maryland statewide commission on the crisis in nursing update and future directions june 5, 2002
TRANSCRIPT
Maryland Statewide Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Commission on the Crisis in
NursingNursing
Update and Future Directions
June 5, 2002
Legislated ChargeLegislated Charge
Convene Summit
“Do something”
“ “Do something”Do something”
COMMISSION
“ “Do something”Do something”Subcommittees Formed
Education
Recruitment
Retention
Workplace Issues
Refined Commission Structure
Vice Chairs’ Leadership
Keeping Nurses Informed
Registered Nurses - Active Licenses*Registered Nurses - Active Licenses*1996 - 20001996 - 2000
50,68246,990 47,86045,525 46,67547,737
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
*Registered Nurses - Maryland Addresses Only
Licensed Practical Nurses-Active Licensed Practical Nurses-Active Licenses* 1996- 2000 Licenses* 1996- 2000
8,481 8,468 8,2297,895 7,945 8,821
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
*Licensed Practice Nurses with Maryland Addresses
RNs By Age GroupsRNs By Age Groups1997 - 20001997 - 2000
0
2,000
4,0006,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,00016,000
18,000
20,000
18 - 27 28 - 37 38 - 47 48 - 57 58 - 67 68 +
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
LPNs BY AGE GROUPSLPNs BY AGE GROUPS1996 - 20001996 - 2000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
18 - 27 28 - 37 38 - 47 48 - 57 58 - 67 68 +
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Inactive Licenses by AgeInactive Licenses by Age20012001
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
18-22 23-27 28-32 33-37 38-42 43-47 48-52 53-57 58-62 63-67 >=68
RN LP
Newly Licensed RNs by TypeNewly Licensed RNs by Type
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
Exam Endorse
2000
2001
Number of Newly Licensed RNs by Number of Newly Licensed RNs by Age 1998 - 2001Age 1998 - 2001
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
18 - 27 28 - 37 38 - 47 48 - 57 58 - 67 68+
1998
1999
2000
2001
Workforce Diversity 2001Workforce Diversity 2001
RNs 5% Males 24% Minority
LPNs 11% Males 50% Minority
Admissions 1997-2001Admissions 1997-2001Registered Nursing ProgramsRegistered Nursing Programs
12021101 1094
698 759
0 0
12471165
850
870855
09546
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Associate Degree Baccalaureate Diploma RN-BSN
Graduations 1997-2001 Graduations 1997-2001 Registered Nursing ProgramsRegistered Nursing Programs
769
0 0 0 0
713
922
898837
616527
813841841
32
178185
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001Associate Degree Baccalaureate Diploma RN-BSN
Baccalaureate totals include RN to BSN students. 1997-1999
Practical Nursing ProgramsPractical Nursing ProgramsAdmissions & GraduationsAdmissions & Graduations
1997-20001997-2000
169
160
177181
165168
169
131
144144
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Admissions Graduations
Places of Employment - RNsPlaces of Employment - RNs1996 - 20011996 - 2001
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Hospitals
LTCCom
m. Health
Sch. Health
Home Health
HMO
Amb. Care
Office Nsg
All Other
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Places of Employment - LPNsPlaces of Employment - LPNs1996 -20011996 -2001
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Hos
pitals
LTC
Comm
Schoo
l Hea
lth
Offi
ce N
sgH
MO
Hom
e Hea
lth
All Oth
er
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Statewide Commission on the Statewide Commission on the Crisis in NursingCrisis in Nursing
Solving the NursingShortage
Recruitment Collaborate to Recruit • Image• Web—disseminate
Information• Tool Kit Development
Education• Education Processes• Scholarship & Financial Aid• Finance & Marketing• Mentoring
Retention• Adequate & Flexible Staffing Protocols• Communication/respect/ Recognition• Competitive Compensation
& Flexible Benefits
Workplace Issues • Stress in the Workplace• Clinical Practice Delivery Models & Quality of Care• Regulatory Issues• Participate in Decision Making Scheduling & Lifestyle Issues
Commission
Chair: Ann Possidente
Vice Chair: Debra B. Doyle
Recruitment SubcommitteeRecruitment Subcommittee
Recruitment – SummitRecruitment – Summit
1. Poor public and media image Women’s profession
What do nurses do?
Promoted to middle & high schoolers
as job vs career
Recruitment – SummitRecruitment – Summit
2. Hospitals are a business
3. Lack respect as a profession by the public and among nurses
Maryland Commission on Maryland Commission on the Crisis in Nursingthe Crisis in Nursing
Project a more positive and professional image of nursing
Attract middle and high school students into nursing as a career
Our Charge Our Charge
Develop statewide campaign
Promote nursing as worthwhile career
Who are wetrying to attract &retain?
What is thecompetition
doing?
What do thesecoworkers
want/value?
What should we do?
The Nursing The Nursing Profession’s FutureProfession’s Future
11 Y.O. 21 Y.O. 30 Y.O.
Middle School1) Students2) Parents
High School College1) Non-Nsg Students2) Nsg Students
“Second Career”1) People desiring a second career
Nurses1) Current Nurses
Expected Outcomes:
Understand current perceptions of the nursing profession
Attract more students into the nursing profession
Recruitment—Middle/High Schools Recruitment—Middle/High Schools Participants N = 219Participants N = 219
1. Viewed Nursing as technical as opposed to professional (like a “shop”)
2. No Career advancement—58.7%
3. Unsure of “what it takes to become an RN”
Educational requirements Differences in 2yr vs. 4yr programs
Recruitment—Middle/High SchoolsRecruitment—Middle/High Schools
4. “Scary” job with life and death decisions
5. Job security Computers and teaching “sure bet” If cut Medicare, hospitals will close
24.1% 6. “Girls” job - 79.9%
Recruitment—Middle/High SchoolsRecruitment—Middle/High Schools
7. Wearing a uniform—unappealing
8. Unfavorable hours & tasks
(work weekends and holidays)
9. Stressful—watching people die
Recruitment Subcommittee Recruitment Subcommittee AccomplishmentsAccomplishments
Nursing Image Videos Resources Library
(www. marylandhealthcareers.org) Web Site Developed through MHA
(www. marylandhealthcareers.org) & (mbon.org)
Information for parents, teachers, students Facts about nursing, scholarships Hyperlinks to other nursing information
Recruitment Subcommittee Recruitment Subcommittee AccomplishmentsAccomplishments
Legislative Shadow ProgramTool kits
(middle and high school students, counselors, teachers and Parents)
Student Volunteer Program Speakers Bureau Listening to constituents
Recruitment Subcommittee Recruitment Subcommittee AccomplishmentsAccomplishments
Working with Education Subcommittee on the best
approach for recruiting faculty Healthcare settings to find clinical
rotations
•Ann Possidente, Chair
•Mona Bahouth•Carolyn G. Baker•Susan Battistoni•Mary L.Beachley•Sharan Lee Bidle•Justin Bishop•Jean L. Bridle•Barbara Marx Brocato•Melissa A. Brodeur •Trena Brown • Linda Brown-Sutphin• Kathryn Buffington• Ann T. Bures
•Debra B. Doyle, V.Chair
•Ann Byrne•Martha R. Caputo•Amy Chi•Virginia R. Clark•Harold Cohen•Robb Cohen•Carol Costante•Judith Covich•Frances Crites•Catherine Crowley•Regina M. Curran•Parker David•Jack Davisdon
•Mary H. Deeley•Lynn M. Derrickson•Mae Esh •Jeffrey Friedman •Susan E. Gibson •Robyn Gilden •Bruce N. Griffin •Dorna P. Hairston •Kathryn V. Hall•John A. Harris•Cheryl Heilman•Sharon Hobson•Mary Cathryn Hoffman•M. Theresa Hommel•Kay Hoskinson
Recruitment Subcommittee VolunteersRecruitment Subcommittee VolunteersTHANKS!
