mcbride 2003

Upload: guidex

Post on 12-Feb-2018

241 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    1/15

    Chapter 9

    STR TEGIES FOR BSOLUTE C LIBR TION

    OF NE R INFR RED TOMOGR PHIC TISSUE

    IM GING

    Troy

    O.

    McBride, Brian

    W.

    Pogue, UlfL. Osterberg, Keith

    D.

    Paulsen

    Thayer School

    o

    Engineering. 8000 Cummings

    Hall

    Dartmouth College. Hanover. New

    Hampshire 03755

    Abstract: Quantitative near infrared NIR) imaging of tissue requires the

    use

    o a diffusion

    model-based

    reconstruction algorithm,

    which solves for the

    absorption

    and

    scattering coefficients of a tissue volume by matching transmission

    measurements

    o light to

    the

    predictive diffusion

    equation

    solution. Calibration

    problems

    as well as other practical considerations arise for an

    imaging

    system

    when using

    a

    model-based method

    for a real system.

    For

    example, systematic

    noise in

    the data acquisition

    hardware

    and source/detector

    fibers must

    be

    removed

    to

    prevent spurious results

    in the

    reconstructed image. Practical

    considerations for a NIR diffuse tomographic imaging system

    include: I)

    calibration with a homogeneous phantom, 2)

    use

    of a homogeneous fitting

    algorithm

    to arrive

    at an initial

    optical property

    estimate for image

    reconstruction o a heterogeneous

    medium.

    and

    3) correction

    for fluctuations

    in

    source strength and initial phase offset during data acquisition. These practical

    considerations, which rely on an accurate

    homogeneous fitting

    algorithm are

    described.

    They have allowed demonstration of a prototype imaging system

    that has the ability to quantitatively

    reconstruct

    heterogeneous

    images

    o

    hemoglobin

    concentrations

    within

    a

    highly scattering medium with

    no

    a priori

    information.

    Key

    words:

    blood,

    calibration, hemoglobin, photon migration, reconstruction,

    tomography

    Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXIV edited by

    Dunn

    and

    Swartz, Kluwer AcademiclPlenum Publishers, 2003

    85

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    2/15

    86 Mc ride et

    al

    1

    INTRODUCTION

    Tissue

    is

    highly scattering at visible and near-infrared

    NIR.)

    wavelengths, thus a simplistic back-projection image is highly blurred and

    difficult to interpret

    as

    the effects

    o

    scattering and absorption can not be

    distinguished. However, by using model-based imaging and computational

    methods in combination with frequency domain measurements, moderate

    resolution, quantitatively accurate images o absorption and scattering can be

    obtained within highly scattering media, such

    as

    tissue [1,2]. This method

    may lead to a potentially powerful medical imaging modality for non

    invasive hemoglobin tomography.

    Practical calibration issues arise when using a model-based image

    reconstruction approach which may not be present in modalities such as x

    ray tomography due to the necessity o fitting the data to a partial differential

    equation solution. In addition, while many system calibrations can be

    ignored in qualitative imaging, more care is required for quantitative

    imaging o hemoglobin concentrations on an absolute scale. Issues

    encountered in the development o the NIR imaging system addressed in this

    paper include: 1) elimination o system-based offsets, 2) choice o

    heterogeneous starting value, and 3) offsets due to long-term drift. These

    issues are addressed through a calibration protocol which involves a

    homogeneous phantom and the use

    o

    a precise homogeneous fitting

    algorithm that is resistant to measurement noise.

    A 4: 1 increase in hemoglobin concentration

    [3]

    and a 1.4 - 4.4 times

    lower oxygen pressure [4] have been observed in breast cancer. By using

    NIR. frequency domain measurements which have been properly calibrated

    at multiple wavelengths, quantitative absolute images o hemoglobin related

    parameters can be obtained [5]. Once calibrated imaging is implemented in

    practice it should be possible to determine whether NIR hemoglobin

    concentration and oxygen saturation information is useful in the diagnosis

    o

    breast tumors.

