mcbride 2003
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
1/15
Chapter 9
STR TEGIES FOR BSOLUTE C LIBR TION
OF NE R INFR RED TOMOGR PHIC TISSUE
IM GING
Troy
O.
McBride, Brian
W.
Pogue, UlfL. Osterberg, Keith
D.
Paulsen
Thayer School
o
Engineering. 8000 Cummings
Hall
Dartmouth College. Hanover. New
Hampshire 03755
Abstract: Quantitative near infrared NIR) imaging of tissue requires the
use
o a diffusion
model-based
reconstruction algorithm,
which solves for the
absorption
and
scattering coefficients of a tissue volume by matching transmission
measurements
o light to
the
predictive diffusion
equation
solution. Calibration
problems
as well as other practical considerations arise for an
imaging
system
when using
a
model-based method
for a real system.
For
example, systematic
noise in
the data acquisition
hardware
and source/detector
fibers must
be
removed
to
prevent spurious results
in the
reconstructed image. Practical
considerations for a NIR diffuse tomographic imaging system
include: I)
calibration with a homogeneous phantom, 2)
use
of a homogeneous fitting
algorithm
to arrive
at an initial
optical property
estimate for image
reconstruction o a heterogeneous
medium.
and
3) correction
for fluctuations
in
source strength and initial phase offset during data acquisition. These practical
considerations, which rely on an accurate
homogeneous fitting
algorithm are
described.
They have allowed demonstration of a prototype imaging system
that has the ability to quantitatively
reconstruct
heterogeneous
images
o
hemoglobin
concentrations
within
a
highly scattering medium with
no
a priori
information.
Key
words:
blood,
calibration, hemoglobin, photon migration, reconstruction,
tomography
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXIV edited by
Dunn
and
Swartz, Kluwer AcademiclPlenum Publishers, 2003
85
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
2/15
86 Mc ride et
al
1
INTRODUCTION
Tissue
is
highly scattering at visible and near-infrared
NIR.)
wavelengths, thus a simplistic back-projection image is highly blurred and
difficult to interpret
as
the effects
o
scattering and absorption can not be
distinguished. However, by using model-based imaging and computational
methods in combination with frequency domain measurements, moderate
resolution, quantitatively accurate images o absorption and scattering can be
obtained within highly scattering media, such
as
tissue [1,2]. This method
may lead to a potentially powerful medical imaging modality for non
invasive hemoglobin tomography.
Practical calibration issues arise when using a model-based image
reconstruction approach which may not be present in modalities such as x
ray tomography due to the necessity o fitting the data to a partial differential
equation solution. In addition, while many system calibrations can be
ignored in qualitative imaging, more care is required for quantitative
imaging o hemoglobin concentrations on an absolute scale. Issues
encountered in the development o the NIR imaging system addressed in this
paper include: 1) elimination o system-based offsets, 2) choice o
heterogeneous starting value, and 3) offsets due to long-term drift. These
issues are addressed through a calibration protocol which involves a
homogeneous phantom and the use
o
a precise homogeneous fitting
algorithm that is resistant to measurement noise.
A 4: 1 increase in hemoglobin concentration
[3]
and a 1.4 - 4.4 times
lower oxygen pressure [4] have been observed in breast cancer. By using
NIR. frequency domain measurements which have been properly calibrated
at multiple wavelengths, quantitative absolute images o hemoglobin related
parameters can be obtained [5]. Once calibrated imaging is implemented in
practice it should be possible to determine whether NIR hemoglobin
concentration and oxygen saturation information is useful in the diagnosis
o
breast tumors.
2 METHODS
2 1 maging system
The frequency-domain near-infrared imaging system consists o three
main components: 1) data acquisition system, 2) image reconstruction
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
3/15
trategiesFor
NIR
alibration
Data
Acquisition
At a single
wavelength .
acquire
256
measurements
Inverse Image
Reconstruction
Reconstruct into
quantitative image
o absotption and
scattering
Repeat
for
all
wavelengths
Tissue Functional
Parameters
Combine I east squares regression)
absotption images at multiple wavelengths
to generate images ofhemoglohin
concentration and oxygen saturation.
