mechanical tests for polymerspolybioskin.eu/polybioskin/files/...tests_jan2020.pdf · the izod test...
TRANSCRIPT
MECHANICAL TESTS
FOR POLYMERSVito Gigante, Laura Aliotta, Luca Panariello, Maria-Beatrice Coltelli, Andrea Lazzeri
WHY TESTING POLYMERS?
❑ Identify the characteristics, properties and
flaws.
❑ Comply with all relevant national and
international standards.
❑ Ensure that your materials meet your clients’
safety, environmental and aging requirements
HOW TO TEST POLYMERS?
Knowledge of the properties of materials is essential for several purposes:
design, specification, quality control, failure analysis and for understanding
the structure and behaviour of new materials
❑ Specific test procedures have been developed
for each type of property to be measured
❑ These procedures are generally those found
best suited to the generic characteristics of the
material class
❑ Standard tests help to provide the most
meaningful results and to allow comparison of
data from different sources
PURPOSE OF TESTING
Approach differences
❑ For quality control, the test should preferably be as simple, rapid and inexpensive as possible. Non-destructive methods
and automation may be particularly attractive. The best tests will additionally relate to product performance.
❑ For predicting product performance the more relevant the test to service conditions the more satisfactory it is likely to be.
Extreme speed and cheapness are less likely to be important but there is a need for test routines which are not
excessively complex. Non-destructive methods may be acceptable.
❑ For producing design data, the need is for tests that give material property data in such a form that they can be applied
with confidence to a variety of configurations. This implies very considerable understanding of the way material properties
vary with geometry, time etc. Extreme speed and cheapness are of relatively minor importance, there is little interest in
non-destructive methods. For complex and long running tests, automation may be desirable.
❑ For investigating failures the first difficulty is to establish what to look for and then the primary need is for a test which
discriminates well (highly sensitive). There is often little need for absolute accuracy or, in some cases, even relevance to
service.
MAIN PROPERTIES TO
EVALUATE - Outline
❑ Tensile
❑ Flexural
❑ Impact
❑ Fracture Toughness
❑ Tearing
❑ Time/Temperature dependant
measurements (HDT, transitions
evaluated with DMTA)
BEFORE THE TEST - HOW TO OBTAIN SAMPLES?
❑ The properties of a material, and
hence the test results, are
dependent on how the material
was formed, not only on whether
there was any cutting or
machining involved but on the
details of mould configuration
and moulding conditions.
❑ Consequently, knowing
exactly how a test
piece was formed is
essential information
for understanding the
significance of the
results
❑ For results to be
comparable it is
essential that a
consistent procedure is
used for the test piece
production.
❑ What kind of “sampling” is better? The
debate is open. Probably to obtain
material properties for use in a data
sheet the preferred approach will be to
mould using standardised procedures
and conditions. For investigations relating
to a product the conditions relevant to
production may be of more interest.
TENSILE TESTS
❑ The short-term tensile characteristics of a material are probably
the most commonly considered of all the properties that can be
determined. Although there are many standards relating to short-
term tensile testing, they all endeavor to quantify a number of
specific characteristics which relate to the strength and
deformation of a material.
❑ Tensile stress-strain characteristics are derived by monitoring both
the force required to pull a material apart and the displacement
that the material undergoes as a result of the applied force at a
constant deformation rate.
TENSILE TESTS - Apparatus & Samples
❑ ISO 527-2 defines specimen to be used for tensile
tests. Types 1A and 1B are standard specimens for
comparable data.
Grips
Load
Cell
Extensometer
❑ Until the relationship between stress and strain is linear up to the failure point and as a consequence the relationship stress/
strain = constant. This constant is known as the elastic modulus of the material and is usually measured in GPa.
❑ Modulus measurement requires for a highly accurate extensometer.
❑ The tensile modulus has to be calculated between two strains, more precisely between 0.05% and 0.25% strain.
❑ It can be calculated as a secant between 2 points or by a linear regression calculation.
Evaluation of Elastic Modulus
Typical stress-strain
curves for polymers
❑ Curve a: Brittle materials
❑ Curve b and c: Tough materials with
yield point
❑ Curve d: Rubber-like behaviour
Properties observed:
❑ Tensile-Modulus
❑ Yielding
❑ Break points
❑ These curves are referred to the
starting section of the sample, this
means that they are the “engineering
stresses and strains”
...more in detail!
