media/apiwebsite/.../colorado/...gas-a75-jul-6-10-20… · 06/07/2010 · a survey of active...
TRANSCRIPT
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-1
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 45 56 54 58 54 43 46 51 Wrong track 38 32 36 33 30 50 44 38 Unsure 16 11 9 8 15 7 10 10 Refused 1 1 2 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 7 25 18 24 25 -7 2 14Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 51 49 48 44 55 54 51 49 Strong 29 26 26 22 29 23 37 26 Not strong 21 24 22 22 26 32 15 23 No to reject 42 42 43 50 33 43 47 44 Not strong 8 13 14 18 6 12 12 13 Strong 34 29 29 32 27 31 35 31 Unsure 7 9 8 6 12 3 2 6
Yes - No 8 8 5 -6 23 12 5 5Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-2
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 58 56 44 51 56 50 51 45 51 Wrong track 29 34 46 44 29 37 42 49 38 Unsure 11 9 10 6 14 12 8 6 10 Refused 2 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 29 22 -2 7 27 13 9 -4 14Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 49 47 48 51 54 45 56 36 49 Strong 25 25 28 34 26 25 28 28 26 Not strong 24 21 19 17 28 21 28 8 23 No to reject 44 46 47 48 40 45 41 59 44 Not strong 13 15 14 13 7 17 14 12 13 Strong 31 31 33 35 33 28 27 47 31 Unsure 8 7 5 1 6 9 3 5 6
Yes - No 5 1 1 3 14 0 15 -23 5Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-3
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 51 52 61 51 42 60 41 63 43 51 Wrong track 37 39 24 41 47 25 49 29 47 38 Unsure 13 8 13 8 10 15 10 6 9 10 Refused 2 2 1 2 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 14 13 37 10 -5 34 -8 34 -3 14Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 44 54 60 47 42 52 34 61 49 49 Strong 23 29 27 26 26 24 22 26 32 26 Not strong 21 25 33 21 16 28 12 35 17 23 No to reject 51 39 30 49 53 41 61 30 46 44 Not strong 15 12 16 14 10 19 11 12 11 13 Strong 36 27 13 35 44 23 50 18 34 31 Unsure 6 7 11 4 5 7 5 9 5 6
Yes - No -7 16 30 -2 -11 11 -26 31 4 5Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-4
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 53 51 54 55 51 50 51 Wrong track 35 38 37 36 36 38 38 Unsure 11 10 9 9 12 11 10 Refused 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 18 12 16 19 15 11 14Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 54 48 58 56 45 45 49 Strong 23 27 29 27 24 26 26 Not strong 31 20 29 29 21 19 23 No to reject 38 46 37 38 49 48 44 Not strong 14 13 10 10 12 15 13 Strong 24 33 27 28 37 33 31 Unsure 8 6 5 6 6 7 6
Yes - No 16 2 21 19 -4 -3 5Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-5
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 43 47 40 58 58 58 51 Wrong track 44 39 47 33 31 35 38 Unsure 14 14 13 8 9 7 10 Refused 1 2 1
Right dir - wrong track -1 7 -6 25 26 23 14Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 48 36 55 50 47 55 49 Strong 26 20 30 26 22 33 26 Not strong 22 17 25 24 25 22 23 No to reject 46 57 39 43 44 43 44 Not strong 12 24 5 14 16 10 13 Strong 33 33 33 29 28 32 31 Unsure 7 7 7 6 9 2 6
Yes - No 2 -21 16 7 4 12 5Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-6
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 51 51 43 58 50 56 46 51 Wrong track 37 38 42 34 41 31 46 38 Unsure 9 10 14 8 8 11 8 10 Refused 3 0 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 13 13 1 24 9 24 0 14Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 45 50 56 52 42 50 45 49 Strong 14 29 35 29 24 26 26 26 Not strong 31 21 20 23 18 24 19 23 No to reject 42 45 40 43 54 43 50 44 Not strong 21 12 12 11 11 12 9 13 Strong 21 33 27 32 42 31 42 31 Unsure 12 5 5 5 4 7 5 6
Yes - No 3 5 16 9 -12 8 -5 5Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-7
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 55 49 46 57 55 40 51 52 51 Wrong track 34 40 45 32 37 46 38 37 38 Unsure 10 9 9 9 9 14 10 10 10 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 21 9 1 24 18 -6 12 14 14Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 50 45 38 49 50 46 45 53 49 Strong 27 22 21 27 26 27 24 28 26 Not strong 23 23 17 22 24 19 21 24 23 No to reject 44 48 53 45 41 50 50 39 44 Not strong 15 14 16 13 14 14 16 10 13 Strong 29 34 37 33 28 35 34 29 31 Unsure 5 7 9 6 9 4 5 8 6
Yes - No 6 -3 -16 4 9 -4 -5 13 5Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-8
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 28 21 33 65 58 73 51 Wrong track 63 76 54 22 28 16 38 Unsure 9 2 13 12 14 9 10 Refused 1 1 2 1
Right dir - wrong track -35 -55 -21 43 30 57 14Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 29 23 34 60 45 78 49 Strong 18 13 22 32 24 40 26 Not strong 11 10 12 29 21 37 23 No to reject 68 73 66 31 44 16 44 Not strong 18 16 19 11 13 8 13 Strong 51 57 47 20 31 8 31 Unsure 2 5 1 9 10 7 6
Yes - No -39 -50 -32 30 1 62 5Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-9
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 30 22 59 30 54 69 66 58 71 67 51 Wrong track 61 69 30 61 35 20 19 25 15 20 38 Unsure 9 8 8 9 10 7 14 16 14 11 10 Refused 2 1 3 1 1
Right dir - wrong track -32 -47 29 -31 19 49 47 33 56 48 14Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 29 25 50 29 40 58 70 58 80 65 49 Strong 17 17 21 16 20 26 41 37 45 35 26 Not strong 12 8 28 13 20 32 29 21 36 30 23 No to reject 66 73 42 67 54 33 24 31 18 27 44 Not strong 17 18 15 18 17 13 7 6 8 10 13 Strong 49 55 27 49 36 20 16 24 10 18 31 Unsure 4 2 9 5 7 10 6 11 2 8 6
Yes - No -37 -48 8 -38 -14 25 47 27 63 38 5Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-10
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 33 27 59 59 62 69 31 29 72 44 76 57 51 Wrong track 58 65 31 29 17 22 59 63 18 47 8 29 38 Unsure 9 8 9 6 21 9 11 7 8 8 15 14 10 Refused 5 3 2 1
Right dir - wrong track -25 -38 28 30 46 47 -28 -34 54 -3 68 27 14Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 27 31 41 58 67 73 42 20 52 46 74 67 49 Strong 15 18 18 26 39 43 26 11 14 31 37 45 26 Not strong 12 13 24 33 28 30 16 10 39 14 38 21 23 No to reject 69 64 53 29 24 23 56 74 36 49 18 29 44 Not strong 18 16 18 11 7 8 18 17 22 7 6 9 13 Strong 51 48 35 18 17 16 37 57 14 43 12 20 31 Unsure 4 5 5 12 9 4 3 6 12 5 8 4 6
Yes - No -42 -32 -12 29 43 50 -14 -54 17 -3 57 38 5Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-11
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 100 59 29 50 69 44 20 51 Wrong track 100 29 66 40 22 42 68 38 Unsure 11 5 10 8 12 12 10 Refused 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 100 -100 30 -37 10 47 2 -48 14Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 58 36 58 32 45 54 45 47 49 Strong 28 21 32 15 19 27 23 32 26 Not strong 31 15 25 17 25 26 22 15 23 No to reject 35 62 35 63 53 39 50 48 44 Not strong 13 14 12 19 13 12 17 8 13 Strong 22 48 23 44 39 26 33 40 31 Unsure 7 3 8 5 3 8 6 5 6
Yes - No 23 -26 23 -30 -8 15 -5 -1 5Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-12
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 44 57 64 30 39 62 56 45 54 41 51 Wrong track 46 31 22 64 51 27 31 48 35 48 38 Unsure 9 12 13 5 9 11 12 7 10 10 10 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track -2 26 42 -34 -12 35 25 -4 19 -7 14Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 31 77 67 24 24 75 74 36 46 53 49 Strong 15 44 38 11 10 44 45 17 24 27 26 Not strong 16 33 28 13 14 31 29 19 21 26 23 No to reject 64 17 26 72 73 20 24 58 49 42 44 Not strong 14 7 12 15 16 10 8 14 12 10 13 Strong 49 10 15 57 57 10 17 45 37 32 31 Unsure 5 6 7 4 4 5 2 5 6 5 6
Yes - No -32 60 40 -48 -49 55 50 -22 -3 12 5Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-13
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 43 36 49 56 63 50 61 40 51 Wrong track 43 52 36 34 30 39 29 46 38 Unsure 13 11 15 8 6 11 6 14 10 Refused 1 1 2 1 4 1
Right dir - wrong track 1 -16 13 22 33 12 33 -5 14Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 46 35 54 58 45 58 46 44 49 Strong 29 28 29 26 22 31 23 26 26 Not strong 17 7 25 32 23 27 23 18 23 No to reject 50 61 42 35 44 40 48 48 44 Not strong 10 6 13 13 19 9 21 8 13 Strong 41 56 30 22 25 31 27 40 31 Unsure 3 4 3 6 11 2 6 7 6
Yes - No -4 -26 12 23 1 18 -1 -4 5Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-14
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 38 59 68 26 58 56 50 51 Wrong track 52 26 21 71 31 30 41 38 Unsure 9 15 10 3 10 14 9 10 Refused 1 2 1 1
Right dir - wrong track -13 33 47 -45 27 25 9 14Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 22 64 72 25 57 58 44 49 Strong 4 41 40 17 34 27 24 26 Not strong 18 23 32 8 23 31 20 23 No to reject 74 29 19 75 34 40 47 44 Not strong 14 13 9 16 14 16 18 13 Strong 59 17 9 59 20 24 29 31 Unsure 4 7 10 9 2 9 6
Yes - No -52 35 53 -49 23 17 -3 5Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-15
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 55 50 51 52 44 54 51 Wrong track 34 42 37 38 38 37 38 Unsure 11 6 12 9 16 8 10 Refused 2 1 2 0 1
Right dir - wrong track 21 8 14 14 6 17 14Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 45 54 75 42 50 49 49 Strong 22 31 48 19 33 23 26 Not strong 23 24 27 23 16 26 23 No to reject 48 39 21 52 42 46 44 Not strong 11 15 7 14 13 13 13 Strong 37 25 14 38 29 33 31 Unsure 7 6 5 6 8 5 6
Yes - No -3 15 54 -10 8 3 5Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-16
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 42 63 47 54 58 55 50 51 Wrong track 46 26 41 38 31 38 37 38 Unsure 11 10 10 9 11 5 13 10 Refused 0 1 2 2 1
Right dir - wrong track -4 37 5 16 27 16 13 14Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 33 73 37 66 56 29 68 49 Strong 15 41 20 38 27 12 38 26 Not strong 18 31 17 28 30 17 29 23 No to reject 62 20 58 28 35 65 27 44 Not strong 16 9 14 11 14 19 9 13 Strong 46 11 44 17 21 45 18 31 Unsure 5 7 5 6 8 7 6 6
Yes - No -29 53 -21 38 21 -36 41 5Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-17
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 42 56 50 53 41 59 51 Wrong track 49 31 38 37 50 29 38 Unsure 8 12 11 10 9 11 10 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track -7 25 13 16 -9 30 14Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 36 60 45 54 28 66 49 Strong 12 37 22 30 10 39 26 Not strong 24 24 23 23 18 27 23 No to reject 59 32 47 41 69 26 44 Not strong 13 12 15 12 18 10 13 Strong 45 21 32 29 50 16 31 Unsure 5 7 8 5 3 8 6
Yes - No -23 28 -2 13 -40 40 5Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-18
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ1 Direction of things in own
part of Colorado today Right direction 60 44 61 57 59 58 52 33 40 51 Wrong track 29 48 27 26 28 31 36 60 52 38 Unsure 12 7 12 17 11 10 12 6 7 10 Refused 1 3 1 1 1 1
Right dir - wrong track 31 -4 33 30 30 28 16 -27 -12 14Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 81 23 100 100 34 55 70 49 Strong 50 6 53 100 15 43 26 Not strong 31 17 47 34 40 28 23 No to reject 16 73 55 33 22 100 100 44 Not strong 6 19 27 24 22 30 13 Strong 10 54 28 10 100 70 31 Unsure 3 5 11 11 8 6
Yes - No 65 -50 100 100 -21 22 48 -100 -100 5Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-19
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q1 Direction of things in own part of Colorado today
Right direction 49 50 50 48 29 67 59 50 42 48 51 Wrong track 40 39 39 42 66 22 28 39 48 44 38 Unsure 11 11 10 10 5 11 11 11 8 8 10 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
Right dir - wrong track 9 11 11 6 -37 45 31 11 -6 4 14Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q2 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment
Yes to approve 49 49 46 47 24 70 51 53 41 46 49 Strong 28 26 25 26 12 41 25 30 23 27 26 Not strong 21 22 21 21 12 29 27 23 18 19 23 No to reject 47 45 48 50 72 27 38 44 54 51 44 Not strong 13 13 14 13 15 7 16 13 11 10 13 Strong 34 33 34 37 57 19 22 31 43 41 31 Unsure 4 6 6 4 3 3 11 3 5 3 6
Yes - No 2 3 -2 -3 -48 43 13 9 -13 -4 5Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-20
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 63 66 66 61 72 65 54 62
Much more 32 35 33 28 42 37 40 35 Somewhat more 31 32 33 33 29 28 14 27 Less likely to support
amendment 36 31 32 35 26 34 42 36
Somewhat less 7 9 10 11 7 15 15 12 Much less 29 22 22 24 19 20 27 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
More - Less 27 35 34 26 46 31 12 26Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 48 53 53 49 58 56 51 52
Much more 15 22 20 15 31 30 28 25 Somewhat more 33 31 32 34 27 26 23 27 Less likely to support
amendment 51 41 42 44 37 39 43 43
Somewhat less 18 14 15 14 13 15 14 14 Much less 33 27 27 29 25 25 29 28 No effect (vol.) 0 3 3 3 3 2 1 2 Unsure 1 3 3 3 2 3 5 3
More - Less -3 13 11 6 20 16 8 10Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-21
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 65 65 55 52 65 61 66 46 62
Much more 34 32 34 37 36 32 43 27 35 Somewhat more 31 32 22 15 29 30 22 19 27 Less likely to support
amendment 32 33 42 44 32 36 32 52 36
Somewhat less 9 9 15 14 12 13 9 14 12 Much less 23 23 28 30 20 23 23 39 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
More - Less 34 32 13 8 33 26 34 -6 26Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 54 53 49 50 50 53 60 38 52
Much more 23 20 25 31 26 24 21 26 25 Somewhat more 31 33 24 19 24 29 39 12 27 Less likely to support
amendment 41 42 45 43 43 41 35 59 43
Somewhat less 12 13 15 15 16 12 11 20 14 Much less 29 29 30 29 27 29 23 40 28 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 1 5 3 1 2 2 Unsure 3 2 4 5 2 3 4 1 3
More - Less 12 11 4 7 6 12 26 -21 10Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-22
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 56 67 77 58 50 68 42 79 57 62
Much more 30 39 43 35 27 33 26 46 34 35 Somewhat more 26 28 34 23 24 35 16 34 23 27 Less likely to support
amendment 41 31 21 39 47 28 55 19 40 36
Somewhat less 11 13 8 13 13 8 13 11 14 12 Much less 31 19 13 26 34 20 42 8 26 24 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
More - Less 15 36 56 19 4 40 -13 60 17 26Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 46 58 63 51 42 57 34 65 52 52
Much more 19 31 25 29 20 23 14 28 32 25 Somewhat more 28 27 38 23 22 34 20 36 20 27 Less likely to support
amendment 49 37 30 45 52 36 62 30 43 43
Somewhat less 14 15 14 14 14 15 13 14 15 14 Much less 35 22 15 31 38 21 50 16 27 28 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 Unsure 2 3 5 1 4 3 1 3 4 3
More - Less -2 21 33 6 -10 21 -28 35 9 10Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-23
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 65 61 65 64 58 60 62
Much more 41 33 38 38 32 34 35 Somewhat more 24 28 27 26 26 26 27 Less likely to support
amendment 35 36 32 33 40 38 36
Somewhat less 13 11 13 13 11 11 12 Much less 21 25 19 20 30 27 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 2 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1
More - Less 31 24 33 32 18 22 26Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 61 50 55 58 50 52 52
Much more 35 23 24 25 23 26 25 Somewhat more 26 28 31 32 27 26 27 Less likely to support
amendment 31 45 41 40 45 43 43
Somewhat less 9 16 14 16 13 14 14 Much less 22 29 27 24 32 29 28 No effect (vol.) 3 4 3 2 2 2 Unsure 8 2 2 4 3
More - Less 30 5 14 18 5 9 10Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-24
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 60 63 57 63 66 58 62
Much more 36 28 41 34 30 41 35 Somewhat more 23 35 16 29 36 18 27 Less likely to support
amendment 38 33 41 34 31 39 36
Somewhat less 9 11 9 13 13 13 12 Much less 28 22 32 21 18 26 24 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 Unsure 1 1 1 0 1 1
More - Less 22 30 17 29 35 19 26Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 49 46 51 55 54 55 52
Much more 26 19 30 24 22 28 25 Somewhat more 23 27 21 30 32 27 27 Less likely to support
amendment 46 45 46 40 41 39 43
Somewhat less 15 19 13 14 16 10 14 Much less 31 26 34 26 25 29 28 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 3 2 6 2 Unsure 4 8 1 2 3 1 3
More - Less 3 1 4 15 14 16 10Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-25
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 75 58 62 61 51 62 55 62
Much more 41 33 41 34 26 34 31 35 Somewhat more 34 25 21 27 26 28 23 27 Less likely to support
amendment 23 40 36 37 47 37 41 36
Somewhat less 8 13 10 19 6 9 14 12 Much less 15 27 26 18 41 28 27 24 No effect (vol.) 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 2 1
More - Less 52 19 26 23 4 25 13 26Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 56 53 58 55 44 51 44 52
Much more 23 25 28 29 18 22 24 25 Somewhat more 34 27 30 26 26 29 20 27 Less likely to support
amendment 29 44 40 41 53 42 50 43
Somewhat less 13 13 11 15 13 12 14 14 Much less 16 31 29 26 40 30 36 28 No effect (vol.) 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Unsure 11 1 1 1 3 5 3
More - Less 27 8 18 13 -9 9 -6 10Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-26
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 64 59 50 64 60 59 56 66 62
Much more 33 33 27 36 31 35 30 39 35 Somewhat more 31 26 23 28 29 25 26 27 27 Less likely to support
amendment 32 39 48 34 36 40 41 32 36
Somewhat less 12 11 16 9 14 14 12 11 12 Much less 20 28 32 25 21 26 29 21 24 No effect (vol.) 3 1 2 2 4 0 2 1 2 Unsure 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
More - Less 32 20 2 30 24 19 15 34 26Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 55 51 43 57 53 45 46 58 52
Much more 25 22 22 28 17 28 21 28 25 Somewhat more 30 29 21 30 37 17 24 30 27 Less likely to support
amendment 38 45 55 36 44 49 48 38 43
Somewhat less 9 14 20 8 13 19 13 15 14 Much less 29 31 35 28 31 29 34 24 28 No effect (vol.) 3 2 1 3 2 3 3 2 2 Unsure 4 2 1 4 0 4 3 2 3
More - Less 17 6 -12 22 9 -4 -2 19 10Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-27
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 34 25 40 78 67 89 62
Much more 18 12 23 44 34 55 35 Somewhat more 16 14 18 34 33 34 27 Less likely to support
amendment 63 71 58 20 30 9 36
Somewhat less 23 21 24 5 6 5 12 Much less 41 50 34 15 25 4 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Unsure 1 2 0 1 1
More - Less -29 -46 -17 57 37 80 26Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 32 23 39 64 48 81 52
Much more 16 11 19 30 22 40 25 Somewhat more 17 13 19 34 27 42 27 Less likely to support
amendment 62 74 54 31 46 14 43
Somewhat less 20 22 19 11 13 9 14 Much less 42 52 35 20 33 5 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 Unsure 3 1 5 3 3 2 3
More - Less -30 -50 -15 33 2 68 10Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-28
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 38 28 67 38 57 77 81 75 87 79 62
Much more 20 14 31 20 26 34 54 49 60 46 35 Somewhat more 18 14 36 18 31 43 27 27 27 34 27 Less likely to support
amendment 58 68 30 59 41 20 18 25 12 19 36
Somewhat less 18 23 8 18 11 5 8 9 6 7 12 Much less 40 45 21 40 30 15 10 15 6 12 24 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 2 2 4 2 2 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
More - Less -20 -40 37 -20 16 57 63 51 75 61 26Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 33 28 57 33 44 67 68 57 77 67 52
Much more 12 8 25 14 24 26 39 31 46 33 25 Somewhat more 21 20 32 19 20 40 29 27 31 34 27 Less likely to support
amendment 62 66 38 62 49 29 26 38 16 27 43
Somewhat less 19 22 14 19 16 13 10 12 9 11 14 Much less 43 44 25 43 33 16 16 26 7 16 28 No effect (vol.) 2 3 1 2 1 1 5 4 5 3 2 Unsure 3 3 4 3 6 4 2 1 2 2 3
More - Less -29 -38 19 -29 -4 38 42 20 61 40 10Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-29
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 35 41 57 78 81 82 52 28 81 49 84 79 62
Much more 21 19 22 42 52 56 28 14 33 29 57 52 35 Somewhat more 14 22 35 37 29 25 24 14 48 20 27 27 27 Less likely to support
amendment 61 56 39 20 19 17 46 67 14 50 16 20 36
Somewhat less 15 21 11 6 5 10 17 19 2 16 11 4 12 Much less 46 35 29 14 14 7 29 48 12 34 5 15 24 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 2 2 3 5 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
More - Less -26 -15 17 58 62 65 6 -39 67 -1 68 59 26Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 29 37 51 63 62 72 43 26 64 48 73 63 52
Much more 11 13 17 33 30 45 15 10 21 29 40 37 25 Somewhat more 18 24 34 30 32 26 28 16 43 18 33 26 27 Less likely to support
amendment 63 61 46 30 33 21 49 71 30 49 22 30 43
Somewhat less 17 20 10 18 14 7 18 19 13 14 13 8 14 Much less 46 41 36 12 19 13 31 52 17 35 9 22 28 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 4 5 3 1 1 5 4 2 Unsure 5 1 1 7 1 2 4 2 5 3 3 3
More - Less -34 -24 5 34 29 51 -6 -45 35 -1 51 33 10Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-30
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 75 41 70 41 57 69 58 51 62
Much more 39 27 39 23 33 38 31 33 35 Somewhat more 36 14 31 18 24 31 26 17 27 Less likely to support
amendment 24 56 29 56 39 28 41 46 36
Somewhat less 10 15 10 21 11 10 14 12 12 Much less 14 41 19 35 28 19 27 34 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 Unsure 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less 51 -15 41 -15 18 41 17 5 26Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 61 36 60 35 48 57 46 53 52
Much more 27 20 25 25 25 26 22 30 25 Somewhat more 34 16 35 10 22 31 25 22 27 Less likely to support
amendment 34 58 36 54 48 40 46 41 43
Somewhat less 14 15 12 17 19 17 15 6 14 Much less 20 43 24 38 29 23 31 35 28 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 Unsure 3 3 2 8 2 1 4 3 3
More - Less 28 -22 23 -20 0 17 0 11 10Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-31
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 39 87 81 31 31 86 78 46 58 59 62
Much more 17 61 50 11 12 58 59 20 31 40 35 Somewhat more 22 26 30 20 19 28 19 26 26 19 27 Less likely to support
amendment 58 13 17 66 66 13 21 52 39 39 36
Somewhat less 16 6 8 17 18 7 8 16 13 12 12 Much less 41 6 10 49 48 6 13 36 27 28 24 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
More - Less -19 74 63 -34 -35 73 57 -6 18 19 26Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 29 83 70 25 21 82 72 36 46 53 52
Much more 11 44 36 8 7 45 43 12 15 34 25 Somewhat more 18 39 34 17 14 37 28 24 31 19 27 Less likely to support
amendment 66 13 26 70 75 13 26 58 47 44 43
Somewhat less 18 6 12 20 21 6 11 17 15 14 14 Much less 48 6 14 51 54 7 16 42 32 30 28 No effect (vol.) 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 Unsure 3 2 1 3 2 2 0 4 4 0 3
More - Less -37 70 44 -45 -54 69 45 -22 -1 9 10Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-32
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 55 41 65 71 63 64 72 52 62
Much more 34 31 37 39 32 37 38 35 35 Somewhat more 21 10 29 33 31 28 34 17 27 Less likely to support
amendment 43 57 33 25 34 32 28 46 36
Somewhat less 11 9 13 11 14 9 14 14 12 Much less 32 48 20 14 20 24 14 33 24 No effect (vol.) 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
More - Less 12 -17 32 46 29 32 44 6 26Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 47 40 53 63 48 58 56 47 52
Much more 24 25 24 25 28 24 27 24 25 Somewhat more 23 15 29 39 20 34 29 23 27 Less likely to support
amendment 49 58 43 29 50 38 34 50 43
Somewhat less 13 9 16 10 24 10 17 12 14 Much less 36 49 27 19 25 28 17 38 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 4 1 4 1 1 2 Unsure 2 1 2 4 1 0 9 2 3
More - Less -2 -18 9 35 -2 20 22 -3 10Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-33
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 29 79 89 34 76 74 56 62
Much more 12 40 58 20 43 40 19 35 Somewhat more 16 40 31 13 32 33 37 27 Less likely to support
amendment 68 18 10 63 23 26 38 36
Somewhat less 22 11 2 18 12 12 12 12 Much less 47 6 8 44 11 14 26 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 3 1 6 2 Unsure 1 1 1 0 1
More - Less -40 62 79 -29 53 47 18 26Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 23 66 80 30 65 64 36 52
Much more 5 32 38 14 29 26 17 25 Somewhat more 18 34 41 16 36 38 19 27 Less likely to support
amendment 73 28 16 65 31 27 62 43
Somewhat less 21 16 6 14 12 13 32 14 Much less 51 12 10 51 19 13 30 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 Unsure 2 4 1 2 2 7 1 3
More - Less -49 38 64 -35 34 38 -26 10Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-34
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to supportamendment 57 68 82 54 64 60 62
Much more 29 41 57 27 36 34 35 Somewhat more 28 27 26 27 28 26 27 Less likely to support
amendment 42 30 16 43 35 37 36
Somewhat less 14 9 8 13 8 13 12 Much less 28 21 8 30 27 24 24 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 3 2 Unsure 0 1 2 0 1 1 1
More - Less 15 38 66 11 29 24 26Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 47 60 73 46 53 51 52
Much more 18 36 45 19 27 24 25 Somewhat more 29 24 28 28 27 27 27 Less likely to support
amendment 50 35 23 49 42 43 43
Somewhat less 15 12 11 15 18 13 14 Much less 34 24 12 35 25 30 28 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 Unsure 1 3 3 2 4 2 3
More - Less -2 24 50 -3 11 8 10Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-35
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 44 85 45 83 73 47 74 62
Much more 21 55 24 54 37 18 50 35 Somewhat more 23 30 21 29 36 29 25 27 Less likely to support
amendment 53 13 52 16 25 49 25 36
Somewhat less 15 7 14 7 13 15 10 12 Much less 38 6 38 9 12 34 15 24 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 Unsure 1 1 1 2 1 0 1
More - Less -10 72 -8 67 48 -2 49 26Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 35 77 40 73 56 35 67 52
Much more 11 44 18 39 25 12 37 25 Somewhat more 24 33 22 35 31 24 31 27 Less likely to support
amendment 59 19 57 24 32 60 28 43
Somewhat less 16 10 15 11 15 19 11 14 Much less 43 8 42 13 16 41 18 28 No effect (vol.) 2 4 2 2 5 1 2 2 Unsure 4 0 2 8 4 2 3
More - Less -24 58 -17 49 24 -25 39 10Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-36
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 48 75 58 65 41 78 62
Much more 24 45 30 39 19 47 35 Somewhat more 24 29 28 25 22 31 27 Less likely to support
amendment 49 25 40 33 56 22 36
Somewhat less 15 11 15 10 16 9 12 Much less 34 14 25 23 39 13 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 3 0 2 Unsure 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
More - Less -1 50 18 32 -15 56 26Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 33 69 50 54 30 71 52
Much more 15 33 20 29 12 34 25 Somewhat more 18 36 30 25 18 37 27 Less likely to support
amendment 63 26 46 40 66 24 43
Somewhat less 17 11 18 12 19 10 14 Much less 46 15 29 28 47 14 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 Unsure 3 3 2 3 2 3 3
More - Less -30 43 4 14 -36 47 10Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-37
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ3 To give each local
government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 88 35 90 92 77 75 71 10 28 62
Much more 60 15 57 69 39 36 38 6 13 35 Somewhat more 27 20 32 23 38 38 33 4 15 27 Less likely to support
amendment 11 62 10 8 21 22 24 87 68 36
Somewhat less 6 18 6 5 9 12 13 16 18 12 Much less 5 44 4 3 12 10 12 71 50 24 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 Unsure 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
More - Less 77 -26 80 85 56 53 47 -77 -40 26Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 84 22 81 91 70 61 53 5 21 52
Much more 47 7 42 63 27 22 20 4 9 25 Somewhat more 37 16 40 28 44 39 33 0 12 27 Less likely to support
amendment 13 72 15 8 26 32 41 90 72 43
Somewhat less 8 20 9 6 9 17 19 16 18 14 Much less 5 52 6 2 17 15 21 75 55 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 1 2 3 4 2 2 2 Unsure 0 3 1 2 4 2 2 5 3
More - Less 71 -50 66 83 45 29 12 -86 -52 10Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-38
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q3 To give each local government a very wide range of options to protect their communities & neighborhoods from the harms generally associated with oil & gas development including fracking
More likely to support amendment 58 60 58 55 28 80 67 60 56 52 62
Much more 33 34 35 31 15 52 37 38 28 32 35 Somewhat more 25 26 23 24 13 28 31 22 28 20 27 Less likely to support
amendment 39 37 39 42 67 19 30 37 43 45 36
Somewhat less 13 12 14 14 22 7 8 13 14 14 12 Much less 26 25 26 28 46 12 22 23 29 31 24 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
More - Less 19 23 18 13 -39 61 37 24 13 7 26Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q4 To allow local governments to pass local bans on oil & gas development
More likely to support amendment 50 51 52 48 28 68 54 56 44 47 52
Much more 26 24 25 24 8 39 23 28 23 26 25 Somewhat more 24 26 27 24 20 29 31 28 21 22 27 Less likely to support
amendment 44 44 43 46 69 28 40 40 49 49 43
Somewhat less 15 15 14 15 20 8 16 14 13 13 14 Much less 30 29 29 31 49 20 25 27 36 36 28 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 Unsure 3 2 2 2 1 2 4 1 4 2 3
More - Less 6 7 9 2 -41 40 14 15 -5 -1 10Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-39
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 59 54 52 47 63 56 56 54
Much more 23 26 23 20 33 21 28 26 Somewhat more 36 28 29 27 30 35 27 28 Less likely to support
amendment 39 42 44 48 35 37 40 42
Somewhat less 6 18 18 19 17 11 11 15 Much less 33 24 26 30 19 27 29 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 Unsure 1 2 3 3 1 6 2 3
More - Less 20 12 8 -2 28 19 15 12Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 71 72 71 68 77 75 70 71
Much more 41 37 35 33 42 48 41 39 Somewhat more 31 35 37 35 35 27 29 32 Less likely to support
amendment 26 22 24 25 18 21 24 24
Somewhat less 10 10 11 11 9 9 7 11 Much less 16 12 13 14 9 12 17 13 No effect (vol.) 1 4 3 5 4 3 2 3 Unsure 1 2 2 3 1 1 4 2
More - Less 45 51 47 43 60 55 46 47Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-40
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 54 52 52 55 61 50 61 39 54
Much more 26 22 28 29 35 22 27 26 26 Somewhat more 29 30 24 26 26 29 34 13 28 Less likely to support
amendment 42 44 44 41 32 45 37 59 42
Somewhat less 16 16 15 11 12 17 14 16 15 Much less 26 28 29 30 20 28 23 43 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 Unsure 2 3 2 2 4 3 1 1 3
More - Less 12 8 8 14 29 5 24 -20 12Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 72 70 68 69 70 75 73 57 71
Much more 38 35 39 39 40 36 45 31 39 Somewhat more 34 35 30 30 30 38 27 26 32 Less likely to support
amendment 21 24 28 25 22 21 20 38 24
Somewhat less 9 10 13 9 11 11 8 13 11 Much less 12 14 14 16 11 10 12 25 13 No effect (vol.) 5 3 1 2 5 2 5 3 3 Unsure 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 2 2
More - Less 50 46 41 44 48 53 53 19 47Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-41
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 47 60 64 49 50 52 40 69 53 54
Much more 21 31 23 30 24 18 23 29 33 26 Somewhat more 26 29 41 19 25 34 17 40 21 28 Less likely to support
amendment 51 34 31 47 46 45 57 26 40 42
Somewhat less 18 12 17 16 9 22 12 12 12 15 Much less 33 22 13 31 37 23 45 14 28 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 Unsure 1 4 3 2 3 1 2 4 4 3
More - Less -4 26 34 1 3 8 -17 43 14 12Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 64 77 79 68 66 71 57 85 70 71
Much more 34 44 37 41 40 34 34 43 46 39 Somewhat more 30 33 42 27 27 37 23 43 25 32 Less likely to support
amendment 29 18 17 25 28 23 36 9 26 24
Somewhat less 13 9 10 13 8 15 11 6 11 11 Much less 16 10 7 12 20 8 25 3 15 13 No effect (vol.) 4 3 3 5 2 4 3 5 2 3 Unsure 3 2 1 2 4 2 3 1 3 2
More - Less 35 58 62 43 39 48 21 77 44 47Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-42
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 63 52 52 51 54 54 54
Much more 33 25 23 23 23 28 26 Somewhat more 30 27 29 28 31 27 28 Less likely to support
amendment 36 43 44 45 43 41 42
Somewhat less 18 14 19 19 12 12 15 Much less 17 30 25 25 31 29 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 Unsure 1 3 1 2 2 3 3
More - Less 28 8 8 7 10 13 12Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 81 68 72 72 67 70 71
Much more 54 35 40 40 37 39 39 Somewhat more 27 33 32 32 31 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 16 26 21 22 28 25 24
Somewhat less 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 Much less 6 15 10 11 17 14 13 No effect (vol.) 2 4 7 6 2 2 3 Unsure 1 2 3 3 2
More - Less 65 43 51 50 39 45 47Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-43
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 56 58 54 52 50 56 54
Much more 27 24 30 25 22 31 26 Somewhat more 28 34 25 27 29 25 28 Less likely to support
amendment 40 39 40 43 45 41 42
Somewhat less 11 14 10 17 20 13 15 Much less 28 26 30 26 25 28 27 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Unsure 3 1 4 2 3 1 3
More - Less 16 19 14 9 5 15 12Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 70 75 66 72 72 72 71
Much more 38 41 37 40 39 42 39 Somewhat more 31 34 29 32 33 30 32 Less likely to support
amendment 25 24 27 22 25 17 24
Somewhat less 11 14 8 11 14 5 11 Much less 15 9 18 11 11 12 13 No effect (vol.) 2 3 4 3 7 3 Unsure 3 2 4 2 0 4 2
More - Less 44 51 40 50 48 55 47Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-44
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 60 52 57 57 41 51 53 54
Much more 22 26 28 29 20 23 27 26 Somewhat more 37 26 29 27 20 28 27 28 Less likely to support
amendment 31 45 39 41 56 45 42 42
Somewhat less 14 15 12 19 11 16 10 15 Much less 17 30 26 22 45 29 32 27 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 Unsure 8 2 1 1 3 2 3 3
More - Less 29 8 19 15 -15 6 11 12Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 69 72 75 75 63 67 73 71
Much more 27 41 49 41 35 38 43 39 Somewhat more 41 30 26 35 28 29 30 32 Less likely to support
amendment 25 23 21 21 28 26 25 24
Somewhat less 19 9 4 11 9 12 7 11 Much less 6 14 17 10 19 14 17 13 No effect (vol.) 2 4 3 2 7 5 3 Unsure 4 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
More - Less 43 49 54 54 35 41 48 47Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-45
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 51 52 49 58 52 49 51 57 54
Much more 25 24 22 29 21 26 26 26 26 Somewhat more 26 28 27 28 31 23 25 30 28 Less likely to support
amendment 40 45 50 36 45 48 45 39 42
Somewhat less 16 12 15 8 19 19 12 17 15 Much less 24 32 35 27 27 29 32 22 27 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 Unsure 6 1 1 5 1 1 2 3 3
More - Less 12 8 -1 22 6 1 6 17 12Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 76 65 65 77 68 67 66 76 71
Much more 45 33 34 45 37 36 35 43 39 Somewhat more 31 33 31 33 31 31 30 33 32 Less likely to support
amendment 19 29 28 16 26 29 27 21 24
Somewhat less 9 12 10 2 14 15 12 9 11 Much less 10 17 18 14 12 14 15 12 13 No effect (vol.) 4 3 6 4 3 1 5 2 3 Unsure 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2
More - Less 57 36 37 61 41 38 39 55 47Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-46
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 30 18 37 68 54 83 54
Much more 13 9 16 33 26 40 26 Somewhat more 16 9 21 35 29 43 28 Less likely to support
amendment 65 76 57 28 41 15 42
Somewhat less 17 12 21 14 16 11 15 Much less 47 63 36 15 25 4 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 Unsure 3 5 2 2 4 1 3
More - Less -35 -57 -20 39 13 69 12Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 54 42 63 81 73 90 71
Much more 26 19 31 47 37 60 39 Somewhat more 28 23 32 34 36 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 38 53 27 15 21 8 24
Somewhat less 15 19 13 8 9 7 11 Much less 22 34 14 7 13 0 13 No effect (vol.) 4 4 4 3 5 1 3 Unsure 4 1 5 1 1 1 2
More - Less 17 -11 36 66 52 83 47Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-47
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 31 26 57 31 47 68 74 64 84 72 54
Much more 14 10 24 15 22 27 40 31 49 35 26 Somewhat more 17 16 33 16 24 41 34 33 35 37 28 Less likely to support
amendment 64 67 37 64 46 26 24 33 15 25 42
Somewhat less 17 18 13 16 13 14 13 18 11 14 15 Much less 46 49 24 48 33 12 10 16 4 11 27 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 Unsure 3 3 4 3 6 4 1 2 1 2 3
More - Less -33 -41 21 -34 1 42 51 30 69 47 12Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 53 50 75 53 69 82 86 81 90 84 71
Much more 26 24 38 25 36 42 55 38 69 50 39 Somewhat more 27 25 37 28 33 40 31 42 22 35 32 Less likely to support
amendment 37 40 22 38 27 15 11 15 6 13 24
Somewhat less 12 15 11 14 12 8 8 10 6 8 11 Much less 25 25 11 24 14 7 3 5 1 4 13 No effect (vol.) 6 6 3 5 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 Unsure 4 5 1 4 1 2 3 1 1 2
More - Less 16 10 53 15 42 67 75 65 84 72 47Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-48
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 28 34 50 66 67 80 39 25 63 50 76 73 54
Much more 13 16 19 29 32 47 18 12 17 33 36 45 26 Somewhat more 15 18 30 36 35 33 21 13 46 17 40 28 28 Less likely to support
amendment 67 60 49 24 32 17 57 68 29 46 24 24 42
Somewhat less 19 16 15 10 18 10 23 14 12 13 19 8 15 Much less 48 45 34 14 14 8 35 54 17 33 5 15 27 No effect (vol.) 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 3 2 2 Unsure 3 3 9 2 1 4 5 3 2 3
More - Less -39 -26 0 42 34 63 -18 -43 34 4 52 49 12Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 46 60 69 81 82 89 58 49 82 67 92 80 71
Much more 23 28 35 42 48 61 24 26 33 45 57 53 39 Somewhat more 23 32 35 39 34 28 34 23 49 21 34 27 32 Less likely to support
amendment 43 31 27 16 14 8 29 42 15 31 6 15 24
Somewhat less 14 11 13 9 12 5 16 10 10 13 6 10 11 Much less 29 20 14 7 3 3 13 33 4 18 5 13 No effect (vol.) 8 5 3 3 1 2 8 5 3 1 2 1 3 Unsure 4 4 1 3 1 5 4 1 4 2
More - Less 3 29 42 65 68 80 29 7 67 36 85 65 47Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-49
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 64 38 58 35 59 60 47 52 54
Much more 28 23 28 18 29 29 22 27 26 Somewhat more 36 15 31 17 30 31 25 25 28 Less likely to support
amendment 32 59 37 61 38 36 49 42 42
Somewhat less 14 16 15 30 7 16 16 9 15 Much less 18 43 22 31 32 21 33 33 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 Unsure 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 4 3
More - Less 33 -21 21 -26 20 24 -1 10 12Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 80 57 75 68 68 79 64 64 71
Much more 45 30 41 33 42 44 33 43 39 Somewhat more 36 27 34 35 26 36 31 21 32 Less likely to support
amendment 15 36 20 31 24 17 27 33 24
Somewhat less 10 10 11 12 9 10 12 12 11 Much less 5 26 9 19 15 7 16 21 13 No effect (vol.) 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 3 Unsure 1 3 2 1 4 0 4 2 2
More - Less 65 21 55 37 43 62 37 31 47Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-50
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 30 83 74 22 24 83 77 38 47 57 54
Much more 12 48 37 9 10 45 48 14 19 35 26 Somewhat more 18 35 37 12 14 38 29 24 28 23 28 Less likely to support
amendment 65 15 22 75 72 15 20 60 50 37 42
Somewhat less 20 9 10 23 17 10 9 19 17 12 15 Much less 45 7 12 53 55 5 11 41 33 26 27 No effect (vol.) 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 Unsure 3 1 3 1 1 2 3 0 1 3 3
More - Less -34 68 51 -54 -48 68 57 -22 -3 20 12Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 57 88 85 47 50 90 88 57 69 67 71
Much more 27 55 49 23 26 56 54 30 36 40 39 Somewhat more 29 33 36 24 25 33 35 27 33 27 32 Less likely to support
amendment 36 9 11 44 42 8 7 38 26 24 24
Somewhat less 14 6 7 17 18 5 7 16 12 11 11 Much less 22 3 4 28 24 3 1 22 14 14 13 No effect (vol.) 4 2 3 5 5 1 4 3 4 5 3 Unsure 3 1 1 4 3 1 2 1 3 2
More - Less 21 79 73 3 8 82 81 19 43 43 47Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-51
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 52 40 61 56 56 62 58 40 54
Much more 31 27 34 21 23 28 30 24 26 Somewhat more 21 13 26 34 33 33 28 15 28 Less likely to support
amendment 44 58 35 37 43 33 35 58 42
Somewhat less 10 7 13 19 16 8 17 21 15 Much less 34 51 22 18 27 25 18 37 27 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Unsure 2 1 3 5 2 3 8 1 3
More - Less 7 -18 26 19 13 29 23 -18 12Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 63 51 72 78 75 71 77 63 71
Much more 40 31 47 34 43 41 41 32 39 Somewhat more 23 20 25 44 32 31 36 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 30 43 21 17 20 22 17 33 24
Somewhat less 12 12 11 10 10 8 12 16 11 Much less 19 32 9 6 10 15 5 17 13 No effect (vol.) 3 4 3 5 2 4 3 3 3 Unsure 3 1 4 0 3 2 3 1 2
More - Less 33 8 51 62 56 49 61 30 47Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-52
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 20 71 81 28 66 60 45 54
Much more 7 33 41 20 27 33 15 26 Somewhat more 13 39 40 9 39 27 30 28 Less likely to support
amendment 77 22 17 67 31 31 51 42
Somewhat less 22 14 10 18 14 17 21 15 Much less 55 8 8 48 16 14 30 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 1 3 1 3 2 2 Unsure 1 6 1 2 2 6 2 3
More - Less -57 50 64 -38 35 29 -6 12Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 51 84 89 50 81 71 72 71
Much more 17 50 51 29 44 43 39 39 Somewhat more 33 34 38 21 37 29 32 32 Less likely to support
amendment 40 11 8 40 15 21 20 24
Somewhat less 13 9 8 13 12 11 10 11 Much less 26 2 1 27 3 10 10 13 No effect (vol.) 7 2 2 3 2 7 5 3 Unsure 2 2 1 6 2 1 3 2
More - Less 11 73 81 10 66 51 52 47Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-53
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 48 60 77 46 56 52 54
Much more 23 32 49 19 31 23 26 Somewhat more 26 29 29 27 24 29 28 Less likely to support
amendment 48 37 20 50 41 43 42
Somewhat less 16 14 10 16 16 14 15 Much less 32 23 10 34 25 29 27 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 1 2 2 Unsure 2 2 3 2 2 3 3
More - Less 0 24 58 -4 14 10 12Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 68 76 88 65 76 69 71
Much more 35 46 55 35 42 38 39 Somewhat more 32 30 33 30 33 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 27 21 10 28 22 24 24
Somewhat less 10 12 8 11 11 11 11 Much less 16 9 2 17 11 14 13 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 4 1 4 3 Unsure 2 1 1 3 2 2 2
More - Less 41 55 78 37 54 44 47Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-54
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 37 77 40 72 62 37 68 54
Much more 14 43 19 39 28 13 39 26 Somewhat more 23 34 21 33 35 25 29 28 Less likely to support
amendment 60 18 56 25 33 59 28 42
Somewhat less 17 12 15 12 17 15 14 15 Much less 43 7 41 12 16 43 14 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 Unsure 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 3
More - Less -23 59 -16 47 29 -21 40 12Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 57 89 62 80 79 58 82 71
Much more 28 55 33 53 37 25 52 39 Somewhat more 28 34 29 27 41 33 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 36 8 32 19 12 32 16 24
Somewhat less 15 5 11 15 6 14 8 11 Much less 20 3 21 5 6 18 8 13 No effect (vol.) 4 2 4 0 6 6 0 3 Unsure 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 2
More - Less 21 82 31 61 66 26 67 47Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-55
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 32 69 47 59 31 72 54
Much more 21 31 14 36 14 35 26 Somewhat more 11 38 33 23 17 37 28 Less likely to support
amendment 63 27 48 37 66 25 42
Somewhat less 20 12 17 13 17 14 15 Much less 44 15 31 24 49 11 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 1 2 1 0 2 Unsure 3 3 3 2 2 3 3
More - Less -31 42 -1 22 -35 47 12Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 55 83 66 76 54 86 71
Much more 23 53 32 46 20 54 39 Somewhat more 32 30 33 29 33 32 32 Less likely to support
amendment 36 15 31 18 38 11 24
Somewhat less 16 7 14 8 16 6 11 Much less 20 8 17 10 22 6 13 No effect (vol.) 5 1 2 4 5 2 3 Unsure 4 2 2 3 3 0 2
More - Less 19 68 35 58 15 75 47Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-56
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ5 To allow local laws &
regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 83 27 81 90 67 61 54 12 23 54
Much more 47 9 43 63 34 24 19 4 10 26 Somewhat more 36 18 38 28 33 37 35 8 13 28 Less likely to support
amendment 14 70 16 8 28 34 41 84 71 42
Somewhat less 9 20 11 6 13 19 22 12 16 15 Much less 5 50 4 1 15 15 19 72 56 27 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 4 4 3 1 3 3
More - Less 69 -43 65 83 40 27 13 -72 -48 12Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & generalwelfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 90 53 90 98 81 79 79 34 48 71
Much more 59 22 59 69 45 42 44 12 19 39 Somewhat more 30 31 30 29 36 37 35 22 29 32 Less likely to support
amendment 8 39 7 1 14 17 16 54 43 24
Somewhat less 4 17 6 1 7 11 9 16 16 11 Much less 4 22 1 7 6 7 38 27 13 No effect (vol.) 1 5 2 1 3 4 8 5 3 Unsure 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 5 4 2
More - Less 82 14 82 96 67 62 62 -20 6 47Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-57
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q5 To allow local laws & regulations to be more restrictive on oil & gas development than state law now allows
More likely to support amendment 52 53 52 51 27 75 57 54 48 49 54
Much more 27 26 27 27 14 45 23 29 25 29 26 Somewhat more 25 27 25 24 13 31 34 25 23 20 28 Less likely to support
amendment 43 43 44 45 67 24 39 42 45 48 42
Somewhat less 13 14 14 13 13 11 15 15 13 14 15 Much less 30 28 30 32 54 13 24 28 32 34 27 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 0 2 3 2 2 Unsure 3 2 2 2 2 1 4 1 3 1 3
More - Less 9 11 8 7 -40 51 18 12 3 2 12Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q6 To require that local laws & regulations must be at least as protective of the public health, safety & general welfare as is current state law
More likely to support amendment 69 71 69 68 50 85 75 69 68 67 71
Much more 40 41 39 40 25 54 37 42 38 41 39 Somewhat more 30 30 30 28 24 31 39 27 29 26 32 Less likely to support
amendment 25 23 25 26 39 11 21 24 26 27 24
Somewhat less 10 11 11 10 11 8 10 13 8 9 11 Much less 15 13 14 16 28 4 10 12 18 17 13 No effect (vol.) 3 4 4 3 6 1 3 5 2 4 3 Unsure 3 2 2 3 5 3 1 2 4 2 2
More - Less 44 47 44 42 10 73 55 45 41 41 47Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-58
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 59 62 60 57 67 51 55 56
Much more 23 23 22 22 25 21 35 25 Somewhat more 36 38 39 35 42 30 21 32 Less likely to support
amendment 37 29 31 33 25 39 37 35
Somewhat less 4 14 14 17 11 19 14 16 Much less 32 15 16 15 15 20 23 19 No effect (vol.) 0 3 3 2 5 2 2 3 Unsure 4 6 7 8 3 7 5 6 Refused 1 0
More - Less 22 33 29 24 42 12 18 22Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 70 76 76 72 82 74 66 73
Much more 48 48 45 44 53 49 53 48 Somewhat more 21 28 31 28 28 24 13 24 Less likely to support
amendment 27 20 21 25 15 24 32 24
Somewhat less 6 7 6 9 5 6 6 6 Much less 21 13 15 16 11 18 26 17 No effect (vol.) 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 Unsure 3 1 1 2 1 1
More - Less 42 56 55 47 66 50 34 49Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-59
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 62 60 49 53 63 53 54 53 56
Much more 24 22 25 32 29 16 26 34 25 Somewhat more 38 38 24 21 34 37 29 19 32 Less likely to support
amendment 30 31 41 38 28 34 42 37 35
Somewhat less 14 14 17 15 11 16 23 12 16 Much less 15 17 24 22 17 18 19 25 19 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 2 6 3 1 2 3 Unsure 5 7 7 7 2 10 2 7 6 Refused 1 0
More - Less 32 29 8 16 35 19 13 16 22Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 75 74 68 64 70 76 74 60 73
Much more 48 44 46 51 51 41 56 47 48 Somewhat more 27 30 21 13 20 35 18 13 24 Less likely to support
amendment 22 23 28 34 24 21 22 37 24
Somewhat less 8 7 4 7 8 9 2 7 6 Much less 14 16 24 27 16 12 21 30 17 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 2 5 0 3 2 2 Unsure 1 2 2 1 2 1 1
More - Less 53 51 40 30 47 55 52 23 49Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-60
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 50 63 68 52 52 57 41 69 58 56
Much more 22 27 21 29 23 27 17 20 33 25 Somewhat more 28 35 47 23 29 31 25 49 25 32 Less likely to support
amendment 39 30 24 38 41 28 51 24 35 35
Somewhat less 17 15 18 16 12 18 14 16 14 16 Much less 22 16 7 21 28 10 37 8 21 19 No effect (vol.) 5 0 2 4 2 8 3 1 3 Unsure 5 7 6 6 6 6 5 7 6 6 Refused 0 1 1 0
More - Less 11 32 43 14 11 29 -10 45 22 22Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 66 79 86 67 66 76 55 88 72 73
Much more 40 56 53 48 44 47 33 55 56 48 Somewhat more 25 23 34 19 22 29 22 33 16 24 Less likely to support
amendment 29 19 13 27 31 21 39 11 25 24
Somewhat less 8 5 2 10 7 6 9 6 5 6 Much less 21 14 11 17 25 14 29 5 20 17 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1
More - Less 37 60 74 41 34 55 16 76 47 49Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-61
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 62 55 57 55 55 56 56
Much more 32 23 23 21 22 25 25 Somewhat more 30 32 34 35 32 31 32 Less likely to support
amendment 31 35 33 35 39 36 35
Somewhat less 14 16 17 18 15 15 16 Much less 16 19 16 17 24 20 19 No effect (vol.) 4 5 4 1 2 3 Unsure 8 6 5 5 5 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less 31 20 24 20 16 20 22Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 81 71 74 72 70 72 73
Much more 63 44 52 53 45 46 48 Somewhat more 17 26 21 19 25 25 24 Less likely to support
amendment 18 26 22 25 27 25 24
Somewhat less 1 8 7 8 7 6 6 Much less 17 18 15 17 20 19 17 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 2 2 2 Unsure 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less 63 45 51 47 43 47 49Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-62
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 56 58 54 57 55 61 56
Much more 24 22 24 25 21 32 25 Somewhat more 32 36 30 32 33 29 32 Less likely to support
amendment 37 34 38 33 35 30 35
Somewhat less 14 16 12 17 19 14 16 Much less 23 17 26 16 16 15 19 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 Unsure 5 7 4 7 7 6 6 Refused 0 1 0
More - Less 19 24 16 24 20 32 22Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 72 77 69 73 74 73 73
Much more 53 53 53 45 42 51 48 Somewhat more 20 25 17 28 31 22 24 Less likely to support
amendment 24 19 27 24 24 24 24
Somewhat less 3 2 3 9 10 8 6 Much less 21 16 24 14 14 16 17 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Unsure 2 2 2 0 1 1
More - Less 49 59 43 50 50 49 49Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-63
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law ®ulations
More likely to support amendment 58 56 63 53 53 56 55 56
Much more 16 26 25 25 28 22 27 25 Somewhat more 41 30 38 28 25 34 28 32 Less likely to support
amendment 27 36 27 40 40 35 36 35
Somewhat less 18 15 7 24 11 17 9 16 Much less 9 21 20 17 29 18 27 19 No effect (vol.) 3 3 2 2 4 4 2 3 Unsure 11 5 7 4 3 5 7 6 Refused 1 0 0
More - Less 31 20 36 13 13 21 19 22Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 80 71 72 75 63 71 68 73
Much more 44 49 57 51 38 46 46 48 Somewhat more 36 22 15 25 25 24 22 24 Less likely to support
amendment 16 26 24 22 32 26 28 24
Somewhat less 5 7 5 10 5 7 5 6 Much less 11 19 20 12 27 18 23 17 No effect (vol.) 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 Unsure 3 1 1 2 2 1 1
More - Less 63 45 48 53 31 45 40 49Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-64
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q7 To address shortcomings or
deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 52 53 54 57 58 49 50 62 56
Much more 24 22 23 25 24 23 23 26 25 Somewhat more 27 31 31 33 34 26 27 36 32 Less likely to support
amendment 37 39 38 27 35 45 40 30 35
Somewhat less 20 17 19 8 21 20 17 15 16 Much less 17 22 19 18 14 25 23 16 19 No effect (vol.) 2 4 6 5 3 1 3 3 3 Unsure 10 3 1 10 5 4 7 5 6 Refused 0 1 1 0 0
More - Less 15 13 16 31 23 4 10 31 22Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 79 68 71 74 76 67 67 78 73
Much more 51 44 51 47 49 45 45 52 48 Somewhat more 28 23 20 27 28 21 22 27 24 Less likely to support
amendment 18 28 25 24 21 30 30 19 24
Somewhat less 4 7 8 3 9 8 9 5 6 Much less 14 22 17 20 12 22 21 14 17 No effect (vol.) 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 Unsure 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1
More - Less 61 39 46 50 56 37 37 59 49Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-65
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 41 33 46 67 54 81 56
Much more 16 17 16 30 26 35 25 Somewhat more 24 17 30 37 28 46 32 Less likely to support
amendment 50 57 46 25 34 14 35
Somewhat less 19 16 21 14 16 11 16 Much less 31 40 25 11 18 3 19 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 Unsure 6 8 5 6 8 3 6 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -10 -23 0 42 20 66 22Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 54 43 61 84 75 95 73
Much more 31 31 31 58 51 67 48 Somewhat more 23 12 30 26 24 28 24 Less likely to support
amendment 40 54 31 14 23 5 24
Somewhat less 11 14 9 4 5 3 6 Much less 29 40 22 10 17 2 17 No effect (vol.) 4 2 5 1 2 2 Unsure 3 2 3 0 0 0 1
More - Less 14 -11 31 70 52 90 49Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-66
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 42 36 56 42 47 62 73 64 81 68 56
Much more 18 16 18 17 20 19 39 28 48 31 25 Somewhat more 24 19 38 25 27 43 34 36 32 38 32 Less likely to support
amendment 46 53 35 47 43 28 21 27 16 24 35
Somewhat less 17 21 17 17 20 18 12 13 11 15 16 Much less 29 32 17 31 23 10 9 13 5 9 19 No effect (vol.) 5 4 2 4 2 3 2 3 1 2 3 Unsure 7 6 7 7 8 7 4 7 2 5 6 Refused 1 1 0 0
More - Less -5 -17 21 -5 4 34 51 38 64 44 22Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 52 47 78 54 72 83 90 81 96 87 73
Much more 28 25 50 31 49 53 68 60 75 61 48 Somewhat more 24 22 27 23 23 30 22 21 21 25 24 Less likely to support
amendment 42 46 19 39 25 16 10 18 4 12 24
Somewhat less 9 12 7 9 7 7 3 6 1 5 6 Much less 32 34 12 31 17 8 7 12 3 8 17 No effect (vol.) 4 5 1 3 2 2 0 1 1 2 Unsure 2 2 2 3 2 1
More - Less 10 1 59 15 47 67 80 63 93 74 49Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-67
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 35 48 47 65 72 74 47 38 62 48 79 67 56
Much more 17 18 14 22 38 40 16 19 13 24 43 35 25 Somewhat more 18 30 34 43 34 34 31 19 49 24 36 32 32 Less likely to support
amendment 51 42 41 28 22 21 34 55 28 44 17 25 35
Somewhat less 18 16 20 14 11 13 18 16 18 16 15 10 16 Much less 33 26 21 13 11 8 16 39 10 27 2 15 19 No effect (vol.) 8 1 4 3 0 8 2 4 3 3 Unsure 5 9 7 7 4 5 10 5 6 8 4 5 6 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -16 6 6 37 50 53 13 -17 35 4 61 42 22Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 46 58 70 86 85 93 62 45 87 66 93 86 73
Much more 18 39 48 53 59 74 31 26 51 50 69 66 48 Somewhat more 28 19 22 33 26 19 30 19 37 16 24 20 24 Less likely to support
amendment 45 38 26 12 14 7 32 48 12 29 7 13 24
Somewhat less 9 10 10 4 4 2 10 9 7 7 2 4 6 Much less 36 29 16 8 10 5 23 39 5 22 5 9 17 No effect (vol.) 6 2 2 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 Unsure 3 1 2 2 2 2 4 1
More - Less 1 19 44 74 72 86 29 -3 76 38 86 74 49Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-68
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 64 43 59 49 59 59 54 54 56
Much more 28 19 26 16 29 25 23 27 25 Somewhat more 37 24 33 33 30 34 31 28 32 Less likely to support
amendment 27 48 32 44 34 33 34 38 35
Somewhat less 17 14 18 17 10 20 13 9 16 Much less 10 34 14 27 24 13 21 29 19 No effect (vol.) 3 4 3 1 3 2 4 3 3 Unsure 6 5 6 4 4 5 8 4 6 Refused 1 2 0 0
More - Less 37 -5 27 5 25 26 20 16 22Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 86 54 79 62 70 78 68 68 73
Much more 57 35 52 33 52 52 45 46 48 Somewhat more 28 19 27 29 18 26 23 22 24 Less likely to support
amendment 12 42 19 37 24 19 28 28 24
Somewhat less 4 10 6 8 7 6 9 3 6 Much less 8 32 13 29 17 13 19 25 17 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 Unsure 0 1 1 3 1 2 2 1
More - Less 74 12 60 25 46 60 40 40 49Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-69
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 41 77 73 31 34 76 81 42 52 59 56
Much more 18 38 34 11 16 37 33 19 24 31 25 Somewhat more 23 39 39 20 18 39 48 23 28 29 32 Less likely to support
amendment 49 18 21 59 56 18 15 49 39 34 35
Somewhat less 20 11 13 22 22 11 6 20 17 14 16 Much less 29 7 8 36 33 7 9 29 21 21 19 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 Unsure 8 2 4 7 7 3 3 7 7 4 6 Refused 1 0 0 0 0
More - Less -8 59 53 -27 -22 58 66 -8 13 25 22Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 56 92 90 46 48 95 88 59 70 72 73
Much more 32 71 63 26 25 72 75 34 44 51 48 Somewhat more 25 22 27 19 23 23 14 26 25 20 24 Less likely to support
amendment 39 7 8 49 46 5 10 37 27 24 24
Somewhat less 10 1 2 13 13 0 3 10 4 10 6 Much less 29 5 6 35 33 5 7 28 23 14 17 No effect (vol.) 3 0 1 4 3 3 3 2 2 Unsure 2 1 1 2 3 2 1 0 2 1
More - Less 17 86 82 -3 2 89 78 22 43 47 49Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-70
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 52 40 60 66 54 57 63 54 56
Much more 28 29 27 23 22 25 28 24 25 Somewhat more 24 12 33 43 33 32 35 30 32 Less likely to support
amendment 42 54 33 25 31 34 32 39 35
Somewhat less 15 13 17 13 18 17 13 11 16 Much less 26 40 16 13 13 17 19 28 19 No effect (vol.) 3 3 4 3 2 5 1 3 Unsure 4 3 4 6 11 3 5 6 6 Refused 1 0
More - Less 10 -13 27 41 23 24 31 15 22Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 64 50 75 82 79 74 81 63 73
Much more 47 34 56 45 58 50 48 41 48 Somewhat more 18 16 19 36 22 24 34 21 24 Less likely to support
amendment 31 45 21 15 18 22 16 36 24
Somewhat less 8 6 9 5 6 6 7 8 6 Much less 24 39 12 10 13 16 9 28 17 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 2 1 4 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1
More - Less 33 5 54 66 61 52 65 27 49Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-71
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 37 69 75 31 63 62 61 56
Much more 14 32 34 12 26 35 24 25 Somewhat more 23 38 41 19 37 27 37 32 Less likely to support
amendment 51 24 16 59 29 22 33 35
Somewhat less 20 18 10 19 17 13 16 16 Much less 31 6 6 41 12 9 17 19 No effect (vol.) 4 1 3 3 4 1 1 3 Unsure 8 5 6 7 3 14 5 6 Refused 1 0 0
More - Less -14 46 59 -28 34 40 28 22Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 48 91 91 50 83 84 79 73
Much more 19 68 64 27 53 53 58 48 Somewhat more 29 23 28 23 30 31 21 24 Less likely to support
amendment 45 8 8 46 14 16 20 24
Somewhat less 11 4 4 8 5 2 10 6 Much less 34 4 4 38 9 13 10 17 No effect (vol.) 5 1 4 2 1 2 Unsure 2 1 1 1
More - Less 3 83 84 4 69 69 59 49Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-72
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 49 67 77 50 60 55 56
Much more 20 31 36 22 32 22 25 Somewhat more 29 36 41 29 29 33 32 Less likely to support
amendment 42 29 17 41 34 35 35
Somewhat less 19 14 9 18 14 17 16 Much less 23 16 7 23 20 19 19 No effect (vol.) 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 Unsure 6 2 4 6 4 6 6 Refused 0 0
More - Less 7 38 60 9 27 20 22Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources More likely to support
amendment 67 79 93 65 76 71 73
Much more 41 58 77 39 54 46 48 Somewhat more 26 21 16 26 22 25 24 Less likely to support
amendment 29 20 7 31 22 25 24
Somewhat less 8 6 1 9 4 8 6 Much less 21 15 6 22 18 17 17 No effect (vol.) 2 0 3 0 3 2 Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 1
More - Less 39 59 86 34 55 46 49Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-73
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ7 To address shortcomings or
deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 45 73 44 76 59 44 65 56
Much more 17 36 19 31 30 15 32 25 Somewhat more 27 37 26 45 29 29 33 32 Less likely to support
amendment 46 20 47 20 24 49 24 35
Somewhat less 17 14 19 12 13 20 13 16 Much less 28 6 29 8 10 29 11 19 No effect (vol.) 3 3 2 2 6 2 3 3 Unsure 7 4 6 2 11 5 8 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less -1 52 -3 56 36 -4 41 22Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 58 92 61 85 82 61 84 73
Much more 34 69 38 64 53 31 66 48 Somewhat more 24 23 23 22 29 31 18 24 Less likely to support
amendment 38 6 35 12 15 35 14 24
Somewhat less 11 1 7 6 5 9 3 6 Much less 27 5 27 6 10 25 10 17 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 Unsure 2 0 2 0 1 2 1 1
More - Less 20 86 26 74 67 26 70 49Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-74
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ7 To address shortcomings or
deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 39 69 48 63 42 69 56
Much more 15 31 20 28 16 30 25 Somewhat more 25 38 27 35 26 39 32 Less likely to support
amendment 51 23 39 31 49 25 35
Somewhat less 22 12 16 16 19 14 16 Much less 29 11 23 15 29 11 19 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 Unsure 7 5 10 3 7 5 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less -12 46 9 33 -7 44 22Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 57 85 71 74 56 86 73
Much more 32 61 43 55 31 62 48 Somewhat more 25 23 27 20 25 24 24 Less likely to support
amendment 38 13 26 23 40 13 24
Somewhat less 11 3 8 6 11 4 6 Much less 27 10 18 17 29 9 17 No effect (vol.) 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 0 1
More - Less 19 71 45 52 16 73 49Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-75
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ7 To address shortcomings
or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 83 34 82 92 60 63 63 17 28 56
Much more 40 11 38 47 26 25 33 6 12 25 Somewhat more 43 23 43 45 33 38 30 11 16 32 Less likely to support
amendment 10 57 13 6 26 27 32 72 59 35
Somewhat less 6 23 9 3 16 17 15 21 22 16 Much less 4 34 3 3 10 9 17 51 38 19 No effect (vol.) 3 3 2 1 4 3 4 3 3 Unsure 4 6 3 1 9 7 6 7 9 6 Refused 0 1 0 0 0
More - Less 73 -23 69 86 33 36 31 -55 -31 22Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 94 52 95 98 86 84 83 28 46 73
Much more 75 27 75 88 51 51 52 13 23 48 Somewhat more 19 25 21 10 35 33 30 16 23 24 Less likely to support
amendment 5 43 4 1 10 13 16 65 48 24
Somewhat less 1 12 3 4 8 16 11 6 Much less 4 31 1 1 10 9 8 48 37 17 No effect (vol.) 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 Unsure 0 2 3 1 1 3 2 1
More - Less 89 9 91 97 76 71 67 -36 -2 49Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-76
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q7 To address shortcomings or deficiencies in state law & regulations
More likely to support amendment 55 55 56 54 37 69 61 55 53 53 56
Much more 25 26 26 26 16 34 22 27 25 28 25 Somewhat more 29 30 30 28 21 35 39 28 28 24 32 Less likely to support
amendment 36 36 36 38 53 26 28 36 40 40 35
Somewhat less 15 16 16 16 18 14 14 19 13 16 16 Much less 21 19 20 22 35 12 14 18 27 24 19 No effect (vol.) 4 3 3 4 4 2 1 3 4 3 3 Unsure 5 6 4 4 5 4 10 5 3 4 6 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0
More - Less 18 20 20 15 -16 43 33 18 13 13 22Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q8 To better protect Colorado's public health, safety & welfare from the impacts of potentially hazardous industrial activities near homes, neighborhoods, schools, playgrounds, & drinking water sources
More likely to support amendment 71 72 71 69 45 89 78 72 67 66 73
Much more 48 48 49 48 26 68 48 53 42 46 48 Somewhat more 22 24 23 21 19 20 30 19 25 20 24 Less likely to support
amendment 25 24 25 26 46 11 20 24 29 31 24
Somewhat less 7 6 7 7 10 3 4 9 5 8 6 Much less 19 18 18 19 36 8 16 14 24 23 17 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 3 5 1 3 3 2 2 Unsure 2 1 2 2 3 0 2 1 1 1
More - Less 46 48 47 43 -1 77 58 48 37 35 49Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-77
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 61 74 74 71 77 71 58 68
Much more 39 46 44 41 52 55 42 45 Somewhat more 22 27 29 30 24 16 16 23 Less likely to support
amendment 39 23 24 26 20 23 40 28
Somewhat less 16 7 7 9 5 8 17 10 Much less 22 16 16 17 15 15 24 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 5 1 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less 22 50 50 45 57 48 17 40Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 44 48 46 42 56 58 41 47
Much more 18 21 19 18 26 23 22 21 Somewhat more 26 27 27 24 30 36 19 26 Less likely to support
amendment 40 40 41 44 35 27 37 39
Somewhat less 13 22 23 25 18 13 14 18 Much less 28 18 18 18 17 13 23 21 No effect (vol.) 4 5 4 6 5 2 4 4 Unsure 12 7 8 9 4 13 18 9
More - Less 4 9 5 -2 21 32 4 9Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-78
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 71 70 62 56 73 70 74 49 68
Much more 45 43 41 42 52 42 50 37 45 Somewhat more 26 28 21 13 21 28 24 13 23 Less likely to support
amendment 26 27 34 42 19 27 25 47 28
Somewhat less 8 8 14 18 5 10 11 12 10 Much less 18 19 20 25 14 17 14 36 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 6 2 1 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1
More - Less 45 44 28 13 54 43 49 2 40Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 47 44 45 42 54 45 52 32 47
Much more 21 18 20 21 29 17 22 19 21 Somewhat more 26 26 25 20 26 28 30 13 26 Less likely to support
amendment 40 42 40 38 32 41 35 52 39
Somewhat less 22 24 14 16 17 22 13 20 18 Much less 18 18 27 21 14 19 22 32 21 No effect (vol.) 6 5 4 1 11 3 4 3 4 Unsure 7 9 11 19 3 11 9 13 9
More - Less 7 2 4 4 23 4 17 -19 9Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-79
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 60 76 82 65 58 68 50 88 67 68
Much more 39 51 51 47 37 44 34 54 48 45 Somewhat more 20 25 30 18 22 24 16 34 19 23 Less likely to support
amendment37 21 16 32 35 28 46 12 28 28
Somewhat less 12 9 7 14 8 14 9 7 10 10 Much less 25 12 9 18 27 14 37 5 18 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 1 5 3 1 4 2 Unsure 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1
More - Less 23 55 65 33 23 40 4 76 39 40Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 44 51 55 46 42 50 38 56 46 47
Much more 18 24 25 22 18 22 14 22 26 21 Somewhat more 26 26 30 24 24 28 23 34 20 26 Less likely to support
amendment 41 37 28 40 48 30 54 30 41 39
Somewhat less 15 21 20 19 15 18 11 26 18 18 Much less 27 15 8 22 32 12 43 4 24 21 No effect (vol.) 6 3 7 4 2 9 2 3 3 4 Unsure 9 10 10 9 9 11 6 10 9 9
More - Less 3 14 26 6 -6 21 -17 25 5 9Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-80
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 69 68 70 68 66 69 68
Much more 55 43 49 49 45 45 45 Somewhat more 15 25 21 19 21 24 23 Less likely to support
amendment 29 29 29 31 29 27 28
Somewhat less 12 10 12 12 9 8 10 Much less 16 19 17 18 21 19 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 Unsure 1 2 2 1
More - Less 40 39 41 37 37 41 40Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 63 44 54 54 42 44 47
Much more 34 18 21 21 20 21 21 Somewhat more 29 25 32 32 23 24 26 Less likely to support
amendment 26 42 31 32 47 43 39
Somewhat less 9 20 15 15 21 20 18 Much less 17 22 16 18 26 23 21 No effect (vol.) 1 5 5 5 5 4 4 Unsure 9 9 10 9 6 9 9
More - Less 37 2 23 21 -4 1 9Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-81
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 65 68 63 71 71 70 68
Much more 44 44 44 46 46 47 45 Somewhat more 21 24 19 25 25 23 23 Less likely to support
amendment 32 29 34 26 27 24 28
Somewhat less 12 14 10 9 12 5 10 Much less 20 15 23 17 15 20 18 No effect (vol.) 3 4 2 2 1 3 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1
More - Less 33 39 29 45 44 46 40Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 48 45 50 47 43 52 47
Much more 24 24 23 19 15 26 21 Somewhat more 25 21 27 27 28 26 26 Less likely to support
amendment 38 40 37 39 39 40 39
Somewhat less 14 22 10 21 24 16 18 Much less 24 18 27 19 15 24 21 No effect (vol.) 4 2 5 5 8 1 4 Unsure 10 12 8 9 10 7 9
More - Less 10 5 13 7 5 12 9Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-82
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 83 66 68 68 59 67 64 68
Much more 45 45 53 45 37 44 43 45 Somewhat more 38 21 15 23 22 23 21 23 Less likely to support
amendment 13 31 31 29 35 30 28 28
Somewhat less 6 11 10 13 7 11 6 10 Much less 7 21 21 15 28 19 22 18 No effect (vol.) 4 2 1 2 3 1 5 2 Unsure 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
More - Less 70 35 38 40 24 37 36 40Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 50 47 50 53 34 45 47 47
Much more 18 21 20 23 19 20 22 21 Somewhat more 33 26 30 30 16 25 25 26 Less likely to support
amendment 29 41 35 36 55 41 42 39
Somewhat less 20 18 12 19 22 18 18 18 Much less 9 23 23 17 33 22 24 21 No effect (vol.) 7 4 6 2 5 5 2 4 Unsure 13 8 9 9 6 10 9 9
More - Less 22 5 15 17 -21 4 5 9Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-83
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment
73 64 61 70 73 62 64 72 68
Much more 44 42 44 43 50 41 41 49 45 Somewhat more 29 22 17 26 23 22 23 23 23 Less likely to support
amendment22 33 35 26 24 35 33 24 28
Somewhat less 7 12 11 5 11 12 12 8 10 Much less 14 21 24 20 14 22 21 16 18 No effect (vol.) 5 2 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 Unsure 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
More - Less 51 31 27 44 48 27 31 48 40Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 47 43 39 43 46 48 39 54 47
Much more 15 20 19 17 20 25 17 25 21 Somewhat more 31 23 20 26 26 23 22 29 26 Less likely to support
amendment 39 43 51 40 40 41 43 36 39
Somewhat less 20 19 21 19 21 17 16 20 18 Much less 19 24 30 21 19 24 27 16 21 No effect (vol.) 5 5 3 6 5 4 6 3 4 Unsure 10 9 7 11 8 8 11 7 9
More - Less 8 0 -12 3 6 7 -4 19 9Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-84
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 50 35 60 80 71 90 68
Much more 30 22 36 54 45 64 45 Somewhat more 20 14 24 26 26 26 23 Less likely to support
amendment 44 59 34 18 27 8 28
Somewhat less 17 19 16 6 7 5 10 Much less 27 41 18 12 20 3 18 No effect (vol.) 5 3 6 1 1 2 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
More - Less 5 -24 26 61 44 81 40Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 29 19 37 58 49 69 47
Much more 14 10 16 26 24 29 21 Somewhat more 16 8 21 32 25 40 26 Less likely to support
amendment 56 71 46 29 37 20 39
Somewhat less 23 23 23 16 17 15 18 Much less 34 49 23 13 21 4 21 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 6 4 8 4 Unsure 12 9 14 7 10 4 9
More - Less -27 -53 -9 29 12 49 9Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-85
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 48 43 76 50 69 83 82 76 87 82 68
Much more 28 24 46 29 44 50 63 54 72 57 45 Somewhat more 20 19 30 21 25 33 19 22 16 25 23 Less likely to support
amendment 46 52 20 43 27 16 18 23 12 17 28
Somewhat less 16 21 6 15 8 6 7 8 7 7 10 Much less 30 30 14 28 19 10 10 15 5 10 18 No effect (vol.) 4 4 3 4 4 1 0 1 1 2 Unsure 3 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1
More - Less 2 -9 56 7 42 66 64 52 76 65 40Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 30 22 50 31 45 56 63 55 70 60 47
Much more 9 6 18 11 20 18 39 39 39 30 21 Somewhat more 21 16 32 21 25 38 24 17 31 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 56 62 32 55 38 26 28 34 21 27 39
Somewhat less 21 22 16 22 17 15 16 18 15 16 18 Much less 35 40 16 33 22 11 11 16 6 11 21 No effect (vol.) 3 3 6 2 2 8 5 6 4 6 4 Unsure 11 13 12 12 14 10 4 5 4 7 9
More - Less -26 -40 18 -23 7 30 36 21 49 33 9Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-86
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 44 51 66 87 70 90 57 41 87 62 84 79 68
Much more 24 32 45 47 52 71 37 21 50 42 59 67 45 Somewhat more 21 19 21 39 18 19 21 20 37 21 26 13 23 Less likely to support
amendment48 44 31 9 29 9 37 52 11 32 16 20 28
Somewhat less 15 18 9 4 11 4 19 15 7 6 9 6 10 Much less 33 26 22 5 18 5 18 38 5 26 7 14 18 No effect (vol.) 5 3 1 4 1 3 4 1 5 1 2 Unsure 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1
More - Less -3 7 35 78 41 81 20 -11 76 31 69 59 40Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 30 30 44 57 61 65 41 22 49 52 68 59 47
Much more 9 8 15 21 34 43 9 8 17 19 40 38 21 Somewhat more 21 21 30 35 27 22 31 14 32 33 29 20 26 Less likely to support
amendment 55 57 35 28 31 25 44 64 27 38 21 34 39
Somewhat less 17 26 12 20 14 18 30 15 21 11 15 17 18 Much less 38 31 23 8 17 7 14 49 6 28 6 16 21 No effect (vol.) 4 2 8 3 5 5 4 2 8 3 7 3 4 Unsure 11 12 13 12 2 6 11 11 17 6 3 5 9
More - Less -25 -27 9 28 30 40 -3 -42 22 13 48 25 9Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-87
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 78 54 73 65 62 74 63 64 68
Much more 52 35 51 37 39 49 40 50 45 Somewhat more 26 19 22 28 24 25 24 15 23 Less likely to support
amendment 19 42 25 29 32 23 33 31 28
Somewhat less 10 11 11 7 12 12 9 6 10 Much less 9 31 14 22 20 11 24 25 18 No effect (vol.) 2 3 1 5 3 2 2 4 2 Unsure 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1
More - Less 59 11 49 36 30 51 30 33 40Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 56 37 49 43 50 54 39 49 47
Much more 25 15 21 12 28 26 15 24 21 Somewhat more 31 21 28 31 23 28 24 25 26 Less likely to support
amendment 31 51 37 42 39 34 44 39 39
Somewhat less 20 15 21 17 14 18 23 8 18 Much less 11 36 16 25 25 16 22 30 21 No effect (vol.) 6 2 6 1 3 4 4 6 4 Unsure 8 10 8 14 8 7 13 6 9
More - Less 25 -14 12 0 11 20 -6 10 9Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-88
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment
51 87 83 44 43 90 83 55 64 69 68
Much more 26 71 61 21 21 73 66 32 42 46 45 Somewhat more 24 16 22 23 22 17 17 23 21 22 23 Less likely to support
amendment 45 11 15 51 53 7 15 42 32 30 28
Somewhat less 15 5 7 17 20 2 6 16 11 10 10 Much less 30 6 8 34 33 6 9 26 21 19 18 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 Unsure 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 1
More - Less 6 76 69 -7 -11 82 68 13 32 39 40Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment
29 74 61 27 25 72 69 33 42 48 47
Much more 10 38 30 10 11 34 33 13 17 28 21 Somewhat more 19 36 31 17 13 37 36 20 25 20 26 Less likely to support
amendment57 18 27 60 60 21 25 53 45 39 39
Somewhat less 20 13 19 18 20 15 15 20 21 16 18 Much less 36 5 8 42 40 6 9 33 24 22 21 No effect (vol.) 5 3 5 4 6 3 1 6 4 5 4 Unsure 10 5 7 9 10 4 6 8 10 8 9
More - Less -28 56 34 -33 -35 51 44 -20 -3 10 9Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-89
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 59 49 66 81 68 68 78 62 68
Much more 41 33 47 55 43 47 47 46 45 Somewhat more 18 16 19 26 25 21 31 16 23 Less likely to support
amendment 38 47 31 15 30 27 17 37 28
Somewhat less 13 8 16 7 10 10 9 12 10 Much less 25 39 15 8 19 17 9 26 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 0 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1
More - Less 21 3 35 66 39 41 61 24 40Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment
45 34 53 52 47 50 56 41 47
Much more 21 22 21 18 27 19 22 21 21 Somewhat more 23 11 32 34 20 31 35 20 26 Less likely to support
amendment45 55 38 33 36 37 34 49 39
Somewhat less 14 13 15 23 20 15 23 19 18 Much less 31 42 23 9 16 22 11 30 21 No effect (vol.) 4 7 2 6 3 5 6 4 Unsure 6 4 7 10 13 8 10 4 9
More - Less 0 -21 15 19 12 13 22 -9 9Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-90
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 40 87 89 47 80 80 76 68
Much more 19 62 66 26 52 44 51 45 Somewhat more 21 26 23 21 27 37 25 23 Less likely to support
amendment 55 10 9 50 16 20 24 28
Somewhat less 21 5 3 16 7 8 14 10 Much less 34 5 6 34 9 12 10 18 No effect (vol.) 3 2 1 3 3 2 Unsure 2 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less -15 77 80 -3 63 61 52 40Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment
27 58 68 24 55 51 43 47
Much more 7 26 32 10 24 24 25 21 Somewhat more 20 32 36 15 31 28 18 26 Less likely to support
amendment62 25 23 58 33 24 47 39
Somewhat less 26 20 14 15 21 10 31 18 Much less 37 5 9 43 11 14 16 21 No effect (vol.) 2 6 5 5 5 1 6 4 Unsure 9 11 4 13 7 24 4 9
More - Less -36 33 44 -34 22 28 -4 9Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-91
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 62 76 84 63 73 66 68
Much more 40 52 71 37 48 44 45 Somewhat more 21 24 13 26 25 22 23 Less likely to support
amendment 35 22 12 34 25 30 28
Somewhat less 13 8 3 13 8 11 10 Much less 22 14 9 21 17 19 18 No effect (vol.) 3 1 2 2 3 2 Unsure 1 1 2 1 2 1 1
More - Less 27 54 72 28 48 36 40Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 43 57 71 40 48 47 47
Much more 19 27 39 16 25 20 21 Somewhat more 24 31 32 24 22 28 26 Less likely to support
amendment 46 34 23 46 37 40 39
Somewhat less 19 19 14 20 16 19 18 Much less 28 15 9 26 21 21 21 No effect (vol.) 4 2 2 6 4 5 4 Unsure 6 7 4 9 11 8 9
More - Less -4 24 48 -6 11 8 9Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-92
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment
54 87 56 83 75 56 79 68
Much more 30 67 35 63 48 27 63 45 Somewhat more 24 20 21 20 27 29 16 23 Less likely to support
amendment42 11 40 16 19 38 19 28
Somewhat less 14 5 14 5 9 13 8 10 Much less 27 6 26 11 10 26 11 18 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 1 4 3 1 2 Unsure 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
More - Less 12 76 17 68 56 18 60 40Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 34 66 36 63 55 37 57 47
Much more 14 32 17 33 19 15 28 21 Somewhat more 21 34 19 30 36 22 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 50 24 50 26 28 51 29 39
Somewhat less 19 17 18 17 17 21 15 18 Much less 31 7 32 9 12 30 13 21 No effect (vol.) 5 4 4 6 3 4 4 4 Unsure 11 6 10 4 14 8 10 9
More - Less -16 43 -14 37 26 -14 29 9Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-93
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to supportamendment
56 78 63 72 52 84 68
Much more 31 58 37 53 26 62 45 Somewhat more 25 20 26 20 26 22 23 Less likely to support
amendment40 19 33 25 45 14 28
Somewhat less 14 7 14 8 14 6 10 Much less 26 12 20 17 30 8 18 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
More - Less 15 59 30 47 7 69 40Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment 35 59 37 56 29 62 47
Much more 17 26 16 27 13 27 21 Somewhat more 18 33 22 29 16 36 26 Less likely to support
amendment 53 28 48 31 59 26 39
Somewhat less 23 15 24 13 25 15 18 Much less 29 13 25 18 35 11 21 No effect (vol.) 6 4 3 5 3 3 4 Unsure 7 9 11 8 9 9 9
More - Less -18 31 -11 25 -30 37 9Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-94
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ9 To keep communities from
being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment 88 49 90 93 76 79 75 26 43 68
Much more 71 24 70 87 52 47 50 10 20 45 Somewhat more 17 26 19 7 24 32 25 15 23 23 Less likely to support
amendment 11 45 9 5 22 19 21 67 52 28
Somewhat less 5 14 5 2 12 10 10 16 17 10 Much less 6 31 3 4 10 8 11 51 36 18 No effect (vol.) 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 6 4 2 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1
More - Less 77 4 81 88 54 60 54 -42 -9 40Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment
72 26 71 81 55 53 44 12 21 47
Much more 36 10 34 47 23 21 20 4 9 21 Somewhat more 36 16 37 34 32 32 24 8 12 26 Less likely to support
amendment18 59 16 14 29 29 39 78 64 39
Somewhat less 13 22 14 12 20 20 28 18 21 18 Much less 5 37 3 2 9 9 11 61 43 21 No effect (vol.) 4 3 5 2 5 6 5 4 3 4 Unsure 5 11 7 4 11 12 12 6 12 9
More - Less 54 -33 55 67 25 24 5 -66 -44 9Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-95
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q9 To keep communities from being overwhelmed & harmed by heavy industrial oil & gas operations right next to neighborhoods & schools
More likely to support amendment
65 67 65 63 43 83 72 69 61 62 68
Much more 44 45 45 42 21 66 50 44 41 42 45 Somewhat more 22 22 20 20 22 16 22 25 20 19 23 Less likely to support
amendment30 30 31 33 50 16 26 28 32 34 28
Somewhat less 11 11 11 12 17 8 8 13 9 10 10 Much less 20 18 20 21 34 8 18 15 23 23 18 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 3 5 1 1 2 4 3 2 Unsure 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 3 2 1
More - Less 35 37 35 30 -7 67 46 41 29 28 40Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q10 To change laws that the state legislature has failed to change, or even refused to change
More likely to support amendment
46 48 46 44 24 59 47 51 42 43 47
Much more 22 22 22 22 7 33 21 24 18 21 21 Somewhat more 24 25 24 23 17 26 26 27 24 22 26 Less likely to support
amendment40 39 41 43 62 34 37 36 47 47 39
Somewhat less 17 17 19 18 20 19 22 16 17 19 18 Much less 24 22 22 25 42 15 15 20 29 28 21 No effect (vol.) 4 4 4 5 2 3 4 6 3 3 4 Unsure 10 9 8 8 12 4 12 8 8 7 9
More - Less 6 8 5 1 -38 25 11 15 -4 -3 9Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-96
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 46 47 45 38 57 58 47 48
Much more 24 22 19 14 32 36 33 26 Somewhat more 22 25 26 24 25 22 15 22 Less likely to support
amendment 46 42 43 50 33 35 46 43
Somewhat less 11 20 19 25 14 11 10 16 Much less 36 22 25 25 19 24 35 27 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 3 1 3 3 Unsure 8 8 10 9 7 6 4 7
More - Less 0 5 2 -12 24 23 2 5Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 38 43 43 44 43 49 46 44
Much more 15 16 15 14 19 19 22 18 Somewhat more 23 27 28 30 24 30 23 26 Less likely to support
amendment 52 43 44 46 39 39 49 45
Somewhat less 18 22 22 24 19 16 22 20 Much less 34 21 22 22 20 24 27 25 No effect (vol.) 1 4 3 3 5 1 3 Unsure 7 10 10 7 13 12 4 9 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -14 1 -1 -2 4 10 -3 -1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-97
