matimba power station units no. 1 to 6 automated emission ......10155. the data collated during the...
TRANSCRIPT
Matimba Power Station
Units No. 1 to 6
Automated Emission
Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Tests
2016
30th December 2016
Report No. RSL229
P.O. Box 2459 Noordheuwel ext 4 Krugersdorp 1756 Vat No. 4670254459
10 Chisel Street Boltonia
Krugersdorp 1739
Tel: +27 (011) 660 9432 Tel: +27 (011) 954 6652 Fax:+27 (086) 689 4572
www.stacklabs.co.za
Eskom Matimba Power Station
Private Bag X215
Lephalale
0557
Attention: Kagiso Lebepe
Tel No: (014) 763 8219
Fax: 086 537 4477
E mail: [email protected]
Date Order No. Report No. Enquiries
30th December 2016 PO: 4600060690
RSL229 Tel: 011 954 6652
Cell: 082 458 7438
e-mail: [email protected]
Report No.: RSL229
Matimba Power Station Units No. 1 to 6 Automated Emission Monitoring Systems Annual
Surveillance Tests 2016
Sir
Herewith the finalised report for the Annual Surveillance Tests conducted on Unit No. 1 to 6 at
Matimba Power Station during September & October 2016.
We thank you for the opportunity to be of service. We trust that your requirements were interpreted
correctly. Should you however have any queries, please contact us at the above numbers, we will
gladly assist.
PH Pretorius
Stacklabs
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 STACKLABS ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
II
Source Information
Source Location: Matimba Power Station
Private Bag X215
Lephalale
557
South Africa
Permit No. TBA
Contact: Kagiso Lebepe
Title: Senior Technician
Telephone: (014) 763 8219
Listed Activity Category: 1.1 Solid Combustion Installation
Plant: Units No. 1 to 6
Survey Date: September & October 2016
Determinant: Total Particulate Matter (TPM)
Emission Limit Value (ELV): 200 mg/Nm3 dry 10% O2
Method: ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155
Measured Concentration: Unit No. 1: 5.3 to 25.2 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 2: 4.5 to 37.9 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 3: 8.5 to 77.0 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 4: 4.4 to 7.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 5: 3.8 to 7.5 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 6: 1.0 to 4.2 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Compliance with ELV: Unit No. 1: Yes
Unit No. 2: Yes
Unit No. 3: Yes
Unit No. 4: Yes
Unit No. 5: Yes
Unit No. 6: Yes
III
Determinant: Oxides of Nitrogen (Expressed as NO2)
Emission Limit Value (ELV): 1100 mg/Nm3 dry 10% O2
Method: EN 14792 (Chemiluminescence analyser)
Measured Concentration: Unit No. 1: 476.7 to 544.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 2: 467.2 to 501.6 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 3: 478.7 to 525.2 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 4: 543.9 to 615.2 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 5: 496.2 to 533.1 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 6: 523 to 549.9 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Compliance with ELV: Unit No. 1: Yes
Unit No. 2: Yes
Unit No. 3: Yes
Unit No. 4: Yes
Unit No. 5: Yes
Unit No. 6: Yes
Determinant: Sulphur Dioxide SO2
Emission Limit Value (ELV): 3500 mg/Nm3 dry 10% O2
Method: EPA M6C
Measured Concentration: Unit No. 1: 2799.1 to 3315.4 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 2: 2882.4 to 3077.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 3: 2880.4 to 3155.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 4: 3002 to 4260.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 5: 2493.8 to 3062.9 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 6: 3046.3 to 3447.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Compliance with ELV: Unit No. 1: Yes
Unit No. 2: Yes
Unit No. 3: Yes
Unit No. 4: No 2 of 5 > 3500 mg/Nm3 dry 10% O2
Unit No. 5: Yes
Unit No. 6: Yes
IV
Determinant: Carbon Dioxide
Emission Limit Value (ELV): 16% / 315 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Method: EPA CTM-030 (NDIR)
Measured Concentration: Unit No. 1: 184,2 to 192,3 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 2: 191,3 to 195,7 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 3: 184,9 to 190,1 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 4: 188,6 to 195.3 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 5: 188.7 to 194.2 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 6: 189,5 to 193,7 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Compliance with ELV: Unit No. 1: Yes
Unit No. 2: Yes
Unit No. 3: Yes
Unit No. 4: Yes
Unit No. 5: Yes
Unit No. 6: Yes
Determinant: Carbon Monoxide
Emission Limit Value (ELV): 100 g/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Method: EPA CTM-030 (NDIR)
Measured Concentration: Unit No. 1: 4.0 to 5.5 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 2: 1.9 to 3.2 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 3: 3.0 to 4.8 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 4: 2.0 to 2.8 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 5: 1.5 to 3.3 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Unit No. 6: 2.4 to 3.7 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
Compliance with ELV: Unit No. 1: Yes
Unit No. 2: Yes
Unit No. 3: Yes
Unit No. 4: Yes
Unit No. 5: Yes
Unit No. 6: Yes
Testing Laboratory Stacklabs
10 Chisel Street
Boltonia
Krugersdorp
1739
Contact: Mr PH Pretorius
Title: Managing Member
Telephone: (011) 954 6652
Facsimile: 086 689 4572
E Mail: [email protected]
V
WB Bronkhorst
………………… …………………... ……………………..
WJ Bronkhorst
Team Leader
P Buell
Quality Representative
PH Pretorius
Managing Member
Review and Certification
All work, activities and tasks performed for this report were carried out under my supervision. All
work was conducted in compliance with listed standards. I have reviewed the details, calculations,
results, conclusions and all written material contained within this report, and hereby certify that the
presented material is authentic and accurate.
Name: PH Pretorius
Title: Managing Member
2016/12/30
Sign:___________________________ Date:______________________
Report Title: Matimba Power Station Units No. 1 to 6 Automated Emission Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Tests 2016
Report No. : RSL229
Report Date: 2016/12/30
Revision Date: No Revision
Compiled by Functional representative Authorised by
VI
Table of Contents
Section Page
Source Information............................................................................................................ II
Review and Certification...................................................................................................... III
Report Summary.................................................................................................................. V
1. Monitoring Objective........................................................................................................... 1
2. Plant Description and General Operating Procedures.......................................................... 1
3. Methods and procedures....................................................................................................... 2
4. Results.................................................................................................................................. 7
5. Discussion............................................................................................................................ 38
6. Monitor Deviations............................................................................................................ 62
7. Recommendations.............................................................................................................. 62
8. Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 62
9. References............................................................................................................................ 62
10. Distribution.......................................................................................................................... 62
Appendix No. 1 .............................................. Particulate Emission Measurement Results 64
Appendix No. 2 ..................................................Gaseous Emission Measurement Results 83
Appendix No. 3 ..........................................................................AMS & Plant Parameters 174
Appendix No. 4 ...................................................................................Correlations Graphs 205
Appendix No. 5.................................................Water Vapour Concentration Calculation 224
Appendix No. 6............................................................................... Outlines of Procedures 226
Appendix No. 7...........................................................................AMS Calibration Reports 229
Appendix No. 8...................................................................................... Filter Mass Sheets 271
Appendix No. 9............................................................................. Calibration Certificates 291
VII
REPORT SUMMARY
In order to meet the requirements of the South African Air Quality Act No. 39 of 2004
(Reference 9.1), all Solid Fuel Combustion Installations (Category 1.1) such as Matimba Power
Station, are obligated to monitor several listed pollutants during operation. These pollutants
include particulate matter, Sulphur Dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen. The Act further implies
that all emission programs are required to meet international standards such as EN 14181
(Reference 9.2) and EN 15259 (Reference 9.3). To this end, and in keeping with the ESKOM
Standard for Emission Monitoring and reporting 240-56242363 (Reference 9.4), ESKOM
scheduled a series of emission measurements on Units No. 1 to 6 at Matimba Power Station.
The emission measurements were scheduled to be conducted in parallel with the permanently
installed Automated Measuring System or AMS on these Units. The data collated during the
parallel measurements on the particulate emissions AMS was to be used in determining an
AMS calibration function, calibration range and operational variability as required by ISO
10155. The data collated during the parallel measurements on the gaseous emissions AMS was
to be used to determining the continued validity of their current QAL2 calibration functions, as
specified in EN 14181.
Most Automated Measuring Systems or AMS require calibration to known quantity in order to
ensure accurate measurements. It is however not sufficient to use simulated reference material
alone to determine a calibration function for a gaseous emission AMS as the reference material
cannot replicate the complex and dynamic gas matrix present in an open operational system. It
is therefore necessary to determine a calibration function for each individual plant from the
actual conditions present using a parallel Standard Reference Method or SRM such as is
described in EN 14181 and ISO 10155. Such procedures must be conducted over a range of
operating conditions representative of a plant’s general conditions and typically consist of a
series of 5 to 15 individual measurements.
Stacklabs, an environmental testing laboratory, was contracted to complete the required Annual
Surveillance Tests and to determine the calibration functions as described in the EN 14181 and
ISO 10155. All the required site measurements were carried out during the period from 20th of
September to the 28th of October 2016. All the relevant results and calibration functions have
been presented in this report and may be summarised as presented in the following pages:
VIII
Results Summary
Unit No. 1 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 22.5775 * mA + (-89.9877) 0.98 25.2 0 to 1.7
2 2016/11/30 3.9843 * mA + (-15.6149) 0.98 25.2 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 3.6124 * %ch + (0.3222) 0.98 25.2 0 to 1.7
2 2016/11/30 0.6375 * %ch + (0.3222) 0.98 25.2 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 1 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2286 * %ch + (-13.9967) 0.99 871.5 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
Unit No. 2 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 8.7002 * mA + (-35.3078) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.6
2 2016/11/30 4.3501 * mA + (-17.9074) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.392 * %ch + (-0.5071) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.6
2 2016/11/30 0.696 * %ch + (-0.5071) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 2 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2123 * kg/s + (-13.1364) 0.997 930.1 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
IX
Unit No. 3 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 11.4798 * mA + (-42.9432) 0.99 77.0 0 to 1.9
2 2016/11/30 2.2592 * mA + (-7.4331) 0.94 16.7 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.8368 * %ch + (2.9758) 0.99 77.0 0 to 1.9
2 2016/11/30 0.3615 * %ch + (1.6038) 0.94 16.7 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 3 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2652 * %ch + (-16.6871) 0.99 901.0 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
Unit No. 4 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 12.4214 * mA + (-49.8715) 0.98 7.7 0 to 1.1
2 2016/11/30 3.3877 * mA + (-13.7364) 0.98 7.7 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.9874 * %ch + (-0.1857) 0.98 7.7 0 to 1.1
2 2016/11/30 0.542 * %ch + (-0.1857) 0.98 7.7 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 4 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.0934 * %ch + (-13.7071) 0.996 858.8 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
X
Unit No. 5 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 11.3135 * mA + (-45.3029) 0.95 7.5 0 to 1.5
2 2016/11/30 2.2627 * mA + (-9.0995) 0.95 7.5 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.8102 * %ch + (-0.0487) 0.95 7.5 0 to 1.5
2 2016/11/30 0.362 * %ch + (-0.0487) 0.95 7.5 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 5 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.0667 * %ch + (-10.8037) 0.996 861.6 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
Unit No. 6 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d)
@ 10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 12.7354 * mA + (-50.8084) 0.95 4.2 0 to 1.0
2 2016/11/30 3.8206 * mA + (-15.1494) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 2.0377 * %ch + (0.133) 0.95 4.2 0 to 1.0
2 2016/11/30 0.6113 * %ch + (0.133) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.3
Unit No. 6 Air flow to gas flow correlation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d)
@ 10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2738 * %ch + (-15.9227) 0.994 911.6 n/a
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
XI
Unit No. 1 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3163 189080
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 545 3315 192286
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 477 2799 184160
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1120 1.0538 1.0774
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 15.3 15.3 1778.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.8 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 29.0 29.0 -4360.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 126.9 126.9 33902.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.4 8.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 5.5 10.3
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.0 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1043 0.9689
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 2.0725 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.8 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.0 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -2.9 0.8
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.9 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XII
Unit No. 2 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 483 2944 193725
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 502 3078 195691
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 467 2882 191249
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1658 1.0427 1.0470
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 11.6480 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 23.4 12.6 5044.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -70.3 483.2 -54046.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 106.5 96.2 37016.6
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.7 6.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.2 7.7
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1.9 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.3582 1.0356
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 0.0 -2.3
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 8.8 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XIII
Unit No. 3 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 497 3042 187813
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 525 3156 190069
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 479 2880 184945
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.0370 1.0000 1.0911
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 27.4 20.4 1797.3
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 48.7 496.8 -20958.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 110.3 103.7 33921.0
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.0 8.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.8 9.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.0 8.3
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 14.7370 1.0206
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 39.0 0.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS did not
Pass AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -50.4 0.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 44.9 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XIV
Unit No. 4 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 589 3534 191111
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 615 4261 195305
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 544 3002 188582
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes No Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.3161 1.0628 1.1513
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 50.7550 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 3.5 27.6 3096.5
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -159.1 589.4 -14499.0
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 115.6 138.6 35159.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.3 7.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.8 8.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.0 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.3447 1.0115
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.2
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -1.4 0.6
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.3
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XV
Unit No. 5 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 522 2895 192353
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 533 3063 194231
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 496 2494 188724
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.9786 1.0517 1.1994
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 4.6096 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 7.1 15.0 2425.4
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.0 521.5 1812.9
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 119.1 126.6 34519.9
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.6 8.0
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.3 9.5
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1.5 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 3.5310 1.0881
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 13.7 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -45.2 0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 23.3 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XVI
Unit No. 6 Gaseous Emissions AMS Annual Surveillance Test Results
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 535 3168 191507
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 550 3448 193718
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3046 189459
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1074 1.0192 1.0173
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 -0.9497 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 8.8 12.3 2657.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -120.7 534.9 9467.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 120.7 124.0 34740.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.2 7.1
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.7 8.4
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.4 6.7
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.6920 1.1148
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.3 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.5 -0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
XVII
Report Recommendations
It is recommended that:
The particulate emissions from Units No. 1 to 6 reported to the authorities are determined with
the correlation function presented in Figures No. 1 to 12 of this report.
The gaseous emissions from Units No. 1 to 6 reported to the authorities are determined with the
functions presented in Reports No.:
o LEV1409M-Report-R2591-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit1 – V5
o LEV1409M-Report-R2592-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit2 – V3
o LEV1409M-Report-R2593-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit3 – V3
o LEV1409M-Report-R2594-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit4 – V4
o LEV1409M-Report-R2595-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit5 – V4
o LEV1409M-Report-R2596-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit6 – V4
Annual Surveillance Tests again be conducted on all the Automated Monitoring Systems at
Matimba Power Station during the third quarter of 2017.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 1 of 294
1. Monitoring Objective
The primary objective of the emission survey presented in this report is to quantify the
concentrations of listed emissions, released into the atmosphere during the operations of Units
No. 1 to 6 at Matimba Power Station.
The requirement for conducting the emission survey is to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (39/2004), Listed
Activities and Associated Minimum Emission Standards in terms of Section 21, Category 1.1.
The substances applicable under Category 1.1 areTotal Particulate matter, Oxides of Nitrogen
& Sulphur Dioxide which have been capped at 200, 1100 and 3500 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2
respectively. Also to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the ESKOM Standard
for Emissions Monitoring and Reporting, 240-56242363. Here the substances applicable under
Section 3.8 are Oxides of Nitrogen, Sulphur Dioxide, and Carbon Dioxide which have been
capped at 1100 and 3500, & 315632 mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2 respectively.
2. Plant Description & General Operating Procedure
The pulverised fuel steam generating boilers on which the emission survey was conducted were
originally designed for a maximum steam flow equivalent to 697MW. These boilers were each
equipped with two parallel electrostatic precipitators with a design capacity of 1070 Am3/s gas
flow and a performance collecting efficiency of greater than 99.93%. The electrostatic
precipitators were later retro-fitted with sulphur trioxide flue gas conditioning.
Electrostatic Precipitator Design Data for Unit under Test (original Design)
Description @ 97 % MCR
Number of ESPs in use 2
Gas Volume Flow Rate Worst Coal 1070 m3/s
Gas Temperature 129°C
Inlet Dust Burden 28 g/Nm3
Outlet Dust Burden n/a mg/Nm3
Carbon in Dust 1.6%
Sulphur in Coal 1.25%
Pressure Drop 0.13Kpa
Temperature Drop 4.2°C
Treatment Time 14.3S
Migration Velocity 45.4MM/S
Gas Velocity at Electrode 1.3M/S
During the survey period, particulate emissions, pressure, temperature and moisture
measurements were conducted through purpose built ports situated on the various units’ stacks
at a level of approximately 160m above ground level (Level 6). Averages of the particulate
emission, pressure, temperature and moisture measurements were determined from conducting
traverses through 20 sectors, distributed along two diameters set at 90° to one another within
the stack gas flow profiles. All gaseous sampling was conducted statically, at the best available
sampling points, previously determined for each flue as follows:
Unit No. 1 Right of Centre Port (A) depth at Point 4 or 1.595m from Stack inner wall
Unit No. 2 Left of Centre Port (D) depth at Point 5 or 2.348m from Stack inner wall
Unit No. 3 Left of Centre Port (D) depth Point 3 or 1.045m from Stack inner wall
Unit No. 4 Left of Centre Port (D) depth Point 3 or 1.045m from Stack inner wall
Unit No. 5 Centre Port (B) depth Point 3 or 1.045m from Stack inner wall
Unit No. 6 Right of Centre Port (A) depth Point 3 or 1.045m from Stack inner wall
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 2 of 294
These best available sampling points are all situated at 4 Levels of each stack and were
identified in the following reports:
o LEV1409M-Report-R2591-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit1 – V5
o LEV1409M-Report-R2592-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit2 – V3
o LEV1409M-Report-R2593-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit3 – V3
o LEV1409M-Report-R2594-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit4 – V4
o LEV1409M-Report-R2595-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit5 – V4
o LEV1409M-Report-R2596-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit6 – V4
For a diagrammatic representation of the test positions, see the following sketch. Particulate
Measurements were conducted along Traverse A to D.
2.1. The operating regime followed during the correlation periods included all significant activities
that arise during normal production as well as some fault conditions. The correlation included
measurements at the following Boiler Loads:
Measurement
No. Unit No. 1 Unit No. 2 Unit No. 3 Unit No. 4 Unit No. 5 Unit No. 6
Load (MW) Load (MW) Load (MW) Load (MW) Load (MW) Load (MW)
1 651 643 677 671 650 674
2 622 608 674 671 666 673
3 632 676 673 671 656 673
4 676 676 678 675 674 669
5 675 675 676 674 674 671
6 673 671 675 674 658 672
7 545 553 544 551 552 540
8 545 546 545 551 552 545
9 545 545 416 552 552 545
10 425 414 416 450 443 417
11 426 414 474 449 443 418
12 462 414 450 443 589
For additional information of the plant parameters please see Appendix No. 2.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 3 of 294
3. Methods & Procedures
3.1. Particulate Emissions
The method selected for the determination of the particulate emission concentration on Unit
No. 1 to 6 was in compliance with ISO 12141 Stationary source emissions - Determination of
concentration of particulate matter (dust) at low concentrations – Manual gravimetric method.
This general method can be briefly described as follows:
A sharp-edged nozzle is positioned in the duct facing into the moving gas stream and a sample
flow of the gas is extracted isokinetically for a measured period of time. To allow for non-
uniformity of the distribution of particulate concentration in the duct, samples are taken at a
pre-selected number of stated positions in the duct cross-section. The particulate matter
entrapped in the gas sample is separated by a filter medium, then dried and weighed. The
particulate concentration is calculated from the weighed particulate mass and the gas sample
volume. The particulate mass flow rate is calculated from the particulate concentration and
the duct gas volumetric flow rate. The particulate mass flow rate can also be calculated from
the weighed particulate matter, the sample time, the area of the sample plane and the nozzle
opening.
The degree to which this sample represents the total gas flow depends on
Homogeneity of the gas velocity within the sampling plane;
A sufficient number of sampling points in the sampling plane;
Isokinetic withdrawal of the plane
As stated above, the gas has to be sampled at more than one sampling point in the sampling
plane, dependant on the sampling plane area. This plane is normally divided into equal areas,
at the centres of which gas is withdrawn. To determine the particle concentration in the plane,
the nozzle is moved from one sampling point to the other, extracting gas isokinetically at each
point. Sampling periods should be equal for each sampling point, resulting in a composite
sample. If equal sampling areas cannot be chosen, the sampling period shall be proportional
to the sampling area. The sample is extracted through a sampling train, which principally
consists of:
A sampling probe tube with entry nozzle;
A particle separator;
A gas metering system, in-stack or external;
A suction system
The particle separator and / or the gas metering system may be located either in the duct, or
placed outside the duct.
It is necessary to avoid condensation of vapour in the sampling train during gas sampling,
because it will interfere with particle separation, particulate condition and flow measurements.
To this end, the probe tube, the particle separator and the gas flow-measuring device may be
heated above the relevant dew point where necessary. The water vapour may intentionally be
removed downstream of the particle separator, to make use of a dry gas meter for the
measurement of sampled gas volume.
For isokinetic sampling, the gas velocity at the sampling point in the duct has to be measured,
and the corresponding sample gas flow has to be calculated and adjusted.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 4 of 294
Normally a Pitot static tube is used for the measurement of duct gas velocity. If the sample gas
flow-measuring device is used within the duct, the relationship between the measured pressure
drop and the pitot static tube differential pressure is simple, facilitating the adjustment to
isokinetic conditions. If the gas meter device is situated outside the duct, the calculation of the
isokinetic sample gas flow rate is more complicated. The calculation may also include the duct
gas density under standard conditions (which may be derived from the dry gas composition and
the moisture content), the temperature, static pressure of the gas in the duct, the gas meter
device, and the water vapour content of the duct gas, if the sample gas flow is measured after
water removal.
After sampling, the collected particulate matter is completely recovered, dried and weighed and
the concentrations are determined.
All Stacklabs isokinetic sampling is carried out employing procedures and equipment that
comply with the requirements of ISO 9096 12141 1992 (Reference 1). All Stacklabs sampling
equipment is calibrated by SANAS accredited laboratories.
Matimba personnel were responsible for the setting of the plant prior to the test period.
The broad outlines of filter weighing, pre-test preparations, sampling system integrity checks
and sampling procedures are discussed in Appendix No 3.
3.2. Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx reported as NO2) & Sulphur Dioxide
The methods selected for the determination of the Sulphur Dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen
were EN 14792 and EPA Methods 6C respectively; EN 14792 Determination of mass
concentration of nitrogen oxides (NOx) Reference Method Chemiluminescence, also portions
From EPA 7E—Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources
(Instrumental Analyser Procedure); EPA 6C—Determination of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions
from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyser Procedure).
These two procedures are essentially the same, with the exception of the two differing analytes
and the detection principles.
A heated stainless-steel nozzle and sampling Probe (M&C PSP 4000-H) was positioned in the
duct with the nozzle facing into the moving gas stream and a sample flow of the gas was
extracted non-isokinetically. The gas was passed through a heated ceramic filter which
separated and entrapped any particulate matter suspended in the gas. The sample gas was
then passed through a heated Teflon tube to a gas conditioning unit (M&C PSS-5) which
removed the moisture in the sample gas and reduced the gas temperature to approximately
4°C. The sample gas then continued through a Teflon tube into a manifold equipped with a
flow controller to a sample analyser where the SO2 and NOx volume concentrations were
determined utilising NDIR (pneumatic) & Chemilluminescence (cross flow modulation)
principles. The sample analyser used was a Horiba PG250 with the following specifications:
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 5 of 294
The response time on site with the M&C PSP 400-H probe and M&C PSS-5 gas cooler was
measured as 1 minute and 32 seconds for 98% concentration.
3.3. Oxygen (O2), Carbon Monoxide (CO) & Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
The methods selected for the determination of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) & Oxygen (O2) were EN
EPA CTM-030, Instrumental method with NDIR and EPA CTM – 030 with a Zirconia cell
respectively. The sampling system and procedure for the Carbon Dioxide & Oxygen was
essentially the same as that which has been described above for the Sulphur Dioxide and
Oxides of Nitrogen pollutants.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 6 of 294
3.4. Stack Gas Temperature, Pressure and Moisture concentrations
The methods used for determining the SRM peripheral parameters, gas Temperatures, Pressures
and Moisture Content were in compliance with EPA Methods 2 & 4 and ISO 12141 –
(Determination of concentration of particulate matter (dust) at low concentrations – Manual
gravimetric method).
