mechanical plaque control. ob j e c t i v e s background mechanical plaque control (a) toothbrush...
TRANSCRIPT
MECHANICAL
PLAQUE
CONTROL
OB JE CT IV ES
Background
Mechanical plaque control
(a) Toothbrush
(b) Dentifrice
(c) Interdental cleaning aids
- Dental floss
- Interdental brushes
- tooth pik
(d) Oral irrigation
• IMPORTANT CHAPTER• CLINICALLY VERY RELEVANT• REQUIREMENT FOR PATIENT TEACHING
Plaque as etiologic factorExperimental gingivitis study (1965 Löe et al. )
The cause and effect relationship between supragingival plaque and gingivitis was demonstrated by Loe et al (1965).
When plaque was allowed to accumulate, gingivitis
developed within 21 days. When plaque control was initiated, the gingivitis was reversed (by means of efficient plaque control, i.e., brushing and flossing) to clinical gingival health
The removal of microbial plaque leads to cessation of gingival inflammation, and cessation of plaque control measure leads to recurrence of inflammation
The removal of plaque also decreased the rate of formation of calculus. ( Sanders , 1962)
Thus eliminating plaque is the key to prevent the occurrence of periodontal disease or halting the progression of the disease.
Masses of plaque first develop ( Lang,1973)
MOLAR & PREMOLAR
AREAS
PROXIMAL SURFACES OF
THE ANTERIOR TEETH
FACIAL SURFACES OF
THE MOLARS & PREMOLARS
PLAQUE CONTROL Plaque control: The removal of dental plaque on
a regular basis and the prevention of its accumulation on the teeth and adjacent gingival surfaces.
Position: supra- & sub-gingival plaque control
Methods: mechanical & chemical
MECHANICAL PLAQUE CONTROL
OBJECTIVE:Complete Daily Removal Of Dental Plaque
With A Minimum OfEffort,
Time, And Devices,
Using The Simplest Methods Possible.
Self-performed
1. Tooth brushing2. Interdental aids
–Dental floss and tape–Toothpicks–Interproximal brushes–Single-tufted brush
3. Adjunctive aids–Dental irrigation devices–Tongue scrapers–Dentifrices
TOOTH BRUSH
A. Toothbrush Design
B. Methods of toothbrushing
C. Frequency and effectiveness of toothbrushing
D. Toothbrush wear and replacement
E. Electric toothbrushes
The Toothbrush
First “toothbrush” -
15th Century in China
First modern
toothbrush - England in
1780 by William Addis
– mass produced
The Toothbrush
Nylon toothbrush bristles -
1938 in USA (Du Pont)
First electric toothbrush -
1960s (Broxodent)
1987 – first rotary action
electric toothbrush•
- Generally toothbrushes vary in
size, design as well as in length
and arrangements of bristles
hardness.
- To overcome this variation ADA
given specification of
toothbrushes.
-------------------------------------------------
The Toothbrush
Toothbrush design
American Dental Association (ADA)›Length : 1 to 1.25 inches
›Width : 5/16 to 3/8 inches
›Surface area : 2.54 to 3.2 cm
›No. of rows : 2 to 4 rows of brushes
›No. of tufts : 5 to 12 per row
›No. of bristles : 80 to 85 per tuft
Toothbrush bristles
• Natural: hog
• Artificial filaments: nylon
NATURAL ARTIFICIAL
Source Hair of hog/ wild boar Synthetic, plastic material mainly nylon
Uniformity Non uniform Uniform
Diameter Varies Extra soft: 0.075mmHard: 0.3 mm
End shape Irregular Rounded
Limitations Standardization not possibleWear: rapid & irregularCollection of debris & microorganisms due to hollow ends
Cleaning, rinsing and maintenance easyWear: DurableRepels debris: end roundedResistant to accumulation of microraganisms
Bristle hardness
Proportional to the square of the diameter and inversely proportional to the square of bristle length
Soft brush: 0.007 inch(0.2 mm) Medium brush: 0.012 inch(0.3 mm) Hard brush: 0.014 inch(0.4 mm)
For most patients:
short-headed brushes with straight-cut, round-ended, soft to medium nylon bristles arranged in three or four rows of
tufts ARE RECOMMENDED.
TOOTH BRUSHING TECHNIQUES
• Various toothbrushing technique have achieved acceptance by the dental profession.
• Each technique has been designed to achieve a definite goal.
• Depending on the individual cases, the techniques of toothbrusing may have to be altered to achieve the maximum beneficial effects.
