membrane desalination systems - trussell · pdf file · 2017-10-20membrane...
TRANSCRIPT
Membrane DesalinationMembrane DesalinationSystemsSystems
R. Rhodes TrussellR. Shane Trussell
http://www.http://www.trusselltechtrusselltech.com.com
The State of the Science withEmphasis on Needed Research
10/17/05
IntroductionIntroduction
• Principle processes: RO, NF, EDand Membrane Filtration
• All are basically post-WWIIdevelopments
• First commercial ED in mid-50s• First Commercial RO in mid-60s• First Commercial NF in late-70s• Large-scale membrane Filtration
came into its own around 1990
IntroductionIntroductionPerhaps the most fundamentaldivide between membraneprocesses is in the driving force– In the case of ED the electric field»Charged species move through the
membrane and the water is retained
–With MF, UF, NF, and RO pressure»Water passes through the membrane &
the other constituents are retained
IntroductionIntroduction
Membrane processes fit into theDesalination & Reuse discussion in twoplaces:– As a means of removing particulates– As a means of removing dissolved
species
Characteristic Rejections ofCharacteristic Rejections ofPressure Driven MembranesPressure Driven Membranes
Size
excl
usio
nC
harg
eSt
eric
Eff
ects
Water
Microfiltration
ParticlesSedimentAlgaeProtozoaBacteria
UltrafiltrationSmall colloidsViruses
NanofiltrationDissolved organic matterDivalent ions (Ca2+, Mg2+)
Reverse osmosis Monovalent species (Na+, Cl-)
Dec
reas
ing
pore
size
Incr
easi
ng p
ress
ure
AA brief look at each of thesebrief look at each of these
SuccessesSuccesses
&&
ChallengesChallenges
Membrane Filtration:Membrane Filtration:SuccessesSuccesses
• The most rapidly growing of membranetechnologies
• Will displace granular media filtrationtechnologies during the next decade
• Is also revolutionizing other processes:– Solids separation for activated sludge
(MBR)– Pretreatment for RO (NF and ED?)
Membrane Filtration:Membrane Filtration:ChallengesChallenges
• Inconsistent virus removal• Inconsistent regulation• Fouling inadequately understood
Flow Schemes for the MBR and ConventionalFlow Schemes for the MBR and ConventionalActivated Sludge ProcessActivated Sludge Process
BackwashWater
SecondaryClarifier
WASTE
TertiaryTreated
Wastewater
MicrofiltrationConventionalConventional
Aeration Basin
Primary TreatedWastewater
(Equivalent toa 1-3 mm screen) WASTE
MBR
Aeration Basin
TertiaryQuality
Wastewater
•• Benefits:Benefits:•• Excellent effluent qualityExcellent effluent quality•• A much smaller footprintA much smaller footprint•• Easily automatedEasily automated•• SludgeSludge need not settleneed not settle•• Effluent quality is notEffluent quality is not
dependent on operationsdependent on operations•• A MUCH better barrier toA MUCH better barrier to
pathogenspathogens
Why is MBR important toWhy is MBR important toReuse?Reuse?