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 45 43 49 48 54 43 50 44 48
Much more 23 19 27 31 30 19 29 28 26 Somewhat more 22 23 22 17 24 25 20 16 22 Less likely to support
amendment 44 46 44 44 38 42 44 54 43
Somewhat less 22 21 9 12 22 16 12 15 16 Much less 22 25 34 32 16 26 32 39 27 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 4 6 2 3 1 3 Unsure 8 10 5 3 2 13 4 1 7
More - Less 1 -3 5 4 16 1 5 -11 5Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 45 44 41 46 46 40 53 38 44
Much more 17 15 18 22 25 12 21 16 18 Somewhat more 28 29 23 24 22 28 32 21 26 Less likely to support
amendment 42 44 50 48 41 45 40 58 45
Somewhat less 20 21 20 22 20 22 15 18 20 Much less 22 23 30 26 21 23 25 40 25 No effect (vol.) 4 3 2 1 5 3 1 1 3 Unsure 9 9 6 4 8 12 6 3 9 Refused 0 1 1 0
More - Less 2 0 -10 -2 6 -5 13 -20 -1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-98
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 43 52 59 43 43 54 32 56 49 48
Much more 20 32 25 28 24 22 17 26 36 26 Somewhat more 24 20 34 15 19 31 15 30 13 22 Less likely to support
amendment 50 37 30 50 47 40 61 32 41 43
Somewhat less 14 18 15 18 14 13 14 22 15 16 Much less 36 19 15 32 33 26 47 10 26 27 No effect (vol.) 3 2 5 2 1 4 1 4 1 3 Unsure 4 9 6 5 8 3 6 9 9 7
More - Less -6 15 29 -7 -4 14 -29 24 9 5Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 39 49 54 40 38 44 33 56 43 44
Much more 15 20 16 20 15 17 13 15 23 18 Somewhat more 23 29 38 19 23 27 20 41 20 26 Less likely to support
amendment 52 38 35 49 49 49 55 29 45 45
Somewhat less 22 18 23 19 18 29 15 20 15 20 Much less 30 21 12 30 31 20 40 9 30 25 No effect (vol.) 4 2 1 3 3 3 4 2 1 3 Unsure 6 11 9 8 9 4 8 13 10 9 Refused 0 0 1 0
More - Less -13 11 19 -9 -11 -5 -22 27 -3 -1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-99
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 62 45 50 50 43 47 48
Much more 33 24 25 26 23 27 26 Somewhat more 29 21 26 23 19 20 22 Less likely to support
amendment 33 45 44 45 46 43 43
Somewhat less 11 17 19 19 15 14 16 Much less 22 28 25 26 31 29 27 No effect (vol.) 1 3 2 2 4 3 3 Unsure 5 7 3 3 8 8 7
More - Less 29 0 7 4 -3 4 5Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 51 42 47 48 38 43 44
Much more 26 15 16 16 15 18 18 Somewhat more 25 27 31 32 23 24 26 Less likely to support
amendment 42 46 41 40 49 46 45
Somewhat less 13 21 17 15 21 20 20 Much less 28 24 24 24 29 25 25 No effect (vol.) 1 3 4 4 2 2 3 Unsure 7 9 7 8 10 9 9 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less 9 -4 6 8 -12 -3 -1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-100
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules whenit comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 53 59 50 44 44 45 48
Much more 28 23 32 24 20 30 26 Somewhat more 25 36 18 20 23 15 22 Less likely to support
amendment 39 36 41 46 43 50 43
Somewhat less 9 9 9 21 21 20 16 Much less 30 27 32 25 22 30 27 No effect (vol.) 2 4 1 3 4 1 3 Unsure 6 1 8 7 10 4 7
More - Less 14 22 9 -1 1 -4 5Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 43 45 42 45 40 52 44
Much more 17 12 20 18 16 22 18 Somewhat more 26 33 22 27 25 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 44 47 43 45 49 37 45
Somewhat less 17 17 18 21 27 12 20 Much less 27 31 25 23 22 26 25 No effect (vol.) 1 2 4 3 5 3 Unsure 11 8 13 7 7 6 9 Refused 0 1 0
More - Less -1 -2 -1 0 -9 15 -1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-101
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 48 48 53 51 36 45 49 48
Much more 22 27 34 26 20 25 29 26 Somewhat more 26 21 20 25 16 19 20 22 Less likely to support
amendment 34 45 41 42 54 48 40 43
Somewhat less 19 15 10 19 16 18 12 16 Much less 15 30 31 24 38 30 28 27 No effect (vol.) 4 2 1 1 3 3 2 3 Unsure 14 5 4 5 7 5 9 7
More - Less 14 2 12 9 -17 -3 9 5Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 47 44 49 43 40 42 42 44
Much more 23 16 19 15 16 16 18 18 Somewhat more 24 27 30 28 24 26 24 26 Less likely to support
amendment 38 45 43 44 49 45 47 45
Somewhat less 23 19 21 23 11 19 19 20 Much less 16 27 22 22 38 26 29 25 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 3 6 4 1 3 Unsure 14 8 7 10 6 9 9 9 Refused 0 1 0
More - Less 9 -1 6 -1 -9 -3 -5 -1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-102
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 52 43 41 48 43 50 41 54 48
Much more 29 21 16 32 19 25 24 27 26 Somewhat more 23 22 24 17 24 25 18 26 22 Less likely to support
amendment 38 49 47 41 48 43 49 38 43
Somewhat less 16 16 16 15 23 9 15 16 16 Much less 22 33 31 26 25 35 34 22 27 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 1 5 1 3 2 3 Unsure 8 6 11 9 4 5 7 6 7
More - Less 14 -6 -6 7 -5 7 -8 16 5Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 46 42 38 51 42 38 40 48 44
Much more 12 19 17 18 14 17 18 18 18 Somewhat more 34 23 21 33 28 21 22 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 41 49 50 39 48 50 47 42 45
Somewhat less 14 23 24 16 25 21 19 20 20 Much less 27 26 26 24 24 29 28 22 25 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 Unsure 10 7 9 8 7 11 10 7 9 Refused 0 1 0 0
More - Less 5 -7 -12 12 -6 -12 -8 6 -1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-103
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 30 22 37 59 48 70 48
Much more 14 9 18 32 25 40 26 Somewhat more 16 13 18 27 23 30 22 Less likely to support
amendment 61 68 57 32 40 24 43
Somewhat less 16 9 20 16 11 21 16 Much less 46 59 37 16 28 3 27 No effect (vol.) 4 4 3 2 2 2 3 Unsure 5 6 3 7 10 4 7
More - Less -31 -47 -20 27 9 46 5Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 29 22 35 52 42 63 44
Much more 12 8 14 20 15 25 18 Somewhat more 18 14 21 32 27 38 26 Less likely to support
amendment 64 74 57 34 41 26 45
Somewhat less 23 23 24 18 17 20 20 Much less 40 51 33 16 25 6 25 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 3 4 2 3 Unsure 4 3 5 11 13 9 9 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -34 -52 -22 18 0 37 -1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-104
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 28 22 47 30 42 51 70 65 75 62 48
Much more 15 9 24 15 21 27 40 37 43 35 26 Somewhat more 14 13 23 15 21 24 30 28 32 27 22 Less likely to support
amendment 61 69 42 60 45 37 24 28 20 29 43
Somewhat less 13 15 23 14 17 22 12 8 17 17 16 Much less 48 54 20 46 28 15 12 20 3 13 27 No effect (vol.) 4 5 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 3 Unsure 7 4 9 6 11 10 4 6 2 6 7
More - Less -33 -47 4 -30 -3 14 46 37 56 33 5Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 31 26 45 31 38 49 56 47 64 53 44
Much more 13 10 17 14 16 16 23 17 29 20 18 Somewhat more 18 16 28 17 22 34 33 30 36 34 26 Less likely to support
amendment 61 68 39 61 42 33 33 46 23 33 45
Somewhat less 19 22 18 19 15 18 22 28 18 21 20 Much less 42 45 21 41 27 15 11 18 5 12 25 No effect (vol.) 2 2 4 2 4 5 2 2 2 3 3 Unsure 5 3 12 6 16 13 9 5 11 11 9 Refused 1 1 0 0
More - Less -30 -42 6 -30 -4 17 23 1 42 20 -1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-105
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to supportamendment 27 30 38 55 71 70 40 20 50 42 74 67 48
Much more 11 19 13 35 39 41 19 11 18 31 36 44 26 Somewhat more 16 11 25 21 32 29 21 9 32 11 38 23 22 Less likely to support
amendment 65 57 53 31 27 22 49 70 37 49 22 26 43
Somewhat less 10 15 21 25 9 15 10 15 27 17 13 12 16 Much less 55 42 32 7 18 7 39 55 11 31 9 14 27 No effect (vol.) 3 4 3 1 3 6 2 3 2 2 3 Unsure 5 8 6 13 1 6 5 8 9 10 2 5 7
More - Less -38 -27 -15 24 44 48 -9 -49 13 -7 52 41 5Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 28 33 44 46 45 65 46 20 49 39 54 59 44
Much more 13 14 14 20 21 25 18 10 13 21 18 28 18 Somewhat more 16 20 30 27 24 40 28 11 36 18 36 31 26 Less likely to support
amendment 64 59 43 35 48 22 48 70 33 47 40 27 45
Somewhat less 17 22 18 18 35 13 18 21 24 10 32 14 20 Much less 46 37 26 16 14 9 30 50 8 37 8 13 25 No effect (vol.) 3 1 5 3 2 2 2 2 5 3 3 3 Unsure 5 6 8 16 4 12 4 6 13 11 7 10 9 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -35 -26 0 12 -3 43 -2 -50 17 -7 14 32 -1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-106
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 57 35 53 34 50 53 44 45 48
Much more 28 22 28 14 29 25 26 29 26 Somewhat more 29 13 25 20 20 28 18 16 22 Less likely to support
amendment 34 56 39 59 43 37 47 48 43
Somewhat less 21 10 15 22 16 17 16 13 16 Much less 14 46 24 37 27 20 32 35 27 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 1 2 4 1 2 3 Unsure 6 7 6 6 6 6 8 5 7
More - Less 22 -21 14 -25 7 15 -4 -3 5Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 50 36 47 41 37 46 41 44 44
Much more 17 18 18 18 19 17 17 19 18 Somewhat more 33 18 29 23 18 29 24 25 26 Less likely to support
amendment 37 58 42 51 48 43 46 48 45
Somewhat less 22 17 21 15 22 23 20 11 20 Much less 15 41 21 36 26 20 26 36 25 No effect (vol.) 3 1 2 1 4 2 4 1 3 Unsure 10 5 9 6 10 9 9 7 9 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less 13 -22 5 -10 -11 3 -4 -4 -1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-107
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 29 74 64 21 23 74 74 29 41 50 48
Much more 13 46 37 7 8 46 44 14 18 34 26 Somewhat more 16 28 27 14 15 29 30 15 23 16 22 Less likely to support
amendment 64 19 26 74 69 19 21 64 51 42 43
Somewhat less 17 11 16 17 16 12 10 21 19 15 16 Much less 47 8 10 57 53 7 11 44 32 28 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 3 Unsure 5 6 7 3 5 5 6 4 7 4 7
More - Less -35 55 38 -53 -46 56 53 -36 -10 8 5Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 29 66 57 23 23 65 65 32 40 46 44
Much more 10 28 23 10 11 25 25 12 16 21 18 Somewhat more 19 38 35 13 12 40 40 20 23 25 26 Less likely to support
amendment 63 24 29 71 69 25 27 59 51 46 45
Somewhat less 23 16 19 24 24 17 13 22 22 19 20 Much less 40 9 10 47 45 8 14 37 29 27 25 No effect (vol.) 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 Unsure 6 8 10 3 6 8 5 6 7 6 9 Refused 0 1 0 0 0 0
More - Less -34 42 28 -48 -47 41 38 -27 -12 0 -1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-108
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 44 37 48 52 51 49 59 40 48
Much more 27 24 30 27 22 26 40 23 26 Somewhat more 16 14 18 26 29 23 19 17 22 Less likely to support
amendment 51 59 46 38 32 44 34 55 43
Somewhat less 15 7 21 22 10 18 19 17 16 Much less 37 52 25 16 21 27 14 38 27 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 5 3 0 3 Unsure 3 1 4 8 12 4 7 5 7
More - Less -8 -22 3 14 20 4 25 -16 5Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 40 32 47 48 44 48 46 35 44
Much more 16 20 13 21 13 18 21 18 18 Somewhat more 24 12 33 26 31 30 25 17 26 Less likely to support
amendment 49 60 41 38 47 40 37 56 45
Somewhat less 14 11 17 22 29 17 12 21 20 Much less 35 49 24 17 17 23 25 36 25 No effect (vol.) 3 3 4 3 4 4 0 3 Unsure 7 6 9 10 10 7 14 8 9 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -9 -28 6 9 -3 8 9 -22 -1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-109
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 19 65 70 19 56 44 51 48
Much more 9 32 42 12 25 28 29 26 Somewhat more 10 33 28 6 31 16 23 22 Less likely to support
amendment 74 22 22 74 36 33 43 43
Somewhat less 24 12 14 23 19 16 17 16 Much less 49 10 8 51 17 17 26 27 No effect (vol.) 4 3 1 3 2 5 6 3 Unsure 4 10 7 5 6 18 7
More - Less -55 43 48 -56 20 10 9 5Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 16 56 69 25 49 41 46 44
Much more 6 19 30 12 17 20 16 18 Somewhat more 10 37 40 13 32 21 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 75 28 20 70 41 39 50 45
Somewhat less 24 21 12 24 24 17 35 20 Much less 51 8 9 45 16 22 15 25 No effect (vol.) 1 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 Unsure 6 13 8 2 8 16 1 9 Refused 1 2 0
More - Less -59 28 49 -44 8 2 -4 -1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-110
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 45 55 77 39 54 45 48
Much more 19 37 46 19 34 22 26 Somewhat more 26 18 30 19 20 23 22 Less likely to support
amendment 48 39 16 53 41 44 43
Somewhat less 16 16 9 18 13 17 16 Much less 32 23 7 35 28 27 27 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 0 3 3 Unsure 5 4 7 5 5 7 7
More - Less -3 16 61 -15 13 1 5Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 38 51 62 38 45 43 44
Much more 16 22 29 14 21 16 18 Somewhat more 22 29 33 24 24 27 26 Less likely to support
amendment 50 41 29 52 43 46 45
Somewhat less 21 21 15 22 15 22 20 Much less 29 20 14 29 28 24 25 No effect (vol.) 3 1 1 3 2 3 3 Unsure 9 6 7 7 9 8 9 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less -13 10 33 -14 2 -3 -1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-111
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 31 72 33 74 51 35 61 48
Much more 13 44 17 47 22 15 35 26 Somewhat more 18 28 16 27 29 19 26 22 Less likely to support
amendment 62 19 61 19 34 55 31 43
Somewhat less 19 12 17 11 19 18 14 16 Much less 42 7 43 8 15 38 17 27 No effect (vol.) 3 3 2 5 2 2 3 Unsure 5 7 4 2 15 8 6 7
More - Less -31 54 -28 55 18 -21 29 5Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 31 62 35 66 39 31 54 44
Much more 11 27 14 27 15 9 24 18 Somewhat more 20 35 21 39 24 22 30 26 Less likely to support
amendment 60 26 55 27 43 57 36 45
Somewhat less 21 20 22 13 24 22 20 20 Much less 39 6 34 14 19 35 16 25 No effect (vol.) 2 3 3 1 3 1 2 3 Unsure 7 8 6 6 15 10 8 9 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less -29 36 -21 39 -4 -26 18 -1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-112
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 38 58 38 56 30 62 48
Much more 17 34 18 32 13 36 26 Somewhat more 22 24 20 24 17 26 22 Less likely to support
amendment 55 32 50 38 64 28 43
Somewhat less 13 17 19 14 19 14 16 Much less 42 16 31 24 45 14 27 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 Unsure 4 8 9 4 4 8 7
More - Less -17 26 -12 18 -34 35 5Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 31 54 30 54 27 58 44
Much more 15 20 8 24 12 22 18 Somewhat more 17 34 22 31 16 36 26 Less likely to support
amendment 60 34 56 37 64 30 45
Somewhat less 24 18 29 13 23 18 20 Much less 37 16 27 23 41 12 25 No effect (vol.) 1 3 3 2 4 1 3 Unsure 7 10 11 7 5 11 9 Refused 1 0 0 0
More - Less -29 19 -26 18 -37 28 -1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-113
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ11 To make certain that
Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 75 25 73 91 59 51 44 10 21 48
Much more 47 9 43 65 30 22 20 6 10 26 Somewhat more 28 16 30 26 28 29 23 4 12 22 Less likely to support
amendment 17 67 21 6 30 37 49 83 69 43
Somewhat less 10 20 14 4 19 21 26 14 17 16 Much less 7 47 6 2 12 16 23 69 52 27 No effect (vol.) 0 4 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 Unsure 7 4 5 3 10 9 5 4 6 7
More - Less 58 -42 52 85 28 14 -5 -73 -48 5Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 65 25 68 80 53 48 43 8 20 44
Much more 25 11 29 41 19 16 13 2 7 18 Somewhat more 40 14 38 39 34 31 30 6 13 26 Less likely to support
amendment 24 65 23 12 37 39 45 82 69 45
Somewhat less 17 22 18 9 17 24 30 19 21 20 Much less 7 43 5 4 20 15 15 62 48 25 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 Unsure 9 6 7 6 9 11 9 6 8 9 Refused 0 0 1 0 0
More - Less 42 -40 45 68 16 9 -2 -73 -49 -1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-114
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q11 To make certain that Colorado oil & gas companies must play by a whole new set of rules when it comes to drilling
More likely to support amendment 47 48 48 45 21 67 52 46 45 44 48
Much more 26 26 27 26 12 38 25 27 26 26 26 Somewhat more 21 22 21 19 9 29 27 20 19 18 22 Less likely to support
amendment 44 43 44 47 68 28 37 47 44 49 43
Somewhat less 16 15 15 17 14 16 16 19 12 15 16 Much less 28 28 29 30 54 12 21 29 33 34 27 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 3 5 2 4 1 3 1 3 Unsure 6 6 5 5 6 3 7 5 8 5 7
More - Less 2 6 4 -2 -47 39 15 -1 1 -5 5Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q12 To shift the state's mission from fostering & promoting the development of oil & gas to administering it instead
More likely to support amendment 41 42 42 40 23 57 44 48 37 41 44
Much more 17 18 16 17 8 24 16 20 16 19 18 Somewhat more 25 24 26 24 15 33 27 28 21 23 26 Less likely to support
amendment 47 47 48 49 70 33 43 44 48 48 45
Somewhat less 21 21 21 22 20 20 21 20 18 17 20 Much less 26 25 26 28 50 13 22 24 31 31 25 No effect (vol.) 3 3 3 4 1 1 1 3 4 3 3 Unsure 8 8 7 6 5 10 12 5 9 7 9 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
More - Less -6 -5 -5 -9 -47 24 1 4 -11 -7 -1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-115
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
51 46 46 40 53 56 55 49
Much more 18 20 18 15 25 20 28 22 Somewhat more 33 26 27 25 27 36 27 28 Less likely to support
amendment 43 49 49 54 44 39 37 46
Somewhat less 12 22 22 24 20 13 11 18 Much less 31 27 27 29 25 26 26 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 1 2 3 2 Unsure 7 3 3 3 2 3 5 3
More - Less 8 -3 -3 -14 8 17 18 4Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
30 31 30 25 37 34 27 30
Much more 13 16 15 12 21 22 17 17 Somewhat more 16 14 15 12 17 12 10 13 Less likely to support
amendment63 64 64 70 57 59 68 64
Somewhat less 23 20 20 20 21 13 18 18 Much less 41 44 45 51 36 46 50 46 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 2 Unsure 6 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0
More - Less -34 -34 -34 -45 -20 -25 -41 -34Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-116
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 45 44 53 53 43 50 62 39 49
Much more 19 17 26 26 25 17 31 20 22 Somewhat more 26 28 27 27 18 33 31 18 28 Less likely to support
amendment 50 50 42 37 53 44 35 58 46
Somewhat less 22 21 14 9 19 19 13 22 18 Much less 28 28 29 28 34 26 22 36 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 Unsure 3 4 3 6 2 3 1 2 3
More - Less -5 -5 11 16 -10 5 27 -19 4Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
30 30 28 29 32 33 23 26 30
Much more 16 15 16 19 21 16 13 19 17 Somewhat more 14 15 13 10 11 17 10 7 13 Less likely to support
amendment65 66 64 65 61 63 67 71 64
Somewhat less 22 22 16 15 19 15 24 16 18 Much less 44 44 48 50 41 48 44 54 46 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 2 3 1 4 1 2 Unsure 2 3 5 3 4 3 6 2 3 Refused 0 1 0
More - Less -35 -36 -36 -36 -29 -31 -44 -45 -34Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-117
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 41 57 66 43 41 49 33 67 49 49
Much more 19 25 24 22 19 24 13 21 28 22 Somewhat more 23 32 42 21 21 25 20 46 21 28 Less likely to support
amendment 53 39 29 52 55 42 65 29 47 46
Somewhat less 20 16 16 21 15 21 18 14 17 18 Much less 33 23 12 30 40 20 47 14 30 28 No effect (vol.) 3 2 1 3 2 5 1 1 2 2 Unsure 3 3 4 2 3 4 2 4 2 3
More - Less -11 18 38 -8 -14 8 -32 38 2 4Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 21 38 37 29 25 23 20 45 33 30
Much more 12 21 16 21 12 12 12 22 21 17 Somewhat more 10 17 21 8 12 11 8 23 12 13 Less likely to support
amendment 72 57 56 66 70 70 74 50 62 64
Somewhat less 16 20 26 14 15 20 12 25 16 18 Much less 56 37 30 51 55 50 63 25 46 46 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Unsure 4 3 4 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0
More - Less -51 -19 -19 -37 -45 -47 -54 -5 -29 -34Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-118
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 60 47 53 52 51 49 49
Much more 28 20 21 22 20 23 22 Somewhat more 31 27 33 30 32 26 28 Less likely to support
amendment 36 48 40 42 46 48 46
Somewhat less 17 18 17 17 15 18 18 Much less 18 30 23 25 32 30 28 No effect (vol.) 1 3 5 5 1 1 2 Unsure 4 3 2 1 2 2 3
More - Less 24 -1 13 9 5 1 4Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
50 25 28 28 27 30 30
Much more 29 14 17 17 15 17 17 Somewhat more 21 11 11 11 13 13 13 Less likely to support
amendment47 68 66 67 68 64 64
Somewhat less 15 19 18 19 20 18 18 Much less 32 49 48 48 48 46 46 No effect (vol.) 3 4 2 1 2 2 Unsure 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0
More - Less 3 -43 -38 -38 -41 -33 -34Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-119
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 56 55 56 45 41 51 49
Much more 26 26 25 19 17 23 22 Somewhat more 30 29 31 26 24 29 28 Less likely to support
amendment 40 41 38 50 53 45 46
Somewhat less 14 18 12 20 25 13 18 Much less 25 24 26 29 28 32 28 No effect (vol.) 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 Unsure 4 2 5 2 3 2 3
More - Less 16 14 18 -5 -12 7 4Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
36 40 35 25 27 23 30
Much more 17 17 17 17 19 13 17 Somewhat more 20 23 18 8 8 10 13 Less likely to support
amendment57 55 59 69 67 73 64
Somewhat less 18 16 19 18 16 22 18 Much less 39 38 40 51 50 51 46 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 Unsure 4 4 4 3 5 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
More - Less -21 -15 -24 -44 -40 -50 -34Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-120
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 62 48 53 49 39 47 43 49
Much more 23 22 25 20 21 18 20 22 Somewhat more 39 26 28 30 18 29 22 28 Less likely to support
amendment 33 48 43 47 56 49 52 46
Somewhat less 17 18 17 21 15 18 20 18 Much less 15 30 26 26 41 31 32 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 2 Unsure 4 2 2 2 1 2 3 3
More - Less 30 -1 11 2 -17 -2 -9 4Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
37 28 36 27 23 29 24 30
Much more 19 17 20 16 15 16 15 17 Somewhat more 18 12 16 11 8 14 10 13 Less likely to support
amendment54 66 60 66 72 65 70 64
Somewhat less 17 18 13 21 20 15 21 18 Much less 38 48 47 45 53 50 48 46 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 Unsure 5 3 0 5 4 5 3 3 Refused 0 1 0 1 0
More - Less -17 -38 -25 -39 -50 -36 -45 -34Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-121
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q13 To shift the administration
of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
57 43 40 47 49 53 47 52 49
Much more 26 19 18 25 17 26 23 21 22 Somewhat more 31 24 23 22 32 27 24 31 28 Less likely to support
amendment38 52 56 47 46 44 48 43 46
Somewhat less 10 21 13 18 24 14 15 20 18 Much less 28 32 43 29 22 30 33 23 28 No effect (vol.) 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 2 Unsure 4 2 1 3 2 2 4 2 3
More - Less 20 -10 -16 -1 3 9 -1 9 4Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 30 27 22 31 24 32 20 38 30
Much more 15 16 14 18 13 18 13 20 17 Somewhat more 15 11 9 13 11 14 7 19 13 Less likely to support
amendment62 67 69 60 74 63 72 58 64
Somewhat less 19 16 17 16 23 17 19 17 18 Much less 43 51 52 44 51 45 53 40 46 No effect (vol.) 2 2 4 4 1 1 3 1 2 Unsure 5 3 5 5 1 4 4 3 3 Refused 0 1 0 0 0
More - Less -32 -40 -46 -29 -50 -31 -52 -19 -34Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-122
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 40 40 40 55 49 62 49
Much more 18 22 15 24 24 25 22 Somewhat more 22 19 25 31 25 37 28 Less likely to support
amendment 57 58 56 39 45 32 46
Somewhat less 17 15 18 19 18 21 18 Much less 40 43 37 20 27 12 28 No effect (vol.) 2 1 4 2 2 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 4 4 4 3
More - Less -17 -18 -16 16 4 30 4Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
21 13 26 35 22 50 30
Much more 10 9 10 21 15 27 17 Somewhat more 11 4 16 15 7 23 13 Less likely to support
amendment76 83 71 57 69 43 64
Somewhat less 13 15 11 21 23 19 18 Much less 63 68 60 36 47 24 46 No effect (vol.) 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Unsure 1 1 1 5 7 3 3 Refused 0 1 0
More - Less -55 -69 -45 -22 -47 7 -34Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-123
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 38 38 50 38 50 55 61 56 65 58 49
Much more 17 17 17 17 19 17 32 31 33 26 22 Somewhat more 21 21 33 21 30 39 29 25 32 33 28 Less likely to support
amendment 57 57 46 58 46 39 33 40 27 36 46
Somewhat less 14 13 21 16 16 20 19 25 14 20 18 Much less 43 45 25 42 30 19 14 14 13 16 28 No effect (vol.) 3 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 Unsure 2 1 3 1 4 3 5 3 5 4 3
More - Less -19 -20 5 -20 4 16 27 17 38 23 4Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment
16 15 30 17 20 33 46 43 48 40 30
Much more 10 8 15 9 11 19 26 24 27 23 17 Somewhat more 5 6 15 8 9 14 20 19 21 18 13 Less likely to support
amendment79 80 62 79 70 56 50 55 46 53 64
Somewhat less 12 11 20 13 21 21 23 25 21 22 18 Much less 67 69 43 66 49 35 27 30 25 30 46 No effect (vol.) 3 4 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 Unsure 3 1 6 2 8 9 2 2 1 5 3 Refused 1 1 0 0
More - Less -63 -66 -33 -62 -51 -23 -4 -12 2 -12 -34Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-124
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 30 46 43 58 54 66 52 28 52 49 70 52 49
Much more 15 19 18 17 25 37 20 15 14 21 35 29 22 Somewhat more 15 27 25 41 29 29 32 14 38 28 35 23 28 Less likely to support
amendment 65 50 53 38 38 30 41 69 41 51 24 42 46
Somewhat less 16 12 24 17 20 18 13 15 25 15 14 23 18 Much less 49 38 29 21 17 12 28 54 16 37 10 18 28 No effect (vol.) 4 3 3 1 2 7 1 3 3 2 Unsure 2 2 1 4 7 3 1 2 4 6 3 3
More - Less -35 -3 -9 20 16 36 11 -40 11 -3 46 11 4Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 12 20 13 47 44 47 20 13 30 29 49 43 30
Much more 6 14 6 24 25 26 13 9 14 16 22 28 17 Somewhat more 5 5 7 23 19 21 6 4 16 13 27 14 13 Less likely to support
amendment 85 74 75 49 53 47 76 81 58 67 49 51 64
Somewhat less 11 14 20 20 18 26 17 9 25 13 24 21 18 Much less 74 59 56 29 35 22 59 72 33 54 25 30 46 No effect (vol.) 2 4 4 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 Unsure 2 3 8 4 2 1 1 4 9 2 3 3 Refused 1 1 0
More - Less -73 -54 -62 -2 -9 0 -57 -68 -29 -38 1 -8 -34Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-125
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 51 48 55 49 40 54 45 47 49
Much more 20 22 23 23 20 24 17 27 22 Somewhat more 31 25 32 26 20 30 28 20 28 Less likely to support
amendment 42 50 40 48 53 42 50 46 46
Somewhat less 20 12 18 13 18 19 19 12 18 Much less 22 38 22 34 34 23 31 34 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 2 Unsure 5 1 3 2 5 2 3 5 3
More - Less 9 -2 14 1 -13 12 -5 1 4Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 32 26 33 20 30 30 27 37 30
Much more 16 16 17 10 20 16 14 25 17 Somewhat more 16 9 16 11 10 14 13 12 13 Less likely to support
amendment 63 67 61 75 63 64 68 56 64
Somewhat less 25 8 19 16 19 19 21 9 18 Much less 38 59 42 60 44 45 47 47 46 No effect (vol.) 1 4 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 Unsure 5 2 4 2 5 4 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 1 0
More - Less -31 -42 -28 -55 -34 -34 -41 -18 -34Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-126
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 37 67 58 33 32 66 68 40 47 48 49
Much more 17 31 25 14 15 29 28 21 17 27 22 Somewhat more 20 36 34 19 17 36 39 19 29 21 28 Less likely to support
amendment61 27 37 64 63 30 29 56 50 47 46
Somewhat less 19 14 19 19 18 17 12 19 16 18 18 Much less 42 13 18 46 46 14 18 38 34 29 28 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Unsure 0 5 3 1 2 3 3 2 1 4 3
More - Less -24 40 22 -32 -31 35 38 -16 -3 1 4Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 13 55 41 10 10 51 56 15 24 37 30
Much more 6 33 22 7 5 31 26 10 13 19 17 Somewhat more 7 22 19 3 5 20 30 6 10 18 13 Less likely to support
amendment 82 41 54 84 86 44 40 79 71 58 64
Somewhat less 13 21 24 9 13 22 14 17 17 11 18 Much less 70 20 30 75 73 21 26 62 54 46 46 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 Unsure 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 4 1 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 0
More - Less -69 14 -12 -75 -76 8 16 -64 -47 -21 -34Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-127
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
47 40 52 56 43 53 62 42 49
Much more 22 23 21 23 17 24 23 19 22 Somewhat more 25 17 31 33 26 28 39 23 28 Less likely to support
amendment49 59 42 38 51 42 30 56 46
Somewhat less 14 11 16 20 24 16 12 17 18 Much less 36 48 26 18 27 26 17 38 28 No effect (vol.) 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 0 2 Unsure 2 3 3 5 1 6 2 3
More - Less -2 -19 10 18 -9 11 32 -14 4Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 30 28 31 32 28 30 44 24 30
Much more 17 19 16 17 16 14 25 17 17 Somewhat more 12 8 15 15 12 16 20 7 13 Less likely to support
amendment 65 69 61 59 71 60 47 75 64
Somewhat less 14 12 15 22 23 17 14 18 18 Much less 51 57 46 37 48 42 32 57 46 No effect (vol.) 3 2 3 3 5 1 2 Unsure 3 1 5 6 1 5 8 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0
More - Less -35 -42 -30 -27 -43 -30 -3 -51 -34Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-128
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 31 59 66 36 55 57 38 49
Much more 15 25 26 17 23 32 23 22 Somewhat more 16 34 41 19 32 25 15 28 Less likely to support
amendment 64 38 28 60 41 31 55 46
Somewhat less 23 20 15 14 23 17 22 18 Much less 42 18 13 46 19 14 34 28 No effect (vol.) 3 1 3 3 2 3 1 2 Unsure 2 3 2 1 1 9 6 3
More - Less -34 21 38 -24 14 26 -18 4Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 11 36 50 10 35 25 29 30
Much more 6 19 31 7 17 18 15 17 Somewhat more 5 17 20 3 18 7 15 13 Less likely to support
amendment 86 57 43 87 61 63 71 64
Somewhat less 12 33 14 10 24 16 25 18 Much less 74 24 29 77 38 46 46 46 No effect (vol.) 1 2 4 3 2 5 2 Unsure 1 6 4 1 7 3 Refused 1 0 0
More - Less -75 -21 8 -77 -26 -37 -42 -34Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-129
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 45 58 69 43 51 49 49
Much more 18 27 38 17 31 18 22 Somewhat more 26 31 31 26 20 31 28 Less likely to support
amendment 51 39 28 52 48 45 46
Somewhat less 20 15 16 18 22 16 18 Much less 32 24 12 34 26 29 28 No effect (vol.) 3 1 3 1 3 2 Unsure 1 3 3 2 1 4 3
More - Less -7 19 42 -9 3 4 4Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 26 38 58 21 34 28 30
Much more 15 20 33 12 19 15 17 Somewhat more 11 18 25 10 14 13 13 Less likely to support
amendment 72 57 36 74 60 66 64
Somewhat less 17 20 21 17 15 19 18 Much less 54 37 15 57 45 47 46 No effect (vol.) 0 2 1 2 1 2 2 Unsure 2 3 5 2 5 3 3 Refused 0 1 0 0 0 0
More - Less -46 -19 22 -53 -27 -38 -34Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-130
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ13 To shift the administration
of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
40 61 40 72 42 30 67 49
Much more 18 26 19 33 16 10 33 22 Somewhat more 22 35 22 38 26 20 34 28 Less likely to support
amendment57 32 56 27 47 65 29 46
Somewhat less 18 19 16 14 27 23 14 18 Much less 39 13 40 13 20 42 15 28 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 2 Unsure 1 4 2 0 8 3 2 3
More - Less -16 29 -15 45 -5 -35 38 4Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 18 48 21 53 24 18 41 30
Much more 11 25 12 32 11 9 24 17 Somewhat more 7 23 9 21 13 10 17 13 Less likely to support
amendment78 45 74 45 64 77 54 64
Somewhat less 14 22 12 24 21 18 19 18 Much less 64 23 62 20 43 58 35 46 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 1 4 1 2 2 Unsure 3 3 3 0 7 3 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 0 0
More - Less -60 3 -53 8 -40 -58 -13 -34Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-131
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ13 To shift the administration
of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
33 64 46 53 30 66 49
Much more 14 28 19 24 12 30 22 Somewhat more 19 36 27 29 18 37 28 Less likely to support
amendment63 32 49 43 65 30 46
Somewhat less 22 15 21 15 22 15 18 Much less 42 17 28 28 44 15 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 Unsure 2 2 3 3 2 2 3
More - Less -30 32 -3 10 -35 36 4Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 24 36 18 39 18 38 30
Much more 14 20 10 22 13 20 17 Somewhat more 10 16 9 17 6 18 13 Less likely to support
amendment68 60 74 57 76 57 64
Somewhat less 11 23 23 15 11 25 18 Much less 57 37 52 42 65 31 46 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 Unsure 6 2 5 2 4 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
More - Less -45 -23 -56 -18 -58 -19 -34Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-132
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ13 To shift the
administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment
72 30 73 78 62 57 50 13 25 49
Much more 36 10 31 39 30 24 25 5 12 22 Somewhat more 36 20 43 39 32 33 26 7 12 28 Less likely to support
amendment22 66 22 18 34 37 44 84 70 46
Somewhat less 12 21 13 12 19 21 20 14 19 18 Much less 10 46 9 6 15 16 24 70 52 28 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 1 4 2 2 3 2 Unsure 4 1 3 3 1 4 6 1 2 3
More - Less 49 -36 52 60 28 20 6 -72 -46 4Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 55 9 47 64 43 29 20 7 12 30
Much more 32 5 25 37 23 15 14 6 9 17 Somewhat more 23 5 21 27 20 14 7 2 3 13 Less likely to support
amendment 40 87 46 30 51 63 72 91 83 64
Somewhat less 21 14 23 15 23 26 27 4 10 18 Much less 19 73 24 15 28 37 44 87 73 46 No effect (vol.) 2 2 3 3 1 2 3 2 2 2 Unsure 3 2 4 3 5 5 5 2 3 Refused 1 0 1 0 0 0
More - Less 15 -78 0 34 -8 -34 -52 -83 -71 -34Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-133
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q13 To shift the administration of oil & gas development from the state level to the city & county government level
More likely to support amendment 45 50 46 44 32 62 56 46 45 44 49
Much more 22 21 19 19 13 31 23 21 21 21 22 Somewhat more 24 28 27 25 19 30 33 25 24 23 28 Less likely to support
amendment 49 46 49 51 64 34 38 49 51 52 46
Somewhat less 17 17 17 16 16 16 17 20 16 16 18 Much less 32 29 31 34 49 19 21 30 35 36 28 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 Unsure 4 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 3
More - Less -3 4 -3 -7 -32 28 18 -3 -5 -8 4Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q14 To send a message to the big oil & gas companies that they are no longer welcome in Colorado
More likely to support amendment 26 29 30 26 14 37 36 28 26 26 30
Much more 14 16 17 14 9 22 18 17 14 16 17 Somewhat more 12 12 13 12 5 15 18 10 12 10 13 Less likely to support
amendment 67 66 65 69 79 58 58 68 66 70 64
Somewhat less 17 18 19 19 9 28 19 18 17 16 18 Much less 50 47 46 50 70 31 39 50 49 54 46 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 3 4 1 1 3 3 2 2 Unsure 3 3 2 2 2 3 5 2 5 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
More - Less -41 -37 -35 -43 -65 -21 -22 -40 -41 -44 -34Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-134
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 48 40 41 35 45 43 52 42
Much more 19 14 13 8 21 20 25 17 Somewhat more 29 26 28 27 24 23 27 25 Less likely to support
amendment 43 51 50 57 44 45 42 49
Somewhat less 5 21 21 24 18 15 6 16 Much less 38 30 30 33 26 31 36 33 No effect (vol.) 3 2 2 0 5 2 2 Unsure 4 6 6 7 6 9 5 6 Refused 2 0 0 1 1 2 1
More - Less 5 -11 -10 -22 1 -2 10 -7Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition fromcarbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 44 51 51 46 58 48 52 49
Much more 26 28 26 20 36 33 34 29 Somewhat more 18 24 25 25 22 14 19 20 Less likely to support
amendment 51 43 45 51 34 48 46 46
Somewhat less 11 16 15 17 14 18 12 15 Much less 40 28 30 34 21 30 35 31 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 Unsure 5 4 3 2 6 2 1 3
More - Less -7 8 7 -5 23 0 6 4Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-135
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 38 39 47 45 38 39 60 32 42
Much more 14 12 22 21 14 13 27 15 17 Somewhat more 25 27 26 24 23 26 33 17 25 Less likely to support
amendment 52 52 46 49 52 50 33 63 49
Somewhat less 21 20 11 7 25 20 9 9 16 Much less 32 32 35 42 28 30 24 54 33 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 4 2 1 1 2 Unsure 7 6 4 3 6 8 6 3 6 Refused 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1
More - Less -14 -12 1 -4 -15 -11 27 -31 -7Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 49 48 49 57 54 49 48 41 49
Much more 27 25 29 35 34 28 31 24 29 Somewhat more 22 23 20 21 21 22 17 17 20 Less likely to support
amendment 46 48 46 41 37 47 46 58 46
Somewhat less 16 16 14 9 14 14 22 10 15 Much less 29 33 32 32 23 33 25 49 31 No effect (vol.) 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 Unsure 4 2 3 1 5 3 4 1 3
More - Less 3 0 3 16 17 3 1 -17 4Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-136
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 41 44 52 39 36 51 30 47 41 42
Much more 15 19 16 18 17 17 12 14 23 17 Somewhat more 26 25 37 21 19 34 18 34 18 25 Less likely to support
amendment 51 47 40 52 54 43 60 43 50 49
Somewhat less 15 17 12 18 17 17 14 17 17 16 Much less 36 30 28 34 37 26 47 26 33 33 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 Unsure 5 7 4 7 7 3 8 7 7 6 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less -11 -3 12 -12 -18 8 -31 4 -9 -7Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 44 54 62 46 42 50 37 61 49 49
Much more 23 34 37 26 25 27 19 34 35 29 Somewhat more 21 20 25 19 17 23 18 28 14 20 Less likely to support
amendment 51 41 31 49 55 42 61 31 48 46
Somewhat less 13 17 11 17 16 14 12 14 18 15 Much less 38 24 20 33 39 28 49 17 30 31 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 2 0 3 1 1 1 1 Unsure 3 4 5 3 2 4 1 6 2 3
More - Less -7 14 30 -4 -13 9 -24 30 1 4Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-137
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 41 43 48 48 37 40 42
Much more 25 15 18 20 13 16 17 Somewhat more 17 28 30 28 24 24 25 Less likely to support
amendment 54 48 46 45 53 50 49
Somewhat less 17 16 10 9 21 19 16 Much less 37 32 36 36 32 31 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 Unsure 4 7 4 5 6 7 6 Refused 1 1 1 1
More - Less -13 -5 2 3 -16 -10 -7Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 61 47 47 47 43 50 49
Much more 44 26 24 25 26 32 29 Somewhat more 17 21 23 22 17 19 20 Less likely to support
amendment 32 49 44 45 53 46 46
Somewhat less 12 16 15 14 17 15 15 Much less 20 33 29 31 36 32 31 No effect (vol.) 2 3 4 1 1 1 Unsure 7 2 6 4 3 2 3
More - Less 29 -2 3 2 -10 4 4Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-138
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 41 43 40 43 42 46 42
Much more 18 15 19 16 14 20 17 Somewhat more 23 28 21 27 27 26 25 Less likely to support
amendment 50 48 51 48 48 49 49
Somewhat less 12 16 9 20 20 19 16 Much less 38 32 42 29 28 30 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 3 3 3 2 Unsure 8 8 8 5 6 2 6 Refused 0 0 1 1 1 1
More - Less -9 -5 -11 -5 -7 -2 -7Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 49 48 49 50 50 50 49
Much more 33 34 32 26 28 24 29 Somewhat more 16 14 17 24 22 27 20 Less likely to support
amendment 44 42 46 46 45 48 46
Somewhat less 12 13 12 16 15 19 15 Much less 32 28 34 30 30 29 31 No effect (vol.) 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 Unsure 6 9 4 2 2 3
More - Less 5 7 3 4 5 2 4Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-139
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 47 42 50 45 29 42 37 42
Much more 9 19 23 20 11 16 17 17 Somewhat more 38 23 27 25 18 26 20 25 Less likely to support
amendment 37 50 42 49 62 50 53 49
Somewhat less 14 16 12 20 16 15 17 16 Much less 24 34 30 29 46 35 36 33 No effect (vol.) 4 1 0 1 2 2 2 2 Unsure 11 5 7 4 6 5 7 6 Refused 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less 10 -8 8 -4 -32 -9 -17 -7Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 71 45 52 46 36 50 43 49
Much more 43 27 33 28 18 27 26 29 Somewhat more 28 18 18 18 18 23 17 20 Less likely to support
amendment 26 50 46 46 59 44 54 46
Somewhat less 9 16 13 18 16 13 19 15 Much less 17 34 32 29 43 31 35 31 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Unsure 2 4 0 6 2 4 2 3
More - Less 45 -5 6 0 -23 6 -11 4Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-140
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q15 To establish in constitutional
law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 40 43 45 42 46 43 40 44 42
Much more 14 17 20 15 15 22 19 15 17 Somewhat more 26 26 25 27 32 22 21 29 25 Less likely to support
amendment 49 49 44 46 48 49 51 47 49
Somewhat less 21 15 14 15 20 15 13 19 16 Much less 28 33 30 32 28 34 38 28 33 No effect (vol.) 2 2 6 3 1 2 3 1 2 Unsure 8 5 4 9 5 5 5 7 6 Refused 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
More - Less -8 -6 0 -5 -2 -6 -11 -2 -7Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 49 49 44 51 43 49 45 54 49
Much more 28 27 22 28 24 31 23 34 29 Somewhat more 21 21 23 24 20 18 21 20 20 Less likely to support
amendment 44 47 50 44 52 48 49 43 46
Somewhat less 19 12 10 14 18 16 14 15 15 Much less 25 34 40 30 34 32 35 27 31 No effect (vol.) 1 2 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 Unsure 6 2 2 3 4 3 4 3 3
More - Less 5 2 -6 8 -8 1 -5 11 4Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-141
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 28 23 31 52 46 58 42
Much more 13 14 12 20 20 19 17 Somewhat more 15 9 19 32 26 39 25 Less likely to support
amendment 64 69 61 39 45 33 49
Somewhat less 17 9 22 16 15 17 16 Much less 47 60 39 23 30 16 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 Unsure 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Refused 1 1 0 1 1
More - Less -36 -46 -30 13 1 25 -7Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 30 18 39 60 49 73 49
Much more 19 6 27 34 25 45 29 Somewhat more 12 11 12 26 24 28 20 Less likely to support
amendment 66 79 57 34 44 22 46
Somewhat less 15 5 21 15 17 13 15 Much less 51 74 36 19 27 9 31 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 Unsure 2 1 2 4 5 3 3
More - Less -35 -61 -18 26 5 50 4Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-142
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 29 26 44 29 40 51 54 49 59 53 42
Much more 11 12 17 12 22 18 23 19 26 21 17 Somewhat more 18 14 27 17 19 33 31 30 34 32 25 Less likely to support
amendment 64 68 43 63 45 36 39 46 33 38 49
Somewhat less 15 16 18 16 16 18 16 15 15 17 16 Much less 50 52 25 47 29 18 23 31 17 21 33 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 Unsure 5 5 9 6 10 9 5 3 5 6 6 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
More - Less -35 -42 1 -34 -5 15 15 3 26 15 -7Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 29 25 54 30 48 62 66 59 71 65 49
Much more 18 15 29 19 26 33 40 34 45 37 29 Somewhat more 11 10 25 12 22 30 26 25 26 27 20 Less likely to support
amendment 67 72 39 66 46 31 29 37 24 30 46
Somewhat less 15 13 13 15 14 11 17 19 16 15 15 Much less 52 58 27 50 32 20 12 17 8 15 31 No effect (vol.) 2 3 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 Unsure 1 1 5 2 5 4 4 5 4 4 3
More - Less -38 -47 15 -35 2 32 37 22 47 35 4Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-143
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 25 33 43 46 58 52 37 23 50 38 59 50 42
Much more 9 13 16 19 21 25 10 11 16 20 20 26 17 Somewhat more 17 20 27 27 37 27 27 12 34 18 39 24 25 Less likely to support
amendment 69 60 47 38 34 43 57 70 37 51 37 40 49
Somewhat less 14 15 21 15 10 20 12 16 19 17 19 13 16 Much less 55 45 26 23 24 23 45 53 18 34 19 27 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 2 Unsure 5 5 6 12 4 5 5 5 8 10 2 7 6 Refused 3 1 2 1 1 1
More - Less -44 -27 -5 8 23 9 -20 -46 13 -13 22 9 -7Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 30 29 39 70 68 64 41 21 58 49 66 66 49
Much more 19 18 16 43 38 43 29 11 26 33 37 44 29 Somewhat more 11 11 23 27 31 22 12 10 32 16 29 22 20 Less likely to support
amendment 67 67 51 27 31 28 53 77 31 50 28 30 46
Somewhat less 10 20 13 12 17 17 14 16 9 17 20 15 15 Much less 57 47 38 15 13 11 39 61 22 33 9 15 31 No effect (vol.) 2 3 3 1 4 1 3 1 1 Unsure 2 1 6 3 8 1 1 8 1 6 3 3
More - Less -37 -38 -12 44 38 36 -12 -56 27 0 38 36 4Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-144
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 45 36 49 26 40 47 39 38 42
Much more 18 15 18 10 19 20 13 20 17 Somewhat more 27 21 31 15 20 27 27 17 25 Less likely to support
amendment 45 58 43 63 53 45 53 52 49
Somewhat less 19 13 15 25 14 21 13 10 16 Much less 26 45 28 38 38 24 40 42 33 No effect (vol.) 3 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Unsure 6 5 6 8 5 5 6 8 6 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 1
More - Less 0 -22 6 -38 -13 2 -14 -14 -7Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 59 37 52 41 52 53 45 50 49
Much more 31 25 31 33 27 29 27 33 29 Somewhat more 27 13 21 8 25 24 18 17 20 Less likely to support
amendment 36 59 42 56 44 43 49 46 46
Somewhat less 17 11 16 17 12 14 18 9 15 Much less 20 48 26 39 32 28 31 37 31 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 Unsure 3 3 4 3 1 3 4 3 3
More - Less 22 -22 10 -15 8 11 -4 4 4Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-145
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 27 64 55 23 24 64 63 33 40 41 42
Much more 9 30 23 6 9 27 33 11 11 24 17 Somewhat more 18 34 31 17 15 37 30 23 28 17 25 Less likely to support
amendment 65 29 36 71 68 29 31 59 52 52 49
Somewhat less 19 13 16 17 16 15 12 17 20 14 16 Much less 46 16 21 55 52 14 20 43 32 39 33 No effect (vol.) 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 Unsure 6 5 5 4 7 5 4 5 4 5 6 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
More - Less -38 34 18 -48 -43 34 31 -26 -13 -11 -7Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 27 74 65 21 21 73 68 32 43 51 49
Much more 14 48 39 10 10 49 45 17 24 31 29 Somewhat more 13 26 27 12 11 24 23 15 18 20 20 Less likely to support
amendment 68 21 29 75 74 23 28 64 54 42 46
Somewhat less 19 12 16 15 18 14 14 19 16 13 15 Much less 49 9 13 61 56 9 14 46 38 29 31 No effect (vol.) 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Unsure 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 5 3
More - Less -41 53 36 -54 -53 51 40 -32 -12 9 4Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-146
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 40 34 45 47 41 45 42 41 42
Much more 20 20 20 17 11 19 24 17 17 Somewhat more 20 14 25 30 30 26 18 24 25 Less likely to support
amendment 54 62 47 44 47 46 45 56 49
Somewhat less 15 8 21 19 15 17 17 17 16 Much less 38 54 27 25 32 29 28 39 33 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 Unsure 4 1 6 7 9 5 11 3 6 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 1
More - Less -14 -28 -3 3 -6 -1 -3 -15 -7Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 41 34 46 58 53 48 65 37 49
Much more 26 21 30 32 29 28 41 24 29 Somewhat more 15 13 16 25 25 20 25 14 20 Less likely to support
amendment 54 63 47 36 44 46 33 57 46
Somewhat less 17 14 20 13 14 19 16 11 15 Much less 36 49 27 24 30 27 17 46 31 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 Unsure 3 1 5 5 2 3 2 6 3
More - Less -13 -28 -1 21 10 2 33 -19 4Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-147
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 29 48 61 29 52 57 36 42
Much more 9 20 21 17 20 26 18 17 Somewhat more 20 28 40 12 32 31 18 25 Less likely to support amendment 65 40 32 67 40 30 61 49 Somewhat less 19 19 16 12 18 16 16 16 Much less 46 21 15 56 21 15 45 33 No effect (vol.) 1 3 2 2 3 1 2 Unsure 5 9 4 1 4 11 2 6 Refused 1 2 1 1
More - Less -37 8 29 -38 12 26 -25 -7Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 22 60 75 25 58 55 47 49
Much more 10 36 50 11 32 37 24 29 Somewhat more 12 24 25 14 26 18 23 20 Less likely to support amendment 77 32 20 70 38 41 50 46 Somewhat less 17 17 12 15 19 16 20 15 Much less 60 15 9 55 19 25 30 31 No effect (vol.) 2 3 3 2 3 1 Unsure 1 7 2 2 2 1 3 3
More - Less -55 28 55 -44 20 14 -3 4Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-148
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 37 48 57 38 44 41 42
Much more 17 19 27 14 20 16 17 Somewhat more 21 30 30 23 24 25 25 Less likely to support
amendment 54 47 36 55 49 50 49
Somewhat less 20 12 10 18 13 18 16 Much less 33 35 25 36 36 32 33 No effect (vol.) 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 Unsure 7 4 5 5 4 6 6 Refused 1 1 0 2 0 1
More - Less -16 2 22 -17 -5 -9 -7Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 39 61 76 40 58 46 49
Much more 22 38 49 22 34 27 29 Somewhat more 17 23 27 18 23 19 20 Less likely to support
amendment 55 35 19 55 39 49 46
Somewhat less 16 14 5 19 11 17 15 Much less 39 21 13 36 28 32 31 No effect (vol.) 2 0 1 2 2 1 Unsure 4 3 5 3 3 3 3
More - Less -16 26 57 -15 19 -3 4Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-149
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ15 To establish in constitutional
law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 33 56 36 59 39 32 53 42 Much more 10 27 14 28 10 9 24 17 Somewhat more 24 29 21 31 29 23 29 25 Less likely to support amendment 61 35 57 37 47 61 39 49 Somewhat less 16 17 14 13 24 17 15 16 Much less 45 18 43 23 24 43 24 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 Unsure 5 6 5 3 12 6 6 6 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 1
More - Less -28 21 -21 22 -9 -29 14 -7Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 33 70 36 69 55 34 62 49 Much more 16 47 22 41 32 20 38 29 Somewhat more 17 23 14 28 23 15 24 20 Less likely to support amendment 63 24 61 25 37 63 32 46 Somewhat less 15 15 16 11 19 21 11 15 Much less 47 9 45 14 19 42 21 31 No effect (vol.) 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 Unsure 4 3 2 5 4 2 5 3
More - Less -30 46 -25 44 18 -28 30 4Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-150
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ15 To establish in constitutional
law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 33 52 40 45 29 55 42
Much more 14 21 11 21 8 23 17 Somewhat more 19 31 29 24 20 31 25 Less likely to support
amendment 59 41 49 49 66 35 49
Somewhat less 13 18 16 16 15 18 16 Much less 46 23 32 33 51 17 33 No effect (vol.) 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 Unsure 7 4 9 4 5 7 6 Refused 1 1 1 1
More - Less -26 12 -8 -4 -37 19 -7Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 33 61 41 56 31 63 49
Much more 22 35 21 36 19 36 29 Somewhat more 11 26 20 21 12 27 20 Less likely to support
amendment 61 36 54 39 64 32 46
Somewhat less 15 15 19 13 15 16 15 Much less 46 21 35 27 49 16 31 No effect (vol.) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Unsure 5 2 4 4 3 3 3
More - Less -28 25 -13 17 -33 31 4Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-151
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ15 To establish in
constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 62 24 61 67 48 47 43 15 21 42
Much more 28 8 27 37 20 16 9 5 8 17 Somewhat more 34 16 34 30 28 31 33 10 13 25 Less likely to support
amendment 31 68 31 26 45 44 47 78 70 49
Somewhat less 14 19 13 7 21 21 18 12 18 16 Much less 18 49 18 19 24 23 29 65 52 33 No effect (vol.) 0 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 Unsure 5 5 6 4 5 7 8 6 7 6 Refused 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 1
More - Less 31 -44 30 41 3 3 -5 -63 -49 -7Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 73 28 69 88 55 53 41 13 26 49
Much more 46 15 44 62 33 27 17 9 16 29 Somewhat more 27 13 25 26 22 26 24 4 11 20 Less likely to support
amendment 22 69 26 11 33 39 53 86 70 46
Somewhat less 10 18 14 7 16 19 26 12 15 15 Much less 12 50 12 4 18 20 27 74 55 31 No effect (vol.) 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 Unsure 3 2 4 1 9 6 6 2 3
More - Less 52 -41 43 77 22 15 -11 -73 -44 4Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-152
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q15 To establish in constitutional law that local government regulations have priority land ownership & mineral property rights
More likely to support amendment 41 42 44 40 27 51 43 45 36 40 42
Much more 19 18 17 17 12 23 12 18 21 20 17 Somewhat more 22 24 27 23 16 28 31 27 15 20 25 Less likely to support
amendment 50 49 49 52 66 42 46 48 56 53 49
Somewhat less 16 16 16 17 16 21 15 15 20 17 16 Much less 33 33 33 35 50 21 31 33 36 36 33 No effect (vol.) 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 Unsure 6 6 5 5 5 5 9 5 4 5 6 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
More - Less -9 -7 -6 -12 -39 9 -3 -3 -19 -13 -7Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q16 Effectively banning new oil & gas development at the local level in order to hasten Colorado's transition from carbon-based fuels to alternative energy such as wind & solar
More likely to support amendment 48 48 48 45 23 60 63 43 41 42 49
Much more 26 27 29 24 11 37 36 26 25 24 29 Somewhat more 21 20 19 21 12 22 27 18 16 18 20 Less likely to support
amendment 49 47 48 51 73 36 33 50 56 54 46
Somewhat less 16 16 17 17 12 22 7 18 21 17 15 Much less 33 31 31 34 61 14 26 32 35 37 31 No effect (vol.) 2 2 1 2 3 1 0 2 2 2 1 Unsure 2 4 3 2 1 3 4 5 1 2 3
More - Less -1 1 0 -6 -50 23 30 -6 -15 -12 4Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-153
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 50 43 42 38 49 44 47 44 Oppose 43 49 49 51 46 52 49 50 Unsure 7 6 6 8 5 4 5 6 Refused 2 2 4 1
Favor - Oppose 6 -6 -7 -13 3 -7 -2 -6Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 54 44 40 38 52 37 44 46 A lot 29 18 17 14 22 15 16 19 Some 25 26 24 24 29 22 28 26 Only a little 24 34 38 42 25 39 20 31 Nothing 20 21 22 20 22 23 32 22 Unsure 1 1 0 2 4 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-154
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 43 42 42 45 45 44 43 36 44 Oppose 49 49 51 51 48 49 49 60 50 Unsure 6 6 6 4 6 5 8 4 6 Refused 2 3 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose -5 -7 -9 -6 -3 -5 -6 -23 -6Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 43 38 52 42 54 38 50 52 46 A lot 17 16 25 13 21 17 21 25 19 Some 26 22 27 29 33 22 29 28 26 Only a little 35 39 23 16 27 37 29 20 31 Nothing 21 22 23 36 18 24 18 28 22 Unsure 1 0 2 6 1 0 3 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-155
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 36 50 55 38 39 43 29 55 47 44 Oppose 58 42 36 55 57 51 66 32 49 50 Unsure 5 6 7 6 4 5 5 10 4 6 Refused 0 2 2 1 1 3 0 1
Favor - Oppose -22 9 19 -17 -18 -8 -38 22 -2 -6Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 44 47 31 50 55 32 58 35 56 46 A lot 23 16 14 23 21 20 27 10 20 19 Some 21 31 17 27 35 12 31 25 36 26 Only a little 30 31 40 29 24 35 25 43 22 31 Nothing 23 21 28 21 19 30 16 21 21 22 Unsure 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-156
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 44 44 47 50 39 42 44 Oppose 51 49 45 44 55 52 50 Unsure 4 6 6 5 6 6 6 Refused 2 1 2 1 1 1
Favor - Oppose -7 -5 2 6 -16 -10 -6Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 39 48 47 48 46 46 46 A lot 12 21 19 19 23 20 19 Some 27 26 28 29 23 25 26 Only a little 31 31 34 34 31 30 31 Nothing 26 21 19 18 23 23 22 Unsure 4 0 2 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-157
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 44 38 47 44 39 52 44 Oppose 51 56 49 48 50 45 50 Unsure 4 6 3 7 9 4 6 Refused 1 1 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose -8 -18 -2 -4 -11 7 -6Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 45 40 49 46 43 51 46 A lot 17 9 23 21 18 25 19 Some 28 32 26 25 25 26 26 Only a little 27 25 28 34 35 33 31 Nothing 25 29 23 20 22 16 22 Unsure 3 6 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-158
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 38 46 49 49 36 43 40 44 Oppose 48 49 47 46 57 50 56 50 Unsure 8 5 2 5 7 5 5 6 Refused 5 0 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose -10 -4 2 3 -20 -7 -16 -6Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 19 51 46 53 53 47 51 46 A lot 10 21 17 19 29 21 22 19 Some 9 30 30 34 24 26 29 26 Only a little 47 28 28 26 33 30 28 31 Nothing 28 20 25 21 14 22 19 22
Unsure 6 0 1 1 2 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-159
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 47 39 38 45 42 41 36 50 44 Oppose 45 55 56 46 50 54 57 43 50 Unsure 7 4 4 7 6 4 7 5 6 Refused 2 2 2 2 2 1
Favor - Oppose 2 -16 -18 -1 -8 -13 -20 7 -6Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 49 44 44 41 42 54 53 39 46 A lot 16 22 21 17 13 29 25 15 19 Some 33 23 23 25 28 26 28 25 26 Only a little 35 30 25 38 28 26 27 35 31 Nothing 15 25 30 20 29 17 19 25 22 Unsure 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-160
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 26 23 27 54 39 71 44 Oppose 72 74 71 36 51 20 50 Unsure 2 3 1 8 8 8 6 Refused 2 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose -47 -50 -44 18 -12 51 -6Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 48 52 45 46 48 43 46 A lot 21 27 16 19 23 15 19 Some 27 25 29 26 25 28 26 Only a little 29 17 38 31 25 38 31 Nothing 21 32 13 23 26 18 22 Unsure 2 3 1 1 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-161
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 31 25 39 28 29 47 62 47 75 56 44 Oppose 65 72 50 68 60 37 34 51 19 35 50
Unsure 4 3 9 4 9 12 4 2 6 7 6 Refused 3 2 4 0 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose -34 -47 -11 -39 -31 10 28 -4 56 21 -6Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 50 51 37 48 44 36 51 46 56 45 46 A lot 23 22 16 22 19 16 19 18 19 18 19 Some 27 28 20 26 25 20 32 27 37 27 26 Only a little 27 27 43 29 34 44 22 22 23 31 31 Nothing 21 20 20 21 22 20 26 31 22 23 22 Unsure 3 2 2 1 2 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-162
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 29 33 30 48 53 69 43 23 37 41 68 56 44 Oppose 67 62 60 39 45 25 56 71 45 56 26 40 50 Unsure 3 5 9 9 2 6 2 6 13 4 5 3 6 Refused 1 5 1 5 1 1
Favor - Oppose -38 -29 -30 9 8 44 -13 -48 -8 -15 42 16 -6Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 44 55 47 26 41 59 34 61 25 51 44 58 46 A lot 26 20 22 10 21 17 21 24 12 23 15 23 19 Some 19 35 25 16 20 41 13 36 14 29 29 35 26 Only a little 31 23 35 53 25 21 37 20 54 30 23 22 31 Nothing 22 20 18 22 32 21 25 19 20 19 34 18 22 Unsure 4 2 2 4 1 2 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-163
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 51 33 48 30 45 47 39 45 44 Oppose 42 63 43 69 50 47 53 50 50 Unsure 7 3 7 1 5 6 6 5 6 Refused 2 1 2 1
Favor - Oppose 8 -30 5 -39 -4 0 -13 -5 -6Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 39 52 41 51 52 47 45 46 46 A lot 14 27 16 21 24 17 21 23 19 Some 25 25 25 30 28 30 24 22 26 Only a little 34 28 37 24 23 27 35 32 31 Nothing 27 18 22 20 23 25 18 22 22 Unsure 0 2 0 5 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-164
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 24 74 61 16 19 71 66 27 42 43 44 Oppose 71 19 30 80 76 24 33 65 53 53 50 Unsure 5 5 6 4 4 6 1 7 5 4 6 Refused 1 2 0 0 0 1 1
Favor - Oppose -47 55 31 -63 -57 47 33 -38 -11 -10 -6Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 54 41 45 50 56 41 52 50 50 48 46 A lot 26 16 18 26 29 14 22 22 23 20 19 Some 28 25 27 24 27 27 30 28 27 27 26 Only a little 22 38 31 28 23 34 30 30 29 28 31 Nothing 22 21 24 20 19 25 19 19 20 23 22 Unsure 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 1
Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-165
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 42 35 48 48 41 47 46 41 44 Oppose 52 59 46 42 56 45 42 54 50 Unsure 6 6 6 8 2 7 8 5 6 Refused 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 1
Favor - Oppose -9 -24 2 6 -15 2 4 -13 -6Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 100 100 100 63 47 62 46 A lot 42 100 20 21 35 19 Some 58 100 43 25 27 26 Only a little 100 37 53 38 31 Nothing 100 22 Unsure 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-166
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 15 61 63 21 49 49 45 44 Oppose 82 29 29 74 46 38 49 50 Unsure 3 8 6 5 4 12 6 6 Refused 2 2 2 1 1
Favor - Oppose -68 32 33 -52 3 11 -4 -6Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 51 42 41 57 42 47 37 46 A lot 22 14 16 31 17 15 12 19 Some 29 28 25 25 25 32 24 26 Only a little 29 30 41 27 37 22 29 31 Nothing 20 28 18 15 21 30 34 22 Unsure 2 0 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-167
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 38 51 73 35 50 41 44 Oppose 56 44 23 59 45 52 50 Unsure 6 3 5 5 2 7 6 Refused 0 1 1 3 0 1
Favor - Oppose -18 7 50 -24 5 -11 -6Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 53 38 46 47 59 41 46 A lot 23 14 20 20 27 16 19 Some 30 24 26 27 32 24 26 Only a little 29 33 33 29 23 34 31 Nothing 17 26 21 22 15 25 22 Unsure 1 2 2 3 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-168
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 28 66 32 63 47 26 60 44 Oppose 67 26 62 33 41 67 34 50 Unsure 5 6 4 4 11 6 5 6 Refused 0 2 1 1 1 1 1
Favor - Oppose -39 40 -30 31 6 -40 26 -6Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 48 44 58 34 35 47 43 46 A lot 21 19 28 16 6 22 17 19 Some 27 26 30 18 29 25 26 26 Only a little 27 35 23 41 37 29 33 31 Nothing 23 20 18 25 27 23 23 22 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-169
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 24 60 39 49 23 60 44 Oppose 68 35 51 47 73 33 50 Unsure 7 3 8 4 4 6 6 Refused 2 2 0 2 1
Favor - Oppose -44 25 -12 1 -50 27 -6Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 48 44 45 47 49 43 46 A lot 23 17 20 18 23 16 19 Some 26 28 25 29 26 27 26 Only a little 32 29 31 31 31 32 31 Nothing 19 25 24 21 19 23 22 Unsure 0 1 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-170
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ17 Local bans on new oil-
and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 100 72 84 52 47 46 9 16 44 Oppose 100 23 11 38 43 44 91 81 50 Unsure 5 3 7 9 9 0 3 6 Refused 1 2 4 1 1
Favor - Oppose 100 -100 49 73 14 4 2 -82 -65 -6Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 45 48 43 48 37 37 40 64 52 46 A lot 16 23 14 22 7 9 13 40 27 19 Some 29 24 29 26 31 28 26 24 25 26 Only a little 34 26 37 28 38 37 37 19 24 31 Nothing 21 25 20 23 25 24 23 16 22 22 Unsure 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-171
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q17 Local bans on new oil-and-gas development in Colorado cities & counties (simplified)
Favor 43 42 44 41 24 59 44 47 37 44 44 Oppose 51 52 51 54 73 37 45 47 60 53 50 Unsure 5 6 5 5 3 4 8 6 3 3 6 Refused 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1
Favor - Oppose -8 -10 -7 -13 -49 22 -1 0 -22 -9 -6Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q18 Read, seen, or heard recently about proposed new restrictions on oil-and-gas development, including fracking
A lot, some 50 47 49 52 57 57 33 49 58 57 46 A lot 22 21 22 24 26 19 14 22 23 26 19 Some 28 27 27 28 31 38 19 27 35 31 26 Only a little 29 29 29 27 21 23 38 29 24 26 31 Nothing 21 22 22 20 21 19 28 21 16 17 22 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-172
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 40 36 35 34 39 36 40 37 Environmental groups 2 3 3 3 3 6 1 4 Oil & gas companies 6 6 6 7 4 2 4 Government officials 5 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 Friends & relatives 8 8 10 10 6 2 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 11 16 17 20 12 20 7 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
5 3 2 2 5 2 5 4
Something else; all; combination 1 2 1 0 4 5 1 3
Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 22 21 22 20 23 23 36 23Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 24 21 21 25 16 26 25 23
Public health & safety 27 30 27 28 31 36 20 29 Politics & political parties 8 4 4 5 3 4 10 5 Environmental impacts 18 31 32 29 32 16 25 26 Property rights 18 9 11 9 10 11 19 12 All 5 4 3 2 6 7 2 4 None 0 0 0 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-173
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 36 35 36 37 38 35 42 35 37 Environmental groups 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 4 4 Oil & gas companies 6 6 4 2 6 4 5 4 Government officials 3 3 4 2 5 2 4 1 3 Friends & relatives 7 9 9 5 6 8 7 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 18 19 11 5 15 17 9 13 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
4 2 4 6 5 3 3 5 4
Something else; all; combination 2 0 3 1 4 1 7 1 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 22 23 25 42 19 24 21 28 23Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 22 23 22 25 21 21 23 33 23
Public health & safety 30 28 26 18 33 31 31 19 29 Politics & political parties 4 4 7 13 6 3 4 9 5 Environmental impacts 27 28 25 26 23 28 27 19 26 Property rights 10 12 16 16 7 13 11 18 12 All 4 3 4 1 7 4 4 1 4 None 0 0 0 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-174
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 36 38 31 34 46 29 44 38 38 37 Environmental groups 3 4 2 4 4 2 4 3 5 4 Oil & gas companies 5 4 5 6 2 6 4 6 2 4 Government officials 3 2 3 3 2 5 1 4 3 Friends & relatives 6 9 10 7 5 8 3 10 8 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 12 17 12 17 14 9 15 17 17 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 5 2 5 5 1 5 5 3 1 4
Something else; all; combination 4 2 2 2 5 3 5 2 2 3
Unsure 2 0 0 2 0 1 3 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 25 22 30 21 20 33 17 21 22 23Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 24 21 12 26 29 21 28 12 28 23
Public health & safety 23 35 35 29 23 27 18 45 28 29 Politics & political parties 8 3 9 5 2 9 7 2 3 5 Environmental impacts 25 26 36 22 20 32 18 31 22 26 Property rights 14 10 5 13 17 8 20 5 13 12 All 5 4 4 4 5 3 6 4 4 4 None 1 0 2 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-175
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 23 40 38 38 37 37 37 Environmental groups 2 4 4 3 3 4 4 Oil & gas companies 4 4 10 11 3 2 4 Government officials 1 3 2 2 5 3 3 Friends & relatives 5 8 9 8 7 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 28 11 13 14 15 15 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
4 4 5 6 2 3 4
Something else; all; combination 2 3 1 1 5 4 3
Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 31 22 19 18 23 25 23Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 18 24 20 21 26 24 23
Public health & safety 35 28 35 35 27 27 29 Politics & political parties 11 4 5 3 5 5 5 Environmental impacts 23 26 23 24 26 27 26 Property rights 5 13 12 12 10 12 12 All 6 4 4 4 4 5 4 None 1 0 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-176
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 32 27 36 40 37 46 37 Environmental groups 2 1 3 5 6 2 4 Oil & gas companies 6 6 6 3 3 2 4 Government officials 2 1 3 3 4 3 3 Friends & relatives 6 4 8 8 10 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 15 22 11 14 14 14 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
5 1 8 3 1 5 4
Something else; all; combination 2 3 2 3 2 5 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 28 35 23 20 22 16 23Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 22 18 24 23 25 20 23
Public health & safety 32 33 30 28 26 29 29 Politics & political parties 9 13 7 3 3 1 5 Environmental impacts 21 20 22 29 30 28 26 Property rights 10 8 10 13 13 13 12 All 5 5 6 3 2 6 4 None 1 2 0 Unsure 1 2 1 0 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-177
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 23 41 44 35 46 37 41 37 Environmental groups 1 4 4 5 2 2 6 4 Oil & gas companies 5 4 1 4 6 5 3 4 Government officials 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 Friends & relatives 17 5 5 7 4 5 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 16 14 12 14 17 14 17 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
1 4 4 6 2 6 1 4
Something else; all; combination 3 2 3 5 3 3 3
Unsure 1 1 1 2 2 1 Not asked; not aware of 34 21 26 21 14 23 21 23Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, bothcosts & benefits 16 24 25 19 30 23 25 23
Public health & safety 31 29 36 29 23 31 24 29 Politics & political parties 9 4 3 4 4 7 2 5 Environmental impacts 32 24 18 29 23 24 22 26 Property rights 5 13 13 13 13 10 18 12 All 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 None 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 3 1 1 1 0 3 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-178
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 40 38 40 41 38 35 37 36 37 Environmental groups 6 2 4 5 2 3 2 5 4 Oil & gas companies 4 4 2 3 1 9 6 3 4 Government officials 4 3 1 3 3 3 4 2 3 Friends & relatives 7 8 13 6 7 8 6 8 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 18 11 6 16 11 12 14 14 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 1 4 1 1 3 7 6 1 4
Something else; all; combination
3 3 3 4 3 3 4 2 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 16 26 30 20 30 19 21 26 23Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 19 26 29 24 26 20 22 23 23
Public health & safety 37 23 39 24 33 31 30 29 29 Politics & political parties 2 6 4 3 3 9 7 4 5 Environmental impacts 23 27 12 31 22 21 22 28 26 Property rights 13 12 12 12 13 11 14 10 12 All 3 4 4 4 2 8 5 4 4 None 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-179
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 38 25 47 36 35 38 37 Environmental groups 2 2 2 5 3 6 4 Oil & gas companies 6 8 4 3 4 3 4 Government officials 3 4 2 3 1 5 3 Friends & relatives 9 9 8 6 5 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 12 11 13 16 15 17 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
3 2 4 4 4 4 4
Something else; all; combination 3 6 1 3 5 1 3
Unsure 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 23 32 16 23 27 19 23Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 37 39 36 14 19 8 23
Public health & safety 22 19 24 35 37 32 29 Politics & political parties 9 11 7 3 3 4 5 Environmental impacts 7 2 10 36 25 49 26 Property rights 20 22 19 6 8 5 12 All 2 2 2 5 7 2 4 None 1 2 0 0 0 Unsure 1 3 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-180
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gasindustry, including fracking, from
News media reports 36 43 36 34 35 38 38 34 41 38 37 Environmental groups 2 1 4 3 4 3 5 2 8 4 4 Oil & gas companies 7 6 1 7 2 4 5 4 2 4 Government officials 4 4 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 Friends & relatives 7 8 9 8 6 9 5 7 2 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 10 7 21 13 22 20 12 14 11 16 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
3 2 3 4 4 3 4 3 5 4 4
Something else; all; combination 5 4 3 4 4 3 1 2 2 3
Unsure 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 24 22 20 23 22 20 26 33 22 24 23Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 40 44 16 38 18 12 11 19 6 11 23
Public health & safety 19 18 32 19 39 38 37 33 40 37 29 Politics & political parties 5 6 5 7 7 2 6 7 6 4 5 Environmental impacts 9 4 34 11 22 41 35 27 41 37 26 Property rights 20 23 10 19 10 6 5 7 3 5 12 All 6 3 2 5 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 None 1 1 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-181
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 41 31 36 37 30 45 26 43 36 37 35 41 37 Environmental groups 1 3 6 1 2 8 3 2 5 4 6 4 Oil & gas companies 6 8 3 6 3 14 2 3 6 3 4 Government officials 2 5 4 4 2 3 4 3 2 4 3 Friends & relatives 5 10 7 11 5 5 6 8 14 4 5 4 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 7 13 17 26 12 13 9 12 20 23 8 16 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 4 3 5 2 6 2 5 2 3 4 5 3 4
Something else; all; combination 6 4 3 2 1 1 7 4 1 4 2 3
Unsure 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 25 22 18 22 34 21 29 20 20 19 34 20 23Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 39 40 18 14 14 10 33 45 11 23 10 13 23
Public health & safety 14 24 27 38 29 43 24 16 41 20 39 35 29 Politics & political parties 7 3 8 1 9 4 4 5 3 6 10 3 5 Environmental impacts 9 10 31 36 38 33 18 4 37 29 38 32 26 Property rights 22 17 12 8 6 5 15 23 6 15 10 12 All 7 5 3 1 4 5 6 6 1 4 4 5 4 None 1 1 1 1 1 0 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-182
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 36 38 37 34 38 41 33 35 37 Environmental groups 3 5 3 4 4 2 5 5 4 Oil & gas companies 3 6 5 6 2 2 6 5 4 Government officials 2 4 3 5 3 2 4 3 Friends & relatives 7 8 8 9 4 7 6 10 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 17 11 13 16 16 12 18 13 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
3 3 5 2 2 4 4 3 4
Something else; all; combination 2 4 3 5 1 2 4 2 3
Unsure 2 0 2 1 0 2 1 Not asked; not aware of 27 20 23 24 25 26 20 22 23Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 17 31 20 28 21 22 24 21 23
Public health & safety 33 20 32 24 27 32 27 26 29 Politics & political parties 5 7 4 10 7 4 6 5 5 Environmental impacts 34 14 31 17 19 28 25 19 26 Property rights 6 22 9 17 15 7 13 22 12 All 4 5 3 4 7 5 4 5 4 None 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Unsure 0 0 0 3 2 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-183
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from News media reports 36 41 39 36 34 41 42 39 41 34 37
Environmental groups 2 6 5 2 2 6 5 3 1 6 4 Oil & gas companies 7 1 2 9 8 2 1 9 5 4 4 Government officials 3 3 1 5 5 2 2 4 2 5 3 Friends & relatives 8 7 6 8 8 6 7 9 8 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet10 14 16 9 12 13 16 9 12 14 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 4 3 4 3 5 3 6 4 4 4 4
Something else; all; combination
4 2 2 4 4 2 3 3 4 2 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 24 21 24 23 21 25 19 20 21 24 23Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 36 7 11 40 38 7 11 31 27 20 23
Public health & safety 21 37 39 13 19 37 37 23 32 25 29 Politics & political parties 6 4 3 10 10 2 5 7 3 9 5 Environmental impacts 14 43 36 9 10 43 34 17 22 25 26 Property rights 17 5 6 23 16 6 9 18 9 17 12 All 5 4 5 4 5 4 3 3 5 4 4 None 1 1 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-184
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 50 37 60 44 100 37 Environmental groups 5 5 6 3 15 4 Oil & gas companies 5 8 3 7 18 4 Government officials 4 5 3 3 11 3 Friends & relatives 6 6 6 15 30 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet15 16 14 25 100 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 6 10 3 3 15 4
Something else; all; combination 6 8 5 12 3
Unsure 2 3 1 0 1 Not asked; not aware of 100 23Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits
25 25 25 21 21 21 24 26 23
Public health & safety 27 21 30 28 37 26 38 22 29 Politics & political parties 4 3 4 2 10 4 4 5 Environmental impacts 23 21 24 34 21 28 26 28 26 Property rights 14 19 11 10 8 15 7 13 12 All 5 9 2 4 3 4 5 6 4 None 1 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 0 2 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-185
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 34 33 41 47 44 28 21 37 Environmental groups 2 5 4 1 4 3 5 4 Oil & gas companies 5 4 1 10 2 5 7 4 Government officials 3 2 4 3 3 1 2 3 Friends & relatives 10 5 10 8 6 7 10 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 15 19 15 9 13 14 18 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 3 3 4 3 4 11 4
Something else; all; combination 5 1 3 3 1 2 3
Unsure 3 1 2 1 Not asked; not aware of 20 28 18 17 21 30 34 23Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 100 15 35 23 23
Public health & safety 100 32 39 42 29 Politics & political parties 1 3 9 5 Environmental impacts 100 38 13 10 26 Property rights 100 12 6 12 12 All 1 4 3 4 None 0 Unsure 1 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-186
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 43 30 35 38 40 35 37 Environmental groups 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 Oil & gas companies 6 3 6 4 4 4 4 Government officials 4 1 2 3 4 2 3 Friends & relatives 7 9 13 5 10 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 9 19 16 13 14 15 15
Own research, observations, experience, education
4 4 1 5 3 4 4
Something else; all; combination 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 18 29 21 24 17 25 23Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 25 19 10 27 19 24 23
Public health & safety 30 26 38 25 28 29 29 Politics & political parties 3 9 5 5 8 4 5 Environmental impacts 24 29 36 22 29 24 26 Property rights 12 12 7 14 11 12 12 All 5 3 5 4 5 4 4 None 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-187
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from News media reports 34 41 38 34 37 30 40 37
Environmental groups 3 5 2 6 4 3 4 4 Oil & gas companies 7 1 6 4 2 6 4 4 Government officials 4 1 3 3 2 4 2 3 Friends & relatives 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 13 16 13 17 15 17 13 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 4 4 5 1 2 4 3 4
Something else; all; combination
4 2 3 3 3 4 2 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 24 21 19 26 27 24 24 23Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 35 6 28 16 20 30 15 23
Public health & safety 21 37 23 35 33 24 33 29 Politics & political parties 7 3 6 5 5 7 4 5 Environmental impacts 15 43 21 32 28 21 31 26 Property rights 17 5 15 9 7 14 11 12 All 4 5 5 2 5 3 5 4 None 1 0 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-188
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 37 35 40 35 33 42 37 Environmental groups 5 3 3 4 3 4 4 Oil & gas companies 8 2 5 4 8 1 4 Government officials 5 2 2 3 4 2 3 Friends & relatives 7 8 7 8 9 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet 11 17 12 16 15 15 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 3 4 3 4 4 4 4
Something else; all; combination
5 2 2 3 4 1 3
Unsure 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 19 27 24 23 20 25 23Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 35 17 26 18 35 13 23
Public health & safety 21 36 30 30 22 37 29 Politics & political parties 5 4 4 6 5 5 5 Environmental impacts 16 32 21 29 14 34 26 Property rights 17 8 13 11 17 9 12 All 4 3 3 5 5 3 4 None 1 0 1 1 0 Unsure 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-189
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ18a Gotten most hard, factual
information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 40 34 43 36 35 38 44 34 33 37 Environmental groups 5 2 5 6 2 3 4 2 2 4 Oil & gas companies 3 6 3 1 1 3 8 9 6 4 Government officials 2 4 3 3 2 1 5 3 3 Friends & relatives 8 7 7 5 10 7 7 9 7 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet15 12 14 18 24 15 6 12 16 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 4 3 3 4 2 3 6 4 4
Something else; all; combination 2 4 2 2 3 2 1 5 4 3
Unsure 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 22 26 20 24 25 26 23 16 24 23Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits
8 38 10 2 17 19 21 46 38 23
Public health & safety 41 17 38 43 36 33 35 12 19 29 Politics & political parties 2 8 4 1 5 7 7 5 7 5 Environmental impacts 37 15 37 44 26 28 22 7 11 26 Property rights 6 17 6 7 11 9 10 23 20 12 All 5 3 4 2 4 5 4 5 4 4 None 0 1 2 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-190
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q18a Gotten most hard, factual information lately about regulation of the oil & gas industry, including fracking, from
News media reports 39 37 37 39 43 44 31 37 44 41 37 Environmental groups 4 4 4 5 1 8 2 4 4 5 4 Oil & gas companies 3 4 4 4 4 2 4 5 3 4 4 Government officials 3 2 3 3 5 2 4 2 2 4 3 Friends & relatives 6 7 8 6 7 4 10 7 4 6 7 Ads you see on TV & the
internet16 14 14 16 8 16 11 16 17 14 15
Own research, observations, experience, education 2 4 4 2 3 2 5 4 2 4 4
Something else; all; combination
3 3 3 3 5 2 3 2 4 4 3
Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 Not asked; not aware of 22 24 23 21 22 20 30 21 17 18 23Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q19 Concept most central to own thoughts about the issue of oil & gas development
Economic impacts, both costs & benefits 24 23 25 25 44 14 23 18 30 26 23
Public health & safety 28 29 28 28 20 36 25 36 23 27 29 Politics & political parties 5 6 5 6 2 4 7 6 2 4 5 Environmental impacts 22 23 25 21 4 32 34 23 19 21 26 Property rights 13 12 11 14 24 7 8 13 15 15 12 All 5 5 4 5 3 5 3 3 8 5 4 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-191
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 3 5 5 6 4 11 3 6 Water pollution 42 43 46 38 48 41 35 40 Threats to school safety 8 4 4 3 5 5 3 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 9 9 9 10 8 7 13 10
Toxic fumes & spills 10 17 17 21 11 12 13 14 All 7 11 8 9 14 8 11 11 None 18 10 11 12 9 15 22 14 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 2 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 69 68 68 73 63 44 58 64 Strongly 34 30 31 35 24 16 32 27 Somewhat 35 38 37 38 39 29 26 36 Disagree 23 21 22 20 23 49 30 27 Somewhat 17 16 17 15 17 38 21 20 Strongly 6 5 5 5 6 11 9 7 Unsure 8 10 10 7 14 6 12 10
Agree - disagree 46 47 45 53 39 -5 27 37Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-192
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 5 4 4 4 7 2 9 6 Water pollution 39 41 41 32 39 44 40 29 40 Threats to school safety 4 4 4 2 6 4 4 2 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 9 11 15 9 9 15 7 10
Toxic fumes & spills 18 18 12 14 20 12 12 15 14 All 13 9 10 11 14 9 10 14 11 None 11 12 16 22 7 13 16 23 14 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 68 68 63 54 72 62 64 57 64 Strongly 30 32 27 30 28 26 25 30 27 Somewhat 38 36 36 24 45 36 39 28 36 Disagree 22 23 27 34 18 27 29 29 27 Somewhat 16 18 20 25 11 20 22 23 20 Strongly 5 6 7 9 7 7 7 6 7 Unsure 10 9 10 11 10 11 6 14 10
