mcsc1050rep005 3 mc193 test results
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 1 of 151
MC/193
Study to Determine the Potential Interference from TDD
LTE into WiFi
Test Results
Issue 3
April 2014
Prepared by:
MASS
Enterprise House, Great North Road
Little Paxton, St Neots
Cambridgeshire, PE19 6BN
United Kingdom
T: +44 (0)1480 222600 F: +44 (0) 1480 407366
E: [email protected] W: www.mass.co.uk
![Page 2: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 2 of 151
Document Authorisation
Prepared by: _______________________________________
A.J. Wagstaff
Principal Consultant
Approved by: ________________________________________
M.W. Biggs
Project Manager
Authorised by: ________________________________________
M. Woodbridge
Integrated Solutions Group Head
Change History
Version Date Change Details
1 15/07/13 First formal release
2 16/09/13 Additional tests of five WiFi devices
Corrected errors in calculation of MUS and related parameters in issue 1
3 15/04/14 Removed DUT 4 results following retest. The results of this device are now given in the accompanying ‘Additional Test Results’ document MC/SC1050A/REP001/2
Copyright © 2014 Mass Consultants Limited. All Rights Reserved.
The copyright and intellectual property rights in this work are vested in Mass Consultants Limited. This document
is issued in confidence for the sole purpose for which it is supplied and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part,
or used for any other purpose, except with the express written consent of Mass Consultants Limited.
![Page 3: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 3 of 151
Contents
1 Introduction 4
1.1 Interference points 4
1.2 DUT numbering 6
2 Test Configuration 7
3 Aggregated test results 8
4 DUT Test Results 14
4.1 Home Routers 15
4.2 Laptops 43
4.3 Tablets 67
4.4 Mobile Phones 82
4.5 Multimedia Dongles 112
4.6 Outdoor Hotspots 117
5 Abbreviations 150
6 References 151
![Page 4: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 4 of 151
1 INTRODUCTION
This document is an appendix to the main report (Wagstaff et al, 2013) on the potential for TDD LTE in
the 2.3 GHz band to interfere with WiFi services in the 2.4 GHz band. It contains the detailed
graphical results for each of the WiFi Devices Under Test (DUT) together with comments on the
interpretation of the results.
Issue 2 of this document contained the results from an additional series of tests and corrects errors in
the post-processing found in issue 1.
The additional tests were:
• DUT 12 Mobile phone MP2 retest
• DUT 18 Mobile phone MP4
• DUT 19 Tablet TB3
• DUT 20 Mobile phone MP5
• DUT 21 Mobile phone MP6
These additional tests were conducted after the main report (Wagstaff et al, 2013) was produced.
With Ofcom’s agreement that report has not been updated. The additional tests have not significantly
affected the conclusions of the main report.
Issue 3 of this document removed the results of DUT 4 Mobile Phone MP1 after a retest. The new
results for this device will be given in an updated version of the ‘Additional Test Results’ report
(Wagstaff, 2014)
1.1 Interference points
The main report (Wagstaff, 2013) describes the two interference points used for the analysis of the
results. These points, 1 Mbps and 90% throughput, are indicated in this report where appropriate, and
are marked on the throughput versus C/I plots as illustrated below:
![Page 5: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 5 of 151
Figure 1: Marking of 1Mbps and 90% throughput points
Note that the 90% throughput point is also commonly referred to as the ‘knee’, because it is the point
at which throughput starts to drop on the throughput versus C/I plot. It is also sometimes referred to
as the point at which throughput has dropped by 10% rather than 90% throughput.
The throughput versus C/I plots illustrate the effect of specific interference signals on a DUT for a
specific WiFi channel at a specific carrier level above the DUT MUS. The interference points
measured for all of the interference signals and WiFi channels used for testing a DUT are grouped
together on the Summary plots:
![Page 6: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 6 of 151
Figure 2: Example of Summary Plot capturing 1 Mbps interference points
A similar “Summary at Knee” plot is provided for analysing the 90% throughput interference points.