    2 METHODS

    2 1 maging system

    The frequency-domain near-infrared imaging system consists o three

    main components: 1) data acquisition system, 2) image reconstruction

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    3/15

    trategiesFor

    NIR

    alibration

    Data

    Acquisition

    At a single

    wavelength .

    acquire

    256

    measurements

    Inverse Image

    Reconstruction

    Reconstruct into

    quantitative image

    o absotption and

    scattering

    Repeat

    for

    all

    wavelengths

    Tissue Functional

    Parameters

    Combine I east squares regression)

    absotption images at multiple wavelengths

    to generate images ofhemoglohin

    concentration and oxygen saturation.

    Figure 1. Schematic o near-infrared tomographic imaging

    system

    87

    algorithm, and (3) spectroscopic determination

    o

    functional properties. A

    schematic

    o

    the imaging process

    is

    shown in Figure 1.

    2 1 1 Data acquisition

    system

    The data acquisition system (shown in Figure 2) uses an amplitude

    modulated 100 MHz) wavelength-tunable 700-850 nm) TiSapphire laser as

    the light source. Sixteen source and sixteen detector optical fibers are

    arranged in a circular geometry to analyze a single tomographic plane

    o

    the

    measured tissue or tissue-simulating phantom. The detector for the system is

    a photomultiplier tube with built-in heterodyning circuitry. The heterodyne

    signal 1 kHz) amplitude and phase shift are read into a computer using a

    commercial-grade data acquisition board. The source and detector are

    multiplexed to acquire the 256 data points using linear translation stages.

    [5,6]

    (a)

    (b)

    ....----., loo.

    oonrnz

    h

    tll

    M z

    I

    Figure 2. a)

    Diagram

    and

    b) photograph of

    the

    data acquisition system.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    4/15

    88

    Mc ride

    et al

    2.1.2 Image reconstruction

    A finite element based solution to the frequency-dependent diffusion

    equation is used to calculate a fit to the measured projection data o

    amplitude and phase shift. Absorption and scattering coefficient images are

    generated using a Newton iterative scheme [1,7] with update vectors

    determined from a full matrix inversion during each iteration. A schematic

    o the image reconstruction algorithm is illustrated in Figure

    3.

    Measured Phase and Amplitude

    data, ~ . a S J r e d h.t.ro)

    ,

    at

    256

    points

    IOriginal

    estimate

    of

    I

    olve forward diffusion equation using latest

    optical properties

    .

    estimate of absorption and scattering at each

    I

    finite element node to determine calculated

    phase and amplitude at 256

    points.

    Compare calculated and measured

    IReturn New I

    phase and amplitude

    data at 256

    points.

    Estimate

    Error below

    I

    rror above

    tolerance

    tolerance

    r

    iniS"ied

    I

    pdate vector based on full matrix

    inversion generates new absorption

    and

    scattering at

    each

    me& node

    Figure 3. Schematic

    o

    the finite element based reconstruction algorithm based on the non

    linear estimation problem

    o

    inferring optical property maps using the frequency-domain

    diffusion equation.

    2.1.3 Determination

    o

    functional properties

    Multiple wavelength images o absorption coefficient can be used to

    determine maps o hemoglobin related parameters by incorporating the

    previously measured absorption spectra o pure oxygenated hemoglobin, de

    oxygenated hemoglobin [8], and other tissue chromophores such as lipids [9]

    and water [10]. Because the image reconstruction algorithm recovers

    quantitative values for the absorption coefficient, a least squares fit can be

    used to determine the metabolic chromophore concentrations from that data

    as shown schematically in Figure 4.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    5/15

    Strategies

    For

    NIR Calibration

    89

    Known

    mol ar

    absorption

    a) at

    each

    wavelength A) from measured values for

    the unknowns (e.g. HbR and Hb02)

    a

    Hb

    -

    R

    =

    1 l 1 i 2 ~ n

    [ m m ~ m M

    a

    Hb

    -

    =

    1l,1i2,b

    [mm.

