master studio

Studio - Joint Master of Architecture - Bern University of Applied Sciences Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineer - Burgdorf Switzerland

MASTER STUDIO

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL / BIENNE

FALL 2014

DOCUMENTATION

PROFESSORS URSULA STCHELI & BEAT MATHYS

MARKUS ZIMMERMANN

5679

10-1112-1314-4950-51

5355

IntroductionAim / MethodSituationHigh Concept - Low Tech / Short ExerciceShort Exercise Film SketchesSituationStudent works Fall Semester 2014Student works Fall Semester 2013, Spring Semester 2014ConclusionImprint

Studio - Joint Master of ArchitectureBern University of Applied Sciences Architecture, Wood and Civil EngineeringBurgdorf Switzerland

Ursula Stcheli, Beat Mathys, Architects ETH BSA, Bern Zurich - Professors Bern University of Applied SciencesMarkus Zimmermann, Architect ETH, Research Associate

Above: Inside space, Nisl GygaxFront Picture: Film still Patrick Rieder

Master Studio Fall 2014

5


4

INTRODUCTION

Visualization Nils Gygax,

INTRODUCTION

I, You, We

To design ones own habitat, as in our case, involves both opportunities and risks. On the one hand, it is great to mould our own needs directly in architecture. On the other hand, there is the architects obligation towards a more comprehensive view: urban planning and architecture form a necessary and essential unity in design as well as constructive development. Our residence seminar will draw its energy from this overlap of ones own, even obsessive or experimental desire for a tem-poral collective and its very long term realisation, with relevance to urban planning.

We will work with references and concepts. Only the intersection of both areas is promising for our concept of architecture. Jean-Luc Go-dard, French director of la Nouvelle Vague, has tersely described these and similar situations of creative freedom in Introduction to a True History of Cinema and Television (Paris 1980, Editions Albatros): This has been my rule do what you can and not what you want. To do what you want, start with what you can. Do what you want out of what you have. And certainly do not dream the impossible (page 24 in the German edition, Fischer Cinema).

Outside Rendering

Student: NILS GYGAX

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL/BIENNEMaster Studio, Fall 2014

Final Review


7


6

AIM

Transitions and public elements

We are interested mainly in space and particularly in the transition from public/collective to private spaces at a time when public space is being diminished and will maybe need to be incorporated more di-rectly into the buildings. Students will thus get to know the value of ar-chitectonic connecting elements that can be used collectively in a wide variety of ways, such as pergolas, courtyards, porticos, terraces, lobbies, stairs, projections or arcades or simple alcoves. Complementing the programme of approx. 300 rooms with a cinema, bars, a concert venue and an exhibition space will result in a sort of institutional house with a very high added value for the cultural revival of the whole city that, due to the permanent flux of residents, needs to stand like a solid rock in the turbulent waters of Biel/Bienne.

In this context, the question of appropriate monumentality in the mo-dern sense is also apposite: a residence for students exerts a certain ap-peal and constitutes an island of intellectual freedom, social exchange and experimental pleasure.

METHOD

We will develop a new method for using space and film (with audio) as design instrument. The filmmaker and musician Christof Mathis from Zurich will explore this method with us in an experimental manner. Students will thus study an extension to the usual media of architecto-nic design and communication. The aim of the cinematic work is first and foremost to specify aspects of the exploration of space and not to serve as an end in itself.

SITUATION

The situation and the size of the perimeter in the Schnyder-Areal in Biel/Bienne allows a dense yet manifold interpretation of the task. We will essentially try to work from the inside out and create without prejudice an urban space, beyond any silly fantasy, and which will bring forth a genuine project that is relevant in its urban planning and, above all, can actually be realised. Structural and loadbearing construction and form will, as always, be an integral part of our ma-ster course and careful attention will be devoted thereto.