This general method for the moisture concentration can be briefly described as follows:
A sharp-edged nozzle is positioned in the duct facing into the moving gas stream and a sample
flow of the gas is extracted for a measured period of time. The moisture in the gas stream is
cooled and condensed in a gas cooler equipped with a silica gel trap. The volume of gas
sampled is totalised by a gas volume meter. The increase in moisture condensate, collected in
the gas cooler, is determined gravimetrically and the moisture concentration is calculated as
follows:
Vwsg(std) = (Wf – Wi) /ρ
Where:
Wf = Final weight of silica gel & impinger (g)
Wi = Initial weight of silica gel & impinger (g)
ρ = Density of water vapour at NTP (0.804 kg/m3)
Vwsg(std) = Volume of water vapour collected in silica gel (g) at NTP
Vwsg(std)
Bws = -------------------------
Vwsg(std) + Vm(std)
Where:
Bws = Proportion of water by volume %v/v
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter (Nm3 dry)
3.5. Plant Operation
ESKOM personnel were responsible for operating the plant prior to and during the
measurement period. The broad outlines of operating procedure have been discussed in Section
No. 2 above and the detailed plant parameters have been presented in Appendix No 3.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 7 of 294
4. Results
4.1. Unit No. 1
4.1.1. Unit No. 1 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 1.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 5.0 9.6 23.1
2 5.0 9.5 18.9
3 5.1 10.1 25.2
4 4.6 7.4 16.5
5 4.7 7.8 16.4
6 4.5 7.0 16.6
7 4.6 7.2 12.2
8 4.8 8.3 17.1
9 4.7 7.9 15.4
10 4.3 5.6 6.9
11 4.3 5.5 5.3
12 4.3 5.5 5.3
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 1 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 22.5775 * mA + (-89.9877) 0.98 25.2 0 to 1.7
2 2016/11/30 3.9843 * mA + (-15.6149) 0.98 25.2 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 3.6124 * %ch + (0.3222) 0.98 25.2 0 to 1.7
2 2016/11/30 0.6375 * %ch + (0.3222) 0.98 25.2 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 8 of 294
4.1.2. Unit No. 1 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 1.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 689.3 869.2
2 677.9 837.1
3 686.2 871.5
4 684.4 864.9
5 656.0 862.8
6 712.2 841.9
7 633.1 720.8
8 620.9 723.0
9 604.9 725.0
10 502.0 546.0
11 496.2 553.6
12 531.3 582.0
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
Unit No. 1 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2286 * %ch + (-13.9967) 0.99 871.5 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 9 of 294
4.1.3. Unit No. 1 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automated Monitoring
Systems Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3163 189080
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 545 3315 192286
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 477 2799 184160
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1120 1.0538 1.0774
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 15.3 15.3 1778.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.8 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 29.0 29.0 -4360.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 126.9 126.9 33902.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.4 8.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 5.5 10.3
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.0 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1043 0.9689
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 2.0725 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.8 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.0 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -2.9 0.8
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.9 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 10 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
4 279.3 241.2 476.7 447.0
5 291.5 260.8 513.5 505.0
6 304.2 260.0 537.8 505.3
10 255.1 217.4 541.4 518.2
12 265.5 216.2 544.7 493.9
Max 304 261 544.7 518
Min 255 216 476.7 447
Average 279 239 522.8 494
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
4 1353.6 1231.3 3219.0 3012.4
5 1317.8 1202.9 3234.2 3075.5
6 1317.6 1190.8 3245.6 3055.2
10 946.4 868.5 2799.1 2733.8
12 1159.6 1074.1 3315.4 3240.0
Max 1354 1231 3315.4 3240
Min 946 869 2799.1 2734
Average 1219 1114 3162.6 3023
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
4 117223.6 113382.5 192286.4 195617.4
5 113054.3 109056.7 191385.3 196621.9
6 112421.8 108950.6 191009.9 197125.8
10 90269.1 83760.5 184159.9 185923.0
12 94605.1 90215.8 186559.2 191915.1
Max 117223.6 113382.5 192286.4 197125.8
Min 90269.1 83760.5 184159.9 185923.0
Average 105514.8 101073.2 189080.1 193440.6
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 11 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
4 5.3 6.2 5.5 9.1
5 4.0 5.5 4.3 8.6
6 4.1 5.6 4.4 8.8
10 3.2 2.3 4.1 6.1
12 3.2 1.2 4.0 4.2
Max 5.3 6.2 5.5 9.1
Min 3.2 1.2 4.0 4.2
Average 3.9 4.2 4.4 7.4
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
4 7.1 6.4 7.4 6.5
5 7.5 7.0 7.9 7.1
6 7.6 7.0 8.0 7.2
10 9.8 9.6 10.3 9.7
12 9.5 9.1 9.9 9.2
Max 9.8 9.6 10.3 9.7
Min 7.1 6.4 7.4 6.5
Average 8.3 7.8 8.7 7.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 12 of 294
4.2. Unit No. 2
4.2.1. Unit No. 2 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 2.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 6.5 8.9 21.7
2 6.1 8.2 16.4
3 6.4 8.7 20.0
4 6.3 8.6 16.4
5 6.7 9.3 19.6
6 7.2 10.5 28.3
7 7.9 11.8 37.9
8 6.6 9.2 19.6
9 6.3 8.7 20.1
10 4.8 5.6 7.1
11 4.8 5.6 4.5
12 4.7 5.5 9.2
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 2 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 8.7002 * mA + (-35.3078) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.6
2 2016/11/30 4.3501 * mA + (-17.9074) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.392 * %ch + (-0.5071) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.6
2 2016/11/30 0.696 * %ch + (-0.5071) 0.98 37.9 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 13 of 294
4.2.2. Unit No. 2 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 2.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 720.8 845.4
2 699.2 849.3
3 740.0 909.4
4 737.1 895.1
5 743.9 911.7
6 745.3 930.1
7 627.2 753.4
8 628.2 739.6
9 626.7 721.5
10 507.7 575.6
11 511.5 568.5
12 512.3 559.3
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
Unit No. 2 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2123 * kg/s + (-13.1364) 0.997 930.1 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 14 of 294
4.2.3. Unit No. 2 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automate Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 483 2944 193725
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 502 3078 195691
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 467 2882 191249
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1658 1.0427 1.0470
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 11.6480 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 23.4 12.6 5044.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -70.3 483.2 -54046.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 106.5 96.2 37016.6
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.7 6.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.2 7.7
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1.9 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.3582 1.0356
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 0.0 -2.3
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 8.8 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 15 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
1 303.2 234.8 487.6 517.2
3 308.4 257.5 501.6 581.8
5 298.9 252.0 480.1 555.6
7 272.5 226.3 467.2 543.7
9 276.8 230.8 479.6 569.1
Max 308 257 501.6 582
Min 273 226 467.2 517
Average 292 240 483.2 553
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
1 1373.5 1209.2 3077.7 3350.0
3 1272.0 1136.6 2882.4 3232.7
5 1290.1 1155.6 2888.0 3206.3
7 1231.9 1083.0 2942.8 3275.6
9 1213.6 1069.1 2929.4 3319.4
Max 1374 1209 3077.7 3350
Min 1214 1069 2882.4 3206
Average 1276 1131 2944.1 3277
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
1 126614.9 128409.4 195690.5 244133.7
3 124540.6 126909.0 194665.6 247554.9
5 126695.3 129221.3 195627.8 245939.7
7 116152.9 120963.8 191390.8 250804.2
9 114869.2 117668.1 191249.3 250422.4
Max 126695.3 129221.3 195690.5 250804.2
Min 114869.2 117668.1 191249.3 244133.7
Average 121774.6 124634.3 193724.8 247771.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 16 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
1 1.9 3.8 1.9 1.5
3 2.7 3.8 2.7 1.6
5 2.7 4.7 2.7 1.9
7 3.1 7.8 3.2 3.5
9 2.9 10.7 3.0 4.9
Max 3.1 10.7 3.2 4.9
Min 1.9 3.8 1.9 1.5
Average 2.7 6.1 2.7 2.7
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
1 6.1 7.9 6.5 8.7
3 6.3 8.1 6.7 8.9
5 6.0 7.8 6.4 8.6
7 7.0 8.9 7.5 9.7
9 7.3 9.2 7.7 10.1
Max 7.3 9.2 7.7 10.1
Min 6.0 7.8 6.4 8.6
Average 6.5 8.4 6.9 9.2
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 17 of 294
4.3. Unit No. 3
4.3.1. Unit No. 3 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 3.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 4.7 14.9 14.9
2 4.7 12.5 12.5
3 4.9 12.3 12.3
4 4.8 10.5 10.5
5 4.9 13.9 13.9
6 5.0 16.7 16.7
7 7.5 Over Range 42.7
8 10.5 Over Range 77.0
9 4.3 6.0 8.5
10 4.3 6.1 9.0
11 4.4 6.4 9.3
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 3 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 11.4798 * mA + (-42.9432) 0.99 77.0 0 to 1.9
2 2016/11/30 2.2592 * mA + (-7.4331) 0.94 16.7 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.8368 * %ch + (2.9758) 0.99 77.0 0 to 1.9
2 2016/11/30 0.3615 * %ch + (1.6038) 0.94 16.7 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 18 of 294
4.3.2. Unit No. 3 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 3.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 693.0 872.7
2 695.5 881.7
3 697.2 901.0
4 669.4 884.4
5 673.6 864.2
6 691.7 870.4
7 613.8 737.4
8 603.5 725.4
9 484.3 536.4
10 486.9 530.6
11 538.7 625.9
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*Data was not made available from Station
Unit No. 3 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2652 * %ch + (-16.6871) 0.99 901.0 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 19 of 294
4.3.3. Unit No. 3 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automate Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 497 3042 187813
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 525 3156 190069
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 479 2880 184945
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.0370 1.0000 1.0911
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 27.4 20.4 1797.3
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 48.7 496.8 -20958.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 110.3 103.7 33921.0
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.0 8.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 4.8 9.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.0 8.3
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 14.7370 1.0206
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 39.0 0.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS did not
Pass AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -50.4 0.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 44.9 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 20 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
7 286.7 230.6 525.2 431.5
8 282.3 263.2 511.0 489.3
9 242.5 221.7 480.5 447.4
10 239.2 211.3 478.7 429.7
11 259.9 230.3 488.6 442.7
Max 287 263 525.2 489
Min 239 211 478.7 430
Average 262 231 496.8 448
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
7 1236.3 1148.4 3155.7 2898.3
8 1142.2 1049.0 2880.4 2630.6
9 1087.0 1003.7 3001.8 2731.3
10 1088.1 1023.0 3034.9 2805.9
11 1198.3 1106.7 3138.8 2869.1
Max 1236 1148 3155.7 2898
Min 1087 1004 2880.4 2631
Average 1150 1066 3042.3 2787
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
7 107733.5 110671.0 189679.6 209427.4
8 109268.9 112156.4 190069.3 210892.7
9 97716.4 101729.5 186128.5 207567.3
10 96134.8 101459.2 184944.8 208663.3
11 104191.7 106649.2 188240.5 207304.7
Max 109268.9 112156.4 190069.3 210892.7
Min 96134.8 101459.2 184944.8 207304.7
Average 103009.0 106533.1 187812.6 208771.1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 21 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
7 2.7 0.7 3.1 11.3
8 2.7 2.9 3.0 46.9
9 3.8 6.8 4.6 118.6
10 4.0 3.1 4.8 55.4
11 3.9 2.4 4.4 39.8
Max 4.0 6.8 4.8 118.6
Min 2.7 0.7 3.0 11.3
Average 3.4 3.2 4.0 54.4
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
7 7.9 7.4 8.4 8.0
8 7.8 7.3 8.3 7.9
9 9.0 8.4 9.5 9.0
10 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1
11 8.3 7.8 8.8 8.4
Max 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1
Min 7.8 7.3 8.3 7.9
Average 8.4 7.9 8.9 8.5
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 22 of 294
4.4. Unit No. 4
4.4.1. Unit No. 4 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 4.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 4.6 6.3 7.7
2 4.6 6.1 7.5
3 4.6 6.1 7.5
4 4.6 6.1 7.7
5 4.6 6.0 6.6
6 4.6 6.1 7.7
7 4.6 6.1 7.0
8 4.6 6.0 7.0
9 4.5 5.9 5.6
10 4.5 5.8 5.2
11 4.5 5.7 4.4
12 4.5 5.7 4.6
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 4 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 12.4214 * mA + (-49.8715) 0.98 7.7 0 to 1.1
2 2016/11/30 3.3877 * mA + (-13.7364) 0.98 7.7 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.9874 * %ch + (-0.1857) 0.98 7.7 0 to 1.1
2 2016/11/30 0.542 * %ch + (-0.1857) 0.98 7.7 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 23 of 294
4.4.2. Unit No. 4 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 4.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 757.6 845.7
2 760.0 852.2
3 765.7 852.2
4 769.3 852.5
5 776.6 858.8
6 778.9 854.9
7 670.3 692.4
8 670.1 696.2
9 663.9 690.1
10 574.1 575.8
11 579.4 575.8
12 579.3 572.0
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
Unit No. 4 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.0934 * %ch + (-13.7071) 0.996 858.8 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 24 of 294
4.4.3. Unit No. 4 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automate Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 589 3534 191111
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 615 4261 195305
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 544 3002 188582
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes No Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.3161 1.0628 1.1513
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 50.7550 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 3.5 27.6 3096.5
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -159.1 589.4 -14499.0
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 115.6 138.6 35159.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.3 7.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.8 8.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.0 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.3447 1.0115
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.2
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -1.4 0.6
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.3
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 25 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 341.0 332.0 543.9 699.3
8 346.4 345.3 599.6 762.5
9 340.7 341.1 585.3 747.9
11 333.9 332.0 615.2 773.8
12 330.0 328.2 603.1 759.1
Max 346 345 615.2 774
Min 330 328 543.9 699
Average 338 336 589.4 748
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 1350.7 1290.6 3002.0 3171.9
8 1332.7 1334.2 3213.7 3433.7
9 1323.0 1324.0 3167.0 3384.5
11 1659.5 1631.7 4260.7 4404.6
12 1580.4 1560.3 4024.3 4184.3
Max 1659 1632 4260.7 4405
Min 1323 1291 3002.0 3172
Average 1449 1428 3533.6 3716
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 127395.9 121277.3 195304.8 214762.2
8 115160.3 111157.6 191551.8 206375.9
9 115900.3 111590.5 191368.1 205720.5
11 106579.0 102163.9 188746.3 200203.5
12 107371.5 103373.1 188582.3 200986.5
Max 127395.9 121277.3 195304.8 214762.2
Min 106579.0 102163.9 188582.3 200203.5
Average 114481.4 109912.5 191110.7 205609.7
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 26 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 2.9 18.9 2.8 6.4
8 1.9 7.5 2.0 2.6
9 1.9 7.2 2.0 2.5
11 2.0 9.4 2.3 3.5
12 2.0 9.0 2.2 3.3
Max 2.9 18.9 2.8 6.4
Min 1.9 7.2 2.0 2.5
Average 2.1 10.4 2.3 3.7
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
3 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.2
8 7.3 6.6 7.7 7.0
9 7.2 6.5 7.6 6.9
11 8.2 7.4 8.6 7.8
12 8.1 7.3 8.5 7.7
Max 8.2 7.4 8.6 7.8
Min 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.2
Average 7.4 6.7 7.7 7.1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 27 of 294
4.5. Unit No. 5
4.5.1. Unit No. 5 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 5.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 4.5 6.4 3.8
2 4.5 6.6 4.6
3 4.5 6.7 5.0
4 4.6 6.8 5.8
5 4.6 6.8 6.8
6 4.6 7.0 6.6
7 4.5 6.6 6.6
8 4.5 6.5 5.3
9 4.5 6.4 5.6
10 4.6 6.8 7.3
11 4.5 6.6 7.5
12 4.5 6.6 6.2
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 5 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 11.3135 * mA + (-45.3029) 0.95 7.5 0 to 1.5
2 2016/11/30 2.2627 * mA + (-9.0995) 0.95 7.5 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 1.8102 * %ch + (-0.0487) 0.95 7.5 0 to 1.5
2 2016/11/30 0.362 * %ch + (-0.0487) 0.95 7.5 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 28 of 294
4.5.2. Unit No. 5 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 5.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 765.7 789.3
2 776.9 802.1
3 768.8 821.9
4 783.6 857.4
5 780.5 859.6
6 778.7 861.6
7 668.6 721.5
8 666.0 716.3
9 654.9 636.1
10 571.5 572.2
11 571.5 562.1
12 573.1 555.0
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
Unit No. 5 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.0667 * %ch + (-10.8037) 0.996 861.6 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 29 of 294
4.5.3. Unit No. 5 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automate Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 522 2895 192353
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 533 3063 194231
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 496 2494 188724
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.9786 1.0517 1.1994
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 4.6096 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 7.1 15.0 2425.4
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.0 521.5 1812.9
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 119.1 126.6 34519.9
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.6 8.0
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.3 9.5
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1.5 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 3.5310 1.0881
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 13.7 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -45.2 0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 23.3 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 30 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 304.2 321.5 522.5 526.6
5 313.1 329.8 533.1 535.5
6 312.8 330.8 532.6 535.5
9 278.3 291.0 496.2 487.6
12 265.2 283.1 523.3 512.3
Max 313 331 533.1 536
Min 265 283 496.2 488
Average 295 311 521.5 520
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 1042.1 1022.5 2493.8 2519.1
5 1219.6 1206.5 2893.2 2944.1
6 1250.5 1232.6 2967.2 2998.2
9 1232.9 1211.4 3062.9 3050.6
12 1111.6 1114.2 3056.4 3031.6
Max 1250 1233 3062.9 3051
Min 1042 1023 2493.8 2519
Average 1171 1157 2894.7 2909
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 116853.6 98194.4 192890.8 189474.9
5 118704.6 102085.8 194231.4 195255.0
6 118288.7 101857.2 193601.2 194202.3
9 112230.4 95828.8 192318.4 189148.5
12 99511.1 86595.0 188724.3 184620.8
Max 118704.6 102085.8 194231.4 195255.0
Min 99511.1 86595.0 188724.3 184620.8
Average 113117.7 96912.2 192353.2 190540.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 31 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
3 1.5 16.8 1.5 60.6
5 2.9 13.6 3.0 48.5
6 2.8 16.7 2.9 59.5
9 2.2 11.4 2.3 42.1
12 2.8 7.2 3.3 28.5
Max 2.9 16.8 3.3 60.6
Min 1.5 7.2 1.5 28.5
Average 2.4 13.2 2.6 47.9
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
3 7.2 6.5 7.6 7.4
5 7.1 6.4 7.4 7.3
6 7.1 6.3 7.4 7.2
9 7.8 6.9 8.1 7.9
12 9.2 8.1 9.5 9.1
Max 9.2 8.1 9.5 9.1
Min 7.1 6.3 7.4 7.2
Average 7.7 6.8 8.0 7.8
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 32 of 294
4.6. Unit No. 6
4.6.1. Unit No. 6 Particulate Emissions
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 6.
Monitor Output
Output No. 1
Monitor Output
Output No.2
2016
Correlation
Measured Dust Mass
Test No. mA mA mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 4.2 4.6 2.4
2 4.2 4.6 2.6
3 4.2 4.8 2.6
4 4.2 4.5 2.4
5 4.2 4.5 2.5
6 4.2 4.6 1.7
7 4.1 4.5 2.9
8 4.1 4.3 1.4
9 4.1 4.2 1.1
10 4.1 4.3 1.0
11 4.1 4.3 1.3
12 4.3 5.1 4.2
All particulate emissions reported as mg/Nm3 Dry corrected to 10% O2.
The final correlation includes three zero points as described in ISO 10155.
Unit No. 6 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Equations
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MME Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
mg/Nm3(d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient mg/Nm
3(d) @
10% O2
Range
No. = m * (mA or %CH) + c OD
1 2016/11/30 12.7354 * mA + (-50.8084) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.1
2 2016/11/30 3.8206 * mA + (-15.1494) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.3
1 2016/11/30 2.0377 * %ch + (0.133) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.1
2 2016/11/30 0.6113 * %ch + (0.133) 0.95 4.2 0 to 0.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 33 of 294
4.6.2. Unit No. 6 Air Flow to Gas Flow
The following table presents the results of the particulate emission monitor’s indications from
Outputs No. 1 & 2 as well as the measured particulate emissions in mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2.
The measurements listed below were all included in the final correlations for Unit No. 6.
The following table presents the results of the plant recorded total Air Flow indication (k/s) as
well as the measured Gas Flow results (Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2).
Recorded Total Air Flow
Measured Gas Flow
Test No. kg/s Nm3 (dry) @ 10% O2
1 675.1 858.7
2 682.8 867.1
3 693.2 894.6
4 681.1 889.8
5 686.5 892.4
6 689.4 911.6
7 582.6 721.8
8 580.5 695.6
9 581.1 702.4
10 513.1 560.6
11 501.4 553.0
12 649.0 787.4
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
Unit No. 6 Air flow to gas flow correlation Equation
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
2016 Correlations
Issued Date Function Correlation *MMGF Monitor
Output yyyy/mm/dd
Nm3/s (d) @ 10% O2
Coefficient Nm
3/s (d) @
10% O2 Range
No. = m * kg/s Air Flow + c
n/a 2016/11/30 1.2738 * %ch + (-15.9227) 0.994 911.6 n/a
Gas Flow reported as Nm3/ s Dry corrected to 10% O2
*MMGF: Maximum Measured Gas Flow during correlation period
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 34 of 294
4.6.3. Unit No. 6 Gaseous Emissions
The following table presents the results of the gaseous emission Automate Monitoring Systems
Annual Surveillance Test.
NOx SO2 CO2
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 535 3168 191507
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 550 3448 193718
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3046 189459
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1074 1.0192 1.0173
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 -0.9497 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 8.8 12.3 2657.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -120.7 534.9 9467.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 120.7 124.0 34740.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.2 7.1
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 3.7 8.4
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 2.4 6.7
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.6920 1.1148
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.3 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.5 -0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 35 of 294
The following Tables present the results of 5 Measurements for each Determinant, showing
the Measured Standard Reference Method results, the AMS reported result and the AMS
corrected result.
NOx
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
2 316.6 361.8 524.7 656.5
3 335.1 365.7 546.0 653.7
5 323.7 365.7 530.8 655.2
6 322.4 359.0 523.0 641.4
8 302.6 344.4 549.9 671.1
Max 335 366 549.9 671
Min 303 344 523.0 641
Average 320 359 534.9 656
SO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
2 1357.5 1253.7 3135.0 2915.0
3 1390.3 1257.3 3157.0 2880.2
5 1336.6 1197.1 3054.0 2748.1
6 1347.7 1193.3 3046.3 2732.4
8 1361.7 1227.8 3447.7 3066.0
Max 1390 1257 3447.7 3066
Min 1337 1193 3046.3 2732
Average 1359 1226 3168.0 2868
CO2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
2 119320.9 114255.2 190072.1 183033.5
3 120965.4 116130.8 189458.6 183286.4
5 122470.1 115042.5 193018.4 181964.5
6 124249.0 115764.2 193718.1 182633.9
8 109518.4 104197.0 191265.8 179277.6
Max 124249.0 116130.8 193718.1 183286.4
Min 109518.4 104197.0 189458.6 179277.6
Average 119304.8 113077.9 191506.6 182039.2
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 36 of 294
CO
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. ppm (Wet) ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2
2 3.6 1.0 3.6 0.7
3 3.7 0.5 3.7 0.4
5 3.3 0.3 3.3 0.2
6 3.3 0.2 3.2 0.2
8 2.2 2.9 2.4 2.1
Max 3.7 2.9 3.7 2.1
Min 2.2 0.2 2.4 0.2
Average 3.2 1.0 3.2 0.7
O2
AST Data
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to AMS
condition (Wet Dry)
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP Dry
(yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s
Test No. % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet) % (Wet)
2 6.4 6.1 6.9 7.2
3 6.3 5.9 6.7 6.9
5 6.4 5.9 6.8 7.0
6 6.3 5.9 6.7 6.9
8 8.0 7.3 8.4 8.5
Max 8.0 7.3 8.4 8.5
Min 6.3 5.9 6.7 6.9
Average 6.7 6.2 7.1 7.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 37 of 294
The detailed results of the emission survey for Units No 1 to 6 have been presented in the
following Tables:
Tables No. 1 to 18: Detailed Measurement Results Particulate Emissions Appendix No. 1
SRM Detailed Measurement Results Gaseouse Emissions Appendix No. 2
Tables No. 19 to 48: AMS Plant Parameters Appendix No. 3
Figures 1 to 12: Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation Graphs Appendix No. 4
Figure 13 to 18: Air Flow to Gas Flow Correlation Graph Appendix No. 4
Appendix No. 8 Filter Mass Sheets
The following abbreviations were used in the text, tables and figures:
MCR Maximum Continuous Rating
°C Degrees Celsius
% v/v Percentage on a Volume-by-Volume basis
Am3 Actual Cubic Metres
Nm3 Normal Cubic Metres
g/s Grams per second
mg/s Milligrams per second
Fo Fields out
ESP Electrostatic Precipitator
FFP Fabric Filter Plant
ext. Extinction
mg/Nm3 (d) @ 10% O2 Milligrams per Normal cubic meters dry corrected to 10% Oxygen
• ‘Actual’ refers to the measured temperature and pressure conditions of the gases in the duct
• ‘Normal’ refers to the actual conditions being normalised to 0 °C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 38 of 294
5. Discussion
5.1. Unit No. 1 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 1 was completed from the 17th to the 26
th of October 2016. A total
of 12 measurements were conducted. The following trends indicate the AMS monitor output
signals captured during the correlation period.
The measured particulate emission concentrations ranged from 5.3 to 25.2 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2, well below the negotiated cap value of 100 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The corresponding
particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1 (0 to 1.7 OD), ranged from
4.3 to 5.1 mA over an operating range of 425 to 676.1 MW. The resulting co-ordinates
produced a correlation coefficient of 0.98, well within the standards tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
A correlation derived for a monitor setting of 0 to 0.94 optical density (OD) has also been
presented in the following figure. This correlation is included in order to provide an alternative
monitor setting that includes an extrapolated operating range that is as close as possible to the
negotiated limit concentration value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 39 of 294
5.2. Unit No. 1 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation was also determined during this
period. The measured gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 546.0 to 871.5 Nm3/s Dry @
10% O2, were correlated against the plants corresponding Total Air flow Rates to produce a
correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. No measurements were excluded from the final Total Air
Flow to Gas Flow correlation. The following Air Flow trend was captured during the
correlation period.
Note: No measurements were conducted during the unit shutdown shown above.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 1 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 40 of 294
5.3. Unit No. 1 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 41 of 294
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produces a pass for all
of the AMS instruments.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 15.3 15.3 1778.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.8 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 29.0 29.0 -4360.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 126.9 126.9 33902.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.8 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.0 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -2.9 0.8
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.9 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 42 of 294
5.4. Unit No. 2 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 2 was completed from the 12TH
to the 28th of October 2016. A total
of 12 measurements were conducted of which all 12 measurements were included in the final
correlation. The following trends indicate the particulate emission monitor output signals
captured during the correlation period.
The measurements produced TPM concentrations that ranged from 4.5 to 37.9 mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2, which were all below the negotiated cap value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The
corresponding particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1, ranged from
4.7 to 7.9 mA over an operating range of 414 to 679 MW. The resulting co-ordinates produced
a correlation coefficient of 0.98, well within the standards tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
A correlation derived for a monitor setting of 0 to 0.9 optical density (OD) has also been
presented below. This correlation has been included in order to provide an alternative monitor
setting that includes an extrapolated operating range slightly above the negotiated limit
concentration value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. This selected monitor setting produces a
correlation with a range of 0 to 208.3 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 43 of 294
5.5. Unit No. 2 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation was also determined during this
period. The measured gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 559.3 to 930.1 Nm3/s Dry @
10% O2, were correlated against the plants corresponding Total Air flow Rates to produce a
correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. No measurements were excluded from the final Total Air
Flow to Gas Flow correlation. The following Air Flow trend was captured during the
correlation period.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 2 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 44 of 294
5.6. Unit No. 2 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 45 of 294
Aparant step changes in the data above result from data gaps, from non correlation sampling periods.
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produces a pass for all
of the AMS instruments.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 23.4 12.6 5044.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -70.3 483.2 -54046.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 106.5 96.2 37016.6
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 0.0 -2.3
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 8.8 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 46 of 294
5.7. Unit No. 3 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 3 was completed from the 10th to the 20
th of October 2016. A total
of 11 measurements were conducted of which all 11 were included in the TPM correlations.
The following trends indicate the particulate emission monitor output signals captured during
the correlation period.
The trend above includes step changes that resulted from a change in the optical density setting
of the monitor. These settings were altered from 1.9 to 0.3 for the duration of the correlation
measurements and then again returned to 1.9 at the end of each day’s measurement period. The
11 measurements produced TPM concentrations that ranged from 8.5 to 77.0 mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2, all below the negotiated cap value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The corresponding
particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1, ranged from 4.3 to 10.5 mA
over an operating range of 415.5 to 677.6 MW. The resulting co-ordinates produced a
correlation coefficient of 0.99, within the standards tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
A correlation derived for a monitor setting of 0 to 2 optical density (OD) has also been
presented below. This correlation has been included in order to provide an alternative monitor
setting that includes an extrapolated operating range slightly below the negotiated limit
concentration value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. This selected monitor setting produces a
correlation with a range of 0 to 196.3 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 47 of 294
5.8. Unit No. 3 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation was also determined during this
period. The measured gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 530.6 to 901.0. Nm3/s Dry @
10% O2, were correlated against the plants corresponding Total Air flow Rates to produce a
correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. The following Air Flow trend was captured during the
correlation period.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 3 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 48 of 294
5.9. Unit No. 3 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 49 of 294
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produces a pass for 4
of the 5 AMS instruments. The CO AMS did not pass the variability tests with the AMS
indicating concentrations of 11.3 & 118.6 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2 whereas the SRM values are
3.0 & 4.8 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 27.4 20.4 1797.3
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 48.7 496.8 -20958.5
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 110.3 103.7 33921.0
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 39.0 0.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS did not
Pass AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -50.4 0.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 44.9 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 50 of 294
5.10. Unit No. 4 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 4 was completed from the 3rd
to 6th of October 2016. A total of 12
measurements were conducted of which all 12 measurements were included in the final
correlation. The following trends indicate the particulate emission monitor output signals
captured during the correlation period.
The 12 measurements produced TPM concentrations that ranged from 4.4 to 7.7 mg/Nm3 Dry
@ 10% O2, which were all below the negotiated cap value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The
corresponding particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1, ranged from
4.5 to 4.6 mA over an operating range of 449 to 675 MW. The resulting co-ordinates produced
a correlation coefficient of 0.98, well within the standards tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
The current correlation derived for output No. 1 setting of 0 to 1.1 optical density provides for a
correlation that is only slightly lower than the negotiated limit concentration value of 200
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. This correlation produces a range of 0 to 198.6 mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10%
O2 as presented in the following figure.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 51 of 294
5.11. Unit No. 4 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation, for Unit No. 4 was derived from the
gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 572.0 to 858.8.Nm3/s Dry @ 10% O2. This data
produced a correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. No measurements were excluded from the
final Total Air Flow to Gas Flow correlation. The following Air Flow trend was captured
during the correlation period.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 4 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 52 of 294
5.12. Unit No. 4 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 53 of 294
Apparent step changes in the data above result from data gaps, from non correlation sampling periods.
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produces a pass for all
of the AMS instruments.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 3.5 27.6 3096.5
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -159.1 589.4 -14499.0
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 115.6 138.6 35159.7
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.2 0.2
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -1.4 0.6
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.3
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 54 of 294
5.13. Unit No. 5 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 5 was completed from the 26th to the 29
th of September 2016. A
total of 12 measurements were conducted. The following trends indicate the particulate
emission monitor output signals captured during the correlation period.
The measured particulate emission concentrations ranged from 3.8 to 7.5 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2, well below the negotiated cap value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The corresponding
particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1, ranged from 4.5 to 4.6 mA
over an operating range of 443.3 to 674.1 MW. The resulting co-ordinates produced a
correlation coefficient of 0.99, well within the standards tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
A correlation derived for a monitor setting of 0 to 1.66 optical density (OD) has been presented
below. This correlation has been included in order to provide an alternative monitor setting that
includes an extrapolated operating range that is as close as possible to the negotiated limit
concentration value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 55 of 294
5.14. Unit No. 5 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation was also determined during this
period. The measured gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 555.0 to 861.6 Nm3/s Dry @
10% O2, were correlated against the plants corresponding Total Air flow Rates to produce a
correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. No measurements were excluded from the final Total Air
Flow to Gas Flow correlation. The following Air Flow trend was captured during the
correlation period.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 5 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 56 of 294
5.15. Unit No. 5 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 57 of 294
Aparant step changes in the data above result from data gaps, from non correlation sampling periods.
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produces a pass for all
of the AMS instruments.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 7.1 15.0 2425.4
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.0 521.5 1812.9
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 119.1 126.6 34519.9
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 13.7 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -45.2 0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 23.3 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 58 of 294
5.16. Unit No. 6 Total Particulate Matter (TPM) Monitor Correlation
The correlation on Unit No 6 was completed from the 20th to the 23
rd of September 2016. A
total of 12 measurements were conducted of which all 12 were included in the TPM
correlations. The following trends indicate the particulate emission monitor output signals
captured during the correlation period.
The 12 measurements produced TPM concentrations that ranged from 1.0 to 4.2 mg/Nm3 Dry
@ 10% O2, all below the negotiated cap value of 200 mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. The
corresponding particulate emission monitor signals, recorded from Output No. 1, ranged from
4.1 to 4.3 mA over an operating range of 417.3 to 674.0 MW. The resulting co-ordinates
produced a correlation coefficient of 0.95, on the standard’s tolerance of 0.95 to 1.00.
The current correlation derived for output No. 1 setting of 0 to 1.0 optical density provide for a
correlation that is only slightly lower than the negotiated limit concentration value of 200
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O2. This correlation produces a range of 0 to 203.9 mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10%
O2 as presented in the following figure.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 59 of 294
5.17. Unit No. 6 Airflow to Gas Flow Correlation
The Total Air Flow to Gas Volume Flow Rates correlation was also determined during this
period. The measured gas volume flow rates, which ranged from 553.0 to 911.6. Nm3/s Dry @
10% O2, were correlated against the plants corresponding Total Air flow Rates to produce a
correlation with a coefficient of 0.99. The following Air Flow trend was captured during the
correlation period.
The resulting Air to Gas Flow Correlation for Unit No. 6 is presented here below and in
Appendix No. 4.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 60 of 294
5.18. Unit No. 6 AMS Annual Surveillance Test (AST)
The following figures present the AMS trends captured during the AST period.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 61 of 294
Aparant step changes in the data above result from data gaps, from non correlation sampling periods.
The evaluation of the AST data as described in ISO 14181 Section No. 8 produced a pass for all
the AMS instruments on Unit No. 6.
NOx SO2 CO2
AST Standard Deviation sD 8.8 12.3 2657.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -120.7 534.9 9467.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 120.7 124.0 34740.8
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
CO O2 (%)
AST Standard Deviation sD 1.3 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.5 -0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.4 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 62 of 294
6. Monitoring Deviations
6.1. There were no significant deviations from either the ISO 10155, 12141 or the ESKOM
Standard for Emission Monitoring and Reporting (420-56242363), with regards to the
measurements during the correlation of Unit No 1 to 6.
7. Recommendations
It is recommended that:
7.1. The particulate emissions from Units No. 1 to 6 reported to the authorities are determined with
the correlation function presented in Figures No. 1 to 12 of this report.
7.2. The gaseous emissions from Units No. 1 to 6 reported to the authorities are determined with the
function presented in Reports No.:
LEV1409M-Report-R2591-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit1 – V5
LEV1409M-Report-R2592-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit2 – V3
LEV1409M-Report-R2593-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit3 – V3
LEV1409M-Report-R2594-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit4 – V4
LEV1409M-Report-R2595-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit5 – V4
LEV1409M-Report-R2596-hbSIA ESKOM Matimba Unit6 – V4
This is recommended, as the Annual Surveillance Test results for Unit No. 1 to 6 support the
continued validity of the calibration functions derived in 2014.
7.3. Annual Surveillance Tests again be conducted on all the Automated Monitoring Systems at
Matimba Power Station during the third quarter of 2017.
7.4. New compliant particulate emission monitor correlations are conducted on Unit No. 1 to 6 during
the third quarter of 2018.
8. Acknowledgement
The author expresses sincere appreciation for the co-operation and assistance of the Matimba
personnel during the correlation.
9. References
9.1. South African Air Quality Act No. 39 of 2004
9.2. ISO 9096 Stationary source emission – Manual Determination of mass concentration of
particulate matter.
9.3. ISO 12141 Stationary source emission – Determination of concentration of particulate matter
(dust) at low concentrations – Manual gravimetric method.