The efficacy of brushing with regard to plaque removal is dictated by three main factors:
The design of the brush The skill of the individual using the brush The frequency and duration of use
1986 Frandsen
Effects and sequel of the incorrect use of toothbrush
SEQUEL REASON
Gingival erosion
Toothbrush stiffness
Gingival recession
Method of brushing
Gingival abrasion
Brushing frequency
Toothbrushing methods
1. Horizontal brushing (scrub)2. Leonard method (vertical)3. Bass method (Sulcular cleaning)4. Modified Bass methods5. Stillman methos (vibratory)6. Modified Stillman method (roll)7. Charters method8. Methods of cleaning with powered
toothbrushes
How to brush?
Patient is instructed to start with molar region of one arch
around the opposite side than continue back around the
lingual or facial surfaces of the same arch
Last surface to be brushed are occlusal.
Patient instructed to stroke each area ten time or spend 10
seconds per area then move on to next area.
Time : 2 minutes ( 30 sec per quadrant )
Method Bristle placement Motion Advantage/disadvantage
Scrub Horizontal on gingival margin Scrub in anterior position direction keeping brush horizontal
Easy to learn & best suited for children
BASS Apical towards gingival into sulcus at 450 to tooth surface
Short back and forth vibratory motion while bristles remain in sulcus.
Cervical plaque removalEasily learned Good gingival stimulation
Charter's Coronally 45o, sides of bristles half on teeth and half of gingiva
Small circular motions with apical movements towards gingival margin
Hard to learn and position brush Clears inter proximalGingival stimulation
Fones Perpendicular to the tooth With teeth in occlusions, move brush in rotary motion over both arches and gingival margin
Easy to learn Inter proximal areas not cleaned May cause trauma
Roll Apically, parallel to tooth and then over tooth surface
On buccal and lingual inward pressure, then rolling of head to sweep bristle over gingiva & tooth
Doesn't clean sulcus area Easy to learn good gingival stimulation
Stillman's
On buccal and lingual, aplically at an ablique angle to long axis of tooth. Ends rest on gingiva and cervical part.
On buccal and lingual slight rotary motions with bristle ends stationary
Excellent gingival stimulationModerate dexterity required Moderate cleaning of interproximal area
Modified stillman's
Pointing apically at and angle of 45o to tooth surface
Apply pressure as in stillmans's method but vibrate brush and also move occlusally
Easy to master Gingival stimulation
Method Bristle placement Motion Advantage/disadvantage
Scrub Horizontal on gingival margin Scrub in anterior position direction keeping brush horizontal
Easy to learn & best suited for children
BASS Apical towards gingival into sulcus at 450 to tooth surface
Short back and forth vibratory motion while bristles remain in sulcus.
Cervical plaque removalEasily learned Good gingival stimulation
Charter's Coronally 45o, sides of bristles half on teeth and half of gingiva
Small circular motions with apical movements towards gingival margin
Hard to learn and position brush Clears inter proximalGingival stimulation
Fones Perpendicular to the tooth With teeth in occlusions, move brush in rotary motion over both arches and gingival margin
Easy to learn Inter proximal areas not cleaned May cause trauma
Roll Apically, parallel to tooth and then over tooth surface
On buccal and lingual inward pressure, then rolling of head to sweep bristle over gingiva & tooth
Doesn't clean sulcus area Easy to learn good gingival stimulation
Stillman's On buccal and lingual, aplically at an ablique angle to long axis of tooth. Ends rest on gingiva and cervical part.
On buccal and lingual slight rotary motions with bristle ends stationary
Excellent gingival stimulationModerate dexterity required Moderate cleaning of interproximal area
Modified stillman's
Pointing apically at and angle of 45o to tooth surface
Apply pressure as in stillmans's method but vibrate brush and also move occlusally
Easy to master Gingival stimulation
Charters method
Bass method
Tooth Brushing Three methods widely accepted: the modified bass
method, the modified stillman method( stillman 1932), and the charters method( Carter’s 1948) .
Controlled studied evaluating the most common brushing technique have shown that no one method is superior
Recommended is Bass technique , because it emphasize sulcular placement of the bristles.
Plaque control devices should be tailored according to individual plaque control needs.
BASS OR SULCUS CLEANING METHOD
Most accepted and effective method for the removal of dental plaque present adjacent to and underneath the gingival margin.
• INDICATIONS interproximal areas cervical areas beneath the height of
contour of enamel. exposed root surfaces.
TECHNIQUE The bristles are placed at a 45 degree angle to
the gingiva and moved in small circular motions. Strokes are repeated around 20 times,3 teeth at
a time. On the lingual aspect of the anterior teeth, the
brush is pressed into the gingival sulci and proximal surfaces at a 45 angle.
The bristles are then activated. Occlusal surfaces are cleaned by pressing the
bristles firmly and then activating the bristles.
Bass method
ADVANTAGES• Effective method for removing plaque.• Provides good gingival stimulation.
