m.a.sc. thesis proposal guidelines · 2 miljana horvat, ryerson university [email protected]...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
M.A.Sc: Developing a good research proposal Miljana Horvat, M.Arch, Ph.D. (Bldg.Eng) Associate professor, Director Graduate program in Building Science Department of Architectural Science Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada [email protected]
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 1
Research proposals
• TBC: Thursday, January 8th, 2014 from 10:00-‐12:00 and 2:00-‐5:00
• 30 minutes per student • 10 min. student’s presentaEon • 20 min feedback & discussion
• To present research progress, receive feedback and new ideas from other professors and peers
• To learn what other students are doing, comment and provide feedback and new ideas to them
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 2
2
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Elements of a good research proposal • IntroducEon
– broad statement, seNng the stage • Research problem
– idenEfying the need for this research – also called: moEvaEon
• Research quesEon(s) – more specific, focused, definite – posed as quesEons
• that you can give an answer to at the end of your work
• Research objecEves (alternaEvely) • Methodology • Expected results (opEonal) • Timeline (schedule)
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 3
CharacterisEcs of a good research problem
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 4
1. The problem can be stated clearly and concisely. – keep tesEng it: write short paragraph and share it with
colleagues and non-‐experts
2. The problem generates research quesEons. – one or more; – quesEons can be answered.
3. It is grounded in theory. – it has good theoreEcal or conceptual framework – it can relate the specifics of what has been invesEgated to
a more general background of theory which helps interpret the results and link it to the field
3
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
CharacterisEcs of a good research problem
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 5
4. It relates to one or more academic disciplines. – it has to have a clear links to at least one academic
discipline – it has to relate to a body of knowledge
5. It has a base in the research literature. – (sources in order of significance and value in a thesis):
academic journals, peer reviewed conferences, naEonal research insEtuEons, PhD theses, M.A.Sc theses, professional publicaEons.
– weak sources: open source journals (could be hit and miss), manufacturer’s data, blogs
CharacterisEcs of a good research problem
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 6
6. It has potenEal significance/importance. – to a broader community of researchers, industry, etc…
7. It is do-‐able within the Eme frame, budget. – remember, you have (now less then) 1 year.
8. Sufficient data are available or can be obtained. – self-‐explanatory.
4
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
CharacterisEcs of a good research problem
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 7
9. The researcher’s methodological strengths can be applied to the problem.
– e.g. do not a`empt to develop a new soaware, if you don’t know programming…
10. The problem is new; it is not already answered sufficiently
– from literature review: idenEfy the knowledge gaps – also, you can tackle the exisEng problem, but through a
different approach – literature review will reveal all of these logical steps.
Literature review • What did others do about this and/or similar problems? – Literature review vs. annotated bibliography – storytelling, – developing an argument (or arguments) – criEcal review (pros and cons)
• IdenEfying knowledge gaps
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 8
5
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Literature review • Building your credibility
– AddiEonal role of the Lit. review
• At the end of this chapter: Summary– to remind a reader of the most important points
• In your presentaEon:– include few most important sources
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 9
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 10
Example by A.Barker, 2013
6
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Specific research quesEons • Based on the knowledge gaps idenEfied in the lit. review summary
• 2-‐3 good focused research quesEons – that can be answered through your research
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 11
Research objecEves • AlternaEve to Research QuesEon • Show determinaEon / intenEon
– The objecEve of this study is to develop an improved numerical model for calculaEng XYZ using the ABC approach based on the previous findings of John Smith (2010).
– The model will be verified through comparison to the measured field data obtained by Jones (2012)
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 12
7
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Methodology • What are you planning to do about it?
– this is also drawn from a literature review
• Try to be as precise as possible – but include only valid academic steps – e.g. “downloading meteorological data” should not be included
• This can be presented in a point form
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 13
Preliminary results or expected results • If you have something, show it. • It is OK if it is vague and incomplete
– or even incorrect -‐ this can point you in the right direcEon
• This proposal is not a Pass/Fail – Although it is a milestone – It is meant to give you a feedback and help you in the further steps.
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 14
8
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Proposed Emeline • Present a proposed Emeline
– Create your own milestones • table, graph
– Print it and keep it on the wall above your desk
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 15
Feedback • Invite audience to give you feedback • If you are stuck on something: say it
• Offer help and ideas to other fellow students through comments and quesEons.
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 16
9
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
PresentaEons • Not too many slides
– general rule: 1 slide – 1 minute
• Avoid long text – 6 x 4 or 4 x 6 (lines vs. words in a line)
• Graphs, images (picture = 1000 words)
• Avoid “funny” clip arts
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 17
PresentaEons
• Avoid over-‐the-‐top animaEons • and transiEons
– it can make some people dizzy
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 18
10
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Useful Eps • Include
– Slide number – Date – Short Etle of your presentaEon or event
• SPELL-‐CHECK • Don’t mix the units • If presenEng graphs next to each other, make sure that they are of the same scale
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 19
PosiEon • Overview
– tell them what will you tell them…
• Find a creaEve way to let know audience where are you in your presentaEon
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 20
11
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 21
Graduate Program in Building Science Information Session for M.A.Sc students 10/12/2014 22
12
Miljana Horvat, Ryerson University [email protected]
Talk • PracEce your talk • Time yourself • Make eye contact with audience
– don’t look only at the screen and turn back to the audience
• If needed, draw a`enEon to the material on the screen
• Use appropriate language – “… and whatnot”
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 23
Other resources • YSGS Thesis regulaEons
– h`p://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/graduate/policies/documents/Thesis_MRP_DissertaEon_Guidelines_06_2014-‐2.pdf
– for copyright informaEon and direcEons about formaNng the MRP document
• Student wriEng centre – h`p://www.ryerson.ca/studentlearningsupport/graduate-‐student-‐support/
index.html – For help with wriEng, the development of other academic skill and support –
• YSGS student-‐supervisor discussion checklist – h`p://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/graduate/forms/documents/
YSGS_Student_Supervisor_Checklist_SEPT2014.pdf – Use this list as a guideline and not as a formal document. Building Science
Graduate Program does not require formal signatures on this document as of this Eme.
10/12/2014 Graduate Program in Building Science
Information Session for M.A.Sc students 24