9.4. ISO 10155 Stationary source emissions – Automated monitoring of mass concentrations of
particles – Performance characteristics, test methods and specifications
9.5. 420-56242363 ESKOM Standard for Emission Monitoring and Reporting
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 63 of 294
10. Distribution
10.1. Kagiso Lebepe Eskom Matimba Power Station
10.2. Tshifhiwa Ndanganeni Eskom Matimba Power Station
10.3. Johan Van Der Walt Eskom Matimba Power Station
10.4. Phathutshedzo Ralupfumo Eskom Matimba Power Station
10.5. Ebrahim Patel Eskom Enterprises Park
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 64 of 294
Appendix No. 1
Detailed Results
For
Particulate Emission Measurements
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 65 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 1
Measurements No. 1 to 4
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 1 1 1 1
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 1 2 3 4
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/17 2016/10/17 2016/10/17 2016/10/19
Start Time hh:mm:ss 05:36:00 07:19:00 09:04:00 05:33:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 06:54:00 08:34:00 10:20:00 06:53:00
Load MW 651 622 632 676
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 5.0 5.0 5.1 4.6
Average Range No. 2 mA 9.6 9.5 10.1 7.4
Ambient Temperature °C 33.7 34.2 35.8 26.5
Gas Temperature °C 136 136 134 134
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.2 88.4 88.6 88.7
Duct pressure Pa -104.0 -143.0 -141.0 -131.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.1 88.2 88.4 88.5
Moisture %v/v 6.2 6.1 5.4 5.2
Oxygen % 7.3 7.9 7.6 7.4
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GK 01 GK 03 GK 04 GK 07
Total Dust Mass g 0.07884 0.06192 0.08603 0.05748
Velocity m/s 30.2 30.4 30.5 29.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1280.4 1291.6 1293.7 1255.8
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 743.7 751.1 758.2 736.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1201.4 1212.4 1223.3 1190.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 697.8 705.0 717.0 698.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 869.2 837.1 871.5 864.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 12.6 10.3 13.9 9.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 21.6 17.7 23.8 15.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 13.4 11.0 14.7 9.7
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 23.1 18.9 25.2 16.5
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 20.0 15.8 21.9 14.2
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 52.8 52.5 46.2 44.3
Isokineticity % 97.0 96.7 96.8 99.6
Particulate
190742-23
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 66 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 2
Measurements No. 5 to 8
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 1 1 1 1
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 5 6 7 8
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/19 2016/10/19 2016/10/20 2016/10/21
Start Time hh:mm:ss 07:25:00 09:07:00 23:50:00 01:33:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 08:37:00 10:18:00 01:07:00 02:47:00
Load MW 675 673 545 545
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.8
Average Range No. 2 mA 7.8 7.0 7.2 8.3
Ambient Temperature °C 25.8 25.3 32.2 31.9
Gas Temperature °C 131 131 128 128
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.6 88.6 88.6 88.4
Duct pressure Pa -139.0 -139.0 -114.5 -146.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.5 88.5 88.5 88.3
Moisture %v/v 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.1
Oxygen % 7.9 8.0 9.3 9.2
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GK 08 GK 09 GK 13 GK 14
Total Dust Mass g 0.05719 0.05427 0.03414 0.04853
Velocity m/s 30.5 30.0 28.2 28.2
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1294.0 1274.2 1194.6 1196.0
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 762.7 752.1 710.5 709.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1228.6 1209.2 1135.4 1134.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 724.2 713.8 675.3 673.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 862.8 841.9 720.8 723.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 9.2 9.3 6.9 9.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 15.6 15.7 11.6 16.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 9.7 9.8 7.2 10.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 16.4 16.6 12.2 17.1
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 14.2 13.9 8.8 12.4
Stack Diameter m 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 42.7 43.2 41.9 43.6
Isokineticity % 99.6 96.0 96.0 96.7
Particulate
190742-23
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 67 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 3
Measurements No. 9 to 12
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 1 1 1 1
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 9 10 11 12
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/21 2016/10/25 2016/10/26 2016/10/26
Start Time hh:mm:ss 03:11:00 00:12:00 02:00:00 03:45:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 04:22:00 01:29:00 03:13:00 05:01:00
Load MW 545 425 426 462
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.3
Average Range No. 2 mA 7.9 5.6 5.5 5.5
Ambient Temperature °C 30.8 36.6 35.0 34.7
Gas Temperature °C 128 126 123 123
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.4 89.0 89.0 89.1
Duct pressure Pa -143.0 -145.0 -143.5 -151.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.3 88.8 88.8 88.9
Moisture %v/v 5.3 4.7 4.8 4.6
Oxygen % 9.0 10.2 10.2 9.8
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GK 15 GG 13 GG 14 GG 15
Total Dust Mass g 0.04488 0.01450 0.01165 0.01218
Velocity m/s 27.9 23.0 23.1 23.3
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1184.4 976.3 979.1 988.8
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 703.2 585.5 591.6 598.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1122.0 930.5 932.2 943.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 666.1 558.0 563.3 570.8
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 725.0 546.0 553.6 582.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 8.6 3.9 3.1 3.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 14.5 6.6 5.1 5.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 9.1 4.1 3.2 3.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 15.4 6.9 5.3 5.3
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 11.1 3.8 2.9 3.1
Stack Diameter m 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 44.7 39.5 40.4 38.9
Isokineticity % 99.4 95.1 97.5 97.8
Particulate
190742-23
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 68 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 4
Measurements No. 1 to 4
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 2 2 2 2
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 1 2 3 4
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/12 2016/10/12 2016/10/13 2016/10/13
Start Time hh:mm:ss 06:13:00 08:00:00 05:22:00 07:02:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 07:35:00 10:15:00 06:39:00 08:18:00
Load MW 643 608 676 676
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 6.5 6.1 6.4 6.3
Average Range No. 2 mA 8.9 8.2 8.7 8.6
Ambient Temperature °C 31.9 33.4 29.7 29.3
Gas Temperature °C 141 140 139 138
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.8 88.9 88.7 88.7
Duct pressure Pa -149.5 -146.0 -156.0 -146.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.7 88.7 88.6 88.6
Moisture %v/v 5.6 5.5 5.9 5.9
Oxygen % 6.4 6.7 6.6 6.6
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GH 07 GH 08 GH 09 GH 10
Total Dust Mass g 0.07819 0.05496 0.07326 0.05940
Velocity m/s 27.6 28.2 30.1 29.5
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1170.0 1195.9 1276.8 1249.6
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 676.0 692.9 739.7 724.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1104.2 1130.5 1201.9 1175.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 637.9 655.0 696.3 682.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 845.4 849.3 909.4 895.1
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 11.9 9.0 10.9 8.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 20.5 15.5 18.9 15.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 12.6 9.5 11.6 9.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 21.7 16.4 20.0 16.4
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 18.4 13.9 18.2 14.6
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 47.9 46.4 50.0 50.6
Isokineticity % 104.8 97.2 99.0 100.0
Particulate
163811-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 69 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 5
Measurements No. 5 to 8
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 6 2 2 2
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 5 6 7 8
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/13 2016/10/13 2016/10/13 2016/10/14
Start Time hh:mm:ss 08:37:00 10:21:00 22:31:00 00:05:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 09:56:00 11:36:00 23:49:00 01:08:00
Load MW 675 671 553 546
Operator WJB WJB wjb WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 6.7 7.2 7.9 6.6
Average Range No. 2 mA 9.3 10.5 11.8 9.2
Ambient Temperature °C 30.4 31.5 30.1 29.8
Gas Temperature °C 139 139 139 135
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.9 88.9 88.8 88.7
Duct pressure Pa -132.5 -110.0 -105.5 -107.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.7 88.8 88.7 88.6
Moisture %v/v 6.3 5.7 5.8 5.4
Oxygen % 6.3 6.2 7.3 7.4
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GH 11 GH 12 GH 13 GH 14
Total Dust Mass g 0.07228 0.10559 0.11409 0.05768
Velocity m/s 29.7 29.7 26.1 25.5
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1257.8 1260.2 1104.7 1081.9
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 730.7 731.8 641.0 632.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1178.2 1188.0 1040.2 1023.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 684.4 689.8 603.6 598.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 911.7 930.1 753.4 739.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 10.7 15.5 20.7 10.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 18.4 26.7 35.7 18.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 11.4 16.4 22.0 11.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 19.6 28.3 37.9 19.6
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 17.9 26.3 28.6 14.5
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 54.3 48.8 49.8 46.2
Isokineticity % 99.5 98.8 98.4 98.2
Particulate
163811-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 70 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 6
Measurements No. 9 to 12
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 2 2 2 2
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 9 10 11 12
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/14 2016/10/27 2016/10/28 2016/10/28
Start Time hh:mm:ss 01:46:00 23:48:00 01:45:00 03:39:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 03:02:00 01:15:00 03:09:00 04:50:00
Load MW 545 414 414 414
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 6.3 4.8 4.8 4.7
Average Range No. 2 mA 8.7 5.6 5.6 5.5
Ambient Temperature °C 29.7 36.7 35.9 35.2
Gas Temperature °C 134 129 125 124
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.6 89.3 89.2 89.3
Duct pressure Pa -111.5 -121.0 -112.5 -118.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.4 89.2 89.0 89.2
Moisture %v/v 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.8
Oxygen % 7.6 8.5 8.7 8.9
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GH 15 GL 01 GL 02 GL 03
Total Dust Mass g 0.05737 0.01657 0.01017 0.02028
Velocity m/s 25.2 21.0 21.0 21.0
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1066.2 890.4 891.3 889.4
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 624.5 532.6 537.8 538.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1009.8 844.0 845.0 837.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 591.5 504.8 509.8 507.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 721.5 575.6 568.5 559.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 11.1 4.0 2.6 5.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 19.0 6.8 4.2 8.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 11.8 4.3 2.7 5.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 20.1 7.1 4.5 9.2
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 14.5 4.1 2.5 5.1
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 44.9 44.2 44.1 49.9
Isokineticity % 97.5 99.3 98.7 97.4
Particulate
163811-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 71 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 7
Measurements No. 1 to 4
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 3 3 3 3
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 1 2 3 4
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/10 2016/10/10 2016/10/10 2016/10/11
Start Time hh:mm:ss 08H55 10H39 12H19 06H29
End Time hh:mm:ss 10H12 12H36 13H33 07H24
Load MW 677 674 673 678
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.8
Average Range No. 2 mA 8.6 8.6 9.6 9.3
Ambient Temperature °C 35.1 32.7 33.2 28.0
Gas Temperature °C 131 132 133 130
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.8
Duct pressure Pa -147.5 -130.0 -121.0 -100.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.7 88.7 88.8 88.7
Moisture %v/v 5.6 5.7 5.9 5.8
Oxygen % 7.2 7.0 6.8 6.8
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GH 01 GH 02 GH 03 GH 04
Total Dust Mass g 0.05108 0.04374 0.04419 0.03686
Velocity m/s 29.3 29.4 29.8 29.0
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1240.3 1246.9 1261.3 1227.6
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 734.6 736.6 743.4 727.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1170.8 1175.2 1187.1 1155.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 693.4 694.3 699.7 685.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 872.7 881.7 901.0 884.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 8.3 7.0 6.8 5.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 14.1 11.8 11.6 9.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 8.8 7.4 7.3 6.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 14.9 12.5 12.3 10.5
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 13.0 11.0 11.1 9.3
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 47.7 49.0 50.2 49.8
Isokineticity % 96.9 97.8 98.2 97.5
Particulate
165753-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 72 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 8
Measurements No. 5 to 8
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 3 3 3 3
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 5 6 7 8
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/11 2016/10/11 2016/10/18 2016/10/18
Start Time hh:mm:ss 08H17 09H56 00H54 02H38
End Time hh:mm:ss 09H30 11H13 12H36 03H50
Load MW 676 675 544 545
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.9 5.0 7.5 10.5
Average Range No. 2 mA 9.8 10.6 26.2 45.2
Ambient Temperature °C 29.4 31.5 31.2 30.4
Gas Temperature °C 131 131 129 131
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.8 88.9 88.7 88.4
Duct pressure Pa -98.0 -127.0 -132.5 -144.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.7 88.7 88.6 88.3
Moisture %v/v 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.6
Oxygen % 6.8 6.9 8.2 8.3
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GH 05 GH 06 GK 05 GK 06
Total Dust Mass g 0.04799 0.05709 0.12405 0.22300
Velocity m/s 28.3 28.7 26.7 26.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1198.2 1217.0 1132.8 1126.0
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 708.3 720.4 671.7 663.6
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1134.8 1150.1 1068.8 1062.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 670.8 680.8 633.7 626.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 864.2 870.4 737.4 725.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 7.8 9.3 23.9 42.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 13.2 15.8 40.3 72.7
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 8.2 9.9 25.3 45.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 13.9 16.7 42.7 77.0
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 12.0 14.5 31.5 55.9
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 44.9 46.7 48.1 48.0
Isokineticity % 98.3 96.9 97.1 98.3
Particulate
165753-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 73 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 9
Measurements No. 9 to 11
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 3 3 3
Location Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 9 10 11
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/20 2016/10/20 2016/10/20
Start Time hh:mm:ss 00H34 02H21 03H53
End Time hh:mm:ss 01H49 03H33 05H08
Load MW 416 416 474
Operator WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.90 1.90 1.90
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.3 4.3 4.4
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.0 6.1 6.4
Ambient Temperature °C 27.9 27.7 27.7
Gas Temperature °C 126 125 124
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.5 88.4 88.5
Duct pressure Pa -145.0 -170.5 -152.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.3 88.2 88.3
Moisture %v/v 5.0 5.3 5.3
Oxygen % 9.5 9.6 8.9
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60
Thimbles used GK 10 GK 11 GK 12
Total Dust Mass g 0.01788 0.01866 0.02277
Velocity m/s 21.4 21.4 23.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 906.0 907.8 1002.1
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 540.9 542.3 600.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 860.8 860.0 948.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 514.0 513.8 568.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 536.4 530.6 625.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 4.8 5.1 5.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 8.1 8.5 8.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 5.1 5.4 5.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 8.5 9.0 9.3
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 4.6 4.8 5.8
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 42.1 44.7 45.2
Isokineticity % 96.8 96.7 96.1
Particulate
165753-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 74 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 10
Measurements No. 4 to 7
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 4 4 4 4
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 4 5 6 7
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/03 2016/10/03 2016/10/03 2016/10/04
Start Time hh:mm:ss 06:30:00 08:13:00 09:50:00 06:30:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 07:48:00 09:29:00 11:11:00 07:46:00
Load MW 671 671 671 675
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.1
Ambient Temperature °C 24.8 24.8 25.6 22.4
Gas Temperature °C 130 130 130 130
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.5 88.6 88.6 88.7
Duct pressure Pa -151.0 -157.0 -155.0 -160.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.5
Moisture %v/v 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.2
Oxygen % 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GG 01 GG 02 GG 03 GG 04
Total Dust Mass g 0.02565 0.02514 0.02578 0.02654
Velocity m/s 27.3 27.5 27.5 27.4
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1158.7 1166.1 1165.0 1159.5
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 685.0 689.7 689.6 686.8
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1094.6 1104.4 1102.5 1099.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 647.1 653.2 652.6 651.2
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 845.7 852.2 852.2 852.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 7.3 7.1 7.1 7.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.7
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.6
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 47.0 44.8 45.5 43.9
Isokineticity % 97.2 96.8 99.6 99.2
Particulate
163809-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 75 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 11
Measurements No. 8 to 11
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 4 4 4 4
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 8 9 10 11
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/04 2016/10/04 2016/10/04 2016/10/05
Start Time hh:mm:ss 08:14:00 09:50:00 23:47:00 01:31:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 09:25:00 11:05:00 01:03:00 02:44:00
Load MW 674 674 551 551
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0
Ambient Temperature °C 23.5 24.2 25.1 24.6
Gas Temperature °C 130 129 130 129
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.6 88.7 88.5 88.3
Duct pressure Pa -150.5 -134.5 -145.5 -147.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.5 88.5 88.3 88.1
Moisture %v/v 5.2 5.0 4.3 5.0
Oxygen % 6.7 6.7 7.8 7.9
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GG 05 GG 06 GG 07 GG 08
Total Dust Mass g 0.02249 0.02586 0.01891 0.01883
Velocity m/s 27.7 27.6 24.0 24.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1173.4 1168.2 1017.4 1044.0
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 694.7 693.6 601.3 616.2
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1112.3 1109.5 974.0 992.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 658.6 658.7 575.6 585.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 858.8 854.9 692.4 696.2
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 3.7 4.3 4.0 3.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 6.3 7.3 6.7 6.7
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 3.9 4.6 4.2 4.1
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 6.6 7.7 7.0 7.0
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 5.7 6.6 4.9 4.9
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 44.1 42.5 35.9 42.1
Isokineticity % 97.7 96.9 95.5 95.0
Particulate
163809-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 76 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 12
Measurements No. 12 to 15
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 4 4 4 4
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 12 13 14 15
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/10/05 2016/10/05 2016/10/06 2016/10/06
Start Time hh:mm:ss 03:13:00 23:24:00 01:07:00 03:00:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 04:32:00 00:38:00 02:28:00 04:14:00
Load MW 552 450 449 450
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Average Range No. 2 mA 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.7
Ambient Temperature °C 23.9 27.8 26.6 26.5
Gas Temperature °C 128 128 128 128
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.3 87.9 87.7 87.6
Duct pressure Pa -152.5 -128.5 -135.5 -119.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.1 87.8 87.5 87.5
Moisture %v/v 4.9 4.1 4.2 4.5
Oxygen % 7.8 8.8 8.8 8.8
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GG 09 GG 10 GG 11 GG 12
Total Dust Mass g 0.01536 0.01161 0.00985 0.01025
Velocity m/s 24.2 21.7 21.7 21.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1024.8 918.5 918.5 916.5
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 606.3 541.7 540.7 539.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 974.1 880.5 880.1 875.4
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 576.3 519.3 518.1 515.3
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 690.1 575.8 575.8 572.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 5.4 5.0 4.2 4.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.7
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 5.6 5.2 4.4 4.6
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 3.9 3.0 2.6 2.7
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 41.8 34.6 35.0 37.7
Isokineticity % 97.2 95.9 95.2 95.2
Particulate
163809-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 77 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 13
Measurements No. 4 to 7
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 5 5 5 5
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 4 5 6 7
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/26 2016/09/26 2016/09/26 2016/09/27
Start Time hh:mm:ss 06:58:00 09:38:00 11:36:00 06:32:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 09:11:00 11:04:00 12:50:00 07:55:00
Load MW 650 666 656 674
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.8
Ambient Temperature °C 27.2 28.5 29.9 27.4
Gas Temperature °C 123 123 123 123
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.0 88.1 88.0 87.5
Duct pressure Pa -136.5 -100.5 -126.5 -131.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 87.9 88.0 87.9 87.4
Moisture %v/v 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4
Oxygen % 7.9 7.8 7.9 7.6
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 100 60 60 60
Thimbles used GF 4 GF 5 GF 6 GF 7
Total Dust Mass g 0.01985 0.01488 0.01646 0.01997
Velocity m/s 27.7 27.9 29.1 29.7
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1149.2 1157.2 1206.1 1230.5
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 687.8 693.0 720.6 730.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1110.0 1115.6 1156.6 1188.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 664.4 668.1 691.0 705.8
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 789.3 802.1 821.9 857.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 2.2 2.7 2.9 3.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 3.7 4.5 4.8 5.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 2.3 2.8 3.0 3.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 3.8 4.6 5.0 5.8
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 3.0 3.7 4.1 5.0
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 28.3 30.0 34.3 28.4
Isokineticity % 96.1 96.3 96.5 96.2
Particulate
163264-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 78 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 14
Measurements No. 8 to 11
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 5 5 5 5
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 8 9 10 11
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/27 2016/09/27 2016/09/27 2016/09/28
Start Time hh:mm:ss 08:26:00 10:12:00 22:55:00 00:41:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 09:45:00 11:29:00 00:12:00 02:00:00
Load MW 674 658 552 552
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.8 7.0 6.6 6.5
Ambient Temperature °C 29.3 30.4 32.7 32.4
Gas Temperature °C 123 124 126 126
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 87.5 87.5 87.8 87.8
Duct pressure Pa -118.0 -120.5 -137.0 -159.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 87.4 87.4 87.6 87.6
Moisture %v/v 3.4 3.7 5.0 5.6
Oxygen % 7.7 7.7 8.3 8.2
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GF 8 GF 9 GF 10 GF 11
Total Dust Mass g 0.02318 0.02239 0.01894 0.01551
Velocity m/s 29.9 30.0 26.7 26.6
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1242.0 1244.4 1107.6 1103.7
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 738.3 739.1 656.1 653.3
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1199.9 1198.9 1052.6 1042.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 713.2 712.1 623.5 616.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 859.6 861.6 721.5 716.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 6.5 6.4 6.2 5.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.1
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 6.8 6.6 6.6 5.3
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 5.8 5.7 4.7 3.8
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 28.2 30.5 42.0 47.6
Isokineticity % 96.0 94.5 96.6 98.6
Particulate
163264-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 79 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 15
Measurements No. 12 to 15
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 5 5 5 5
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 12 13 14 15
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/28 2016/09/28 2016/09/29 2016/09/29
Start Time hh:mm:ss 02:25:00 22:46:00 00:26:00 02:11:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 03:41:00 23:58:00 01:42:00 03:22:00
Load MW 552 443 443 443
Operator WJB WJB WJB WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5
Average Range No. 2 mA 6.4 6.8 6.6 6.6
Ambient Temperature °C 31.3 31.2 31.2 31.6
Gas Temperature °C 126 123 118 118
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 87.7 87.9 87.9 87.9
Duct pressure Pa -147.5 -113.0 -125.8 -128.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 87.6 87.8 87.7 87.8
Moisture %v/v 4.3 4.4 3.9 4.1
Oxygen % 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.8
Nozzle diameter mm 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GF 12 GF 13 GF 14 GF 15
Total Dust Mass g 0.01442 0.01646 0.01673 0.01373
Velocity m/s 26.2 23.3 22.6 22.5
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1086.1 965.7 937.7 935.0
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 642.9 577.1 566.7 565.9
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1039.0 923.4 901.2 896.6
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 615.1 551.8 544.7 542.7
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 636.1 572.2 562.1 555.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 3.2 4.2 4.4 3.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 5.4 7.0 7.2 5.9
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 3.3 4.4 4.6 3.7
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 5.6 7.3 7.5 6.2
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 3.6 4.2 4.2 3.4
Stack Diameter m 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 36.4 36.9 32.5 34.4
Isokineticity % 97.0 94.9 95.3 96.9
Particulate
163264-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 80 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 16
Measurements No. 1 to 4
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 6 6 6 6
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 1 2 3 4
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/20 2016/09/20 2016/09/20 2016/09/21
Start Time hh:mm:ss 06:30:00 08:36:00 10:58:00 04:59:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 07:53:00 09:58:00 12:11:00 06:11:00
Load MW 674 673 673 669
Operator SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Range No. 2 OD 1.00 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
Average Range No. 2 mA 4.2 4.6 4.8 4.5
Ambient Temperature °C 22.1 23.0 24.3 23.6
Gas Temperature °C 127 127 128 127
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 89.2 89.2 89.2 89.1
Duct pressure Pa -164.5 -149.0 -150.8 -126.3
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 89.0 89.0 89.0 89.0
Moisture %v/v 6.1 6.8 6.1 5.9
Oxygen % 7.3 7.1 6.9 6.9
Nozzle diameter mm 6.5 6.7 7.5 7.5
Sample Time min 60 60 60 60
Thimbles used GE10 GE11 GE12 GE12
Total Dust Mass g 0.00604 0.00649 0.00867 0.00802
Velocity m/s 28.8 28.9 29.2 29.1
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1224.0 1227.2 1239.9 1234.8
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 733.7 735.4 742.7 739.8
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1148.8 1143.2 1163.7 1162.1
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 688.6 685.1 697.1 696.2
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 858.7 867.1 894.6 889.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.4
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.2
Stack Diameter m 7.35 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 52.6 59.0 52.6 50.2
Isokineticity % 103.0 95.1 98.2 99.2
Particulate
165752-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 81 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 17
Measurements No. 5 to 8
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 6 6 6 6
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 5 6 7 8
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/21 2016/09/21 2016/09/21 2016/09/22
Start Time hh:mm:ss 06:41:00 08:14:00 22H52 01H17
End Time hh:mm:ss 07:53:00 09:24:00 00H43 03H15
Load MW 671 672 540 545
Operator SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng WJB
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1
Average Range No. 2 mA 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.3
Ambient Temperature °C 23.2 24.5 29.6 27.1
Gas Temperature °C 128 128 128 126
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.9 89.0 88.9 88.5
Duct pressure Pa -129.8 -134.3 -114.0 -127.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.7 88.8 88.7 88.4
Moisture %v/v 6.1 5.5 4.2 4.3
Oxygen % 6.9 6.8 8.3 8.5
Nozzle diameter mm 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.0
Sample Time min 60 60 100 100
Thimbles used GE14 GE15 GC13 GD14
Total Dust Mass g 0.00811 0.00593 0.01089 0.00513
Velocity m/s 29.4 29.6 25.8 25.2
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1245.6 1254.0 1094.0 1070.9
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 743.6 749.4 652.1 640.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1169.6 1184.6 1047.7 1025.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 698.3 707.9 624.5 612.6
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 892.4 911.6 721.8 695.6
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 1.4 1.0 1.7 0.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 2.3 1.6 2.8 1.3
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 1.5 1.0 1.7 0.8
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2.5 1.7 2.9 1.4
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 2.2 1.6 2.1 0.9
Stack Diameter m 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 52.2 47.0 35.5 35.9
Isokineticity % 98.8 100.2 95.2 100.1
Particulate
165752-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 82 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 18
Measurements No. 9 to 12
Customer Matimba Matimba Matimba Matimba
Unit No. 6 6 6 6
Location Stack Stack Stack Stack
Measurement No. 9 10 11 12
Date yyyy/mm/dd 2016/09/22 2016/09/23 2016/09/23 2016/09/23
Start Time hh:mm:ss 03H39 00H19 02H29 04:54:00
End Time hh:mm:ss 04H48 02H09 04H21 06:05:00
Load MW 545 417 418 589
Operator SS Diutlwileng WJB SS Diutlwileng SS Diutlwileng
Monitor Type
Serial No.
Range No. 1 OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Range No. 2 OD 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Average Range No. 1 mA 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3
Average Range No. 2 mA 4.2 4.3 4.3 5.1
Ambient Temperature °C 24.1 31.2 29.9 29.2
Gas Temperature °C 126 122 118 122
Barometric pressure kPa (g) 88.2 88.4 88.4 88.4
Duct pressure Pa -136.5 -106.5 -115.0 -122.5
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.1 88.2 88.2 88.3
Moisture %v/v 4.3 3.6 4.3 4.3
Oxygen % 8.5 9.8 9.7 8.1
Nozzle diameter mm 7.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Sample Time min 60 100 100 60
Thimbles used GD15 GF1 GF2 GF3
Total Dust Mass g 0.00281 0.00282 0.00344 0.00957
Velocity m/s 25.6 22.4 21.9 27.3
Gas Volume Flow Am3/s 1087.7 949.8 929.2 1159.5
Gas Volume Flow Nm3/s 647.6 572.0 564.7 699.2
Gas Volume Flow Dry Am3/s (d) 1040.9 915.6 889.3 1109.5
Gas Volume Flow Dry Nm3/s (d) 619.7 551.4 540.4 669.0
Gas Volume Flow Dry @ 10% O2 Nm3/s 702.4 560.6 553.0 787.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (wet) 0.6 0.6 0.8 2.4
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (wet) 1.1 1.0 1.3 4.0
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Am3 (dry) 0.7 0.6 0.8 2.5
Dust Concentration Corrected for Ref O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 1.1 1.0 1.3 4.2
Outlet Dust Flowrate g/s 0.8 0.6 0.7 3.3
Stack Diameter m 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Duct Area m2 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4
Moisture Concentration mg/Nm3 (dry) 36.2 30.0 36.1 36.3
Isokineticity % 95.3 102.9 98.4 102.6
Particulate
165752-94
Dust Concentration [mg/Nm3] is the measured dust concentration Normalised to gas conditions at 0°C and 101,325 kPa.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 83 of 294
Appendix No. 2
Detailed Results
For
Gaseous Emission Measurements
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 84 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 477 545 523
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2799 3315 3163
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 184160 192286 189080
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 4.0 5.5 4.4
Oxygen % 7.4 10.3 8.7
Velocity m/s 23.0 30.5 27.3
Gas Temperature °C 122.9 133.5 129.0
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.6 89.1 88.8
Moisture % 4.6 5.2 4.9
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1120 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0538 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0774 ppm (Act) (Wet) 200000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 2.0725 1.1043 0.0000 0.0000 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9689 % v/v (Wet) 25.00
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 85 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3163 189080 4.4 8.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 545 3315 192286 5.5 10.3
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 477 2799 184160 4.0 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method B) Method B) Method A) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1120 1.0538 1.0774 1.1043 0.9689
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0725 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 599.2 3646.9 211515.0 6.1 11.3
AST Standard Deviation sD 15.3 15.3 1778.1 1.8 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.8 44426.8 14.0 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 29.0 29.0 -4360.5 -2.9 0.8
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 126.9 126.9 33902.7 11.9 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 86 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
4 241.2 476.7 447.0 6.2
5 260.8 513.5 505.0 1.7
6 260.0 537.8 505.3 6.1
10 217.4 541.4 518.2 4.3
12 216.2 544.7 493.9 9.3
Max 261 544.7 518 9
Min 216 476.7 447 2
Average 239 522.8 494 6
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
4 1231.3 3219.0 3012.4 6.4
5 1202.9 3234.2 3075.5 4.9
6 1190.8 3245.6 3055.2 5.9
10 868.5 2799.1 2733.8 2.3
12 1074.1 3315.4 3240.0 2.3
Max 1231 3315.4 3240 6
Min 869 2799.1 2734 2
Average 1114 3162.6 3023 4
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 87 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
4 113382.5 192286.4 195617.4 -1.7
5 109056.7 191385.3 196621.9 -2.7
6 108950.6 191009.9 197125.8 -3.2
10 83760.5 184159.9 185923.0 -1.0
12 90215.8 186559.2 191915.1 -2.9
Max 113382.5 192286.4 197125.8 -1
Min 83760.5 184159.9 185923.0 -3
Average 101073.2 189080.1 193440.6 -2
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
4 6.2 5.5 9.1 -65.9
5 5.5 4.3 8.6 -101.9
6 5.6 4.4 8.8 -101.6
10 2.3 4.1 6.1 -47.9
12 1.2 4.0 4.2 -4.6
Max 6.2 5.5 9.1 -5
Min 1.2 4.0 4.2 -102
Average 4.2 4.4 7.4 -64
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 88 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
4 6.4 7.4 6.5 12.6
5 7.0 7.9 7.1 9.9
6 7.0 8.0 7.2 10.1
10 9.6 10.3 9.7 6.0
12 9.1 9.9 9.2 7.1
Max 9.6 10.3 9.7 12.6
Min 6.4 7.4 6.5 6.0
Average 7.8 8.7 7.9 9.1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 89 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nox Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
4 241 0 447 477
5 261 0 505 513
6 260 0 505 538
10 217 0 518 541
12 216 0 494 545
Sum 1195.7 0.0 2469.3 2614.1
Max 260.8 0.0 518.2 544.7
Min 216.2 0.0 447.0 476.7
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 239.1 0.0 493.9 522.8
Difference (mg) -29.0
DiffStandard Deviation sD 28.55 15.32 Difference (%) -5.5
Uncertainty Q0 112.2 112.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation
SD < or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 90 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 522.8 29.0
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 247.2 234.6
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 91 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
4 1231 0 3012 3219
5 1203 0 3075 3234
6 1191 0 3055 3246
10 869 0 2734 2799
12 1074 0 3240 3315
Sum 5567.7 0.0 15117.0 15813.2
Max 1231.3 0.0 3240.0 3315.4
Min 868.5 0.0 2733.8 2799.1
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1113.5 0.0 3023.4 3162.6
Difference (mg) -139.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 206.56 65.33 Difference (%) -4.4
Uncertainty Q0 357.1 357.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 92 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 3162.6 139.2
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 554.1 419.4
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 93 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
4 113382 0 195617 192286
5 109057 0 196622 191385
6 108951 0 197126 191010
10 83761 0 185923 184160
12 90216 0 191915 186559
Sum 505366.1 0.0 967203.1 945400.7
Max 113382.5 0.0 197125.8 192286.4
Min 83760.5 0.0 185923.0 184159.9
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 101073.2 0.0 193440.6 189080.1
Difference (mg) 4360.5
DiffStandard Deviation sD 3531.35 1778.07 Difference (%) 2.3
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 94 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 189080.1 -4360.5
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 35574.3 33902.7
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 95 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
4 6 9 0 5
5 5 9 0 4
6 6 9 0 4
10 2 6 0 4
12 1 4 0 4
Sum 20.8 36.8 0.0 22.2
Max 6.2 9.1 0.0 5.5
Min 1.2 4.2 0.0 4.0
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 4.2 7.4 0.0 4.4
Difference (mg) 2.9
DiffStandard Deviation sD 1.82 0.60 Difference (%) 65.5
Uncertainty Q0 10.2 10.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 96 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar -2.9 4.4
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 11.9 10.8
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 97 of 294
Unit No. 1 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
4 6.4 0.0 6.5 7.4
5 7.0 0.0 7.1 7.9
6 7.0 0.0 7.2 8.0
10 9.6 0.0 9.7 10.3
12 9.1 0.0 9.2 9.9
Sum 39.1 0.0 39.7 43.6
Max 9.6 0.0 9.7 10.3
Min 6.4 0.0 6.5 7.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 7.8 0.0 7.9 8.7
Difference (mg) -0.8
DiffStandard Deviation sD 1.31 0.12 Difference (%) -8.8
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 10%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 98 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 8.7 0.8
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 2.3 1.2
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 99 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 467 502 483
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2882 3078 2944
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 191249 195691 193725
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 1.9 3.2 2.7
Oxygen % 6.4 7.7 6.9
Velocity m/s 25.2 30.1 27.7
Gas Temperature °C 133.9 141 138.2
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.6 88.90 88.8
Moisture % 5.3 6.3 5.8
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1658 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 11.6480 1.0427 0.0000 0.0000 ppm (Act) (Wet) 4000.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0470 ppm (Act) (Wet) 400000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3582 ppm (Act) (Wet) 500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0356 % v/v (Wet) 25.00
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 100 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 483 2944 193725 2.7 6.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 502 3078 195691 3.2 7.7
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 467 2882 191249 1.9 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1658 1.0427 1.0470 0.3582 1.0356
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 11.6480 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 551.8 3385.5 215259.6 3.5 8.5
AST Standard Deviation sD 23.4 12.6 5044.0 1.2 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -70.3 483.2 -54046.2 0.0 -2.3
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 106.5 96.2 37016.6 8.8 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 101 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
1 234.8 487.6 517.2 -6.1
3 257.5 501.6 581.8 -16.0
5 252.0 480.1 555.6 -15.7
7 226.3 467.2 543.7 -16.4
9 230.8 479.6 569.1 -18.7
Max 257 501.6 582 -6
Min 226 467.2 517 -19
Average 240 483.2 553 -15
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
1 1209.2 3077.7 3350.0 -8.8
3 1136.6 2882.4 3232.7 -12.2
5 1155.6 2888.0 3206.3 -11.0
7 1083.0 2942.8 3275.6 -11.3
9 1069.1 2929.4 3319.4 -13.3
Max 1209 3077.7 3350 -9
Min 1069 2882.4 3206 -13
Average 1131 2944.1 3277 -11
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 102 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
1 128409.4 195690.5 244133.7 -24.8
3 126909.0 194665.6 247554.9 -27.2
5 129221.3 195627.8 245939.7 -25.7
7 120963.8 191390.8 250804.2 -31.0
9 117668.1 191249.3 250422.4 -30.9
Max 129221.3 195690.5 250804.2 -25
Min 117668.1 191249.3 244133.7 -31
Average 124634.3 193724.8 247771.0 -28
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
1 3.8 1.9 1.5 16.5
3 3.8 2.7 1.6 40.6
5 4.7 2.7 1.9 28.6
7 7.8 3.2 3.5 -9.2
9 10.7 3.0 4.9 -63.9
Max 10.7 3.2 4.9 41
Min 3.8 1.9 1.5 -64
Average 6.1 2.7 2.7 3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 103 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
1 7.9 6.5 8.7 -33.5
3 8.1 6.7 8.9 -34.3
5 7.8 6.4 8.6 -34.2
7 8.9 7.5 9.7 -30.5
9 9.2 7.7 10.1 -31.8
Max 9.2 7.7 10.1 -31
Min 7.8 6.4 8.6 -34
Average 8.4 6.9 9.2 -33
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 104 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nox Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
1 235 0 517 488
3 257 0 582 502
5 252 0 556 480
7 226 0 544 467
9 231 0 569 480
Sum 1201.4 0.0 2767.5 2416.1
Max 257.5 0.0 581.8 501.6
Min 226.3 0.0 517.2 467.2
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 240.3 0.0 553.5 483.2
Difference (mg) 70.3
DiffStandard Deviation sD 12.61 23.40 Difference (%) 14.5
Uncertainty Q0 84.2 84.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 105 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 483.2 -70.3
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 96.2 106.5
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 106 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
1 1209 3350 0 3078
3 1137 3233 0 2882
5 1156 3206 0 2888
7 1083 3276 0 2943
9 1069 3319 0 2929
Sum 5653.6 16384.1 0.0 14720.3
Max 1209.2 3350.0 0.0 3077.7
Min 1069.1 3206.3 0.0 2882.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1130.7 3276.8 0.0 2944.1
Difference (mg) 332.8
DiffStandard Deviation sD 43.17 79.09 Difference (%) 11.3
Uncertainty Q0 267.9 267.9 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 107 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar -332.8 2944.1
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 309.0 343.3
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 108 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
1 128409 0 244134 195690
3 126909 0 247555 194666
5 129221 0 245940 195628
7 120964 0 250804 191391
9 117668 0 250422 191249
Sum 623171.5 0.0 1238855.0 968624.0
Max 129221.3 0.0 250804.2 195690.5
Min 117668.1 0.0 244133.7 191249.3
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 124634.3 0.0 247771.0 193724.8
Difference (mg) 54046.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 2233.04 5044.04 Difference (%) 27.9
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 109 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 193724.8 -54046.2
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 34336.5 37016.6
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 110 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
1 4 0 2 2
3 4 0 2 3
5 5 0 2 3
7 8 0 4 3
9 11 0 5 3
Sum 30.7 0.0 13.5 13.5
Max 10.7 0.0 4.9 3.2
Min 3.8 0.0 1.5 1.9
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 6.1 0.0 2.7 2.7
Difference (mg) -2.7
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.52 1.19 Difference (%) -100
Uncertainty Q0 7.7 7.7 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 111 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 2.7 0.0
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 8.1 8.8
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 112 of 294
Unit No. 2 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
1 7.9 0.0 8.7 6.5
3 8.1 0.0 8.9 6.7
5 7.8 0.0 8.6 6.4
7 8.9 0.0 9.7 7.5
9 9.2 0.0 10.1 7.7
Sum 42.0 0.0 46.1 34.7
Max 9.2 0.0 10.1 7.7
Min 7.8 0.0 8.6 6.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 8.4 0.0 9.2 6.9
Difference (mg) 2.3
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.58 0.10 Difference (%) 32.8
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 113 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 6.9 -2.3
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 1.6 1.2
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 114 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 479 525 497
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2880 3156 3042
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 184945 190069 187813
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 3.0 4.8 4.0
Oxygen % 8.3 9.6 8.9
Velocity m/s 21.4 26.7 23.9
Gas Temperature °C 123.9 131 126.9
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.4 88.70 88.5
Moisture % 5.0 5.6 5.4
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0370 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0037 ppm (Act) (Wet) 4000.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0911 ppm (Act) (Wet) 400000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.7370 ppm (Act) (Wet) 500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0206 % v/v (Wet) 25.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 115 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 497 3042 187813 4.0 8.9
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 525 3156 190069 4.8 9.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 479 2880 184945 3.0 8.3
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.0370 1.0000 1.0911 14.7370 1.0206
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 577.7 3471.3 209076.2 5.3 10.6
AST Standard Deviation sD 27.4 20.4 1797.3 39.0 0.0
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS did not
Pass AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 48.7 496.8 -20958.5 -50.4 0.4
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 110.3 103.7 33921.0 44.9 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 116 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
7 230.6 525.2 431.5 17.8
8 263.2 511.0 489.3 4.2
9 221.7 480.5 447.4 6.9
10 211.3 478.7 429.7 10.2
11 230.3 488.6 442.7 9.4
Max 263 525.2 489 18
Min 211 478.7 430 4
Average 231 496.8 448 10
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
7 1148.4 3155.7 2887.6 8.5
8 1049.0 2880.4 2620.9 9.0
9 1003.7 3001.8 2721.2 9.3
10 1023.0 3034.9 2795.6 7.9
11 1106.7 3138.8 2858.5 8.9
Max 1148 3155.7 2888 9
Min 1004 2880.4 2621 8
Average 1066 3042.3 2777 9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 117 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
7 110671.0 189679.6 209427.4 -10.4
8 112156.4 190069.3 210892.7 -11.0
9 101729.5 186128.5 207567.3 -11.5
10 101459.2 184944.8 208663.3 -12.8
11 106649.2 188240.5 207304.7 -10.1
Max 112156.4 190069.3 210892.7 -10
Min 101459.2 184944.8 207304.7 -13
Average 106533.1 187812.6 208771.1 -11
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
7 0.7 3.1 11.3 -270.8
8 2.9 3.0 46.9 -1469.9
9 6.8 4.6 118.6 -2469.2
10 3.1 4.8 55.4 -1049.7
11 2.4 4.4 39.8 -796.0
Max 6.8 4.8 118.6 -271
Min 0.7 3.0 11.3 -2469
Average 3.2 4.0 54.4 -1211
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 118 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
7 7.4 8.4 8.0 5.2
8 7.3 8.3 7.9 4.6
9 8.4 9.5 9.0 4.9
10 8.5 9.6 9.1 5.1
11 7.8 8.8 8.4 4.8
Max 8.5 9.6 9.1 5
Min 7.3 8.3 7.9 5
Average 7.9 8.9 8.5 5
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 119 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nox Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
7 231 0 431 525
8 263 0 489 511
9 222 0 447 481
10 211 0 430 479
11 230 0 443 489
Sum 1157.1 0.0 2240.6 2484.0
Max 263.2 0.0 489.3 525.2
Min 211.3 0.0 429.7 478.7
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 231.4 0.0 448.1 496.8
Difference (mg) -48.7
DiffStandard Deviation sD 20.42 27.43 Difference (%) -9.8
Uncertainty Q0 84.2 84.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 120 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 496.8 48.7
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 103.7 110.3
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 121 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
7 1148 0 2898 3156
8 1049 0 2631 2880
9 1004 0 2731 3002
10 1023 0 2806 3035
11 1107 0 2869 3139
Sum 5330.9 0.0 13935.2 15211.5
Max 1148.4 0.0 2898.3 3155.7
Min 1003.7 0.0 2630.6 2880.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1066.2 0.0 2787.0 3042.3
Difference (mg) -255.3
DiffStandard Deviation sD 111.87 17.06 Difference (%) -8.4
Uncertainty Q0 267.9 267.9 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 122 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 265.5 255.3
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 284.2 284.1
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 123 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
7 110671 0 209427 189680
8 112156 0 210893 190069
9 101729 0 207567 186129
10 101459 0 208663 184945
11 106649 0 207305 188241
Sum 532665.3 0.0 1043855.4 939062.8
Max 112156.4 0.0 210892.7 190069.3
Min 101459.2 0.0 207304.7 184944.8
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 106533.1 0.0 208771.1 187812.6
Difference (mg) 20958.5
DiffStandard Deviation sD 2226.10 1797.27 Difference (%) 11.2
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 124 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 187812.6 -20958.5
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 34329.8 33921.0
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 125 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
7 1 0 11 3
8 3 0 47 3
9 7 0 119 5
10 3 0 55 5
11 2 0 40 4
Sum 15.9 0.0 272.0 19.9
Max 6.8 0.0 118.6 4.8
Min 0.7 0.0 11.3 3.0
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 3.2 0.0 54.4 4.0
Difference (mg) 50.4
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.89 39.01 Difference (%) 1265.7
Uncertainty Q0 7.7 7.7 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 126 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 4.0 -50.4
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 8.5 44.9
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 127 of 294
Unit No. 3 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
7 7.4 0.0 8.0 8.4
8 7.3 0.0 7.9 8.3
9 8.4 0.0 9.0 9.5
10 8.5 0.0 9.1 9.6
11 7.8 0.0 8.4 8.8
Sum 39.5 0.0 42.4 44.6
Max 8.5 0.0 9.1 9.6
Min 7.3 0.0 7.9 8.3
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 7.9 0.0 8.5 8.9
Difference (mg) -0.4
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.61 0.04 Difference (%) -4.9
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 10%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 128 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 8.9 0.4
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 1.7 1.1
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 129 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 544 615 589
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 3002 4261 3534
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 188582 195305 191111
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2.0 2.8 2.3
Oxygen % 6.4 8.6 7.7
Velocity m/s 21.6 27.5 23.9
Gas Temperature °C 127.7 130 128.6
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 87.6 88.60 88.1
Moisture % 4.2 5.4 4.8
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3161 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 50.7550 1.0628 0.0000 0.0000 ppm (Act) (Wet) 4000.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1513 ppm (Act) (Wet) 400000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3447 ppm (Act) (Wet) 500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0115 % v/v (Wet) 25.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 130 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 589 3534 191111 2.3 7.7
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 615 4261 195305 2.8 8.6
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 544 3002 188582 2.0 6.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.3161 1.0628 1.1513 0.3447 1.0115
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 50.7550 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 676.7 4686.8 214835.3 3.1 9.5
AST Standard Deviation sD 3.5 27.6 3096.5 1.2 0.2
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -159.1 589.4 -14499.0 -1.4 0.6
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 115.6 138.6 35159.7 11.4 1.3
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 131 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
3 332.0 543.9 699.3 -28.6
8 345.3 599.6 762.5 -27.2
9 341.1 585.3 747.9 -27.8
11 332.0 615.2 773.8 -25.8
12 328.2 603.1 759.1 -25.9
Max 345 615.2 774 -26
Min 328 543.9 699 -29
Average 336 589.4 748 -27
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
3 1290.6 3002.0 3171.9 -5.7
8 1334.2 3213.7 3433.7 -6.8
9 1324.0 3167.0 3384.5 -6.9
11 1631.7 4260.7 4404.6 -3.4
12 1560.3 4024.3 4184.3 -4.0
Max 1632 4260.7 4405 -3
Min 1291 3002.0 3172 -7
Average 1428 3533.6 3716 -5
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 132 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
3 121277.3 195304.8 214762.2 -10.0
8 111157.6 191551.8 206375.9 -7.7
9 111590.5 191368.1 205720.5 -7.5
11 102163.9 188746.3 200203.5 -6.1
12 103373.1 188582.3 200986.5 -6.6
Max 121277.3 195304.8 214762.2 -6
Min 102163.9 188582.3 200203.5 -10
Average 109912.5 191110.7 205609.7 -8
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
3 18.9 2.8 6.4 -125.4
8 7.5 2.0 2.6 -30.1
9 7.2 2.0 2.5 -26.7
11 9.4 2.3 3.5 -54.8
12 9.0 2.2 3.3 -51.8
Max 18.9 2.8 6.4 -27
Min 7.2 2.0 2.5 -125
Average 10.4 2.3 3.7 -58
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 133 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
3 5.8 6.4 6.2 3.4
8 6.6 7.7 7.0 8.7
9 6.5 7.6 6.9 8.9
11 7.4 8.6 7.8 8.9
12 7.3 8.5 7.7 8.9
Max 7.4 8.6 7.8 9
Min 5.8 6.4 6.2 3
Average 6.7 7.7 7.1 8
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 134 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 332 0 699 544
8 345 0 762 600
9 341 0 748 585
11 332 0 774 615
12 328 0 759 603
Sum 1678.6 0.0 3742.5 2947.1
Max 345.3 0.0 773.8 615.2
Min 328.2 0.0 699.3 543.9
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 335.7 0.0 748.5 589.4
Difference (mg) 159.1
DiffStandard Deviation sD 27.60 3.55 Difference (%) 27.0
Uncertainty Q0 112.2 112.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 135 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 589.4 -159.1
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 138.6 115.6
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 136 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
3 1291 3172 0 3002
8 1334 3434 0 3214
9 1324 3384 0 3167
11 1632 4405 0 4261
12 1560 4184 0 4024
Sum 7140.7 18579.0 0.0 17667.8
Max 1631.7 4404.6 0.0 4260.7
Min 1290.6 3171.9 0.0 3002.0
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1428.1 3715.8 0.0 3533.6
Difference (mg) 182.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 34.57 567.61 Difference (%) 5.2
Uncertainty Q0 357.1 357.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 137 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar -182.2 3533.6
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 390.1 898.3
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 138 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
3 121277 0 214762 195305
8 111158 0 206376 191552
9 111591 0 205721 191368
11 102164 0 200204 188746
12 103373 0 200986 188582
Sum 549562.4 0.0 1028048.6 955553.3
Max 121277.3 0.0 214762.2 195304.8
Min 102163.9 0.0 200203.5 188582.3
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 109912.5 0.0 205609.7 191110.7
Difference (mg) 14499.0
DiffStandard Deviation sD 2731.07 3096.49 Difference (%) 7.6
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 139 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 191110.7 -14499.0
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 34811.3 35159.7
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 140 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 19 0 6 3
8 7 0 3 2
9 7 0 3 2
11 9 0 4 2
12 9 0 3 2
Sum 52.0 0.0 18.3 11.3
Max 18.9 0.0 6.4 2.8
Min 7.2 0.0 2.5 2.0
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 10.4 0.0 3.7 2.3
Difference (mg) 1.4
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.34 1.23 Difference (%) 62.5
Uncertainty Q0 10.2 10.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 141 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 2.3 -1.4
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 10.5 11.4
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 142 of 294
Unit No. 4 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 5.8 0.0 6.2 6.4
8 6.6 0.0 7.0 7.7
9 6.5 0.0 6.9 7.6
11 7.4 0.0 7.8 8.6
12 7.3 0.0 7.7 8.5
Sum 33.6 0.0 35.6 38.7
Max 7.4 0.0 7.8 8.6
Min 5.8 0.0 6.2 6.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 6.7 0.0 7.1 7.7
Difference (mg) -0.6
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.87 0.23 Difference (%) -8.0
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 10%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 143 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 7.7 0.6
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 1.9 1.3
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 144 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 496 533 522
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2494 3063 2895
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 188724 194231 192353
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 1.5 3.3 2.6
Oxygen % 7.4 9.5 8.0
Velocity m/s 22.5 30.0 27.6
Gas Temperature °C 117.7 126 122.8
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 87.5 88.00 87.7
Moisture % 3.3 5.0 4.5
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9786 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 4.6096 1.0517 0.0000 0.0000 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1994 ppm (Act) (Wet) 200000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.5310 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0881 % v/v (Wet) 25.00
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 145 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 522 2895 192353 2.6 8.0
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 533 3063 194231 3.3 9.5
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 496 2494 188724 1.5 7.4
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 0.9786 1.0517 1.1994 3.5310 1.0881
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 4.6096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 586.4 3369.2 213654.5 3.6 10.5
AST Standard Deviation sD 7.1 15.0 2425.4 13.7 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar 2.0 521.5 1812.9 -45.2 0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 119.1 126.6 34519.9 23.3 1.2
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 146 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
3 321.5 522.5 526.6 -0.8
5 329.8 533.1 535.5 -0.5
6 330.8 532.6 535.5 -0.5
9 291.0 496.2 487.6 1.7
12 283.1 523.3 512.3 2.1
Max 331 533.1 536 2
Min 283 496.2 488 -1
Average 311 521.5 520 0
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
3 1022.5 2493.8 2519.1 -1.0
5 1206.5 2893.2 2944.1 -1.8
6 1232.6 2967.2 2998.2 -1.0
9 1211.4 3062.9 3050.6 0.4
12 1114.2 3056.4 3031.6 0.8
Max 1233 3062.9 3051 1
Min 1023 2493.8 2519 -2
Average 1157 2894.7 2909 -1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 147 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
3 98194.4 192890.8 189474.9 1.8
5 102085.8 194231.4 195255.0 -0.5
6 101857.2 193601.2 194202.3 -0.3
9 95828.8 192318.4 189148.5 1.6
12 86595.0 188724.3 184620.8 2.2
Max 102085.8 194231.4 195255.0 2
Min 86595.0 188724.3 184620.8 -1
Average 96912.2 192353.2 190540.3 1
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
3 16.8 1.5 60.6 -3814.8
5 13.6 3.0 48.5 -1491.2
6 16.7 2.9 59.5 -1929.4
9 11.4 2.3 42.1 -1699.4
12 7.2 3.3 28.5 -761.7
Max 16.8 3.3 60.6 -762
Min 7.2 1.5 28.5 -3815
Average 13.2 2.6 47.9 -1939
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 148 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
3 6.5 7.6 7.4 1.6
5 6.4 7.4 7.3 1.9
6 6.3 7.4 7.2 2.5
9 6.9 8.1 7.9 3.0
12 8.1 9.5 9.1 3.9
Max 8.1 9.5 9.1 4
Min 6.3 7.4 7.2 2
Average 6.8 8.0 7.8 3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 149 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 321 0 527 523
5 330 0 536 533
6 331 0 535 533
9 291 0 488 496
12 283 0 512 523
Sum 1556.2 0.0 2597.5 2607.6
Max 330.8 0.0 535.5 533.1
Min 283.1 0.0 487.6 496.2
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 311.2 0.0 519.5 521.5
Difference (mg) -2.0
DiffStandard Deviation sD 27.60 3.55 Difference (%) -0.4
Uncertainty Q0 112.2 112.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 150 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 521.5 2.0
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 126.6 119.1
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 151 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
3 1023 2519 0 2494
5 1206 2944 0 2893
6 1233 2998 0 2967
9 1211 3051 0 3063
12 1114 3032 0 3056
Sum 5787.1 14543.6 0.0 14473.5
Max 1232.6 3050.6 0.0 3062.9
Min 1022.5 2519.1 0.0 2493.8
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1157.4 2908.7 0.0 2894.7
Difference (mg) 14.0
DiffStandard Deviation sD 31.55 234.74 Difference (%) 0.5
Uncertainty Q0 357.1 357.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 152 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar -14.0 2894.7
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 387.2 581.0
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 153 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
3 98194 0 189475 192891
5 102086 0 195255 194231
6 101857 0 194202 193601
9 95829 0 189149 192318
12 86595 0 184621 188724
Sum 484561.2 0.0 952701.5 961766.0
Max 102085.8 0.0 195255.0 194231.4
Min 86595.0 0.0 184620.8 188724.3
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 96912.2 0.0 190540.3 192353.2
Difference (mg) -1812.9
DiffStandard Deviation sD 2153.15 2425.44 Difference (%) -0.9
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 154 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 192353.2 1812.9
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 34260.3 34519.9
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 155 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 17 0 61 2
5 14 0 49 3
6 17 0 59 3
9 11 0 42 2
12 7 0 29 3
Sum 65.8 0.0 239.3 13.2
Max 16.8 0.0 60.6 3.3
Min 7.2 0.0 28.5 1.5
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 13.2 0.0 47.9 2.6
Difference (mg) 45.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.70 13.70 Difference (%) 1715
Uncertainty Q0 10.2 10.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 156 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 2.6 -45.2
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 10.9 23.3
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 157 of 294
Unit No. 5 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
3 6.5 0.0 7.4 7.6
5 6.4 0.0 7.3 7.4
6 6.3 0.0 7.2 7.4
9 6.9 0.0 7.9 8.1
12 8.1 0.0 9.1 9.5
Sum 34.2 0.0 39.0 40.0
Max 8.1 0.0 9.1 9.5
Min 6.3 0.0 7.2 7.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 6.8 0.0 7.8 8.0
Difference (mg) -0.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.87 0.10 Difference (%) -2.7
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 10%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 158 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 8.0 0.2
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 1.9 1.2
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 159 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results
Nitric Oxide NOx @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 523 550 535
Sulphur Dioxide SO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 3046 3448 3168
Carbon Dioxide CO2 @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 189459 193718 191507
Carbon Monoxide CO @ 10% O2 mg/Nm3 (dry) 2.4 3.7 3.2
Oxygen % 6.7 8.4 7.1
Velocity m/s 25.2 29.6 28.5
Gas Temperature °C 125.6 128 127.1
Duct pressure kPa (abs) 88.5 89.20 88.9
Moisture % 4.3 6.8 5.8
Previous QAL2 Correlation Equations Method A Method B
Correlation Function Function a b a b Units AMS Scale
