master class: ‘achieving positive€¦ · master class: ‘achieving positive ... • final...
TRANSCRIPT
Master Class: ‘Achieving positive
health impacts through social
marketing’
Tuesday 1st March 2016, 10.00am- 4.00pm
The Core, Science Central, Bath Lane, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5TF
Objectives:
• Enable delegates to gain an in depth understanding of ‘social marketing’ theory and concepts
• Through the use of case studies, ensure participants understand how social marketing can be applied – both in their roles and also to support in delivering improved healthcare and outcomes in a clinical setting within their organisations
• Through practical workshop exercises, promote participant networking to exchange and share their learning and collaborate on potential social marketing plans across the North East and North Cumbria
• Enable participants to access a suite of resources and materials to support them in developing these plans and putting them in to practice.
• Encourage delegates to take their learning back in to their organisations to share and put this learning in to practice.
Public Health and the Value of Disobedience: Critical Social Marketing
Professor Gerard Hastings OBE
Institute for Social Marketing
University of Stirling and the Open University
Critical Social Marketing Case Study: E- cigarettes and Tobacco Marketing Loopholes
Dr Marisa de Andrade
Lecturer and Programme Director in Integrated Service Improvement, Counselling & Psychotherapy and Applied Social Sciences, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh
Public Health and the Value of Disobedience:
Critical Social Marketing
Marisa de Andrade & Gerard Hastings
Newcastle
1st March 2016
STRUCTURE
1. What is marketing:
• Basic principles
• Strategic planning
• Final thought: this is about power
2. A case study of ecigarettes:
• Overview, evidence and policy options
3. Pushing back: social marketing
6
What is marketing?
Consider something you have bought
recently – an item of clothing perhaps
or an electrical appliance. Think
through why and how you bought it.
What made you think of it in the first
place? What encouraged or
discouraged you? Would you buy it
again? What did you like / dislike about
it and the process of buying it?
What does this tell us about marketing?
1. Needs and wants
– Listening
– Understanding and empathy
– Segmentation and targeting
Consumers
Stakeholders
What is marketing?
What is marketing?
1. Needs and wants
2. Availability and affordability
– Being there
– Context matters
What does this tell us about marketing?
What is marketing?
1. Needs and wants
2. Availability and affordability
3. Competition
What does this tell us about marketing?
What is marketing?
1. Needs and wants
2. Availability and affordability
3. Competition
4. Reputation
– Time
– Trust
– Emotion matters branding relationships
What does this tell us about marketing?
11
Relationship Marketing
• Its much cheaper to keep existing
customers, then win new ones
• Satisfied customers sell your product
for you
• Complaints are an opportunity to get
to know your customers
Loyalty schemes, customer service,
relationships not transactions
What is marketing?
1. Needs and wants
2. Availability and affordability
3. Competition
4. Reputation
5. Advertising?
– The marketing mix……
What does this tell us about marketing?
The Marketing Mix
“marketing is essentially about getting the right
product, at the right time, in the right place, with
the right price and presented in the right way that
succeeds in satisfying buyer needs.’ (Cannon 1992: p46)
Three key points to note:
(i) Not just comms; multifaceted effort
(ii) it is not a formula – the right mix will vary
(iii) defining ‘right’ needs consumer input
What is marketing?
What is marketing?
1. Needs and wants
2. Availability and affordability
3. Competition
4. Reputation
5. Advertising?
6. Ultimately it’s about understanding and
influencing behaviour : it’s about people
What does this tell us about marketing?
consumers
and stakeholders
Social marketing
works in exactly
the same way
15
This is all about strategy
Marketing Planning Process
• Vital: provides your road map
• Long term
• Continuous, circular activity
• Customers are central
• Research plays a fundamental role
16
Social Marketing Planning Process
Situation Analysis
Market Segmentation
and Targeting
Set Objectives
Formulation of Strategy
- Product (what)
- Price (how much)
- Place (where)
- Promotion (message)
M
A
R
K
E
T
/
C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H
mass media
advertising
cinema press
billboards
other marketing
communications
point of
sale
packaging
internet
sponsor-
ship
product
placement
brand
stretching
free
samples
mass media
advertising
cinema press
billboards
other marketing
communications
point of
sale
packaging
internet
sponsor-
ship
product
placement
brand
stretching
free
samples
consumer
marketing
product
design
distribution
price
mass media
advertising
cinema press
billboards
other marketing
communications
point of
sale
packaging
internet
sponsor-
ship
product
placement
brand
stretching
free
samples
consumer
marketing
product
design
distribution
price
stakeholder
marketing
corporate
social
responsibility
youth
prev-
ention
media
know-
how
lobbying health
warnings
‘What’s more, consumers have been conditioned to see these companies differently. Just as Richard
Branson’s long hair and goatee preserved Virgin’s image as the rebel upstart long after it had become a vast conglomerate, so a company such as Apple has been able to keep persuading people it’s too cool to
be a corporate monster that has now piled up $200bn in what the FT calls its “minimally taxed pot of
overseas cash”. Google, with its “Don’t be evil” motto, has fed a similar assumption.’
Jonathan Freedland,The Guardian, 30 Jan 2016
market is as old as human society: doing deals
you
mutually beneficial exchange
me
Final thought: this is about power
mutually beneficial exchange
me shop-
keeper
market is as old as human society: doing deals
Final thought: this is about power
teen
(i) the problem is power
(ii) plus the fiduciary imperative
market is as old as human society: doing deals
Final thought: this is about power
Social marketing is
essentially about
rebalancing this
power relationship
STRUCTURE
1. What is marketing:
– Basic principles
– Strategic planning
– Final thought: this is about power
2. A case study:
– Overview, evidence and policy options
3. Pushing back: social marketing
Marketing
Marketing is everything a company does to
achieve this vision by encouraging the
consumption of its products
Starts with a vision:
• what market are we in: tobacco, nicotine,
lifestyle …satisfying consumer moments
• Shareholder / investor returns
Marketing
Four core functions
• Recruit new users
• Get them to use more
• Keep them brand loyal
• Keep them using
Plus: leverage
stakeholders
Marketing is everything a company does
to encourage the consumption of its
products Four core tools
• Promotion
• Product
• Price
• Place
Customers and
stakeholders
structure
• Marketing in practice
• Why loopholes matter
• The need for a comprehensive
strategy
• The marketing of product:
– Study methodology
– The current position
• Your views
Case study: ‘Marketing’ the use of research
evidence in Maternity Care- Induction of labour
Allison Farnworth
NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Fellow & Senior Research Midwife, Newcastle University
‘MARKETING’ THE USE OF RESEARCH
EVIDENCE IN MATERNITY CARE
Allison Farnworth
NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Fellow
Research Midwife
Disclaimer
• Funding Acknowledgement:
This project was funded by the National Institute for
Health Research Knowledge Mobilisation Fellowship
programme (NIHR-KMF-2012-01-16)
• Department of Health Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Knowledge Mobilisation Fellowship programme, NIHR,
NHS or the Department of Health.
Knowledge Mobilisation
• “Never in human history have we hunted for so much data, information and knowledge. Never in human history have we gathered so much that is useful but not used” Institute for Knowledge Mobilization
• KM = putting knowledge to active service • “making what we know ready for
action to produce value”
The GRIP Project
• Stakeholder analysis then scoping
• Interviews semi structured
• Analysis structured by social marketing ‘P’s
Interviews with
• Recently pregnant women
• Midwives
• Obstetricians
• Managers
Barrier and Facilitators • Accessibility of evidence base, knowledge of choices available about
induction Knowledge
• Ability to interpret /explain risk, ability to make informed decisions Skills
• Evidence based practice a professional expectation, individuals expected to make rational choices, protecting baby Social/professional role Identity
• Groups norms about pregnancy and risk, and about which knowledge is shared/used Social Influences
• Anticipating regret if providing evidence leads to choice with bad outcome Beliefs about Consequences
• Habit of presenting induction as routine, lack of reflection Behavioural regulation
• Ability to access, understand and use evidence base Beliefs about Capabilities
• Clinical protocols and guidelines replacing personal knowledge Memory, attention and decision
processes
• Organisational cultures, trust regarding use of evidence Environmental Context and
Resources
Theoretical Domains Framework. Cane J et al, 2012
Lesson 1: Trusted guidelines are main
vehicle for evidence use in practice
“I’ve got me NICE guidelines and I’m quite
happy with things as they are at the moment.
I think if I felt like I needed to <find more
information> I would” HCP 114
“you would always hope that whoever’s
developed the guideline has looked at the
most, you know, like you say, we‘re all
supposed to kind of practice evidence, you
know, evidence based research” HCP 118
Lesson 2: Knowledge beyond ‘guidelines’
often limited or constrained
“a lot of medicine is learnt in such an apprentice
type of way as opposed to people learning from
published information. So you do what the
consultants do, you tell patients what the
consultants say, and you may even go off and
read something different and write something
different in an exam, though in real life you tell
patients what the consultants say” HCP 088
“people accept it’s 42 weeks and you kind of
think, and this sounds terrible and don’t ever
identify me as saying this, erm, if people are, if
10 consultants that I work with say it’s safe, I
kind of think then it must be pretty safe” HCP119
Lesson 3: Knowledge transfer often stops
at the health care professionals
“I think a lot of women, they want the
information but they don’t want to go into
the ins and outs of it, about risks of
<caesarean> section” HCP 100
“in circumstances where induction is clearly
indicated … then there isn’t a lot of
discussion except to say ‘You are fully two
weeks you need to be induced’ and she
says ‘Yes’, ‘Off you go, off you go to get
induced’ so that’s a fair picture of the 30
second discussion.” HCP 088
“No-one explained anything about what would
happen if I went beyond 42 weeks, or if there was
a choice of going beyond, but I didn’t ask … it was
kind of a given that you would, I suppose. … but I
suppose for me it was more like well, I have to go
in because if I don’t then something bad will
happen to the baby” MSU115
“I think I felt quite comfortable to kind of trust, trust
in a way, not to question everything of them, so but
I guess in a way it would be good to <be given
information>, if, cos now if I’m thinking, did I sort of
know everything exactly? Erm, I’m not sure” MSU
094
Lesson 4: Women accept limited info and
accept rather than choose induction
Lesson 5: Discussion more likely to
happen when prompted by women
“I think actually the risk element of it isn’t communicated well … as a pregnant woman you make all sorts of decisions that may or not be risky, like whether or not you’re gonna have a glass of wine or eat some meat that isn’t fully cooked. So I think women … are very well capable of making choices based on risk but that isn’t, I think sometimes you’re fed a bit of, like, ‘you’re a dumb person so, it’s risky, don’t do it’” MSU 111
“I brought it up with the doctors, and then they asked why I was opting for a caesarean, and then we discussed the different options, that’s how it came up yeah” MSU 097
Compliance as Competition
Induction presented as routine, no
discussion of options
Woman assumes induction best or not worth arguing
about, accepts induction, few
questions
No questions, HCP assumes no questions means
no interest, further
information not required
Plan
Challenge to habitual practice
Professionalism and scrutiny
Evidence based knowledge + risk communication skills
Maintain trust & relationships
Uninformed compliance
Incorrect knowledge
Unhelpful social norms
Unchecked practice
Incre
ase
D
ecre
ase
Cycle Inhibiting Evidence Use
Induction presented as routine, no
discussion of options
Woman assumes induction best or not worth arguing
about, accepts induction, few
questions
No questions, HCP assumes no questions means
no interest, further
information not required
Cycle Promoting Evidence Use
Induction presented as a choice, discussion of
options
Woman assumes induction best or not worth arguing
about, accepts induction, few
questions
No questions, HCP assumes no questions means
no interest, further
information not required
What we Planned
Induction presented as a choice, discussion of
options
Woman knows induction
optional, prompts information seeking–
evidence based information made
accessible
No questions, HCP assumes no questions
means no interest, further information not
required
What we Planned
Induction presented as a choice, discussion of
options
Woman knows induction
optional, prompts information seeking–
evidence based information made
accessible
Questions! HCP motivated to have
information to be able to answer them
Preliminary Evaluation Results
• Preliminary results suggests use of leaflets is associated with: • Increased number of women reporting that they were
given a choice about induction and were aware of risks and benefits of induction and its alternative
• More accurate knowledge about evidence base re induction
Limitations of the marketing model
• Knowledge is a complicated!
• Harder to reach/ segmented audiences a challenge
• Reality of ‘free choice’
Strengths of the marketing model
• Clear model, not prescriptive
• Keeps focus on:
• Needs, motivations and experiences of stakeholders
• Competition, context of knowledge mobilisation
• Behaviour change based on theory
Summary
• Social marketing offers a different way of thinking about knowledge mobilisation, encourages creativity
• Easy to understand in practice
• Keeps focus on end user
• Theory informed
• Useful with caveats
Acknowledgements
• Project Participants
• Study team: Dr Ruth Graham, Dr Katie Haighton,
Professor Stephen Robson, Janine Rudin, Lauren
Kendall, Angela O’Brien, Professor Peter Baylis
• Newcastle University, the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
• Contact:
• Allison Farnworth, Senior Research Midwife
• Email: [email protected]
• Tel: 0191 208 8239
• Twitter: @a_farnworth
Case Study: ‘Social Marketing: insight
into action- ‘Sugar Smart’
Claire Troughton
Social Marketing Manager (North)
Public Health England
Public Health England
Social Marketing: insight into action
Claire Troughton
Saving lives and improving health outcomes
Today’s session
• Introduction to the change 4 life
programme and brand
• Latest customer insights
• Turning insight into action
• Overview of current activity and
resources
79
This is all about strategy
Marketing Planning Process
• Vital: provides your road map
• Long term
• Continuous, circular activity
• Customers are central
• Research plays a fundamental role
80
Social Marketing Planning Process
Situation Analysis
Market Segmentation
and Targeting
Set Objectives
Formulation of Strategy
- Product (what)
- Price (how much)
- Place (where)
- Promotion (message)
M
A
R
K
E
T
/
C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H