DISADVANTAGES• Injury to the gingival margin.• Time consuming.• Dexterity.
MODIFIED BASS TECHNIQUE
• INDICATION:• As a routine oral hygiene measure• Intrasulcular cleansing.
TECHINIQUE• Vibratary and circular movements with
sweeping motion• Bristles are at 45 to the gingiva• Bristles are swept over the sides of the
teeth towards their occlusal surfaces in a single stroke.
ADVANTAGES• EXCELLENT SULCUS CLEANING.• GOOD INTER PROXIMAL AND GINGIVAL
CLEANING.• GOOD GINGIVAL STIMULATION
DISADVATAGES• DEXTERITY
MODIFIED STILLMAN’S TECHNIQUE
INDICATIONS• DENTAL PLAQUE REMOVAL• CLEANING TOOTH SURFACES AND GINGIVAL
MASSAGE .
DISADVANTAGE• TIME CONSUMING• DAMAGE EPITHELIAL ATTACHMENT.
TECHNIQUE• Bristles are pointed apically with an
oblique angle to the long axis of the tooth• Bristles placed on the cervical aspect of
the teeth• Short back and forth motion moved in a
coronal direction.
CHARTER’S METHOD
INDICATIONS:• Persons having :-• Missing papilla and exposed root surfaces.• FPD and Orthodontic appliances.• Periodontal surgery.• Interproximal gingival recession.
TECHNIQUE• A soft/medium multi-tufted tooth brush
taken• Bristles are placed 45 to the gingiva with
bristles directed coronally.• Mild vibratory strokes required with
bristles ends lying interproximally.
ADVANTAGES• Massage and stimulation of gingiva.
DISADVANTAGES • Poor removal of subgingival bacterial
accumulations.• Limited brush placement.• Requirements in digital dexterity are high.
The use of hard toothbrush , vigorous horizontal brushing, the use of extremely abrasive dentifrices may lead to cervical abrasion of teeth and recession of the gingiva.( Jepson ,1998)
Toothbrushes need to be replaced every 3 months
The Toothbrush
The Toothbrush
Soft, nylon bristle toothbrush • clean effectively (when used properly),• remain effective for a reasonable time , • Soft bristle are more flexible and atraumatic• clean beneath the gingival margin, • reach farther into the proximal tooth surfaces.
Lecture II
Col area
EMBRASURE• V-shaped spillway next
to the contact area of adjacent teeth;
• Narrowest at the contact and widening toward the facial, lingual, and occlusal contacts
Powered toothbrushesInvented in 1939.
Motions: Back and forth
Circular Elliptic Combinations
Cleaning action by:
1. Mechanical contact between the bristles and the tooth
2. Low-frequency acoustic energy generates dynamic fluid movement and provides cleaning slightly away from the bristle tips.
INDICATIONS:
1. Children and adolescents2. Children with physical or mental disabilities3. Hospitalized patients, including older adults
who need to have their teeth cleaned by caregivers
4. Patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.
• Patients who can develop the ability to use a toothbrush properly usually do equally well with a manual or a powered toothbrush.
• Less diligent brushers do better with powered tooth brushes, which generate stroke motions automatically and require less operator effort.
DENTIFRICESAids in cleaning and polishing
tooth surfaces.
Composition:1. Abrasives- silicon oxides, aluminum oxide2. Humectants3. Water4. Soap or detergent5. Flavoring and sweetening agents6. Therapeutic agents such as fluorides and
pyrophosphates7. Coloring agents and preservatives.
The term dentifrice is derived from dens (tooth) and fricare (to
rub). A simple, contemporary
definition of a dentifrice is a mixture used on the tooth in
conjunction with a toothbrush.
55
Dentifrices are marketed asToothpowders
Toothpastes Gels
Original purpose:
• Pleasant taste• Cosmetic effect• Remove extrinsic stains
Abrasives
Degree of abrasive hardness depends on:
• inherent hardness of the abrasive
• size of the abrasive particle• shape of the particle
Other variables:• the brushing technique• pressure on the brush• the hardness of the bristles• the direction of the strokes• number of strokes
Abrasives used:
• Calcium carbonate • calcium phosphate• baking soda (sodium bicarbonate)• Silicas• silicon oxides• aluminum oxides
Humectants• Toothpaste consisting only of a
toothpowder and water results in a product with several undesirable properties.
• Over time, the solids in the paste tend to settle out of solution and the water evaporates.
• This may result in caking of the remaining dentifrice.
• To solve this problem, humectants were added to maintain the moisture.
• Commonly used humectants are:• Sorbitol, • Mannitol, • Propylene glycol
• Advantages:1. Long shelf life2. Maintained moisture content3. Nontoxic• Disadvantages1. Mold or bacterial growth can occur
in their presence
Soaps• Logical cleansing agent. • The toothbrush bristles dislodge
food debris and plaque• The foaming action of the soap
aids in the removal of the loosened material.
