measuring inflation in the modern economy – a micro price ... · globalization (decreased?)...
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring inflation in the modern economy – a microprice-setting view
Aviv Nevo1 Arlene Wong 2
1University of Pennsylvania and NBER
2Princeton University and NBER
June 2018
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Introduction
• Trends in advanced economics:• Globalization• (Decreased?) Competition• Increased high FC/low MC industries• Growth of e-commerce and the sharing economy• Price setting behavior: “Big data” and new pricing models
• We have been asked to give an IO/Marketing view on why/how these might changepricing at the micro level
• What are the aggregate implications?• Mostly leave it for the discussion
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 2
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Overview
• We organize the discussion around two areas:• Measurement
• Substitution bias: shopping behavior• New products and online shopping• Measuring prices online
• Conceptual issues• Cost pass through• Decreased competition• “New” pricing models• Heterogeneity
• To think through some of the issues, one needs a specific question in mind• We will focus (somewhat) on the question of low inflation during the recent recovery
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 3
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Bottom line
• Not sure we have a bottom line, but to the extent we do• The need for more data• The need for more (collaborative) research
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 4
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Why is inflation low?
• Inflation has stayed persistently low post the Great Recession• Part of what we have been asked is to give an IO/Marketing view on reasons why this
might be the case• Why do we expect inflation to rise post recession?
• A tightening job market should lead to rising wages• Rising wages (higher cost more generally) should lead to rising prices
• Did wages go up?• Seems like maybe not• We will leave if to labor economists to argue• Could monopsony power be a reason? (Marinescu, Azar, Steinbaum and Taska, 2018)
• Additional reason: rising aggregate demand could bring the production sector closer tocapacity constraints
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 5
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Other reasons for low inflation
• To an IO economist it is not obvious that even if wages went up that we should see high(measured) inflation
• Measurement of inflation• Imperfect cost pass through• Long term secular trends that are bringing a structural change
• Trends in concentration• Global trade and a more complex supply chain• Changes in how firms set prices
• We provide an initial exploration of some of these topics
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 6
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
The measurement of inflation
• Measuring inflation is notoriously difficult• We will focus on:
• Substitution bias: shopping behavior• New products and online shopping• Measuring prices online
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 7
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Substitution bias
• “Substitution bias occurs because a fixed market basket fails to reflect the fact thatconsumers substitute when relative prices change” (Boskin committee report)
• Substitution bias can come in many forms:• products• outlets• new goods
• We focus on shopping behavior more generally• Substitution across stores• Substitution across sizes• The use of coupons (or other discounts)• Substitute over time (by stockpiling)
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 8
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping behavior
• Several papers suggest that shopping behavior changes with economic conditions• Aguiar and Hurst (2007); Griffith et al. (2009); McKenzie and Schargrodsky (2011);
Coibion, Gorodnichenko and Hong (2012); Aguiar, Hurst and Karabarbounis (2013); Beraja,Hurst and Ospina (2015)
• Generally we believe that substitution bias leads to an underestimate of inflation• Nevo and Wong (forthcoming) imply increased shopping behavior, which could lead to an
overestimate of inflation during the recession• In principle inflation could be underestimated during the recovery if behavior reverted
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 9
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping patterns and the recession: Sales
0.24
0.25
0.26
0.27
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Purchases of Sale Items
Share of total household expenditure
Non-parametric Cubic Linear Spline
Source: US Nielsen Homescan Data
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 10
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping patterns and the recession: Coupons
0.060
0.070
0.080
0.090
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Purchases with Coupon Use
Share of total household expenditure
Non-parametric Cubic Linear Spline
Source: US Nielsen Homescan Data
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 11
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping patterns and the recession: Generic products
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Purchases of Generic Items
Share of total household expenditure
Non-parametric Cubic Linear Spline
Source: US Nielsen Homescan Data
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 12
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping patterns and the recession: Discount stores
0.28
0.30
0.32
0.34
0.36
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Purchases made at Discount Stores
Share of total household expenditure
Non-parametric Cubic Linear Spline
Source: US Nielsen Homescan Data
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 13
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
What impact did this have on inflation?
• Hard to give an exact answer• Back of the envelope computation suggests that true inflation could be as much as 20%
higher than measured inflation
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 14
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Shopping behavior and the measurement of inflation
• Low inflation post recession• Did shopping behavior revert after the recession? yes!• If so, is the true inflation higher than measured? Maybe
• How about more generally?• Shopping behavior not new• But has there been a change over time?• Maybe: here are a few examples
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 15
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Product variety• Neiman and Vavra (2018) show a rise in the concentration of household spending• So maybe less product substitution
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 16
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Online Shopping• On the other hand, online shopping is increasing
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 17
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Measuring online economic activity
• Online shopping potentially can generate substitution bias• But more basically there is a measurement issue• Hasuman and Leibtag (2004) “CPI Bias from Supercenters: Does the BLS Know that
Wal-Mart Exists?”• How about Amazon? eBay? Uber? AirBnB?
