mdot 2016 may monthly update - som - state of michigan

63
Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – May 2016 1 Revisions for the month of May are listed and displayed below. New special details will be included in projects submitted for the August letting as is stated on the special detail index sheets. E-mail Road related questions on these changes to MDOT-Road-Design- [email protected]. E-mail Bridge related questions to MDOT-Bridge-Design- [email protected]. Special Details 24: Guardrail Anchored in Back Slope Types 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8: Reduced the length of the Type 4MGS-8 terminal on sheets 2 & 4 from 37’-6” to 34’-4½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-60-J: Guardrail Types A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D: Reduced the length of the transition from guardrail Type MGS to guardrail Type B or T by 3’-1½” (sheet 10) using the non-standard beam element (length = 9'-4 ½") on sheet 11. R-66-E: Guardrail Departing Terminal Types B, D, & MGS: Reduced the length of the departing terminal Type MGS on sheet 2 by 3’-1½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-72-D: W-Beam Backed Guardrail & Guardrail Long Span Installations: Deleted the 2’-8” offset from the face of the post to the hinge point in the detail at the top of sheet 8, since it is only applicable to the MGS long span details. Bridge Design Manual Chapter 2 Table of Contents and 2.05: New section for Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control. Chapter 6: Sample Plans have been deleted from the manual and new Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) are available at the MDOT Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7). Chapter 9: Chapter 9 has been condensed and the information previously contained within Chapter 9 has been incorporated into or is contained in the following documents or sections of the Bridge Design Manual:

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Road & Bridge Design Publications

Monthly Update – May 2016

1

Revisions for the month of May are listed and displayed below. New special details will be included in projects submitted for the August letting as is stated on the special detail index sheets. E-mail Road related questions on these changes to [email protected]. E-mail Bridge related questions to [email protected].

Special Details

24: Guardrail Anchored in Back Slope Types 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8: Reduced the length of the Type 4MGS-8 terminal on sheets 2 & 4 from 37’-6” to 34’-4½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-60-J: Guardrail Types A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D: Reduced the length of the transition from guardrail Type MGS to guardrail Type B or T by 3’-1½” (sheet 10) using the non-standard beam element (length = 9'-4 ½") on sheet 11. R-66-E: Guardrail Departing Terminal Types B, D, & MGS: Reduced the length of the departing terminal Type MGS on sheet 2 by 3’-1½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-72-D: W-Beam Backed Guardrail & Guardrail Long Span Installations: Deleted the 2’-8” offset from the face of the post to the hinge point in the detail at the top of sheet 8, since it is only applicable to the MGS long span details.

Bridge Design Manual

Chapter 2 Table of Contents and 2.05: New section for Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control. Chapter 6: Sample Plans have been deleted from the manual and new Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) are available at the MDOT Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7). Chapter 9: Chapter 9 has been condensed and the information previously contained within Chapter 9 has been incorporated into or is contained in the following documents or sections of the Bridge Design Manual:

Road & Bridge Design Publications

Monthly Update – May 2016

2

Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) are available at the MDOT Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) Standard Naming Conventions (Chapter 3) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements). Michigan Structure Inventory and Appraisal Coding Guide Bridge Design Manual Section 2.05, Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control

Bridge Design Guides

6.29.06A: Revised EA04 bars to EB04 bars at fascia and under railing. 6.29.09E, 6.29.17A: Revised EA06 bars to EB06 bars at fascia and under railing. 6.29.10B: Added note to use waterstop only when railing is mounted flush to the slab. 6.29.10D: Added dimensions for EB06 bar for 4 foot wide box beams. 6.29.16A: Added waterstop to section A-A. 6.29.17H: Deleted waterstop from sections.

Updates to MDOT Cell Library, Bridge Auto Draw Program, etc., may be required in tandem with some of this month's updates. Until such updates to automated tools can be made, it is the designer's/detailer's responsibility to manually incorporate any necessary revisions to notes and plan details to reflect these revisions.

 

  

 

 Index to Special Details

5-23-2016  

 

 

SPECIAL DETAIL

NUMBER

NUMBER

OF SHEETS

TITLE

CURRENT

DATE

21

2 GUARDRAIL AT INTERSECTIONS 3-14-16

*24

8

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPES 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8 4-25-16

99

2

CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH WIRE ROPE 9-22-14

R-1-G 9

DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 7-28-15

R-28-J 7

SIDEWALK RAMP AND DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS 3-15-16

R-53-A 22

TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER LIMITED DEFLECTION 8-14-15

*R-60-J 16

GUARDRAIL TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D 4-22-16

R-61-H 19

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T (SKT, FLEAT, & X-Lite) 3-15-16

R-62-H 10

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T (SKT & X-Lite) 3-15-16

R-63-C 16

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 3B & 3T 3-15-16

*R-66-E 4

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS 4-27-16

R-67-G 7

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAILS 3-15-16

*R-72-D 11

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL & GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN INSTALLATIONS 5-11-16

R-73-F 6

GUARDRAIL OVER BOX OR SLAB CULVERTS 3-15-16

R-83-C 5

UTILITY TRENCHES 2-8-16

R-126-I 5

PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY CONCRETE & STEEL BARRIER 8-25-15

* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for (beginning with) the August letting.

Note: Former Standard Plans IV-87, IV-89, IV-90, and IV-91 Series, used for building cast-in-place concrete head walls for elliptical and circular pipe culverts, are now being replaced with plans that detail each specific size. The Municipal Utilities Unit will provide these full sized special details for inclusion in construction plans for MDOT jobs. To assure prompt delivery, requests must be made in advance.

Former Standard Plans IV-93 and IV-94 series have been replaced with precast concrete box & three-sided culverts as per the 2012 Standard Specifications for Construction.

 

    

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

  

  

    Index to Bridge Detail Sheets

5-23-2016  

 

 

DETAIL NUMBER

NUMBER

OF SHEETS

TITLE

CURRENT

DATE

B-22-E

4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (R4 TYPE RAILING) 3-15-16

B-23-F

4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (OPEN PARAPET RAILING) 3-15-16

B-101-G

2 DRAIN CASTING ASSEMBLEY DETAILS 2-8-16

EJ3AB

1 or 2

EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16

EJ4O

1 or 2

EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16

PC-2G

1

70" PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 3-31-06

PC-4E

1

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 1800 BEAM DETAILS 3-31-06

PC-1L

1

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 7-12-06

* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for

(beginning with) the August letting. Note: Details EJ3AA & EJ4N are interactive, i.e. designers and detailers choose details

based upon railing type and angle of crossing. Place all details appropriate for the project, structure specific information, and the Expansion Joint Device quantity on the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.

Detail PC-1L, PC-2G and PC-4E shall have structure specific information and quantities added to the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.

 

 

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

B.L.T.

W.K.P. 1 8

OF

TR

AF

FI

C

DI

RE

CTI

ON

PL

AN

VIE

W

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL,

TY

PE

4B

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL,

TY

PE

4T

FL

AR

E

RA

TE

S

IN

TE

RC

EP

T

AN

D

TH

E

BA

CK

SL

OP

E.

BE

TW

EE

N

TH

E

FO

RE

SL

OP

E /

BA

CK

SL

OP

E

FL

AR

E

RA

TE

CA

N

BE

RE

DU

CE

D

TO 8:1

GU

AR

DR

AIL

AT 6'-3" P

OST SP

ACI

NG

VA

RI

ABLE LE

NGT

H

SE

E

NO

TE

S

FO

R

BU

RI

ED

PO

ST

S

6"

MI

N.

TY

P.

SE

E

NO

TE

S

FO

R

BU

RI

ED

PO

ST

S

6"

MI

N.

TY

P.

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AN

CH

OR

ED I

N

BA

CK

SL

OP

E

TY

PE 4

B

SE

E

NO

TE

S

FO

R

BU

RI

ED

PO

ST

S

6"

MI

N.

TY

P.

(mp

h)

DE

SI

GN

SP

EE

D

A

LE

VE

L

SL

OP

E

BEI

NG

DE

SI

RA

BL

E

1:1

0

SL

OP

E

OR

FL

AT

TE

R,

WI

TH

EXI

STI

NG

SL

OP

E

SL

OP

E

TO

MA

TC

H

FA

CE

OF

34"28"

70

60

50

40

30

FL

AR

E

7:1

8:1

11:1

14:1

15:1

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

(MI

NI

MU

M)

BU

RY

TW

O

PO

ST

S

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AN

CH

OR

ED I

N

BA

CK

SL

OP

E

TY

PE 4

T

(MI

NI

MU

M)

BU

RY

TW

O

PO

ST

S

VARIES

ED

GE

OF

SH

OU

LD

ER

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AIL

AN

CH

ORE

D I

N

BA

CKSL

OPE

6 SP

ACES

AT 6'-3"

DETAIL

SPECIAL24

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Kirk T. Steudle

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

4-25-2016

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

OF

TR

AF

FI

C

DI

RE

CTI

ON

PL

AN

VIE

W

FL

AR

E

RA

TE

S

IN

TE

RC

EP

T

AN

D

TH

E

BA

CK

SL

OP

E.

BE

TW

EE

N

TH

E

FO

RE

SL

OP

E /

BA

CK

SL

OP

E

FL

AR

E

RA

TE

CA

N

BE

RE

DU

CE

D

TO 8:1

SE

E

NO

TE

S

FO

R

BU

RI

ED

PO

ST

S

6"

MI

N.

TY

P.

SE

E

NO

TE

S

FO

R

BU

RI

ED

PO

ST

S

6"

MI

N.

TY

P.

