mechanical removal of non-native fishes in the colorado river within grand canyon lew coggins,...

23
Mechanical Removal of Non- native Fishes in the Colorado River within Grand Canyon Lew Coggins, Michael Yard, Lew Coggins, Michael Yard, Daniel Gwinn, and Clay Nelson Daniel Gwinn, and Clay Nelson 1 USGS, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center USGS, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Arizona Game and Fish Department

Upload: noel-ball

Post on 30-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Mechanical Removal of Non-native Fishes in the Colorado River

within Grand Canyon

Lew Coggins, Michael Yard, Lew Coggins, Michael Yard, Daniel Gwinn, and Clay NelsonDaniel Gwinn, and Clay Nelson11

USGS, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research CenterUSGS, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center11Arizona Game and Fish DepartmentArizona Game and Fish Department

The Historic Fish Community in Grand CanyonThe Historic Fish Community in Grand Canyon

Humpback Chub (Gila cypha) Bonytail Chub (Gila elegans) Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta)

Colorado Pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius ) Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus )

Flannelmouth Sucker (Catastomus latipinnis) Bluehead Sucker (Catastomus discobulus)Razorback Sucker (Xyrauchen texanus)

Modifications to the Aquatic EcosystemModifications to the Aquatic Ecosystem

The Present Native Fish CommunityThe Present Native Fish Community

Humpback Chub (Gila cypha)Federally Endangered

Bonytail Chub (Gila elegans)Extirpated

Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta)Extirpated

Colorado Pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius ) Extirpated

Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus )Locally Common

Flannelmouth Sucker (Catastomus latipinnis)AZ Species of Special Concern

Bluehead Sucker (Catastomus discobulus)Locally Common

Razorback Sucker (Xyrauchen texanus)Extirpated

The Recent Fish Community in Grand CanyonThe Recent Fish Community in Grand Canyon

2000-2001 Observed Species Composition in the Colorado River Using Electrofishing and Netting Methods

Salmonids80%

Bluehead Sucker

1%

Flannelmouth Sucker

7%

Humpback Chub5%

Speckled Dace1%

Cyprinids6%Centrarchids

0.1%Ictalurids

0.3%

Background and MotivationBackground and MotivationAdult Humpback Chub Abundance (Age 4+)

Year

A

du

lt A

bu

nd

an

ce (

Ag

e 4

+)

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

In 2002, concern for the In 2002, concern for the

downward trend in downward trend in

humpback chub humpback chub Gila cyphaGila cypha

abundance prompted abundance prompted

experimental adaptive experimental adaptive

management actions management actions

including removal of non-including removal of non-

native fishnative fish

Melis et al. 2006

ObjectivesObjectives Evaluate Efficacy of Removing Non-native FishEvaluate Efficacy of Removing Non-native Fish

To what extent can we remove non-native fishes To what extent can we remove non-native fishes from a large reach of the Colorado River?from a large reach of the Colorado River?

Evaluate Effect of Non-native Fish Removal on the Evaluate Effect of Non-native Fish Removal on the Population Dynamics of Native FishesPopulation Dynamics of Native Fishes Will humpback chub recruitment increase as a Will humpback chub recruitment increase as a

result of non-native removal?result of non-native removal?

MethodsMethods

2003 to 2006 - 6 trips/year2003 to 2006 - 6 trips/year Jan, Feb, Mar (Winter)Jan, Feb, Mar (Winter) Jul, Aug, Sep (Summer)Jul, Aug, Sep (Summer)

Sampling Methods:Sampling Methods: ElectrofishingElectrofishing

4-5 pass depletions4-5 pass depletions HoopnettingHoopnetting

Estimate relative Estimate relative abundance of native abundance of native fish (Juveniles).fish (Juveniles).

MethodsMethods

Methods – Data AnalysisMethods – Data Analysis Constructed abundance estimates for rainbow trout using a Constructed abundance estimates for rainbow trout using a

Hierarchical Bayes Removal Model (Dorazio et al 2005).Hierarchical Bayes Removal Model (Dorazio et al 2005). Assumed that site-specific capture probability is drawn Assumed that site-specific capture probability is drawn

from a common Beta distribution.from a common Beta distribution. Prior on capture probability.Prior on capture probability.

Assumed that site-specific abundance is drawn from a Assumed that site-specific abundance is drawn from a common Poisson distribution.common Poisson distribution.

Prior on abundance.Prior on abundance.

