measured performance of satellite systems in the arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 d = 339 (=38*9) r r d...

22
Norsk Marinteknisk Forskningsinstitutt Ørnulf Jan Rødseth Research Director, MARINTEK – Maritime Transport Systems [email protected] Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic

Upload: others

Post on 28-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Norsk Marinteknisk Forskningsinstitutt

Ørnulf Jan Rødseth Research Director, MARINTEK – Maritime Transport Systems

[email protected]

Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic

Page 2: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

2

MARINTEK Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute

NTNU Norwegian University

of Science and Technology

Cavitation tunnel

Towing tank

Ocean basin Structural testing

The Maritime Technology Center Trondheim, Norway

Energy and engine laboratory

Integrated operations laboratory

Page 3: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Presentation overview

• The MARENOR project

• Satellite systems in the Arctic – the issues

• Actual VSAT performance

• Low Earth Orbit – Iridium

• AIS Satellite AISSat-1 and AISSat-2

Page 4: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

The MARENOR project

• EMGS – Project Owner • MARINTEK – Technical Coordinator • Duration Feb 2012 – Jan 2015 • Supported by

Research Council of Norway

MARENOR shall quantify the system performance of the most common navigation and communication systems being used by maritime users in the Arctic.

Page 5: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

In-situ measurements of satellite performance

MV Atlantic Guardian Mexican Gulf Norwegian Sea

FV Remøy Greenland Sea Barents Sea

Kjell Henriksen Observatory Svalbard

Page 6: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Satellite systems in the Arctic – the issues

Icing

Strong ionospheric activity Visibility from geostationary orbit

Page 7: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Ionospheric scintillation

• Well known phenomena

• Normally more pronounced around equator

• Known to impact GNSS accuracy

• May also impact low frequency communication L-band, VHF etc.

• Effect varies with solar activity, time of day and other parameters.

© Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2015, Bureau of Meteorology (ABN 92 637 533 532)

Page 8: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Rain fade ?

The rain rate (mm/h) exceeded for 0.01% of the average year from Recommendation ITU-R P.837-5.

D

d r = 6 371d = 9D = 339 (=38*9)

rR D2 = R2 – r2

Page 9: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Presentation overview

• The MARENOR project

• Satellite systems in the Arctic – the issues

• Actual VSAT performance

• Low Earth Orbit – Iridium

• AIS Satellite AISSat-1 and AISSat-2

Page 10: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

VSAT Data recorded from Remøy Using ASTRA 4A Ku-band

Svalbard-Trømsø transit each 6 weeks

Page 11: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Results of measurements

• Good performance up to 78° N.

• No statistically significant degradation below 78° N.

• Intermittent communication breaks above 78°. Sometimes up to 82° N.

• Expected round-tip time (RTT) is 700 ms

• 14% more than 1.4 seconds

• 1.4% more than 7 seconds.

Page 12: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Presentation overview

• The MARENOR project

• Satellite systems in the Arctic – the issues

• Actual VSAT performance

• Low Earth Orbit – Iridium

• AIS Satellite AISSat-1 and AISSat-2

Page 13: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Iridium: Low Earth Orbit System – Global coverage

Page 14: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Main measurements on Svalbard, but also elsewhere

Page 15: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Results of Iridium measurements (on Svalbard) - 1

• Expected RTT is 1.5s

• … except first message from ship, RTT is 3.5s

• … and first message from shore, RTT is about 15s

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Page 16: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Results of Iridium measurements (on Svalbard) - 2

• A relatively high incidence of connection breaks over the four month period.

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Break length Number over 4 months < 900 seconds 95 > 900 < 2800 seconds 11 > 2800 seconds 8

Page 17: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Iridium: Similar results from other areas

• Svalbard

• Barents Sea

• Mexican Gulf

13-Oct 02-Nov 22-Nov 12-Dec 01-Jan 21-Jan 10-Feb 02-Mar 22-Mar0

2

4

6

8

10

12

11-Jan 16-Jan 21-Jan 26-Jan 31-Jan 05-Feb 10-Feb 15-Feb 20-Feb 25-Feb0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

07-Dec 12-Dec 17-Dec 22-Dec 27-Dec 01-Jan 06-Jan0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Not identical and measurement

conditions vary. Same patterns can

be observed though.

Page 18: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Presentation overview

• The MARENOR project

• Satellite systems in the Arctic – the issues

• Actual VSAT performance

• Low Earth Orbit – Iridium

• AIS Satellite AISSat-1 and AISSat-2

Page 19: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

AIS Signal reception via AISSat-1

• Polar orbit: Normally coverage each 1.6 hours down to about 75°N.

• AISSat-2 launched in July 2014. Decreasing interval to about 50 minutes.

• Tracked FV Remøy over almost 12 months.

Page 20: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Very good detection probability

• 98% detection probability. Many drop-outs due to port calls and narrow fjords. • AISSat-2 entered service in July

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

02.01.201400:00

02.02.201400:00

02.03.201400:00

02.04.201400:00

02.05.201400:00

02.06.201400:00

02.07.201400:00

02.08.201400:00

02.09.201400:00

02.10.201400:00

02.11.201400:00

Page 21: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

AISSat-1 Some details

• Many drop-outs close to Longyearbyen and Tromsø (fjord and port calls).

• Sensitivity dependent on satellite height over horizon (inversely)

y = -0,0139x + 1,2873R² = 0,2424

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100

Page 22: Measured Performance of Satellite Systems in the Arctic · d r = 6 371 d = 9 D = 339 (=38*9) R r D 2 = R2 – r2. Presentation overview

Conclusions

• VSAT over Ku works well up to fairly high latitudes. − Variance in RTT may have an impact on some critical applications. − East/West longitude will reduce maximum latitude

• Must be verified with each satellite and service provider !

• Iridium over L-band works ok elsewhere in the Arctic region, but with limitations: − Limited bandwidth − Relatively long RTT − Very high variance in RTT − Some drop-outs

• AIS satellite is a very good system for monitoring ships in the area