memo.marking.rubric
DESCRIPTION
memo marking schemeTRANSCRIPT
-
Holmes Institute HI5002 Memo 0-05: Marking Rubric Trimester 03, 2014 Page 1 of 1 Marking Directions for each of the four sub-tasks: Choose the appropriate column; Choose the appropriate percent within that column, Multiply the value in the task-
description column by the appropriate percent and put in the appropriate cell (e.g. Context Line task is Acceptable at 56% = 10.0 x 56% = 5.6); Add all of the marks in the cells (round to the nearest whole number) and put the rounded total in the Total Mark cell; Divide the total by 7 and put the result into the Adj. to 10.0 cell; put any general comments on the bottom and/or on the back. Put the student numbers on the marking rubric and attach to the back of the memo.
Photocopy and retain a copy of the memos and marking rubrics.
Task Ranking
Task Description
Very poor under-
standing of task. Little
or no value generated.
(0-20 %)
Poor understanding
of task. Some value
generated.
(20-40 %)
Acceptable under-
standing of task.
Acceptable value
(40-60 %)
Good understanding of
task. Good value given.
(60-80 %)
Excellent understanding of
task. Excellent value given.
(80-100 %)
1)
Headings (5.0)
Missing a lot or all headings
0.0-1.0
Missing one or more essential features and/ /or poorly organised
1.0-2.0
All headings but poorly organised and/or difficult to read
2.0-3.0
All headings, well organised but some difficulty reading it.
3.0-4.0
All headings are clean & easy to read. e.g.
To: XXXXXX From: YYYYYYYYY Date: 27/04/2014 Re: Ideally 6 to 12 words 4.0-5.0
2)
Context Line (15.0)
Little or no insight on the issue with many irrelevancies. 0.0-3.0
A confused statement of the issue with some irrelevancies 3.0-6.0
A clear statement of the issue 6.0-9.0
A clear and concise statement of the issues 9.0-12.0
A clear and concise statement of the issues & consequences 12.0-15.0
2)
Action Line (25.0)
Generally confused with no request or conclusion. 0.0-5.0
A confused request or conclusionmay be poorly placed (e.g. at the end or blended with other parts). 5.0-10.0
An acceptable request or conclusion, given near the start. 10.0-15.0
A good clear concise request or conclusion, given near the start. 15.0-20.0
An excellent clear concise statement of how to resolve the issues. 20.0-25.0
4)
Rest of the Memo (25.0)
Generally confused discussion with little or no linkage to the issues and/or action line. 0.0-5.0
Confused and poorly linked to the issues and/or action line. 5.0-10.0
Acceptable insight plus clear support for the action line.
10.0-15.0
Good insight plus strong, clear, and concise support for the action line. 15.0-20.0
Excellent insight plus strong, clear, and concise support for the action line that is clearly tied to it. 20.0-25.0
Total Mark /70
Adj. to 10.0 /7 Student Numbers:
General Comments:
memo memo memo - Amazon Web Services memo memo memo. Title: cocorochecklist2 Created Date: 9/30/2014
MEMO MEMO MEMO MEMO - SOKAnet ... أ¥Bi e أ±أ®j أ¥Bi e أ±أ®j MEMO MEMO أ¥Bi e أ±أ®j أ¥Bi e أ±أ®j MEMO
Gen Memo 42/13: Philippines / AGM 11/13 Minutes / Alert ... memo/gen memo 42.13.pdfآ Gen Memo 42/13: