matching needs of older people with health care management … · 2003-05-07 · management tools...
TRANSCRIPT
Matching Needs of Older
People with Health Care
Management Tools
Prof. Réjean Hébert, MD MPhilResearch Centre on AgingUniversité de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
Programme de
recherche sur
l’intégration des
services de maintien
de l’autonomie
Programme of
Research to Integrate
the Services for the
Maintenance of
Autonomy
PRISMA is funded by :
The Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
and the following agencies :
. Five Regional Health and Social Services Authorities
(Estrie, Mauricie – Centre du Québec, Laval,
Montérégie, Québec)
. Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services
. Quebec Health Research Foundation (FRSQ)
. Quebec Geronto-Geriatrics Research Network
. Sherbrooke Geriatric University Institute
PRISMA
Integrated Network
Operationnalization
Development of Network
Support Tools
Iso-SMAF Profiles
PRISMA-7
Computerized Clinical Chart
Evaluation
Methods
Development
- satisfaction
- empowerment
- quality of services
- economic evaluation
- continuity indicators
- implementation evaluation
Experimental implementation and impact evaluation
. Bois-Francs Project
. Estrie Project
Integrated Network of Services
• Coordination between services
• Single point of entry
• Case-management
• Individualized Service Plan
• Unique assessment tool with a Casemix
system
• Information tool (Computerised Chart)
Assessment Problems
• Multiple entry points
• Services determined by
the provider rather than
the needs
• Multiple redundant
assessments (different
tools)
• Information sharing
• Partial response to the
needs
System « schizophrenia »
Needs assessment
Services prescription
Resources allocation
Follow-up and quality assessment
Data collection
Budget allocation
Accountability
Clinical path Management path
Reconciliating
clinical and management
Needs assessment
Services prescription
Resources allocation
Follow-up and quality assessment
Data collection
Budget allocation
Accountability
Clinical path Management path
Advantages
• Avoid redondant evaluation
• Data collection for management less fakable
• Accountability and quality assessment are
more consistent
SMAF
• Système de Mesure de l’Autonomie Fonctionnelle(Functional Autonomy Measurement System)
• Developed according to the WHO Classification
of disabilities
• 29 items on a 5-point scale– 0: autonomous– -0.5: with difficulty– -1: need supervision– -2: need help– -3: dependent
Items of the SMAF
• Activities of Daily Living
– eating
– washing
– dressing
– grooming
– urinary continence
– fecal continence
– using the bathroom
• Mobility
– transfers
– walking outside
– walking outside
– donning a prosthesis & orthesis
– propelling a wheelchair
– negociating stairs
Items of the SMAF (suite)
• Communication
– vision
– hearing
– speaking
• Mental functions
– memory
– orientation
– judgement
– behaviour
• Instrumental Activities of Daily
Living
– housekeeping
– preparing meals
– shopping
– doing the laundry
– using the telephone
– using public transportation
– taking medications
– managing the budget
SMAFReliability & Responsiveness
• Test-retest reliability (n=39)
– ICC= 0.95
• Inter-rater reliability (n=45)
– ICC= 0.96
• Minimal Metrically Detectable Change (measurement
error)
– 5 points and over
• Responsiveness (n = 80)
– Guyatt index: 14.5
(FIM: 13.7; Barthel: 12.8)
SMAF
Validity• Content
– WHO Theoritical framework
– Consultations with experts
• Construct
– Correlation with nursing time
• r=0.92 (n=1997)
– Correlation with cost
• r=0.75 (n=1997)
– Discrimination between institutions
– Correlation with other func. scales
• FIM: r= 0.94
• Barthel: r= 0.92 (n= 80)
Total SMAF score
100806040200
Re
qu
ire
d n
urs
ing
tim
e (
ho
urs
/da
y)
8
6
4
2
1
,8
,6
,4
,2 Rsq = 0,8504
Correlation with nursing care
time
Distribution of SMAF scores
SMAF score (/3)
3.02.52.01.51.0.50.0
ADL
Mobility
Communication
Mental Functions
IADL
Home-dwelling
Intermediate facilities
Nursing homes
Cost associated with
disabilities (n=1345)
Total SMAF scoreTotal SMAF score
100806040200
To
tal
To
tal c
os
t c
os
t ( (C
an
Ca
n$
/$
/ da
yd
ay))
400
200
100
80
60
40
20
10
Type ofType of setting setting
nursing homenursing home
RsqRsq = 0,6811 = 0,6811
intermediateintermediate
RsqRsq = 0,1529 = 0,1529
home-home-dwellingdwelling
RsqRsq = 0,5479 = 0,5479
150
70
$80
ISO-SMAF Profiles(Dubuc et al, 2001)
• Case-mix classification system
– RUG-type
• Developed by Cluster analysis (n=1997) and
expert consultation
• Validation– internal: split samples– external: discrimination of nursing care time and
costs
• 14 groups
PROBLEMS IN INSTRUMENTAL
ACTIVITES OF DAILY LIVING ONLY
PREDOMINANT ALTERATIONS
IN MOBILITY FUNCTIONS
HELP IN MOBILITY
BEDRIDDEN AND DEPENDENCY IN ADL
PREDOMINAN T ALTERATIONS
IN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS
MIXED ALTERATIONS
MOBILITY + COGNITIVE
Autonomous (0)
Difficult ies (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
Difficulties
ADL MOBCOM MF IADL
SupervisionADL MOB COM MF IADL
Help
ADL MOB COM MF IADL
Autonomous ADL
ADL MOBCOM MF IADL
Difficulties ADL
Without incontinence
With incontinence(Majors behavioral problems)
ADL
ADL
MOB
MOB
COM
COM
MF
MF
IADL
IADL
Moderate + difficulties ADL
Severe + difficulties ADL
Severe + supervision mobil ity
Severe cognitive impaiment
Severe + help ADL(walke independently, behavioral problems)
Very severe cognitive impaiment(moderate behavioral problems)
ADL
ADL
ADL
ADL
ADL
ADL
MOB
MOB
MOB
MOB
MOB
MOB
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
MF
IADL
IADL
IADL
IADL
IADL
IADL
Help ADL
ADL
ADL
MOB
MOB
COM
COM
MF
MF
IADL
IADL
49,0
9
59,0
12
23,0
4
20,0
13,5
2
9,0
1
32,0
6
59,0
11
52,0
10
43,0
8
74,0
14
65,5
13
39,0
7
29,0
5
3
PROBLEMS IN INSTRUMENTAL
ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING ONLY
DifficultiesADLMOBCOMMF IADL
Supervision
ADLMOBCOM MF IADL
Help
ADLMOBCOM MF IADL20,0
3
13,5
2
9,0
Autonomous (0)
Difficulties (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
PREDOMINANT ALTERATIONS
IN MOBILITY FUNCTIONS
Autonomous ADL
ADL MOBCOM MF IADL
Difficulties ADL
ADLMOBCOM MF IADL
Help ADL
ADL MOBCOM MF IADL
49,0
9
23,0
4
32,0
6
Autonomous (0)
Difficulties (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
PREDOMINANT ALTERATIONS
IN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS
Moderate + difficulties ADL
Severe + difficulties ADL
Severe + supervision mobility
Severe + help ADL(walke independently, behavioral problems)
ADL
ADL
ADL
ADL
MOB
MOB
MOB
MOB
COM
COM
COM
COM
MF
MF
MF
MF
IADL
IADL
IADL
IADL
52,0
10
43,0
8
39,0
7
29,0
5
Autonomous (0)
Difficulties (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
HELP IN MOBILITY
Without incontinence
With incontinence
ADLMOBCOM MF IADL
ADLMOBCOM MF IADL
59,0
12
59,0
11
Autonomous (0)
Difficulties (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
BEDRIDDEN AND DEPENDENCY IN ADL
Severe cognitive impaiment
Very severe cognitive impaiment(moderate behavioral problems)
ADL
ADL
MOB
MOB
COM
COM
MF
MF
IADL
IADL
74,0
14
65,5
13
Autonomous (0)
Difficulties (0,5)
Supervision (1)
Help (2)
Dependence (3)
Legend
ISO-SMAF Profiles
• Functions:
– Service prescription: admission criteria
– Monitoring
– Management of resources
– Financing
4, 6 and 9
11, 12, 13 and 14
1, 2 and 3
5, 7, 8 and 10
Instrumental activities daily living
Mobility
Mental functions
Mixed and heavy disabilities
100%
40%10%35%15%
Profile of a LTC facility(Tousignant et al. Age and Ageing, 2003)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
IUGS
profil 1
profil 2
profil 3
profil 4
profil 6
profil 9
profil 5
profil 7
profil 8
profil 10
profil 11
profil 12
profil 13
profil 14
MobilityIADL Mental Mixed
Distribution ISO-SMAF profiles of a LTC facility
Distribution of ISO-SMAF profiles of a LTC facility
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Carrefour santé du Granit
(N=116)
CLSC-CH-CHSLD MRC
Asbestos (N=96)
CLSC-CHSLD Haut-St-François
(N=100)
Carrefour sss du Val-St-
François
Carrefour sss CLSC-CHSLD
MRC Coaticook (N=89)
CLSC- CHH Memphrémagog
(N=130)
La Maison Blanche de North
Hatley Inc. (N=60)
Centre d'accueil Shermont Inc.
(N=51)
Maison Reine-Marie Inc. (N=48)
CHSLD l'Estriade (N=379)
IUGS (N=386)
Région de l'Estrie (N=1590)
profil 1
profil 3
profil 4
profil 6
profil 9
profil 5
profil 7
profil 8
profil 10
profil 11
profil 12
profil 13
profil 14
MobilityIADL Mental Mixed
Standard budget
(ISOSMAF-based)
Profile 3 :
$ 68.48
Profile 4 :
$ 100.74
Profile 5 :
$ 78.42
Profile 6 :
$ 90.89
Profile 7 :
$ 98.78
Profile 8 :
$ 114.96
Profile 9 :
$ 147.76
Profile 10 :
$ 129.70
Profil e11 :
$ 159.02
Profile 12 :
$ 144.81
Profile 13 :
$ 169.63
Profile 14 :
$ 183.19
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
IUGS
profil 1
profil 2
profil 3
profil 4
profil 6
profil 9
profil 5
profil 7
profil 8
profil 10
profil 11
profil 12
profil 13
profil 14
10 profiles 7 � $ 98.78 $
50 profiles 9 � $ 147.76 $
150 profiles 13 � $ 169.63 $
Le budget standard ISO-SMAF et le budget disponible
présenté par établissement
18 661 178 $
14 610 327 $
2 389 823 $
1 937 723 $
2 201 419 $
6 759 347 $
5 149 136 $
5 548 173 $
8 100 285 $
9 669 835 $
4 428 917 $
22 773 450 $
21 692 976 $
2 782 931 $
2 662 467 $
2 242 907 $
7 991 441 $
6 784 084 $
6 726 120 $
9 378 250 $
12 851 823 $
5 373 118 $
- $ 5 000 000 $ 10 000 000
$
15 000 000
$
20 000 000
$
25 000 000
$
IUGS
CHSLD Estriade
Centre d'accueil
Shermont Inc.
Maison Reine-Marie Inc.
Maison Blanche de North
Hatley
Carrefour santé du
Granit
CLSC - CHSLD du Haut-
St-François
CLSC, CH et CHSLD
MRC d'Asbestos
Carrefour s.s.s. du Val
St-François
CLSC - CHH
Memphrémagog
Carr. s.s.s. CLSC-
CHSLD Coaticook
Budget théorique standard ISO-SMAF
Budget disponible
• ISO-SMAF-based funding
• Traditional funding
Pourcentages des besoins comblés
par le budget standard ISO-SMAF par rapport au budget disponible
présentés par établissement
82%
67%
86%
73%
98%
85%
76%
82%
86%
75%
82%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
IUGS
CHSLD Estriade
Centre d'accueil Shermont
Inc.
Maison Reine-Marie Inc.
Maison Blanche de North
Hatley
Carrefour santé du Granit
CLSC - CHSLD du Haut-St-
François
CLSC, CH et CHSLD MRC
d'Asbestos
Carrefour s.s.s. du Val St-
François
CLSC - CHH
Memphrémagog
Carr. s.s.s. CLSC-CHSLD
Coaticook
Budget standard ISO-SMAF
Budget disponible
• ISO-SMAF-based funding
• Traditional funding
Computerized clinical chart(Tourigny et al, 2002)
• SIGG (Système d’information géronto-
gériatrique)
• Version 3.0
• Implemented in 2 regions as part of an
integrated network
• Continuous monitoring of clients
• linked to administrative data base
Conclusion
• Reconciliate clinical and management needs
• Decrease assessment burden for clients,
managers and clinicians
• Continuous monitoring of needs– prescription of services
– resources allocation
– fair financing
– accountability
– planning
www.prisma-qc.ca