Figure 1. Schematic o near-infrared tomographic imaging
system
87
algorithm, and (3) spectroscopic determination
o
functional properties. A
schematic
o
the imaging process
is
shown in Figure 1.
2 1 1 Data acquisition
system
The data acquisition system (shown in Figure 2) uses an amplitude
modulated 100 MHz) wavelength-tunable 700-850 nm) TiSapphire laser as
the light source. Sixteen source and sixteen detector optical fibers are
arranged in a circular geometry to analyze a single tomographic plane
o
the
measured tissue or tissue-simulating phantom. The detector for the system is
a photomultiplier tube with built-in heterodyning circuitry. The heterodyne
signal 1 kHz) amplitude and phase shift are read into a computer using a
commercial-grade data acquisition board. The source and detector are
multiplexed to acquire the 256 data points using linear translation stages.
[5,6]
(a)
(b)
....----., loo.
oonrnz
h
tll
M z
I
Figure 2. a)
Diagram
and
b) photograph of
the
data acquisition system.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
4/15
88
Mc ride
et al
2.1.2 Image reconstruction
A finite element based solution to the frequency-dependent diffusion
equation is used to calculate a fit to the measured projection data o
amplitude and phase shift. Absorption and scattering coefficient images are
generated using a Newton iterative scheme [1,7] with update vectors
determined from a full matrix inversion during each iteration. A schematic
o the image reconstruction algorithm is illustrated in Figure
3.
Measured Phase and Amplitude
data, ~ . a S J r e d h.t.ro)
,
at
256
points
IOriginal
estimate
of
I
olve forward diffusion equation using latest
optical properties
.
estimate of absorption and scattering at each
I
finite element node to determine calculated
phase and amplitude at 256
points.
Compare calculated and measured
IReturn New I
phase and amplitude
data at 256
points.
Estimate
Error below
I
rror above
tolerance
tolerance
r
iniS"ied
I
pdate vector based on full matrix
inversion generates new absorption
and
scattering at
each
me& node
Figure 3. Schematic
o
the finite element based reconstruction algorithm based on the non
linear estimation problem
o
inferring optical property maps using the frequency-domain
diffusion equation.
2.1.3 Determination
o
functional properties
Multiple wavelength images o absorption coefficient can be used to
determine maps o hemoglobin related parameters by incorporating the
previously measured absorption spectra o pure oxygenated hemoglobin, de
oxygenated hemoglobin [8], and other tissue chromophores such as lipids [9]
and water [10]. Because the image reconstruction algorithm recovers
quantitative values for the absorption coefficient, a least squares fit can be
used to determine the metabolic chromophore concentrations from that data
as shown schematically in Figure 4.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
5/15
Strategies
For
NIR Calibration
89
Known
mol ar
absorption
a) at
each
wavelength A) from measured values for
the unknowns (e.g. HbR and Hb02)
a
Hb
-
R
=
1 l 1 i 2 ~ n
[ m m ~ m M
a
Hb
-
=
1l,1i2,b
[mm.
1
m ]
+
Measured absorption W at n
wavelengths at each point in the image
from
finite element reconstruction algorithm
Ji ,.tI,.t2,An =
~ m
]
t
Calculate
concentrations in. this case [Hb
02] and [HbR]) o unknowns for each
point using least squares
fit.
1i.,AI
[Hb
-
2 l
a':-02 +[Hb -
R]
.a':-R
l i
a
A2
= [ H b - 0 2 l a ~ - 0 2
[ H b - R ] . a ~ - R
1i.,hI [Hb 02laJ b-02 [Hb R]a: '-R
Figure 4. Schematic
o methodology
for
determining
hemoglobin related parameters from
multiple wavelength
images
o absorption coefficient.
2.2 Practical considerations
Calibration and other practical considerations arise when using a model
based image reconstruction method with data acquired from a real imaging
system. In the NIR diffuse tomography context these include: (1) system
based offsets, (2) initial optical property estimate for a heterogeneous
medium, and (3) long term fluctuations o source strength and initial phase
offset.
2.2.1 System-based offsets
Systematic offset in the measured data occurs at various source and
detector locations due to optical fiber differences, multiplexing imprecision,
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
6/15
90
McBride et al
and other systematic inconsistencies. Obviously, these offsets need to be
removed from the' data prior to image reconstruction in order to prevent the
appearance
of
artifacts in the resultant tissue property profiles. The method
adopted here measures a homogeneous phantom and subtracts differences
between measured and calculated values:
:alibrated heterO) = ~ e a S U r e d h e t e r O ) - ~ e a s u r e d h O m O ) - :alculated hOmO) (1)
where ~ e s u r e d is the measured amplitude and phase at each
of
the 256
measurement locations for the calibration phantom
homo)
and the actual
heterogeneous object hetero), while ;alculated is the corresponding
calculation for the homogeneous
homo)
case. This requires either exact
knowledge
of
the scattering and absorption coefficients for the measured
homogeneous phantom or a homogeneous fitting algorithm which
determines these properties for the measured data on the homogeneous
calibration phantom. The homogeneous fitting algorithm (described in
Section 2.3) is an important component
of
the practical reconstruction
algorithm and is, therefore, also used in the calibration procedure.
The calibration procedure for eliminating systematic offset at different
source and detector locations involves: (1) measurement of a homogeneous
phantom (each day and after equipment changes), (2) determination of the
scattering and absorption coefficient for the phantom (from the measured
data using the homogeneous fitting algorithm), and (3) use of the difference
between calculated and measured values as the calibration factor.
2 2 2
Heterogeneous starting values
The image reconstruction algorithm starts from an estimated set of
optical properties and then calculates an update vector based on
l
(the
squared difference between the calculated and measured values).
f
the
initially estimated set
of
optical properties is far from the actual optical
properties
of
the heterogeneous object being imaged, this inaccurate starting
point can slow convergence and even lead to erroneous answers.
n
order to
determine the initial optical property estimate for patient data or a
heterogeneous phantom, the measurements are averaged for each of the
sixteen sources and the homogeneous fitting algorithm is used to determine a
homogeneous estimate of the properties that are consistent with a diffusion
equation solution which matches the averaged data. n this manner, the
initial estimate is determined solely from the heterogeneous phantom or
patient measurements, yet, is close enough to the unknown actual
heterogeneous parameter distribution that the algorithm will converge.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
7/15
Strategies
For NIR Calibration
9
2.2.3 ong term drift
Differences between the source strength and initial phase at the time
o
the measurement o the homogeneous calibration phantom and the actual
source strength and initial phase observed at the time o the heterogeneous
measurement can lead to an overall offset mainly due to long term drift)
between the calibrated measured and calculated data. This difference in
overall offset needs to be removed in order for the reconstruction algorithm,
which fits to the absolute amplitude and phase data, to be effective. To
account for long term drift, the offset for both the homogeneous phantom
measurements and the actual heterogeneous measurement are calculated
based on the homogeneous fitting algorithm. The homogeneous fitting
algorithm responds to the slope o the data and is therefore independent o
initial source strength and phase shift.) The offset is estimated as the
average difference between the measured and calculated data.
N
t P ~ e a s U r e d h O m O ) - tP:alculated hOmO)
tPojfset homo) =...: i=..:. l N
N
L
t P ~ e a s U r e d h e t e r O )
- tP:alculated heterO)
ffojfset hetero) =...: i=::.: l N
tPojJset net) = Pojfset heterO) -
tPojJset homO)
2)
3)
4)
where tPojfset nel) is the long term drift correction for initial phase and
source strength.
2 3 Homogeneous fitting algorithm
An important part o practical imaging is the homogeneous fitting
algorithm. The homogeneous fitting algorithm is critical for both calibration
o the system and for providing the initial optical property estimate for the
image reconstruction process. Assuming a homogeneous medium, only one
source location is needed to determine the absorption and scattering
coefficient
o
the material from measurements around its periphery. The
absorption and scattering coefficients which result in the best fit to the
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
8/15
92
McBride
et
al.
measured data can be determined by using a Newton-Raphson iterative
scheme applied to the finite element forward solution of the diffusion
equation
for
the relevant geometry. To reduce the effect
of
noise on the
fitting algorithm, the data acquired is averaged together
for
all sources based
on detector distance from the source location. The Newton-Raphson
solution is simplified by reducing the fit to two parameters: slope of the
phase with respect to distance from the source location and slope of the log
of intensity times distance with respect to distance. These two parameters
were chosen because they are nearly constant and can be obtained from the
data through linear regression. They are constant
for the analytic infinite
medium diffusion equation solution [11]. This method
is
insensitive to noise
due to the large amount
of
averaging which occurs (256 measurements are
used
to
find two parameters).
Figure 5 contrasts two versions
of
the homogeneous fitting algorithm.
Method A performs a Newton-Raphson iterative scheme based on an
estimate of the first derivative for the averaged data (number of detectors
minus one (15) parameters), while Method B uses the slope of the phase
with respect to distance from the source location and slope of the log of
intensity times distance with respect to distance determined from linear
regression (2 parameters).
I
Measured data
--
ZS (16 source x 16
detector) JMllnts
for
phase and Intensity
I
I
verage
data
to
I
I
source x 16 detectors
Iteratively
solve for
optical
Method A: Newton-
Method
B:
Newton-Raphson
Raphson Iterative method
properties
by
comparing
Iterative
method
based on
slope
of
(minimization of
I )
based
wtth
nnlte element
fOl ward
de
On
approximation
or
nrst
solution
of dl/fuslon equation
the phase
shirt versus distance
7,)
for drcular geometry
and
a
and slope o
In(dlstance intensity)
derivative of the measured
homogeneous medium
d(ln(d
AC
data
versus
distance
- d r
z
= Qin(I '1 l-ln(I, lHn(I :1l-ln(I,mlY
X = d ( I n ~ I _ d ) ) d ( i n ~ I ' ' I ~ ' ) ) J
P 1
dr
dr
+ cro. 1
-
11, ]- [0 :1
_
1,m
Y
[
dfl' '''- _dr I
dr dr
where N =
16detectors,
In(J')am f are
the
[d(ln(>-i) del
where all slope calculations -----;;:-.b
caJculaJed
In(Iniensity) and
phase
shift
from
are perfonnedwith a linear
regression
to
finite element
solution,
m
In(i ) and
r are
the measured
daJa
or the calculated
daJa
the measured
In(Intensity)
andphllJie.
from
the
finite element solution
Figure 5. Schematic describing two homogeneous fitting algorithms.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
9/15
Strategies
or
NIR alibration
93
3.
RESULTS
3.1
Practical considerations
3.1.1 Homogeneous calibration
Figure 6 shows systematic offset from a slight difference in alignment of
two optical fibers with the laser source fiber during multiplexing. This offset
is consistent over a period of weeks and only changes during system
modifications/maintenance such as re-alignment
of
the laser. The resultant
difference data (Fig.6.c.) between the measured (Fig.6.a.) and the calculated
data (Fig.6.b.) is used as a calibration factor in the reconstruction algorithm.
a)
(b) c)
6,00
.
6,00
6.00
5,00
5,00
5,00
' .00
' ,00
' ,00
3.00
3,00
3.00
E
~ 2 . 0 0
1
00
E
.
00
0.00
,00
1.00
1.00
1 ,00
2 ,00
2,00
2,00
3,00
3,00 -
-
_
-3 .00
Figure 6. Plot of (a) In(Intensity) data at 16 detector sites showing offset due
to
alignment
differences, (b) calculated data from finite element solution, and (c) difference between (a)
and (b). Difference data (c) is used
as
the 'calibration' factor.
