mci detects deficits in numerous cognitive (degree of mean...

1
Research has shown that the detects deficits in numerous cognitive domains with a high degree of accuracy. This study consisted of 101 total subjects (54 female; 47 male) with a mean age of 74.76. We compared AD and Control (C) groups as well as diagnostic categories within the AD group; Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI); Early AD; Mild to Moderate AD; Moderate to Severe AD. The AD patients met all criteria set forth by the NINCDS/ADRDA and DSM - IV. All patients completed the ALZ selftest prior to routine neurocognitive procedures, including Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Test of Executive Functions (EF), Verbal Fluency (VF) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). For comparisons between groups we utilized the Kruskal-Wallis test. We employed Discriminant Analysis (DA) to determine the efficacy of the ALZ selftest and MMSE in classification of the five experimental groups. The ALZ selftest is scored on a scale of 30 possible points. Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 show actual screens from the ALZ selftest As many as 5 million Americans are living with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and by 2050,10 million ‘Baby Boomers’ will develop AD. 60% of the patients with early indicators of AD may go undiagnosed in the primary care setting. Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns (DSCP) offer promise in discriminating between Normal, MCI and stages of AD. Tracking several cognitive domains (DSCP) over time may prove superior to tracking a single specific domain alone (e.g. memory or attention). Table 1 shows the scoring scale and data range from this study. From left to right are the group, the range, standard deviation, mean and 95% confidence intervals. Figure 4 shows significant differences between AD and Control for all routine neurocognitive measures administered to patients presenting to the memory disorder clinic. Figure 5 shows the significant differences between AD and Control for domains within the ALZ selftest . Figure 6 shows significant differences between AD and Control for domains within the MMSE . The total score for the ALZ selftest correlates with the total score for the MMSE at significant levels r (.668) . Figure 7 and figure 8 show the results of DA using the ALZ selftest and MMSE for the same random sample. Figure 9 shows the results of DA for the ALZ selftest for the entire sample. Figure 10 shows the plotted Chi- Square values for each diagnostic group compared to (C), illustrating the domain specific cognitive patterns (DSCP) for each group. Logistic regression procedures indicate both ALZ selftest (97%) and MMSE (83%) detect cognitive deficits with significant accuracy; however, the ALZ selftest classifies groups more accurately. Moreover, the ALZ selftest discriminates between Control, MCI and subtypes of AD with 93% accuracy while the MMSE shows only 67% accuracy in this respect. Comparisons between AD and Control Groups Scoring Scale and Data Range of Study Screens for the ALZ selftest Discriminant Analysis ALZ selftest / MMSE Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns (DSCP) The ALZ selftest and MMSE both exhibit sensitivity to cognitive deficits. The ALZ selftest appears more sensitive to deficits in numerous cognitive domains within MCI and diagnostic categories of AD as compared to MMSE. These domain specific cognitive patterns offer the possibility to detect AD or MCI earlier and more efficiently. The ALZ selftest shows superior ability to discriminate between the normal and AD groups in addition to the AD/ MCI groups as compared to MMSE. The ALZ selftest , unlike the MMSE and other assessment instruments does not require professional administration, allowing for continuous monitoring by self, caregiver, family member or primary care physician. The ALZ selftest may also prove important in differentiating between AD and other types of dementias, including vascular dementia, diffuse Lewy body disease, and dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. The ALZ selftest is easily accessible via the Internet and offers an objective, standardized, rapid and reliable assessment of verbal fluency, memory, attention, orientation, executive functions and visu0-spatial construction without a high demand on motor functions (i.e. writing and drawing). Further research is planned to confirm and expand on the results of this study. Methods Background Results Results (continued) Conclusions Source Ongoing 1 2 3 4 0 2 = early ad group centroid 4 = moderate to severe 3 = mild to moderate 0 = control 1 = mci 2 = early ad group centroid 4 = moderate to severe 3 = mild to moderate 0 = control 1 = mci 1 2 3 4 0 2 = early ad group centroid 4 = moderate to severe 3 = mild to moderate 0 = control 1 = mci 1 2 3 4 0 www.alzselftest.com For more information, visit: ©2008 Medinteract, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Designed by Designsensory. Printed in USA. All research data from The Computer Self Test (CST): A Computerized Internet Accessible Cognitive Screening Test for Dementia study conducted at the University of Tennessee Medical Center. Total Score mci Early