med test ii - world resources forum
TRANSCRIPT
SWITCH-Med Programme
is funded by the
European Union
MED TEST II
Carolina Gonzalez & Rachid Nafti14 October 2015
Davos, Switzerland
2
SWITCHMED initiative
Facilitate the shift toward Sustainable
Consumption and Production (SCP) in
the Southern Mediterranean Region
3
What is SWITCH-Med about?
At SWITCH-Med, we build capacity,
implement pilot actions, engage with
policy-makers and create partnerships
toward sustainable consumption and
production in the Mediterranean.
4
SWITCHMED
EU NEAR
SWITCH MED
Policy
Component
Demonstration & Networking
Components
UNIDOUNEP MAP
• UNEP DTIE
• SCPRAC
• UNEP MAP
• UNIDO
• UNEP DTIE
• SCPRAC
Ma
in
contr
acto
rs
Executing
Part
ners N
F
ME
DT
ES
T II
SC
P N
AP
s
GE
/SC
5
www.switchmed.eu
Action Network
6
MED TEST II:outputs, activities and workflow at Regional level
7
TEST approachTransfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies
TEST approach embeds traditional "one-stop improvement" or "audit-
like" approaches to resource efficiency in the system approach, driving
continuous learning and improvement.
TEST Basic Tools:
i) Cleaner Production Assessment (CPA)
ii) Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA)
iii) Core elements of an Environmental Management System (EMS)
and an Energy Management System (EnMS) to sustain
performance.
8
MED TEST IIUpscaling and replicating MED TEST I pilot experience
Objectives: Stimulate the demand and supply of sustainable production services in key manufacturing sectors:
o Strengthen the national capacities of local service providers, which could offer in the future sustainable production integrated services (TEST approach) to industry on a commercial basis;
o Complete industry demonstration projects, consisting in the identification and implementation of sustainable production practices and technologies in key sectors.
o Expose local stakeholders including policy makers to the project’s activities, proving inputs for harmonizing and reinforcing policies, and incentive schemes to support the introduction of resource efficient, clean technologies in industry.
9
Benefits for Service Providers
How to conduct integrated resource efficiency
with :
energy efficiency audits with focus on process
optimization;
environmental management systems for
continuous improvement;
Material flow cost accounting techniques to reveal
the actual economic losses due to inefficient use of
resources
Benchmarking techniques for environmental performance of
industries;
Best practices and eco-innovative technology for specific
industrial sectors;
How to market sustainable production services to industry
10
Increased productivity, reduced operational costs, optimized
investments;
Minimized environmental compliance costs, reduced
business risks and smaller environmental/carbon footprint;
Compliance with international environmental standards for
accessing new markets (global supply chains and export
markets, new green markets, public procurement, etc.);
Secured long-term supply of production inputs: the adoption
of a resource-efficiency strategy can mitigate the effects of
disruptions and price volatility in the raw materials supply chain;
Improved relationship with stakeholders (investors, banks,
regulatory bodies, local communities, consumer associations,
etc.).
Added value for Industry
11
MED TEST II Expected Results
1.Capacity Building
Network of national institutions, service providers (SP) & practitioners/ consultants trained and experienced in implementing UNIDO TEST approach:
Target 15-20 SP
2. Industry Demonstrations
Best practices for resource efficiency and integrated management systems demonstrated and implemented in Industry: Target 130-150
Investment portfolio for cleaner technology transfer tapping existing national financial instruments
3. Dissemination & Replication
National and Regional dissemination of best practices and lessons learned
Roadmaps for market uptake
12
Selected Service Providers -
Contractors
TUNISIA
CNCC (Lead)
CTAA
CETTEX
CETIME
CTC
LEBANON
Industrial Research Institute
(IRI)
LCPC
JORDAN
Royal Scientific Society (RSS) (Lead)
Amman chamber
of Industry
(ACI)
ISRAEL
WEITZ Center (Lead)
Green Targets
SherConsulting
PALESTINE
Palestinian Academy of
Science
(Lead)
Palestinian Polytechnic University
EnvironmentPark
MOROCCO
Fraquemar
(Lead)
Gemtech
MSI Conseil
EGYPT
ENCPC (Lead)
Enviglobe
EWATEC
E-JUST
ALGERIA
CNTPP
13
The business case of
sustainable production in the
MEDITERRANEAN context
14
MED TEST I pilot phase (2009-2012)
Countries: Egypt,
Morocco, Tunisia
Target: Industrial hot spots
on the Med Sea
Funding: GEF, Italian
Government, Private
sector
15
MED TEST I - Results
> 760 RECP measures identified
54% measure PBP < 6 months
75% implementation rate 2012
20 MUSD investment
9.7 M m3 water savings/yr
263 GWh energy savings/yr
Key Figures – Industry demonstrations
Industry Fact sheets:
www.unido.org/MEDTEST
16
Conclusions from MED TEST I
“Significant” and “unexploited” potential for resource efficiency and integrated environmental management in industry of MED
Industry motivation and responsiveness: only 10% discarded measures, above 20 M USD private sector investment
Demonstrations are key to convince local industry that sustainable production is a sound business strategy within their local context
Need to enlarge the base of national service providers to cover future needs for sustainable production services
17
Experience from MED TEST I
Tunisia
18
MED TEST TUNISIA pilot phase 1 (2009-2012)
Target: Industrial hot spots
on the Med Sea
Industrial sectors:
Agribusiness, Textile and
Tanneries
National partners:
Industry technical centres-
CETTEX, CTAA, CNCC
Funding: GEF, Italian
Government, Private
sector
19 19
SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES
Improvement of the material and energy productivity
Reduction of the costs of the products
Decrease of the losses and wastage in production
Application of BEPs and BATS that lead to better
economical and environmental performance
20
TEST Tools for improvement
Identified constraints TEST Tool kit
Need to improve economic & environmental performance
CP
Lack of information system for management of material/energy flows
EMA
Poor environmental management system EMS
Limited human capacities for improvement Training Outsourcing
Lack of strategies and strategic thinking for sustainable development
CSR
21
Achievements
Achievements
Capacity building:
A network of local institutions and experts for implementing TEST
approach (122 trainees)
Demonstration in industry:
• CP, EMS and MFCA introduced and implemented in 15 industrial
enterprises.