An algorithm for extracting these two points has been developed and has been used to show the
1 Mbps and 90% points in this document. The algorithm is not completely reliable, because the C/I
versus throughput curves are not always straightforward to interpret and the definitions of the two
points do not always give results that are what the human interpreter would expect. For this reason it
is recommended that any use of these figures should be visually checked to ensure that the results
are commensurate with the analyst’s expectations.
1.2 DUT numbering
In order to maintain anonymity of the devices considered, details of the DUTs themselves are
contained in a separate document (Biggs, 2013) which will not be published beyond MASS and
Ofcom.
Each DUT was allocated a serial number (e.g. DUT 1) for the purposes. Additionally each DUT was
later allocated a group number (e.g. HR1 for a home router) to clarify what type of DUT was being
tested. Both numbers are given in this report and either can be used to uniquely identify a DUT.
![Page 7: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 7 of 151
2 TEST CONFIGURATION
Device Type / ID DUT #
Test Type
Test Started
Test Completed
Test Script Version
Test Configuration
MUS
Home router HR1 2 2 10/06/13 11/06/13 120 2 -95.4dBm
Home router HR2 6 2 12/06/13 13/06/13 122 2 -98.0dBm
Home router HR2 (test 2) 6 3 02/07/13 02/07/13 149 9 -85.1dBm
Home router HR3 9 2 18/06/13 18/06/13 124 5 -93.0dBm
Home router HR4 14 2 26/06/13 26/06/13 139 5 -91.8dBm
Laptop LP1 1 1 16/05/13 23/05/13 77 1 -91.2dBm
Laptop LP2 3 2 24/06/13 24/06/13 137 6 -90.8dBm
Tablet TB1 5 2 03/06/13 09/06/13 107 1 -95.3dBm
Tablet TB2 15 2 26/06/13 27/06/13 139 7 -90.6dBm
Tablet TB3 19 2 21/08/13 22/08/13 153 11 -89.2dBm
Mobile Phone MP2 12 2 21/06/13 21/06/13 134 6 -89.5dBm
Mobile Phone MP2 (re-test) 12 2 19/08/13 20/08/13 153 11 -82.7dBm
Mobile Phone MP3 16 2 28/06/13 28/06/13 145 8 -89.8dBm
Mobile Phone MP4 18 2 20/08/13 21/08/13 153 11 -90.7dBm
Mobile Phone MP5 20 2 23/08/13 24/08/13 153 11 -86.8dBm
Mobile Phone MP6 21 2 27/08/13 27/08/13 153 11 -88.9dBm
Multimedia dongle MD1 17 2 27/06/13 27/06/13 139 5 -85.8dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH1 7 2 14/06/13 14/06/13 124 5 -94.8dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH2 8 2 17/06/13 17/06/13 124 5 -95.1dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH2 (test 2) 8 3 03/07/13 03/07/13 149 9 -87.1dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH3 10 2 19/06/13 19/06/13 128 5 -87.5dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH4 11 2 20/06/13 20/06/13 130 5 -88.6dBm
Outdoor Hotspot OH5 13 2 25/06/13 25/06/13 139 5 -92.1dBm
Table 1: Test Configuration Details
Key
DUT # Device Under Test ID. See MC/SC1050/REP004 for actual device details
Test Type
1 Full set of “Essential” tests
2 Reduced set of “Essential” tests
3 Additional tests agreed with Ofcom
Test Configuration
1 Iperf client; ZyXEL router; DUT as Iperf server. RF Amp 1
2 Iperf client; EnGenius bridge; DUT; Iperf server. RF Amp 1
3 Iperf client; EnGenius bridge; DUT; Iperf server. RF Amp 1; 20dB attenuators to reduce noise floor
4 Iperf client; ZyXEL bridge; DUT; Iperf server. RF Amp 2; 10dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
5 Iperf client; ZyXEL bridge; DUT; Iperf server. RF Amp 2; 6dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
6 Iperf client; ZyXEL router; DUT as Iperf server. RF Amp 2; 6dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
7 Iperf client; ZyXEL bridge; DUT; Iperf server. RF Amp 2; 6dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
8 Web Server; ZyXEL router; DUT as Media Client. RF Amp 2; 6dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
9 Iperf client; ZyXEL bridge; DUT as Iperf server. RF Amp 2
![Page 8: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 8 of 151
10 Iperf client; Long cable; ZyXEL router; DUT as Iperf server. RF Amp 2; Long cable
11 Test configuration for additional devices. Iperf client; ZyXEL router; DUT as Iperf server. RF Amp 2; 6dB attenuator to reduce noise floor
MUS minimum magnitude of wanted WiFi signal required to produce a response in the DUT in Channel 1
3 AGGREGATED TEST RESULTS
This section contains the aggregated results for all DUTs tested in Ofcom’s Baldock chamber test
facility.