ad Mild to Moderate Moderate To severe Chi-square (Degree of mean from control) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Completion Time for test Clock face Clock Number Clock Hand Total Clock Animal Naming Memory Ident V Orientation 49.43 30.37 6.90 31.67 35.71 24.42 37.99 3.98 * Total alzselftest Score Chi-square ALzselftest domain subtests * = Significant < .05, = Significant < .01 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 alzselftest Time of Completion Self report Of memory Problems Clock number Total Clock score Animal Naming Memory For words Orientation 49.43 48.24 30.42 41.06 37.92 30.37 1.505 ns total alzselftest Chi-square neurocognitive measures = Significant < .01, ns = non significant 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 total mmse exec functions verbal fluency self report of memory problems time to complete alzselftest geriatric depression scale 18.64 16.01 14.44 7.67 Orientation time Chi-square mmse domain subtests = Significant < .01 0 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Orientation place Attention Recall Further research is continuing to be carried out on the ALZ selftest . If you are interested in becoming a research partner, please contact us through our website. Figure 5 Significant Differences for ALZ selftest domain subtests between AD and Control groups The AD group shows significant deficits in numerous cognitive domains as measured by ALZ selftest , including, verbal fluency, visuo-spatial construction, memory, processing speed, orientation, executive functions and the total score. The AD group self-reports memory problems significantly higher than controls. Figure 8 ALZ selftest : Classification of groups (random sample) with 95% accuracy Results of discriminant analysis on random sample of 42 subjects (20 AD and 22 controls). The first two functions account for 91.5% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (11.905) and (3.883) and Wilks’ Lambda .006, p = .000 and .076, p = .000. The ALZ selftest classifies 95% of the groups accurately. Figure 2 Animal Naming Interface Figure 4 Routine neurocognitive procedural measurements administered to patients presenting to the memory disorders clinic, Significant Differences between AD and Control groups The AD group shows significant deficits in almost all neurocognitive measures except the GDS. The AD group scores lower on ALZ selftest and MMSE total scores, test of executive functions, and verbal fluency. The AD group self-reports memory problems higher than controls and took more time to complete the ALZ selftest than controls. † = Significant < .01 Figure 7 MMSE: Classification of groups (random sample) with 67% accuracy Results of discriminant analysis on random sample of 42 subjects (20 AD and 22 controls). The first two functions account for 90.6% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (3.298) and (1.121) and Wilks’ Lambda .073, p = .000 and .314, p = .025. The MMSE classifies 67% of the groups accurately. Figure 1 Clock Number Interface Figure 6 Significant Differences for MMSE domain subtests between AD and Control groups The AD group shows significant deficits in orientation to time and place, attention and recall. The listed domains show the only significant differences between groups. Study conducted by Dr. John Dougherty, Jr., Rex Cannon, Andrew Dougherty, Lorin Hall, Jennifer Janowitz and Felicia Hare Figure 9 ALZ selftest : Classification of AD/MCI groups with 93% accuracy Results of Discriminant analysis for the entire sample for ALZ selftest . The first two of four discriminant functions are shown. These functions account for 97.3% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (9.306) and (.675) and Wilks’ Lambda of .045, p = .000 and .460, p = .002. These functions accurately classify 93.1 percent of the groups. Figure 3 Animal Naming and Memory for words interface Figure 10 Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns associated with Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Results of comparison between stages of AD, MCI and controls for ALZ selftest domain subtests. Plotting the degree of each groups’ difference from the mean of the control group illustrates Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns associated with MCI and each stage of AD. Table 1 Scoring scale and data range from this study for standardization. In the table from left to right are the group, the range, standard deviation, mean and 95% confidence intervals. The ALZ selftest is a new online test designed to assess cognitive functions for signs of impairment or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The ALZ selftest evaluates orientation, visuo-spatial abilities, verbal fluency, memory, attention, and executive processing. The ALZ selftest is easily self- administered with basic computer skills, or can be administered by a caregiver, family member or primary care physician in the home or office. Overview Diagnostic group range sd mean 95% ci 0 = normal 27.00–30.00 1.20 29.03 26.60–29.50 1 = mci 26.00–30.00 .998 27.61 27.18–28.03 2 = early ad 24.00–26.00 .852 25.00 24.46–25.54 3 = mild to moderate 22.00–25.00 .997 23.07 22.50–23.65 4 = moderate to severe 11.00–22.00 2.66 18.70 17.45–19.94

