me tidal

Upload: rahul-nampalliwar

Post on 02-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    1/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    HARNESSING THEPOWER OF THE MOON

    How dowe go

    from

    to

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    2/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tides rise and fall with great predictability

    each day. How can we use this resource?Option 1: Tidal Barrage

    Build a dam across the mouth of an

    estuary (like a hydro-electric dam)

    Option 2: In-Stream Tidal

    Harness kinetic energy of the tides

    Lets take a closer look at each option

    Harness potential energy of tides

    Underwater wind turbine

    All pictures of in-stream turbines all available from the publicly accessible

    Electric Power Research Institute website (www.epri.com/oceanergy)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    3/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tidal barrage systems work like

    hydro-electric dams

    Ocean Estuary

    Barrage Dam

    Low Tide

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    4/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    On the incoming tide (flood tide),

    water flows into the estuary

    Ocean Estuary

    Barrage Dam

    Low Tide High Tide

    Then the dam shuts

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    5/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Once the tide goes out, there is a height

    (potential energy) difference between ocean

    and estuary

    Ocean Estuary

    Barrage Dam

    Low Tide High Tide

    Then the dam opens

    Low Tide

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    6/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    As water flows through the dam, a turbine

    extracts energy from the flow

    Ocean

    Estuary

    Barrage Dam

    Low Tide High Tide

    Turbine

    Low Tide

    Then the entire process repeats on

    the next tide

    Since the ocean is much moremassive than the estuary, its

    height does not change

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    7/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tidal barrages have issues

    Cost ($$$) The infrastructure required is enormous and so the

    cost of construction is very high

    A project in the Severn Estuary (UK) was projected to

    cost $8 billion and take 10 years to build!

    Who can afford something like that?

    Variable Power

    Production

    Huge amount of power twice each day when dam in

    operation, but no power in between (most of the day)

    How can utilities integrate that with the grid?

    Environmental

    Impact

    Operation of dam completely alters circulation in

    estuary Dam turbines kill fish and cant accommodate marine

    mammals

    It is unlikely that a tidal barrage would ever be constructed again

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    8/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    So how about in-stream tidal energy?

    Its like a wind turbine but underwater.

    Harnesses tidal currents rather than wind

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    9/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tidal currents are generated by rise and fall

    of the tides (water flows downhill)

    Seabed

    Estuary

    Inlet

    Estuary

    BasinFlood

    tide

    Estuary

    Inlet

    Slack water

    Constant water heightNo velocity

    Flood Tide

    Water level higher outsideestuary than in main basin

    Water flows into estuary

    Ebb Tide

    Water level higher in mainbasin than outside estuary

    Water flows out of estuary

    Ebb Tide

    EstuaryInlet

    Tidal turbines harness both ebb and flood tides

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    10/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tides are caused by the pull of the moon

    and sun on the earths oceans

    Gravitational mass of sun and

    moon pulls on ocean, causingwater to rise and fall Strongest tides when sun and moon pull

    in same direction (spring tide)

    Weakest tides when sun and moon in

    opposition (neap tide)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    11/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Since currents are driven by tidal range, when

    the range is greatest, currents are fastest

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    1-Feb 6-Feb 11-Feb 16-Feb 21-Feb 26-Feb

    Date

    CurrentVelocit

    y(m/s)

    Neap Tides (weakest)

    Spring Tides (strongest)

    Tidal currents vary with the lunar cycle (14 days)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    12/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Tidal in-stream energy is in the

    early stages. Lots of ideas.

    Lets take a closer look at them

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    13/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    All in-stream turbines have the

    same basic components

    RotorExtracts power from

    flow

    Foundation Secures turbine to

    seabed

    Horizontal axis

    Vertical axis

    Monopile

    Gravity

    Chain Anchors

    Gearbox Steps up rotationalspeed from rotor

    Planetary Gears Hydraulics

    Generator Converts rotational

    power to electricity

    Induction

    Permanent Magnet

    I

    II

    III

    IV

    Component Function Options

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    14/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Marine Current Turbines

    Power trainHorizontal axis (2 bladed)