3.1.2 Heterogeneous starting value
Simulations were performed to demonstrate the effect
of
different
starting values during reconstruction of a heterogeneous object. Images for
three different initial optical property estimates ( 0 , 10 , and 50 error
from the actual average optical properties) are compared in Figure 7 after
one iteration. The algorithm converges to the correct image
2:
I absorbing
object with Gaussian profile) during the first iteration for an initial estimate
which is equal to the average optical properties of the heterogeneous test
object (Fig.7.a,d). When the initial estimate is significantly removed from
the actual average optical properties, the algorithm takes longer to converge.
This slowdown is evident in the other images in Figure
7.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
10/15
94
(a)
r:
::,,
" I
n
; 1
.1
~ i I U
(d)
, [7\
I
l n .
n
t lO
II iIP .
n
llO lilll
II lIl J
II 4lD '0.
II UI IU .
I I I I I I
I
.
10
II
)0
(b)
r-;
"
"
I , I I I I
II
: J I. ,. )
(e)
.
[1\
.
uuHIO
O.UtIH
lll
U Ul3110
.H'. , : :
I
111
I'll
)11
4 U
JtI
McBride et al
(t)
[
lIHt 4 UO
(lOUHCI
tI
Oll j lUI
(J
OOl$C1
(J OO}OO
I() OtHSCl
o OIHUCJ
I I J I I I
I 10 i l l
;lO 40
J O
Figure 7. Image after first iteration
of
reconstruction
of
absorbing object with Gaussian
profile with (a) initial estimate equal to average optical properties, (b) \0% error in initial
estimate, and (c) 50% error in initial estimate. The vertical axis units are
in
mm
t
(d), (e),
and (t) are profile plots along a vertical line through the center
of
images (a), (b), and (c)
respectively.
3.1.3 ()ffset
Offset between the natural log
of
intensity profile
of
a calculated and
measured phantom due to long term drift in the Ti:Sapphire laser intensity is
shown in Figure 8. The offset is accounted for by comparison of the changes
in offset between the homogeneous calibration phantom and the measured
heterogeneous object.
In
the extreme case shown in Figure
8,
the offset in
intensity is almost two natural log units.
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00 .
2.00
'iii
0.00
c
-4 .00 .
-6.00
8
.
00
10.00
I calibrated Measured d1
* Calculated
Data
_ .. J
Figure 8. Plot demonstrating measured data with overall offset due to long term drift
of
laser
intensity. The average difference
is
used to correct this offset.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
11/15
Strategies
For
NIR
Calibration
95
3.2 Testing
o
homogeneous fitting algorithm
Using repeated measurements
of
the same phantom, the results
of
the
homogeneous fitting algorithm (Method B in Figure
5)
have been shown to
have an average deviation of 0.5 even in the presence
of 5%
measurement
noise. This compares very favorably with our previous approach (Method A
in Figure 5), which did not take full advantage
of
the data averaging, where
5%
measurement noise translated to 5 average deviation in the
homogeneous fit. This decrease in deviation is demonstrated in Figure 9
which shows data for a phantom study involving triplicate measurement of
objects with increasing amounts
of
blood. The absorption coefficient
increases while the scattering coefficient remains constant. The study is
performed at three wavelengths and the slope of the line of increasing
absorption with added blood is compared with expected values
of
the molar
extinction coefficient from Wray et
al. [8]
in Table
1.
(a)
0.8
0.7
_ 6
0.5
I
I
I
1 0.4
'
0.3
E
0.2
0.1
0.0
a
3
ml blood I liter 0.5 Intrallpld
(c)
0.007
--
_ 0.006
1 0.005
.
0.
004
,
.
0.
003 _ - -
a
3
4
5
mI blood 0.5 Intrallpld
5
(b)
0 8
r ------------
0.7 1
:
0.6 t
t
n
E 0.2
J
0.1
I
0.0 - - - ~ ~ - _ _ . ___I
a
1
3
0.
007
-
0.006
I
i o.005 '
.
0.004 '
ml blood I
l i ter O.soh
ntrallpld
(d)
--
_ 1
0.003 . - . - -
;
o
2 5
ml blood I liter 0.5 Intrallpld
5
Figure
9. Homogeneous fits to measured data for
the
two
methods
described
in
Figure 5: (a)
Method A scattering coefficient
data, (b) Method
8 scattering coefficient
data,
(c)
Method
A
absorption coefficient
data, (d) Method
B absorption coefficient
data. Each
concentration
was
measured
three
times
at
each
of three wavelengths.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
12/15
96
McBride et
al.