Within the scope of the planned Campus Biel (2020) offers for stu-dent apartments are also to be. Our project is based on a real need of the developing city of Biel. Together with famous architects, whom we invite as a guest critic, also the leader of the structural enginee-ring office of Biel as well as representatives of the town marketing and the town planning department will visit us.Biel/Bienne is a dynamic city with an eventful history of urban de-velopment and architectonic benchmarks that are unique in Switzer-land. The convention centre (Kongresshaus) by Max Schlup dating from 1966 and the Volkshaus (Rotonde) by Eduard Lanz from 1932 are neighbours and possible references for our semester. We are looking forward to starting it with you soon.

Beat Mathys und Ursula Stcheli


9


8

SHORT EXERCICE FILM SKETCH

With the aid of a model, of human figures and with the camera of your mobile phone, narrate cinematically a spatially motivated and an evocatively refined story that makes a statement as to your inten-tions for the Students Residence that is to be designed later. Sound and dialogue will be included and afforded the same attention as the spatial situation. The work is complete when all architectonic and social elements have been accurately represented, reflected upon and assembled into a dense statement about space transitions (concept).

Submission: film sequence (single room crossover element exte-rior, or in reverse order), 15-20 seconds. The films will be viewed and critiqued together.

Our team member and film-maker Christof Mathis will give an in-troductory lecture on the theory and practice of film and architecture and will be at your disposal for the production of the film, e.g. coordi-nation of editing, software, camera work, lighting, sound and plot and will provide support to you until the final submission.

HIGH CONCEPT - LOW TECH

A cleverly conceived idea that can be executed easily will enable us to explore the notion of space. Video is a suitable tool to let us experience space in our imagination. Video is Latin for I see. A video camera, however, also records audio and we will thus also be concerned with sound in space.In the model, we will take pictures and make videos that will define our perception and our understanding of space more clearly. The methods will be developed according to the model and the character of the project. The following realizations of the idea are conceivable:To make oneself visible in the space (cross fading and keying). Searching for true spaces that have been previously thought out in the imagination and in the model. Many other approaches are possible.When we progress in our model from the cell through the door into the common area: what would we see and hear? How would we move within this space? Where would we sit down and perhaps read a book? Which sounds are conceivable in this space? Both from outside and from inside?In this exercise, the aim is to sharpen the senses, that of sight of course (dimension, light, perspectives, colours, surfaces etc.) but also that of hearing (reverberation, echo vs. dry sound etc.). The sense of touch can also provide inspiration.It is thus all about perception in the broad sense, and also about what we perceive as beautiful or as having aesthetic qualities.Tools: mobile phone and simple editing software.

Christof Mathis


11


10


13


12

Geo data, Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment

Commons house (Rotonde)

Congress Hall

Perimeter of reflection

Perimeter of construction

2

1

1

2


15


14

Alvina Jagant

GSPublisherEngine 239.6.11.66GSEducationalVersion

Student: Alvina Jagant

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL

Master Studio, Final Review

Fall Semester 2014 / 2015

N


17


16

Kosuke Osawa

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL/BIENNE

Section 1:200

Kosuke Osawa


Review III


19


18

Floor Plan 1:200

Kosuke Osawa


Review III

Cell 1:20 , Detail

Kosuke Osawa


Review III

Kosuke Osawa

Student:Stasia Kremer

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIELMaster Studio, Review I



21


20

Stasia Kremer











23


22

Stasia Kremer


25


24

Inside Rendering

Student: NILS GYGAX


Final Review

First Floor and Section 1:200

Student: NILS GYGAX


Final Review

Nils Gygax


27


26

Nils Gygax

Floor Plan Apartments I and Facade 1:200

Student: NILS GYGAX


Final Review


29


28

Regular Floor Plan & Section 1:200

Student: Mario Moor


Final Review

N

GSEducationalVersion

A

A


SECTION A-A

Mario Moor


31


30

Nolliplan 1:1000

Student: Mario Moor


Final Review

N


Schweizer Architektur, 1930-4017

-mnhrihDTXF&

US-

\3>.