The main features of the aggregated plots are:
• The x-axis values are the absolute RF level of blocking in dBm, for either 1Mbps or 90%
throughput;
• The y-axis represents either the frequency offset in MHz when separated on the basis of
offset frequency, or else dB above MUS when separated on the basis of wanted level;
• The distribution of blocking levels over the grouped DUT and modulation types is
represented as a box plot. The box plot represents the range, median and inter-quartile
points;
• Protection distance scales are included for a LTE BS of +60dBm EIRP and three
attenuation indexes. An attenuation index of 2 corresponds to a minimum coupling loss in
free space;
• A protection distance scale is included for a LTE UE of +23dBm EIRP. This is minimum
coupling loss in free space only;
• The plot shown in Figure 3 is for all DUT, both modulation types and all wanted levels
against frequency offset;
• The plot shown in Figure 4 is for all DUT, the lower duty cycle modulation type and all
wanted levels against frequency offset;
• The plot shown in Figure 5 is for all DUT, both modulation types and all offsets against
wanted level;
• Plots of both modulation types and all offsets against wanted level are then provided for
the six types of DUT, with separate graphs for each of the two interference points (1 Mbps
and 90%), in Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Note that these aggregated plots have not been updated for issue 3 of this document. The results of
DUT 4 have not been removed. This is not expected to significantly affect the main conclusions.
![Page 9: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 9 of 151
Figure 3: TDD LTE power levels causing disruption to WiFi (all DUTs)
![Page 10: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 10 of 151
Figure 4: TDD LTE power levels causing disruption to WiFi (all DUTs, low duty cycle TDD
LTE only)
![Page 11: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 11 of 151
Figure 5: TDD LTE power levels causing disruption to WiFi at different WiFi levels (all
DUTs)
![Page 12: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 12 of 151
Figure 6: Level above MUS versus TDD LTE EIRP for different DUT types at 1Mbps point
![Page 13: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 13 of 151
Figure 7: Level above MUS versus TDD LTE EIRP for different DUT types at 90% point
![Page 14: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 14 of 151
4 DUT TEST RESULTS
This section contains the detailed results for each individual DUT tested in Ofcom’s Baldock chamber
test facility.
The CW and LTE test settings used for the majority of the tests (Test Type 2) are specified in the Test
Parameters section of the main report (Wagstaff, 2013).
The additional test settings used for Test Type 1 (for DUT1) and Test Type 3 (DUT6 and DUT8) are
stated in the relevant section for each DUT in this document.
All tests were performed with copolarised antennas. It was established during testing that the WiFi
antennas generally used vertical polarisation. To avoid using special test jigs to hold devices in the
vertical position, the devices were placed flat on the turntable in the chamber, and the test antenna
polarisation was adjusted to match the device orientation.
![Page 15: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 15 of 151
4.1 Home Routers
4.1.1 Home Router HR1 (DUT 2)
Figure 8
Figure 9
![Page 16: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 16 of 151
Figure 10
Figure 11
![Page 17: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 17 of 151
Figure 12
Figure 13
![Page 18: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 18 of 151
Figure 14
Figure 15
![Page 19: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 19 of 151
Figure 16
Observations
• This DUT was vertically polarised and approximately omnidirectional.
• Throughput can be seen to be poor, although this may have been limited by the EnGenius test
device which was later replaced.
![Page 20: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 20 of 151
4.1.2 Home Router HR2 (DUT 6)
Figure 17
Figure 18
![Page 21: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 21 of 151
Figure 19
Figure 20
![Page 22: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 22 of 151
Figure 21
Figure 22
![Page 23: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 23 of 151
Figure 23
Figure 24
![Page 24: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 24 of 151
Figure 25
Observations:
• Throughput can be seen to be poor, although this may have been limited by the EnGenius test
device which was later replaced.
• To eliminate the effect of the EnGenius, additional tests (see the following section) were
performed on DUT6, using home router HR1 in client bridge mode as the test device injecting
the Wi-Fi signal.
![Page 25: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 25 of 151
4.1.2.1 Additional Out of Band Tests
The WiFi and LTE settings for the LTE additional out-of-band (OOB) tests for DUT6 are shown below:
WiFi Receiver
Sensitivity
WiFi Channels LTE Channel
Bandwidth
LTE Frequency Offsets LTE Frame Structure
MUS +20dB, +30dB,
+40dB
1, 6, 11 20MHz 2380MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB, +30dB 1 10MHz 2385MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
Table 2: Additional OOB Test Settings for DUT6
![Page 26: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 26 of 151
Figure 26
Figure 27
![Page 27: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 27 of 151
Figure 28
Figure 29
![Page 28: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 28 of 151
Figure 30
Figure 31
![Page 29: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 29 of 151
Figure 32
Figure 33
![Page 30: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 30 of 151
Figure 34
Figure 35
![Page 31: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 31 of 151
Figure 36
Figure 37
![Page 32: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 32 of 151
Figure 38
Observations
• At offsets greater than 50MHz, the blocking is independent of the offset frequency.
• At MUS +40dB, the expected improvement in blocking is achieved with respect to the MUS
+20dB and +30dB results.
• Overall WiFi data throughput is in line with expectations following replacement of the EnGenius
test device.
![Page 33: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 33 of 151
4.1.3 Home Router HR3 (DUT 9)
Figure 39
Figure 40
![Page 34: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 34 of 151
Figure 41
Figure 42
![Page 35: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 35 of 151
Figure 43
Figure 44
![Page 36: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 36 of 151
Figure 45
Figure 46
![Page 37: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 37 of 151
Figure 47
Observations
• The CW throughput test results at 2380MHz (Figure 42) showed very low throughput at the
lowest interference power levels. A conjecture for this behaviour, which is seen elsewhere, is
that rate adaptation in some devices can lead to an increase in data rate when structured
interference is detected. This behaviour has not been investigated in detail.
• The CW test results were not used in the post-processing analysis of the DUT.
![Page 38: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 38 of 151
4.1.4 Home Router HR4 (DUT 14)
Figure 48
Figure 49
![Page 39: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 39 of 151
Figure 50
Figure 51
![Page 40: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 40 of 151
Figure 52
Figure 53
![Page 41: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 41 of 151
Figure 54
Figure 55
![Page 42: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 42 of 151
Figure 56
Observations
• In Figure 56 there is a marked difference in behaviour of the DUT when the duty cycle is high
compared to when it is low. When the duty cycle is low it appears that the DUT can manage to
maintain traffic throughput at higher interference levels, but throughput is not maintained when
the duty cycle is higher. The most likely explanation for this difference in behaviours is that the
DUT is managing to successfully transmit packets in the gaps between the interference
packets. This conjecture is given further credence by observing that the behaviour is seen
when the interferer is co-channel, which is when signal structure is more likely to be detectable
by the WiFi receiver
![Page 43: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 43 of 151
4.2 Laptops
4.2.1 Laptop LP1 (DUT 1)
Figure 57
Figure 58
![Page 44: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 44 of 151
Figure 59
Figure 60
![Page 45: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 45 of 151
Figure 61
Figure 62
![Page 46: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 46 of 151
Figure 63
Figure 64
![Page 47: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 47 of 151
4.2.1.1 Additional Tests
The WiFi and CW settings for the full set of blocking and selectivity tests performed for DUT1 (Test
Type 1) are shown below:
WiFi Receiver
Sensitivity
WiFi Channels CW Frequencies
MUS +30dB 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 13 2350MHz, 2360MHz, 2370MHz, 2380MHz, 2390MHz, 2400MHz, 2410MHz
Table 3: CW Test Settings for DUT1
The WiFi and LTE settings for the full set of LTE out-of-band (OOB) tests for DUT1 (Test Type 1) are
shown below:
WiFi Receiver
Sensitivity
WiFi Channels LTE Channel
Bandwidth
LTE Frequency Offsets LTE Frame Structure
MUS +20dB 1, 2, 3, 6 10MHz 2375MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB 1, 2, 3, 6 10MHz 2385MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB, +30dB 1 20MHz 2350MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB 6 20MHz 2350MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB, +30dB 1, 3 20MHz 2360MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB 2, 6 20MHz 2360MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB, +30dB 1, 3 20MHz 2380MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB 2, 6 20MHz 2380MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
Table 4: OOB Test Settings for DUT1
N.B.: The LTE OOB throughput versus C/I results for WiFi channels 1 and 6 at 2350MHz and
2380MHz are presented in the preceding section, to be consistent with the presentation of the other
DUT (Test Type 2) results, and are not replicated in this section.
![Page 48: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 48 of 151
Figure 65
Figure 66
![Page 49: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 49 of 151
Figure 67
Figure 68
![Page 50: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 50 of 151
Figure 69
Figure 70
![Page 51: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 51 of 151
Figure 71
Figure 72
![Page 52: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 52 of 151
Figure 73
Figure 74
![Page 53: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 53 of 151
Figure 75
Figure 76
![Page 54: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 54 of 151
Figure 77
Figure 78
![Page 55: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 55 of 151
Figure 79
Figure 80
![Page 56: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 56 of 151
Figure 81
Figure 82
![Page 57: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 57 of 151
Figure 83
Figure 84
![Page 58: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 58 of 151
Figure 85
Figure 86
![Page 59: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 59 of 151
Figure 87
Figure 88
![Page 60: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 60 of 151
Figure 89
Figure 90
![Page 61: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 61 of 151
Observations
• The additional tests performed for DUT1 show that, for offsets greater than 50MHz, the blocking
is independent of the offset frequency.
• The additional tests performed for DUT1 show that the 10MHz bandwidth LTE transmissions
exhibit the same characteristics as the 20MHz bandwidth transmissions.
![Page 62: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 62 of 151
4.2.2 Laptop LP2 (DUT 3)
Figure 91
Figure 92
![Page 63: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 63 of 151
Figure 93
Figure 94
![Page 64: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 64 of 151
Figure 95
Figure 96
![Page 65: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 65 of 151
Figure 97
Figure 98
![Page 66: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 66 of 151
Figure 99
Observations
• The attenuation level of the wanted WiFi signal on channel 6 blocking and selectivity tests was
set incorrectly by 3dB as such the test results are reflective of performance at MUS+33dB. This
is not expected to significantly affect the overall conclusions.
• Receiver sensitivity tests were conducted on both WiFi channel 1 and channel 6 which resulted
in marginally different MUS values present in the summary plots.