• Are online prices collected?• Are online prices different?• Easy to come up with theory that suggest they would be• Measurement: Goolsbee and Klenow (2018) suggest lower inflation online
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 18
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Cost pass through
• It might seem intuitive that prices should go up if wages increase• This does need to be the case• Consider a firm f facing a (residual) demand curve Q(p) setting a uniform price p to
maximize
maxp
Π(p) = (p − mc)Q(p) − F
where mc is (constant) marginal cost; and F is fixed cost
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 19
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Cost pass through
• The FOC is given by
p = mc − Q∂Q/∂p
• It is tempting to conclude that the pass through on marginal cost is 1• In general, this is not true
• The semi-elasticity depends on price (for most demand curves)• The degree of pass through depends on the curvature of the demand curve• In principle, can be more or less than 1• “Typical” demand curves have less or near 1 (e.g. linear 0.5)
• Empirically most products pass through is less than 1
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 20
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Cost pass through
• Note: imperfect pass through is profit maximizing• It is not the case that firms are “eating the cost”• Is this enough to explain low inflation?• Could work together with labor market forces• How about longer term?
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 21
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Long term trends: decreased competition
• Much publicity has been given recently to the rise in market power (e.g., De Loecker andEeckhout, 2017)
• Could this be impacting pass through?• Directly tied to decreasing labor share: so less impact on price even holding pass-through
constant• Some believe that pass-through decreases with concentration, which might suggest less
pass-through• Might be US only phenomena
• As an aside• What about welfare? If consumers are paying more and getting better quality are they really
worse off?
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 22
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
More complex supply chain
• An additional long term trend is globalization and a more complex supply chain (Wei andXie, 2018)
• Two implications• Less direct link between local labor and products• More levels of intermediates and therefore even lower(?) pass through
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 23
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
More complex supply chain
5010
015
020
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
CAN
5010
015
020
025
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
USA
010
020
030
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
AUS
5010
015
020
025
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
NOR
050
100
150
200
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
SWE
050
100
150
200
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
PPI CPI
DNK
PPI and CPI Indexed to 100 in 1985
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 24
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Changes in how firms set prices
• Up to now we talked about a simple linear uniform price• However, firms are consistently coming up with new forms of pricing• Consider (the not so new idea of) price discrimination
• 1st degree (perfect PD): charge each consumer their WTP• 2nd degree (discriminate based on observable demographics): price to market, student
discounts• 3rd degree (self sorting): coupons, temporary price reductions, product line pricing, bundling
and others• Historically limited amount of 1st and 2nd degree PD ... but with Big Data ...
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 25
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Price discrimination and inflation
• What does this have to do with low inflation post-recession• In many cases “fancier” pricing can yield lower pass through rates• Takes measurement issues to a whole new level• How do we measure inflation in a world where prices are individualized?
• already today there is heterogeneity in prices levels and inflation• does this matter?
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 28
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
Concluding Comments
• Measurement• Substitution bias: shopping behavior• New products and online shopping• Measuring prices online
• Conceptual issues• Cost pass through• Decreased competition• “New” pricing models• Heterogeneity
• A real need for more data to measure true inflation better• Consistent measurement of online prices• A focus on what consumer pay versus what firms charge
• To understand aggregate application of modern pricing need more collaborative research
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 29
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
References
• Aguiar, Mark, and Erik Hurst. 2007. “Life-cycle Prices and Production.” American Economic Review, 5(3): 1533-1599.• Aguiar, Mark, Erik Hurst, and Loukas Karabarbounis. 2013. “Time Use during the Great Recession.” American Economic
Review, 103(5): 1664-1696. Beraja, Martin, Erik Hurst, and Juan Ospina. 2015. “The Aggregate Implications ofRegional Business Cycles.”
• Coibion, Olivier, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Gee Hee Hong. 2012. “The cyclicality of sales, regular and effective prices:Business cycle and policy implications.” American Economic Review, 105(3): 993-1029.
• De Loecker and Eeckhout, 2017. “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications”. NBER WorkingPaper No. 23687.
• Goolsbee, Austin D. and Peter J. Klenow, 2018. “Internet Rising, Prices Falling: Measuring Inflation in a World ofE-Commerce”, NBER Working Paper No. 24649.
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 30
Introduction Measurement Conceptual Conclusion
References
• Griffith, Rachel, Ephraim Leibtag, Andrew Leicester, and Aviv Nevo. 2009. “Consumer Shopping Behavior: How MuchDo Consumers Save?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2): 99-120.
• Hasuman, Jerry and Ephraim Leibtag, 2009. “CPI Bias from Supercenters: Does the BLS Know that Wal-Mart Exists?”in Price Index Concepts and Measurement, Diewert, Greenlees, and Hulten. 2009.
• McKenzie, David and Ernesto Schargrodsky, 2011. “Buying less and shopping more: the use of non-market labor during acrisis”, Economia Journal, 0(20), 1-43.
• Nevo, Aviv and Arlene Wong (2018), “The Elasticity of Substitution Between Time and Market Goods: Evidence fromthe Great Recession”, International Economic Review, forthcoming.
• Wei Shang-Jin and Yinxi Xie, 2018, “On the Divergence between CPI and PPI as Inflation Gauges: The Role of SupplyChains”, NBER Working Paper No. 24319.
Nevo and Wong Micro Price-Setting June 2018 31