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: mci detects deficits in numerous cognitive (Degree of mean ...cogselftest.com/media/ALZselftest_research.pdf · al mmse exec functions verbal fluency memory problems self report oftime

Research has shown that the detects deficits in numerous cognitive domains with a high degree of accuracy.

This study consisted of 101 total subjects (54 female; 47 male) with a mean age of 74.76.

We compared AD and Control (C) groups as well as diagnostic categories within the AD group; Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI); Early AD; Mild to Moderate AD; Moderate to Severe AD.

The AD patients met all criteria set forth by the NINCDS/ADRDA and DSM - IV. All patients completed the ALZselftest prior to routine neurocognitive procedures, including Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Test of

Executive Functions (EF), Verbal Fluency (VF) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).

For comparisons between groups we utilized the Kruskal-Wallis test. We employed Discriminant Analysis (DA) to determine the efficacy of the ALZselftest and MMSE in classification of the five experimental groups.

The ALZselftest is scored on a scale of 30 possible points.

Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 show actual screens from the ALZselftest

As many as 5 million Americans are living with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and by 2050,10 million ‘Baby Boomers’ will develop AD.

60% of the patients with early indicators of AD may go undiagnosed in the primary care setting.

Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns (DSCP) offer promise in discriminating between Normal, MCI and stages of AD.

Tracking several cognitive domains (DSCP) over time may prove superior to tracking a single specific domain alone (e.g. memory or attention).

Table 1 shows the scoring scale and data range from this study. From left to right are the group, the range, standard deviation, mean and 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 4 shows significant differences between AD and Control for all routine neurocognitive measures administered to patients presenting to the memory disorder clinic.

Figure 5 shows the significant differences between AD and Control for domains within the ALZselftest.

Figure 6 shows significant differences between AD and Control for domains within the MMSE .

The total score for the ALZselftest correlates with the total score for the MMSE at significant levels r (.668)†.

Figure 7 and figure 8 show the results of DA using the ALZselftest and MMSE for the same random sample. Figure 9 shows the results of DA for the ALZselftest for the entire sample. Figure 10 shows the plotted Chi-Square values for each diagnostic group compared to (C), illustrating the domain specific cognitive patterns (DSCP) for each group.

Logistic regression procedures indicate both ALZselftest (97%) and MMSE (83%) detect cognitive deficits with significant accuracy; however, the ALZselftest classifies groups more accurately. Moreover, the ALZselftest discriminates between Control, MCI and subtypes of AD with 93% accuracy while the MMSE shows only 67% accuracy in this respect.

Comparisons between AD and Control Groups

Scoring Scale and Data Range of Study

Screens for the ALZselftest

Discriminant Analysis ALZselftest / MMSE

Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns (DSCP)

The ALZselftest and MMSE both exhibit sensitivity to cognitive deficits. The ALZselftest appears more sensitive to deficits in numerous cognitive domains within MCI and diagnostic categories of AD as compared to MMSE. These domain specific cognitive patterns offer the possibility to detect AD or MCI earlier and more efficiently.

The ALZselftest shows superior ability to discriminate between the normal and AD groups in addition to the AD/MCI groups as compared to MMSE.

The ALZselftest, unlike the MMSE and other assessment instruments does not require professional administration, allowing for continuous monitoring by self, caregiver, family member or primary care physician.

The ALZselftest may also prove important in differentiating between AD and other types of dementias, including vascular dementia, diffuse Lewy body disease, and dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease.

The ALZselftest is easily accessible via the Internet and offers an objective, standardized, rapid and reliable assessment of verbal fluency, memory, attention, orientation, executive functions and visu0-spatial construction without a high demand on motor functions (i.e. writing and drawing).

Further research is planned to confirm and expand on the results of this study.

Methods

Background

Results Results (continued)

Conclusions

Source

Ongoing

123

4 0

2 = early adgroup centroid

4 = moderate to severe3 = mild to moderate0 = control

1 = mci

2 = early adgroup centroid

4 = moderate to severe3 = mild to moderate0 = control

1 = mci

123

4

0

2 = early adgroup centroid

4 = moderate to severe3 = mild to moderate0 = control

1 = mci

123

4

0

www.alzselftest.com

For more information, visit:

©2008 Medinteract, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Designed by Designsensory. Printed in USA.

All research data from The Computer Self Test (CST): A Computerized Internet Accessible Cognitive Screening Test for Dementia study conducted at the University of Tennessee Medical Center.

