medical law and ethics refresher 2013
TRANSCRIPT
New Zealand Medical Law and Ethics Refresher 2013
Dr Chris Cresswell Emergency Medicine Physician Whanganui
Disclaimer!
! I am not an expert on Medical Law and Ethics
! I complained about lack of clinicians and clinical cases at previous conferences ! So why me? – cos no one else is doing it
! Keith
! I do not represent my employer
Conversation
! One clinician posing some curly cases ! Cases based on real cases or common ED challenges
! Some cases did not go so well
! Often grey areas without definite rules ! “This is a difficult area”
! Opinion
! Medical cultural agreement
! Medico-legal-ethical agreement
! Societal agreement
! Respecting patients autonomy vs perceived risk/benefit of treatment or non treatment
! Big picture vs the individual in front of us
Key issues for clinicians
! Confidentiality
! Duty of Care
! Competence
Sedated Ambo
! Sunday night of long weekend, provincial hospital in Australia
! Moderately busy ED
! 30M took a 8 sleeping tablets and then had low speed motorcycle crash. Hx of depression. An antidepressant and sleeping pills
! BIB colleague by private vehicle
! Sleepy, minor grazes
! Denies suicidal ideation
! Medically treated and cleared
! d/w psych: patient known to them. Low risk of suicide. Has follow up appointment with psych in a few days -> fit for discharge.
! Patient due to work tomorrow
! Sleeping pills will have worn off by then
! Is he safe to work?
?
! The doctors had concerns re his safety to drive an ambulance and manage patients
! What would you do?
! Encouraged pt to take time off and talk to his employer
! Pt refused
! Drs asked if they could talk to his employer
! Pt refused
! What would you do?
?
! Discussion between the junior and senior doctor on duty and a senior nurse
! Considered there to be a serious and risk to the patient or the public
! d/w ambulance station manager
! Patient lost his job
! Pt suicided
! On review it was considered that this was not serious and imminent enough risk to break patient confidentiality
! Strong contrary opinions from several ED docs
! Reframing ! Would the doctors have acted the same if he had been
driving, out of work hours, under the influence of alcohol?
! Is it valid that we considered driving under the influence of sedatives different?
Confidentiality
! We can break confidentiality if there is serious risk to the patient or the public ! It must be reported to someone who can directly
address the risk ! eg police or psych services ! Not the media!
! Only divulge as much information as required for that agency to be able to address the risk
! If in doubt talk to senior colleagues and to your employers privacy officer +/or your indemnity insurer
Duty of Care
! What does this mean?
Duty of Care
! An ethical and legal responsibility to act in patients’ best interests ! Even if it is against their will
! Even if it requires use of force or chemical sedation
! Especially when they are not competent to decide for themselves
! Means we can get away with a lot if we think it is in the patients best interests
Or, in terms of the Health and Disability Code:
! RIGHT 4 Right to Services of an Appropriate Standard
! 4) Every consumer has the right to have services provided in a manner that minimises the potential harm to, and optimises the quality of life of, that consumer.
Or the Common Law Principle of Necessity
Competence
! What is competence?
Competence
! In practice ! Can the patient tell me what is happening and the
implications of the decisions s/he is making ! + a clinician’s assessment of whether or not they are actually
making the decision they would make if they were well /uninjured / sane ! Does she know enough? ! Does she understand enough? ! Is she free enough to make the best decisions for herself?
! Free from the coercive forces of ! Psychiatric illness ! Drugs
! But not necessarily free from coercive force of the threat of violence
Competence
! Competent patients have the right to make “wrong” decisions.
! Generally age 16 is the age of competence but age is less important than the patient’s ability to understand. ! If patient understands they may be able to make their own
decisions
! Especially with contraception, termination of pregnancy
! Competence assessment on all elderly admitted or hospital ! Because likely to come to a competence question
Some common cases
Paracetamol testing
! 23F 25g (potentially dangerous) paracetamol taken with suicidal intent
! Blood test required to determine whether she needs antidote
! Patients refuses to allow a blood test to be taken
! She says she understands the risk that she could die without treatment
! What do we do?
! We assess that she is not competent to make this decision for herself because she is under the coercive force of a psychiatric illness.
! We say if she was competent / well she would want to have testing and treatment
What we have done
! Traditionally we have threatened patients with sectioning under the Mental Health Act and they usually give in and allow testing and treatment
! In fact Mental Health Act does not allow medical investigation and treatment against the patients will
! But we have a Duty of Care to test +/- treat
! So we have a duty of care to test +/- treat this patient even against her will, by force if necessary
! In practice most patients agree to testing and treatment when they have had this explained to them
Confidentiality
! 23M comes in after an assault. He has moderate injuries and is competent
! You encourage him to report the assault to the police
! He declines
! You ask if you may report the assault to the police
! He declines
! Are there any situations in which you may report the assault to the police?
! We have a Duty of Care to report serious / life threatening injuries eg knife or firearm
Suspected DV
! 25F multiple minor injuries, requiring ED treatment but not admission
! You suspect domestic violence
! She denies this and refuses your offer to inform the police
! She is competent ! But is she free of the coercive force of the threat of violence?
! What will you do?
! She is a competent adult and I can not break confidentiality unless ! You think it is likely there is a child at risk of harm ->
CYF (who may inform the police) ! A knife or a gun was involved
! But I can report your concerns to another colleague, eg a social worker, who may not have the same confidentiality relationship with the patient and so may be able / be required to report to the police
Police request for information
! Police request information about a specific patient’s injuries
! What will you do?
! If possible ask the patient if you can give the information to the police
! Otherwise should go through your privacy officer
! (Information is usually given but we need to ensure there is not irrelevant information, or information about other people given out).
A trickier case ...
An unconscious patient
! 60F with severe MS, BIBA unresponsive.
! Examination and investigations including bloods, ECG, CT brain do not reveal a cause.
! D/W GP: could be drug overdose with suicidal intent
! GP suggests that the patient be allowed to die ! Terrible quality of life
! No family
! Treatment options are keep patient comfortable vs put patient on a ventilator and see if drugs wear off.
! What would you do?
! The doctor discussed with another senior doctor
! Patient was allowed to die
Hypothetical case from Prof Skegg 2012
! 50 year old with terminal lung cancer
! BIBA with suicide note stating he had taken a drug overdose
! Prof Skegg says we could allow this man to die
! This horrified several psychiatrists and ED docs in my institution
What do you think?
Some simpler cases …
! Drunk guy, minor head injury, but ? KOd, belligerent, wants to leave ED
! What are you going to do?
! No easy answer – Is he belligerent because he is bleeding into his brain?
! Depends on severity of injury
! Is he competent – can he tell you that he’s had a head injury, that there is a small chance he will deteriorate, and that he is prepared to take the risk
! Is the belligerence out of character?
! Are there friends or family who can reason with him
! Has he got a responsible adult to go with?
! If in doubt, don’t let him out
! If not KOd he’d probably be OK to go
! Can usually encourage patient to stay to be observed (or CT and discharge).
! Occasionally I’ll sedate a patient like this so I can scan or observe him and keep an eye on him.
! Small dose of sedative still allows accurate neuro obs to be done.
Drunk driver
! 50M BIBA post car crash.
! Drunk. Minor injuries
! Treated and discharged.
! You think he is OK to walk, but not to drive.
! You believe he is going to drive home
! What are you going to do?
! Call police
! While there is an imminent and serious risk to himself and public we don’t hold a patient like this against his will
! Why not? Will this change?
Drunk walker
! 50M, bar fight, minor injuries
! Treated and discharged. Says he is going to walk home but probably too drunk to walk safely home
! You encourage him to stay
! He declines
! What are you going to do?
! We allow him to walk – this is probably his standard Friday night behaviour
! Relatively minor risk to himself and others
! Right or wrong?
Agitated dying patient
! 70M terminal cancer, in hospice
! Agitated +++
! Refusing medications
! Palliative care specialist requests psych to section patient so he can by sedated
! Psych resists, long delay for assessment
! What would you do?
! The palliative care specialist has a Duty of Care to treat the patients agitation
! Psych not needed
! What do you think?
Stroppy patient with liver failure
! 50M in HDU with liver failure
! Agitated and wanting to self discharge
! What are you going to do?
! Depends if he is competent ! Can he tell you what is going on, is he orientated and
the potential implications of him leaving?
! Is there a good reason for him going or is he just agitated?
! What would you do?
! Low threshold for saying there is a high risk his agitation is from hepatic encephalopathy or some other complication of his disease and not allowing him to go.
! This patient was allowed to leave and was found dead in a neighbour’s garden the next day
23F Serial Self Harmer
! Normally attempted suicide patients are seen by psych before discharge
! Patient has been stapled back together
! Patient wants to leave and go to a friend’s home rather than waiting to see psych
! Would need to be held against her will
! You believe she is at low risk of doing serious harm to herself
! What do you do?
! Respect her autonomy
! Decrease the drama
! Patient allowed to go
! Management plan drawn up with psych to formalise this approach
The great EPOA/NFR/withholding treatment debate
! 90F, severely demented, doubly incontinent rest home resident BIBA with pneumonia
! EPOA wants active treatment – IV antibiotics, IV fluids
! What are you going to do?
! EPOA can not make decisions for an incompetent patient about with holding medical treatment (including NFR)
! EPOA can not demand futile medical treatment
! The previous Health and Disability Commissioner likes this – removed the burden of making these decisions from the family / EPOA
! We need to be aware of medical culture / nihilism vs the EPOA / family’s readiness to let go.
! Conversation ! Your mother is very sick and without treatment she will
probably die
! What is your mother’s life like now?
! Antibiotics might prolong your mother’s life.
! With or without antibiotics we can keep her very comfortable
! If she was aware of how she is now do you think she would want antibiotics for this pneumonia or would she want to die of natural causes?
! Sometimes it is appropriate to treat the patient if family want treatment, ! But plant the seed to help them let go when the patient
next becomes unwell.
! Advanced Care Plans
! Treatment Escalation Plans
Conclusion ! Often difficult to balance patients’ autonomy with what we think is best for
them
! Competence ! Assessed and documented ! Are they free enough to make good decisions? ! Do they understand what is happening and the implications of their decisions?
! Duty of Care / Patient’s right to treatment that minimises harm / optimises quality of life ! We are responsible to do what is best for the patient
! Sometimes against their will
! Confidentiality ! Can be broken for serious and risk ! Can share health information with colleagues if in patient’s best interest
! If in doubt ask a senior colleague +/- indemnity insurer