mdot 2016 may monthly update - som - state of michigan
TRANSCRIPT
Road & Bridge Design Publications
Monthly Update – May 2016
1
Revisions for the month of May are listed and displayed below. New special details will be included in projects submitted for the August letting as is stated on the special detail index sheets. E-mail Road related questions on these changes to [email protected]. E-mail Bridge related questions to [email protected].
Special Details
24: Guardrail Anchored in Back Slope Types 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8: Reduced the length of the Type 4MGS-8 terminal on sheets 2 & 4 from 37’-6” to 34’-4½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-60-J: Guardrail Types A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D: Reduced the length of the transition from guardrail Type MGS to guardrail Type B or T by 3’-1½” (sheet 10) using the non-standard beam element (length = 9'-4 ½") on sheet 11. R-66-E: Guardrail Departing Terminal Types B, D, & MGS: Reduced the length of the departing terminal Type MGS on sheet 2 by 3’-1½” using a non-standard beam element (length=9'-4 ½"). R-72-D: W-Beam Backed Guardrail & Guardrail Long Span Installations: Deleted the 2’-8” offset from the face of the post to the hinge point in the detail at the top of sheet 8, since it is only applicable to the MGS long span details.
Bridge Design Manual
Chapter 2 Table of Contents and 2.05: New section for Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control. Chapter 6: Sample Plans have been deleted from the manual and new Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) are available at the MDOT Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7). Chapter 9: Chapter 9 has been condensed and the information previously contained within Chapter 9 has been incorporated into or is contained in the following documents or sections of the Bridge Design Manual:
Road & Bridge Design Publications
Monthly Update – May 2016
2
Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) are available at the MDOT Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) Standard Naming Conventions (Chapter 3) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements). Michigan Structure Inventory and Appraisal Coding Guide Bridge Design Manual Section 2.05, Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control
Bridge Design Guides
6.29.06A: Revised EA04 bars to EB04 bars at fascia and under railing. 6.29.09E, 6.29.17A: Revised EA06 bars to EB06 bars at fascia and under railing. 6.29.10B: Added note to use waterstop only when railing is mounted flush to the slab. 6.29.10D: Added dimensions for EB06 bar for 4 foot wide box beams. 6.29.16A: Added waterstop to section A-A. 6.29.17H: Deleted waterstop from sections.
Updates to MDOT Cell Library, Bridge Auto Draw Program, etc., may be required in tandem with some of this month's updates. Until such updates to automated tools can be made, it is the designer's/detailer's responsibility to manually incorporate any necessary revisions to notes and plan details to reflect these revisions.
Index to Special Details
5-23-2016
SPECIAL DETAIL
NUMBER
NUMBER
OF SHEETS
TITLE
CURRENT
DATE
21
2 GUARDRAIL AT INTERSECTIONS 3-14-16
*24
8
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPES 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8 4-25-16
99
2
CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH WIRE ROPE 9-22-14
R-1-G 9
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 7-28-15
R-28-J 7
SIDEWALK RAMP AND DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS 3-15-16
R-53-A 22
TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER LIMITED DEFLECTION 8-14-15
*R-60-J 16
GUARDRAIL TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D 4-22-16
R-61-H 19
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T (SKT, FLEAT, & X-Lite) 3-15-16
R-62-H 10
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T (SKT & X-Lite) 3-15-16
R-63-C 16
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 3B & 3T 3-15-16
*R-66-E 4
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS 4-27-16
R-67-G 7
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAILS 3-15-16
*R-72-D 11
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL & GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN INSTALLATIONS 5-11-16
R-73-F 6
GUARDRAIL OVER BOX OR SLAB CULVERTS 3-15-16
R-83-C 5
UTILITY TRENCHES 2-8-16
R-126-I 5
PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY CONCRETE & STEEL BARRIER 8-25-15
* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for (beginning with) the August letting.
Note: Former Standard Plans IV-87, IV-89, IV-90, and IV-91 Series, used for building cast-in-place concrete head walls for elliptical and circular pipe culverts, are now being replaced with plans that detail each specific size. The Municipal Utilities Unit will provide these full sized special details for inclusion in construction plans for MDOT jobs. To assure prompt delivery, requests must be made in advance.
Former Standard Plans IV-93 and IV-94 series have been replaced with precast concrete box & three-sided culverts as per the 2012 Standard Specifications for Construction.
Index to Bridge Detail Sheets
5-23-2016
DETAIL NUMBER
NUMBER
OF SHEETS
TITLE
CURRENT
DATE
B-22-E
4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (R4 TYPE RAILING) 3-15-16
B-23-F
4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (OPEN PARAPET RAILING) 3-15-16
B-101-G
2 DRAIN CASTING ASSEMBLEY DETAILS 2-8-16
EJ3AB
1 or 2
EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16
EJ4O
1 or 2
EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16
PC-2G
1
70" PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 3-31-06
PC-4E
1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 1800 BEAM DETAILS 3-31-06
PC-1L
1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 7-12-06
* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for
(beginning with) the August letting. Note: Details EJ3AA & EJ4N are interactive, i.e. designers and detailers choose details
based upon railing type and angle of crossing. Place all details appropriate for the project, structure specific information, and the Expansion Joint Device quantity on the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.
Detail PC-1L, PC-2G and PC-4E shall have structure specific information and quantities added to the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 8
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL,
TY
PE
4B
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL,
TY
PE
4T
FL
AR
E
RA
TE
S
IN
TE
RC
EP
T
AN
D
TH
E
BA
CK
SL
OP
E.
BE
TW
EE
N
TH
E
FO
RE
SL
OP
E /
BA
CK
SL
OP
E
FL
AR
E
RA
TE
CA
N
BE
RE
DU
CE
D
TO 8:1
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AT 6'-3" P
OST SP
ACI
NG
VA
RI
ABLE LE
NGT
H
SE
E
NO
TE
S
FO
R
BU
RI
ED
PO
ST
S
6"
MI
N.
TY
P.
SE
E
NO
TE
S
FO
R
BU
RI
ED
PO
ST
S
6"
MI
N.
TY
P.
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AN
CH
OR
ED I
N
BA
CK
SL
OP
E
TY
PE 4
B
SE
E
NO
TE
S
FO
R
BU
RI
ED
PO
ST
S
6"
MI
N.
TY
P.
(mp
h)
DE
SI
GN
SP
EE
D
A
LE
VE
L
SL
OP
E
BEI
NG
DE
SI
RA
BL
E
1:1
0
SL
OP
E
OR
FL
AT
TE
R,
WI
TH
EXI
STI
NG
SL
OP
E
SL
OP
E
TO
MA
TC
H
FA
CE
OF
34"28"
70
60
50
40
30
FL
AR
E
7:1
8:1
11:1
14:1
15:1
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
(MI
NI
MU
M)
BU
RY
TW
O
PO
ST
S
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AN
CH
OR
ED I
N
BA
CK
SL
OP
E
TY
PE 4
T
(MI
NI
MU
M)
BU
RY
TW
O
PO
ST
S
VARIES
ED
GE
OF
SH
OU
LD
ER
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AN
CH
ORE
D I
N
BA
CKSL
OPE
6 SP
ACES
AT 6'-3"
DETAIL
SPECIAL24
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
4-25-2016
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
FL
AR
E
RA
TE
S
IN
TE
RC
EP
T
AN
D
TH
E
BA
CK
SL
OP
E.
BE
TW
EE
N
TH
E
FO
RE
SL
OP
E /
BA
CK
SL
OP
E
FL
AR
E
RA
TE
CA
N
BE
RE
DU
CE
D
TO 8:1
SE
E
NO
TE
S
FO
R
BU
RI
ED
PO
ST
S
6"
MI
N.
TY
P.
SE
E
NO
TE
S
FO
R
BU
RI
ED
PO
ST
S
6"
MI
N.
TY
P.
(mp
h)
DE
SI
GN
SP
EE
D
A
LE
VE
L
SL
OP
E
BEI
NG
DE
SI
RA
BL
E
1:1
0
SL
OP
E
OR
FL
AT
TE
R,
WI
TH
EXI
STI
NG
SL
OP
E
SL
OP
E
TO
MA
TC
H
FA
CE
OF
31"
70
60
50
40
30
FL
AR
E
7:1
8:1
11:1
14:1
15:1
(MI
NI
MU
M)
BU
RY
TW
O
PO
ST
S
VARIES
ED
GE
OF
SH
OU
LD
ER
2 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL,
TY
PE
4M
GS-8
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
VA
RI
ABLE LE
NGT
H FL
ARE
D
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YPE
MGS-8
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
34'-4•
"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AN
CH
OR
ED I
N
BA
CK
SL
OP
E
TY
PE 4
MG
S-8
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
LE
NG
TH
9'-4•
"
EF
FE
CTI
VE
W-
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
ST
AN
DA
RD (12'-6")
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
MG
S (9'-4•
")
POST SP
ACI
NG
6'-3" T
YPI
CAL
BE
AM ELE
ME
NT LE
NGT
H9'-4•" EFFE
CTI
VE
BE
AM ELE
ME
NT LE
NGT
H12'-6" EFFE
CTI
VE
34'-4•"
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AN
CH
ORE
D I
N
BA
CKSL
OPE
BE
AM ELE
ME
NT LE
NGT
H12'-6" EFFE
CTI
VE
4-25-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
UPPER CORRUGATION ONLY.
ANCHOR PLATE SHALL BE PLACED ON
EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT ENDINGS.
THE BEAM ELEMENT MAY BE USED FOR
HOLES WILL BE ALLOWED SO THAT
* AN OPTIONAL SET OF ANCHOR PLATE
PLAN VIEW
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE
PLAN R-61-SERIES)
(SEE STANDARD
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4B
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4T
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
LINE POST FOR
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
LINE POST FOR
PLAN R-61-SERIES)
(SEE STANDARD
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
BEARING PLATE
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
BEARING PLATE
OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS
NOTE:
OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS
NOTE:
SOIL PLATE
GROUND
UNDISTURBED
GROUND
UNDISTURBED
31"
STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES BY ADDING TWO HOLES
MODIFIED FROM SOIL PLATE SPECIFIED ON
NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)
†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH
SEE POST DETAILS
TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST
8 HOLES
* ƒ" DIA.
NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)
†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH
SEE POST DETAILS
TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
EXISTING
PERPENDICULAR TO THE POST
THE 24" DIMENSION BEING
THE CENTER OF THE POST WITH
PLATE CAN BE FASTENED TO
DRILL ƒ" DIAMETER HOLES SO
‚" THICK STEEL PLATE
6"
6"
6"
18"
12" 12"
24"
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
SOIL PLATE
EXCAVATION LIMITS
1'-0"1'-2"
12'-6"
PROPOSED GROUND
GROUND LINE
SPLICE (TYP.)
34"
PROPOSED GROUND
12'-6"
1'-0"
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
25"
EXCAVATION LIMITS
SOIL PLATEGROUND LINE
SPLICE (TYP.)
28"
3 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
4-25-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE
PLAN R-61-SERIES)
(SEE STANDARD
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES)
BEARING PLATE
OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST TWO POSTS
NOTE:
GROUND
UNDISTURBED
NUT AND WASHERS (TYP.)
†" DIA. HEX HEAD BOLT WITH
SEE POST DETAILS
TWO POSTS (6" x 8" x 7'-0")
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED FOR LAST
PROPOSED GROUND
1'-0"
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
28"
EXCAVATION LIMITS
SOIL PLATE
31"
WOOD POST DETAILS
POST 1 POST 2
22"
36"
2•" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
14"
6"
7'-0"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
6"
7'-0"
4"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
9"
6"
3"
8"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
9"
6"
3"
8"
4"
4 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
PLAN VIEW
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4MGS-8
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
4-25-2016
W-BEAM ELEMENT
STANDARD (12'-6")
GROUND LINE
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
9'-4•" EFFECTIVE
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
BEAM ELEMENT
MGS (9'-4•")
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS
LINE POST FOR
(TYP.)
SPLICE
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
WOOD POST DETAILS
WOOD POST DETAILS
POST 1 POST 2
POST 1 POST 2
19"
33"
2•" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
14"
6"
7'-0"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
6"
7'-0"
4"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
9"
6"
3"
8"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
9"
6"
3"
8"
4"
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4B
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4T
7†
"17
…"
15"
7†
"32
…"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
2•" DIA. HOLE
9"
6"
7'-0"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
9"
7'-0"
6"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
4"
6"
3"
8"
4"
6"
3"
8"
5 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
4-25-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
PLAN VIEW
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4B
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4T
(TYP.)
DRILL HOLE
(TYP.)
DRILL HOLE
AT POST
SECTION
AT POST
SECTION
WITH RUB RAIL
SEE DETAIL BELOW
SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL BELOW
SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)
WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)
HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND
†" DIA. X 9•" LONG
WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)
HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND
†" DIA. X 9•" LONG
WITH RUB RAIL
1'-8ƒ" VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL 1'-8ƒ"
1'-6" OR GREATER
14"
1'-8ƒ" VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL 1'-8ƒ"
14"
1'-6" OR GREATER
WITH RUB RAIL
3"+
3…
"
2'-6"
SPECIAL END SHOE
(OPTIONAL)
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" X 2•"
3•
"3•
"
4" WHEN SLOT LENGTH IS 5"
3" WHEN SLOT LENGTH IS 3"
(TYP.)
1" DIA. HOLES
8•"
7‚"
1'-0‚
"
< ‚
"
(3" OR 5" SLOT LENGTHS)
12" 4" 4"
\ BEAM ELEMENT
\ ž" x 3" OR 5" SLOTS
INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPE 4B OR TYPE 4T.
EXTRA POSTS, SPECIAL END SHOES, GUARDRAIL, HARDWARE AND ANY EXTRA WORK ARE
NOTE:
6 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
4-25-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
(TYP.)
DRILL HOLE
AT POST
SECTION
WASHER UNDER NUT (TYP.)
HEX HEAD BOLT WITH ROUND
†" DIA. X 9•" LONG
WITH RUB RAIL
1'-8ƒ" 1'-8ƒ"
1'-6" OR GREATER
14"
WITH RUB RAIL
PLAN VIEW GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8
VARIABLE LENGTH W BEAM RUB RAIL
3'-1•" 3'-1•"
SEE DETAIL SHEET 6
SPECIAL END SHOE (TYP.)
7 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
TYPE 4MGS-8
WORK ARE INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE
EXTRA POSTS, SPECIAL END SHOES, GUARDRAIL, HARDWARE AND ANY EXTRA
NOTE:
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
ELEVATION GUARDRAIL, TYPE 4MGS-8
4-25-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL DETAIL FOR
8 8DETAIL
SPECIAL24
THE TOP OF THE BEARING PLATE TO KEEP THE BEARING PLATE FROM ROTATING.
TWO HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE WOOD POST AT
OR PUNCHED AND REGALVANIZED. BURNING WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.
WHEN ADDITIONAL POST BOLT SLOTS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE DRILLED
INSTALLED SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN TIGHTENED, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE
ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.
EROSION AND SNAG AN IMPACTING VEHICLE.
COVER ON ALL SIDES TO LESSEN THE POSSIBILITY IT WILL BE EXPOSED BY
TERMINAL SHALL BE SET A MINIMUM 6" INTO THE BACKSLOPE AND HAVE 6" OF
APPLICABLE, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN.
SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE
BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD
ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING
NOTES:
BURIED ENDING SKETCHES
EDGE OF
TRAVELED LANE
OF TRAFFI
CDI
RECTION
(OTHER POSTS ALONG THE FLARED GUARDRAIL RUN ARE NOT SHOWN)
AND THE LAST BURIED GUARDRAIL POST ARE SHOWN.
NOTE: ONLY THE LAST GUARDRAIL POST OF THE PARALLEL GUARDRAIL RUN
MAKE SURE PROPER DRAINAGE IS MAINTAINED
IF 1'-6" OR GREATER INSTALL RUB RAIL,
SEE NOTES
FOR BURIED POSTS
6" MIN. TYP.
PRIMARY RAIL IS 1'-6" OR MORE. SEE DETAILS.
GRADE. A W BEAM RUB RAIL WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE OPENING UNDER THE
THE GUARDRAIL SHALL REMAIN AT A CONSTANT HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE LOCAL
4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8
BACKSLOPE TYPES
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN
4-25-2016
WOOD POST STEEL POST ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE A
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
( WOOD POST )
22"
GROUND LINE
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
6"
7"
6'-0"
3'-7"
WOOD LINE POST
6" x 8"
22"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
7"
6'-0"
3'-7"
UNDER NUT
ROUND WASHER
POST BOLT WITH
8"
UNDER NUT
ROUND WASHER
POST BOLT WITH
GROUND LINE
AND TYPICAL POST SPACING
EFFECTIVE BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6"
* 28"
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
GROUND LINEOPTIONAL
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
GROUND LINE
* 2
8"
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
COATED NAIL
3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC
WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM
TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO
SHOULDER
NORMAL
2'-0"
8"8"(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
14"
7"
22"
3'-7"
6'-0"
** 5'-0" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 16
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENTR-60-J
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD
( WOOD POST )
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
* 28"
GROUND LINE
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
GROUND LINE
WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8"
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
8" 8" 8"(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
14"
7"
6'-0"
22"
3'-7"
NAIL
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED
A MINIMUM 3" LONG
TO WOOD POST WITH
TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR BD)
( STEEL POST )
GROUND LINE
* 2
8"
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
22"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
7"
6'-0"
3'-7"
14"
GROUND LINE
UNDER NUT
ROUND WASHER
POST BOLT WITH
FOR STEEL POST
WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
ROUTED 6" x 8"
BEAM ELEMENT
POST BOLT
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
162
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
NUT
ROUND WASHER
FOR STEEL POST
ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
(OPTIONAL)
GALVANIZING HOLE
2" TO 3"
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
TOP
SIDEFRONT
WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE B AND TYPE BD
FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS
TOP
FRONT SIDE
FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS
WOOD POST STEEL POST
BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS
1'-0•"
2"2" 4‚"4‚"
1„"
\ STEEL POST
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
\ POST BOLT SLOT
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
x 1„"
1'-0•"
2"2" 4‚"4‚"
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
x 1„"
\ WOOD POST
\ POST BOLT SLOT AND
3"
14"
7"
7"
1„"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
+ „"-
\
14"
7"
7"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)
163
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
8"
…"
6"
4‚" 3"3"8"
6"
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
( WOOD POST )
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD
( WOOD POST )
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
GROUND LINE
* 34"
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
LINE
GROUND
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
2'-0"
8"8"(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
SHOULDER
NORMAL
7‰
"28"
7'-0"
4'-0
Ž"
22"
7†
"
22"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
7'-0"
4'-0
Ž"
8" 8"
7†
"
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
28"
7‰
"
8"
OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8" WOOD
GROUND LINE
GROUND LINE
* 3
4"
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
** 5'-0" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".
164
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T OR TD
( STEEL POST )
BLOCK AND POST CONNECTION DETAILS
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
22"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT
7'-0"
4'-0
Ž"
7†
"
28"
7‰
"
GROUND LINEFOR STEEL POST
WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
ROUTED 6" x 8" UNDER NUT
ROUND WASHER
POST BOLT WITH
BEAM ELEMENT
POST BOLT (TYP.)
NUT (TYP.)
(TYP.)
ROUND WASHER
GROUND LINE
* 34"
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING STEEL POST
POST BOLT
ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING STEEL POST TO
POST BOLT
WOOD POST STEEL POST
ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING STEEL POST TO
POST BOLT
TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING STEEL POST
POST BOLT
WOOD POST STEEL POST
165
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
FOR STEEL POST
ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK
(OPTIONAL)
GALVANIZING HOLE
2" TO 3"
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
TOP
SIDEFRONT
WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TYPE TD
FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS
TOP
FRONT SIDE
FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS
WOOD POST STEEL POST
THRIE BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS
1'-0•"
2"2" 4‚"4‚"
1„"
\ STEEL POST
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
\ POST BOLT SLOT
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
x 1„"
1'-0•"
2"2" 4‚"4‚"
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
x 1„"
\ WOOD POST
\ POST BOLT SLOT AND
3"3"
8"
8"
…"
6"6"
4‚"
3"2
2"
1„"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
+ „"-
\
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
7‰
"7
‰"
7†
"
22"
7‰
"7
‰"
7†
"
(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)
166
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
( WOOD POST )
6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
COATED NAIL
3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC
WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM
TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO
SHOULDER
NORMAL
2'-8"
8"
14"
7"
25"
3'-4"
** 5'-8" OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-8".
6" x 8" WOOD LINE POST
8"
14"
7"
25"
3'-4"
6'-0"
** FOR PAVED SHOULDER WIDTHS OF AT LEAST 12', USE 3'-0".
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
NAIL
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED
A MINIMUM 3" LONG
TO WOOD POST WITH
TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK
GROUND LINE
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D
( WOOD POST )
8"
8"8"
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8
167
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
6'-0"
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
( STEEL POST )
25"
7"
6'-0"
3'-4"
14"
UNDER NUT
ROUND WASHER
POST BOLT WITH
NUT
ROUND WASHER
BEAM ELEMENT
POST BOLT
GROUND LINE
FOR STEEL POST
WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
ROUTED 6" x 8"
FOR STEEL POST
ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
STEEL LINE POST
W6 x 9 OR W6 x 8.5
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 (OR MGS-8D)
168
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
(OPTIONAL)
GALVANIZING HOLE
2" TO 3"
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
ROUTED WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING STEEL POST TO
POST BOLT
WOOD POST STEEL POST
TO WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
CONNECTING WOOD POST
POST BOLT
1„"
\ STEEL POST
BLOCK AND POST CONNECTION DETAILS
TOP
SIDEFRONT
FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS
TOP
FRONT SIDE
FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS
3"3"
…"
6"6"
4‚"
3"
14"
7"
7"
1„"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
+ „"-
\
14"
7"
7"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 AND TYPE MGS-8D
8
8"
169
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 16 OF 16)
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
6'-3" TYPICAL POST SPACING
12'-6" EFFECTIVE BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
GROUND LINE
* 31"
TOP OF RAIL
* SEE NOTES FOR GUARDRAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CURB
28"
31"
GROUND LINE
34"
GROUND LINE
31"
30"
\ MGS POST
GUARDRAIL POST
\ EXISTING
\ MGS POST
GUARDRAIL POST
\ EXISTING
TYPE 1B, 2B OR 3B
APPROACH TERMINAL
OR GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
1610
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
DETAIL A1, T1, T4, OR T6
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN
GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING FOR
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 1B, 2B, OR 3B
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B, GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD, OR
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D TO
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING CONNECTING
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE DETAIL A1, T1, T4 OR T6
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN,
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T, GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD,
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 OR MGS-8D TO
ELEVATION SHOWING POST SPACING CONNECTING
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
9'-4•" EFFECTIVE
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
34'-4•" HEIGHT TRANSITION
W-BEAM ELEMENT
STANDARD (12'-6")
BEAM ELEMENT
MGS (9'-4•")
W-BEAM ELEMENT
STANDARD (12'-6")
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
9'-4•" EFFECTIVE
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
12'-6" EFFECTIVE
28'-1•" HEIGHT TRANSITION
LENGTH
EFFECTIVE
6'-3"
W-BEAM ELEMENT
STANDARD (12'-6")
BEAM ELEMENT
MGS (9'-4•")
TRANSITION
THRIE BEAM
4-22-2016
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
SECTION THROUGH BEAM ELEMENT
Œ"
1˜"
3‰" ˆ"
3‚"
-0 + „"
TOLERANCE
3‚
"
…" R
(TYP.)
1'-0‚
"
+
‰"
(TYP.)
•" R
SYMMETRICAL
ABOUT \
•" R
(TYP.) NE
UT
RA
L
AXI
S
1̂ "
10°
1611
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE DETAILS
1'-0•"
2"2" 4‚"4‚"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
x 1„"
\ SLOTTED HOLE
SLOTTED HOLE
ƒ" x 2•"
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"
3'-1•"
\ OF POST BOLT SLOTS
3'-1•" 3'-1•"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
ž" x 1„"
(TYP.)
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
10'-5"
FRONT ELEVATION OF BEAM ELEMENT
4‚"4‚" 2"
13'-6•"
4‚"4‚"2"
3'-1•"
\ OF POST BOLT SLOTS
3'-1•" 3'-1•" 3'-1•"
(TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
ž" x 1„"
(TYP.)
POST BOLT SLOT
ƒ" x 2•"
FRONT ELEVATION OF MGS (9'-4•") BEAM ELEMENT
4-22-2016
SECTION THROUGH THRIE BEAM ELEMENT
FRONT ELEVATION OF THRIE BEAM ELEMENT
4‚"4‚" 2"
13'-6•"
POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ƒ" x 2•"
6'-3"
4‚"4‚"2"
6'-3"
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
x 1„"
> OF POST BOLT SLOTS
(FOR GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TD)
3‰" ˆ"
3‚"
-0 + „"
TOLERANCE
1˜"
3‚
"
Œ"
1„
"3‚
"
•" R
(TYP.)
1̂ "
10°
…" R
(TYP.)
(TYP.)
•" R
Œ"
1„
"3‚
"3‚
"
1'-8"
+
‰"
1612
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"
7'-3•"
1'-6ƒ" 1'-6ƒ" 3'-1•"
1'-8"
+
‰"
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ž" x 1„"
POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ƒ" x 2•"
6„
"4„
"
4‚"4‚" 2"4‚"4‚"2"
7'-3•"
1'-6ƒ" 1'-6ƒ" 3'-1•"
+
‰"
1'-0‚
"
1'-8"
+
‰"
POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ƒ" x 2•"
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
x 1„"
1613
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
4‚"4‚"2" 4‚"4‚" 2"
7'-3•"
1'-6ƒ"1'-6ƒ"3'-1•"
1'-8"
<
‰"6„
"4„
"
<
‰"
1'-0‚
"
<
‰"
1'-0‚
"
POST BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ƒ" x 2•"
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
ž" x 1„"
ASYMMETRICAL THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONSNOTE: ASYMMETRICAL TRANSITION TYPE WILL VARY BY LOCATION DEPENDING ON GUARDRAIL LAYOUT
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
SECTION THROUGH
THRIE BEAM TRANSITION
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TYPE TD)
DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR TYPE T)
SPLICE BOLT AND POST BOLT
MINIMUM POST BOLT THREAD LENGTHAT BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE POSTS AND AT INTERMEDIATE POSTS
POST BOLTS, SPLICE BOLTS AND WASHERS
)
150'
METAL TAG
ROUND WASHER NUT
STANDARD WIDTH VARIABLE WIDTH (FIELD BEND)
8"
MA
X.
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
(TWO REQUIRED FOR TYPE TD)
(ONE REQUIRED FOR TYPE BD)
POST BOLT LENGTH 2'-10"
PAY ITEM: GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TD) GUARDRAIL, TYPE B (OR T)
PAY ITEM EACH SIDE:
APPROX. 6'-3"OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE TD) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-10"
OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE BD) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-3"
OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE TD) 6" x 9" x 1'-10"
OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE BD) 6" x 9" x 1'-3"
(TWO REQUIRED FOR TYPE TD)
(ONE REQUIRED FOR TYPE BD)
POST BOLT LENGTH 2'-4"
BOLT LENGTH MINIMUM THREAD LENGTH
18"
26•" 3"
9•" 1ƒ"
2•"
POSTBLOCK
OFFSET
POST BOLTS
NO. LENGTH
SPLICE BOLTS WASHERS
WOOD
WOOD
STEEL
STEEL
WOOD
STEEL
WOOD
STEEL
WOOD
STEEL
(ROUND)
NO
T
NE
ED
ED
AT I
NT
ER
ME
DI
AT
E
PO
ST
S
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
A
B
BD
T
TD
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
8
8
16
12
24
1
1
1
2
2
4
1
2
*
REQ'D (NO. REQ'D)(NO. REQ'D)
TYPE
GUARDRAIL
N/A
N/A
26•"
9•"
18"
2"
9•"
9•"
9•"
9•"
* 26•"
18"
(1‚" LONG)
EXTEND MORE THAN •" BEYOND NUT.
(OR TYPE T) TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE BD (OR TYPE TD). POST BOLTS SHALL NOT
* EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
AND 8 ON TYPE B END).
THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONS REQUIRE 20 SPLICE BOLTS EACH (12 0N TYPE T END
1‚" (SPLICE BOLT)
SEE CHART (POST BOLT)
1Š"
†"
“"Š"
•"
+ˆ
"
-
"
1„
"
†"
RECESS ONE OR BOTH SIDES
•" DIA. x ˆ" DEEP¤"1ƒ" DIAMETER
•" DIAMETER
1‚" •"
0.012" THICK
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
+ „
"
1•
" ƒ"
ƒ"
1" 3"
4" + „"
METAL TAG
EMBOSSED ƒ" HIGH ON THE
CURVED GUARDRAIL RADIUS
FOR CURVED GUARDRAIL WITH RADIUS OF 150' OR LESS 1614
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
MINIMUM POST BOLT THREAD LENGTHAT BEAM ELEMENT SPLICE POSTS AND AT INTERMEDIATE POSTS
POST BOLTS, SPLICE BOLTS AND WASHERS
STANDARD WIDTH VARIABLE WIDTH (FIELD BEND)
8"
MA
X.
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
APPROX. 6'-3"
BOLT LENGTH MINIMUM THREAD LENGTH
18"
26•" 3"
9•" 1ƒ"
2•"
POSTBLOCK
OFFSET
POST BOLTS
NO. LENGTH
SPLICE BOLTS WASHERS
(ROUND)
REQ'D (NO. REQ'D)(NO. REQ'D)
TYPE
GUARDRAIL(1‚" LONG)
WOOD
STEEL
WOOD
WOOD
1
216
2
* 26•"
9•"MGS-8D
WOOD
STEEL
WOOD
WOOD
1
18
1
1
9•"
18"MGS-8
1615
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
PAY ITEM: GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8 TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D
DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM
OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE MGS-8D) 6" x 1'-0" x 1'-2"
OFFSET BLOCKS (TYPE MGS-8D) 6" x 9" x 1'-2"
2'-4" FOR TYPE MGS-8D
POST BOLT LENGTH
2'-10" FOR TYPE MGS-8D
POST BOLT LENGTH
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8
PAY ITEM EACH SIDE:
NUT.
TO GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D POST BOLTS SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN •" BEYOND
* EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL SHOWING TRANSITION FROM GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8
ON TYPE MGS END).
THRIE BEAM TRANSITIONS REQUIRE 20 SPLICE BOLTS EACH (12 0N TYPE T END AND 8
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
PLACEMENT OF GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS
ONE-WAY TRAFFIC
TWO-WAY TRAFFIC
GUARDRAIL
NOTES GOVERNING THE USE OF GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS
GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR
DIRECTION OF RAIL LAP
TWO-WAY TRAFFIC
ONE-WAY TRAFFIC
3"
2"
ƒ"•
"
(TYP.)
REFLECTORIZED SIDE FACING TRAFFIC
13 GAGE GALVANIZED
(0.0934") NOMINAL
2ƒ"
5"
‚" R
1•
"96° + 4°
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
TRAFFIC
SURFACE FACING
REFLECTORIZED GUARDRAILSEE NOTES BELOW
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
GUARDRAIL
SEE NOTES BELOW
ADJACENT GUARDRAIL POSTS
IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ON
PLACE GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
GUARDRAIL
HEIGHT AND COMPATIBILITY WITH POST HOLES.
THE POST BOLT HOLES SHALL BE LOCATED TO ENSURE PROPER RAIL
DEPTH OF THE BLOCK SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD AND
BEVELS SPECIFIED. THE LENGTH (FRONT AND BACK FACE), WIDTH AND
A 1" BEVELED TOP MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF WOOD BLOCKS WITHOUT
WOOD OFFSET BLOCKS WITH •" BEVELS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OR
HEIGHT.
THE POST BOLT HOLES SHALL BE LOCATED TO ENSURE PROPER RAIL
DEPTH OF THE POST SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD AND
WOOD POSTS WITHOUT BEVELS SPECIFIED. THE LENGTH, WIDTH AND
WOOD POSTS WITH •" BEVELS AT THE TOP MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF
BENT SECTION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH CURVED ELEMENT.
150' OR LESS. A TAG IDENTIFYING THE CURVATURE OF THE SHOP
BEAM ELEMENTS SHALL BE SHOP BENT TO PLAN RADIUS FOR CURVE RADII
GUARDRAIL.
SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE GROUND JUST IN FRONT OF THE
THE GUARDRAIL PANEL IS LOCATED BEHIND THE CURB THE RAIL HEIGHT
CLOSEST TO THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED LANE. WHEN THE FACE OF
GUTTER PAN, WHICH IS THE POINT ON THE GUTTER PAN THAT IS
THE RAIL HEIGHT SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE
WHEN THE FACE OF GUARDRAIL IS PLACED FLUSH WITH FACE OF CURB,
GUIDE TO STANDARDIZED HIGHWAY BARRIER HARDWARE."
AGC-ARTBA JOINT COMMITTEE, TASK FORCE 13 PUBLICATION TITLED "A
DETAILS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD ARE ACCORDING TO THE AASHTO-
NOTES:
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE.
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINALS AND STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES FOR
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINALS, STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES FOR
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES, R-62-SERIES OR R-63-SERIES FOR
1616
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-60-J
BY THE ENGINEER.)
REASONABLY LEVEL BEYOND THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, AS DETERMINED
EMBEDDED FOR ADDED STABILITY. (NOT NECESSARY WHEN THE SLOPE IS
PLAN, 8'-0" POSTS SHALL BE PROVIDED, WITH THE ADDITIONAL LENGTH
THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, RATHER THAN AS SPECIFIED ON THIS
WHEN THE PLANS SPECIFY GUARDRAIL (TYPE B OR T) TO BE PLACED ON
REGARDLESS OF ROADWAY LIGHTING.
1. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS SHALL BE USED ON ALL STANDARD GUARDRAIL RUNS,
b) 25'-0" ON CURVES WITH A RADIUS LESS THAN 1150'.
1150' OR MORE.
a) 5O'-0" ON TANGENT SECTIONS AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF
2. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS ARE TO BE SPACED AT THE FOLLOWING INTERVALS:
APPROPRIATE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL STANDARD PLAN.
3. FOR GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR PLACEMENT ON APPROACH TERMINALS, SEE THE
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL.
4. A GUARDRAIL REFLECTOR IS TO BE PLACED ON THE SECOND POST FROM THE
PLACED ON THE UPPER POST BOLT.
5. ON GUARDRAIL, TYPE T AND TYPE TD GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS ARE TO BE
6. GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS SHALL MATCH COLOR OF EDGE LINE.
BY THE ENGINEER.)
REASONABLY LEVEL BEYOND THE SHOULDER HINGE POINT, AS DETERMINED
EMBEDDED FOR ADDED STABILITY. (NOT NECESSARY WHEN THE SLOPE IS
9'-0" POSTS SHALL BE PROVIDED, WITH THE ADDITIONAL LENGTH
SHOULDER HINGE POINT, RATHER THAN AS SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN,
WHEN THE PLANS SPECIFY GUARDRAIL TYPE MGS-8 TO BE PLACED ON THE
MGS-8, & MGS-8D
TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD,
GUARDRAIL,
4-22-2016
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 41R-66-E
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING
GROUND LINE
28"
BEARING PLATE
3"
SPLICE (TYP.)
34"
BEARING PLATE
3"
UPPER CORRUGATION ONLY.
ANCHOR PLATE SHALL BE PLACED ON
EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT ENDINGS.
THE BEAM ELEMENT MAY BE USED FOR
HOLES WILL BE ALLOWED SO THAT
* AN OPTIONAL SET OF ANCHOR PLATE
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST
NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
SH
OU
LD
ER
NO
RM
AL
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
LINE POST FOR
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE B
TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE T
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLEGROUND LINE
SPLICE (TYP.)
GUARDRAIL, TYPE T
LINE POST FOR
SH
OU
LD
ER
NO
RM
AL
1'-0"
12'-6"
12'-6"
1'-2" 1'-0"
8 HOLES
* ƒ" DIA.
> 2•" DIA. HOLE
> 2•" DIA. HOLE
(6" x 8" x 7'-0")
ON LAST TWO POSTS
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED
(6" x 8" x 7'-0")
ON LAST TWO POSTS
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED
4-27-2016
42R-66-E
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING
W-BEAM ELEMENT
STANDARD (12'-6")
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
ANCHOR PLATE AND
(6" x 8" x 7'-0")
ON LAST TWO POSTS
WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED
OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
SH
OU
LD
ER
NO
RM
AL
1'-2"
NOTE: OMIT OFFSET BLOCK ON LAST POST
HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
BEARING PLATE
PLACE POST SLEEVE IN HOLE> 2•" DIA. HOLE
31"
3"
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS
TERMINAL END SHOE
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS
SPLICE (TYP.)
GROUND LINE
BEAM ELEMENT LENGTH
9'-4•" EFFECTIVE
POST SPACING
6'-3" TYPICAL
BEAM ELEMENT
MGS (9'-4•")
4-27-2016
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS
LINE POST FOR
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
3"7†
"
3"
( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE T )
WOOD POST DETAILWOOD POST DETAIL
6" 8"
4"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
2•" DIA. HOLE
7'-
0"
6" 8"
4"
2•" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
7'-
0"
7"
7"
1'-
7"
1'-
5…
"
( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE B )
WOOD POST DETAIL
3"
6"
4"
8"
7"
1'-1
0"
2•" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
7'-0"
( FOR LAST POST, GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPE MGS )
43R-66-E
TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING
4-27-2016
FOR DETAILS OF GUARDRAIL PLACEMENT, SEE STANDARD PLAN R-59-SERIES.
ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.
LOOSEN.
BE INSTALLED ON EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN TIGHTENED, A SECOND NUT SHALL
ROTATING.
AT THE TOP OF THE BEARING PLATE TO KEEP THE BEARING PLATE FROM
TWO HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE WOOD POST
APPLICABLE, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD.
SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE
BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD
ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING
NOTES:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
TYPE B OR TYPE MGS
TERMINAL END SHOE,
44R-66-E
TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING
4-27-2016
POST SLEEVE
‡"
BEARING PLATE
30
8•"
3" MIN.3" MIN.
8•"
TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE T
o30
o
6"
8"
4"
5"
8"
1ˆ" DIA. HOLE
TACK WELDED TO †" THICK STEEL PLATE
‚" THICK x 1" x 8" STEEL PLATE
‚"
2'-
0"
+ ‚
"
1" TO 2…" R
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
x 1„"
1'-
8"
+ ‚
"
6‚" R
3…
"
2‚"
6‚" R
3…
"
2‚"
1" TO 2…" R
SPLICE BOLT SLOT (TYP.)
x 1„"
1'-
4"
+ ‚
"
1'-
0‚
"
+ ‚
"
2"
I.
D.
7•"+7•"+
2'-0" APPROX.2'-0" APPROX.
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 11R-72-D
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
SE
E
PO
ST
PL
AC
EM
EN
T
DE
TAI
L
75'-0"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-1
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
CL
EA
R
SP
AN
12'-6"
75'-0"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-1
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
13
56
42
24
53
1
2'-8"
31"
31"
PL
AN
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL
LO
NG
SP
AN, D
ET
AIL
MG
S-1
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
TY
PE 2
B.
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
OR
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
87'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-2
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
CL
EA
R
SP
AN
18'-9"
SE
E
PO
ST
PL
AC
EM
EN
T
DE
TAI
L
13
56
42
13
42
PL
AN
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL
LO
NG
SP
AN, D
ET
AIL
MG
S-2
31"
31"
56
87'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-2
2 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
2'-8"
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
TY
PE 2
B.
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
OR
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
5-11-2016
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
CL
EA
R
SP
AN
25'-0"
SE
E
PO
ST
PL
AC
EM
EN
T
DE
TAI
L 13
56
42
23
1
PL
AN
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL
LO
NG
SP
AN, D
ET
AIL
MG
S-3
45
31"
31"
78
67
11
2'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-3
11
2'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
MG
S-3
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
3 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
2'-8"
AT
THI
S
POI
NT
OR
BE
YO
ND
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
MA
Y
BE
FL
AR
ED
TY
PE 2
B.
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
OR
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
31"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
PA
RTI
NG
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE
MG
S
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 2
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L,
TY
PE 1
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
37'-6"
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
4 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
PL
AN
EL
EV
ATIO
N
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
12'-6"
56
74
32
1
25'-0"
CL
EA
R
SP
AN
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
B-2
5
10
0'-0"
NE
ST
ED
TY
PE
B
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
TS
25'-0"
CL
EA
R
SP
AN
GU
AR
DR
AIL
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAIL
B-25
12'-6"
12'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
12'-6"
56
74
32
1
12'-6"
12'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
10
0'-0"
NE
ST
ED
TY
PE
B
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
TS
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LO
NG
SP
AN,
DE
TAI
L
B-2
5
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
12'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
BG
UA
RD
RAI
L,
TY
PE
B
28"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
TE
RMI
NA
L.
IN
ST
AL
L
A
MI
NI
MU
M
OF 1
2'-6"
OF
TY
PE
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
BE
TW
EE
N
PO
ST 7
AN
D
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
K.
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES.
PO
ST
S 4, 5, 6,
AN
D 7
AR
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
ST
EE
L
OR
WO
OD
TY
PE
B
PO
ST
S
WI
TH
AT
TA
CH
ED
TO
TH
E
PO
ST.
SE
E
SH
EE
T 1
0
FO
R
CR
T
PO
ST
DE
TAI
L.
PO
ST
S 1, 2,
AN
D 3
AR
E
CR
T
PO
ST
S
WI
TH
TW
O
ST
AN
DA
RD
WO
OD
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
NO
TE
S:
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
5 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
A A
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G3
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G3 (
TY
P.)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 12'-6"
SP
AN )
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G2 (
TY
P.)
B C
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 12'-6"
SP
AN )
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E
7'-
0"
PO
ST
S)
C
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
B
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
B ( 12'-6"
SP
AN )
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G2
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
(U
SE
AT
DE
EP
TH
RO
AT
ED
DO
WN
SP
OU
T
HE
AD
ER
S)
12'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G1
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G1 (
TY
P.)
12'-6"
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E
7'-
0"
PO
ST
S)
PL
AN
VIE
W ( 12'-6"
SP
AN )
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
KS
AT 3'-1•
"
37'-6"
OF
W-
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E 7'-0"
PO
ST
S)
12'-6"
12
GA
GE
W-
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
TS
PA
CE
R
BL
OC
KS
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E 7'-0"
PO
ST
S)
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W ( 15'-7•
"
SP
AN )
B
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
KS
AT 3'-1•
"
3'-1•
"
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E
7'-
0"
PO
ST
S)
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G2
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G2 (
TY
P.)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 15'-7•
"
SP
AN )
B
3'-1•
"1
5'-7•
"
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G3
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G3 (
TY
P.)
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 15'-7•
"
SP
AN )
C
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
C
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
15'-7•
"
12
GA
GE
W-
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
KS
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
7 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
B
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E
7'-
0"
PO
ST
S)
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G2
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G2 (
TY
P.)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
B C
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 18'-9"
SP
AN )
37'-6"
OF
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
WI
TH
W-
BE
AM
ON
BA
CK (
US
E
7'-
0"
PO
ST
S)
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
DE
TAI
L
G3
SE
E
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
K
DE
TAI
L
G3 (
TY
P.)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
C
W-
BE
AM
BA
CK
ED
GU
AR
DR
AIL, T
YP
E
T ( 18'-9"
SP
AN )
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
18'-9"
SP
AC
ER
BL
OC
KS
AT 3'-1•
"
6'-3"
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W ( 18'-9"
SP
AN )
18'-9"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
12
GA
GE
W-
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
TS
PA
CE
R
BL
OC
KS
5-11-2016
1'-0"
MIN.
1'-0"
MIN.
11
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
POST PLACEMENT DETAIL
7"
6'-0"
ƒ" DIA.
(TYP)
3•" DIA.
2'-8"
1'-3
ƒ"
6"
6"
PLAN
SIDEFRONT
FACE OF HEADWALL (TYP)
WITH OR IN FRONT OF FRONT
BACK OF POST MUST BE FLUSH
8"
THAN 2" ABOVE THE SHOULDER
HEADWALL MUST NOT PROTRUDE MORE
NOTE:
8"
MGS-CRT POST
7"
ƒ" DIA.
6"
6"
TOP
SIDEFRONT12"
14"
14"
12"
7"
ƒ" DIA.
TOP
SIDEFRONT
14"
14"
12"
12"
6"
4‚"
…"
1„"
+ „"-
\
FOR USE ON WOOD POSTS
FOR USE ON STEEL POSTS
MGS 12" OFFSET BLOCK
MGS 12" OFFSET BLOCK
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
5-11-2016
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
COATED NAIL
3" LONG HOT-DIP ZINC
WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM
TOE NAIL WOOD BLOCK TO
2'-8"
14"
7"
25"
3'-4"
6'-0"
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
2'-8"
14"
7"
25"
3'-4"
6'-0"
POST 1 THROUGH 3 DETAIL
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
12"
12" 8"
MGS-CRT POST
POST 4 THROUGH 6 DETAIL
POST 4 THROUGH 8 DETAIL
GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAILS MGS-1 & MGS-2
GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAILS MGS-1, MGS-2, & MGS-3
9 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL MGS-3
(WOOD POST SHOWN)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
TYPE MGS WOOD OR STEEL LINE POST
OFFSET BLOCK
MGS 12" WOOD
OFFSET BLOCK
MGS 12" WOOD
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
7"
22"
16"
27"
6'-0"
6"
3"
8"
4"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
3•" DIA. HOLES
8"
CRT POST
8"
14"
WASHER UNDER NUT
POST BOLT WITH ROUND
7"
22"
(POST 1 AND 3)
SPLICE BOLT (TYP.)
8"
10 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
3'-7"
6'-0"
POST 4 THROUGH 7 DETAIL
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
3'-7"
6'-0"
POST 1 THROUGH 3 DETAIL
GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL B-25
LINE
GROUND
HINGE POINT
SHOULDER
8"
14"
7"
22"
GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN DETAIL B-25
(WOOD POST SHOWN)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
TYPE B WOOD OR STEEL LINE POST
( CRT )
TERMINAL POST
CONTROLLED RELEASING
DETAIL
NESTED GUARDRAIL
BEAM ELEMENT
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
BEAM ELEMENT
GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
NESTED GUARDRAIL
(POST 5 AND 7)
SPLICE BOLT (TYP.)
NESTED GUARDRAIL
OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8" WOOD
OFFSET BLOCKS
6" x 8" WOOD
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
11 11R-72-D
INSTALLATIONS
AND GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL
OTHER OPTIONS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND USED.
GUARDRAIL BRIDGE ANCHORAGE AS SPECIFIED ON STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES,
IF USE OF THIS DESIGN WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE POST SPACING WITHIN A
POST SPACING SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE APPROACH END.
WHEN THE SPANNING DISTANCE BETWEEN POSTS IS 15'-7•", THE 3'-1•"
USED WHERE 6'-3" POST SPACING AND POST EMBEDMENT CANNOT BE MET.
THE GUARDRAIL MODIFICATIONS DETAILED ON THIS STANDARD SHOULD ONLY BE
APPLICABLE, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED ON THIS STANDARD.
SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE
BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT STANDARD
ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING
NOTES:
SECTION C - C
SECTION B - B
2'-6"
UNDER NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHER
EDGE OF CULVERT
34"
SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G3
UNDER BOLT HEAD AND TOP NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS
1'-4"
SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G2
32"
2'-6"
UNDER NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHER
EDGE OF CULVERT
UNDER BOLT HEAD AND TOP NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS
SECTION A - A
SPACER BLOCK DETAIL G1
1'-4"
UNDER BOLT HEAD AND NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHERS
1'-4"
28"
2'-6"
UNDER NUT
PLACE POST BOLT WASHER
EDGE OF CULVERT
5-11-2016
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN CHAPTER 2 - STEPS IN PRODUCING PLANS INDEX (continued) 2.02.15 Scope Verification Meeting (11-19-99) 2.02.16 THE Plan Review (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.02.17 Region/TSC Maintaining Traffic Recommendations 2.02.18 Final Constructability Review (10-22-2012) 2.02.19 Omissions Errors / Check (OEC) Meeting (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.02.20 Rehabilitation Project Scoping (11-19-99) (10-22-2012) 2.03 PLAN PREPARATION STEPS 2.03.01 FHWA Oversight / MDOT Oversight (12-5-2005) 2.03.02 Study 2.03.03 Preliminary Plans 2.03.04 Final Plans 2.03.05 Changes During Plan Preparation 2.03.06 Changes After Plan Completion 2.04 PLAN PRODUCTION PROCEDURE 2.04.01 Unit Assignment 2.04.02 Plan Distribution 2.04.03 Estimating Man-Hours 2.04.04 Project History 2.04.05 Project Contact Person 2.05 BRIDGE DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUAILTY CONTROL (5-23-2016) 2.05.01 Overview 2.05.02 Definitions 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures 2.05.04 Role of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 2.05.05 References and Other Sources of Information Appendix 2.02.04 Survey/Mapping Action Request (8-20-2009) (5-28-2013)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05 BRIDGE DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUAILTY CONTROL (5-23-2016) 2.05.01 Overview A. To ensure bridges are designed correctly,
with no errors once the design calculations, drawings, and specifications are finalized, MDOT requires QA/QC procedures in accordance with this section.
B. The MDOT Bridge Design QA/QC
program consists of organizational procedures established to ensure a deliberate and systematic program that reduces the risk of introducing errors and omissions into bridge design final contract documents. The MDOT QA/QC program provides checks and balances within the organization to assure quality in final contract plans and specifications. The MDOT QA/QC program is implemented at different levels or phases of project activity, as defined in the MDOT Bridge Design Manual, the MDOT Road Design Manual, and the MDOT Quality Assurance and Quality Control Process Guide for Project Managers and as included in this section.
C. The rigor and level of resources allocated
to QA/QC applications on a given bridge are tempered by the size, complexity, and degree of redundancy in the structural system involved, and by the degree of standardization of the design. For major projects involving unusual, complex, and innovative features, a peer review may be desirable to raise the level of confidence in the quality of design and construction.
2.05.02 Definitions A. Quality Control (QC). Procedures followed within a unit or
working group to check the accuracy of the calculations, drawings, and specifications for the purpose of detecting and correcting design omissions and errors to accomplish the overarching goal of producing complete and error free final plans and specifications. QC occurs continuously throughout the course of a project.
B. Quality Assurance (QA). Review procedures followed by staff
outside the unit or working group to ensure the QC procedures were effective in preventing mistakes and promoting consistency in the development of bridge design calculations, drawings, and specifications.
C. Program Level Quality Assurance (PLQA). Review procedures followed by
management to assure the effectiveness of QC and QA procedures in verifying and measuring the level of quality of the entire bridge design QA/QC program.
D. Peer Review. A high-level QA review by a separate unit
or consultant not intimately involved with the design of the structure. Determination of the need for a peer review is made by the Bridge Design Supervising Engineer, with guidance provided by the State Bridge Alignment Team (SBAT).
E. Designer. An individual directly responsible for the
development of design calculations, drawings, and specifications, and review of shop drawings related to a specific bridge design.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.02 Definitions (continued) F. Checker. An individual responsible for performing
technical review of design calculations, drawings, and specifications.
G. Reviewer. An individual responsible for performing
QA procedures that ensure that QC procedures were performed properly.
H. Engineer of Record (EOR). An individual responsible for all aspects of
the design of the structure, including the design of all of the bridge’s systems and components. This individual is appointed by the bridge owner, and must be a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Michigan. For MDOT in-house projects, the bridge squad leader is the EOR, and signs, but does not seal the final contract plans. For consultant-designed projects, the EOR is the consultant Project Manager, and is required to seal and sign his/her portion of the final contract plans.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures A. Qualification of the Designer, Checker,
and Reviewer. The Designers, Checkers, and Reviewers
are key personnel providing well-designed, accurate, and constructible plans for use in the construction of bridges. The Designers, Checkers, and Reviewers must be experienced in structural designs and familiar with the current AASHTO bridge design and construction specifications and the MDOT Bridge Design Manual, Bridge Design Guides, and procedures.
1. Designer and Checker.
The following are the requirements for a bridge Designer and Checker.
a. Possess a professional engineer
(PE) license in Michigan with experience as a Bridge Engineer. A Designer or Checker without a PE license works under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in Michigan who is the Reviewer and Engineer of Record for the project.
b. Non-engineer staff are often
utilized to design and check CADD drawings, develop quantity calculations and perform other non-structural design functions during the course of a project. As noted above, all work is done under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed in Michigan who is the Reviewer and Engineer of Record for the project.
c. The Designers’ and Checkers’
experience is commensurate with the complexity of the bridge being designed. Whenever possible, the experience of the Checker exceeds the experience of the Designer.
2.05.03 A. (continued)
2. Reviewer.
The Reviewer possesses a professional engineer (PE) license in Michigan, and has significant experience in bridge design and is familiar with MDOT’s bridge design and construction practices, procedures, and policies.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) B. Minimum Items/Areas Required to Be
Checked. Design calculations, design drawings, and
contract documents are required to be verified by a Checker with a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the project and design methods. In particular, the following minimum items/areas must be checked:
1. Design Computations and Checks.
All structural components, including deck, superstructure, and substructure components. The assumptions of the bridge design including general conditions and loadings are documented. Computations needed to determine type, size, and location of the bridge are checked including grade and quantity calculations.
2.05.03 B. (continued)
2. Bridge Contract Drawings Checks.
All components (as described above) of bridge design drawings are checked in detail. Plan notes are checked, including verification of correct materials specified. Plan notes must not alter the work, materials, or method of payment for standard pay items. All quantities and pay items are verified to be in conformance with plan details, and pay item wording checked against MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction or associated special provisions. In cases where the Designer is not the drawing Checker, the Designer at least reviews the drawings to ensure that they are in conformance with the design. After any required changes are made, names or initials are placed on the drawings indicating the individual who prepared the drawing, the individual who modified the drawing (as needed), and the Designer. The plans include the name of the unit or work area responsible for the plans. Consultant plans include their company logo.
3. Bridge Design Contract Document
Checks.
All special provisions are reviewed for appropriateness with respect to the contract plans and pay items and MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction. All permits, certifications, clauses and other supporting information are reviewed to ensure they are complete and correspond with the plans and remainder of contract package and that there are no conflicts between any documents.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) C. QC Procedures.
1. A supervisor or team leader is responsible for determining the necessary technical knowledge and experience of the Designer and Checker for that specific design. Designers and Checkers are assigned to bridge projects by matching experience and performance to project complexity.
2. The Checker is responsible to the
supervisor for quality control of the design, which includes checking the design calculations, plans, and specifications to assure accuracy and constructability. One hundred percent of all design calculations, quantity calculations, plans, and specifications are checked as part of the QC process.
3. All bridge plan sheets include the
names or initials of the person who drafted the details along with the Checker of the sheet and the date last revisions were made to that plan sheet. See Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) for guidelines related to drafting and plan preparation.
2.05.03 C. (continued)
4. All special provisions include the author’s initials and work area identifier, and are subject to a well-defined review process facilitated by MDOT’s Quality Assurance Section that includes various subject matter experts.
a. Unique special provisions
authored specifically for a project are drafted by the Designer or support area and submitted for review and approval during the course of the project.
b. Previously approved special
provisions can be used, and are reviewed by the Designer to assure that the entire content is appropriate for a project.
c. Frequently used special provisions
are utilized on projects as noted in specific use statements and are incorporated into the project without any changes.
5. Software programs such as MDOT’s
Bridge Design System, MDX, or Leap Bridge, various finite element modeling programs, among others, are often too complex for a Designer and Checker to review and confirm directly. The Designer and Checker must fully understand the methodology, assumptions, and limitations of each program prior to utilizing output on a project. This can be accomplished through review of all available program documentation and independent verification with hand calculations, spreadsheets or other known and proven software.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued)
6. All design calculations include name or initials of the Designer and Checker along with the date designed and checked.
a. Hand calculations have a
“prepared by”, and “checked by” notation for each page of the calculations.
b. Spreadsheets, MathCad
calculations, and computer programs have a “prepared by” and “checked by” notation on the user input and results pages. These sheets are generated specifically for a project, or are utilized from a previous project, sometimes generated by others. The Checker is responsible for reviewing the data input, and the Designer and Checker must have a full understanding of the methodology, assumptions, and limitations of the program or spreadsheet and be able to verify that they are appropriate for the design.
7. All calculations are checked vs. the
Final Package Submittal for the project.
a. All dimensions, member sizes, bar
sizes from design calculations are verified to match plan dimensions.
b. Reinforcing steel takeoffs are
performed and verified for consistency between detail drawings and Steel Reinforcement Detail sheets.
c. A final cost estimate (project
verification estimate) is printed, and the wording for each pay item is verified for consistency between the cost estimate, plan drawings and (if applicable) special provisions.
2.05.03 C. (continued)
8. Calculations. At the completion of the project,
provide a set of design calculations for all elements of the bid package for the design file. All calculations include completed “prepared by” and “checked by” fields. Consultants provide calculations sealed/stamped and signed by the Engineer of Record for the project, who is licensed in Michigan. Design calculations are stored within the project file in ProjectWise and hard copies (if applicable) are stored in the MDOT Design Unit in accordance with the MDOT plan retention policy.
9. The design file includes (but is not
limited to) the following.
a. Design calculations.
b. Check calculations (e.g. to verify computer output, if applicable).
c. Supporting reports (e.g.
geotechnical recommendations).
d. Cost estimates including quantity calculations and supporting documentation
e. Review comments/resolutions.
f. Documentation substantiating the
completion of Quality Control and Quality Assurance procedures in accordance with this document and other accepted standards.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) D. QA procedures.
1. The MDOT Quality Assurance and Quality Control Process Guide for Project Managers provides a deliberate and systematic process for plan development and quality assurance. These processes are further defined in other sections of the MDOT Bridge Design Manual and the MDOT Road Design Manual.
2. The MDOT Design Division Quality
Assurance Section performs QA during The Plan Review, Plan Completion (Omissions and Errors Check) and Final Package Submittal stages of each project. The Quality Assurance Section reviews all project contract documents, facilitates department wide review, and documents all review comments in accordance with section 14 of the MDOT Road Design Manual.
3. In accordance with National Bridge
Inspection Standard requirements, a load rating is performed for each bridge rehabilitation and bridge replacement/new construction project. For bridge rehabilitation projects, a preliminary load rating is typically performed at The Plan Review stage, and finalized at the Plan Completion stage. For new or reconstructed bridges, load rating is typically performed at Plan Completion stage. Load rating calculations serve as a QA of structural design of the beams for projects, and feedback is provided to the Designer if deficiencies are discovered.
4. MDOT’s Bridge Field Services (BFS)
section performs QA at the Plan Completion (Omissions and Errors Check) stage of each project. BFS maintains a plan review checklist
2.05.03 D. (continued) comprised of focus areas for plan reviews based on past experience with construction issues. BFS focuses specifically on constructability and structural fabrication aspects of bridge projects and provides feedback to the designer for incorporation into the final project package.
5. QA is performed by the project
supervisor or team leader at various times during the project and at The Plan Review, Plan Completion, and Final Package submittal stages. While QC is performed on one hundred percent of project documents, the level of QA performed by the supervisor or team leader is subject to the supervisor’s discretion based on a combination of factors such as experience of the Designer and Checker, complexity of the project, uniqueness of project parameters and details.
6. PLQA is performed by the Bridge
Design Supervising Engineer to ensure that the bridge design units, consultant coordinators, and consultant design teams are performing adequate QA/QC in accordance to this document. This involves periodic review of a representative sample of bridge design units and consultant coordinator projects at selected project milestones. The Bridge Design Supervising Engineer may assign peer reviews to promote consistency and uniformity between MDOT working units and between MDOT in-house and consultant designers. Performance measures will be developed and used to track progress in key areas.
7. If the QA review shows evidence that
the proper QA/QC process is not being properly followed, a more rigorous review of the QA/QC process documentation is performed, and recommendations are provided.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) E. In-House Design Quality Control/Quality
Assurance. All bridges designed by MDOT are
reviewed in compliance with this document and the referenced manuals and procedures. Each work unit documents a process for implementing the procedures to assure consistency within the Bridge Design Section.
F. Design Consultant Quality Control/Quality
Assurance.
1. Every consultant performing bridge design for MDOT is required to have its own QA/QC process in place. As part of the prequalification application, each consultant must submit a Quality Control Plan in accordance with the MDOT Consultant Prequalification Instructions. The QA/QC program document is available to the MDOT consultant coordinator to review as necessary throughout the course of a project.
2. Project proposals define the QA/QC
program and responsibilities specific to a project. In general, each prime consultant and sub consultant follows their own documented QA/QC procedures on file with their prequalification. Additionally, the prime consultant for a project is responsible for project level QA of sub consultant’s deliverables to assure uniformity within the project and to assure that sub consultant’s procedures are being followed. Documentation of QA/QC procedures for a specific project will be furnished to MDOT at any point during a project upon request.
2.05.03 D. (continued)
3. At the completion of a project, the consultant furnishes the completed design package, including all design calculations, quantity calculations, and documentation of completed QA/QC along with a letter certifying completion of QA/QC.
4. Consultant design contracts have
clauses protecting MDOT from design errors and omissions by requiring that the consultant’s work meet “sound, prudent, appropriate, and required professional standards and practices,” and that the consultant will promptly revise work that does not meet MDOT criteria, at no additional cost to MDOT.
5. The consultant coordinator or project
manager assures that the documented QA and QC program is followed by the consultant in accordance with this document and the project QA/QC program by performing cursory checks of submittals and contract documents throughout the course of the project and requiring changes as appropriate. Additionally, consultant coordinators will verify reasonableness of the design based on knowledge of design standards and engineering judgement.
6. At the completion of each project,
consultants are rated via performance evaluations. Past performance is a part of the scoring criteria for proposals for all Quality Based Selections. Consultants are also scored based on the experience of their QA/QC review team and the quality of their QA/QC plan as detailed in a project proposal.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.03 Implementing and Documenting Procedures (continued) G. Corrective Actions.
QA/QC procedures are implemented on all projects. Through the PLQA, the overall program is continually monitored for effectiveness. When level of QC or QA is found to be insufficient, corrective actions are required.
1. The following actions are taken if QA
or PLQA reviews indicate that a specific design unit, consultant, or consultant coordinator is not following the process.
a. The representative sample of
projects for that unit or coordinator is increased until the Bridge Design Supervising Engineer is satisfied that the issue is corrected.
b. Concerns with consultant’s
performance are noted on consultant’s review at the completion of the project.
c. Concerns with MDOT staff
member’s performance are reflected in the staff member’s annual performance review or interim performance review, depending on severity.
2. If, during the review of project
submittals, it is evident that the consultant team has not followed QA/QC practices, payment for hours associated with QA of a project as negotiated prior to the start of a project can be withheld.
2.05.04 Role of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) A. Initial Review and Approval of Program. The general role of FHWA Division Office
is to review each State Highway Agency (SHA) QA/QC Program and to ensure the QA/QC program is thorough, effective, documented, and followed. Further, it is the role of the FHWA Office of Bridge Technology to assure uniformity within division offices regarding implementation of this guidance.
B. Periodic Program Reviews. FHWA division offices may perform
periodic reviews of the MDOT’s programs. Upon request, MDOT will provide project documents to the FHWA division office for review, in accordance with the Federal-Aid Stewardship Agreement. The need of periodic reviews depends on the complexity of the bridge projects.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUL
BRIDGE DESIGN 2.05.05 References and Other Sources of Information A. MDOT Bridge Design Manual The procedures involved in preparing
bridge plans, quality control and quality assurance are interlaced within Chapters 2 – 6 as well as Chapter 15.
B. MDOT Road Design Manual
Procedures for plan preparation are addressed in Chapter 14.
C. The Quality Assurance and Quality
Control Process Guide for Project Managers
Documents the MDOT QA/QC process for
preparing road and bridge projects, and is based on a well-documented plan development procedure.
D. Program/Project Management System
(PPMS) Task Manual Documents the preconstruction process
as it pertains to project development. Networks based on the PPMS Tasks are used to plan and to track virtually every aspect of a project design schedule.
E. Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation
(MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) Bridge sample plans including plan sheet
examples of typical plan set detailing preferred details and drafting procedures.
VOLUME 5 MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
CHAPTER 6
PLAN SHEET EXAMPLES
6.00 INTRODUCTION (5-23-2016) Plan sheet examples can be found at Guidelines for Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge). The document presents samples of detail sheets that can be used as guides in preparing plans of highway bridges. The samples were selected and tailored to provide as much reference data as possible on a limited number of sheets. Each of the detail sheets of a typical set of plans is represented. At the same time, detailing procedures for a variety of bridge types are illustrated. Commentary is provided for more clarity and background on guidelines and detailing procedures. Also included are abbreviations, symbols and naming conventions for files. In general, adherence to these guides is recommended. Many of them result from past construction experience, and while other methods of presenting structural details may be equally effective, it is possible that they would create problems. The format shown is preferred if for no other reason than the familiarity that the state contractors have developed following it on previous jobs. On rare occasions, the guides may not be appropriate, but before electing to deviate, drafting personnel should be sure there is ample justification. (2-23-2001)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
CHAPTER 9 DETAILING PRACTICES 9.00 DETAILING PRACTICES (5-23-2016) Drafting details and practices, cell libraries and other miscellaneous files can be found on the MDOT Design Services Website. (8-20-2009) (5-28-2013) Various details have been standardized and appear on specific sheets. See Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation (MDOT Sample Plans Bridge) of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements Chapter 7) for various details, practices and sample plan sheets. It also contains drafting degrees of accuracy, abbreviations and symbols used on plans. For naming convention of files see Chapter 3 of Development Guide (Design Submittal Requirements). Structure designations and additional bridge/structure information is available in the Michigan Structure Inventory and Appraisal Coding Guide. Checking of all detail drawings must be done to assure the accuracy of the plans. The drawings shall comply with the design calculations, existing design guides, and the practices listed in Guidelines For Bridge Plan Preparation and Section 2.05, Bridge Design Quality Assurance & Quality Control.
6.29.06A
VZ
BLT
SUPERSEDES:11/27/01
ISSUED: / /
START CROWN OF ROADWAY
EA03 BARS
BARS
EA04
LEVEL
W8 x 24
ET040408 BAR
PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK
BRIDGE RAILING, 2 TUBE
SL
AB
EM
BE
D.
MI
N.
EM
BE
D.
BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-21-SERIES.
WATER STOP **
ET040408 *
T
1'-1"
10•"
11"
11"
10•"
1'-7"
6"
6"
** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.
4"
5" 7"
ANCHOR STUD (TYP)
‡" ! x 1'-11•"
6"
8"
MI
N.
ƒ" BEVEL1"
5•"10•"3"
3"
7"
2•" < ‚"
EB04 BAR
(TYP)
HSS 5" x 5" x Š"
6" SPACING
EB04 BARS @
10•" MAX. SPACING
EA03 BARS @
1•"
3ƒ"
9" EACH SIDE OF \ RAILING POST.
* SPACE AT ALTERNATE TRANSVERSE SLAB BARS. PLACE ADDITIONAL ET040408 BARS
PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90°, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.
NOTES:
3•
"
4'-11•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)
3'-11•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES: / /
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
VZ
BLT
6.29.09E
ON PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK
BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 4
EB06 BAR
EZ040501
EP040702
1'-9ƒ
"
2•
"
< ‚
"
@ 10•" MAX. SPA.
EA03 BARS
3"
10"
2'-3"
3'-4"
@ 8" MAX. SPA.
EP040702
(TYP.)
ƒ" BEVEL
3"
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF BARRIER RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-17-SERIES.
*
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90° PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.
2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.
ƒ" BEVEL (TYP.)
7"3"
1'-
0"
1'-1"
10" R.
2"
10"
3"
8"
1'-6"
3"
*
6"
6"
EA03 BAR
EA
04
BA
RS
SL
AB
CONDUIT
UTILITY
BOX BEAMS
PRESTRESSED
@ 6" SPA.
EA04 BARS
1•"
1•"
@ 8" MAX. SPA.
EZ040501
5"
5"
10"
1'-2"
2'-10"
3"
3ƒ"
1'-5‚"
8‚
"
2'-11ƒ
"
2'-9ƒ
"
1•
"
1•
"
3ƒ
"
3ƒ"
6‚"
6‚"
VERTICAL - LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.
PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB - NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.
BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.
NOTES:
PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.
**
DO NOT PLACE MORE THAN ONE 3" ! UTILITY CONDUIT IN THE BARRIER.
BARRIER.
BARS UNDER
BETWEEN EA04
PLACE EB06 BARS
3•
"
5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)
4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)
WATER STOP **
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:11/27/01
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
6.29.10B
VZ
BLT
END WALL SECTIONS
BRIDGE RAILING, AESTHETIC PARAPET TUBE
EA04
BA
RS
EA04
BA
RS
1'-6"
BAR
EL06
EL04 BAR
* SIDEWALK FASCIA
SLAB FASCIA
EA04
BA
RS
1'-6"
(N
S)
(2)-
EA
04
07
06
(N
S)
(2)-
EA
04
04
09
EL06 BAR
SLAB FASCIA
SECTION AT END WALL
(TUBE CONNECTION AREA)
SECTION AT END WALL
(FULL CONCRETE AREA)
1'-0" 2•"
9"3" ƒ" BEVEL (TYP)7"
1'-8•
"
5"
9"
9•
"4"
2•"7"2•"
3"
LEVEL UNDER RAILING
2•"
ƒ" BEVEL (TYP)
5"
9"
9•
"
3'-8•
"
2…"2…" 7‚"
3"
* SIDEWALK FASCIA
LEVEL UNDER RAILING
3'-8•
"
1'-0"
WATER STOP **
WATER STOP **
USE WHEN RAILING IS MOUNTED FLUSH TO THE SLAB.
** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.
THE "EL" BARS SHALL BE CAST IN THE SLAB.
* IF BRIDGE RAILING IS MOUNTED FLUSH TO THE SLAB,
NOTE:
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:12/22/11
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
MI
N.
4"
6"
MI
N.
9"
VA
RI
ES
7"
3'-0"
BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.
VERTICAL - LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.
PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.
** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.
SUPERELEVATED SECTIONS.
* PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB - NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE OF
PULLOUT OF EL04 BAR.
BEAM DESIGN MUST BE CHECKED FOR ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD AND POSSIBLE
3•
"
8"7"
MAX. SPACING
EA03 BARS @ 10•"
2'-2"
1'-2"
1'-5"
VA
RI
ES
(B
AS
ED
ON
EM
BE
DM
EN
T)
1'-2"
1'-0"
*
EL040504 BARS
6" SPACING
EA04 BARS @EL04 BAR ***15"
MI
N.
*** EL04 BAR
L = a+e+f
a = 1'-2"
b = f = 8"
c,d,g = 0
EL040504
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF BRIDGE RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-25-SERIES.
EXTRA EA03 BAR
6.29.10D
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAM
AESTHETIC PARAPET TUBE RAILING ONVZ
BLT
STEEL TO BRIDGE \.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE
STEEL TO REF. LINE.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH PLACE TRANSVERSE
LINE.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90° PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF.
LEVEL UNDER RAILING
WATERSTOP **
(ENTIRE LENGTH OF BEAM)
EA04 BARS
EA04 BARS UNDER BARRIER
PLACE EB06 BARS BETWEEN
5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)
4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)
EB06 BAR
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:02/27/12
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
VZ
BLT
AT INDEPENDENT BACKWALL
BARRIER RAILING DETAILS
**
EZ06 BARS
AS REQUIRED
EF06 & EZ06 BARS
* WHEN ! 70° OR ! 110°, CAST BARRIER END SQUARE; OTHERWISE CAST PARALLEL TO REFERENCE LINE.
TO BARRIER.
** WHEN ! 80° OR ! 100°, PLACE BARS PARALLEL TO REFERENCE LINE, OTHERWISE PLACE PERPENDICULAR
2•"
SECTION A-A
\ EXP. JOINT
SLAB FASCIA
!
EF06 &
*
BA
RRI
ER
RAI
LI
NG
REF. LINE
PLAN
1•" 1'-6"
1'-7•"
EF06 BARS
GUARD RAIL ANCHORAGE
EA
04
BA
RS
3"
BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 4
EZ06 BARS
1'-
10•
"
6.29.16A
6.29.08 AND 6.29.09.
BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDES
BARRIER RAILINGS, SEE
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF
NOTE:
FORMING NOT REQUIRED
WATERSTOP (2" HIGH x 4" WIDE <)
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:05/04/06
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
VZ
BLT
1'-8"
3" 1"
3"
9"
LEVEL
BARS
EA04
ƒ" BEVEL (TYP.)
RAIL POST
W6 x 25
HSS 8" x 4" x Š"
6•"8"
3'-
9"
HSS 4" x 4" x ‚" (TYP.)
1'-2"
11•"
11•"
2 SPA @ 6‚" = 1'-0•"
6.29.17A
OPTION ON PRESTRESSED BOX BEAM DECK
BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE - BICYCLE RAILING
ET050503 BAR
1'-
1"
1'-
1"
3•
"
6"
EM
BE
D.
MI
N.
WATER STOP **
* ET050503
START CROWN OF ROADWAY
6"
SL
AB
ANCHOR STUD (TYP.)
1"! x 1'-0"
10•" MAX. SPA.
EA03 BARS @
@ 6" SPA.
EA04 BARS
2•" < ‚"
1•"
5" 9"
** 2" HIGH x 4" LONG (<). FORMING NOT REQUIRED.
REMAINING AREAS.
* AT EACH POST PLACE 7 - ET050503 BARS SPACED AT 6". PLACE ET050503 BARS AT 12" MAX. IN
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF RAILING, SEE STANDARD PLAN B-26-SERIES.
BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.
PLACE LONGITUDINAL STEEL PARALLEL TO BRIDGE \ IN ALL CASES.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO REF. LINE.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° AND SPAN LENGTH DECK WIDTH, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL TO BRIDGE \.
FOR ANGLE OF CROSSING 70° TO 90°, PLACE TRANSVERSE STEEL PARALLEL TO REF. LINE.
NOTES:
EA03 BARS
3ƒ"
EB06 BAR
UNDER BRUSH BLOCK
BETWEEN EA04 BARS
PLACE EB06 BARS
5'-4•" (4' WIDE BOX BEAM)
4'-4•" (3' WIDE BOX BEAM)
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:05/04/06
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY:
VZ
BLT
PEDESTRIAN RAILING SECTION
BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE
6.29.17H
ED051101 BARSE
M0
5
BA
RS
EC
05
&
ED
05
LA
PP
ED
WI
TH
8•
"
OU
T-
OU
T
SE
CTI
ON
F-
F
EK
06
12
00
EC
05
05
01
ED
05
BA
RS
EC
05
BA
RS
VARIES 3'-0" TO 4'-0"
SE
CTI
ON
E-
E
BA
RS
EK
06
12
00
BA
RS
ED
06
07
06
BA
RS
EC
05
05
01
1'-
7"
SE
CTI
ON
D-
D
GUI
DE
6.
29.
17
E
SE
E
BRI
DG
E
REI
NF
OR
CE
ME
NT
SI
DE
WA
LK
EK
061103
EM051102 BARS
BA
RS
EA
060306
4'-0"
BA
RS
EM
05
1'-
2•
"
BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:
APPROVED BY: DAJ
DESIGN DIVISION
PREPARED BY
SUPERSEDES:08/15/03
ISSUED: 05/23/16
CHECKED BY: