quality thresholds that define each of the five Clean Air Act classifications for areas designated nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS; and establishing the attainment deadline associated with each classification. Table 1 shows the updated classification thresholds and attainment dates.


Table 1: Nonattainment Classification Thresholds and Attainment Date Deadlines under 2015 Ozone NAAQS Classification Lower Limit Upper Limit Attainment Date

Marginal From 71 ppb Up to 81 ppb 3 years from effective date of designation Moderate From 81 ppb Up to 93 ppb 6 years from effective date of designation Serious From 93 ppb Up to 105 ppb 9 years from effective date of designation Severe From 105 ppb Up to 163 ppb 15 years (or 17 years) from effective date of designation Extreme From 163 ppb 20 years from effective date of designation

Given the 74 ppb design value from Table 2, if the San Antonio area receives a nonattainment designation, it would be under a marginal classification. 2015 Ozone NAAQS Timeline The following is a timeline of NAAQS-related events: October 2015 EPA announces new ozone NAAQS (0.070 ppm or 70 ppb); Clean Air Act

dictates that once ozone NAAQS are set, the EPA must declare initial area designations within two years

September 30, 2016 Governor Abbott, in letter to EPA, recommends nonattainment designation for Bexar County

June 6, 2017 EPA announces a one-year extension for the designation of nonattainment areas, making the deadline October 1, 2018

August 2, 2017 One-year extension of nonattainment designations is revoked, returning the deadline to October 1, 2017

September 27, 2017 Governor Abbott writes a letter to EPA asking for a delay in the designation of Bexar County to allow for consideration of additional factors that might lead to an “attainment” or “unclassifiable” designation

October 1, 2017 EPA did not release nonattainment designations by the Oct. 1, 2017 deadline mandated by the Clean Air Act.1

November 6, 2017 EPA Administrator Pruitt releases attainment/unclassifiable designations; there are no San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA counties on this list, but further designations are pending

December 22, 2017 EPA Administrator Pruitt releases additional area designations, including Houston and Dallas/Fort Worth area counties; the San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA is not included in these designations and is the only area in the state without a designation

January 19, 2018 EPA files Supplemental Status Report in relation to an active lawsuit in the US Court of Appeals

February 28, 2018 Deadline for the State to submit additional information to be considered in the EPA’s final assessment of designations for the San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA

March 7, 2018 TCEQ approves proposal of 2015 Ozone NAAQS Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revisions and initiates a public comment period

1 80 Fed. Reg. 65438 (October 26, 2015)


March 12, 2018 U.S. District Court, Northern District of California orders EPA to promulgate final designations for San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA no later than 127 days from the date of the order

March 19, 2018 In a letter to Governor Abbott, the EPA releases its intended designations for the San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA. Atascosa, Bandera, Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall, Medina, and Wilson Counties are intended to be designated attainment/unclassifiable, while “all or portions of Bexar County” are intended to be designated, “at best, Unclassifiable.” This letter grants the State 60 days to submit additional information to support a designation of Attainment for Bexar County.

March 30, 2018 EPA intended designations for San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA are published in the Federal Register, initiating a 30-day public comment period

April 10, 2018 Public hearing for Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revisions at TCEQ headquarters; public comment period ends

April 30, 2018 Public comment period regarding intended designations for San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA ends

July 17, 2018 Court-ordered deadline for EPA to promulgate area designations for San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA

Unless the EPA Administrator determines the need for additional review or investigation, the following is the anticipated timeline of NAAQS Implementation if the area is declared to be in nonattainment, and is not reflective of any proposed legislation or any regulatory modification by the EPA Administrator: August 10, 2018 EPA finalizes nonattainment designations, classifications, and State

Implementation Plan (SIP) rules for the San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA

October 1, 2018 Initial Infrastructure and Interstate Transport SIPs are due 1 year after designation Initial Transportation and General Conformity determinations are due 2-4 years after designation SIP elements for non-attainment areas are due for areas classified as

Moderate or higher 3 years after designation Attainment deadline for Marginal areas 6 years after designation Attainment deadline for Moderate areas San Antonio – New Braunfels MSA Ozone Status Table 2 lists the fourth-highest maximum eight-hour average ozone concentrations and the design values for the region’s three regulatory monitors for the 2017 ozone season. Numbers in red represent exceedances of the 70 ppb threshold established by the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Both CAMS 23 and CAMS 58 are in exceedance of the 2015 ozone standard. The design value trend from 2010-2017 at each regulatory monitor is provided in Figure 1.


