med sci monit

2
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Dec 5;19:1109-13. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889412. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: A comparison of hypertensive and normotensive patients. Acar NS, U!an S, "o#ta$ M, %a&a#o'() A, A**oc +, Dinc S. Author information Abstract ac*'ro)nd #oten$ion i$ t&e !o$t co!!on #ro (e! it& $#ina( ane$t&e$ia. "&i$ #ro$#ecti e $t)d ai!ed to co!#are nor!oten$i e and & #erten$i e #atient$ it& re$#ect to t&e &e!od na!ic e ect$ o $#ina( ane$t&e$ia #er or!ed it& & #er aric )#i acaine. Materia( and Met&od$ Si t #atient$ &o ere $c&ed)(ed )nder'o ario)$ e(ecti e o#eration$ )nder $#ina( ane$t&e$ia ere inc()ded into t& $t)d . "&e #atient$ ere $e#arated into 2 'ro)#$: & #erten$i e #atient$ con$tit)t ro)# n730 and nor!oten$i e #atient$ con$tit)ted ro)# N n730 . A ter ()id (oadin', $#ina( ane$t&e$ia a$ #er or!ed it& 3.5 !( 0.5 & #er aric )#i acain De!o'ra#&ic c&aracteri$tic$ and incidence o & #oten$ion and rad cardia ere co!#ared. S $to(ic S , dia$to(ic D , and !ean (ood #re$$)re$ M and &ea rate ere a($o co!#ared e ore and a ter $#ina( ane$t&e$ia. e$)(t$ "&ere $i'ni icant di erence et een t&e 'ro)#$ it& re$#ect to de!o'ra#&ic c&aracter !a i!a( &ei'&t o $en$or (oc*, incidence$ o & #oten$ion and rad cardia, and a!o)nt o ()id$ in )$ed #<0.05 . +n t&e & #erten$i e #atient 'ro)#, t&e S , D M a()e$ ere $i'ni icant( &i'&er t&an in t&e nor!oten$i e #atient 'ro)# at a !ea$)re!ent ti!e$ #=0.05 . o!#ari$on it&in t&e 'ro)#$ did not re ea( an $i'ni icant di erence$ in eit&er 'ro)# co!#ared to t&e a$a( a()e$ #<0.05 . " no $i'ni icant di erence$ in et een or it&in 'ro)#$ #<0.05 . onc()$ion a$ no $i'ni icant di erence et een nor!oten$i e and & #erten$i e #atient$ in incidence$ o & #oten$ion ca)$ed $#ina( ane$t&e$ia it& 0.5 & #er aric )#i acaine. M+D: 24304>44 ? ) Med - in #roce$$@ M +D: M 3862143 Free PMC Article

Upload: rezza-hary

Post on 02-Nov-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

med

TRANSCRIPT

Med Sci Monit.2013 Dec 5;19:1109-13. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889412.Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaricbupivacaine: A comparison of hypertensive and normotensive patients.Acar NS,Uzman S,Toptas M,Vahapoglu A,Akkoc I,Dinc SC.Author informationAbstractBackgroundHypotensionis the most common problem with spinal anesthesia. This prospective study aimed to compare normotensive and hypertensive patients with respect to the hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia performed with hyperbaricbupivacaine. Material and Methods Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo various elective operations under spinal anesthesia were included into the study. The patients were separated into 2 groups: hypertensive patients constituted Group H (n=30) and normotensive patients constituted Group N (n=30). After fluid loading, spinal anesthesia was performed with 3.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaricbupivacaine. Demographic characteristics and incidence ofhypotensionand bradycardia were compared. Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean blood pressures (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were also compared before and after spinal anesthesia. Results There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to demographic characteristics, maximal height of sensory block, incidences ofhypotensionand bradycardia, and the amount of fluids infused (p>0.05). In the hypertensive patient group, the SBP, DBP, and MBP values were significantly higher than in the normotensive patient group at all measurement times (p0.05). There were no significant differences in HR between or within groups (p>0.05). Conclusions There was no significant difference between normotensive and hypertensive patients in the incidences ofhypotensioncaused by spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaricbupivacaine.PMID:24304744[PubMed - in process]PMCID:PMC3862143Free PMC Article