Recruitment Subcommittee MembersRecruitment Subcommittee Members
Wayne HowardCecelia HughesLorraine Hughes-GirandolaJoan HumlockEmeka IfemejeLinda JanzikSeth Johnson Stephanie JourdanLaura L. KatzKathy KemperLisa LambertLena LeeFran LeibfreidRomona Lewis Amy L. Lohfield
MontgomeryBarbara LuminellaSusan LynottKim Kathryn Lothschuetz- McCarronChristina McGannJanet MelsonFran MillerBerta R. MitchellDonna MuellerDawn NallyKathleen N. NeelyJack Neil Matt NeiswangerLola NullKathleen Ogle
Lisette K. OsborneMarc PalovitzYvonne ParawayDavid ParkerKaren M. ParrotteKaren C. PoiskerConstance M. PryorJennifer B. RainerAnn RegierHope RipkinGeorge RoseSharon M. RossiPeter RussellStephanie L. SandPat Saunders
THANKS!
Amy SchaeferCarol SchatzmanMary SchriverLisa SeldomridgeLynn Z. SklarJeanne SmootKaren SullivanVicki L. TaliaferroMarion TaylorLisa TenneyLana ThomasTammy J. ThompsonMary R. ToweDenise TuckerDavid Uhlfelder
Recruitment Subcommittee MembersRecruitment Subcommittee Members
Laura Van SyckleLisa WadeMaureen WakefieldMary Lou WatsonElizabeth WegleinCarol WigginsErica WilliamsEvelyn S. WilmerPat WilmsenBonnita D. WilsonMark WoodardEmmaline T. WoodsonRhonda WyskielGary Yakimov
THANKS!
Recruitment SubcommitteeRecruitment Subcommittee
Get involved We welcome additional volunteers Access the Maryland Board of Nursing
(mbon.org)
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeWorkplace Issues Subcommittee
Chair: Donna Wilhelm
Vice Chair: Maria Koszalka
Workplace Issues Subcommittee Workplace Issues Subcommittee MembersMembers
Micaela, M Aigner-JacobsNancy AllenLoretta BeckmanStephanie BernardSusan D. BoettgerJudith E. BreitenbachJean L. BridleMelissa A. BrodeurDeneen brownAngela T. BurdenAnn ByrneRosalyn G. CarterFilissa M. CasertaPhyllis CassidyApril C. ChaseNalini CherianDeborah L. ChesserVirginia R. ClarkJanet CoglianoRobb CohenHarold CohenStacey M. CookCatherine CrowleyRegina M. CurranCarol A. Curran
Donna Damico
Sandra L. Dearholt
Mary H. Deeley
Connie A. Dennis
Mary Dent
Carole Derck
Sarah S. Detmer
Dottie Devine
Sallie Dicus
Elizabeth Ann Evins
Beverly S. Francis
Susan E. Gibson
Beverly B. Goldsmith
Sheila Greenwood
Catherine M. Griswold
Larry L. Grosser
Beverly S. Guy
Kathryn V. Hall
Sharon G, Hameroff
Elise Handelman
Janet Holly Hoppenstein
Ellen L. Horowits
Kay Hoskinson
Belinda D. Houston
Paula A. James
S. Nooshin Javan
Michael Jenifer
Sharon A. Johnson
Seth Johnson
Keith Jones
Judith Karp
Silvie Kassar
Laura L. Katz
Jack C. Keane
Juanita Kennedy
Vicky P. Kent
Kathie Kloch
Maria V. Koszalka
Dina A. Krenzischek
Pamela E. Kumar
Mary J. Larkin
Sandy Levy
Mary A. Linton
Kathryn Lothschuetz-Montgomery
Sandra Lucci
Suzan Lundy
Marsha Marcus W.
Christin McGann
Christin McGann
Kate McPhaul
Judith Meyers
Barbara Anne Miklewski
Linda A. Miles
Sharon Millar
Linda Miller
Berta Z. Mitchell
Harriett Moore
Toni Moore-Duggan
Dawn Nally
Moira Namuth
Sandra Natolly
Victoria B. Navarro
Kathleen N. Neely
Jack Neil
Lois H. Neuman
Robin Purdy Newhouse
Catherine S. Novak
Linda O'Hara
Joann Oliver
Carolyn R. Overcash
Vanessa R. Pierre
Carol Portner
Curtis Price
Workplace Issues Subcommittee Workplace Issues Subcommittee Members Members (cont.)(cont.)
Constance Sumpter
Sandra Sundeen
Cecile E. Sutherland
Carol Swartz
Tami W. Swearingen
Irene Taylor
Lana Thomas
Tammy J. Thompson
Lynn Z. Sklar
Dianne C. Smith
Lucie Smith
Regina Smith-Yurek
Annette E. Snyder
Joan M. Spear
Denise Stanback
Cathy Stonebraker
Eleanor Walker
Joan Humlock
Mary Zohlen
Barbara Watts
Patricia Watts-Kelley
Beverly A. Wehmer
Donna Wilhelm
Erica Williams
Marisa Wilson
Helen Jane Wobbeking
Heather Yockey
Gloria Zarlenga
Karen Tipton
Cathy Toepfner
Janis Trainor
Denise Tucker
David Uhlfelder
Brenda Vitucci
Maureen Wakefield
Florine Marshel
Delores M. Puno
Donna Raimondi
Ann Rasenberger
Anne E. Rehfegd
Robin H. Reid
Susan Reiman
Tina Roach
George Rose
Arlene Marie Rosen
Stephanie L. Sand
Genene Saxton
Judy J. Schuur
Ernestine Scott
Carol Sheehan
Denise Singleton
Dawn Strecker
Karen Sullivan
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeWorkplace Issues Subcommittee
Initial ChargeInitial Charge
Identify workplace issues causing nurse dissatisfaction
Recommend ways to improve
nurses’ work environments
Nurse Dissatisfaction Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues IdentifiedIssues Identified
Scheduling and Life Style Mandatory overtime Flexible scheduling On call Child care/sick child care Reassignment Scheduling Women-friendly issues Age appropriate assignments
Nurse DissatisfactionNurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified Issues Identified
Professional environment Difficulties with delegation Physician collaboration Autonomy Respect Agency nurse accountability/autonomy Skill mix LPN scope of practice Difference in practice settings
Nurse Dissatisfaction Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues IdentifiedIssues Identified
RegulatoryScope of practice for techs, extenders, etcDocumentation requirementsLPN scope of practiceInconsistent regulation for providers in
different settings
Nurse Dissatisfaction Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues IdentifiedIssues Identified
Clinical Practice Delivery Model/ Quality of Care
Nurse-patient ratio Quality of care Skill mix
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues IdentifiedIdentified
Stress in the workplace Public expectations Support services Occupational health issues Self-care Injury protection Safety/violence/abuse
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeWorkplace Issues SubcommitteeAccomplishments Accomplishments
1. Survey validated nurses’ issues & concerns
2. Paper written that identified: Scope of the problems Impact on quality of care Strategies to address identified concerns
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeWorkplace Issues SubcommitteeAccomplishmentAccomplishment
3.Developed Concept Paper to Support LegislationMandatory overtimeWhistleblower protection Nurses participating in organizational policies
4. Impact on Legislation-all legislation passedHB 329 - Healthcare Whistleblower Protection ActSB 537 - Nurses Involuntary Overtime ProhibitionHB 590/SB 46 - Study of the Use of Technology to
Assist Nurses in Caring for Patients
5. Established Workplace Subgroup to Address
Technology Issues
Next StepsNext Steps1. Address the following topics:
Review information obtained from nursing survey to determine which areas of focus
2. Other areas to address are: Stress in the workplace Technology issues- Professional environment Regulations Clinical practice delivery model/quality of care
3. Respond to legislative updates to current legislation
HB 329, SB 537, & HB 590/SB 46
Maryland Board of Nursing Website
(Http://www.mbon.org)
For Upcoming Meeting Dates and
Locations
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeWorkplace Issues Subcommittee
Nursing Technology Nursing Technology WorkgroupWorkgroup
Chairperson: Maria KoszalkaChairperson: Maria Koszalka
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology WorkgroupCommittee MembersCommittee Members
Maria Koszalka Chairperson
Mary Beachley Stephen Buckingham Bycoffe Marcia Robert Cohen Ernestine Cosby Brian Gugerty Toni Hughes Terry Herbert
Dina Krenzischek Janet Marron Carol Mariglia
Pat Maher
Linda Miller
Sandra Natolly
Susan Newbold
Carol Sheehan
Mary Lou Watson
Marisa Wilson
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup Initial Charge Initial Charge
HB 590 – Taskforce to Study the Use of
Technology to Assist Nurses in Caring for
Patients Technological applications MUST:
Maximize nursing productivity Increase quality of patient care Improve work environment infrastructure in
health care settings
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup PurposePurpose
Establish Workplace Issues Taskforce Identify technology driven point of care
applications Consultation with technology driven
point of care application experts
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology WorkgroupAccomplishmentsAccomplishments
Goal statements developed to support nursingpractice through technology:
Systems functional for nurses Maximize nursing time Maximize patient safety Bar coding standardized to support technology Reports allow for data extraction & electronic
transferal Programs maximize information sharing via
web-based technology
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology WorkgroupAccomplishments- Goal StatementsAccomplishments- Goal Statements
( continued)( continued)
Hard and software adaptable to nursing workflow Nursing staff participate in hardware selection Clinical staff involved in development of clinical data
base Acceptance of technology by nurses UAPs by on-the-
job training (mandatory competency) Technology competency education supported by
administration Basic informatics training occur in nursing education
programs
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup Expected OutcomesExpected Outcomes
How will information be used? Direct policy development Investigate funding for developing specific
technology Develop criteria/parameters for selecting
technology Healthcare organizations use criteria to select
technology Develop resource manual
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup Expected OutcomesExpected Outcomes
References will be developed to include Criteria for selection of information, clinical,
robotics technology Information to determine benefits of integrated
versus “best of breed” systems Recommendations for selection of basic
technology required to provide safe nursing care Data on technology that support nursing practice
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup
“ “Big Impact”Big Impact”
Focus: Support nursing practice and enhance
patient safety Provider Order Management Electronic medical record
Supported by: Leapfrog organization IOM report Professional nursing organizations
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup Next StepsNext Steps
Representation from Acute care hospitals Nurse managers IS Staff nurses Third party payer MNA
Need representation LTC Home care Ambulatory Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene
IS nurses in clinical setting
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNursing Technology Workgroup Next StepsNext Steps
Develop: Criteria to evaluate technology
(cost- benefit) Recommendations for basic technology
required to provide nursing care List of technology currently used
(survey)
Retention Subcommittee Retention Subcommittee
Chair: Jeff Jefferies
Vice Chair: Nancy Dianis
We want to Thank our VolunteersWe want to Thank our Volunteers Ruby Anderson Gloria Barlow Anne Bilderback Bramblee Bird Lorna Branch Jean L. Bridle Audrey Byrd Timothy Carey Amy Chi Pat Cimno Sandy Cohen Robb Cohen Catherine Crowley Regina M. Curran Mary Kay Demarco Sarah S. Detmer Donna M. Dorsey Joyce Emerick Jill L. England Joanne Evans Rebecca Faughander Jane H. Flowers Susan Gibson Kathryn V. Hall DeLois G. Hamilton Elise Handelman Elaine J. Holman Mike Holy Bernice Hughes Jeannette Jefferies Bonita E. Jenkins H. Scott Johnson Susan Kalaine Theresa A. Kapetanovic Jack Keane Eileen Lacijan Diane Liebeskind Dora Long “Ski” Lower Sandra Lucci Florine Marshel Carol Marsiglia Suellyn Masek Christina McGann Judith McMillan Grace McNeal Elaine Mennito Steve Morrison Rosemary Mortimer Donna Mueller Pat Mynarski Kathy Neely Bonnie Neibauer Bette Nunn Bette Carole O’Connor Leigh Pancoast Julia Pannell Karen M. Parrotte Janet Passley-Harp Tina Patrico Anne E. Rehfegd Tina Roach Deborah L. Royalty M. Judith Rudell Vicki Ryan Valerie Shearer Carol Sheehan Leslie R. Simmons Lynn Sklar Dean Smith Dawn Stecker Karen Sullivan Constance Sumpter Cecile E. Sutherland Irene Taylor Mary R. Towe David Uhlfelder Diane Walbridge Jan Watts Elizabeth Whiting Carol Wiggins Donna Wilhelm Mark Woodward
And a Special Thanks And a Special Thanks to Our Co-Chair:to Our Co-Chair:
Nancy Dianis