    1

    m ]

    +

    Measured absorption W at n

    wavelengths at each point in the image

    from

    finite element reconstruction algorithm

    Ji ,.tI,.t2,An =

    ~ m

    ]

    t

    Calculate

    concentrations in. this case [Hb

    02] and [HbR]) o unknowns for each

    point using least squares

    fit.

    1i.,AI

    [Hb

    -

    2 l

    a':-02 +[Hb -

    R]

    .a':-R

    l i

    a

    A2

    = [ H b - 0 2 l a ~ - 0 2

    [ H b - R ] . a ~ - R

    1i.,hI [Hb 02laJ b-02 [Hb R]a: '-R

    Figure 4. Schematic

    o methodology

    for

    determining

    hemoglobin related parameters from

    multiple wavelength

    images

    o absorption coefficient.

    2.2 Practical considerations

    Calibration and other practical considerations arise when using a model

    based image reconstruction method with data acquired from a real imaging

    system. In the NIR diffuse tomography context these include: (1) system

    based offsets, (2) initial optical property estimate for a heterogeneous

    medium, and (3) long term fluctuations o source strength and initial phase

    offset.

    2.2.1 System-based offsets

    Systematic offset in the measured data occurs at various source and

    detector locations due to optical fiber differences, multiplexing imprecision,

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    6/15

    90

    McBride et al

    and other systematic inconsistencies. Obviously, these offsets need to be

    removed from the' data prior to image reconstruction in order to prevent the

    appearance

    of

    artifacts in the resultant tissue property profiles. The method

    adopted here measures a homogeneous phantom and subtracts differences

    between measured and calculated values:

    :alibrated heterO) = ~ e a S U r e d h e t e r O ) - ~ e a s u r e d h O m O ) - :alculated hOmO) (1)

    where ~ e s u r e d is the measured amplitude and phase at each

    of

    the 256

    measurement locations for the calibration phantom

    homo)

    and the actual

    heterogeneous object hetero), while ;alculated is the corresponding

    calculation for the homogeneous

    homo)

    case. This requires either exact

    knowledge

    of

    the scattering and absorption coefficients for the measured

    homogeneous phantom or a homogeneous fitting algorithm which

    determines these properties for the measured data on the homogeneous

    calibration phantom. The homogeneous fitting algorithm (described in

    Section 2.3) is an important component

    of

    the practical reconstruction

    algorithm and is, therefore, also used in the calibration procedure.

    The calibration procedure for eliminating systematic offset at different

    source and detector locations involves: (1) measurement of a homogeneous

    phantom (each day and after equipment changes), (2) determination of the

    scattering and absorption coefficient for the phantom (from the measured

    data using the homogeneous fitting algorithm), and (3) use of the difference

    between calculated and measured values as the calibration factor.

    2 2 2

    Heterogeneous starting values

    The image reconstruction algorithm starts from an estimated set of

    optical properties and then calculates an update vector based on

    l

    (the

    squared difference between the calculated and measured values).

    f

    the

    initially estimated set

    of

    optical properties is far from the actual optical

    properties

    of

    the heterogeneous object being imaged, this inaccurate starting

    point can slow convergence and even lead to erroneous answers.

    n

    order to

    determine the initial optical property estimate for patient data or a

    heterogeneous phantom, the measurements are averaged for each of the

    sixteen sources and the homogeneous fitting algorithm is used to determine a

    homogeneous estimate of the properties that are consistent with a diffusion

    equation solution which matches the averaged data. n this manner, the

    initial estimate is determined solely from the heterogeneous phantom or

    patient measurements, yet, is close enough to the unknown actual

    heterogeneous parameter distribution that the algorithm will converge.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    7/15

    Strategies

    For NIR Calibration

    9

    2.2.3 ong term drift

    Differences between the source strength and initial phase at the time

    o

    the measurement o the homogeneous calibration phantom and the actual

    source strength and initial phase observed at the time o the heterogeneous

    measurement can lead to an overall offset mainly due to long term drift)

    between the calibrated measured and calculated data. This difference in

    overall offset needs to be removed in order for the reconstruction algorithm,

    which fits to the absolute amplitude and phase data, to be effective. To

    account for long term drift, the offset for both the homogeneous phantom

    measurements and the actual heterogeneous measurement are calculated

    based on the homogeneous fitting algorithm. The homogeneous fitting

    algorithm responds to the slope o the data and is therefore independent o

    initial source strength and phase shift.) The offset is estimated as the

    average difference between the measured and calculated data.