Molar Extinction Coefficient
(mm
1
mM
1
)
Wavelength
Wrall et al.
data Method B
Percent
difference
750 nm 3.10E-04 2.49E-04 -19.68
800 nm
4.50E-04 5.06E-04 12.44
830 nm
5.30E-04
4.79E-04 -9.62
Table
1 Comparison
of molar extinction
coefficient
for
oxygenated
hemoglobin
measured
by Wray et al.
[8] with
results from use of homogeneous fitting algorithm (Method B.) based
on data from phantoms increasing hemoglobin concentration
(Figure
9.d).
3.3 Modified imaging algorithm
The modified image reconstruction algorithm is shown schematically in
Figure 10. This modified algorithm uses
the
three practical imaging
considerations discussed in this paper. These modifications are denoted in
the figure by the thicker border lines.
Once a day MellllUfe
Mea llred Phase and Amplilude Avet'l8e over
16
sources and
obtain
data, '-..ur.d
(Iw
. , )
, 81256
estimate
for
qtical properties
by
Iterative
known hcmogenoous
Least Squares Fit to data as llming
phantom;-
:
..,.d
(homo)
p.xnts for objec:t ofinterest
bomogeoeous
Iis II
"
y
Use calilnled data:?ca.bralod(Iw' ,) - . . . . vod(Iw,. ') -
. . .
urwd(ho lfID) -
caJaJaIod(ho fOO
- .ffi.
.
)
olve forward diffusion e"",l ion using latest
,
--+
eslimllle of absorplion and scaltering at
each
J Original
estimate
of
finite .lemeDl node to determin. calculllled
I
qtical properties
phase and
8IIlplilude
at
256
points.
~
Compare calculilled and measured
I dum ew I
pbase and amplilude data
at 256
points.
Estimate
Error
below
I
rror
above
tolerance tolOIllD O
~ F i n i h e d
I
~
Update vector baaed
]II full
mabix
I
nveni
]II
generatea
new absorpti(]ll
and scattering III each melb node
Figure
10.
Schematic of revised image reconstruction algorithm (compare with Figure
3)
which
includes calibration
and
other practical
imaging
considerations added in bold
boxes.
3.4 Phantom imaging results
The final calibrated system was used to measure a tissue-simulating
phantom. A representative image is shown in Figure
11.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
13/15
Strategies
For
NIR
alibration
97
a)
b)
c)
I
-0.015
I
-0.010
-0.005
-0.000
d)
-60.000
-100.000
-50.000
-80.000
-40.000
-30.000
-60.000
-20.000
I
I
10.000
-0.000
-40.000
-20.000
-0.000
D
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0-
Figure
11.
Representative phantom
images from the
calibrated
imaging system. The 90 mm
diameter phantom consists of a mixture o
0.5
Intralipid and 20 microMolar hemoglobin
concentration in water. The hemoglobin in
the
phantom is
fully
oxygenated except for
a 24
mm
diameter object
to
the
right
of center which
was
de-oxygenated by bubbling
with
Nitrogen
gas. Absorption
coefficient images
(scale
is
rom-I)
of
the
phantom are shown
(a)
at
720 nm, (b)
at
750
nm,
and (c) 800 nm.
These
three
images
were
combined
to form images
of
(d)
hemoglobin concentration
(units are microMolar) and (e)
hemoglobin oxygen saturation
(in percent
oxygenation).
t)
and
(g) are
horizontal profile plots
through
the center of (d) and
(e)
respectively.