I used uninformative (Uniform) hyper-prior distributions.I used uninformative (Uniform) hyper-prior distributions. Model based aggregation of among site dataModel based aggregation of among site data

Allows sites with high measurement error to be informed or “shrunk” Allows sites with high measurement error to be informed or “shrunk” towards the common meantowards the common mean

Results:Results:Efficacy of Removal EffortsEfficacy of Removal Efforts

Results - Electrofishing CatchResults - Electrofishing CatchElectrofishing Species Composition in the LCR Removal Reach

Humpback.ChubFlannelmouth.SuckerBluehead.SuckerSpeckled.DaceCyprinidsCentrarchidsBlack.BullheadChannel.CatfishBrown.TroutRainbow.Trout

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mp

os

itio

n b

y N

um

be

r

Jan

-03

Fe

b-0

3

Ma

r-0

3

Jul-

03

Au

g-0

3

Se

p-0

3

Jan

-04

Fe

b-0

4

Ma

r-0

4

Jul-

04

Au

g-0

4

Se

p-0

4

Jan

-05

Fe

b-0

5

Ma

r-0

5

Jul-

05

Au

g-0

5

Se

p-0

5

Jan

-06

Fe

b-0

6

Ma

r-0

6

Jul-

06

Au

g-0

6

Electrofishing Catch by Species in the LCR Removal Reach

Humpback.ChubFlannelmouth.SuckerBluehead.SuckerSpeckled.DaceCyprinidsCentrarchidsBlack.BullheadChannel.CatfishBrown.TroutRainbow.Trout

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

To

tal C

atc

h (

# o

f F

ish

)

Results - Electrofishing CatchResults - Electrofishing CatchElectrofishing Species Composition in the LCR Removal Reach

Humpback.ChubFlannelmouth.SuckerBluehead.SuckerSpeckled.DaceCyprinidsCentrarchidsBlack.BullheadChannel.CatfishBrown.TroutRainbow.Trout

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mp

os

itio

n b

y M

as

s

Jan

-03

Fe

b-0

3

Ma

r-0

3

Jul-

03

Au

g-0

3

Se

p-0

3

Jan

-04

Fe

b-0

4

Ma

r-0

4

Jul-

04

Au

g-0

4

Se

p-0

4

Jan

-05

Fe

b-0

5

Ma

r-0

5

Jul-

05

Au

g-0

5

Se

p-0

5

Jan

-06

Fe

b-0

6

Ma

r-0

6

Jul-

06

Au

g-0

6

Electrofishing Catch by Species in the LCR Removal Reach

Humpback.ChubFlannelmouth.SuckerBluehead.SuckerSpeckled.DaceCyprinidsCentrarchidsBlack.BullheadChannel.CatfishBrown.TroutRainbow.Trout

0

500

1000

1500

To

tal C

atc

h (

Kg

)

Results - Rainbow Trout AbundanceResults - Rainbow Trout AbundanceRainbow Trout Abundance in the Little Colorado River Removal Reach

02

00

04

00

06

00

08

00

0

Jan

-03

Fe

b-0

3

Ma

r-0

3

Jul-

03

Au

g-0

3

Se

p-0

3

Jan

-04

Fe

b-0

4

Ma

r-0

4

Jul-

04

Au

g-0

4

Se

p-0

4

Jan

-05

Fe

b-0

5

Ma

r-0

5

Jul-

05

Au

g-0

5

Se

p-0

5

Jan

-06

Fe

b-0

6

Ma

r-0

6

Jul-

06

Au

g-0

6

Trip Date

Ra

inb

ow

Tro

ut

Ab

un

da

nc

e

2003 2004 2005 2006

Results - Rainbow Trout AbundanceResults - Rainbow Trout AbundanceRainbow Trout Abundance in the Little Colorado River Removal Reach

01

00

02

00

03

00

04

00

05

00

06

00

0

Jan

-03

Fe

b-0

3

Ma

r-0

3

Jul-

03

Au

g-0

3

Se

p-0

3

Jan

-04

Fe

b-0

4

Ma

r-0

4

Jul-

04

Au

g-0

4

Se

p-0

4

Jan

-05

Fe

b-0

5

Ma

r-0

5

Jul-

05

Au

g-0

5

Se

p-0

5

Jan

-06

Fe

b-0

6

Ma

r-0

6

Jul-

06

Au

g-0

6

Trip Date

Ra

inb

ow

Tro

ut

Ab

un

da

nc

e

2003 2004 2005 2006

UpstreamDownstream

Results - Rainbow Trout Capture ProbabilityResults - Rainbow Trout Capture Probability