    N

    t P ~ e a s U r e d h O m O ) - tP:alculated hOmO)

    tPojfset homo) =...: i=..:. l N

    N

    L

    t P ~ e a s U r e d h e t e r O )

    - tP:alculated heterO)

    ffojfset hetero) =...: i=::.: l N

    tPojJset net) = Pojfset heterO) -

    tPojJset homO)

    2)

    3)

    4)

    where tPojfset nel) is the long term drift correction for initial phase and

    source strength.

    2 3 Homogeneous fitting algorithm

    An important part o practical imaging is the homogeneous fitting

    algorithm. The homogeneous fitting algorithm is critical for both calibration

    o the system and for providing the initial optical property estimate for the

    image reconstruction process. Assuming a homogeneous medium, only one

    source location is needed to determine the absorption and scattering

    coefficient

    o

    the material from measurements around its periphery. The

    absorption and scattering coefficients which result in the best fit to the

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    8/15

    92

    McBride

    et

    al.

    measured data can be determined by using a Newton-Raphson iterative

    scheme applied to the finite element forward solution of the diffusion

    equation

    for

    the relevant geometry. To reduce the effect

    of

    noise on the

    fitting algorithm, the data acquired is averaged together

    for

    all sources based

    on detector distance from the source location. The Newton-Raphson

    solution is simplified by reducing the fit to two parameters: slope of the

    phase with respect to distance from the source location and slope of the log

    of intensity times distance with respect to distance. These two parameters

    were chosen because they are nearly constant and can be obtained from the

    data through linear regression. They are constant

    for the analytic infinite

    medium diffusion equation solution [11]. This method

    is

    insensitive to noise

    due to the large amount

    of

    averaging which occurs (256 measurements are

    used

    to

    find two parameters).

    Figure 5 contrasts two versions

    of

    the homogeneous fitting algorithm.

    Method A performs a Newton-Raphson iterative scheme based on an

    estimate of the first derivative for the averaged data (number of detectors

    minus one (15) parameters), while Method B uses the slope of the phase

    with respect to distance from the source location and slope of the log of

    intensity times distance with respect to distance determined from linear

    regression (2 parameters).

    I

    Measured data

    --

    ZS (16 source x 16

    detector) JMllnts

    for

    phase and Intensity

    I

    I

    verage

    data

    to

    I

    I

    source x 16 detectors

    Iteratively

    solve for

    optical

    Method A: Newton-

    Method

    B:

    Newton-Raphson

    Raphson Iterative method

    properties

    by

    comparing

    Iterative

    method

    based on

    slope

    of

    (minimization of

    I )

    based

    wtth

    nnlte element

    fOl ward

    de

    On

    approximation

    or

    nrst

    solution

    of dl/fuslon equation

    the phase

    shirt versus distance

    7,)

    for drcular geometry

    and

    a

    and slope o

    In(dlstance intensity)

    derivative of the measured

    homogeneous medium

    d(ln(d

    AC

    data

    versus

    distance

    - d r

    z

    = Qin(I '1 l-ln(I, lHn(I :1l-ln(I,mlY

    X = d ( I n ~ I _ d ) ) d ( i n ~ I ' ' I ~ ' ) ) J

    P 1

    dr

    dr

    + cro. 1

    -

    11, ]- [0 :1

    _

    1,m

    Y

    [

    dfl' '''- _dr I

    dr dr

    where N =

    16detectors,

    In(J')am f are

    the

    [d(ln(>-i) del

    where all slope calculations -----;;:-.b

    caJculaJed

    In(Iniensity) and

    phase

    shift

    from

    are perfonnedwith a linear

    regression

    to

    finite element

    solution,

    m

    In(i ) and

    r are

    the measured

    daJa

    or the calculated

    daJa

    the measured

    In(Intensity)

    andphllJie.

    from

    the

    finite element solution

    Figure 5. Schematic describing two homogeneous fitting algorithms.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    9/15

    Strategies

    or

    NIR alibration

    93

    3.