Polymers like PLA, PHB,
exhibit type a curves.
Properties allowed to
evaluate:
❑ Tensile modulus
❑ max stress
❑ max strain
Polymers like PBS, exhibit type
b curves:
❑ Modulus, Et
❑ Yield stress, σy
❑ Yield strain, εy
❑ Max stress, σM
❑ Strain at max. stress, εM
❑ Stress at break, σB
❑ Nominal strain at break, εB
Polymers like PLA/PBAT
blends, exhibit type c curves.
Modulus, Et
❑ Yield stress, σy
❑ Yield strain, εy
❑ Max stress, σM
❑ Strain at max. stress, εM
❑ Stress at break, σB
❑ Nominal strain at break,
εB
Polymers like PBAT, exhibit type
D curves. Properties allowed to
evaluate:
❑ Modulus with the elasticity
rubber theory
❑ max stress
❑ max strain
Speed test and sample aspect
❑ Modulus determination has to
be done at lower speed than
the breakage evaluation.
❑ Typical speeds are 1 mm/min
for Modulus, 5 or 50 mm/min
for yielding and stress at break
evaluation.
❑ Tensile modulus and further
tests results can be
determined for at least 5
specimens (reproducibility has
to be guaranteed).
❑ It is preferable to unload the
specimen before testing at a
different speed (at least five
tests for Modulus and five for
the breakage).
❑ The necking appearance is typical of ductile polymers in which both upper and lower
yield points are evident on the curve, which are followed by a near horizontal region.
❑ At the upper yield point, a small neck forms within the gauge section of the specimen.
Within this neck, the chains become oriented (i.e., chain axes become aligned parallel
to the elongation direction) which leads to localized strengthening.
❑ Specimen elongation proceeds by the propagation of this neck region along the gauge
length; the chain orientation phenomenon accompanies this neck extension. This
tensile behavior may be contrasted to that found for ductile metals wherein once a
neck has formed, all subsequent deformation is confined to within the neck region.
Necking development and rate/temperature effect
❑ The mechanical characteristics of polymers are much more sensitive to temperature
changes near room temperature
❑ It should be noted that increasing the temperature produces a decrease in elastic
modulus, a reduction in tensile strength, and an enhancement of ductility. While there
is considerable plastic deformation at both 50 and 60°C.
❑ The influence of strain rate on the mechanical behavior may also be important. In
general, decreasing the rate of deformation has the same influence on the stress–
strain characteristics as increasing the temperature; that is, the material becomes
softer and more ductile.
❑ Flexural stress-strain characteristics are derived by monitoring both the
force required to flex a material and the displacement that the material
undergoes as a result of the applied force at a constant deformation rate.
❑ Flexural tests also have the advantage that a strip test piece is easier to
produce than a dumbbell and there are no gripping problems as can occur
in tensile tests.
❑ The mode of loading can take one of three forms:
❑ Three point
❑ Four point
❑ Simple cantilever
❑ By far the most common is three point loading. As the name implies, this
mode of loading is achieved by applying the force to the specimen at three
points
FLEXURAL PROPERTIES
ASTM D790 - Standard Test Methods for
Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and
Reinforced Plastics
EN ISO 178 - Plastics. Determination of
flexural properties
Common
Standards
3-point
configuration
Flexural
Stress &
Strain
Flexural
Modulus
Flexural stress (σf) = 3Fl/2bh2
Flexural strain (εf) = 6hs/l2
where:l = Support span - the length of the beam between
the centres of the two
outer supporting rods (mm)
h = The thickness of the beam (mm)
b = The width of the beam (mm)
F = Force (N)
s = Deflection of the specimen at mid span (mm)
σf = Flexural stress (N mm-2)
εf = Flexural strain
3-point FLEXURAL PROPERTIES
where slope is the slope of force-deflection
curve between reference strains (0.05% and
0.25% in ISO 178).
Speed & Sample dimensions
❑ A minimum of five test pieces are required by ISO 178
for each direction tested.