Retention Subcommittee Retention Subcommittee Initial ChargeInitial Charge
Review data that describes nurse retention issues
Explore compensation as a nurse retainerExplore aspects of professional
development as a nurse retainer
Retention Subcommittee Retention Subcommittee RecommendationsRecommendations
Total Compensation Guiding Principals:– Flexible and possibly transferable– Reduce salary compression– Review of salaries at specified intervals– Benefits menu – developed with RN input – Benefits reviewed annually– Career development plan– Non-selected benefits reinvested by RN into –
additional educational days, retirement account, etc.
Retention Subcommittee Retention Subcommittee RecommendationsRecommendations
“Holistic” Compensation Models by Generation
– 401 (k)– Medical Coverage– Pension– Clear sense of Organizational purpose– Compensation that grows with the RN
Retention Subcommittee Retention Subcommittee RecommendationsRecommendations
Career Path Development Within current workplace Across healthcare organizations
Coaching/mentoring Work Place Safety
Create safe environment Create resources for RN to handle safety issues
(threatening behaviors, verbal and physical abuse)
Retention Subcommittee: Retention Subcommittee: the Next Stepsthe Next Steps
Create a “product” that represents the compensation package recommendations
Written information disseminated to stakeholders– Create a “tool kit” to be used for presentations– Create materials focused on each stakeholder– Hold compensation forums to present information– Include total compensation package information in the
Commission’s Annual Report– Design a “Nurses Compensation Hot-Line” via web or
phone that provides nurses with a venue to learn about compensation and to ask questions
Retention Subcommittee: Retention Subcommittee: the Next Stepsthe Next Steps
Develop plans to overcome barriers to a comprehensive compensation plan
Develop Career Path options Explore Nursing Care Delivery Systems – to
enhance the work environment Encourage participation of RN volunteers to
develop these programs
The Education Subcommittee The Education Subcommittee ReportReport
Chair: Patricia Watts-Kelley
Vice Chair: Peggy Soderstrom
The Goals The Goals of the Education Subcommitteeof the Education Subcommittee
Facilitate the education of qualified individuals
Ensure that pool of qualified, accessible nurses continues to alleviate the existing void
Prepare future nurses with the competency based skills to meet the healthcare needs
BackgroundBackground
Working groups of the Subcommittee Education Financial Mentoring Faculty
BackgroundBackground
Working groups of the Subcommittee Education Financial Mentoring Faculty
Accomplishments to dateAccomplishments to date
Scholarship legislation Financial assistance enhances many students’
ability to finish a nursing program often leading to early entry into the workforce
Measuring successful completion outcomes (Scholarships are a crucial factor) Supported an increase in funding of the nursing
scholarship to include all eligible students
Work Priority Work Priority Fall 2001Fall 2001
Identify a credible method for determining the number of nurses needed to meet the healthcare needs of Maryland’s citizens Explore an accurate method to measure need
related to demand Develop outcome-based recommendations to
address the nursing shortage
On Going Work-OutcomesOn Going Work-Outcomes
Developing a forecasting model A credible method to calculate the number of
nurses needed Project the supply and demand/need
Analyze trend data Use forecasting model for future
educational adjustments
Forecasting ModelForecasting Model
Estimates the future supply of nurses Forecasts the size, the age and the educational
level of the nursing workforce New graduates are added, as well as
in-migration Predicts impact of retirements, deaths and out-
migration of experienced nurses
Present Data CollectionPresent Data Collection
Occupational Projections of RNs, LPNs and nursing faculty
Nursing student enrollment (LPN, AD, BSN, Advanced degrees)
Faculty Salaries Preliminary data analysis indicate a widening of the
gap between clinical service and faculty salaries
2002 year first time licensure exam takers RN & LPN candidates
Monitor, Evaluate, ReviseMonitor, Evaluate, Revise
What is succeeding? What can be improved upon? What additional issues and areas need to be
addressed?