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx as NO2) ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1074 ppm (Act) (Wet) 2000.00
Sulphur Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi -0.9497 1.0192 0.0000 0.0000 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Carbon Dioxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0173 ppm (Act) (Wet) 200000.00
Carbon Monoxide ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6920 ppm (Act) (Wet) 1500.00
Oxygen ŷi = a + b * xi 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1148 % v/v (Wet) 25.00
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 160 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
Nit
ric
Ox
ide
NO
x @
10
% O
2
Su
lph
ur
Dio
xid
e S
O2
@ 1
0%
O2
Car
bo
n D
iox
ide
CO
2 @
10
% O
2
Car
bo
n M
ono
xid
e C
O @
10
% O
2
Ox
yg
en
%
(SRM) Average mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 535 3168 191507 3.2 7.1
(SRM) Max mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 550 3448 193718 3.7 8.4
(SRM) Min mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 523 3046 189459 2.4 6.7
ELV mg/Nm3 (dry) @ 10 O2 1100 3500 315632 100 21
Compliance With ELV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function (NB Dry or Wet) Method B) Method A) Method B) Method B) Method B)
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function b or Slope 1.1074 1.0192 1.0173 0.6920 1.1148
Previous QAL2 Correlation Function a or Inter 0.0000 -0.9497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Previous QAL2 Calibration Range mg/Nm3 604.9 3792.5 213089.9 4.1 9.2
AST Standard Deviation sD 8.8 12.3 2657.1 1.3 0.1
AST Q0kv*0.9761 154.8 154.2 44426.8 14.1 1.5
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
Difference Di-Dbar -120.7 534.9 9467.4 2.5 -0.2
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 120.7 124.0 34740.8 11.4 1.1
AST Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes AMS Passes
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 161 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued NOX
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
2 361.8 524.7 656.5 -25.1
3 365.7 546.0 653.7 -19.7
5 365.7 530.8 655.2 -23.4
6 359.0 523.0 641.4 -22.6
8 344.4 549.9 671.1 -22.0
Max 366 549.9 671 -20
Min 344 523.0 641 -25
Average 359 534.9 656 -23
SO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm
3 10%O2 %
2 1253.7 3135.0 2915.0 7.0
3 1257.3 3157.0 2880.2 8.8
5 1197.1 3054.0 2748.1 10.0
6 1193.3 3046.3 2732.4 10.3
8 1227.8 3447.7 3066.0 11.1
Max 1257 3447.7 3066 11
Min 1193 3046.3 2732 7
Average 1226 3168.0 2868 9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 162 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued CO2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
2 114255.2 190072.1 183033.5 3.7
3 116130.8 189458.6 183286.4 3.3
5 115042.5 193018.4 181964.5 5.7
6 115764.2 193718.1 182633.9 5.7
8 104197.0 191265.8 179277.6 6.3
Max 116130.8 193718.1 183286.4 6
Min 104197.0 189458.6 179277.6 3
Average 113077.9 191506.6 182039.2 5
CO
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. ppm (Wet) mg/Nm3 10%O2 mg/Nm3 10%O2 %
2 1.0 3.6 0.7 81.1
3 0.5 3.7 0.4 90.0
5 0.3 3.3 0.2 94.0
6 0.2 3.2 0.2 94.9
8 2.9 2.4 2.1 10.3
Max 2.9 3.7 2.1 95
Min 0.2 2.4 0.2 10
Average 1.0 3.2 0.7 74
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 163 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2
AST Data
AMS Signal (xi) as
measured
SRM Value (yi)
corrected to STP
Dry (yi,s)
AMS ŷi,s Difference AMS to
RMS
Test No. % (Wet) % (Dry) % (Dry) %
2 6.1 6.9 7.2 -4.5
3 5.9 6.7 6.9 -3.8
5 5.9 6.8 7.0 -3.3
6 5.9 6.7 6.9 -4.0
8 7.3 8.4 8.5 -1.5
Max 7.3 8.4 8.5 -1
Min 5.9 6.7 6.9 -5
Average 6.2 7.1 7.3 -3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 164 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
2 362 0 657 525
3 366 0 654 546
5 366 0 655 531
6 359 0 641 523
8 344 0 671 550
Sum 1796.6 0.0 3277.9 2674.4
Max 365.7 0.0 671.1 549.9
Min 344.4 0.0 641.4 523.0
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 359.3 0.0 655.6 534.9
Difference (mg) 120.7
Standard Deviation sD 12.35 8.84 Difference (%) 22.6
Uncertainty Q0 112.2 112.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
154.24 154.83 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 165 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 534.9 -120.7
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 124.0 120.7
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 166 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
SO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
2 1254 2915 0 3135
3 1257 2880 0 3157
5 1197 2748 0 3054
6 1193 2732 0 3046
8 1228 3066 0 3448
Sum 6129.2 14341.7 0.0 15840.1
Max 1257.3 3066.0 0.0 3447.7
Min 1193.3 2732.4 0.0 3046.3
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1225.8 2868.3 0.0 3168.0
Difference (mg) -299.7
DiffStandard Deviation sD 58.81 163.75 Difference (%) -9.5
Uncertainty Q0 357.1 357.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
490.77 492.64 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 167 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 299.7 3168.0
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 413.2 513.3
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS did not Pass
1 0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 168 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s)
mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10%
O2
2 114255 0 183033 190072
3 116131 0 183286 189459
5 115042 0 181965 193018
6 115764 0 182634 193718
8 104197 0 179278 191266
Sum 565389.7 0.0 910195.9 957533.0
Max 116130.8 0.0 183286.4 193718.1
Min 104197.0 0.0 179277.6 189458.6
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 113077.9 0.0 182039.2 191506.6
Difference (mg) -9467.4
DiffStandard Deviation sD 1836.17 2657.14 Difference (%) -4.9
Uncertainty Q0 32207.3 32207.3 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
44257.73 44426.81 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 169 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 191506.6 9467.4
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 33958.1 34740.8
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 170 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
CO Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
2 1 0 1 4
3 1 0 0 4
5 0 0 0 3
6 0 0 0 3
8 3 0 2 2
Sum 4.9 0.0 3.6 16.2
Max 2.9 0.0 2.1 3.7
Min 0.2 0.0 0.2 2.4
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 1.0 0.0 0.7 3.2
Difference (mg) -2.5
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.52 1.28 Difference (%) -78.1
Uncertainty Q0 10.2 10.2 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 20%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 20 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
14.02 14.08 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 171 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 3.2 2.5
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to
t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 10.7 11.4
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 172 of 294
Unit No. 6 Annual Surveillance Test Results Continued
O2 Correlation
8.4 Calculation of Variability For AST
Di = yi,s - ŷi,s
yi,s SRM values
ŷi,s AMS Calibrated Values
ŷi,s M A) ŷi,s M B)
Sample Number (i) AMS Signal (xi) as measured mg/Nm
3 Dry @ 10% O2 M
A)
mg/Nm3 Dry @
10% O2 M B)
SRM Value at
Standard Cond (yi,s) mg/Nm
3 Dry
@ 10% O2
2 6.1 0.0 7.2 6.9
3 5.9 0.0 6.9 6.7
5 5.9 0.0 7.0 6.8
6 5.9 0.0 6.9 6.7
8 7.3 0.0 8.5 8.4
Sum 31.1 0.0 36.5 35.3
Max 7.3 0.0 8.5 8.4
Min 5.9 0.0 6.9 6.7
Average ẋ & ẏ & Ḋ 6.2 0.0 7.3 7.1
Difference (mg) 0.2
DiffStandard Deviation sD 0.74 0.07 Difference (%) 3.3
Uncertainty Q0 1.1 1.1 mg/Nm
The uncertainty laid down by the authorities is 10%
of the ELV as a 95% confidence interval. 10 %
The AMS passes the variability test when Standard Deviation sD < or = to Standard Deviation sD <
or = to
1.47 1.48 see pg 19 EN 14181
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 173 of 294
Test of Variability AMS Passes AMS Passes
1 1
The Calibration of the AMS is accepted if
Difference Di-Dbar 7.1 -0.2
is less than or equal to < or = to < or = to t0.95(N-1)sD/√N+σo 1.8 1.1
Test of Variability AMS did not Pass AMS Passes
0 1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 174 of 294
Appendix No. 3
AMS
&
Plant Parameters
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 175 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 19
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 40 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 40 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 40 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/10/17 05:35:00 06:53:00 6.6 2.0 10.9 240.7 28.8 269.6 1097.3 150.7 905.7 30.8
2 2016/10/17 07:18:00 08:33:00 7.2 2.6 10.3 247.4 29.6 277.0 1037.6 153.1 907.9 29.9
3 2016/10/17 09:03:00 10:19:00 6.9 5.3 10.2 262.5 31.4 293.9 1049.6 149.1 907.2 30.1
4 2016/10/19 05:32:00 06:52:00 6.4 6.2 11.3 241.2 29.0 270.3 1231.3 141.9 919.3 28.7
5 2016/10/19 07:24:00 08:36:00 7.0 5.5 10.9 260.8 31.2 292.0 1202.9 142.4 920.3 29.8
6 2016/10/19 09:06:00 10:17:00 7.0 5.6 10.9 260.0 31.4 291.4 1190.8 142.2 920.1 29.5
7 2016/10/20 23:49:00 01:06:00 8.4 4.2 8.4 208.4 24.8 233.3 843.5 144.1 912.3 28.2
8 2016/10/21 01:32:00 02:46:00 8.4 3.8 9.8 238.5 28.8 267.3 996.0 144.1 911.0 27.6
9 2016/10/21 03:10:00 04:21:00 8.2 3.2 10.0 242.7 28.8 271.5 1030.2 143.5 912.3 27.4
10 2016/10/25 00:11:00 01:28:00 9.6 2.3 8.4 217.4 26.2 243.6 868.5 146.9 907.4 24.4
11 2016/10/26 01:59:00 03:12:00 9.5 2.1 8.6 213.0 25.6 238.6 929.9 142.2 905.4 23.9
12 2016/10/26 03:44:00 05:00:00 9.1 1.2 9.0 216.2 25.9 242.2 1074.1 141.0 905.3 25.2
Ave 8.4 2.7 9.5 228.9 27.5 256.4 1057.2 143.5 908.8 26.9
Max 9.6 6.2 11.3 262.5 31.4 293.9 1231.3 153.1 920.3 30.8
Min 6.4 1.2 8.4 208.4 24.8 233.3 843.5 141.0 905.3 23.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 176 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 20
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT011 XQ01 40 HLA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA25 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/10/17 05:35:00 06:53:00 5.5 4.3 4.2 651.1 592.3 0.0 559.3 558.9 689.3 2.6
2 2016/10/17 07:18:00 08:33:00 5.4 4.0 4.1 622.0 558.7 0.0 527.5 527.3 677.9 3.4
3 2016/10/17 09:03:00 10:19:00 5.6 4.4 4.4 632.5 580.2 0.0 548.1 548.0 686.2 3.8
4 2016/10/19 05:32:00 06:52:00 5.2 2.6 2.5 676.1 590.5 0.0 554.0 553.1 684.4 2.3
5 2016/10/19 07:24:00 08:36:00 5.0 2.8 3.0 675.2 583.7 0.0 546.2 545.7 656.0 3.4
6 2016/10/19 09:06:00 10:17:00 5.2 2.4 2.4 672.7 584.1 0.0 547.5 546.7 712.2 3.7
7 2016/10/20 23:49:00 01:06:00 4.1 2.4 2.4 544.7 473.0 0.0 447.1 446.2 633.1 4.8
8 2016/10/21 01:32:00 02:46:00 4.9 3.1 3.1 544.5 469.2 0.0 443.6 442.6 620.9 4.4
9 2016/10/21 03:10:00 04:21:00 5.0 2.9 2.9 544.7 469.2 0.0 443.5 442.3 604.9 4.2
10 2016/10/25 00:11:00 01:28:00 4.1 1.2 1.2 425.4 361.5 0.0 350.6 349.1 502.0 5.0
11 2016/10/26 01:59:00 03:12:00 4.2 1.2 1.2 425.5 359.6 0.0 349.7 347.3 496.2 5.3
12 2016/11/26 03:44:00 05:00:00 4.3 1.1 1.1 461.8 390.3 0.0 378.4 377.0 531.3 4.6
Ave 4.9 2.7 2.7 573.0 501.0 0.0 474.6 473.7 624.5 4.0
Max 5.6 4.4 4.4 676.1 592.3 0.0 559.3 558.9 712.2 5.3
Min 4.1 1.1 1.1 425.4 359.6 0.0 349.7 347.3 496.2 2.3
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 177 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 21
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA45 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA35 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA26 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA16 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA27 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA17 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA28 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA18 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA29 CT001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/17 05:35:00 06:53:00 2.6 2.5 3.4 3.3 333.4 302.0 317.0 332.2 137.7 133.7
2 2016/10/17 07:18:00 08:33:00 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.7 330.6 299.2 314.2 329.4 138.2 132.3
3 2016/10/17 09:03:00 10:19:00 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 329.3 299.3 314.2 329.8 139.9 124.7
4 2016/10/19 05:32:00 06:52:00 2.3 2.2 3.4 3.4 327.1 296.2 313.6 325.0 138.8 128.9
5 2016/10/19 07:24:00 08:36:00 3.4 3.1 3.8 3.8 330.1 298.6 317.4 328.0 139.0 122.9
6 2016/10/19 09:06:00 10:17:00 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.5 330.9 299.8 318.6 329.5 140.2 121.7
7 2016/10/20 23:49:00 01:06:00 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 318.6 288.8 305.1 318.8 134.3 118.1
8 2016/10/21 01:32:00 02:46:00 4.4 4.2 5.0 5.0 317.9 287.6 305.5 317.6 137.8 117.7
9 2016/10/21 03:10:00 04:21:00 4.2 3.9 4.5 4.4 316.4 286.5 303.4 316.3 138.1 116.8
10 2016/10/25 00:11:00 01:28:00 5.0 5.0 5.2 5.2 302.2 273.3 290.8 302.7 135.8 112.1
11 2016/10/26 01:59:00 03:12:00 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.1 302.0 273.0 291.0 302.0 135.1 110.7
12 2016/11/26 03:44:00 05:00:00 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 307.3 277.6 297.1 306.7 137.3 113.6
Ave 4.0 3.7 4.2 4.2 320.5 290.1 307.3 319.8 137.7 121.1
Max 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.2 333.4 302.0 318.6 332.2 140.2 133.7
Min 2.3 2.2 3.4 3.3 302.0 273.0 290.8 302.0 134.3 110.7
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 178 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 22
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 40 HNE01 CE001 XQ01 40 HLB20 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB10 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC20 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC10 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB40 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB30 CE201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 401 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/17 05:35:00 06:53:00 74.2 312.2 296.7 302.1 302.3 149.8 158.3 139.4 147.0 136.6
2 2016/10/17 07:18:00 08:33:00 74.8 310.6 294.3 300.4 300.9 149.5 158.2 138.8 146.8 136.5
3 2016/10/17 09:03:00 10:19:00 60.1 310.3 293.7 299.1 299.9 149.8 150.6 140.1 140.3 137.7
4 2016/10/19 05:32:00 06:52:00 67.2 309.6 291.8 297.1 298.3 151.4 152.1 136.4 141.0 133.7
5 2016/10/19 07:24:00 08:36:00 57.5 312.1 291.8 298.3 300.4 151.7 148.1 135.7 136.5 133.8
6 2016/10/19 09:06:00 10:17:00 58.1 313.2 291.7 296.9 299.3 147.5 145.3 136.8 135.4 135.3
7 2016/10/20 23:49:00 01:06:00 61.7 300.8 282.9 288.8 288.9 148.9 144.8 135.9 131.4 132.8
8 2016/10/21 01:32:00 02:46:00 62.1 302.4 282.2 286.7 286.9 146.1 141.2 136.3 129.9 134.2
9 2016/10/21 03:10:00 04:21:00 62.8 302.0 280.9 285.5 285.9 145.8 140.8 136.6 128.8 134.1
10 2016/10/25 00:11:00 01:28:00 67.2 290.6 269.2 276.3 279.5 152.6 137.6 133.2 129.9 134.7
11 2016/10/26 01:59:00 03:12:00 68.9 290.0 266.6 268.5 273.3 144.0 133.7 131.1 126.4 130.8
12 2016/11/26 03:44:00 05:00:00 67.7 294.2 271.2 270.1 275.0 141.2 136.6 132.9 128.7 130.7
Ave 65.2 304.0 284.4 289.2 290.9 148.2 145.6 136.1 135.2 134.2
Max 74.8 313.2 296.7 302.1 302.3 152.6 158.3 140.1 147.0 137.7
Min 57.5 290.0 266.6 268.5 273.3 141.2 133.7 131.1 126.4 130.7
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 179 of 294
Unit No. 1
Table No. 23
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HFB02 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB02 CS 401 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 401 XQ01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/10/17 05:35:00 06:53:00 136.6 142.1 142.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/10/17 07:18:00 08:33:00 136.4 142.1 141.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/10/17 09:03:00 10:19:00 131.3 143.2 136.7 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/10/19 05:32:00 06:52:00 131.2 139.0 136.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/10/19 07:24:00 08:36:00 127.0 139.2 132.5 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/10/19 09:06:00 10:17:00 124.6 140.8 130.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/10/20 23:49:00 01:06:00 122.3 138.1 127.6 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/10/21 01:32:00 02:46:00 121.6 139.3 126.9 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/10/21 03:10:00 04:21:00 120.8 139.2 126.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/10/25 00:11:00 01:28:00 120.5 139.6 125.5 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/26 01:59:00 03:12:00 116.3 135.6 121.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/11/26 03:44:00 05:00:00 116.6 135.5 121.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 125.4 139.5 130.8 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 136.6 143.2 142.2 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 116.3 135.5 121.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 180 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 24
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 40 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 40 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 40 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/10/12 06:12:00 07:34:00 7.9 3.8 12.8 234.8 27.9 262.8 1209.2 144.2 909.1 25.9
2 2016/10/12 07:59:00 10:14:00 8.2 5.3 12.2 246.6 29.4 275.9 1188.8 143.4 910.1 28.8
3 2016/10/13 05:21:00 06:38:00 8.1 3.8 12.7 257.5 30.6 288.0 1136.6 142.2 912.1 31.1
4 2016/10/13 07:01:00 08:17:00 8.0 3.7 12.8 251.5 30.0 281.5 1150.5 141.4 913.1 32.1
5 2016/10/13 08:36:00 09:55:00 7.8 4.7 12.9 252.0 29.7 281.7 1155.6 141.2 913.6 32.4
6 2016/10/13 10:20:00 11:35:00 7.7 4.4 13.1 247.9 29.6 277.5 1154.4 142.7 912.6 30.6
7 2016/10/13 22:30:00 23:48:00 8.9 7.8 12.1 226.3 26.9 253.2 1083.0 142.4 911.6 30.8
8 2016/10/14 00:04:00 01:07:00 9.2 9.5 11.8 232.4 27.7 260.1 1058.6 138.8 911.4 29.6
9 2016/10/14 01:45:00 03:01:00 9.2 10.7 11.8 230.8 27.4 258.2 1069.1 136.9 911.0 27.6
10 2016/10/27 23:47:00 01:14:00
11 2016/10/28 01:44:00 03:08:00
12 2016/10/28 03:38:00 04:49:00
Ave 8.3 5.9 12.5 242.2 28.8 271.0 1134.0 141.5 911.6 29.9
Max 9.2 10.7 13.1 257.5 30.6 288.0 1209.2 144.2 913.6 32.4
Min 7.7 3.7 11.8 226.3 26.9 253.2 1058.6 136.9 909.1 25.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 181 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 25
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT011 XQ01 40 HLA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA25 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/10/12 06:12:00 07:34:00 5.3 28.8 29.0 642.9 586.2 0.0 577.2 579.0 720.8 3.4
2 2016/10/12 07:59:00 10:14:00 5.4 23.2 23.2 608.4 558.3 0.0 549.8 551.7 699.2 3.2
3 2016/10/13 05:21:00 06:38:00 5.8 26.4 26.5 675.8 589.6 0.0 580.8 582.6 740.0 3.4
4 2016/10/13 07:01:00 08:17:00 5.8 25.3 25.5 675.6 592.8 0.0 583.4 585.5 737.1 3.1
5 2016/10/13 08:36:00 09:55:00 5.9 31.3 31.2 674.7 603.7 0.0 594.2 596.2 743.9 2.9
6 2016/10/13 10:20:00 11:35:00 6.1 37.2 37.3 671.0 610.7 0.0 600.7 602.8 745.3 3.1
7 2016/10/13 22:30:00 23:48:00 5.5 46.6 45.5 552.7 485.6 0.0 479.3 481.2 627.2 4.4
8 2016/10/14 00:04:00 01:07:00 5.2 28.6 28.5 545.8 475.5 0.0 469.6 471.5 628.2 4.6
9 2016/10/14 01:45:00 03:01:00 5.2 32.2 31.9 545.4 472.5 0.0 466.5 468.5 626.7 4.4
10 2016/10/27 23:47:00 01:14:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 370.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/28 01:44:00 03:08:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 370.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/10/28 03:38:00 04:49:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 370.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 4.2 23.3 23.2 558.5 414.6 0.0 408.5 409.9 522.4 2.7
Max 6.1 46.6 45.5 675.8 610.7 0.0 600.7 602.8 745.3 4.6
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 370.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 182 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 26
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA45 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA35 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA26 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA16 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA27 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA17 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA28 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA18 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA29 CT001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/12 06:12:00 07:34:00 3.4 4.1 3.5 3.7 334.1 335.1 334.5 328.9 144.5 137.9
2 2016/10/12 07:59:00 10:14:00 3.2 3.9 3.7 3.9 328.5 329.7 329.5 324.2 143.4 138.5
3 2016/10/13 05:21:00 06:38:00 3.4 4.5 3.9 4.1 337.0 338.1 337.3 332.0 142.2 136.7
4 2016/10/13 07:01:00 08:17:00 3.1 3.8 3.8 4.0 336.1 337.6 336.7 331.4 140.9 136.8
5 2016/10/13 08:36:00 09:55:00 2.9 3.7 4.1 4.4 336.8 338.7 337.5 332.4 141.4 137.5
6 2016/10/13 10:20:00 11:35:00 3.1 4.1 3.6 3.8 337.2 339.3 337.7 332.7 142.8 138.4
7 2016/10/13 22:30:00 23:48:00 4.4 5.2 4.9 4.4 316.3 318.8 317.6 312.5 139.6 137.7
8 2016/10/14 00:04:00 01:07:00 4.6 5.5 3.7 3.9 314.1 316.7 315.7 310.8 135.8 134.1
9 2016/10/14 01:45:00 03:01:00 4.4 5.2 4.1 4.5 314.5 316.6 315.7 310.6 134.8 132.8
10 2016/10/27 23:47:00 01:14:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/28 01:44:00 03:08:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/10/28 03:38:00 04:49:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 2.7 3.3 2.9 3.1 246.2 247.6 246.9 243.0 105.4 102.5
Max 4.6 5.5 4.9 4.5 337.2 339.3 337.7 332.7 144.5 138.5
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 183 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 27
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 40 HNE01 CE001 XQ01 40 HLB20 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB10 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC20 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC10 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB40 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB30 CE201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 401 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/12 06:12:00 07:34:00 59.4 304.0 298.7 295.2 304.9 151.6 145.5 137.9 144.7 144.8
2 2016/10/12 07:59:00 10:14:00 61.3 300.1 295.8 288.9 298.4 147.8 142.9 136.2 143.5 143.3
3 2016/10/13 05:21:00 06:38:00 54.9 305.7 300.8 295.8 306.1 145.6 141.4 134.6 141.7 142.5
4 2016/10/13 07:01:00 08:17:00 54.8 304.5 300.5 294.5 304.8 144.7 140.6 133.6 141.0 141.3
5 2016/10/13 08:36:00 09:55:00 55.4 305.2 301.2 295.2 305.6 145.6 141.6 134.6 141.8 141.6
6 2016/10/13 10:20:00 11:35:00 57.1 305.8 301.6 296.1 306.5 147.2 142.6 136.2 142.9 142.9
7 2016/10/13 22:30:00 23:48:00 58.5 291.8 290.1 284.8 294.5 145.1 143.4 132.4 143.2 141.1
8 2016/10/14 00:04:00 01:07:00 57.0 288.8 287.3 278.0 288.0 140.0 138.3 128.3 138.6 136.4
9 2016/10/14 01:45:00 03:01:00 55.6 288.7 286.9 279.0 288.4 141.4 139.3 127.9 138.6 134.7
10 2016/10/27 23:47:00 01:14:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/28 01:44:00 03:08:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/10/28 03:38:00 04:49:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 42.8 224.5 221.9 217.3 224.8 109.1 106.3 100.1 106.3 105.7
Max 61.3 305.8 301.6 296.1 306.5 151.6 145.5 137.9 144.7 144.8
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 184 of 294
Unit No. 2
Table No. 28
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HFB02 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB02 CS 401 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 401 XQ01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/10/12 06:12:00 07:34:00 138.8 148.2 17.6 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/10/12 07:59:00 10:14:00 138.9 146.7 17.2 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/10/13 05:21:00 06:38:00 136.9 145.9 17.4 26.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/10/13 07:01:00 08:17:00 136.6 144.7 17.0 25.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/10/13 08:36:00 09:55:00 137.2 145.0 18.1 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/10/13 10:20:00 11:35:00 137.9 146.3 17.2 37.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/10/13 22:30:00 23:48:00 139.0 144.3 18.4 45.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/10/14 00:04:00 01:07:00 135.5 139.7 17.0 28.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/10/14 01:45:00 03:01:00 134.0 138.0 16.3 31.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/10/27 23:47:00 01:14:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/28 01:44:00 03:08:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/10/28 03:38:00 04:49:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 102.9 108.2 13.0 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 139.0 148.2 18.4 45.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 185 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 29
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 40 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 40 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 40 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/10/10 08:54:00 10:11:00 6.3 3.4 12.1 302.2 36.1 338.3 1227.0 145.1 915.5 21.4
2 2016/10/10 10:38:00 12:35:00 6.2 3.2 12.2 303.2 36.2 339.4 1283.7 146.2 915.0 21.5
3 2016/10/10 12:18:00 13:32:00 6.0 4.8 12.1 308.5 36.9 345.4 1260.4 147.1 914.1 21.1
4 2016/10/11 06:28:00 07:23:00 5.9 3.3 12.4 284.0 33.7 317.6 1199.1 143.3 914.7 20.6
5 2016/10/11 08:16:00 09:29:00 5.9 4.4 12.4 277.8 33.3 311.1 1204.2 143.1 915.2 20.7
6 2016/10/11 09:55:00 11:12:00 5.9 3.7 12.2 290.5 34.6 325.1 1195.5 142.6 915.2 21.6
7 2016/10/18 00:53:00 00:25:00 7.4 0.7 11.1 230.6 27.5 258.1 1148.4 142.4 913.0 19.0
8 2016/10/18 02:37:00 03:49:00 7.3 2.9 11.2 263.2 31.4 294.5 1049.0 143.1 912.2 19.0
9 2016/10/20 00:33:00 01:48:00 8.4 6.8 10.2 221.7 26.4 248.1 1003.7 137.3 913.7 15.4
10 2016/10/20 02:20:00 03:32:00 8.5 3.1 10.1 211.3 25.0 236.3 1023.0 136.9 912.3 15.6
11 2016/10/20 03:52:00 05:07:00 7.8 2.4 10.7 230.3 27.4 257.8 1106.7 135.8 913.6 17.6
Ave 6.9 3.5 11.5 265.7 31.7 297.4 1154.6 142.1 914.0 19.4
Max 8.5 6.8 12.4 308.5 36.9 345.4 1283.7 147.1 915.5 21.6
Min 5.9 0.7 10.1 211.3 25.0 236.3 1003.7 135.8 912.2 15.4
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 186 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 30
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT011 XQ01 40 HLA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA25 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/10/10 08:54:00 10:11:00 5.8 10.4 10.1 676.8 592.7 0.0 570.2 573.1 693.0 3.6
2 2016/10/10 10:38:00 12:35:00 5.8 10.4 10.6 674.4 602.1 0.0 579.1 581.9 695.5 3.6
3 2016/10/10 12:18:00 13:32:00 5.7 12.5 12.8 672.7 607.9 0.0 584.8 587.7 697.2 3.8
4 2016/10/11 06:28:00 07:23:00 5.5 11.7 11.7 677.6 587.6 0.0 565.1 568.0 669.4 3.1
5 2016/10/11 08:16:00 09:29:00 5.7 12.8 12.9 676.1 589.6 0.0 566.7 569.5 673.6 3.6
6 2016/10/11 09:55:00 11:12:00 5.7 14.5 14.3 674.7 598.1 0.0 574.8 577.5 691.7 3.4
7 2016/10/18 00:53:00 00:25:00 5.1 83.0 84.1 543.6 476.1 0.0 456.7 460.0 613.8 5.2
8 2016/10/18 02:37:00 03:49:00 5.3 149.1 148.2 545.1 473.0 0.0 455.3 458.1 603.5 4.6
9 2016/10/20 00:33:00 01:48:00 4.6 41.0 40.8 415.5 362.9 0.0 351.1 355.4 484.3 5.1
10 2016/10/20 02:20:00 03:32:00 4.7 42.2 42.5 415.6 361.1 0.0 349.4 353.4 486.9 5.6
11 2016/10/20 03:52:00 05:07:00 4.9 47.6 48.0 473.7 418.9 0.0 404.2 407.7 538.7 4.7
Ave 4.9 36.3 36.3 537.2 472.5 0.0 454.8 457.7 570.6 3.9
Max 5.8 149.1 148.2 677.6 607.9 0.0 584.8 587.7 697.2 5.6
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 187 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 31
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HLA15 CT002
XQ01
40 HLA45 CT001
XQ01
40 HLA35 CT001
XQ01
40 HNA26 CT011
XQ01
40 HNA16 CT011
XQ01
40 HNA27 CT001
XQ01
40 HNA17 CT001
XQ01
40 HNA28 CT001
XQ01
40 HNA18 CT001
XQ01
40 HNA29 CT001
XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/10 08:54:00 10:11:00 3.6 3.5 4.2 5.8 336.7 342.3 337.0 334.4 130.7 131.5
2 2016/10/10 10:38:00 12:35:00 3.6 3.5 3.8 5.2 337.4 343.0 337.6 334.4 131.7 133.8
3 2016/10/10 12:18:00 13:32:00 3.8 3.7 3.5 4.9 337.9 343.7 338.2 334.4 131.2 135.1
4 2016/10/11 06:28:00 07:23:00 3.1 3.0 3.7 4.9 337.7 343.1 337.8 334.4 128.6 131.3
5 2016/10/11 08:16:00 09:29:00 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.8 337.5 342.8 337.6 334.4 130.6 131.7
6 2016/10/11 09:55:00 11:12:00 3.4 3.3 4.0 5.4 339.8 345.3 340.1 334.4 129.7 132.4
7 2016/10/18 00:53:00 00:25:00 5.2 4.8 4.5 5.5 325.2 330.1 325.8 334.4 126.2 134.0
8 2016/10/18 02:37:00 03:49:00 4.6 4.5 4.7 5.9 326.3 331.5 326.5 334.4 130.5 132.6
9 2016/10/20 00:33:00 01:48:00 5.1 5.1 6.1 7.0 303.0 307.1 303.8 334.4 100.5 138.1
10 2016/10/20 02:20:00 03:32:00 5.6 5.6 6.2 7.1 303.1 307.0 303.7 334.4 98.8 137.4
11 2016/10/20 03:52:00 05:07:00 4.7 4.7 5.6 6.4 311.2 315.8 312.8 334.4 113.7 132.5
Ave 3.9 3.8 4.2 5.2 299.7 304.3 300.1 306.5 112.7 122.5
Max 5.6 5.6 6.2 7.1 339.8 345.3 340.1 334.4 131.7 138.1
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 188 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 32
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNE01 EP390
REWE
40 HNE01 CE001
XQ01
40 HLB20 CE201
XQ01
40 HLB10 CE201
XQ01
40 HNC20 CE201
XQ01
40 HNC10 CE201
XQ01
40 HLB40 CE201
XQ01
40 HLB30 CE201
XQ01
40 HFB01 CS201
XQ01
40 HFB01 CS401
XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/10 08:54:00 10:11:00 55.1 312.7 320.8 291.3 58.1 133.9 136.5 127.4 136.6 125.8
2 2016/10/10 10:38:00 12:35:00 57.3 313.2 321.7 291.7 60.5 136.0 137.1 129.0 138.1 127.1
3 2016/10/10 12:18:00 13:32:00 58.6 313.8 322.5 294.2 62.3 137.3 140.1 129.4 140.2 127.6
4 2016/10/11 06:28:00 07:23:00 52.6 314.2 322.6 291.9 54.0 131.2 133.8 124.5 136.0 123.3
5 2016/10/11 08:16:00 09:29:00 54.6 313.6 322.1 293.7 57.3 136.7 137.2 128.4 137.7 126.5
6 2016/10/11 09:55:00 11:12:00 56.4 316.0 323.8 295.6 59.7 134.9 138.6 126.9 138.1 125.6
7 2016/10/18 00:53:00 00:25:00 55.6 305.2 314.1 282.2 56.1 132.5 138.5 121.0 138.2 121.9
8 2016/10/18 02:37:00 03:49:00 54.3 306.7 315.4 282.7 54.6 134.3 134.5 125.4 136.3 125.0
9 2016/10/20 00:33:00 01:48:00 54.2 269.1 296.4 269.0 52.6 139.6 143.0 114.7 141.8 109.0
10 2016/10/20 02:20:00 03:32:00 53.4 267.8 296.4 269.1 51.9 139.1 140.6 114.6 140.9 106.0
11 2016/10/20 03:52:00 05:07:00 52.4 283.0 301.5 269.4 52.0 135.5 133.4 118.8 135.0 108.6
Ave 50.4 276.3 288.1 260.9 51.6 124.3 126.1 113.3 126.6 110.5
Max 58.6 316.0 323.8 295.6 62.3 139.6 143.0 129.4 141.8 127.6
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 189 of 294
Unit No. 3
Table No. 33
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HFB02 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB02 CS 401 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 401 XQ01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/10/10 08:54:00 10:11:00 136.0 130.5 140.3 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/10/10 10:38:00 12:35:00 137.4 131.9 141.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/10/10 12:18:00 13:32:00 138.9 132.6 143.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/10/11 06:28:00 07:23:00 135.7 127.9 139.8 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/10/11 08:16:00 09:29:00 136.3 131.0 140.4 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/10/11 09:55:00 11:12:00 136.6 130.4 141.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/10/18 00:53:00 00:25:00 137.8 126.9 141.5 84.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/10/18 02:37:00 03:49:00 136.2 129.8 139.7 148.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/10/20 00:33:00 01:48:00 138.6 113.9 141.9 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/10/20 02:20:00 03:32:00 139.2 110.8 142.7 42.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/20 03:52:00 05:07:00 136.3 113.4 140.1 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 125.8 114.9 129.4 36.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 139.2 132.6 143.3 148.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 190 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 34
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 40 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 40 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 40 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 40 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0140 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/10/03 06:29:00 07:47:00 3.9 12.7 12.1 345.3 41.5 386.8 1341.2 128.5 938.9 23.9
2 2016/10/03 08:12:00 09:28:00 3.9 13.0 12.1 342.7 41.3 383.9 1338.3 128.7 939.8 24.0
3 2016/10/03 09:49:00 11:10:00 5.8 18.9 12.1 332.0 40.2 372.2 1290.6 128.9 940.2 24.1
4 2016/10/04 06:29:00 07:45:00 5.3 7.8 12.2 355.3 42.8 398.1 1325.0 128.1 938.8 24.2
5 2016/10/04 08:13:00 09:24:00 5.3 7.5 12.2 357.8 43.0 400.8 1406.4 128.5 939.6 24.2
6 2016/10/04 09:49:00 11:04:00 5.4 7.3 12.1 361.2 43.5 404.7 1489.3 128.1 939.6 24.2
7 2016/10/04 23:46:00 01:02:00 6.6 7.7 11.3 340.0 40.8 380.8 1352.3 132.2 937.6 21.9
8 2016/10/05 01:30:00 02:43:00 6.6 7.5 11.1 345.3 41.7 387.0 1334.2 130.7 934.7 21.9
9 2016/10/05 03:12:00 04:31:00 6.5 7.2 11.2 341.1 41.2 382.3 1324.0 129.2 933.9 21.6
10 2016/10/05 23:23:00 00:37:00 7.2 13.4 10.4 327.9 38.7 366.6 1723.3 129.4 933.5 19.0
11 2016/10/06 01:06:00 02:27:00 7.4 9.4 10.2 332.0 40.1 372.0 1631.7 128.4 931.0 19.3
12 2016/10/06 02:59:00 04:13:00 7.3 9.0 10.3 328.2 39.7 367.9 1560.3 128.0 930.5 19.3
Ave 6.5 9.7 11.0 336.7 40.6 377.3 1479.9 128.6 934.1 21.1
Max 7.4 18.9 12.2 361.2 43.5 404.7 1723.3 132.2 940.2 24.2
Min 3.9 7.2 10.2 327.9 38.7 366.6 1290.6 128.0 930.5 19.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 191 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 35
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA15 CT011 XQ01 40 HLA24 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA14 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA25 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/10/03 06:29:00 07:47:00 5.3 9.5 9.4 671.2 579.5 0.0 563.1 558.5 757.6 3.8
2 2016/10/03 08:12:00 09:28:00 5.4 8.7 8.7 671.4 579.7 0.0 562.9 558.6 760.0 3.9
3 2016/10/03 09:49:00 11:10:00 5.3 8.6 8.6 671.0 583.2 0.0 566.8 562.6 765.7 4.2
4 2016/10/04 06:29:00 07:45:00 5.1 8.6 8.6 674.7 582.2 0.0 565.6 561.1 769.3 3.9
5 2016/10/04 08:13:00 09:24:00 5.1 8.3 8.3 674.3 585.6 0.0 568.7 564.2 776.6 4.0
6 2016/10/04 09:49:00 11:04:00 5.1 8.7 8.7 674.3 589.0 0.0 572.3 567.6 778.9 4.1
7 2016/10/04 23:46:00 01:02:00 4.4 8.6 8.5 550.5 475.4 0.0 462.9 458.2 670.3 4.7
8 2016/10/05 01:30:00 02:43:00 4.5 8.4 8.4 551.3 470.5 0.0 458.4 453.8 670.1 4.8
9 2016/10/05 03:12:00 04:31:00 4.6 8.0 8.0 551.6 469.6 0.0 457.0 452.3 663.9 4.7
10 2016/10/05 23:23:00 00:37:00 4.2 7.5 7.5 449.5 379.7 0.0 370.6 365.7 574.1 5.3
11 2016/10/06 01:06:00 02:27:00 4.0 7.3 7.2 449.2 377.8 0.0 369.2 364.1 579.4 5.7