❑ The preferred test piece is a strip with the following
dimensions:
❑ Length: l = 80.0 ± 2.0
❑ Width: b = 10.0 ± 0.2
❑ Thickness: h = 4.0 ±
❑ The thickness of the central third of the specimen
length shall not deviate by more than 2 %
❑ The width of the central third of the specimen length
shall not deviate by more than 3%.
❑ The specimen must have a rectangular cross section
with no rounded edges.
❑ The length to thickness ratio shall be 20 (l/h = 20 ± 1)
IMPACT PROPERTIES
❑ Impact properties of plastics
materials are directly related to
the overall toughness of the
material. The concept of
‘toughness’ is the work done in
breaking a test piece or object.
❑ The Impact test is a
standardized high strain-rate
test which determines the
amount of energy absorbed by
a material during fracture.
❑ On molded samples the test is
performed by striking a notched
specimen with a moving mass
(a hammer). On films is
preferred the falling dart
method
❑ The energy absorbed can be
evaluated in Charpy or Izod
configurations (more details in the
following slides), through a
load/displacement curve or
correlated with the tensile
properties on samples .
Charpy Impact test
❑ Standards: ASTM D6110, ISO 179 The test
can be done on notched (V-shape or U-
shape) or unnotched samples
M
hs
hf
ΔE = M*g*(hf-hs)
❑ WHAT IS OBTAINED FROM THE TEST? It is
a balance of mechanical energy! The energy
absorbed by the specimen is proportional to
the difference in height.
❑ Impact resistance is defined as the ability of a
material to absorb energy resulting from a
collision:
Impact strength = IS = ∆𝑬
𝑺𝟎
❑ ΔE is the absorbed energy and S0 is the
resistant section of the specimen (the part not
notched).
❑ Example of Charpy
impact tests. ISO
179 v-notched
samples 80x10x4
mm with 2mm 45°
notch.
Charpy Impact test
3
14
2
1. Control system
2. Pendulum with a final
hummer
3. A fulcrum supported for the
release and the brake of the
hummer
4. Two-point support for the
specimen for the Charpy
configuration
❑ The Izod test is notionally very similar to the Charpy test, except that the test piece is clamped at one end just below
the notch, or the centre of the specimen if it is unnotched, and struck by a pendulum close to the other end.
❑ The standard used for these tests are: EN ISO 180 and ASTM D256.
❑ Unlike the Charpy test, the notched Izod is capable of being tested either with the notch on the same side as the point
of impact, which is the normal way round, or on the opposite side when it is called the reverse notched test. Thus, in
the normal test the side containing the notch is placed under tension and the notch fulfils its purpose as a stress
concentrator.
❑ The hammer swings downward, hits the test material in the middle, at the bottom of its swing, and then is left free at the
top.
❑ It is not applicable to compound materials because of the influence of complicated and inconsistent failure modes.
IZOD test
❑ Energy is required both to create a crack and to allow this
crack to be propagated through the material. The energy to
initiate a crack is called the crack initiation energy. If the
available energy in the system undergoing impact exceeds
the crack initiation energy, the crack will continue to
propagate, and complete failure will occur if the system has
sufficient energy to also exceed the crack propagation
energy.
❑ Four basic types of failure that are encountered under
impact and the result of an impact test may result in
different types of failure:
Fracture types
❑ The distinction between the four types of failures is not
always very clear and some overlapping is quite possible.
❑ For Charpy and Izod tests, for example, the following
definitions along with their letter abbreviations need to be
adopted:
❑ Brittle fracture is where the part fractures
extensively without yielding and typically has sharp
‘glassy’ edges.
❑ Ductile failure is where there is a definite yielding of
material, often indicated by stress whitening, along
with cracking.
❑ C complete break; a break in which the
specimen separates into two or more pieces.
❑ H hinge break; an incomplete break such that
both parts of the specimen are held together
only by a thin peripheral layer in the form of a
hinge having no residual stiffness.
❑ P partial break; an incomplete break that does
not meet the definition for a hinge break.
❑ NB non-break; in the case where there is no
break, and the specimen is only bent, possibly
combined with stress whitening.