(mp

h)

DE

SI

GN

SP

EE

D

A

LE

VE

L

SL

OP

E

BEI

NG

DE

SI

RA

BL

E

1:1

0

SL

OP

E

OR

FL

AT

TE

R,

WI

TH

EXI

STI

NG

SL

OP

E

SL

OP

E

TO

MA

TC

H

FA

CE

OF

31"

70

60

50

40

30

FL

AR

E

7:1

8:1

11:1

14:1

15:1

(MI

NI

MU

M)

BU

RY

TW

O

PO

ST

S

VARIES

ED

GE

OF

SH

OU

LD

ER

2 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL,

TY

PE

4M

GS-8

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

VA

RI

ABLE LE

NGT

H FL

ARE

D

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YPE

MGS-8

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

34'-4•

"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AN

CH

OR

ED I

N

BA

CK

SL

OP

E

TY

PE 4

MG

S-8

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

T

LE

NG

TH

9'-4•

"

EF

FE

CTI

VE

W-

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

T

ST

AN

DA

RD (12'-6")

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

T

MG

S (9'-4•

")

POST SP

ACI

NG

6'-3" T

YPI

CAL

BE

AM ELE

ME

NT LE

NGT

H9'-4•" EFFE

CTI

VE

BE

AM ELE

ME

NT LE

NGT

H12'-6" EFFE

CTI

VE

34'-4•"

GU

AR

DR

AIL

AN

CH

ORE

D I

N

BA

CKSL

OPE

BE

AM ELE

ME

NT LE

NGT

H12'-6" EFFE

CTI

VE

4-25-2016

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

UPPER CORRUGATION ONLY.

ANCHOR PLATE SHALL BE PLACED ON

EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT ENDINGS.

THE BEAM ELEMENT MAY BE USED FOR

HOLES WILL BE ALLOWED SO THAT

* AN OPTIONAL SET OF ANCHOR PLATE

PLAN VIEW

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE

PLAN R-61-SERIES)

(SEE STANDARD

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4B

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4T

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

LINE POST FOR

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

LINE POST FOR

PLAN R-61-SERIES)

(SEE STANDARD

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

BEARING PLATE

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

BEARING PLATE

OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS

NOTE:

OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS

NOTE:

SOIL PLATE

GROUND

UNDISTURBED

GROUND

UNDISTURBED

31"

STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES BY ADDING TWO HOLES

MODIFIED FROM SOIL PLATE SPECIFIED ON

NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)

†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH

SEE POST DETAILS

TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST

8 HOLES

* ƒ" DIA.

NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)

†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH

SEE POST DETAILS

TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

EXISTING

PERPENDICULAR TO THE POST

THE 24" DIMENSION BEING

THE CENTER OF THE POST WITH

PLATE CAN BE FASTENED TO

DRILL ƒ" DIAMETER HOLES SO

‚" THICK STEEL PLATE

6"

6"

6"

18"

12" 12"

24"

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

SOIL PLATE

EXCAVATION LIMITS

1'-0"1'-2"

12'-6"

PROPOSED GROUND

GROUND LINE

SPLICE (TYP.)

34"

PROPOSED GROUND

12'-6"

1'-0"

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

25"

EXCAVATION LIMITS

SOIL PLATEGROUND LINE

SPLICE (TYP.)

28"

3 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

4-25-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE

PLAN R-61-SERIES)

(SEE STANDARD

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)

BEARING PLATE

OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS

NOTE:

GROUND

UNDISTURBED

NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)

†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH

SEE POST DETAILS

TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST

PROPOSED GROUND

1'-0"

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

28"

EXCAVATION LIMITS

SOIL PLATE

31"

WOOD POST DETAILS

POST 1 POST 2

22"

36"

2•" DIA. HOLE

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

14"

6"

7'-0"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

6"

7'-0"

4"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

9"

6"

3"

8"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

9"

6"

3"

8"

4"

4 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

PLAN VIEW

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4MGS-8

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

4-25-2016

W-BEAM ELEMENT

STANDARD (12'-6")

GROUND LINE

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

9'-4•" EFFECTIVE

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

BEAM ELEMENT

MGS (9'-4•")

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS

LINE POST FOR

(TYP.)

SPLICE

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

WOOD POST DETAILS

WOOD POST DETAILS

POST 1 POST 2

POST 1 POST 2

19"

33"

2•" DIA. HOLE

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

14"

6"

7'-0"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

6"

7'-0"

4"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

9"

6"

3"

8"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

9"

6"

3"

8"

4"

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4B

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4T

7†

"17

…"

15"

7†

"32

…"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

2•" DIA. HOLE

9"

6"

7'-0"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

9"

7'-0"

6"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

4"

6"

3"

8"

4"

6"

3"

8"

5 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

4-25-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

PLAN VIEW

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4B

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4T

(TYP.)

DRILL HOLE

(TYP.)

DRILL HOLE

AT POST

SECTION

AT POST

SECTION

WITH RUB RAIL

SEE DETAIL BELOW

SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)

SEE DETAIL BELOW

SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)

WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)

HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND

†" DIA. X 9•" LONG

WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)

HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND

†" DIA. X 9•" LONG

WITH RUB RAIL

1'-8ƒ" VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL 1'-8ƒ"

1'-6" OR GREATER

14"

1'-8ƒ" VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL 1'-8ƒ"

14"

1'-6" OR GREATER

WITH RUB RAIL

3"+

3…

"

2'-6"

SPECIAL END SHOE

(OPTIONAL)

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" X 2•"

3•

"3•

"

4" WHEN SLOT LENGTH IS 5"

3" WHEN SLOT LENGTH IS 3"

(TYP.)

1" DIA. HOLES

8•"

7‚"

1'-0‚

"

< ‚

"

(3" OR 5" SLOT LENGTHS)

12" 4" 4"

\ BEAM ELEMENT

\ ž" x 3" OR 5" SLOTS

INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4B OR TYPE 4T.

EXTRA POSTS, SPECIAL END SHOES, GUARDRAIL, HARDWARE AND ANY EXTRA WORK ARE

NOTE:

6 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

4-25-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

(TYP.)

DRILL HOLE

AT POST

SECTION

WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)

HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND

†" DIA. X 9•" LONG

WITH RUB RAIL

1'-8ƒ" 1'-8ƒ"

1'-6" OR GREATER

14"

WITH RUB RAIL

PLAN VIEW GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8

VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL

3'-1•" 3'-1•"

SEE DETAIL SHEET 6

SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)

7 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

TYPE 4MGS-8

WORK ARE INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE

EXTRA POSTS, SPECIAL END SHOES, GUARDRAIL, HARDWARE AND ANY EXTRA

NOTE:

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8

4-25-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR

8 8DETAIL

SPECIAL24

THE TOP OF THE BEARING PLATE TO KEEP THE BEARING PLATE FROM ROTATING.

TWO HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE WOOD POST AT

OR PUNCHED AND REGALVANIZED. BURNING WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.

WHEN ADDITIONAL POST BOLT SLOTS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE DRILLED

INSTALLED SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.

AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN TIGHTENED, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE

ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.

EROSION AND SNAG AN IMPACTING VEHICLE.

COVER ON ALL SIDES TO LESSEN THE POSSIBILITY IT WILL BE EXPOSED BY

TERMINAL SHALL BE SET A MINIMUM 6" INTO THE BACKSLOPE AND HAVE 6" OF

APPLICABLE, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN.

SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE

BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD

ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING

NOTES:

BURIED ENDING SKETCHES

EDGE OF

TRAVELED LANE

OF TRAFFI

CDI

RECTION

(OTHER POSTS ALONG THE FLARED GUARDRAIL RUN ARE NOT SHOWN)

AND THE LAST BURIED GUARDRAIL POST ARE SHOWN.

NOTE: ONLY THE LAST GUARDRAIL POST OF THE PARALLEL GUARDRAIL RUN

MAKE SURE PROPER DRAINAGE IS MAINTAINED

IF 1'-6" OR GREATER INSTALL RUB RAIL,

SEE NOTES

FOR BURIED POSTS

6" MIN. TYP.

PRIMARY RAIL IS 1'-6" OR MORE. SEE DETAILS.

GRADE. A W BEAM RUB RAIL WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE OPENING UNDER THE

THE GUARDRAIL SHALL REMAIN AT A CONSTANT HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE LOCAL

4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8

BACKSLOPE TYPES

GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN

4-25-2016

WOOD POST STEEL POST ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE A

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

( WOOD POST )

22"

GROUND LINE

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

6"

7"

6'-0"

3'-7"

WOOD LINE POST

6" x 8"

22"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

7"

6'-0"

3'-7"

UNDER NUT

ROUND WASHER

POST BOLT WITH

8"

UNDER NUT

ROUND WASHER

POST BOLT WITH

GROUND LINE

AND TYPICAL POST SPACING

EFFECTIVE BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6"

* 28"

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

GROUND LINEOPTIONAL

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

GROUND LINE

* 2

8"

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

COATED NAIL

3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC

WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM

TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO

SHOULDER

NORMAL

2'-0"

8"8"(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

14"

7"

22"

3'-7"

6'-0"

** 5'-0" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS

** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".

B.L.T.

W.K.P. 1 16

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Kirk T. Steudle

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENTR-60-J

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD

( WOOD POST )

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

* 28"

GROUND LINE

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

GROUND LINE

WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

6" x 8"

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

8" 8" 8"(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

14"

7"

6'-0"

22"

3'-7"

NAIL

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED

A MINIMUM 3" LONG

TO WOOD POST WITH

TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR BD)

( STEEL POST )

GROUND LINE

* 2

8"

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

22"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

7"

6'-0"

3'-7"

14"

GROUND LINE

UNDER NUT

ROUND WASHER

POST BOLT WITH

FOR STEEL POST

WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

ROUTED 6" x 8"

BEAM ELEMENT

POST BOLT

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

162

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

NUT

ROUND WASHER

FOR STEEL POST

ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

(OPTIONAL)

GALVANIZING HOLE

2" TO 3"

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

TOP

SIDEFRONT

WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE B AND TYPE BD

FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS

TOP

FRONT SIDE

FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS

WOOD POST STEEL POST

BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS

1'-0•"

2"2" 4‚"4‚"

1„"

\ STEEL POST

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

\ POST BOLT SLOT

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

x 1„"

1'-0•"

2"2" 4‚"4‚"

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

x 1„"

\ WOOD POST

\ POST BOLT SLOT AND

3"

14"

7"

7"

1„"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

+ „"-

\

14"

7"

7"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)

163

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

8"

…"

6"

4‚" 3"3"8"

6"

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

( WOOD POST )

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD

( WOOD POST )

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

GROUND LINE

* 34"

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

LINE

GROUND

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

2'-0"

8"8"(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

SHOULDER

NORMAL

7‰

"28"

7'-0"

4'-0

Ž"

22"

7†

"

22"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

7'-0"

4'-0

Ž"

8" 8"

7†

"

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

28"

7‰

"

8"

OFFSET BLOCK

6" x 8" WOOD

GROUND LINE

GROUND LINE

* 3

4"

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

** 5'-0" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS

** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".

164

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T OR TD

( STEEL POST )

BLOCK AND POST CONNECTION DETAILS

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

22"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT

7'-0"

4'-0

Ž"

7†

"

28"

7‰

"

GROUND LINEFOR STEEL POST

WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

ROUTED 6" x 8" UNDER NUT

ROUND WASHER

POST BOLT WITH

BEAM ELEMENT

POST BOLT (TYP.)

NUT (TYP.)

(TYP.)

ROUND WASHER

GROUND LINE

* 34"

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING STEEL POST

POST BOLT

ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING STEEL POST TO

POST BOLT

WOOD POST STEEL POST

ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING STEEL POST TO

POST BOLT

TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING STEEL POST

POST BOLT

WOOD POST STEEL POST

165

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

FOR STEEL POST

ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK

(OPTIONAL)

GALVANIZING HOLE

2" TO 3"

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

TOP

SIDEFRONT

WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TYPE TD

FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS

TOP

FRONT SIDE

FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS

WOOD POST STEEL POST

THRIE BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS

1'-0•"

2"2" 4‚"4‚"

1„"

\ STEEL POST

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

\ POST BOLT SLOT

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

x 1„"

1'-0•"

2"2" 4‚"4‚"

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

x 1„"

\ WOOD POST

\ POST BOLT SLOT AND

3"3"

8"

8"

…"

6"6"

4‚"

3"2

2"

1„"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

+ „"-

\

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

7‰

"7

‰"

7†

"

22"

7‰

"7

‰"

7†

"

(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)

166

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

( WOOD POST )

6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

COATED NAIL

3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC

WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM

TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO

SHOULDER

NORMAL

2'-8"

8"

14"

7"

25"

3'-4"

** 5'-8" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS

** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-8".

6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST

8"

14"

7"

25"

3'-4"

6'-0"

** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

NAIL

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED

A MINIMUM 3" LONG

TO WOOD POST WITH

TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK

GROUND LINE

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D

( WOOD POST )

8"

8"8"

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8

167

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

6'-0"

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

( STEEL POST )

25"

7"

6'-0"

3'-4"

14"

UNDER NUT

ROUND WASHER

POST BOLT WITH

NUT

ROUND WASHER

BEAM ELEMENT

POST BOLT

GROUND LINE

FOR STEEL POST

WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

ROUTED 6" x 8"

FOR STEEL POST

ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

STEEL LINE POST

W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 (OR MGS-8D)

168

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

(OPTIONAL)

GALVANIZING HOLE

2" TO 3"

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING STEEL POST TO

POST BOLT

WOOD POST STEEL POST

TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK

CONNECTING WOOD POST

POST BOLT

1„"

\ STEEL POST

BLOCK AND POST CONNECTION DETAILS

TOP

SIDEFRONT

FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS

TOP

FRONT SIDE

FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS

3"3"

…"

6"6"

4‚"

3"

14"

7"

7"

1„"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

+ „"-

\

14"

7"

7"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 AND TYPE MGS-8D

8

8"

169

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

6'-3" TYPICAL POST SPACING

12'-6" EFFECTIVE BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

GROUND LINE

* 31"

TOP OF RAIL

* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB

28"

31"

GROUND LINE

34"

GROUND LINE

31"

30"

\ MGS POST

GUARDRAIL POST

\ EXISTING

\ MGS POST

GUARDRAIL POST

\ EXISTING

TYPE 1B, 2B OR 3B

APPROACH TERMINAL

OR GUARDRAIL

GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

1610

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

DETAIL A1, T1, T4, OR T6

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN

GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING FOR

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 1B, 2B, OR 3B

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B, GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD, OR

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D TO

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING CONNECTING

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE DETAIL A1, T1, T4 OR T6

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN,

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T, GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD,

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D TO

ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING CONNECTING

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

9'-4•" EFFECTIVE

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

34'-4•" HEIGHT TRANSITION

W-BEAM ELEMENT

STANDARD (12'-6")

BEAM ELEMENT

MGS (9'-4•")

W-BEAM ELEMENT

STANDARD (12'-6")

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

9'-4•" EFFECTIVE

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

12'-6" EFFECTIVE

28'-1•" HEIGHT TRANSITION

LENGTH

EFFECTIVE

6'-3"

W-BEAM ELEMENT

STANDARD (12'-6")

BEAM ELEMENT

MGS (9'-4•")

TRANSITION

THRIE BEAM

4-22-2016

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

SECTION THROUGH BEAM ELEMENT

Œ"

1˜"

3‰" ˆ"

3‚"

-0 + „"

TOLERANCE

3‚

"

…" R

(TYP.)

1'-0‚

"

+

‰"

(TYP.)

•" R

SYMMETRICAL

ABOUT \

•" R

(TYP.) NE

UT

RA

L

AXI

S

1̂ "

10°

1611

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS

1'-0•"

2"2" 4‚"4‚"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

x 1„"

\ SLOTTED HOLE

SLOTTED HOLE

ƒ" x 2•"

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"

3'-1•"

\ OF POST BOLT SLOTS

3'-1•" 3'-1•"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

ž" x 1„"

(TYP.)

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

10'-5"

FRONT ELEVATION OF BEAM ELEMENT

4‚"4‚" 2"

13'-6•"

4‚"4‚"2"

3'-1•"

\ OF POST BOLT SLOTS

3'-1•" 3'-1•" 3'-1•"

(TYP.)

SPLICE BOLT SLOT

ž" x 1„"

(TYP.)

POST BOLT SLOT

ƒ" x 2•"

FRONT ELEVATION OF MGS (9'-4•") BEAM ELEMENT

4-22-2016

pikkaw
Highlight

SECTION THROUGH THRIE BEAM ELEMENT

FRONT ELEVATION OF THRIE BEAM ELEMENT

4‚"4‚" 2"

13'-6•"

POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ƒ" x 2•"

6'-3"

4‚"4‚"2"

6'-3"

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

x 1„"

> OF POST BOLT SLOTS

(FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TD)

3‰" ˆ"

3‚"

-0 + „"

TOLERANCE

1˜"

3‚

"

Œ"

1„

"3‚

"

•" R

(TYP.)

1̂ "

10°

…" R

(TYP.)

(TYP.)

•" R

Œ"

1„

"3‚

"3‚

"

1'-8"

+

‰"

1612

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"

7'-3•"

1'-6ƒ" 1'-6ƒ" 3'-1•"

1'-8"

+

‰"

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ž" x 1„"

POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ƒ" x 2•"

6„

"4„

"

4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"

7'-3•"

1'-6ƒ" 1'-6ƒ" 3'-1•"

+

‰"

1'-0‚

"

1'-8"

+

‰"

POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ƒ" x 2•"

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

x 1„"

1613

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

4‚"4‚"2" 4‚"4‚" 2"

7'-3•"

1'-6ƒ"1'-6ƒ"3'-1•"

1'-8"

<

‰"6„

"4„

"

<

‰"

1'-0‚

"

<

‰"

1'-0‚

"

POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ƒ" x 2•"

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

ž" x 1„"

ASYMMETRICAL THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONSNOTE: ASYMMETRICAL TRANSITION TYPE WILL VARY BY LOCATION DEPENDING ON GUARDRAIL LAYOUT

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

SECTION THROUGH

THRIE BEAM TRANSITION

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TYPE TD)

DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR TYPE T)

SPLICE BOLT AND POST BOLT

MINIMUM POST BOLT THREAD LENGTHAT BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE POSTS AND AT INTERMEDIATE POSTS

POST BOLTS, SPLICE BOLTS AND WASHERS

)

150'

METAL TAG

ROUND WASHER NUT

STANDARD WIDTH VARIABLE WIDTH (FIELD BEND)

8"

MA

X.

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

(TWO REQUIRED FOR TYPE TD)

(ONE REQUIRED FOR TYPE BD)

POST BOLT LENGTH 2'-10"

PAY ITEM: GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TD) GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR T)

PAY ITEM EACH SIDE:

APPROX. 6'-3"OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE TD) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-10"

OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE BD) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-3"

OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE TD) 6" x 9" x 1'-10"

OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE BD) 6" x 9" x 1'-3"

(TWO REQUIRED FOR TYPE TD)

(ONE REQUIRED FOR TYPE BD)

POST BOLT LENGTH 2'-4"

BOLT LENGTH MINIMUM THREAD LENGTH

18"

26•" 3"

9•" 1ƒ"

2•"

POSTBLOCK

OFFSET

POST BOLTS

NO. LENGTH

SPLICE BOLTS WASHERS

WOOD

WOOD

STEEL

STEEL

WOOD

STEEL

WOOD

STEEL

WOOD

STEEL

(ROUND)

NO

T

NE

ED

ED

AT I

NT

ER

ME

DI

AT

E

PO

ST

S

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

WOOD

A

B

BD

T

TD

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

4

8

8

16

12

24

1

1

1

2

2

4

1

2

*

REQ'D (NO. REQ'D)(NO. REQ'D)

TYPE

GUARDRAIL

N/A

N/A

26•"

9•"

18"

2"

9•"

9•"

9•"

9•"

* 26•"

18"

(1‚" LONG)

EXTEND MORE THAN •" BEYOND NUT.

(OR TYPE T) TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TYPE TD). POST BOLTS SHALL NOT

* EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

AND 8 ON TYPE B END).

THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONS REQUIRE 20 SPLICE BOLTS EACH (12 0N TYPE T END

1‚" (SPLICE BOLT)

SEE CHART (POST BOLT)

1Š"

†"

“"Š"

•"

"

"

1„

"

†"

RECESS ONE OR BOTH SIDES

•" DIA. x ˆ" DEEP¤"1ƒ" DIAMETER

•" DIAMETER

1‚" •"

0.012" THICK

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

+ „

"

1•

" ƒ"

ƒ"

1" 3"

4" + „"

METAL TAG

EMBOSSED ƒ" HIGH ON THE

CURVED GUARDRAIL RADIUS

FOR CURVED GUARDRAIL WITH RADIUS OF 150' OR LESS 1614

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

MINIMUM POST BOLT THREAD LENGTHAT BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE POSTS AND AT INTERMEDIATE POSTS

POST BOLTS, SPLICE BOLTS AND WASHERS

STANDARD WIDTH VARIABLE WIDTH (FIELD BEND)

8"

MA

X.

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

APPROX. 6'-3"

BOLT LENGTH MINIMUM THREAD LENGTH

18"

26•" 3"

9•" 1ƒ"

2•"

POSTBLOCK

OFFSET

POST BOLTS

NO. LENGTH

SPLICE BOLTS WASHERS

(ROUND)

REQ'D (NO. REQ'D)(NO. REQ'D)

TYPE

GUARDRAIL(1‚" LONG)

WOOD

STEEL

WOOD

WOOD

1

216

2

* 26•"

9•"MGS-8D

WOOD

STEEL

WOOD

WOOD

1

18

1

1

9•"

18"MGS-8

1615

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

PAY ITEM: GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D

DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM

OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE MGS-8D) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-2"

OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE MGS-8D) 6" x 9" x 1'-2"

2'-4" FOR TYPE MGS-8D

POST BOLT LENGTH

2'-10" FOR TYPE MGS-8D

POST BOLT LENGTH

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8

PAY ITEM EACH SIDE:

NUT.

TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D POST BOLTS SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN •" BEYOND

* EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8

ON TYPE MGS END).

THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONS REQUIRE 20 SPLICE BOLTS EACH (12 0N TYPE T END AND 8

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

PLACEMENT OF GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS

ONE-WAY TRAFFIC

TWO-WAY TRAFFIC

GUARDRAIL

NOTES GOVERNING THE USE OF GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS

GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR

DIRECTION OF RAIL LAP

TWO-WAY TRAFFIC

ONE-WAY TRAFFIC

3"

2"

ƒ"•

"

(TYP.)

REFLECTORIZED SIDE FACING TRAFFIC

13 GAGE GALVANIZED

(0.0934") NOMINAL

2ƒ"

5"

‚" R

1•

"96° + 4°

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

TRAFFIC

SURFACE FACING

REFLECTORIZED GUARDRAILSEE NOTES BELOW

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

GUARDRAIL

SEE NOTES BELOW

ADJACENT GUARDRAIL POSTS

IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ON

PLACE GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

GUARDRAIL

HEIGHT AND COMPATIBILITY WITH POST HOLES.

THE POST BOLT HOLES SHALL BE LOCATED TO ENSURE PROPER RAIL

DEPTH OF THE BLOCK SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD AND

BEVELS SPECIFIED. THE LENGTH (FRONT AND BACK FACE), WIDTH AND

A 1" BEVELED TOP MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF WOOD BLOCKS WITHOUT

WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS WITH •" BEVELS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OR

HEIGHT.

THE POST BOLT HOLES SHALL BE LOCATED TO ENSURE PROPER RAIL

DEPTH OF THE POST SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD AND

WOOD POSTS WITHOUT BEVELS SPECIFIED. THE LENGTH, WIDTH AND

WOOD POSTS WITH •" BEVELS AT THE TOP MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF

BENT SECTION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH CURVED ELEMENT.

150' OR LESS. A TAG IDENTIFYING THE CURVATURE OF THE SHOP

BEAM ELEMENTS SHALL BE SHOP BENT TO PLAN RADIUS FOR CURVE RADII

GUARDRAIL.

SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE GROUND JUST IN FRONT OF THE

THE GUARDRAIL PANEL IS LOCATED BEHIND THE CURB THE RAIL HEIGHT

CLOSEST TO THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED LANE. WHEN THE FACE OF

GUTTER PAN, WHICH IS THE POINT ON THE GUTTER PAN THAT IS

THE RAIL HEIGHT SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE

WHEN THE FACE OF GUARDRAIL IS PLACED FLUSH WITH FACE OF CURB,

GUIDE TO STANDARDIZED HIGHWAY BARRIER HARDWARE."

AGC-ARTBA JOINT COMMITTEE, TASK FORCE 13 PUBLICATION TITLED "A

DETAILS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD ARE ACCORDING TO THE AASHTO-

NOTES:

GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE.

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINALS AND STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES FOR

GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINALS, STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES FOR

SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES, R-62-SERIES OR R-63-SERIES FOR

1616

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

R-60-J

BY THE ENGINEER.)

REASONABLY LEVEL BEYOND THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, AS DETERMINED

EMBEDDED FOR ADDED STABILITY. (NOT NECESSARY WHEN THE SLOPE IS

PLAN, 8'-0" POSTS SHALL BE PROVIDED, WITH THE ADDITIONAL LENGTH

THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, RATHER THAN AS SPECIFIED ON THIS

WHEN THE PLANS SPECIFY GUARDRAIL (TYPE B OR T) TO BE PLACED ON

REGARDLESS OF ROADWAY LIGHTING.

1. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS SHALL BE USED ON ALL STANDARD GUARDRAIL RUNS,

b) 25'-0" ON CURVES WITH A RADIUS LESS THAN 1150'.

1150' OR MORE.

a) 5O'-0" ON TANGENT SECTIONS AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF

2. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS ARE TO BE SPACED AT THE FOLLOWING INTERVALS:

APPROPRIATE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL STANDARD PLAN.

3. FOR GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR PLACEMENT ON APPROACH TERMINALS, SEE THE

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL.

4. A GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR IS TO BE PLACED ON THE SECOND POST FROM THE

PLACED ON THE UPPER POST BOLT.

5. ON GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TYPE TD GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS ARE TO BE

6. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS SHALL MATCH COLOR OF EDGE LINE.

BY THE ENGINEER.)

REASONABLY LEVEL BEYOND THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, AS DETERMINED

EMBEDDED FOR ADDED STABILITY. (NOT NECESSARY WHEN THE SLOPE IS

9'-0" POSTS SHALL BE PROVIDED, WITH THE ADDITIONAL LENGTH

SHOULDER HINGE POINT, RATHER THAN AS SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN,

WHEN THE PLANS SPECIFY GUARDRAIL TYPE MGS-8 TO BE PLACED ON THE

MGS-8, & MGS-8D

TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,

GUARDRAIL,

4-22-2016

B.L.T.

W.K.P. 41R-66-E

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Kirk T. Steudle

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING

GROUND LINE

28"

BEARING PLATE

3"

SPLICE (TYP.)

34"

BEARING PLATE

3"

UPPER CORRUGATION ONLY.

ANCHOR PLATE SHALL BE PLACED ON

EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT ENDINGS.

THE BEAM ELEMENT MAY BE USED FOR

HOLES WILL BE ALLOWED SO THAT

* AN OPTIONAL SET OF ANCHOR PLATE

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST

NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

SH

OU

LD

ER

NO

RM

AL

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T

R-61-SERIES

SEE STANDARD PLAN

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

R-61-SERIES

SEE STANDARD PLAN

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

LINE POST FOR

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE B

TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE T

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLEGROUND LINE

SPLICE (TYP.)

GUARDRAIL, TYPE T

LINE POST FOR

SH

OU

LD

ER

NO

RM

AL

1'-0"

12'-6"

12'-6"

1'-2" 1'-0"

8 HOLES

* ƒ" DIA.

> 2•" DIA. HOLE

> 2•" DIA. HOLE

(6" x 8" x 7'-0")

ON LAST TWO POSTS

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED

(6" x 8" x 7'-0")

ON LAST TWO POSTS

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED

4-27-2016

42R-66-E

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING

W-BEAM ELEMENT

STANDARD (12'-6")

R-61-SERIES

SEE STANDARD PLAN

CABLE ASSEMBLY

ANCHOR PLATE AND

(6" x 8" x 7'-0")

ON LAST TWO POSTS

WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED

OF TRAFFIC

DIRECTION

SH

OU

LD

ER

NO

RM

AL

1'-2"

NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST

HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)

BEARING PLATE

PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE> 2•" DIA. HOLE

31"

3"

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS

TERMINAL END SHOE

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS

SPLICE (TYP.)

GROUND LINE

BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH

9'-4•" EFFECTIVE

POST SPACING

6'-3" TYPICAL

BEAM ELEMENT

MGS (9'-4•")

4-27-2016

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS

LINE POST FOR

GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

3"7†

"

3"

( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T )

WOOD POST DETAILWOOD POST DETAIL

6" 8"

4"

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

2•" DIA. HOLE

7'-

0"

6" 8"

4"

2•" DIA. HOLE

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

7'-

0"

7"

7"

1'-

7"

1'-

5…

"

( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B )

WOOD POST DETAIL

3"

6"

4"

8"

7"

1'-1

0"

2•" DIA. HOLE

ƒ" DIA. HOLES

7'-0"

( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS )

43R-66-E

TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING

4-27-2016

FOR DETAILS OF GUARDRAIL PLACEMENT, SEE STANDARD PLAN R-59-SERIES.

ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.

LOOSEN.

BE INSTALLED ON EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT

AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN TIGHTENED, A SECOND NUT SHALL

ROTATING.

AT THE TOP OF THE BEARING PLATE TO KEEP THE BEARING PLATE FROM

TWO HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE WOOD POST

APPLICABLE, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD.

SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE

BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD

ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING

NOTES:

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

TYPE B OR TYPE MGS

TERMINAL END SHOE,

44R-66-E

TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS

GUARDRAIL DEPARTING

4-27-2016

POST SLEEVE

‡"

BEARING PLATE

30

8•"

3" MIN.3" MIN.

8•"

TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE T

o30

o

6"

8"

4"

5"

8"

1ˆ" DIA. HOLE

TACK WELDED TO †" THICK STEEL PLATE

‚" THICK x 1" x 8" STEEL PLATE

‚"

2'-

0"

+ ‚

"

1" TO 2…" R

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

x 1„"

1'-

8"

+ ‚

"

6‚" R

3…

"

2‚"

6‚" R

3…

"

2‚"

1" TO 2…" R

SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)

x 1„"

1'-

4"

+ ‚

"

1'-

0‚

"

+ ‚

"

2"

I.

D.

7•"+7•"+

2'-0" APPROX.2'-0" APPROX.

B.L.T.

W.K.P. 1 11R-72-D

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Kirk T. Steudle

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

SE

E

PO

ST

PL

AC

EM

EN

T

DE

TAI

L

75'-0"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-1

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

CL

EA

R

SP

AN

12'-6"

75'-0"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-1

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

13

56

42

24

53

1

2'-8"

31"

31"

PL

AN

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL

LO

NG

SP

AN, D

ET

AIL

MG

S-1

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

POI

NT

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

TY

PE 2

B.

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

OR

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

LA

YO

UT

TO

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

FR

OM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

TO

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

*

SE

E

ST

AN

DA

RD

PL

AN

R-6

0-

SE

RI

ES

FO

R

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

AN

D

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

87'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-2

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

CL

EA

R

SP

AN

18'-9"

SE

E

PO

ST

PL

AC

EM

EN

T

DE

TAI

L

13

56

42

13

42

PL

AN

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL

LO

NG

SP

AN, D

ET

AIL

MG

S-2

31"

31"

56

87'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-2

2 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

POI

NT

2'-8"

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

TY

PE 2

B.

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

OR

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

LA

YO

UT

TO

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

FR

OM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

TO

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

*

SE

E

ST

AN

DA

RD

PL

AN

R-6

0-

SE

RI

ES

FO

R

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

AN

D

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

5-11-2016

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

CL

EA

R

SP

AN

25'-0"

SE

E

PO

ST

PL

AC

EM

EN

T

DE

TAI

L 13

56

42

23

1

PL

AN

EL

EV

ATIO

N

GU

AR

DR

AIL

LO

NG

SP

AN, D

ET

AIL

MG

S-3

45

31"

31"

78

67

11

2'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-3

11

2'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

MG

S-3

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

3 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

POI

NT

2'-8"

AT

THI

S

POI

NT

OR

BE

YO

ND

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

MA

Y

BE

FL

AR

ED

TY

PE 2

B.

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

OR

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

LA

YO

UT

TO

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

FR

OM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

TO

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

*

SE

E

ST

AN

DA

RD

PL

AN

R-6

0-

SE

RI

ES

FO

R

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

AN

D

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8

31"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

PA

RTI

NG

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE

MG

S

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 2

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

AP

PR

OA

CH

TE

RMI

NA

L,

TY

PE 1

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

MG

S-8 *

37'-6"

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

4 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

PL

AN

EL

EV

ATIO

N

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

POI

NT

12'-6"

56

74

32

1

25'-0"

CL

EA

R

SP

AN

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

B-2

5

10

0'-0"

NE

ST

ED

TY

PE

B

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

TS

25'-0"

CL

EA

R

SP

AN

GU

AR

DR

AIL

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAIL

B-25

12'-6"

12'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

12'-6"

56

74

32

1

12'-6"

12'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

10

0'-0"

NE

ST

ED

TY

PE

B

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

TS

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

LO

NG

SP

AN,

DE

TAI

L

B-2

5

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

12'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

BG

UA

RD

RAI

L,

TY

PE

B

28"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

TE

RMI

NA

L.

IN

ST

AL

L

A

MI

NI

MU

M

OF 1

2'-6"

OF

TY

PE

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

BE

TW

EE

N

PO

ST 7

AN

D

OF

FS

ET

BL

OC

K.

SE

E

ST

AN

DA

RD

PL

AN

R-6

0-

SE

RI

ES.

PO

ST

S 4, 5, 6,

AN

D 7

AR

E

ST

AN

DA

RD

ST

EE

L

OR

WO

OD

TY

PE

B

PO

ST

S

WI

TH

AT

TA

CH

ED

TO

TH

E

PO

ST.

SE

E

SH

EE

T 1

0

FO

R

CR

T

PO

ST

DE

TAI

L.

PO

ST

S 1, 2,

AN

D 3

AR

E

CR

T

PO

ST

S

WI

TH

TW

O

ST

AN

DA

RD

WO

OD

OF

FS

ET

BL

OC

KS

NO

TE

S:

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

5 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

OF

TR

AF

FI

C

DI

RE

CTI

ON

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

A A

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G3

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G3 (

TY

P.)

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 12'-6"

SP

AN )

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G2 (

TY

P.)

B C

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 12'-6"

SP

AN )

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E

7'-

0"

PO

ST

S)

C

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

B

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

B ( 12'-6"

SP

AN )

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G2

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

(U

SE

AT

DE

EP

TH

RO

AT

ED

DO

WN

SP

OU

T

HE

AD

ER

S)

12'-6"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G1

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G1 (

TY

P.)

12'-6"

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E

7'-

0"

PO

ST

S)

PL

AN

VIE

W ( 12'-6"

SP

AN )

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

KS

AT 3'-1•

"

37'-6"

OF

W-

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E 7'-0"

PO

ST

S)

12'-6"

12

GA

GE

W-

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

TS

PA

CE

R

BL

OC

KS

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

6 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E 7'-0"

PO

ST

S)

OF

TR

AF

FI

C

DI

RE

CTI

ON

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

PL

AN

VIE

W ( 15'-7•

"

SP

AN )

B

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

KS

AT 3'-1•

"

3'-1•

"

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E

7'-

0"

PO

ST

S)

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G2

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G2 (

TY

P.)

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 15'-7•

"

SP

AN )

B

3'-1•

"1

5'-7•

"

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G3

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G3 (

TY

P.)

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 15'-7•

"

SP

AN )

C

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

C

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

15'-7•

"

12

GA

GE

W-

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

T

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

KS

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

7 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

B

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E

7'-

0"

PO

ST

S)

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G2

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G2 (

TY

P.)

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

B C

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 18'-9"

SP

AN )

37'-6"

OF

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

WI

TH

W-

BE

AM

ON

BA

CK (

US

E

7'-

0"

PO

ST

S)

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

DE

TAI

L

G3

SE

E

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

K

DE

TAI

L

G3 (

TY

P.)

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

C

W-

BE

AM

BA

CK

ED

GU

AR

DR

AIL, T

YP

E

T ( 18'-9"

SP

AN )

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

T

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

18'-9"

SP

AC

ER

BL

OC

KS

AT 3'-1•

"

6'-3"

PO

ST

SP

ACI

NG

TH

RI

E

BE

AM

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

PL

AN

VIE

W ( 18'-9"

SP

AN )

18'-9"

GU

AR

DR

AI

L,

TY

PE

B

OF

TR

AF

FI

C

DI

RE

CTI

ON

12

GA

GE

W-

BE

AM

EL

EM

EN

TS

PA

CE

R

BL

OC

KS

5-11-2016

1'-0"

MIN.

1'-0"

MIN.

11

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

POST PLACEMENT DETAIL

7"

6'-0"

ƒ" DIA.

(TYP)

3•" DIA.

2'-8"

1'-3

ƒ"

6"

6"

PLAN

SIDEFRONT

FACE OF HEADWALL (TYP)

WITH OR IN FRONT OF FRONT

BACK OF POST MUST BE FLUSH

8"

THAN 2" ABOVE THE SHOULDER

HEADWALL MUST NOT PROTRUDE MORE

NOTE:

8"

MGS-CRT POST

7"

ƒ" DIA.

6"

6"

TOP

SIDEFRONT12"

14"

14"

12"

7"

ƒ" DIA.

TOP

SIDEFRONT

14"

14"

12"

12"

6"

4‚"

…"

1„"

+ „"-

\

FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS

FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS

MGS 12" OFFSET BLOCK

MGS 12" OFFSET BLOCK

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

8 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

5-11-2016

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

COATED NAIL

3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC

WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM

TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO

2'-8"

14"

7"

25"

3'-4"

6'-0"

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

2'-8"

14"

7"

25"

3'-4"

6'-0"

POST 1 THROUGH 3 DETAIL

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

12"

12" 8"

MGS-CRT POST

POST 4 THROUGH 6 DETAIL

POST 4 THROUGH 8 DETAIL

GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAILS MGS-1 & MGS-2

GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAILS MGS-1, MGS-2, & MGS-3

9 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL MGS-3

(WOOD POST SHOWN)

SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES

TYPE MGS WOOD OR STEEL LINE POST

OFFSET BLOCK

MGS 12" WOOD

OFFSET BLOCK

MGS 12" WOOD

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

7"

22"

16"

27"

6'-0"

6"

3"

8"

4"

ƒ" DIA. HOLE

3•" DIA. HOLES

8"

CRT POST

8"

14"

WASHER UNDER NUT

POST BOLT WITH ROUND

7"

22"

(POST 1 AND 3)

SPLICE BOLT (TYP.)

8"

10 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

3'-7"

6'-0"

POST 4 THROUGH 7 DETAIL

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

3'-7"

6'-0"

POST 1 THROUGH 3 DETAIL

GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL B-25

LINE

GROUND

HINGE POINT

SHOULDER

8"

14"

7"

22"

GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL B-25

(WOOD POST SHOWN)

SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES

TYPE B WOOD OR STEEL LINE POST

( CRT )

TERMINAL POST

CONTROLLED RELEASING

DETAIL

NESTED GUARDRAIL

BEAM ELEMENT

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

BEAM ELEMENT

GUARDRAIL, TYPE B

NESTED GUARDRAIL

(POST 5 AND 7)

SPLICE BOLT (TYP.)

NESTED GUARDRAIL

OFFSET BLOCK

6" x 8" WOOD

OFFSET BLOCKS

6" x 8" WOOD

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

11 11R-72-D

INSTALLATIONS

AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN

W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL

OTHER OPTIONS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND USED.

GUARDRAIL BRIDGE ANCHORAGE AS SPECIFIED ON STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES,

IF USE OF THIS DESIGN WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE POST SPACING WITHIN A

POST SPACING SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE APPROACH END.

WHEN THE SPANNING DISTANCE BETWEEN POSTS IS 15'-7•", THE 3'-1•"

USED WHERE 6'-3" POST SPACING AND POST EMBEDMENT CANNOT BE MET.

THE GUARDRAIL MODIFICATIONS DETAILED ON THIS STANDARD SHOULD ONLY BE

APPLICABLE, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED ON THIS STANDARD.

SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE

BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT STANDARD

ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING

NOTES:

SECTION C - C

SECTION B - B

2'-6"

UNDER NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHER

EDGE OF CULVERT

34"

SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G3

UNDER BOLT HEAD AND TOP NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS

1'-4"

SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G2

32"

2'-6"

UNDER NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHER

EDGE OF CULVERT

UNDER BOLT HEAD AND TOP NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS

SECTION A - A

SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G1

1'-4"

UNDER BOLT HEAD AND NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS

1'-4"

28"

2'-6"

UNDER NUT

PLACE POST BOLT WASHER

EDGE OF CULVERT

5-11-2016

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN CHAPTER 2 - STEPS IN PRODUCING PLANS INDEX (continued) 2.02.15 Scope Verification Meeting (11-19-99) 2.02.16 THE Plan Review (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.02.17 Region/TSC Maintaining Traffic Recommendations 2.02.18 Final Constructability Review (10-22-2012) 2.02.19 Omissions Errors / Check (OEC) Meeting (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.02.20 Rehabilitation Project Scoping (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.03 PLAN PREPARATION STEPS 2.03.01 FHWA Oversight / MDOT Oversight (12-5-2005) 2.03.02 Study 2.03.03 Preliminary Plans 2.03.04 Final Plans 2.03.05 Changes During Plan Preparation 2.03.06 Changes After Plan Completion 2.04 PLAN PRODUCTION PROCEDURE 2.04.01 Unit Assignment 2.04.02 Plan Distribution 2.04.03 Estimating Man-Hours 2.04.04 Project History 2.04.05 Project Contact Person 2.05 BRIDGE DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUAILTY CONTROL (5-23-2016) 2.05.01 Overview 2.05.02 Definitions 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures 2.05.04 Role of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 2.05.05 References and Other Sources of Information Appendix 2.02.04 Survey/Mapping Action Request (8-20-2009) (5-28-2013)

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05 BRIDGE DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUAILTY CONTROL (5-23-2016) 2.05.01 Overview A. To ensure bridges are designed correctly,

with no errors once the design calculations, drawings, and specifications are finalized, MDOT requires QA/QC procedures in accordance with this section.

B. The MDOT Bridge Design QA/QC

program consists of organizational procedures established to ensure a deliberate and systematic program that reduces the risk of introducing errors and omissions into bridge design final contract documents. The MDOT QA/QC program provides checks and balances within the organization to assure quality in final contract plans and specifications. The MDOT QA/QC program is implemented at different levels or phases of project activity, as defined in the MDOT Bridge Design Manual, the MDOT Road Design Manual, and the MDOT Quality Assurance and Quality Control Process Guide for Project Managers and as included in this section.

C. The rigor and level of resources allocated

to QA/QC applications on a given bridge are tempered by the size, complexity, and degree of redundancy in the structural system involved, and by the degree of standardization of the design. For major projects involving unusual, complex, and innovative features, a peer review may be desirable to raise the level of confidence in the quality of design and construction.

2.05.02 Definitions A. Quality Control (QC). Procedures followed within a unit or

working group to check the accuracy of the calculations, drawings, and specifications for the purpose of detecting and correcting design omissions and errors to accomplish the overarching goal of producing complete and error free final plans and specifications. QC occurs continuously throughout the course of a project.

B. Quality Assurance (QA). Review procedures followed by staff

outside the unit or working group to ensure the QC procedures were effective in preventing mistakes and promoting consistency in the development of bridge design calculations, drawings, and specifications.

C. Program Level Quality Assurance (PLQA). Review procedures followed by

management to assure the effectiveness of QC and QA procedures in verifying and measuring the level of quality of the entire bridge design QA/QC program.

D. Peer Review. A high-level QA review by a separate unit

or consultant not intimately involved with the design of the structure. Determination of the need for a peer review is made by the Bridge Design Supervising Engineer, with guidance provided by the State Bridge Alignment Team (SBAT).

E. Designer. An individual directly responsible for the

development of design calculations, drawings, and specifications, and review of shop drawings related to a specific bridge design.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.02 Definitions (continued) F. Checker. An individual responsible for performing

technical review of design calculations, drawings, and specifications.

G. Reviewer. An individual responsible for performing

QA procedures that ensure that QC procedures were performed properly.

H. Engineer of Record (EOR). An individual responsible for all aspects of

the design of the structure, including the design of all of the bridge’s systems and components. This individual is appointed by the bridge owner, and must be a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Michigan. For MDOT in-house projects, the bridge squad leader is the EOR, and signs, but does not seal the final contract plans. For consultant-designed projects, the EOR is the consultant Project Manager, and is required to seal and sign his/her portion of the final contract plans.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures A. Qualification of the Designer, Checker,

and Reviewer. The Designers, Checkers, and Reviewers

are key personnel providing well-designed, accurate, and constructible plans for use in the construction of bridges. The Designers, Checkers, and Reviewers must be experienced in structural designs and familiar with the current AASHTO bridge design and construction specifications and the MDOT Bridge Design Manual, Bridge Design Guides, and procedures.

1. Designer and Checker.

The following are the requirements for a bridge Designer and Checker.

a. Possess a professional engineer

(PE) license in Michigan with experience as a Bridge Engineer. A Designer or Checker without a PE license works under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in Michigan who is the Reviewer and Engineer of Record for the project.

b. Non-engineer staff are often

utilized to design and check CADD drawings, develop quantity calculations and perform other non-structural design functions during the course of a project. As noted above, all work is done under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in Michigan who is the Reviewer and Engineer of Record for the project.

c. The Designers’ and Checkers’

experience is commensurate with the complexity of the bridge being designed. Whenever possible, the experience of the Checker exceeds the experience of the Designer.

2.05.03 A. (continued)

2. Reviewer.

The Reviewer possesses a professional engineer (PE) license in Michigan, and has significant experience in bridge design and is familiar with MDOT’s bridge design and construction practices, procedures, and policies.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) B. Minimum Items/Areas Required to Be

Checked. Design calculations, design drawings, and

contract documents are required to be verified by a Checker with a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the project and design methods. In particular, the following minimum items/areas must be checked:

1. Design Computations and Checks.

All structural components, including deck, superstructure, and substructure components. The assumptions of the bridge design including general conditions and loadings are documented. Computations needed to determine type, size, and location of the bridge are checked including grade and quantity calculations.

2.05.03 B. (continued)

2. Bridge Contract Drawings Checks.

All components (as described above) of bridge design drawings are checked in detail. Plan notes are checked, including verification of correct materials specified. Plan notes must not alter the work, materials, or method of payment for standard pay items. All quantities and pay items are verified to be in conformance with plan details, and pay item wording checked against MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction or associated special provisions. In cases where the Designer is not the drawing Checker, the Designer at least reviews the drawings to ensure that they are in conformance with the design. After any required changes are made, names or initials are placed on the drawings indicating the individual who prepared the drawing, the individual who modified the drawing (as needed), and the Designer. The plans include the name of the unit or work area responsible for the plans. Consultant plans include their company logo.

3. Bridge Design Contract Document

Checks.

All special provisions are reviewed for appropriateness with respect to the contract plans and pay items and MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction. All permits, certifications, clauses and other supporting information are reviewed to ensure they are complete and correspond with the plans and remainder of contract package and that there are no conflicts between any documents.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) C. QC Procedures.

1. A supervisor or team leader is responsible for determining the necessary technical knowledge and experience of the Designer and Checker for that specific design. Designers and Checkers are assigned to bridge projects by matching experience and performance to project complexity.

2. The Checker is responsible to the

supervisor for quality control of the design, which includes checking the design calculations, plans, and specifications to assure accuracy and constructability. One hundred percent of all design calculations, quantity calculations, plans, and specifications are checked as part of the QC process.

3. All bridge plan sheets include the

names or initials of the person who drafted the details along with the Checker of the sheet and the date last revisions were made to that plan sheet. See Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) for guidelines related to drafting and plan preparation.

2.05.03 C. (continued)

4. All special provisions include the author’s initials and work area identifier, and are subject to a well-defined review process facilitated by MDOT’s Quality Assurance Section that includes various subject matter experts.

a. Unique special provisions

authored specifically for a project are drafted by the Designer or support area and submitted for review and approval during the course of the project.

b. Previously approved special

provisions can be used, and are reviewed by the Designer to assure that the entire content is appropriate for a project.

c. Frequently used special provisions

are utilized on projects as noted in specific use statements and are incorporated into the project without any changes.

5. Software programs such as MDOT’s

Bridge Design System, MDX, or Leap Bridge, various finite element modeling programs, among others, are often too complex for a Designer and Checker to review and confirm directly. The Designer and Checker must fully understand the methodology, assumptions, and limitations of each program prior to utilizing output on a project. This can be accomplished through review of all available program documentation and independent verification with hand calculations, spreadsheets or other known and proven software.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued)

6. All design calculations include name or initials of the Designer and Checker along with the date designed and checked.

a. Hand calculations have a

“prepared by”, and “checked by” notation for each page of the calculations.

b. Spreadsheets, MathCad

calculations, and computer programs have a “prepared by” and “checked by” notation on the user input and results pages. These sheets are generated specifically for a project, or are utilized from a previous project, sometimes generated by others. The Checker is responsible for reviewing the data input, and the Designer and Checker must have a full understanding of the methodology, assumptions, and limitations of the program or spreadsheet and be able to verify that they are appropriate for the design.

7. All calculations are checked vs. the

Final Package Submittal for the project.

a. All dimensions, member sizes, bar

sizes from design calculations are verified to match plan dimensions.

b. Reinforcing steel takeoffs are

performed and verified for consistency between detail drawings and Steel Reinforcement Detail sheets.

c. A final cost estimate (project

verification estimate) is printed, and the wording for each pay item is verified for consistency between the cost estimate, plan drawings and (if applicable) special provisions.

2.05.03 C. (continued)

8. Calculations. At the completion of the project,

provide a set of design calculations for all elements of the bid package for the design file. All calculations include completed “prepared by” and “checked by” fields. Consultants provide calculations sealed/stamped and signed by the Engineer of Record for the project, who is licensed in Michigan. Design calculations are stored within the project file in ProjectWise and hard copies (if applicable) are stored in the MDOT Design Unit in accordance with the MDOT plan retention policy.

9. The design file includes (but is not

limited to) the following.

a. Design calculations.

b. Check calculations (e.g. to verify computer output, if applicable).

c. Supporting reports (e.g.

geotechnical recommendations).

d. Cost estimates including quantity calculations and supporting documentation

e. Review comments/resolutions.

f. Documentation substantiating the

completion of Quality Control and Quality Assurance procedures in accordance with this document and other accepted standards.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) D. QA procedures.

1. The MDOT Quality Assurance and Quality Control Process Guide for Project Managers provides a deliberate and systematic process for plan development and quality assurance. These processes are further defined in other sections of the MDOT Bridge Design Manual and the MDOT Road Design Manual.

2. The MDOT Design Division Quality

Assurance Section performs QA during The Plan Review, Plan Completion (Omissions and Errors Check) and Final Package Submittal stages of each project. The Quality Assurance Section reviews all project contract documents, facilitates department wide review, and documents all review comments in accordance with section 14 of the MDOT Road Design Manual.

3. In accordance with National Bridge

Inspection Standard requirements, a load rating is performed for each bridge rehabilitation and bridge replacement/new construction project. For bridge rehabilitation projects, a preliminary load rating is typically performed at The Plan Review stage, and finalized at the Plan Completion stage. For new or reconstructed bridges, load rating is typically performed at Plan Completion stage. Load rating calculations serve as a QA of structural design of the beams for projects, and feedback is provided to the Designer if deficiencies are discovered.

4. MDOT’s Bridge Field Services (BFS)

section performs QA at the Plan Completion (Omissions and Errors Check) stage of each project. BFS maintains a plan review checklist

2.05.03 D. (continued) comprised of focus areas for plan reviews based on past experience with construction issues. BFS focuses specifically on constructability and structural fabrication aspects of bridge projects and provides feedback to the designer for incorporation into the final project package.

5. QA is performed by the project

supervisor or team leader at various times during the project and at The Plan Review, Plan Completion, and Final Package submittal stages. While QC is performed on one hundred percent of project documents, the level of QA performed by the supervisor or team leader is subject to the supervisor’s discretion based on a combination of factors such as experience of the Designer and Checker, complexity of the project, uniqueness of project parameters and details.

6. PLQA is performed by the Bridge

Design Supervising Engineer to ensure that the bridge design units, consultant coordinators, and consultant design teams are performing adequate QA/QC in accordance to this document. This involves periodic review of a representative sample of bridge design units and consultant coordinator projects at selected project milestones. The Bridge Design Supervising Engineer may assign peer reviews to promote consistency and uniformity between MDOT working units and between MDOT in-house and consultant designers. Performance measures will be developed and used to track progress in key areas.

7. If the QA review shows evidence that

the proper QA/QC process is not being properly followed, a more rigorous review of the QA/QC process documentation is performed, and recommendations are provided.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) E. In-House Design Quality Control/Quality

Assurance. All bridges designed by MDOT are

reviewed in compliance with this document and the referenced manuals and procedures. Each work unit documents a process for implementing the procedures to assure consistency within the Bridge Design Section.

F. Design Consultant Quality Control/Quality

Assurance.

1. Every consultant performing bridge design for MDOT is required to have its own QA/QC process in place. As part of the prequalification application, each consultant must submit a Quality Control Plan in accordance with the MDOT Consultant Prequalification Instructions. The QA/QC program document is available to the MDOT consultant coordinator to review as necessary throughout the course of a project.

2. Project proposals define the QA/QC

program and responsibilities specific to a project. In general, each prime consultant and sub consultant follows their own documented QA/QC procedures on file with their prequalification. Additionally, the prime consultant for a project is responsible for project level QA of sub consultant’s deliverables to assure uniformity within the project and to assure that sub consultant’s procedures are being followed. Documentation of QA/QC procedures for a specific project will be furnished to MDOT at any point during a project upon request.

2.05.03 D. (continued)

3. At the completion of a project, the consultant furnishes the completed design package, including all design calculations, quantity calculations, and documentation of completed QA/QC along with a letter certifying completion of QA/QC.

4. Consultant design contracts have

clauses protecting MDOT from design errors and omissions by requiring that the consultant’s work meet “sound, prudent, appropriate, and required professional standards and practices,” and that the consultant will promptly revise work that does not meet MDOT criteria, at no additional cost to MDOT.

5. The consultant coordinator or project

manager assures that the documented QA and QC program is followed by the consultant in accordance with this document and the project QA/QC program by performing cursory checks of submittals and contract documents throughout the course of the project and requiring changes as appropriate. Additionally, consultant coordinators will verify reasonableness of the design based on knowledge of design standards and engineering judgement.

6. At the completion of each project,

consultants are rated via performance evaluations. Past performance is a part of the scoring criteria for proposals for all Quality Based Selections. Consultants are also scored based on the experience of their QA/QC review team and the quality of their QA/QC plan as detailed in a project proposal.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) G. Corrective Actions.

QA/QC procedures are implemented on all projects. Through the PLQA, the overall program is continually monitored for effectiveness. When level of QC or QA is found to be insufficient, corrective actions are required.

1. The following actions are taken if QA

or PLQA reviews indicate that a specific design unit, consultant, or consultant coordinator is not following the process.

a. The representative sample of

projects for that unit or coordinator is increased until the Bridge Design Supervising Engineer is satisfied that the issue is corrected.

b. Concerns with consultant’s

performance are noted on consultant’s review at the completion of the project.

c. Concerns with MDOT staff

member’s performance are reflected in the staff member’s annual performance review or interim performance review, depending on severity.

2. If, during the review of project

submittals, it is evident that the consultant team has not followed QA/QC practices, payment for hours associated with QA of a project as negotiated prior to the start of a project can be withheld.

2.05.04 Role of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) A. Initial Review and Approval of Program. The general role of FHWA Division Office

is to review each State Highway Agency (SHA) QA/QC Program and to ensure the QA/QC program is thorough, effective, documented, and followed. Further, it is the role of the FHWA Office of Bridge Technology to assure uniformity within division offices regarding implementation of this guidance.

B. Periodic Program Reviews. FHWA division offices may perform

periodic reviews of the MDOT’s programs. Upon request, MDOT will provide project documents to the FHWA division office for review, in accordance with the Federal-Aid Stewardship Agreement. The need of periodic reviews depends on the complexity of the bridge projects.

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL

BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.05 References and Other Sources of Information A. MDOT Bridge Design Manual The procedures involved in preparing

bridge plans, quality control and quality assurance are interlaced within Chapters 2 – 6 as well as Chapter 15.

B. MDOT Road Design Manual

Procedures for plan preparation are addressed in Chapter 14.

C. The Quality Assurance and Quality

Control Process Guide for Project Managers

Documents the MDOT QA/QC process for

preparing road and bridge projects, and is based on a well-documented plan development procedure.

D. Program/Project Management System

(PPMS) Task Manual Documents the preconstruction process

as it pertains to project development. Networks based on the PPMS Tasks are used to plan and to track virtually every aspect of a project design schedule.

E. Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation

(MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) Bridge sample plans including plan sheet

examples of typical plan set detailing preferred details and drafting procedures.

VOLUME 5 MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

CHAPTER 6

PLAN SHEET EXAMPLES

6.00 INTRODUCTION (5-23-2016) Plan sheet examples can be found at Guidelines for Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge). The document presents samples of detail sheets that can be used as guides in preparing plans of highway bridges. The samples were selected and tailored to provide as much reference data as possible on a limited number of sheets. Each of the detail sheets of a typical set of plans is represented. At the same time, detailing procedures for a variety of bridge types are illustrated. Commentary is provided for more clarity and background on guidelines and detailing procedures. Also included are abbreviations, symbols and naming conventions for files. In general, adherence to these guides is recommended. Many of them result from past construction experience, and while other methods of presenting structural details may be equally effective, it is possible that they would create problems. The format shown is preferred if for no other reason than the familiarity that the state contractors have developed following it on previous jobs. On rare occasions, the guides may not be appropriate, but before electing to deviate, drafting personnel should be sure there is ample justification. (2-23-2001)

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

CHAPTER 9 DETAILING PRACTICES 9.00 DETAILING PRACTICES (5-23-2016) Drafting details and practices, cell libraries and other miscellaneous files can be found on the MDOT Design Services Website. (8-20-2009) (5-28-2013) Various details have been standardized and appear on specific sheets. See Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) for various details, practices and sample plan sheets. It also contains drafting degrees of accuracy, abbreviations and symbols used on plans. For naming convention of files see Chapter 3 of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements). Structure designations and additional bridge/structure information is available in the Michigan Structure Inventory and Appraisal Coding Guide. Checking of all detail drawings must be done to assure the accuracy of the plans. The drawings shall comply with the design calculations, existing design guides, and the practices listed in Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation and Section 2.05, Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control.

6.29.06A

VZ

BLT

SUPERSEDES:11/27/01

ISSUED: / /

START CROWN OF ROADWAY

EA03 BARS

BARS

EA04

LEVEL

W8 x 24

ET040408 BAR

PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK

BRIDGE RAILING, 2 TUBE

SL

AB

EM

BE

D.

MI

N.

EM

BE

D.

BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-21-SERIES.

WATER STOP **

ET040408 *

T

1'-1"

10•"

11"

11"

10•"

1'-7"

6"

6"

** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.

4"

5" 7"

ANCHOR STUD (TYP)

‡" ! x 1'-11•"

6"

8"

MI

N.

ƒ" BEVEL1"

5•"10•"3"

3"

7"

2•" < ‚"

EB04 BAR

(TYP)

HSS 5" x 5" x Š"

6" SPACING

EB04 BARS @

10•" MAX. SPACING

EA03 BARS @

1•"

3ƒ"

9" EACH SIDE OF \ RAILING POST.

* SPACE AT ALTERNATE TRANSVERSE SLAB BARS. PLACE ADDITIONAL ET040408 BARS

PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90°, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.

NOTES:

3•

"

4'-11•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)

3'-11•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES: / /

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle

VZ

BLT

6.29.09E

ON PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 4

EB06 BAR

EZ040501

EP040702

1'-9ƒ

"

2•

"

< ‚

"

@ 10•" MAX. SPA.

EA03 BARS

3"

10"

2'-3"

3'-4"

@ 8" MAX. SPA.

EP040702

(TYP.)

ƒ" BEVEL

3"

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF BARRIER RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-17-SERIES.

*

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90° PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.

2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.

ƒ" BEVEL (TYP.)

7"3"

1'-

0"

1'-1"

10" R.

2"

10"

3"

8"

1'-6"

3"

*

6"

6"

EA03 BAR

EA

04

BA

RS

SL

AB

CONDUIT

UTILITY

BOX BEAMS

PRESTRESSED

@ 6" SPA.

EA04 BARS

1•"

1•"

@ 8" MAX. SPA.

EZ040501

5"

5"

10"

1'-2"

2'-10"

3"

3ƒ"

1'-5‚"

8‚

"

2'-11ƒ

"

2'-9ƒ

"

1•

"

1•

"

"

3ƒ"

6‚"

6‚"

VERTICAL - LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.

PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB - NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.

BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.

NOTES:

PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.

**

DO NOT PLACE MORE THAN ONE 3" ! UTILITY CONDUIT IN THE BARRIER.

BARRIER.

BARS UNDER

BETWEEN EA04

PLACE EB06 BARS

3•

"

5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)

4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)

WATER STOP **

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:11/27/01

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle

6.29.10B

VZ

BLT

END WALL SECTIONS

BRIDGE RAILING, AESTHETIC PARAPET TUBE

EA04

BA

RS

EA04

BA

RS

1'-6"

BAR

EL06

EL04 BAR

* SIDEWALK FASCIA

SLAB FASCIA

EA04

BA

RS

1'-6"

(N

S)

(2)-

EA

04

07

06

(N

S)

(2)-

EA

04

04

09

EL06 BAR

SLAB FASCIA

SECTION AT END WALL

(TUBE CONNECTION AREA)

SECTION AT END WALL

(FULL CONCRETE AREA)

1'-0" 2•"

9"3" ƒ" BEVEL (TYP)7"

1'-8•

"

5"

9"

9•

"4"

2•"7"2•"

3"

LEVEL UNDER RAILING

2•"

ƒ" BEVEL (TYP)

5"

9"

9•

"

3'-8•

"

2…"2…" 7‚"

3"

* SIDEWALK FASCIA

LEVEL UNDER RAILING

3'-8•

"

1'-0"

WATER STOP **

WATER STOP **

USE WHEN RAILING IS MOUNTED FLUSH TO THE SLAB.

** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.

THE "EL" BARS SHALL BE CAST IN THE SLAB.

* IF BRIDGE RAILING IS MOUNTED FLUSH TO THE SLAB,

NOTE:

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:12/22/11

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle

MI

N.

4"

6"

MI

N.

9"

VA

RI

ES

7"

3'-0"

BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.

VERTICAL - LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.

PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.

** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.

SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.

* PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB - NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE OF

PULLOUT OF EL04 BAR.

BEAM DESIGN MUST BE CHECKED FOR ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD AND POSSIBLE

3•

"

8"7"

MAX. SPACING

EA03 BARS @ 10•"

2'-2"

1'-2"

1'-5"

VA

RI

ES

(B

AS

ED

ON

EM

BE

DM

EN

T)

1'-2"

1'-0"

*

EL040504 BARS

6" SPACING

EA04 BARS @EL04 BAR ***15"

MI

N.

*** EL04 BAR

L = a+e+f

a = 1'-2"

b = f = 8"

c,d,g = 0

EL040504

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF BRIDGE RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-25-SERIES.

EXTRA EA03 BAR

6.29.10D

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAM

AESTHETIC PARAPET TUBE RAILING ONVZ

BLT

STEEL TO BRIDGE \.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE

STEEL TO REF. LINE.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE

LINE.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90° PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF.

LEVEL UNDER RAILING

WATERSTOP **

(ENTIRE LENGTH OF BEAM)

EA04 BARS

EA04 BARS UNDER BARRIER

PLACE EB06 BARS BETWEEN

5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)

4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)

EB06 BAR

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:02/27/12

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle

VZ

BLT

AT INDEPENDENT BACKWALL

BARRIER RAILING DETAILS

**

EZ06 BARS

AS REQUIRED

EF06 & EZ06 BARS

* WHEN ! 70° OR ! 110°, CAST BARRIER END SQUARE; OTHERWISE CAST PARALLEL TO REFERENCE LINE.

TO BARRIER.

** WHEN ! 80° OR ! 100°, PLACE BARS PARALLEL TO REFERENCE LINE, OTHERWISE PLACE PERPENDICULAR

2•"

SECTION A-A

\ EXP. JOINT

SLAB FASCIA

!

EF06 &

*

BA

RRI

ER

RAI

LI

NG

REF. LINE

PLAN

1•" 1'-6"

1'-7•"

EF06 BARS

GUARD RAIL ANCHORAGE

EA

04

BA

RS

3"

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 4

EZ06 BARS

1'-

10•

"

6.29.16A

6.29.08 AND 6.29.09.

BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDES

BARRIER RAILINGS, SEE

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF

NOTE:

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

WATERSTOP (2" HIGH x 4" WIDE <)

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:05/04/06

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Polygon
thelenb
Rectangle

VZ

BLT

1'-8"

3" 1"

3"

9"

LEVEL

BARS

EA04

ƒ" BEVEL (TYP.)

RAIL POST

W6 x 25

HSS 8" x 4" x Š"

6•"8"

3'-

9"

HSS 4" x 4" x ‚" (TYP.)

1'-2"

11•"

11•"

2 SPA @ 6‚" = 1'-0•"

6.29.17A

OPTION ON PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK

BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE - BICYCLE RAILING

ET050503 BAR

1'-

1"

1'-

1"

3•

"

6"

EM

BE

D.

MI

N.

WATER STOP **

* ET050503

START CROWN OF ROADWAY

6"

SL

AB

ANCHOR STUD (TYP.)

1"! x 1'-0"

10•" MAX. SPA.

EA03 BARS @

@ 6" SPA.

EA04 BARS

2•" < ‚"

1•"

5" 9"

** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.

REMAINING AREAS.

* AT EACH POST PLACE 7 - ET050503 BARS SPACED AT 6". PLACE ET050503 BARS AT 12" MAX. IN

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-26-SERIES.

BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.

PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.

FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90°, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.

NOTES:

EA03 BARS

3ƒ"

EB06 BAR

UNDER BRUSH BLOCK

BETWEEN EA04 BARS

PLACE EB06 BARS

5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)

4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:05/04/06

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle

VZ

BLT

PEDESTRIAN RAILING SECTION

BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE

6.29.17H

ED051101 BARSE

M0

5

BA

RS

EC

05

&

ED

05

LA

PP

ED

WI

TH

8•

"

OU

T-

OU

T

SE

CTI

ON

F-

F

EK

06

12

00

EC

05

05

01

ED

05

BA

RS

EC

05

BA

RS

VARIES 3'-0" TO 4'-0"

SE

CTI

ON

E-

E

BA

RS

EK

06

12

00

BA

RS

ED

06

07

06

BA

RS

EC

05

05

01

1'-

7"

SE

CTI

ON

D-

D

GUI

DE

6.

29.

17

E

SE

E

BRI

DG

E

REI

NF

OR

CE

ME

NT

SI

DE

WA

LK

EK

061103

EM051102 BARS

BA

RS

EA

060306

4'-0"

BA

RS

EM

05

1'-

2•

"

BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: DAJ

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:08/15/03

ISSUED: 05/23/16

CHECKED BY:

thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle
thelenb
Rectangle