-iii]s^

/

-

tee^

j;

v;

L_^J

iaL

HiH?n

HG

s

-

SfP

n

ffjt--TfTTfrr^

X T?. P LA

*li

JLTH

^T

^^, \

A

l

H-Um

raiTTTW]

s\

'"]jin

^s

\J\\\F\

D

10

DE

k Hl

b li:lXZLJ

LU

9 Bahnhofquartier Biel/quartier de la gare, Bienne: Erdgeschossplan/plan du rez-de-chaussee.

undsich

widersprechende

Elemente sichtbar, die diese

These untersttzen. So wird

die klar geforderte horizon

tale Betonung der gesamten

Arealberbauung mit dem

Volkshaus gebrochen, jedoch

gleichzeitig inbestimmten

Momentenwieder

aufge

nommen. So nimmt das Erd

geschoss die betont horizon

tal, in langen Bndern gefhr

ten Elemente der Strassen-

front auf; dasselbe gilt fr die

zu Horizontalen zusammen-

gefassten Hotelgeschosse. Ei

ne Einheit, hnlich wie im

Sinne einesgotischen Mu

sters, ist deshalb auch in die

sem Areal - trotz seinen Wi

dersprchen - zu finden.

berdies wre die auffal

lende Diskrepanz der archi

tektonischenAuffassungen

der Zeit, die hier direkt auf-

einanderstossen, zu diskutie

ren. DasBahnhofgebude

imneoklassizistischen

Stil

(1923), flankiert von der stili

stisch verwandten Hauptpost

(1927), steht in krassem Ge

gensatz zu den Bauten aus den

Jahren 1929-33, welche di

rekt Bezug auf Ideen des

neuen Bauens nehmen. Inter

essant in diesem Zusammen

hang ist dabei der Vergleich

der verschiedenenWettbe

werbein

der Zeitvon

1918-1929 und der endglti

gen Bauverordnungen von

1930, die den Wandel der Ar

chitektur am besten aufzei

gen. Dabei ist diesptere

Wende in den 40er Jahren

auch hier sprbar: das Flach

dach hat nicht mehr absoluten

Vorrang, an Stelle von Roll

den treten wiederum Fenster

lden etc.DieEntstehung und die

kompromissloseDurchfh

rung dieses Quartiers ist sicher

nicht ohne den Einfluss der

auslndischenArchitektur

szene zu sehen. Namentlich

die Beziehungen des Stadt

baumeisters Schaub sowie der

Architekten Lanz und Bod

mer (letzteregewannen zu

dieser Zeit einen internatio

nalen Wettbewerb fr eine

Stadterweiterung von Bel

grad) mit diversen Architek

ten des In- und Auslandes, die

demneuen bauen nahestan

den, fhrten zu diesem Ent

wurf. Deshalb ist es auch nicht

verwunderlich, dass sie viele

Zitate von bekannten Bau

ten der zwanziger Jahre auf

weisen: eine Wohnhauszeile

nimmt Elemente des Karl-

Marx-Hofs in Wien auf; die

Erker an der Bahnhofstrasse

knntenvon Mendelssohn

entworfen sein etc. Jedoch ist

immer wieder sprbar, dass

die Grossstadtgedanken und

die Ideen des neuen bauens in

einen provinziellen Kontext

umgesetzt sind - mit all ihren

Abstrichen und Realittsan

passungen.

Schweizer Architektur, 1930-4017

-mnhrihDTXF&

US-

\3>.

-iii]s^

/

-

tee^

j;

v;

L_^J

iaL

HiH?n

HG

s

-

SfP

n

ffjt--TfTTfrr^

X T?. P LA

*li

JLTH

^T

^^, \

A

l

H-Um

raiTTTW]

s\

'"]jin

^s

\J\\\F\

D

10

DE

k Hl

b li:lXZLJ

LU

9 Bahnhofquartier Biel/quartier de la gare, Bienne: Erdgeschossplan/plan du rez-de-chaussee.

undsich

widersprechende

Elemente sichtbar, die diese

These untersttzen. So wird

die klar geforderte horizon

tale Betonung der gesamten

Arealberbauung mit dem

Volkshaus gebrochen, jedoch

gleichzeitig inbestimmten

Momentenwieder

aufge

nommen. So nimmt das Erd

geschoss die betont horizon

tal, in langen Bndern gefhr

ten Elemente der Strassen-

front auf; dasselbe gilt fr die

zu Horizontalen zusammen-

gefassten Hotelgeschosse. Ei

ne Einheit, hnlich wie im

Sinne einesgotischen Mu

sters, ist deshalb auch in die

sem Areal - trotz seinen Wi

dersprchen - zu finden.

berdies wre die auffal

lende Diskrepanz der archi

tektonischenAuffassungen

der Zeit, die hier direkt auf-

einanderstossen, zu diskutie

ren. DasBahnhofgebude

imneoklassizistischen

Stil

(1923), flankiert von der stili

stisch verwandten Hauptpost

(1927), steht in krassem Ge

gensatz zu den Bauten aus den

Jahren 1929-33, welche di

rekt Bezug auf Ideen des

neuen Bauens nehmen. Inter

essant in diesem Zusammen

hang ist dabei der Vergleich

der verschiedenenWettbe

werbein

der Zeitvon

1918-1929 und der endglti

gen Bauverordnungen von

1930, die den Wandel der Ar

chitektur am besten aufzei

gen. Dabei ist diesptere

Wende in den 40er Jahren

auch hier sprbar: das Flach

dach hat nicht mehr absoluten

Vorrang, an Stelle von Roll

den treten wiederum Fenster

lden etc.DieEntstehung und die

kompromissloseDurchfh

rung dieses Quartiers ist sicher

nicht ohne den Einfluss der

auslndischenArchitektur

szene zu sehen. Namentlich

die Beziehungen des Stadt

baumeisters Schaub sowie der

Architekten Lanz und Bod

mer (letzteregewannen zu

dieser Zeit einen internatio

nalen Wettbewerb fr eine

Stadterweiterung von Bel

grad) mit diversen Architek

ten des In- und Auslandes, die

demneuen bauen nahestan

den, fhrten zu diesem Ent

wurf. Deshalb ist es auch nicht

verwunderlich, dass sie viele

Zitate von bekannten Bau

ten der zwanziger Jahre auf

weisen: eine Wohnhauszeile

nimmt Elemente des Karl-

Marx-Hofs in Wien auf; die

Erker an der Bahnhofstrasse

knntenvon Mendelssohn

entworfen sein etc. Jedoch ist

immer wieder sprbar, dass

die Grossstadtgedanken und

die Ideen des neuen bauens in

einen provinziellen Kontext

umgesetzt sind - mit all ihren

Abstrichen und Realittsan

passungen.

Mario Moor


33


32

Inner Images

Student: Patrick Rieder


Finalreview

Courtyard Facade 1:200



Finalreview

City Facade 1:200



Finalreview

Ground Floor Plan 1:200



Finalreview

N

finalreview.indd 5-8 15.01.15 10:09

Patrick Rieder


35


34

Patrick Rieder

Urban Image



Finalreview

Sections 1:200



Finalreview

Floor Plans 1:200



Finalreview

Nolliplan 1:1000



Finalreview

N

1st Floor

2nd - 5th Floor

7th - 10th Floor


Urban Image



Finalreview

Sections 1:200



Finalreview

Floor Plans 1:200



Finalreview

Nolliplan 1:1000



Finalreview

N

1st Floor

2nd - 5th Floor

7th - 10th Floor



37


36

Alexander Radulow

3rd Floor 1:200

Student: Alexander Radulow

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIELMaster Studio, Final ReviewFall Semester 2014 / 2015

View Inside a Cell, Cell Composition 1:50, Section 1:25

Student: Alexander Radulow

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIELMaster Studio, Final ReviewFall Semester 2014 / 2015


39


38

Hugo Alhinho

Floor Plan, section 1-1, 1:200

Student: Hugo Alhinho


Final Review

N


1. floor +3.75m

2. floor +6.50m

3. floor +9.25m

3. floor +12.00m

4. floor +14.75m

ground floor +0.00m

5. floor +17.50m

roof +21.00m


N

image public space



Final Review


41


40

Hugo Alhinho

detail 1:10, floor plan and faade1:50



Final Review


Wandaufbau:-Innenputz-Backstein 17.5cm-expand. Polystyrol 20cm-Klebemrtel 1cm-Klinker-Riemchen 1.5cm