Table 2: Fourth Highest Eight-Hour Average Ozone Measurements and Three-Year Average at Regulatory Monitors, 2015 – 2017

Figure 1: San Antonio Design Value Trend, 2010 – 2017 The 2018 ozone season began on March 1. Table 3 shows the maximum allowable fourth-highest average eight-hour ozone for each regulatory monitor to comply with the 2015 ozone NAAQS by the end of the 2018 ozone season. The four highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations for each regulatory monitor in the AACOG Region for 2018 are shown in Table 4Error! Reference source not found..

Table 3: 2018 Maximum Allowable Fourth-Highest Eight-Hour Ozone for Each Regulatory Monitor

Monitor Site 4th Highest Reading, ppb 2018 Maximum Allowable 4th-Highest

under 70 ppb Standard 2016 2017

San Antonio NW C23 71 73 68

Camp Bullis C58 69 72 71

Calaveras Lake C59 62 65 85

Monitor Site Fourth Highest 8-Hour Average O3 Measurement, ppb Three Year

Average 2015 2016 2017

San Antonio NW C23 79 71 73 74

Camp Bullis C58 80 69 72 73

Calaveras Lake C59 68 62 65 65


So far in 2018, there have been no NAAQS exceedances at any regulatory monitors; however, there were eight days with moderate ozone levels reported in March at any regulatory monitor. During an average March, San Antonio can excpect to see between four and five moderate ozone days. An average April typically sees one NAAQS exceedance every other year, and about ten moderate ozone days.

Table 4: Four Highest 8-Hour Average Ozone Measurements at Regulatory Monitors, 2018*

Monitor Site Date PPB Date PPB Date PPB Date PPB

San Antonio NW C23 3/14/18 62 4/11/18 60 3/21/18 60 4/10/18 56

Camp Bullis C58 4/11/18 64 3/14/18 62 3/21/18 61 3/31/18 56

Calaveras Lake C59 3/14/18 65 4/11/18 61 3/21/18 59 3/31/18 56

* As of April 11, 2018; Ozone data validated through December 2017; Yellow represents moderate ozone levels (> 54 ppb)

The month of April marks the beginning of the spring peak of ozone season, when the greatest frequency of moderate-or-higher ozone days tends to occur. Figure 2 shows the semi-monthly frequency of moderate days and NAAQS exceedances, with the spring and fall ozone season peaks clearly visible. The fall peak of ozone season begins in August and lasts through early October, and is typically more severe than the spring peak.

Figure 2: Ozone Exceedances of Selected Thresholds at Regulatory Monitors by Semi-Monthly Period, 2010-2017

Air Quality Program Updates


On September 19, 2017, the U.S. District Court approved the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust agreement for state and related beneficiaries resulting from the Volkswagen emissions cheating settlement. The Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust allocates $209 million to Texas to fund emissions mitigation activities, such as the replacement or repower of aging diesel-powered vehicles and equipment. On October 2, the Trust Effective Date was set, giving the Governor’s Office 60 days to apply for beneficiary status. On December 4, Governor Abbott designated the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) as the lead agency responsible for overseeing the funds. On January 29, 2018, Wilmington Trust (the Trustee) certified Texas a beneficiary of Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust (EMT) funds. The TCEQ has issued a request for public comment regarding their administration of approximately $209 million in EMT funding. TCEQ will consider public comments as it develops the Beneficiary Mitigation Plan, summarizing how the funds allocated to the state will be used. The draft plan will be made publicly available and provided for public comment before the final plan is approved. The final plan must be submitted to the Trustee at least thirty days prior to the TCEQ’s first funding request. Comments can be submitted to [email protected]. For more information, please visit www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/trust. In support of the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Walk & Roll program, National Bike Month, and National Air Quality Awareness Week (May 1-7), AACOG’s Commute Solutions program will host its 13th annual Walk & Roll Challenge during May. This is a friendly competition among employers of the San Antonio-New Braunfels metropolitan area to see whose employees can record (on NuRide.com) the greatest percentage of trips taken by biking, walking, busing, or carpooling or saved by telecommuting or working an alternative schedule. The month-long event encourages individuals to adopt alternative modes of transportation and employers to facilitate that adoption. This year, about 20 employers are expected to participate.




At any time during the meeting of the MPO Transportation Policy Board, the Board reserves the right to adjourn into executive Session at any time to discuss any of the matters listed on the posted agenda, as authorized by Texas Government Code Section 551.071 (consultation with attorney), Section 551.072 (deliberations about real property), Section 551.074 (personnel matters), and Section 551.086 (economic development).

14. Adjourn