Rainbow Trout Capture Probability in the Little Colorado River Removal Reach

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Jan

-03

Fe

b-0

3

Ma

r-0

3

Jul-

03

Au

g-0

3

Se

p-0

3

Jan

-04

Fe

b-0

4

Ma

r-0

4

Jul-

04

Au

g-0

4

Se

p-0

4

Jan

-05

Fe

b-0

5

Ma

r-0

5

Jul-

05

Au

g-0

5

Se

p-0

5

Jan

-06

Fe

b-0

6

Ma

r-0

6

Jul-

06

Au

g-0

6

Trip Date

Ca

ptu

re P

rob

ab

ility

2003 2004 2005 2006

UpstreamDownstream

Results:Results:Indicators of Native Fish Indicators of Native Fish

Population ResponsePopulation Response

Electrofishing Catch Rate of Humpback Chub in the LCR Removal Reach

01

/01

/03

04

/01

/03

07

/01

/03

10

/01

/03

01

/01

/04

04

/01

/04

07

/01

/04

10

/01

/04

01

/01

/05

04

/01

/05

07

/01

/05

10

/01

/05

01

/01

/06

04

/01

/06

07

/01

/06

10

/01

/06

02

46

8

CP

UE

(F

ish

/Ho

ur)

Trip Date

Results - Humpback Chub Relative AbundanceResults - Humpback Chub Relative Abundance

Electrofishing CPUE of Flannelmouth Sucker in the LCR Removal Reach

01

/01

/03

04

/01

/03

07

/01

/03

10

/01

/03

01

/01

/04

04

/01

/04

07

/01

/04

10

/01

/04

01

/01

/05

04

/01

/05

07

/01

/05

10

/01

/05

01

/01

/06

04

/01

/06

07

/01

/06

10

/01

/06

05

10

15

CP

UE

(F

ish

/Ho

ur)

Trip Date

Results - Flannelmouth Sucker Relative AbundanceResults - Flannelmouth Sucker Relative Abundance

Electrofishing CPUE of Bluehead Sucker in the LCR Removal Reach

01

/01

/03

04

/01

/03

07

/01

/03

10

/01

/03

01

/01

/04

04

/01

/04

07

/01

/04

10

/01

/04

01

/01

/05

04

/01

/05

07

/01

/05

10

/01

/05

01

/01

/06

04

/01

/06

07

/01

/06

10

/01

/06

02

46

8

CP

UE

(F

ish

/Ho

ur)

Trip Date

Results - Bluehead Sucker Relative AbundanceResults - Bluehead Sucker Relative Abundance

Thanks!

Background and MotivationBackground and Motivation February 2002, GCMRC proposes a 16 year study to address questions February 2002, GCMRC proposes a 16 year study to address questions

related to providing better management of Sediment related to providing better management of Sediment ANDAND Native Fish. Native Fish.

YearYear Mechanical RemovalMechanical Removal Fluctuating FlowsFluctuating Flows Temperature Control DeviceTemperature Control Device

11 XXXXXX XXXXXX

22 XXXXXX XXXXXX

33 XXXXXX

44 XXXXXX

55 XXXXXX

66 XXXXXX

77

88

99 XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1010 XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1111 XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1212 XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1313 XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1414 XXXXXX XXX???XXX???

1515 XXX???XXX???

1616 XXX???XXX???

What Really HappenedWhat Really HappenedYearYear Mechanical RemovalMechanical Removal Fluctuating Fluctuating

FlowsFlowsTemperature Control DeviceTemperature Control Device

1 (2003)1 (2003) XXXXXX XXXXXX ““Naturally Elevated Temp”Naturally Elevated Temp”

2 (2004)2 (2004) XXXXXX XXXXXX ““More Naturally Elevated Temp”More Naturally Elevated Temp”

3 (2005)3 (2005) XXXXXX XXXXXX ““Even More Naturally Elevated Temp”Even More Naturally Elevated Temp”

4 (2006)4 (2006) XXXXXX ““Naturally Elevated Temp”Naturally Elevated Temp”

5 5 (2007)(2007) (Non-natives in low abundance)(Non-natives in low abundance) ““Likely Elevated Temp”Likely Elevated Temp”

66 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

77 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

88 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

99 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1010 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1111 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1212 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1313 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1414 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1515 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????

1616 ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????