Factors that influence fracture
01 02 03Rate of Loading
❑ Low rates of impact,
relatively stiff materials can
still have good impact
strength, but at high enough
rates of impact, even
rubbery materials will exhibit
brittle failure.
❑ All polymer materials seem
to have a critical velocity
above which they behave as
glassy, brittle materials.
Temperature
❑ Decreasing the temperature
tends to promote the onset of
brittle failure.
❑ Note that increasing
temperature has the opposite
effect of increasing speed and
so there is not a single
temperature at which brittleness
occurs, but a locus of
temperature/speed values
where the transition from ductile
to brittle behaviour takes place.
Notch Sensitivity
❑ A sharp corner in a test
specimen can
dramatically lower the
impact strength of the
material.
❑ A notch creates a
localized stress
concentration where the
true stress can be many
times higher than the bulk
stress being imposed on
the test piece or object as
a whole.
Other Impact tests: Instrumented Impact test and falling dart
❑ ISO 17282 at 1m/s on damped notched samples to obtain a load/displacement curve starting from a Charpy Impact test
❑ Falling dart method: films and sheets are
tested in this way, typically 125 mm, as
does the impacting striker. The
standardized tests are given in ISO 7765.
❑ The dart with a 20 mm diameter striker is
released from a preferred height of one
meter. The test piece may be clamped or
unclamped on the support
❑ All the traditional standard stress-
strain tests for plastics have some
limitations because the results are
geometry dependent and they do
not yield fundamental properties.
❑ Fracture mechanics provides a way
of interpreting the material response
independently of geometry through
consideration of the loads or
stresses that cause a crack to
propagate.
❑ The two types of fracture
mechanics, depending on the
fracture behavior of the polymers,
are LEFM and EPFM.
Fracture toughness
Fracture toughness -LEFM
❑ Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) is the basic theory of fracture, that deals with sharp cracks in elastic bodies. It
describes the energy change which occurs when such a body undergoes an increase in crack area.
❑ Fracture mechanics study starts from three-point bending test on SENB specimens.
❑ Properties evaluated: in terms of stress intensity, the critical stress intensity factor, Kc,
is the minimum stress intensity for fracture to occur and, although called a factor, has
units of Pa m0.5.
❑ Gc is the Elastic energy release rate and it is related to Kc through the Elastic Modulus.
❑ Instead to relate Gc and Kc to the measured load or energy requires a calibration factor
which is a function of the crack length and the test piece width (the geometry of the
sample).
Fracture toughness - EPFM.
❑ Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics (EPFM) represents the study of a stable
crack growth and the presence of a plastic zone at the crack tip. The energy
release rate is the Jc , that is the equivalent of Gc for a non-linear elastic
material.
❑ Procedure to evaluate Jc:
❑ Three point bending on SENB samples at different crack growth
❑ Microscopic analysis to evaluate Δa
❑ The energy is measured and Jc determined to give an 'R' curve that is a
power law curve:
❑ The true initiation value of crack propagation is determined when this
line intercepted the crack growth curve:
❑ ISO 6133 states that the two ‘legs’ are gripped in the stationary
and moving grips of a universal testing machine and pulled
apart at 200 or 250 mm/min.
❑ Typically, an irregular wavelike trace results and the standard
defines the tearing force as the mean force after ignoring the
first 20 mm and last 5 mm of the tearing trace. This tearing
force is then normalized by dividing it by the film or sheet
thickness to produce the tearing resistance value.
TEAR PROPERTIES
❑ A common technique to measure the critical fracture energy during fracture of films is trouser tear test. The origin of the
name is correlated to the trouser shape of the samples. The legs of the trouser are pulled in opposite direction to create
the tearing action
TestingCutting
Correctdimensions
Machine & Cross
DirectionSamples
❑ Critical Fracture Energy (N/m) is calculated in two different ways if the
legs are stretched (a) or not (b) during the test. (F is the load, 𝜆 the ratio
lenght, t is the thickness, w is the width, E is the Energy density.)
a) 𝑇 =2λ𝐹
𝑡− 𝑤𝐸
b) 𝑇 =2𝐹
𝑡
TEAR TESTING
❑ HDT is defined as the temperature at which a standard test
bar (ISO 75 - 80x10x4 mm or ASTM D648 - 127x13x3mm)
deflects 0.025 mm under a stated load of either 0.455 or 1.82
MPa.