Total S

core

mci

Early ad

Mild toModerate

ModerateTo severe

Chi-

squ

are

(Deg

ree

of m

ean

from

con

trol

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Completio

n

Time for test

Clock fa

ce

Clock Number

Clock H

and

Total C

lock

Animal N

aming

Memory

Ident V

Orienta

tion

49.43†

30.37†

6.90†

31.67†35.71†

24.42†

37.99†

3.98*

Total

alzself

test Score

Chi-

squ

are

ALzselftest domain subtests* = Significant < .05, † = Significant < .01

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

alzself

test Time

of Completio

n

Self report

Of memory

Problems

Clock number

Total

Clock score

Animal N

aming

Memory

For words

Orienta

tion

49.43†48.24†

30.42†

41.06†

37.92†

30.37†

1.505ns

total

alzself

test

Chi-

squ

are

neurocognitive measures† = Significant < .01, ns = non significant

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

total m

mse

exec functions

verbal flu

ency

self report of

memory problems

time to comple

te

alzself

test

geriatric

depression scale

18.64†

16.01†

14.44†

7.67†

Orienta

tion tim

e

Chi-

squ

are

mmse domain subtests† = Significant < .01

0

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

Orienta

tion pla

ce

Attention

Recall

Further research is continuing to be carried out on the ALZselftest. If you are interested in becoming a research partner, please contact us through our website.

Figure 5

Significant Differences for ALZselftest domain subtests between AD and Control groupsThe AD group shows significant deficits in numerous cognitive domains as measured by ALZselftest, including, verbal fluency, visuo-spatial construction, memory, processing speed, orientation, executive functions and the total score. The AD group self-reports memory problems significantly higher than controls.

Figure 8

ALZselftest: Classification of groups (random sample) with 95% accuracyResults of discriminant analysis on random sample of 42 subjects (20 AD and 22 controls). The first two functions account for 91.5% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (11.905) and (3.883) and Wilks’ Lambda .006, p = .000 and .076, p = .000. The ALZselftest classifies 95% of the groups accurately.

Figure 2

Animal Naming Interface

Figure 4

Routine neurocognitive procedural measurements administered to patients presenting to the memory disorders clinic, Significant Differences between AD and Control groupsThe AD group shows significant deficits in almost all neurocognitive measures except the GDS. The AD group scores lower on ALZselftest and MMSE total scores, test of executive functions, and verbal fluency. The AD group self-reports memory problems higher than controls and took more time to complete the ALZselftest than controls.

† = Significant < .01

Figure 7

MMSE: Classification of groups (random sample) with 67% accuracy Results of discriminant analysis on random sample of 42 subjects (20 AD and 22 controls). The first two functions account for 90.6% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (3.298) and (1.121) and Wilks’ Lambda .073, p = .000 and .314, p = .025. The MMSE classifies 67% of the groups accurately.

Figure 1

Clock Number Interface

Figure 6

Significant Differences for MMSE domain subtests between AD and Control groupsThe AD group shows significant deficits in orientation to time and place, attention and recall. The listed domains show the only significant differences between groups.

Study conducted by Dr. John Dougherty, Jr., Rex Cannon, Andrew Dougherty, Lorin Hall, Jennifer Janowitz and Felicia Hare

Figure 9

ALZselftest: Classification of AD/MCI groups with 93% accuracy Results of Discriminant analysis for the entire sample for ALZselftest. The first two of four discriminant functions are shown. These functions account for 97.3% of the variance with Eigenvalues of (9.306) and (.675) and Wilks’ Lambda of .045, p = .000 and .460, p = .002. These functions accurately classify 93.1 percent of the groups.

Figure 3

Animal Naming and Memory for words interface

Figure 10

Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns associated with Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive ImpairmentResults of comparison between stages of AD, MCI and controls for ALZselftest domain subtests. Plotting the degree of each groups’ difference from the mean of the control group illustrates Domain Specific Cognitive Patterns associated with MCI and each stage of AD.

Table 1

Scoring scale and data range from this study for standardization. In the table from left to right are the group, the range, standard deviation, mean and 95% confidence intervals.

The ALZselftest is a new online test designed to assess cognitive functions for signs of impairment or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).

The ALZselftest evaluates orientation, visuo-spatial abilities, verbal fluency, memory, attention, and executive processing.

The ALZselftest is easily self-administered with basic computer skills, or can be administered by a caregiver, family member or primary care physician in the home or office.

Overview

Diagnostic group range sd mean 95% ci

0 = normal 27.00–30.00 1.20 29.03 26.60–29.50

1 = mci 26.00–30.00 .998 27.61 27.18–28.03

2 = early ad 24.00–26.00 .852 25.00 24.46–25.54

3 = mild to moderate

22.00–25.00 .997 23.07 22.50–23.65

4 = moderate to severe

11.00–22.00 2.66 18.70 17.45–19.94