    RESULTS

    3.1

    Practical considerations

    3.1.1 Homogeneous calibration

    Figure 6 shows systematic offset from a slight difference in alignment of

    two optical fibers with the laser source fiber during multiplexing. This offset

    is consistent over a period of weeks and only changes during system

    modifications/maintenance such as re-alignment

    of

    the laser. The resultant

    difference data (Fig.6.c.) between the measured (Fig.6.a.) and the calculated

    data (Fig.6.b.) is used as a calibration factor in the reconstruction algorithm.

    a)

    (b) c)

    6,00

    .

    6,00

    6.00

    5,00

    5,00

    5,00

    ' .00

    ' ,00

    ' ,00

    3.00

    3,00

    3.00

    E

    ~ 2 . 0 0

    1

    00

    E

    .

    00

    0.00

    ,00

    1.00

    1.00

    1 ,00

    2 ,00

    2,00

    2,00

    3,00

    3,00 -

    -

    _

    -3 .00

    Figure 6. Plot of (a) In(Intensity) data at 16 detector sites showing offset due

    to

    alignment

    differences, (b) calculated data from finite element solution, and (c) difference between (a)

    and (b). Difference data (c) is used

    as

    the 'calibration' factor.

    3.1.2 Heterogeneous starting value

    Simulations were performed to demonstrate the effect

    of

    different

    starting values during reconstruction of a heterogeneous object. Images for

    three different initial optical property estimates ( 0 , 10 , and 50 error

    from the actual average optical properties) are compared in Figure 7 after

    one iteration. The algorithm converges to the correct image

    2:

    I absorbing

    object with Gaussian profile) during the first iteration for an initial estimate

    which is equal to the average optical properties of the heterogeneous test

    object (Fig.7.a,d). When the initial estimate is significantly removed from

    the actual average optical properties, the algorithm takes longer to converge.

    This slowdown is evident in the other images in Figure

    7.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    10/15

    94

    (a)

    r:

    ::,,

    " I

    n

    ; 1

    .1

    ~ i I U

    (d)

    , [7\

    I

    l n .

    n

    t lO

    II iIP .

    n

    llO lilll

    II lIl J

    II 4lD '0.

    II UI IU .

    I I I I I I

    I

    .

    10

    II

    )0

    (b)

    r-;

    "

    "

    I , I I I I

    II

    : J I. ,. )

    (e)

    .

    [1\

    .

    uuHIO

    O.UtIH

    lll

    U Ul3110

    .H'. , : :

    I

    111

    I'll

    )11

    4 U

    JtI

    McBride et al

    (t)

    [

    lIHt 4 UO

    (lOUHCI

    tI

    Oll j lUI

    (J

    OOl$C1

    (J OO}OO

    I() OtHSCl

    o OIHUCJ

    I I J I I I

    I 10 i l l

    ;lO 40

    J O

    Figure 7. Image after first iteration

    of

    reconstruction

    of

    absorbing object with Gaussian

    profile with (a) initial estimate equal to average optical properties, (b) \0% error in initial

    estimate, and (c) 50% error in initial estimate. The vertical axis units are

    in

    mm

    t

    (d), (e),

    and (t) are profile plots along a vertical line through the center

    of

    images (a), (b), and (c)

    respectively.

    3.1.3 ()ffset

    Offset between the natural log

    of

    intensity profile

    of

    a calculated and

    measured phantom due to long term drift in the Ti:Sapphire laser intensity is

    shown in Figure 8. The offset is accounted for by comparison of the changes

    in offset between the homogeneous calibration phantom and the measured

    heterogeneous object.

