measuring acoustic phase shifts between multiple atmospheric heights
DESCRIPTION
Measuring acoustic phase shifts between multiple atmospheric heights. Ruizhu Chen 1,2 & Junwei Zhao 2 1 . Dept. Physics, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305 2 Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 94305-4085. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Measuring acoustic phase shifts between multiple atmospheric heights
Ruizhu Chen1,2 & Junwei Zhao2
1. Dept. Physics, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA 943052 Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford Univ.,
Stanford, CA 94305-4085
Motivation
2
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A :
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
• Compute acoustic phase shifts (travel-time differences) between multiple heights in quiet regions, along the same ray path but traveling in opposite directions. One purpose is to examine whether the difference is related to evanescent waves.
• Compute acoustic phase shifts (travel-time differences) between multiple heights in quiet regions, along the same ray path but traveling in opposite directions. One purpose is to examine whether the difference is related to evanescent waves.
• Investigate the orbital-velocity dependence of measured phase shifts.
• Because center-to-limb measurements are also related to different line-formation heights, the main purpose of this work is to investigate whether multi-height is one cause of center-to-limb effect.
3
Motivation
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Data
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
4
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A :
4 sets of data: (Higher and Lower, AB and A’B’)
•I3 and I0 (original data before calibration on Vorbit)
•Line core (LC) and continuum intensity (Ic)
•Doppler proxies at line core (LC) and line wing(LW)
•AIA 1600Å and 1700Å broad lines.
Data
• 512 x 512 pixels; 0.06°/pix; 24 hrs long.
• Each set of data is divided to five 8-hour intervals:
0-8h(++), 4-12h(+-), 8-16h(--), 12-20h(--), 16-24h(+-)• I3 and I0
Line core (LC) and continuum intensity (Ic)
Doppler proxies at Line core (LC) and line wing(LW)
AIA 1600Å and 1700Å broad lines
5
Line profile influenced by Vorbit Orbital velocity for data used
calibratedoriginal
independent of Vorbit
proxy
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Measurement Procedure
6
A
B’B’
B’ B’
A
B’B’
B’ B’
Corss-correlation function f (t, d)
dist
ance
time
dist
ance
frequency
phase change ΔΦ (d , w)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A
TAB’ - TB’A
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
I3 and I0
7
Distance (Mm)
Freq
uenc
y (m
Hz)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = ΦI3 to I0 – ΦI0 to I3
• Formation height: 270 km (I3) and 20 km(I0)
• 0-8h(++), 4-12h(+-), 8-16h(--), 12-20h(--), 16-24h(+-)
K Rsun
Fre
quen
cy
(mH
z)
Phase of cross spectrum
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
8
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) low freq (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)5 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)6 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)small freq (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)large freq (rad)
I3 & I0 ~ 4 ~ 2.5 ~ 0.5 ~3-4 ~3
Phas
e sh
ift
(rad
)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = ΦI3 to I0 – ΦI0 to I3
Tim
e di
ffer
ence
(s
)
TAB’ - TB’A = TI3 to I0 – TI0 to I3
Distance (Mm)
I3 and I0
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Line core (LC) and continuum intensity(Ic)
9
Distance (Mm)
Freq
uenc
y (m
Hz)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = ΦLC to Ic – ΦlC to Ic
K Rsun
Fre
quen
cy
(mH
z)
Phase of cross spectrum
• Formation height: 270 km (LC) and 20 km(Ic)
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Distance (Mm)
Phas
e sh
ift
(rad
)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = ΦLC to Ic – Φic to LC
Line core (LC) and continuum intensity(Ic)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) low freq (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)5 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)6 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)small freq (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)large freq (rad)
LC & Ic ~2-3 ~ 1 ~ -0.5
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Tim
e di
ffer
ence
(s
)
TAB’ - TB’A = TLC to Ic – TIc to LC
Line core (LC) and continuum intensity(Ic)
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Phas
e sh
ift
(rad
)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A - mean ( ΦAB’ - ΦB’A )
Tim
e di
ffer
ence
(s
)
TAB’ - TB’A – mean ( TAB’ - TB’A )
Distance (Mm)
3mHz 3.5mHz 5mHz4mHz 6mHz
3mHz 3.5mHz 5mHz4mHz 6mHz
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) low freq (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)5 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)6 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)small freq (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)large freq (rad)
LC & Ic ~2-3 ~ 1 ~ -0.5 0.3 ~ 0.1
12
Doppler proxy: LW=(I0-I5)/(I0+I5)
(Nagashima et al. (2014) LC=(I2-I3)/(I2+I3)
• Formation height assumed same as line core and continuum: 270 km (LC) and 20 km(LW)•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Doppler proxy at line core and line wing
13
Distance (Mm)
Freq
uenc
y (m
Hz)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = Φlc to lw – Φlw to lc
Doppler proxy at line core and line wing
Doppler proxy: LW=(I0-I5)/(I0+I5)
(Nagashima et al. (2014) LC=(I2-I3)/(I2+I3)
K Rsun
Fre
quen
cy
(mH
z)
Phase of cross spectrum
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
• Formation height: 270 km (LC) and 20 km(Ic)
Phas
e sh
ift
(rad
)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = Φlc to lw – Φlc to lw
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) low freq (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)5 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)6 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)small freq (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)large freq (rad)
LC & LW ~ -0.2 <0 ~ -0.5 ~ -0.8 0.2 ~ 0.5 1 ~ 2.5
Doppler proxy at Line core and line wing
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Tim
e di
ffer
ence
(r
ad)
TAB’ - TB’A = Tlc to lw – Tlc to lw
Distance (Mm)
15
Distance (Mm)
Freq
uenc
y (m
Hz)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = Φ1600-1700 – Φ1600 to 1700
AIA 1600Å and 1700Å broad lines
K Rsun
Fre
quen
cy
(mH
z)
Phase of cross spectrum
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
• Formation height: 480 km (LC) and 360 km(Ic)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) ΔΦ ( Vorbit)
I3 & I0 1.3 π π
Distance (Mm)
Phas
e sh
ift
(rad
)
ΦAB’ - ΦB’A = Φ1600 to 1700 – Φ1700 to 1600
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A) low freq (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)5 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ (AB’-B’A)6 mHz (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)small freq (rad)
ΔΦ ( Vorbit)large freq (rad)
AIA ~ -0.5 ~ -0.8 ~ -1.2 0 0
AIA 1600Å and 1700Å broad lines
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary
Tim
e di
ffer
ence
(r
ad)
TAB’ - TB’A = T1600 to 1700 – T1700 to 1600
Summary
1. Phase shifts from I3 and I0 are dominant by orbital velocity. Phase shifts from calibrated LC & Ic, and Doppler proxies at LC & LW, both have non-ignorable dependence on the orbital velocity.
2. Acoustic travel time (phase) between multiple heights is asymmetric with respect to directions.
3. ΦAB’ - ΦB’A for low frequencies are positive from line core & continuum intensity data, and negative from line core & line wing of Doppler proxy, AIA 1600Å & 1700Å data. It is unclear why is the sign different.
4. Waves of 6mHz don’t cut off, but always has a negative phase shifts. 5. Multiple formation heights will cause a phase shifts , which may be one
cause center-to-limb effect.
•Motivation
•Data
•Method
•Results
I3 & I0
LC &Ic
LC & LW
AIA
•Summary