may 27, 2021 quarterly board executive summary presentation

7
Quarterly Board Executive Summary Presentation Texas Municipal Retirement System Period Ended: March 31, 2021 May 27, 2021

Upload: others

Post on 23-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Quarterly Board Executive Summary PresentationTexas Municipal Retirement SystemPeriod Ended: March 31, 2021

May 27, 2021

Total Fund PerformanceHow Did TMRS Perform Relative to Investment Policy Benchmarks?

The Total Fund returned 2.79% net of fees in the first quarter and 20.43% over the trailing 12

months.

– First Quarter – TMRS underperformed the Actual Allocation Benchmark (3.10%) by 31

basis points.

• Underperformance was driven primarily by Absolute Return, which trailed the HFRI

FOF: Dvf’d Index (1 Mo Lag) by 293 basis points for the quarter.

– Trailing year – TMRS trailed the Actual Allocation Benchmark (20.88%) by 45 basis points.

• Total Equity, Real Estate, and Absolute return contributed to underperformance,

trailing their asset class benchmarks by 316, 203, and 469 basis points, respectively.

The Total Fund outperformed the Actual Allocation Benchmark net of fees in the 5, 7 and 10 - year

time periods ended March 31, 2021.

Performance (%)

QTD 1Year

3Years

5Years

7Years

10Years

Total Fund 2.79 20.43 7.07 8.11 6.52 6.73Actual Allocation Benchmark 3.10 20.88 7.26 7.96 6.41 6.60

Difference -0.31 -0.45 -0.19 0.15 0.11 0.13

Performance shown is net of fees. Please see the Addendum of the Quarterly Board Presentation for custom benchmark definitions.

Page 2

Total Fund PerformanceHow Did TMRS Perform Relative to Investment Policy Benchmarks?

The Total Fund performance expectation, as stated in the Investment Policy Statement, is to exceed the Actual Allocation Benchmark over rolling five-year periods.

– Five-year – TMRS outperformed the Actual Allocation Benchmark by 15 basis points, net

of fees.

– The chart below (page 7 of the Quarterly Board Presentation) shows that TMRS has beaten the

five-year rolling performance expectation 93% of time since 1993, and 97% over the last

ten years.

Performance shown is net of fees. Please see the Addendum of the Quarterly Board Presentation for custom benchmark definitions.

Page 3

Total Fund PerformanceHow Did TMRS Perform Relative to Investment Policy Benchmarks?

Although not yet implemented to the Strategic Target Allocation, TMRS exceeded the Board’s Assumed Long-Term Rate of Return of 6.75% for the five-year period.

– The chart below (page 8 of the Quarterly Board Presentation) illustrates TMRS’ rolling five-year

returns relative to the Strategic Target Allocation Index as a gauge for the effectiveness of

the Board-approved Strategic Target Allocation, which was designed to meet or exceed the

actuarial return assumption of 6.75%, once implemented. The five-year return for the

Strategic Target Allocation Index was 9.17%.

Performance shown is net of fees. Please see the Addendum of the Quarterly Board Presentation for custom benchmark definitions.

Page 4

Objective: Meet or exceed its policy benchmark performance net of fees over rolling five year periods.

TMRS Composites Benchmark 5 Year Composite Return

5 Year Benchmark Return Meets Objective

Total Equity Benchmark 12.83 13.48 No

Bloomberg US Agg Bond Index 3.47 3.10 Yes

Non-Core Fixed Income Benchmark 6.08 5.34 Yes

Real Return Benchmark 5.04 4.93 Yes

NCREIF ODCE Index 7.42 6.21 Yes

HFRI FoF Diversified Index Month Lag 6.84 5.39 Yes

Private Equity Benchmark 13.66 13.66 N/A

TMRS Composite Objectives - Policy Benchmarks

Real Return

Real Estate

Absolute Return

Private Equity

Total Equity

Core Fixed Income

Non-Core Fixed Income

Asset Class PerformanceHow Did TMRS’ Asset Classes Perform Relative to Their Respective Benchmarks?As shown on page 11 of the Quarterly Board Presentation, TMRS’ Asset Class relative performance

was mixed for the first quarter of 2021.

– Relative Outperformers – Two of the seven Asset Classes exceeded their benchmarks, net of fees, in the

quarter. Non-Core Fixed Income and Real Return beat their custom benchmarks by 43 and 44 basis points,

respectively, for the quarter.

– Relative Underperformers – Four of the seven Asset Classes trailed in the quarter. Total Equity

underperformed its benchmark by 0.51% with most of the underperformance due to a core/growth bias as

the Value rotation that began in Q4 2020 persisted. Absolute Return trailed its custom benchmark by 293

basis points. Core Fixed Income and Real Estate generally kept pace with their custom benchmarks,

lagging by 5 and 2 basis points, respectively.

The Investment Policy Statement performance expectations for each Asset Class performance is to meet or exceed their respective benchmarks over rolling five-year periods. As shown below, all Asset Classes outperformed their respective benchmarks for the 5-year period with the exception of Total Equity, which underperformed its benchmark by 65 basis points.

Performance shown is net of fees. Please see the Addendum of the Quarterly Board Presentation for custom benchmark definitions.

Page 5

Asset Allocation Relative to TargetHow Is TMRS Positioned Relative to the Board’s Strategic Target Allocation?The Total Fund market value was $34.5 billion as of March 31, 2021, an increase of over $860

million from the end of 2020. All asset classes, with the exception of Private Equity, were within their

respective Strategic Target Asset Allocation ranges as of quarter-end. TMRS’ 2019 Pacing Model

estimates reaching the targeted 10% allocation to Private Equity by 2026.

Page 6

Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability - This document was prepared by RVK, Inc. (RVK) and may include

information and data from some or all of the following sources: client staff; custodian banks; investment managers;

specialty investment consultants; actuaries; plan administrators/record-keepers; index providers; as well as other

third-party sources as directed by the client or as we believe necessary or appropriate. RVK has taken

reasonable care to ensure the accuracy of the information or data, but makes no warranties and disclaims

responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information or data provided or methodologies

employed by any external source. This document is provided for the client’s internal use only

and does not constitute a recommendation by RVK or an offer of, or a solicitation for, any

particular security and it is not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future

performance of the investment products, asset classes, or capital markets.

Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability - This document was prepared by RVK, Inc. (RVK) and may include

information and data from some or all of the following sources: client staff; custodian banks; investment managers;

specialty investment consultants; actuaries; plan administrators/record-keepers; index providers; as well as other

third-party sources as directed by the client or as we believe necessary or appropriate. RVK has taken

reasonable care to ensure the accuracy of the information or data, but makes no warranties and disclaims

responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information or data provided or methodologies

employed by any external source. This document is provided for the client’s internal use only

and does not constitute a recommendation by RVK or an offer of, or a solicitation for, any

particular security and it is not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future

performance of the investment products, asset classes, or capital markets.