    In

    the extreme case shown in Figure

    8,

    the offset in

    intensity is almost two natural log units.

    10.00

    8.00

    6.00

    4.00 .

    2.00

    'iii

    0.00

    c

    -4 .00 .

    -6.00

    8

    .

    00

    10.00

    I calibrated Measured d1

    * Calculated

    Data

    _ .. J

    Figure 8. Plot demonstrating measured data with overall offset due to long term drift

    of

    laser

    intensity. The average difference

    is

    used to correct this offset.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    11/15

    Strategies

    For

    NIR

    Calibration

    95

    3.2 Testing

    o

    homogeneous fitting algorithm

    Using repeated measurements

    of

    the same phantom, the results

    of

    the

    homogeneous fitting algorithm (Method B in Figure

    5)

    have been shown to

    have an average deviation of 0.5 even in the presence

    of 5%

    measurement

    noise. This compares very favorably with our previous approach (Method A

    in Figure 5), which did not take full advantage

    of

    the data averaging, where

    5%

    measurement noise translated to 5 average deviation in the

    homogeneous fit. This decrease in deviation is demonstrated in Figure 9

    which shows data for a phantom study involving triplicate measurement of

    objects with increasing amounts

    of

    blood. The absorption coefficient

    increases while the scattering coefficient remains constant. The study is

    performed at three wavelengths and the slope of the line of increasing

    absorption with added blood is compared with expected values

    of

    the molar

    extinction coefficient from Wray et

    al. [8]

    in Table

    1.

    (a)

    0.8

    0.7

    _ 6

    0.5

    I

    I

    I

    1 0.4

    '

    0.3

    E

    0.2

    0.1

    0.0

    a

    3

    ml blood I liter 0.5 Intrallpld

    (c)

    0.007

    --

    _ 0.006

    1 0.005

    .

    0.

    004

    ,

    .

    0.

    003 _ - -

    a

    3

    4

    5

    mI blood 0.5 Intrallpld

    5

    (b)

    0 8

    r ------------

    0.7 1

    :

    0.6 t

    t

    n

    E 0.2

    J

    0.1

    I

    0.0 - - - ~ ~ - _ _ . ___I

    a

    1

    3

    0.

    007

    -

    0.006

    I

    i o.005 '

    .

    0.004 '

    ml blood I

    l i ter O.soh

    ntrallpld

    (d)

    --

    _ 1

    0.003 . - . - -

    ;

    o

    2 5

    ml blood I liter 0.5 Intrallpld

    5

    Figure

    9. Homogeneous fits to measured data for

    the

    two

    methods

    described

    in

    Figure 5: (a)

    Method A scattering coefficient

    data, (b) Method

    8 scattering coefficient

    data,

    (c)

    Method

    A

    absorption coefficient

    data, (d) Method

    B absorption coefficient

    data. Each

    concentration

    was

    measured

    three

    times

    at

    each

    of three wavelengths.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    12/15

    96

    McBride et

    al.

    Molar Extinction Coefficient

    (mm

    1

    mM

    1

    )

    Wavelength

    Wrall et al.

    data Method B

    Percent

    difference

    750 nm 3.10E-04 2.49E-04 -19.68

    800 nm

    4.50E-04 5.06E-04 12.44

    830 nm

    5.30E-04

    4.79E-04 -9.62

    Table

    1 Comparison

    of molar extinction

    coefficient

    for

    oxygenated

    hemoglobin

    measured

    by Wray et al.

    [8] with

    results from use of homogeneous fitting algorithm (Method B.) based

    on data from phantoms increasing hemoglobin concentration

    (Figure

    9.d).

    3.3 Modified imaging algorithm

    The modified image reconstruction algorithm is shown schematically in

    Figure 10. This modified algorithm uses

    the

    three practical imaging

    considerations discussed in this paper. These modifications are denoted in

    the figure by the thicker border lines.