Future WorkFuture Work
Diversity (geographic, ethnic, cultural, physiologic, and gender)
Questions for future consideration are: What is the extent of the need for a more diverse
nursing faculty? How do nursing educators address the needs of diverse
students?
Pamela Ambush Lynda A.Bartko Madeliene Becker Rosemarie O.Berman Sharon L.Bernier Teresa Bianco Barbara Marx Brocato Trena Brown Martha R.Caputo Virginia R.Clark Mary Clisham Robb Cohen Harold Cohen Frances Crites Catherine Crowley Regina M. Curran Barbara P. Daniel Mary H. Deeley Thomas James DeGraba
Rosie Delegrotti Mary Dent Carol G. Dignon Elizabeth Dunne Eugenie J.Dunnells Sandra
Dunnington Linda Epstein Judith Feustle Jane Garvin Susan E.Gibson Bruce N.Griffin Kathryn V.Hall Donna Helfferich Gertrude T.Hodges Janice Hoffman Dorothy Holley Marie T. Holley Robyn E.Holley
Education Subcommittee Members
Thank YOUThank YOUEllen L. HorowitsKay HoskinsonM. Patricia HowardJoan HumlockS. Nooshin JavanBonita E. JenkinsBeth JerniganSeth JohnsonKathleen JonesJohnnye S. JonhsonGoar KaramiSilvie KassarLaura L. KatzBarbara H.KemererCynthia E.KielinenMichael KiphartKathryn Lothschuetz-
MontgomerySandra Lucci
Susan LynottErin MarekDenise MarshallJoyce B. McAdooBlanka McClammerChristina McGannJudith McMillanCheryl McNamaraGrace McNealEarlene B. MerrillFran MillerNancy MonahanToni Moore-DugganRosemary E. S. MortimerMarion MulhollandRobert MurrayDawn NallySandra Natolly
Thank YOU MembersThank YOU Members Kathleen N. Neely Jack Neil Ronnie Netteburg Jean Nichols Janice Oliver Kathleen Parsons Edith Patten Carol Bryant Payne Lesley Perry Nayna Phillipsen Karen C.Poisker Barbara C.Poniatowski Ann Possidente Constance M. Pryor Ann Rasenberger Robin H. Reid Bernadette Rock Stephanie L. Sand
Georgeanne C. Santolla Amy Schaefer Terri Schreyer Marge Schueler Judy J. Schuur B. Joan Scott Lisa Seldomridge Valerie Shearer Darlene Shoemaker Dianne C. Smith Peggy Soderstrom Karen Sullivan Sandra Sundeen Lana Thomas Tammy J.Thompson Patricia Travis Eleanor Walker Robin Wantz
Joan WarrenJan WattsElizabeth WeathingtonAnna WhiteCarol WigginsErica WilliamsKaren Wons
Please Join Us !!!Please Join Us !!!
E-mail questions about subcommittee activities [email protected]
Check the MBON website for meeting schedules and subcommittee Volunteer Form
mbon.org
Major FocusMajor Focus Education Subcommittee
MORE Students Faculty Scholarships Basic Graduates
Major FocusMajor Focus Recruitment Subcommittee
Collaborate! Collaborate! Collaborate! Youth Help from nurses and nursing
students Develop recruitment tools
Major FocusMajor Focus Retention Subcommittee
Value nurses Respect nurses Take control of career
Major FocusMajor Focus Workplace Issues
Give nurses their “due” Acknowledge
Needs Fears Lifestyle
Thanks
VOLUNTEERS!