12 2016/10/06 02:59:00 04:13:00 4.1 7.1 7.1 449.5 380.6 0.0 371.4 366.4 579.3 5.7
Ave 4.8 8.3 8.3 586.6 504.4 0.0 490.7 486.1 695.4 4.6
Max 5.4 9.5 9.4 674.7 589.0 0.0 572.3 567.6 778.9 5.7
Min 4.0 7.1 7.1 449.2 377.8 0.0 369.2 364.1 574.1 3.8
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 192 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 36
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HLA15 CT002 XQ01 40 HLA45 CT001 XQ01 40 HLA35 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA26 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA16 CT011 XQ01 40 HNA27 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA17 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA28 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA18 CT001 XQ01 40 HNA29 CT001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/03 06:29:00 07:47:00 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.1 333.0 325.4 338.2 561.0 128.7 126.8
2 2016/10/03 08:12:00 09:28:00 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.7 333.6 325.8 338.8 561.0 129.4 126.6
3 2016/10/03 09:49:00 11:10:00 4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 334.4 326.4 339.6 561.0 130.4 125.4
4 2016/10/04 06:29:00 07:45:00 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.2 331.1 323.9 336.2 561.0 128.6 125.7
5 2016/10/04 08:13:00 09:24:00 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.8 331.5 324.2 336.6 561.0 129.7 124.7
6 2016/10/04 09:49:00 11:04:00 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.9 332.8 325.4 337.9 561.0 129.3 119.9
7 2016/10/04 23:46:00 01:02:00 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 317.0 309.7 323.2 561.0 134.7 122.5
8 2016/10/05 01:30:00 02:43:00 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.2 318.1 310.4 324.2 561.0 131.4 125.4
9 2016/10/05 03:12:00 04:31:00 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 318.2 310.4 324.2 561.0 128.9 125.4
10 2016/10/05 23:23:00 00:37:00 5.3 5.3 5.6 5.8 303.5 295.5 310.0 561.0 128.8 124.4
11 2016/10/06 01:06:00 02:27:00 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.5 304.8 297.1 311.5 561.0 128.4 124.0
12 2016/10/06 02:59:00 04:13:00 5.7 5.6 5.3 5.4 305.8 298.1 312.5 561.0 127.8 124.9
Ave 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 322.0 314.3 327.7 561.0 129.7 124.6
Max 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.8 334.4 326.4 339.6 561.0 134.7 126.8
Min 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6 303.5 295.5 310.0 561.0 127.8 119.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 193 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 37
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 40 HNE01 CE001 XQ01 40 HLB20 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB10 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC20 CE201 XQ01 40 HNC10 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB40 CE201 XQ01 40 HLB30 CE201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB01 CS 401 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/10/03 06:29:00 07:47:00 52.7 317.0 315.7 289.8 392.8 158.6 136.0 127.6 133.5 129.0
2 2016/10/03 08:12:00 09:28:00 53.7 317.7 315.6 288.7 392.8 157.0 136.0 128.0 133.1 129.4
3 2016/10/03 09:49:00 11:10:00 54.6 318.5 315.4 289.2 392.8 158.4 137.7 129.5 133.4 130.0
4 2016/10/04 06:29:00 07:45:00 54.4 314.8 313.3 287.3 392.8 158.3 135.0 127.7 133.1 128.9
5 2016/10/04 08:13:00 09:24:00 55.2 315.4 312.9 288.7 392.8 160.5 136.9 128.6 134.1 129.4
6 2016/10/04 09:49:00 11:04:00 44.8 317.0 313.6 289.4 392.8 159.0 131.5 127.9 127.9 130.2
7 2016/10/04 23:46:00 01:02:00 56.7 307.0 301.5 280.9 392.8 161.8 137.5 130.3 134.4 132.0
8 2016/10/05 01:30:00 02:43:00 54.9 307.1 303.5 281.2 392.8 160.4 134.0 127.6 132.4 130.4
9 2016/10/05 03:12:00 04:31:00 55.1 306.5 303.6 280.0 392.8 157.5 133.0 125.4 132.9 128.3
10 2016/10/05 23:23:00 00:37:00 54.0 294.3 293.0 270.5 392.8 156.4 133.4 124.2 136.4 127.2
11 2016/10/06 01:06:00 02:27:00 56.2 295.7 293.8 271.3 392.8 157.2 135.6 124.1 137.6 126.1
12 2016/10/06 02:59:00 04:13:00 55.2 296.4 295.0 272.4 392.8 157.7 135.1 123.7 137.7 125.5
Ave 54.0 309.0 306.4 282.5 392.8 158.6 135.1 127.1 133.9 128.9
Max 56.7 318.5 315.7 289.8 392.8 161.8 137.7 130.3 137.7 132.0
Min 44.8 294.3 293.0 270.5 392.8 156.4 131.5 123.7 127.9 125.5
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 194 of 294
Unit No. 4
Table No. 38
Plant parameters
00:00:53 40 HFB02 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB02 CS 401 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 201 XQ01 40 HFB03 CS 401 XQ01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/10/03 06:29:00 07:47:00 128.0 133.8 133.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/10/03 08:12:00 09:28:00 127.8 134.2 133.2 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/10/03 09:49:00 11:10:00 127.3 134.8 132.8 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/10/04 06:29:00 07:45:00 127.3 133.6 132.8 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/10/04 08:13:00 09:24:00 127.2 134.2 132.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/10/04 09:49:00 11:04:00 124.0 135.1 129.7 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/10/04 23:46:00 01:02:00 125.6 136.3 130.9 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/10/05 01:30:00 02:43:00 126.3 134.9 131.7 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/10/05 03:12:00 04:31:00 125.9 132.7 131.1 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/10/05 23:23:00 00:37:00 128.6 131.9 133.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/10/06 01:06:00 02:27:00 127.9 130.8 133.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/10/06 02:59:00 04:13:00 128.4 130.2 133.4 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 127.0 133.5 132.4 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 128.6 136.3 133.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 124.0 130.2 129.7 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 195 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 39
Plant parameters
00:00:53 50 HNE00 CQ002 XQ01 50 HNE00 CQ004 XQ01 50 HNE00 CQ007 XQ01 50 HNE00 CQ005 XQ01 50 HNE00 CQ006 XQ01 Oxide s of Nit roge n 50 HNE00 CQ003 XQ01 50 HNE00 CT001 XQ01 50 HNE00 CP 001 XQ01 50 HNE00 CS 001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/09/26 06:57:00 09:10:00 6.5 14.9 10.0 304.3 36.5 340.8 1055.7 120.5 912.1 25.3
2 2016/09/26 09:37:00 11:03:00 6.4 16.2 10.1 311.2 37.3 348.5 1052.5 121.3 911.8 26.3
3 2016/09/26 11:35:00 12:49:00 6.5 16.8 9.8 321.5 38.4 359.9 1022.5 122.0 910.1 26.4
4 2016/09/27 06:31:00 07:54:00 6.2 12.0 10.3 329.8 39.7 369.4 1204.7 121.0 908.3 26.8
5 2016/09/27 08:25:00 09:44:00 6.4 13.6 10.2 329.8 39.5 369.4 1206.5 121.6 908.8 27.0
6 2016/09/27 10:11:00 11:28:00 6.3 16.7 10.2 330.8 39.7 370.5 1232.6 122.0 908.0 26.3
7 2016/09/27 22:54:00 00:11:00 6.8 12.6 9.4 293.4 35.3 328.6 1118.6 124.4 907.1 23.4
8 2016/09/28 00:40:00 01:59:00 6.8 12.7 8.3 256.0 30.6 286.6 1012.1 125.0 910.1 23.3
9 2016/09/28 02:24:00 03:40:00 6.9 11.4 9.6 291.0 35.1 326.0 1211.4 124.4 906.3 22.9
10 2016/09/28 22:45:00 23:57:00 8.0 6.5 7.4 247.2 29.5 276.6 957.2 117.5 911.8 19.8
11 2016/09/29 00:25:00 01:41:00 8.0 6.5 7.4 247.2 29.5 276.6 957.2 117.5 911.8 19.8
12 2016/09/29 02:10:00 03:21:00 8.1 7.2 8.7 283.1 33.9 316.9 1114.2 116.3 908.1 19.4
Ave 6.9 12.3 9.3 295.4 35.4 330.8 1095.4 121.1 909.5 23.9
Max 8.1 16.8 10.3 330.8 39.7 370.5 1232.6 125.0 912.1 27.0
Min 6.2 6.5 7.4 247.2 29.5 276.6 957.2 116.3 906.3 19.4
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 196 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 40
Plant parameters
00:00:53 50 HNE00 CQ001 XQ01 50 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 50 HNE01 CE001 XQ02 50 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 50 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 50 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 50 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 50 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 50 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 50 HNA25 CQ011A XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/09/26 06:57:00 09:10:00 4.9 4.8 4.8 649.9 553.2 0.0 542.5 535.4 765.7 3.1
2 2016/09/26 09:37:00 11:03:00 5.0 5.2 5.2 666.5 575.0 0.0 563.6 557.0 776.9 3.0
3 2016/09/26 11:35:00 12:49:00 4.9 5.3 5.3 656.1 573.7 0.0 562.6 555.1 768.8 3.1
4 2016/09/27 06:31:00 07:54:00 5.0 5.5 5.5 674.1 588.9 0.0 577.1 570.4 783.6 2.9
5 2016/09/27 08:25:00 09:44:00 5.0 5.6 5.6 673.8 591.2 0.0 578.6 571.6 780.5 3.1
6 2016/09/27 10:11:00 11:28:00 4.9 5.8 5.7 657.9 590.2 0.0 577.3 570.4 778.7 4.8
7 2016/09/27 22:54:00 00:11:00 3.7 5.0 5.0 551.8 490.0 0.0 479.9 471.9 668.6 3.6
8 2016/09/28 00:40:00 01:59:00 3.5 5.0 5.0 552.2 490.9 0.0 482.3 474.9 666.0 3.4
9 2016/09/28 02:24:00 03:40:00 4.2 4.8 4.8 552.5 476.1 0.0 466.9 459.4 654.9 3.6
10 2016/09/28 22:45:00 23:57:00 2.8 5.2 5.1 443.3 387.4 0.0 380.9 373.4 571.5 4.6
11 2016/09/29 00:25:00 01:41:00 2.8 5.2 5.1 443.3 387.4 0.0 380.9 373.4 571.5 4.6
12 2016/09/29 02:10:00 03:21:00 3.3 5.1 5.1 443.4 385.6 0.0 379.3 371.9 573.1 5.0
Ave 4.2 5.2 5.2 580.4 507.5 0.0 497.7 490.4 696.7 3.7
Max 5.0 5.8 5.7 674.1 591.2 0.0 578.6 571.6 783.6 5.0
Min 2.8 4.8 4.8 443.3 385.6 0.0 379.3 371.9 571.5 2.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 197 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 41
Plant parameters
00:00:53 50 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0150 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0150 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0150 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 50 HNA15 CT011 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/09/26 06:57:00 09:10:00 3.1 3.1 1.9 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.9 122.8
2 2016/09/26 09:37:00 11:03:00 3.0 2.9 1.8 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.4 122.9
3 2016/09/26 11:35:00 12:49:00 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 128.4 124.0
4 2016/09/27 06:31:00 07:54:00 2.9 2.8 1.8 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.7 122.4
5 2016/09/27 08:25:00 09:44:00 3.1 3.0 1.9 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.5 123.1
6 2016/09/27 10:11:00 11:28:00 4.8 5.3 3.4 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 128.5 123.6
7 2016/09/27 22:54:00 00:11:00 3.6 3.4 2.7 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.0 124.7
8 2016/09/28 00:40:00 01:59:00 3.4 3.3 2.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.3 124.9
9 2016/09/28 02:24:00 03:40:00 3.6 3.6 2.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.4 125.5
10 2016/09/28 22:45:00 23:57:00 4.6 4.5 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.4 0.0
11 2016/09/29 00:25:00 01:41:00 4.6 4.5 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.4 116.8
12 2016/09/29 02:10:00 03:21:00 5.0 4.9 4.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.2 116.7
Ave 3.7 3.7 2.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 129.5 112.3
Max 5.0 5.3 4.1 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.3 125.5
Min 2.9 2.8 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.2 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 198 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 42
Plant parameters
00:00:53 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50 HNA26 CT011 XQ01 50 HNA16 CT011 XQ01 50 HNA27 CT001 XQ01 50 HNA17 CT001 XQ01 50 HNA28 CT001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/09/26 06:57:00 09:10:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 133.7 138.5 124.0 129.2 114.1
2 2016/09/26 09:37:00 11:03:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.5 141.4 126.1 129.6 115.1
3 2016/09/26 11:35:00 12:49:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.5 140.6 125.2 129.9 115.6
4 2016/09/27 06:31:00 07:54:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.2 140.6 127.3 129.8 114.8
5 2016/09/27 08:25:00 09:44:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 136.9 140.9 126.8 129.8 115.4
6 2016/09/27 10:11:00 11:28:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.0 141.5 126.3 130.0 115.9
7 2016/09/27 22:54:00 00:11:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.8 142.0 128.5 130.7 120.6
8 2016/09/28 00:40:00 01:59:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 144.9 142.8 128.8 131.1 121.3
9 2016/09/28 02:24:00 03:40:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.2 141.5 127.5 131.4 120.6
10 2016/09/28 22:45:00 23:57:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/09/29 00:25:00 01:41:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.7 134.5 117.6 123.2 112.4
12 2016/09/29 02:10:00 03:21:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 133.6 133.9 116.4 123.2 110.8
Ave 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.6 128.2 114.5 118.2 106.4
Max 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 144.9 142.8 128.8 131.4 121.3
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 199 of 294
Unit No. 5
Table No. 43
Plant parameters
00:00:53 50 HNA18 CT001 XQ01 50 HNA29 CT001 XQ01 50 HNA19 CT001 XQ01 50 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/09/26 06:57:00 09:10:00 126.9 120.3 133.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/09/26 09:37:00 11:03:00 127.2 121.4 133.5 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/09/26 11:35:00 12:49:00 128.1 122.0 134.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/09/27 06:31:00 07:54:00 126.9 121.2 133.3 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/09/27 08:25:00 09:44:00 127.4 122.0 133.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/09/27 10:11:00 11:28:00 127.9 122.3 134.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/09/27 22:54:00 00:11:00 128.5 126.8 134.7 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/09/28 00:40:00 01:59:00 129.1 127.4 135.2 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/09/28 02:24:00 03:40:00 129.1 126.9 135.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/09/28 22:45:00 23:57:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/09/29 00:25:00 01:41:00 121.5 118.7 127.7 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/09/29 02:10:00 03:21:00 121.0 117.0 127.1 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 116.1 112.2 121.9 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 129.1 127.4 135.2 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 200 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 44
Plant parameters
00:00:53 60 HNE00 CQ002 XQ01 60 HNE00 CQ004 XQ01 60 HNE00 CQ007 XQ01 60 HNE00 CQ005 XQ01 60 HNE00 CQ006 XQ01 Oxide s of Nit roge n 60 HNE00 CQ003 XQ01 60 HNE00 CT001 XQ01 60 HNE00 CP 001 XQ01 60 HNE00 CS 001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS AM
S O
xy
gen
%
AM
S C
arb
on
Mo
no
xid
e p
pm
AM
S C
arb
on
Dio
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itri
c O
xid
e p
pm
AM
S N
itro
gen
Dio
xid
e p
pm
Ox
ides
of
Nit
rog
en
AM
S S
ulp
hu
r D
iox
ide p
pm
AM
S G
as
Tem
pera
ture
°C
AM
S G
as
Pre
ssu
re m
Bar
AM
S G
as
Velo
cit
y m
/s
Test Date Start End AMS O 2 % AMS CO ppm AMS CO 2 % AMS NO ppm AMS NO 2 ppm NO x ppm AMS S O 2 ppm AMS °C AMS P re ssu re mba r AMS m/s
1 2016/09/20 06:29:00 07:52:00 6.3 0.9 11.3 360.7 43.2 403.9 1240.2 120.9 915.0 24.2
2 2016/09/20 08:35:00 09:57:00 6.1 1.0 11.4 361.8 43.2 405.0 1253.7 121.5 916.3 25.1
3 2016/09/20 10:57:00 12:10:00 5.9 0.5 11.6 365.7 43.7 409.4 1257.3 122.0 914.6 25.6
4 2016/09/21 04:58:00 06:10:00 6.0 0.7 11.5 363.3 43.5 406.8 1194.9 121.0 911.9 24.6
5 2016/09/21 06:40:00 07:52:00 5.9 0.3 11.5 365.7 43.7 409.4 1197.1 121.6 912.7 25.1
6 2016/09/21 08:13:00 09:23:00 5.9 0.2 11.6 359.0 42.9 401.8 1193.3 122.0 913.1 25.1
7 2016/09/21 22:53:00 00:42:00 7.1 2.7 10.5 344.4 41.2 385.7 1164.6 122.5 900.4 22.2
8 2016/09/22 01:16:00 03:14:00 7.3 2.9 10.4 344.4 41.2 385.6 1227.8 120.5 901.4 22.4
9 2016/09/22 03:38:00 04:47:00 7.4 3.3 10.5 344.5 41.2 385.7 1246.0 120.3 909.4 22.1
10 2016/09/23 00:18:00 02:08:00 8.7 1.5 0.0 269.8 32.2 302.0 926.7 117.4 906.7 19.4
11 2016/09/23 02:28:00 04:20:00 8.5 0.1 0.0 284.9 34.1 319.0 1012.1 113.4 905.2 19.1
12 2016/09/23 04:53:00 05:58:00 7.1 0.3 0.0 353.2 42.1 395.3 1126.3 115.6 907.2 23.9
Ave 6.8 1.2 8.4 343.1 41.0 384.1 1170.0 119.9 909.5 23.2
Max 8.7 3.3 11.6 365.7 43.7 409.4 1257.3 122.5 916.3 25.6
Min 5.9 0.1 0.0 269.8 32.2 302.0 926.7 113.4 900.4 19.1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 201 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 45
Plant parameters
00:00:53 60 HNE00 CQ001 XQ01 60 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 60 HNE01 CE001 XQ02 60 MKA80 FE901 XQ01 60 LBA80 CF901 XQ01 60 LAB90 CF001 XQ01 60 LAB90 CF002 XQ01 60 LAB90 CF003 XQ01 60 HFE17 EP 600 REWE 60 HNA25 CQ011A XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
AM
S M
ois
ture
%
AM
S D
ust
Em
issi
on
To
tal
Vo
lum
e m
g/N
m3
AM
S P
recip
Du
st E
mis
sio
n
mg
/Nm
3
Ele
ctr
ic L
oad
LIV
E S
TM
FL
EC
ON
IN
L F
LO
W 1
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 2
EC
ON
IN
L F
L 3
To
atl
Air
Flo
w
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
Test Date Start End AMS H2O %AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2AMS mg/Nm3 Dry @ 10% O 2 MW kg/s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s m3 /s %
1 2016/09/20 06:29:00 07:52:00 5.4 2.7 2.7 674.0 549.1 0.0 566.2 564.9 675.1 3.5
2 2016/09/20 08:35:00 09:57:00 5.5 2.9 2.9 673.3 560.8 0.0 577.5 576.4 682.8 3.4
3 2016/09/20 10:57:00 12:10:00 5.6 3.2 3.2 673.3 573.9 0.0 590.6 589.5 693.2 3.3
4 2016/09/21 04:58:00 06:10:00 5.3 3.6 4.1 669.1 564.2 0.0 580.9 579.7 681.1 3.4
5 2016/09/21 06:40:00 07:52:00 5.4 2.5 2.6 671.2 568.9 0.0 585.6 584.1 686.5 3.4
6 2016/09/21 08:13:00 09:23:00 5.5 2.8 2.6 671.7 576.2 0.0 593.1 591.7 689.4 3.8
7 2016/09/21 22:53:00 00:42:00 3.8 2.0 2.0 539.5 447.7 0.0 462.9 462.0 582.6 4.5
8 2016/09/22 01:16:00 03:14:00 4.1 1.5 1.6 544.7 440.8 0.0 455.7 454.9 580.5 4.6
9 2016/09/22 03:38:00 04:47:00 4.1 1.4 1.4 544.9 438.5 0.0 453.2 452.2 581.1 4.7
10 2016/09/23 00:18:00 02:08:00 3.3 0.0 0.0 417.3 352.4 0.0 372.0 370.5 513.1 4.3
11 2016/09/23 02:28:00 04:20:00 3.7 0.0 0.0 418.1 348.7 0.0 361.2 360.0 501.4 4.0
12 2016/09/23 04:53:00 05:58:00 4.2 0.0 0.0 589.1 487.6 0.0 511.9 510.8 649.0 3.2
Ave 4.6 1.9 1.9 590.5 492.4 0.0 509.2 508.1 626.3 3.8
Max 5.6 3.6 4.1 674.0 576.2 0.0 593.1 591.7 693.2 4.7
Min 3.3 0.0 0.0 417.3 348.7 0.0 361.2 360.0 501.4 3.2
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 202 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 46
Plant parameters
00:00:53 60 HNA25 CQ011A XQ0160 HNA25 CQ011B XQ0160 HNA15 CQ011A XQ0160 HNA15 CQ011B XQ01 60 HNA24 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA14 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA25 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA15 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA25 CT011 XQ01 60 HNA15 CT011 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
LH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
A
RH
O2
IN
DIC
AT
ION
B
LH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
RH
EC
ON
OU
T G
AS
T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
IN
L T
LH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
SE
C A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
Test Date Start End % % % % °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/09/20 06:29:00 07:52:00 3.5 3.4 3.8 4.2 275.3 0.3 333.8 331.7 125.7 120.7
2 2016/09/20 08:35:00 09:57:00 3.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 276.3 0.3 334.9 333.1 125.8 121.1
3 2016/09/20 10:57:00 12:10:00 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.4 277.6 0.3 336.4 334.5 126.5 121.3
4 2016/09/21 04:58:00 06:10:00 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.5 276.6 0.3 335.6 333.7 126.0 120.4
5 2016/09/21 06:40:00 07:52:00 3.4 3.3 3.7 4.2 276.9 0.3 335.8 334.1 126.2 120.7
6 2016/09/21 08:13:00 09:23:00 3.8 3.8 3.1 3.4 277.8 0.3 336.8 334.8 126.3 120.7
7 2016/09/21 22:53:00 00:42:00 4.5 4.5 4.1 4.4 261.5 0.3 317.7 315.3 131.7 118.6
8 2016/09/22 01:16:00 03:14:00 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.8 263.1 0.3 319.4 317.1 127.8 118.7
9 2016/09/22 03:38:00 04:47:00 4.7 4.6 4.7 5.3 263.1 0.3 319.3 317.0 126.6 118.9
10 2016/09/23 00:18:00 02:08:00 4.3 3.6 4.6 5.0 252.8 0.3 307.7 304.7 121.5 112.8
11 2016/09/23 02:28:00 04:20:00 4.0 3.4 4.5 4.8 250.0 0.3 304.0 301.2 119.6 110.9
12 2016/09/23 04:53:00 05:58:00 3.2 2.6 3.4 3.8 270.9 0.3 327.6 325.6 123.8 117.3
Ave 3.8 3.6 3.9 4.2 268.5 0.3 325.8 323.6 125.6 118.5
Max 4.7 4.6 4.7 5.3 277.8 0.3 336.8 334.8 131.7 121.3
Min 3.2 2.6 3.1 3.4 250.0 0.3 304.0 301.2 119.6 110.9
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 203 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 47
Plant parameters
00:00:53 60 HLA14 CT001 XQ01 60 HLA25 CT002 XQ01 60 HLA15 CT002 XQ01 60 HLA45 CT001 XQ01 60 HLA35 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA26 CT011 XQ01 60 HNA16 CT011 XQ01 60 HNA27 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA17 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA28 CT001 XQ01
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
SE
C A
/H I
NL
T
LH
SE
C A
T
RH
SE
C A
T
LH
TU
B A
/H O
UT
T
RH
TU
B A
/H A
IR O
UT
T
LH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
RH
TU
B A
/H G
AS
OU
T T
LH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
RH
PR
EC
IP I
NL
T
LH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
Test Date Start End °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C °C
1 2016/09/20 06:29:00 07:52:00 59.3 312.4 308.2 288.5 285.5 151.0 139.7 130.1 127.5 126.2
2 2016/09/20 08:35:00 09:57:00 59.2 313.3 309.3 289.0 286.1 151.5 139.8 130.2 127.6 126.5
3 2016/09/20 10:57:00 12:10:00 59.0 314.9 310.7 291.1 288.4 152.8 141.2 131.7 127.6 127.4
4 2016/09/21 04:58:00 06:10:00 59.7 314.0 309.2 290.1 286.8 152.5 142.1 131.1 127.6 126.7
5 2016/09/21 06:40:00 07:52:00 59.6 314.3 309.6 290.5 287.5 152.5 142.1 131.7 127.6 127.2
6 2016/09/21 08:13:00 09:23:00 59.4 315.1 310.4 290.9 287.7 152.4 141.6 131.9 127.2 127.4
7 2016/09/21 22:53:00 00:42:00 59.3 302.0 295.7 279.9 276.6 153.8 139.1 134.3 125.7 131.7
8 2016/09/22 01:16:00 03:14:00 60.9 302.6 296.8 278.7 275.3 151.2 137.5 130.4 125.6 128.1
9 2016/09/22 03:38:00 04:47:00 61.2 302.1 296.7 278.7 275.2 151.3 138.5 129.7 126.2 126.4
10 2016/09/23 00:18:00 02:08:00 66.5 291.0 283.4 269.5 260.8 146.2 132.3 125.7 120.7 125.3
11 2016/09/23 02:28:00 04:20:00 69.1 286.6 278.4 263.0 253.6 142.8 130.4 122.9 119.9 120.1
12 2016/09/23 04:53:00 05:58:00 62.9 305.3 299.9 276.5 272.4 148.6 137.3 128.1 125.9 122.2
Ave 61.3 306.1 300.7 282.2 278.0 150.5 138.5 129.8 125.7 126.3
Max 69.1 315.1 310.7 291.1 288.4 153.8 142.1 134.3 127.6 131.7
Min 59.0 286.6 278.4 263.0 253.6 142.8 130.4 122.9 119.9 120.1
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 204 of 294
Unit No. 6
Table No. 48
Plant parameters
00:00:53 60 HNA18 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA29 CT001 XQ01 60 HNA19 CT001 XQ01 60 HNE01 EP 390 REWE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
00:01:00
Time
difference
between
SRM &
AMS
RH
PR
EC
IP O
UT
T
LH
ID
F D
IS T
RH
ID
F D
IS T
DU
ST
EM
MIS
SIO
N T
OT
AL
VO
L
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Test Date Start End °C °C °C mg/Nm3 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
1 2016/09/20 06:29:00 07:52:00 124.6 56.9 129.8 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2016/09/20 08:35:00 09:57:00 124.8 56.0 130.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2016/09/20 10:57:00 12:10:00 125.3 57.8 130.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2016/09/21 04:58:00 06:10:00 124.7 58.0 130.1 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 2016/09/21 06:40:00 07:52:00 125.2 57.9 130.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 2016/09/21 08:13:00 09:23:00 125.2 57.4 130.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 2016/09/21 22:53:00 00:42:00 122.8 58.8 127.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 2016/09/22 01:16:00 03:14:00 122.5 56.7 127.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 2016/09/22 03:38:00 04:47:00 122.5 56.6 127.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 2016/09/23 00:18:00 02:08:00 118.3 55.2 123.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 2016/09/23 02:28:00 04:20:00 115.4 52.8 120.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
12 2016/09/23 04:53:00 05:58:00 119.0 54.7 124.4 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ave 122.5 56.6 127.8 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Max 125.3 58.8 130.6 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Min 115.4 52.8 120.7 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 205 of 294
Appendix No. 4
Particulate Emission Monitor
Correlation Graphs
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 206 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 361.6 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 5.3 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 25.2 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 190742-23 Linear function: E = 22.5775 * x – 89.9877 Monitor setting: 0 to 1.7 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 17th to 26
th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 1
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 207 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 64.1 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 5.3 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 25.2 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 190742-23 Linear function: E = 3.9843 * x – 15.6149 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 17th to 26th October 2016 Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 2
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 208 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 138.7 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 4.5 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 37.9 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 163811-94 Linear function: E = 8.7002 * x – 35.3078 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.6 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 12th to 28
th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 3
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 209 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 69.1 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 4.5 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 37.9 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 165753-94 Linear function: E = 4.3501 * x – 17.9074 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 12th to 28
th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 4
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 210 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3 Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation
October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 121.3 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 8.5 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 16.7 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 165753-94 Linear function: E = 11.4798 * x – 42.9432 Monitor setting: 0 to 1.9 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 10th to 20
th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 5
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 211 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 37.8 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 8.5 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 16.7 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 165753-94 Linear function: E = 2.2592 * x – 7.4331 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 20
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 10th to 20
th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.94
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 6
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 212 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 198.6 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 4.4 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 7.7 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 163809-94 Linear function: E = 12.4214 * x – 49.8715 Monitor setting: 0 to 1.1 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 3rd to 6th October 2016 Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 7
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 213 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 54.0 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 4.4 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 7.7 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 163809-94 Linear function: E = 3.3877 * x – 13.7364 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 3rd
to 6th October 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.98
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 8
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 214 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 181.0 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 3.8 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 7.5 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 163264-94 Linear function: E = 11.3135 * x – 45.3029 Monitor setting: 0 to 1.5 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 26th 29
th September 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.95
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 9
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 215 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 36.2 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 3.8 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 7.5 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 163264-94 Linear function: E = 2.2627* x – 9.0995 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 26th 29
th September 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.95
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 10
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 216 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 1
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 203.9 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 1.0 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 4.2 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 165752-94 Linear function: E = 12.7354 * x – 50.8084 Monitor setting: 0 to 1.0 OD Output No. 1 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 20th to 23
rd September 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.95
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 11
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 217 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6
Particulate Emission Monitor Correlation October 2016 Output No. 2
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data:
Location: Stack Operating Range: 0 – 61.3 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Monitor information: Limits of validity: [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: Land Lower limit: 1.0 [mg/Nm
3 dry @ 10% O2]
Model: 4500 Mk III Upper limit: 4.2 [mg/Nm3 dry @ 10% O2]
Serial Number: 165752-94 Linear function: E = 3.8206 * x – 15.1494 Monitor setting: 0 to 0.3 OD Output No. 2 where: E = Emission [mg/Nm
3 dry @10% O2]
Dates: x = Monitor output [mA] Calibration date: 19
th September 2016
Correlation dates: 20th to 23
rd September 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.95
This correlation was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 12
Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 218 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 1 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 546.0 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 871.5 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.2286 * x – 13.9967 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 1st to 6
th Oct 2014
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 13 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 219 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 2 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 559.3 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 930.1 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.2123 * x – 13.1364 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 12th to 28
th Oct 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 14 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155 PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 220 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 3 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 530.6 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 901.3 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.2123 * x – 16.6871 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 10th to 20
th Oct 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 15 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155
PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 221 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 4 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 572.0 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 858.8 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.0937 * x – 13.7071 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 3rd
to 6th Oct 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 16 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155
PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 222 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 5 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 555.0 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 861.6 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.0667 * x – 10.8037 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 26th to 29
th Sep 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 17 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155
PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 223 of 294
Matimba Power Station Unit No. 6 Air Flow to Gas flow Correlation
October 2016
Plant: Matimba PS Operational data: Location: Stack Operating Range: 1000 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Monitor information: Limits of validity : [as an hourly average] Make of Monitor: N/A Lower limit: 553.0 Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2
Model: N/A Upper limit: 911.6 Nm3/s Dry 10% O2
Serial Number: N/A Linear function: E = 1.2738 * x – 15.9227 Monitor setting: N/A where: E = Gas Flow [Nm
3/s Dry 10% O2]
Dates: x = Total Air Flow [kg/s] Calibration date: N/A
Correlation dates: 20th to 23
rd Sep 2016
Correlation Coefficient: 0.99
This correlation spot-check was produced as described in the German VDI guide with reference to the zero point hypotheses.