    Once a day MellllUfe

    Mea llred Phase and Amplilude Avet'l8e over

    16

    sources and

    obtain

    data, '-..ur.d

    (Iw

    . , )

    , 81256

    estimate

    for

    qtical properties

    by

    Iterative

    known hcmogenoous

    Least Squares Fit to data as llming

    phantom;-

    :

    ..,.d

    (homo)

    p.xnts for objec:t ofinterest

    bomogeoeous

    Iis II

    "

    y

    Use calilnled data:?ca.bralod(Iw' ,) - . . . . vod(Iw,. ') -

    . . .

    urwd(ho lfID) -

    caJaJaIod(ho fOO

    - .ffi.

    .

    )

    olve forward diffusion e"",l ion using latest

    ,

    --+

    eslimllle of absorplion and scaltering at

    each

    J Original

    estimate

    of

    finite .lemeDl node to determin. calculllled

    I

    qtical properties

    phase and

    8IIlplilude

    at

    256

    points.

    ~

    Compare calculilled and measured

    I dum ew I

    pbase and amplilude data

    at 256

    points.

    Estimate

    Error

    below

    I

    rror

    above

    tolerance tolOIllD O

    ~ F i n i h e d

    I

    ~

    Update vector baaed

    ]II full

    mabix

    I

    nveni

    ]II

    generatea

    new absorpti(]ll

    and scattering III each melb node

    Figure

    10.

    Schematic of revised image reconstruction algorithm (compare with Figure

    3)

    which

    includes calibration

    and

    other practical

    imaging

    considerations added in bold

    boxes.

    3.4 Phantom imaging results

    The final calibrated system was used to measure a tissue-simulating

    phantom. A representative image is shown in Figure

    11.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    13/15

    Strategies

    For

    NIR

    alibration

    97

    a)

    b)

    c)

    I

    -0.015

    I

    -0.010

    -0.005

    -0.000

    d)

    -60.000

    -100.000

    -50.000

    -80.000

    -40.000

    -30.000

    -60.000

    -20.000

    I

    I

    10.000

    -0.000

    -40.000

    -20.000

    -0.000

    D

    60.0

    40.0

    20.0

    0.0-

    Figure

    11.

    Representative phantom

    images from the

    calibrated

    imaging system. The 90 mm

    diameter phantom consists of a mixture o

    0.5

    Intralipid and 20 microMolar hemoglobin

    concentration in water. The hemoglobin in

    the

    phantom is

    fully

    oxygenated except for

    a 24

    mm

    diameter object

    to

    the

    right

    of center which

    was

    de-oxygenated by bubbling

    with

    Nitrogen

    gas. Absorption

    coefficient images

    (scale

    is

    rom-I)

    of

    the

    phantom are shown

    (a)

    at

    720 nm, (b)

    at

    750

    nm,

    and (c) 800 nm.

    These

    three

    images

    were

    combined

    to form images

    of

    (d)

    hemoglobin concentration

    (units are microMolar) and (e)

    hemoglobin oxygen saturation

    (in percent

    oxygenation).

    t)

    and

    (g) are

    horizontal profile plots

    through

    the center of (d) and

    (e)

    respectively.

    4 DIS USSION

    4 1 Practical considerations

    Practical considerations for a NIR diffuse imaging system include: 1)

    system calibration with a homogeneous phantom, 2) use

    o

    a homogeneous

    fitting algorithm to arrive at an initial optical property estimate for image

    reconstruction o a heterogeneous medium, and 3) correction for long term

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    14/15

    98

    McBride et al

    drift by subtraction o source strength and initial phase offsets. These

    practical considerations necessary when using data from a real imaging

    system with a model-based reconstruction scheme in order

    to

    reduce data

    model mismatch errors associated with system imperfections which are not

    idealized in the model. These modifications allow for the realization o a

    prototype imaging system that has the potential to quantitatively reconstruct

    heterogeneous images

    o hemoglobin-related parameters o highly scattering

    tissue in vivo

    4 2 Testing

    o

    homogeneous fitting algorithm

    n

    important component

    o

    our practical imaging system is a robust,

    stable homogeneous fitting algorithm. One method which is insensitive to

    noise due

    to

    the large amount

    o

    data averaging which is possible (256

    measurements are used to find two parameters) is a Newton-Raphson

    minimization based on two parameters: slope o the phase with respect to

    distance from the source location and slope o the log o intensity times

    distance with respect to distance. This method produces only 0.5% deviation

    in determined optical properties in the presence o over

    5

    measurement

    noise

    in

    repeated phantom measurements.