MBR: SuccessesMBR: Successes
• Consistently superior effluent quality• Fouling and foaming are better
understood• Projects at increasingly larger scale• Costs increasingly competitive• Energy costs decreasing• Long-term success demonstrated in
numerous locations
MBR: ChallengesMBR: Challenges
• Our thinking must shift to decentralizedreuse
• Strategies for dealing with peak flowsmust mature
• MBR-specific strategies for operationmust be developed (filter, not settle)
• Membranes must be made to the sameQC standards as drinking watermembranes
RO: SuccessesRO: Successes
• Cost has dropped significantly• Membranes have improved• Energy efficiency has improved
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges
• Particulate Fouling– The area where we’ve longest felt we
knew something (SDI, MFI, etc,)– Yet:» A high SDI has always guaranteed fouling» But» A low SDI has never guaranteed good
performance
–We need a better understanding ofthe role low levels of particulatesplay in fouling behavior
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges
• Inorganic Fouling (scaling)– The Good News:»We have good models to predict it»We know how to control CaCO3 and
CaSO4
– The Bad News:» For silica our principle strategy is to
reduce recovery» Scale inhibitors are available, but their
selection and use is more of an art than ascience
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges
• Organic Fouling– The least-understood area of fouling
• Biological Fouling– Pretreatment is helpful, but– The key will be the use of
disinfectants
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges
Water Quality and Corrosion• We are stuck with the Langelier Index• The LSI is an idea from nearly 100 years
ago that the way to prevent corrosionis keep CaCO3 supersaturated
• This strategy cannot be reconciled withUS communities who successfully usenaturally soft water: San Francisco,Oakland, Portland, Tacoma, Seattle,New York, and Boston
• We are wasting a lot of money“hardening” good quality water
RO: Challenges (reuse)RO: Challenges (reuse)• Removing Microbiological Contaminants– Little doubt that the capability is there, but– SD work showed can’t just rely on MW cut-ff– Uniform standards, specifications and
regulations are required
• Emerging Organics– New compounds will continue to show up– RO will not remove them all– It is important that we understand those that
RO does not remove and» Either establish there is no risk, or» Find other ways to remove them
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges(seawater)(seawater)
Pretreatment– It’s unlikely that one universal treatment
will work in every application– The appropriate pretreatment depends on
the site– In some cases we’ve been lucky– Others have been less fortunate– We need to invest more in pretreatment
studies before we build projects– With an emerging technology, large-scale
failure sets back the entire industry
RO: ChallengesRO: Challenges(seawater)(seawater)
Boron• Essential for plants, perhaps for humans• Low levels have toxic effects on both• What we know about plants– Information is old– Is limited to agricultural crops– Reported toxic levels range from 0.3 to 2 mg/L– Little information on horticulture (Grandma’s roses)
• Boron is difficult to remove– Doesn’t ionize– Current technologies all increase cost
• Need better information on safe levels• Need better removal technologies
Future ResearchFuture Research
Recommendation 1 - Improve FeedwaterRecovery
1. Understand scale inhibitors2. Study silica scale control (esp.)3. Study chemical pretreatment &
sidestream interventions4. Optimize element design
Recommendation 2 - Improve ourunderstanding of pretreatment forSWRO
Future ResearchFuture ResearchRecommendation 3 - Water Quality and Horticulture
1. Desktop study and field studies on commonplants
Recommendation 4 - Biofilm Control/Microbiofouling1. Understanding it better
– Reuse, seawater, brackish water– Which organisms?– Important parameters, TOC, Temp, Stagnation,
micronutrients, etc.– Effectiveness of pretreatment
2. Use of chloramines– Long-term exposure tests (>20,000 hrs)– Better documentation on the redox chemistry of
chloramines– Seawater/bromamines
Future ResearchFuture Research
• Recommendation 5 - Study OrganicFouling– We should continue to fund strong studies
in this area. We don’t understand it
• Recommendation 6 - Removal ofMicrobials– Here we have the understanding– We need standard specifications,
confirmation tests, & a design Manual
Future ResearchFuture Research
• Recommendation 7 - MBR– A huge new area– We should keep an active research
program in this area, funding only thebest proposals
• Recommendation 8 - Documentingthe rejection of emergingcontaminants– They will keep coming– We will need to maintain our database
Future ResearchFuture Research
• Recommendation 9 - Boron control– SWRO - support studies to demo
approaches– Reuse - scoping study
• Recommendation 10 - EnergyRecovery– Studies/demonstrations of new
techniques
Future ResearchFuture Research
• Recommendation 11 - Corrosion– Desktop study of natural low TDS
supplies– Testing of alternate strategies (besides
Langelier)
• Recommendation 12 - Pretreatmentfor EDR & Reuse– Strategies to prevent anion membrane
fouling– Research to understand the same