FIGURE 18 Prepared by: Stacklabs report No. RSL229
ISO 9096, 12141 & 10155
PH Pretorius ISO 9096:2003(E) Stacklabs ISO #:825268/:2007-05-23 © ISO 2003
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 224 of 294
Appendix No. 5
Water Vapour Concentration Calculation
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 225 of 294
Vwsg(std) = (Wf – Wi) /ρ
Where:
Wf = Final weight of silica gel & impinger (g)
Wi = Initial weight of silica gel & impinger (g)
ρ = Density of water vapour at NTP (0.804 kg/m3)
Vwsg(std) = Volume of water vapour collected in silica gel (g) at NTP
Vwsg(std)
Bws = -------------------------
Vwsg(std) + Vm(std)
Where:
Bws = Proportion of water by volume %v/v
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter (Nm3 dry)
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 226 of 294
Appendix No. 6
Outlines of
Filter Weighing Procedure
Pre-test Preparations Procedure
Sampling System Integrity Checks
And
Sampling Procedures
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 227 of 294
1. FILTER WEIGHING
Before the test, the filters are prepared as follows:
The required numbers of filters are marked with a unique number. The filters are then heated
in an oven at 120 degrees Celsius for a period of one hour. After heating, all the filters are set
out together with three reference filters in a dedicator where they will condition for a period of
48 hours. Each filter is then weighed three times, in a temperature controlled clean room,
where the masses are captured on a dedicated computer system. Following the weighing
process, the filters are packed and sealed into a separate container ready for use. The reference
filters are treated in the same manner as those earmarked for the tests, but are not taken to site.
After the site measurements, the used and reference filters are again set out in the desiccators
and allowed to condition for up to 100 hours. The same weighing procedure is again followed
and the final contaminant masses are calculated by the computer system.
2. PRE-TEST PREPARATIONS
On site, the equipment is set up at the measuring location. The inside dimensions of the duct
are determined. The number of test points per traverse is determined according to the standards
and the sampling probe marked accordingly
3. SAMPLING SYSTEM INTEGRITY
A leak check is performed on the impulse lines to ensure measurement integrity.
With each change in filter or any other operation which might influence the integrity of the
vacuum system, a vacuum check is performed. This ensures that only the gas which entered the
nozzle will be measured by the gas test meter. Gaseous analysers are zero and span checked
with calibration gas at the measurement points.
4. SAMPLING PROCEDURE
Gas temperature, pressure and velocity head readings are logged at each sampling point.
Velocity head readings are updated at intervals of 1 minute. During this time, the computer
program calculates the orifice flow settings required for isokineticity and the flow is adjusted
accordingly with each update, either automatically or manually depending on the particular
system used.
Oxygen in the flue gas is measured to determine gas density.
An orifice flow meter is used to facilitate the adjustment of the sampling flow rate at one-
minute intervals. The relevant parameters for flow calculation are entered into the computer.
The computer is programmed to determine the flow rate through the orifice in order to achieve
isokineticity. A dry gas meter is incorporated into the sampling train and is used to record the
total actual volume sampled and therewith to determine the percentage isokineticity.
Moisture is separated from the sampled gases during sampling, using a water trap and silica gel.
The ‘A’ indicator in the silica gel changes colour as moisture is absorbed. The accumulated
liquid is used after the test to determine the moisture content on a percentage-by-volume basis.
This value is again incorporated into the volume of dry gas sampled to determine the
concentration of pollutants in the gases at Actual and Normal (sometimes referred to as
Standard) conditions.
The uncertainty before the test, about the moisture content in the gas, fluctuation in the gas
flows and human error contribute towards the final deviation from 100 % isokineticity.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 228 of 294
After completion of a measurement the relevant sampling components may be rinsed in order to
capture pollutants that may have become attached to the sampling system’s exposed surfaces.
The rinse medium is captured and contaminants within will be added to the total sampled mass.
Relevant plant operating parameters are logged, where possible, for reference purposes and it is
usually recommended to take raw product samples during the tests. The content of certain
elements in the raw product has specific bearing on plant performance and is useful for
comparative reference.
On completion of all the site measurements the equipment will be removed from the plant,
returned to the laboratory and work shop for processing and cleaning. Where necessary,
additional calibration checks will be conducted on specific instruments to determine operational
continuity.
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 229 of 294
Appendix No. 7
AMS Calibration Reports
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 230 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 231 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 232 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 233 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 234 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 235 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 236 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 237 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 238 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 239 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 240 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 241 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 242 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 243 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 244 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 245 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 246 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 247 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 248 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 249 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 250 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 251 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 252 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 253 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 254 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 255 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 256 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 257 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 258 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 259 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 260 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 261 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 262 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 263 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 264 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 265 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 266 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 267 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 268 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 269 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 270 of 294
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 271 of 294
Appendix No. 8
Filter Mass Sheets
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 272 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GK
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: E
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba Plant: Matimba
Unit: U1 & U3 Unit: U1 & U3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00030
Date: 2016/02/29 Date: 2016/11/07 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.10436
Start Time: 14H44 Start Time: 14H41 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.05041
End time: 15H19 End time: 15H04 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82 Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9976 99.9976 99.9976 99.9976 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971
49.99900 49.99898 49.99896 49.99898 49.99903 49.99903 49.99903 49.99903
Total initial mass = 149.9966 Total Final mass = 149.9961
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 E 2.71247 2.71260 2.71268 2.71258 2.71258 2.70933 2.70939 2.70931 2.70934
REF 2 E 2.59849 2.59867 2.59878 2.59865 2.59864 2.59628 2.59631 2.59631 2.59630
REF 3 E 2.61515 2.61529 2.61539 2.61528 2.61527 2.61244 2.61255 2.61264 2.61254
Total initial mass = 7.9265 7.9265 Total Final mass = 7.9182
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GK 1 2.72306 2.72316 2.72311 2.7231 2.7231 2.7203 2.7216 2.78234 2.78245 2.78259 2.7825 0.0608 0.0608 0.0000 0.06083 Matimba Unit 1 Test 1
GK 2 2.59611 2.59613 2.59613 2.5961 2.5961 2.5934 2.5947 2.59477 2.59467 2.59470 2.5947 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000 Blankk U 1 to 3
GK 3 2.70968 2.70974 2.70980 2.7097 2.7097 2.7069 2.7083 2.76477 2.76482 2.76483 2.7648 0.0565 0.0565 0.0000 0.05654 Matimba Unit 1 Test 2
GK 4 2.65768 2.65780 2.65790 2.6578 2.6578 2.6550 2.6563 2.73463 2.73481 2.73480 2.7347 0.0784 0.0784 0.0000 0.07840 Matimba Unit 1 Test 3
GK 5 2.67622 2.67642 2.67646 2.6764 2.6764 2.6736 2.6749 2.79346 2.79350 2.79351 2.7935 0.1186 0.1186 0.0000 0.11858 Matimba Unit 3 Test 7
GK 6 2.52827 2.52838 2.52836 2.5283 2.5283 2.5257 2.5270 2.74690 2.74703 2.74707 2.7470 0.2200 0.2200 0.0000 0.22004 Matimba Unit 3 Test 8
GK 7 2.67379 2.67392 2.67398 2.6739 2.6739 2.6711 2.6724 2.72033 2.72049 2.72066 2.7205 0.0480 0.0480 0.0000 0.04805 Matimba Unit 1 Test 4
GK 8 2.68888 2.68904 2.68910 2.6890 2.6890 2.6862 2.6875 2.73832 2.73839 2.73851 2.7384 0.0509 0.0509 0.0000 0.05086 Matimba Unit 1 Test 5
GK 9 2.70068 2.70072 2.70071 2.7007 2.7007 2.6979 2.6992 2.75023 2.75028 2.75042 2.7503 0.0511 0.0511 0.0000 0.05107 Matimba Unit 1 Test 6
GK 10 2.57707 2.57710 2.57704 2.5771 2.5771 2.5744 2.5757 2.58839 2.58840 2.58832 2.5884 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 0.01270 Matimba Unit 3 Test 9
GK 11 2.58451 2.58454 2.58457 2.5845 2.5845 2.5818 2.5831 2.59673 2.59681 2.59681 2.5968 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.01365 Matimba Unit 3 Test 10
GK 12 2.69559 2.69568 2.69571 2.6957 2.6957 2.6928 2.6942 2.71205 2.71211 2.71210 2.7121 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 0.01789 Matimba Unit 3 Test 11
GK 13 2.68647 2.68652 2.68659 2.6865 2.6865 2.6837 2.6851 2.71458 2.71477 2.71492 2.7148 0.0297 0.0297 0.0000 0.02969 Matimba Unit 1 Test 7
GK 14 2.68088 2.68097 2.68095 2.6809 2.6809 2.6781 2.6795 2.72162 2.72168 2.72168 2.7217 0.0422 0.0422 0.0000 0.04218 Matimba Unit 1 Test 8
GK 15 2.69340 2.69343 2.69340 2.6934 2.6934 2.6906 2.6919 2.73539 2.73540 2.73545 2.7354 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 0.0435 Matimba Unit 1 Test 9
GK 2 2.59612 2.59612 2.59341 2.59471 2.59471 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.59341 2.59471
0.00131
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.05041
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 273 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GG
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: E1
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba Plant: Matimba
Unit: Unit 1 Unit: Unit 1 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00029
Date: 2016/02/26 Date: 2016/11/16 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.15236
Start Time: 09H23 Start Time: 11H33 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.05041
End time: 10H25 End time: 11H52 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.6 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: W J Bronkhorst Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9975 99.9975 99.9976 99.9975 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972
49.99894 49.99894 49.99895 49.99894 49.99884 49.99884 49.99884 49.99884
Total initial mass = 149.9965 Total Final mass = 149.9960
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 E1 2.71372 2.71372 2.71370 2.71371 2.71371 2.70865 2.70878 2.70884 2.70876
REF 2 E1 2.59970 2.59969 2.59969 2.59969 2.59969 2.59588 2.59599 2.59607 2.59598
REF 3 E1 2.61556 2.61555 2.61555 2.61555 2.61555 2.61192 2.61213 2.61224 2.61210
Total initial mass = 7.9290 7.9289 Total Final mass = 7.9169
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GG 13 2.61463 2.61463 2.61464 2.6146 2.6146 2.6106 2.6120 2.62154 2.62166 2.62177 2.6217 0.0097 0.0097 0.0000 0.00970 Matimba Unit 1 Test 10
GG 14 2.61222 2.61223 2.61224 2.6122 2.6122 2.6082 2.6096 2.61743 2.61749 2.61751 2.6175 0.0079 0.0079 0.0000 0.00792 Matimba Unit 1 Test 11
GG 15 2.62586 2.62587 2.62589 2.6259 2.6259 2.6219 2.6232 2.63179 2.63171 2.63169 2.6317 0.0085 0.0085 0.0000 0.0085 Matimba Unit 1 Test 12
GK 2 2.59612 2.59612 2.59341 2.59471 2.59471 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.59341 2.59471
0.00131
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.05041
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 274 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GH
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: E1
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba U3 Customer: Matimba U3 % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U3 Plant: Matimba U3
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00057
Date: 2013/07/16 Date: 2016/11/07 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.13281
Start Time: 10H56 Start Time: 13H50 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 11H19 End time: 14H10 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.6 Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: W J Bronkhorst Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9978 99.9978 99.9978 99.9978 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972
49.99915 49.99915 49.99915 49.99915 49.99889 49.99890 49.99891 49.99890
Total initial mass = 149.9970 Total Final mass = 149.9961
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 E1 2.71436 2.71435 2.71435 2.71435 2.71434 2.70911 2.70934 2.70942 2.70929
REF 2 E1 2.59907 2.59908 2.59908 2.59908 2.59906 2.59635 2.59640 2.59635 2.59637
REF 3 E1 2.61554 2.61555 2.61555 2.61555 2.61553 2.61261 2.61271 2.61278 2.61270
Total initial mass = 7.9290 7.9289 Total Final mass = 7.9184
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GH 1 2.58995 2.58996 2.58995 2.5900 2.5899 2.5865 2.5906 2.61159 2.61169 2.61171 2.6117 0.0211 0.0211 0.0000 0.02108 Matimba Unit 3 Test 1
GH 2 2.62171 2.62172 2.62172 2.6217 2.6217 2.6182 2.6223 2.64037 2.64044 2.64039 2.6404 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 0.01805 Matimba Unit 3 Test 2
GH 3 2.66855 2.66856 2.66856 2.6686 2.6685 2.6650 2.6692 2.68280 2.68284 2.68285 2.6828 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.01363 Matimba Unit 3 Test 3
GH 4 2.62367 2.62368 2.62368 2.6237 2.6237 2.6202 2.6243 2.64456 2.64466 2.64474 2.6447 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 0.02034 Matimba Unit 3 Test 4
GH 5 2.58639 2.58640 2.58639 2.5864 2.5864 2.5829 2.5870 2.61088 2.61093 2.61091 2.6109 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 0.02389 Matimba Unit 3 Test 5
GH 6 2.58221 2.58221 2.58221 2.5822 2.5822 2.5788 2.5828 2.61258 2.61268 2.61261 2.6126 0.0298 0.0298 0.0000 0.02979 Matimba Unit 3 Test 6
GH 7 2.66302 2.66303 2.66304 2.6630 2.6630 2.6595 2.6637 2.72221 2.72234 2.72241 2.7223 0.0586 0.0586 0.0000 0.05865 Matimba Unit 2 Test 1
GH 8 2.64404 2.64405 2.64406 2.6441 2.6440 2.6405 2.6447 2.68147 2.68148 2.68147 2.6815 0.0368 0.0368 0.0000 0.03678 Matimba Unit 2 Test 2
GH 9 2.60836 2.60837 2.60837 2.6084 2.6084 2.6049 2.6090 2.66326 2.66338 2.66349 2.6634 0.0544 0.0544 0.0000 0.05438 Matimba Unit 2 Test 3
GH 10 2.62132 2.62131 2.62130 2.6213 2.6213 2.6178 2.6219 2.66510 2.66517 2.66521 2.6652 0.0432 0.0432 0.0000 0.04322 Matimba Unit 2 Test 4
GH 11 2.64727 2.64728 2.64728 2.6473 2.6473 2.6437 2.6479 2.70165 2.70165 2.70164 2.7016 0.0537 0.0537 0.0000 0.05373 Matimba Unit 2 Test 5
GH 12 2.63967 2.63969 2.63968 2.6397 2.6397 2.6362 2.6403 2.72115 2.72129 2.72136 2.7213 0.0809 0.0809 0.0000 0.08095 Matimba Unit 2 Test 6
GH 13 2.63532 2.63532 2.63532 2.6353 2.6353 2.6318 2.6360 2.72986 2.72999 2.73005 2.7300 0.0940 0.0940 0.0000 0.09401 Matimba Unit 2 Test 7
GH 14 2.65940 2.65940 2.65940 2.6594 2.6594 2.6559 2.6600 2.70479 2.70486 2.70488 2.7048 0.0448 0.0448 0.0000 0.04480 Matimba Unit 2 Test 8
GH 15 2.60327 2.60326 2.60327 2.6033 2.6033 2.5998 2.6039 2.64565 2.64570 2.64571 2.6457 0.0418 0.0418 0.0000 0.04179 Matimba Unit 2 Test 9
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60571 2.60982
0.00411
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 275 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GL
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: A
Filter Type & Size: 30x100
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: MTB and MDP Customer: MTB and MDP % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: U1/Aux B1and2 Unit: U1/Aux B1and2 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00017
Date: 2016/10/25 Date: 2016/11/16 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00742
Start Time: 09H59 Start Time: 10H29 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 10H22 End time: 11H00 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970
49.99890 49.99894 49.99895 49.99893 49.99896 49.99898 49.99898 49.99897
Total initial mass = 149.9962 Total Final mass = 149.9960
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 A 2.87605 2.87606 2.87609 2.87607 2.87606 2.87727 2.87736 2.87741 2.87735
REF 2 A 2.84575 2.84584 2.84581 2.84580 2.84580 2.84563 2.84570 2.84568 2.84567
REF 3 A 2.85205 2.85214 2.85216 2.85212 2.85211 2.85146 2.85157 2.85169 2.85157
Total initial mass = 8.5740 8.5740 Total Final mass = 8.5746
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GL 1 2.67177 2.67187 2.67195 2.6719 2.6719 2.6721 2.6763 2.68118 2.68137 2.68146 2.6813 0.0051 0.0051 0.0000 0.00507 Matimba Unit 2 Test 10
GL 2 2.65724 2.65724 2.65725 2.6572 2.6572 2.6574 2.6616 2.66755 2.66777 2.66788 2.6677 0.0061 0.0061 0.0000 0.00611 Matimba Unit 2 Test 11
GL 3 2.68787 2.68788 2.68790 2.6879 2.6879 2.6881 2.6923 2.69681 2.69692 2.69706 2.6969 0.0046 0.0046 0.0000 0.00461 Matimba Unit 2 Test 12
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
7.81713 7.82946
0.01233
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 276 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GG
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: E1
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba U4 Customer: Matimba U4 % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U4 Plant: Matimba U4
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00026
Date: 2016/02/26 Date: 2016/10/11 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.09546
Start Time: 09H23 Start Time: 09H00 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 10H25 End time: 09H22 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.6 Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: W J Bronkhorst Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9975 99.9975 99.9976 99.9975 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972
49.99894 49.99894 49.99895 49.99894 49.99886 49.99889 49.99892 49.99889
Total initial mass = 149.9965 Total Final mass = 149.9961
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 E1 2.71372 2.71372 2.71370 2.71371 2.71371 2.71066 2.71082 2.71082 2.71077
REF 2 E1 2.59970 2.59969 2.59969 2.59969 2.59969 2.59766 2.59764 2.59763 2.59764
REF 3 E1 2.61556 2.61555 2.61555 2.61555 2.61555 2.61285 2.61292 2.61305 2.61294
Total initial mass = 7.9290 7.9289 Total Final mass = 7.9214
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GG 1 2.62815 2.62816 2.62817 2.6282 2.6282 2.6256 2.6298 2.64986 2.65008 2.65022 2.6501 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 0.02027 Matimba Unit 4 T1
GG 2 2.59564 2.59566 2.59565 2.5957 2.5956 2.5932 2.5973 2.60832 2.60852 2.60869 2.6085 0.0113 0.0113 0.0000 0.01125 Matimba Unit 4 T2
GG 3 2.59336 2.59338 2.59335 2.5934 2.5934 2.5909 2.5950 2.60613 2.60612 2.60599 2.6061 0.0111 0.0111 0.0000 0.01111 Matimba Unit 4 T3
GG 4 2.62913 2.62915 2.62916 2.6291 2.6291 2.6266 2.6308 2.64134 2.64127 2.64114 2.6413 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 0.01048 Matimba Unit 4 T4
GG 5 2.60280 2.60281 2.60281 2.6028 2.6028 2.6003 2.6044 2.61457 2.61465 2.61468 2.6146 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 0.01022 Matimba Unit 4 T5
GG 6 2.61755 2.61754 2.61755 2.6175 2.6175 2.6150 2.6192 2.62950 2.62950 2.62941 2.6295 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.01030 Matimba Unit 4 T6
GG 7 2.65759 2.65757 2.65757 2.6576 2.6576 2.6550 2.6592 2.66801 2.66802 2.66803 2.6680 0.0088 0.0088 0.0000 0.00880 Matimba Unit 4 T7
GG 8 2.58293 2.58294 2.58294 2.5829 2.5829 2.5805 2.5845 2.59268 2.59281 2.59289 2.5928 0.0083 0.0083 0.0000 0.00826 Matimba Unit 4 T8
GG 9 2.67698 2.67699 2.67702 2.6770 2.6770 2.6744 2.6787 2.68602 2.68614 2.68627 2.6861 0.0075 0.0075 0.0000 0.00749 Matimba Unit 4 T9
GG 10 2.65101 2.65105 2.65105 2.6510 2.6510 2.6485 2.6527 2.65836 2.65855 2.65868 2.6585 0.0059 0.0059 0.0000 0.00585 Matimba Unit 4 T10
GG 11 2.59713 2.59715 2.59716 2.5971 2.5971 2.5947 2.5988 2.60365 2.60384 2.60388 2.6038 0.0050 0.0050 0.0000 0.00504 Matimba Unit 4 T11
GG 12 2.62091 2.62091 2.62090 2.6209 2.6209 2.6184 2.6225 2.62753 2.62753 2.62749 2.6275 0.0050 0.0050 0.0000 0.00499 Matimba Unit 4 T12
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60571 2.60982
0.00411
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 277 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GF
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C1
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba U5 Customer: Matimba U5 % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U5 Plant: Matimba U5
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00001
Date: 2016/02/24 Date: 2016/10/06 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.11454
Start Time: 14H47 Start Time: 09H52 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 15h41 End time: 10H20 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.7 Pressure (kPa): 81.8 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: W J Bronkhorst Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972
49.99880 49.99880 49.99880 49.99880 49.99885 49.99886 49.99884 49.99885
Total initial mass = 149.9961 Total Final mass = 149.9961
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C1 2.84917 2.84918 2.84917 2.84917 2.84917 2.84644 2.84654 2.84662 2.84653
REF 2 C1 2.86125 2.86126 2.86128 2.86126 2.86126 2.85832 2.85841 2.85850 2.85841
REF 3 C1 2.90795 2.90794 2.90794 2.90794 2.90794 2.90347 2.90358 2.90364 2.90356
Total initial mass = 8.6184 8.6184 Total Final mass = 8.6085
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GF 4 2.58732 2.58733 2.58733 2.5873 2.5873 2.5844 2.5884 2.60420 2.60420 2.60420 2.6042 0.0158 0.0158 0.0000 0.01576 Matimba U5 T4
GF 5 2.57937 2.57936 2.57937 2.5794 2.5794 2.5764 2.5805 2.59250 2.59250 2.59250 2.5925 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 0.01202 Matimba U5 T5
GF 6 2.60082 2.60082 2.60081 2.6008 2.6008 2.5978 2.6019 2.61540 2.61550 2.61560 2.6155 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.01356 Matimba U5 T6
GF 7 2.64676 2.64675 2.64676 2.6468 2.6468 2.6437 2.6479 2.66530 2.66530 2.66540 2.6653 0.0174 0.0174 0.0000 0.01744 Matimba U5 T7
GF 8 2.60702 2.60700 2.60698 2.6070 2.6070 2.6040 2.6081 2.62710 2.62720 2.62730 2.6272 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 0.01908 Matimba U5 T8
GF 9 2.58476 2.58475 2.58476 2.5848 2.5848 2.5818 2.5859 2.60690 2.60680 2.60680 2.6068 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 0.02097 Matimba U5 T9
GF 10 2.64191 2.64193 2.64192 2.6419 2.6419 2.6389 2.6431 2.65820 2.65820 2.65810 2.6582 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 0.01511 Matimba U5 T10
GF 11 2.58508 2.58509 2.58508 2.5851 2.5851 2.5821 2.5862 2.59940 2.59950 2.59950 2.5995 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 0.01327 Matimba U5 T11
GF 12 2.59083 2.59083 2.59085 2.5908 2.5908 2.5879 2.5920 2.60080 2.60080 2.60090 2.6008 0.0089 0.0089 0.0000 0.00888 Matimba U5 T12
GF 13 2.68720 2.68721 2.68721 2.6872 2.6872 2.6841 2.6884 2.70200 2.70200 2.70190 2.7020 0.0136 0.0136 0.0000 0.01360 Matimba U5 T13
GF 14 2.60303 2.60304 2.60305 2.6030 2.6030 2.6001 2.6042 2.61630 2.61630 2.61620 2.6163 0.0121 0.0121 0.0000 0.01211 Matimba U5 T14
GF 15 2.65573 2.65572 2.65570 2.6557 2.6557 2.6527 2.6569 2.66800 2.66800 2.66790 2.6680 0.0111 0.0111 0.0000 0.0111 Matimba U5 T15
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60571 2.60982
0.00411
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 278 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GE
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U4,5,6 Plant: Matimba U4,5,6
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00067
Date: 2016/03/03 Date: 2016/09/23 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.12812
Start Time: 15H24 Start Time: 14H36 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.04464
End time: 15H59 End time: 15H21 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.8 Pressure (kPa): 81.8 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 21 Temperature (°C): 21
Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9977 99.9977 99.9977 99.9977 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971
49.99908 49.99908 49.99909 49.99908 49.99858 49.99874 49.99873 49.99868
Total initial mass = 149.9968 Total Final mass = 149.9958
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C 2.84927 2.84920 2.84920 2.84922 2.84920 2.84516 2.84539 2.84562 2.84539
REF 2 C 2.86164 2.86179 2.86174 2.86172 2.86170 2.85809 2.85820 2.85840 2.85823
REF 3 C 2.90773 2.90761 2.90758 2.90764 2.90762 2.90368 2.90381 2.90394 2.90381
Total initial mass = 8.6186 8.6185 Total Final mass = 8.6075
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GE 3 2.60902 2.60908 2.60891 2.6090 2.6090 2.6056 2.6068 2.60688 2.60682 2.60672 2.6068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000 Blank
GE 10 2.63280 2.63281 2.63282 2.6328 2.6328 2.6294 2.6306 2.63510 2.63530 2.63590 2.6354 0.0048 0.0048 0.0000 0.00484 Matimba U6 T1
GE 11 2.58493 2.58484 2.58480 2.5849 2.5848 2.5815 2.5827 2.58770 2.58790 2.58800 2.5879 0.0052 0.0052 0.0000 0.00519 Matimba U6 T2
GE 12 2.65170 2.65168 2.65170 2.6517 2.6517 2.6483 2.6495 2.65640 2.65640 2.65650 2.6564 0.0070 0.0070 0.0000 0.00697 Matimba U6 T3
GE 13 2.65917 2.65925 2.65931 2.6592 2.6592 2.6558 2.6570 2.66210 2.66220 2.66210 2.6621 0.0051 0.0051 0.0000 0.00513 Matimba U6 T4
GE 14 2.64183 2.64169 2.64161 2.6417 2.6417 2.6383 2.6395 2.64480 2.64480 2.64480 2.6448 0.0053 0.0053 0.0000 0.00531 Matimba U6 T5
GE 15 2.61528 2.61512 2.61505 2.6152 2.6151 2.6118 2.6129 2.61790 2.61810 2.61810 2.6180 0.0051 0.0051 0.0000 0.0051 Matimba U6 T6
GE 3 2.60900 2.60899 2.60564 2.60681 2.60681 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60564 2.60681
0.00116
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.04464
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 279 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GC
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: A
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U 6 Plant: Matimba U 6
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00100
Date: 2016/03/02 Date: 2016/09/26 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.08334
Start Time: 10H03 Start Time: 16H38 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 10H38 End time: 16H42 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.8 Pressure (kPa): 81.8 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9974 99.9974 99.9974 99.9974 99.9980 99.9980 99.9981 99.9980
49.99889 49.99896 49.99696 49.99827 49.99914 49.99912 49.99914 49.99913
Total initial mass = 149.9957 Total Final mass = 149.9972
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 A 2.87798 2.87800 2.87808 2.87802 2.87805 2.87454 2.87461 2.87478 2.87464
REF 2 A 2.84642 2.84656 2.84662 2.84653 2.84656 2.84450 2.84452 2.84457 2.84453
REF 3 A 2.85243 2.85252 2.85244 2.85246 2.85249 2.85073 2.85088 2.85099 2.85087
Total initial mass = 8.5770 8.5771 Total Final mass = 8.5700
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GC 13 2.63379 2.63379 2.63360 2.6337 2.6338 2.6316 2.6357 2.64564 2.64592 2.64592 2.6458 0.0101 0.0101 0.0000 0.01012 Matimba U 6 T7
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60571 2.60982
0.00411
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 280 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GD
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U6 Plant: Matimba U6
Unit: No. 1 Unit: No. 1 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00048
Date: 2016/09/13 Date: 2016/09/13 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.04623
Start Time: 18h14 Start Time: 0 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.15773
End time: 18h32 End time: 0 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Pressure (kPa): 0 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 0 Temperature (°C): 0
Weighed By: SS Diutlwileng Weighed By: WJ Bronkhorst
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9976 99.9974 99.9974 99.9975 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970
49.99889 49.99886 49.99881 49.99885 49.99860 49.99860 49.99860 49.99860
Total initial mass = 149.9963 Total Final mass = 149.9956
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C 2.84908 2.84899 2.84905 2.84904 2.84903 2.84770 2.84770 2.84770 2.84770
REF 2 C 2.86145 2.86139 2.86149 2.86144 2.86143 2.85950 2.85950 2.85950 2.85950
REF 3 C 2.90776 2.90772 2.90757 2.90768 2.90767 2.90690 2.90690 2.90690 2.90690