    Planetary gearbox

    Induction generator

    Rated from 1.22.5 MW

    FoundationMonopile drilled or driven

    into seabed

    MaintenanceLifting mechanism pulls

    turbine out of water

    Development3 years of testing prototype

    in UK (300 kW)Large Scale

    (18 m diameter)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    15/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Lunar Energy

    Power trainHorizontal axis (ducted)

    Hydraulic gearbox

    Induction generator

    Rated at 2 MW

    FoundationGravity foundation using

    concrete and aggregate

    MaintenanceBarge recovers cassette

    with all moving parts

    DevelopmentTank testing

    Nearing end of design for

    first large scale unit

    Large Scale(21 m diameter inlet)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    16/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Open Hydro

    Power train Horizontal axisNo gearbox

    Rim-mount permanent

    magnet generator

    Rated at 1500 kW

    FoundationMonopile drilled or driven

    into seabed

    Maintenance

    Divers, barge recovery?

    DevelopmentSmall scale demonstration

    unit off barge

    Large Scale(15 m diameter)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    17/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Verdant

    Power trainHorizontal axis (3 blades)

    Planetary gearbox

    Induction generator

    Rated at 34 kW

    FoundationMonopile drilled or driven

    into seabed

    MaintenanceBoat recovers entire power

    train (pops off)

    DevelopmentInstalling 6 turbines off

    Roosevelt Island, NY CitySmall Scale(5 m diameter)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    18/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    GCK (Gorlov Helical Turbine)

    Power trainVertical axis (3 blades)

    Power train in development

    Rated at 7 kW

    Foundation Foundation in development

    MaintenanceDivers, boat recovery?

    DevelopmentTesting off barges and in

    rivers

    Small Scale(1 m diameter)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    19/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    So where should turbines be sited?

    Criteria

    Strong currents

    Reason Logical Sites

    Power flux goes

    with the cube of

    velocity

    Constrictions in

    estuaries with good

    tidal range

    Large cross-

    sectional area

    Channel power

    product of power

    flux and area

    Large-scale

    constrictions

    ElectricalInfrastructure

    Need to put thepower to use

    Close proximity toexisting electrical

    infrastructure

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    20/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    (more siting issues)

    Criteria

    Solid seabed

    Reason Logical Sites

    Needs to support

    or hold turbine

    foundation

    Scoured gravel or rock

    seabed

    Port Facilities Maintenance and

    installation costs

    lower if site near

    port

    Close proximity to

    majorport

    Multiple Use Estuaries used for

    shipping and

    recreation

    Minimize conflicts in

    design stage (e.g. fully

    submerged turbines)

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    21/34

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    22/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    So lets look at a case study close

    to home Tacoma Narrows

    Port of Tacoma(base for installation

    and maintenance)

    Tacoma Narrows Bridge

    Point Evans Possible

    Turbine Site

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    23/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    High velocity currents in a relatively wide channelresults in a strong resource

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    0:00 12:00 0:00

    Hour

    ChannelPow

    er(MW)

    Channel Power- Single Day -

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

    Month

    AverageChannelPower(MW)

    nnual Average= 106 MW

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1-Feb 6-Feb 11-Feb

    Date

    ChannelPow

    er(MW)

    Channel Power- Tidal Cycle -

    Channel Power- Monthly Average -

    Extraction Limit (15% Annual Average) = 16 MW

    High hourly

    variability

    (two ebb and

    flood tides per

    day)

    High daily

    variability

    (14 day lunar

    cycle) Low monthly

    variabilitystable long-term

    resource

    The seabed is relatively deep at Point Evans plenty of

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    24/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    The seabed is relatively deep at Point Evans - plenty ofspace to install large diameter turbines

    Tacoma Narrows

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    25/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    The seabed is composed of dense sand and clay andshould support either pile or gravity foundations

    Seabed Surface Seabed Geology

    Predominantly clay and sand

    Soil layers have beenglacially consolidated and

    are very dense

    High voltage interconnection is possible on the west

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    26/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    High voltage interconnection is possible on the westside of Tacoma Narrows

    Pt. Evans channel

    marker

    Tacoma Power has a

    right of way (ROW)running south along the

    bluffs from the channel

    marker. Turbine power

    cable would come ashorethere.

    Tacoma Power

    ROW115kV cable

    crossing towers

    115kV transmission line

    (Tacoma Power)

    Turbine array power

    would connect with

    existing 115kV line nearcable crossing towers

    Marine Current Turbines is the best fit for megawatt

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    27/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Marine Current Turbines is the best fit for megawatt-scale generation in Tacoma Narrows

    GCK (Gorlov)

    Lunar Energy

    Marine Current Turbines

    Open Hydro

    SeaPower

    SMD Hydrovision

    UEK

    Verdant

    Design Device

    A number of devices are

    unsuitable (in the near

    term) due to immature:

    Maintenance

    FoundationPower train

    Of the remaining

    devices, Marine Current

    Turbines fit the site best

    A surface piercing pilot plant could be tested followed

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    28/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    A surface piercing pilot plant could be tested, followedby installation of a larger array of submerged turbines

    SeaGenDual-rotor

    Surface piercing

    Ready for deployment in short-term

    Pilot Plant

    Next-generation design

    Fully submergedCompatible with shipping traffic

    Requires new support structure and lifting

    mechanismSame power train and foundation as SeaGen

    Requires further development prior to

    deployment

    Commercial Plant

    Device selection is driven by a need to minimize impact

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    29/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Device selection is driven by a need to minimize impacton Tacoma Narrows

    Category Issue Design Approach

    Biological Activity Kelp wrapped around rotors

    Bio-accumulation on rotor and

    support structure

    Marine mammals and fish

    Rope cutters at base of hub

    Use of glass-based anti-fouling paints to prevent

    bio-accumulation without introducing toxins to

    ecosystem

    Low rotational speed (~12 RPM)

    Shipping Traffic Array footprint overlaps with

    conventional shipping lane

    15m LAT (lowest astronomical tide) overhead

    clearance for fully submerged turbines

    Pilot at edge of shipping lane

    Eddies and

    Turbulence

    Eddies and large-scale

    turbulence degrade turbine

    operation and shorten life

    Eddies from bridge and points

    Far enough north of bridge to avoid caisson wake

    Far enough offshore to be out of Point Evans eddy

    Far enough south for Point Defiance turbulence todissipate

    Recreational Use Swimming, diving, fishing all

    take place in Tacoma Narrows

    May require exclusion zone around turbine

    array (< 10% total surface area). Enforceable?

    Sport fishing lines unlikely to effect rotors

    Turbines need to be separated to prevent the wake from

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    30/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    Turbines need to be separated to prevent the wake fromone from degrading the operation of another

    8 m17 m

    Seabed

    18 m

    9 m

    15 m

    (minimum)

    Surface

    10 m

    46 m 46 m

    Lateral Spacing

    and Clearance

    Downstream

    Spacing

    Channel Edge

    Channel Edge 180 m180 m

    Dual rotor turbine

    (46m tip-to-tip)

    A commercial scale array at Point Evans might look like

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    31/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    A commercial scale array at Point Evans might look likethis...

    Turbine

    Electrical

    Cabling

    f lik thi

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    32/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    perform like this

    Equipment Installed 64 fully submerged next-

    generation MCT arranged

    in 5 rows - 18,600 tons of

    equipment

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    1-Jan 20-Feb 11-Apr 31-May 20-Jul 8-Sep 28-Oct 17-Dec

    Date

    Daily

    Average

    Power

    (MW)

    Average Array Output = 13.7 MW

    Enough renewable energy to power

    more than 10,000 homes

    7.4 km of subsea cablerated to 33 kV

    1700 m of trenching and

    400 m of directional

    drilling

    Average installation depth

    of 56 m

    and produce dependable electricity at a cost-

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    33/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www.energy.washington.edu

    and produce dependable electricity at a cost-competitive rate!

    Utility GeneratorMunicipal

    Generator

    cents/kWh (RealNominal)

    7.68.8 5.76.5

    Locally available renewable energy:

    Low speed wind - ~10 cents/kWh

    Solar PV - ~50 cents/kWh

    And unlike solar and wind, tidal energy is

    predictable centuries in advance!

  • 7/27/2019 Me Tidal

    34/34

    Energy and Environmental Combustion Laboratory

    http://www energy washington edu

    In-stream tidal energy represents

    an environmentally benign, low-cost, sustainable, predictable

    source of energy in our own

    backyard

    Thank you