    5 CONCLUSION

    Quantitatively accurate images o hemoglobin related parameters

    recovered

    on

    an absolute scale have been demonstrated with no a priori

    information. Production o these quantitative images o hemoglobin

    concentration and oxygen saturation in a tissue-simulating phantom were

    critically dependent on a prototype imaging system implementation which

    includes the practical considerations o source/detector calibration, an

    accurate first estimate o the optical property distribution, and a correction

    for long term source/sensor drift. Once properly calibrated, this near

    infrared tomographic imaging system has the potential to provide

    in vivo

    images o hemoglobin related parameters which may make it useful in breast

    cancer imaging and therapy monitoring.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This work has been supported by the NIH through grants ROICA69544 and

    POICA80139 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. Authors gratefully acknowledge

    previous development work by Huabei Jiang and David Rinehart.

  • 7/23/2019 Mcbride 2003

    15/15

    Strategies For

    NIR

    alibration

    99

    REFEREN ES

    I. Jiang

    H

    Paulsen

    KD

    Osterberg

    UL

    Pogue

    BW

    Patterson

    MS.

    Optical

    image

    reconstruction using

    frequency-domain data: simulations

    and experiments. J

    Opt Soc Am

    A 1996;13:253-266.

    2. Arridge

    SR

    Schweiger

    M.

    Image

    reconstruction in optical tomography. Phil Trans R.

    Soc Lond B 1997;352:717-726.

    3. Profio

    AF

    Navarro GA. Scientific basis o breast diaphanography.

    Med Phys 1989;

    16:60-65.

    4. Vaupel P Kallinowski F Okunieff P.

    Blood

    flow oxygen

    and

    nutrient

    supply

    and

    metabolic

    microenvironment of

    human tumors:

    a review.

    Cancer Research 1989;49:

    6449-6465.

    5. McBride TO Pogue BW

    Gerety

    ED

    Poplack

    SB Osterberg

    UL Paulsen

    KD.

    Spectroscopic diffuse optical tomography

    for

    quantitatively assessing hemoglobin

    concentration

    and

    oxygenation

    in

    breast tissue.

    Appl Opt

    1999;38:5480-5490.

    6.

    Pogue

    BW Testorf M

    McBride T

    Osterberg U

    Paulsen K.

    Instrumentation and

    design

    of a frequency-domain diffuse optical tomography

    imager

    for breast cancer detection.

    Optics Express

    1997;1:391-403.

    7.

    Pogue BW McBride

    TO

    Osterberg UL Paulsen KD. Spatially variant regularization

    improves diffuse optical tomography. Appl Opt 1999;38:2950-2961.

    8. Wray S Cope

    M

    Delpy DT

    Wyatt JS

    Reynolds

    EOR.

    Characterization o the near

    infrared absorption spectra of cytochrome aa3 and haemoglobin for

    the

    non invasive

    monitoring of cerebral

    oxygenation.

    Biochim Biophys

    Acta 1988;933: 184-192.

    9. Quaresima V Matcher SJ Ferrari M. Identification

    and

    quantification o intrinsic optical

    contrast for near infrared

    mammography. Photochem Photobiol

    1998;67:4-14.

    10.

    Hale GM

    Querry

    MR

    Optical constants ofwater

    in the

    200-nm

    to

    200- Ilm

    wavelength

    region. Appl Opt 1973;12:555-563.

    11.

    Pogue

    BW Patterson MS Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy o finite

    element tissue

    volumes

    using diffusion

    theory. Phys

    Med

    Bio 1994;39:1157-1180