measuring infringement of ipr ipo report summary findings a review of existing methods and...
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring Infringement of IPR
IPO Report Summary Findings
A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies
September 2013
Content
► Background
► Approach Methodology
► General Observations
► Distinctive Features
► Harmonising Framework
► Application of the Framework
IP INFRINGEMEN
T
BACKGROUND
Study commissioned by the intellectual Property Office (IPO) Scope: Review of methodologies identifying the scale of infringement across 4 main IP Rights Types:
Copyright(online & offline)
TrademarkPatent Design Rights
METHODOLOGY
METHODOLOGY
Team composed of academics from the University of Hertfordshire and Research/Industry experts from Audiencenet
3348
1127
3873
1422
Online Copyright infringement
Patentenforcement
Counterfeitingand piracy
Design rightenforcement
reviewed
used
SOURCES
4 month review of Grey Literature, Trade Body approach to research and views from Experts in the field of piracy, big data, Top down & Bottom Up ApproachClassification and segmentation of available research
• IP Type• Source of Funding
reviewed
used
reviewed
used
reviewed
used
TRADE BODIES RESEARCH
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
DISTINCTIVE FEATURES
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
1. Highly skewed behaviour2. Dynamically changing perceptions3. Rapidly changing costs of distribution and
recompense4. Driven by perception of risk
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
APPLICATIONOF THE
FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION OF THE FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC REFERENCE
POINT
audience
Creator
perpetrator
THE CONCLUSION: A CALL FOR CONSISTENT OVERSIGHT
A call for the need to establish a consensus around the common stack in the ground, a role in this instance for a government contribution to act as the guardian and frame of reference, this will require a commitment to a sustained and regular reporting of a sampling of the participants, alongside longitudinal collation of extreme behaviour.
CONCLUSION