Total initial mass = 8.6182 8.6181 Total Final mass = 8.6141
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GD 14 2.60715 2.60717 2.60718 2.6072 2.6072 2.6059 2.6101 2.61397 2.61399 2.61400 2.6140 0.0039 0.0039 0.0000 0.00393 Matimba Unit 6 T8
GD 15 2.66139 2.66134 2.66127 2.6613 2.6613 2.6601 2.6643 2.66632 2.66627 2.66620 2.6663 0.0020 0.0020 0.0000 0.0020 Matimba Unit 6 T9
GE 3 2.60907 2.60905 2.60571 2.60982 2.60982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60571 2.60982
0.00411
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.15773
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 281 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GF
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C1
Filter Type & Size: 88R 30x100mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Eskom Customer: Eskom % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Matimba U 6 Plant: Matimba U 6
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00006
Date: 2016/02/24 Date: 2016/09/26 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.18553
Start Time: 14H47 Start Time: 15H44 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.04464
End time: 15h41 End time: 15H50 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 81.7 Pressure (kPa): 81.7 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: W J Bronkhorst Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973
49.99880 49.99880 49.99880 49.99880 49.99890 49.99889 49.99889 49.99889
Total initial mass = 149.9961 Total Final mass = 149.9962
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C1 2.84917 2.84918 2.84917 2.84917 2.84918 2.84563 2.84569 2.84578 2.84570
REF 2 C1 2.86125 2.86126 2.86128 2.86126 2.86127 2.85792 2.85806 2.85821 2.85806
REF 3 C1 2.90795 2.90794 2.90794 2.90794 2.90795 2.93051 2.93061 2.93073 2.93062
Total initial mass = 8.6184 8.6184 Total Final mass = 8.6344
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GF 1 2.65020 2.65019 2.65020 2.6502 2.6502 2.6551 2.6563 2.65703 2.65713 2.65722 2.6571 0.0008 0.0008 0.0000 0.00083 Matimba U6 T10
GF 2 2.65038 2.65039 2.65041 2.6504 2.6504 2.6553 2.6565 2.65797 2.65801 2.65808 2.6580 0.0015 0.0015 0.0000 0.00152 Matimba U6 T11
GF 3 2.60289 2.60291 2.60293 2.6029 2.6029 2.6077 2.6089 2.61703 2.61730 2.61752 2.6173 0.0084 0.0084 0.0000 0.00838 Matimba U6 T12
GE 3 2.60900 2.60899 2.60564 2.60681 2.60681 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
2.60564 2.60681
0.00116
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.04464
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 282 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AV
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: B
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 1 Unit: 1 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00003
Date: 2016/10/12 Date: 2016/11/08 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.01528
Start Time: 15H47 Start Time: 11H38 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 -0.00275
End time: 16H04 End time: 11H43 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82 Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9972 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971 99.9971
49.99873 49.99875 49.99877 49.99875 49.99880 49.99883 49.99885 49.99883
Total initial mass = 149.9959 Total Final mass = 149.9959
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 B 64.26910 64.26910 64.26910 64.26910 64.26912 64.26840 64.26830 64.26830 64.26833
REF 2 B 59.90490 59.90490 59.90500 59.90493 59.90495 59.90500 59.90490 59.90480 59.90490
REF 3 B 59.79460 59.79470 59.79470 59.79467 59.79468 59.79410 59.79410 59.71420 59.76747
Total initial mass = 183.9687 183.9688 Total Final mass = 183.9406
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AV 14 59.72980 59.72980 59.72980 59.7298 59.7298 59.7207 59.7191 59.73730 59.73700 59.73690 59.7371 0.0180 0.0180 0.0000 0.01802 Matimba Unit 1 Test 1
AQ 1 64.13123 64.13113 64.13600 64.13423 64.13423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
192.40799 192.40270
-0.00529
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = -0.00275
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 283 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AQ
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 1 Unit: 1 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00025
Date: 2016/09/06 Date: 2016/11/08 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00794
Start Time: 09H02 Start Time: 11H47 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 -0.00275
End time: 09H11 End time: 12H01 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9970 99.9973 99.9974 99.9972 99.9969 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970
49.99897 49.99896 49.99898 49.99897 49.99886 49.99886 49.99887 49.99886
Total initial mass = 149.9962 Total Final mass = 149.9958
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C 59.83170 59.83160 59.83150 59.83160 59.83145 59.83130 59.83140 59.83150 59.83140
REF 2 C 60.04490 60.00490 60.04500 60.03160 60.03145 60.04490 60.04490 60.04490 60.04490
REF 3 C 59.81340 59.81330 59.81330 59.81333 59.81318 59.81370 59.81360 59.81350 59.81360
Total initial mass = 179.6765 179.6761 Total Final mass = 179.6903
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AQ 8 59.74620 59.74620 59.74610 59.7462 59.7460 59.7508 59.7491 59.75440 59.75460 59.75450 59.7545 0.0054 0.0054 0.0000 0.00538 Matimba Unit 1 Test 2
AQ 9 64.17500 64.17500 64.17510 64.1750 64.1749 64.1800 64.1782 64.18600 64.18580 64.18570 64.1858 0.0076 0.0076 0.0000 0.00763 Matimba Unit 1 Test 3
AQ 10 64.20460 64.20450 64.20450 64.2045 64.2044 64.2095 64.2077 64.21720 64.21710 64.21710 64.2171 0.0094 0.0094 0.0000 0.00943 Matimba Unit 1 Test 4
AQ 11 64.21810 64.21810 64.21820 64.2181 64.2180 64.2231 64.2213 64.22760 64.22760 64.22770 64.2276 0.0063 0.0063 0.0000 0.00633 Matimba Unit 1 Test 5
AQ 12 64.16710 64.16690 64.16690 64.1670 64.1668 64.1719 64.1701 64.17340 64.17330 64.17330 64.1733 0.0032 0.0032 0.0000 0.00320 Matimba Unit 1 Test 6
AQ 13 64.33350 64.33350 64.33350 64.3335 64.3333 64.3384 64.3367 64.34110 64.34110 64.34120 64.3411 0.0045 0.0045 0.0000 0.00445 Matimba Unit 1 Test 7
AQ 14 59.82930 59.82940 59.82950 59.8294 59.8293 59.8340 59.8324 59.83870 59.83870 59.83870 59.8387 0.0063 0.0063 0.0000 0.00634 Matimba Unit 1 Test 8
AQ 15 59.83130 59.83140 59.83160 59.8314 59.8313 59.8360 59.8344 59.83580 59.83580 59.83580 59.8358 0.0014 0.0014 0.0000 0.00141 Matimba Unit 1 Test 9
AQ 1 64.13123 64.13113 64.13600 64.13423 64.13423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
192.40799 192.40270
-0.00529
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = -0.00275
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 284 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AW
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: R
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: MTB/MDP Customer: MTB/MDP % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 2/Auxboiler 123 Unit: 2/Auxboiler 123 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00000
Date: 2016/11/08 Date: 2016/11/11 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00197
Start Time: 11H05 Start Time: 10H14 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 -0.00275
End time: 11H22 End time: 10H32 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Pressure (kPa): 81.9 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9971 99.9971 99.9970 99.9971 99.9969 99.9971 99.9972 99.9971
49.99875 49.99878 49.99880 49.99878 49.99877 49.99878 49.99878 49.99878
Total initial mass = 149.9958 Total Final mass = 149.9958
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 R 59.98930 59.98920 59.98910 59.98920 59.98920 59.99010 59.99010 59.99020 59.99013
REF 2 R 59.75080 59.75080 59.75080 59.75080 59.75080 59.75190 59.75190 59.75180 59.75187
REF 3 R 59.78370 59.78360 59.78350 59.78360 59.78360 59.78530 59.78510 59.78500 59.78513
Total initial mass = 179.5236 179.5236 Total Final mass = 179.5271
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AW 1 64.31200 64.31200 64.31200 64.3120 64.3120 64.3133 64.3115 64.31650 64.31630 64.31610 64.3163 0.0048 0.0048 0.0000 0.00480 Matimba Unit 1 Test 10
AW 2 59.85110 59.85120 59.85130 59.8512 59.8512 59.8524 59.8507 59.85450 59.85450 59.85440 59.8545 0.0037 0.0037 0.0000 0.00373 Matimba Unit 1 Test 11
AW 3 59.72490 59.72470 59.72450 59.7247 59.7247 59.7259 59.7242 59.72780 59.72790 59.72790 59.7279 0.0036 0.0036 0.0000 0.00363 Matimba Unit 1 Test 12
AW 4 59.90990 59.91030 59.91020 59.9101 59.9101 59.9113 59.9097 59.92120 59.92120 59.92110 59.9212 0.0115 0.0115 0.0000 0.01150 Matimba Unit 2 Test 10
AW 5 59.81200 59.81200 59.81200 59.8120 59.8120 59.8132 59.8115 59.81560 59.81560 59.81560 59.8156 0.0041 0.0041 0.0000 0.00407 Matimba Unit 2 Test 11
AW 6 64.37020 64.37020 64.36990 64.3701 64.3701 64.3714 64.3696 64.38540 64.38530 64.38510 64.3853 0.0157 0.0157 0.0000 0.01567 Matimba Unit 2 Test 12
AQ 1 64.13123 64.13113 64.13600 64.13423 64.13423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
192.40799 192.40270
-0.00529
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = -0.00275
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 285 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AU
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: B
Filter Type & Size: 335x263x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 2 Unit: 2 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00003
Date: 2016/10/12 Date: 2016/10/27 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00124
Start Time: 15H23 Start Time: 10H06 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 -0.00275
End time: 15H43 End time: 10H20 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9970 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970 99.9969 99.9970 99.9970 99.9970
49.99874 49.99877 49.99879 49.99877 49.99885 49.99885 49.99884 49.99885
Total initial mass = 149.9958 Total Final mass = 149.9958
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 B 64.26880 64.26880 64.26870 64.26877 64.26879 64.26960 64.26970 64.26980 64.26970
REF 2 B 59.90510 59.90490 59.90490 59.90497 59.90499 59.90560 59.90560 59.90560 59.90560
REF 3 B 59.79470 59.79460 59.79450 59.79460 59.79462 59.79550 59.79540 59.79540 59.79543
Total initial mass = 183.9683 183.9684 Total Final mass = 183.9707
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AU 1 64.27860 64.27870 64.27870 64.2787 64.2787 64.2795 64.2777 64.29720 64.29730 64.29730 64.2973 0.0195 0.0195 0.0000 0.01955 Matimba Unit 2 Test 1
AU 2 64.13150 64.13160 64.13160 64.1316 64.1316 64.1324 64.1306 64.14890 64.14880 64.14870 64.1488 0.0182 0.0182 0.0000 0.01818 Matimba Unit 2 Test 2
AU 3 64.07830 64.07830 64.07830 64.0783 64.0783 64.0791 64.0774 64.09620 64.09620 64.09630 64.0962 0.0189 0.0189 0.0000 0.01888 Matimba Unit 2 Test 3
AU 4 64.09680 64.09680 64.09680 64.0968 64.0968 64.0976 64.0959 64.11190 64.11210 64.11210 64.1120 0.0162 0.0162 0.0000 0.01618 Matimba Unit 2 Test 4
AU 5 64.25730 64.25720 64.25720 64.2572 64.2573 64.2581 64.2563 64.27450 64.27490 64.27510 64.2748 0.0185 0.0185 0.0000 0.01855 Matimba Unit 2 Test 5
AU 6 64.12910 64.12900 64.12900 64.1290 64.1291 64.1298 64.1281 64.15280 64.15270 64.15270 64.1527 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 0.02465 Matimba Unit 2 Test 6
AU 7 64.07060 64.07050 64.07060 64.0706 64.0706 64.0714 64.0696 64.08970 64.08970 64.08970 64.0897 0.0201 0.0201 0.0000 0.02008 Matimba Unit 2 Test 7
AU 8 59.83270 59.83270 59.83270 59.8327 59.8327 59.8335 59.8318 59.84470 59.84470 59.84470 59.8447 0.0129 0.0129 0.0000 0.01288 Matimba Unit 2 Test 8
AU 9 63.82980 63.82980 63.82980 63.8298 63.8298 63.8306 63.8289 63.84450 63.84440 63.84440 63.8444 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.01557 Matimba Unit 2 Test 9
AQ 1 64.13123 64.13113 64.13600 64.13423 64.13423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
192.40799 192.40270
-0.00529
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = -0.00275
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 286 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AT
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: R
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 3 Unit: 3 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00015
Date: 2019/10/03 Date: 2016/10/28 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00583
Start Time: 13H23 Start Time: 11H25 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 -0.00584
End time: 13H38 End time: 11H44 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9970 99.9972 99.9972 99.9971
49.99892 49.99891 49.99890 49.99891 49.99885 49.99885 49.99886 49.99885
Total initial mass = 149.9962 Total Final mass = 149.9960
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 R 59.98980 59.98990 59.98990 59.98987 59.98978 59.99980 59.99980 59.99980 59.99980
REF 2 R 59.75130 59.75140 59.75140 59.75137 59.75128 59.75150 59.75150 59.75150 59.75150
REF 3 R 59.78460 59.78450 59.78450 59.78453 59.78444 59.78460 59.78430 59.78430 59.78440
Total initial mass = 179.5258 179.5255 Total Final mass = 179.5360
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AT 1 59.82490 59.82500 59.82500 59.8250 59.8249 59.8284 59.8249 59.85490 59.85480 59.85480 59.8548 0.0300 0.0300 0.0000 0.02996 Matimba Unit 3 Test 1
AT 2 59.86870 59.86870 59.86870 59.8687 59.8686 59.8721 59.8686 59.89430 59.89430 59.89420 59.8943 0.0257 0.0257 0.0000 0.02566 Matimba Unit 3 Test 2
AT 3 59.97630 59.97640 59.97650 59.9764 59.9763 59.9798 59.9763 60.00680 60.00690 60.00700 60.0069 0.0306 0.0306 0.0000 0.03059 Matimba Unit 3 Test 3
AT 4 59.93260 59.93270 59.93280 59.9327 59.9326 59.9361 59.9326 59.94930 59.94920 59.94900 59.9492 0.0166 0.0166 0.0000 0.01656 Matimba Unit 3 Test 4
AT 5 64.19230 64.19210 64.19220 64.1922 64.1921 64.1958 64.1921 64.21630 64.21610 64.21610 64.2162 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 0.02407 Matimba Unit 3 Test 5
AT 6 59.93790 59.93790 59.93800 59.9379 59.9378 59.9413 59.9378 59.96510 59.96510 59.96510 59.9651 0.0273 0.0273 0.0000 0.02726 Matimba Unit 3 Test 6
AT 7 59.89070 59.89060 59.89060 59.8906 59.8905 59.8940 59.8905 59.89600 59.89600 59.89610 59.8960 0.0055 0.0055 0.0000 0.00549 Matimba Unit 3 Test 7
AT 8 63.92420 63.92410 63.92410 63.9241 63.9240 63.9278 63.9240 63.92720 63.92700 63.92670 63.9270 0.0029 0.0029 0.0000 0.00293 Matimba Unit 3 Test 8
AT 9 64.13790 64.13790 64.13800 64.1379 64.1378 64.1416 64.1378 64.14290 64.14300 64.14310 64.1430 0.0052 0.0052 0.0000 0.00517 Matimba Unit 3 Test 9
AT 10 64.18870 64.18860 64.18860 64.1886 64.1885 64.1923 64.1885 64.19360 64.19360 64.19350 64.1936 0.0050 0.0050 0.0000 0.00503 Matimba Unit 3 Test 10
AT 11 64.27310 64.27310 64.27310 64.2731 64.2730 64.2768 64.2730 64.27790 64.27790 64.27790 64.2779 0.0049 0.0049 0.0000 0.00490 Matimba Unit 3 Test 11
AT 15 64.30720 64.30710 64.31085 64.30710 64.30710 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
192.93256 192.92130
-0.01126
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = -0.00584
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 287 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AS
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 4 Unit: 4 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00063
Date: 2016/10/03 Date: 2016/10/11 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00107
Start Time: 11H09 Start Time: 09H59 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.00007
End time: 11H29 End time: 10H14 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Pressure (kPa): 82 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9968 99.9968 99.9968 99.9968
49.99899 49.99901 49.99901 49.99900 49.99853 49.99856 49.99859 49.99856
Total initial mass = 149.9963 Total Final mass = 149.9954
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C 59.83170 59.83160 59.83160 59.83163 59.83126 59.83160 59.83140 59.83140 59.83147
REF 2 C 60.04480 60.04480 60.04480 60.04480 60.04442 60.04450 60.04460 60.04460 60.04457
REF 3 C 59.81360 59.81350 59.81340 59.81350 59.81312 59.81350 59.81360 59.81360 59.81357
Total initial mass = 179.6899 179.6888 Total Final mass = 179.6907
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AS 1 64.28140 64.28140 64.28140 64.2814 64.2810 64.2817 64.2817 64.28714 64.28710 64.28710 64.2871 0.0054 0.0054 0.0000 0.00539 Matimba Unit 4 T4
AS 2 64.15890 64.15900 64.15900 64.1590 64.1586 64.1593 64.1593 64.17305 64.17330 64.17320 64.1732 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 0.01389 Matimba Unit 4 T5
AS 3 59.89220 59.89200 59.89190 59.8920 59.8917 59.8923 59.8923 59.90701 59.90700 59.90700 59.9070 0.0147 0.0147 0.0000 0.01466 Matimba Unit 4 T6
AS 4 64.15240 64.15240 64.15240 64.1524 64.1520 64.1527 64.1527 64.16867 64.16890 64.16880 64.1688 0.0161 0.0161 0.0000 0.01606 Matimba Unit 4 T7
AS 5 59.80580 59.80570 59.80560 59.8057 59.8053 59.8060 59.8060 59.81823 59.81830 59.81830 59.8183 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 0.01227 Matimba Unit 4 T8
AS 6 64.31290 64.31290 64.31300 64.3129 64.3125 64.3132 64.3133 64.32856 64.32880 64.32910 64.3288 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.01556 Matimba Unit 4 T9
AS 7 64.06930 64.06930 64.06920 64.0693 64.0689 64.0696 64.0696 64.07971 64.07980 64.07960 64.0797 0.0101 0.0101 0.0000 0.01011 Matimba Unit 4 T10
AS 8 59.96800 59.96810 59.96810 59.9681 59.9677 59.9683 59.9684 59.97893 59.97900 59.97890 59.9789 0.0106 0.0106 0.0000 0.01057 Matimba Unit 4 T11
AS 9 64.26860 64.26850 64.26850 64.2685 64.2681 64.2688 64.2689 64.27671 64.27680 64.27670 64.2767 0.0079 0.0079 0.0000 0.00787 Matimba Unit 4 T12
AS 10 59.77440 59.77450 59.77450 59.7745 59.7741 59.7747 59.7748 59.78049 59.78060 59.78050 59.7805 0.0058 0.0058 0.0000 0.00576 Matimba Unit 4 T13
AS 11 59.80360 59.80340 59.80340 59.8035 59.8031 59.8037 59.8038 59.80855 59.80870 59.80850 59.8086 0.0048 0.0048 0.0000 0.00481 Matimba Unit 4 T14
AS 12 64.05400 64.05400 64.05400 64.0540 64.0536 64.0543 64.0543 64.05957 64.05960 64.05960 64.0596 0.0053 0.0053 0.0000 0.00526 Matimba Unit 4 T15
AR 15 59.85500 59.85495 59.85603 59.85607 59.85607 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
179.56808 179.56820
0.00012
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.00007
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 288 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AR
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: C
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 5 Unit: 5 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 -0.00008
Date: 2016/10/03 Date: 2016/10/03 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 0.00179
Start Time: 10H20 Start Time: 15H20 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.00007
End time: 10H34 End time: 15H34 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9972 99.9973 99.9973 99.9973 99.9970 99.9972 99.9972 99.9971
49.99884 49.99882 49.99883 49.99883 49.99884 49.99884 49.99885 49.99884
Total initial mass = 149.9961 Total Final mass = 149.9960
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 C 59.82970 59.82970 59.82960 59.82967 59.82962 59.83100 59.83090 59.83090 59.83093
REF 2 C 60.04360 60.04340 60.04330 60.04343 60.04339 60.04400 60.04400 60.04410 60.04403
REF 3 C 59.81190 59.81190 59.81180 59.81187 59.81182 59.81290 59.81290 59.81300 59.81293
Total initial mass = 179.6850 179.6848 Total Final mass = 179.6880
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AR 1 64.08420 64.08420 64.08420 64.0842 64.0841 64.0853 64.0853 64.08930 64.08950 64.08950 64.0894 0.0041 0.0041 0.0000 0.0041 Matimba Unit 5 T4
AR 2 64.10320 64.10310 64.10320 64.1032 64.1031 64.1043 64.1043 64.10710 64.10720 64.10720 64.1072 0.0029 0.0029 0.0000 0.0029 Matimba Unit 5 T5
AR 3 64.05440 64.05410 64.05400 64.0542 64.0541 64.0553 64.0553 64.05830 64.05820 64.05810 64.0582 0.0029 0.0029 0.0000 0.0029 Matimba Unit 5 T6
AR 4 59.89950 59.89950 59.89940 59.8995 59.8994 59.9005 59.9005 59.90320 59.90300 59.90300 59.9031 0.0025 0.0025 0.0000 0.0025 Matimba Unit 5 T7
AR 5 59.79310 59.79290 59.79280 59.7929 59.7929 59.7940 59.7940 59.79810 59.79810 59.79810 59.7981 0.0041 0.0041 0.0000 0.0041 Matimba Unit 5 T8
AR 6 64.09580 64.09560 64.09550 64.0956 64.0956 64.0967 64.0968 64.09820 64.09820 64.09820 64.0982 0.0014 0.0014 0.0000 0.0014 Matimba Unit 5 T9
AR 7 63.96300 63.96310 63.96310 63.9631 63.9630 63.9642 63.9642 63.96800 63.96810 63.96800 63.9680 0.0038 0.0038 0.0000 0.0038 Matimba Unit 5 T10
AR 8 59.85740 59.85760 59.85760 59.8575 59.8575 59.8586 59.8586 59.86090 59.86080 59.86080 59.8608 0.0022 0.0022 0.0000 0.0022 Matimba Unit 5 T11
AR 9 59.85860 59.85850 59.85850 59.8585 59.8585 59.8596 59.8596 59.86510 59.86510 59.86520 59.8651 0.0055 0.0055 0.0000 0.0055 Matimba Unit 5 T12
AR 10 64.21390 64.21380 64.21370 64.2138 64.2137 64.2149 64.2149 64.21790 64.21780 64.21770 64.2178 0.0029 0.0029 0.0000 0.0029 Matimba Unit 5 T13
AR 11 63.95390 63.95390 63.95390 63.9539 63.9538 63.9550 63.9550 63.95970 63.95970 63.95960 63.9597 0.0046 0.0046 0.0000 0.0046 Matimba Unit 5 T14
AR 12 64.15530 64.15510 64.15510 64.1552 64.1551 64.1563 64.1563 64.15910 64.15880 64.15890 64.1589 0.0026 0.0026 0.0000 0.0026 Matimba Unit 5 T15
AR 15 59.85500 59.85495211 59.85602501 59.85606667 59.85606667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
179.56808 179.56820
0.00012
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.00007
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 289 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label AP
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: R
Filter Type & Size: 335x262x203mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 4,5,6 Unit: 4,5,6 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00031
Date: 2016/09/06 Date: 2016/09/26 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.00039
Start Time: 14H38 Start Time: 10H58 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.00547
End time: 14H56 End time: 11H14 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.3 Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9969 99.9969 99.9969 99.9969 99.9971 99.9972 99.9972 99.9972
49.99864 49.99865 49.99867 49.99865 49.99884 49.99886 49.99887 49.99886
Total initial mass = 149.9956 Total Final mass = 149.9960
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 R 59.98970 59.98970 59.98980 59.98973 59.98992 59.98960 59.98950 59.98960 59.98957
REF 2 R 59.75120 59.75110 59.75120 59.75117 59.75135 59.75180 59.75180 59.75170 59.75177
REF 3 R 59.78450 59.78470 59.78460 59.78460 59.78479 59.78460 59.78460 59.78460 59.78460
Total initial mass = 179.5255 179.5261 Total Final mass = 179.5254
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
AP 7 64.20570 64.20560 64.20560 64.2056 64.2058 64.2056 64.2091 64.21040 64.21020 64.21030 64.2103 0.0012 0.0012 0.0000 0.00120 Matimba U6 T1
AP 8 59.74670 59.74680 59.74680 59.7468 59.7470 59.7467 59.7500 59.75130 59.75130 59.75130 59.7513 0.0013 0.0013 0.0000 0.00131 Matimba U6 T2
AP 9 59.86100 59.86110 59.86110 59.8611 59.8613 59.8610 59.8643 59.86610 59.86590 59.86600 59.8660 0.0017 0.0017 0.0000 0.00170 Matimba U6 T3
AP 10 64.36900 64.36930 64.36930 64.3692 64.3694 64.3692 64.3727 64.37500 64.37590 64.37580 64.3756 0.0029 0.0029 0.0000 0.00289 Matimba U6 T4
AP 11 64.31150 64.31140 64.31130 64.3114 64.3116 64.3114 64.3149 64.31760 64.31770 64.31770 64.3177 0.0028 0.0028 0.0000 0.00279 Matimba U6 T5
AP 12 63.91660 63.91670 63.91680 63.9167 63.9169 63.9167 63.9202 63.92100 63.92100 63.92100 63.9210 0.0008 0.0008 0.0000 0.00085 Matimba U6 T6
AP 13 59.73750 59.73730 59.73720 59.7373 59.7375 59.7373 59.7406 59.74110 59.74140 59.74150 59.7413 0.0008 0.0008 0.0000 0.00077 Matimba U6 T7
AP 14 59.81130 59.81100 59.81100 59.8111 59.8113 59.8111 59.8143 59.81540 59.81550 59.81570 59.8155 0.0012 0.0012 0.0000 0.00120 Matimba U6 T8
AP 15 59.82190 59.82200 59.82190 59.8219 59.8221 59.8219 59.8252 59.82600 59.82600 59.82600 59.8260 0.0008 0.0008 0.0000 0.0008 Matimba U6 T9
AP 1 64.80770 64.80790 64.80765 64.81120 64.81120 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
194.42296 194.43360
0.01064
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.00547
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 290 of 294
Filter Mass Sheet
Filters
Label GR-AN
Number 1 to 15
Reference Filters: R
Filter Type & Size: 335x626x203mm
Initial Weighing Final Weighing
Customer: Matimba Customer: Matimba % Moisture in Dust from Lab Result = % 0.00000
Plant: Stack Plant: Stack
Unit: 6 Unit: 6 Correction from Reference Masses (%) = K1 0.00573
Date: 2016/09/06 Date: 2016/09/26 Correction for Moisture in Filters (%) = K2 -0.01067
Start Time: 13H25 Start Time: 11H17 Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = K3 0.00547
End time: 13H47 End time: 12H21 Correction for Moisture in Dust (%) = K4 0.00000
Pressure (kPa): 82.2 Pressure (kPa): 82.1 Mass ofDust in Rinse (g) = RM From Rinse Sheet
Temperature (°C): 19 Temperature (°C): 19
Weighed By: SSD Weighed By: SSD
Average Average
1 2 3 Initial 1 2 3 Final
99.9975 99.9977 99.9978 99.9977 99.9975 99.9975 99.9976 99.9975
49.99000 49.99040 49.99080 49.99040 49.99915 49.99912 49.99910 49.99912
Total initial mass = 149.9881 Total Final mass = 149.9967
Average K1 Average
1 2 3 Initial g 1 2 3 Final
REF 1 R 59.98990 59.98980 59.98990 59.98987 59.99330 59.99050 59.99050 59.99040 59.99047
REF 2 R 59.75170 59.75150 59.75130 59.75150 59.75492 59.75170 59.75180 59.75180 59.75177
REF 3 R 59.78440 59.78440 59.78430 59.78437 59.78779 59.78490 59.78490 59.78490 59.78490
Total initial mass = 179.5257 179.5360 Total Final mass = 179.5169
Preliminary *Final
Dust Correction Correction Dust Comments
Average K1 K2 K3 Average Masses K4 K5 Masses
1 2 3 Initial g g g 1 2 3 Final g g g g
GR-AN 8 63.81550 63.81550 63.81570 63.8156 63.8192 63.8124 63.8159 63.81790 63.81790 63.81790 63.8179 0.0020 0.0020 0.0000 0.00200 Matimba U6 T10
GR-AN 9 59.88890 59.88890 59.88880 59.8889 59.8923 59.8859 59.8892 59.89110 59.89110 59.89110 59.8911 0.0019 0.0019 0.0000 0.00192 Matimba U6 T11
GR-AN 10 64.32890 64.32920 64.32910 64.3291 64.3328 64.3259 64.3294 64.33050 64.33060 64.33070 64.3306 0.0012 0.0012 0.0000 0.00120 Matimba U6 T12
AP 1 64.80770 64.80790 64.80765 64.81120 64.81120 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Blank
194.42296 194.43360
0.01064
Correction from Blank Filter Mass(%) = 0.00547
50g
Filter Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
Reference Initials Finals
Masses
100g
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 291 of 294
Appendix No. 9
Calibration Certificates
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 292 of 294
List of Instrumentation Calibration Certificates
Instrument Certificate No. Range Calibration Date Slope & Intercept Lab Accreditation
Pressure (1242) (B) 1608P6588-2 0 to 130 kpa 31st August 2016 1.0003 UM SANAS
(1242) (B) -0.3470 306/205
Pressure (AT) (VG) 1608P6588-3 -40 to 0 kPa 31st August 2016 1.0515 UM SANAS
(AT) (VG) 0.2948 306/205
Pressure (AT) (S) 1608P6588-1A 0 to 5 kpa 31st August 2016 1.0117 UM SANAS
(AT) (S) -0.0011 306/205
Pressure (AT) (O) SF 0.2 1608P6588-1B 0 to 0.47 kpa 31st August 2016 0.9650 UM SANAS
(AT) (O) SF 0.2 0.0016 306/205
Pressure (AT) (O) SF 1.0 1608P6588-1C 0 to 0.22 kpa 31st August 2016 0.9988 UM SANAS
(AT) (O) SF 1.0 -0.0001 306/205
Temperature (AT) (G) 1608T6588-5 0 to 300 °C 31st August 2016 1.0043 UM SANAS
(AT) (G) -0.7857 306/205
Temperature (AT) (O) 1608T6588-6 0 to 50 °C 31st August 2016 1.0413 UM SANAS
(AT) (Orifice Temp) 0.3554 306/205
Flow L58129 10 to 50 l/m 30th July 2016 1.0001 TS NIST
62577336 0.0000 L2347.01
Orifice calibration Box AT 20160901 10 to 50 l/m 1st September 2016 0.0072 SL NIST
Box AT 0.6372 Box AT 20160901
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 293 of 294
Instrument Certificate No. Range Calibration Date Slope & Intercept Lab Accreditation
Pressure (61195) (B) 1509P5970-7 75 to 130 kpa 09 September 2015 1.0100 UM SANAS
(61195) (B) -0.7334 306/205
Pressure (CT) (VG) 1509P5970-1 -25 to 0 kPa 09 September 2015 1.0242 UM SANAS
(CT) (VG) -0.4178 306/205
Pressure (CT) (S) 1509P597-4 0 to 5 kpa 09 September 2015 1.0076 UM SANAS
(CT) (S) 0.0001 306/205
Pressure (CT )(V) SF 0.2 1509P5970-3 0 to 0.0.45 kpa 09 September 2015 0.9113 UM SANAS
(CT )(V) SF 0.2 -0.0002 306/205
Pressure (CT) (O) SF 0.2 1509P5970-2 0 to 0.45 kpa 09 September 2015 0.9135 UM SANAS
(CT) (O) SF 0.2 0.0017 306/205
TemperCTure (CT) (G) 1509T5970-6 0 to 300 °C 09 September 2015 0.9978 UM SANAS
(CT) (G) -0.3896 306/205
Temperature (CT) (O) 1509T5970-5 0 to 50 °C 09 September 2015 1.0290 UM SANAS
(CT) (Orifice Temp) 0.0461 306/205
Temperature (CT) (Amb) 1509T5970-5 0 to 50 °C 10 September 2015 1.0017 UM SANAS
(CT) (Amb) -0.2432 306/205
Flow Box CT 20151124 10 to 50 l/m 24th November 2015 1.0000 SL NIST
62577293 0.0000 Box ET 20151124 (14019633)
Orifice calibration Box CT 20151124 10 to 50 l/m 24th November 2015 -0.0242 SL NIST
Box CT 0.7351 Box AT 20151124
# Matimba Power Station Units No 1 to 6 Correlation Aug & Sep 2014 Report No. RSL229 Page 294 of 294
Instrument Certificate No. Range Calibration Date Slope & Intercept Lab Accreditation
Pressure (1405) (B) 1608P6588-4 0 to 130 kpa 31st August 2016 1.0009 UM SANAS
(1405) (B) -0.6368 306/205
Pressure (DT) (VG) 1511P6093-10 -80 to 0 kPa 17th November 2015 0.9900 UM SANAS
(DT) (VG) -0.1600 306/205
Pressure (DT) (S) 1511P6093-8 0 to 5 kpa 13th November 2015 0.9992 UM SANAS
(DT) (S) 0.0074 306/205
Pressure (DT )(V) SF 0.2 1511P6093-7 0.001 12 November 2015 0.9897 UM SANAS
(DT )(V) SF 0.2 kPa 0.0009 306/205
Pressure (DT) (V) SF 0.1 1511P6093-7 0.001 12 November 2015 0.9897 UM SANAS
(DT) (V) SF 0.1 kPa 0.0009 306/205
Pressure (DT) (V) SF 1.0 1511P6093-7 0.001 12 November 2015 0.9897 UM SANAS
(DT) (V) SF 1.0 kPa 0.0009 306/205
Pressure (DT) (O) SF 0.2 1511P6093-9 0.001 17 November 2015 0.9926 UM SANAS
(DT) (O) SF 0.2 kPa -0.0011 306/205
Pressure (DT) (O) SF 1.0 1511P6093-9 0.001 17 November 2015 0.9926 UM SANAS
(DT) (O) SF 1.0 kPa -0.0011 306/205
Temperature (DT) (G) 1511P6093-11 0 to 350 °C 14th November 2015 0.9987 UM SANAS
(DT) (G) 0.5799 306/205
Temperature (DT) (O) 1511P6093-13 0 to 50 °C 14th November 2015 1.0279 UM SANAS
(DT) (Orifice Temp) -0.3032 306/205
Temperature (DT) (Amb) 1511T6093-14 °C 18th November 2015 1.0256 UM SANAS
(DT) (Amb) 22.8 0.0011 306/205