maxillary class-iii designs
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
1/28
Presented by,Jagadish.Konchada
Div of Prosthodontia
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
2/28
Anterior edentulous segment only
Single anterior space which does not cross midline
Left central and lateral incisor teeth are missing
Both third molars are missing which we dont take into consideration
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
3/28
Embrasure clasps may be moved one tooth
forward or backward depending upon
location of undercuts and occlusal contacts.
Cingulum rests should always be included on the
central incisor and canine
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
4/28
Anterior guide plates must be located on the
linguo proximal surfaces so that they will not be
visible from the labial aspect or interfere with
positioning of the replacement teeth.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
5/28
An anterior-posterior palatal strap major connector is
preferred if the palatal opening would be large
enough to be of significant benefit ie.,15 mm in
anterior-posterior dimension
For a maxillary R.P.D there should be at least 6 mm of
space between gingival margin and the border of the
major connector
A U-shaped major connector may also be considered.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
6/28
Minor connectors that connect rests to
major connectors should be positioned in
embrasures and form a right angle at the
junction with the major connector.
Whenever possible, at least 4 mm of
space should be present between
adjacent vertical minor connector
4 mm
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
7/28
Cast clasps are almost always used for class-III RPDs
With a small anterior edentulous space, anterior retentive
arms are seldom used.
Clasp can be placed on the canine if added retention is
desired.
Bar clasp can be given if the approach arm will be hiddenby the upper lip.
Circumferential clasp on the canine is usually
contraindicated.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
8/28
Circumferential (embrasure )clasps are almost always used to provide
retention posteriorly.
If the height of contour is very near the occlusal aspect on the buccal surface,
minor recontouring may be required where retentive arms emerge from the
embrasure.
Access into and out of the rest seats ( shaded areas)
must be created by removal of tooth structure from the
proximal inclines of adjacent cusps,inorder to attain
adequate strength of metal.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
9/28
Retentive network , denture teeth and denture base would tend to be selected if
the space is not appropriate for the missing teeth or if the residual ridge exhibits
extensive resorption or incomplete healing.
Facings ,tube teeth , or heat cure or light activated resin replacements would be
more appropriate if the residual ridge exhibits little resorption and large
undercuts and if the spacing is correct.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
10/28
Posterior edentulous segment with no modification space
Left first and second molar are missing
Right third molar is missing which is not considered.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
11/28
Occlusal rest on the left second premolar may be
moved to the mesial fossa or mesial or distal aspect of
first premolar if occlusal problem exists.
On the right side embrasure clasp may also be used on
second premolar and first molar.
In embrasure clasp some stability may be sacrificed
because the rests will be closer together.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
12/28
Guide surface-guide plate contacts should be parallel
to path of insertion/dislodgement.
Occluso-gingival dimension of the contact should be
one half to two thirds the crown length.
Since class-III RPDs do not exhibit functional motion,
guide plates may be longer and may extend further
lingually and above the survey line without creating
adverse torquing forces on the abutments.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
13/28
With only two teeth in edentulous segment, a palatal
strap major connector would always be used.
Palatal strap should be minimum of 8 mm in
anterio-posterior direction.
If the occlusion dictated that the rests be more
widely separated, an anterio-posterior palatal strap
could be considered with minimum of 15 mm or more
opening between the straps.
8 mm
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
14/28
Minor connectors that connect rests to
major connectors should be positioned in
embrasures and form a right angle at thejunction with the major connector.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
15/28
On the left side, cast circumferential clasps are the
retainers of choice if the undercuts are on the sides
of the abutments away from the edentulous space
.
Bar clasps would be preferred if the undercuts are
adjacent to the edentulous space.
-If the undercut is located at the middle of the facial
surface, an I-bar is preferred.
-If the undercut is adjacent to the edentulous
space, a modified T-bar is preferred.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
16/28
Retentive network , denture teeth and denture base would tend to be selected
with two or more teeth in the edentulous space.
A metal base with heat cured or light activated resin replacement is indicated if :
- vertical space is limited
- metal base is not visible when patient smiles.
- residual ridge is well healed.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
17/28
Posterior edentulous segment with modification space on same side of arch.
Left first premolar and second molar are missing.
Right third molar is missing which is not considered.
It is class-III Mod 1.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
18/28
One or both rests on the left molar may be omitted
if occlusal interference exists.
Rests on the right side may be moved forward or
backward depending on the occlusal interference.
Stability tends to improve as the rests and clasps
are more widely separated.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
19/28
Guide surface-guide plate contacts should be parallel
to path of insertion/dislodgement.
Occluso-gingival dimension of the contact should be
one half to two thirds the crown length.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
20/28
Anterior-posterior palatal strap is usually
preferred.
However if the posterior border can be placed
farther forward, a palatal strap may be selected.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
21/28
If the esthetics is a problem, the anterior clasp
on the left side may be placed on the first molar
rather than the first premolar.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
22/28
Tube teeth or heat cured or light activated resin replacements would usually be
used for the two single tooth posterior replacement.
All metal tooth could be used to replace the second molar if vertical space is
limited.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
23/28
Posterior edentulous segment with modification space on opposite side of arch.
Left first and second molars and right second molar are missing.
It is class-III Mod 1.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
24/28
Rests on the distal of the right first molar could be
moved forward to the mesial fossa or to the distal fossa
of the second premolar if the occlusal interferencespreclude normal placement.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
25/28
Guide surface-guide plate contacts should be parallel to
path of insertion/dislodgement.
Occluso-gingival dimension of the contact should be
one half to two thirds the crown length.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
26/28
A palatal strap would almost always be used.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
27/28
Modified T-bars are the retainers of choice on the right
first and third molar if the only usable undercuts are
adjacent to the edentulous space.
-
8/22/2019 Maxillary Class-III Designs
28/28
Tube teeth or heat cured or light activated resin replacements would usually
be used for the single tooth in the modification space.
All metal tooth could be used if vertical space is limited or if the width of the
space is narrowed by drifting.