meaningful purpose to drive lasting cultures of improvement iverson and ben...mckinsey & company...
TRANSCRIPT
Ted Iverson and Ben Pasquier | November 7, 2018
Meaningful Purpose to Drive Lasting
Cultures of Improvement
RESULTS WASHINGTON CONFERENCE
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited
2McKinsey & Company
Summary
▪ Developing Meaningful Purpose - how to get started, how to scale in your teams
▪ Meaningful Purpose in your Organization - a quick survey and discussion about
current MP in your organizations
▪ Actionable Meaningful Purpose - how do we move from words to something that
inspires greatness at each level of the organization
▪ Evidence of Meaningful Purpose - across many industries meaningful purpose is
becoming more common and for good reasons
▪ Meaningful Purpose that Drives Strategy - examples of how meaningful purpose
can guide not only improvement but strategy
3McKinsey & Company
Something is happening related to purpose . . .
Evidences
4McKinsey & Company
Something is happening related to purpose . . .
Evidences
SOURCE: McKinsey Organization Practice; Lievegoed, Greiner; Glaszl, Barefoot,
Features
$
Crises that push people to new model
chaos, arbitrariness,
dependence of core
staff, new generation
owner, employees want
more professionalism
over-organization, silo,
bureaucracy, fragmenting
sense of purpose, process
over impact
Too much performance yet
not engagement, short
termism, people feeling
underutilized and
overstretched,
▪ Founder has an idea
▪ Pioneer shapes ways
of working
▪ Charismatic and
authoritarian
leadership
▪ Highly personalized
functions organized
around the leader
▪ Formalized structures
and roles
▪ Guided by policies
▪ Division of labor
▪ Staff fit into
organizational
requirements
▪ Compliance focus
▪ Drive financial value
and free cash flow
▪ Management by clear
targets
▪ Flatter structure
▪ Integrated functions
▪ Customer focus
▪ Leadership
Development
▪ Diversity
▪ Strength-based
▪ Purpose driven, accepting
responsibility for society
▪ Processes and speed
▪ Hierarchy melts, agile team
of teams
▪ Interdependency with
ecosystem
▪ Digitally infused
▪ Competition to cooperation
Optimization for own
company, missing talent, not
tapping into ecosystems,
missed opportunities, public
critique
Organizations are evolving
6McKinsey & Company
Something is happening related to purpose . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJJqGh2HLM8
Evidences
7McKinsey & Company
Something is happening related to purpose . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxGUmtRLm5g
Evidences
Customers
Partners
Government
Umfelt
Capital
providers
Shared
Aspiration
Shared Aspiration will bind the network
Talent
9McKinsey & Company
Others working with Meaningful Purpose . .
Simon Sinek –The Golden Circle
Lisa Earle McLeod – Selling with Noble Purpose
Dr. Kim CameronCenter for Positive OrganizationsRoss School of BusinessUniversity of Michigan
Meaningful Purpose in your organization
Our organization
has a meaningful
purpose that is . . .
Susan Cranston and Scott KellerMcKinsey Quarterly 2013
Others working with Meaningful Purpose . . Others working with Meaningful Purpose . .
McKinsey and Meaningful Purpose . . .
10McKinsey & Company
▪ Story telling/teaching/sharing – leaders, customers, team members, partners,
with dedicated time sharing moments of greatness
▪ Find alignment of those moments to process sequences, steps and actions
▪ Ensure pure intent the purpose must adopted as the leading driver of the
organization to have long term impact
▪ Searching and Gathering method for moments and further sharing
Discovering Meaningful Purpose
11McKinsey & Company
Meaningful Purpose Pieces
Discovering Meaningful Purpose
12McKinsey & Company
Meaningful Purpose – is not enough
Is having a meaningful purpose enough to insure that your organization will achieve
greatness over time?