❑ HDT values are used to compare the elevated temperature
performance of the materials under load at the stated
conditions.
❑ The result is the temperature at which a specified deformation
or penetration is achieved. Four replicate specimens are used
for each test.
❑ Conditioning: 23 ± 2°C and 50 ± 5% RH for not less than 40
hours prior to test.
HEAT DEFLECTION TEMPERATURE
❑ The weight of the rod used to transfer the force on the test specimen is
included as part of the total load.
❑ The load (P) is calculated as: P = 2Sbd2/3, where:
❑ S = Max. stress in the specimen of 0.455 MPa or 1.82 MPa
❑ b = Width of specimen
❑ d = Depth of specimen
❑ L = Width of span between support
❑ The temperature of the medium is measured when the test bar has
deflected 0.25mm (0.010 in).
❑ This temperature is recorded as the deflection temperature under
flexural load of the test specimen.
HDT Apparatus & Procedure
DYNAMIC MECHANICAL THERMAL ANALYSIS (DMTA)
❑ Dynamic Mechanical Thermal
Analysis (DMTA) records material’s
temperature-dependent visco-elastic
properties and determines its
properties by applying an oscillating
force to the sample.
❑ DMTA measures stiffness and damping,
these are reported as modulus and tan delta.
Because of sinusoidal stress is applied,
modulus can be expresesed as in-phase
component, the storage modulus (E‘) and
out of phase component, the loss modulus
(E").
❑ Storage modulus (E’) is a measure of elastic
response of a material. It measures the
stored energy. Being in-phase with the
applied stress, represents the elastic
component of the material’s behaviour
❑ Loss modulus (E") is a measure of viscous
response of a material. It measures the
energy dissipated as heat. It corresponds to
the viscous nature of the material.
❑ Tan delta (tan ) is the ratio between
loss modulus and storage modulus and
it is called damping. It is a measure of
the energy dissipation of a material and
should range between 0° and 90°.
❑ When tan delta is around 0° the
material behaviour is purely
elastic. Otherwise when tan delta
approaches 90°, the material behaviour
is purely viscous.
❑ Compression
❑ Tension
❑ Shear
❑ Torsion
DMTA TYPE OF TESTING
Frequency SweepLo
g E’
,E’’
Frequency
Temperature Sweep
Log
E’,E
’’
Temperature
---E’’E’
❑ Why do E’ and E” vary with frequency and temperature? The chain can alter itsconformation and its entanglements relative to the frequency (or at the temperature) ofthe load.
❑ DMTA analysis can be realized changingfrequency or temperature. In any case four typicalzones can be evaluated for polymers. DMTAgraphs are useful to evaluate polymer transitions.
1. Terminal Zone: Period of oscillation is so long that chains cansnake through their entanglement constraints and completelyrearrange their conformations.
2. Plateau Zone: Strain is accommodated by entropic changes topolymer segments between entanglements, providing goodelastic response.
3. Transition Zone: The periodof oscillation is becoming tooshort to allow for completerearrangement of chainconformation. Enough mobilityis present for substantial frictionbetween chain segments.
4. Glassy Zone: Noconfigurational rearrangementsoccur within the period ofoscillation. Stress response to agiven strain is high (glass-likesolid).
❑ Resistance: ability to resist to an applied force without
fracturing.
❑ Elasticity: the capacity of a material to deform under an
applied load and when it ceases it returns to its original
dimensions.
❑ Plasticity: ability to maintain the deformation imposed.
❑ Ductility: ability of a material to be reduced into wires.
❑ Inelasticity: time-dependent elastic deformation.
❑ Creep: ability of a material to deform permanently. The
deformation degree depends on the load application time
and temperature.
❑ Brittleness: Easiness of a material to break at the
minimum shock. The break occurs with a crash without
warning.
❑ Toughness: ability to resist to a fracture undergoing a
deformation.
❑ Hardness: resistance to abrasion and indentation and,
more in general, to a plastic deformation.
BEFORE TO FINISH…A GLOSSARY OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
http://polybioskin.eu/