![Page 67: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 67 of 151
4.3 Tablets
4.3.1 Tablet TB1 (DUT 5)
Figure 100
Figure 101
![Page 68: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 68 of 151
Figure 102
Figure 103
![Page 69: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 69 of 151
Figure 104
Figure 105
![Page 70: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 70 of 151
Figure 106
Figure 107
![Page 71: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 71 of 151
Figure 108
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• WiFi tablet devices are commonly used in vertical or semi-vertical position as well as flat on a
table or other surface.
• In Figure 108 the DUT maintained a high throughput for the 10% duty cycle interference when
applied co-channel. This is similar behaviour to that seen in other DUTs in this study.
![Page 72: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 72 of 151
4.3.2 Tablet TB2 (DUT 15)
Figure 109
Figure 110
![Page 73: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 73 of 151
Figure 111
Figure 112
![Page 74: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 74 of 151
Figure 113
Figure 114
![Page 75: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 75 of 151
Figure 115
Figure 116
![Page 76: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 76 of 151
Figure 117
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Tablet devices commonly used in vertical or semi-vertical position, as well as horizontally on a
table or similar surface.
![Page 77: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 77 of 151
4.3.3 Tablet TB3 (DUT 19)
Figure 118
Figure 119
![Page 78: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 78 of 151
Figure 120
Figure 121
![Page 79: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 79 of 151
Figure 122
Figure 123
![Page 80: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 80 of 151
Figure 124
Figure 125
![Page 81: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 81 of 151
Figure 126
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• WiFi tablet devices are commonly used in vertical or semi-vertical position as well as flat on a
table or other surface.
![Page 82: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 82 of 151
4.4 Mobile Phones
4.4.1 Mobile Phone MP2 (DUT 12)
Figure 127
Figure 128
![Page 83: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 83 of 151
Figure 129
Figure 130
![Page 84: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 84 of 151
Figure 131
Figure 132
![Page 85: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 85 of 151
Figure 133
Figure 134
![Page 86: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 86 of 151
Figure 135
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Mobile phone devices commonly used in near vertical position.
• Maintains high throughput for 10% duty cycle interference when co-channel.
![Page 87: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 87 of 151
4.4.1.1 Mobile Phone MP2 (DUT 12) Re-test
Figure 136
Figure 137
![Page 88: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 88 of 151
Figure 138
Figure 139
![Page 89: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 89 of 151
Figure 140
Figure 141
![Page 90: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 90 of 151
Figure 142
Figure 143
![Page 91: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 91 of 151
Figure 144
Observations
• The co-channel (2412MHz) test on channel 1 for an LTE Downlink 20MHz C5 interference was
conducted at MUS+10dB while the other results on the same plot show MUS+20dB.
• In Figure 144 there is a marked difference in throughput between the low and high duty cycle
cases. This is similar to other DUTs in this report.
![Page 92: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 92 of 151
4.4.2 Mobile Phone MP3 (DUT 16)
Figure 145
Figure 146
![Page 93: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 93 of 151
Figure 147
Figure 148
![Page 94: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 94 of 151
Figure 149
Figure 150
![Page 95: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 95 of 151
Figure 151
Figure 152
![Page 96: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 96 of 151
Figure 153
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Mobile phone devices commonly used in near vertical position.
• Maintains high throughput for 10% and 26% duty cycle interference when co-channel.
![Page 97: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 97 of 151
4.4.3 Mobile Phone MP4 (DUT 18)
Figure 154
Figure 155
![Page 98: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 98 of 151
Figure 156
Figure 157
![Page 99: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 99 of 151
Figure 158
Figure 159
![Page 100: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 100 of 151
Figure 160
Figure 161
![Page 101: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 101 of 151
Figure 162
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Mobile phone devices commonly used in near vertical position.
• Maintains higher throughput for 10% duty cycle interference in comparison with 26% duty cycle
interference when co-channel.