13McKinsey & Company
Meaningful Purpose within Lean principles systems and toolsActionable Meaningful Purpose
Connecting
strategy, goals,
and meaningful
purpose
Discovering
better ways
of working
Delivering
value efficiently
to the customer
Enabling
people to lead
and contribute
to their fullest
potential
15McKinsey & Company
Strategy and Goals
Lean Management Systems
Mindsets and Behaviors(feedback loop)
Meaningful Purpose
Connecting
Systems
Enabling
Systems
Discovering
Systems
Delivering
(value)
Systems
Actionable Meaningful Purpose
16McKinsey & Company
Strategy & financials linked
▪ Translates strategy into
quantifiable metrics that bridge to
budget / investment case
▪ Engage field in budget process to
align on financial targets
Strategy scorecard
▪ Measures and tracks
performance on a periodic
basis to “keep score”
against strategy
Alignment & accountability
▪ Focuses organization on
what moves the needle
▪ Assigns owners at all
levels down to the point
of execution
Control tower
▪ X-Matrix: strategy on a page
▪ Allows senior executives to easily
see who is driving the strategy and
how it will impact financials
1 2
3
Prioritization of the “list”4
5
▪ Filter all initiatives and
projects and execute against
those that will drive performance
the most
Unique
Elements
Actionable Meaningful Purpose – Strategy Deployment
17McKinsey & Company
Top Level X Matrix 2015
Optimize capital expenditure
Reduce costsCreate performance management culture
Improve marketing ROIOptimize guest spend
Improve guest experience
Achie
ve 4
-wall
EB
ITD
A m
arg
in o
f x%
Achie
ve a
4-w
all
EB
ITD
A o
f $X
mill
ion,
(YoY
x%
gro
wth
)
Achie
ve a
vera
ge w
eekly
sale
s o
f $X
(Y
oY
x%
gro
wth
)
Sponsor
1
Sponsor
2
Sponsor
3
Sponsor
4
Sponsor
5
Ow
ner 10
Ow
ner 11
Ow
ner 12
Primary Responsibility
Secondary Responsibility
Ow
ner 13
Ow
ner 9
Ow
ner 1
Ow
ner 2
Ow
ner 3
Ow
ner 7
Ow
ner 8
Ow
ner 6
Ow
ner 4
Ow
ner 5
Top strategic
priorities
A
B
C
E
How to accomplish?
▪ Translates financial goals into 6-8 areas of focus for the year
▪ Rule of thumb: 2 priorities per financial objective
▪ Aligns senior management on the priorities of the organization
How much and when?
▪ Support strategic priorities with strategic initiatives
▪ Rule of thumb: 2-3 initiatives per priority
▪ Breaks down into monthly progress increments
▪ Measures results, rather than action plan milestones
▪ Easy to calculate and communicate
▪ Assigns accountability of who is ultimately responsible for
achieving the strategic initiative (usually VP or Director level)
Incre
ase a
vera
ge g
ratu
ity s
ize f
rom
x%
(2014)
to y
% b
y
12/3
1; in
cre
ase inte
nt to
recom
mend u
s fro
m x
to y
by
12/3
1
Intr
oduce 1
0+
new
menu ite
ms that either
exceed c
ate
gory
avera
ge in
sale
s v
olu
me, or
incre
ase tota
l cate
gory
sale
s
Com
ple
te K
aiz
ens
on a
ll re
levant part
s o
f th
e b
usin
ess a
nd
subsequently s
chedule
all
rollo
uts
by 1
2/3
1; have e
mplo
yees
subm
it their x
kill
er
ideas, adopt th
em
by 1
2/3
1
Incre
ase w
ebsite tra
ffic
fro
m x
-y m
illio
n s
essio
ns; book x
%
incr
reserv
ations thro
ugh w
ebsite; im
pro
ve a
vera
ge tic
ket siz
e
for
ord
ers
pla
ced o
nlin
e b
y x
%; in
cre
ase g
ift card
sale
s f
rom
$X
-$Y
mill
ion -
-all
by 1
2/3
1
Imple
ment new
regio
nal pricin
g a
rchitectu
re (desig
n a
nd
pricin
g)
in a
ll sto
res b
y Q
3, deliv
ering e
xit r
un r
ate
x%
uplif
t per
avera
ge c
heck
By 1
2/3
1, in
cre
ase b
rand h
ealth tra
cker score
for
bra
nd
com
munic
ation a
ware
ness b
y x
% a
nd c
onsid
era
tion b
y
x%
vs. a)
baselin
e a
nd b
) com
posite o
f our
polis
hed
casual com
petito
rs
Reach x
mill
ion e
nro
llments
in the loyalty p
rogra
m b
y 1
2/3
1
By 1
2/3
1, in
cre
ase b
rand h
ealth tra
cker score
for
bra
nd
com
munic
ation a
ware
ness b
y x
% a
nd c
onsid
era
tion b
y
x%
in x
media
mix
test m
ark
ets
. F
or LT
O e
vents
,
outp
erf
orm
the a
vera
ge o
f la
st 5 s
easonal LT
O e
ntr
ies in
avera
ge s
ale
s p
er
sto
re p
er
week d
uring the p
rom
otion
period b
y x
% o
r m
ore
Reduce 1
2-m
onth
rolli
ng e
mplo
yee turn
over
at m
anager
level fr
om
x-t
o-y
managers
; re
duce 1
2 m
onth
rolli
ng
em
plo
yee turn
over at hourly level fo
r hosts
/hoste
sses
from
x to y
, and s
erv
ers
fro
m x
to y
, all
by 1
2/3
1
Net of in
flation, decre
ase p
rocure
ment cost to
genera
te
$x m
illio
n s
avin
gs b
y 1
2/3
1
Exit 2
015 w
ith a
nnualiz
ed o
pex
savin
gs o
f $X
mill
ion
Reduce identified T
FC
gap b
y x
bps b
y 1
2/3
1
Reduce a
vera
ge c
ost to
build
new
Sm
all
Box s
tore
to
$x m
illio
n o
n a
bid
basis
by 1
2/3
1Targets
to improve
3-year
financial breakthrough
objectives
2015
annual
financial
objectives
What?