Deckenaufbau:-Hartbeton mit Bodenheizung 6cm-Trittschalldmmung 2 x 2cm-Stahlbetondecke 22cm-weisse Lasur

Verglasung:-Holz-Metall Fenstermit 3-facher IV-Verglasung

detail 1:10, floor plan and faade1:50



Final Review


Wandaufbau:-Innenputz-Backstein 17.5cm-expand. Polystyrol 20cm-Klebemrtel 1cm-Klinker-Riemchen 1.5cm

Deckenaufbau:-Hartbeton mit Bodenheizung 6cm-Trittschalldmmung 2 x 2cm-Stahlbetondecke 22cm-weisse Lasur

Verglasung:-Holz-Metall Fenstermit 3-facher IV-Verglasung


43


42

Barbara Rodrigues

DRAWINGS / REFERENCESBarbara Rodrigues


Regular Bedroom 1:50 Facade (S) Detail 1:20


levation (S) Student Residence 1:200

Drawing_Bedroom Drawing_Exterior

Drawing_ Inside Space_Circulation

Barbara Rodrigues



Regular Bedroom 1:50 Facade (S) Detail 1:20


levation (S) Student Residence 1:200

Drawing_Bedroom Drawing_Exterior

Drawing_ Inside Space_Circulation

Barbara Rodrigues


45


44

Gabriela Aguilar Ferrel

Ground Floor Plan 1:200

Gabriela Isabel Aguilar Ferrel

STUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL/BIENNE

Master Studio, Fall 2014

Final Review

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.00

+0.60

+0.40

+0.20

+0.00

+0.00

+0.60

+0.60

+0.00

+0.00

+0.60

+0.60

+0.00

+0.40

+0.00

+0.40

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

+0.60

Postd

ienst

49 m

2

+0.60

Laun

dry

+0.60

Polifuct

ional co

mmon s

pace

+1.20

+0.60

+0.60

Bibliot

ek

Ateliers

+0.60

Views

Gabriela Isabel Aguilar Ferrel

CHURCH / MARKET HALL BIEL/BIENNE

Professors Beat Mathys, Ursula Stcheli

Spring Semester 2014 Review III


47


46

Joanna Wosiek

Floor Plan 1:200, Section B-B 1:200

Student: Joanna Wosiek


Review IV


0,00

0 Groundfloor

+4,76

1 Floor

+7,82

2 Floor

+10,88

3 Floor

+13,94

4 Floor

+17,00

5 Floor

+20,06

6 Floor

+23,12

7 Foor

A-A

A-A

126,04 m2

162,97 m2

106,97 m2

120,31 m2

88,02 m2

64,90 m2

107,62 m2

88,74 m2

110,69 m2

40,95 m2

40,95 m2

Students` council

Barb

ecue g

ard

en

55,0

7 m

2

22.0

22.0 22.0

22.0

22.0

22.0

22.0

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5

11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.5 11.5

4.5

11.511.5

4.5

11.511.5

31.8 31.8

31.8

31.8

31.8 31.8

31.8

31.8

76.2

41.2

44.4

76.5

27.3

Noliplan

Student: Joanna Wosiek


Review IV


A-A

126,

04 m

2

162,

97 m

2

106,

97 m

2

120,

31 m

2

88,0

2 m

2

64,9

0 m

2

107,

62 m

2

88,7

4 m

2

110,

69 m

2

40,9

5 m

2

40,9

5 m

2

Stud

ents`

coun

cil

Bar

becu

e ga

rden


49


48

Abbas Mansouri

Section B-B 1:200Student: Abbas MansouriSTUDENT RESIDENCE BIEL

Master Studio, The Final ReviewFall Semester 2014 / 2015

Floors Plan 1:200

Student: A

bb

as M

anso

uriSTU

DEN

T RESIDEN

CE BIEL

Ma

ster Studio, The

Final Review

Fall Sem

ester 2014 / 2015

Bar Loung

e

Me

dia

Tek

P.O. Bo

xes

Void

Fitness ha

ll

Ho

tel reception

Basem

ent1:200

Second

floor1:200

Typica

l floor1:200

Third floor

1:200Top

roo

f1:200

A A