•Investment portfolio in CP
•Reduction of pollution in targeted enterprises
Dissemination and replication of TEST
•Publication and dissemination of case studies
•Strategy for replication and sustaining TEST in industry.
22
Summary of achievements in figures
(15 companies)
Item Gains
Investissement 4.5 million US$
Gains 3.3 million US$
Temps de retour sur investissement 1,4 an
Economie d’eau 650000 m3/an
Economie d’énergie 25080 MWh/an
Réduction de DBO5 1610 t/an
Réduction de DCO 2762 t/an
23
Achievements
63%20%
18%
options
réalisés
options
retenues pour
étude
options nonretenues
Total improvements options identified
232
Options implemented after 1 year
63%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
40%
25%
35%
1,5 < TRI < 4 an
0,5 <TRI < 1,5 an
0 < TRI < 0,5 an
Investment 4,456,87 US$
Annual savings 3,286,53 US$
24
Industry Case: GIASMinimized environmental compliance costs,
Optimized investments
Improved relationship with stakeholders
Results: Resource efficiency at the core of
the business strategy
• PROCESS:
• Product losses (-33%), water (-12%), energy (-17%)
• BOD (-93%) – compliance WWTP discharge parameters
• Sustainable Design – new cold storage room (-5% electricity vs.
baseline design)
• MANGEMENT SYSTEMS: upgrade existing ISO14001 and
OHS18001
• ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: (CSR) sign up to the Global
Compact
25
Industry Case: SARTEXCompliance with international standards to access new markets
Secured long term supply of production inputs
Results: Resource efficiency at the core of
the business strategy
• PROCESS:
• water (-10%), energy (-15%) and chemicals (-8%) conservation
measures,
• new process technology for ozone bleaching
• new process technology for eco-dryers (-22% drying cycle, -15%
electricity use)
• ZERO LIQUID WASTE discharge: 70% in process water
recycling
• PRODUCT and VALUE CHAIN: adoption of OEKO-TEX® 100
• MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: implementation of ISO14001 standards
26
Industry Case: TMMImproved productivity,
Minimization of environmental compliance costs
-Energy saving: the installation of a boiler economizer, the insulation of steam and hot
water pipes, the recovery of heat losses from the compressor into the dryer, and the fuel
switch to natural gas ( reduction in thermal energy by 7%)
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: implementation of ISO14001 standard and a CSR program
Results: Resource efficiency in the business strategy
PROCESS:
- Reduced use of salt through punched drumming: facilitating the
elimination of all conservation salt stuck on the skins before the
soaking process. It allows for a 50% reduction of salt in all liquid
effluents, and therefore of chloride, COD and BOD5 loads
- Cold conservation of skins: The installation of a cold chamber (+4°)
for fresh hides storage helps minimize or even completely eliminate
salt as a conservation agent. This option provides for a 15% reduction
in chloride in waste water and savings of 600 t. of solid salt and net
savings of $US 50,000/year, taking into account additional electricity
costs.
27
Lessons learnt
When considering NPO costs, the real environmental costs increase on average by one order of magnitude, which is usually very surprising to industry.
Assessing performance related to the use of inputs and comparing them to industry sector benchmarks and international best practices, often provides a good indication of achievable improvements.
Installing an effective information system on the efficiency of material and energy flows, which helps identify new opportunities for improvement, monitor results and, last but not least, make people accountable for resource efficiency at the point where they influence it.
28
• TEST approach leads to the efficient use of resources andreduction in waste, thus improving enterprise performanceand achieving economical and environmental gains.
• TEST approach reveals the « real cost » of waste byidentifying, quantifying and putting monetary value on «non product output »;
• TEST approach addresses changes at the strategic,managerial and operational levels of the enterprise withthe objective to achieve sustainable development goals.
• TEST approach is flexible and customized for SME needs
• TEST approach aims at building capacity at enterpriselevel for sustainability and continued improvement.
Conclusion
29
Thank you for your attention
www.switchmed.eu
SWITCH-Med Programme
is funded by the
European Union
Contact:
Carolina [email protected]
Industrial Resource Efficiency Unit
UNIDO
Rachid [email protected]
National TEST team leader
Tunisia