▪ Key value generation metrics that require
the organization to stretch itself
A
Achieve average weekly sales of $X (3-yr CAGR of x% growth)
Achieve a 4-wall EBITDA of $X million (3-yr CAGR of x%)
Achieve 4-wall EBITDA margin of x%
E
C
How far do you need to improve…?
▪ …in the 1st year to meet the 3-year breakthrough objective?
▪ Rule of thumb: 30-50% of 3-year target; breakthroughs exceed budget targets
B
D
Who?
▪ Assigns accountability of who is ultimately responsible
for achieving the strategic priority (usually C-suite level)
D
▪ The closer a financial objective, strategic priority or strategic initiative is to the center of the X-Matrix, the higher priority it is for the organization
▪ One senior executive should own SDP (e.g., CFO, CSO) and reinforce accountability
Actionable Meaningful Purpose – Strategy Deployment
18McKinsey & Company
Company
Shareholder
Value
Team
Organizational
Health
Society
Social Impact
Me
Personal
Growth
Customer
Customer
Experience
▪ Improving society
▪ Building the nation
▪ Stewarding resources
▪ Share price targets
▪ Industry leadership
▪ Beating the competition
▪ High performing teams
▪ Sense of belonging
▪ Caring/humane environment
▪ Personal development, learning
▪ Paycheck / big bonus
▪ Empowerment
▪ Making it easy for the customer
▪ Superior service
▪ The work
Companies connect strategy to 5 areas of meaning
“We save lives”
▪ Seat belts
▪ Air bags
▪ Automated braking and
steering systems
“Appreciate”
▪ Bulk pins and jewelry
▪ Customized individual
awards
▪ Appreciation systems
19McKinsey & Company
20McKinsey & Company
SOURCE: 1 HBR/The Energy Project, Human era at work (2014); 2 Gallup - State of the global workplace (2013); 3 Imperative and New York University, Workforce Purpose Index (2015); 4 HBR/EY, The
business case for purpose (2015); 5 Deloitte, Core beliefs culture survey (2013); 6 Raj Sisodia, Firms of Endearment (2013); 7 Havas, Meaningful Brands Index (2013); 8 Edelman, Trust Barometer
Global (2016); 8 B Corporations, B Corp Index (2012).
Attract and retain talent within
the organisation...
50% People that see work as a
calling are 50% more likely
to have a top position in
the firm.3
Organizations at which
employees experience
purpose at work deliver
employees to society that
are 2.2 times as likely to
be satisfied at work.1
2.2x
People with purpose at
work are 2.8 times as
likely to stay.1
2.8x
People who experience
purpose at work are 2.3
times as likely to be
engaged.1
2.3x
...serve clients better...
Executives believe that
purpose-driven companies
will deliver higher quality of
products and services for
their clients.4
81%
Executives believing that an
organisation with shared
purpose will have greater
customer loyalty.4
80%
Executives of purpose-driven
companies say their
company has strong
customer satisfaction5
94%
Executives that are more
likely to recommend a
company with purpose to
others.4
85%
...while increasing returns for
shareholders & partners…
Of purpose-prioritizing
firms showing a >10%
growth rate in the past 3
years (vs 42% in the non-
prioritizers).4
58%
Meaningful brands related
to human well-being
outperform the stock
market by 120% between
2005 and 2012.7
120%
14x Outperformance of
S&P500 by purpose-led
companies between 1998
and 2013.6
84% Executives believing that
their internal
transformation will be
more effective if integrated
with purpose.4
...and having a positive impact
on society & government
Of people believe that
CEO’s should be
personally visible in
discussing societal
issues.8
80%
Higher score of B
Corporations versus
other sustainable
businesses. B Corps
use their strengths to
address social and
ecological challenges
and formulate their
goals with this mindset9
25%
Some hard facts on purpose
21McKinsey & CompanySOURCE: interviews,press clippings
Context
▪ Leading European
fashion e-commerce
▪ 14,000 countries in 15
countries
▪ Sense of plateauing
after Unicorn IPO
What is your purpose?Why did you start thinking about purpose?
What is the business impact of purpose?How did you develop your purpose?
Example <client> case:“Purpose is something you surface, not something you create”
“Reimagine fashion for the good of all”
▪ Reimagine: Employees that come to work to
experiment, create and rethink. Employees that ask
the right questions when things get more complex.
▪ Fashion: From celebrating your personal style to
earning money with your outfits
▪ Good for all: Best results for people–customers,
producers, trendsetters or brands
▪ Arrived at the company’s turning point – successful IPO, crossed the EUR1bil
revenue mark, recognized as the European unicorn
▪ Talent: Employees were leaving more often than ever–due to the lack of
established culture. “No longer a startup, but not established either”
▪ Leadership: Even the founding employees echoed the sentiments – “I wouldn’t
like to work here, as it is now. We had built a house we didn’t like living in.”
▪ Viewed purpose as a “ product” – it needed to be designed, prototype and made
useful for people
▪ Started ideation with executive teams
▪ Engaged 5,000 employees (about 70% of company then) in coffee/ lunch
conversations to share “why do you work at <client> ”, “what is your proudest
<client> moment?”
▪ Engaged its partners and customers in ideation workshops (over six months)
▪ Prototyped the purpose in 20 teams (totaling 200 people) for six months –
“Can the purpose be used for decision making”
▪ Developed a purpose toolkit (e.g. discussion cards on how to make this
meeting serve our purpose, branding guidelines for product and recruitment and
a game for new joiners)
Improved employee retention after a year and attracted
US talent to work for <client> in Germany
▪ Purpose-centered conversations amongst employees
▪ Introduced employee-centric initiatives (e.g. daycare
shifts to support its logistics employees)
▪ Accelerated its platform strategy by helping the
team think about the customer needs it wanted to fulfill,
rather than the product. For e.g., <client> launched
new products such as individual stylists.
▪ Accelerated sustainable supply chain initiative
▪ Purpose also helped decision making; products were
not launched if it didn’t fulfill the purpose
BACKUP
23McKinsey & Company
Others working with Meaningful Purpose . . .
Simon Sinek –The Golden Circle
@VG: Can you please
combine these next 4
slide
24McKinsey & Company
Others working with Meaningful Purpose . . .
Lisa Earle McLeod – Selling with Noble Purpose
25McKinsey & Company
Dr. Kim CameronCenter for Positive OrganizationsRoss School of BusinessUniversity of Michigan
Others working with Meaningful Purpose . . .
26McKinsey & Company
McKinsey and Meaningful Purpose . . .
Susan Cranstonand
Scott KellerMcKinsey Quarterly
2013
27McKinsey & Company
Audience poll
Poll anywhere with
audience
Our organization has a
meaningful purpose that is . . .
Meaningful Purpose in your organization
28McKinsey & Company
Organizational affinity toward Meaningful Purpose follows Maslow’s Hierarch . . .
Abraham Maslow
Organizational actualization:
Achievement and increasing potential,
creativity, ingenuity, authenticity
EsteemRespect and recognition
Contributions beyond the
organizational walls
Sense of belongingSocial connectedness, part of a
community or tribe,
SecurityStable work environment (benefits,
clear job duties and responsibilities)
Physiological needsSurvival issues (salary, stable
employment)
Meaningful Purpose is
not visible or within the
current dialog
Meaningful purpose
discussions become
increasingly organic
Intentional and
systemic
Meaningful Purpose in your organization
29McKinsey & Company
Meaningful Purpose at an Organizational Level - sources
▪ Specific workshop activities with
leadership
▪ Interviews with customers, partners
and suppliers
▪ Panel interviews with associates at
each level of the organization
▪ Legacy of the founder
▪ Diligent observation, constant
searching and discovery
Discovering Meaningful Purpose