![Page 102: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 102 of 151
4.4.4 Mobile Phone MP5 (DUT 20)
Figure 163
Figure 164
![Page 103: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 103 of 151
Figure 165
Figure 166
![Page 104: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 104 of 151
Figure 167
Figure 168
![Page 105: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 105 of 151
Figure 169
Figure 170
![Page 106: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 106 of 151
Figure 171
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Mobile phone devices commonly used in near vertical position.
• Maintains high throughput for 10% duty cycle interference when co-channel.
![Page 107: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 107 of 151
4.4.5 Mobile Phone MP6 (DUT 21)
Figure 172
Figure 173
![Page 108: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 108 of 151
Figure 174
Figure 175
![Page 109: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 109 of 151
Figure 176
Figure 177
![Page 110: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 110 of 151
Figure 178
Figure 179
![Page 111: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 111 of 151
Figure 180
Observations
• Vertically polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• Mobile phone devices commonly used in near vertical position.
• Maintains high throughput for 10% duty cycle interference when co-channel.
![Page 112: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 112 of 151
4.5 Multimedia Dongles
4.5.1 Multimedia Dongle MD1 (DUT 17)
Figure 181
Figure 182
![Page 113: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 113 of 151
Figure 183
Figure 184
![Page 114: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 114 of 151
Figure 185
Figure 186
![Page 115: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 115 of 151
Figure 187
Figure 188
![Page 116: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 116 of 151
Figure 189
Observations
• Horizontally polarised when positioned horizontally on turntable.
• WiFi USB dongles commonly used in horizontal position.
• Maintains high throughput for 10% and 26% duty cycle interference when co-channel.
![Page 117: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 117 of 151
4.6 Outdoor Hotspots
4.6.1 Outdoor Hotspot OH1 (DUT 7)
Figure 190
Figure 191
![Page 118: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 118 of 151
Figure 192
Figure 193
![Page 119: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 119 of 151
Figure 194
Figure 195
![Page 120: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 120 of 151
Figure 196
Figure 197
![Page 121: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 121 of 151
Figure 198
Observations
• Measured in vertical position and vertically polarised in operation.
• In Figure 198 the DUTs maintains a high throughput when the LTE duty cycle is lower.
![Page 122: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 122 of 151
4.6.2 Outdoor Hotspot OH2 (DUT 8)
Figure 199
Figure 200
![Page 123: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 123 of 151
Figure 201
Figure 202
![Page 124: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 124 of 151
Figure 203
Figure 204
![Page 125: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 125 of 151
Figure 205
Figure 206
![Page 126: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 126 of 151
Figure 207
Observations
• Measured in vertical position and vertically polarised in operation.
• In Figure 205 the DUT shows a very low throughput, which may have been anomalous.
• In Figure 207 the DUT exhibits markedly higher throughputs when the LTE duty cycle is lower
which is similar to other DUTs in this report.
![Page 127: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 127 of 151
4.6.2.1 Additional Out of Band Tests
The WiFi and LTE settings for the LTE additional out-of-band (OOB) tests for DUT8 are shown below:
WiFi Receiver
Sensitivity
WiFi Channels LTE Channel
Bandwidth
LTE Frequency Offsets LTE Frame Structure
MUS +20dB, +30dB,
+40dB
1, 6, 11 20MHz 2380MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
MUS +20dB 1 10MHz 2385MHz UL_C0, UL_C5,
DL_C0, DL_C5
Table 5: Additional OOB Test Settings for DUT8
The WiFi Receiver Sensitivity tests were performed on each of the three WiFi channels, to determine
any variations in the MUS dependent upon WiFi receiver frequency. The MUS levels measured for
WiFi channels 1, 6 and 11 are shown on the summary plots, and were used to determine the MUS
+20db, MUS +30dB and MUS +40dB carrier levels used for each WiFi channel in the LTE additional
OOB tests.
