mechanical properties of biomaterials advances in biomaterials, volume 2: editors g.w. hastings and...
TRANSCRIPT
The review of corrosion in surgical implants in chapter 1 by Steinemann of the lnstitut Straumann is excellent. It
concentrates on the local pH changes arising from corrosion
which it is claimed can exceed the buffering capacity of
tissue fluids and lead to toxic effects. It is this type of
investigation and reasoning that leads to a better under-
standing of the fundamental aspects of biocompatibility.
From the same Institut, Pohler and Straumann present, in
chapter 6, a study of fatigue and corrosion fatigue in stainless
steel. They demonstrate with the aid of some very good
optical and scanning electron micrographs that although
the fatigue life is reduced in Ringers solution, morphologi-
cally there is no corrosion effect superimposed on the
fracture pattern.
Several of the papers dealing with ceramics are of good
scientific quality. Pabst, Wichmann and Elssner of the
Max Plank Institut, Stuttgart, in chapter 17 present data on
the fracture toughness of alumina, measuring K/,-M in four
point bending after immersion in fluids of varying polarity.
For dense alumina, KICM was found to decrease with
increasing polarity, being at its lowest for physiological
media. In the next chapter, Richter, Seidelmann and
Soltesz (Marburg, W. Germany) report on subcritical crack
growth in alumina using the double torsion method and
immersion in physiological media. Again fluids were shown
to increase crack growth rate and calculations showing the
maximum allowable flaw depth for a given lifetime are
presented. Some very interesting data on a similar theme
is also given by Dawihl and Dorne (Saarbrucken, W.
Germany, chapter 20) long-chained carboxylic acids being
shown to adsorb on alumina, completely covering the
surface with a monolayer, even at low concentration.
Adsorbed films are assumed to improve the wear and
friction properties of the material.
Amongst the papers on biocompatibility, chapter 34
on the techniques for histological examination of tissue
containing implant materials (Pesch et al., Vienna); chapter
38 on the tissue response to carbon (Helbingetal., Ulm);
chapter 43 on the histological evaluation of calcium hydroxy-
apatite (Vermeiden et a/., Amsterdam); chapter 46 on the
tissue response to alumina debris (Plenk et al., Vienna);
chapter 54 on protein adsorption on polymers (Lemm and
Unger, Berlin) and chapter 55 on in vitro culture methods
for evaluating vascular prosthetic materials (Sigot-Luizart,
Compiegne, France) are all highly recommended.
The book contains, therefore, a large number of very
good papers and is an excellent testament to the quality of
biomaterials research carried out in Europe. It is such a pity
that it took so long to produce, a fact which this reviewer
hopes will not detract too seriously from its scientific value.
David Williams
Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials Advances in Biomaterials, Volume 2
Editors G.W. Hastings and D.F. Williams John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1980. pp 400 Q95.00lf38.50
This book is produced from papers presented at a conference
held at Keele University in September 1978. Despite its
conference origins there is no air of improvization about
this book. The layout and presentation are of a high
standard, with clear drawings and well-reproduced photo-
graphs.
There are 48 papers from 136 contributors in it. These
are divided amongst seven sections of which five cover
aspects of orthopaedic surgery, as perhaps might be
expected when the main topic is that of mechanical properties.
The remaining sections are on general surgery and on dental
and maxillofacial surgery.
Ceramics feature strongly, not only in their special
orthopaedic section but throughout the book. This reflects
the current interest in these materials that stems from their
wear resistance, their inert nature and often a constitution
that is based on elements found naturally in the body.
Mechanical strength is the big problem with ceramics and
the papers that concentrate strongly on this aspect are
looking mainly at prostheses of part ceramic part metal
construction. The property of wear resistance features in
more of the papers, which relate to joint surfaces and teeth.
The topic of mechanical compatibility is raised in
many papers, showing a greater awareness of the importance
of this factor than was common a few years ago. There are
a number of papers concerned with porous materials or
porous coatings made from metals, ceramics and polymers:
the inclusion of one on polysulphone introduces a relatively
new implant material. Carbon has created much attention
in its solid form, as coatings, as fibrous reinforcement for
UHMWPE bearing surfaces and for structural composite
materials. Calcium hydroxyapatite accounts for a run of
four papers presented by authors from five countries.
There are a fair number of unusual materials investi-
gated; including glass ceramics, nitride ceramics and plasma
sprayed ceramic coatings. Crosslinked gelatine has two
papers describing its successful use as a resorbable material
for repair of ureters and urethras and for use in hip joint
surgery. Another two papers report successful work on bone
defect bridging by porous formers of elastomer/textile
construction to carry autologous bone chips and defect
filling by collagen fleece.
Apart from novel devices and materials there is much
work reporting clinically-proven improvements from design
and materials developments in well established devices such
as total hip prostheses. In the same group there is extra
future potential being developed by such techniques as hot
isostatic pressing as an alternative to casting or forging of
Co/Cr/Mo alloys. Acrylic cement gets its usual mentions
including two papers on the modification of fracture
behaviour by X-ray contrast materials.
With others, these topics go to make up the 48
papers presented. They contain much worthwhile informa-
tion and the presentation is good.
G. Murray
Biomaterials 198 1, Vol2 July 191