• Disadvantages of soaps:1. irritating to the mucous membrane2. flavor is difficult to mask3. often causes nausea4. soaps are incompatible with other
ingredients, such as calcium.
Detergents• Substitute to soaps• sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is the
most widely used detergent
• Advantages of SLS:1. Stable2. Possesses some antibacterial properties3. Has a low surface tension which facilitates
the flow of the dentifrice over the teeth4. Active at a neutral ph5. Flavor is easy to mask6. Compatible with the current dentifrice
ingredients
Flavoring and Sweetening Agents
• Flavor, along with smell, color, and consistency of a product, are important characteristics that lead to public acceptance of a dentifrice.
• The flavor must be: pleasant, provide an immediate taste sensation, relatively long-lasting
• Synthetic flavors are blended to provide the desired taste.
• Spearmint, • peppermint, • wintergreen, • cinnamon, • other flavors give toothpaste a pleasant
taste, aroma, and refreshing aftertaste
Sweetening Agents
• In early toothpaste formulations, sugar, honey, and other sweeteners were used.
• DISADAVNTAGE: these materials can be broken down in the mouth to produce acids and lower plaque pH, they may increase caries RISK.
• Replaced with: Saccharin, Cyclamate, Sorbitol, Mannitol
• Sorbitol and mannitol serve a dual role as sweetening agents and humectants.
• Glycerin also serves as a humectant, adds to the sweet taste.
• A new sweetener in some dentifrices is xylitol.
SPECIFIC DENTIFRICES:
Essential-Oil Dentifrices
• The essential-oil ingredients found in Listerine mouth rinse are also available in a dentifrice formulation.
• The clinical and laboratory data suggest a benefit to gingival health and plaque reduction
• This product does not carry the ADA Seal of Acceptance
Therapeutic Dentifrices
• The most commonly used therapeutic agent added to dentifrices is fluoride, which aids in the control of caries.
• OTC: The original level of fluoride -restricted to 1,000 to 1,100 ppm fluoride
• total of no more than 120 mg of fluoride in the tube
• Requirement that the package include a safety closure.
• Therapeutic toothpastes, dispensed on prescription, could contain up to 260 mg of fluoride in a tube.
• OTC safe levels:• 0.22% sodium fluoride (NaF) at a level of
1,100 ppm, • 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP) at
a level of 1,000 ppm, • 0.4% stannous fluoride (SnF2) at a level of
1,000 ppm.
• Fluoride levels were increased to 1,500 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate in "Extra Strength Aim," marketed OTC. In published studies,17,18 this product was 10% more effective than an 1,100 ppm NaF dentifrice. A recently introduced prescription dentifrice, Colgate Prevident 5,000, contains 5,000-ppm
Stannous Salts
• Stannous fluoride (SnF2), specifically the stannous ion, has reported activity against caries, plaque, and gingivitis.
• While SnF2 has a long record as an anticaries agent, long-term stability in dentifrices and mouthrinses has been questioned since clinical antimicrobial activity has only been demonstrated in anhydrous state.
Triclosan
• Triclosan is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent
• It is effective against wide variety of bacteria
• A review of the available pharmacological and toxicological information concluded
• Triclosan can be considered safe for use in dentifrice and mouth rinse products.
Anticalculus Dentifrices
• Interrupt the process of mineralization of plaque to calculus.
• Plaque has a bacterial matrix that mineralizes due to the super saturation of saliva with calcium and phosphate ions.
• Crystal growth inhibitors may be added to dentifrices to provide a reduction in calculus formation.
Antihypersensitivity Dentifrices
Active agents such as:• potassium nitrate, • strontium chloride, • sodium citrate
Whiteners
• Controversial
• These dentifrices control stain via physical methods (abrasives) and chemical mechanisms (surface active agents or bleaching/oxidizing agents).
To be continued in next lecture
Interdental cleaning aids
• Dental floss
• Interdental brushes
• Wooden or rubber tips
Dental floss
• Multifilament vs. monofilament• Twisted vs. untwisted• Bonded vs. unbonded• Waxed vs. unwaxed• 12-18 inches for use• Stretch: thumb and forefinger• Up-and-down stroke
Interdental brush
Gingival massage
• Epithelial thickening, increased keratinization, and increased mitotic activity in epithelium and connective tissue
• Emphasizing the importance of altering or removing plaque rather than stimulating or thickening the keratinized surface in the plaque control program
Oral irrigation devices
• Supragingival irrigation
• Subgingival irrigation
Chemical plaque control
• Antiadhesive • Antimicrobial• Plaque removal • Antipathogenic