BB

AA

A A

BB

A A

BB

A A

BB

A A

BB

A A

BB


51


50

Guy Louchet

Student: Guy Louchet


Review III

Detail Bedroom 1/20


53


52

Models 1:500 Models 1:500

Guy Louchet Patrick Rieder

Alexander Radulow Joanna Wosiek

Barbara Rodrigues Mario Moor

Alvina Jagant Kosuke Osawa

Gabriela Aguilar Ferrel Nils Gygax

Hugo Alhinho Stasia Kremer


55


54

Plan / Section 1:100

Student: Andrea Soto Gonzalez

CHURCH / MARKET HALL BIEL/BIENNEProfessors Beat Mathys, Ursula Stcheli













Spring Semester 2014 Review III Final Review

Student: Marc Kammermann

HIGH-RISE BUILDING IN BERLIN


Fall Semester 2013 Final Review





60

738

135

7275

105

172

738

35

45

1.60 1.45 1.45 1.45

60 1.175

25 1.175

30 1.175

25 1.175

30

11

30

2.59

11

30

2.59

11

30

11

30

72.23

29

11

30

72.23

29

11

30

135

10 95

19 7 60

Plan 1:500




Image




Image




Situation 1:2000




N

Final Review





Sky Bar

Gym Hall, Fitness, Conference Rooms

Maintenance, Technique

Living Floor A

Living Floor B

Lobby
















Spring Semester 2014 Review III Final Review

Studio Highrise Berlin, Fall Semester 2013 Studio Church / Market Hall Biel, Spring Semester 2014

Ondrej Havlin Marc Kammermann Patric Denis Huber Andrea Soto Gonzalez

Student:


Professors Beat Mathys, Ursula StcheliFall Semester 2013 Final Review

Ondrej Havlin

Ondrej Havlin

+ 104,50

+ 124,00

+ 36,50

+ 144,50

Student:



Student:



Ondrej Havlin

Image Market Hall

Patric Huber


Spring Semester 2014 Final Review

Section 1:100

Patric Huber



Plan 1:100

Patric Huber



N


57


56

CONCLUSION

Die Studierenden haben, angeregt durch die Aktualitt des knf-tigen Campus Biel, auf dem Schnyderareal die Mglichkeiten des studentischen Wohnens untersucht. Eine Vielfalt an Konzepten und Vorstellungen fr diesen stdtischen Ort ist entstanden. Unsere Lehre ist undogmatisch und basiert auf klassischen Prinzipien der Lesart der Stadt und deren individuell-rationalen architektonischen Intervention fr deren Entwicklung. In dieser Mischung liegt der didaktische Wert unseres Kurses, der die eigenen Ideen der Studierenden in eine tieferliegende Logik der unzertrenn-lich verbundenen Disziplinen Architektur und Stdtebau fhrt.

Ursula Stcheli und Beat Mathys

Film Still, Kosuke Osawa, 2015


59


58

Master StudioStudent Residence Biel/BienneJointmaster Burgdorf, Fall 2014

Gabriela Aguilar FerrelStasia KremerAlvina Jagant

Barbara RodriguesJoanna WosiekHugo Alhinho

Nils GygaxGuy Louchet

Abbas MansourMario Moor

Alexander RadulowPatrick Rieder

Muhammet Emin SismanKosuke Osawa

Ursula Stcheli und Beat MathysProfessors AHB BFH

Markus Zimmermann Research Associate

Special Thanks to:Daniel Boermann

Roland FreyThomas GfellerChristof Mathys

Heinz MllerJrg Saager

Christian Scheidegger

Film Still, Muhammet Emin Sisman, 2015

Studio - Joint Master of Architecture - Bern University of Applied Sciences Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineer - Burgdorf Switzerland

master studio

Documents