mechanical design of the roman pots

17
Mechanical design of the Roman pots Status report M.Oriunno In Collaboration with L.Favre, G.Laurent and R.Perret EST Division F. Haug AT Division

Upload: henrik

Post on 19-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mechanical design of the Roman pots. Status report M.Oriunno In Collaboration with L.Favre, G.Laurent and R.Perret EST Division F. Haug AT Division. SSTEEL 316. Inconel 600. Welding on a flat foil and folding. Inconel 718. What must be done on the pot design: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Status report

M.Oriunno

In Collaboration with

L.Favre, G.Laurent and R.Perret EST Division

F. Haug AT Division

Page 2: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Welding on a flat foil and folding

Inconel 718

Inconel 600

SSTEEL 316

Page 3: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

What must be done on the pot design:

Production of 5 pot prototypes to test under vacuum the welding technology of the thin window (June 2003)

1. Test on welding technology….Inconel loose ~30% of mech. strength

2. Electrochemical machining without welds.

Pot Prototype for RF Pick up test on electronics

1. Calculations

2. No problems found on other beams (Desy)…check the bunch structure

Page 4: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 5: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Pot

Lever Arm

Capacitive sensor

Compensation bellow

Page 6: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 7: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 8: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 9: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Racks

TAN

Collimator

BPMQLR

Page 10: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 11: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Cryogenic Cooling (F.Haug, AT/ECR)

Heat loads ~12 watt

(with vacuum ~10-4 torr)

130oK

< 230oK

fews mWatt

2 Watt

Two main options: local cooling (microchanneling) or passive elements

• Micropumps systems have low reliability, problems on manifolds.

• Passive system are preferable: Heatpipes, Peltier Cells

• Cold source at 80oK -> pulse-tube (no vibrations)

• Other systems as J-T are under investigation

Heatpipe ~ 1500mm

Pulse tube

80oK

T ~ 5oK

T ~ 20o K

Page 12: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Constraints from the LHC-Vacuum group :

The compensation of the forces must not be relied on a pick up of the primary vacuum

Since all the vacuum chamber in the LSS are NEG coated, the pot must be designed to stand a baked out up to 300oC

A risk analysis of the operation of the detector operation should be performed

A design pressure of at least 1.5 bar shall be considered in the design of the window

Page 13: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 14: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

Roman Pots’ Chapter in the TDR

Pot Design : Integration study, Simulation and Prototype test results

Cooling System: Capillaries or Cold finger

Roman Pots Station design: precision, stability, vacuum and accessibility

Integration in the Tunnel: Space allocation, services and radiation environment

We are ready to write an exhaustive chapter !!

Page 15: Mechanical design of the Roman pots
Page 16: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

What must be done on the pot design:

Production of 5 pot prototypes to test under vacuum the welding technology of the thin window (June 2003)

Pot Prototype for RF Pick up test on electronics

Production of a mock-up of the pot with dummy detectors to have a full integration exercise with the services (June 2003)

Open issues:

Cryogenic Cooling System: Capillary local cooling, Cold fingers. Very unlikely we can spill cryogens from the machine or CMS. LHC/ECR group is working on that.

Electronic RF pickup shielding: are there special constraints on the window ?

Do we have to bake out the pot at 200oC ?

•Yes -> a thin window can not stand the thermal stress

•No -> a locally increased dynamic pressure of residual gases must be accepted

Page 17: Mechanical design of the Roman pots

What has been done for the Roman pot system:

Two solutions have been designed:

Symmetric distribution of the loads but less favorable access for maintenance

Not symmetric loads but optimized access

For Both solutions

A compensation system linked to the primary vacuum allows for a fine regulation but an independent vacuum system can be still implemented

A capacitive system accounting the relative position of the top-bottom pots,

Integration of two Roman Pot stations between the TAN and D2