4 DIS USSION
4 1 Practical considerations
Practical considerations for a NIR diffuse imaging system include: 1)
system calibration with a homogeneous phantom, 2) use
o
a homogeneous
fitting algorithm to arrive at an initial optical property estimate for image
reconstruction o a heterogeneous medium, and 3) correction for long term
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
14/15
98
McBride et al
drift by subtraction o source strength and initial phase offsets. These
practical considerations necessary when using data from a real imaging
system with a model-based reconstruction scheme in order
to
reduce data
model mismatch errors associated with system imperfections which are not
idealized in the model. These modifications allow for the realization o a
prototype imaging system that has the potential to quantitatively reconstruct
heterogeneous images
o hemoglobin-related parameters o highly scattering
tissue in vivo
4 2 Testing
o
homogeneous fitting algorithm
n
important component
o
our practical imaging system is a robust,
stable homogeneous fitting algorithm. One method which is insensitive to
noise due
to
the large amount
o
data averaging which is possible (256
measurements are used to find two parameters) is a Newton-Raphson
minimization based on two parameters: slope o the phase with respect to
distance from the source location and slope o the log o intensity times
distance with respect to distance. This method produces only 0.5% deviation
in determined optical properties in the presence o over
5
measurement
noise
in
repeated phantom measurements.
5 CONCLUSION
Quantitatively accurate images o hemoglobin related parameters
recovered
on
an absolute scale have been demonstrated with no a priori
information. Production o these quantitative images o hemoglobin
concentration and oxygen saturation in a tissue-simulating phantom were
critically dependent on a prototype imaging system implementation which
includes the practical considerations o source/detector calibration, an
accurate first estimate o the optical property distribution, and a correction
for long term source/sensor drift. Once properly calibrated, this near
infrared tomographic imaging system has the potential to provide
in vivo
images o hemoglobin related parameters which may make it useful in breast
cancer imaging and therapy monitoring.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by the NIH through grants ROICA69544 and
POICA80139 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. Authors gratefully acknowledge
previous development work by Huabei Jiang and David Rinehart.
-
7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003
15/15
Strategies For
NIR
alibration
99
REFEREN ES
I. Jiang
H
Paulsen
KD
Osterberg
UL
Pogue
BW
Patterson
MS.
Optical
image
reconstruction using
frequency-domain data: simulations
and experiments. J
Opt Soc Am
A 1996;13:253-266.
2. Arridge
SR
Schweiger
M.
Image
reconstruction in optical tomography. Phil Trans R.
Soc Lond B 1997;352:717-726.
3. Profio
AF
Navarro GA. Scientific basis o breast diaphanography.
Med Phys 1989;
16:60-65.
4. Vaupel P Kallinowski F Okunieff P.
Blood
flow oxygen
and
nutrient
supply
and
metabolic
microenvironment of
human tumors:
a review.
Cancer Research 1989;49:
6449-6465.
5. McBride TO Pogue BW
Gerety
ED
Poplack
SB Osterberg
UL Paulsen
KD.
Spectroscopic diffuse optical tomography
for
quantitatively assessing hemoglobin
concentration
and
oxygenation
in
breast tissue.
Appl Opt
1999;38:5480-5490.
6.
Pogue
BW Testorf M
McBride T
Osterberg U
Paulsen K.
Instrumentation and
design
of a frequency-domain diffuse optical tomography
imager
for breast cancer detection.
Optics Express
1997;1:391-403.
7.
Pogue BW McBride
TO
Osterberg UL Paulsen KD. Spatially variant regularization
improves diffuse optical tomography. Appl Opt 1999;38:2950-2961.
8. Wray S Cope
M
Delpy DT
Wyatt JS
Reynolds
EOR.
Characterization o the near
infrared absorption spectra of cytochrome aa3 and haemoglobin for
the
non invasive
monitoring of cerebral
oxygenation.
Biochim Biophys
Acta 1988;933: 184-192.
9. Quaresima V Matcher SJ Ferrari M. Identification
and
quantification o intrinsic optical
contrast for near infrared
mammography. Photochem Photobiol
1998;67:4-14.
10.
Hale GM
Querry
MR
Optical constants ofwater
in the
200-nm
to
200- Ilm
wavelength
region. Appl Opt 1973;12:555-563.
11.
Pogue
BW Patterson MS Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy o finite
element tissue
volumes
using diffusion
theory. Phys
Med
Bio 1994;39:1157-1180