Agree - disagree 47 45 36 20 54 35 35 28 37Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-193
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 3 8 6 6 5 3 3 6 10 6 Water pollution 42 38 45 40 35 49 35 46 31 40 Threats to school safety 4 4 3 6 4 4 4 6 3 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 11 10 9 12 10 9 9 12 10
Toxic fumes & spills 13 16 21 14 8 15 9 17 14 14 All 10 11 8 11 14 8 13 8 14 11 None 17 11 8 14 20 11 24 8 13 14 Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 1 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 67 61 66 61 65 68 65 65 57 64 Strongly 33 22 26 26 30 35 30 18 25 27 Somewhat 34 38 41 34 35 33 36 47 32 36 Disagree 26 27 28 28 24 26 27 27 27 27 Somewhat 19 21 25 19 17 21 17 21 21 20 Strongly 7 6 3 9 7 5 10 6 6 7 Unsure 7 12 6 11 11 6 8 8 16 10
Agree - disagree 41 34 38 33 41 42 39 38 30 37Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-194
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 4 6 3 2 9 7 6 Water pollution 38 40 37 39 40 41 40 Threats to school safety 8 4 8 6 2 3 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 8 11 10 10 9 10 10
Toxic fumes & spills 16 14 20 21 12 11 14 All 12 11 8 8 9 12 11 None 11 15 13 13 17 15 14 Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 Refused 2 0 1 1 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 57 65 66 64 63 62 64 Strongly 22 28 23 23 29 28 27 Somewhat 35 37 43 41 34 34 36 Disagree 34 25 32 34 25 25 27 Somewhat 23 19 25 26 19 18 20 Strongly 11 6 7 7 6 7 7 Unsure 9 10 2 2 12 13 10
Agree - disagree 23 40 34 31 38 38 37Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-195
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 6 4 7 6 7 4 6 Water pollution 36 32 38 43 43 43 40 Threats to school safety 5 7 3 4 3 6 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 6 5 7 12 15 9 10
Toxic fumes & spills 17 23 13 12 14 9 14 All 14 12 15 9 5 15 11 None 15 13 16 13 13 14 14 Unsure 1 2 0 1 1 Refused 1 2 1 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 65 68 63 63 59 70 64 Strongly 28 23 31 27 23 33 27 Somewhat 37 45 33 36 36 36 36 Disagree 25 23 26 27 30 23 27 Somewhat 18 19 18 21 23 17 20 Strongly 7 4 8 7 7 6 7 Unsure 10 9 10 9 11 7 10
Agree - disagree 40 46 37 36 29 47 37Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-196
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 10 5 5 6 3 5 5 6 Water pollution 37 41 40 44 37 40 38 40 Threats to school safety 5 4 5 4 2 6 2 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 13 10 11 10 7 11 10 10
Toxic fumes & spills 14 13 14 14 11 15 8 14 All 11 11 12 9 13 7 17 11 None 8 15 12 10 25 14 19 14 Unsure 2 0 0 1 2 1 Refused 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 69 61 56 60 69 63 65 64 Strongly 26 26 23 27 29 27 31 27 Somewhat 44 35 34 32 40 37 34 36 Disagree 21 29 36 29 19 28 25 27 Somewhat 16 21 26 23 13 22 18 20 Strongly 5 7 10 6 7 6 7 7 Unsure 10 10 7 11 11 8 10 10
Agree - disagree 48 33 20 30 50 35 40 37Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-197
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 8 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 6 Water pollution 42 41 35 42 44 36 39 41 40 Threats to school safety 5 3 3 4 3 6 4 5 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 9 10 8 13 9 14 7 10
Toxic fumes & spills 15 11 15 11 19 12 12 16 14 All 11 10 14 15 6 10 10 12 11 None 7 20 17 15 9 20 15 13 14 Unsure 2 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 61 65 64 57 62 70 66 61 64 Strongly 28 27 23 23 26 28 32 24 27 Somewhat 32 39 41 33 36 42 35 37 36 Disagree 32 24 20 32 27 23 26 27 27 Somewhat 24 19 20 21 22 16 20 20 20 Strongly 9 5 1 10 4 7 6 7 7 Unsure 7 11 16 12 11 7 7 12 10
Agree - disagree 28 42 43 25 36 47 40 34 37Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-198
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 4 4 3 7 4 10 6 Water pollution 35 18 47 43 35 53 40 Threats to school safety 3 2 3 5 8 2 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 15 6 10 9 10 10
Toxic fumes & spills 15 18 13 14 15 13 14 All 5 5 6 13 16 10 11 None 26 37 19 7 12 1 14 Unsure 1 1 1 0 1 1 Refused 1 1 1 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 68 66 70 61 64 58 64 Strongly 30 29 31 25 27 23 27 Somewhat 38 37 39 36 37 35 36 Disagree 23 21 25 28 25 32 27 Somewhat 16 15 16 22 20 25 20 Strongly 7 6 8 6 5 7 7 Unsure 9 13 5 10 11 9 10
Agree - disagree 46 46 45 33 39 26 37Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-199
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 4 3 7 5 3 8 6 5 6 6 6 Water pollution 30 31 44 32 38 44 46 41 51 46 40 Threats to school safety 4 3 5 3 6 7 3 5 1 5 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 12 11 6 10 6 7 12 10 15 10 10
Toxic fumes & spills 12 13 14 13 17 14 16 19 15 15 14 All 9 6 12 9 14 14 12 12 11 13 11 None 28 31 9 26 13 6 4 7 1 5 14 Unsure 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 66 70 63 66 62 60 62 62 62 61 64 Strongly 32 34 24 30 21 23 26 29 23 25 27 Somewhat 35 37 39 37 41 37 36 32 39 36 36 Disagree 24 20 29 25 29 31 27 24 29 29 27 Somewhat 17 14 24 18 24 26 19 16 22 22 20 Strongly 7 6 5 7 5 5 8 8 8 7 7 Unsure 10 9 8 9 9 9 11 14 9 10 10
Agree - disagree 42 50 34 42 33 29 35 37 33 33 37Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-200
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 3 6 1 14 6 5 2 6 7 8 2 8 6 Water pollution 32 28 47 41 49 45 38 24 54 32 50 44 40 Threats to school safety 6 3 5 6 1 5 6 3 6 4 2 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 13 12 5 6 11 13 12 12 6 5 11 13 10
Toxic fumes & spills 8 15 16 12 14 19 12 11 19 9 18 16 14 All 8 10 11 13 13 11 5 12 7 19 12 11 11 None 30 26 15 4 5 3 24 30 2 19 5 3 14 Unsure 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Refused 1 2 1 2 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 76 56 63 62 60 64 68 65 65 60 68 57 64 Strongly 39 24 26 22 33 21 25 36 27 20 30 23 27 Somewhat 37 32 37 40 27 43 43 29 38 40 37 34 36 Disagree 17 31 33 25 29 25 26 23 30 27 23 31 27 Somewhat 12 23 26 21 19 19 21 15 27 20 14 23 20 Strongly 6 8 6 4 11 6 5 8 3 8 9 8 7 Unsure 6 13 4 13 11 11 6 12 4 13 10 12 10
Agree - disagree 59 25 30 37 31 39 42 42 35 32 45 26 37Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-201
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 8 4 6 8 5 4 7 7 6 Water pollution 45 33 44 39 35 45 34 39 40 Threats to school safety 5 3 4 5 4 6 3 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 11 8 13 5 8 13 8 6 10
Toxic fumes & spills 14 15 15 5 17 11 18 14 14 All 12 9 8 11 14 11 11 11 11 None 6 26 10 26 13 9 17 18 14 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 61 62 62 66 65 64 68 54 64 Strongly 24 29 25 36 24 28 28 23 27 Somewhat 36 33 37 30 41 35 40 31 36 Disagree 29 28 28 25 26 27 23 34 27 Somewhat 21 22 22 20 18 21 18 24 20 Strongly 8 5 6 5 8 6 5 11 7 Unsure 11 10 10 9 9 9 9 12 10
Agree - disagree 32 35 34 42 39 37 45 20 37Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-202
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 8 7 5 4 8 9 5 5 8 6 Water pollution 30 51 49 26 27 53 43 34 42 34 40 Threats to school safety 7 2 3 7 6 3 3 4 5 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 11 8 11 6 9 8 14 8 12 9 10
Toxic fumes & spills 14 14 13 16 16 12 10 18 10 18 14 All 7 15 13 7 7 14 16 6 8 12 11 None 25 2 3 32 30 1 3 23 17 13 14 Unsure 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 Refused 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 70 57 59 72 75 56 65 68 71 62 64 Strongly 36 19 23 34 39 18 22 32 35 25 27 Somewhat 34 38 36 38 36 37 43 35 36 37 36 Disagree 20 35 33 18 17 34 30 23 23 29 27 Somewhat 15 25 26 13 12 25 21 17 18 21 20 Strongly 5 9 7 5 5 9 9 6 5 8 7 Unsure 10 8 8 10 8 10 6 9 7 9 10
Agree - disagree 51 23 26 54 58 21 35 45 48 33 37Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-203
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 5 6 5 8 6 4 4 6 Water pollution 36 34 38 48 37 48 36 32 40 Threats to school safety 6 4 7 3 4 7 2 3 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 8 12 7 14 8 10 11 10
Toxic fumes & spills 11 9 13 13 22 8 17 16 14 All 11 10 12 14 6 12 19 11 11 None 18 30 10 9 9 10 10 23 14 Unsure 0 0 1 1 1 Refused 1 1 0 0 2 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 68 73 64 65 52 69 57 70 64 Strongly 31 36 28 26 23 30 22 31 27 Somewhat 37 38 37 39 29 39 35 38 36 Disagree 27 22 30 28 27 26 32 25 27 Somewhat 21 19 23 19 20 20 24 19 20 Strongly 5 4 7 8 7 7 8 6 7 Unsure 5 4 6 8 22 5 11 5 10
Agree - disagree 42 51 35 37 25 43 25 45 37Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-204
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 4 9 2 6 Water pollution 26 44 59 41 100 40 Threats to school safety 2 7 2 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes15 13 5 6 100 10
Toxic fumes & spills 14 21 6 14 100 14 All 3 11 16 4 11 None 31 2 28 14 Unsure 2 1 Refused 2 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 68 61 62 63 60 62 70 64 Strongly 34 22 26 35 27 29 28 27 Somewhat 33 39 36 28 34 33 42 36 Disagree 20 28 31 32 32 22 25 27 Somewhat 12 23 24 23 23 14 22 20 Strongly 9 5 7 9 9 8 4 7 Unsure 12 10 7 6 8 16 5 10
Agree - disagree 48 33 31 31 29 40 45 37Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-205
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 8 5 6 6 5 6 Water pollution 39 43 45 39 38 41 40 Threats to school safety 6 3 6 4 4 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes13 4 7 11 9 11 10
Toxic fumes & spills 13 18 16 14 17 13 14 All 8 13 19 8 12 10 11 None 16 10 2 19 12 15 14 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 2 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 72 55 58 66 68 63 64 Strongly 33 21 21 30 28 28 27 Somewhat 39 34 37 36 40 35 36 Disagree 22 34 31 27 25 27 27
Somewhat 16 26 22 20 19 20 20 Strongly 6 9 9 6 5 7 7 Unsure 6 11 11 7 8 10 10
Agree - disagree 51 21 26 40 43 36 37Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-206
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 7 5 9 4 4 8 6 Water pollution 34 49 33 48 43 39 41 40 Threats to school safety 5 2 5 4 3 3 5 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 10 9 8 8 16 9 12 10
Toxic fumes & spills 16 13 14 17 11 14 14 14 All 7 16 9 9 17 8 13 11 None 23 2 23 4 5 22 7 14 Unsure 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 Refused 1 1 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 69 58 75 52 55 66 59 64 Strongly 32 21 35 16 24 33 22 27 Somewhat 37 37 40 36 31 34 37 36 Disagree 22 33 20 40 24 25 30 27 Somewhat 15 26 17 27 17 20 22 20 Strongly 6 7 3 13 7 5 8 7 Unsure 9 9 5 8 21 9 11 10
Agree - disagree 47 25 54 12 31 42 29 37Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-207
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 4 7 6 6 5 8 6 Water pollution 34 46 40 40 35 45 40 Threats to school safety 5 4 6 4 4 5 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 7 13 12 9 9 12 10
Toxic fumes & spills 17 10 13 16 15 13 14 All 6 13 9 12 5 13 11 None 25 7 13 14 26 5 14 Unsure 1 0 1 1 0 1 Refused 1 1 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 68 60 66 61 72 57 64 Strongly 34 23 30 26 36 21 27 Somewhat 33 37 37 35 36 37 36 Disagree 19 33 23 30 19 34 27 Somewhat 14 25 17 23 14 25 20 Strongly 5 8 6 7 5 9 7 Unsure 13 7 11 9 9 9 10
Agree - disagree 48 27 43 31 53 24 37Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-208
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ20 Possibility most worries
you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 8 4 7 5 3 7 9 3 4 6 Water pollution 45 37 46 54 37 41 44 26 31 40 Threats to school safety 4 3 6 5 7 4 3 5 3 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 11 8 12 9 11 13 10 5 9 10
Toxic fumes & spills 15 14 13 10 14 15 20 14 15 14 All 16 6 15 15 21 13 9 4 7 11 None 1 27 2 1 5 5 6 42 29 14 Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 1 2 1 1 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 58 68 60 54 52 61 64 76 70 64 Strongly 22 35 23 14 17 25 35 42 34 27 Somewhat 36 34 37 40 35 36 29 35 36 36 Disagree 34 22 33 37 41 28 22 17 21 27 Somewhat 25 17 24 27 32 20 13 14 16 20 Strongly 9 5 8 10 9 7 9 3 5 7 Unsure 8 10 8 9 7 11 13 7 9 10
Agree - disagree 24 47 27 17 11 33 42 60 49 37Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-209
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q20 Possibility most worries you when thinking about issues of oil & gas development
Air pollution 5 5 6 5 3 4 8 5 5 5 6 Water pollution 38 40 39 37 28 50 45 37 38 35 40 Threats to school safety 3 5 3 4 5 2 4 6 2 4 4 Threats to neighborhoods &
homes 11 10 10 10 14 11 9 10 10 11 10
Toxic fumes & spills 14 13 14 14 8 16 16 15 10 13 14 All 12 11 11 12 8 12 8 11 14 12 11 None 16 15 15 17 32 3 10 15 17 19 14 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q21 Energy production is one of Colorado's biggest industries & employers
Agree 63 64 66 66 70 64 64 63 64 65 64 Strongly 26 28 28 28 38 24 25 28 30 30 27 Somewhat 37 36 38 39 32 40 38 36 35 35 36 Disagree 26 27 25 25 21 26 24 30 26 27 27 Somewhat 19 20 19 18 14 19 19 20 21 20 20 Strongly 8 7 6 7 7 7 5 9 5 7 7 Unsure 10 9 9 9 9 10 13 7 10 9 10
Agree - disagree 37 37 41 41 49 38 40 33 39 38 37Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-210
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 53 54 55 57 52 39 32 48 Strongly 18 18 18 17 19 13 13 16 Somewhat 35 37 37 40 33 26 19 33 Disagree 35 36 34 31 42 48 52 40 Somewhat 20 23 22 20 27 31 30 25 Strongly 14 13 12 11 15 17 21 16 Unsure 12 10 12 13 6 12 17 11 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree 18 18 21 26 10 -9 -20 8Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 37 26 25 17 36 17 13 25 Strongly 21 10 9 3 17 5 8 10 Somewhat 16 16 17 13 19 12 5 15 Disagree 58 69 69 77 60 80 87 71 Somewhat 24 31 29 30 31 37 35 31 Strongly 35 39 40 47 30 42 51 40 Unsure 3 5 6 6 4 3 0 4 Refused 2 0
Agree - disagree -21 -44 -44 -61 -24 -63 -74 -46Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-211
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 55 56 41 30 46 53 49 39 48 Strongly 18 18 15 12 19 16 12 18 16 Somewhat 37 37 26 18 28 37 37 22 33 Disagree 35 32 46 57 45 34 40 49 40 Somewhat 22 20 26 33 26 20 26 27 25 Strongly 13 12 20 24 18 14 14 21 16 Unsure 10 13 13 13 8 13 11 12 11 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree 20 24 -6 -27 1 20 9 -10 8Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 22 20 31 13 29 23 26 24 25 Strongly 9 8 13 8 16 8 11 8 10 Somewhat 13 13 18 4 14 15 15 16 15 Disagree 73 74 66 87 68 70 74 73 71 Somewhat 30 29 30 35 34 31 36 23 31 Strongly 43 45 36 53 35 39 38 50 40 Unsure 5 6 1 2 6 0 3 4 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -51 -53 -35 -75 -39 -47 -48 -48 -46Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-212
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 52 45 48 49 48 48 56 50 41 48 Strongly 19 13 13 15 19 12 26 12 13 16 Somewhat 34 32 34 34 30 36 30 37 27 33 Disagree 37 43 41 39 42 41 33 39 47 40 Somewhat 22 28 31 22 23 27 15 26 29 25 Strongly 16 15 10 17 19 14 18 13 18 16 Unsure 10 12 11 12 10 10 11 12 12 11 Refused 0 1 1 0
Agree - disagree 15 1 6 10 7 7 24 11 -6 8Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 20 30 28 25 22 24 16 33 27 25 Strongly 6 14 8 11 12 7 5 15 14 10 Somewhat 14 15 20 14 11 17 11 18 13 15 Disagree 77 65 67 72 74 72 83 62 68 71 Somewhat 30 32 38 29 27 34 27 38 27 31 Strongly 47 34 29 43 47 39 56 25 41 40 Unsure 2 5 5 2 4 4 1 5 4 4 Refused 1 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -57 -36 -39 -47 -52 -49 -67 -29 -41 -46Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-213
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 43 49 54 56 49 46 48 Strongly 10 17 11 12 21 18 16 Somewhat 34 32 43 44 28 28 33 Disagree 46 39 35 34 42 42 40 Somewhat 25 25 22 21 26 26 25 Strongly 22 14 13 13 16 17 16 Unsure 10 11 11 9 9 11 11 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -3 10 19 22 6 3 8Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 42 21 34 34 22 21 25 Strongly 17 8 11 10 9 10 10 Somewhat 25 13 23 24 12 12 15 Disagree 54 75 63 64 74 74 71 Somewhat 25 32 34 34 27 30 31 Strongly 29 43 29 29 47 44 40 Unsure 3 4 2 1 4 4 4 Refused 2 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -12 -54 -29 -29 -53 -53 -46Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-214
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 45 44 46 51 52 48 48 Strongly 17 18 15 15 17 13 16 Somewhat 29 25 31 35 36 35 33 Disagree 44 45 43 38 35 42 40 Somewhat 27 28 27 23 22 26 25 Strongly 17 18 16 15 14 16 16 Unsure 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 Refused 0 1 0
Agree - disagree 1 -2 3 13 17 6 8Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 31 38 27 21 18 27 25 Strongly 11 14 10 9 7 14 10 Somewhat 20 24 17 12 11 13 15 Disagree 64 56 70 76 79 69 71 Somewhat 25 21 28 36 41 28 31 Strongly 39 35 41 40 39 42 40 Unsure 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 Refused 1 2 0
Agree - disagree -34 -18 -43 -55 -62 -43 -46Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-215
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 41 50 48 50 51 51 47 48 Strongly 17 16 23 9 18 15 20 16 Somewhat 24 34 25 41 33 36 27 33 Disagree 46 39 37 40 40 38 41 40 Somewhat 35 23 21 25 22 25 23 25 Strongly 11 17 16 16 18 13 17 16 Unsure 12 11 15 10 9 11 13 11 Refused 1 0 0
Agree - disagree -5 10 10 10 11 14 6 8Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 33 23 22 24 23 22 25 25 Strongly 12 9 8 11 8 7 15 10 Somewhat 21 14 14 13 15 15 10 15 Disagree 59 74 76 74 73 74 71 71 Somewhat 31 32 34 36 26 35 25 31 Strongly 28 42 42 38 48 39 47 40 Unsure 7 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 Refused 0 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -26 -51 -54 -50 -50 -52 -46 -46Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-216
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 47 48 42 50 44 55 49 48 48 Strongly 16 17 18 16 14 18 19 13 16 Somewhat 31 30 24 34 30 37 30 35 33 Disagree 45 39 43 37 45 37 39 42 40 Somewhat 26 24 27 20 30 20 22 28 25 Strongly 19 15 17 16 15 17 18 14 16 Unsure 8 13 13 12 11 9 11 10 11 Refused 0 1 1 0 0
Agree - disagree 2 8 -1 14 -1 18 10 6 8Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 23 23 24 21 19 34 26 24 25 Strongly 7 10 10 10 9 10 11 10 10 Somewhat 16 13 13 12 10 24 15 15 15 Disagree 72 75 72 73 77 66 70 72 71 Somewhat 31 33 36 29 39 27 30 32 31 Strongly 41 42 36 44 37 39 40 40 40 Unsure 5 2 5 5 4 1 4 3 4 Refused 0
Agree - disagree -49 -52 -48 -52 -57 -32 -44 -48 -46Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-217
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 52 52 53 45 51 38 48 Strongly 19 22 17 14 17 11 16 Somewhat 33 29 36 31 34 28 33 Disagree 38 36 39 42 35 50 40 Somewhat 20 18 20 28 24 33 25 Strongly 18 17 18 14 12 17 16 Unsure 9 13 7 13 14 12 11 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree 15 16 14 3 16 -12 8Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 22 22 22 27 25 28 25 Strongly 7 7 7 11 10 11 10 Somewhat 15 15 15 16 15 17 15 Disagree 75 74 75 69 70 69 71 Somewhat 22 19 24 37 32 43 31 Strongly 52 56 50 32 37 27 40 Unsure 2 3 2 4 5 3 4 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -52 -52 -53 -43 -44 -41 -46Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-218
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 56 57 45 52 45 46 43 47 40 45 48 Strongly 18 18 18 18 18 18 11 13 8 14 16 Somewhat 38 38 27 35 27 28 33 34 32 31 33 Disagree 34 32 43 37 42 41 45 39 50 43 40 Somewhat 19 16 29 22 25 29 26 26 26 28 25 Strongly 15 17 14 16 17 12 18 12 24 16 16 Unsure 10 10 12 10 13 13 12 14 10 12 11 Refused 1 1 0 0
Agree - disagree 22 24 2 15 3 5 -1 8 -10 1 8Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 19 15 23 22 25 19 34 40 30 28 25 Strongly 6 4 8 8 8 6 16 18 15 12 10 Somewhat 13 11 15 15 16 13 17 21 15 15 15 Disagree 79 82 72 75 68 76 62 56 67 68 71 Somewhat 24 25 35 23 27 40 34 31 38 37 31 Strongly 55 58 36 52 41 36 28 26 29 31 40 Unsure 2 2 5 2 6 5 4 4 3 4 4 Refused 1 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -60 -67 -49 -53 -43 -57 -28 -17 -37 -41 -46Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-219
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 61 51 52 38 42 45 56 56 46 44 46 42 48 Strongly 20 17 23 12 12 10 13 22 15 21 7 14 16 Somewhat 41 34 29 26 30 35 43 34 31 23 39 27 33 Disagree 31 36 37 50 45 44 33 34 42 45 45 45 40 Somewhat 15 23 23 36 27 25 24 16 31 28 25 27 25 Strongly 16 13 13 14 18 19 9 18 11 17 20 17 16 Unsure 6 13 12 13 13 11 9 10 12 12 9 14 11 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree 30 15 15 -12 -4 0 23 21 4 -1 1 -3 8Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 18 20 20 26 24 42 28 13 24 22 33 34 25 Strongly 5 8 4 12 9 22 7 5 5 12 20 13 10 Somewhat 13 12 16 14 14 20 20 7 19 10 13 21 15 Disagree 81 77 76 67 74 53 69 86 70 74 63 61 71 Somewhat 19 30 32 39 43 27 28 22 42 26 35 34 31 Strongly 62 47 45 28 31 26 41 64 28 48 29 27 40 Unsure 1 3 4 5 2 5 3 2 6 3 3 5 4 Refused 2 2 0
Agree - disagree -63 -57 -57 -40 -51 -11 -41 -73 -46 -52 -30 -26 -46Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-220
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 52 44 51 40 46 55 45 38 48 Strongly 14 16 15 19 13 21 12 11 16 Somewhat 37 28 36 21 33 34 33 27 33 Disagree 39 45 38 46 45 35 41 52 40 Somewhat 26 26 25 28 27 23 28 22 25 Strongly 13 19 14 18 19 13 13 30 16 Unsure 9 11 10 13 9 9 14 10 11 Refused 1 2 0 0
Agree - disagree 13 -1 13 -6 1 20 4 -14 8Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 25 25 27 19 25 25 24 28 25 Strongly 12 9 10 10 12 11 9 10 10 Somewhat 13 16 18 9 13 14 15 19 15 Disagree 72 72 70 76 70 72 70 69 71 Somewhat 36 22 36 21 29 35 32 19 31 Strongly 36 50 34 55 41 37 39 50 40 Unsure 3 4 3 5 3 3 5 3 4 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -47 -47 -42 -56 -45 -48 -47 -41 -46Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-221
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 59 37 45 55 60 40 53 50 59 41 48 Strongly 22 8 13 20 25 8 15 16 20 12 16 Somewhat 37 29 32 35 36 32 38 35 39 29 33 Disagree 33 50 43 37 30 48 37 42 32 46 40 Somewhat 20 28 28 20 19 27 27 24 23 23 25 Strongly 13 22 15 17 11 21 10 17 9 23 16 Unsure 8 12 12 8 10 11 11 8 9 13 11 Refused 1 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree 26 -13 2 19 30 -8 16 9 27 -5 8Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 15 40 30 17 14 38 45 17 27 25 25 Strongly 5 18 14 3 3 18 22 5 10 11 10 Somewhat 10 22 16 14 11 21 23 12 17 14 15 Disagree 83 56 66 80 84 58 53 81 71 71 71 Somewhat 29 34 36 23 24 35 27 32 34 26 31 Strongly 54 23 30 57 60 22 27 49 37 45 40 Unsure 3 2 3 2 2 4 0 2 3 3 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -68 -16 -36 -63 -70 -19 -9 -64 -44 -46 -46Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-222
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 56 57 55 46 37 56 31 59 48 Strongly 20 23 18 11 12 15 12 21 16 Somewhat 36 34 36 35 25 40 19 38 33 Disagree 33 30 36 44 48 33 53 37 40 Somewhat 19 12 24 28 30 22 29 20 25 Strongly 15 18 12 15 18 10 24 16 16 Unsure 11 13 9 10 14 11 16 5 11 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree 22 28 18 2 -11 23 -21 22 8Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 25 26 24 27 24 24 28 28 25 Strongly 13 17 10 7 9 8 12 14 10 Somewhat 12 9 14 20 15 16 15 14 15 Disagree 73 73 73 68 70 74 64 69 71 Somewhat 30 24 35 37 24 36 34 28 31 Strongly 43 49 38 31 46 37 31 41 40 Unsure 1 0 2 6 6 2 6 2 4 Refused 1 1 2 0
Agree - disagree -48 -47 -48 -41 -47 -50 -37 -41 -46Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-223
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 53 49 45 49 47 63 43 48 Strongly 19 11 17 18 16 14 12 16 Somewhat 35 38 28 30 31 49 31 33 Disagree 34 36 47 43 44 16 51 40 Somewhat 16 23 33 22 29 6 30 25 Strongly 18 13 13 20 15 10 21 16 Unsure 13 14 9 9 9 21 6 11 Refused 1 0 0
Agree - disagree 19 13 -2 6 3 47 -8 8Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 11 32 36 14 29 16 29 25 Strongly 4 15 11 4 12 10 4 10 Somewhat 7 18 24 10 17 7 25 15 Disagree 86 61 62 84 69 77 68 71 Somewhat 26 33 37 38 35 44 30 31 Strongly 60 28 25 46 35 33 38 40 Unsure 2 6 2 2 2 7 3 4 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree -75 -29 -26 -70 -41 -60 -40 -46Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-224
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 100 44 51 45 50 48 Strongly 32 8 19 11 17 16 Somewhat 68 36 32 34 32 33 Disagree 100 51 38 46 39 40 Somewhat 62 30 24 29 24 25 Strongly 38 21 14 17 15 16 Unsure 5 11 9 11 11 Refused 0 0
Agree - disagree 100 -100 -7 13 -1 11 8Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 23 31 100 43 18 25 Strongly 6 16 40 21 6 10 Somewhat 17 16 60 22 12 15 Disagree 75 67 100 54 78 71 Somewhat 33 30 44 29 32 31 Strongly 42 38 56 24 46 40 Unsure 2 1 2 4 4 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree -52 -36 100 -100 -11 -61 -46Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-225
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 55 39 57 35 43 52 45 48 Strongly 20 9 24 6 7 21 11 16 Somewhat 35 29 33 29 36 31 33 33 Disagree 35 50 34 59 34 37 44 40 Somewhat 20 34 19 37 25 24 27 25 Strongly 15 17 16 22 9 13 17 16 Unsure 11 11 8 6 23 11 11 11 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree 20 -12 23 -23 9 15 1 8Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 19 35 18 46 16 16 35 25 Strongly 6 16 6 17 10 7 13 10 Somewhat 13 19 12 29 6 9 22 15 Disagree 78 63 78 53 76 80 63 71 Somewhat 28 37 33 27 31 28 33 31 Strongly 50 26 45 25 45 51 30 40 Unsure 3 2 3 1 8 5 2 4 Refused 1 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -59 -28 -60 -6 -60 -64 -27 -46Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-226
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 54 45 51 47 55 45 48 Strongly 20 14 17 15 22 12 16 Somewhat 35 32 33 32 33 33 33 Disagree 33 44 37 43 34 45 40 Somewhat 21 28 23 27 22 27 25 Strongly 13 16 14 16 13 18 16 Unsure 12 10 13 10 11 10 11 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree 21 2 14 4 21 0 8Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 22 30 21 29 21 29 25 Strongly 6 13 7 13 2 16 10 Somewhat 16 17 14 17 19 13 15 Disagree 75 67 73 69 74 69 71 Somewhat 31 32 29 32 27 35 31
Strongly 44 34 44 37 47 34 40 Unsure 3 3 6 2 4 3 4 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -53 -37 -53 -40 -53 -40 -46Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-227
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ22 Colorado's state
regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 42 55 44 39 47 47 45 57 52 48 Strongly 9 22 9 10 14 14 13 24 22 16 Somewhat 33 32 35 29 33 34 32 33 30 33 Disagree 48 36 45 53 43 40 40 33 36 40 Somewhat 30 21 28 35 23 26 25 16 20 25 Strongly 18 15 17 18 21 14 15 18 15 16 Unsure 10 10 11 8 8 13 15 10 12 11 Refused 0 1 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -6 19 -1 -13 4 8 5 23 16 8Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 42 12 38 49 30 24 22 11 12 25 Strongly 18 3 15 17 14 9 6 7 5 10 Somewhat 23 8 23 32 15 15 15 4 6 15 Disagree 57 84 60 50 66 71 69 87 83 71 Somewhat 35 26 35 30 33 37 31 20 24 31 Strongly 22 59 25 20 34 34 38 67 59 40 Unsure 1 3 2 1 3 5 9 2 4 4 Refused 1 2 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -15 -73 -22 -1 -36 -47 -48 -76 -72 -46Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-228
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q22 Colorado's state regulators over oil & gas development are highly-educated, well-trained, & experienced experts who know how to establish & enforce technical rules
Agree 48 49 47 48 59 40 47 48 50 50 48 Strongly 14 16 16 15 22 10 16 13 21 18 16 Somewhat 33 33 31 32 37 30 32 35 30 32 33 Disagree 40 40 42 42 30 51 41 39 42 40 40 Somewhat 22 24 25 23 12 30 30 20 25 21 25 Strongly 18 16 17 19 18 20 11 18 18 19 16 Unsure 12 11 10 10 10 9 12 13 7 9 11 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree 8 9 5 6 29 -10 7 9 8 10 8Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q23 Oil & gas development activity in or near my city & county is growing at an alarming rate
Agree 23 24 23 22 13 32 26 26 22 23 25 Strongly 9 10 9 9 5 14 10 11 9 10 10 Somewhat 14 14 14 14 8 18 16 15 13 12 15 Disagree 72 72 73 73 86 66 70 71 74 75 71 Somewhat 30 31 32 29 28 34 33 30 29 29 31 Strongly 42 41 41 44 58 32 36 40 45 45 40 Unsure 5 3 4 4 1 2 4 2 4 3 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0
Agree - disagree -50 -48 -50 -50 -73 -33 -44 -45 -52 -52 -46Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-229
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 44 31 32 31 30 33 37 35 Strongly 21 9 9 7 10 10 9 11 Somewhat 22 22 23 24 20 22 28 24 Disagree 52 53 53 55 52 56 55 52 Somewhat 28 33 32 33 33 35 27 31 Strongly 24 20 21 22 19 21 28 21 Unsure 4 16 15 14 18 12 9 13 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -8 -23 -21 -24 -22 -23 -18 -17Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 51 26 28 15 39 13 37 28 Strongly 35 13 13 8 18 4 27 16 Somewhat 16 14 14 7 21 8 9 12 Disagree 47 72 71 83 60 87 62 71 Somewhat 25 22 21 19 25 27 17 21
Strongly 22 51 50 64 35 60 46 49 Unsure 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 3 -46 -43 -68 -21 -74 -26 -43Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-230
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 32 33 39 33 36 32 40 36 35 Strongly 9 10 13 9 12 8 15 11 11 Somewhat 22 23 26 25 23 23 25 25 24 Disagree 54 53 49 58 51 53 52 44 52 Somewhat 32 31 28 30 30 30 37 19 31 Strongly 22 22 20 27 21 23 15 25 21 Unsure 15 13 12 9 13 15 8 20 13 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -22 -20 -9 -24 -16 -21 -12 -8 -17Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 21 22 40 38 16 22 39 44 28 Strongly 11 11 25 28 9 11 24 26 16 Somewhat 10 10 15 10 7 11 16 18 12 Disagree 77 77 59 62 82 77 60 56 71 Somewhat 21 20 19 16 31 24 15 7 21 Strongly 56 56 40 46 51 53 45 49 49 Unsure 1 2 1 2 1 0 1
Agree - disagree -56 -55 -19 -24 -66 -55 -21 -12 -43Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-231
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 39 31 43 29 35 45 32 30 32 35 Strongly 14 8 9 12 11 16 11 5 11 11 Somewhat 25 23 34 16 24 29 21 25 21 24 Disagree 52 51 45 60 47 48 57 56 48 52 Somewhat 25 36 33 34 25 25 24 44 30 31 Strongly 27 15 12 27 22 22 32 11 18 21 Unsure 9 18 12 11 18 7 11 14 20 13 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -13 -20 -2 -32 -12 -2 -25 -25 -16 -17Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 30 26 31 29 23 38 22 23 29 28 Strongly 18 14 19 16 13 24 11 15 14 16 Somewhat 12 12 12 13 11 13 10 8 15 12 Disagree 69 73 67 70 76 62 77 76 70 71 Somewhat 21 22 25 21 18 23 19 27 18 21 Strongly 48 51 42 49 57 39 58 49 52 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -39 -47 -36 -41 -53 -24 -55 -54 -41 -43Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-232
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 34 35 33 32 34 36 35 Strongly 13 10 14 15 9 10 11 Somewhat 22 25 19 16 25 26 24 Disagree 58 50 59 61 51 48 52 Somewhat 36 29 43 45 26 25 31 Strongly 22 21 16 16 25 23 21 Unsure 7 15 8 7 15 16 13 Refused 1 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -23 -15 -26 -29 -16 -12 -17Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 27 28 34 33 24 26 28 Strongly 19 15 22 22 13 14 16 Somewhat 8 13 11 11 11 12 12 Disagree 72 70 66 67 75 72 71 Somewhat 30 20 24 24 21 20 21 Strongly 42 51 43 43 54 52 49 Unsure 1 1 1 2 1
Agree - disagree -46 -42 -33 -33 -51 -46 -43Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-233
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 38 46 34 32 38 24 35 Strongly 14 16 12 9 8 11 11 Somewhat 25 30 22 23 30 13 24 Disagree 49 44 52 53 48 63 52 Somewhat 28 24 30 33 29 38 31 Strongly 21 19 22 21 19 25 21 Unsure 13 10 14 14 15 13 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -10 3 -18 -21 -10 -39 -17Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 29 30 29 27 29 26 28 Strongly 17 16 18 15 16 14 16 Somewhat 12 14 10 12 12 12 12 Disagree 70 69 71 71 70 74 71 Somewhat 23 20 25 20 22 18 21 Strongly 47 49 46 51 48 56 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Agree - disagree -41 -39 -42 -44 -41 -48 -43Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-234
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 46 32 34 32 30 34 32 35 Strongly 7 12 11 12 13 11 14 11 Somewhat 40 20 24 19 17 23 18 24 Disagree 39 55 56 54 55 53 51 52 Somewhat 21 33 31 32 35 33 25 31 Strongly 17 22 25 22 20 20 26 21 Unsure 14 13 9 14 14 12 17 13 Refused 1 0
Agree - disagree 8 -23 -22 -22 -25 -19 -19 -17Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 24 30 25 34 29 32 22 28 Strongly 18 16 11 18 19 19 14 16 Somewhat 6 14 14 16 10 13 8 12 Disagree 74 69 75 64 71 66 77 71 Somewhat 18 22 28 19 19 19 20 21 Strongly 57 48 48 45 52 47 57 49 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -50 -40 -51 -30 -42 -34 -55 -43Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-235
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 35 37 33 33 27 43 35 35 35 Strongly 13 10 11 11 4 16 12 10 11 Somewhat 22 27 22 22 23 26 22 25 24 Disagree 52 50 50 50 60 46 53 50 52 Somewhat 32 26 23 29 37 25 29 31 31 Strongly 20 23 27 21 23 21 24 19 21 Unsure 13 13 17 17 13 11 12 14 13 Refused 0 1 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -17 -13 -17 -17 -33 -4 -18 -15 -17Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 21 33 31 27 20 38 34 22 28 Strongly 7 22 22 16 12 20 23 10 16 Somewhat 14 11 9 10 8 18 11 12 12 Disagree 78 67 68 72 78 61 64 77 71 Somewhat 22 20 24 20 24 18 19 24 21 Strongly 56 47 44 52 55 44 45 53 49 Unsure 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -57 -34 -37 -45 -58 -23 -30 -54 -43Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-236
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 37 33 39 34 36 31 35 Strongly 13 11 15 9 12 6 11 Somewhat 23 22 24 24 24 25 24 Disagree 49 47 50 54 52 57 52 Somewhat 27 24 29 33 28 40 31 Strongly 22 24 21 21 24 17 21 Unsure 15 20 11 12 13 12 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -12 -14 -11 -21 -16 -26 -17Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 25 26 23 31 36 25 28 Strongly 15 15 15 17 20 14 16 Somewhat 10 11 9 14 16 11 12 Disagree 75 73 76 68 63 72 71 Somewhat 19 16 22 23 19 27 21 Strongly 55 56 54 45 44 45 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 3 1
Agree - disagree -50 -46 -53 -37 -27 -47 -43Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-237
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 30 34 42 33 40 39 34 39 28 36 35 Strongly 11 12 12 11 14 9 10 13 9 10 11 Somewhat 19 22 30 22 26 30 23 26 19 26 24 Disagree 53 50 48 51 47 51 54 51 56 53 52 Somewhat 29 29 28 26 25 33 36 31 40 34 31 Strongly 24 21 20 24 21 19 18 21 16 18 21 Unsure 17 16 10 16 14 10 12 10 15 11 13 Refused 0 1 0 0
Agree - disagree -23 -16 -6 -18 -7 -13 -20 -12 -28 -17 -17Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 22 24 31 23 33 32 31 38 26 32 28 Strongly 11 13 19 13 22 18 19 22 16 19 16 Somewhat 11 11 12 11 11 14 12 16 10 13 12 Disagree 77 76 68 76 67 66 68 60 74 67 71 Somewhat 20 21 20 19 17 24 24 24 23 24 21 Strongly 56 55 47 57 50 42 44 36 51 43 49 Unsure 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 1
Agree - disagree -55 -52 -37 -52 -34 -33 -37 -22 -48 -36 -43Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-238
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 37 23 40 43 40 29 29 31 47 34 36 31 35 Strongly 13 8 14 10 14 8 5 14 12 11 14 7 11 Somewhat 24 15 26 33 26 21 23 17 35 23 22 24 24 Disagree 53 53 52 44 51 56 59 49 47 49 49 58 52 Somewhat 19 39 29 27 27 42 38 23 31 24 35 36 31 Strongly 34 15 23 17 24 13 21 26 16 25 14 21 21 Unsure 10 24 8 14 9 15 12 21 6 17 15 10 13 Refused 1 1 0
Agree - disagree -16 -30 -12 -1 -11 -27 -30 -18 0 -15 -13 -26 -17Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 26 18 33 29 31 31 24 21 30 33 37 26 28 Strongly 13 8 22 16 19 18 9 12 24 13 25 13 16 Somewhat 13 10 11 13 12 13 15 9 6 19 12 12 12 Disagree 72 82 66 69 69 68 75 78 69 66 63 73 71 Somewhat 20 21 17 24 28 21 25 17 25 14 24 24 21 Strongly 52 60 49 46 41 47 50 61 43 53 39 48 49 Unsure 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1
Agree - disagree -46 -63 -33 -40 -38 -37 -50 -58 -39 -34 -26 -47 -43Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-239
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 33 34 35 31 38 39 33 29 35 Strongly 9 12 10 13 13 13 9 11 11 Somewhat 24 21 25 18 25 26 25 17 24 Disagree 56 52 51 59 49 49 51 60 52 Somewhat 38 26 33 25 31 31 33 24 31 Strongly 18 26 18 34 18 18 18 36 21 Unsure 11 14 14 10 13 12 16 11 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -23 -19 -16 -28 -11 -10 -18 -32 -17Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 24 28 29 27 27 28 30 24 28 Strongly 15 15 17 13 15 18 15 14 16 Somewhat 9 13 12 14 12 10 15 10 12 Disagree 75 70 69 73 72 70 70 75 71 Somewhat 22 22 21 20 25 25 19 19 21 Strongly 53 49 48 52 47 46 51 56 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -51 -42 -40 -46 -45 -42 -40 -51 -43Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-240
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 36 32 34 36 37 33 44 33 38 34 35 Strongly 14 8 9 13 15 9 12 12 14 12 11 Somewhat 23 24 25 23 22 24 32 21 25 22 24 Disagree 49 56 54 50 50 54 46 55 50 56 52 Somewhat 27 33 35 24 28 35 28 34 27 33 31 Strongly 22 23 18 26 22 20 18 21 22 22 21 Unsure 14 12 12 14 13 13 10 11 12 10 13 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -13 -24 -20 -14 -13 -21 -2 -22 -11 -22 -17Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 28 30 28 31 26 30 32 28 33 28 28 Strongly 16 16 17 16 17 16 18 15 18 16 16 Somewhat 12 14 11 15 10 14 13 13 14 12 12 Disagree 71 68 71 68 73 68 67 71 66 72 71 Somewhat 20 25 22 21 17 25 24 18 24 19 21 Strongly 51 43 48 47 56 43 44 53 42 53 49 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 1
Agree - disagree -43 -38 -42 -37 -47 -38 -36 -43 -33 -45 -43Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-241
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 41 42 39 31 30 39 29 37 35 Strongly 16 20 12 7 7 11 10 15 11 Somewhat 25 22 27 24 23 28 19 22 24 Disagree 45 47 44 57 55 47 55 50 52 Somewhat 27 24 29 35 29 30 40 25 31 Strongly 18 23 14 22 26 16 15 26 21 Unsure 14 11 17 12 15 14 16 12 13 Refused 0 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -4 -5 -4 -25 -25 -7 -26 -13 -17Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 36 39 34 21 19 30 27 33 28 Strongly 20 26 16 11 12 16 17 17 16 Somewhat 16 13 18 10 7 14 9 15 12 Disagree 63 60 65 78 80 68 73 67 71 Somewhat 18 19 17 25 23 21 22 21 21 Strongly 45 41 48 53 57 47 51 47 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -27 -21 -31 -57 -61 -38 -46 -35 -43Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-242
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 42 32 36 35 36 41 25 35 Strongly 13 12 8 18 11 15 5 11 Somewhat 29 20 28 17 25 26 20 24 Disagree 44 60 48 49 54 42 67 52 Somewhat 24 40 30 23 34 21 54 31 Strongly 20 20 18 26 21 22 12 21 Unsure 14 8 16 16 10 15 8 13 Refused 0 1 0
Agree - disagree -2 -28 -12 -13 -19 -1 -42 -17Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 24 27 31 27 27 24 35 28 Strongly 14 14 16 13 16 15 11 16 Somewhat 10 13 15 14 11 10 23 12 Disagree 76 72 67 73 72 76 65 71 Somewhat 19 25 21 20 25 11 26 21 Strongly 56 46 46 53 48 65 38 49 Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -52 -45 -36 -46 -46 -52 -30 -43Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-243
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 38 32 39 34 43 32 35 Strongly 15 9 15 10 15 10 11 Somewhat 24 23 24 24 28 22 24 Disagree 49 56 50 54 45 54 52 Somewhat 29 34 30 32 26 33 31 Strongly 20 22 20 21 19 21 21 Unsure 12 12 11 12 12 14 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -11 -24 -11 -20 -2 -23 -17Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 26 32 48 21 100 28 Strongly 11 22 30 12 58 16 Somewhat 15 10 19 10 42 12 Disagree 73 68 50 78 100 71 Somewhat 21 25 24 21 30 21 Strongly 52 43 26 57 70 49 Unsure 1 2 1 1
Agree - disagree -47 -37 -2 -57 100 -100 -43Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-244
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 40 29 42 31 25 35 34 35 Strongly 12 9 14 9 7 12 11 11 Somewhat 27 20 28 23 18 23 24 24 Disagree 48 57 48 64 44 53 51 52 Somewhat 27 36 26 39 29 30 33 31 Strongly 21 21 22 25 15 23 18 21 Unsure 13 13 10 4 31 12 14 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -8 -28 -6 -33 -19 -18 -17 -17Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 29 26 28 36 19 24 31 28 Strongly 16 17 18 18 10 14 17 16 Somewhat 14 10 10 18 9 10 14 12 Disagree 69 73 70 64 80 74 68 71 Somewhat 17 28 24 22 16 19 24 21 Strongly 52 45 46 41 64 55 44 49 Unsure 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -40 -46 -42 -28 -61 -50 -37 -43Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-245
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 39 34 34 35 40 32 35 Strongly 13 11 10 11 13 9 11 Somewhat 26 23 24 24 27 23 24 Disagree 45 54 51 52 46 56 52 Somewhat 25 33 31 31 25 36 31 Strongly 20 21 20 21 21 20 21 Unsure 15 12 15 13 14 12 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -6 -20 -16 -17 -6 -24 -17Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 26 31 30 26 25 32 28 Strongly 11 20 20 13 13 20 16 Somewhat 15 11 10 13 12 13 12 Disagree 73 68 69 72 75 66 71 Somewhat 24 21 20 22 22 20 21 Strongly 49 47 48 50 53 46 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 2 1
Agree - disagree -47 -37 -38 -46 -50 -34 -43Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-246
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ24 Since the recession, most
of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 31 39 36 30 39 36 34 35 36 35 Strongly 10 12 10 10 12 9 11 16 13 11 Somewhat 21 27 26 20 27 28 24 19 22 24 Disagree 56 49 53 60 46 50 53 50 50 52 Somewhat 36 27 34 39 28 31 36 24 27 31 Strongly 20 22 19 20 18 18 17 27 23 21 Unsure 13 12 11 10 14 14 13 15 15 13 Refused 0 1 0
Agree - disagree -24 -10 -17 -29 -7 -13 -19 -15 -14 -17Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 32 25 28 36 25 26 27 27 26 28 Strongly 18 14 17 15 17 17 17 14 16 16 Somewhat 14 11 11 21 8 9 10 13 11 12 Disagree 66 74 70 63 73 73 69 73 73 71 Somewhat 29 15 27 29 24 22 19 15 15 21 Strongly 37 60 42 34 50 51 50 58 58 49 Unsure 2 0 2 1 1 2 4 0 1
Agree - disagree -34 -49 -42 -27 -48 -47 -42 -45 -47 -43Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-247
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q24 Since the recession, most of the new jobs created in Colorado are energy-related
Agree 32 35 35 32 35 31 42 32 30 30 35 Strongly 9 12 10 9 13 9 10 12 11 12 11 Somewhat 23 23 25 23 22 22 31 20 20 18 24 Disagree 53 52 52 54 50 60 43 55 58 56 52 Somewhat 29 31 30 31 22 42 31 30 32 31 31 Strongly 24 22 21 23 28 18 13 25 26 24 21 Unsure 15 13 13 14 15 8 15 13 12 14 13 Refused 0 0 0
Agree - disagree -21 -18 -17 -22 -15 -29 -2 -23 -27 -25 -17Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q25 I regularly see visible signs of oil & gas development near where I live
Agree 28 27 25 26 21 25 30 27 27 28 28 Strongly 16 16 14 15 12 15 15 19 12 15 16 Somewhat 12 11 11 11 9 10 14 8 15 13 12 Disagree 72 72 74 74 78 74 68 72 73 72 71 Somewhat 20 22 23 21 19 25 22 21 22 19 21 Strongly 51 49 51 53 60 49 47 51 50 53 49 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1
Agree - disagree -44 -44 -49 -48 -58 -49 -39 -45 -46 -44 -43Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-248
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 64 56 59 61 50 50 66 57 Strongly 38 31 33 36 26 36 40 35 Somewhat 26 24 26 25 24 13 26 23 Disagree 31 41 38 36 47 48 33 40 Somewhat 18 21 21 19 22 21 13 20 Strongly 13 21 17 17 25 26 20 21 Unsure 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 Refused 3 1 2 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 33 14 20 25 3 2 33 17Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 56 67 68 69 65 67 58 66 Strongly 32 35 37 40 30 35 42 36 Somewhat 24 32 31 29 35 32 16 30 Disagree 31 24 22 23 25 31 35 27 Somewhat 18 14 15 15 13 20 19 16 Strongly 13 10 8 8 12 11 15 11 Unsure 13 9 10 8 10 2 7 7
Agree - disagree 25 43 45 46 40 37 24 39Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-249
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 57 61 61 64 54 55 53 80 57 Strongly 34 37 36 40 30 34 31 52 35 Somewhat 23 24 25 24 24 21 22 28 23 Disagree 39 35 38 36 44 41 46 19 40 Somewhat 18 18 20 11 15 23 24 5 20 Strongly 21 17 18 25 29 18 22 14 21 Unsure 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 Refused 1 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 18 26 24 28 10 15 7 61 17Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 69 70 63 60 63 67 64 73 66 Strongly 38 41 34 45 37 35 28 52 36 Somewhat 31 29 29 15 26 32 35 22 30 Disagree 23 21 30 36 32 23 28 23 27 Somewhat 13 13 19 19 14 17 16 9 16 Strongly 10 8 11 17 18 6 12 14 11 Unsure 8 9 7 4 5 9 8 3 7
Agree - disagree 46 48 32 24 30 44 35 50 39Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-250
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 68 47 48 59 64 63 74 38 55 57 Strongly 39 30 19 38 45 25 55 23 36 35 Somewhat 29 17 29 21 19 38 19 15 18 23 Disagree 31 49 46 41 34 37 25 54 44 40 Somewhat 19 20 24 18 17 24 13 23 18 20 Strongly 13 28 21 23 18 13 12 31 26 21 Unsure 0 3 4 2 1 5 1 2 Refused 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 37 -1 3 18 30 26 49 -16 11 17Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 67 65 61 69 68 66 68 62 68 66 Strongly 40 33 28 38 42 37 43 25 39 36 Somewhat 27 32 33 31 26 30 24 37 29 30 Disagree 26 27 32 26 24 26 27 31 25 27 Somewhat 12 20 22 13 14 13 11 23 17 16 Strongly 14 8 9 12 10 13 16 8 8 11 Unsure 7 7 8 6 8 8 5 7 8 7
Agree - disagree 41 38 29 43 44 41 40 31 43 39Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-251
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 52 58 59 56 61 57 57 Strongly 35 34 31 32 38 37 35 Somewhat 16 24 28 24 23 20 23 Disagree 48 39 39 42 37 40 40 Somewhat 20 19 20 22 15 19 20 Strongly 27 19 19 19 22 22 21 Unsure 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 Refused 1 2 1 1
Agree - disagree 4 20 20 14 24 16 17Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development Agree 67 66 69 68 64 65 66
Strongly 33 37 33 32 37 38 36 Somewhat 34 28 36 36 28 27 30 Disagree 27 27 25 26 30 27 27 Somewhat 18 16 17 17 15 15 16 Strongly 9 11 8 9 15 12 11 Unsure 6 7 6 5 6 8 7
Agree - disagree 40 38 43 42 35 38 39Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-252
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 62 73 55 54 55 53 57 Strongly 39 48 34 31 31 31 35 Somewhat 22 25 21 23 24 22 23 Disagree 36 26 42 44 42 46 40 Somewhat 17 14 18 22 25 16 20 Strongly 19 12 24 22 17 30 21 Unsure 2 1 3 1 2 0 2 Refused 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 26 47 13 10 13 7 17Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 67 75 63 65 66 65 66 Strongly 38 45 34 35 34 36 36 Somewhat 29 29 28 31 32 29 30 Disagree 26 18 32 27 26 28 27 Somewhat 17 13 20 15 14 16 16 Strongly 9 5 12 12 12 11 11 Unsure 6 7 6 8 8 7 7
Agree - disagree 41 57 31 38 39 37 39Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-253
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 57 58 52 55 66 60 58 57 Strongly 37 34 33 26 48 35 38 35 Somewhat 21 23 20 29 18 25 20 23 Disagree 35 41 44 44 33 36 40 40 Somewhat 20 19 22 18 16 18 16 20 Strongly 16 22 22 26 17 18 24 21 Unsure 4 1 3 1 0 2 2 2 Refused 3 1 1
Agree - disagree 22 16 8 11 33 24 18 17Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 56 68 61 69 75 65 67 66 Strongly 31 38 38 32 45 33 46 36 Somewhat 25 31 22 37 30 32 21 30 Disagree 35 25 32 23 19 28 23 27 Somewhat 28 13 19 13 6 15 15 16 Strongly 7 12 13 11 14 13 9 11 Unsure 9 7 7 7 6 7 10 7
Agree - disagree 21 43 28 46 56 36 44 39Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-254
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 56 61 63 53 63 61 64 52 57 Strongly 29 38 35 32 37 37 35 34 35 Somewhat 27 22 27 20 27 23 29 18 23 Disagree 42 37 32 44 37 36 33 46 40 Somewhat 20 19 17 23 19 16 15 23 20 Strongly 22 18 15 21 18 20 18 23 21 Unsure 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 Refused 1 4 2 2 1
Agree - disagree 14 23 31 9 26 25 31 6 17Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 69 66 65 64 68 66 66 65 66 Strongly 34 39 38 29 37 41 37 35 36 Somewhat 35 27 27 35 31 25 29 30 30 Disagree 25 26 30 23 27 30 26 28 27 Somewhat 15 15 13 9 20 18 12 20 16 Strongly 10 11 17 14 8 12 14 9 11 Unsure 6 8 5 13 5 4 8 7 7
Agree - disagree 44 40 34 41 41 36 41 37 39Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-255
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 80 83 78 44 60 26 57 Strongly 60 70 53 20 28 11 35 Somewhat 20 14 25 24 32 15 23 Disagree 18 16 20 53 35 74 40 Somewhat 8 10 7 26 20 33 20 Strongly 10 6 13 27 15 41 21 Unsure 2 1 2 2 3 0 2 Refused 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 62 67 58 -9 25 -48 17Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 69 64 72 63 65 61 66 Strongly 47 43 51 29 33 24 36 Somewhat 22 22 22 34 32 37 30 Disagree 26 31 23 28 26 30 27 Somewhat 15 12 17 17 15 20 16 Strongly 12 19 6 11 11 10 11 Unsure 5 4 5 9 9 9 7
Agree - disagree 43 33 49 35 39 31 39Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-256
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 82 85 55 81 64 48 32 48 20 39 57 Strongly 61 70 27 57 31 22 14 22 8 17 35 Somewhat 21 16 29 24 32 26 18 26 12 22 23 Disagree 16 13 40 18 30 46 67 51 79 58 40 Somewhat 8 7 21 9 15 24 30 25 33 28 20 Strongly 8 5 19 9 15 21 37 26 46 30 21 Unsure 1 2 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 Refused 0 2 0 2 2 1 1
Agree - disagree 67 73 15 63 33 2 -34 -3 -59 -19 17Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 66 67 67 67 69 65 65 64 64 65 66 Strongly 46 48 30 45 34 27 32 37 28 30 36 Somewhat 20 19 38 22 35 38 33 28 36 35 30 Disagree 29 28 25 29 25 25 26 21 31 26 27 Somewhat 18 17 15 17 14 16 15 12 19 16 16 Strongly 11 11 11 12 11 9 11 9 12 10 11 Unsure 5 5 7 4 6 9 9 15 5 9 7
Agree - disagree 36 38 42 38 44 40 39 43 34 40 39Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-257
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 91 74 70 40 38 28 80 84 48 65 28 36 57 Strongly 64 58 34 20 15 13 56 65 10 49 11 16 35 Somewhat 27 16 36 21 23 15 23 20 39 16 17 20 23 Disagree 8 23 30 50 61 71 18 14 44 35 72 62 40 Somewhat 5 11 21 22 33 28 6 10 28 13 35 25 20 Strongly 3 12 10 28 29 43 12 4 16 22 37 37 21 Unsure 3 6 1 1 2 1 5 2 2 Refused 1 3 1 3 1
Agree - disagree 82 51 39 -10 -23 -43 61 70 4 29 -44 -25 17Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 74 58 72 63 53 74 64 67 66 70 63 67 66 Strongly 49 42 38 22 31 34 42 49 27 34 27 38 36 Somewhat 25 15 34 41 22 41 23 18 39 36 36 29 30 Disagree 24 35 21 30 37 18 31 28 26 24 28 24 27 Somewhat 7 29 11 18 19 12 23 15 15 14 16 14 16 Strongly 16 6 9 12 17 6 8 13 11 10 12 10 11 Unsure 3 7 8 7 10 8 5 5 8 6 9 9 7
Agree - disagree 50 22 51 33 16 56 33 38 40 46 35 43 39Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-258
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 47 71 54 71 59 51 59 70 57 Strongly 22 54 28 57 36 29 36 47 35 Somewhat 25 17 25 15 23 22 24 23 23 Disagree 49 28 43 29 39 47 38 28 40 Somewhat 26 11 21 7 22 24 19 8 20 Strongly 23 17 22 21 18 23 19 20 21 Unsure 3 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 Refused 1 0 1 1 2 1
Agree - disagree -2 43 10 43 19 3 22 43 17Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 65 70 69 67 60 63 67 72 66 Strongly 33 43 34 41 38 28 39 53 36 Somewhat 33 27 34 25 23 35 28 19 30 Disagree 26 25 24 24 33 31 23 26 27 Somewhat 18 14 14 12 25 17 15 15 16 Strongly 8 11 11 12 8 14 7 11 11 Unsure 9 5 7 10 7 7 10 2 7
Agree - disagree 39 44 44 43 27 32 45 46 39Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-259
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 78 31 35 92 88 30 41 75 65 54 57 Strongly 55 10 12 68 64 9 18 49 39 35 35 Somewhat 23 22 23 23 23 20 23 26 26 20 23 Disagree 21 67 62 8 12 69 58 24 33 44 40 Somewhat 13 27 29 4 7 30 20 15 16 18 20 Strongly 8 40 33 4 5 39 38 10 18 26 21 Unsure 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 Refused 0 1 0 1 0 1
Agree - disagree 57 -36 -27 84 76 -39 -18 51 32 11 17Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 68 65 62 71 68 65 69 69 66 67 66 Strongly 43 31 29 46 44 31 35 42 38 42 36 Somewhat 25 34 33 25 24 34 33 28 28 24 30 Disagree 26 29 29 27 27 27 26 25 26 29 27 Somewhat 14 18 18 15 16 16 11 17 15 17 16 Strongly 12 11 11 12 11 11 15 8 11 12 11 Unsure 5 7 9 3 6 8 6 5 8 5 7
Agree - disagree 42 36 33 44 41 38 43 44 40 38 39Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-260
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 60 62 60 51 59 53 51 65 57 Strongly 40 46 36 27 32 32 30 41 35 Somewhat 20 16 24 24 27 21 21 24 23 Disagree 39 38 39 46 37 45 44 35 40 Somewhat 17 13 20 19 25 21 21 11 20 Strongly 22 25 19 26 12 24 24 23 21 Unsure 1 1 4 1 2 5 2 Refused 3 1
Agree - disagree 22 23 20 5 22 8 6 31 17Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 64 59 68 72 63 69 70 65 66 Strongly 37 41 34 36 33 34 33 43 36 Somewhat 27 18 33 36 30 34 38 21 30 Disagree 30 34 27 18 32 23 19 31 27 Somewhat 16 16 15 12 21 14 12 15 16 Strongly 15 19 12 6 10 9 7 16 11 Unsure 6 7 6 10 5 8 11 4 7
Agree - disagree 34 24 41 54 31 45 51 34 39Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-261
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q26 Environmental extremistsexaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 89 41 33 82 49 56 64 57 Strongly 68 17 11 54 22 41 32 35 Somewhat 21 24 22 28 27 15 32 23 Disagree 10 52 67 17 50 36 36 40 Somewhat 6 28 26 12 26 24 18 20 Strongly 4 24 41 5 23 12 18 21 Unsure 5 1 0 6 2 Refused 1 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 79 -11 -34 65 -1 20 29 17Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 70 65 62 70 67 47 72 66 Strongly 40 32 32 42 34 23 49 36 Somewhat 30 33 30 28 33 23 23 30 Disagree 27 28 25 27 25 44 27 27 Somewhat 15 15 18 13 17 19 22 16 Strongly 12 13 7 13 9 25 5 11 Unsure 4 7 13 3 7 9 1 7
Agree - disagree 43 37 37 44 42 3 45 39Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-262
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 65 49 43 63 60 56 57 Strongly 41 28 15 42 31 36 35 Somewhat 24 21 27 21 29 20 23 Disagree 32 50 56 36 38 41 40 Somewhat 19 21 19 20 15 22 20 Strongly 13 29 37 15 23 20 21 Unsure 2 0 1 1 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 33 -1 -14 27 22 15 17Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 64 74 69 67 66 67 66 Strongly 36 41 42 36 41 34 36 Somewhat 28 33 27 31 25 32 30 Disagree 31 23 25 28 25 28 27 Somewhat 16 16 15 16 14 17 16 Strongly 14 7 9 12 12 10 11 Unsure 6 2 7 5 9 6 7
Agree - disagree 33 51 44 39 40 39 39Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-263
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 100 71 45 44 69 48 57 Strongly 60 44 24 28 47 24 35 Somewhat 40 27 21 17 23 23 23 Disagree 100 28 53 53 26 52 40 Somewhat 48 14 23 27 17 22 20 Strongly 52 14 30 26 9 30 21 Unsure 1 2 3 3 0 2 Refused 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 100 -100 43 -8 -8 43 -4 17Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 72 61 70 66 59 67 65 66 Strongly 45 26 44 36 21 41 32 36 Somewhat 27 35 26 30 38 26 33 30 Disagree 22 31 25 30 25 26 27 27 Somewhat 13 20 14 22 14 17 15 16 Strongly 9 12 11 8 12 9 12 11 Unsure 5 8 5 4 15 7 7 7
Agree - disagree 50 29 45 36 34 41 38 39Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-264
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 69 50 63 53 78 42 57 Strongly 50 25 39 30 55 19 35 Somewhat 19 25 23 23 23 23 23 Disagree 30 47 33 46 21 55 40 Somewhat 16 22 19 20 11 26 20 Strongly 14 25 15 26 9 29 21 Unsure 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 39 3 29 7 57 -13 17Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 70 64 60 71 69 63 66 Strongly 39 35 34 37 42 32 36 Somewhat 31 29 26 34 27 31 30 Disagree 26 28 32 24 25 28 27 Somewhat 16 15 20 14 16 16 16 Strongly 9 13 12 10 9 13 11 Unsure 5 8 8 5 5 9 7
Agree - disagree 44 36 28 46 44 35 39Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-265
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ26 Environmental extremists
exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 37 77 39 27 56 54 59 87 80 57 Strongly 13 56 14 6 29 27 27 73 59 35 Somewhat 24 21 25 21 27 27 32 14 20 23 Disagree 61 21 60 70 43 43 39 13 18 40 Somewhat 25 13 25 19 26 25 21 7 11 20 Strongly 36 8 35 51 17 18 19 6 7 21 Unsure 2 0 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 0 1
Agree - disagree -24 56 -21 -43 13 11 20 75 62 17Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 65 67 65 63 73 65 62 70 68 66 Strongly 35 40 32 33 33 30 36 51 43 36 Somewhat 31 27 33 30 40 35 26 19 24 30 Disagree 25 29 27 32 17 26 30 26 26 27 Somewhat 17 16 16 20 10 16 17 14 16 16 Strongly 9 13 11 12 7 10 13 11 10 11 Unsure 9 4 8 5 10 9 8 5 6 7
Agree - disagree 40 38 38 32 56 39 33 44 42 39Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-266
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q26 Environmental extremists exaggerate the dangers of oil & gas development
Agree 57 58 57 59 83 29 55 57 60 60 57 Strongly 35 34 35 37 67 9 30 35 40 39 35 Somewhat 22 23 23 22 16 20 25 22 21 21 23 Disagree 41 40 41 40 15 70 41 40 39 40 40 Somewhat 20 20 19 18 10 26 22 17 19 16 20 Strongly 22 20 22 22 5 45 19 23 20 24 21 Unsure 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 Refused 0 1 0 0 2 1
Agree - disagree 15 18 16 19 68 -41 14 17 22 20 17Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q27 Your own local governments probably don't have staff members today who are experts in technical topics like oil & gas development
Agree 66 66 65 66 66 67 68 62 70 68 66 Strongly 37 36 37 37 47 35 34 33 43 41 36 Somewhat 29 30 28 29 19 31 33 29 27 27 30 Disagree 27 28 29 28 31 28 26 29 25 27 27 Somewhat 17 16 17 17 18 17 16 16 16 14 16 Strongly 10 12 11 11 13 10 10 13 9 12 11 Unsure 7 6 6 6 4 6 6 9 5 6 7
Agree - disagree 39 38 37 38 35 39 42 33 46 41 39Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-267
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 61 45 47 49 40 43 58 50 Strongly 32 20 20 20 20 16 26 21 Somewhat 29 25 27 29 21 27 32 28 Disagree 22 27 25 21 35 41 15 26 Somewhat 13 20 19 18 22 35 10 19 Strongly 9 7 6 2 13 6 6 7 Unsure 14 27 27 30 23 16 27 23 Refused 3 1 1 0 2 1
Agree - disagree 39 18 22 28 6 2 43 23Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 95 95 95 95 95 95 99 96 Favorable 56 46 47 51 40 42 59 50 Very 23 14 15 14 13 12 23 16 Somewhat 32 32 33 36 27 30 37 34 Unsure, but familiar 3 10 12 14 6 9 3 8 Unfavorable 36 39 36 30 49 44 37 39 Somewhat 20 26 25 23 29 29 19 25 Very 16 13 11 7 20 14 17 14 Not familiar 3 4 4 5 3 5 1 3 Refused 2 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-268
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 45 48 57 53 44 52 49 55 50 Strongly 21 21 23 22 21 20 19 30 21 Somewhat 24 27 34 31 23 32 31 25 28 Disagree 27 24 21 16 34 24 27 22 26 Somewhat 21 19 13 10 24 19 16 18 19 Strongly 7 5 8 6 10 5 11 4 7 Unsure 26 26 22 31 22 23 24 23 23 Refused 1 2 2 1
Agree - disagree 18 24 37 37 10 28 22 33 23Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 95 94 99 98 98 94 96 98 96 Favorable 45 46 57 57 45 49 49 62 50 Very 14 15 18 23 13 15 13 27 16 Somewhat 31 31 38 34 32 34 37 36 34 Unsure, but familiar 11 13 5 4 4 10 7 8 8 Unfavorable 39 35 37 38 50 36 39 28 39 Somewhat 25 24 23 17 28 24 28 13 25 Very 14 11 14 21 22 12 11 14 14 Not familiar 4 5 1 2 2 4 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-269
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 56 44 39 49 61 50 63 35 51 50 Strongly 24 19 15 21 29 18 31 15 22 21 Somewhat 32 25 25 28 32 32 32 20 28 28 Disagree 24 28 34 24 22 27 21 33 24 26 Somewhat 17 21 31 15 14 21 14 28 16 19 Strongly 7 7 3 9 8 6 8 6 8 7 Unsure 19 27 25 27 16 23 16 29 25 23 Refused 1 2 0 2 0 1
Agree - disagree 32 15 6 25 39 23 42 2 26 23Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 96 95 97 97 97 97 94 97 96 Favorable 56 43 36 52 60 49 65 32 52 50 Very 19 13 5 16 25 10 28 5 19 16 Somewhat 38 31 31 36 35 39 37 27 33 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 9 12 8 5 9 4 13 6 8 Unfavorable 34 43 46 37 32 39 28 49 38 39 Somewhat 23 27 34 23 19 25 20 37 19 25 Very 11 16 13 15 13 14 8 13 19 14 Not familiar 3 3 5 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 Refused 1 1 0 2 0 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-270
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 40 52 43 45 53 53 50 Strongly 15 23 20 21 23 22 21 Somewhat 25 29 24 24 30 31 28 Disagree 34 25 30 30 28 25 26 Somewhat 22 19 25 26 20 18 19 Strongly 12 6 5 4 8 8 7 Unsure 25 23 26 24 18 21 23 Refused 1 1 0 0 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 6 27 13 15 25 28 23Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 96 97 97 97 96 96 96 Favorable 38 53 46 43 55 51 50 Very 9 17 11 11 20 18 16 Somewhat 29 35 35 33 35 34 34 Unsure, but familiar 8 8 11 12 5 7 8 Unfavorable 51 36 40 41 36 38 39 Somewhat 27 24 29 29 23 23 25 Very 24 11 11 11 13 15 14 Not familiar 4 3 2 2 4 4 3 Refused 0 1 2 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-271
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 55 52 56 46 44 49 50 Strongly 25 23 26 19 17 21 21 Somewhat 29 29 30 27 27 28 28 Disagree 24 34 18 28 27 30 26 Somewhat 17 27 12 21 21 21 19 Strongly 7 7 6 7 6 9 7 Unsure 21 14 25 25 28 21 23 Refused 0 0 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 31 18 38 18 17 19 23Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 96 93 98 96 95 99 96 Favorable 54 56 54 45 47 43 50 Very 18 13 21 13 13 13 16 Somewhat 37 42 33 32 34 30 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 5 9 10 8 8 Unfavorable 35 29 39 42 38 48 39 Somewhat 21 15 25 28 26 31 25 Very 14 14 13 14 12 16 14 Not familiar 4 6 2 3 4 1 3 Refused 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-272
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 40 52 54 53 49 50 55 50 Strongly 19 23 22 22 24 21 29 21 Somewhat 21 30 32 31 25 28 26 28 Disagree 29 26 27 21 31 26 25 26 Somewhat 27 19 19 17 20 22 14 19 Strongly 2 7 8 4 11 5 11 7 Unsure 27 22 19 25 20 23 20 23 Refused 4 1 1
Agree - disagree 11 27 27 32 17 23 30 23Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 95 96 97 93 99 97 96 96 Favorable 38 52 48 49 61 50 55 50 Very 2 18 21 13 23 14 21 16 Somewhat 35 34 28 36 38 36 34 34 Unsure, but familiar 14 6 9 3 8 11 3 8 Unfavorable 43 38 40 41 30 36 38 39 Somewhat 28 24 27 24 21 24 23 25 Very 15 14 13 17 9 12 15 14 Not familiar 5 3 3 5 1 3 4 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-273
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 45 53 51 47 44 58 54 45 50 Strongly 13 26 23 19 15 31 26 18 21 Somewhat 32 28 29 28 29 27 29 27 28 Disagree 31 24 20 22 30 29 24 29 26 Somewhat 24 17 12 15 25 21 18 22 19 Strongly 7 7 8 7 6 8 6 7 7 Unsure 24 22 24 31 25 12 21 26 23 Refused 1 4 0 2 1 0 1
Agree - disagree 14 29 31 25 14 29 31 17 23Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 92 98 99 94 97 97 97 96 96 Favorable 49 52 55 43 53 55 54 46 50 Very 12 19 19 15 9 22 21 10 16 Somewhat 37 34 36 28 43 33 33 35 34 Unsure, but familiar 3 10 10 7 6 8 9 8 8 Unfavorable 40 36 34 44 38 33 34 42 39 Somewhat 28 22 21 29 30 18 21 28 25 Very 12 14 13 15 9 15 13 14 14 Not familiar 7 2 1 4 3 3 2 4 3 Refused 2 2 1 0 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-274
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 59 57 61 44 53 35 50 Strongly 33 39 30 14 21 6 21 Somewhat 26 18 31 30 31 28 28 Disagree 24 25 23 29 25 33 26 Somewhat 18 22 16 21 19 24 19 Strongly 5 3 7 8 7 9 7 Unsure 17 18 16 26 20 32 23 Refused 1 2 0 1
Agree - disagree 36 32 38 15 27 2 23Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 98 96 96 94 99 96 Favorable 71 81 65 37 52 19 50 Very 28 41 19 8 14 1 16 Somewhat 43 40 46 29 38 19 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 6 9 9 9 8 Unfavorable 19 9 25 51 33 70 39 Somewhat 13 6 18 33 20 47 25 Very 5 3 7 18 13 24 14 Not familiar 3 2 4 3 6 1 3 Refused 0 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-275
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 59 62 46 57 49 45 43 53 33 44 50 Strongly 31 35 18 31 23 13 14 20 9 14 21 Somewhat 28 27 28 26 26 31 29 33 25 30 28 Disagree 23 24 24 23 22 25 32 33 33 29 26 Somewhat 18 19 20 18 18 21 20 22 19 20 19 Strongly 4 5 4 4 4 3 13 11 14 9 7 Unsure 18 14 28 20 26 28 24 13 33 26 23 Refused 2 2 2 0 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 36 38 22 34 26 20 11 20 1 15 23Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 99 98 95 99 95 95 95 90 99 95 96 Favorable 76 79 42 73 48 36 29 47 15 32 50 Very 28 32 11 27 16 7 6 12 1 7 16 Somewhat 48 47 31 46 33 28 23 35 13 25 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 7 14 7 13 16 3 3 3 9 8 Unfavorable 15 13 39 19 33 43 63 40 81 54 39 Somewhat 13 13 25 13 19 29 38 21 51 34 25 Very 3 14 6 14 14 25 19 30 20 14 Not familiar 1 2 4 1 5 5 5 10 1 5 3 Refused 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-276
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 67 51 52 40 48 40 48 67 44 50 37 49 50 Strongly 31 31 25 10 14 15 21 39 15 22 13 16 21 Somewhat 35 20 27 30 34 25 27 28 28 28 24 33 28 Disagree 18 27 25 24 31 33 31 17 26 22 34 31 26 Somewhat 11 25 20 20 21 19 27 12 24 16 21 18 19 Strongly 7 2 4 4 10 14 4 5 2 6 12 13 7 Unsure 15 22 23 33 21 26 21 16 27 29 29 19 23 Refused 3 1 3 1 1
Agree - disagree 48 24 27 16 17 7 17 50 17 28 4 18 23Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 98 99 96 94 96 94 100 98 91 100 97 93 96 Favorable 76 76 54 29 35 25 66 83 35 51 25 33 50 Very 29 27 17 5 8 6 15 37 6 17 2 10 16 Somewhat 47 49 38 24 27 20 51 45 29 34 23 23 34 Unsure, but familiar 4 11 14 13 2 4 11 5 20 6 1 5 8 Unfavorable 18 13 28 51 60 64 24 10 37 42 70 55 39 Somewhat 16 9 21 29 33 42 18 9 28 21 45 31 25 Very 2 4 6 23 27 23 5 1 9 21 25 24 14 Not familiar 2 1 4 4 4 6 2 7 3 6 3 Refused 3 0 2 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-277
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 45 55 44 62 55 48 51 52 50 Strongly 14 32 17 30 26 21 21 23 21 Somewhat 32 22 28 32 29 27 30 29 28 Disagree 28 26 29 15 27 25 26 33 26 Somewhat 21 19 22 10 17 17 21 24 19 Strongly 7 7 7 5 10 8 5 8 7 Unsure 26 19 25 23 18 26 23 15 23 Refused 1 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 18 28 15 47 28 23 25 20 23Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 94 99 96 96 96 97 94 100 96 Favorable 43 61 47 65 45 53 48 45 50 Very 9 26 13 23 15 16 14 17 16 Somewhat 34 35 35 42 29 37 34 28 34 Unsure, but familiar 8 6 7 5 10 6 11 6 8 Unfavorable 43 32 42 27 41 37 36 48 39 Somewhat 29 20 28 19 25 26 21 30 25 Very 14 12 14 8 17 11 15 19 14 Not familiar 5 1 3 4 4 3 5 3 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-278
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 67 30 42 65 67 36 45 57 59 49 50 Strongly 36 5 11 40 39 7 18 28 26 21 21 Somewhat 31 25 31 25 28 29 27 29 33 27 28 Disagree 16 41 30 21 17 38 37 23 19 34 26 Somewhat 12 30 22 17 12 27 26 18 14 23 19 Strongly 4 12 8 5 5 11 11 5 5 11 7 Unsure 17 29 26 14 15 26 18 19 20 17 23 Refused 1 0 1 0 1
Agree - disagree 51 -12 12 44 50 -1 8 34 40 15 23Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 100 100 98 99 97 98 99 98 98 100 96 Favorable 100 35 77 84 19 40 65 59 49 50 Very 31 8 29 32 2 11 21 18 14 16 Somewhat 69 26 48 52 17 28 44 40 35 34 Unsure, but familiar 8 7 5 2 3 5 6 4 8 Unfavorable 100 55 15 7 76 56 28 33 47 39 Somewhat 64 35 12 6 47 28 21 23 28 25 Very 36 21 3 2 29 28 7 10 20 14 Not familiar 2 0 3 2 1 1 1 3 Refused 1 0 0 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-279
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 62 71 56 37 40 52 45 58 50 Strongly 31 46 19 10 19 18 15 34 21 Somewhat 32 25 37 27 21 34 30 24 28 Disagree 19 22 18 35 29 25 32 24 26 Somewhat 12 14 10 29 22 18 25 16 19 Strongly 8 8 7 6 7 7 7 8 7 Unsure 18 7 26 28 28 24 23 18 23 Refused 0 0 3 0 1
Agree - disagree 43 49 39 2 10 27 14 34 23Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 100 95 95 96 97 91 98 96 Favorable 58 67 52 35 49 48 34 59 50 Very 23 34 15 7 13 16 10 22 16 Somewhat 35 33 37 28 37 32 24 37 34 Unsure, but familiar 4 2 6 13 10 5 21 3 8 Unfavorable 34 31 37 48 36 43 37 36 39 Somewhat 19 11 25 36 22 33 16 22 25 Very 15 20 12 11 14 11 20 15 14 Not familiar 3 5 3 4 2 9 2 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-280
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 61 40 41 66 42 42 49 50 Strongly 34 9 9 41 11 22 23 21 Somewhat 27 31 32 24 31 20 26 28 Disagree 19 32 33 20 32 22 32 26 Somewhat 15 24 24 14 24 13 29 19 Strongly 4 8 9 5 8 9 4 7 Unsure 20 26 26 14 25 36 18 23 Refused 2 1 1 1
Agree - disagree 43 8 8 46 10 20 17 23Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 93 99 94 95 90 98 96 Favorable 78 35 27 71 38 52 48 50 Very 31 6 3 29 9 12 14 16 Somewhat 47 30 25 42 28 40 35 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 9 7 5 8 9 13 8 Unfavorable 12 49 65 18 50 29 37 39 Somewhat 9 36 37 14 35 21 26 25 Very 2 13 28 4 14 8 11 14 Not familiar 3 7 1 2 4 10 2 3 Refused 4 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-281
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 59 42 36 55 50 49 50 Strongly 29 16 11 25 21 22 21 Somewhat 30 26 25 29 29 27 28 Disagree 19 38 49 20 34 24 26 Somewhat 15 28 32 16 22 19 19 Strongly 5 11 17 4 12 5 7 Unsure 21 20 15 25 16 26 23 Refused 1 1 0 1 1
Agree - disagree 40 4 -13 35 16 25 23Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 96 97 98 96 99 95 96 Favorable 60 40 29 58 50 50 50 Very 20 12 7 19 16 15 16 Somewhat 40 28 22 38 34 35 34 Unsure, but familiar 6 9 7 8 8 8 8 Unfavorable 30 48 62 31 42 37 39 Somewhat 24 27 33 22 20 26 25 Very 6 21 29 8 22 11 14 Not familiar 3 3 2 3 1 4 3 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-282
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 61 35 100 57 44 50 Strongly 31 10 43 30 15 21 Somewhat 31 25 57 27 29 28 Disagree 21 35 100 20 32 26 Somewhat 16 25 74 16 23 19 Strongly 5 10 26 4 9 7 Unsure 18 30 100 21 24 23 Refused 0 1 0 1
Agree - disagree 41 0 100 -100 36 12 23Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 97 96 96 96 93 98 96 Favorable 67 25 67 31 36 57 42 50 Very 22 7 23 8 9 21 11 16 Somewhat 45 19 44 23 27 37 31 34 Unsure, but familiar 8 7 7 5 12 11 5 8 Unfavorable 21 64 23 60 49 24 52 39 Somewhat 16 38 15 37 33 18 31 25 Very 5 26 8 23 16 6 20 14 Not familiar 3 3 3 4 4 7 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-283
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 55 47 55 46 63 40 50 Strongly 30 16 25 19 34 12 21 Somewhat 25 31 30 27 29 27 28 Disagree 24 31 19 32 16 35 26 Somewhat 19 22 16 23 13 25 19 Strongly 5 9 3 10 3 10 7 Unsure 21 21 24 21 21 24 23 Refused 1 2 1 1
Agree - disagree 31 16 36 14 48 4 23Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 95 97 97 96 96 96 96 Favorable 63 40 57 43 65 37 50 Very 21 11 21 12 23 10 16 Somewhat 42 29 36 31 42 27 34 Unsure, but familiar 4 9 12 4 11 7 8 Unfavorable 27 47 27 49 20 53 39 Somewhat 19 28 18 31 15 34 25 Very 9 19 9 18 5 19 14 Not familiar 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-284
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ28 Colorado already has
some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 37 62 38 34 46 44 46 74 65 50 Strongly 8 36 8 10 10 11 15 53 38 21 Somewhat 29 26 29 25 36 33 32 21 27 28 Disagree 38 17 35 43 31 27 21 11 17 26 Somewhat 28 13 25 32 22 21 13 8 13 19 Strongly 11 4 10 11 9 7 8 3 4 7 Unsure 25 19 27 22 23 28 33 14 18 23 Refused 1 0 1 1 1
Agree - disagree -2 45 2 -9 15 16 25 63 48 23Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 96 97 100 93 94 95 98 95 96 Favorable 27 71 32 21 39 42 51 85 71 50 Very 4 27 4 4 8 8 11 41 29 16 Somewhat 23 44 27 17 31 35 41 45 42 34 Unsure, but familiar 5 10 5 6 13 11 5 4 9 8 Unfavorable 66 15 60 73 40 41 39 9 15 39 Somewhat 41 10 39 42 25 30 29 2 9 25 Very 25 5 21 31 15 11 10 6 6 14 Not familiar 2 3 2 7 5 3 2 5 3 Refused 0 1 1 1 3 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-285
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q28 Colorado already has some of the toughest regulations in the nation on oil & gas development
Agree 50 52 53 53 68 46 45 48 60 56 50 Strongly 23 23 23 25 39 11 18 19 30 26 21 Somewhat 27 29 30 28 28 35 26 29 30 30 28 Disagree 26 25 25 25 18 34 30 25 24 23 26 Somewhat 18 18 19 18 14 22 27 16 15 15 19 Strongly 8 7 6 7 4 12 3 9 9 9 7 Unsure 24 22 22 22 14 19 23 27 16 21 23 Refused 1 2 1
Agree - disagree 24 27 28 28 49 12 14 23 36 33 23Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q29 Impression of oil & gas industry
Knows oil & gas industry 97 97 97 98 98 94 94 97 97 98 96 Favorable 51 50 50 53 80 28 42 49 62 56 50 Very 18 16 17 19 35 10 9 13 28 21 16 Somewhat 33 34 33 33 45 18 32 36 34 35 34 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 6 7 4 4 8 10 4 5 8 Unfavorable 39 39 41 38 13 62 44 38 31 38 39 Somewhat 26 26 27 26 12 37 28 25 21 23 25 Very 13 13 14 13 1 25 16 13 11 15 14 Not familiar 3 3 3 2 2 6 5 2 3 2 3 Refused 0 1 0 0 1 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-286
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 94 81 82 79 82 85 98 86
Favorable 39 32 31 33 32 35 53 39 Very 8 6 5 5 7 11 17 9 Somewhat 32 27 26 28 25 24 36 30 Unsure, but familiar 16 21 21 22 20 13 8 17 Unfavorable 38 27 29 24 30 37 37 30 Somewhat 30 20 22 18 22 23 20 20 Very 8 7 7 6 8 14 17 9 Not familiar 4 17 16 19 16 14 1 13 Refused 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 99 95 94 94 96 100 97 96 Favorable 57 58 56 53 64 54 54 56 Very 11 18 16 12 24 20 17 18 Somewhat 46 41 40 41 40 34 37 38 Unsure, but familiar 2 6 5 5 7 7 5 5 Unfavorable 39 31 33 36 25 40 38 35 Somewhat 19 17 20 22 12 16 17 18 Very 19 13 13 14 13 24 21 17 Not familiar 1 5 5 6 3 2 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-287
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 80 81 94 97 80 81 91 94 86
Favorable 32 30 49 56 30 33 54 43 39 Very 5 5 12 22 7 7 10 13 9 Somewhat 26 25 37 34 23 26 45 30 30 Unsure, but familiar 22 22 11 8 21 16 16 16 17 Unfavorable 26 29 33 33 30 32 21 35 30 Somewhat 20 22 21 20 18 25 14 19 20 Very 7 7 12 12 11 7 8 16 9 Not familiar 18 16 6 2 18 17 9 5 13 Refused 2 3 0 1 2 2 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 95 95 96 96 98 95 98 96 96 Favorable 59 56 51 57 59 58 58 37 56 Very 16 13 20 22 26 17 18 15 18 Somewhat 43 43 31 34 33 41 41 23 38 Unsure, but familiar 6 5 5 5 8 4 6 2 5 Unfavorable 31 34 41 35 31 33 33 56 35 Somewhat 16 19 23 16 16 18 20 22 18 Very 14 15 18 19 15 14 13 34 17 Not familiar 5 5 3 3 2 5 1 3 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-288
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 87 85 75 91 90 81 93 79 89 86
Favorable 40 38 24 44 48 32 49 32 43 39 Very 7 10 4 10 11 2 12 9 11 9 Somewhat 33 28 19 34 37 29 37 23 31 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 19 30 12 11 22 8 31 10 17 Unfavorable 31 28 21 35 32 28 36 17 37 30 Somewhat 21 19 17 24 19 22 20 12 25 20 Very 10 9 3 11 13 5 15 4 12 9 Not familiar 12 13 24 8 8 18 6 17 10 13 Refused 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 95 97 97 95 97 97 93 96 98 96 Favorable 46 65 67 54 47 56 36 75 57 56 Very 15 21 15 21 17 17 14 16 25 18 Somewhat 31 44 51 33 31 40 22 59 32 38 Unsure, but familiar 4 6 7 3 6 4 4 6 6 5 Unfavorable 45 27 23 38 43 36 54 15 35 35 Somewhat 25 12 15 20 19 24 27 7 16 18 Very 19 15 8 18 24 12 27 8 20 17 Not familiar 4 3 2 5 2 2 6 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-289
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 85 86 87 87 84 85 86
Favorable 38 39 36 35 40 40 39 Very 10 8 5 4 12 10 9 Somewhat 28 31 31 31 28 30 30 Unsure, but familiar 13 18 26 26 13 14 17 Unfavorable 35 29 26 26 32 31 30 Somewhat 26 19 19 20 19 20 20 Very 9 10 6 6 12 11 9 Not familiar 15 12 10 11 15 14 13 Refused 1 3 2 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 93 97 95 96 97 97 96 Favorable 56 56 55 57 56 56 56 Very 25 17 8 9 21 23 18 Somewhat 31 39 48 48 36 33 38 Unsure, but familiar 7 5 4 5 3 6 5 Unfavorable 31 37 35 33 38 36 35 Somewhat 17 19 19 19 18 18 18 Very 14 18 16 14 20 18 17 Not familiar 6 3 4 4 2 3 3 Refused 1 0 1 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-290
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 86 86 86 85 86 85 86
Favorable 37 37 36 40 40 41 39 Very 9 13 6 8 9 6 9 Somewhat 28 25 30 32 31 34 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 13 16 19 22 14 17 Unfavorable 35 35 34 26 24 30 30 Somewhat 25 24 25 17 16 19 20 Very 10 11 9 9 8 11 9 Not familiar 14 14 13 12 12 13 13 Refused 0 0 2 2 2 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 94 88 98 98 97 99 96 Favorable 48 35 56 62 61 62 56 Very 17 14 18 19 16 25 18 Somewhat 31 21 37 42 45 38 38 Unsure, but familiar 8 10 7 3 4 1 5 Unfavorable 39 43 36 33 32 35 35 Somewhat 18 21 17 18 17 20 18 Very 20 22 19 15 15 14 17 Not familiar 5 10 2 2 2 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-291
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 79 87 96 79 89 86 90 86
Favorable 25 41 46 33 48 35 47 39 Very 5 9 13 6 10 7 13 9 Somewhat 20 32 33 27 38 28 34 30 Unsure, but familiar 25 16 14 16 17 20 11 17 Unfavorable 28 30 36 30 24 32 32 30 Somewhat 22 21 20 24 16 23 19 20 Very 7 10 16 7 8 9 13 9 Not familiar 19 11 2 19 10 13 8 13 Refused 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 99 96 97 95 97 97 94 96 Favorable 48 57 59 60 52 55 52 56 Very 15 20 21 20 18 14 23 18 Somewhat 34 38 39 40 33 41 29 38 Unsure, but familiar 15 3 4 2 4 5 6 5 Unfavorable 35 35 33 33 41 38 37 35 Somewhat 27 17 14 20 16 21 17 18 Very 8 19 19 13 26 17 20 17 Not familiar 1 4 3 4 3 2 5 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-292
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 82 90 91 84 89 85 88 83 86
Favorable 34 43 44 35 44 38 42 36 39 Very 7 9 8 8 10 8 9 8 9 Somewhat 28 34 36 27 34 30 33 27 30 Unsure, but familiar 17 17 15 21 15 13 16 18 17 Unfavorable 31 30 32 27 30 34 30 30 30 Somewhat 22 19 18 19 22 22 19 22 20 Very 9 11 14 9 8 12 11 8 9 Not familiar 17 9 7 12 11 15 9 16 13 Refused 2 1 2 4 0 2 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups Knows environmental groups 99 96 94 97 97 95 97 96 96
Favorable 57 52 49 59 58 46 54 57 56 Very 19 20 17 23 15 16 16 19 18 Somewhat 39 33 32 36 43 30 38 38 38 Unsure, but familiar 11 3 3 9 3 3 4 6 5 Unfavorable 30 40 43 29 36 47 39 33 35 Somewhat 18 20 25 15 19 24 21 16 18 Very 12 20 18 14 17 22 18 16 17 Not familiar 1 4 3 2 3 5 2 4 3 Refused 1 3 1 1 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-293
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 90 90 91 84 84 85 86
Favorable 42 48 38 38 44 31 39 Very 13 17 9 6 9 3 9 Somewhat 29 30 29 31 35 28 30 Unsure, but familiar 12 14 11 20 15 25 17 Unfavorable 36 29 42 27 25 29 30 Somewhat 26 15 33 18 16 21 20 Very 11 13 9 9 9 8 9 Not familiar 10 10 9 14 15 14 13 Refused 0 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 94 98 91 98 97 99 96 Favorable 27 23 31 73 59 89 56 Very 11 9 12 23 13 35 18 Somewhat 17 14 19 50 46 54 38 Unsure, but familiar 5 1 7 5 6 3 5 Unfavorable 62 74 54 20 32 8 35 Somewhat 27 18 34 14 21 5 18 Very 35 56 20 7 11 2 17 Not familiar 5 2 8 2 2 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-294
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 92 93 82 90 81 83 83 85 81 83 86
Favorable 44 43 40 42 41 42 33 40 26 37 39 Very 12 13 6 10 6 7 9 16 3 8 9 Somewhat 32 30 34 32 35 36 24 25 23 29 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 13 19 14 15 23 17 12 20 20 17 Unfavorable 33 37 23 34 25 17 34 33 36 27 30 Somewhat 26 30 12 23 12 12 23 23 24 18 20 Very 7 7 10 10 13 5 11 10 12 8 9 Not familiar 7 6 17 9 19 17 15 13 16 16 13 Refused 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 97 96 98 97 97 98 94 91 98 96 96 Favorable 33 22 59 33 51 68 78 59 94 74 56 Very 6 6 17 7 14 19 32 21 41 27 18 Somewhat 27 15 41 25 37 49 46 38 54 47 38 Unsure, but familiar 4 3 9 6 10 8 2 4 1 5 5 Unfavorable 60 72 30 58 37 22 14 28 3 18 35 Somewhat 26 29 19 26 22 16 9 20 1 12 18 Very 34 43 11 32 14 7 5 8 2 6 17 Not familiar 3 4 1 2 2 2 6 9 2 4 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-295
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 92 92 84 79 83 84 87 95 76 89 79 87 86
Favorable 47 41 41 38 30 35 30 54 37 44 28 37 39 Very 9 14 6 5 5 11 6 15 4 8 6 10 9 Somewhat 38 27 35 33 24 24 24 38 33 36 21 27 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 15 19 20 11 22 26 8 30 5 22 12 17 Unfavorable 30 36 24 21 42 27 32 33 9 39 29 38 30 Somewhat 22 30 14 10 30 17 28 25 7 19 21 24 20 Very 8 6 10 11 13 9 4 9 3 20 8 14 9 Not familiar 6 8 16 18 16 14 13 3 21 11 18 12 13 Refused 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 96 97 96 100 94 95 96 97 99 97 94 95 96 Favorable 26 40 46 71 72 82 39 28 70 44 83 73 56 Very 5 6 10 25 34 30 3 8 15 20 30 34 18 Somewhat 21 33 36 47 38 52 37 20 55 24 53 39 38 Unsure, but familiar 5 3 4 14 3 2 7 3 8 10 4 5 Unfavorable 65 54 46 14 18 11 50 66 21 43 11 17 35 Somewhat 28 24 31 8 16 5 24 26 17 23 7 11 18 Very 38 31 15 7 3 7 26 40 4 19 4 6 17 Not familiar 3 3 3 6 5 4 2 3 6 5 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-296
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners
82 91 82 94 91 85 82 95 86