![Page 128: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 128 of 151
Figure 208
Figure 209
![Page 129: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 129 of 151
Figure 210
Figure 211
![Page 130: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 130 of 151
Figure 212
Figure 213
![Page 131: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 131 of 151
Figure 214
Figure 215
![Page 132: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 132 of 151
Figure 216
Figure 217
![Page 133: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 133 of 151
Figure 218
Figure 219
![Page 134: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 134 of 151
Observations
• The additional tests show that, at offsets greater than 50MHz, the blocking is independent of the
offset frequency.
• The additional tests show that the 10MHz bandwidth LTE transmissions have the same
characteristics as the 20MHz transmissions.
• The device MUS was measured independently on each of the tested WiFi channels and the
tests were performed for each channel at the wanted signal levels relative to the measured
channel MUS.
![Page 135: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 135 of 151
4.6.3 Outdoor Hotspot OH3 (DUT 10)
Figure 220
Figure 221
![Page 136: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 136 of 151
Figure 222
Figure 223
![Page 137: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 137 of 151
Figure 224
Figure 225
![Page 138: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 138 of 151
Figure 226
Figure 227
![Page 139: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 139 of 151
Figure 228
Observations
• Measured in horizontal position and vertically polarised in operation.
• In Figure 228 there is a marked increase in the throughout achieved at higher interference
powers when the duty cycle is lower. This is similar to other DUTs in this report.
![Page 140: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 140 of 151
4.6.4 Outdoor Hotspot OH4 (DUT 11)
Figure 229
Figure 230
![Page 141: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 141 of 151
Figure 231
Figure 232
![Page 142: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 142 of 151
Figure 233
Figure 234
![Page 143: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 143 of 151
Figure 235
Figure 236
![Page 144: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 144 of 151
Figure 237
Observations
• Measured in horizontal position and vertically polarised in operation.
• In Figure 237 the DUT maintains high throughput for both 10% and 26% duty cycle interference
when co-channel. This is similar to other DUTs in this report.
![Page 145: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 145 of 151
4.6.5 Outdoor Hotspot OH5 (DUT 13)
Figure 238
Figure 239
![Page 146: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 146 of 151
Figure 240
Figure 241
![Page 147: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 147 of 151
Figure 242
Figure 243
![Page 148: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 148 of 151
Figure 244
Figure 245
![Page 149: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 149 of 151
Figure 246
Observations
• Measured in horizontal position and vertically polarised in operation.
• Receiver sensitivity tests were conducted on both WiFi channel 1 and channel 6 which resulted
in marginally different MUS values present in the summary plots.
• In Figure 246 the DUT maintains a relatively high throughput for 10% but not 26% duty cycle
interference when co-channel.
![Page 150: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 150 of 151
5 ABBREVIATIONS
BS Base Station
C/I Carrier to Interference Ratio
CW Continuous Wave
DC Duty Cycle
DL Down Link
DUT Device Under Test
EIRP Effective Isotropic Radiated Power
HR Home Router
LP Laptop
LTE Long Term Evolution
MD Multimedia Dongle
MP Mobile Phone
MUS Minimum Usable Signal
OH Outdoor Hotspot
OOB Out of Band
TB Tablet
TDD Time Division Duplexing
UE User Equipment
UL Up Link
![Page 151: MCSC1050REP005 3 MC193 Test Results](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012103/616a129211a7b741a34e80ff/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
MC/SC1050/REP005/3
Page 151 of 151
6 REFERENCES
Biggs, M.W. (2013) MC/193, Devices Tested. MASS reference MC/SC1050/REP004/1 (unpublished).
Ofcom (2013) A study to determine the potential for interference from TDD LTE into WiFi, MC No.:
MC/193
Wagstaff, A.J., Day, S., MacDonald, A., Tadman, P., Biggs, M.W. (2013) MC/193, Study to determine
the potential interference from TDD LTE into WiFi. MASS reference MC/SC1050/REP006/2.
Wagstaff, A.J. (2014) MC/193, Study to determine the potential interference from TDD LTE into WiFi.
Additional test results. MASS reference MC.SC1050A/REP001/2.