Favorable 41 39 36 39 45 67 20 7 39 Very 9 8 8 11 8 18 1 1 9 Somewhat 32 30 28 28 37 49 19 5 30 Unsure, but familiar 22 8 18 12 17 13 27 5 17 Unfavorable 18 44 27 43 29 6 34 83 30 Somewhat 14 29 19 26 20 5 27 45 20 Very 4 15 8 17 10 0 7 38 9 Not familiar 17 7 16 4 9 14 15 4 13 Refused 1 2 2 2 0 3 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 95 97 97 94 96 97 94 98 96 Favorable 70 32 60 35 58 66 51 38 56 Very 19 13 18 15 20 23 13 16 18 Somewhat 50 20 42 19 38 43 39 22 38 Unsure, but familiar 5 5 5 5 7 2 9 5 5 Unfavorable 21 60 32 55 31 29 34 56 35 Somewhat 17 22 18 28 16 17 18 23 18 Very 4 38 14 27 15 12 16 33 17 Not familiar 5 1 3 4 4 3 5 2 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-297
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 91 83 86 90 91 83 87 92 90 93 86
Favorable 50 31 40 39 48 33 46 41 52 34 39 Very 12 5 8 8 13 6 11 8 12 7 9 Somewhat 37 26 32 30 35 27 35 33 40 27 30 Unsure, but familiar 10 19 21 9 11 19 13 12 14 14 17 Unfavorable 31 33 24 42 31 32 28 39 25 45 30 Somewhat 21 22 18 28 23 21 26 24 18 30 20 Very 9 11 6 14 8 11 1 16 6 15 9 Not familiar 8 16 12 10 9 15 13 7 8 6 13 Refused 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 97 99 100 100 95 99 99 97 97 99 96 Favorable 39 80 100 29 81 84 40 56 57 56 Very 8 35 32 6 34 37 6 18 22 18 Somewhat 31 45 68 23 48 47 34 37 35 38 Unsure, but familiar 3 5 2 4 2 3 3 3 5 Unfavorable 55 14 100 64 13 13 54 38 39 35 Somewhat 27 8 52 30 9 5 28 19 17 18 Very 28 6 48 33 4 8 27 19 22 17 Not familiar 2 1 5 1 1 2 3 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-298
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 91 88 93 79 84 90 79 84 86
Favorable 45 40 50 33 35 48 28 35 39 Very 10 10 11 4 11 13 4 2 9 Somewhat 35 30 39 28 23 36 23 33 30 Unsure, but familiar 16 15 17 20 17 15 25 16 17 Unfavorable 29 33 26 27 33 27 26 33 30 Somewhat 21 22 21 18 20 18 17 24 20 Very 8 11 6 9 13 8 9 9 9 Not familiar 8 10 7 18 15 7 21 15 13 Refused 1 1 0 3 1 2 2 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 96 99 93 96 98 97 94 95 96 Favorable 54 52 56 57 61 59 62 46 56 Very 18 17 19 18 19 15 24 19 18 Somewhat 36 35 37 39 41 44 38 27 38 Unsure, but familiar 3 1 4 8 5 4 11 3 5 Unfavorable 38 46 32 31 32 35 21 45 35 Somewhat 17 17 18 18 18 16 12 22 18 Very 21 30 15 14 14 18 9 23 17 Not familiar 4 7 3 2 3 6 3 3 Refused 0 1 1 2 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-299
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 89 87 75 94 85 80 83 86
Favorable 48 39 30 38 37 46 21 39 Very 12 8 6 3 7 14 8 9 Somewhat 36 31 24 34 30 32 13 30 Unsure, but familiar 14 21 21 6 18 14 27 17 Unfavorable 27 27 24 50 31 21 36 30 Somewhat 21 15 18 33 23 15 27 20 Very 6 12 6 17 8 6 9 9 Not familiar 9 13 24 1 13 20 16 13 Refused 1 2 5 2 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 93 97 97 98 95 97 98 96 Favorable 27 74 79 27 68 63 53 56 Very 7 20 34 7 24 18 12 18 Somewhat 20 54 46 21 44 45 40 38 Unsure, but familiar 4 7 5 2 4 11 5 5 Unfavorable 63 16 12 69 23 23 40 35 Somewhat 25 12 12 34 15 10 23 18 Very 38 4 0 35 8 13 17 17 Not familiar 7 3 3 5 3 2 3 Refused 1 2 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-300
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners87 84 86 87 89 85 86
Favorable 46 31 33 41 40 38 39 Very 11 7 8 9 9 8 9 Somewhat 35 24 25 32 31 30 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 18 17 17 18 17 17 Unfavorable 26 35 36 28 30 29 30 Somewhat 21 22 27 19 21 20 20 Very 5 14 9 9 9 9 9 Not familiar 12 15 14 12 11 13 13 Refused 2 1 2 0 2 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 95 97 99 95 99 95 96 Favorable 52 59 67 52 56 56 56 Very 17 19 27 15 19 18 18 Somewhat 35 40 40 37 37 38 38 Unsure, but familiar 3 7 7 4 4 6 5 Unfavorable 40 32 25 40 39 34 35 Somewhat 22 16 14 20 23 17 18 Very 18 16 11 19 17 17 17 Not familiar 4 2 1 4 0 4 3 Refused 0 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-301
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 90 81 90 81 83 85 87 86
Favorable 40 38 47 26 38 41 34 39 Very 9 8 9 9 7 7 10 9 Somewhat 31 30 38 17 30 34 24 30 Unsure, but familiar 15 20 13 18 23 17 17 17 Unfavorable 34 24 30 36 22 26 35 30 Somewhat 23 17 21 25 14 17 25 20 Very 11 7 9 11 8 9 10 9 Not familiar 9 17 9 18 15 14 12 13 Refused 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 95 98 96 98 95 94 98 96 Favorable 34 87 48 64 63 42 67 56 Very 7 34 15 22 21 7 27 18 Somewhat 27 52 33 42 42 35 40 38 Unsure, but familiar 4 5 2 6 11 5 4 5 Unfavorable 56 7 46 28 21 47 27 35 Somewhat 29 4 24 12 14 26 13 18 Very 28 3 22 16 7 21 14 17 Not familiar 4 2 4 2 4 5 2 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-302
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 83 87 91 82 89 83 86
Favorable 38 38 46 33 43 36 39 Very 9 9 12 7 7 11 9 Somewhat 29 29 34 26 37 25 30 Unsure, but familiar 12 20 21 14 15 18 17 Unfavorable 33 29 24 36 31 28 30 Somewhat 22 20 15 26 23 18 20 Very 11 9 9 10 8 10 9 Not familiar 14 13 8 16 11 15 13 Refused 3 0 1 2 1 2 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 97 96 97 97 96 97 96 Favorable 36 68 51 61 35 71 56 Very 15 22 14 22 11 24 18 Somewhat 21 46 37 39 25 47 38 Unsure, but familiar 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 Unfavorable 57 23 42 31 55 22 35 Somewhat 28 13 20 18 27 13 18 Very 28 11 22 13 29 9 17 Not familiar 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-303
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ30 Impression of County
Commissioners Knows County
Commissioners 83 89 83 90 81 82 85 92 89 86
Favorable 33 45 37 30 38 39 43 44 42 39 Very 7 11 7 3 15 10 8 8 10 9 Somewhat 26 33 30 27 23 29 35 35 32 30 Unsure, but familiar 22 11 18 18 21 19 15 12 14 17 Unfavorable 28 33 29 42 22 23 27 36 32 30 Somewhat 21 21 20 32 16 16 14 23 22 20 Very 7 12 9 10 6 8 13 13 10 9 Not familiar 16 9 15 9 19 16 11 7 10 13 Refused 0 2 2 2 1 2 4 1 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 98 94 98 100 93 96 95 95 95 96 Favorable 79 34 76 84 63 62 65 23 33 56 Very 28 10 27 42 26 18 11 2 10 18 Somewhat 50 24 49 43 37 44 54 21 23 38 Unsure, but familiar 6 4 5 3 7 6 2 3 4 5 Unfavorable 13 57 17 12 23 27 29 70 57 35 Somewhat 8 27 11 9 13 17 16 29 28 18 Very 5 29 6 3 10 11 13 41 29 17 Not familiar 2 5 2 7 4 4 4 5 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-304
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q30 Impression of County Commissioners
Knows County Commissioners 87 88 86 88 94 88 76 92 89 90 86
Favorable 42 41 40 42 53 39 25 43 51 45 39 Very 9 9 8 9 15 10 6 8 13 11 9 Somewhat 33 32 31 33 38 30 19 36 37 33 30 Unsure, but familiar 14 15 16 13 10 17 24 16 9 13 17 Unfavorable 31 31 31 33 32 32 26 33 29 32 30 Somewhat 20 21 21 21 23 22 20 21 19 21 20 Very 11 10 10 12 8 10 6 11 10 12 9 Not familiar 11 11 13 10 4 11 21 8 9 9 13 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 2 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q31 Impression of environmental groups
Knows environmental groups 97 97 96 97 97 94 95 98 96 98 96 Favorable 55 55 56 54 26 77 59 59 46 54 56 Very 19 18 20 19 5 33 16 20 18 21 18 Somewhat 36 37 36 35 20 44 44 39 28 33 38 Unsure, but familiar 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 8 3 5 Unfavorable 37 37 36 40 68 13 30 35 42 40 35 Somewhat 19 20 18 20 27 8 16 21 18 18 18 Very 18 17 18 20 41 5 15 14 24 22 17 Not familiar 2 3 3 2 2 6 4 2 3 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-305
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 95 95 94 95 96 98 96 96 Favorable 52 40 41 48 31 34 52 44 Very 30 16 16 16 15 14 20 18 Somewhat 22 24 25 32 16 20 31 25 Unsure, but familiar 6 11 11 13 10 11 8 10 Unfavorable 38 44 41 34 54 54 36 43 Somewhat 15 22 21 19 27 25 10 20 Very 23 21 21 16 28 28 27 23 Not familiar 3 4 5 5 3 2 3 3 Refused 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 94 95 95 96 94 92 98 96 Favorable 55 56 55 57 54 49 60 57 Very 9 9 9 8 9 10 18 11 Somewhat 47 47 46 49 45 39 42 45 Unsure, but familiar 9 12 10 13 12 12 5 11 Unfavorable 30 27 30 26 28 31 32 28 Somewhat 23 18 19 16 21 22 21 19 Very 7 9 10 11 7 10 12 9 Not familiar 3 4 4 4 4 6 1 3 Refused 2 1 1 2 2 1 1
Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-306
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 94 97 97 98 94 98 96 96 Favorable 41 43 49 48 37 43 44 52 44 Very 16 16 24 22 15 18 21 21 18 Somewhat 26 27 25 25 22 25 24 31 25 Unsure, but familiar 12 12 6 10 10 9 8 10 10 Unfavorable 42 39 41 39 51 42 46 35 43 Somewhat 21 19 16 10 25 20 21 14 20 Very 21 20 25 29 26 22 25 20 23 Not familiar 3 4 3 2 1 5 2 3 3 Refused 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 95 95 99 97 98 93 98 98 96 Favorable 55 54 61 60 57 50 69 51 57 Very 8 8 16 22 11 9 12 14 11 Somewhat 47 46 45 38 46 41 57 38 45 Unsure, but familiar 13 11 8 4 16 13 9 4 11 Unfavorable 27 29 29 32 25 30 20 43 28 Somewhat 18 18 19 20 19 21 13 24 19 Very 9 11 10 12 7 9 6 19 9 Not familiar 4 4 1 2 2 6 2 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-307
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 96 95 96 97 95 98 95 97 96 Favorable 54 34 32 46 52 48 60 22 44 44 Very 24 13 11 18 26 16 34 7 17 18 Somewhat 29 22 21 28 26 32 27 15 27 25 Unsure, but familiar 7 12 16 8 5 8 7 21 4 10 Unfavorable 35 50 46 42 41 39 31 52 49 43 Somewhat 18 22 27 17 17 22 14 27 18 20 Very 17 28 19 25 24 17 16 25 31 23 Not familiar 3 3 5 2 2 4 2 3 3 3 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 96 96 94 96 96 96 96 93 98 96 Favorable 63 50 61 54 55 66 60 50 51 57 Very 13 10 10 12 12 12 14 8 11 11 Somewhat 50 41 51 42 44 54 46 42 40 45 Unsure, but familiar 7 15 13 11 9 7 6 20 12 11 Unfavorable 26 30 20 31 32 23 30 23 35 28 Somewhat 17 20 13 21 22 19 16 14 26 19 Very 9 9 7 10 10 4 14 9 10 9 Not familiar 4 3 6 3 2 4 3 5 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-308
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 100 96 96 96 99 96 96 Favorable 40 45 42 41 50 44 44 Very 20 18 15 16 22 20 18 Somewhat 20 27 27 25 28 24 25 Unsure, but familiar 12 9 16 15 4 7 10 Unfavorable 48 42 38 39 44 46 43 Somewhat 18 21 21 22 20 20 20 Very 30 21 17 17 24 26 23 Not familiar 4 2 2 1 4 3 Refused 0 2 2 0 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 96 96 95 95 96 96 96 Favorable 57 57 58 60 57 56 57 Very 16 10 7 6 13 12 11 Somewhat 41 47 51 54 44 43 45 Unsure, but familiar 9 12 11 10 10 11 11 Unfavorable 31 27 27 25 29 29 28 Somewhat 25 17 19 16 19 19 19 Very 6 10 8 8 10 10 9 Not familiar 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1
Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-309
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 97 97 97 96 93 100 96 Favorable 50 54 47 38 38 38 44 Very 23 20 25 14 14 15 18 Somewhat 27 34 23 24 24 23 25 Unsure, but familiar 9 11 8 10 13 6 10 Unfavorable 38 32 42 47 42 55 43 Somewhat 17 14 19 23 22 24 20 Very 21 18 22 25 21 32 23
Not familiar 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 Refused 1 2 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 97 95 98 95 94 96 96 Favorable 53 55 52 59 60 58 57 Very 13 19 9 10 12 7 11 Somewhat 40 36 43 49 48 51 45 Unsure, but familiar 10 7 12 11 13 9 11 Unfavorable 34 33 34 24 21 29 28 Somewhat 23 26 21 16 12 22 19 Very 11 7 13 8 9 7 9 Not familiar 3 5 2 4 4 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 2 0 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-310
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 96 95 95 99 95 97 96 Favorable 36 44 38 39 57 46 44 44 Very 17 19 17 11 32 18 23 18 Somewhat 19 25 21 27 26 27 21 25 Unsure, but familiar 20 8 12 5 7 11 6 10 Unfavorable 40 45 45 51 35 39 47 43 Somewhat 11 23 22 25 19 19 20 20 Very 29 22 23 26 16 19 27 23 Not familiar 4 3 4 4 1 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 92 97 97 95 98 95 96 96 Favorable 52 57 57 53 63 56 55 57 Very 10 11 11 8 15 9 13 11 Somewhat 42 46 46 45 49 47 42 45 Unsure, but familiar 13 10 11 9 12 11 8 11 Unfavorable 27 29 29 33 23 28 33 28 Somewhat 17 20 17 27 13 19 25 19 Very 10 9 12 6 10 9 9 9 Not familiar 8 2 2 3 1 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 2 0 1 2 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-311
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 95 96 97 94 100 95 96 96 96 Favorable 40 46 48 34 42 55 50 37 44 Very 11 22 22 16 11 27 23 14 18 Somewhat 29 24 26 19 30 28 28 23 25 Unsure, but familiar 8 9 10 9 11 4 9 11 10 Unfavorable 46 41 39 51 47 36 37 48 43 Somewhat 19 18 21 26 24 15 18 22 20 Very 27 23 18 25 24 21 19 26 23 Not familiar 4 3 2 4 0 5 2 4 3 Refused 2 1 1 2 2 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 94 97 97 93 98 95 96 95 96 Favorable 54 56 52 50 62 56 58 55 57 Very 8 12 10 10 12 10 11 12 11 Somewhat 45 44 42 40 50 46 47 43 45 Unsure, but familiar 13 10 10 16 8 9 10 12 11 Unfavorable 27 30 35 27 28 31 28 28 28 Somewhat 19 20 22 18 20 22 20 18 19 Very 8 10 13 9 8 9 8 10 9 Not familiar 4 3 2 4 2 4 3 4 3 Refused 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-312
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 98 96 99 96 93 99 96 Favorable 72 83 64 27 41 11 44 Very 35 45 28 8 15 1 18 Somewhat 36 38 35 19 26 10 25 Unsure, but familiar 6 4 7 11 13 9 10 Unfavorable 21 9 29 58 39 79 43 Somewhat 11 2 17 26 21 32 20 Very 10 7 12 31 17 47 23 Not familiar 2 4 1 4 6 1 3 Refused 1 1 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 97 97 97 96 95 97 96 Favorable 53 61 47 60 67 54 57 Very 13 19 8 11 11 11 11 Somewhat 40 42 39 50 56 43 45 Unsure, but familiar 9 8 9 12 8 16 11 Unfavorable 36 28 41 24 21 27 28 Somewhat 25 13 34 16 14 18 19 Very 10 15 7 8 7 9 9 Not familiar 3 2 3 4 4 3 3 Refused 0 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-313
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 97 98 96 98 96 96 95 91 99 96 96 Favorable 72 78 36 70 46 26 21 35 9 23 44 Very 34 39 13 32 18 8 7 15 8 18 Somewhat 38 38 23 38 28 18 14 20 9 16 25 Unsure, but familiar 9 7 13 7 13 18 6 10 4 11 10 Unfavorable 17 13 46 20 37 52 68 46 86 61 43 Somewhat 11 9 24 11 19 29 26 22 29 27 20 Very 6 4 22 9 18 23 42 24 57 34 23 Not familiar 2 2 3 2 4 4 4 8 1 4 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 98 98 94 97 95 94 96 95 98 95 96 Favorable 55 55 57 55 60 60 57 64 52 58 57 Very 10 11 10 10 11 10 14 16 14 12 11 Somewhat 46 44 47 45 49 50 43 48 38 46 45 Unsure, but familiar 11 10 13 10 10 17 9 3 13 12 11 Unfavorable 31 33 23 33 26 17 30 27 33 25 28 Somewhat 22 25 14 21 14 12 21 23 21 17 19 Very 9 8 10 11 12 6 9 5 12 7 9 Not familiar 2 2 5 2 5 6 4 5 1 5 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-314
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 98 97 98 94 92 98 100 96 93 99 92 98 96 Favorable 74 69 55 16 26 17 62 78 28 46 19 23 44 Very 40 27 22 4 8 7 26 39 7 20 4 11 18 Somewhat 35 42 33 13 18 11 37 39 21 26 15 12 25 Unsure, but familiar 6 12 9 18 8 6 19 2 20 5 4 9 10 Unfavorable 17 16 34 59 59 75 19 15 45 48 70 66 43 Somewhat 11 10 20 29 24 27 13 9 30 17 27 24 20 Very 6 5 14 30 34 48 6 5 15 31 43 42 23 Not familiar 1 3 2 4 6 2 4 5 1 7 2 3 Refused 1 3 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 95 100 97 90 95 97 98 97 89 100 98 94 96 Favorable 63 48 64 50 62 53 53 57 60 53 62 53 57 Very 13 6 12 8 14 14 3 14 10 9 16 12 11 Somewhat 50 42 52 42 48 39 50 43 50 44 46 41 45 Unsure, but familiar 9 13 8 19 2 14 13 10 16 10 9 8 11 Unfavorable 23 39 25 21 31 30 31 30 13 37 27 33 28 Somewhat 16 27 13 14 24 19 23 20 8 21 20 23 19 Very 7 12 12 7 7 10 8 10 5 16 7 10 9 Not familiar 3 3 7 5 3 2 1 9 2 5 3 Refused 2 3 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-315
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 95 97 95 96 98 96 95 99 96 Favorable 33 60 38 57 47 43 44 44 44 Very 9 31 14 30 18 19 17 19 18 Somewhat 24 28 24 27 29 25 27 24 25 Unsure, but familiar 10 7 11 4 9 9 10 9 10 Unfavorable 52 31 46 35 42 44 40 47 43 Somewhat 25 12 22 20 17 23 18 18 20 Very 26 19 24 16 25 21 22 29 23 Not familiar 4 2 4 2 2 3 4 1 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 2 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 94 98 95 97 96 99 90 99 96 Favorable 65 45 58 50 53 92 39 4 57 Very 14 9 11 15 11 22 2 1 11 Somewhat 51 37 47 35 43 69 37 2 45 Unsure, but familiar 11 9 10 10 13 3 22 8 11 Unfavorable 18 44 27 37 29 4 30 87 28 Somewhat 14 28 18 26 19 4 24 46 19 Very 5 16 9 11 10 0 6 41 9 Not familiar 5 1 4 2 4 1 7 1 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-316
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 97 98 97 98 100 100 97 98 97 98 96 Favorable 74 8 23 79 100 25 61 51 42 44 Very 34 1 6 39 42 11 27 24 13 18 Somewhat 40 7 17 40 58 13 34 26 29 25 Unsure, but familiar 6 5 11 3 8 6 7 8 10 Unfavorable 17 85 63 16 100 64 32 39 48 43 Somewhat 12 33 28 10 47 30 16 18 22 20 Very 5 52 35 6 53 35 15 22 26 23 Not familiar 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 99 96 97 99 98 96 96 98 98 98 96 Favorable 64 50 62 55 63 51 60 54 68 43 57 Very 14 9 11 11 15 9 12 11 15 10 11 Somewhat 50 41 50 43 48 42 48 43 53 33 45 Unsure, but familiar 8 11 11 7 8 12 8 10 8 12 11 Unfavorable 26 35 24 36 26 34 29 34 22 43 28 Somewhat 16 26 18 21 16 26 22 21 16 28 19 Very 10 9 6 15 10 8 6 13 5 16 9 Not familiar 1 4 2 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 3 Refused 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-317
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 99 99 99 93 93 98 92 99 96 Favorable 54 66 44 32 38 40 36 57 44 Very 25 39 15 10 14 16 10 29 18 Somewhat 28 27 29 23 24 24 27 28 25 Unsure, but familiar 7 2 11 14 8 9 19 5 10 Unfavorable 38 31 44 47 48 48 37 37 43 Somewhat 15 8 21 24 25 27 8 14 20 Very 23 23 23 23 23 21 29 22 23 Not familiar 0 1 5 6 1 8 1 3 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 97 98 96 93 97 96 93 96 96 Favorable 58 58 59 55 56 60 58 52 57 Very 11 9 11 8 18 11 9 9 11 Somewhat 48 49 47 47 38 49 50 43 45 Unsure, but familiar 10 10 9 14 11 9 16 11 11 Unfavorable 29 30 28 24 29 27 18 33 28 Somewhat 20 18 21 17 19 19 12 22 19 Very 9 12 7 8 11 8 6 11 9 Not familiar 2 1 3 5 3 2 7 3 3 Refused 1 1 0 2 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-318
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 96 97 94 96 89 97 96 Favorable 73 29 17 61 29 39 49 44 Very 38 6 5 27 7 16 14 18 Somewhat 35 23 12 34 22 23 35 25 Unsure, but familiar 9 12 8 11 10 15 12 10 Unfavorable 14 55 71 22 57 35 36 43 Somewhat 10 28 30 12 26 22 21 20 Very 4 27 41 10 31 13 15 23 Not familiar 3 4 3 1 2 11 3 3 Refused 1 5 2 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 97 96 95 94 96 90 99 96 Favorable 61 56 58 51 58 64 51 57 Very 15 8 12 4 11 7 18 11 Somewhat 46 48 45 47 47 57 33 45 Unsure, but familiar 13 11 12 3 9 9 19 11 Unfavorable 23 29 25 40 29 17 29 28 Somewhat 17 22 18 19 22 13 19 19 Very 6 7 7 21 7 4 11 9 Not familiar 2 4 5 1 3 10 1 3 Refused 1 5 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-319
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 97 99 96 95 97 96 Favorable 55 32 24 52 41 45 44 Very 22 16 9 21 19 18 18 Somewhat 33 16 15 30 21 27 25 Unsure, but familiar 5 14 9 10 8 10 10 Unfavorable 36 51 66 35 46 41 43 Somewhat 21 19 22 20 20 20 20 Very 15 32 44 15 27 21 23 Not familiar 3 2 1 3 5 2 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 97 96 97 96 98 95 96 Favorable 63 50 54 58 59 55 57 Very 11 13 11 11 12 10 11 Somewhat 51 37 43 46 47 45 45 Unsure, but familiar 10 12 10 12 8 12 11 Unfavorable 24 34 32 26 30 28 28 Somewhat 19 21 26 16 23 17 19 Very 6 13 7 10 7 10 9 Not familiar 2 4 3 3 2 4 3 Refused 2 1 0 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-320
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 98 96 96 99 93 97 95 96 Favorable 67 13 59 29 29 59 32 44 Very 29 4 29 8 6 25 12 18 Somewhat 38 9 30 20 23 34 19 25 Unsure, but familiar 9 10 6 9 16 9 6 10 Unfavorable 22 73 31 62 48 29 57 43 Somewhat 13 29 16 26 22 16 25 20 Very 9 44 15 35 25 13 32 23 Not familiar 1 4 2 1 7 2 4 3 Refused 1 0 2 0 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 96 97 96 94 97 95 97 96 Favorable 55 58 58 55 54 59 54 57 Very 12 11 12 11 11 13 11 11 Somewhat 43 48 47 44 43 47 43 45 Unsure, but familiar 11 12 8 12 16 9 13 11 Unfavorable 30 27 30 27 26 27 30 28 Somewhat 19 19 19 20 18 18 20 19 Very 10 8 10 7 9 9 10 9 Not familiar 3 3 2 6 3 4 3 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-321
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 93 98 96 96 97 95 96 Favorable 58 34 52 37 65 27 44 Very 25 13 21 17 29 11 18 Somewhat 33 20 31 20 36 16 25 Unsure, but familiar 3 11 10 8 9 8 10 Unfavorable 32 54 35 51 23 61 43 Somewhat 15 24 15 25 10 30 20 Very 16 29 19 26 13 30 23 Not familiar 5 2 4 3 3 3 3 Refused 2 1 0 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 95 96 94 97 96 96 96 Favorable 56 56 62 53 61 54 57 Very 13 10 12 10 13 9 11 Somewhat 44 46 50 43 48 45 45 Unsure, but familiar 12 11 10 11 8 12 11 Unfavorable 26 30 22 33 26 30 28 Somewhat 15 22 16 21 16 23 19 Very 11 8 6 12 11 7 9 Not familiar 3 3 5 1 4 3 3 Refused 2 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-322
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 97 96 96 97 98 95 96 98 97 96 Favorable 19 67 21 10 35 36 42 84 71 44 Very 6 31 3 3 9 9 12 49 37 18 Somewhat 13 36 18 7 26 27 30 35 35 25 Unsure, but familiar 9 8 10 10 19 12 5 3 7 10 Unfavorable 70 21 66 77 44 47 49 11 19 43 Somewhat 28 13 28 26 21 26 26 4 11 20 Very 41 8 37 51 23 21 23 7 9 23 Not familiar 3 2 3 2 2 4 2 1 2 3 Refused 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 96 96 95 99 98 94 94 98 96 96 Favorable 55 61 58 54 52 58 62 55 55 57 Very 9 14 9 9 15 11 11 13 14 11 Somewhat 45 47 49 46 38 47 51 42 41 45 Unsure, but familiar 12 7 10 6 19 15 10 7 9 11 Unfavorable 30 29 27 38 27 22 22 36 31 28 Somewhat 22 18 18 31 16 14 14 22 21 19 Very 8 11 8 8 10 8 7 13 11 9 Not familiar 4 2 4 1 2 5 4 1 3 3 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-323
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q32 Impression of fracking Knows fracking 96 96 98 98 96 98 94 98 96 98 96 Favorable 46 45 45 49 78 18 36 46 50 49 44 Very 20 19 19 21 39 7 14 19 23 22 18 Somewhat 26 26 26 28 39 11 23 27 27 27 25 Unsure, but familiar 6 9 8 6 4 7 11 11 6 5 10 Unfavorable 44 43 45 43 14 73 47 42 40 45 43 Somewhat 18 20 21 19 9 27 25 16 20 19 20 Very 25 23 24 24 5 46 22 26 20 25 23 Not familiar 4 3 2 2 3 1 4 2 3 2 3 Refused 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q33 Impression of county government
Knows county government 96 97 97 97 97 97 93 96 98 97 96 Favorable 58 58 56 58 61 51 54 57 60 57 57 Very 11 12 12 12 12 10 11 8 17 11 11 Somewhat 47 47 45 46 48 41 43 49 43 46 45 Unsure, but familiar 9 10 10 9 8 12 13 11 8 8 11 Unfavorable 29 29 30 30 29 34 27 28 30 32 28 Somewhat 19 20 20 20 21 23 19 18 21 22 19 Very 10 9 10 10 8 11 7 11 9 10 9 Not familiar 3 2 3 2 2 3 5 3 1 2 3 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-324
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 93 94 93 93 95 98 97 96 Favorable 52 63 62 63 63 52 62 62 Very 7 13 13 13 13 15 9 12 Somewhat 45 50 49 50 50 36 53 49 Unsure, but familiar 9 8 8 12 4 5 7 8 Unfavorable 32 23 22 18 28 42 27 26 Somewhat 21 16 15 13 20 29 14 17 Very 11 7 7 5 8 13 13 9 Not familiar 3 5 6 7 2 2 3 Refused 3 1 1 3 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 97 97 98 97 98 98 98 Favorable 62 67 64 63 71 41 56 60 Very 10 12 10 10 14 8 10 10 Somewhat 52 55 54 53 57 34 46 50 Unsure, but familiar 5 10 11 15 4 6 7 9 Unfavorable 31 21 22 19 22 51 35 29 Somewhat 22 15 15 10 20 31 19 19 Very 9 6 7 9 2 20 16 10 Not familiar 2 3 3 2 3 1 1 2 Refused 2 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-325
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 93 92 99 96 99 94 98 95 96 Favorable 61 59 64 72 67 58 65 56 62 Very 12 12 12 12 15 12 9 16 12 Somewhat 49 47 53 60 52 46 56 40 49 Unsure, but familiar 9 10 7 7 6 9 8 8 8 Unfavorable 23 23 27 16 26 26 24 31 26 Somewhat 16 16 16 7 19 18 18 15 17 Very 7 7 11 9 7 9 6 16 9 Not familiar 5 7 1 3 1 5 1 4 3 Refused 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 97 97 99 98 99 98 97 99 98 Favorable 66 62 58 58 63 61 63 45 60 Very 11 9 9 9 12 9 12 9 10 Somewhat 54 53 48 49 51 52 51 35 50 Unsure, but familiar 11 12 6 9 7 9 7 12 9 Unfavorable 21 22 35 31 29 28 26 42 29 Somewhat 13 13 23 19 19 18 16 28 19 Very 8 9 12 12 10 10 10 14 10 Not familiar 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 Refused 0 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-326
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 96 96 97 96 95 97 94 94 97 96 Favorable 66 57 67 60 59 68 65 64 52 62 Very 14 10 8 14 15 11 18 8 12 12 Somewhat 52 47 59 46 44 57 47 56 40 49 Unsure, but familiar 5 10 10 8 5 7 4 13 8 8 Unfavorable 24 28 20 27 31 23 26 17 37 26 Somewhat 15 19 16 16 20 14 15 13 25 17 Very 9 9 4 11 11 8 10 4 12 9 Not familiar 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1
Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 99 96 98 98 99 98 98 Favorable 61 60 67 59 55 65 57 66 55 60 Very 13 8 5 12 12 10 17 5 10 10 Somewhat 48 52 62 47 43 56 40 61 45 50 Unsure, but familiar 7 10 11 8 7 7 7 14 7 9 Unfavorable 29 29 19 32 35 25 34 19 37 29 Somewhat 19 19 17 18 22 17 21 16 21 19 Very 11 10 2 14 13 9 13 2 16 10 Not familiar 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-327
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 97 96 96 95 96 96 96 Favorable 65 61 65 66 58 60 62 Very 13 12 8 8 14 14 12 Somewhat 53 49 57 58 44 45 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 8 8 6 8 8 8 Unfavorable 25 27 23 23 30 28 26 Somewhat 16 18 15 15 22 19 17 Very 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 Not familiar 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 Refused 1 1 2 2 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 99 99 97 98 98 Favorable 69 58 57 58 62 62 60 Very 15 9 7 6 11 12 10 Somewhat 54 49 50 52 51 50 50 Unsure, but familiar 4 10 11 10 5 8 9 Unfavorable 24 30 32 32 30 28 29 Somewhat 16 20 25 27 16 16 19 Very 8 11 6 5 13 12 10 Not familiar 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-328
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 97 95 97 95 94 98 96 Favorable 57 59 56 65 67 63 62 Very 10 10 10 14 14 15 12 Somewhat 47 49 46 51 53 48 49 Unsure, but familiar 10 6 12 7 8 5 8 Unfavorable 30 30 29 24 20 30 26 Somewhat 18 18 18 17 13 24 17 Very 12 13 11 7 7 7 9 Not familiar 3 5 2 3 4 1 3 Refused 0 0 2 2 0 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 98 99 97 98 Favorable 58 60 57 62 67 52 60 Very 10 11 10 10 13 6 10 Somewhat 48 49 48 52 55 46 50 Unsure, but familiar 8 10 7 9 10 7 9 Unfavorable 32 29 33 27 21 37 29 Somewhat 18 15 20 19 14 28 19 Very 13 13 13 8 7 9 10 Not familiar 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 Refused 0 0 1 1 0 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-329
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 95 97 96 96 97 97 95 96 Favorable 61 61 58 59 69 62 57 62 Very 3 15 16 9 22 12 15 12 Somewhat 58 47 42 50 46 50 42 49 Unsure, but familiar 11 7 9 6 7 7 9 8 Unfavorable 22 28 30 31 22 28 30 26 Somewhat 15 19 19 24 11 19 20 17 Very 7 9 11 7 10 9 10 9 Not familiar 5 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 Refused 1 1 2 0 1 2 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 99 98 99 98 97 99 96 98 Favorable 61 60 54 64 60 61 57 60 Very 7 11 13 6 16 9 13 10 Somewhat 54 49 41 58 43 52 44 50 Unsure, but familiar 17 7 13 2 8 9 5 9 Unfavorable 21 31 32 31 30 28 34 29 Somewhat 14 20 19 22 19 19 20 19 Very 7 11 13 9 11 9 14 10 Not familiar 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 0 2 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-330
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 94 96 96 94 96 98 96 96 96 Favorable 58 61 58 59 67 60 63 61 62 Very 14 12 13 15 12 10 14 10 12 Somewhat 44 49 45 43 55 50 48 50 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 9 4 12 3 8 9 7 8 Unfavorable 30 27 34 23 27 30 24 28 26 Somewhat 20 17 18 17 17 20 17 18 17 Very 9 9 15 6 10 10 7 11 9 Not familiar 4 3 3 4 4 2 3 3 3 Refused 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 97 98 99 96 99 100 99 97 98 Favorable 56 59 60 54 61 63 62 58 60 Very 9 11 9 9 11 10 12 9 10 Somewhat 48 48 51 45 50 53 51 49 50 Unsure, but familiar 7 10 6 14 6 8 8 9 9 Unfavorable 34 29 33 28 32 29 29 30 29 Somewhat 21 19 20 22 23 13 21 18 19 Very 13 10 14 6 9 16 8 12 10 Not familiar 3 1 3 1 1 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-331
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 95 94 96 97 96 98 96 Favorable 55 58 53 66 65 68 62 Very 13 18 9 12 13 11 12 Somewhat 42 40 44 54 52 57 49 Unsure, but familiar 8 7 8 8 6 10 8 Unfavorable 32 30 34 23 25 20 26 Somewhat 20 16 23 16 18 14 17 Very 12 13 11 6 7 6 9 Not familiar 4 5 3 2 3 1 3 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 98 99 97 98 Favorable 48 34 58 67 67 68 60 Very 10 13 9 11 15 6 10 Somewhat 38 21 49 57 52 62 50 Unsure, but familiar 8 11 6 9 6 11 9 Unfavorable 42 52 34 22 25 19 29 Somewhat 23 28 21 17 18 15 19 Very 18 25 13 5 7 3 10 Not familiar 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 1 0 1 0 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-332
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 97 97 95 96 94 97 96 96 97 97 96 Favorable 59 57 60 57 59 65 66 64 69 66 62 Very 13 12 13 12 12 14 11 11 11 12 12 Somewhat 46 45 47 45 46 51 55 53 59 54 49 Unsure, but familiar 10 8 9 9 6 10 5 3 7 7 8 Unfavorable 28 31 26 30 29 22 25 30 21 24 26 Somewhat 20 22 15 19 15 16 16 23 12 16 17 Very 8 9 10 10 14 7 9 7 9 8 9 Not familiar 2 3 3 3 5 3 4 4 2 3 3 Refused 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 99 99 97 98 100 97 99 96 98 98 Favorable 53 47 58 51 55 64 70 74 68 67 60 Very 11 10 9 10 10 10 11 17 6 10 10 Somewhat 42 37 49 41 45 54 59 56 62 57 50 Unsure, but familiar 9 9 11 9 8 12 6 4 8 9 9 Unfavorable 36 43 29 38 35 24 21 22 20 22 29 Somewhat 23 27 17 22 19 17 16 16 16 16 19 Very 13 15 12 15 16 7 5 6 4 6 10 Not familiar 1 0 1 2 2 3 1 4 2 2 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-333
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 96 97 96 94 96 96 98 96 93 97 97 95 96 Favorable 67 51 66 53 66 67 60 59 66 52 72 61 62 Very 15 11 14 12 14 9 5 18 13 13 10 12 12 Somewhat 52 40 53 41 52 58 55 40 53 39 63 49 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 13 6 12 3 6 14 7 11 7 4 5 8 Unfavorable 23 33 24 28 26 24 24 31 16 37 20 29 26 Somewhat 15 25 12 20 19 14 16 23 12 20 14 18 17 Very 8 8 12 8 7 10 8 8 5 17 6 11 9 Not familiar 2 3 3 4 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Refused 2 1 3 1 1 4 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 97 100 99 99 98 97 99 98 99 98 97 97 98 Favorable 61 46 54 64 71 69 57 50 64 51 75 66 60 Very 15 6 10 8 14 8 7 14 7 11 8 13 10 Somewhat 45 39 44 56 57 61 50 37 57 40 67 53 50 Unsure, but familiar 6 12 10 12 5 7 11 8 15 5 4 8 9 Unfavorable 30 43 35 23 22 20 31 40 19 42 18 24 29 Somewhat 19 28 21 12 15 16 22 24 15 20 14 18 19 Very 11 15 14 11 7 4 9 15 4 22 4 6 10 Not familiar 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 Refused 2 1 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-334
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 95 96 96 95 96 99 92 98 96 Favorable 71 51 65 52 57 96 47 4 62 Very 15 8 13 13 11 23 4 1 12 Somewhat 57 43 52 39 47 72 43 3 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 7 7 10 8 1 17 5 8 Unfavorable 18 38 24 33 30 2 27 90 26 Somewhat 12 24 17 23 19 1 23 46 17 Very 5 15 8 10 11 1 4 44 9 Not familiar 4 2 3 3 3 1 6 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 3 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 98 98 99 96 98 98 Favorable 75 39 66 48 55 88 47 18 60 Very 13 6 11 12 10 17 7 2 10 Somewhat 63 32 55 37 45 71 40 16 50 Unsure, but familiar 8 6 8 6 12 2 17 7 9 Unfavorable 14 53 24 44 31 10 32 73 29 Somewhat 13 29 19 19 20 8 26 33 19 Very 1 24 5 25 11 2 7 40 10 Not familiar 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 Refused 0 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-335
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 98 99 98 98 96 98 98 97 96 98 96 Favorable 67 58 68 57 63 62 66 59 75 45 62 Very 16 10 14 9 14 13 16 9 19 7 12 Somewhat 51 49 54 48 49 49 50 50 56 38 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 9 5 8 7 7 5 4 11 8 Unfavorable 24 32 21 36 25 30 25 34 17 43 26 Somewhat 16 21 15 22 17 20 19 23 13 24 17 Very 8 11 6 14 8 10 6 12 4 18 9 Not familiar 2 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 3 1 3 Refused 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 99 97 98 99 99 97 97 100 99 99 98 Favorable 62 62 73 45 57 65 74 55 72 52 60 Very 13 6 11 8 14 7 11 9 15 7 10 Somewhat 49 56 62 37 43 58 63 45 58 45 50 Unsure, but familiar 6 6 8 6 7 7 3 4 5 7 9 Unfavorable 31 29 17 48 35 25 20 40 21 40 29 Somewhat 19 21 15 27 21 18 16 25 15 22 19 Very 12 9 3 21 14 7 4 16 6 18 10 Not familiar 1 2 2 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-336
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 96 97 96 93 98 97 89 96 96 Favorable 63 61 64 55 68 65 49 59 62 Very 14 13 15 10 12 17 8 8 12 Somewhat 48 47 49 45 56 48 41 51 49 Unsure, but familiar 8 8 8 8 8 7 12 8 8 Unfavorable 26 29 24 30 22 25 28 30 26 Somewhat 19 20 19 20 10 18 20 21 17 Very 7 9 5 10 13 7 8 9 9 Not familiar 2 1 3 5 2 1 11 2 3 Refused 1 2 0 2 1 2 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 97 98 98 99 97 99 98 98 Favorable 60 54 64 58 64 61 55 58 60 Very 11 13 10 7 12 13 9 5 10 Somewhat 49 42 54 50 52 48 46 53 50 Unsure, but familiar 5 5 5 12 11 5 15 7 9 Unfavorable 33 38 30 28 23 31 28 33 29 Somewhat 23 24 22 17 13 23 17 21 19 Very 10 14 7 10 10 8 12 12 10 Not familiar 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 Refused 1 1 0 0 0 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-337
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 95 97 97 90 97 91 97 96 Favorable 63 67 63 42 67 71 58 62 Very 15 13 13 4 14 20 7 12 Somewhat 48 55 51 39 52 50 51 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 6 11 6 5 2 4 8 Unfavorable 26 23 23 41 25 18 35 26 Somewhat 16 17 17 26 15 13 31 17 Very 9 6 6 16 10 5 4 9 Not familiar 4 3 2 5 2 9 3 3 Refused 1 1 5 2 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 99 99 96 97 96 100 100 98 Favorable 49 68 71 45 70 60 57 60 Very 10 10 11 8 12 12 6 10 Somewhat 39 58 60 36 58 48 51 50 Unsure, but familiar 10 7 9 2 5 13 11 9 Unfavorable 40 25 17 51 22 27 32 29 Somewhat 27 18 14 24 14 24 23 19 Very 13 7 2 27 8 3 9 10 Not familiar 1 1 4 1 4 2 Refused 1 2 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-338
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 95 98 97 96 97 96 96 Favorable 67 58 66 61 64 61 62 Very 17 9 8 14 15 11 12 Somewhat 50 49 58 47 49 50 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 7 4 9 5 9 8 Unfavorable 22 33 27 26 27 26 26 Somewhat 17 19 16 18 20 16 17 Very 6 13 10 8 7 10 9 Not familiar 4 1 2 3 2 3 3 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Favorable 69 52 66 60 64 58 60 Very 11 9 10 10 10 10 10 Somewhat 58 43 55 49 54 48 50 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 9 7 8 9 9 Unfavorable 22 39 24 31 26 31 29 Somewhat 16 25 16 20 19 19 19 Very 6 14 7 11 6 12 10 Not familiar 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 Refused 1 1 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-339
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 95 99 96 97 95 94 98 96 Favorable 57 70 60 60 67 61 63 62 Very 11 14 13 7 17 9 14 12 Somewhat 46 55 47 53 50 52 49 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 11 9 3 11 6 8 8 Unfavorable 32 18 27 35 16 26 27 26 Somewhat 21 13 17 23 12 19 17 17 Very 11 6 10 12 5 8 10 9 Not familiar 4 1 3 1 5 5 1 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 97 99 98 99 98 Favorable 55 69 61 59 60 58 63 60 Very 11 9 10 9 13 9 11 10 Somewhat 44 59 51 50 46 49 52 50 Unsure, but familiar 7 9 7 7 15 11 6 9 Unfavorable 36 20 31 31 24 28 29 29 Somewhat 22 15 20 20 15 19 19 19 Very 14 5 10 10 9 10 10 10 Not familiar 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 Refused 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-340
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 93 98 95 98 94 98 96 Favorable 60 64 63 62 59 65 62 Very 11 13 14 11 11 14 12 Somewhat 49 50 49 51 48 52 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 7 9 6 7 7 8 Unfavorable 26 27 23 30 28 26 26 Somewhat 18 18 15 20 18 18 17 Very 9 9 8 9 10 8 9 Not familiar 5 2 4 1 6 1 3 Refused 2 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 98 99 98 98 98 Favorable 53 65 58 63 53 66 60 Very 9 11 13 7 9 11 10 Somewhat 44 54 45 56 43 55 50 Unsure, but familiar 11 7 10 7 10 7 9 Unfavorable 34 26 31 28 35 26 29 Somewhat 24 17 20 18 22 18 19 Very 10 10 11 10 13 7 10 Not familiar 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-341
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ34 Impression of city
government Knows city government 98 95 97 100 95 95 96 96 94 96 Favorable 64 60 65 65 61 65 68 52 57 62 Very 11 14 12 13 18 12 14 12 13 12 Somewhat 53 47 53 51 43 53 54 40 44 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 7 8 7 9 9 7 8 8 8 Unfavorable 28 27 25 29 25 21 20 36 28 26 Somewhat 17 19 16 18 12 13 14 26 19 17 Very 10 8 9 11 13 8 6 11 10 9 Not familiar 2 3 2 5 4 2 3 5 3 Refused 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 98 98 97 99 98 98 98 99 99 98 Favorable 66 56 66 65 63 65 67 47 53 60 Very 9 12 10 9 11 10 13 11 11 10 Somewhat 56 44 56 56 51 55 54 36 41 50 Unsure, but familiar 6 8 8 8 11 10 8 6 9 9 Unfavorable 26 34 23 26 25 23 23 46 37 29 Somewhat 20 20 17 17 17 16 13 27 22 19 Very 6 14 6 9 7 7 9 18 14 10 Not familiar 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 Refused 0 1 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-342
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q34 Impression of city government
Knows city government 96 97 97 97 97 97 95 97 95 97 96 Favorable 59 62 60 58 60 66 65 62 57 61 62 Very 11 12 13 11 18 13 11 11 17 16 12 Somewhat 47 49 47 47 42 53 55 51 40 45 49 Unsure, but familiar 8 8 8 8 9 3 9 9 5 7 8 Unfavorable 29 27 29 31 29 28 20 27 34 30 26 Somewhat 20 18 19 22 19 17 12 18 23 20 17 Very 9 9 10 9 10 10 8 9 10 9 9 Not familiar 3 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q35 Impression of state government
Knows state government 97 98 98 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Favorable 57 60 58 55 47 71 66 55 61 56 60 Very 11 11 10 10 14 8 6 12 13 11 10 Somewhat 46 49 48 45 34 63 60 43 47 45 50 Unsure, but familiar 9 8 8 8 6 5 10 10 5 7 9 Unfavorable 32 30 32 34 45 22 22 33 32 36 29 Somewhat 20 19 21 21 29 16 15 22 19 23 19 Very 12 11 11 12 17 6 7 11 13 13 10 Not familiar 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-343
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 97 90 89 87 94 88 95 91 Favorable 26 24 24 18 31 21 16 23 Very 8 4 3 1 7 6 4 4 Somewhat 18 21 21 18 24 16 12 18 Unsure, but familiar 15 23 23 22 25 20 20 21 Unfavorable 55 43 43 46 39 47 59 48 Somewhat 29 24 22 26 22 17 32 26 Very 26 18 20 20 16 30 27 21 Not familiar 3 9 9 11 6 10 4 7 Refused 1 1 2 3 1 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 94 87 86 84 89 85 90 88
Favorable 54 44 44 42 47 38 46 45 Very 6 9 9 9 8 11 5 8 Somewhat 48 35 35 32 39 27 41 37 Unsure, but familiar 7 11 12 13 9 11 7 10 Unfavorable 33 32 30 30 34 36 36 33 Somewhat 24 21 19 19 24 24 24 22 Very 9 11 11 11 10 13 12 12 Not familiar 6 13 14 15 11 15 9 11 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-344
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 91 90 94 95 91 87 96 97 91 Favorable 23 23 22 18 22 25 22 19 23 Very 3 3 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 Somewhat 20 20 17 14 17 21 18 15 18 Unsure, but familiar 24 23 16 19 25 21 16 20 21 Unfavorable 44 44 56 57 44 41 57 57 48 Somewhat 25 22 32 30 21 23 38 26 26 Very 19 22 23 27 23 18 19 31 21 Not familiar 8 8 5 4 8 11 4 2 7 Refused 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
87 86 90 90 92 85 89 90 88
Favorable 44 44 49 49 42 43 52 53 45 Very 9 9 8 6 7 9 8 9 8 Somewhat 35 35 41 42 35 34 43 43 37 Unsure, but familiar 10 11 9 7 9 10 12 3 10 Unfavorable 33 31 32 34 42 32 25 34 33 Somewhat 22 20 19 23 29 23 15 15 22 Very 11 11 13 11 12 9 10 19 12 Not familiar 12 13 9 9 7 14 11 9 11 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-345
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 88 94 89 92 92 89 87 91 97 91 Favorable 19 26 25 24 19 22 15 27 26 23 Very 4 5 3 6 4 5 2 9 4 Somewhat 15 21 23 18 14 17 13 27 17 18 Unsure, but familiar 17 24 26 16 22 17 17 28 22 21 Unfavorable 52 44 38 52 51 49 55 36 50 48 Somewhat 27 25 22 27 29 27 27 24 26 26 Very 25 18 16 25 23 22 28 11 24 21 Not familiar 9 5 11 7 5 9 10 9 3 7 Refused 3 0 1 3 2 4 0 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 87 89 81 91 93 83 92 85 92 88
Favorable 50 41 40 44 52 49 51 35 45 45 Very 10 7 3 8 13 6 14 6 8 8 Somewhat 40 34 37 36 38 43 37 30 37 37 Unsure, but familiar 8 12 11 9 10 7 9 16 9 10 Unfavorable 30 36 30 37 31 28 32 34 38 33 Somewhat 21 22 23 23 18 22 19 26 19 22 Very 9 14 7 14 14 6 13 8 18 12 Not familiar 12 11 19 9 6 16 7 15 8 11 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-346
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 93 91 95 94 89 90 91 Favorable 26 22 25 26 22 22 23 Very 7 4 2 3 5 5 4 Somewhat 19 18 23 24 17 17 18 Unsure, but familiar 27 20 21 19 17 21 21 Unfavorable 40 49 49 49 51 47 48 Somewhat 21 28 29 30 26 25 26 Very 19 22 20 19 25 22 21 Not familiar 5 8 4 4 9 9 7 Refused 2 1 1 1 2 2 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
90 88 88 86 87 88 88
Favorable 43 45 45 46 48 46 45 Very 11 7 6 7 10 9 8 Somewhat 32 38 39 40 38 36 37 Unsure, but familiar 11 10 14 15 6 8 10 Unfavorable 36 33 30 25 32 34 33 Somewhat 27 20 20 18 21 21 22 Very 9 12 9 7 12 13 12 Not familiar 10 12 12 13 13 11 11 Refused 1 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-347
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 94 91 96 90 88 93 91 Favorable 28 23 30 19 16 24 23 Very 6 5 7 3 2 7 4 Somewhat 22 19 24 16 15 18 18 Unsure, but familiar 20 23 18 22 24 19 21 Unfavorable 46 44 48 48 48 49 48 Somewhat 23 27 20 29 27 31 26 Very 23 17 27 20 21 18 21 Not familiar 6 9 4 8 8 7 7 Refused 0 1 2 4 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
87 85 89 89 88 91 88
Favorable 42 41 42 47 43 54 45 Very 7 11 5 9 7 11 8 Somewhat 34 30 37 39 36 43 37 Unsure, but familiar 8 11 6 11 15 5 10 Unfavorable 37 33 40 30 30 31 33 Somewhat 23 23 23 21 19 23 22 Very 15 10 17 10 11 8 12 Not familiar 13 15 11 10 11 9 11 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-348
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 93 91 92 89 94 91 92 91 Favorable 18 24 28 23 23 23 20 23 Very 2 5 6 5 4 4 7 4 Somewhat 15 19 22 18 18 19 13 18 Unsure, but familiar 29 19 19 19 21 19 23 21 Unfavorable 46 48 46 47 50 49 49 48 Somewhat 25 26 22 29 26 27 25 26 Very 21 22 24 18 24 23 24 21 Not familiar 6 7 6 10 3 8 6 7 Refused 1 2 2 1 3 1 2 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
84 89 94 83 92 87 91 88
Favorable 47 45 43 38 56 46 49 45 Very 5 9 9 7 14 8 15 8 Somewhat 42 36 35 32 43 38 34 37 Unsure, but familiar 7 11 15 9 8 11 9 10 Unfavorable 30 34 36 36 28 31 34 33 Somewhat 25 20 18 25 16 22 19 22 Very 5 13 18 10 12 9 15 12 Not familiar 16 10 5 16 7 12 8 11 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-349
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 90 92 88 90 92 92 91 91 91 Favorable 18 21 21 21 20 24 19 25 23 Very 2 5 3 6 3 4 4 5 4 Somewhat 16 16 17 15 17 20 16 20 18 Unsure, but familiar 23 21 19 26 20 15 19 23 21 Unfavorable 49 49 49 43 52 53 53 43 48 Somewhat 26 27 26 23 30 30 31 22 26 Very 23 22 22 20 22 23 22 21 21 Not familiar 10 6 4 7 6 8 7 8 7 Refused 0 3 8 2 2 0 2 1 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 90 89 94 89 89 86 87 89 88
Favorable 49 48 59 39 50 51 46 45 45 Very 10 8 9 10 7 7 5 11 8 Somewhat 38 40 50 29 43 43 41 34 37 Unsure, but familiar 10 10 8 18 4 6 8 11 10 Unfavorable 32 31 27 32 34 29 33 33 33 Somewhat 20 20 14 22 23 18 23 20 22 Very 12 11 13 10 11 12 10 13 12 Not familiar 10 11 5 10 11 13 12 11 11 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-350
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 91 92 91 91 91 92 91 Favorable 20 16 23 24 22 26 23 Very 4 4 4 5 7 2 4 Somewhat 16 12 19 19 16 24 18 Unsure, but familiar 12 12 12 26 22 31 21 Unfavorable 59 64 55 41 47 35 48 Somewhat 27 26 28 26 29 24 26 Very 32 38 28 15 18 12 21 Not familiar 6 6 6 8 8 8 7 Refused 3 2 3 1 2 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
92 88 95 87 84 90 88
Favorable 49 42 53 44 48 39 45 Very 12 13 11 6 6 5 8 Somewhat 37 29 42 38 42 34 37 Unsure, but familiar 6 6 7 12 8 16 10 Unfavorable 37 39 35 31 28 35 33 Somewhat 22 21 23 22 18 26 22 Very 15 19 12 10 10 9 12 Not familiar 8 12 5 13 15 10 11 Refused 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-351
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 92 92 90 93 92 88 92 88 95 90 91 Favorable 17 16 21 18 20 21 31 35 28 27 23 Very 2 2 5 3 7 4 6 10 3 6 4 Somewhat 15 14 16 15 13 17 25 25 25 21 18 Unsure, but familiar 15 12 24 15 22 27 24 19 28 25 21 Unfavorable 60 64 45 60 51 40 37 34 39 38 48 Somewhat 30 33 22 27 23 25 26 26 25 26 26 Very 30 31 23 32 27 14 11 8 14 12 21 Not familiar 5 5 9 5 7 11 7 10 5 9 7 Refused 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
92 95 84 91 83 82 88 84 92 86 88
Favorable 53 54 43 50 42 43 40 43 37 41 45 Very 11 12 7 10 6 5 6 8 5 6 8 Somewhat 42 42 35 40 36 37 33 35 32 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 10 6 12 9 10 14 8 4 11 10 10 Unfavorable 30 35 29 31 31 26 41 37 44 34 33 Somewhat 20 24 13 18 13 14 32 28 35 24 22 Very 10 11 16 13 18 12 9 8 9 10 12 Not familiar 7 5 16 8 17 18 11 15 8 14 11 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-352
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 87 97 90 90 86 96 94 91 85 96 91 92 91 Favorable 15 19 10 32 35 28 21 14 19 23 34 28 23 Very 3 1 1 8 7 6 1 3 1 9 5 8 4 Somewhat 11 18 8 24 28 22 19 12 18 13 29 21 18 Unsure, but familiar 13 17 24 24 13 32 16 15 31 16 19 28 21 Unfavorable 60 61 56 34 38 36 58 62 35 57 38 35 48 Somewhat 30 31 26 18 25 27 31 30 20 25 29 23 26 Very 30 31 30 16 14 9 27 32 16 32 9 12 21 Not familiar 8 3 8 10 12 4 4 6 13 3 8 7 7 Refused 5 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 91 93 83 85 88 89 89 95 77 93 88 88 88
Favorable 60 45 44 42 44 36 50 54 44 42 34 45 45 Very 14 7 8 7 6 7 7 13 7 8 3 10 8 Somewhat 46 37 35 35 38 30 43 41 37 33 31 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 5 14 13 10 4 11 14 7 10 15 10 7 10 Unfavorable 26 34 26 33 40 41 25 33 24 36 45 37 33 Somewhat 20 21 13 13 31 32 23 18 12 14 39 25 22 Very 6 14 13 20 9 9 3 15 12 22 6 12 12 Not familiar 7 7 17 15 11 11 11 4 23 7 11 12 11 Refused 2 1 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-353
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 90 94 91 90 93 88 93 97 91 Favorable 25 19 26 19 19 27 20 19 23 Very 5 4 4 5 7 5 3 5 4 Somewhat 20 15 22 14 13 22 17 13 18 Unsure, but familiar 24 14 19 16 29 20 24 17 21 Unfavorable 41 61 47 55 44 41 49 61 48 Somewhat 27 26 28 25 23 24 32 19 26 Very 14 35 19 30 21 18 17 42 21 Not familiar 9 4 7 7 7 9 7 3 7 Refused 1 2 1 3 0 3 0 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
85 93 86 95 89 89 85 94 88
Favorable 47 42 46 50 43 59 39 22 45 Very 11 7 7 15 6 12 6 5 8 Somewhat 36 36 39 34 37 48 33 17 37 Unsure, but familiar 11 8 9 9 11 7 15 6 10 Unfavorable 27 43 31 36 36 23 31 65 33 Somewhat 21 21 23 16 25 18 21 32 22 Very 6 22 9 20 11 5 10 33 12 Not familiar 15 7 13 4 11 10 14 6 11 Refused 0 0 1 1 0 1 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-354
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 92 93 94 91 91 93 100 100 91 96 91 Favorable 18 33 34 8 13 34 100 21 28 23 Very 3 7 7 2 3 7 19 3 7 4 Somewhat 16 26 27 7 10 27 81 18 21 18 Unsure, but familiar 11 25 26 9 11 24 18 16 21 Unfavorable 62 35 34 73 67 35 100 51 53 48 Somewhat 34 21 24 33 33 24 55 30 24 26 Very 28 13 10 41 34 11 45 22 28 21 Not familiar 6 6 5 7 7 6 7 3 7 Refused 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 92 89 89 92 91 89 89 93 100 100 88
Favorable 53 39 45 49 53 42 42 48 100 45 Very 10 6 8 8 10 6 6 8 18 8 Somewhat 44 33 37 41 43 35 36 40 82 37 Unsure, but familiar 6 10 10 7 6 10 6 8 10 Unfavorable 33 41 34 37 32 37 41 37 100 33 Somewhat 19 30 23 23 21 24 29 23 65 22 Very 14 11 10 14 11 13 12 14 35 12 Not familiar 7 11 11 7 9 11 11 7 11 Refused 1 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-355
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 93 93 94 91 87 93 89 94 91 Favorable 26 25 26 22 19 26 25 21 23 Very 5 5 4 4 5 2 2 8 4 Somewhat 21 20 21 18 14 24 23 13 18 Unsure, but familiar 16 12 18 23 28 17 34 11 21 Unfavorable 52 55 50 46 40 50 31 61 48 Somewhat 29 26 31 26 20 31 17 30 26 Very 23 29 19 20 21 19 14 31 21 Not familiar 6 6 6 8 10 5 10 6 7 Refused 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 92 92 93 86 82 92 82 91 88
Favorable 49 52 47 42 40 50 37 45 45 Very 5 5 5 8 15 6 10 5 8 Somewhat 44 47 41 34 25 44 27 40 37 Unsure, but familiar 9 5 12 14 7 11 14 9 10 Unfavorable 35 35 34 30 35 30 32 37 33 Somewhat 21 21 20 21 24 19 21 23 22 Very 14 14 14 9 11 12 10 13 12 Not familiar 7 7 7 14 17 8 18 8 11 Refused 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-356
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 91 88 91 97 89 83 95 91 Favorable 11 29 31 17 25 32 15 23 Very 4 4 5 4 4 1 1 4 Somewhat 7 25 25 12 20 31 14 18 Unsure, but familiar 14 21 29 9 23 12 18 21 Unfavorable 66 38 31 72 41 39 62 48 Somewhat 32 31 19 27 24 27 34 26 Very 34 7 13 45 17 11 28 21 Not familiar 7 11 9 2 10 13 5 7 Refused 3 1 0 2 1 4 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 90 88 85 92 88 89 83 88
Favorable 54 50 39 36 48 54 33 45 Very 10 9 6 4 7 14 5 8 Somewhat 44 40 33 33 41 40 28 37 Unsure, but familiar 7 10 13 8 12 5 7 10 Unfavorable 29 28 33 47 28 30 43 33 Somewhat 16 22 21 24 18 27 34 22 Very 13 6 12 23 10 2 9 12 Not familiar 9 12 15 7 11 11 17 11 Refused 1 2 0 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-357
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 90 96 97 91 90 92 91 Favorable 25 21 41 17 26 22 23 Very 4 4 9 2 7 3 4 Somewhat 20 16 31 15 19 18 18 Unsure, but familiar 15 26 24 20 16 23 21 Unfavorable 50 49 32 54 48 48 48 Somewhat 28 26 24 28 33 24 26 Very 22 23 8 26 15 24 21 Not familiar 9 3 2 8 7 7 7 Refused 1 1 2 1 2 1 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations
90 86 91 88 92 87 88
Favorable 55 36 48 45 53 42 45 Very 10 6 8 8 9 8 8 Somewhat 45 29 40 37 44 34 37 Unsure, but familiar 7 12 9 10 6 11 10 Unfavorable 28 38 34 33 33 34 33 Somewhat 20 22 24 21 20 22 22 Very 8 16 10 12 13 11 12 Not familiar 9 14 9 11 8 12 11 Refused 0 0 1 1 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-358
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 92 92 90 94 90 92 91 91 Favorable 16 33 20 32 18 11 34 23 Very 3 6 5 5 3 2 6 4 Somewhat 13 26 16 27 15 8 27 18 Unsure, but familiar 13 31 15 20 33 23 17 21 Unfavorable 62 29 55 42 39 59 41 48 Somewhat 32 19 31 23 20 28 25 26 Very 30 10 24 19 20 31 16 21 Not familiar 7 6 7 4 10 7 7 7 Refused 2 1 2 1 1 2 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 91 85 94 84 82 87 88 88
Favorable 52 37 54 33 40 46 44 45 Very 9 7 7 7 12 9 8 8 Somewhat 42 30 47 26 28 36 37 37 Unsure, but familiar 8 12 7 8 17 10 9 10 Unfavorable 31 36 32 43 24 31 35 33 Somewhat 21 23 20 29 17 18 23 22 Very 11 13 13 13 8 13 11 12 Not familiar 8 14 6 16 18 13 11 11 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 0 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-359
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 89 92 91 92 91 91 91 Favorable 17 29 14 31 16 30 23 Very 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 Somewhat 12 24 10 26 12 25 18 Unsure, but familiar 17 23 23 17 17 21 21 Unfavorable 56 40 54 45 59 40 48 Somewhat 26 28 31 23 30 24 26 Very 30 13 22 22 29 16 21 Not familiar 9 6 7 6 7 8 7 Refused 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 89 88 87 89 91 85 88
Favorable 46 45 50 43 51 41 45 Very 9 9 7 9 7 10 8 Somewhat 37 36 42 34 44 31 37 Unsure, but familiar 8 12 11 8 9 10 10 Unfavorable 35 31 26 38 30 33 33 Somewhat 22 21 16 25 19 23 22 Very 13 10 10 13 11 11 12 Not familiar 10 12 13 10 9 15 11 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-360
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ36 Impression of banning
things Knows banning things 93 91 93 93 90 90 93 94 90 91 Favorable 34 15 34 45 23 21 16 11 12 23 Very 7 3 6 6 8 5 5 1 2 4 Somewhat 28 12 28 39 15 16 12 10 10 18 Unsure, but familiar 28 14 24 19 31 26 20 10 15 21 Unfavorable 30 62 35 29 36 42 56 73 63 48 Somewhat 21 29 23 17 22 27 32 32 30 26 Very 9 33 12 11 13 16 24 41 33 21 Not familiar 7 7 6 6 8 9 7 4 7 7 Refused 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 2 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 89 89 89 89 86 86 91 92 87 88
Favorable 43 48 42 39 40 45 50 50 49 45 Very 6 11 7 6 9 9 10 9 10 8 Somewhat 37 37 35 33 31 37 40 41 40 37 Unsure, but familiar 13 6 12 16 14 10 10 6 7 10 Unfavorable 33 35 36 35 32 31 31 36 31 33 Somewhat 22 22 24 22 24 22 19 21 19 22 Very 11 13 12 13 8 9 13 15 12 12 Not familiar 11 10 10 10 14 14 9 7 12 11 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-361
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q36 Impression of banning things
Knows banning things 91 92 92 93 91 93 87 94 92 92 91 Favorable 22 22 23 22 16 28 21 26 20 23 23 Very 5 5 4 5 3 7 4 4 5 6 4 Somewhat 17 17 19 17 13 21 17 21 15 18 18 Unsure, but familiar 20 21 21 20 12 28 19 22 22 18 21 Unfavorable 49 49 48 51 64 37 48 47 49 51 48 Somewhat 26 26 26 28 31 28 26 26 27 27 26 Very 23 22 21 24 32 9 22 21 22 23 21 Not familiar 7 7 6 5 6 5 12 4 6 6 7 Refused 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 3 2 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q37 Impression of local zoning & land-use regulations
Knows zoning, land-use regulations 87 89 89 89 93 87 84 90 92 93 88
Favorable 44 46 45 44 50 47 45 41 52 49 45 Very 9 9 9 8 12 8 4 8 15 11 8 Somewhat 35 37 36 36 38 39 40 34 37 38 37 Unsure, but familiar 9 10 9 10 10 7 8 14 7 9 10 Unfavorable 34 34 34 35 33 32 32 34 33 34 33 Somewhat 21 21 22 21 23 20 23 22 19 20 22 Very 13 12 12 14 11 13 8 13 15 14 12 Not familiar 12 10 11 11 6 12 15 10 7 7 11 Refused 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-362
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 90 89 91 89 84 96 91 Favorable 52 50 47 46 55 40 58 50 Very 12 12 12 12 12 6 18 13 Somewhat 40 38 36 34 43 33 39 37 Unsure, but familiar 18 17 20 21 12 17 22 18 Unfavorable 21 23 22 23 22 28 17 24 Somewhat 13 14 15 16 12 20 6 15 Very 8 9 7 7 11 8 11 9 Not familiar 6 9 10 9 9 14 4 8 Refused 3 1 1 3 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 95 95 95 94 96 95 97 96 Favorable 62 62 61 60 64 49 60 61 Very 7 11 13 10 12 6 17 12 Somewhat 55 51 49 50 52 43 43 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 9 8 10 7 5 4 7 Unfavorable 25 25 25 25 24 41 33 28 Somewhat 18 19 19 19 18 23 21 19 Very 7 6 6 5 6 17 12 9 Not familiar 2 3 3 4 2 4 2 3 Refused 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-363
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 90 90 97 94 88 93 92 91 Favorable 50 47 49 59 58 42 58 41 50 Very 10 10 17 18 12 8 24 12 13 Somewhat 40 37 31 41 46 34 34 29 37 Unsure, but familiar 18 21 21 25 14 19 16 27 18 Unfavorable 23 22 21 13 23 27 19 25 24 Somewhat 14 15 12 5 13 18 12 13 15 Very 9 7 9 8 10 9 7 12 9 Not familiar 7 9 9 3 6 10 6 8 8 Refused 1 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 94 94 99 96 99 92 99 97 96 Favorable 60 59 63 65 63 56 69 54 61 Very 9 10 16 20 8 9 12 23 12 Somewhat 51 49 47 45 55 47 57 31 49 Unsure, but familiar 9 9 5 4 11 9 5 3 7 Unfavorable 25 26 30 27 25 27 25 40 28 Somewhat 19 20 18 17 14 20 17 26 19 Very 6 6 12 10 11 7 8 14 9 Not familiar 4 4 1 2 1 5 1 1 3 Refused 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-364
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 89 93 89 93 90 88 89 93 94 91 Favorable 49 50 50 50 48 55 42 51 50 50 Very 11 14 15 14 9 10 12 17 12 13 Somewhat 38 36 36 36 39 45 30 34 38 37 Unsure, but familiar 14 21 21 16 17 14 15 22 21 18 Unfavorable 25 22 17 28 25 19 32 21 23 24 Somewhat 17 12 13 16 14 14 21 15 11 15 Very 8 10 4 11 11 5 11 6 13 9 Not familiar 10 6 11 5 9 11 9 5 6 8 Refused 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 98 94 94 97 96 99 96 91 97 96 Favorable 65 56 65 60 57 67 64 61 52 61 Very 15 9 7 11 16 11 18 4 12 12 Somewhat 51 48 58 49 41 56 45 58 40 49 Unsure, but familiar 5 9 6 7 8 6 3 9 9 7 Unfavorable 27 29 23 30 31 25 29 20 36 28 Somewhat 19 20 19 19 20 20 17 14 24 19 Very 8 9 4 11 11 5 12 6 12 9 Not familiar 2 3 5 1 3 1 3 5 2 3 Refused 0 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-365
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 88 92 93 92 91 90 91 Favorable 53 49 51 51 47 48 50 Very 10 13 12 13 13 13 13 Somewhat 43 36 39 38 34 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 14 19 15 15 19 19 18 Unfavorable 21 24 26 26 24 23 24 Somewhat 13 15 18 18 14 13 15 Very 7 9 8 8 11 10 9 Not familiar 9 8 5 6 8 9 8 Refused 3 0 2 2 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 98 96 96 97 96 96 96 Favorable 64 60 62 64 62 60 61 Very 9 12 8 8 13 13 12 Somewhat 55 48 54 55 48 46 49 Unsure, but familiar 9 7 9 9 5 7 7 Unfavorable 25 29 25 25 30 30 28 Somewhat 15 21 18 17 21 20 19 Very 10 9 7 8 9 10 9 Not familiar 2 3 1 1 4 3 3 Refused 1 2 2 0 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-366
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 92 94 91 90 89 91 91 Favorable 48 42 52 50 50 50 50 Very 13 11 15 12 12 13 13 Somewhat 35 31 37 38 38 37 37 Unsure, but familiar 18 23 15 18 17 19 18 Unfavorable 26 29 25 22 22 22 24 Somewhat 16 19 14 14 12 18 15 Very 11 10 11 8 10 4 9 Not familiar 7 5 8 9 8 9 8 Refused 0 1 0 2 3 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 97 95 98 95 95 95 96 Favorable 53 48 57 66 67 65 61 Very 7 6 7 15 16 13 12 Somewhat 46 42 49 51 52 51 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 5 8 8 7 8 7 Unfavorable 37 43 34 21 21 22 28 Somewhat 24 30 21 15 13 19 19 Very 13 13 13 6 8 3 9 Not familiar 2 4 1 3 4 2 3 Refused 1 1 0 2 1 3 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-367
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 90 91 95 87 93 91 91 91 Favorable 43 51 50 50 52 49 49 50 Very 19 12 17 7 14 12 14 13 Somewhat 23 39 33 43 39 37 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 29 16 19 14 16 18 15 18 Unfavorable 18 25 27 23 26 24 26 24 Somewhat 14 15 17 14 14 16 16 15 Very 4 10 10 9 12 9 10 9 Not familiar 9 8 4 12 5 8 8 8 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 91 97 98 96 97 96 94 96 Favorable 54 62 58 62 64 60 54 61 Very 7 13 13 7 20 9 16 12 Somewhat 47 49 45 55 44 51 39 49 Unsure, but familiar 9 7 7 5 9 8 8 7 Unfavorable 28 29 33 29 24 28 31 28 Somewhat 18 20 19 25 13 20 20 19 Very 9 9 14 4 11 8 11 9 Not familiar 7 2 1 2 1 3 4 3 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-368
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 86 92 92 88 93 91 92 90 91 Favorable 46 47 51 51 50 46 52 48 50 Very 11 15 16 12 12 13 16 10 13 Somewhat 36 33 34 39 37 33 36 38 37 Unsure, but familiar 13 21 17 16 17 20 18 18 18 Unfavorable 27 24 25 20 27 25 22 25 24 Somewhat 17 14 12 11 16 17 13 16 15 Very 10 10 13 9 10 8 9 9 9 Not familiar 12 7 6 10 6 9 6 9 8 Refused 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 95 96 98 92 99 97 96 96 96 Favorable 61 58 61 56 71 55 62 60 61 Very 9 14 12 10 14 10 13 10 12 Somewhat 52 44 50 46 57 44 49 50 49 Unsure, but familiar 5 8 5 11 4 5 7 7 7 Unfavorable 29 31 32 25 24 37 27 29 28 Somewhat 18 22 20 18 16 26 20 18 19 Very 11 9 12 7 8 11 7 11 9 Not familiar 4 3 2 4 1 3 2 3 3 Refused 2 1 4 0 2 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-369
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 89 92 92 90 94 91 Favorable 42 36 46 55 61 49 50 Very 13 14 13 13 12 13 13 Somewhat 29 22 33 42 48 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 19 20 19 17 10 25 18 Unfavorable 29 33 27 20 19 21 24 Somewhat 19 15 22 12 14 9 15 Very 10 18 5 8 5 12 9 Not familiar 7 8 7 8 10 6 8 Refused 2 3 1 0 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 96 97 95 97 97 96 96 Favorable 52 55 50 66 67 66 61 Very 11 16 7 12 15 9 12 Somewhat 42 39 43 54 52 57 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 6 8 6 7 6 7 Unfavorable 36 36 36 24 23 24 28 Somewhat 23 21 24 17 18 17 19 Very 14 15 13 6 5 7 9 Not familiar 3 1 4 3 3 2 3 Refused 1 2 1 1 2 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-370
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 93 92 92 92 91 94 89 85 92 91 91 Favorable 44 40 50 42 54 56 55 65 48 56 50 Very 11 10 12 12 12 11 15 17 13 13 13 Somewhat 32 30 38 30 41 45 41 48 35 43 37 Unsure, but familiar 21 21 19 21 14 18 14 1 24 16 18 Unfavorable 28 30 23 29 23 20 19 18 20 20 24 Somewhat 22 24 11 20 10 12 11 15 8 11 15 Very 6 6 12 9 13 9 9 4 12 9 9 Not familiar 6 7 6 6 8 6 11 14 8 9 8 Refused 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 97 97 94 97 96 95 96 96 97 96 96 Favorable 58 54 62 56 60 69 62 61 62 65 61 Very 12 10 12 10 13 14 11 13 8 12 12 Somewhat 47 44 50 45 48 55 51 47 54 52 49 Unsure, but familiar 8 8 8 8 8 9 6 6 5 7 7 Unfavorable 31 36 24 33 28 17 29 30 29 24 28 Somewhat 23 26 14 22 14 13 20 23 18 17 19 Very 8 10 10 11 14 4 9 7 11 7 9 Not familiar 1 1 5 2 4 5 2 4 1 4 3 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-371
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 94 92 92 81 94 94 91 89 95 88 89 91 Favorable 41 46 54 46 52 58 40 46 51 48 67 45 50 Very 11 12 9 16 14 15 9 13 15 9 15 14 13 Somewhat 31 34 45 30 38 43 31 33 37 39 51 32 37 Unsure, but familiar 18 24 13 24 12 15 21 21 20 17 12 15 18 Unfavorable 32 24 25 21 17 21 33 24 17 31 10 28 24 Somewhat 25 19 13 8 12 10 30 16 11 10 3 18 15 Very 7 5 12 13 5 11 3 8 6 20 7 10 9 Not familiar 6 6 7 5 19 5 6 7 7 5 12 11 8 Refused 2 1 3 0 2 4 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 97 98 99 88 96 96 97 97 91 97 97 95 96 Favorable 65 52 67 56 64 60 54 62 64 59 74 50 61 Very 16 8 16 7 12 10 6 16 12 11 4 17 12 Somewhat 49 44 51 49 52 50 48 45 52 48 70 33 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 10 5 11 4 7 9 7 10 5 3 8 7 Unfavorable 26 36 26 22 29 29 34 29 17 33 20 37 28 Somewhat 20 27 14 14 23 18 23 24 14 14 16 24 19 Very 6 9 12 8 6 11 11 5 3 19 4 13 9 Not familiar 2 1 9 4 2 1 1 6 3 1 4 3 Refused 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-372
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 90 91 96 91 96 85 93 91 Favorable 60 36 51 46 47 84 27 9 50 Very 17 8 15 12 9 24 4 2 13 Somewhat 43 28 37 34 38 60 22 7 37 Unsure, but familiar 17 18 14 29 22 8 32 13 18 Unfavorable 15 35 25 20 21 4 26 71 24 Somewhat 9 22 16 13 12 4 19 34 15 Very 5 14 9 7 9 7 37 9 Not familiar 8 8 8 4 8 4 13 7 8 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 95 97 95 97 98 99 90 99 96 Favorable 72 49 63 56 58 98 41 5 61 Very 13 10 12 11 10 22 4 12 Somewhat 59 39 50 45 48 76 37 5 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 7 6 4 12 1 17 2 7 Unfavorable 17 42 27 36 28 1 32 92 28 Somewhat 14 25 19 24 18 1 30 43 19 Very 3 17 8 12 10 2 49 9 Not familiar 4 1 3 3 1 1 6 3 Refused 1 2 1 1 3 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-373
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 93 92 93 92 91 93 96 93 94 93 91 Favorable 54 48 57 43 49 52 63 49 59 44 50 Very 14 12 15 8 12 15 18 13 19 7 13 Somewhat 40 36 42 35 37 38 45 36 40 37 37 Unsure, but familiar 15 18 17 16 16 19 11 14 19 13 18 Unfavorable 24 26 19 33 26 23 22 30 16 36 24 Somewhat 15 17 12 22 16 13 17 17 13 18 15 Very 9 9 7 12 9 9 5 12 4 18 9 Not familiar 6 7 6 6 8 6 4 6 4 6 8 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 97 97 96 98 96 97 96 98 97 97 96 Favorable 65 59 68 55 60 62 69 58 74 44 61 Very 14 10 13 9 12 12 14 10 19 6 12 Somewhat 51 49 55 46 47 50 55 48 56 39 49 Unsure, but familiar 4 6 7 4 5 6 5 4 4 7 7 Unfavorable 28 31 22 39 31 30 22 35 19 46 28 Somewhat 20 20 16 26 23 18 17 22 16 27 19 Very 8 11 6 14 8 11 5 13 3 19 9 Not familiar 2 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 1 1 3 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-374
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 92 90 94 89 91 94 83 90 91 Favorable 51 44 55 46 53 54 42 45 50 Very 13 12 13 13 12 16 10 10 13 Somewhat 38 32 43 33 41 38 32 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 17 19 15 16 19 15 27 13 18 Unfavorable 24 26 23 26 19 25 15 32 24 Somewhat 15 15 16 18 9 19 8 17 15 Very 9 11 8 8 9 6 7 14 9 Not familiar 7 9 6 10 7 4 17 9 8 Refused 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 98 99 97 92 96 94 94 98 96 Favorable 62 59 65 56 65 63 56 57 61 Very 13 12 13 8 15 14 3 11 12 Somewhat 49 46 52 48 51 50 53 46 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 6 7 8 7 5 15 5 7 Unfavorable 29 34 25 28 24 26 23 37 28 Somewhat 20 22 19 21 13 19 12 27 19 Very 9 12 6 7 11 6 10 10 9 Not familiar 1 2 5 3 3 6 1 3 Refused 1 1 0 3 1 3 0 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-375
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 88 91 94 84 92 89 90 91 Favorable 51 57 50 31 53 61 50 50 Very 17 16 11 6 15 17 11 13 Somewhat 34 41 39 25 38 44 38 37 Unsure, but familiar 17 13 21 11 16 9 16 18 Unfavorable 20 21 22 42 22 18 24 24 Somewhat 15 16 10 22 13 15 16 15 Very 5 5 12 20 9 3 8 9 Not familiar 10 9 5 12 7 8 10 8 Refused 2 1 4 2 3 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 95 96 95 94 97 92 100 96 Favorable 62 61 65 48 64 68 55 61 Very 12 8 14 9 13 18 7 12 Somewhat 50 53 51 39 51 50 48 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 7 7 9 5 8 8 7 Unfavorable 26 28 23 38 28 16 37 28 Somewhat 18 19 18 20 18 16 33 19 Very 8 9 5 18 10 4 9 Not familiar 3 4 4 1 2 8 3 Refused 2 1 5 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-376
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 91 92 95 91 92 91 91 Favorable 54 45 48 50 53 48 50 Very 14 10 17 12 15 12 13 Somewhat 40 35 32 39 37 37 37 Unsure, but familiar 14 21 16 18 17 18 18 Unfavorable 22 26 30 22 22 24 24 Somewhat 15 15 22 13 12 16 15 Very 8 11 8 9 9 9 9 Not familiar 8 6 3 9 6 8 8 Refused 1 1 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 96 97 99 96 99 94 96 Favorable 63 61 64 61 57 62 61 Very 15 10 13 11 13 11 12 Somewhat 48 51 51 49 43 51 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 6 5 8 7 7 7 Unfavorable 27 30 31 28 36 25 28 Somewhat 21 18 21 19 28 16 19 Very 6 12 10 9 8 9 9 Not familiar 2 3 1 3 0 4 3 Refused 1 1 0 2 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-377
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 92 91 92 89 90 89 93 91 Favorable 48 54 49 52 50 48 50 50 Very 14 11 11 14 15 10 15 13 Somewhat 34 43 38 38 35 38 35 37 Unsure, but familiar 18 17 18 11 24 18 18 18 Unfavorable 26 20 26 26 17 23 25 24 Somewhat 17 11 15 19 9 13 17 15 Very 9 9 10 8 7 10 8 9 Not familiar 6 9 6 9 10 11 5 8 Refused 2 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 96 97 97 95 95 94 98 96 Favorable 55 70 60 57 64 59 61 61 Very 12 12 12 10 12 9 13 12 Somewhat 43 58 48 48 52 50 48 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 8 8 4 10 7 6 7 Unfavorable 34 20 29 34 20 28 31 28 Somewhat 24 13 21 22 14 19 22 19 Very 10 6 9 12 6 10 9 9 Not familiar 2 2 1 4 4 5 1 3 Refused 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-378
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 86 94 92 91 90 92 91 Favorable 44 51 50 49 46 54 50 Very 10 15 13 12 11 15 13 Somewhat 34 36 37 37 35 39 37 Unsure, but familiar 17 19 20 16 16 18 18 Unfavorable 25 24 22 26 28 20 24 Somewhat 15 16 14 16 17 14 15 Very 10 8 8 10 10 6 9 Not familiar 13 5 7 8 9 7 8 Refused 2 1 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 94 97 94 98 95 96 96 Favorable 57 62 60 63 59 62 61 Very 11 12 16 9 11 12 12 Somewhat 46 49 44 54 48 51 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 7 7 5 6 6 7 Unfavorable 30 29 27 30 31 28 28 Somewhat 20 20 21 19 21 21 19 Very 10 9 6 11 10 7 9 Not familiar 3 3 5 1 4 2 3 Refused 3 0 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-379
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 93 90 92 96 92 91 92 89 90 91 Favorable 53 48 53 58 48 49 56 45 46 50 Very 14 12 14 14 13 13 13 10 12 13 Somewhat 39 36 40 43 35 36 43 35 34 37 Unsure, but familiar 16 18 14 11 19 21 16 15 21 18 Unfavorable 24 24 25 27 26 20 20 29 23 24 Somewhat 16 13 17 16 18 14 12 15 13 15 Very 8 11 8 11 8 6 9 14 10 9 Not familiar 7 7 6 4 8 8 6 9 9 8 Refused 0 2 2 1 3 2 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 97 96 96 100 98 95 92 96 96 96 Favorable 65 58 65 65 61 62 63 54 56 61 Very 11 13 11 14 10 10 10 14 12 12 Somewhat 54 45 54 52 51 52 53 40 44 49 Unsure, but familiar 6 8 5 3 13 8 6 7 9 7 Unfavorable 26 31 26 32 24 24 24 34 30 28 Somewhat 19 20 18 21 16 19 17 19 20 19 Very 8 10 8 11 8 5 6 15 11 9 Not familiar 3 2 3 1 4 4 2 3 3 Refused 0 2 2 1 2 4 2 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-380
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q38 Impression of mayors Knows mayors 90 91 92 91 92 89 89 93 91 93 91 Favorable 49 50 51 50 46 53 50 49 50 50 50 Very 14 13 13 14 12 17 11 14 13 12 13 Somewhat 35 37 38 36 34 36 39 35 36 38 37 Unsure, but familiar 16 18 17 17 17 14 18 19 15 16 18 Unfavorable 24 24 24 25 29 22 21 24 26 27 24 Somewhat 13 14 15 13 21 11 14 15 16 15 15 Very 11 9 10 12 8 12 7 9 10 12 9 Not familiar 9 8 7 7 6 11 9 7 8 6 8 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q39 Impression of local government
Knows local government 96 97 97 97 98 100 93 98 97 97 96 Favorable 59 61 60 59 64 59 64 58 60 61 61 Very 12 12 12 12 16 15 9 10 18 14 12 Somewhat 48 49 48 48 48 44 55 48 42 47 49 Unsure, but familiar 7 7 7 7 7 8 6 8 7 6 7 Unfavorable 30 29 30 31 27 33 23 32 29 30 28 Somewhat 19 20 20 20 19 22 17 21 19 20 19 Very 10 9 9 10 9 11 6 10 11 10 9 Not familiar 3 1 2 2 1 0 4 2 3 2 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-381
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 67 66 67 74 57 63 54 64 Very convincing 24 25 25 30 21 32 24 27 Somewhat convincing 43 41 42 44 37 31 30 37 Not very convincing 31 31 30 25 39 37 42 34 Unsure 2 2 2 1 4 4 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 56 50 53 56 44 55 55 52 Very convincing 30 17 16 16 18 28 32 23 Somewhat convincing 27 33 36 40 25 28 23 29 Not very convincing 37 47 45 44 51 39 42 45 Unsure 7 3 2 6 6 3 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-382
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 66 67 62 53 61 61 65 68 64 Very convincing 26 26 26 27 31 22 26 36 27 Somewhat convincing 40 42 36 26 31 39 39 32 37 Not very convincing 32 31 35 43 37 37 33 28 34 Unsure 2 1 3 5 1 2 2 4 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 50 53 52 51 44 52 45 65 52 Very convincing 17 16 28 29 17 19 22 36 23 Somewhat convincing 33 37 24 22 27 33 23 29 29 Not very convincing 47 45 46 46 50 46 50 33 45 Unsure 3 2 2 2 5 2 5 2 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-383
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 67 61 66 59 68 68 66 58 64 64 Very convincing 27 27 25 25 31 24 30 25 28 27 Somewhat convincing 40 35 41 33 37 44 35 32 36 37 Not very convincing 31 37 33 38 31 30 32 41 34 34 Unsure 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 55 49 60 48 49 61 48 50 48 52 Very convincing 26 20 20 21 28 24 28 12 26 23 Somewhat convincing 29 30 40 27 21 36 20 39 22 29 Not very convincing 41 48 34 50 49 34 50 47 49 45 Unsure 4 3 6 2 3 6 2 2 3 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-384
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 59 65 67 69 61 62 64 Very convincing 16 29 23 22 29 29 27 Somewhat convincing 43 36 44 47 32 34 37 Not very convincing 36 33 30 27 37 36 34 Unsure 5 1 3 4 1 1 2 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 43 54 52 53 50 51 52 Very convincing 19 24 16 18 25 25 23 Somewhat convincing 24 30 37 35 26 26 29 Not very convincing 52 42 47 46 45 45 45 Unsure 5 3 1 1 4 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-385
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 63 67 61 64 64 63 64 Very convincing 28 27 29 25 29 18 27 Somewhat convincing 35 40 32 39 35 45 37 Not very convincing 34 29 37 34 34 36 34 Unsure 3 5 2 1 2 0 2 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 56 62 52 49 54 40 52 Very convincing 28 24 30 19 22 13 23 Somewhat convincing 28 38 22 30 31 27 29 Not very convincing 41 34 46 48 41 59 45 Unsure 3 4 2 4 5 1 3 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-386
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 53 66 62 70 65 62 66 64 Very convincing 29 27 25 26 31 26 32 27 Somewhat convincing 24 39 37 44 34 37 34 37 Not very convincing 46 32 34 29 35 36 31 34 Unsure 1 2 4 2 1 3 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 49 51 51 52 52 55 47 52 Very convincing 18 23 25 22 22 23 25 23 Somewhat convincing 31 29 26 30 29 32 22 29 Not very convincing 43 46 47 44 48 43 50 45 Unsure 7 2 2 4 1 2 3 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-387
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 65 64 65 62 62 64 65 63 64 Very convincing 23 30 30 30 22 28 29 25 27 Somewhat convincing 42 34 35 32 39 36 36 38 37 Not very convincing 35 35 35 37 37 35 33 34 34 Unsure 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 46 55 49 45 55 53 50 53 52 Very convincing 17 26 27 20 22 24 21 24 23 Somewhat convincing 28 29 22 25 33 29 29 29 29 Not very convincing 50 42 45 52 42 45 46 44 45 Unsure 5 3 5 3 4 2 4 3 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-388
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 64 57 68 64 72 55 64 Very convincing 32 30 33 23 29 17 27 Somewhat convincing 32 27 35 40 43 38 37 Not very convincing 35 40 31 34 26 43 34 Unsure 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 54 55 53 51 60 41 52 Very convincing 27 37 20 20 26 14 23 Somewhat convincing 27 19 33 31 34 28 29 Not very convincing 44 42 45 45 35 56 45 Unsure 2 3 2 4 5 2 3 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-389
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 66 64 67 67 71 67 58 66 51 62 64 Very convincing 33 33 29 33 33 28 18 20 15 22 27 Somewhat convincing 33 31 38 34 38 39 40 46 36 40 37 Not very convincing 32 34 29 31 26 29 41 33 47 36 34 Unsure 1 1 4 1 4 4 1 1 2 3 2 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 59 59 59 57 60 63 37 47 29 48 52 Very convincing 29 30 22 29 23 20 17 23 12 18 23 Somewhat convincing 30 29 38 29 37 43 20 23 17 30 29 Not very convincing 38 39 36 40 33 31 61 50 70 48 45 Unsure 3 2 5 3 6 6 2 3 1 4 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-390
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 66 66 74 60 58 57 61 70 67 68 60 56 64 Very convincing 32 34 30 28 17 18 28 36 28 30 16 19 27 Somewhat convincing 34 32 44 32 42 39 32 34 39 37 43 37 37 Not very convincing 32 32 21 38 41 41 37 29 30 28 40 42 34 Unsure 1 2 5 2 1 2 2 0 3 5 1 2 2 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 60 58 60 58 42 34 59 58 65 51 41 33 52 Very convincing 30 28 21 22 27 9 23 33 12 33 21 14 23 Somewhat convincing 30 29 39 35 14 25 36 25 53 18 21 20 29 Not very convincing 38 39 33 39 56 65 39 38 25 49 59 63 45 Unsure 2 4 7 3 3 2 2 3 9 4 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-391
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 64 63 60 71 66 60 68 65 64 Very convincing 26 29 24 34 25 25 28 29 27 Somewhat convincing 39 34 36 37 41 35 40 36 37 Not very convincing 33 35 37 29 32 36 31 35 34 Unsure 3 2 2 2 4 1 2 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 51 53 52 49 49 49 55 51 52 Very convincing 21 26 22 29 19 21 23 28 23 Somewhat convincing 30 27 31 21 30 28 32 23 29 Not very convincing 45 45 44 48 46 47 43 45 45 Unsure 4 1 3 2 5 4 2 4 3 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-392
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 71 52 57 72 73 55 57 69 63 60 64 Very convincing 37 13 20 37 37 20 21 31 27 29 27 Somewhat convincing 34 39 37 36 36 36 36 38 36 31 37 Not very convincing 26 46 41 26 25 43 42 28 35 37 34 Unsure 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 62 38 45 62 60 41 41 59 52 50 52 Very convincing 35 11 17 32 33 13 19 30 24 22 23 Somewhat convincing 27 27 28 29 26 28 22 30 28 27 29 Not very convincing 36 59 52 38 39 55 59 40 46 47 45 Unsure 2 3 4 1 1 4 1 2 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-393
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 66 59 71 66 57 66 70 66 64 Very convincing 27 32 23 30 23 24 24 37 27 Somewhat convincing 39 28 48 36 34 42 46 28 37 Not very convincing 32 39 26 32 41 32 26 32 34 Unsure 2 2 3 2 1 2 4 2 2 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 49 47 50 58 51 53 51 55 52 Very convincing 25 34 18 19 24 23 15 27 23 Somewhat convincing 24 13 33 39 27 29 37 29 29 Not very convincing 49 52 47 40 41 45 45 44 45 Unsure 2 1 3 2 7 2 3 1 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-394
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 77 62 60 58 67 53 75 64 Very convincing 43 25 14 24 24 24 27 27 Somewhat convincing 33 37 46 35 43 29 48 37 Not very convincing 21 37 36 38 32 44 25 34 Unsure 2 1 4 3 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 72 49 47 44 45 48 74 52 Very convincing 45 11 16 19 19 19 22 23 Somewhat convincing 27 38 31 24 26 30 52 29 Not very convincing 26 45 50 55 50 49 26 45 Unsure 1 6 3 2 5 1 1 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-395
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 67 59 57 66 68 63 64 Very convincing 32 22 16 31 26 27 27 Somewhat convincing 35 37 41 35 42 35 37 Not very convincing 30 40 42 32 30 35 34 Unsure 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 56 46 39 55 53 51 52 Very convincing 26 18 13 27 22 23 23 Somewhat convincing 30 27 26 29 31 28 29 Not very convincing 41 50 57 41 44 45 45 Unsure 2 4 4 3 2 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-396
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 70 56 67 55 68 85 47 64 Very convincing 34 16 33 19 24 45 12 27 Somewhat convincing 36 40 34 37 44 39 35 37 Not very convincing 28 42 32 43 26 15 50 34 Unsure 2 2 1 1 6 0 3 2 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 60 40 58 46 46 66 42 52 Very convincing 28 16 28 13 22 33 16 23 Somewhat convincing 31 24 30 33 24 33 26 29 Not very convincing 39 55 41 48 50 31 55 45 Unsure 1 5 1 5 3 3 3 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-397
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 77 55 64 64 78 55 64 Very convincing 39 18 26 27 42 15 27 Somewhat convincing 38 36 37 37 36 40 37 Not very convincing 22 44 34 35 21 43 34 Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 66 43 56 48 67 41 52 Very convincing 35 14 20 25 32 14 23 Somewhat convincing 31 29 35 24 34 28 29 Not very convincing 32 53 43 48 33 54 45 Unsure 2 4 2 4 1 4 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-398
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ40 While a few larger
Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 53 72 56 46 60 65 70 76 73 64 Very convincing 14 39 17 11 20 23 31 47 39 27 Somewhat convincing 40 33 39 36 40 42 39 28 34 37 Not very convincing 45 25 43 52 37 34 29 22 24 34 Unsure 1 3 2 2 3 1 0 3 2 2 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 43 59 43 29 54 54 52 63 60 52 Very convincing 15 32 15 9 15 19 21 41 31 23 Somewhat convincing 28 27 28 20 39 35 31 22 29 29 Not very convincing 54 38 54 70 39 41 45 37 37 45 Unsure 3 4 3 2 7 5 2 2 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-399
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q40 While a few larger Colorado communities & counties may be up to the challenges of regulating oil & gas development locally, most cities & counties could not handle the task, not technically nor financially
Convincing 65 63 64 65 68 57 64 64 64 63 64 Very convincing 27 26 27 28 35 20 28 25 29 28 27 Somewhat convincing 38 36 37 37 33 37 37 39 34 35 37 Not very convincing 33 35 34 33 30 42 34 34 34 36 34 Unsure 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q41 Most of Colorado's oil & gas development today occurs in just one county, Weld County, so residents there shouldn't have the unilateral right to threaten the whole state's energy economy by passing a local ban
Convincing 49 50 51 48 60 34 60 48 48 48 52 Very convincing 25 23 24 25 35 12 23 20 27 24 23 Somewhat convincing 25 27 27 24 25 22 37 27 21 24 29 Not very convincing 48 46 47 49 38 63 34 52 48 51 45 Unsure 2 3 3 2 2 3 6 1 4 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-400
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 49 56 58 62 49 53 43 53 Very convincing 22 28 27 32 23 21 20 25 Somewhat convincing 26 28 31 30 26 32 24 28 Not very convincing 44 38 36 34 42 43 53 41 Unsure 7 6 6 3 9 4 4 5 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 70 65 68 69 61 70 58 66 Very convincing 44 33 33 33 32 39 28 35 Somewhat convincing 27 32 35 35 29 31 31 31 Not very convincing 28 32 29 28 37 30 40 32 Unsure 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-401
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 56 59 48 43 47 61 50 52 53 Very convincing 29 29 20 21 23 25 23 32 25 Somewhat convincing 27 30 28 23 24 36 27 20 28 Not very convincing 38 36 47 53 48 34 49 36 41 Unsure 6 5 5 4 5 5 2 12 5 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 66 69 64 57 59 66 66 75 66 Very convincing 34 35 34 29 34 31 32 53 35 Somewhat convincing 31 34 30 28 25 35 34 22 31 Not very convincing 32 28 35 43 40 32 32 25 32 Unsure 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-402
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 56 51 53 55 51 54 57 56 47 53 Very convincing 27 23 22 25 28 23 31 24 22 25 Somewhat convincing 29 28 32 30 23 32 26 32 24 28 Not very convincing 39 44 39 40 45 39 38 38 48 41 Unsure 5 5 8 4 4 6 4 6 5 5 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 69 63 76 64 58 72 66 68 60 66 Very convincing 39 32 31 37 37 37 40 28 34 35 Somewhat convincing 30 32 45 28 22 35 26 40 25 31 Not very convincing 30 35 23 34 40 27 32 30 39 32 Unsure 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-403
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 41 56 52 54 52 53 53 Very convincing 15 27 26 26 23 25 25 Somewhat convincing 27 28 26 28 29 29 28 Not very convincing 49 40 40 38 43 42 41 Unsure 10 4 8 8 4 4 5 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 66 66 71 72 65 65 66 Very convincing 36 34 33 35 35 36 35 Somewhat convincing 30 32 38 37 30 28 31 Not very convincing 33 32 29 27 33 34 32 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-404
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 56 57 54 51 55 46 53 Very convincing 27 25 28 23 23 23 25 Somewhat convincing 28 32 26 28 32 23 28 Not very convincing 35 29 39 46 43 52 41 Unsure 9 13 7 2 3 2 5 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 70 70 70 63 65 61 66 Very convincing 38 39 37 32 32 34 35 Somewhat convincing 32 31 32 31 33 28 31 Not very convincing 29 29 29 35 34 37 32 Unsure 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-405
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 58 52 37 60 56 53 49 53 Very convincing 21 25 18 23 37 26 24 25 Somewhat convincing 38 27 19 37 19 27 26 28 Not very convincing 29 44 58 36 42 41 46 41 Unsure 13 4 5 4 2 6 5 5 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 69 66 58 74 62 71 59 66 Very convincing 35 36 26 39 42 36 40 35 Somewhat convincing 34 30 32 36 20 35 18 31 Not very convincing 30 32 40 25 35 28 39 32 Unsure 1 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-406
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 51 55 48 50 53 54 51 55 53 Very convincing 22 27 26 27 26 21 28 22 25 Somewhat convincing 30 29 22 22 27 34 23 33 28 Not very convincing 44 40 46 45 42 41 42 41 41 Unsure 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 4 5 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 58 69 72 59 72 66 65 67 66 Very convincing 32 38 43 31 36 38 39 32 35 Somewhat convincing 26 31 29 27 36 28 26 35 31 Not very convincing 41 30 27 39 28 33 34 32 32 Unsure 1 2 1 3 0 1 1 2 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-407
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 61 57 63 48 56 39 53 Very convincing 31 32 30 22 29 14 25 Somewhat convincing 30 25 34 26 27 26 28 Not very convincing 32 34 30 48 38 60 41 Unsure 7 9 6 4 6 1 5 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 75 74 75 60 72 47 66 Very convincing 45 47 44 28 40 14 35 Somewhat convincing 30 27 31 32 31 32 31 Not very convincing 25 26 25 38 26 51 32 Unsure 2 2 3 1 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-408
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 64 68 53 61 50 54 41 54 30 47 53 Very convincing 35 37 24 32 24 26 15 23 7 19 25 Somewhat convincing 29 31 29 29 26 28 27 31 23 28 28 Not very convincing 31 27 38 32 39 39 55 40 69 49 41 Unsure 4 4 8 6 12 6 3 6 1 5 5 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 77 77 69 77 74 65 51 61 42 57 66 Very convincing 44 46 35 43 41 31 25 37 15 28 35 Somewhat convincing 33 31 33 34 33 34 26 24 27 29 31 Not very convincing 21 23 29 22 25 32 47 36 58 41 32 Unsure 1 2 0 1 3 1 3 2 1 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-409
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 69 59 56 51 39 43 66 62 59 46 39 43 53 Very convincing 37 33 24 24 17 12 36 35 23 25 11 17 25 Somewhat convincing 32 26 32 26 22 31 31 28 36 21 28 26 28 Not very convincing 29 34 35 42 56 54 29 33 30 49 58 53 41 Unsure 2 7 9 7 5 3 4 4 10 6 3 4 5 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 80 75 71 66 54 50 81 75 70 66 60 44 66 Very convincing 49 39 39 31 26 24 37 49 35 36 27 23 35 Somewhat convincing 31 36 32 35 28 25 44 26 36 31 33 20 31 Not very convincing 19 24 28 30 45 49 19 23 26 34 40 54 32 Unsure 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 4 3 1 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-410
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 53 55 56 46 46 49 62 44 53 Very convincing 22 29 26 26 18 20 33 20 25 Somewhat convincing 31 26 30 21 27 29 29 23 28 Not very convincing 42 40 40 46 47 46 32 50 41 Unsure 5 5 4 8 7 4 6 6 5 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 63 71 67 74 59 62 70 68 66 Very convincing 34 40 33 42 33 31 37 41 35 Somewhat convincing 29 31 34 32 25 31 33 27 31 Not very convincing 35 29 32 24 38 35 29 32 32 Unsure 2 0 1 2 3 3 1 1 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-411
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 68 33 43 67 68 37 43 59 56 54 53 Very convincing 36 10 16 36 37 14 19 32 28 27 25 Somewhat convincing 32 23 27 31 31 24 24 27 28 27 28 Not very convincing 28 61 52 28 27 59 52 38 42 39 41 Unsure 3 6 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 7 5 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 73 53 58 76 74 56 64 70 67 66 66 Very convincing 46 16 25 47 46 23 31 41 36 38 35 Somewhat convincing 28 37 33 29 28 33 33 29 31 28 31 Not very convincing 26 45 40 22 25 42 36 28 32 33 32 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-412
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 53 57 49 56 49 48 51 65 53 Very convincing 26 35 20 26 21 22 25 35 25 Somewhat convincing 26 22 29 30 29 26 26 31 28 Not very convincing 42 40 44 41 41 48 42 33 41 Unsure 5 3 6 2 9 4 7 2 5 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 63 63 63 68 72 62 62 72 66 Very convincing 35 45 27 34 38 32 29 41 35 Somewhat convincing 28 18 36 35 34 30 33 31 31 Not very convincing 36 37 36 29 26 36 36 27 32 Unsure 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-413
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 71 45 47 61 46 45 60 53 Very convincing 40 19 17 30 18 28 28 25 Somewhat convincing 30 26 30 31 28 17 32 28 Not very convincing 27 48 48 37 49 54 35 41 Unsure 1 6 5 2 5 4 5 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 81 63 58 72 63 63 82 66 Very convincing 48 32 20 46 31 34 33 35 Somewhat convincing 33 31 38 26 32 30 49 31 Not very convincing 18 35 39 28 35 34 18 32 Unsure 2 3 2 1 1 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-414
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 61 44 37 58 44 57 53 Very convincing 29 18 13 28 22 26 25 Somewhat convincing 32 26 24 30 22 31 28 Not very convincing 35 49 54 38 49 38 41 Unsure 4 7 9 4 7 5 5 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 70 59 60 68 64 68 66 Very convincing 41 29 30 37 32 37 35 Somewhat convincing 30 30 30 32 32 31 31 Not very convincing 27 40 39 30 36 31 32 Unsure 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-415
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 61 43 65 38 47 67 41 53 Very convincing 33 13 31 20 17 38 14 25 Somewhat convincing 28 31 33 18 30 28 28 28 Not very convincing 33 54 33 54 47 28 54 41 Unsure 6 2 3 7 6 5 5 5 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 76 51 69 59 67 79 58 66 Very convincing 43 22 43 28 25 53 23 35 Somewhat convincing 33 29 26 31 42 27 35 31 Not very convincing 23 47 30 40 30 19 41 32 Unsure 1 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-416
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 72 40 53 52 73 38 53 Very convincing 42 13 21 28 43 12 25 Somewhat convincing 30 27 32 24 30 27 28 Not very convincing 23 55 40 45 24 56 41 Unsure 4 5 7 3 3 5 5 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 80 60 69 65 83 56 66 Very convincing 50 27 36 35 53 23 35 Somewhat convincing 30 33 32 30 30 33 31 Not very convincing 20 38 29 35 17 43 32 Unsure 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-417
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ42 Underground oil & gas
formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 35 69 36 22 55 52 48 78 72 53 Very convincing 12 37 13 6 17 21 24 46 39 25 Somewhat convincing 24 31 23 16 38 31 25 32 33 28 Not very convincing 59 25 60 72 37 42 50 19 23 41 Unsure 5 6 5 5 8 6 1 3 5 5 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 55 78 58 47 68 68 65 75 74 66 Very convincing 19 49 22 21 30 30 34 56 50 35 Somewhat convincing 35 29 36 25 37 39 31 19 25 31 Not very convincing 45 21 41 53 31 29 30 25 24 32 Unsure 0 1 0 2 2 5 2 1 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-418
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q42 Underground oil & gas formations & fields don't follow city or county boundaries, so it makes no sense to try & set controls for their development on a piecemeal city-by-city or county-by-county basis
Convincing 50 51 53 50 67 42 60 49 51 51 53 Very convincing 24 23 25 24 40 16 29 22 22 26 25 Somewhat convincing 26 28 28 26 27 26 31 26 28 25 28 Not very convincing 45 44 42 45 29 53 34 45 46 47 41 Unsure 5 6 5 5 4 5 5 7 3 2 5 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q43 Local regulation of oil & gas development could get out of control in some communities & counties, just as zoning & land-use regulations already often go overboard, telling private property owners what they can & cannot do with their own land
Convincing 64 65 66 62 77 47 72 66 59 61 66 Very convincing 32 34 35 31 51 21 38 32 34 35 35 Somewhat convincing 32 31 31 31 26 26 33 33 25 25 31 Not very convincing 35 33 32 36 22 52 28 32 39 38 32 Unsure 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-419
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 76 61 68 70 50 65 72 64 Very convincing 34 32 36 39 24 36 38 34 Somewhat convincing 42 29 32 30 26 29 34 30 Not very convincing 23 37 30 27 48 35 28 34 Unsure 0 2 2 2 1 0 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 57 58 61 63 53 55 46 57 Very convincing 17 15 14 18 12 18 14 16 Somewhat convincing 40 43 47 45 40 37 31 41 Not very convincing 40 37 35 32 43 38 53 39 Unsure 3 4 4 4 4 7 2 4 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-420
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 61 69 66 70 42 67 71 71 64 Very convincing 33 37 32 38 23 34 34 47 34 Somewhat convincing 28 31 34 32 19 33 37 25 30 Not very convincing 37 29 32 30 56 33 28 23 34 Unsure 2 2 1 1 0 1 5 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 58 62 54 47 54 60 58 55 57 Very convincing 17 17 14 14 18 16 10 23 16 Somewhat convincing 41 45 40 33 35 44 48 32 41 Not very convincing 38 35 43 52 42 36 39 40 39 Unsure 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 5 4 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-421
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 65 64 68 65 60 68 61 64 63 64 Very convincing 39 29 33 33 36 36 42 27 31 34 Somewhat convincing 26 35 35 32 24 32 19 37 32 30 Not very convincing 32 36 29 35 39 28 37 36 36 34 Unsure 2 0 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt,taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 58 55 61 54 56 61 55 54 56 57 Very convincing 16 16 13 14 21 12 20 14 18 16 Somewhat convincing 42 39 48 39 35 49 35 40 38 41 Not very convincing 37 41 34 43 40 37 38 41 41 39 Unsure 4 4 5 3 4 2 6 5 2 4 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-422
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 67 63 67 68 64 62 64 Very convincing 26 36 32 34 35 35 34 Somewhat convincing 41 27 35 34 29 28 30 Not very convincing 33 35 30 30 35 37 34 Unsure 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 54 57 57 56 52 57 57 Very convincing 14 17 12 12 15 18 16 Somewhat convincing 40 40 45 44 37 39 41 Not very convincing 38 40 37 37 44 40 39 Unsure 8 3 6 7 3 3 4 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-423
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 69 65 71 61 63 57 64 Very convincing 37 30 41 31 35 25 34 Somewhat convincing 32 35 30 30 28 32 30 Not very convincing 28 28 28 39 37 43 34 Unsure 3 7 1 1 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 58 65 54 56 57 54 57 Very convincing 18 21 16 14 15 13 16 Somewhat convincing 40 44 38 42 42 41 41 Not very convincing 36 26 42 42 40 44 39 Unsure 6 9 4 3 3 1 4 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-424
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 70 63 64 63 61 65 59 64 Very convincing 32 34 33 35 35 33 35 34 Somewhat convincing 39 28 31 28 25 32 24 30 Not very convincing 26 37 35 36 39 33 40 34 Unsure 4 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 68 55 55 54 57 57 55 57 Very convincing 16 16 16 13 21 13 25 16 Somewhat convincing 52 39 39 40 36 44 30 41 Not very convincing 25 42 38 44 42 37 41 39 Unsure 7 3 7 2 1 5 4 4 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-425
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 56 68 71 54 65 69 60 67 64 Very convincing 28 39 47 29 38 33 32 35 34 Somewhat convincing 27 29 24 24 27 36 28 32 30 Not very convincing 43 30 28 45 34 29 37 33 34 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 0 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 55 58 60 55 56 58 54 58 57 Very convincing 13 16 19 21 12 15 17 15 16 Somewhat convincing 42 42 41 34 45 42 37 43 41 Not very convincing 44 38 36 43 40 38 41 38 39 Unsure 1 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-426
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 73 63 80 58 60 56 64 Very convincing 45 46 44 27 33 20 34 Somewhat convincing 28 18 36 31 27 37 30 Not very convincing 24 32 19 41 39 44 34 Unsure 3 5 1 1 1 1 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 58 55 61 56 59 52 57 Very convincing 20 24 18 14 18 9 16 Somewhat convincing 38 31 43 42 41 43 41 Not very convincing 38 41 35 40 36 45 39 Unsure 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-427
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 70 76 67 70 66 66 55 58 51 59 64 Very convincing 41 46 32 40 35 29 28 39 18 29 34 Somewhat convincing 30 30 35 29 32 36 27 19 33 31 30 Not very convincing 28 24 31 28 30 34 45 41 49 40 34 Unsure 1 0 3 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 57 59 66 57 64 69 46 50 45 56 57 Very convincing 23 25 10 20 12 11 14 18 13 13 16 Somewhat convincing 34 34 56 37 52 58 32 33 32 43 41 Not very convincing 38 38 30 37 30 29 51 45 55 42 39 Unsure 5 3 4 6 6 2 2 5 0 2 4 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-428
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 71 70 68 65 53 56 76 66 66 68 57 53 64 Very convincing 41 40 41 24 34 23 42 40 27 39 28 28 34 Somewhat convincing 30 30 28 42 19 33 35 26 39 29 29 25 30 Not very convincing 26 30 27 35 47 43 22 32 30 32 43 46 34 Unsure 2 5 1 2 1 5 1 1 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 64 50 65 67 42 49 55 59 74 56 41 52 57 Very convincing 24 22 7 13 15 14 22 24 5 15 13 16 16 Somewhat convincing 39 28 58 54 27 36 33 34 69 41 28 36 41 Not very convincing 34 41 26 33 55 49 37 38 23 39 59 44 39 Unsure 1 9 8 3 2 8 3 3 6 5 4 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-429
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 62 70 64 77 58 62 66 66 64 Very convincing 31 38 33 37 32 31 36 36 34 Somewhat convincing 31 32 30 40 27 31 30 30 30 Not very convincing 36 29 35 23 38 38 31 33 34 Unsure 2 1 1 3 3 0 1 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the stateon things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 56 56 58 58 50 56 59 50 57 Very convincing 13 17 15 16 17 17 17 10 16 Somewhat convincing 43 39 43 42 33 39 43 40 41 Not very convincing 40 41 38 42 44 39 37 46 39 Unsure 4 3 4 6 4 3 4 4 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-430
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 70 55 60 68 72 57 62 70 70 63 64 Very convincing 44 19 27 42 47 24 26 42 39 35 34 Somewhat convincing 26 35 33 26 25 33 36 28 31 28 30 Not very convincing 28 45 39 29 25 43 38 30 29 36 34 Unsure 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 61 47 57 55 59 51 63 54 62 52 57 Very convincing 23 8 13 19 21 11 22 15 18 15 16 Somewhat convincing 38 38 44 36 37 40 41 39 44 37 41 Not very convincing 35 51 40 40 36 47 37 42 37 45 39 Unsure 4 2 3 5 5 2 0 3 1 3 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-431
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 64 63 65 66 61 65 57 71 64 Very convincing 38 45 33 28 34 30 23 48 34 Somewhat convincing 26 18 32 37 27 35 34 23 30 Not very convincing 34 34 34 34 35 34 43 28 34 Unsure 1 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 53 59 49 66 49 57 58 62 57 Very convincing 18 28 12 15 12 16 15 20 16
Somewhat convincing 35 32 37 51 37 41 42 42 41 Not very convincing 43 40 46 31 44 41 34 37 39 Unsure 3 1 5 2 6 2 8 1 4 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-432
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 73 63 60 67 64 66 63 64 Very convincing 47 30 28 36 33 33 35 34 Somewhat convincing 26 32 32 30 31 33 29 30 Not very convincing 25 37 38 32 35 32 30 34 Unsure 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 63 55 59 60 55 59 61 57 Very convincing 24 13 10 18 10 29 10 16 Somewhat convincing 39 42 49 42 45 30 51 41 Not very convincing 34 42 34 40 41 39 34 39 Unsure 2 3 7 4 5 4 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-433
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 68 57 60 65 62 66 64 Very convincing 38 28 20 39 29 36 34 Somewhat convincing 30 29 40 26 33 30 30 Not very convincing 31 41 36 35 35 34 34 Unsure 1 2 3 1 3 0 1 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 63 47 53 57 53 58 57 Very convincing 19 10 13 16 14 17 16 Somewhat convincing 44 37 40 41 40 41 41 Not very convincing 33 47 40 39 44 38 39 Unsure 3 5 7 3 3 4 4 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-434
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 70 55 69 54 64 72 58 64 Very convincing 41 24 41 30 22 46 25 34 Somewhat convincing 29 32 28 25 42 26 33 30 Not very convincing 28 45 30 42 35 26 41 34 Unsure 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 59 52 65 49 45 64 51 57 Very convincing 18 11 21 12 12 20 13 16 Somewhat convincing 40 41 45 37 33 43 38 41 Not very convincing 37 45 33 41 52 31 46 39 Unsure 4 3 2 10 3 6 2 4 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-435
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 72 61 67 62 74 57 64 Very convincing 47 29 35 34 44 26 34 Somewhat convincing 25 33 32 28 29 31 30 Not very convincing 26 37 31 38 25 42 34 Unsure 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 66 53 56 59 63 55 57 Very convincing 27 10 16 17 26 10 16 Somewhat convincing 40 43 40 42 37 45 41 Not very convincing 30 43 37 40 32 43 39 Unsure 3 3 7 1 5 2 4 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-436
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ44 Proposed amendment
allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 57 72 61 53 64 66 63 69 70 64 Very convincing 23 46 25 18 30 30 32 52 43 34 Somewhat convincing 34 27 35 34 33 35 32 18 27 30 Not very convincing 42 26 39 46 33 32 37 31 27 34 Unsure 0 2 0 1 3 2 2 1 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 52 61 53 48 65 59 55 56 61 57 Very convincing 11 20 12 10 15 14 15 24 23 16 Somewhat convincing 40 41 41 38 50 45 40 32 38 41 Not very convincing 45 35 45 46 33 38 44 39 34 39 Unsure 4 4 2 6 2 3 1 5 5 4 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-437
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q44 Proposed amendment allows elected or appointed local officials to stop oil & gas development in a city or county without even requiring a vote of the people, & that's undemocratic, like raising taxes without a vote
Convincing 61 63 63 60 68 50 70 63 58 60 64 Very convincing 33 34 35 33 45 27 34 35 32 35 34 Somewhat convincing 28 29 28 27 23 23 36 28 26 25 30 Not very convincing 37 35 35 38 32 50 28 35 42 40 34 Unsure 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q45 Counties & cities already have limits set by the state on things like their debt, taxes, transportation, criminal law & other matters, so it makes sense that the state also places some limits on what local governments can & cannot do when it comes to oil & gas development
Convincing 52 54 55 52 57 46 67 53 47 55 57 Very convincing 16 16 15 16 27 12 18 14 17 18 16 Somewhat convincing 36 38 40 36 31 34 49 39 30 36 41 Not very convincing 44 41 41 44 38 51 30 42 48 44 39 Unsure 4 4 3 4 5 3 2 5 5 1 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-438
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 55 57 59 62 52 57 41 57 Very convincing 34 26 28 28 25 29 22 28 Somewhat convincing 22 31 31 34 27 28 19 28 Not very convincing 42 39 37 32 46 42 55 40 Unsure 2 4 4 5 2 1 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-439
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 56 58 55 43 51 59 57 54 57 Very convincing 25 27 30 25 17 31 28 32 28 Somewhat convincing 31 30 25 18 34 28 28 22 28 Not very convincing 39 37 42 54 46 37 42 41 40 Unsure 4 5 2 3 2 4 1 5 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-440
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 61 52 66 50 56 60 62 61 46 57 Very convincing 28 29 36 23 28 26 30 35 24 28 Somewhat convincing 33 24 30 27 29 35 32 26 22 28 Not very convincing 36 43 33 47 37 39 34 38 47 40 Unsure 2 4 1 3 6 1 3 1 7 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-441
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 51 58 58 60 55 56 57 Very convincing 28 28 36 37 23 25 28 Somewhat convincing 23 30 22 23 32 31 28 Not very convincing 48 38 41 40 40 39 40 Unsure 0 4 1 1 4 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-442
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 55 58 54 57 60 52 57 Very convincing 27 26 28 28 33 20 28 Somewhat convincing 28 32 26 29 27 32 28 Not very convincing 41 39 42 40 37 44 40 Unsure 4 3 4 3 2 4 3 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-443
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 61 56 49 58 60 57 55 57 Very convincing 19 30 26 33 30 29 28 28 Somewhat convincing 42 26 22 25 30 28 27 28 Not very convincing 38 40 50 37 35 41 39 40 Unsure 1 4 1 5 5 2 6 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-444
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 55 56 60 47 66 54 58 55 57 Very convincing 20 29 36 20 29 31 29 26 28 Somewhat convincing 35 27 24 27 37 23 28 29 28 Not very convincing 42 41 35 49 31 43 40 41 40 Unsure 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 4 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-445
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 58 56 58 57 63 50 57 Very convincing 31 36 28 27 35 18 28 Somewhat convincing 27 21 31 30 28 32 28 Not very convincing 39 43 36 40 33 48 40 Unsure 4 1 6 3 5 2 3 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-446
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 60 57 60 61 67 59 49 48 49 53 57 Very convincing 34 32 27 32 35 28 23 27 19 25 28 Somewhat convincing 26 25 33 29 32 31 26 22 29 28 28 Not very convincing 36 39 36 35 28 36 49 50 50 44 40 Unsure 4 5 4 4 5 4 2 2 2 3 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-447
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 64 56 70 51 47 51 58 62 71 46 50 48 57 Very convincing 28 39 36 18 17 28 34 33 27 28 30 17 28 Somewhat convincing 36 17 33 33 30 23 24 28 44 19 21 31 28 Not very convincing 32 39 28 44 52 47 39 33 29 45 50 49 40 Unsure 3 5 2 6 1 2 3 5 9 3 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-448
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 60 53 59 56 51 59 58 46 57 Very convincing 26 30 29 33 21 29 28 27 28 Somewhat convincing 34 23 29 23 30 30 31 19 28 Not very convincing 38 43 39 42 45 37 38 52 40 Unsure 3 4 2 2 4 3 4 2 3 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-449
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 66 40 51 65 65 45 44 59 58 54 57 Very convincing 36 15 25 33 35 20 21 30 29 24 28 Somewhat convincing 29 25 26 32 31 25 23 29 29 30 28 Not very convincing 29 58 46 32 30 53 54 38 38 43 40 Unsure 4 2 3 3 4 2 2 3 4 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-450
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 57 56 57 58 55 51 59 65 57 Very convincing 31 37 27 22 31 25 25 34 28 Somewhat convincing 25 19 30 36 24 26 34 31 28 Not very convincing 40 41 39 40 40 46 39 33 40 Unsure 4 4 3 2 5 3 1 2 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-451
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 69 60 49 53 57 54 63 57 Very convincing 40 25 23 28 29 25 23 28 Somewhat convincing 29 35 25 25 28 28 40 28 Not very convincing 26 37 48 46 41 43 33 40 Unsure 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-452
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 63 51 47 59 55 57 57 Very convincing 34 22 23 30 31 27 28 Somewhat convincing 29 29 24 29 24 30 28 Not very convincing 34 46 52 37 42 39 40 Unsure 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-453
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 62 48 65 47 48 75 42 57 Very convincing 32 22 34 23 20 41 20 28 Somewhat convincing 30 26 31 24 28 33 23 28 Not very convincing 34 49 32 51 46 22 55 40 Unsure 4 3 3 1 6 3 3 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-454
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 70 48 61 53 72 47 57 Very convincing 35 25 29 27 38 21 28 Somewhat convincing 35 23 31 26 35 25 28 Not very convincing 27 49 36 44 24 51 40 Unsure 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-455
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ46 Colorado collects revenue
for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes the revenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties passlocal bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 41 70 45 38 57 57 51 68 67 57 Very convincing 16 40 19 19 27 25 25 42 37 28 Somewhat convincing 24 30 26 20 30 32 25 27 30 28 Not very convincing 57 26 53 59 39 40 46 27 29 40 Unsure 2 4 2 2 4 3 3 4 4 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-456
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q46 Colorado collects revenue for most K-12 school funding on a statewide basis & then distributes therevenue to all local school districts; under this system, if one or two of the biggest oil producing counties pass local bans on oil & gas activity, local schools statewide would lose up to $300M annually in taxes once paid by oil & gas companies
Convincing 54 55 56 55 61 49 63 52 54 53 57 Very convincing 27 27 27 26 34 20 33 24 28 27 28 Somewhat convincing 27 29 30 28 27 29 31 28 26 26 28 Not very convincing 43 41 40 42 36 48 34 45 40 43 40 Unsure 3 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 6 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-457
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 57 51 55 59 42 53 47 52 Very convincing 27 20 20 20 20 31 13 22 Somewhat convincing 30 31 35 39 22 23 34 30 Not very convincing 39 45 41 37 53 46 49 44 Unsure 5 4 3 3 5 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 54 48 51 51 45 60 46 52 Very convincing 23 18 20 20 16 25 19 21 Somewhat convincing 31 30 31 31 29 35 28 31 Not very convincing 40 46 43 44 48 39 50 44 Unsure 6 5 5 3 7 3 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-458
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 50 55 54 47 43 54 49 60 52 Very convincing 21 21 19 14 22 23 16 31 22 Somewhat convincing 29 34 35 33 21 32 33 29 30 Not very convincing 45 41 43 49 53 43 45 38 44 Unsure 4 4 3 4 3 3 6 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 49 52 53 43 46 52 51 59 52 Very convincing 19 21 22 19 20 17 18 35 21 Somewhat convincing 30 31 31 24 26 35 33 24 31 Not very convincing 46 42 43 53 47 44 45 36 44 Unsure 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 Refused 1 1 3 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-459
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 59 45 53 54 48 62 55 44 46 52 Very convincing 24 20 14 25 24 19 29 15 23 22 Somewhat convincing 35 25 39 29 23 43 27 29 23 30 Not very convincing 36 52 43 43 48 34 38 53 52 44 Unsure 5 2 4 2 4 4 6 3 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 51 53 59 48 51 50 52 56 51 52 Very convincing 22 19 22 19 21 17 27 19 20 21 Somewhat convincing 29 34 37 29 30 33 25 37 31 31 Not very convincing 44 43 39 49 41 46 42 42 44 44 Unsure 4 4 1 3 7 3 5 1 6 4 Refused 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-460
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 53 52 55 53 47 51 52 Very convincing 17 23 20 20 21 23 22 Somewhat convincing 36 29 34 33 26 28 30 Not very convincing 41 46 43 44 51 46 44 Unsure 6 2 3 3 2 3 3 Refused 0 1 1 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 45 54 53 55 50 52 52 Very convincing 15 22 24 26 18 19 21 Somewhat convincing 31 32 28 29 31 33 31 Not very convincing 50 42 44 43 46 43 44 Unsure 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 Refused 1 0 1 0 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-461
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 51 54 49 53 50 58 52 Very convincing 22 20 24 21 17 29 22 Somewhat convincing 28 33 25 32 33 29 30 Not very convincing 46 38 50 44 46 40 44 Unsure 4 8 1 3 3 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, therewill be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 59 67 55 47 47 45 52 Very convincing 26 19 30 16 18 14 21 Somewhat convincing 34 48 25 30 29 32 31 Not very convincing 36 29 40 50 49 50 44 Unsure 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 Refused 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-462
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 51 52 49 52 56 53 52 52 Very convincing 12 24 21 22 29 22 29 22 Somewhat convincing 39 28 27 30 26 32 23 30 Not very convincing 46 45 46 46 42 44 44 44 Unsure 3 3 5 2 2 3 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 64 49 47 53 47 50 54 52 Very convincing 25 20 20 20 22 20 22 21 Somewhat convincing 39 29 28 33 25 30 33 31 Not very convincing 33 46 48 43 49 47 38 44 Unsure 2 4 4 4 4 2 7 4 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-463
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 46 54 45 51 47 55 53 51 52 Very convincing 18 23 27 20 17 29 20 22 22 Somewhat convincing 28 31 18 31 31 27 32 29 30 Not very convincing 47 44 54 43 49 44 43 46 44 Unsure 7 2 1 5 4 1 4 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 52 53 53 37 57 60 51 52 52 Very convincing 17 22 24 19 15 28 22 19 21 Somewhat convincing 35 31 29 19 42 33 29 33 31 Not very convincing 44 43 44 55 41 38 45 43 44 Unsure 3 4 4 7 1 2 4 4 4 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-464
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 60 61 60 48 54 41 52 Very convincing 33 34 33 15 21 9 22 Somewhat convincing 27 27 27 33 33 32 30 Not very convincing 38 38 38 48 42 56 44 Unsure 2 1 2 3 4 3 3 Refused 0 1 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 61 58 63 46 55 37 52 Very convincing 25 29 23 17 23 9 21 Somewhat convincing 35 29 40 30 31 28 31 Not very convincing 36 39 34 49 38 62 44 Unsure 3 3 4 4 6 1 4 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-465
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 70 71 47 65 47 50 37 44 32 43 52 Very convincing 37 41 13 33 18 13 14 17 12 14 22 Somewhat convincing 33 30 34 32 29 37 23 27 20 29 30 Not very convincing 27 28 47 33 50 45 60 52 66 54 44 Unsure 2 1 5 2 3 5 2 4 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 64 64 55 63 58 55 37 44 28 45 52 Very convincing 33 30 16 29 16 17 12 20 6 14 21 Somewhat convincing 31 34 39 34 42 38 25 25 23 30 31 Not very convincing 32 35 38 32 33 40 61 53 70 52 44 Unsure 3 1 6 5 8 4 2 3 1 3 4 Refused 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-466
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 75 65 58 36 40 35 69 71 53 40 40 34 52 Very convincing 37 37 18 9 15 14 29 42 7 21 19 10 22 Somewhat convincing 39 28 40 27 25 21 40 29 46 19 22 24 30 Not very convincing 20 35 35 60 57 62 28 27 41 55 60 60 44 Unsure 4 7 4 3 2 3 1 6 5 4 3 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 59 68 60 49 29 43 65 63 62 46 32 41 52 Very convincing 31 35 19 12 13 11 32 34 14 18 10 14 21 Somewhat convincing 28 33 41 37 16 31 33 29 48 28 22 27 31 Not very convincing 35 29 33 44 69 55 31 33 35 43 67 55 44 Unsure 4 3 7 6 1 3 4 3 2 11 1 3 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-467
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 47 59 48 67 56 48 59 46 52 Very convincing 13 32 18 36 24 19 23 27 22 Somewhat convincing 34 27 31 32 32 29 36 19 30 Not very convincing 49 39 48 30 41 49 37 50 44 Unsure 4 2 3 2 2 2 4 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 49 58 52 61 45 47 56 57 52 Very convincing 17 27 19 23 20 14 27 23 21 Somewhat convincing 32 31 32 38 24 33 29 34 31 Not very convincing 47 36 46 35 48 49 38 41 44 Unsure 3 4 2 4 6 3 5 2 4 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-468
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 61 38 40 70 69 38 48 60 54 51 52 Very convincing 30 12 13 37 33 14 21 28 25 25 22 Somewhat convincing 31 26 28 33 35 24 27 32 29 26 30 Not very convincing 35 60 55 28 29 60 52 38 42 46 44 Unsure 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 0 1 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 61 38 47 59 60 43 51 55 58 50 52 Very convincing 30 10 15 29 30 10 18 27 25 20 21 Somewhat convincing 31 28 32 30 30 33 32 28 33 31 31 Not very convincing 34 57 49 38 36 52 47 43 40 44 44 Unsure 5 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 4 4 Refused 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-469
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 55 65 48 54 41 52 52 61 52 Very convincing 30 37 24 15 16 24 13 30 22 Somewhat convincing 26 28 24 39 25 28 39 31 30 Not very convincing 42 32 49 41 56 45 44 36 44 Unsure 3 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 3 Refused 1 1 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 51 52 50 53 54 50 45 59 52 Very convincing 26 37 17 15 19 17 13 34 21 Somewhat convincing 25 15 33 38 35 34 32 25 31 Not very convincing 45 43 46 44 40 45 52 38 44 Unsure 4 6 3 3 4 5 3 3 4 Refused 0 1 2 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-470
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 64 41 44 57 46 51 44 52 Very convincing 37 9 12 34 17 18 11 22 Somewhat convincing 27 32 32 23 30 33 33 30 Not very convincing 32 57 52 37 51 43 51 44 Unsure 3 2 4 6 3 3 5 3 Refused 1 2 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 61 47 47 64 53 41 53 52 Very convincing 31 14 13 34 16 15 27 21 Somewhat convincing 30 33 34 30 38 27 25 31 Not very convincing 36 48 49 34 43 52 47 44 Unsure 3 4 4 2 4 5 4
Refused 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-471
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 56 45 48 53 51 53 52 Very convincing 29 15 18 23 21 22 22 Somewhat convincing 28 30 30 30 30 31 30 Not very convincing 40 51 51 42 48 43 44 Unsure 3 4 1 4 0 4 3 Refused 1 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 55 51 56 51 48 54 52 Very convincing 25 18 19 22 21 21 21 Somewhat convincing 30 34 36 29 27 34 31 Not very convincing 39 47 40 45 48 41 44 Unsure 5 2 5 3 5 4 4 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-472
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 64 35 61 46 40 66 43 52 Very convincing 30 11 32 13 10 30 16 22 Somewhat convincing 34 24 29 32 30 36 27 30 Not very convincing 33 61 35 51 57 33 53 44 Unsure 3 3 4 2 3 1 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 0 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 59 40 59 48 41 63 45 52 Very convincing 27 11 27 15 11 29 15 21 Somewhat convincing 33 29 32 32 29 34 30 31 Not very convincing 36 57 37 49 52 32 52 44 Unsure 4 3 3 3 6 4 3 4 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-473
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 66 44 54 50 68 40 52 Very convincing 35 13 20 24 33 13 22 Somewhat convincing 31 31 34 26 35 27 30 Not very convincing 32 51 42 48 31 56 44 Unsure 2 3 4 3 1 3 3 Refused 1 0 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 64 46 56 50 67 42 52 Very convincing 31 14 18 23 33 11 21 Somewhat convincing 32 32 38 27 34 31 31 Not very convincing 32 50 40 47 30 55 44 Unsure 4 2 4 3 4 3 4 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-474
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ47 Radical environmentalists
have failed to get what they want on fracking from thelegislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 42 61 45 38 50 51 52 65 63 52 Very convincing 11 33 14 13 17 15 18 42 33 22 Somewhat convincing 31 28 31 25 33 35 34 23 31 30 Not very convincing 54 36 53 59 43 45 44 34 33 44 Unsure 3 3 3 4 7 4 3 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 43 62 42 38 55 51 44 64 62 52 Very convincing 12 29 12 10 21 17 16 36 29 21 Somewhat convincing 30 33 30 29 34 34 28 28 34 31 Not very convincing 54 33 53 56 40 45 54 32 33 44 Unsure 3 4 4 5 5 3 2 5 4 4 Refused 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-475
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q47 Radical environmentalists have failed to get what they want on fracking from the legislature, even when the Democrats have controlled both the legislature & the Governor's office, so they now want to shift control to the local level where they think they may have better luck getting control
Convincing 48 51 51 50 68 35 49 56 49 53 52 Very convincing 21 23 22 22 38 10 18 22 27 27 22 Somewhat convincing 27 28 29 28 30 25 32 34 23 26 30 Not very convincing 49 45 45 47 31 62 46 41 48 45 44 Unsure 3 3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q48 If local governments suddenly strip oil & gas property owners of the value of their investments, there will be court-ordered lawsuit judgments & takings claims that could bankrupt some local governments that lack the financial wherewithal to pay claims & judgments
Convincing 47 50 51 47 61 39 59 45 54 49 52 Very convincing 18 18 20 18 31 10 26 16 21 20 21 Somewhat convincing 30 32 32 29 30 29 33 29 33 29 31 Not very convincing 48 45 44 48 35 58 38 51 39 47 44 Unsure 4 4 4 5 4 2 1 4 7 4 4 Refused 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-476
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 46 43 42 44 42 36 43 44 Very convincing 29 23 22 24 23 19 25 24 Somewhat convincing 17 20 19 21 19 17 18 19 Not very convincing 52 55 57 55 56 54 55 53 Unsure 3 1 1 0 2 9 2 3 Refused 0 0 1 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 55 54 55 63 43 57 47 53 Very convincing 24 25 25 29 19 19 21 24 Somewhat convincing 30 29 30 34 23 38 26 29 Not very convincing 39 43 41 34 53 40 49 44 Unsure 6 3 3 2 4 3 4 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-477
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 43 42 45 40 49 42 36 57 44 Very convincing 24 23 25 26 27 22 21 37 24 Somewhat convincing 19 19 20 14 22 20 15 20 19 Not very convincing 55 57 53 58 48 56 60 42 53 Unsure 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 55 57 47 43 44 56 53 57 53 Very convincing 26 27 21 22 20 23 18 39 24 Somewhat convincing 29 30 26 21 24 33 35 18 29 Not very convincing 41 38 50 55 53 40 45 41 44 Unsure 4 4 2 3 2 5 2 3 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-478
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 50 38 42 44 45 46 54 36 39 44 Very convincing 31 19 27 23 25 29 32 15 22 24 Somewhat convincing 19 19 15 21 20 17 22 22 17 19 Not very convincing 47 59 53 55 52 50 44 61 58 53 Unsure 3 3 5 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 56 51 49 53 57 54 58 51 51 53 Very convincing 26 22 18 23 30 18 34 22 22 24 Somewhat convincing 30 29 31 30 27 35 25 29 28 29 Not very convincing 42 45 47 44 39 45 39 46 45 44 Unsure 2 4 4 2 4 2 2 4 5 3 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-479
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 35 46 42 42 42 45 44 Very convincing 14 27 24 24 23 25 24 Somewhat convincing 21 19 18 19 19 20 19 Not very convincing 57 52 55 54 55 53 53 Unsure 8 1 3 3 2 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 52 53 55 57 53 52 53 Very convincing 8 27 23 24 25 24 24 Somewhat convincing 44 26 32 32 27 28 29 Not very convincing 45 43 43 41 44 43 44 Unsure 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-480
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 42 41 42 44 48 38 44 Very convincing 27 21 30 22 24 19 24 Somewhat convincing 15 20 12 22 24 18 19 Not very convincing 55 54 56 53 47 62 53 Unsure 3 4 2 3 4 3 Refused 0 1 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 52 58 48 54 61 42 53 Very convincing 24 27 22 24 28 17 24 Somewhat convincing 28 31 27 30 33 25 29 Not very convincing 45 40 48 43 35 57 44 Unsure 3 2 4 3 4 1 3 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-481
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 52 42 35 40 51 45 42 44 Very convincing 26 24 23 22 28 25 26 24 Somewhat convincing 25 18 12 18 23 20 16 19 Not very convincing 47 55 62 56 47 53 55 53 Unsure 1 3 3 4 1 2 3 3 Refused 1 0 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 50 54 46 49 71 55 53 53 Very convincing 22 24 17 21 36 23 29 24 Somewhat convincing 28 30 29 27 35 32 24 29 Not very convincing 42 43 51 49 28 42 43 44 Unsure 7 2 3 3 1 3 4 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-482
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 40 46 44 38 43 50 47 41 44 Very convincing 18 27 29 23 22 26 29 21 24 Somewhat convincing 22 19 15 15 21 24 18 20 19 Not very convincing 58 52 56 61 55 49 53 55 53 Unsure 2 1 1 2 1 0 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 49 56 49 50 52 54 55 51 53 Very convincing 19 27 28 26 22 24 29 19 24 Somewhat convincing 30 30 21 24 30 30 26 32 29 Not very convincing 47 41 46 48 45 42 42 46 44 Unsure 4 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-483
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 56 55 57 35 46 24 44 Very convincing 34 42 28 18 27 8 24 Somewhat convincing 23 13 29 17 19 15 19 Not very convincing 42 44 41 61 50 73 53 Unsure 1 1 2 3 4 3 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 62 59 64 47 58 35 53 Very convincing 32 39 28 18 24 11 24 Somewhat convincing 30 20 36 29 34 24 29 Not very convincing 35 39 32 50 39 63 44 Unsure 3 2 5 3 4 2 3 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-484
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 58 61 42 57 48 37 31 39 23 33 44 Very convincing 36 34 25 37 30 20 12 20 5 15 24 Somewhat convincing 22 26 17 20 19 18 19 20 18 18 19 Not very convincing 40 38 55 40 47 59 67 58 75 64 53 Unsure 2 1 4 3 5 4 2 2 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 63 63 56 63 58 53 39 53 27 45 53 Very convincing 31 35 26 32 28 22 13 17 9 17 24 Somewhat convincing 32 29 30 31 30 30 26 36 18 28 29 Not very convincing 31 32 42 33 40 44 58 43 72 52 44 Unsure 5 5 2 4 2 3 2 4 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-485
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 62 53 47 36 39 24 55 59 36 50 37 25 44 Very convincing 39 32 33 17 18 7 33 38 19 33 17 7 24 Somewhat convincing 23 21 14 20 21 17 22 22 17 16 19 18 19 Not very convincing 37 43 48 62 59 73 41 39 60 48 63 71 53 Unsure 1 4 5 2 2 2 4 1 5 2 4 3 Refused 1 0 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 66 60 60 52 38 40 59 66 57 55 40 39 53 Very convincing 31 31 30 22 13 13 24 37 23 31 13 13 24 Somewhat convincing 35 29 30 30 25 27 36 29 34 24 26 26 29 Not very convincing 30 32 39 45 60 57 35 28 40 44 60 57 44 Unsure 3 7 1 3 2 3 5 5 3 1 4 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-486
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 36 55 44 42 41 42 44 45 44 Very convincing 18 33 25 26 18 24 24 28 24 Somewhat convincing 17 22 19 15 23 18 21 17 19 Not very convincing 61 43 54 56 55 53 54 54 53 Unsure 3 1 2 2 4 4 2 1 3 Refused 1 1 1 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 50 59 50 55 56 51 58 47 53 Very convincing 21 28 23 24 22 23 26 21 24 Somewhat convincing 29 31 28 31 33 28 32 26 29 Not very convincing 47 38 47 40 39 46 39 48 44 Unsure 2 3 2 5 5 3 3 5 3 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-487
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 59 25 28 65 61 22 32 53 49 43 44 Very convincing 39 10 13 42 39 10 21 32 26 27 24 Somewhat convincing 21 15 14 23 22 13 11 21 23 17 19 Not very convincing 39 74 68 34 37 76 66 46 50 54 53 Unsure 1 1 4 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 67 31 44 63 70 34 41 61 58 47 53 Very convincing 36 7 15 35 39 11 14 31 28 22 24 Somewhat convincing 31 24 29 28 31 24 27 29 30 25 29 Not very convincing 30 67 52 35 28 64 57 37 39 50 44 Unsure 3 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-488
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 47 56 39 43 38 40 45 53 44 Very convincing 28 39 19 23 22 19 18 39 24 Somewhat convincing 19 17 20 21 17 21 27 14 19 Not very convincing 50 43 56 55 58 59 46 45 53 Unsure 3 5 2 3 1 9 1 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 54 56 52 56 47 55 53 56 53 Very convincing 27 30 24 22 21 25 17 28 24 Somewhat convincing 28 26 29 34 25 30 36 28 29 Not very convincing 43 42 45 42 47 43 45 42 44 Unsure 3 2 3 2 6 2 2 1 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-489
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 70 32 28 55 38 52 39 44 Very convincing 44 10 17 34 17 33 18 24 Somewhat convincing 26 22 11 21 21 19 21 19 Not very convincing 27 65 68 43 58 45 61 53 Unsure 2 3 3 2 4 1 1 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 67 44 43 59 48 49 46 53 Very convincing 36 13 13 36 19 18 23 24 Somewhat convincing 31 31 30 24 29 31 22 29 Not very convincing 29 51 55 40 48 46 54 44 Unsure 3 5 2 1 4 4 3 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-490
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 50 36 29 49 37 46 44 Very convincing 30 18 15 28 21 26 24 Somewhat convincing 20 18 14 21 17 20 19 Not very convincing 48 61 68 49 61 50 53 Unsure 1 3 4 2 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 60 44 39 57 50 55 53 Very convincing 31 15 11 28 28 22 24 Somewhat convincing 29 29 28 29 23 32 29 Not very convincing 36 54 59 39 49 41 44 Unsure 3 2 2 4 0 4 3 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-491
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 58 24 52 30 39 63 28 44 Very convincing 33 13 32 13 22 38 14 24 Somewhat convincing 25 11 20 16 17 25 13 19 Not very convincing 41 72 45 65 59 33 71 53 Unsure 2 4 2 5 2 4 1 3 Refused 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 62 41 63 39 50 71 38 53 Very convincing 32 11 31 16 18 39 13 24 Somewhat convincing 29 30 32 23 32 32 25 29 Not very convincing 36 56 35 57 47 25 61 44 Unsure 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 3 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-492
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 69 28 44 42 66 27 44 Very convincing 44 12 23 26 41 11 24 Somewhat convincing 25 16 21 16 25 16 19 Not very convincing 30 68 53 55 31 71 53 Unsure 1 4 3 3 3 2 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 66 42 59 47 72 39 53 Very convincing 39 13 26 22 41 10 24 Somewhat convincing 27 29 33 25 31 29 29 Not very convincing 32 53 38 50 25 57 44 Unsure 2 4 4 3 2 3 3 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-493
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ49 If cities are given the right
to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 25 61 26 16 41 39 32 74 63 44 Very convincing 10 38 13 8 18 19 17 47 38 24 Somewhat convincing 15 23 13 8 23 19 15 27 25 19 Not very convincing 73 35 72 80 51 58 66 26 33 53 Unsure 2 4 2 4 7 3 2 3 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 33 70 39 24 49 54 59 71 69 53 Very convincing 6 38 10 3 13 21 28 45 39 24 Somewhat convincing 26 31 29 20 36 33 31 27 30 29 Not very convincing 63 28 59 73 46 42 39 27 28 44 Unsure 4 2 2 4 5 4 2 1 3 3 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-494
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q49 If cities are given the right to stop oil & gas development, the most radical ones will next seek the right to stop any other industry that they don't like, shutting down car washes that use too much water, dry cleaners that use cleaning fluids, grocers that sell processed foods, & even gas stations that sell carbon-based fuels
Convincing 42 43 44 42 61 26 47 41 43 44 44 Very convincing 24 24 24 24 39 7 28 22 24 25 24 Somewhat convincing 18 19 20 18 22 18 19 20 19 19 19 Not very convincing 56 54 54 56 38 71 50 56 55 55 53 Unsure 2 3 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 1 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q50 Statewide regulation of oil & gas is generally working out well, so why take the risk of radically changing the system to an untested maze of local regulations
Convincing 52 51 54 53 66 42 51 52 57 52 53 Very convincing 24 22 24 25 35 16 25 19 29 25 24 Somewhat convincing 28 28 30 29 31 26 26 33 28 27 29 Not very convincing 46 46 43 44 29 55 44 45 41 47 44 Unsure 2 3 3 3 5 3 4 3 2 2 3 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-495
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 56 50 54 56 45 53 51 52 Very convincing 26 19 19 20 19 20 19 21 Somewhat convincing 31 31 34 36 26 33 32 31 Not very convincing 39 48 45 43 54 42 47 46 Unsure 4 1 1 0 2 5 1 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 48 56 57 60 51 48 47 53 Very convincing 21 24 24 26 22 19 23 23 Somewhat convincing 27 31 33 34 28 29 24 30 Not very convincing 44 40 38 36 44 50 50 43 Unsure 8 4 5 3 5 2 3 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-496
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 49 52 56 53 47 50 54 63 52 Very convincing 20 20 23 23 20 22 15 30 21 Somewhat convincing 29 33 33 31 27 28 39 33 31 Not very convincing 50 46 42 46 52 48 46 35 46 Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 54 56 51 47 48 57 49 56 53 Very convincing 24 24 22 24 24 25 15 32 23 Somewhat convincing 31 32 29 23 23 32 34 24 30 Not very convincing 41 38 44 50 47 40 46 35 43 Unsure 4 5 5 3 3 3 5 9 4 Refused 1 1 2 0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-497
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 55 49 59 47 52 56 54 53 47 52 Very convincing 23 19 19 20 23 20 26 13 23 21 Somewhat convincing 32 31 40 27 29 36 28 40 24 31 Not very convincing 44 47 38 52 45 43 45 42 51 46 Unsure 1 3 3 1 2 1 0 5 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 57 49 64 48 47 62 51 53 47 53 Very convincing 25 21 25 24 20 26 24 21 21 23 Somewhat convincing 32 28 39 25 27 36 27 32 25 30 Not very convincing 39 46 34 47 46 34 45 45 46 43 Unsure 4 5 2 5 7 4 3 2 7 4 Refused 1 0 0 1 0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-498
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 48 54 53 53 50 52 52 Very convincing 12 23 15 15 20 23 21 Somewhat convincing 36 31 37 38 30 28 31 Not very convincing 47 45 44 44 48 47 46 Unsure 5 1 3 3 1 1 2 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 58 52 59 60 48 51 53 Very convincing 22 23 24 25 21 23 23 Somewhat convincing 36 29 34 35 28 28 30 Not very convincing 38 43 39 39 47 44 43 Unsure 4 5 2 2 4 5 4 Refused 1 0 1 0 0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-499
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 58 60 57 48 48 48 52 Very convincing 25 20 29 17 17 17 21 Somewhat convincing 33 41 28 31 31 31 31 Not very convincing 41 38 42 50 48 52 46 Unsure 1 1 1 3 4 1 2 Refused 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 55 66 49 51 55 45 53 Very convincing 27 29 26 20 21 19 23 Somewhat convincing 28 37 23 31 34 26 30 Not very convincing 40 28 47 45 43 48 43 Unsure 4 6 4 4 2 7 4 Refused 0 1 0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-500
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 59 50 45 53 52 50 51 52 Very convincing 21 21 17 22 23 21 25 21 Somewhat convincing 38 29 28 31 29 29 27 31 Not very convincing 41 47 51 45 47 48 45 46 Unsure 3 4 2 1 2 3 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 69 50 45 48 56 55 47 53 Very convincing 27 22 20 23 23 25 22 23 Somewhat convincing 42 28 26 25 33 30 25 30 Not very convincing 30 45 51 45 39 42 45 43 Unsure 1 5 2 7 5 3 9 4 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-501
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 55 52 52 46 51 57 52 53 52 Very convincing 20 22 22 21 12 28 23 19 21 Somewhat convincing 35 30 30 25 40 29 29 34 31 Not very convincing 45 46 47 53 46 43 46 45 46 Unsure 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 50 54 53 43 58 59 57 49 53 Very convincing 16 25 29 20 29 22 25 22 23 Somewhat convincing 33 29 24 23 29 37 33 27 30 Not very convincing 48 40 39 50 39 39 38 47 43 Unsure 3 6 8 6 4 2 5 4 4 Refused 0 1 0 0 0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-502
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 57 61 54 49 56 41 52 Very convincing 26 30 23 17 24 8 21 Somewhat convincing 31 31 31 32 32 33 31 Not very convincing 42 38 46 48 41 56 46 Unsure 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 Refused 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 63 55 69 46 57 33 53 Very convincing 31 34 29 18 25 10 23 Somewhat convincing 32 21 40 28 32 23 30 Not very convincing 33 41 28 49 36 64 43 Unsure 4 4 3 5 7 3 4 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-503
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 55 59 53 54 57 55 48 60 37 51 52 Very convincing 26 27 22 25 25 22 14 23 7 17 21 Somewhat convincing 29 32 32 29 31 33 34 37 30 34 31 Not very convincing 40 40 47 42 43 45 50 37 62 48 46 Unsure 4 1 3 2 3 1 1 2 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 61 63 54 63 62 49 43 54 33 46 53 Very convincing 28 29 22 29 27 18 19 30 11 18 23 Somewhat convincing 33 34 32 34 35 31 24 24 21 27 30 Not very convincing 33 33 43 33 34 46 52 40 64 50 43 Unsure 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 6 3 4 4 Refused 0 0 0 1 1 0 0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-504
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 55 55 57 50 54 44 56 54 53 54 55 41 52 Very convincing 29 23 22 21 16 12 25 27 14 32 13 15 21 Somewhat convincing 26 31 34 29 37 32 31 27 39 22 42 27 31 Not very convincing 44 37 43 50 44 55 38 42 47 46 42 58 46 Unsure 8 2 1 6 3 3 1 2 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 65 56 61 46 40 45 61 61 61 45 51 36 53 Very convincing 25 31 30 13 19 19 21 33 23 20 26 13 23 Somewhat convincing 40 26 31 33 22 26 40 28 38 25 25 24 30 Not very convincing 32 35 33 52 56 50 34 33 37 50 46 58 43 Unsure 2 9 5 2 4 5 6 5 2 4 3 6 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-505
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 50 54 51 59 50 54 52 47 52 Very convincing 12 30 18 35 16 16 25 24 21 Somewhat convincing 38 24 33 24 33 39 27 23 31 Not very convincing 47 45 46 39 48 42 47 52 46 Unsure 3 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 47 60 52 60 51 49 55 59 53 Very convincing 20 26 21 29 24 20 24 29 23 Somewhat convincing 27 33 31 31 27 29 31 29 30 Not very convincing 48 37 44 33 44 47 39 38 43 Unsure 5 2 4 7 4 4 5 3 4 Refused 0 1 0 0 0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-506
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 61 39 46 59 60 43 48 55 55 47 52 Very convincing 28 10 13 30 28 11 19 24 18 21 21 Somewhat convincing 32 29 33 29 32 32 29 31 37 26 31 Not very convincing 37 59 51 40 38 56 51 45 43 52 46 Unsure 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 61 40 44 62 65 40 51 56 54 50 53 Very convincing 29 12 17 27 30 17 24 22 22 25 23 Somewhat convincing 31 28 28 35 35 23 28 34 33 25 30 Not very convincing 35 55 50 35 31 55 45 42 41 46 43 Unsure 5 4 5 3 4 5 4 2 5 4 4 Refused 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-507
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 54 59 50 47 57 49 45 58 52 Very convincing 29 38 23 14 13 18 21 31 21 Somewhat convincing 25 21 28 33 44 30 24 27 31 Not very convincing 44 39 47 51 40 49 51 42 46 Unsure 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 Refused 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 48 53 44 60 50 51 56 55 53 Very convincing 21 29 16 20 31 17 18 28 23 Somewhat convincing 27 25 28 40 19 34 38 27 30 Not very convincing 46 41 50 36 46 44 41 39 43 Unsure 5 6 5 4 3 5 3 5 4 Refused 0 1 1 1 0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-508
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 72 55 41 42 47 59 61 52 Very convincing 36 13 17 23 14 24 17 21 Somewhat convincing 35 42 25 19 33 35 44 31 Not very convincing 27 43 56 56 50 38 38 46 Unsure 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 67 49 43 50 53 46 59 53 Very convincing 35 16 15 22 19 30 31 23 Somewhat convincing 32 34 28 28 34 16 28 30 Not very convincing 31 45 49 46 43 53 37 43 Unsure 2 5 6 4 4 4 4 Refused 1 1 1 0
Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-509
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 58 44 47 53 51 53 52 Very convincing 24 18 16 22 23 20 21 Somewhat convincing 34 26 31 31 28 33 31 Not very convincing 41 54 48 45 47 45 46 Unsure 1 3 5 1 2 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 55 53 50 54 46 56 53 Very convincing 24 22 22 23 18 25 23 Somewhat convincing 31 31 28 31 28 31 30 Not very convincing 40 45 43 42 48 40 43 Unsure 5 2 6 3 6 4 4 Refused 0 0 1 0 0 0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-510
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 60 40 56 47 50 66 43 52 Very convincing 25 13 25 14 20 30 14 21 Somewhat convincing 34 28 31 33 30 36 29 31 Not very convincing 39 57 42 51 48 31 57 46 Unsure 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 Refused 1 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 61 41 59 48 44 67 42 53 Very convincing 28 16 30 16 17 31 17 23 Somewhat convincing 34 25 29 32 26 36 26 30 Not very convincing 34 55 36 49 51 28 53 43 Unsure 4 4 5 2 6 5 4 4 Refused 0 1 0 0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-511
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 65 47 57 49 64 44 52 Very convincing 33 15 19 23 30 14 21 Somewhat convincing 32 31 38 27 34 30 31 Not very convincing 34 51 39 50 33 55 46 Unsure 1 2 4 1 3 1 2 Refused 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 69 44 51 53 69 42 53 Very convincing 32 16 24 22 35 14 23 Somewhat convincing 36 28 28 31 34 27 30 Not very convincing 28 51 42 44 27 54 43 Unsure 3 5 6 3 4 5 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-512
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ51 Widespread changes in
the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 44 59 45 37 51 53 53 61 58 52 Very convincing 13 28 12 10 17 16 14 39 32 21 Somewhat convincing 32 31 33 27 35 38 39 22 27 31 Not very convincing 53 39 53 60 46 45 45 37 40 46 Unsure 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Refused 0 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 38 67 42 34 61 52 42 67 66 53 Very convincing 13 31 13 16 22 18 17 37 34 23 Somewhat convincing 25 35 28 19 39 34 25 30 32 30 Not very convincing 56 30 53 59 32 44 56 29 30 43 Unsure 5 3 5 6 7 4 3 4 4 4 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-513
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q51 Widespread changes in the system used to produce oil & gas could disrupt energy markets & lead to increases in utility bills & gasoline prices at the pump
Convincing 49 50 53 48 58 39 64 44 49 47 52 Very convincing 20 20 20 19 29 12 24 17 23 21 21 Somewhat convincing 29 30 33 30 29 27 40 27 27 26 31 Not very convincing 49 47 46 50 38 60 35 53 49 51 46 Unsure 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 3 2 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q52 If local governments take over oil & gas regulation, there will have to be significant local property & sales tax increases to pay the cost of regulation & lawsuits
Convincing 48 51 53 50 58 42 61 46 52 49 53 Very convincing 21 23 23 22 30 17 29 20 20 23 23 Somewhat convincing 27 28 30 28 28 25 32 26 33 26 30 Not very convincing 47 44 42 46 35 56 37 47 43 45 43 Unsure 5 5 4 4 6 2 1 7 4 5 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-514
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 38 41 43 46 35 49 30 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
54 50 49 44 56 48 62 52
Both 2 2 0 0 3 1 3 2 Neither 4 5 5 7 3 1 3 4 Unsure 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0
Complicated - Sensible -16 -9 -7 2 -21 1 -33 -11Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-515
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 41 43 38 32 35 40 39 45 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
49 48 55 60 53 52 54 48 52
Both 2 0 1 3 3 0 1 4 2 Neither 5 5 4 3 6 5 4 1 4 Unsure 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0
Complicated - Sensible -8 -5 -17 -28 -18 -13 -15 -3 -11Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-516
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
43 38 42 33 48 37 48 39 38 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 48 55 54 57 42 56 39 52 57 52
Both 2 1 1 3 2 3 2 2 1 2 Neither 4 5 2 6 5 3 5 7 3 4 Unsure 3 1 2 4 1 5 2 2 Refused 0 0 1 0
Complicated - Sensible -5 -17 -12 -24 5 -19 10 -14 -19 -11Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-517
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 31 43 36 36 44 42 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
58 50 56 57 50 50 52
Both 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Neither 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 Unsure 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -27 -7 -20 -22 -6 -9 -11Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-518
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 40 40 40 40 43 36 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
53 53 53 51 49 53 52
Both 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 Neither 3 3 3 6 4 8 4 Unsure 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Refused 0
Complicated - Sensible -13 -13 -13 -10 -7 -17 -11Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-519
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 45 39 34 38 46 39 47 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
51 53 61 56 41 54 44 52
Both 2 1 2 2 2 0 2 Neither 3 4 4 3 6 3 5 4 Unsure 2 2 1 0 4 1 4 2 Refused 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -6 -14 -27 -18 5 -15 2 -11Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-520
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
39 43 48 37 41 41 39 42 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 50 51 46 54 51 54 52 51 52
Both 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 Neither 8 3 3 6 6 2 6 3 4 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 Refused 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -11 -9 2 -17 -10 -13 -13 -9 -11Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-521
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 46 44 48 38 45 30 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
45 49 42 55 48 64 52
Both 1 1 1 2 4 2 Neither 5 4 6 4 2 6 4 Unsure 3 2 4 1 2 0 2 Refused 0
Complicated - Sensible 2 -5 6 -17 -3 -34 -11Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-522
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 48 44 43 50 50 39 29 34 26 33 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens
43 45 49 42 41 51 64 61 67 58 52
Both 1 1 3 1 5 4 1 1 2 2 Neither 5 7 4 4 3 5 4 2 5 5 4 Unsure 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible 5 -1 -6 8 8 -12 -35 -27 -41 -25 -11Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-523
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
49 47 50 35 25 32 48 49 40 45 26 32 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 39 47 41 57 67 61 47 40 48 49 68 59 52
Both 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 2 Neither 6 4 2 6 4 4 4 6 5 3 6 3 4 Unsure 3 1 3 3 2 3 1 2 4 2 Refused 1 1 0
Complicated - Sensible 10 1 9 -22 -41 -29 1 8 -8 -3 -42 -28 -11Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-524
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 43 41 38 51 37 41 41 37 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 50 51 58 43 47 51 50 58 52
Both 3 1 1 4 2 2 2 Neither 4 5 3 4 7 5 4 5 4 Unsure 0 2 1 1 4 1 3 2 Refused 0 1 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -7 -10 -20 8 -10 -10 -9 -22 -11Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-525
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 47 25 30 53 54 27 19 49 41 38 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 44 69 62 40 37 69 76 45 51 54 52
Both 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 Neither 4 4 4 5 5 3 1 4 4 4 4 Unsure 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible 3 -44 -32 13 17 -42 -57 5 -10 -16 -11Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-526
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 41 46 38 37 43 33 47 46 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 48 44 51 55 54 55 46 47 52
Both 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 Neither 6 6 6 5 1 7 4 4 4 Unsure 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 1 0
Complicated - Sensible -7 2 -13 -18 -11 -22 1 -1 -11Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-527
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
53 33 33 47 39 34 41 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 34 59 63 46 53 59 50 52
Both 3 3 1 1 3 5 2 Neither 7 4 3 4 5 4 4 Unsure 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 Refused 1 1 0
Complicated - Sensible 19 -26 -30 0 -13 -25 -9 -11Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-528
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 43 37 25 45 35 42 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 48 56 72 45 57 49 52
Both 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 Neither 4 4 0 6 4 5 4 Unsure 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -4 -19 -47 0 -22 -7 -11Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-529
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
49 26 46 31 37 100 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 43 67 46 63 53 100 52
Both 3 0 2 1 2 2 Neither 4 5 5 2 6 4 Unsure 1 2 2 2 1 2 Refused 1 0
Complicated - Sensible 6 -41 0 -31 -16 100 -100 -11Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-530
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities
59 30 40 42 61 26 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 36 66 55 52 30 70 52
Both 1 0 1 2 2 1 2 Neither 4 2 3 3 5 3 4 Unsure 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 Refused 0 0
Complicated - Sensible 23 -37 -15 -10 31 -44 -11Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-531
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ53 Point-of-view closest to
own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 24 54 23 16 33 38 42 64 59 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 71 35 71 80 60 55 47 25 31 52
Both 0 3 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 Neither 2 6 3 1 4 4 6 7 6 4 Unsure 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 Refused 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -47 19 -47 -65 -28 -17 -5 39 27 -11Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-532
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q53 Point-of-view closest to own: Oil & gas is too complicated & technical to be regulated by most Colorado counties & cities, vs. Sensible oil & gas rules can be set by ordinary citizens working together in their communities
Too complicated, technical for most counties, cities 39 40 41 40 51 28 38 40 44 40 40
Sensible rules can be set by ordinary citizens 51 52 49 49 37 63 59 50 45 51 52
Both 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 Neither 6 5 5 6 7 5 2 6 6 5 4 Unsure 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 4 2 2 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0
Complicated - Sensible -12 -12 -8 -9 14 -35 -21 -10 -1 -11 -11Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-533
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
37 36 37 36 37 40 24 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 48 50 51 53 48 53 61 52
Neither 6 8 5 4 12 4 6 7 Unsure 9 5 6 7 3 4 8 6 Refused 1 1 0
Ban - A few rules -11 -14 -14 -17 -10 -12 -38 -17Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-534
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
35 35 35 24 41 34 30 44 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 52 53 52 59 44 55 59 44 52
Neither 7 4 7 7 11 5 7 5 7 Unsure 6 7 6 10 4 6 5 6 6 Refused 0 1 0
Ban - A few rules -17 -18 -17 -34 -4 -21 -29 1 -17Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-535
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
35 35 33 33 40 31 40 34 36 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 52 52 58 51 49 58 46 51 53 52
Neither 6 7 3 10 6 4 9 8 6 7 Unsure 6 6 6 6 5 7 4 7 5 6 Refused 0 0 1 0
Ban - A few rules -17 -17 -24 -18 -9 -26 -6 -18 -17 -17Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-536
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
29 36 31 31 34 37 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 56 52 55 56 55 52 52
Neither 9 6 11 11 4 5 7 Unsure 7 6 4 2 7 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -26 -15 -24 -25 -21 -15 -17Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-537
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
35 36 34 36 40 29 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 52 53 52 52 49 56 52
Neither 5 5 5 8 6 11 7 Unsure 7 6 8 5 5 3 6 Refused 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -18 -17 -18 -16 -10 -27 -17Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-538
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
46 34 32 33 39 33 38 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 48 54 57 59 42 56 51 52
Neither 2 7 9 3 13 8 5 7 Unsure 4 5 2 6 6 3 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -3 -20 -25 -26 -4 -24 -13 -17Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-539
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
35 37 35 33 39 38 34 36 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 51 53 58 53 50 55 51 53 52
Neither 8 6 6 8 6 5 9 5 7 Unsure 5 4 1 5 6 2 5 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -16 -16 -22 -19 -11 -17 -17 -17 -17Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-540
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
44 50 40 30 33 27 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 47 43 50 55 52 59 52
Neither 4 4 3 9 10 7 7 Unsure 4 3 5 6 6 7 6 Refused 0 1 0
Ban - A few rules -3 6 -10 -25 -19 -32 -17Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-541
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
45 49 33 44 34 30 27 31 25 28 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 45 43 51 46 51 52 62 61 62 58 52
Neither 6 5 10 5 11 13 5 2 7 8 7 Unsure 5 4 6 5 4 6 7 7 6 6 6 Refused 0 0 1 0
Ban - A few rules 0 6 -18 -2 -17 -22 -35 -30 -37 -29 -17Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-542
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
47 43 32 34 26 28 44 46 29 38 26 27 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 46 43 51 51 61 62 48 42 53 49 64 60 52
Neither 5 7 10 10 4 5 4 7 10 9 3 7 7 Unsure 3 7 7 5 9 5 5 5 8 3 7 6 6 Refused 1 1 0
Ban - A few rules 1 0 -19 -17 -35 -34 -4 4 -24 -11 -37 -32 -17Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-543
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
29 46 36 35 33 31 41 33 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 57 43 56 56 45 55 48 56 52
Neither 9 5 4 3 13 7 7 6 7 Unsure 5 7 4 5 8 7 5 5 6 Refused 1 0 0
Ban - A few rules -28 3 -20 -21 -12 -23 -7 -23 -17Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-544
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
45 25 23 56 47 26 26 41 36 38 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules
42 64 64 34 40 65 67 44 52 48 52
Neither 8 4 7 5 7 4 4 9 8 6 7 Unsure 5 7 6 4 6 5 3 5 4 9 6 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules 2 -39 -41 22 7 -39 -42 -3 -16 -11 -17Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-545
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
37 41 34 37 30 35 27 47 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules
50 44 55 49 60 49 61 44 52
Neither 9 9 9 5 4 8 7 7 7 Unsure 3 5 1 9 7 7 6 2 6 Refused 0 1 0 0
Ban - A few rules -13 -3 -21 -12 -30 -14 -34 4 -17Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-546
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
54 25 22 50 30 25 43 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 38 65 65 36 60 65 38 52
Neither 5 6 7 6 5 7 9 7 Unsure 2 3 6 7 5 3 10 6 Refused 1 1 0
Ban - A few rules 15 -39 -43 14 -30 -40 5 -17Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-547
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
40 29 31 37 33 36 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 49 57 63 49 58 50 52
Neither 7 8 2 9 5 8 7 Unsure 4 7 5 5 4 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -10 -27 -32 -12 -25 -14 -17Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-548
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
42 26 39 32 31 51 25 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 46 61 49 61 48 38 67 52
Neither 7 6 7 2 11 4 5 7 Unsure 5 7 4 5 10 7 3 6 Refused 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -3 -35 -10 -29 -17 13 -43 -17Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-549
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
100 36 36 59 20 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 100 53 54 29 71 52
Neither 5 6 6 6 7 Unsure 6 4 5 3 6 Refused 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules 100 -100 -17 -18 30 -52 -17Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-550
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ54 Point-of-view closest to
own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
20 48 26 14 26 33 35 56 47 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules
72 37 64 79 67 54 41 29 38 52
Neither 3 9 5 4 4 5 9 12 10 7 Unsure 5 5 6 3 2 7 16 3 6 6 Refused 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -52 11 -38 -66 -41 -22 -6 28 9 -17Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-551
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q54 Point-of-view closest to own: If passed, a local control amendment would result in an outright ban or prohibition on almost all oil & gas development across the state, vs. If passed, a local amendment would result in a few limited common sense rules that oil & gas drillers would find easy to follow
Would result in outright ban on almost all development
34 35 34 33 48 26 36 35 36 35 35
Would result in a few limited common sense rules 51 52 53 50 41 62 54 51 51 51 52
Neither 8 7 7 9 6 7 3 10 6 9 7 Unsure 8 6 6 7 5 5 7 5 6 4 6 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ban - A few rules -17 -16 -19 -17 7 -37 -18 -17 -16 -16 -17Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-552
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 50 39 42 41 37 41 49 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 46 56 53 54 58 58 47 54
Both 1 1 0 Neither 2 4 4 5 2 1 3 Unsure 2 1 1 2 2 1 Refused 0 1 1 0
No right - My right 4 -17 -11 -13 -21 -17 2 -13Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-553
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 38 41 44 48 26 44 43 52 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 56 53 53 48 69 52 52 45 54
Both 1 1 1 1 1 0 Neither 4 4 2 1 2 4 3 3 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Refused 1 1 1 0 0
No right - My right -18 -12 -9 0 -42 -7 -9 7 -13Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-554
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 44 39 41 40 45 47 41 36 42 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out51 57 58 53 51 49 53 58 56 54
Both 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Neither 2 3 1 4 2 2 2 6 1 3 Unsure 2 1 1 1 3 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
No right - My right -7 -18 -18 -14 -6 -2 -13 -22 -14 -13Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-555
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 31 44 44 45 43 41 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 63 52 52 52 53 55 54
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 Unsure 3 0 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 1 0 0
No right - My right -32 -7 -8 -7 -10 -14 -13Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-556
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 38 44 35 44 44 45 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 58 51 62 52 51 53 54
Both 0 1 1 1 0 Neither 2 1 2 3 3 2 3 Unsure 2 3 1 0 1 1 Refused 0 0 0
No right - My right -20 -7 -28 -8 -7 -9 -13Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-557
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 43 42 48 38 41 43 46 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 52 55 52 59 51 54 50 54
Both 1 1 1 0 0 Neither 2 3 1 7 2 1 3 Unsure 2 0 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
No right - My right -10 -13 -4 -22 -10 -12 -4 -13Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-558
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 35 47 50 38 46 43 42 41 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 61 49 50 56 51 55 53 55 54
Both 1 1 1 1 0 Neither 2 3 5 2 1 4 2 3 Unsure 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
No right - My right -26 -3 0 -17 -5 -12 -11 -14 -13Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-559
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 46 61 35 40 43 35 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 50 35 60 57 53 61 54
Both 1 2 0 1 0 Neither 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 Unsure 1 2 1 1 0 1 Refused 0 0 0
No right - My right -4 26 -25 -17 -10 -25 -13Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-560
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 47 47 49 47 50 49 29 30 27 37 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 47 48 48 47 47 48 68 67 70 59 54
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 4 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 3 3 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0
No right - My right 0 -1 0 0 3 1 -39 -37 -43 -22 -13Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-561
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 44 50 56 41 30 28 44 50 51 45 29 28 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out49 46 40 57 67 68 49 46 44 54 69 67 54
Both 2 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 3 2 2 4 5 2 3 1 2 2 3 Unsure 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 Refused 1 1 1 1 0
No right - My right -4 4 15 -16 -38 -40 -5 4 8 -9 -40 -38 -13Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-562
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 41 42 45 36 34 45 42 32 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 55 53 53 62 55 52 52 66 54
Both 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 Neither 3 3 2 2 5 2 3 2 3 Unsure 0 1 3 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
No right - My right -15 -12 -7 -26 -21 -7 -10 -35 -13Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-563
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 48 30 38 49 49 33 26 47 46 33 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 47 68 59 48 46 65 73 51 51 63 54
Both 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 Neither 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 Refused 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No right - My right 1 -39 -21 2 3 -31 -47 -4 -5 -30 -13Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-564
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 41 43 39 42 45 45 34 40 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 55 50 59 54 53 52 58 56 54
Both 1 2 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 4 2 4 3 6 3 3 Unsure 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 Refused 0 1 1 0
No right - My right -14 -7 -20 -12 -7 -7 -24 -17 -13Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-565
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 48 43 34 48 42 50 37 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out44 55 62 51 55 48 61 54
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 6 0 2 1 2 1 3 Unsure 1 0 1 1 1 Refused 1 0 3 0
No right - My right 4 -12 -28 -3 -13 2 -24 -13Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-566
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 44 38 34 43 45 40 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out53 58 63 53 51 55 54
Both 1 0 1 1 0 0 Neither 2 3 0 3 2 3 3 Unsure 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
No right - My right -9 -20 -29 -10 -6 -15 -13Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-567
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 45 35 46 30 43 42 44 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 50 62 50 67 50 57 54 54
Both 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Neither 3 2 2 0 5 2 1 3 Unsure 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 Refused 0 0 1 0 0
No right - My right -5 -27 -4 -36 -6 -15 -10 -13Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-568
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 42 42 100 46 41 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 55 56 100 49 59 54
Both 1 1 0 0 0 Neither 2 1 4 1 3 Unsure 0 0 1 Refused 0 0 0
No right - My right -13 -14 100 -100 -3 -18 -13Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-569
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ55 Point-of-view closest to
own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 38 43 38 29 35 45 53 44 44 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 60 52 59 71 58 51 44 50 50 54
Both 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Neither 0 4 1 4 2 2 5 4 3 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 0 0 1 0 0
No right - My right -23 -9 -21 -42 -23 -7 9 -6 -6 -13Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-570
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q55 Point-of-view closest to own: I would never suppose it's my right to tell others whether they can or cannot regulate oil or gas in their part of Colorado, vs. It's my right & responsibility to speak out on oil & gas drilling issues in every part of Colorado, regardless of where I live
Not my right to tell others 42 42 41 42 51 29 41 43 40 42 42 My right, responsibility to
speak out 54 54 54 53 44 68 55 53 55 55 54
Both 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 Neither 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 2 2 2 3 Unsure 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 Refused 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
No right - My right -12 -13 -14 -10 8 -38 -13 -11 -15 -13 -13Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-571
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 39 40 43 47 33 44 32 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
51 53 52 49 58 54 53 51
Both 2 0 Neither 1 4 3 2 5 2 5 3 Unsure 9 3 2 1 4 8 4 Refused 0 0 1 0
Hides - Focused -12 -13 -10 -2 -25 -10 -22 -10Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-572
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 41 43 40 33 33 42 36 57 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
52 51 51 53 55 53 58 34 51
Both 1 1 2 0 Neither 4 3 4 6 7 2 2 5 3 Unsure 3 2 5 8 4 3 4 2 4 Refused 0 0 1 0
Hides - Focused -11 -7 -11 -20 -22 -11 -23 23 -10Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-573
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 44 39 37 42 44 40 48 39 38 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
47 55 56 48 50 50 43 59 52 51
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 4 1 6 3 2 3 2 6 3 Unsure 6 1 6 3 3 8 5 2 4 Refused 0 0 1 0
Hides - Focused -3 -17 -20 -6 -6 -10 5 -20 -14 -10Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-574
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 36 42 44 45 42 40 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
54 50 50 48 53 53 51
Both 0 1 1 0 Neither 1 4 3 3 4 4 3 Unsure 8 3 3 3 2 3 4 Refused 0 0 0 0
Hides - Focused -18 -8 -6 -3 -11 -12 -10Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-575
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 42 49 38 41 47 31 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
47 39 52 55 49 64 51
Both 1 2 0 Neither 3 2 3 4 4 4 3 Unsure 7 8 7 1 1 1 4 Refused 0
Hides - Focused -5 9 -14 -14 -2 -34 -10Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-576
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 49 41 37 38 48 41 42 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
45 54 58 57 46 53 52 51
Both 0 1 1 0 Neither 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unsure 4 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 Refused 0 0
Hides - Focused 4 -13 -20 -19 3 -12 -11 -10Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-577
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 37 47 48 39 42 43 45 38 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
58 46 48 55 51 52 49 54 51
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 Unsure 2 2 1 2 3 2 3 4 4 Refused 0 0
Hides - Focused -21 1 1 -17 -9 -9 -4 -15 -10Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-578
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 56 65 51 33 40 26 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
39 31 44 59 53 66 51
Both 1 2 0 Neither 2 2 1 4 4 4 3 Unsure 3 5 3 3 4 4 Refused 0
Hides - Focused 18 34 7 -26 -13 -41 -10Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-579
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 59 62 39 58 44 35 24 27 22 28 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
35 35 53 35 48 59 67 66 70 64 51
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 1 1 4 1 3 5 5 6 4 5 3 Unsure 4 2 3 5 3 1 4 2 5 3 4 Refused 0 0 0
Hides - Focused 24 27 -13 23 -5 -24 -43 -39 -48 -35 -10Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-580
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 58 60 46 32 23 24 61 58 40 38 19 28 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
33 37 48 58 63 70 33 36 54 51 74 61 51
Both 2 2 0 Neither 1 2 2 6 5 6 2 3 6 3 8 3 Unsure 7 1 4 2 9 1 6 3 3 3 4 4 4 Refused 1 1 0
Hides - Focused 25 23 -1 -26 -39 -47 27 22 -14 -13 -55 -33 -10Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-581
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending
33 54 37 42 49 36 49 38 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
59 40 58 54 37 57 43 53 51
Both 1 1 2 0 Neither 5 2 3 4 5 3 2 7 3 Unsure 4 3 2 9 3 6 4 Refused 0 1 0 0
Hides - Focused -26 14 -20 -12 12 -22 6 -15 -10Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-582
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 54 22 26 65 61 22 28 51 47 38 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
38 70 65 32 31 72 66 43 47 52 51
Both 1 1 1 1 1 0 Neither 3 4 5 1 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 Unsure 4 4 3 1 5 2 2 3 3 6 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 0
Hides - Focused 16 -48 -39 33 30 -50 -38 8 0 -14 -10Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-583
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 44 48 41 42 36 37 42 53 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
48 43 52 53 54 59 51 38 51
Both 1 0 Neither 4 5 4 3 2 3 3 5 3 Unsure 4 3 4 2 6 1 4 4 4 Refused 1 0
Hides - Focused -4 5 -11 -12 -19 -22 -9 15 -10Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-584
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 64 31 23 60 36 39 44 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
28 64 68 38 58 59 46 51
Both 1 0 Neither 1 3 6 2 4 1 2 3 Unsure 4 1 3 1 2 8 4 Refused 1 1 0
Hides - Focused 36 -33 -46 22 -21 -20 -2 -10Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-585
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending
47 35 35 43 37 43 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
47 57 59 49 59 48 51
Both 0 0 0 Neither 2 4 4 3 1 4 3 Unsure 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 Refused 0 0 0 0
Hides - Focused -1 -22 -24 -6 -22 -4 -10Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-586
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 56 21 52 25 37 62 24 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
38 70 41 68 53 33 69 51
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 2 5 3 4 3 2 3 3 Unsure 4 4 3 2 7 3 3 4 Refused 1 0
Hides - Focused 18 -49 12 -43 -17 30 -45 -10Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-587
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 69 23 45 37 100 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
29 70 50 55 100 51
Both 1 1 0 Neither 0 4 2 4 3 Unsure 1 2 3 3 4 Refused 0 0
Hides - Focused 40 -47 -5 -18 100 -100 -10Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-588
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ56 Point-of-view closest to
own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 22 60 24 13 29 35 35 74 63 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
70 34 69 80 60 56 55 21 30 51
Both 1 1 1 0 Neither 4 2 4 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unsure 5 3 4 1 8 5 7 1 2 4 Refused 0 0 0
Hides - Focused -49 27 -45 -67 -31 -21 -20 53 33 -10Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-589
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q56 Point-of-view closest to own: Push for local control over oil & gas development hides behind local control sentiment to distract voters from its hidden but real agenda of ending all drilling, vs. Push for local control over oil & gas development is sincerely focused on allowing each community to do as it pleases
Hides behind local control, hidden agenda of ending 40 40 42 42 64 24 38 44 42 42 41
Sincerely focused on allowing each to do as pleases
51 51 49 48 32 70 55 51 47 52 51
Both 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Neither 4 4 4 5 1 4 2 2 8 4 3 Unsure 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 1 4 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hides - Focused -11 -11 -7 -6 32 -46 -17 -7 -5 -10 -10Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-590
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 46 49 51 50 47 58 55 51 Strong 28 28 28 26 30 33 35 29 Not strong 19 21 23 25 17 25 20 22 No to reject 41 44 44 48 38 37 38 42 Not strong 5 11 12 13 8 4 10 9 Strong 36 33 32 35 30 33 27 33 Unsure 11 7 4 0 14 5 8 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 9 7 5 1 13 9 15 7Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 57 60 59 54 67 62 64 61 Yes 22 29 29 25 33 33 31 28 Unsure 4 4 3 9 1 1 3 No 32 27 27 30 25 28 32 29 Moved 41 39 39 45 32 38 36 39 Toward Yes 16 17 18 21 12 25 16 19 Toward No 25 22 22 23 20 13 20 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 1
Net movement -9 -5 -4 -2 -8 12 -5 -1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 16 18 18 14 22 18 25 18 Hard No 31 23 23 23 24 26 25 25 Swing voter 52 58 59 62 53 57 50 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-591
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 49 51 50 53 44 51 61 41 51 Strong 28 28 29 35 28 28 29 29 29 Not strong 21 23 21 18 17 23 32 12 22 No to reject 44 45 41 38 43 42 36 55 42 Not strong 11 12 8 11 7 10 8 10 9 Strong 34 34 33 27 35 32 28 45 33 Unsure 6 2 9 9 12 7 2 4 7 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 1
Yes - No 6 5 9 17 11 5 -3 17 7Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 59 57 62 66 64 58 61 63 61 Yes 27 26 28 32 28 27 35 19 28 Unsure 3 2 3 1 5 4 1 3 No 29 29 31 33 30 27 26 44 29 Moved 40 42 38 34 36 41 38 37 39 Toward Yes 18 20 19 17 14 21 20 20 19 Toward No 22 22 18 18 22 20 17 17 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 0 1 1
Net movement -4 -2 1 -1 -8 0 3 2 -1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 17 16 19 25 19 16 18 17 18 Hard No 25 24 27 26 29 23 20 40 25 Swing voter 58 58 54 50 51 61 60 43 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-592
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 44 57 67 44 43 53 34 63 52 51 Strong 26 32 28 30 28 31 20 28 35 29 Not strong 18 25 38 14 15 22 14 35 17 22 No to reject 48 36 22 50 51 38 58 28 43 42 Not strong 10 8 9 10 8 12 8 8 7 9 Strong 37 29 13 40 44 26 50 20 36 33 Unsure 7 7 11 5 5 8 6 8 5 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 8 7 -10 16 13 8 6 -8 18 7Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 61 60 57 58 66 55 69 57 62 61 Yes 23 33 35 25 27 26 21 34 33 28 Unsure 2 3 6 1 2 3 2 5 1 3 No 35 24 17 33 38 26 46 18 28 29 Moved 38 40 43 40 34 44 30 43 38 39 Toward Yes 19 19 25 17 16 25 13 21 17 19 Toward No 18 21 18 23 17 19 17 22 21 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1
Net movement 1 -2 7 -6 -1 6 -4 -1 -4 -1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 15 20 16 19 19 17 14 15 24 18 Hard No 30 21 10 30 35 19 42 15 26 25
Swing voter 54 59 74 50 46 63 43 70 49 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-593
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 52 51 54 53 48 50 51 Strong 39 27 30 30 25 29 29 Not strong 13 24 24 23 22 21 22 No to reject 34 43 41 41 45 43 42 Not strong 6 9 11 11 6 8 9 Strong 28 34 31 30 39 35 33 Unsure 13 6 4 5 7 7 7 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
Yes - No 26 3 6 7 3 7 7Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 52 63 57 60 65 63 61 Yes 25 30 28 30 31 29 28 Unsure 3 3 1 1 3 4 3 No 25 31 28 29 31 31 29 Moved 47 37 42 39 34 36 39 Toward Yes 27 17 19 20 15 19 19 Toward No 19 19 23 19 19 18 20 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
Net movement 8 -2 -4 1 -3 1 -1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 18 18 17 18 18 18 18 Hard No 21 27 24 25 29 26 25 Swing voter 60 55 58 57 52 55 56 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-594
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 51 47 53 51 49 54 51 Strong 30 28 32 28 24 34 29 Not strong 20 19 21 23 25 20 22 No to reject 41 41 41 43 43 43 42 Not strong 7 10 5 10 13 5 9 Strong 34 30 36 33 30 38 33 Unsure 8 12 6 6 7 3 7 Refused 1 1 1
Yes - No 10 9 10 5 -2 15 7Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 62 56 65 60 59 63 61 Yes 29 22 33 29 27 32 28 Unsure 2 2 2 3 5 1 3 No 31 32 30 28 27 31 29 Moved 38 44 35 39 40 37 39 Toward Yes 21 30 15 18 19 15 19 Toward No 18 14 20 21 21 22 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1
Net movement 3 15 -5 -3 -2 -7 -1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 19 13 22 18 14 23 18 Hard No 27 24 29 24 22 29 25 Swing voter 54 62 50 57 63 48 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-595
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 58 50 61 52 37 49 46 51 Strong 19 31 40 29 24 29 30 29 Not strong 39 19 21 22 13 19 16 22 No to reject 35 44 35 42 56 44 49 42 Not strong 15 8 7 8 9 10 8 9 Strong 20 36 29 35 47 33 40 33 Unsure 6 6 3 6 7 7 5 7 Refused 0 1 1 1
Yes - No -20 12 18 7 11 10 13 7Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 65 61 63 65 55 65 65 61 Yes 31 29 37 32 17 29 29 28 Unsure 6 2 1 3 2 4 2 3 No 28 30 25 30 37 32 34 29 Moved 35 39 37 35 45 34 35 39 Toward Yes 25 17 18 16 20 16 18 19 Toward No 10 21 19 20 25 18 17 20 Not ascertained 0 1 1 1
Net movement 15 -4 -2 -4 -6 -2 1 -1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 9 20 27 20 13 19 19 18 Hard No 16 28 21 28 36 27 32 25 Swing voter 75 51 51 52 51 54 49 56 Not ascertained 0 1 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-596
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 53 48 42 55 51 46 45 56 51 Strong 32 24 19 35 26 23 25 32 29 Not strong 21 23 23 19 25 23 19 24 22 No to reject 40 47 53 43 40 47 49 37 42 Not strong 9 10 9 9 9 10 10 8 9 Strong 30 37 44 34 32 38 38 29 33 Unsure 8 5 5 3 8 7 6 7 7 Refused 0 0 0 1 1
Yes - No 11 1 -4 16 1 0 6 8 7Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 54 66 62 56 58 68 64 58 61 Yes 24 30 25 26 30 27 26 31 28 Unsure 1 3 4 0 4 4 2 3 3 No 28 33 34 29 24 37 36 24 29 Moved 46 33 38 44 41 32 35 41 39 Toward Yes 23 17 16 24 20 13 14 22 19 Toward No 23 17 22 20 22 19 21 19 20 Not ascertained 0 0 0 1 1
Net movement 0 0 -6 4 -2 -6 -7 3 -1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 19 15 12 19 16 16 16 20 18 Hard No 24 28 32 25 23 31 30 22 25 Swing voter 57 56 56 56 60 53 54 57 56 Not ascertained 0 0 0 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-597
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 32 25 37 62 47 79 51 Strong 18 11 23 34 27 42 29 Not strong 14 14 14 28 19 37 22 No to reject 62 68 58 31 46 14 42 Not strong 11 11 12 7 9 5 9 Strong 51 57 46 24 37 9 33 Unsure 5 6 4 8 8 8 7 Refused 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 4 -3 8 7 8 5 7Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 65 67 63 60 61 59 61 Yes 17 11 21 36 22 52 28 Unsure 1 2 4 6 2 3 No 47 54 42 20 33 5 29 Moved 34 32 36 40 39 41 39 Toward Yes 17 14 18 20 20 19 19 Toward No 18 18 18 20 20 21 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1
Net movement -1 -4 1 -1 0 -2 -1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 10 5 14 23 16 30 18 Hard No 41 48 36 17 28 5 25 Swing voter 48 46 49 60 56 65 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-598
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 32 27 56 32 46 67 66 53 76 66 51 Strong 19 13 27 19 24 31 42 38 45 37 29 Not strong 12 14 30 13 21 36 24 16 31 29 22 No to reject 63 68 38 62 47 29 23 35 13 26 42 Not strong 11 12 8 11 10 7 7 8 5 7 9 Strong 52 55 30 51 37 22 16 27 8 19 33 Unsure 5 5 5 5 6 4 11 11 11 8 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 7 0 -3 6 3 -5 18 22 13 8 7Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 61 67 61 62 62 62 59 60 57 60 61 Yes 15 15 31 15 22 38 40 28 49 39 28 Unsure 1 1 2 1 2 3 5 8 2 4 3 No 45 51 28 46 38 20 14 24 6 17 29 Moved 38 33 38 37 37 38 41 40 43 40 39 Toward Yes 18 14 22 18 21 23 18 17 19 20 19 Toward No 19 18 16 19 15 15 23 23 24 20 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 1
Net movement -1 -4 5 0 6 8 -6 -6 -5 0 -1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 10 9 15 10 13 19 29 23 33 24 18 Hard No 40 45 23 40 31 17 12 21 5 14 25 Swing voter 48 45 61 49 55 65 59 57 62 61 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-599
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 26 37 49 64 61 69 41 25 60 51 70 61 51 Strong 14 24 27 26 39 44 25 15 22 33 42 41 29 Not strong 12 13 22 38 21 25 16 10 39 18 28 20 22 No to reject 68 58 46 29 24 22 57 67 31 46 15 31 42 Not strong 14 8 10 6 5 8 16 8 11 5 4 9 9 Strong 54 50 36 23 19 14 41 59 20 42 11 22 33 Unsure 5 5 4 7 15 8 2 6 7 3 15 8 7 Refused 2 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 2 11 5 -12 18 18 9 5 -17 15 15 21 7Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 60 62 61 61 63 56 62 61 53 72 53 64 61 Yes 11 19 26 37 36 43 22 10 29 34 37 43 28 Unsure 1 2 5 7 2 1 1 4 6 3 3 No 48 42 36 19 19 11 39 49 20 38 10 18 29 Moved 38 38 37 39 37 44 38 38 46 28 47 36 39 Toward Yes 18 18 24 19 16 20 18 18 28 14 23 13 19 Toward No 20 19 14 19 22 24 20 19 18 14 24 23 20 Not ascertained 2 1 1 1 1
Net movement -1 -1 10 0 -6 -5 -1 -1 10 -1 -1 -10 -1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 8 13 14 16 26 31 17 6 7 25 25 32 18 Hard No 42 39 30 15 15 10 30 47 13 35 9 15 25 Swing voter 48 48 55 69 58 60 53 45 78 40 65 53 56 Not ascertained 2 1 1 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-600
Direction of things Financial expectations for next year
Overall impression of government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 60 36 60 34 42 55 46 49 51 Strong 34 20 32 19 28 32 22 36 29 Not strong 26 16 28 15 14 24 23 13 22 No to reject 33 59 34 62 46 36 48 43 42 Not strong 10 9 7 19 9 6 13 6 9 Strong 23 50 27 43 37 30 35 37 33 Unsure 7 4 6 3 10 8 6 7 7 Refused 0 1 0 2 1 1 1
Yes - No 9 4 4 4 15 8 -1 23 7Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 58 66 60 64 59 59 60 68 61 Yes 34 20 34 21 22 32 23 32 28 Unsure 3 0 4 1 1 5 1 1 3 No 20 45 22 42 35 22 35 35 29 Moved 42 33 40 36 39 41 40 32 39 Toward Yes 22 14 19 17 21 19 19 20 19 Toward No 20 19 21 19 19 21 21 13 20 Not ascertained 0 1 0 2 1 1 1
Net movement 2 -4 -2 -1 2 -2 -2 7 -1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 20 12 21 12 14 19 13 26 18 Hard No 16 41 19 34 31 20 28 34 25 Swing voter 64 46 59 54 53 60 59 41 56 Not ascertained 0 1 0 2 1 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-601
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 32 75 69 23 24 76 76 33 46 51 51 Strong 17 47 41 12 12 44 51 17 23 30 29 Not strong 15 29 28 11 12 31 25 16 23 21 22 No to reject 62 16 23 72 70 18 22 61 48 38 42 Not strong 8 6 6 11 10 5 4 11 12 4 9 Strong 54 10 17 61 59 14 18 50 37 33 33 Unsure 6 8 8 5 6 5 2 6 5 10 7 Refused 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
Yes - No 2 18 13 2 0 13 26 1 0 9 7Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 64 59 55 71 65 58 67 62 61 62 61 Yes 14 50 41 12 10 48 52 18 26 30 28 Unsure 2 3 3 3 0 2 2 2 3 3 No 48 7 12 57 55 8 14 43 32 29 29 Moved 35 40 45 28 34 42 33 38 39 37 39 Toward Yes 15 20 22 12 15 19 19 14 17 19 19 Toward No 20 20 23 16 19 22 14 23 22 18 20 Not ascertained 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
Net movement -5 0 -1 -4 -4 -3 5 -9 -5 0 -1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 8 34 27 6 4 32 35 11 15 19 18 Hard No 44 6 10 50 49 7 12 39 28 28 25 Swing voter 48 60 62 43 46 61 52 50 56 53 56 Not ascertained 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-602
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 47 32 58 59 49 57 58 42 51 Strong 28 24 32 29 30 31 38 21 29 Not strong 19 9 26 30 19 26 20 21 22 No to reject 46 62 35 38 37 40 34 51 42 Not strong 6 3 8 13 7 9 10 8 9 Strong 40 59 27 25 30 32 24 43 33 Unsure 6 4 8 3 13 3 9 6 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1
Yes - No 10 15 6 0 11 4 18 1 7Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 67 78 58 53 56 58 61 66 61 Yes 27 24 30 31 28 31 34 24 28 Unsure 1 2 1 1 7 0 1 2 3 No 38 53 27 20 22 27 26 40 29 Moved 33 20 42 47 42 42 39 33 39 Toward Yes 16 7 22 23 22 18 31 13 19 Toward No 17 14 20 24 21 24 8 20 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1
Net movement -1 -7 3 0 1 -5 23 -8 -1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 19 20 18 16 19 18 22 16 18 Hard No 36 52 23 16 18 24 20 37 25 Swing voter 45 26 59 68 62 59 58 46 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-603
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 21 68 77 28 60 63 42 51 Strong 7 42 42 17 34 30 22 29 Not strong 13 26 35 10 26 33 20 22 No to reject 74 23 18 68 32 32 44 42 Not strong 9 7 5 14 8 12 12 9 Strong 65 16 12 54 24 20 33 33
Unsure 5 9 5 5 7 4 13 7 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Yes - No -6 16 8 7 8 -4 3 7Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 67 51 62 65 60 59 52 61 Yes 13 34 51 10 36 38 17 28 Unsure 1 4 3 4 2 2 3 No 54 13 8 55 20 20 33 29 Moved 32 48 37 35 40 39 47 39 Toward Yes 14 24 20 18 18 20 19 19 Toward No 18 24 17 16 22 19 28 20 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Net movement -4 0 2 2 -4 1 -9 -1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 2 26 31 10 24 16 13 18 Hard No 52 10 7 49 17 12 25 25
Swing voter 46 63 62 41 58 71 61 56 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-604
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 47 55 75 43 55 49 51 Strong 27 35 51 22 31 28 29 Not strong 20 20 25 21 24 21 22 No to reject 46 37 21 49 38 44 42 Not strong 9 8 5 9 7 10 9 Strong 37 29 16 39 31 34 33 Unsure 7 7 3 8 6 7 7 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
Yes - No 6 15 26 2 7 8 7Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 62 59 59 62 63 61 61 Yes 26 32 45 24 30 28 28 Unsure 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 No 33 25 14 35 30 30 29 Moved 37 40 40 37 37 39 39 Toward Yes 19 21 23 18 17 20 19 Toward No 18 19 17 19 19 19 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
Net movement 0 1 6 -1 -2 1 -1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 14 23 35 13 23 16 18 Hard No 30 21 11 31 25 26 25 Swing voter 55 55 53 56 51 58 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-605
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 35 73 41 69 52 29 70 51 Strong 18 44 22 41 31 13 43 29 Not strong 17 29 19 28 22 16 27 22 No to reject 60 17 55 24 35 65 23 42 Not strong 11 5 9 7 11 12 7 9 Strong 49 13 46 17 24 54 16 33 Unsure 5 9 4 6 12 6 6 7 Refused 0 1 0 1 0 1
Yes - No 1 15 3 14 9 -3 16 7Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 61 60 64 60 53 64 59 61 Yes 17 46 21 42 29 15 42 28 Unsure 1 4 1 3 5 3 3 3 No 43 10 42 15 20 47 15 29 Moved 39 40 36 38 47 36 41 39 Toward Yes 19 21 18 23 19 16 23 19 Toward No 20 19 18 16 28 21 18 20 Not ascertained 0 1 0 1 0 1
Net movement -2 1 0 7 -9 -5 4 -1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 8 31 12 29 17 7 28 18 Hard No 39 8 38 11 16 41 12 25 Swing voter 53 60 49 58 68 53 60 56 Not ascertained 0 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-606
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 31 70 46 56 29 70 51 Strong 16 42 21 36 12 43 29 Not strong 16 28 25 20 17 27 22 No to reject 63 25 48 37 68 23 42 Not strong 13 6 10 8 11 8 9 Strong 51 19 38 29 58 15 33 Unsure 5 5 6 7 2 7 7 Refused 1 0 0 1
Yes - No 0 13 -4 16 -5 16 7Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 66 59 58 63 69 56 61 Yes 16 41 24 33 17 39 28 Unsure 3 2 2 3 1 4 3 No 46 17 32 27 51 13 29 Moved 34 40 41 37 30 44 39 Toward Yes 14 25 16 21 13 23 19 Toward No 20 15 25 16 17 21 20 Not ascertained 1 0 0 1
Net movement -5 9 -9 5 -3 1 -1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 7 27 13 23 6 28 18 Hard No 41 14 27 24 46 10 25 Swing voter 52 58 60 53 48 62 56 Not ascertained 1 0 0 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-607
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ57 Local government
regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 84 21 85 100 81 58 34 15 51 Strong 51 10 50 100 57 20 9 29 Not strong 33 11 35 23 39 34 7 22 No to reject 10 72 10 10 29 54 100 80 42 Not strong 3 13 5 10 16 16 13 9 Strong 7 59 5 13 38 100 67 33 Unsure 6 6 5 10 12 12 4 7 Refused 1 0 1 1
Yes - No 18 -1 15 100 34 -19 -34 2 7Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 56 67 58 100 31 100 66 61 Yes 49 12 58 100 19 28 Unsure 1 3 5 3 No 6 53 7 100 66 29 Moved 44 32 42 100 69 100 33 39 Toward Yes 23 15 13 100 34 24 19 Toward No 21 18 28 35 100 10 20 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1
Net movement 2 -3 -15 100 -1 -100 14 -1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 34 4 36 100 18 Hard No 5 47 100 57 25 Swing voter 61 48 63 100 100 100 42 56 Not ascertained 1 0 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-608
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q57 Local government regulation of oil & gas development amendment (follow-up)
Yes to approve 48 48 49 46 28 61 55 51 44 46 51 Strong 29 29 29 29 15 39 27 31 28 31 29 Not strong 19 19 20 17 13 23 28 20 17 15 22 No to reject 45 44 45 48 68 29 34 43 51 51 42 Not strong 9 9 8 8 7 8 12 7 7 7 9 Strong 36 35 37 39 61 21 22 36 44 44 33 Unsure 7 7 6 6 4 10 11 5 4 3 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
Yes - No 9 10 9 11 3 16 -1 12 11 15 7Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment movement
Stayed 62 61 61 62 66 66 60 57 67 64 61 Yes 28 28 28 27 15 45 31 27 27 27 28 Unsure 2 3 2 1 1 3 6 1 2 0 3 No 32 30 31 34 51 18 23 29 38 37 29 Moved 37 39 38 37 33 34 40 42 33 36 39 Toward Yes 16 18 19 16 16 12 21 19 17 16 19 Toward No 21 21 19 21 17 22 18 23 16 20 20 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
Net movement -5 -2 -1 -4 -1 -10 3 -5 1 -3 -1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q2/Q57 Local government regulation amendment segmentation
Hard Yes 19 18 18 19 8 31 17 19 17 20 18 Hard No 28 27 28 30 48 14 18 26 35 35 25 Swing voter 53 55 53 50 43 55 65 54 48 45 56 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-609
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments
77 69 70 68 71 73 84 74
Local control, officials know better for community 46 35 37 38 31 36 56 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
18 19 19 15 23 31 23 21
Opposed to fracking 10 11 12 10 12 12 6 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 4 8 8 7 9 3 9 6
Other positive comments 11 8 8 8 8 1 9 7 General positive comments 5 8 6 6 10 7 1 6 Negative comments 1 7 8 9 5 4 6 6 Neutral comments 2 8 8 12 4 8 2 7 Other 6 3 4 1 6 6 4 3 Don't know; no answer 19 20 18 17 23 15 4 16Number of cases 44 137 114 75 62 43 49 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-610
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments69 70 81 79 70 70 79 86 74
Local control, officials know better for community 34 36 50 48 37 33 53 48 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
17 17 26 32 14 18 28 30 21
Opposed to fracking 10 12 10 4 8 12 11 2 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 7 8 6 10 6 8 4 9 6
Other positive comments 9 9 7 10 10 7 4 12 7 General positive comments 8 6 3 2 9 5 7 6 Negative comments 6 6 8 7 5 3 9 9 6 Neutral comments 9 9 2 2 8 11 1 6 7 Other 4 4 2 5 3 3 3 6 3 Don't know; no answer 20 18 10 6 21 17 12 2 16Number of cases 123 100 97 35 43 101 72 31 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-611
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 77 71 73 76 72 75 81 69 73 74
Local control, officials know better for community 42 40 37 45 40 42 43 36 43 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 21 21 23 22 17 21 22 22 20 21
Opposed to fracking 11 9 6 15 8 10 11 9 9 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 8 5 8 6 5 6 11 6 4 6
Other positive comments 9 5 6 7 9 9 10 5 5 7 General positive comments 6 6 7 6 4 8 3 5 7 6 Negative comments 2 9 4 6 8 1 2 6 12 6 Neutral comments 3 9 11 3 5 2 6 14 4 7 Other 3 4 2 5 5 3 3 2 5 3 Don't know; no answer 19 13 16 15 16 22 14 17 10 16Number of cases 106 148 101 87 66 67 39 72 76 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-612
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments
72 74 68 66 84 77 74
Local control, officials know better for community 28 44 34 34 51 44 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
27 20 24 23 17 20 21
Opposed to fracking 19 7 9 7 10 10 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 10 6 8 7 6 6 6
Other positive comments 3 8 5 2 11 8 7 General positive comments 13 4 8 6 5 5 6 Negative comments 3 6 5 5 7 6 6 Neutral comments 2 8 7 7 5 6 7 Other 4 3 2 2 2 4 3 Don't know; no answer 23 14 25 28 7 11 16Number of cases 52 203 81 72 107 171 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-613
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments
79 72 83 70 62 82 74
Local control, officials know better for community 36 18 46 44 42 48 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
25 30 23 19 11 30 21
Opposed to fracking 8 12 11 5 20 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 7 10 5 6 3 11 6
Other positive comments 6 10 3 8 7 10 7 General positive comments 10 11 9 3 3 4 6 Negative comments 8 15 4 4 4 4 6 Neutral comments 5 3 6 8 11 4 7 Other 5 3 6 2 1 4 3 Don't know; no answer 9 18 5 20 22 15 16Number of cases 107 38 69 145 87 58 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-614
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments64 76 73 82 71 75 72 74
Local control, officials know better for community 42 41 35 52 28 41 48 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
13 23 31 14 30 22 18 21
Opposed to fracking 6 10 9 10 14 9 8 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 6 4 7 11 7 7 6
Other positive comments 4 8 10 6 7 8 7 7 General positive comments 4 6 4 10 7 5 6 Negative comments 7 7 3 18 1 10 6 Neutral comments 21 3 7 5 7 6 7 Other 4 5 4 4 3 8 3 Don't know; no answer 17 15 14 17 13 17 15 16Number of cases 48 197 71 85 41 133 56 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-615
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 71 78 88 68 87 73 71 76 74
Local control, officials know better for community
44 46 59 35 55 37 42 41 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 20 22 14 26 22 18 20 22 21
Opposed to fracking 6 10 9 11 13 5 10 9 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 8 6 6 11 5 5 7 6 6
Other positive comments 7 7 4 8 4 11 10 5 7 General positive comments 2 6 12 7 5 9 10 6 Negative comments 7 4 5 4 2 11 6 6 6 Neutral comments 8 5 2 7 7 5 5 8 7 Other 2 4 5 5 2 3 1 5 3 Don't know; no answer 16 12 2 21 6 17 19 13 16Number of cases 74 131 34 79 78 75 100 150 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-616
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments
82 76 84 73 79 68 74
Local control, officials know better for community 39 28 45 43 48 39 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
22 32 17 21 19 22 21
Opposed to fracking 2 3 12 15 10 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 9 2 12 6 8 4 6
Other positive comments 9 3 11 7 4 8 7 General positive comments 6 10 3 7 10 4 6 Negative comments 15 29 8 3 7 1 6 Neutral comments 2 3 7 4 9 7 Other 6 10 4 3 6 1 3 Don't know; no answer 8 8 8 17 9 23 16Number of cases 59 19 40 186 74 112 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-617
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments69 78 66 70 74 65 83 92 79 75 74
Local control, officials know better for community 31 30 50 36 56 48 38 38 39 42 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
23 30 11 20 12 12 29 27 31 22 21
Opposed to fracking 3 7 3 10 7 16 18 14 12 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 5 9 2 5 3 1 11 18 7 7 6
Other positive comments 11 15 2 9 2 10 7 12 6 7 General positive comments 3 2 4 2 7 4 10 16 6 8 6 Negative comments 13 20 2 11 4 2 5 12 1 4 6 Neutral comments 6 10 7 5 10 4 3 5 7 7 Other 7 7 3 7 5 2 3 6 1 2 3 Don't know; no answer 16 11 19 14 13 21 12 2 16 16 16Number of cases 55 33 93 68 53 79 107 38 67 186 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-618
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments 80 61 77 58 77 87 76 61 62 73 80 85 74
Local control, officials know better for community 45 22 52 48 32 42 28 35 48 53 35 41 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 10 33 21 3 27 30 34 11 9 14 28 31 21
Opposed to fracking 4 2 12 2 12 18 3 2 5 9 18 13 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 4 4 12 10 5 6 2 2 11 10 6
Other positive comments 23 2 3 11 9 13 8 3 8 12 7 General positive comments 4 6 2 10 10 6 4 3 12 8 6 Negative comments 7 18 4 9 13 14 5 2 8 6 Neutral comments 11 18 8 1 9 4 14 3 2 6 7 Other 2 9 5 6 5 8 7 4 1 3 Don't know; no answer 13 17 23 16 17 9 13 19 24 12 17 7 16Number of cases 22 33 41 51 43 64 29 26 56 37 54 52 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-619
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments
76 75 74 71 74 78 65 79 74
Local control, officials know better for community 44 38 40 33 47 47 36 33 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health
21 29 22 26 18 21 18 29 21
Opposed to fracking 10 8 7 16 13 11 9 7 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells5 10 7 9 3 6 6 9 6
Other positive comments 6 5 7 6 10 6 6 14 7 General positive comments 7 3 7 2 4 5 6 9 6 Negative comments 4 11 4 13 7 7 5 5 6 Neutral comments 6 5 9 3 2 13 5 7 Other 3 5 2 13 5 4 10 3 Don't know; no answer 18 12 15 10 18 16 20 7 16Number of cases 153 69 177 22 48 125 88 41 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-620
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments 75 75 75 68 70 79 74 76 81 75 74
Local control, officials know better for community
55 33 44 33 41 41 34 48 46 40 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 13 30 23 17 10 27 27 21 19 26 21
Opposed to fracking 6 14 12 4 2 14 14 5 10 11 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 3 8 5 7 5 6 9 3 9 6 6
Other positive comments 2 10 8 4 4 10 8 4 10 7 7 General positive comments 7 4 4 8 11 5 7 4 3 6 6 Negative comments 10 3 5 11 17 3 3 9 9 5 6 Neutral comments 6 7 8 2 3 10 2 3 7 7 Other 3 4 2 10 4 4 5 3 2 3 3 Don't know; no answer 12 16 14 22 16 15 13 17 13 14 16Number of cases 79 146 192 40 53 163 86 78 105 86 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-621
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 71 78 68 69 85 75 58 72 74
Local control, officials know better for community 42 54 37 36 46 40 32 44 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 15 8 18 24 31 20 14 21 21
Opposed to fracking 6 6 6 12 12 9 12 7 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 5 7 7 5 9 5 3 6
Other positive comments 7 13 5 8 4 11 3 5 7 General positive comments 5 2 7 9 3 6 6 10 6 Negative comments 8 6 9 5 3 7 5 7 6 Neutral comments 5 5 5 12 3 5 11 10 7 Other 2 3 3 6 3 4 3 Don't know; no answer 18 20 17 18 7 15 29 16 16Number of cases 108 32 76 91 54 105 42 52 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-622
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments 56 83 65 76 78 62 74 74
Local control, officials know better for community 51 45 36 44 41 42 35 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 6 23 22 14 21 15 31 21
Opposed to fracking 10 10 4 8 11 9 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 7 6 17 8 4 4 6
Other positive comments 4 11 5 6 5 2 7 General positive comments 5 5 3 7 7 8 6 Negative comments 2 8 5 4 8 16 6 Neutral comments 4 4 11 4 6 5 7 Other 3 3 9 2 3 Don't know; no answer 38 9 20 14 14 26 15 16Number of cases 23 99 99 16 120 32 30 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-623
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments74 74 79 70 78 71 74
Local control, officials know better for community 41 42 40 41 44 39 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 18 23 25 19 24 21 21
Opposed to fracking 8 10 11 8 9 9 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells6 6 8 5 7 6 6
Other positive comments 7 6 10 4 10 5 7 General positive comments 8 5 3 7 3 7 6 Negative comments 9 4 6 6 8 5 6 Neutral comments 3 11 5 8 6 7 7 Other 5 1 2 4 3 4 3 Don't know; no answer 19 13 16 16 13 17 16Number of cases 114 112 95 153 77 174 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-624
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 72 74 75 77 68 73 75 74
Local control, officials know better for community
43 39 47 35 40 32 44 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 15 25 11 31 24 21 21 21
Opposed to fracking 5 13 6 12 12 9 9 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 7 7 7 5 10 5 6
Other positive comments 7 7 8 6 7 2 8 7 General positive comments 6 6 6 6 6 8 5 6 Negative comments 8 5 7 7 1 8 5 6 Neutral comments 4 9 6 5 9 7 6 7 Other 3 3 1 4 7 6 3 3 Don't know; no answer 18 14 14 16 16 14 16 16Number of cases 101 148 101 91 61 58 182 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-625
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 75 73 70 76 66 76 74
Local control, officials know better for community
28 45 49 35 31 43 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 30 18 11 27 22 21 21
Opposed to fracking 11 8 4 13 6 11 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 8 5 5 7 4 7 6
Other positive comments 2 8 4 8 2 9 7 General positive comments 8 6 6 6 6 7 6 Negative comments 9 5 6 6 7 5 6 Neutral comments 9 8 6 4 7 7 Other 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 Don't know; no answer 20 14 19 13 25 13 16Number of cases 55 183 96 152 60 179 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-626
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ57a.1 Why you would vote
yes on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote yes,
positive comments 75 71 75 79 66 71 83 74 74
Local control, officials know better for community 39 47 40 39 35 41 43 49 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 24 14 22 27 23 18 19 19 21
Opposed to fracking 11 5 11 12 11 8 13 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 4 6 6 7 7 11 10 6
Other positive comments 8 3 8 10 3 5 14 2 7 General positive comments 6 8 7 3 5 8 7 5 6 Negative comments 6 7 4 3 8 7 17 16 6 Neutral comments 6 4 6 3 10 9 7 2 7 Other 3 5 3 4 5 3 4 3 Don't know; no answer 15 16 16 15 19 16 5 12 16Number of cases 184 52 210 90 78 164 33 34 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-627
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q57a.1 Why you would vote yes on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote yes, positive comments 76 75 75 77 69 88 74 75 70 76 74
Local control, officials know better for community
42 42 42 43 34 41 41 47 29 45 41
Harmful to the environment, people's health 22 21 22 22 26 24 21 20 23 22 21
Opposed to fracking 12 11 11 12 2 14 7 11 12 12 10 Restrict distance from home
for oil & gas wells 6 7 8 7 9 12 4 6 10 8 6
Other positive comments 9 8 7 9 8 11 7 6 8 8 7 General positive comments 7 6 5 6 2 9 8 4 7 4 6 Negative comments 6 5 4 5 11 7 4 6 9 7 6 Neutral comments 5 4 7 5 3 5 9 3 8 5 7 Other 4 4 3 4 11 1 6 5 4 3 Don't know; no answer 14 16 14 13 15 6 15 16 15 14 16Number of cases 175 220 203 150 33 58 95 103 56 138 254
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-628
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 86 92 92 93 90 72 94 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
30 47 49 49 45 20 32 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 28 12 10 8 16 16 8 13
Too much government, regulations already
11 11 9 10 13 10 11 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 7 11 8 10 13 10 7 11
Oil & gas are needed 9 6 7 7 5 14 18 9 Property, mineral rights 10 5 6 3 6 8 8 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 13 4 3 3 5 2 7 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 1 2 3 14 7 4
Other negative comments 11 6 7 6 5 6 12 7 General negative comments 11 15 13 12 18 8 12 12 Positive comments 6 2 2 2 2 17 8 6 Neutral comments 1 1 1 2 10 3 3 Other 2 1 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 11 5 6 5 6 3 2 5Number of cases 39 122 99 72 50 28 34 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-629
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 91 91 89 95 82 87 92 97 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
44 46 36 27 33 38 44 46 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 13 12 11 5 15 10 14 17 13
Too much government, regulations already
12 9 14 10 19 11 10 11 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 12 8 9 6 19 9 4 11 11
Oil & gas are needed 7 8 9 24 5 8 14 9 9 Property, mineral rights 5 6 11 10 2 8 6 11 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 5 4 9 9 5 4 8 8 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 2 2 4 9 2 5 10 4
Other negative comments 6 8 8 15 5 14 11 7 General negative comments 13 11 13 14 15 13 17 5 12 Positive comments 2 2 12 10 13 3 6 3 6 Neutral comments 2 1 2 3 3 3 4 2 3 Other 1 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 6 7 3 3 8 3 1 5Number of cases 112 89 79 26 41 83 43 41 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-630
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments90 88 100 90 84 94 87 94 85 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 42 37 51 41 33 48 38 46 32 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
11 16 22 13 9 16 7 19 14 13
Too much government, regulations already 8 18 3 12 17 2 12 15 20 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
10 11 3 14 10 8 12 6 13 11
Oil & gas are needed 10 7 9 7 11 8 11 7 8 9 Property, mineral rights 7 7 11 6 6 5 8 11 5 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned5 7 5 5 8 3 6 8 7 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 3 5 4 6 2 4 5 5 4
Other negative comments 8 6 15 6 5 14 3 6 6 7 General negative comments 13 12 12 12 13 12 13 16 10 12 Positive comments 4 8 4 10 2 6 3 10 6 Neutral comments 3 3 2 5 4 3 3 3 Other 1 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 6 3 7 4 6 5 3 4 5Number of cases 116 94 34 98 78 49 67 32 62 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-631
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 78 91 94 94 89 87 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
28 41 51 53 36 35 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 9 14 19 17 12 11 13
Too much government, regulations already
13 13 7 5 19 15 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 13 12 13 11 10 11
Oil & gas are needed 9 9 3 3 9 11 9 Property, mineral rights 8 6 11 12 5 5 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 2 7 3 2 8 7 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 5 2 3 5 5 4
Other negative comments 14 6 5 5 6 8 7 General negative comments 15 12 15 15 12 11 12 Positive comments 10 5 2 2 7 8 6 Neutral comments 2 3 2 1 3 3 3 Other 0 1 0 0 Don't know; no answer 10 4 5 5 4 5 5Number of cases 34 173 62 56 101 147 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-632
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 82 79 84 94 94 94 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
33 41 28 44 44 45 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 17 3 25 11 6 19 13
Too much government, regulations already
13 3 19 12 11 14 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 5 8 15 15 15 11
Oil & gas are needed 12 17 9 7 7 5 9 Property, mineral rights 7 6 7 7 10 3 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 2 10 5 7 2 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 4 7 4 4 4 4
Other negative comments 9 9 8 6 4 10 7 General negative comments 10 9 10 14 13 16 12 Positive comments 8 10 7 4 4 5 6 Neutral comments 4 1 5 2 2 4 3 Other 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 6 9 4 4 5 2 5Number of cases 86 33 54 123 77 46 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-633
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 85 90 90 89 90 93 82 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
48 38 31 37 43 44 33 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 11 14 14 12 16 16 6 13
Too much government, regulations already
11 13 20 9 11 13 13 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 3 12 12 11 13 10 5 11
Oil & gas are needed 11 8 7 10 6 9 8 9 Property, mineral rights 10 7 4 9 6 5 6 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 9 5 7 5 11 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 5 9 6 1 3 6 4
Other negative comments 11 7 2 8 8 12 1 7 General negative comments 2 13 19 11 13 12 15 12 Positive comments 10 5 8 5 2 2 12 6 Neutral comments 2 3 1 6 2 2 6 3 Other 0 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 5 5 3 4 6 5 3 5Number of cases 29 174 41 70 63 119 59 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-634
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments85 91 89 84 93 90 94 84 89
State should control industry;shouldn't be local 46 38 39 49 42 31 38 42 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
7 15 15 12 7 17 17 9 13
Too much government, regulations already 10 13 19 3 21 14 18 7 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
10 8 12 12 10 7 10 10 11
Oil & gas are needed 7 10 12 12 5 11 11 7 9 Property, mineral rights 10 7 6 6 9 6 8 6 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 4 7 5 3 5 7 7 4 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 2 6 4 4 2 6 2 6 4
Other negative comments 9 7 5 5 4 11 10 4 7 General negative comments 13 13 5 9 17 11 11 14 12 Positive comments 11 2 1 5 5 6 4 8 6 Neutral comments 3 3 2 3 4 2 1 5 3 Other 1 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 3 5 7 8 1 4 3 6 5Number of cases 56 128 42 62 62 77 110 99 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-635
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 88 88 87 92 93 86 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
35 32 38 44 43 49 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 12 12 11 16 19 7 13
Too much government, regulations already
17 25 10 8 7 9 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 9 9 9 12 12 14 11
Oil & gas are needed 12 7 16 5 5 3 9 Property, mineral rights 8 11 6 4 3 7 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 6 7 4 7 8 2 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 8 12 4 4
Other negative comments 8 3 13 6 6 4 7 General negative comments 10 6 12 16 13 28 12 Positive comments 6 3 8 5 5 6 6 Neutral comments 4 5 3 2 1 7 3 Other 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 6 6 5 3 2 5 5Number of cases 114 51 63 92 73 19 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-636
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 93 92 91 91 91 100 74 70 81 87 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
33 29 61 38 58 61 23 18 34 41 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 15 14 13 13 14 20 9 11 4 14 13
Too much government, regulations already
16 18 12 16 12 11 2 3 6 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 10 11 10 9 9 17 12 10 11 14 11
Oil & gas are needed 12 15 3 11 3 2 8 10 4 5 9 Property, mineral rights 8 10 8 7 3 7 3 4 5 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 7 6 7 7 9 1 4 5 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 8 10 6 4
Other negative comments 9 10 6 8 7 9 2 3 5 7 General negative comments 13 10 5 12 6 3 22 15 42 13 12 Positive comments 4 4 5 6 6 13 14 4 7 6 Neutral comments 2 2 3 3 3 7 5 12 4 3 Other 1 1 0 0 Don't know; no answer 4 5 2 4 1 10 13 3 5 5Number of cases 110 84 63 135 55 34 38 25 11 72 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-637
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments
93 93 92 90 74 75 95 92 100 84 77 73 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 36 30 64 56 13 31 36 32 75 49 16 26 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
10 21 12 14 11 6 14 16 21 5 17 5 13
Too much government, regulations already 9 24 7 21 4 11 19 4 19 3 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
10 10 8 15 17 8 4 13 11 10 8 14 11
Oil & gas are needed 12 12 5 13 5 13 11 5 7 9 9 Property, mineral rights 11 4 5 15 5 10 7 7 9 4 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned5 10 7 6 2 11 5 12 2 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 6 10 6 9 4
Other negative comments 8 10 10 4 15 6 6 6 8 7 General negative comments 15 11 5 5 22 22 16 12 4 6 31 19 12 Positive comments 1 7 3 10 17 9 3 4 10 8 15 6 Neutral comments 4 4 8 7 3 1 5 10 3 Other 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 5 3 4 11 9 3 5 4 23 4 5Number of cases 59 50 39 23 17 21 41 69 29 34 11 26 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-638
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
yearOverall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 92 87 92 85 86 93 92 74 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local
62 22 44 30 39 51 35 26 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 13 13 14 10 17 6 20 12 13
Too much government, regulations already 4 17 12 15 11 13 10 16 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 9 12 10 10 12 11 9 12 11
Oil & gas are needed 6 10 5 14 13 5 14 4 9 Property, mineral rights 7 8 9 9 3 4 7 13 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 3 7 5 8 4 6 7 2 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 1 7 3 2 10 5 5 4
Other negative comments 3 11 7 12 5 3 11 6 7 General negative comments 13 13 13 8 14 13 13 9 12 Positive comments 3 9 2 7 8 3 7 9 6 Neutral comments 2 4 2 6 3 2 2 7 3 Other 1 2 1 0 Don't know; no answer 5 4 4 2 8 4 3 9 5Number of cases 86 111 100 40 52 81 93 36 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-639
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 92 71 82 94 93 76 73 92 90 86 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 40 30 47 34 39 41 37 39 38 30 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 15 3 14 13 15 5 14 14 14 14 13
Too much government, regulations already 15 6 6 17 15 8 14 13 12 17 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 9 12 15 10 10 11 13 11 12 13 11
Oil & gas are needed 11 2 6 11 11 4 3 9 9 6 9 Property, mineral rights 7 6 9 7 4 7 9 6 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 3 8 8 6 6 6 6 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban
5 3 7 6 5 4 7 4
Other negative comments 10 3 10 10 9 9 6 7 General negative comments 11 26 15 11 11 16 7 13 15 11 12 Positive comments 3 23 8 4 3 16 4 7 7 5 6 Neutral comments 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 Other 0 1 0 0 1 0 Don't know; no answer 3 13 10 1 3 9 19 2 2 8 5Number of cases 154 31 64 127 152 40 26 145 109 63 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-640
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 91 92 89 87 88 92 81 91 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 34 38 30 48 45 42 19 42 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 18 21 13 8 11 14 13 15 13
Too much government, regulations already 12 11 14 4 25 8 9 12 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 14 12 18 10 2 17 12 9 11
Oil & gas are needed 9 9 10 5 5 9 3 9 9 Property, mineral rights 8 11 4 6 6 7 3 10 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 9 11 8 3 1 7 3 8 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban
5 5 5 3 4 6 6 2 4
Other negative comments 9 9 8 2 2 4 6 9 7 General negative comments 12 12 11 17 9 15 23 9 12 Positive comments 6 5 7 8 4 4 22 3 6 Neutral comments 4 2 6 2 2 4 2 3 3 Other 1 3 0 Don't know; no answer 3 3 4 6 6 4 5 5Number of cases 107 61 46 58 41 75 25 63 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-641
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments 93 78 83 95 81 96 91 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 31 42 66 41 46 41 42 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
20 15 4 5 11 10 10 13
Too much government, regulations already 15 12 14 11 27 6 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
9 14 16 8 9 13 19 11
Oil & gas are needed 10 3 7 6 4 2 9 Property, mineral rights 4 5 27 7 10 7 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned9 4 6 5 4 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 6 10 2 2 4
Other negative comments 7 4 9 8 2 7 General negative comments 13 10 11 15 9 12 9 12 Positive comments 5 12 6 5 9 6 5 6 Neutral comments 1 5 3 1 5 3 Other 1 0 Don't know; no answer 3 10 12 1 10 4 4 5Number of cases 84 33 23 40 65 16 31 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-642
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 90 90 71 92 94 88 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 42 31 30 40 46 38 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 14 14 7 15 20 11 13
Too much government, regulations already 9 19 6 13 7 14 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 11 10 6 12 7 12 11
Oil & gas are needed 10 8 2 10 12 8 9 Property, mineral rights 8 8 10 7 10 6 7
Fracking is okay, should not be banned
8 4 9 6 8 5 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 5 2 3 5 5 4 4
Other negative comments 5 11 8 14 5 7 General negative comments 14 12 16 12 9 13 12 Positive comments 2 11 15 5 2 7 6 Neutral comments 3 1 3 2 1 4 3 Other 1 0 1 0 Don't know; no answer 6 4 14 3 2 5 5Number of cases 111 75 26 173 53 156 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-643
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments91 78 93 80 83 91 87 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 39 40 39 27 50 48 27 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
14 13 15 15 5 10 14 13
Too much government, regulations already 15 2 12 21 7 12 14 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
10 14 13 7 6 7 14 11
Oil & gas are needed 10 1 11 4 5 9 10 9 Property, mineral rights 9 8 5 6 6 11 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 9 2 8 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 5 5 4 4 5 4
Other negative comments 8 2 10 3 2 7 7 7 General negative comments 10 25 10 24 12 14 11 12 Positive comments 5 12 4 12 7 6 6 6 Neutral comments 3 4 2 3 5 2 4 3 Other 0 2 0 Don't know; no answer 3 11 3 10 6 3 7 5Number of cases 172 35 137 31 41 132 60 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-644
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments93 81 93 84 91 85 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 43 28 45 35 39 37 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict
15 7 12 14 15 11 13
Too much government, regulations already 12 15 14 12 11 16 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment
10 8 8 13 11 8 11
Oil & gas are needed 7 14 8 11 8 11 9 Property, mineral rights 8 8 6 8 7 8 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 4 6 6 8 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 4 5 4 3 6 4
Other negative comments 9 6 4 9 7 8 7 General negative comments 14 11 12 12 11 17 12 Positive comments 5 9 4 8 2 15 6 Neutral comments 3 3 2 4 4 2 3 Other 1 1 1 0 Don't know; no answer 3 9 4 6 4 5 5Number of cases 112 65 100 100 141 60 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-645
Local Control(simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ57a.2 Why you would vote no
on the Amendment Reason(s) to vote no;
negative comments 68 92 76 100 89 86 89 91 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 22 39 41 33 46 52 35 39 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 15 5 6 5 5 18 15 13
Too much government, regulations already 5 14 16 14 13 14 12 12 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 20 10 9 10 11 11 11 11
Oil & gas are needed 10 5 8 11 6 7 10 9 Property, mineral rights 4 8 9 16 6 6 8 7 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 4 6 10 7 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban
5 3 8 2 2 6 4 4
Other negative comments 8 3 5 1 9 8 7 General negative comments 17 12 27 29 15 15 11 10 12 Positive comments 10 6 11 6 8 5 5 6 Neutral comments 4 3 9 3 4 3 2 3 Other 0 1 1 0 0 Don't know; no answer 21 3 9 6 6 4 4 5Number of cases 21 180 24 9 82 54 128 178 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-646
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q57a.2 Why you would vote no on the Amendment
Reason(s) to vote no; negative comments
89 89 88 88 91 77 91 89 88 89 89
State should control industry; shouldn't be local 41 39 39 39 38 23 52 40 28 36 40
Would hurt the economy to restrict 11 12 13 11 14 3 18 15 7 13 13
Too much government, regulations already 14 13 14 15 16 3 2 14 20 15 12
Shouldn't be constitutional amendment 13 10 11 13 11 17 3 12 15 13 11
Oil & gas are needed 7 9 8 7 10 9 11 10 5 8 9 Property, mineral rights 5 7 5 5 7 8 6 8 6 7 Fracking is okay, should not
be banned 7 6 7 7 8 2 3 5 10 7 6
Environmentalist agenda pushing ban 5 4 5 5 11 2 3 7 6 4
Other negative comments 5 6 6 5 7 3 10 7 4 6 7 General negative comments 15 12 12 14 10 28 7 11 19 15 12 Positive comments 7 6 6 7 3 17 5 6 7 7 6 Neutral comments 4 3 3 4 2 10 1 4 3 4 3 Other 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Don't know; no answer 4 5 5 4 6 1 6 5 4 3 5Number of cases 162 198 187 156 81 27 59 87 65 153 210
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-647
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q58 Education High school or less 22 14 13 10 18 15 20 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 4 1 1 1 1 2 4 2 Graduated high school 18 13 12 9 17 14 16 14 Some college 34 21 21 20 22 33 35 26 College graduate 43 65 65 69 60 51 44 57 Graduated college 30 40 43 46 33 31 31 36 Graduate, professional school 13 25 22 23 27 19 13 21 Refused 1 0 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 25 26 25 23 30 19 34 26 2 or more 72 73 75 76 69 80 60 72 2 58 56 56 56 56 59 48 55 3 or more 14 17 19 20 13 20 12 17 Refused 4 1 0 1 1 1 6 2
Mean 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.2 1.8 2.0Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 64 67 66 63 72 74 76 69 1 or more 33 32 34 37 27 25 19 30 1 14 12 12 14 10 8 10 12 2 13 12 14 15 10 3 8 11 3 or more 6 8 9 9 6 14 1 7 Refused 4 0 1 1 5 1
Mean .6 .6 .7 .7 .5 .8 .3 .6Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-648
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ58 Education High school or less 14 14 21 20 12 13 19 24 16 Some grade school 0 0 1 0 Some high school 1 1 4 5 2 1 6 1 2 Graduated high school 13 13 17 15 10 12 13 23 14 Some college 23 23 28 29 22 25 27 29 26 College graduate 62 62 50 48 65 61 54 46 57 Graduated college 39 42 30 35 35 41 31 31 36 Graduate, professional school 23 20 20 13 30 20 23 16 21 Refused 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 26 24 30 36 31 25 24 28 26 2 or more 73 75 67 57 69 74 74 72 72 2 57 56 51 47 57 56 54 57 55 3 or more 17 19 16 10 13 19 20 15 17 Refused 1 0 3 7 0 2 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 66 64 70 75 83 67 63 70 69 1 or more 33 36 27 19 17 33 36 30 30 1 13 13 10 8 9 12 10 13 12 2 13 14 11 9 6 12 15 10 11 3 or more 8 8 6 1 2 8 11 7 7 Refused 0 3 6 0 1 1
Mean .6 .7 .6 .3 .3 .7 .9 .5 .6Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-649
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q58 Education High school or less 17 15 18 15 15 19 15 10 19 16 Some grade school 0 0 1 0 Some high school 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 Graduated high school 14 13 17 12 13 17 11 9 17 14 Some college 23 29 31 23 26 22 25 29 29 26 College graduate 58 56 51 62 57 59 58 61 51 57 Graduated college 35 36 37 39 29 37 33 46 28 36 Graduate, professional school 23 20 13 23 28 22 25 15 23 21 Refused 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 26 26 21 21 38 25 28 17 34 26 2 or more 71 73 76 78 60 71 70 83 65 72 2 55 55 59 54 53 54 56 63 49 55 3 or more 16 18 18 25 6 18 15 20 16 17 Refused 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 1 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.0Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 67 70 49 62 96 49 86 47 88 69 1 or more 31 29 48 38 3 48 12 53 11 30 1 10 13 18 14 2 16 4 21 6 12 2 11 11 17 15 0 17 5 21 3 11 3 or more 9 6 13 8 1 14 4 11 2 7 Refused 3 0 3 0 2 3 2 1 1
Mean .7 .6 1.1 .7 .0 1.0 .3 1.1 .2 .6Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-650
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q58 Education High school or less 34 11 16 16 13 16 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 5 1 3 3 2 2 2 Graduated high school 29 10 13 13 11 14 14 Some college 29 25 24 24 30 26 26 College graduate 37 62 59 60 57 57 57 Graduated college 24 38 37 39 36 36 36 Graduate, professional school 13 24 22 22 21 22 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 30 26 10 34 26 2 or more 65 73 90 100 100 66 72 2 43 58 66 73 78 52 55 3 or more 22 16 24 27 22 14 17 Refused 4 1 0 2
Mean 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 1.9 2.0Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 55 72 100 100 69 1 or more 41 27 100 100 30 1 16 11 39 39 12 2 13 10 37 36 11 3 or more 12 6 24 25 7 Refused 4 1 1
Mean .9 .6 2.1 2.1 .6Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-651
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q58 Education High school or less 38 100 16 Some grade school 0 1 0 Some high school 5 13 2 Graduated high school 33 86 14 Some college 62 100 26 College graduate 100 100 100 57 Graduated college 62 100 36 Graduate, professional school 38 100 21 Refused 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 27 35 22 26 25 29 26 2 or more 71 63 75 73 75 71 72 2 51 40 57 59 58 59 55 3 or more 20 23 18 15 17 11 17 Refused 3 2 3 0 0 2
Mean 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 69 67 69 69 68 70 69 1 or more 29 30 28 31 32 30 30 1 12 12 12 11 12 11 12 2 8 7 9 13 15 10 11 3 or more 9 12 7 6 5 9 7 Refused 3 2 3 1
Mean .7 .6 .7 .6 .6 .7 .6Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-652
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ58 Education High school or less 22 14 24 11 7 14 20 16 Some grade school 0 1 0 0 Some high school 3 2 4 2 2 3 2 Graduated high school 19 12 20 9 6 12 17 14 Some college 30 25 34 26 16 22 27 26 College graduate 47 60 41 63 77 62 51 57 Graduated college 42 35 26 37 41 38 25 36 Graduate, professional school 5 25 15 26 35 24 26 21 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 45 23 28 23 16 20 43 26 2 or more 54 77 72 77 84 79 56 72 2 43 59 59 56 64 62 48 55 3 or more 11 18 13 21 20 17 8 17 Refused 1 0 0 1 1 2
Mean 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.0Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 71 69 68 66 73 57 97 69 1 or more 29 31 32 34 27 43 3 30 1 7 13 13 11 15 17 1 12 2 9 12 11 14 9 14 1 11 3 or more 12 7 8 9 3 11 1 7 Refused 1 0 0 1
Mean .7 .6 .7 .7 .4 .9 .1 .6Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-653
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q58 Education High school or less 16 15 9 12 14 21 13 18 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 5 1 4 1 2 2 3 2 Graduated high school 11 14 9 8 12 19 11 15 14 Some college 19 29 31 22 17 34 25 27 26 College graduate 65 55 60 65 69 44 61 55 57 Graduated college 34 40 44 42 39 29 37 35 36 Graduate, professional school 32 15 16 23 30 16 23 20 21 Refused 1 0 0 1 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 26 27 25 31 27 24 24 29 26 2 or more 74 73 75 68 73 75 76 69 72 2 58 55 61 52 54 60 62 51 55 3 or more 16 17 14 17 20 15 14 19 17 Refused 0 0 1 1 2 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 70 72 70 76 67 69 64 73 69 1 or more 30 27 30 24 33 31 36 25 30 1 9 10 9 8 12 12 14 9 12 2 13 11 14 16 10 10 13 9 11 3 or more 8 6 7 0 11 10 9 7 7 Refused 0 0 2 1
Mean .6 .6 .7 .4 .7 .7 .8 .5 .6Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-654
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q58 Education High school or less 23 24 23 12 16 7 16 Some grade school 0 1 0 Some high school 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 Graduated high school 20 21 20 10 14 6 14 Some college 30 31 29 23 25 21 26 College graduate 46 44 47 65 58 72 57 Graduated college 26 29 25 41 37 46 36 Graduate, professional school 20 15 23 23 21 26 21 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 21 15 25 29 30 29 26 2 or more 79 85 75 69 69 69 72 2 61 66 58 52 51 54 55 3 or more 18 19 17 17 18 15 17 Refused 0 0 2 1 3 2
Mean 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 73 72 74 67 60 74 69 1 or more 27 28 26 32 39 23 30 1 10 11 10 12 15 9 12 2 7 5 9 13 16 10 11 3 or more 9 13 6 7 9 4 7 Refused 2 1 3 1
Mean .6 .7 .5 .6 .8 .5 .6Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-655
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ58 Education High school or less 15 19 16 19 21 11 16 26 8 14 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 2 3 3 2 4 3 1 3 2 2 Graduated high school 13 16 13 16 18 8 15 24 8 12 14 Some college 28 29 24 27 25 23 27 33 22 25 26 College graduate 55 52 60 52 54 66 56 39 70 61 57 Graduated college 32 30 43 30 35 50 31 24 36 39 36 Graduate, professional school 23 22 17 22 19 16 25 15 34 21 21 Refused 2 0 2 1 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 24 24 24 22 23 28 31 34 29 30 26 2 or more 75 76 74 77 75 70 66 65 67 68 72 2 59 60 57 61 60 51 49 41 56 50 55 3 or more 16 16 18 16 16 19 17 24 11 18 17 Refused 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 2 2
Mean 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 71 75 62 71 56 61 72 72 73 67 69 1 or more 28 25 37 29 43 38 25 28 24 31 30 1 11 8 14 11 17 15 10 13 8 12 12 2 9 7 16 9 15 16 9 9 10 12 11 3 or more 8 10 8 8 11 8 6 7 6 7 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 1
Mean .6 .6 .7 .6 .9 .8 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-656
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q58 Education High school or less 17 13 18 14 15 17 18 13 12 23 16 17 16 Some grade school 1 1 0 Some high school 1 3 5 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 Graduated high school 16 10 13 13 12 17 16 11 9 19 16 15 14 Some college 22 35 18 30 33 22 28 28 22 26 26 27 26 College graduate 58 52 64 56 52 59 53 56 67 51 58 55 57 Graduated college 33 32 44 42 27 34 36 30 54 29 31 32 36 Graduate, professional school 25 20 19 14 25 25 18 26 12 22 27 23 21 Refused 3 1 1 1 3 2 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 25 23 23 25 32 31 19 27 20 29 25 37 26 2 or more 74 77 74 75 63 68 81 71 78 69 71 61 72 2 55 63 61 53 47 51 56 61 60 53 58 40 55 3 or more 19 14 14 22 16 18 25 10 18 17 13 21 17 Refused 1 1 2 5 1 2 1 1 4 2 2
Mean 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 74 68 53 72 73 71 44 90 45 83 55 88 69 1 or more 24 32 45 28 21 28 56 9 53 17 41 11 30 1 7 15 16 11 8 12 24 2 19 7 13 7 12 2 9 8 17 14 6 11 16 4 23 7 17 2 11 3 or more 8 9 12 3 8 5 16 3 12 2 11 2 7 Refused 1 1 1 5 0 2 1 4 1 1
Mean .5 .7 1.0 .5 .5 .6 1.2 .2 1.1 .3 .9 .2 .6Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-657
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q58 Education High school or less 14 17 12 25 20 13 15 24 16 Some grade school 0 1 0 0 Some high school 2 2 2 3 3 4 1 1 2 Graduated high school 12 14 10 22 17 9 15 23 14 Some college 20 32 26 30 24 23 28 29 26 College graduate 64 50 61 45 55 63 55 47 57 Graduated college 40 30 42 27 28 42 31 29 36 Graduate, professional school 24 20 20 18 27 20 24 18 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 24 31 21 38 33 23 31 24 26 2 or more 74 69 79 60 64 74 68 76 72 2 58 51 61 43 48 57 51 59 55 3 or more 16 17 18 17 16 17 17 17 17 Refused 3 1 1 4 3 1 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.0Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 66 70 61 88 75 70 66 72 69 1 or more 31 30 39 12 22 28 34 28 30 1 10 12 14 5 10 10 14 11 12 2 13 11 14 5 7 11 11 11 11 3 or more 8 7 10 3 4 7 9 6 7 Refused 2 0 4 2 1 1
Mean .7 .6 .8 .2 .4 .6 .7 .6 .6Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-658
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q58 Education High school or less 18 12 10 20 20 12 16 15 14 16 16 Some grade school 0 0 Some high school 4 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Graduated high school 14 12 10 16 16 12 15 13 12 14 14 Some college 28 26 26 26 28 25 35 26 25 31 26 College graduate 52 62 63 53 50 63 48 58 60 52 57 Graduated college 33 35 39 32 31 35 25 36 34 32 36 Graduate, professional school 18 27 24 21 19 28 23 22 26 20 21 Refused 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 24 27 25 25 19 29 25 22 23 33 26 2 or more 74 71 73 74 78 71 74 76 76 64 72 2 58 53 57 57 60 53 60 58 58 50 55 3 or more 16 18 16 17 18 18 15 17 17 14 17 Refused 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 71 67 68 69 68 73 66 67 69 71 69 1 or more 28 31 30 30 29 27 33 31 30 27 30 1 13 9 13 12 11 9 14 11 10 13 12 2 8 14 11 9 9 12 13 12 14 8 11 3 or more 7 7 6 9 8 6 6 8 5 6 7 Refused 2 2 2 0 3 1 2 1 2 1
Mean .5 .7 .6 .6 .6 .6 .7 .7 .6 .5 .6Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-659
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ58 Education High school or less 14 7 19 13 21 12 24 11 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 3 3 3 0 2 3 3 2 Graduated high school 11 4 16 12 19 8 21 11 14 Some college 28 31 25 24 27 25 20 31 26 College graduate 57 61 55 63 51 62 54 58 57 Graduated college 33 33 33 40 36 36 33 38 36 Graduate, professional school 24 28 21 23 16 27 21 20 21 Refused 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 25 20 30 24 28 27 25 21 26 2 or more 73 80 69 75 69 72 72 78 72 2 57 63 52 56 53 55 58 57 55 3 or more 17 17 17 19 16 17 14 21 17 Refused 1 1 1 1 3 0 4 1 2
Mean 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 68 71 66 66 71 68 72 62 69 1 or more 31 29 32 33 25 31 26 37 30 1 13 12 13 13 7 10 11 19 12 2 10 12 8 16 8 12 10 13 11 3 or more 8 5 11 4 10 9 5 4 7 Refused 1 0 1 1 3 0 2 1 1
Mean .7 .5 .8 .6 .6 .7 .5 .6 .6Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-660
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q58 Education High school or less 13 18 12 11 13 8 26 16 Some grade school 1 0 0 Some high school 1 3 1 2 1 4 2 Graduated high school 11 15 11 9 11 8 21 14 Some college 27 27 22 23 25 17 25 26 College graduate 58 54 65 64 62 70 48 57 Graduated college 39 32 42 40 39 51 35 36 Graduate, professional school 19 22 23 24 23 19 13 21 Refused 2 0 2 0 5 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 21 23 29 31 27 30 17 26 2 or more 76 75 70 68 72 68 78 72 2 60 58 52 52 54 58 54 55 3 or more 16 18 18 16 18 9 24 17 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.0Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 71 63 72 68 71 68 53 69 1 or more 27 36 27 32 28 30 42 30 1 11 14 12 11 11 6 19 12 2 9 12 10 14 12 13 10 11 3 or more 7 11 5 7 6 12 13 7 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1
Mean .5 .8 .5 .6 .5 .9 .9 .6Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-661
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ58 Education High school or less 14 18 24 13 17 16 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 Some high school 2 2 3 2 0 3 2 Graduated high school 12 16 21 10 17 13 14 Some college 25 28 28 26 27 26 26 College graduate 60 53 48 61 56 57 57
Graduated college 39 31 25 40 36 35 36 Graduate, professional school 21 22 23 21 20 22 21 Refused 1 1 0 1 0 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 21 28 23 27 29 25 26 2 or more 77 70 76 71 70 73 72 2 59 55 59 55 53 56 55 3 or more 18 15 17 16 18 17 17 Refused 2 2 1 2 0 2 2
Mean 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 65 72 59 71 64 70 69 1 or more 34 26 41 27 36 28 30 1 12 12 19 9 17 10 12 2 15 7 16 10 13 10 11 3 or more 7 8 7 8 6 8 7 Refused 1 2 0 2 2 1
Mean .7 .5 .7 .6 .6 .6 .6Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-662
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ58 Education High school or less 20 10 17 20 10 16 16 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 Some high school 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 Graduated high school 18 9 14 18 9 14 14 14 Some college 25 27 30 18 28 26 27 26 College graduate 54 62 53 61 61 57 56 57 Graduated college 34 37 31 36 42 38 34 36 Graduate, professional school 20 25 21 24 19 19 22 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 24 28 27 21 32 24 26 26 2 or more 74 70 72 79 63 74 74 72 2 56 53 57 60 44 57 56 55 3 or more 18 16 16 18 18 17 18 17 Refused 1 2 1 5 3 0 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 68 69 73 66 62 71 67 69 1 or more 31 29 26 34 34 27 33 30 1 11 12 13 11 10 9 13 12 2 12 11 9 13 14 8 14 11 3 or more 8 6 5 10 10 10 6 7 Refused 1 2 1 4 2 0 1
Mean .6 .6 .4 .8 .9 .7 .6 .6Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-663
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ58 Education High school or less 16 16 17 15 19 12 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 Some high school 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Graduated high school 14 14 15 14 16 10 14 Some college 25 26 22 30 24 26 26 College graduate 58 57 60 54 56 61 57
Graduated college 40 34 37 33 40 34 36 Graduate, professional school 18 23 23 21 16 27 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 31 23 24 28 24 28 26 2 or more 68 76 75 70 75 72 72 2 48 62 56 54 57 56 55 3 or more 20 15 19 16 18 16 17 Refused 1 1 1 2 1 1 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 73 68 68 69 67 71 69 1 or more 26 31 32 29 32 29 30 1 9 12 14 11 12 10 12 2 8 13 9 12 10 13 11 3 or more 10 6 9 6 10 7 7 Refused 1 0 1 2 1 0 1
Mean .6 .6 .6 .6 .7 .6 .6Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-664
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ58 Education High school or less 14 18 12 12 25 18 11 15 20 16 Some grade school 0 1 0 0 0 Some high school 2 2 2 2 5 3 1 2 2 Graduated high school 12 16 10 10 18 15 11 14 18 14 Some college 28 26 29 32 21 23 26 29 23 26 College graduate 57 55 58 56 53 58 61 55 56 57 Graduated college 32 36 34 29 36 40 38 30 35 36 Graduate, professional school 25 19 24 27 17 18 23 24 21 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 27 24 26 28 33 28 28 21 26 26 2 or more 72 74 72 71 64 69 68 78 72 72 2 56 56 56 59 44 49 49 64 55 55 3 or more 16 18 16 12 21 20 19 14 17 17 Refused 2 2 2 1 3 3 4 0 1 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 66 72 63 70 67 67 61 71 74 69 1 or more 32 27 35 29 30 31 35 28 25 30 1 12 11 14 15 10 11 16 11 10 12 2 12 10 13 9 13 12 12 10 8 11 3 or more 8 6 8 5 8 8 7 8 7 7 Refused 2 1 2 1 3 2 4 0 1 1
Mean .7 .5 .8 .6 .7 .7 .7 .6 .5 .6Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-665
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q58 Education High school or less 13 16 14 13 12 13 19 11 20 9 16 Some grade school 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Some high school 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 Graduated high school 11 14 13 11 9 11 18 8 17 9 14 Some college 26 26 27 27 30 27 23 28 28 22 26 College graduate 59 57 58 59 57 59 57 61 50 68 57 Graduated college 35 34 34 33 32 29 39 37 29 34 36 Graduate, professional school 25 23 24 27 25 30 19 24 21 34 21 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q59 Adults in household 1 26 26 25 23 22 29 28 24 28 25 26 2 or more 72 72 74 75 77 70 69 75 70 74 72 2 57 56 56 59 62 54 52 56 58 59 55 3 or more 15 16 18 16 14 16 18 19 13 15 17 Refused 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 2
Mean 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q60 Infants & children in household
None 72 69 71 72 78 82 65 55 95 74 69 1 or more 27 29 28 26 21 17 32 44 4 26 30 1 10 11 10 10 7 6 15 15 2 10 12 2 10 11 12 11 7 8 12 16 2 11 11 3 or more 7 7 6 6 8 4 6 13 1 5 7 Refused 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 1
Mean .6 .6 .6 .5 .6 .4 .6 1.0 .1 .5 .6Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-666
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 75 77 79 81 73 81 63 75 With children 33 32 34 37 27 25 19 30 Single adult 3 4 4 4 4 1 3 3 No children 42 45 45 44 46 56 44 45 Single adult, no children 21 22 21 19 26 18 31 23 Not ascertained 4 1 0 1 1 1 6 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 3 25 12 12 40 25 3 19 Suburb 45 54 64 65 41 36 6 39 Medium-sized town 7 9 10 7 11 13 7 10 Small town 27 3 4 3 4 9 40 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 13 8 10 12 4 10 39 15 Unsure 4 0 0 1 3 5 1 Refused 5 0 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q62 Employment Employed 62 66 67 68 64 55 57 64 Full-time 59 59 59 60 59 48 48 54 Part-time 3 7 8 8 5 7 9 9 Other 32 32 31 31 33 44 38 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 4 5 5 3 3 5 4
Retired 28 21 19 15 28 35 30 24 Homemaker 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 Student 5 5 8 2 2 4 Other, something else 2 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 6 1 1 2 2 5 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-667
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ59/Q60 Household type Family 77 79 70 61 73 77 75 78 75 With children 33 36 27 19 17 33 36 30 30 Single adult 4 4 3 3 4 3 1 6 3 No children 44 44 43 42 56 45 39 48 45 Single adult, no children 22 20 27 33 27 22 23 22 23 Not ascertained 1 0 3 7 0 2 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 26 10 10 1 100 19 Suburb 55 67 19 2 100 39 Medium-sized town 6 6 17 8 44 10 Small town 3 4 28 40 56 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 10 13 23 42 100 15 Unsure 3 6 1 Refused 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q62 Employment Employed 65 66 62 56 57 64 71 64 64 Full-time 59 59 48 47 54 56 57 52 54 Part-time 6 7 14 10 3 8 15 12 9 Other 33 32 34 38 42 34 28 36 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 5 3 5 3 5 4 3 4
Retired 21 18 28 30 34 22 20 27 24 Homemaker 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 Student 6 6 2 4 5 2 4 4 Other, something else 0 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 0 1 1 Refused 1 1 3 6 1 1 1 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-668
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q59/Q60 Household type Family 74 76 81 82 60 77 71 89 66 75 With children 31 29 48 38 3 48 12 53 11 30 Single adult 3 3 5 4 6 1 6 1 3 No children 43 47 33 44 57 29 58 36 55 45 Single adult, no children 23 23 16 17 38 20 27 11 33 23 Not ascertained 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 1 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 19 19 15 18 25 17 22 14 22 19 Suburb 37 42 41 41 36 33 42 50 35 39 Medium-sized town 10 11 13 10 9 12 7 14 9 10 Small town 15 12 17 12 11 19 10 10 12 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 17 14 10 18 16 16 18 7 19 15 Unsure 2 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 Refused 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q62 Employment Employed 68 59 83 75 30 84 51 75 47 64 Full-time 63 47 71 67 22 79 45 61 35 54 Part-time 6 12 11 8 8 6 6 14 11 9 Other 29 39 15 22 68 12 48 24 51 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off4 4 1 7 2 2 6 3 4 4
Retired 22 26 1 10 66 4 42 4 44 24 Homemaker 3 1 3 0 4 2 2 Student 2 6 12 0 4 12 1 4 Other, something else 0 0 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 1 2 1 1 Refused 3 1 2 2 2 4 2 2 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-669
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 70 76 100 100 100 66 75 With children 41 27 100 100 30 Single adult 5 3 10 3 No children 29 49 100 66 45 Single adult, no children 25 23 34 23 Not ascertained 4 1 0 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 21 19 11 9 24 23 19 Suburb 38 39 43 43 39 39 39 Medium-sized town 13 10 15 16 8 8 10 Small town 15 13 13 14 12 13 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 7 17 15 13 16 16 15 Unsure 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 Refused 3 1 2 2 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q62 Employment Employed 65 63 86 86 61 55 64 Full-time 58 53 77 77 50 45 54 Part-time 7 10 8 9 11 10 9 Other 28 35 13 13 39 43 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 4 2 1 4 5 4
Retired 20 25 2 2 29 34 24 Homemaker 2 4 4 1 1 2 Student 3 4 5 6 4 4 4 Other, something else 1 0 1 1 0 Unsure 2 0 0 1 1 Refused 4 1 1 1 0 1 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-670
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 74 67 79 76 77 74 75 With children 29 30 28 31 32 30 30 Single adult 4 4 4 3 2 3 3 No children 45 36 51 45 45 44 45 Single adult, no children 23 31 18 24 23 26 23 Not ascertained 3 2 3 0 0 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 16 15 16 22 19 27 19 Suburb 36 32 38 42 45 37 39 Medium-sized town 11 13 10 10 9 13 10 Small town 15 15 15 12 11 13 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 19 23 17 12 13 11 15 Unsure 3 2 4 0 0 1 Refused 0 1 1 2 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q62 Employment Employed 55 55 55 70 73 66 64 Full-time 48 49 47 60 59 61 54 Part-time 7 6 8 11 14 5 9 Other 42 43 42 28 24 34 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 5 4 6 3 3 3 4
Retired 28 31 25 22 17 29 24 Homemaker 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 Student 8 7 8 1 2 4 Other, something else 0 1 0 1 0 Unsure 1 2 1 Refused 3 3 3 1 1 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-671
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ59/Q60 Household type Family 61 79 73 81 84 84 57 75 With children 29 31 32 34 27 43 3 30 Single adult 7 2 1 4 5 1 3 No children 32 48 41 47 57 41 54 45 Single adult, no children 39 21 27 19 16 15 42 23 Not ascertained 1 0 0 1 1 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 24 18 19 18 19 19 27 19 Suburb 47 39 31 46 37 41 35 39 Medium-sized town 12 9 11 7 12 12 6 10 Small town 8 15 21 14 11 13 14 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 8 17 15 16 21 14 17 15 Unsure 2 0 1 0 1 1 Refused 1 3 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q62 Employment Employed 64 65 62 67 66 100 64 Full-time 52 56 55 60 52 100 54 Part-time 11 8 7 6 13 9 Other 35 35 38 33 32 100 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 7 3 5 2 3 4
Retired 17 26 28 26 23 100 24 Homemaker 2 4 1 1 2 Student 10 3 1 3 5 4 Other, something else 1 1 0 Unsure 0 2 1 Refused 2 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-672
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q59/Q60 Household type Family 75 76 82 71 78 78 81 71 75 With children 30 27 30 24 33 31 36 25 30 Single adult 1 3 7 3 5 2 5 1 3 No children 46 48 52 47 46 46 45 46 45 Single adult, no children 25 24 18 29 22 22 19 27 23 Not ascertained 0 0 1 1 2 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 24 16 16 21 23 16 21 18 19 Suburb 41 38 44 37 41 42 34 45 39 Medium-sized town 13 9 8 13 9 9 11 10 10 Small town 12 17 12 13 10 18 16 11 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 9 20 19 14 15 16 19 13 15 Unsure 1 0 1 1 2 1 Refused 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q62 Employment Employed 54 70 70 56 69 73 77 54 64 Full-time 44 60 57 47 57 64 67 44 54 Part-time 10 10 13 9 12 9 9 9 9 Other 45 29 30 42 31 27 23 44 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off4 4 2 4 4 3 2 5 4
Retired 33 21 22 35 22 18 16 31 24 Homemaker 1 2 4 0 3 0 2 1 2 Student 7 1 2 3 3 4 2 6 4 Other, something else 1 0 1 0 0 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 Refused 0 1 1 0 3 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-673
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 81 85 78 72 75 70 75 With children 27 28 26 32 39 23 30 Single adult 2 1 3 4 6 1 3 No children 54 57 52 41 35 47 45 Single adult, no children 19 15 22 26 24 28 23 Not ascertained 0 0 2 1 3 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 15 14 16 22 20 24 19 Suburb 40 28 48 39 38 40 39 Medium-sized town 11 10 11 11 10 12 10 Small town 10 13 9 15 20 11 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 24 35 16 10 11 9 15 Unsure 2 2 2 1 Refused 1 2 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q62 Employment Employed 56 53 58 69 75 62 64 Full-time 48 45 51 59 66 50 54 Part-time 8 8 7 10 9 12 9 Other 43 47 40 29 25 33 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 6 7 5 3 2 3 4
Retired 30 28 31 22 21 24 24 Homemaker 3 5 2 0 0 0 2 Student 3 6 1 3 1 6 4 Other, something else 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 1 1 1 Refused 1 2 1 3 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-674
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ59/Q60 Household type Family 77 78 79 80 82 75 69 69 69 71 75 With children 28 25 37 29 43 38 25 28 24 31 30 Single adult 2 2 5 2 7 5 3 4 2 4 3 No children 49 53 42 51 39 37 43 41 45 41 45 Single adult, no children 22 22 20 19 16 23 29 30 28 26 23 Not ascertained 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 2 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 17 15 15 16 16 17 25 21 29 22 19 Suburb 37 39 43 37 38 43 39 43 36 41 39 Medium-sized town 11 13 12 11 10 13 8 7 10 10 10 Small town 12 10 13 12 15 14 14 19 11 14 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 20 23 16 21 19 11 10 10 10 10 15 Unsure 2 2 2 3 1 4 3 1 Refused 3 2 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q62 Employment Employed 61 60 72 60 75 78 58 54 62 66 64 Full-time 52 50 60 51 66 64 52 52 52 57 54 Part-time 9 10 12 9 9 14 6 2 10 10 9 Other 38 40 25 39 24 19 38 45 35 30 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 5 3 4 4 2 4 4 5 3 4
Retired 26 26 18 27 19 13 29 36 25 22 24 Homemaker 3 5 3 1 2 1 1 2 Student 4 3 4 4 1 5 3 3 4 4 4 Other, something else 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Unsure 1 2 0 1 1 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 4 2 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-675
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 77 78 81 77 63 73 85 72 86 70 77 61 75 With children 24 32 45 28 21 28 56 9 53 17 41 11 30 Single adult 3 1 6 3 5 3 1 8 1 6 3 No children 53 46 35 49 41 45 29 64 33 54 35 50 45 Single adult, no children 22 21 17 23 32 26 15 26 13 29 19 37 23 Not ascertained 1 1 2 5 1 2 1 1 4 2 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 23 11 14 17 21 28 9 23 15 15 22 28 19 Suburb 39 35 34 52 39 38 37 36 42 44 44 34 39 Medium-sized town 10 12 13 11 6 11 16 7 15 8 8 9 10 Small town 12 13 16 9 17 13 17 9 14 11 15 14 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 16 23 23 9 11 9 16 22 12 20 6 13 15 Unsure 3 5 1 1 2 4 2 1 Refused 1 5 1 0 4 2 1 0 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q62 Employment Employed 70 51 76 68 57 58 76 51 87 53 76 42 64 Full-time 63 40 68 52 55 49 70 39 71 47 70 35 54 Part-time 7 12 8 16 2 10 6 12 15 7 6 7 9 Other 29 47 23 28 35 40 24 47 10 45 19 55 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off4 4 5 2 3 5 1 6 1 6 5 3 4
Retired 23 28 17 20 27 31 6 39 2 39 5 50 24 Homemaker 7 2 6 1 2 2 Student 2 7 1 7 4 3 9 1 7 7 4 Other, something else 1 1 2 1 0 Unsure 2 1 2 1 1 Refused 1 2 1 2 7 0 2 1 2 5 2 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-676
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 76 73 83 64 64 77 72 79 75 With children 31 30 39 12 22 28 34 28 30 Single adult 2 4 4 3 2 4 3 3 No children 45 43 44 52 42 49 38 51 45 Single adult, no children 21 26 17 35 33 21 27 21 23 Not ascertained 3 1 1 4 3 1 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 21 15 17 23 23 22 16 18 19 Suburb 38 39 42 33 38 34 45 42 39 Medium-sized town 11 11 11 12 10 10 14 4 10 Small town 12 15 14 13 12 18 7 14 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 13 20 15 20 12 12 16 20 15 Unsure 2 1 1 4 2 1 2 1 Refused 2 0 1 2 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q62 Employment Employed 67 56 77 43 45 67 57 67 64 Full-time 59 46 66 36 42 54 54 55 54 Part-time 8 11 11 7 3 13 3 13 9 Other 29 42 22 57 49 29 40 32 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 2 5 3 8 2 4 4 4 4
Retired 22 30 12 46 43 21 27 25 24 Homemaker 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 Student 4 3 5 3 3 2 7 2 4 Other, something else 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 1 2 1 1 Refused 3 2 1 4 2 3 1 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-677
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 78 73 75 78 81 73 76 79 78 71 75 With children 28 31 30 30 29 27 33 31 30 27 30 Single adult 4 2 2 5 3 2 2 3 2 6 3 No children 50 42 45 48 52 46 43 48 48 44 45 Single adult, no children 20 25 23 21 16 27 23 19 21 27 23 Not ascertained 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 17 25 20 17 16 23 18 18 18 24 19 Suburb 39 37 41 37 39 39 44 34 37 38 39 Medium-sized town 9 13 10 10 10 12 7 14 12 7 10 Small town 15 11 15 12 14 13 16 14 15 11 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 19 11 10 24 18 12 13 18 18 16 15 Unsure 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 Refused 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q62 Employment Employed 63 61 64 66 64 61 63 66 64 59 64 Full-time 55 51 53 58 57 49 55 56 55 50 54 Part-time 8 10 11 7 7 12 7 9 9 9 9 Other 36 35 33 33 33 37 34 32 35 37 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 2 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 4
Retired 27 24 23 25 25 27 21 25 26 25 24 Homemaker 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 3 2 Student 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 4 4 Other, something else 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Unsure 0 1 0 1 1 Refused 1 4 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 4 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-678
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ59/Q60 Household type Family 76 81 72 78 72 76 72 81 75 With children 31 29 32 33 25 31 26 37 30 Single adult 3 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 No children 45 53 40 45 47 45 46 45 45 Single adult, no children 23 18 27 20 24 24 25 18 23 Not ascertained 1 1 1 1 3 0 4 1 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 23 21 24 17 15 20 19 21 19 Suburb 33 34 33 48 43 37 47 36 39 Medium-sized town 13 11 15 11 2 13 8 15 10 Small town 13 15 11 11 17 14 6 12 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 17 19 16 10 19 14 13 14 15 Unsure 0 1 2 4 1 2 1 Refused 1 0 2 2 1 6 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q62 Employment Employed 64 67 62 63 63 64 55 67 64 Full-time 56 58 54 53 54 55 51 55 54 Part-time 9 9 8 10 9 10 4 12 9 Other 34 30 36 34 33 35 39 31 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 3 2 3 3 7 4 4 1 4
Retired 27 27 27 22 20 27 28 21 24 Homemaker 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 Student 1 2 8 5 1 4 7 4 Other, something else 1 2 1 1 0 Unsure 0 1 1 3 1 1 Refused 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-679
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 79 79 72 71 74 72 80 75 With children 27 36 27 32 28 30 42 30 Single adult 2 3 2 3 2 5 2 3 No children 52 42 45 40 46 42 38 45 Single adult, no children 19 20 27 28 25 26 16 23 Not ascertained 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 18 22 17 11 19 17 27 19 Suburb 37 41 43 42 44 36 33 39 Medium-sized town 12 10 12 5 9 16 13 10 Small town 11 14 12 17 15 20 7 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 22 10 11 23 11 10 16 15 Unsure 1 1 1 1 5 1 Refused 1 0 4 1 2 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q62 Employment Employed 62 70 60 57 65 67 71 64 Full-time 55 57 51 47 55 61 58 54 Part-time 7 12 9 10 10 6 13 9 Other 35 29 36 42 32 32 24 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off3 5 5 2 4 4 4
Retired 27 20 21 37 23 25 13 24 Homemaker 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 2 Student 1 3 9 2 4 7 4 Other, something else 1 1 1 0 Unsure 2 1 1 1 Refused 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-680
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ59/Q60 Household type Family 79 73 80 74 74 76 75 With children 34 26 41 27 36 28 30 Single adult 2 3 4 2 4 3 3 No children 45 47 39 47 38 48 45 Single adult, no children 19 25 19 24 26 22 23 Not ascertained 2 2 1 2 0 2 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 18 21 22 18 11 22 19 Suburb 44 33 36 39 31 43 39 Medium-sized town 10 11 9 11 14 9 10 Small town 14 12 15 13 19 11 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 12 18 15 15 24 12 15 Unsure 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 Refused 1 2 2 1 2 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q62 Employment Employed 66 60 59 65 72 60 64 Full-time 58 51 48 57 63 51 54 Part-time 8 10 11 8 9 9 9 Other 33 35 39 32 27 37 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 3 4 3 1 5 4
Retired 24 24 24 24 19 26 24 Homemaker 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Student 3 6 9 2 4 4 4 Other, something else 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 1 4 1 2 1 3 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-681
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ59/Q60 Household type Family 79 71 74 82 69 76 76 75 With children 31 29 26 34 34 27 33 30 Single adult 4 1 2 3 6 3 3 3 No children 48 42 48 48 35 50 44 45 Single adult, no children 20 27 25 18 26 21 23 23 Not ascertained 1 2 1 5 3 0 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 18 21 17 25 18 17 20 19 Suburb 38 40 41 35 39 39 40 39 Medium-sized town 10 12 9 10 15 12 8 10 Small town 12 15 14 14 9 11 16 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 21 7 17 12 15 17 14 15 Unsure 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 Refused 0 3 1 2 1 3 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q62 Employment Employed 65 60 65 63 60 61 68 64 Full-time 57 49 54 55 54 53 57 54 Part-time 8 11 10 9 6 8 11 9 Other 33 36 34 35 34 36 32 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off3 5 4 2 5 3 4 4
Retired 25 24 27 23 21 28 21 24 Homemaker 1 2 1 1 4 3 1 2 Student 4 4 2 8 4 2 6 4 Other, something else 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Unsure 1 0 0 2 0 1 Refused 1 4 1 2 4 3 1 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-682
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ59/Q60 Household type Family 70 79 78 73 78 76 75 With children 26 31 32 29 32 29 30 Single adult 2 2 3 3 2 4 3 No children 44 47 46 44 45 46 45 Single adult, no children 29 21 21 25 22 24 23 Not ascertained 1 1 1 2 1 1 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 22 16 12 24 15 21 19 Suburb 38 42 42 38 41 41 39 Medium-sized town 8 12 10 11 10 11 10 Small town 12 15 15 12 11 16 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 19 13 19 13 21 10 15 Unsure 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Refused 0 2 2 1 2 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q62 Employment Employed 61 66 65 64 64 64 64 Full-time 51 59 56 54 54 56 54 Part-time 10 8 10 9 10 8 9 Other 38 32 34 33 34 34 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off2 4 4 3 2 5 4
Retired 26 24 27 22 24 25 24 Homemaker 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 Student 6 3 2 6 4 4 4 Other, something else 1 0 1 1 0 0 Unsure 0 0 1 0 1 Refused 1 1 1 3 1 1 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-683
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ59/Q60 Household type Family 73 77 76 73 66 73 78 80 74 75 With children 32 27 35 29 30 31 35 28 25 30 Single adult 1 3 4 2 2 4 9 2 2 3 No children 41 50 41 44 36 42 42 52 50 45 Single adult, no children 25 21 22 26 31 24 19 20 24 23 Not ascertained 2 2 2 1 3 3 4 0 1 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 20 19 21 21 14 17 21 22 17 19 Suburb 40 39 36 35 43 43 41 35 40 39 Medium-sized town 10 11 11 9 11 12 11 7 10 10 Small town 13 13 16 15 14 13 10 11 12 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 13 18 11 15 15 12 13 24 20 15 Unsure 3 0 3 1 1 2 4 1 Refused 2 1 2 4 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q62 Employment Employed 63 64 64 66 56 62 61 66 63 64 Full-time 54 55 56 57 46 52 50 58 52 54 Part-time 9 9 8 9 9 9 12 8 11 9 Other 35 34 33 33 41 35 34 34 35 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 3 4 4 3 5 4 8 3 4 4
Retired 22 27 22 26 22 21 21 30 27 24 Homemaker 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 Student 7 1 5 1 11 7 4 2 4 Other, something else 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Unsure 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 Refused 2 2 3 1 1 3 4 0 1 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-684
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q59/Q60 Household type Family 75 75 77 77 77 70 74 78 71 76 75 With children 27 29 28 26 21 17 32 44 4 26 30 Single adult 3 3 3 3 1 5 3 1 2 3 No children 48 46 49 51 56 53 42 34 67 51 45 Single adult, no children 23 23 22 20 22 29 23 21 27 23 23 Not ascertained 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q61 Size of place Urban area 21 20 21 22 18 32 19 13 30 22 19 Suburb 38 38 38 36 37 30 45 38 34 37 39 Medium-sized town 10 11 10 10 11 10 7 16 6 10 10 Small town 14 14 13 13 14 15 12 15 11 12 13 Rural area, farm, ranch 15 15 16 16 19 10 15 15 15 18 15 Unsure 1 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 0 1 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q62 Employment Employed 60 64 61 59 59 51 69 73 41 60 64 Full-time 51 55 51 50 48 42 58 63 35 52 54 Part-time 9 10 10 9 11 8 11 9 7 9 9 Other 37 33 36 37 40 47 28 26 55 40 34 Unemployed, temporarily laid
off 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 4
Retired 30 26 27 32 32 41 11 19 50 36 24 Homemaker 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 Student 0 1 3 0 11 0 4 Other, something else 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Refused 3 2 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 0 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-685
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 17 26 24 29 23 45 15 28 Government; military 12 18 16 18 18 31 10 19 Education 5 8 9 11 6 14 5 9 Private sector 61 55 59 55 54 37 73 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 6 3 4 6 1 2 16 5
Tourism 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 3 Retail business 10 7 7 3 11 5 9 7 Real estate; construction 13 11 12 11 11 7 7 10 Manufacturing 8 3 4 2 4 4 5 3 Financial services 3 5 5 6 5 3 8 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 11 6 6 8 3 1 11 6
High-tech; communications 5 13 15 13 12 11 2 10 Transportation 3 5 4 3 6 3 2 4 Other private sector 1 2 2 3 1 1 Healthcare 11 11 9 8 14 7 5 9 Other 0 0 0 1 0 Unsure 9 4 5 3 5 3 6 4 Refused 1 3 3 4 3 7 1 4Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-686
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 28 27 24 16 35 29 29 16 28 Government; military 19 17 16 10 24 21 19 10 19 Education 9 9 9 6 11 8 10 6 9 Private sector 53 58 59 71 46 52 60 72 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 4 5 9 18 1 2 6 22 5
Tourism 1 1 6 17 2 0 7 5 3 Retail business 6 6 7 8 5 7 10 3 7 Real estate; construction 10 12 11 8 8 11 10 14 10 Manufacturing 4 5 2 1 2 4 2 4 3 Financial services 5 5 6 7 5 7 4 5 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 6 6 8 10 5 5 8 9 6
High-tech; communications 11 13 6 2 12 11 8 7 10 Transportation 4 3 3 4 3 5 2 4 Other private sector 2 2 1 2 1 Healthcare 11 8 7 5 14 11 6 4 9 Other 1 1 0 0 Unsure 4 4 6 6 5 2 4 4 Refused 4 4 2 1 3 2 2 4 4
Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-687
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 24 32 25 24 36 23 25 31 32 28 Government; military 18 20 14 19 24 16 20 20 20 19 Education 6 12 11 5 12 7 5 11 12 9 Private sector 63 47 51 61 49 63 62 43 49 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 6 5 5 6 4 6 6 4 6 5
Tourism 3 3 2 5 1 4 2 2 4 3 Retail business 6 7 7 7 6 8 5 6 9 7 Real estate; construction 13 8 12 9 10 13 14 10 6 10 Manufacturing 4 2 3 2 5 3 6 3 3 Financial services 7 4 2 5 9 5 9 1 7 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities10 3 8 6 4 12 7 3 3 6
High-tech; communications 10 9 8 13 7 10 10 12 7 10 Transportation 3 4 4 5 1 2 4 4 4 4 Other private sector 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 Healthcare 7 11 12 8 8 9 5 13 10 9 Other 1 1 1 0 Unsure 4 4 6 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 Refused 2 5 6 2 3 1 3 8 3 4Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-688
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 28 28 27 29 28 29 28 Government; military 18 19 17 19 19 20 19 Education 9 9 10 10 9 8 9 Private sector 45 57 50 49 59 58 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 4 6 4 4 4 6 5
Tourism 1 4 1 1 4 4 3 Retail business 9 6 4 5 5 8 7 Real estate; construction 9 10 14 12 11 9 10 Manufacturing 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 Financial services 3 6 1 2 8 7 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 3 7 7 7 8 6 6
High-tech; communications 4 11 10 10 11 10 10 Transportation 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 Other private sector 2 1 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 9 9 10 10 10 9 9 Other 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Unsure 12 2 6 7 1 2 4 Refused 6 3 6 4 2 2 4Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-689
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 23 28 20 32 26 41 28 Government; military 17 22 14 21 18 25 19 Education 6 6 6 11 8 16 9 Private sector 57 53 60 53 62 38 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 9 12 7 3 4 1 5
Tourism 4 1 5 3 4 3 Retail business 10 15 8 4 4 4 7 Real estate; construction 12 7 15 9 12 5 10 Manufacturing 5 7 4 2 2 1 3 Financial services 3 2 4 7 7 7 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 7 1 11 5 6 3 6
High-tech; communications 4 4 4 14 15 12 10 Transportation 3 3 3 4 5 3 4 Other private sector 0 1 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 7 5 8 11 8 16 9 Other 0 0 0 1 0 Unsure 8 8 9 2 1 2 4 Refused 4 6 2 3 3 3 4Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-690
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 27 29 28 33 24 22 38 28 Government; military 20 19 21 19 18 15 26 19 Education 8 9 7 14 5 7 13 9 Private sector 61 55 59 51 59 60 47 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 10 5 8 5 2 6 6 5
Tourism 4 3 2 3 4 2 4 3 Retail business 9 7 6 9 3 8 6 7 Real estate; construction 13 10 11 10 10 13 5 10 Manufacturing 4 5 3 4 2 5 3 Financial services 3 6 7 2 10 3 10 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 6 7 9 6 4 9 4 6
High-tech; communications 10 10 6 9 14 12 6 10 Transportation 6 3 4 2 4 4 1 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 Healthcare 5 10 5 13 11 12 7 9 Other 0 1 0 1 0 Unsure 4 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 Refused 2 3 4 1 4 2 3 4Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-691
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 100 38 31 21 26 30 28 Government; military 69 28 20 14 17 21 19 Education 31 9 11 7 9 8 9 Private sector 100 100 48 53 67 60 51 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 10 6 4 6 7 5 5
Tourism 6 2 3 3 3 3 3 Retail business 12 8 5 8 7 7 7 Real estate; construction 19 65 6 13 11 12 9 10 Manufacturing 6 2 2 4 2 4 3 Financial services 10 35 6 7 5 5 6 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 12 1 2 17 12 2 6
High-tech; communications 18 12 12 7 6 13 10 Transportation 7 3 4 4 4 4 4 Other private sector 2 2 1 2 0 1 Healthcare 9 10 8 11 8 9 Other 0 1 0 0 0 Unsure 2 4 1 1 6 4 Refused 3 2 2 2 4 4Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-692
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 26 22 29 29 26 32 28 Government; military 19 17 21 19 19 19 19 Education 7 5 8 10 7 13 9 Private sector 59 64 56 53 57 48 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 9 12 7 4 3 4 5
Tourism 3 4 2 3 4 3 3 Retail business 6 7 6 7 7 7 7 Real estate; construction 11 10 12 10 15 5 10 Manufacturing 2 3 2 3 5 2 3 Financial services 8 5 9 4 6 3 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 6 6 6 7 9 5 6
High-tech; communications 11 14 10 9 6 12 10 Transportation 2 3 1 5 4 6 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 2 1 Healthcare 6 6 7 11 9 14 9 Other 0 1 0 0 0 Unsure 5 2 7 3 4 2 4 Refused 3 5 1 3 3 3 4Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-693
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 25 26 32 26 32 32 27 18 35 29 28 Government; military 18 20 22 18 23 22 17 12 21 19 19 Education 7 6 10 7 9 10 10 6 14 10 9 Private sector 59 64 54 59 51 54 50 61 42 51 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 7 8 5 8 6 3 4 4 4 4 5
Tourism 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 Retail business 6 7 5 6 3 4 10 15 6 8 7 Real estate; construction 8 9 17 10 23 15 7 7 7 10 10 Manufacturing 2 3 3 1 3 3 5 8 3 4 3 Financial services 10 9 2 9 3 2 3 5 2 3 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 7 6 8 7 7 9 4 6 3 6 6
High-tech; communications 14 15 7 11 2 9 8 7 9 8 10 Transportation 2 2 4 3 2 4 5 5 4 4 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 7 5 7 6 7 8 14 12 17 12 9 Other 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Unsure 3 2 5 4 8 4 5 6 4 5 4 Refused 6 3 1 5 2 2 4 4 2 3 4Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-694
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 21 29 27 38 23 29 22 27 33 31 23 30 28 Government; military 18 18 19 26 17 17 17 19 21 25 15 18 19 Education 3 10 8 12 6 13 5 8 13 6 8 12 9 Private sector 72 47 59 50 57 44 60 59 58 50 44 54 55
Agriculture; farming, ranching 5 8 8 3 4 3 8 6 5 6 3 5 5
Tourism 3 3 1 4 6 1 6 2 6 4 3 3 Retail business 6 5 2 7 11 10 8 4 3 7 10 10 7 Real estate; construction 9 6 20 13 10 5 4 10 21 11 6 7 10 Manufacturing 4 5 5 5 3 3 2 2 8 3 Financial services 11 9 3 1 5 2 7 13 5 3 4 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities8 6 14 2 7 2 8 7 9 6 6 2 6
High-tech; communications 21 6 3 12 5 10 15 13 10 3 8 7 10 Transportation 3 2 3 5 3 6 3 2 4 4 2 7 4 Other private sector 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Healthcare 4 9 6 8 12 16 7 6 7 7 19 10 9 Other 1 1 1 1 0 Unsure 1 4 7 3 5 5 3 2 3 9 7 3 4 Refused 2 10 1 1 2 5 8 5 3 6 2 4Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-695
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 30 25 25 38 31 25 29 35 28 Government; military 22 16 17 19 22 20 18 18 19 Education 8 9 8 19 8 4 10 17 9 Private sector 53 58 59 48 50 55 54 55 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching5 7 4 5 8 4 8 5 5
Tourism 4 2 4 2 1 5 1 2 3 Retail business 7 6 7 6 8 6 8 8 7 Real estate; construction 10 11 13 6 8 12 7 12 10 Manufacturing 3 3 2 3 4 3 4 2 3 Financial services 4 7 3 13 8 5 5 8 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 5 7 7 8 3 8 7 3 6
High-tech; communications 10 8 13 4 4 8 11 11 10 Transportation 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 Other private sector 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 Healthcare 9 8 10 8 7 12 8 6 9 Other 1 0 1 2 0 Unsure 4 5 2 3 9 4 6 2 4 Refused 5 4 3 2 3 4 4 1 4Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-696
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 27 29 29 24 26 30 22 29 30 27 28 Government; military 22 15 19 18 21 17 13 18 21 17 19 Education 6 14 10 6 5 13 9 10 9 10 9 Private sector 58 52 51 62 58 52 51 56 58 51 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 6 3 4 7 6 4 5 5 4 6 5
Tourism 3 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 3 5 3 Retail business 7 8 5 9 5 7 8 6 5 9 7 Real estate; construction 10 10 10 12 10 10 11 9 13 10 10 Manufacturing 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 Financial services 8 4 4 8 8 4 4 8 8 3 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 10 3 6 9 12 2 5 9 9 5 6
High-tech; communications 7 12 10 8 6 13 12 8 11 5 10 Transportation 3 5 3 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 Healthcare 7 12 11 7 7 12 15 8 7 11 9 Other 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Unsure 5 5 5 1 4 4 8 4 2 7 4 Refused 4 3 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 4 4Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-697
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 30 23 34 32 19 30 34 30 28 Government; military 20 21 19 21 14 21 17 21 19 Education 10 2 15 11 4 9 16 8 9 Private sector 53 61 47 52 61 56 42 52 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 5 4 5 4 9 5 3 4 5
Tourism 3 2 3 3 5 4 3 1 3 Retail business 6 5 7 6 7 5 6 8 7 Real estate; construction 10 11 8 9 14 11 3 10 10 Manufacturing 3 4 1 4 3 4 5 0 3 Financial services 6 6 6 4 7 6 3 5 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 9 16 4 4 5 6 1 12 6
High-tech; communications 7 6 8 15 7 14 9 6 10 Transportation 4 5 4 3 3 3 6 4 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 Healthcare 10 11 10 6 11 8 13 8 9 Other 1 1 0 1 0 Unsure 4 2 5 3 7 2 4 6 4 Refused 3 2 3 6 2 4 8 3 4Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-698
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 23 35 25 32 29 28 30 28 Government; military 17 23 15 24 20 18 15 19 Education 6 12 10 8 9 11 15 9 Private sector 63 44 58 58 56 51 44 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 4 2 5 13 4 6 10 5
Tourism 4 2 5 3 2 6 3 3 Retail business 5 7 10 1 8 2 4 7 Real estate; construction 10 17 5 8 10 13 9 10 Manufacturing 2 3 2 8 3 3 2 3 Financial services 10 4 3 8 4 3 8 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities7 4 7 6 6 4 3 6
High-tech; communications 11 3 17 9 15 8 1 10 Transportation 7 3 4 1 3 5 5 4 Other private sector 3 0 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 7 13 8 6 8 13 13 9 Other 1 0 2 0 Unsure 4 3 5 4 3 9 4 Refused 3 5 5 1 3 6 4 4Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-699
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 27 31 25 28 21 31 28 Government; military 19 19 12 22 11 23 19 Education 8 12 14 7 10 8 9 Private sector 54 53 50 57 64 51 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching4 6 4 6 8 5 5
Tourism 2 4 1 4 2 3 3 Retail business 6 8 8 6 11 5 7 Real estate; construction 8 12 12 10 14 9 10 Manufacturing 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 Financial services 5 5 3 6 3 6 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities8 3 4 7 8 6 6
High-tech; communications 11 9 11 10 10 10 10 Transportation 5 2 4 4 4 3 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 10 8 9 9 8 9 9 Other 0 0 1 0 0 0 Unsure 4 5 8 3 4 4 4 Refused 4 3 7 2 4 4 4Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-700
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 27 29 25 33 29 27 27 28 Government; military 18 21 17 21 21 21 16 19 Education 10 8 8 12 7 6 11 9 Private sector 58 50 58 49 51 58 54 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 8 2 7 3 5 6 5 5
Tourism 3 3 3 4 3 1 5 3 Retail business 6 8 6 10 5 3 10 7 Real estate; construction 10 9 10 7 13 12 9 10 Manufacturing 3 3 4 2 2 4 2 3 Financial services 7 4 7 5 4 7 5 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 8 4 10 3 3 8 5 6
High-tech; communications 8 12 7 12 13 10 10 10 Transportation 3 4 4 2 4 5 3 4 Other private sector 2 1 2 1 1 Healthcare 8 10 10 8 8 8 11 9 Other 0 0 0 1 1 0 Unsure 3 6 4 1 9 3 5 4 Refused 3 4 2 8 3 4 3 4Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-701
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 28 27 24 32 25 32 28 Government; military 24 15 17 20 20 19 19 Education 4 12 6 11 5 13 9 Private sector 57 56 61 50 63 49 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 7 5 7 4 8 2 5
Tourism 4 2 3 4 2 4 3 Retail business 7 7 4 9 5 8 7 Real estate; construction 10 11 12 10 14 8 10 Manufacturing 3 3 4 2 4 3 3 Financial services 6 6 7 5 5 6 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 7 6 7 6 8 6 6
High-tech; communications 9 11 12 8 9 9 10 Transportation 4 4 5 2 6 2 4 Other private sector 1 0 1 2 1 Healthcare 9 9 8 11 7 12 9 Other 0 0 0 1 0 Unsure 2 4 3 5 2 4 4 Refused 4 4 4 3 4 3 4Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-702
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ63 Most affects income,
financial situation Public sector 30 25 29 29 34 28 32 26 28 28 Government; military 17 20 18 18 21 18 22 22 21 19 Education 13 6 11 11 13 10 11 4 7 9 Private sector 49 61 50 47 48 54 46 61 59 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 2 9 3 6 8 5 2 7 9 5
Tourism 3 3 5 6 2 3 3 1 1 3 Retail business 7 7 7 6 5 8 2 5 6 7 Real estate; construction 10 11 9 8 7 10 10 13 10 10 Manufacturing 2 3 3 4 2 3 4 3 2 3 Financial services 4 7 3 3 6 6 8 7 9 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 5 8 5 3 2 5 5 13 8 6
High-tech; communications 11 7 10 9 12 10 9 8 8 10 Transportation 5 3 5 2 1 4 2 4 3 4 Other private sector 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 Healthcare 11 8 10 15 5 7 11 10 8 9 Other 0 0 1 0 Unsure 6 3 7 5 7 5 5 2 3 4 Refused 4 3 5 4 6 5 6 1 3 4Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-703
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q63 Most affects income, financial situation
Public sector 27 27 29 28 25 34 27 26 33 33 28 Government; military 17 19 19 17 17 20 20 18 21 21 19 Education 10 8 10 11 8 15 7 8 12 12 9 Private sector 58 56 54 57 64 49 53 57 52 53 55 Agriculture; farming,
ranching 6 6 6 6 7 5 6 5 5 5 5
Tourism 4 3 3 4 5 4 2 4 2 4 3 Retail business 7 7 5 6 5 7 9 5 7 5 7 Real estate; construction 10 11 10 10 10 7 9 14 7 10 10 Manufacturing 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 Financial services 7 6 6 7 11 5 3 5 9 7 5 Energy, mining, oil & gas,
utilities 6 6 6 6 7 4 6 7 6 6 6
High-tech; communications 10 9 9 10 14 7 11 9 9 9 10 Transportation 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 Other private sector 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Healthcare 8 9 10 9 7 12 9 10 7 10 9 Other 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Unsure 3 4 4 4 1 2 6 3 4 1 4 Refused 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 4 2 4Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-704
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 28 32 34 32 32 27 31 29 1 to 25% 18 35 34 36 33 25 24 31 More than 25% 42 27 26 24 30 40 34 32 Unsure 11 6 6 7 5 8 11 7 Refused 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
Mean 31 21 21 19 23 24 27 24Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 58 44 41 41 48 17 57 45 No 41 55 59 59 52 81 42 54 Unsure 2 0 Refused 0 0 1 2 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 55 60 61 62 58 59 50 59 Worse off 11 10 11 10 10 15 19 13 About the same 31 24 23 21 26 21 24 22 Unsure 4 6 5 6 5 4 6 5 Refused 0 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-705
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 32 34 25 32 32 27 32 27 29 1 to 25% 34 33 29 27 37 32 25 31 31 More than 25% 27 26 38 28 26 35 36 34 32 Unsure 6 6 8 13 4 6 6 7 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Mean 21 20 29 25 20 26 24 26 24Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 44 40 54 52 48 38 51 56 45 No 56 60 43 47 51 61 48 44 54 Unsure 1 1 0 Refused 2 1 1 0 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 59 59 59 53 52 63 62 58 59 Worse off 10 11 16 23 15 10 13 17 13 About the same 25 24 19 18 27 22 21 18 22 Unsure 6 6 4 5 6 5 3 7 5 Refused 2 1 0 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-706
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 23 34 21 26 40 19 29 31 36 29 1 to 25% 34 28 32 29 32 32 36 26 29 31 More than 25% 36 29 37 36 24 42 30 31 28 32 Unsure 6 9 10 7 4 7 4 12 6 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Mean 28 21 28 26 19 32 24 20 21 24Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 49 41 48 51 34 56 41 44 39 45 No 50 57 52 47 64 42 59 56 58 54 Unsure 1 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 60 59 84 60 33 71 47 84 39 59 Worse off 11 14 5 13 20 8 15 6 20 13 About the same 22 23 8 22 38 17 27 9 34 22 Unsure 7 3 3 4 8 4 11 1 4 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-707
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 25 29 23 23 30 32 29 1 to 25% 30 31 33 31 31 30 31 More than 25% 33 33 34 35 33 33 32 Unsure 12 6 10 11 5 5 7 Refused 1 1 1 1
Mean 25 24 25 26 23 24 24Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 41 45 54 51 45 42 45 No 57 53 45 48 54 57 54 Unsure 2 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 52 61 77 76 58 53 59 Worse off 15 12 5 4 14 16 13 About the same 28 21 16 18 21 24 22 Unsure 5 5 2 2 7 6 5 Refused 1 0 1 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-708
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 24 22 25 33 34 31 29 1 to 25% 23 26 20 37 33 43 31 More than 25% 42 43 42 25 26 24 32
Unsure 11 9 12 5 6 3 7 Refused 1 1 0 0 1
Mean 31 29 32 19 20 18 24Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 41 37 43 48 47 49 45 No 58 60 56 52 52 51 54 Unsure 1 2 0 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 54 45 59 64 69 55 59 Worse off 17 20 14 10 10 11 13 About the same 23 28 20 22 18 28 22 Unsure 6 6 6 4 3 7 5 Refused 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-709
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 27 30 27 27 40 25 41 29 1 to 25% 30 30 26 34 29 32 27 31 More than 25% 39 32 38 33 25 38 24 32 Unsure 4 7 9 6 6 5 7 7 Refused 0 0 1 1
Mean 26 24 27 26 18 28 19 24Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 43 46 41 49 48 56 30 45 No 56 53 59 51 51 44 69 54 Unsure 0 1 1 0 Refused 1 0 0 1 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 72 59 57 61 56 71 28 59 Worse off 15 13 15 15 6 8 24 13 About the same 12 24 22 21 29 17 40 22 Unsure 1 5 6 3 9 3 7 5 Refused 0 0 0 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-710
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 39 25 21 100 27 31 29 1 to 25% 34 29 39 100 30 31 31 More than 25% 25 40 34 100 38 29 32 Unsure 2 6 6 5 9 7 Refused 0 0 1
Mean 16 30 24 12 57 28 21 24Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 42 49 51 42 45 52 100 45 No 58 51 49 58 55 47 100 54 Unsure 0 Refused 0 0 0 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 53 64 60 54 69 59 62 58 59 Worse off 17 11 15 10 10 16 11 14 13 About the same 25 21 23 28 16 21 21 23 22 Unsure 5 4 3 7 4 3 6 4 5 Refused 0 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-711
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 25 23 26 32 27 37 29 1 to 25% 31 34 29 31 32 31 31 More than 25% 39 37 40 30 36 24 32 Unsure 5 5 5 7 6 9 7 Refused 1
Mean 27 29 26 22 27 17 24Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 42 47 39 47 52 40 45 No 56 53 59 53 48 60 54 Unsure 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 52 52 51 64 60 69 59 Worse off 16 19 14 11 14 9 13 About the same 26 24 26 21 20 22 22 Unsure 7 5 8 4 7 0 5 Refused 0 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-712
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 28 25 29 28 22 29 29 26 33 29 29 1 to 25% 29 32 31 29 33 33 32 31 34 32 31 More than 25% 34 39 32 34 38 31 32 36 29 31 32 Unsure 7 4 8 7 6 8 6 7 4 7 7 Refused 2 1 1 1 1
Mean 27 28 23 26 28 23 23 27 19 23 24Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 44 42 48 44 54 48 43 42 45 45 45 No 55 57 51 54 45 52 56 57 55 54 54 Unsure 1 1 1 0 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 54 52 64 54 58 68 59 56 65 63 59 Worse off 16 16 13 15 13 14 9 12 6 11 13 About the same 24 26 16 24 19 13 28 27 28 22 22 Unsure 5 7 7 6 10 6 2 5 1 4 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-713
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 28 28 21 37 21 36 22 33 28 30 24 34 29 1 to 25% 30 28 39 23 32 32 26 31 31 32 30 33 31 More than 25% 37 31 34 29 37 28 39 31 33 30 38 26 32 Unsure 3 11 6 11 8 5 13 3 9 8 6 6 7 Refused 2 2 2 0 3 1 1 1
Mean 29 24 26 19 29 19 32 23 22 24 26 20 24Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 50 38 53 43 43 43 48 41 56 38 46 40 45 No 48 61 47 55 56 56 51 57 44 60 53 58 54 Unsure 2 2 0 Refused 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 59 50 60 68 60 59 78 37 79 45 73 47 59 Worse off 15 16 15 12 2 14 11 19 5 23 6 11 13 About the same 19 28 14 17 34 24 8 35 11 21 20 35 22 Unsure 6 4 11 3 3 2 3 7 4 11 4 5 Refused 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-714
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 32 25 26 24 36 26 34 25 29 1 to 25% 33 30 36 24 22 35 24 33 31 More than 25% 25 39 33 42 30 30 34 37 32 Unsure 9 5 5 10 10 8 7 5 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 19 29 24 30 21 23 25 26 24Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 45 46 47 40 43 47 47 36 45 No 54 53 53 60 56 52 51 63 54 Unsure 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 68 46 100 65 55 53 59 Worse off 7 22 100 10 11 22 13 About the same 22 24 100 20 27 20 22 Unsure 2 8 4 6 5 5 Refused 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-715
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 25 33 30 23 23 34 27 26 25 28 29 1 to 25% 32 30 32 31 29 34 26 33 34 32 31 More than 25% 36 28 27 43 41 27 35 36 37 29 32 Unsure 6 8 10 3 5 5 11 3 4 11 7 Refused 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 28 19 20 31 30 19 26 26 27 22 24Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 49 39 44 50 52 39 38 50 46 45 45 No 50 59 54 50 46 61 59 48 53 53 54 Unsure 1 1 1 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 56 64 63 54 52 64 67 58 60 55 59 Worse off 16 9 8 20 17 10 10 15 14 14 13 About the same 20 24 23 20 24 22 19 21 21 24 22 Unsure 6 3 4 6 6 3 2 5 4 6 5 Refused 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-716
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 26 24 27 36 26 32 31 26 29 1 to 25% 28 21 33 28 41 31 24 24 31 More than 25% 39 48 32 28 25 30 27 44 32 Unsure 7 7 7 8 8 6 14 6 7 Refused 1 0 2 1 1 1 3 1 1
Mean 28 34 23 20 21 21 20 32 24Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 52 58 47 39 39 46 43 51 45 No 46 41 50 60 61 53 53 48 54 Unsure 1 1 2 0 Refused 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 52 47 56 70 60 59 54 65 59 Worse off 14 14 14 10 11 12 14 13 13 About the same 25 28 24 17 24 23 25 16 22 Unsure 7 10 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 Refused 2 2 2 0 1 2 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-717
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 30 24 34 30 30 24 23 29 1 to 25% 35 34 26 35 34 39 41 31 More than 25% 29 35 27 31 29 30 28 32 Unsure 5 6 12 4 6 4 9 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 3 1
Mean 24 21 21 23 22 26 19 24Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 44 46 39 52 44 60 40 45 No 54 53 59 46 55 37 60 54 Unsure 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 2 1 2 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 52 65 73 46 65 73 63 59 Worse off 15 10 8 19 12 7 5 13 About the same 21 21 17 28 19 18 28 22 Unsure 11 2 1 6 2 5 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-718
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 30 26 25 30 27 29 29 1 to 25% 28 34 24 33 22 34 31 More than 25% 37 30 44 30 45 28 32 Unsure 4 10 8 6 6 8 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 26 24 28 24 30 22 24Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 46 44 46 44 55 41 45 No 53 55 53 55 43 58 54 Unsure 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 63 56 65 58 62 58 59 Worse off 10 14 10 13 12 13 13 About the same 21 25 23 22 22 23 22 Unsure 4 3 2 5 3 6 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-719
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 27 31 27 24 38 26 30 29 1 to 25% 34 28 27 35 33 31 30 31 More than 25% 34 29 38 35 16 33 34 32 Unsure 5 11 7 5 11 8 5 7 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 26 21 28 22 17 26 24 24Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 50 37 49 41 40 43 45 45 No 49 62 49 59 59 56 53 54 Unsure 1 1 1 0 Refused 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 55 63 53 65 65 56 66 59 Worse off 16 9 16 7 13 16 11 13 About the same 23 22 25 23 17 21 20 22 Unsure 6 4 5 5 4 7 2 5 Refused 0 2 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-720
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 27 29 27 30 27 31 29 1 to 25% 34 29 34 29 32 31 31 More than 25% 35 34 33 33 34 33 32 Unsure 3 6 6 8 6 5 7 Refused 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 25 25 25 24 26 23 24Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 44 44 45 44 49 43 45 No 55 54 53 55 50 57 54 Unsure 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 60 63 64 57 54 67 59 Worse off 13 14 11 15 13 13 13 About the same 21 19 18 23 27 16 22 Unsure 6 3 6 4 6 3 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-721
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ64 Family's livelihood &
financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 30 27 29 30 36 29 30 28 29 29 1 to 25% 29 31 31 28 31 33 33 27 28 31 More than 25% 31 36 30 30 21 30 31 40 36 32 Unsure 9 6 9 10 9 7 6 4 5 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Mean 22 27 22 23 16 22 21 30 27 24Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 37 51 41 39 33 43 48 53 50 45 No 62 47 58 59 62 55 52 47 48 54 Unsure 1 2 1 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 66 52 69 70 59 63 63 44 47 59 Worse off 9 18 8 9 11 12 12 17 18 13 About the same 23 22 20 17 24 21 21 27 27 22 Unsure 2 7 1 3 3 3 4 11 8 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-722
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q64 Family's livelihood & financial situation directly or indirectly impacted by any energy-related industry, including oil & gas
None 31 29 30 33 35 33 25 32 30 33 29 1 to 25% 30 30 32 31 30 32 34 28 30 33 31 More than 25% 32 33 30 30 28 27 33 33 31 30 32 Unsure 7 7 7 6 5 5 7 8 6 4 7 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 1
Mean 24 24 23 22 23 21 25 24 24 22 24Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q65 Personally know anyone who works in the oil & gas industry in Colorado
Yes 48 46 44 48 44 44 44 46 43 46 45 No 51 52 54 51 54 54 55 52 54 54 54 Unsure 0 0 0 0 1 0 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 3 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q66 Financial expectations Better off 53 56 55 49 49 56 75 58 38 51 59 Worse off 13 13 13 14 16 10 7 10 24 15 13 About the same 28 24 26 30 29 30 12 25 31 28 22 Unsure 5 5 5 6 5 2 5 6 4 5 5 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-723
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 12 17 18 22 12 18 11 16 Own 81 78 77 74 82 81 82 78 Less than $200K 27 15 14 11 19 46 38 23 $200k to $400K 37 36 38 38 34 24 31 33 More than $400K 17 27 26 26 28 11 13 22 Unsure 4 2 1 2 2 4 2 Refused 3 3 3 2 5 2 3 3Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 33 32 37 41 22 44 41 37 Very 12 10 12 14 7 20 19 15 Somewhat 21 22 25 27 15 24 22 22 Moderate; liberal 64 65 60 56 75 54 56 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 43 34 31 24 45 27 29 32 Liberal 21 31 29 32 29 27 27 28 Somewhat 17 16 17 17 13 20 19 17 Very 4 15 12 15 16 7 8 11 Unsure 3 3 3 2 3 1 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 22 19 16 15 23 28 13 20 Asian 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 Black, African-American 3 3 1 1 5 2 3 3 Hispanic, Latino 11 8 8 6 11 20 1 10 Native American 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 Multi-racial 2 5 5 6 4 4 7 5 White, Anglo 76 80 83 84 76 72 87 80 Refused 2 1 1 0 2 1Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-724
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 18 19 15 11 20 19 14 9 16 Own 78 77 78 81 75 77 81 90 78 Less than $200K 14 13 30 37 23 18 31 23 23 $200k to $400K 38 40 29 31 30 38 29 35 33 More than $400K 26 24 20 14 22 21 22 32 22 Unsure 2 1 3 5 1 1 3 2
Refused 2 2 5 3 3 3 2 1 3Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 34 39 38 37 29 37 33 58 37 Very 11 13 18 19 11 11 15 35 15 Somewhat 22 26 20 18 18 26 19 23 22 Moderate; liberal 63 57 59 59 68 59 67 40 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 33 28 33 30 33 31 40 23 32 Liberal 31 29 25 29 35 29 27 17 28 Somewhat 16 17 18 19 17 18 17 9 17 Very 15 12 8 10 19 11 10 8 11 Unsure 3 3 2 3 2 Refused 0 0 3 3 1 0 2 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 19 17 21 16 21 19 23 9 20 Asian 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 Black, African-American 3 1 3 5 4 1 4 3 Hispanic, Latino 8 8 12 2 10 10 12 5 10 Native American 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 Multi-racial 5 5 5 8 5 5 6 3 5 White, Anglo 80 82 79 84 79 79 77 91 80 Refused 1 1 1 1Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-725
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Q67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 14 19 36 8 9 20 7 32 9 16 Own 79 77 58 89 86 72 87 66 86 78 Less than $200K 23 23 19 23 28 18 28 18 28 23 $200k to $400K 33 33 31 38 29 39 25 30 36 33 More than $400K 24 21 8 28 29 15 34 19 23 22 Unsure 3 1 5 0 1 6 1 1 2 Refused 4 3 2 3 5 2 5 2 4 3Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 39 35 26 37 47 28 51 27 41 37 Very 15 15 8 17 19 10 20 10 20 15 Somewhat 24 19 18 20 27 18 31 17 21 22 Moderate; liberal 57 63 69 60 51 68 45 69 58 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 39 25 33 35 26 48 29 18 30 32 Liberal 18 38 37 25 24 20 16 50 28 28 Somewhat 11 23 25 13 15 13 9 32 15 17 Very 7 15 12 12 10 8 7 19 12 11 Unsure 1 2 3 1 0 2 1 4 2 Refused 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 22 18 21 25 13 26 18 18 17 20 Asian 1 2 1 3 0 2 2 2 1 Black, African-American 4 2 6 1 2 6 2 2 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 12 8 8 13 7 12 12 9 7 10 Native American 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Multi-racial 5 5 6 7 2 7 2 4 7 5 White, Anglo 78 82 79 74 87 74 82 80 83 80 Refused 0 1 1 0 0 2 1Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-726
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 20 16 16 13 12 17 16 Own 71 80 82 85 84 79 78 Less than $200K 22 23 25 26 21 23 23 $200k to $400K 31 33 37 37 34 32 33 More than $400K 18 24 20 22 29 24 22 Unsure 4 1 2 2 2 Refused 5 3 3 2 3 3 3Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 33 38 33 34 44 39 37 Very 8 17 14 15 19 16 15 Somewhat 24 21 19 18 25 23 22 Moderate; liberal 67 58 63 62 54 58 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 43 29 42 39 25 28 32 Liberal 25 29 22 23 29 31 28 Somewhat 17 17 10 12 18 19 17 Very 8 12 11 12 12 12 11 Unsure 1 3 3 1 1 2 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 100 27 26 13 16 20 Asian 7 2 3 1 1 1 Black, African-American 13 1 2 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 50 17 19 7 7 10 Native American 4 1 1 1 Multi-racial 26 7 5 3 4 5 White, Anglo 100 72 72 87 84 80 Refused 1 2 0 0 1Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-727
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 21 23 19 14 19 4 16 Own 73 68 76 83 77 93 78 Less than $200K 32 35 30 17 17 17 23 $200k to $400K 29 23 33 36 35 39 33 More than $400K 12 10 14 30 26 37 22 Unsure 4 6 3 2 Refused 2 3 1 3 3 3 3Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 46 54 42 30 27 34 37 Very 20 23 18 12 12 11 15 Somewhat 27 31 24 18 15 23 22 Moderate; liberal 50 45 53 68 70 66 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 31 32 31 32 33 31 32 Liberal 19 13 22 36 37 34 28 Somewhat 11 11 11 22 25 16 17 Very 8 2 11 14 12 18 11 Unsure 2 4 1 1 1 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 30 43 22 13 13 12 20 Asian 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 Black, African-American 5 5 5 1 1 1 3 Hispanic, Latino 16 27 9 6 4 8 10 Native American 1 1 1 1 1 1 Multi-racial 7 8 6 4 4 3 5 White, Anglo 70 57 78 86 86 88 80 Refused 0 0 1 1 1Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-728
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 100 16 12 16 Own 100 100 100 100 81 84 78 Less than $200K 29 100 23 27 23 $200k to $400K 42 100 36 36 33 More than $400K 29 100 22 22 22 Unsure 1 1 2 Refused 2 3 3Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 37 37 37 32 46 33 45 37 Very 12 16 20 11 20 12 17 15 Somewhat 25 21 16 21 26 20 28 22 Moderate; liberal 56 61 62 66 53 65 55 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 21 34 33 37 30 39 27 32 Liberal 36 27 29 29 24 26 28 28 Somewhat 25 15 19 14 14 16 14 17 Very 11 12 10 15 10 10 13 11 Unsure 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 1 1 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 24 18 19 19 16 21 17 20 Asian 1 1 5 1 0 1 Black, African-American 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 12 10 11 11 7 11 10 10 Native American 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 Multi-racial 8 5 5 7 3 7 3 5 White, Anglo 76 81 81 80 84 78 83 80 Refused 1 1 1 1 0 1Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-729
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Q67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 16 19 16 16 16 20 16 17 16 Own 81 79 80 83 78 78 81 78 78 Less than $200K 23 25 26 22 20 27 21 25 23 $200k to $400K 39 30 25 30 37 33 36 31 33 More than $400K 19 24 29 31 21 18 24 21 22 Unsure 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 Refused 2 2 3 1 4 2 2 3 3Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 35 40 44 32 38 44 35 39 37 Very 12 18 14 12 17 17 16 15 15 Somewhat 22 22 30 20 21 27 19 24 22 Moderate; liberal 63 58 55 66 62 55 62 60 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 30 33 42 30 33 35 37 28 32 Liberal 33 25 14 36 29 21 26 31 28 Somewhat 16 17 11 18 19 14 15 19 17 Very 17 8 3 18 10 7 11 12 11 Unsure 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 20 16 16 17 19 20 18 21 20 Asian 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Black, African-American 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 5 3 Hispanic, Latino 15 7 7 9 11 10 10 10 10 Native American 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Multi-racial 3 5 5 4 5 7 6 4 5 White, Anglo 79 83 83 81 81 80 81 79 80 Refused 2 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-730
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 17 13 19 15 11 21 16 Own 80 85 76 80 84 76 78 Less than $200K 23 31 17 24 24 23 23 $200k to $400K 29 23 32 36 39 34 33 More than $400K 28 30 26 20 21 19 22 Unsure 0 1 3 3 2 2 Refused 3 1 5 2 2 1 3Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 100 100 100 37 Very 41 100 15 Somewhat 59 100 22 Moderate; liberal 100 100 100 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 53 100 32 Liberal 47 100 28 Somewhat 28 60 17 Very 19 40 11 Unsure 2 Refused 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 18 11 22 22 27 17 20 Asian 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 Black, African-American 1 2 1 4 3 4 3 Hispanic, Latino 8 4 11 12 14 8 10 Native American 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Multi-racial 6 4 7 5 7 3 5 White, Anglo 82 89 78 78 73 83 80 Refused 0 0 1Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-731
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 12 11 27 17 23 23 11 11 12 16 16 Own 84 87 69 78 71 73 82 84 83 78 78 Less than $200K 25 27 18 21 17 22 27 32 23 25 23 $200k to $400K 27 28 32 26 33 36 39 42 38 38 33 More than $400K 32 32 19 31 21 16 16 9 22 16 22 Unsure 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 4 2 2 Refused 3 2 2 4 3 1 4 5 2 3 3Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 71 100 26 77 37 11 25 6 37 Very 32 45 8 32 12 4 8 2 15 Somewhat 39 55 17 45 25 7 16 4 22 Moderate; liberal 24 72 19 63 100 87 75 100 92 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 19 44 15 63 61 33 75 45 32 Liberal 5 28 4 39 54 100 47 28 Somewhat 4 21 3 29 27 50 28 17 Very 1 7 1 10 27 50 20 11 Unsure 2 2 2 1 0 2 Refused 3 0 2 2 1 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 11 9 18 15 23 14 31 45 20 24 20 Asian 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 Black, African-American 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 7 6 4 3 Hispanic, Latino 6 5 8 8 11 6 16 23 10 12 10
Native American 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Multi-racial 4 4 6 5 7 5 6 9 3 5 5 White, Anglo 89 91 81 85 77 86 69 54 80 76 80 Refused 1 0 1 0 1Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-732
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 14 10 17 37 10 12 25 2 36 15 13 9 16 Own 81 87 76 62 82 82 72 92 59 81 79 84 78 Less than $200K 20 30 18 17 32 23 26 24 12 25 17 36 23 $200k to $400K 23 32 38 26 38 40 19 33 34 30 51 29 33 More than $400K 39 25 19 19 12 19 27 35 13 26 11 20 22 Unsure 2 1 3 4 1 2 1 3 4 1 2 Refused 3 2 3 1 4 5 1 4 1 4 4 5 3Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 70 73 32 19 9 12 64 76 14 41 10 12 37 Very 28 36 10 7 3 4 24 37 5 13 3 4 15 Somewhat 41 38 22 12 6 8 40 39 10 27 7 8 22 Moderate; liberal 25 22 66 78 87 87 28 21 84 58 88 85 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 23 15 54 34 42 26 22 16 47 40 29 37 32 Liberal 2 8 12 44 45 60 5 5 36 17 60 49 28 Somewhat 2 6 9 33 24 29 5 3 28 11 29 25 17 Very 2 3 11 21 32 1 8 6 31 24 11 Unsure 2 3 1 3 2 5 2 1 1 1 2 Refused 4 2 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 15 8 20 17 34 28 13 11 18 18 37 25 20 Asian 1 4 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 Black, African-American 2 1 8 5 2 1 10 3 3 Hispanic, Latino 7 5 10 6 21 12 7 6 8 8 17 14 10 Native American 2 3 2 2 1 1 Multi-racial 5 3 5 6 3 7 6 3 5 7 6 5 5 White, Anglo 85 92 80 81 65 72 87 89 80 82 63 75 80 Refused 3 1 2 1 1Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-733
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 16 16 20 20 9 15 20 12 16 Own 79 80 78 78 82 79 74 85 78 Less than $200K 19 26 22 27 23 23 18 36 23 $200k to $400K 37 30 34 40 31 32 36 30 33 More than $400K 22 24 21 11 29 25 21 19 22 Unsure 2 1 1 4 3 1 2 Refused 3 3 2 2 5 2 4 4 3Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 20 62 32 46 42 31 37 52 37 Very 6 31 13 23 16 14 12 23 15 Somewhat 14 31 19 23 25 16 25 28 22 Moderate; liberal 76 35 65 54 56 68 57 47 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 36 23 32 35 28 37 29 23 32 Liberal 40 12 33 20 28 31 27 24 28 Somewhat 25 7 21 8 16 21 16 8 17 Very 15 5 12 12 12 9 12 16 11 Unsure 2 2 2 1 4 1 2 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 21 19 17 24 25 21 19 20 20 Asian 2 1 0 6 2 1 1 Black, African-American 4 1 2 2 4 4 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 11 8 10 10 10 12 7 11 10 Native American 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 Multi-racial 3 8 4 12 4 2 7 7 5 White, Anglo 79 81 82 76 75 79 80 80 80 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 1Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-734
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 12 18 14 16 14 15 13 16 17 15 16 Own 83 76 81 78 79 81 84 78 78 79 78 Less than $200K 23 24 25 22 20 24 28 22 22 25 23 $200k to $400K 32 35 35 31 29 39 33 32 28 35 33 More than $400K 28 17 21 26 29 18 22 24 28 19 22 Unsure 2 2 3 0 3 1 3 2 2 2 Refused 3 3 2 5 5 2 3 3 3 4 3Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 53 18 18 65 60 18 33 45 40 41 37 Very 25 4 6 32 29 3 11 20 14 18 15 Somewhat 28 14 12 33 32 14 22 25 26 23 22 Moderate; liberal 44 79 78 35 37 81 63 52 58 57 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 33 27 33 29 30 29 31 31 34 27 32 Liberal 11 52 45 6 7 52 32 21 24 30 28 Somewhat 9 27 27 4 6 28 17 13 15 16 17 Very 2 24 18 2 1 24 15 8 9 14 11 Unsure 1 2 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 2 Refused 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 15 26 20 17 18 22 23 17 19 21 20 Asian 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 Black, African-American 2 4 3 2 4 1 3 3 2 4 3 Hispanic, Latino 7 14 9 10 9 12 11 8 10 8 10 Native American 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Multi-racial 5 5 5 5 4 7 5 5 5 6 5 White, Anglo 85 74 79 82 82 78 77 82 80 78 80 Refused 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-735
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 7 8 6 25 21 10 18 19 16 Own 87 84 89 72 72 86 77 76 78 Less than $200K 23 20 26 21 26 28 19 17 23 $200k to $400K 38 32 42 28 32 31 32 39 33 More than $400K 26 33 21 24 14 28 27 20 22 Unsure 1 1 1 6 1 2 2 Refused 5 6 4 3 1 3 5 4 3Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 38 39 38 35 35 38 31 38 37 Very 17 21 14 8 21 10 11 19 15 Somewhat 21 18 24 27 13 28 20 19 22 Moderate; liberal 60 59 60 60 61 59 66 58 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 33 37 30 25 37 30 34 28 32 Liberal 26 22 30 35 24 29 32 30 28 Somewhat 12 10 13 25 18 16 24 14 17 Very 15 12 17 11 5 14 8 16 11 Unsure 4 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 2 2 2 0 3 1 2 2 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 17 12 20 20 24 13 38 15 20 Asian 1 1 2 2 1 6 1 1 Black, African-American 2 2 3 2 4 2 2 3 3 Hispanic, Latino 9 6 11 13 7 8 24 7 10 Native American 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Multi-racial 3 2 4 2 11 2 4 3 5 White, Anglo 83 87 80 79 76 86 62 85 80 Refused 0 1 1 1 1Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-736
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 11 17 21 7 15 22 16 16 Own 83 79 74 88 81 76 73 78 Less than $200K 25 29 16 26 23 26 22 23 $200k to $400K 28 33 38 37 36 33 34 33 More than $400K 30 18 20 26 21 16 17 22 Unsure 2 1 1 1 0 1 9 2 Refused 3 2 4 4 4 1 1 3Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 61 27 10 64 32 36 40 37 Very 26 10 1 29 7 22 19 15 Somewhat 35 18 9 35 26 14 21 22 Moderate; liberal 37 71 86 32 65 59 59 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 27 40 31 21 28 30 34 32 Liberal 10 31 55 11 38 30 25 28 Somewhat 6 16 33 7 23 14 15 17 Very 4 15 21 4 15 16 11 11 Unsure 0 2 4 1 2 Refused 2 1 2 1 2 5 1 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 16 24 18 9 19 17 23 20 Asian 3 1 2 2 1 1 Black, African-American 2 1 1 2 2 1 5 3 Hispanic, Latino 8 15 8 5 12 7 10 10 Native American 1 1 1 0 1 1 Multi-racial 2 6 6 2 3 8 6 5 White, Anglo 84 76 82 88 80 83 76 80 Refused 0 4 1 1 1Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-737
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 14 19 22 14 14 17 16 Own 80 77 73 82 83 77 78 Less than $200K 23 21 20 25 20 25 23 $200k to $400K 34 33 31 34 40 30 33 More than $400K 24 22 21 23 23 22 22 Unsure 2 2 2 0 2 2 Refused 4 3 5 3 2 4 3Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 40 34 33 39 32 39 37 Very 16 13 13 16 14 15 15 Somewhat 24 21 19 23 18 23 22 Moderate; liberal 56 63 64 59 67 57 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 33 28 32 31 41 28 32 Liberal 22 35 32 28 25 29 28 Somewhat 11 24 21 16 16 16 17 Very 12 11 11 11 9 12 11 Unsure 2 2 3 1 2 2 Refused 2 1 1 2 1 2 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 18 23 33 15 19 20 20 Asian 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 Black, African-American 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 Hispanic, Latino 10 12 21 6 7 11 10 Native American 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 Multi-racial 3 6 6 5 7 4 5 White, Anglo 81 77 67 84 81 79 80 Refused 1 0 1 1 1Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-738
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 16 14 13 18 19 18 16 16 Own 79 80 82 77 74 77 81 78 Less than $200K 21 25 25 24 19 19 27 23 $200k to $400K 32 36 35 26 36 31 36 33 More than $400K 26 19 22 27 19 26 18 22 Unsure 2 2 2 1 4 3 0 2 Refused 3 4 3 5 2 2 2 3Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 51 17 44 33 27 42 32 37 Very 22 6 17 14 12 17 14 15 Somewhat 29 11 27 19 15 26 18 22 Moderate; liberal 46 80 53 66 67 56 64 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 33 28 34 31 28 35 29 32 Liberal 13 52 20 35 39 21 35 28 Somewhat 8 30 13 25 18 16 18 17 Very 4 22 7 11 22 5 17 11 Unsure 1 2 1 0 3 3 2 Refused 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 18 24 16 26 22 15 22 20 Asian 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 Black, African-American 2 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 9 12 8 15 9 10 10 10 Native American 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Multi-racial 5 6 5 4 6 2 8 5 White, Anglo 81 76 83 74 78 84 77 80 Refused 1 1 0 1 1Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-739
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 21 15 17 16 20 14 16 Own 76 81 78 79 77 82 78 Less than $200K 21 25 27 22 21 26 23 $200k to $400K 30 37 30 36 30 37 33 More than $400K 25 18 22 21 26 20 22 Unsure 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 Refused 2 3 3 3 2 3 3Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 46 33 40 34 50 28 37 Very 21 12 22 10 24 9 15 Somewhat 25 21 18 24 27 19 22 Moderate; liberal 51 63 57 63 48 70 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 29 31 33 31 31 33 32 Liberal 22 32 24 32 18 37 28 Somewhat 16 17 17 17 12 19 17 Very 6 15 7 15 5 17 11 Unsure 2 1 1 2 2 2 Refused 0 2 2 1 1 1 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 16 21 15 23 18 21 20 Asian 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Black, African-American 3 1 2 3 2 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 9 11 8 11 10 11 10 Native American 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 Multi-racial 2 7 3 7 3 7 5 White, Anglo 82 79 85 76 82 78 80 Refused 1 0 1 0 1 1Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-740
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoQ67 Own, rent, or lease own
place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 14 16 15 8 21 22 8 10 16 16 Own 82 78 80 89 71 72 84 87 79 78 Less than $200K 26 22 26 35 21 21 22 19 21 23 $200k to $400K 37 30 35 37 27 30 33 36 32 33 More than $400K 19 26 19 16 23 20 29 32 27 22 Unsure 1 2 1 3 3 5 1 2 2 Refused 2 4 3 3 5 3 2 2 3 3Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 22 54 22 21 32 31 33 59 57 37 Very 8 22 7 4 11 12 14 29 25 15 Somewhat 14 31 15 17 21 19 19 31 32 22 Moderate; liberal 74 44 74 76 61 64 62 41 42 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 29 33 29 28 32 32 31 35 32 32 Liberal 46 11 45 48 29 33 31 5 10 28 Somewhat 24 8 24 23 19 21 19 4 9 17 Very 21 3 21 24 10 12 12 1 1 11 Unsure 2 1 3 1 4 2 3 2 Refused 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 0 2 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 20 20 22 20 28 21 19 16 17 20 Asian 1 2 1 1 4 2 2 1 Black, African-American 2 3 4 1 6 4 4 1 2 3 Hispanic, Latino 11 9 11 8 16 10 8 12 9 10 Native American 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Multi-racial 4 5 5 8 2 5 7 3 4 5 White, Anglo 80 79 77 80 72 78 79 83 83 80 Refused 1 1 1 2 0 0 1Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-741
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Q67 Own, rent, or lease own place of residence & value of home
Rent, lease 11 13 13 10 5 8 31 10 7 2 16 Own 83 81 82 84 91 87 62 88 86 96 78 Less than $200K 25 25 22 25 26 27 14 28 28 26 23 $200k to $400K 33 34 34 33 29 39 33 33 33 39 33 More than $400K 25 22 25 27 36 21 15 27 25 30 22 Unsure 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 0 2 Refused 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 1 7 2 3Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q68 Ideology Conservative 41 37 39 42 78 10 28 39 45 40 37 Very 18 15 16 18 41 2 9 17 20 19 15 Somewhat 23 22 23 23 37 8 19 22 25 21 22 Moderate; liberal 58 60 59 57 21 88 66 60 52 59 60 Moderate; middle-of-road 31 33 30 29 18 32 31 33 30 31 32 Liberal 27 26 29 28 3 56 34 27 22 28 28 Somewhat 14 16 17 15 2 28 22 15 14 14 17 Very 13 11 12 13 1 28 13 12 8 13 11 Unsure 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 Refused 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 0 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Q69 Ethnicity Minority 18 21 18 17 12 25 17 22 20 15 20 Asian 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 0 1 Black, African-American 2 3 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 1 3 Hispanic, Latino 9 11 8 8 7 15 6 12 13 9 10 Native American 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 Multi-racial 4 5 5 4 3 4 6 5 4 4 5 White, Anglo 82 79 82 83 88 74 81 78 80 85 80 Refused 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-742
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Age 40 or less 31 31 32 36 25 28 29 30 18 - 30 17 18 21 22 14 8 12 15 31 - 40 14 13 11 14 12 20 17 15 41 to 60 40 41 41 41 41 30 36 39 41 - 50 24 21 22 22 20 11 9 18 51 - 60 16 20 20 19 21 19 27 22 More than 60 30 28 26 23 34 43 35 30 61 - 65 10 11 11 11 11 12 9 10 More than 65 20 17 15 12 23 31 26 21
Mean 50 49 49 47 52 55 54 51Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Ideology & age Conservative 33 32 37 41 22 44 41 37 50 or less 11 12 15 17 6 15 13 13 More than 50 21 20 22 24 16 29 28 24 Moderate; liberal 64 65 60 56 75 54 56 60 50 or less 40 38 37 39 37 23 23 33 More than 50 23 27 23 17 38 31 33 27 Unsure 3 3 3 2 3 1 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-743
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchAge 40 or less 31 33 29 29 23 31 38 20 30 18 - 30 18 21 12 12 11 19 11 15 15 31 - 40 14 12 17 18 12 13 27 6 15 41 to 60 41 42 39 37 37 41 36 47 39 41 - 50 22 23 14 10 16 19 19 16 18 51 - 60 19 19 26 27 20 22 17 31 22 More than 60 28 26 32 34 40 28 25 33 30 61 - 65 10 11 9 8 11 10 9 10 10 More than 65 17 15 23 26 29 18 17 23 21
Mean 49 48 53 54 55 49 49 53 51Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Ideology & age Conservative 34 39 38 37 29 37 33 58 37 50 or less 12 15 14 15 6 12 19 18 13 More than 50 22 24 24 22 23 25 15 40 24 Moderate; liberal 63 57 59 59 68 59 67 40 60 50 or less 39 38 27 23 31 35 39 16 33 More than 50 24 19 32 37 37 24 28 23 27 Unsure 3 3 2 3 2 Refused 0 0 3 3 1 0 2 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-744
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Age 40 or less 32 28 100 62 65 30 18 - 30 19 11 49 36 25 15 31 - 40 13 17 51 26 39 15 41 to 60 39 40 100 38 39 35 43 39 41 - 50 20 15 45 38 35 18 51 - 60 19 24 55 39 43 22 More than 60 29 32 100 61 57 30 61 - 65 9 10 32 20 18 10 More than 65 20 21 68 41 38 21
Mean 50 52 30 52 71 36 65 36 64 51Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Ideology & age Conservative 39 35 26 37 47 28 51 27 41 37 50 or less 15 12 26 13 28 27 13 More than 50 24 23 24 47 51 41 24 Moderate; liberal 57 63 69 60 51 68 45 69 58 60 50 or less 36 30 69 30 68 69 33 More than 50 22 32 30 51 45 58 27 Unsure 1 2 3 1 0 2 1 4 2 Refused 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-745
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Age 40 or less 32 30 48 48 22 22 30 18 - 30 14 15 12 14 14 15 15 31 - 40 17 15 36 34 9 6 15 41 to 60 49 37 49 49 39 36 39 41 - 50 23 16 32 31 12 12 18 51 - 60 26 21 17 18 27 24 22 More than 60 20 33 3 3 39 43 30 61 - 65 6 11 2 2 14 14 10 More than 65 13 22 1 1 24 29 21
Mean 48 51 41 41 54 55 51Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Ideology & age Conservative 33 38 33 34 44 39 37 50 or less 13 13 24 24 10 9 13 More than 50 19 25 9 10 34 30 24 Moderate; liberal 67 58 63 62 54 58 60 50 or less 41 31 52 51 24 24 33 More than 50 26 27 11 12 30 35 27 Unsure 1 3 3 1 1 2 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-746
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Age 40 or less 35 34 36 27 32 19 30 18 - 30 20 22 18 12 17 3 15 31 - 40 16 12 18 15 15 16 15 41 to 60 35 37 34 43 43 42 39 41 - 50 10 11 10 24 24 23 18 51 - 60 25 26 24 19 20 18 22 More than 60 30 29 30 30 25 40 30 61 - 65 10 7 11 10 8 13 10 More than 65 20 22 19 20 16 26 21
Mean 50 50 50 51 48 56 51Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Ideology & age Conservative 46 54 42 30 27 34 37 50 or less 18 23 15 10 11 8 13 More than 50 28 31 27 20 16 26 24 Moderate; liberal 50 45 53 68 70 66 60 50 or less 25 21 28 39 42 34 33 More than 50 25 24 25 29 28 32 27 Unsure 2 4 1 1 1 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-747
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KAge 40 or less 66 22 24 28 11 40 1 30 18 - 30 48 7 5 10 5 17 15 31 - 40 18 15 19 18 6 23 1 15 41 to 60 18 44 39 45 49 48 16 39 41 - 50 8 20 13 23 24 22 7 18 51 - 60 10 24 26 22 25 26 9 22 More than 60 16 33 37 26 40 12 82 30 61 - 65 8 10 11 8 13 7 18 10 More than 65 8 23 26 19 26 5 65 21
Mean 38 54 55 51 56 45 69 51Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Ideology & age Conservative 37 37 37 32 46 33 45 37 50 or less 26 11 14 9 12 17 3 13 More than 50 11 26 23 23 35 16 43 24 Moderate; liberal 56 61 62 66 53 65 55 60 50 or less 42 31 23 41 24 44 6 33 More than 50 14 31 39 26 29 21 49 27 Unsure 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 Refused 1 0 1 1 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-748
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Age 40 or less 27 28 27 22 31 34 33 29 30 18 - 30 11 15 11 8 14 21 14 16 15 31 - 40 16 13 16 15 17 13 19 13 15 41 to 60 34 44 36 36 37 44 44 34 39 41 - 50 19 19 17 19 15 20 21 15 18 51 - 60 15 25 18 17 23 24 23 20 22 More than 60 39 27 38 42 31 22 23 36 30 61 - 65 12 10 12 11 11 9 7 12 10 More than 65 27 18 26 31 21 13 16 24 21
Mean 53 51 53 55 50 48 49 52 51Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Ideology & age Conservative 35 40 44 32 38 44 35 39 37 50 or less 9 16 15 8 12 20 14 13 13 More than 50 26 24 28 23 26 24 21 26 24 Moderate; liberal 63 58 55 66 62 55 62 60 60 50 or less 34 31 28 30 33 33 38 30 33 More than 50 29 27 27 35 28 22 25 30 27 Unsure 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 Refused 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-749
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Age 40 or less 22 16 25 35 31 39 30 18 - 30 10 8 12 17 16 19 15 31 - 40 11 9 13 18 15 21 15 41 to 60 40 44 36 39 44 34 39 41 - 50 14 15 14 20 20 19 18 51 - 60 25 29 23 19 23 15 22 More than 60 39 39 38 26 25 26 30 61 - 65 11 8 14 9 8 10 10 More than 65 27 32 24 17 17 16 21
Mean 55 56 54 49 50 48 51Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Ideology & age Conservative 100 100 100 37 50 or less 36 32 39 13 More than 50 64 68 61 24 Moderate; liberal 100 100 100 60 50 or less 55 51 59 33 More than 50 45 49 41 27 Unsure 2 Refused 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-750
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffAge 40 or less 22 18 39 23 36 44 30 26 34 36 30 18 - 30 9 9 22 10 18 25 14 17 12 19 15 31 - 40 13 9 17 13 18 19 16 9 21 17 15 41 to 60 42 43 38 40 37 39 38 41 35 38 39 41 - 50 19 19 17 16 13 21 18 16 19 19 18 51 - 60 23 24 21 25 24 18 20 25 16 19 22 More than 60 36 39 23 36 27 17 32 33 32 26 30 61 - 65 10 12 9 11 10 8 10 6 13 9 10 More than 65 26 27 14 26 16 10 22 26 19 17 21
Mean 54 55 47 54 49 44 51 53 50 48 51Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Ideology & age Conservative 71 100 26 77 37 11 25 6 37 50 or less 26 37 8 27 11 5 11 3 13 More than 50 45 63 18 50 26 6 14 4 24 Moderate; liberal 24 72 19 63 100 87 75 100 92 60 50 or less 11 47 9 38 65 42 31 53 52 33 More than 50 12 25 10 25 35 45 44 47 41 27 Unsure 2 2 2 1 0 2 Refused 3 0 2 2 1 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-751
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Age 40 or less 23 21 39 39 36 26 54 70 63 30 18 - 30 12 6 21 23 25 6 22 39 30 15 31 - 40 12 15 18 16 10 20 32 31 33 15 41 to 60 42 41 38 38 35 40 46 39 30 48 37 38 39 41 - 50 20 17 20 13 20 16 46 30 37 18 51 - 60 22 24 18 25 14 24 39 48 38 22 More than 60 34 37 23 23 30 35 61 52 62 30 61 - 65 11 9 10 9 7 13 17 21 20 10 More than 65 23 28 13 14 23 22 43 31 42 21
Mean 53 55 47 47 49 53 38 65 34 63 36 65 51Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Ideology & age Conservative 70 73 32 19 9 12 64 76 14 41 10 12 37 50 or less 26 27 12 3 4 5 64 14 10 13 More than 50 44 46 20 16 5 7 76 41 12 24 Moderate; liberal 25 22 66 78 87 87 28 21 84 58 88 85 60 50 or less 14 9 46 47 50 36 28 84 88 33 More than 50 11 14 20 31 37 51 21 58 85 27 Unsure 2 3 1 3 2 5 2 1 1 1 2 Refused 4 2 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-752
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Age 40 or less 36 19 43 12 11 32 33 19 30 18 - 30 17 8 20 8 7 14 21 4 15 31 - 40 19 11 23 4 4 18 12 15 15 41 to 60 39 43 40 41 38 40 35 48 39 41 - 50 21 15 19 16 17 20 17 13 18 51 - 60 18 28 21 25 21 20 17 35 22 More than 60 25 38 17 47 51 28 32 33 30 61 - 65 8 13 6 16 15 8 11 12 10 More than 65 17 25 11 32 37 19 22 21 21
Mean 48 55 45 58 59 50 50 55 51Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Ideology & age Conservative 20 62 32 46 42 31 37 52 37 50 or less 8 22 16 13 8 9 15 19 13 More than 50 13 40 16 33 34 21 22 33 24 Moderate; liberal 76 35 65 54 56 68 57 47 60 50 or less 47 10 44 14 20 42 31 13 33 More than 50 29 25 21 40 36 26 26 34 27 Unsure 2 2 2 1 4 1 2 Refused 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-753
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Age 40 or less 22 37 36 20 23 33 34 24 27 27 30 18 - 30 12 14 15 13 13 14 17 12 15 10 15 31 - 40 10 23 21 7 9 19 17 13 11 17 15 41 to 60 41 38 38 43 41 38 41 43 38 44 39 41 - 50 17 18 20 16 16 18 18 19 18 18 18 51 - 60 24 20 18 27 25 21 23 24 20 27 22 More than 60 37 25 26 37 36 29 25 33 35 29 30 61 - 65 10 9 8 13 12 10 7 13 13 7 10 More than 65 27 17 18 25 24 19 18 20 21 22 21
Mean 54 49 49 54 53 50 49 52 52 52 51Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Ideology & age Conservative 53 18 18 65 60 18 33 45 40 41 37 50 or less 17 8 7 20 20 7 16 14 14 14 13 More than 50 36 10 11 44 41 11 16 31 26 26 24 Moderate; liberal 44 79 78 35 37 81 63 52 58 57 60 50 or less 22 43 46 15 19 43 32 27 30 30 33 More than 50 22 36 32 19 18 38 31 25 28 27 27 Unsure 1 2 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 2 Refused 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-754
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsAge 40 or less 20 21 20 39 38 25 24 34 30 18 - 30 6 11 2 22 22 8 9 21 15 31 - 40 15 10 18 17 16 17 15 13 15 41 to 60 43 46 40 37 37 37 46 42 39 41 - 50 15 17 14 22 18 17 18 19 18 51 - 60 28 30 27 15 18 19 28 24 22 More than 60 37 32 40 24 26 38 30 23 30 61 - 65 12 12 11 9 9 12 13 6 10 More than 65 25 21 28 15 17 26 18 17 21
Mean 55 53 56 47 48 54 53 48 51Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Ideology & age Conservative 38 39 38 35 35 38 31 38 37 50 or less 8 9 7 16 18 10 6 16 13 More than 50 31 30 31 19 17 28 25 22 24 Moderate; liberal 60 59 60 60 61 59 66 58 60 50 or less 27 28 26 41 36 31 36 34 33 More than 50 33 31 35 19 25 28 30 24 27 Unsure 4 1 2 1 2 2 Refused 2 2 2 0 3 1 2 2 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-755
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Age 40 or less 16 36 42 13 34 29 46 30 18 - 30 6 14 27 3 17 12 28 15 31 - 40 10 22 15 10 17 17 18 15 41 to 60 45 40 34 43 40 35 38 39 41 - 50 20 22 17 14 23 16 10 18 51 - 60 25 18 17 29 16 19 28 22 More than 60 39 24 24 44 26 35 16 30 61 - 65 13 11 9 6 9 8 7 10 More than 65 26 13 15 37 18 27 10 21
Mean 56 48 46 59 49 53 44 51Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Ideology & age Conservative 61 27 10 64 32 36 40 37 50 or less 18 14 4 18 14 8 21 13 More than 50 43 13 6 45 18 29 18 24 Moderate; liberal 37 71 86 32 65 59 59 60 50 or less 17 44 53 5 41 36 33 33 More than 50 20 28 33 27 24 23 26 27 Unsure 0 2 4 1 2 Refused 2 1 2 1 2 5 1 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-756
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeAge 40 or less 30 31 34 29 34 29 30 18 - 30 15 15 20 13 21 13 15 31 - 40 15 16 14 16 13 16 15 41 to 60 40 38 39 40 41 39 39 41 - 50 19 17 20 17 18 18 18 51 - 60 21 21 19 23 22 21 22 More than 60 31 32 27 32 25 33 30 61 - 65 11 9 11 10 8 11 10 More than 65 20 23 16 22 17 22 21
Mean 50 51 48 52 49 52 51Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Ideology & age Conservative 40 34 33 39 32 39 37 50 or less 14 14 15 13 14 13 13 More than 50 26 21 18 26 18 26 24 Moderate; liberal 56 63 64 59 67 57 60 50 or less 33 32 36 31 38 31 33 More than 50 23 31 28 27 29 26 27 Unsure 2 2 3 1 2 2 Refused 2 1 1 2 1 2 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-757
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setAge 40 or less 26 34 24 39 33 32 32 30 18 - 30 13 16 13 18 13 17 16 15 31 - 40 13 19 11 21 20 15 16 15 41 to 60 40 40 38 36 46 32 43 39 41 - 50 17 20 17 16 21 13 19 18 51 - 60 23 20 21 20 25 19 24 22 More than 60 34 26 38 25 22 36 25 30 61 - 65 11 8 12 7 8 12 8 10 More than 65 23 18 25 18 14 24 17 21
Mean 53 49 53 48 49 52 49 51Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Ideology & age Conservative 51 17 44 33 27 42 32 37 50 or less 18 7 13 17 10 14 13 13 More than 50 34 10 31 16 17 28 19 24 Moderate; liberal 46 80 53 66 67 56 64 60 50 or less 23 45 27 37 39 31 35 33 More than 50 23 35 26 29 28 25 30 27 Unsure 1 2 1 0 3 3 2 Refused 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-758
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityAge 40 or less 29 33 30 33 27 33 30 18 - 30 18 15 16 15 15 15 15 31 - 40 11 19 14 17 12 19 15 41 to 60 37 38 37 39 40 37 39 41 - 50 16 17 19 15 19 18 18 51 - 60 21 21 19 24 21 19 22 More than 60 35 29 33 29 33 30 30 61 - 65 11 9 10 10 12 9 10 More than 65 24 20 23 19 20 21 21
Mean 52 50 51 50 51 51 51Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Ideology & age Conservative 46 33 40 34 50 28 37 50 or less 19 11 11 14 20 9 13 More than 50 27 22 30 20 30 19 24 Moderate; liberal 51 63 57 63 48 70 60 50 or less 24 37 36 31 26 40 33 More than 50 28 26 21 32 23 29 27 Unsure 2 1 1 2 2 2 Refused 0 2 2 1 1 1 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-759
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoAge 40 or less 38 22 37 27 39 40 27 12 20 30 18 - 30 17 13 14 11 19 20 11 7 12 15 31 - 40 22 9 23 15 21 20 16 5 8 15 41 to 60 34 43 37 41 35 35 46 46 43 39 41 - 50 15 19 18 16 19 17 23 20 18 18 51 - 60 19 24 19 25 16 18 24 26 25 22 More than 60 27 35 26 33 26 25 27 42 36 30 61 - 65 9 11 9 13 6 7 8 15 12 10 More than 65 18 24 17 20 19 18 19 27 24 21
Mean 49 53 49 53 48 48 51 57 54 51Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Ideology & age Conservative 22 54 22 21 32 31 33 59 57 37 50 or less 9 19 11 13 10 12 10 15 17 13 More than 50 13 35 11 8 22 19 23 44 39 24 Moderate; liberal 74 44 74 76 61 64 62 41 42 60 50 or less 42 20 41 29 44 42 36 17 20 33 More than 50 32 23 33 47 17 23 26 24 21 27 Unsure 2 1 3 1 4 2 3 2 Refused 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 0 2 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-760
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Age 40 or less 19 26 24 15 8 15 60 23 1 10 30 18 - 30 6 10 11 4 1 40 3 1 15 31 - 40 13 16 14 11 8 14 20 20 1 9 15 41 to 60 42 42 41 43 43 38 25 54 35 45 39 41 - 50 19 19 18 19 19 18 12 30 6 18 18 51 - 60 23 23 22 24 24 20 13 24 29 26 22 More than 60 38 32 35 42 49 47 15 23 64 46 30 61 - 65 12 10 11 13 14 13 6 8 18 14 10 More than 65 27 22 24 29 35 34 9 15 46 31 21
Mean 56 53 53 57 60 58 40 51 65 59 51Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Ideology & age Conservative 41 37 39 42 78 10 28 39 45 40 37 50 or less 12 13 12 11 20 3 18 15 4 6 13 More than 50 29 25 27 31 58 7 10 24 42 34 24 Moderate; liberal 58 60 59 57 21 88 66 60 52 59 60 50 or less 26 31 29 23 6 29 49 37 3 21 33 More than 50 32 29 29 34 14 59 16 23 49 38 27 Unsure 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 Refused 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 0 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-761
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 54 48 49 47 49 44 54 48 50 or less 37 26 27 26 25 17 30 25 More than 50 17 23 22 22 24 27 25 23 Republican 15 17 18 19 16 12 19 17 Democratic 21 14 12 7 22 14 19 14 Unaffiliated, other 19 17 19 22 12 19 17 17 Conservative 19 19 22 23 14 19 20 19 Moderate; liberal 34 28 27 23 34 24 32 28 Female 46 52 51 53 51 56 46 52 50 or less 18 27 27 33 20 22 8 23 More than 50 28 25 24 20 31 34 37 29 Republican 16 13 15 19 6 27 18 17 Democratic 12 22 20 19 26 11 17 18 Unaffiliated, other 18 17 16 15 18 18 11 16 Conservative 14 13 15 18 8 25 21 18 Moderate; liberal 30 37 33 33 41 30 24 32Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-762
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 47 47 52 56 49 46 50 54 48 50 or less 25 27 28 31 22 21 34 26 25 More than 50 22 20 24 25 27 24 16 28 23 Republican 17 18 18 20 21 17 16 18 17 Democratic 13 10 17 20 16 14 13 10 14 Unaffiliated, other 17 19 16 16 12 15 21 25 17 Conservative 19 22 17 17 15 20 15 30 19 Moderate; liberal 27 24 32 36 31 25 35 21 28 Female 53 53 48 44 51 54 50 46 52 50 or less 28 28 15 9 17 29 24 10 23 More than 50 25 24 34 35 34 25 26 36 29 Republican 14 16 19 20 10 15 19 27 17 Democratic 22 18 16 15 27 18 18 11 18 Unaffiliated, other 18 18 14 9 14 21 13 9 16 Conservative 15 17 21 20 14 18 18 28 18 Moderate; liberal 37 33 27 23 37 35 32 19 32Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-763
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Sex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 100 51 48 46 100 100 48 50 or less 52 51 25 100 25 More than 50 48 23 46 100 23 Republican 36 13 19 19 30 43 17 Democratic 29 17 12 14 31 27 14 Unaffiliated, other 35 21 16 13 39 30 17 Conservative 39 15 19 23 28 51 19 Moderate; liberal 57 34 28 21 68 45 28 Female 100 49 52 54 100 100 52 50 or less 44 49 20 100 23 More than 50 56 32 54 100 29 Republican 34 12 18 21 29 37 17
Democratic 36 16 19 21 33 37 18 Unaffiliated, other 31 21 15 12 37 26 16 Conservative 35 12 19 23 27 41 18 Moderate; liberal 63 35 32 30 69 58 32Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-764
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 54 47 49 49 46 47 48 50 or less 34 23 40 39 17 18 25 More than 50 20 24 9 10 30 29 23 Republican 13 19 14 14 20 19 17 Democratic 24 11 10 11 13 15 14 Unaffiliated, other 17 17 25 24 13 13 17 Conservative 18 19 15 13 24 21 19 Moderate; liberal 36 26 34 35 21 24 28 Female 46 53 51 51 54 53 52 50 or less 21 23 40 40 18 16 23 More than 50 25 30 11 11 36 37 29 Republican 7 20 18 20 18 17 17 Democratic 26 17 17 16 18 19 18 Unaffiliated, other 13 16 15 15 17 17 16 Conservative 15 19 18 20 20 18 18 Moderate; liberal 31 33 29 27 33 34 32Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-765
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 46 51 43 50 48 52 48 50 or less 24 30 21 26 26 26 25 More than 50 22 22 22 23 21 26 23 Republican 16 19 14 18 16 20 17 Democratic 16 13 17 13 11 16 14 Unaffiliated, other 15 19 12 19 21 15 17 Conservative 21 27 17 17 17 17 19 Moderate; liberal 23 23 23 31 29 35 28 Female 54 49 57 50 52 48 52 50 or less 21 15 25 24 29 16 23 More than 50 33 34 32 26 23 32 29 Republican 20 14 23 16 15 16 17 Democratic 17 20 15 19 18 22 18 Unaffiliated, other 17 15 18 16 19 10 16 Conservative 25 26 24 13 10 17 18 Moderate; liberal 27 22 30 37 41 31 32Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-766
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 40 49 48 48 52 56 44 48 50 or less 30 23 20 30 17 37 4 25 More than 50 10 26 28 17 35 19 40 23 Republican 14 18 15 12 30 20 17 17 Democratic 8 15 20 16 7 14 16 14 Unaffiliated, other 18 16 13 20 14 21 12 17 Conservative 22 18 17 14 27 21 21 19 Moderate; liberal 15 30 30 33 25 33 23 28 Female 60 51 52 52 48 44 56 52 50 or less 44 19 17 21 19 25 4 23 More than 50 16 32 35 32 29 19 52 29 Republican 10 19 22 17 20 13 20 17 Democratic 14 19 18 23 15 16 23 18 Unaffiliated, other 36 13 12 13 13 15 13 16 Conservative 16 19 20 18 19 12 25 18 Moderate; liberal 41 32 32 33 29 32 31 32Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-767
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Sex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 41 56 61 39 53 53 53 45 48 50 or less 20 29 28 17 26 32 32 20 25 More than 50 20 26 33 23 27 21 21 25 23 Republican 13 23 23 17 17 20 19 16 17 Democratic 12 15 13 10 15 16 13 15 14 Unaffiliated, other 16 18 25 12 22 17 20 15 17 Conservative 12 25 23 17 18 24 19 19 19 Moderate; liberal 28 29 37 22 35 28 31 26 28 Female 59 44 39 61 47 47 47 55 52 50 or less 25 18 16 25 19 21 22 24 23 More than 50 34 26 23 36 27 25 25 31 29 Republican 18 15 17 17 16 17 15 20 17 Democratic 19 15 8 23 19 16 18 19 18 Unaffiliated, other 22 15 15 21 12 14 15 16 16 Conservative 23 15 20 15 20 20 15 20 18 Moderate; liberal 35 29 19 44 27 27 31 34 32Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-768
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 51 47 54 46 59 31 48 50 or less 19 16 21 29 38 18 25 More than 50 32 31 33 17 21 13 23 Republican 33 33 33 7 12 1 17 Democratic 4 3 4 20 18 22 14 Unaffiliated, other 15 11 17 19 29 7 17 Conservative 51 47 54 19 Moderate; liberal 46 59 31 28 Female 49 53 46 54 41 69 52 50 or less 17 15 18 26 13 40 23 More than 50 32 38 28 28 27 28 29 Republican 34 41 30 6 8 5 17 Democratic 6 5 7 27 15 39 18 Unaffiliated, other 8 7 9 21 17 25 16 Conservative 49 53 46 18 Moderate; liberal 54 41 69 32Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-769
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 50 49 51 53 63 47 43 50 36 45 48 50 or less 22 18 30 22 35 33 24 30 19 28 25 More than 50 28 31 21 30 27 14 19 20 17 17 23 Republican 50 49 40 17 Democratic 43 50 36 25 14 Unaffiliated, other 51 13 63 47 20 17 Conservative 35 49 17 41 24 4 9 2 19 Moderate; liberal 12 34 10 39 47 38 41 36 42 28 Female 50 51 49 47 37 53 57 50 64 55 52 50 or less 19 19 26 17 13 32 23 12 34 27 23 More than 50 31 32 23 31 24 21 33 38 30 28 29 Republican 50 51 40 17 Democratic 57 50 64 33 18 Unaffiliated, other 49 7 37 53 22 16 Conservative 37 51 9 36 13 7 16 4 18 Moderate; liberal 11 38 9 24 53 49 34 64 51 32Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-770
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 100 100 100 53 48 54 48 51 36 48 50 or less 44 59 56 53 54 51 25 More than 50 56 41 44 48 48 36 23 Republican 100 53 48 17 Democratic 100 51 36 14 Unaffiliated, other 100 54 48 17 Conservative 70 32 9 31 37 11 23 4 4 19 Moderate; liberal 25 66 87 17 9 43 23 45 30 28 Female 100 100 100 47 52 46 52 49 64 52 50 or less 38 53 41 47 46 49 23 More than 50 62 47 59 52 52 64 29 Republican 100 47 52 17 Democratic 100 49 64 18 Unaffiliated, other 100 46 52 16 Conservative 73 19 12 33 39 3 18 6 7 18 Moderate; liberal 22 78 87 10 12 41 34 43 55 32
Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-771
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 48 47 49 43 46 49 50 42 48 50 or less 29 17 30 16 19 28 26 17 25 More than 50 18 30 18 27 28 21 24 25 23 Republican 11 27 17 21 15 17 19 16 17 Democratic 17 6 14 2 21 14 17 9 14 Unaffiliated, other 19 14 17 19 10 19 14 18 17 Conservative 11 30 17 20 20 16 21 22 19 Moderate; liberal 34 15 30 23 24 32 26 19 28 Female 52 53 51 57 54 51 50 58 52 50 or less 28 17 32 11 9 24 24 15 23 More than 50 25 36 19 46 44 27 26 42 29 Republican 9 30 15 22 22 14 20 22 17 Democratic 25 11 18 20 20 21 14 20 18 Unaffiliated, other 18 13 18 15 12 16 16 15 16 Conservative 9 32 15 26 21 15 17 29 18 Moderate; liberal 42 20 35 31 32 36 30 28 32Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-772
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 55 42 40 61 59 39 40 53 53 44 48 50 or less 25 25 25 26 28 23 25 26 27 21 25 More than 50 30 17 15 35 32 16 15 26 26 22 23 Republican 27 8 8 32 30 7 11 22 23 13 17 Democratic 10 22 18 7 8 19 22 11 14 17 14 Unaffiliated, other 19 12 14 22 21 13 7 20 16 13 17 Conservative 28 9 8 37 33 8 15 23 22 18 19 Moderate; liberal 25 32 31 24 25 30 24 29 30 24 28 Female 45 58 60 39 41 61 60 47 47 56 52 50 or less 15 29 30 10 11 27 27 17 18 23 23 More than 50 30 29 29 29 29 33 33 30 29 33 29 Republican 26 6 12 27 27 6 15 22 17 18 17 Democratic 9 31 27 6 7 32 23 14 15 23 18 Unaffiliated, other 9 21 20 7 6 22 23 11 15 16 16 Conservative 25 9 10 28 28 9 18 22 18 23 18 Moderate; liberal 19 47 47 11 12 51 39 23 28 33 32Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-773
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 47 58 39 48 51 47 40 50 48 50 or less 18 26 12 29 34 20 16 30 25 More than 50 29 32 27 19 16 27 24 20 23 Republican 17 23 12 17 17 19 9 17 17 Democratic 13 15 11 11 20 11 11 13 14 Unaffiliated, other 17 19 16 19 14 16 19 20 17 Conservative 19 24 16 20 15 20 14 21 19 Moderate; liberal 27 33 22 26 32 26 25 28 28 Female 53 42 61 52 49 53 60 50 52 50 or less 18 12 22 32 22 23 26 23 23 More than 50 36 30 40 21 27 30 34 27 29 Republican 21 18 23 13 16 15 16 23 17 Democratic 23 16 29 12 17 22 16 16 18 Unaffiliated, other 9 8 10 27 16 16 28 11 16 Conservative 19 15 23 15 20 18 18 17 18 Moderate; liberal 33 26 38 34 29 34 42 30 32Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-774
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 52 38 47 56 51 46 43 48 50 or less 23 23 31 17 31 25 28 25 More than 50 29 14 16 40 20 21 15 23 Republican 30 8 6 32 14 22 10 17 Democratic 8 14 21 7 17 16 14 14 Unaffiliated, other 13 16 20 17 20 9 19 17 Conservative 30 7 8 37 19 13 17 19 Moderate; liberal 20 30 37 19 31 28 24 28 Female 48 62 53 44 49 54 57 52 50 or less 12 35 28 11 26 21 28 23 More than 50 36 28 25 33 23 33 29 29 Republican 30 14 7 26 12 21 19 17 Democratic 8 27 23 8 21 23 24 18 Unaffiliated, other 10 21 23 10 16 10 14 16 Conservative 30 21 2 27 13 23 22 18 Moderate; liberal 17 41 48 13 34 31 35 32Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-775
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 52 44 39 53 52 47 48 50 or less 25 26 24 26 34 22 25 More than 50 27 19 15 27 18 25 23 Republican 22 14 12 20 16 18 17 Democratic 12 16 13 15 16 14 14 Unaffiliated, other 18 15 13 18 20 16 17 Conservative 20 20 15 21 22 18 19 Moderate; liberal 29 24 23 30 29 27 28 Female 48 56 61 47 48 53 52 50 or less 23 22 30 20 18 24 23 More than 50 25 34 31 28 30 29 29 Republican 18 16 14 19 11 20 17 Democratic 17 20 31 14 20 18 18 Unaffiliated, other 12 20 17 15 17 16 16 Conservative 20 14 17 18 10 21 18 Moderate; liberal 26 39 41 29 37 30 32Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-776
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation
Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 57 38 54 45 41 51 45 48 50 or less 28 23 25 26 25 23 27 25 More than 50 30 14 29 19 15 28 17 23 Republican 28 4 23 12 11 21 13 17 Democratic 9 21 14 17 13 9 18 14 Unaffiliated, other 21 13 18 16 17 21 13 17 Conservative 29 5 25 17 8 24 13 19 Moderate; liberal 27 31 28 26 30 26 30 28 Female 43 62 46 55 59 49 55 52 50 or less 15 31 16 29 29 22 23 23 More than 50 28 32 30 27 31 27 32 29 Republican 22 10 18 18 16 20 16 17 Democratic 9 32 15 23 21 15 22 18 Unaffiliated, other 11 20 13 14 23 14 18 16 Conservative 22 11 19 16 20 18 19 18 Moderate; liberal 19 49 25 40 37 30 34 32Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-777
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control
Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilitySex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 49 48 51 46 52 44 48 50 or less 23 28 29 23 25 25 25 More than 50 26 20 22 23 27 19 23 Republican 23 15 19 16 25 11 17 Democratic 10 16 10 17 8 17 14 Unaffiliated, other 15 16 23 13 19 16 17 Conservative 24 16 20 18 28 13 19 Moderate; liberal 23 30 29 27 23 31 28 Female 51 52 49 54 48 56 52 50 or less 22 22 20 24 22 26 23 More than 50 30 29 29 30 27 30 29 Republican 21 14 21 15 25 12 17 Democratic 15 22 12 23 11 25 18 Unaffiliated, other 16 16 16 17 13 18 16 Conservative 22 17 21 16 23 15 18 Moderate; liberal 28 33 28 36 25 38 32Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-778
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoSex by age, party affiliation &
ideology Male 40 57 43 41 49 46 44 57 55 48 50 or less 25 26 27 24 33 29 25 19 24 25 More than 50 15 31 16 17 16 17 20 38 31 23 Republican 12 24 10 8 17 15 17 29 27 17 Democratic 17 13 19 20 11 15 16 9 8 14 Unaffiliated, other 12 20 14 13 21 16 12 20 20 17 Conservative 9 29 9 9 15 15 17 33 31 19 Moderate; liberal 29 26 31 30 30 29 25 24 22 28 Female 60 43 57 59 51 54 56 43 45 52 50 or less 29 15 28 19 25 28 25 13 15 23 More than 50 31 29 29 40 26 26 31 30 30 29 Republican 13 22 11 13 16 15 17 26 25 17 Democratic 29 9 27 32 19 19 23 7 10 18 Unaffiliated, other 18 13 19 15 16 20 16 10 11 16 Conservative 13 24 12 13 16 16 16 26 25 18 Moderate; liberal 46 18 42 45 31 36 37 17 20 32Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-779
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Sex by age, party affiliation & ideology
Male 49 50 48 47 49 35 51 50 42 46 48 50 or less 22 26 22 19 13 10 39 28 2 16 25 More than 50 27 24 26 29 36 25 12 22 39 31 23 Republican 18 19 18 18 49 16 18 18 20 17 Democratic 16 15 14 15 35 15 13 15 13 14 Unaffiliated, other 16 16 16 15 20 19 8 14 17 Conservative 21 20 19 21 38 3 16 20 22 20 19 Moderate; liberal 26 29 27 25 11 30 32 30 19 26 28 Female 51 50 52 53 51 65 49 50 58 54 52 50 or less 16 19 20 15 14 23 33 25 5 12 23 More than 50 35 31 32 37 37 42 16 25 53 41 29 Republican 18 17 18 19 51 11 19 23 21 17 Democratic 20 18 20 21 65 17 17 24 21 18 Unaffiliated, other 13 15 14 13 21 14 12 12 16 Conservative 19 18 19 20 41 7 12 19 24 21 18 Moderate; liberal 31 31 32 32 10 58 34 31 33 33 32Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-780
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 31 30 34 38 22 39 37 35 Conservative 20 21 25 28 13 30 29 25 Very conservative 10 7 8 9 4 14 15 11 Moderate; liberal 10 7 7 8 7 8 7 8 50 or less 16 11 13 15 8 17 15 14 More than 50 15 19 21 23 14 22 22 20 Democratic 33 36 31 26 48 24 35 32 Conservative 2 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 White 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 Moderate 20 13 12 5 22 6 12 11 Liberal 11 19 15 17 22 13 18 17 Minority 15 10 8 6 15 13 9 10 50 or less 19 19 16 16 22 3 15 15 More than 50 14 17 15 10 26 21 21 17 Unaffiliated; other 36 34 35 36 31 36 28 33 Conservative 11 7 8 9 6 10 8 8 Moderate 15 15 13 13 17 16 13 15 Liberal 9 10 13 14 6 10 7 9 50 or less 19 22 25 28 15 19 9 18 More than 50 17 12 10 9 15 18 19 15Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Vote history General 2010 71 72 71 72 72 63 82 72 General 2012 95 88 87 82 95 94 93 90 General 2014 76 83 82 86 78 77 88 83 All 3 61 64 63 67 61 56 76 65 Primary voter 31 41 40 42 40 41 48 42 Republican 21 20 23 26 13 26 28 24 Democratic 10 21 17 16 26 15 20 19 Other 2 6 6 8 2 2 4Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-781
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 31 35 37 39 31 32 34 45 35 Conservative 21 26 27 30 20 25 24 37 25 Very conservative 7 8 15 16 9 8 13 22 11 Moderate; liberal 7 7 9 7 9 6 10 6 8 50 or less 12 14 16 18 7 14 20 15 14 More than 50 19 21 21 21 24 19 14 30 20 Democratic 34 28 33 35 43 32 31 21 32 Conservative 4 4 2 5 3 4 2 5 3 White 2 2 2 4 2 2 1 3 2 Moderate 11 9 13 8 12 11 13 4 11 Liberal 19 15 16 20 27 16 16 12 17 Minority 11 9 8 11 14 11 7 6 10 50 or less 19 16 14 13 18 17 15 6 15 More than 50 16 12 19 22 25 15 16 14 17 Unaffiliated; other 35 37 30 25 26 36 34 34 33 Conservative 8 9 9 2 6 9 7 16 8 Moderate 15 13 14 15 13 14 17 14 15 Liberal 11 13 7 8 7 12 10 4 9 50 or less 22 26 12 9 15 20 22 15 18 More than 50 13 11 18 17 11 16 12 19 15Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Vote history General 2010 73 72 76 79 78 70 75 71 72 General 2012 87 86 94 91 95 87 93 87 90 General 2014 83 83 84 87 90 81 80 86 83 All 3 65 64 69 73 76 60 63 69 65 Primary voter 40 38 46 52 54 37 45 42 42 Republican 20 23 27 29 22 22 25 29 24 Democratic 20 15 19 23 32 14 20 13 19 Other 6 6 2 3 3 4 3 7 4Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-782
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Party affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 36 34 26 37 41 30 43 29 37 35 Conservative 25 25 15 27 32 18 33 21 28 25 Very conservative 10 12 5 12 16 5 16 9 14 11 Moderate; liberal 9 8 7 9 8 10 8 7 8 8 50 or less 16 13 26 17 30 29 14 More than 50 20 21 21 41 43 37 20 Democratic 29 36 32 31 35 31 27 33 37 32 Conservative 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 4 3 White 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 3 2 Moderate 12 9 8 12 11 15 9 3 14 11 Liberal 13 21 19 15 18 13 13 26 18 17 Minority 10 10 10 12 6 13 7 11 9 10 50 or less 16 15 32 14 31 33 15 More than 50 13 21 16 35 27 37 17 Unaffiliated; other 35 31 42 32 25 39 30 37 26 33 Conservative 11 6 8 7 11 8 15 2 9 8 Moderate 19 11 20 15 9 24 13 11 10 15 Liberal 4 14 15 9 4 7 2 22 7 9 50 or less 20 16 42 14 39 37 18 More than 50 14 15 18 25 30 26 15Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Vote history General 2010 74 71 46 78 92 64 85 51 87 72 General 2012 94 88 77 97 96 92 95 77 96 90 General 2014 82 84 66 86 96 72 92 74 92 83 All 3 64 66 32 72 90 48 82 44 84 65 Primary voter 38 47 16 44 67 20 57 33 58 42 Republican 24 23 6 26 38 12 37 15 30 24 Democratic 14 24 10 18 29 8 20 19 27 19 Other 3 5 10 1 1 3 2 9 2 4Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-783
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 20 39 32 33 38 36 35 Conservative 11 28 21 21 29 27 25 Very conservative 5 13 10 11 14 12 11 Moderate; liberal 8 8 9 10 9 8 8 50 or less 9 16 26 28 9 9 14 More than 50 11 23 6 6 29 27 20 Democratic 50 28 27 27 31 34 32 Conservative 8 2 3 4 4 4 3 White 2 1 1 3 2 2 Moderate 24 7 10 9 9 11 11 Liberal 17 18 14 14 17 19 17 Minority 50 11 10 7 9 10 50 or less 29 12 21 20 12 12 15 More than 50 21 16 6 7 19 22 17 Unaffiliated; other 30 33 40 39 31 30 33 Conservative 13 7 9 9 11 8 8 Moderate 14 15 24 23 9 10 15 Liberal 3 11 6 7 11 11 9 50 or less 17 18 32 31 13 12 18 More than 50 13 15 8 8 17 18 15Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Vote history General 2010 64 75 64 65 77 76 72 General 2012 95 89 88 87 93 91 90 General 2014 75 85 76 75 91 86 83 All 3 57 68 57 57 74 69 65 Primary voter 38 44 28 30 51 49 42 Republican 14 26 17 18 29 27 24 Democratic 24 18 11 12 22 23 19 Other 1 5 4 4 3 4 4Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-784
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 36 33 37 33 32 37 35 Conservative 28 30 27 22 21 26 25 Very conservative 14 14 13 9 10 8 11 Moderate; liberal 5 3 6 11 10 11 8 50 or less 15 16 15 13 14 12 14 More than 50 20 17 22 20 17 25 20 Democratic 33 33 33 32 28 38 32 Conservative 6 7 6 1 1 1 3 White 3 5 2 1 1 1 2 Moderate 14 17 12 9 8 9 11 Liberal 12 9 15 21 18 27 17 Minority 18 20 16 4 4 4 10 50 or less 15 15 15 16 13 20 15 More than 50 18 18 18 16 15 18 17 Unaffiliated; other 31 34 30 35 40 25 33 Conservative 12 18 8 6 5 8 8 Moderate 13 13 14 16 17 13 15 Liberal 6 3 7 12 16 4 9 50 or less 15 13 15 21 28 10 18 More than 50 17 21 14 13 12 15 15Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Vote history General 2010 67 58 73 76 70 84 72 General 2012 91 92 90 90 87 95 90 General 2014 82 74 86 84 78 93 83 All 3 61 52 67 68 60 81 65 Primary voter 41 33 47 43 37 54 42 Republican 23 17 27 24 21 28 24 Democratic 18 15 19 19 15 26 19 Other 2 4 1 5 7 2 4Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-785
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 25 37 37 29 49 33 37 35 Conservative 17 27 29 21 36 23 27 25 Very conservative 5 13 16 8 17 8 14 11 Moderate; liberal 2 10 8 8 14 9 10 8 50 or less 22 13 16 8 17 18 3 14 More than 50 3 24 21 21 32 15 33 20 Democratic 22 34 38 39 23 31 39 32 Conservative 1 4 6 6 3 7 3 White 2 3 3 1 5 2 Moderate 8 11 14 13 6 11 14 11 Liberal 13 18 18 20 17 17 18 17 Minority 8 10 10 12 5 9 11 10 50 or less 12 16 12 24 8 20 3 15 More than 50 10 18 26 15 15 11 35 17 Unaffiliated; other 53 29 25 32 28 36 25 33 Conservative 20 6 3 5 10 8 12 8 Moderate 13 15 14 18 12 20 6 15 Liberal 21 7 8 8 5 8 6 9 50 or less 40 14 10 19 11 24 1 18 More than 50 13 15 16 13 17 12 23 15Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Vote history General 2010 50 77 78 72 82 68 90 72 General 2012 73 94 98 93 89 91 96 90 General 2014 66 86 80 87 92 79 92 83 All 3 41 70 70 65 77 60 86 65 Primary voter 17 48 49 43 56 35 63 42 Republican 8 28 27 21 38 21 31 24
Democratic 10 21 22 23 18 15 32 19 Other 13 2 1 3 4 5 2 4Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-786
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Party affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 31 38 39 34 33 36 34 35 35 Conservative 23 29 28 21 26 30 23 26 25 Very conservative 9 14 12 10 12 12 11 12 11 Moderate; liberal 7 8 11 12 6 6 9 8 8 50 or less 11 16 10 11 12 17 15 14 14 More than 50 20 22 29 24 21 19 19 22 20 Democratic 31 29 21 33 34 32 31 34 32 Conservative 3 2 1 2 4 4 3 4 3 White 2 2 1 0 1 3 2 2 2 Moderate 6 13 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Liberal 22 13 10 20 19 16 18 18 17 Minority 7 9 7 8 12 10 7 13 10 50 or less 13 13 9 13 15 18 16 15 15 More than 50 18 17 12 20 18 13 15 18 17 Unaffiliated; other 38 33 40 33 34 32 35 31 33 Conservative 9 9 15 8 8 9 9 8 8 Moderate 18 13 23 9 17 18 19 11 15 Liberal 10 11 1 14 8 5 6 12 9 50 or less 22 19 24 18 18 19 23 15 18 More than 50 16 13 15 15 15 13 12 16 15Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Vote history General 2010 70 77 77 78 70 71 77 69 72 General 2012 88 93 97 91 90 92 93 88 90 General 2014 86 83 85 87 87 77 82 83 83 All 3 65 68 70 74 65 60 69 62 65 Primary voter 44 45 44 51 43 37 42 43 42 Republican 21 28 31 29 23 21 23 24 24 Democratic 23 17 14 22 20 16 18 19 19 Other 4 3 5 5 3 4 4 4Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-787
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 67 74 63 14 20 6 35 Conservative 67 74 63 25 Very conservative 30 74 11 Moderate; liberal 14 20 6 8 50 or less 25 23 26 7 10 3 14 More than 50 43 51 37 7 10 3 20 Democratic 10 8 11 47 34 62 32 Conservative 10 8 11 3 White 5 5 5 2 Moderate 18 34 11 Liberal 29 62 17 Minority 4 3 5 14 15 12 10 50 or less 4 3 5 23 14 32 15 More than 50 5 5 6 24 20 29 17 Unaffiliated; other 23 18 26 39 46 32 33 Conservative 23 18 26 8 Moderate 24 46 15 Liberal 15 32 9 50 or less 7 6 8 26 27 23 18 More than 50 16 13 18 14 19 9 15Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Vote history General 2010 80 85 76 70 70 69 72 General 2012 92 92 93 90 95 85 90 General 2014 87 88 87 81 78 85 83 All 3 74 80 70 62 60 64 65 Primary voter 56 67 47 36 32 39 42 Republican 50 64 41 8 13 2 24 Democratic 5 3 7 28 19 37 19 Other 4 7 1 4 2 7 4Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-788
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 100 100 80 35 Conservative 71 100 57 25 Very conservative 32 45 26 11 Moderate; liberal 24 19 8 50 or less 41 37 33 14 More than 50 59 63 47 20 Democratic 100 100 100 58 32 Conservative 11 25 6 3 White 6 13 3 2 Moderate 33 75 19 11 Liberal 54 100 31 17 Minority 31 45 20 18 10 50 or less 48 42 53 27 15 More than 50 52 58 47 30 17 Unaffiliated; other 100 20 100 100 42 33 Conservative 26 20 37 8 Moderate 44 63 61 26 15 Liberal 28 39 16 9 50 or less 56 6 49 65 27 18 More than 50 44 14 51 35 15 15Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Vote history General 2010 75 79 63 78 72 55 79 74 84 69 72 General 2012 94 95 84 93 91 82 93 93 93 88 90 General 2014 86 85 75 87 79 70 88 79 95 81 83 All 3 70 73 55 72 62 46 71 62 79 60 65 Primary voter 68 75 55 58 56 60 33 42 Republican 68 75 55 24 Democratic 58 56 60 33 19 Other 2 3 7 3 4 9 2 2 3 5 4Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-789
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 100 100 100 100 35 Conservative 70 73 64 76 25 Very conservative 28 36 24 37 11 Moderate; liberal 25 22 28 21 8 50 or less 44 38 100 14 More than 50 56 62 100 20 Democratic 100 100 100 100 32 Conservative 9 12 10 12 3 White 5 7 4 8 2 Moderate 42 26 29 37 11 Liberal 45 60 60 49 17 Minority 34 28 37 25 10 50 or less 56 41 100 15 More than 50 44 59 100 17 Unaffiliated; other 100 100 100 100 33 Conservative 32 19 14 41 8 Moderate 54 34 47 40 15 Liberal 12 44 36 17 9 50 or less 59 53 100 18 More than 50 41 47 100 15Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Vote history General 2010 75 75 67 59 80 78 57 88 49 81 69 88 72 General 2012 99 89 86 82 96 91 89 98 78 92 89 96 90 General 2014 84 88 77 73 85 91 70 97 67 85 84 92 83 All 3 67 73 58 51 68 73 45 87 37 76 57 84 65 Primary voter 67 70 47 66 44 85 40 74 42 Republican 67 70 44 85 24 Democratic 47 66 40 74 19 Other 4 6 9 2 3 4 1 11 3 2 2 4Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-790
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 20 57 32 44 37 30 38 38 35 Conservative 11 46 22 31 28 21 25 34 25 Very conservative 4 24 10 19 11 12 9 15 11 Moderate; liberal 8 9 8 12 7 9 9 4 8 50 or less 9 22 19 12 5 11 18 15 14 More than 50 12 34 13 31 32 20 20 22 20 Democratic 42 17 33 22 41 35 31 29 32 Conservative 4 3 3 6 4 4 4 2 3 White 2 2 1 6 2 2 1 2 2 Moderate 12 7 11 7 13 12 11 7 11 Liberal 24 7 19 9 22 18 16 19 17 Minority 13 5 9 5 17 11 9 8 10 50 or less 23 3 19 7 14 20 13 9 15 More than 50 19 13 14 15 27 15 18 20 17 Unaffiliated; other 38 27 36 34 23 35 30 34 33 Conservative 5 13 8 9 9 6 8 16 8 Moderate 19 8 15 16 10 19 11 13 15 Liberal 13 5 12 10 4 10 10 4 9 50 or less 26 9 25 7 9 22 19 8 18 More than 50 12 18 11 27 13 13 11 25 15Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Vote history General 2010 69 77 65 77 89 72 68 82 72 General 2012 88 94 86 94 98 93 84 98 90 General 2014 81 87 77 88 95 81 85 86 83 All 3 61 73 55 72 87 63 63 75 65 Primary voter 38 52 37 46 55 44 38 47 42 Republican 13 41 20 31 30 25 21 28 24 Democratic 24 11 18 15 25 20 18 19 19 Other 4 3 7 3 6 2 4Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-791
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 53 14 20 59 57 13 26 44 40 31 35 Conservative 39 8 10 50 44 8 18 34 30 26 25 Very conservative 20 2 3 26 23 1 6 16 12 13 11 Moderate; liberal 12 4 9 8 11 5 5 9 10 5 8 50 or less 19 9 10 20 20 6 13 17 16 11 14 More than 50 34 5 10 38 37 7 13 27 25 20 20 Democratic 19 53 45 13 16 51 44 25 28 40 32 Conservative 3 3 3 2 4 3 7 2 2 5 3 White 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 Moderate 10 12 11 10 8 12 15 8 11 10 11 Liberal 5 37 30 1 4 35 22 14 14 23 17 Minority 6 15 12 5 7 13 16 6 8 15 10 50 or less 8 28 23 5 7 25 23 12 12 21 15 More than 50 11 24 22 8 9 26 21 13 17 19 17 Unaffiliated; other 28 34 35 28 27 35 30 31 31 29 33 Conservative 10 7 5 13 13 7 8 10 8 10 8 Moderate 12 13 16 11 12 13 12 14 14 12 15 Liberal 5 14 13 4 3 15 10 5 9 7 9 50 or less 13 18 23 11 12 19 15 14 18 13 18 More than 50 15 16 12 17 15 16 14 17 13 16 15Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Vote history General 2010 74 74 72 76 76 74 72 74 71 74 72 General 2012 91 91 90 95 93 90 89 92 92 91 90 General 2014 84 88 83 84 86 87 84 83 83 86 83 All 3 69 65 63 73 73 65 62 70 64 68 65 Primary voter 49 38 37 52 50 39 40 46 46 42 42 Republican 38 8 11 45 42 8 17 32 26 24 24 Democratic 11 30 26 7 8 32 23 15 20 18 19 Other 4 2 3 4 4 2 1 5 3 3 4Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-792
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 38 41 35 30 33 34 25 40 35 Conservative 27 29 27 22 22 29 13 26 25 Very conservative 14 17 11 6 13 9 6 15 11 Moderate; liberal 9 11 8 6 8 5 10 11 8 50 or less 11 15 7 17 16 10 8 21 14 More than 50 27 25 28 13 17 24 16 20 20 Democratic 36 32 39 24 38 34 28 30 32 Conservative 3 2 4 2 6 3 3 3 3 White 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 Moderate 11 11 10 8 14 10 10 8 11 Liberal 21 17 24 13 17 19 13 18 17 Minority 9 5 12 7 16 6 15 8 10 50 or less 15 12 17 11 23 15 9 14 15 More than 50 21 20 23 12 14 19 19 15 17 Unaffiliated; other 26 28 25 46 29 32 48 30 33 Conservative 8 8 7 11 7 6 15 10 8 Moderate 14 15 14 14 16 16 20 10 15 Liberal 4 5 4 19 6 9 12 11 9 50 or less 10 11 9 32 17 18 25 18 18 More than 50 16 17 16 14 13 14 23 12 15Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Vote history General 2010 79 81 77 67 69 77 80 66 72 General 2012 94 95 92 84 92 92 87 88 90 General 2014 88 92 85 77 83 84 79 84 83 All 3 74 79 70 58 59 70 71 62 65 Primary voter 53 49 55 30 38 50 33 40 42 Republican 29 31 28 16 22 28 13 24 24 Democratic 23 18 27 14 16 22 20 16 19 Other 2 1 3 8 1 1 9 7 4Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-793
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 61 23 13 58 26 42 29 35 Conservative 48 16 4 48 19 28 23 25 Very conservative 23 7 1 22 4 20 12 11 Moderate; liberal 10 6 7 10 6 9 4 8 50 or less 20 12 10 18 13 17 12 14 More than 50 40 11 3 40 13 25 16 20 Democratic 16 41 44 14 38 39 38 32 Conservative 1 6 2 3 4 6 6 3 White 1 3 1 2 2 4 2 2 Moderate 11 10 14 6 10 7 14 11 Liberal 4 24 28 5 22 26 19 17 Minority 5 13 8 4 8 6 17 10 50 or less 7 20 23 19 17 19 15 More than 50 10 21 21 14 19 22 19 17 Unaffiliated; other 23 36 43 28 36 19 34 33 Conservative 11 6 5 13 9 2 11 8 Moderate 7 25 15 6 13 13 16 15 Liberal 5 6 23 5 13 4 7 9 50 or less 9 26 27 9 25 11 24 18 More than 50 14 10 16 19 12 7 10 15Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Vote history General 2010 77 70 63 83 69 80 70 72 General 2012 91 91 83 95 91 88 86 90 General 2014 91 81 80 81 80 83 84 83 All 3 73 62 53 76 60 64 66 65 Primary voter 58 39 28 60 40 54 35 42 Republican 46 16 4 48 17 34 14 24 Democratic 12 23 24 11 24 20 21 19 Other 2 6 4 3 5 10 6 4Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-794
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 40 29 26 39 28 38 35 Conservative 29 20 15 29 21 27 25 Very conservative 13 9 8 12 11 12 11 Moderate; liberal 9 7 8 9 7 9 8 50 or less 17 12 16 14 12 15 14 More than 50 24 17 10 25 15 23 20 Democratic 29 36 44 28 36 31 32 Conservative 4 4 5 3 3 4 3 White 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Moderate 10 10 17 8 16 8 11 Liberal 14 22 21 16 16 18 17 Minority 10 10 19 7 11 10 10 50 or less 15 17 20 14 20 14 15 More than 50 15 19 23 15 16 17 17 Unaffiliated; other 31 35 30 33 37 31 33 Conservative 7 11 12 7 9 9 8 Moderate 15 13 10 15 19 13 15 Liberal 8 11 7 10 9 9 9 50 or less 17 19 17 18 20 18 18 More than 50 13 16 13 15 17 14 15Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Vote history General 2010 71 72 66 74 72 73 72 General 2012 91 90 88 92 88 91 90 General 2014 81 87 77 85 74 86 83 All 3 64 67 59 67 60 68 65 Primary voter 45 41 36 46 35 46 42 Republican 29 18 12 29 18 26 24 Democratic 16 24 24 17 17 20 19 Other 4 3 4 3 7 3 4Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-795
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 50 14 41 30 27 42 29 35 Conservative 37 8 31 23 15 27 22 25 Very conservative 17 4 14 9 8 12 10 11 Moderate; liberal 12 4 10 7 7 14 5 8 50 or less 20 6 14 17 13 17 13 14 More than 50 30 7 28 13 14 25 16 20 Democratic 18 54 28 40 33 23 40 32 Conservative 3 4 5 3 2 3 4 3 White 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Moderate 8 15 10 15 7 8 13 11 Liberal 6 34 12 22 25 11 23 17 Minority 7 15 9 14 7 8 11 10 50 or less 8 28 12 20 19 10 20 15 More than 50 11 26 17 20 14 14 20 17 Unaffiliated; other 32 33 30 30 39 35 31 33 Conservative 11 5 8 8 11 12 7 8 Moderate 15 12 15 12 15 17 12 15 Liberal 5 15 7 10 13 6 11 9 50 or less 15 20 16 18 22 18 17 18 More than 50 16 13 14 12 18 16 14 15Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Vote history General 2010 72 74 73 71 75 70 72 72 General 2012 91 90 95 86 86 89 91 90 General 2014 83 85 89 78 79 85 79 83 All 3 67 64 70 62 61 65 62 65 Primary voter 44 42 50 41 30 43 40 42 Republican 34 9 32 16 15 30 17 24 Democratic 10 33 17 24 16 13 23 19 Other 4 2 1 7 6 6 3 4Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-796
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 44 30 39 30 50 24 35 Conservative 34 20 28 22 38 17 25 Very conservative 16 9 17 7 19 6 11 Moderate; liberal 9 7 10 7 11 5 8 50 or less 18 13 15 13 21 9 14 More than 50 27 17 24 17 29 14 20 Democratic 25 38 22 41 19 42 32 Conservative 2 5 2 4 2 5 3 White 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 Moderate 10 12 8 13 7 13 11 Liberal 12 21 11 23 9 24 17 Minority 9 10 5 14 6 12 10 50 or less 12 19 11 20 7 22 15 More than 50 13 19 12 21 11 20 17 Unaffiliated; other 31 32 38 29 32 34 33 Conservative 10 8 10 8 11 6 8 Moderate 12 14 18 12 13 16 15 Liberal 8 10 10 9 7 11 9 50 or less 15 18 23 15 18 19 18 More than 50 16 14 16 14 13 15 15Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Vote history General 2010 69 70 73 72 71 72 72 General 2012 90 89 90 91 89 91 90 General 2014 79 84 81 83 86 80 83 All 3 62 63 66 64 67 62 65 Primary voter 46 41 42 42 48 40 42 Republican 32 18 29 19 37 15 24 Democratic 14 22 13 23 11 26 19 Other 6 3 6 2 6 3 4Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-797
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoParty affiliation by ideology &
age Republican 25 45 21 20 33 30 34 55 52 35 Conservative 14 36 13 13 18 20 23 44 41 25 Very conservative 6 16 4 1 8 9 10 23 19 11 Moderate; liberal 8 9 6 7 8 7 10 11 10 8 50 or less 14 16 12 13 14 13 14 17 18 14 More than 50 11 29 9 7 20 17 20 38 34 20 Democratic 46 22 46 52 30 34 38 15 17 32 Conservative 4 4 5 5 6 4 4 2 3 3 White 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Moderate 11 11 12 13 7 10 12 10 7 11 Liberal 30 7 29 32 17 19 21 4 7 17 Minority 14 8 13 12 14 10 12 7 6 10 50 or less 24 8 23 22 18 18 19 6 6 15 More than 50 22 14 23 30 12 16 20 10 11 17 Unaffiliated; other 29 33 33 27 37 36 27 30 31 33 Conservative 4 14 4 3 7 7 6 14 13 8 Moderate 12 14 14 13 18 15 12 15 15 15 Liberal 14 4 14 11 11 12 7 1 3 9 50 or less 16 17 20 8 26 26 17 9 15 18 More than 50 14 16 14 20 10 10 11 20 16 15Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Vote history General 2010 72 74 72 76 60 68 78 79 76 72 General 2012 87 95 90 91 85 88 94 95 92 90 General 2014 83 85 78 85 80 78 82 92 90 83 All 3 61 71 62 68 56 59 69 78 73 65 Primary voter 38 49 38 43 31 37 42 55 50 42 Republican 13 35 12 11 20 18 21 45 39 24 Democratic 25 14 27 32 12 18 21 11 11 19 Other 4 2 5 2 4 6 5 1 3 4Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-798
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Party affiliation by ideology & age
Republican 36 36 36 37 100 27 37 41 40 35 Conservative 27 26 26 28 78 19 27 30 30 25 Very conservative 13 11 12 14 41 7 12 16 15 11 Moderate; liberal 8 9 9 9 21 4 11 10 11 8
50 or less 11 14 12 10 27 18 19 2 10 14 More than 50 25 22 24 27 73 9 19 39 30 20 Democratic 35 33 34 35 100 31 29 39 34 32 Conservative 3 3 4 3 10 2 3 6 3 3 White 2 2 2 2 8 1 6 2 2 Moderate 11 12 10 10 32 10 9 14 9 11 Liberal 20 18 20 21 56 18 17 17 22 17 Minority 8 10 9 8 25 12 7 10 7 10 50 or less 15 15 16 14 33 24 15 4 11 15 More than 50 21 18 19 22 67 7 14 34 23 17 Unaffiliated; other 29 31 30 27 42 33 20 26 33 Conservative 10 8 9 11 7 9 9 8 8 Moderate 13 15 12 11 18 16 8 13 15 Liberal 6 7 8 5 15 8 3 5 9 50 or less 12 16 15 11 30 19 1 7 18 More than 50 16 15 15 17 12 14 19 19 15Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Vote history General 2010 100 78 79 100 90 94 42 83 97 89 72 General 2012 97 100 93 100 99 100 74 99 100 97 90 General 2014 91 86 100 100 99 97 68 86 98 96 83 All 3 90 72 79 100 88 91 30 77 95 86 65 Primary voter 54 47 50 58 100 100 20 45 70 60 42 Republican 29 26 28 32 100 10 27 37 35 24 Democratic 24 21 22 26 100 10 18 33 26 19 Other 2 10 1 0 1 4Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-799
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Years registered to vote Less than 10 39 36 37 37 36 29 36 35 10 to 24 39 39 41 46 30 42 37 40 25 or more 22 25 22 17 34 29 27 25
Mean 16 17 16 15 19 19 19 17Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 24 11 Greeley (Weld County) 24 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 7 Denver & Collar counties 42 100 100 100 100 56 Denver County 20 43 11 Collar counties 42 80 100 100 57 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 100 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 75 11
Pueblo County 25 4 Plains 2 23 4 West Slope 31 77 14 Drill permit county 100 14 18 30 36 19Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 53 66 100 30
Arapahoe County 19 24 37 11 Douglas County 12 15 22 7 Jefferson County 22 27 41 12 Denver County 20 43 11 Balance of state 100 27 34 57 100 100 59Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-800
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchYears registered to vote Less than 10 37 39 31 36 34 39 27 34 35 10 to 24 40 43 41 37 27 39 54 40 40 25 or more 22 18 28 27 39 22 18 26 25
Mean 17 16 18 19 21 16 17 17 17Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 30 3 8 21 15 11 Greeley (Weld County) 12 3 10 5 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 18 3 5 11 9 7 Denver & Collar counties 98 97 18 74 76 29 30 56 Denver County 22 46 4 3 11 Collar counties 75 97 18 28 72 26 30 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 10 19 13 14 9 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 13 12 7 8 11
Pueblo County 10 6 2 7 2 4 Plains 1 1 10 29 1 0 7 14 4 West Slope 2 3 33 71 2 2 29 31 14 Drill permit county 16 20 28 24 3 22 28 17 19Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 59 76 19 49 13 23 30
Arapahoe County 22 28 9 19 4 5 11 Douglas County 13 17 1 9 6 10 7 Jefferson County 24 31 9 21 4 8 12 Denver County 22 46 4 3 11 Balance of state 19 24 100 100 35 47 84 77 59Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-801
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Years registered to vote Less than 10 36 33 68 22 17 53 18 50 19 35 10 to 24 42 39 31 55 30 45 39 44 34 40 25 or more 22 28 1 23 53 2 43 5 46 25
Mean 17 18 8 18 26 11 24 11 23 17Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 10 12 12 14 7 13 8 14 11 11 Greeley (Weld County) 5 4 5 6 2 7 3 6 3 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 6 8 7 9 5 6 5 8 8 7 Denver & Collar counties 56 56 57 58 51 56 55 65 49 56 Denver County 10 12 10 11 13 8 13 13 11 11 Collar counties 46 44 47 47 39 48 43 52 37 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 14 16 14 11 21 10 18 14 17 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 12 11 9 14 7 12 13 12 11
Pueblo County 4 4 3 3 7 3 5 1 6 4 Plains 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 2 6 4 West Slope 16 12 14 12 15 17 14 4 17 14 Drill permit county 21 17 19 19 18 28 14 15 19 19Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties29 30 35 31 22 30 28 43 20 30
Arapahoe County 11 11 15 9 10 12 10 16 7 11 Douglas County 7 6 5 8 6 6 8 8 5 7 Jefferson County 11 13 15 14 7 12 10 18 9 12 Denver County 10 12 10 11 13 8 13 13 11 11 Balance of state 61 58 55 58 65 62 60 44 68 59Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-802
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Years registered to vote Less than 10 30 35 37 35 32 33 35 10 to 24 44 39 59 62 30 32 40 25 or more 25 25 3 3 37 35 25
Mean 17 18 12 12 20 20 17Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 14 11 16 18 8 9 11 Greeley (Weld County) 6 4 9 10 2 3 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 8 7 7 8 6 7 7 Denver & Collar counties 53 56 60 59 55 55 56 Denver County 16 10 9 9 11 12 11 Collar counties 37 46 51 49 44 43 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 21 14 12 13 19 16 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 11 9 9 15 12 11
Pueblo County 10 2 3 4 4 4 4 Plains 1 5 5 5 3 4 4 West Slope 10 14 6 5 14 16 14 Drill permit county 21 18 20 20 18 18 19Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 23 31 37 36 29 27 30
Arapahoe County 8 12 12 11 11 11 11 Douglas County 3 8 9 10 7 6 7 Jefferson County 12 12 16 15 11 11 12 Denver County 16 10 9 9 11 12 11 Balance of state 60 59 54 55 60 61 59Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-803
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Years registered to vote Less than 10 34 40 30 35 38 30 35 10 to 24 37 28 43 43 42 45 40 25 or more 29 31 27 22 21 24 25
Mean 18 18 18 17 17 18 17Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 13 14 12 10 9 11 11 Greeley (Weld County) 7 6 7 3 3 2 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 6 8 5 7 6 9 7 Denver & Collar counties 46 48 45 63 62 65 56 Denver County 10 11 9 12 8 19 11 Collar counties 36 37 36 51 54 46 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 17 14 19 13 13 13 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 11 4 15 11 12 9 11
Pueblo County 6 10 4 2 1 4 4 Plains 7 10 5 2 3 1 4 West Slope 16 13 18 12 13 10 14 Drill permit county 25 26 25 14 16 11 19Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 21 18 23 36 38 31 30
Arapahoe County 9 7 10 12 14 9 11 Douglas County 5 6 4 8 8 7 7 Jefferson County 7 5 9 16 16 15 12 Denver County 10 11 9 12 8 19 11 Balance of state 68 70 67 52 54 50 59Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-804
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KYears registered to vote Less than 10 65 27 20 35 24 37 16 35 10 to 24 24 45 49 41 48 47 32 40 25 or more 10 28 31 25 28 16 52 25
Mean 10 19 21 18 19 15 27 17Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 14 11 6 11 15 10 8 11 Greeley (Weld County) 5 5 4 3 7 6 3 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 9 6 3 8 7 4 5 7 Denver & Collar counties 58 56 35 61 68 61 49 56 Denver County 9 11 9 10 16 13 14 11 Collar counties 50 44 27 51 52 48 35 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 16 15 29 11 7 13 22 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 12 20 9 7 11 12 11
Pueblo County 6 4 9 2 2 9 4 Plains 2 5 9 5 1 4 5 4 West Slope 10 14 20 12 9 11 17 14 Drill permit county 14 20 22 21 15 20 21 19Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 39 28 14 34 35 32 18 30
Arapahoe County 16 9 6 12 10 11 8 11 Douglas County 2 8 2 7 14 7 3 7 Jefferson County 21 11 6 15 11 15 7 12 Denver County 9 11 9 10 16 13 14 11 Balance of state 52 60 78 56 49 55 67 59Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-805
Employment & sector dependency
Family energy dependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Years registered to vote Less than 10 33 34 26 30 39 35 34 36 35 10 to 24 37 42 47 44 36 41 42 39 40 25 or more 29 24 26 26 25 24 24 25 25
Mean 18 18 19 18 17 17 17 18 17Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 14 10 16 5 10 17 16 6 11 Greeley (Weld County) 3 5 4 3 2 8 7 2 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 11 5 11 2 9 10 9 4 7 Denver & Collar counties 52 56 58 62 64 46 55 58 56 Denver County 14 8 8 10 14 10 14 9 11 Collar counties 39 48 50 52 50 36 41 49 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 24 10 10 14 12 18 6 22 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 15 9 10 11 8 14 4 17 11
Pueblo County 9 1 3 4 4 2 6 4 Plains 3 6 5 5 2 5 5 4 4 West Slope 7 18 11 14 11 14 18 10 14 Drill permit county 12 21 19 19 11 24 24 14 19Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties30 30 32 33 35 22 27 32 30
Arapahoe County 11 11 12 12 15 6 11 11 11 Douglas County 5 8 6 5 8 7 6 7 7 Jefferson County 14 12 13 16 12 8 11 14 12 Denver County 14 8 8 10 14 10 14 9 11 Balance of state 56 62 60 57 51 68 58 59 59Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-806
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Years registered to vote Less than 10 26 21 30 38 34 42 35 10 to 24 43 46 41 40 42 38 40 25 or more 31 33 29 22 23 20 25
Mean 20 21 19 17 18 15 17Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 14 20 10 10 11 8 11 Greeley (Weld County) 5 6 4 4 8 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 9 14 5 5 3 8 7 Denver & Collar counties 49 39 56 60 60 61 56 Denver County 4 3 4 16 16 15 11 Collar counties 45 35 51 45 44 46 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 18 19 17 13 13 14 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 14 17 13 9 8 11 11
Pueblo County 4 3 4 4 5 3 4 Plains 6 5 6 3 5 1 4 West Slope 14 18 12 13 11 16 14 Drill permit county 17 15 18 20 25 14 19Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 33 27 37 28 23 33 30
Arapahoe County 13 10 15 10 7 14 11 Douglas County 9 9 10 5 4 7 7 Jefferson County 11 8 13 13 12 13 12 Denver County 4 3 4 16 16 15 11 Balance of state 63 70 58 56 61 52 59Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-807
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffYears registered to vote Less than 10 27 26 44 27 38 48 34 31 36 40 35 10 to 24 43 43 41 44 44 40 36 34 39 38 40 25 or more 30 30 15 29 18 12 30 35 25 22 25
Mean 19 20 15 19 16 14 18 20 17 16 17Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 16 14 11 16 14 8 7 4 9 8 11 Greeley (Weld County) 7 4 5 7 8 4 2 4 3 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 9 9 6 9 6 4 6 9 5 7 Denver & Collar counties 49 47 57 48 54 60 62 65 61 61 56 Denver County 5 3 9 5 12 11 19 17 22 16 11 Collar counties 43 45 48 43 42 49 43 49 39 46 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 17 18 17 17 17 16 11 11 11 13 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 14 15 11 14 11 11 7 6 8 9 11
Pueblo County 2 3 5 3 6 6 4 5 3 4 4 Plains 6 6 3 5 5 4 3 5 1 4 4 West Slope 13 14 12 13 11 11 16 15 17 14 14 Drill permit county 17 15 21 18 21 19 19 29 11 19 19Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 32 33 33 32 28 34 24 19 28 28 30
Arapahoe County 9 10 14 10 11 14 10 9 11 11 11 Douglas County 11 13 5 9 3 7 3 3 4 5 7 Jefferson County 13 11 13 12 14 14 10 7 14 12 12 Denver County 5 3 9 5 12 11 19 17 22 16 11 Balance of state 62 64 58 63 60 55 57 64 50 56 59Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-808
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Years registered to vote Less than 10 31 22 41 46 36 31 44 15 56 28 54 15 35 10 to 24 42 44 46 35 36 36 53 37 43 39 39 34 40 25 or more 26 33 12 19 27 32 3 48 1 33 7 51 25
Mean 19 20 15 14 18 19 12 25 10 21 11 25 17Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 14 17 9 13 7 7 19 13 10 13 12 3 11 Greeley (Weld County) 4 9 7 4 3 1 13 2 4 6 2 1 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 10 8 3 9 5 6 6 11 5 7 10 2 7 Denver & Collar counties 56 41 57 58 55 68 45 51 67 45 68 57 56 Denver County 8 2 7 12 17 21 5 6 6 14 21 17 11 Collar counties 48 39 50 45 37 48 40 45 61 32 47 40 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 11 23 16 17 14 9 18 16 15 18 3 19 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 19 11 11 8 7 15 14 13 9 3 12 11
Pueblo County 1 4 5 6 6 2 3 2 3 9 7 4 Plains 5 7 5 2 2 4 4 7 3 4 1 5 4 West Slope 15 11 12 11 21 13 14 12 5 20 16 17 14 Drill permit county 16 18 21 21 28 12 21 14 20 22 23 15 19Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties32 32 38 28 14 31 31 33 45 18 30 17 30
Arapahoe County 10 7 14 14 8 11 4 12 23 2 11 8 11 Douglas County 9 12 7 3 3 4 9 11 7 3 5 2 7 Jefferson County 13 12 17 10 3 16 17 9 14 13 14 7 12 Denver County 8 2 7 12 17 21 5 6 6 14 21 17 11 Balance of state 59 66 56 60 69 48 65 61 49 69 48 65 59Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-809
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Years registered to vote Less than 10 40 26 44 20 19 34 40 24 35 10 to 24 39 42 40 33 46 39 39 47 40 25 or more 21 32 16 47 35 27 21 29 25
Mean 16 20 14 24 22 18 16 19 17Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 10 13 13 11 8 13 10 10 11 Greeley (Weld County) 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 8 7 8 7 4 8 5 6 7 Denver & Collar counties 61 47 57 45 59 56 63 41 56 Denver County 14 4 11 7 13 12 12 5 11 Collar counties 47 43 46 38 46 43 50 36 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 13 20 15 18 14 12 14 27 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 13 12 11 11 11 9 18 11
Pueblo County 3 7 3 7 3 1 5 9 4 Plains 3 6 3 7 3 5 3 5 4 West Slope 13 15 12 19 16 15 10 17 14 Drill permit county 17 19 18 17 26 18 20 20 19Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 33 26 31 24 28 28 35 21 30
Arapahoe County 15 6 10 11 13 12 13 3 11 Douglas County 7 7 7 4 9 6 9 3 7 Jefferson County 12 13 15 10 7 10 13 15 12 Denver County 14 4 11 7 13 12 12 5 11 Balance of state 53 70 58 69 58 59 53 73 59Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-810
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Years registered to vote Less than 10 29 40 37 30 29 38 32 35 34 33 35 10 to 24 40 40 43 40 42 39 46 40 37 42 40 25 or more 31 21 21 30 29 23 22 26 29 25 25
Mean 20 16 16 19 19 17 17 18 18 18 17Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 15 9 10 16 16 9 14 14 15 11 11 Greeley (Weld County) 8 1 3 8 8 2 6 6 6 5 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 6 8 7 8 8 7 8 7 9 6 7 Denver & Collar counties 51 57 58 48 51 57 60 50 54 53 56 Denver County 9 15 13 6 9 14 12 10 11 13 11 Collar counties 43 42 45 42 42 43 47 40 44 40 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 13 17 14 17 12 19 14 15 12 16 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 12 12 12 9 13 11 9 9 13 11
Pueblo County 2 5 2 5 3 5 3 6 4 3 4 Plains 6 2 3 5 5 3 5 4 4 3 4 West Slope 15 15 14 14 16 13 7 18 14 16 14 Drill permit county 21 18 19 21 22 17 22 22 23 19 19Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 30 23 28 30 32 24 24 29 27 27 30
Arapahoe County 12 7 11 10 12 9 8 10 9 9 11 Douglas County 8 4 6 8 9 5 4 8 8 5 7 Jefferson County 11 12 11 12 12 10 13 11 10 13 12 Denver County 9 15 13 6 9 14 12 10 11 13 11 Balance of state 61 62 58 64 59 62 63 61 62 60 59Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-811
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsYears registered to vote Less than 10 25 24 25 42 43 29 27 40 35 10 to 24 43 46 41 38 39 41 43 40 40 25 or more 32 30 34 20 18 30 29 20 25
Mean 20 19 20 16 15 20 18 16 17Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 17 22 13 8 6 11 7 20 11 Greeley (Weld County) 9 10 9 1 4 2 11 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 8 12 4 6 6 6 5 10 7 Denver & Collar counties 54 51 56 62 52 55 63 57 56 Denver County 15 13 16 8 8 12 12 12 11 Collar counties 39 39 40 55 44 43 51 45 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 12 12 12 19 16 15 21 12 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties)10 7 11 14 11 13 10 9 11
Pueblo County 3 5 1 5 5 1 11 3 4 Plains 4 4 5 2 7 4 1 4 4 West Slope 13 11 14 9 19 16 8 7 14 Drill permit county 22 28 18 15 17 20 15 21 19Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 24 21 27 41 27 27 41 30 30
Arapahoe County 8 7 9 12 15 9 17 8 11 Douglas County 5 4 6 10 5 8 6 6 7 Jefferson County 11 10 12 18 7 10 19 16 12 Denver County 15 13 16 8 8 12 12 12 11 Balance of state 61 66 58 52 65 61 47 58 59Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-812
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Years registered to vote Less than 10 35 29 46 24 39 33 39 35 10 to 24 32 50 36 44 37 42 44 40 25 or more 34 20 18 32 24 26 17 25
Mean 19 17 14 21 17 19 15 17Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 13 13 7 13 9 15 5 11 Greeley (Weld County) 8 5 3 3 4 1 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 5 8 7 10 6 11 4 7 Denver & Collar counties 51 57 67 45 60 52 66 56 Denver County 9 15 10 2 9 14 12 11 Collar counties 42 42 57 42 51 38 54 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 17 18 9 14 15 11 13 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 14 13 9 5 12 9 4 11
Pueblo County 3 5 1 8 3 2 9 4 Plains 6 3 2 8 5 4 5 4 West Slope 14 8 15 21 11 18 11 14 Drill permit county 20 17 14 29 20 17 14 19Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties32 29 34 23 28 30 45 30
Arapahoe County 13 11 12 5 11 8 27 11 Douglas County 9 3 9 5 7 4 6 7 Jefferson County 10 15 13 14 11 18 12 12 Denver County 9 15 10 2 9 14 12 11 Balance of state 59 56 56 74 63 56 43 59Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-813
Regulators know technical rules
O&G development growing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeYears registered to vote Less than 10 34 35 36 34 37 33 35 10 to 24 40 39 42 40 39 41 40 25 or more 26 26 22 26 24 26 25
Mean 18 17 16 18 17 18 17Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 13 10 23 7 17 9 11 Greeley (Weld County) 7 2 10 2 9 3 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 7 8 13 5 8 6 7 Denver & Collar counties 63 50 58 54 53 57 56 Denver County 12 13 12 11 8 12 11 Collar counties 51 37 45 43 44 45 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 12 18 10 17 7 18 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 10 12 8 12 6 13 11
Pueblo County 2 6 2 4 1 5 4 Plains 4 4 1 5 6 4 4 West Slope 8 19 8 16 18 12 14 Drill permit county 21 16 28 15 34 13 19Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 35 22 20 32 16 35 30
Arapahoe County 10 12 8 12 9 11 11 Douglas County 10 3 3 8 4 8 7 Jefferson County 15 7 8 12 3 16 12 Denver County 12 13 12 11 8 12 11 Balance of state 53 65 68 57 76 53 59Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-814
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setYears registered to vote Less than 10 33 35 31 40 35 33 39 35 10 to 24 40 41 39 38 48 40 39 40 25 or more 26 24 30 23 18 27 22 25
Mean 18 17 19 16 16 18 16 17Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 12 10 16 9 5 12 11 11 Greeley (Weld County) 6 2 9 0 6 4 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 6 9 7 8 5 6 7 7 Denver & Collar counties 54 58 50 58 64 57 54 56 Denver County 9 15 8 16 13 9 11 11 Collar counties 46 42 42 42 51 48 43 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 13 18 13 23 11 18 14 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 9 14 10 18 7 12 11 11
Pueblo County 4 3 3 5 4 6 3 4 Plains 6 2 5 3 5 6 3 4 West Slope 15 12 16 7 16 7 19 14 Drill permit county 21 15 23 16 11 18 20 19Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties32 27 29 23 38 34 25 30
Arapahoe County 13 9 13 8 10 12 10 11 Douglas County 8 5 5 4 12 7 6 7 Jefferson County 11 13 11 11 17 15 10 12 Denver County 9 15 8 16 13 9 11 11 Balance of state 60 58 63 61 49 57 64 59Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-815
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityYears registered to vote Less than 10 35 36 34 35 32 37 35 10 to 24 40 39 41 40 43 40 40 25 or more 25 25 24 25 25 23 25
Mean 18 17 18 17 18 17 17Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 13 10 12 11 16 8 11 Greeley (Weld County) 6 3 6 3 7 2 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 7 7 5 8 8 6 7 Denver & Collar counties 58 54 53 57 55 58 56 Denver County 10 10 8 14 8 12 11 Collar counties 48 44 45 44 46 46 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 17 15 15 16 16 16 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 12 12 13 10 13 11 11
Pueblo County 5 3 2 6 3 5 4 Plains 4 5 5 3 5 3 4 West Slope 8 16 16 12 9 16 14 Drill permit county 20 17 23 16 18 19 19Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties30 30 29 29 34 28 30
Arapahoe County 11 11 10 11 12 11 11 Douglas County 6 6 8 5 9 5 7 Jefferson County 13 12 11 13 13 12 12 Denver County 10 10 8 14 8 12 11 Balance of state 60 60 63 57 58 60 59Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-816
Local Control (simplified)
Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoYears registered to vote Less than 10 35 32 36 33 39 40 32 24 29 35 10 to 24 43 38 43 43 39 39 48 42 40 40 25 or more 22 30 21 24 22 22 20 35 31 25
Mean 16 19 16 17 16 16 17 21 19 17Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 10 12 9 6 17 11 10 16 15 11 Greeley (Weld County) 4 5 4 6 4 5 9 6 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 7 7 5 6 11 7 5 6 8 7 Denver & Collar counties 55 55 56 55 49 58 62 52 53 56 Denver County 12 10 12 11 7 11 13 12 9 11 Collar counties 43 45 44 44 42 47 49 40 44 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 15 16 16 15 19 15 10 15 14 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties)13 11 13 13 14 11 8 10 10 11
Pueblo County 3 5 4 2 5 4 2 5 4 4 Plains 4 5 3 6 5 3 1 6 6 4 West Slope 15 13 16 19 9 13 17 12 13 14 Drill permit county 21 16 19 17 16 17 24 23 18 19Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 26 30 27 23 33 33 35 27 33 30
Arapahoe County 9 13 9 8 16 13 12 9 13 11 Douglas County 6 6 5 1 4 7 10 9 9 7 Jefferson County 11 11 13 13 13 13 13 9 12 12 Denver County 12 10 12 11 7 11 13 12 9 11 Balance of state 62 59 61 66 60 56 52 61 58 59Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-817
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Years registered to vote Less than 10 20 28 28 16 15 18 100 16 35 10 to 24 46 44 42 47 46 38 100 46 40 25 or more 34 28 30 36 39 44 100 37 25
Mean 21 19 19 22 23 23 5 17 36 22 17Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Geographic area I Greeley-Ft Collins 11 12 12 12 15 7 10 14 9 11 11 Greeley (Weld County) 4 5 4 4 7 1 4 7 2 4 5 Ft Collins (Larimer County) 7 7 8 8 9 6 6 8 7 7 7 Denver & Collar counties 56 55 56 55 48 62 59 54 55 55 56 Denver County 12 12 11 12 5 21 11 8 16 13 11 Collar counties 44 43 44 43 43 41 48 45 39 41 45 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 13 15 14 13 16 12 13 16 17 15 15 Colorado Springs (El Paso,
Teller Counties) 9 11 11 9 14 8 11 10 13 10 11
Pueblo County 4 4 3 4 2 4 2 5 4 5 4 Plains 4 4 5 4 7 5 4 4 5 5 4 West Slope 17 14 14 17 14 14 15 12 14 14 14 Drill permit county 19 20 17 18 17 10 21 18 16 16 19Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Geographic area II Arapahoe, Douglas, &
Jefferson Counties 30 27 31 30 33 25 32 34 20 28 30
Arapahoe County 10 10 12 11 11 7 15 10 7 8 11 Douglas County 7 6 7 7 10 5 5 10 3 7 7 Jefferson County 13 11 12 13 12 14 12 14 10 13 12 Denver County 12 12 11 12 5 21 11 8 16 13 11 Balance of state 59 61 58 58 62 53 58 57 64 59 59Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-818
Geographic area TotalDrill Denver+ Denver Arap- Adams/ CO West
permit Collar Collar ahoe/ Broom- Springs- slope;county counties counties Douglas/ field/ Pueblo Plains
Jeffer- Boulder/son Denver
Media market Denver 78 100 100 100 100 51 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 100 15 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 16 24 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 5 10 2Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Metro area Metro 83 100 100 100 100 100 24 87 Micro 7 35 6 Rural 10 41 7Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 83 100 100 100 100 100 24 87 Boulder 12 15 26 7 Colorado Springs 75 11 Denver-Aurora 42 88 85 100 74 7 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 7 Grand Junction 16 17 3 Greeley 24 5 Pueblo 25 4 Micropolitan areas 7 35 6 Canon City 7 1 Durango 5 6 1 Edwards 10 2 Fort Morgan 2 2 0 Montrose 5 1 Silverthorne 2 0 Sterling 2 0 Rural 10 41 7Number of cases 95 281 225 149 132 75 89 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-819
MSA Size of place TotalDenver- Denver Other Rural+ Urban Suburban Medium, Rural,Aurora suburbs Micro- small farm,
politan town ranchMedia market Denver 100 100 68 58 78 85 68 71 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 17 19 20 13 18 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 11 9 2 2 10 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 5 13 4 5 2Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Metro area Metro 100 100 65 99 99 72 63 87 Micro 16 46 1 0 17 12 6 Rural 19 54 0 11 25 7Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 100 100 65 99 99 72 63 87 Boulder 18 8 6 10 4 7 Colorado Springs 13 12 7 8 11 Denver-Aurora 100 100 67 70 19 34 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 18 3 5 11 9 7 Grand Junction 8 2 2 8 1 3 Greeley 12 3 10 5 5 Pueblo 10 6 2 7 2 4 Micropolitan areas 16 46 1 0 17 12 6 Canon City 3 9 1 2 4 1 Durango 3 7 3 1 1 Edwards 5 14 6 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 3 1 2 0 Montrose 2 6 2 2 1 Silverthorne 1 3 2 0 Sterling 1 3 0 1 1 0 Rural 19 54 0 11 25 7Number of cases 252 196 194 67 96 198 118 76 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-820
Sex Age Sex & age TotalMale Female 40 or 41-60 More Male Male Female Female
less than 60 18-50 51+ 18-50 51+Media market Denver 76 76 77 83 67 80 73 83 71 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 16 19 17 13 24 13 20 16 21 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 4 5 3 6 5 5 1 6 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 2Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Metro area Metro 84 89 87 87 85 84 85 95 84 87 Micro 7 6 7 5 7 6 7 4 7 6 Rural 9 6 6 7 8 10 7 1 9 7Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 84 89 87 87 85 84 85 95 84 87 Boulder 8 6 5 7 8 6 10 3 8 7 Colorado Springs 10 12 11 9 14 7 12 13 12 11 Denver-Aurora 49 52 52 53 45 50 47 62 44 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 6 8 7 9 5 6 5 8 8 7 Grand Junction 4 3 4 2 4 5 3 1 4 3 Greeley 5 4 5 6 2 7 3 6 3 5 Pueblo 4 4 3 3 7 3 5 1 6 4 Micropolitan areas 7 6 7 5 7 6 7 4 7 6 Canon City 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Durango 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 Edwards 3 1 3 2 0 4 1 2 2 Fort Morgan 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Montrose 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 2 0 Sterling 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Rural 9 6 6 7 8 10 7 1 9 7Number of cases 242 260 152 197 153 127 115 114 146 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-821
Ethnicity Household type TotalMinority White; Child 2+ 2+ No child
Anglo (all) adults, adults, (all)child no child
Media market Denver 77 76 81 80 73 74 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 21 17 17 18 20 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 2 5 2 2 5 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 2 2 3 2Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Metro area Metro 89 86 92 92 88 85 87 Micro 6 6 3 3 6 8 6 Rural 4 8 5 4 7 7 7Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 89 86 92 92 88 85 87 Boulder 4 8 6 5 7 8 7 Colorado Springs 10 11 9 9 15 12 11 Denver-Aurora 49 50 56 55 49 49 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 8 7 7 8 6 7 7 Grand Junction 1 4 2 1 4 4 3 Greeley 6 4 9 10 2 3 5 Pueblo 10 2 3 4 4 4 4 Micropolitan areas 6 6 3 3 6 8 6 Canon City 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 Durango 1 2 1 1 Edwards 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 1 0 1 0 Rural 4 8 5 4 7 7 7
Number of cases 100 400 151 135 226 344 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-822
Education TotalNot a HS or Some College 4-year Grad,
college less college grad degree prof.grad (all) school
Media market Denver 72 75 70 80 81 79 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 21 20 22 15 15 14 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 6 5 7 3 2 3 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 1 3 2 3 2Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Metro area Metro 84 83 85 89 87 92 87 Micro 7 13 4 6 7 4 6 Rural 9 5 12 6 7 4 7Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 84 83 85 89 87 92 87 Boulder 4 5 4 9 8 10 7 Colorado Springs 11 4 15 11 12 9 11 Denver-Aurora 45 46 44 55 55 55 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 6 8 5 7 6 9 7 Grand Junction 5 3 6 2 2 2 3 Greeley 7 6 7 3 3 2 5 Pueblo 6 10 4 2 1 4 4 Micropolitan areas 7 13 4 6 7 4 6 Canon City 3 5 1 0 0 1 Durango 2 1 2 1 Edwards 3 5 1 1 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 2 0 0 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Silverthorne 1 1 0 Sterling 1 1 0 0 0 0 Rural 9 5 12 6 7 4 7Number of cases 211 80 131 286 179 108 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-823
Residence & value of home Employment TotalRent, Own Less $200K More Full- Retiredlease (all) than to $400K than time
$200K $400KMedia market Denver 81 75 51 80 92 79 66 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 16 19 36 14 7 16 24 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 2 5 10 4 4 7 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Metro area Metro 91 86 79 87 92 89 83 87 Micro 7 6 7 6 5 5 8 6 Rural 2 8 14 6 3 6 8 7Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 91 86 79 87 92 89 83 87 Boulder 4 7 5 6 11 7 7 7 Colorado Springs 10 12 20 9 7 11 12 11 Denver-Aurora 55 50 30 58 59 55 43 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 9 6 3 8 7 4 5 7 Grand Junction 2 3 7 2 3 4 3 Greeley 5 5 4 3 7 6 3 5 Pueblo 6 4 9 2 2 9 4 Micropolitan areas 7 6 7 6 5 5 8 6 Canon City 2 4 1 1 1 1 Durango 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 Edwards 4 1 1 4 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Montrose 1 2 1 0 2 1 Silverthorne 3 1 0 Sterling 1 1 0 1 0 Rural 2 8 14 6 3 6 8 7Number of cases 83 393 116 165 112 273 122 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-824
Employment & sector dependency
Family energydependence
Know anyone working in oil &
gas Total
Public Private Real None 1%-25% More Yes No(all) estate; than
finance 25%Media market Denver 69 80 79 76 81 73 81 73 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 26 13 15 17 14 20 8 25 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 3 6 5 4 2 6 8 1 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 2Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Metro area Metro 92 83 87 85 88 88 84 88 87 Micro 3 8 3 7 4 7 8 5 6 Rural 5 9 9 8 7 5 8 7 7Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 92 83 87 85 88 88 84 88 87 Boulder 2 9 9 8 9 5 6 7 7 Colorado Springs 15 9 10 11 8 14 4 17 11 Denver-Aurora 51 49 49 56 56 42 49 52 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 11 5 11 2 9 10 9 4 7 Grand Junction 1 4 4 2 1 6 6 0 3 Greeley 3 5 4 3 2 8 7 2 5 Pueblo 9 1 3 4 4 2 6 4 Micropolitan areas 3 8 3 7 4 7 8 5 6 Canon City 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 Durango 1 1 1 2 1 1 Edwards 3 1 4 3 1 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 0 0 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 1 1 0 1 0 0 Rural 5 9 9 8 7 5 8 7 7Number of cases 140 274 79 144 153 163 225 270 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-825
Ideology TotalConser- Very Somewhat Moderate, Moderate Liberalvative conser- conser- liberal(all) vative vative
Media market Denver 74 73 74 78 78 78 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 21 21 21 16 17 15 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 1 2 0 4 2Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Metro area Metro 86 83 89 87 87 86 87 Micro 7 8 6 6 6 5 6 Rural 7 9 5 7 6 8 7Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 86 83 89 87 87 86 87 Boulder 5 3 7 8 9 7 7 Colorado Springs 14 17 13 9 8 11 11 Denver-Aurora 46 38 51 53 52 55 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 9 14 5 5 3 8 7 Grand Junction 4 2 5 3 3 2 3 Greeley 5 6 4 4 8 5 Pueblo 4 3 4 4 5 3 4 Micropolitan areas 7 8 6 6 6 5 6 Canon City 2 1 3 1 2 1 Durango 1 1 1 3 1 Edwards 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 Fort Morgan 0 1 0 1 0 0 Montrose 0 1 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 3 0 Sterling 0 1 0 1 0 0 Rural 7 9 5 7 6 8 7Number of cases 185 76 109 301 159 142 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-826
Party affiliation & ideology TotalGOP Conser- Unaff GOP+ Cons/ Mod/ Dem Cons/ Liberal Dem+(all) vative (all) cons mod lib (all) mod Dem M/L
GOP Unaff Unaff Unaff Dem UnaffMedia market Denver 75 74 74 75 74 74 80 78 82 78 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 20 22 20 20 21 21 13 13 12 16 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 8 2 4 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 2Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Metro area Metro 85 84 90 87 90 87 85 87 85 86 87 Micro 8 9 6 7 4 7 5 6 3 6 6 Rural 7 8 5 6 5 7 10 7 12 9 7Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 84 90 87 90 87 85 87 85 86 87 Boulder 6 6 5 5 5 6 10 14 7 8 7 Colorado Springs 14 15 11 14 11 11 7 6 8 9 11 Denver-Aurora 44 44 53 45 51 54 53 52 56 54 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 9 9 6 9 6 4 6 9 5 7 Grand Junction 2 3 3 4 4 2 4 7 1 3 3 Greeley 7 4 5 7 8 4 2 4 3 5 Pueblo 2 3 5 3 6 6 4 5 3 4 4 Micropolitan areas 8 9 6 7 4 7 5 6 3 6 6 Canon City 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 Durango 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 Edwards 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 2 1 0 Sterling 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 Rural 7 8 5 6 5 7 10 7 12 9 7Number of cases 174 124 165 217 116 119 163 71 88 282 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-827
Party affiliation by sex Party affiliation by age TotalGOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Dem GOP GOP Unaff Unaff Dem Demmale female male female male female 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+ 18-49 50+
Media market Denver 82 68 71 77 76 83 76 74 78 69 91 70 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 12 28 21 18 15 11 21 19 19 21 3 22 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 4 4 5 3 5 5 1 6 2 6 7 4 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 3 2 3 1 2 2 4 4 2Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Metro area Metro 85 85 87 92 81 89 83 86 94 84 89 82 87 Micro 8 8 5 6 6 4 11 6 2 11 3 6 6 Rural 7 7 7 2 13 7 6 8 5 5 8 12 7Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 85 87 92 81 89 83 86 94 84 89 82 87 Boulder 8 3 7 4 9 11 3 8 5 5 6 13 7 Colorado Springs 10 19 11 11 8 7 15 14 13 9 3 12 11 Denver-Aurora 49 39 51 56 45 60 42 46 61 44 62 46 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 10 8 3 9 5 6 6 11 5 7 10 2 7 Grand Junction 3 2 4 3 4 3 1 3 2 5 6 2 3 Greeley 4 9 7 4 3 1 13 2 4 6 2 1 5 Pueblo 1 4 5 6 6 2 3 2 3 9 7 4 Micropolitan areas 8 8 5 6 6 4 11 6 2 11 3 6 6 Canon City 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 Durango 3 2 1 2 4 1 1 Edwards 6 2 2 1 6 1 3 1 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 1 1 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 Silverthorne 3 3 0 Sterling 1 1 1 1 1 0 Rural 7 7 7 2 13 7 6 8 5 5 8 12 7Number of cases 87 87 85 80 70 92 72 103 92 73 77 85 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-828
Direction of things Financial expectations for next
year Overall impression of
government Total
Right Wrong Better Worse Same Favorable Medium, Un-direction track off off mixed favorable
Media market Denver 81 69 78 69 78 80 79 59 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 14 24 17 23 16 15 15 30 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 2 6 3 8 6 3 4 9 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Metro area Metro 87 84 88 76 89 83 91 86 87 Micro 6 7 5 14 3 7 5 6 6 Rural 7 8 7 10 7 10 4 7 7Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 87 84 88 76 89 83 91 86 87 Boulder 6 9 8 4 6 9 5 7 7 Colorado Springs 10 13 12 11 11 11 9 18 11 Denver-Aurora 57 39 50 41 55 47 59 37 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 8 7 8 7 4 8 5 6 7 Grand Junction 2 4 2 2 6 2 3 5 3 Greeley 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 Pueblo 3 7 3 7 3 1 5 9 4 Micropolitan areas 6 7 5 14 3 7 5 6 6 Canon City 1 2 0 5 1 1 1 2 1 Durango 1 1 1 2 1 1 Edwards 1 3 2 5 1 2 2 1 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Montrose 1 1 1 4 0 0 3 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Rural 7 8 7 10 7 10 4 7 7Number of cases 258 189 297 63 113 225 194 84 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-829
Name IDs TotalFav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav Unfav Fav UnfavO&G O&G environ environ frack- frack- banning banning zoning, zoning,
indus- indus- groups groups ing ing things things land landtry try regs. regs.
Media market Denver 76 76 78 74 78 74 78 76 79 77 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 16 18 17 19 15 21 19 17 15 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 6 3 4 6 6 3 2 5 4 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 2 3 2 1 1 3 0 2 2 1 2Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Metro area Metro 85 87 86 87 85 88 89 84 86 86 87 Micro 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 8 6 4 6 Rural 8 8 8 8 8 6 7 9 8 9 7Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 87 86 87 85 88 89 84 86 86 87 Boulder 7 8 7 7 5 9 8 5 7 6 7 Colorado Springs 10 12 12 12 9 13 11 9 9 13 11 Denver-Aurora 46 51 53 43 48 49 52 46 49 50 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 6 8 7 8 8 7 8 7 9 6 7 Grand Junction 5 2 3 4 5 2 2 4 3 3 3 Greeley 8 1 3 8 8 2 6 6 6 5 5 Pueblo 2 5 2 5 3 5 3 6 4 3 4 Micropolitan areas 7 6 6 6 6 6 3 8 6 4 6 Canon City 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 Durango 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 Edwards 2 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Montrose 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 1 1 0 Sterling 1 1 1 0 0 Rural 8 8 8 8 8 6 7 9 8 9 7Number of cases 249 194 280 177 219 215 114 239 227 167 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-830
Read, seen, heard about proposal Gotten most information
from Total
A lot+ A lot Some Little Nothing News TV, Othersome media internet
adsMedia market Denver 78 78 78 75 73 74 73 83 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 15 14 16 20 20 18 21 14 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 7 4 4 3 6 4 3 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 1 2 1 4 2 2 2Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Metro area Metro 88 91 85 93 78 87 95 92 87 Micro 6 3 8 2 9 6 2 3 6 Rural 6 6 6 5 13 7 2 6 7Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 88 91 85 93 78 87 95 92 87 Boulder 8 8 8 6 7 8 2 9 7 Colorado Springs 10 7 11 14 11 13 10 9 11 Denver-Aurora 47 44 49 58 48 49 62 49 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 8 12 4 6 6 6 5 10 7 Grand Junction 4 5 3 3 2 5 3 2 3 Greeley 9 10 9 1 4 2 11 5 Pueblo 3 5 1 5 5 1 11 3 4 Micropolitan areas 6 3 8 2 9 6 2 3 6 Canon City 1 2 0 3 1 1 1 Durango 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Edwards 2 3 2 2 2 Fort Morgan 0 1 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 2 0 Sterling 1 1 1 1 0 Rural 6 6 6 5 13 7 2 6 7Number of cases 230 98 132 155 111 185 73 123 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-831
Most central to own thoughts about oil & gas
Most worries you when thinking about oil & gas
Total
Economic Public Environ- Property Water Neighbor- Toxicimpacts health, mental rights pollution hood, fumes,
safety impacts home spillsthreats
Media market Denver 74 74 82 69 74 80 80 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 20 21 11 18 19 14 16 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 4 3 4 12 5 4 3 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 2Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Metro area Metro 85 92 87 81 89 80 87 87 Micro 8 4 6 7 5 9 4 6 Rural 6 4 8 12 6 11 9 7Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 92 87 81 89 80 87 87 Boulder 4 6 14 4 12 3 4 7 Colorado Springs 14 13 9 5 12 9 4 11 Denver-Aurora 49 52 54 42 49 49 62 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 5 8 7 10 6 11 4 7 Grand Junction 2 2 3 8 4 3 3 3 Greeley 8 5 3 3 4 1 5 Pueblo 3 5 1 8 3 2 9 4 Micropolitan areas 8 4 6 7 5 9 4 6 Canon City 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 Durango 2 1 1 2 1 Edwards 1 3 1 0 3 2 Fort Morgan 1 1 0 1 0 Montrose 1 1 2 0 1 1 Silverthorne 2 4 0 Sterling 1 1 1 0 Rural 6 4 8 12 6 11 9 7Number of cases 114 146 129 59 200 51 71 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-832
Regulators know technical rules
O&G developmentgrowing at alarming
rate
Regularly see signs of O&G development
Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree DisagreeMedia market Denver 83 72 84 73 81 75 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 14 20 11 20 11 20 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 3 4 3 5 5 4 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 0 3 2 2 3 1 2Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Metro area Metro 92 81 93 84 82 88 87 Micro 4 8 3 8 8 5 6 Rural 4 11 4 9 10 6 7Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 92 81 93 84 82 88 87 Boulder 7 8 14 5 14 4 7 Colorado Springs 10 12 8 12 6 13 11 Denver-Aurora 57 43 44 52 39 55 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 7 8 13 5 8 6 7 Grand Junction 3 2 2 3 5 2 3 Greeley 7 2 10 2 9 3 5 Pueblo 2 6 2 4 1 5 4 Micropolitan areas 4 8 3 8 8 5 6 Canon City 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Durango 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Edwards 1 4 1 2 4 1 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 0 0 Montrose 0 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 0 0 1 0 0 0 Rural 4 11 4 9 10 6 7Number of cases 242 203 126 357 140 356 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-833
Environmental extremists
exaggerate dangers
Colorado already has toughest regulations in nation Local control Total
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Unsure Too Sensibletechnical rules can
be setMedia market Denver 78 74 77 71 80 75 76 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 16 19 15 26 14 22 16 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 4 6 2 2 3 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 3 1 1 4 3 2Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Metro area Metro 85 88 86 92 82 89 84 87 Micro 7 6 6 7 6 4 8 6 Rural 8 6 8 1 12 6 8 7Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 88 86 92 82 89 84 87 Boulder 6 9 6 6 9 6 8 7 Colorado Springs 9 14 10 18 7 12 11 11 Denver-Aurora 50 49 46 52 56 51 47 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 6 9 7 8 5 6 7 7 Grand Junction 4 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 Greeley 6 2 9 0 6 4 5 Pueblo 4 3 3 5 4 6 3 4 Micropolitan areas 7 6 6 7 6 4 8 6 Canon City 1 1 0 2 3 1 1 1 Durango 0 2 0 1 3 2 1 Edwards 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 Fort Morgan 1 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 2 1 0 Sterling 1 0 1 1 0 0 Rural 8 6 8 1 12 6 8 7Number of cases 288 202 250 133 116 202 259 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-834
Local control would result in
Telling others whether or not they
can regulate
Push for local control Total
Outright Common Not my My right, Hidden Sincereban sense right responsib agenda
rules ilityMedia market Denver 77 74 75 77 76 74 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 19 18 17 18 19 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 3 6 6 3 3 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 1 2 2 2 1 2 2Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Metro area Metro 91 85 85 88 89 86 87 Micro 5 8 5 7 5 7 6 Rural 4 7 11 5 6 7 7Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 91 85 85 88 89 86 87 Boulder 9 6 8 6 6 8 7 Colorado Springs 12 12 13 10 13 11 11 Denver-Aurora 50 50 46 52 50 51 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 7 7 5 8 8 6 7 Grand Junction 2 4 4 2 2 4 3 Greeley 6 3 6 3 7 2 5 Pueblo 5 3 2 6 3 5 4 Micropolitan areas 5 8 5 7 5 7 6 Canon City 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 Durango 1 1 1 1 2 1 Edwards 2 2 0 3 1 3 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 1 1 0 0 Rural 4 7 11 5 6 7 7Number of cases 177 262 209 272 206 257 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-835
Local Control (simplified) Amendment 75 (Local Control) Total
Favor Oppose Yes Hard Moved Swing Moved Hard No(all) Yes toward toward No (all)
Yes NoMedia market Denver 74 77 75 72 73 77 82 77 76 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 18 18 18 19 22 17 11 18 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 4 4 4 4 5 6 4 5 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 3 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 2Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Metro area Metro 86 86 86 81 88 88 88 86 86 87 Micro 6 7 7 10 5 6 4 5 6 6 Rural 7 7 7 8 6 6 8 9 8 7Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 86 86 86 81 88 88 88 86 86 87 Boulder 7 7 8 12 2 6 6 5 4 7 Colorado Springs 13 11 13 13 14 11 8 10 10 11 Denver-Aurora 50 49 50 47 47 52 57 49 49 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 7 7 5 6 11 7 5 6 8 7 Grand Junction 4 2 3 2 3 4 6 3 3 3 Greeley 4 5 4 6 4 5 9 6 5 Pueblo 3 5 4 2 5 4 2 5 4 4 Micropolitan areas 6 7 7 10 5 6 4 5 6 6 Canon City 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Durango 1 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 Edwards 2 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 3 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 1 1 1 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Silverthorne 1 1 1 0 Sterling 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 Rural 7 7 7 8 6 6 8 9 8 7Number of cases 219 249 247 90 96 282 99 128 223 502
A survey of active voters Colorado statewide A75July 6-10, 2016
Hill Research Consultants Created on Wednesday July 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, pg E-836
Vote history Years registered to vote Most likely voter
Total
Gen Gen Gen All 3 GOP Dem Less 10-24 25 or2010 2012 2014 Prim. Prim. than 10 more
Media market Denver 78 76 77 78 74 79 80 76 73 76 76 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 15 18 17 15 20 15 15 19 19 18 18 Grand Junction-Montrose 5 5 5 6 6 3 3 4 7 4 4 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 2Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Metro area Metro 85 87 86 85 84 83 86 88 86 85 87 Micro 6 6 6 6 9 6 8 5 5 6 6 Rural 9 7 8 9 7 10 6 7 9 9 7Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502
Metropolitan Statistical Area Metropolitan areas 85 87 86 85 84 83 86 88 86 85 87 Boulder 7 7 7 6 6 11 6 5 11 7 7 Colorado Springs 9 11 11 9 14 8 11 10 13 10 11 Denver-Aurora 50 49 50 50 43 53 54 50 45 49 50 Fort Collins-Loveland 7 7 8 8 9 6 6 8 7 7 7 Grand Junction 4 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 2 3 Greeley 4 5 4 4 7 1 4 7 2 4 5 Pueblo 4 4 3 4 2 4 2 5 4 5 4 Micropolitan areas 6 6 6 6 9 6 8 5 5 6 6 Canon City 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 Durango 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 Edwards 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 Fort Morgan 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 Montrose 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 Silverthorne 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 Sterling 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Rural 9 7 8 9 7 10 6 7 9 9 7Number of cases 363 454 417 328 119 94 174 202 126 301 502