marxism childe archaeology.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
1/8
245
C H IL D E M A R X I S M A N D A R C H A E O L O G Y
Nicholas Thomas
The history of an area of knowledge can
never be seen as something which is fixed and
given in an unproblematic way. These histories
have more in common with the genealogies of
Hawaiian kings: they are manipulated and re-
constr ucted as orthodoxies and lineages are
developed and displaced. Somet imes a body of
work will be anxious to stress its connections
with earlier texts; at other times it will claim a
revolutionary distance from them. Sometimes
a particular body of past work is seen to belong
to one school, at other times to another. These
sentences are not meant to imply a simple rela-
tivistic conc eption of knowledge history, since
real issues are involved and some positions are
demonstrably more adequate than others. The
issues can be quite crucial, since history is used
to legitimate presen t strategies - strategies
which are not merely modes of explanation
but which can have real social and political con-
sequences as is most evident from debates
within the anthropology of development). It
is, however, crucial to recognize the ex ten t to
Nic h o la s Th o ma s i s As s i s t a n t P r o f e s s o r in th e De p a r tme n t o f
P r e h i s to r y a n d An th r o p o lo g y , F a c u l ty o f Ar t s , Au s t r a l i a n
Na t io n a l U n iv e r s i ty .
which conceptions of the history of a discipline
are circumscribed and specified by the prob-
lematics which generate those conceptions.
Marxists are familiar with these principles
through various theoretical struggles over their
own history, bu t archaeologists are not, and
this is not because archaeological anthropology
has not been interpreted in ways commensurate
with particular orthodox ies but because these
interpreta tions and reinterpre tations have been
implicit and non-theorised.
Here I am conc erned with the place of the
work of V. Gordon Childe in archaeology.
While Childe 189 2-1 957 ) has generally been
recognised as a major figure, this recogni tion
has involved a restricted view of his work,
equating it entirely with the de velopmen t of
the culture-historical framework. Other crucial
areas, in pa rticula r a socio-historical interpre-
tation of prehistory and philosophical work on
the place o f knowledge in society, have been
almost enti rely ignored. This neglect has facili-
tated an uncritical attitude toward certain
facets of cont empo rary archaeological ortho-
doxy, which, as anyone who has dipped into
the literature will observe, is overwhelmingly
positivist and reductively cultural not, of
0 3 0 4 - 4 0 9 2 / 8 2 / 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 / 0 2 . 7 5 1 9 8 2 E l s ev i e r S c i e n t if i c P u b l is h in g C o m p a n y
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
2/8
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
3/8
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
4/8
248
fers to Childe quite frequent ly in culture-
historical contex ts, but only once refers to
othe r aspects of his work, and only then to
describe
S c o t l a n d B e f o r e t h e S c o t s
as a
piece of anti-establishment whim sey [ 10].
The only infere nce to be drawn here is that
Daniel - and more significantly the world-
view of traditional British a rchaeology within
which he was working - had no real understand-
ing of what Childe was atte mpting to accom-
plish. It may well be the case that Childe pro-
duced the book partially in a spirit of radical
mischief, but this is quite irrelevant to any
evaluation of its theoretical significance.
The most revealing of the discussions of
Childe's work is that by Grahame Clark. He
explicitly states that Childe's contri bution is
to be seen entirely in terms of the culture-
historical approach. Like Piggot, Clark re-
ferred to the Preface to
T h e D a n u b e i n P re
h i s t o r y in which Childe elabora ted the culture-
historical perspective and stated that this
was his essential contr ibuti on to prehistoric
archa eology [ 11 ], and furt her that He had
achieved what he was going to achieve in this
genre essentially by 1930 [ 12]. This is a
dismissive statement, since about ninety per-
cent of Childe's work appeared after that date.
But the la ter work was spoilt for Clark by the
influence of the anti quate d folk-lore of Karl
Marx [ 13 ]. The overall tone of Clark's article
is worth indicating in a longer quote:
M a r x i s m e x e r t e d a s e r io u s l y i n h i b it i n g e f f e c t o n h i s m i d d l e
y e a r s . I t h e l p s t o e x p l a i n w h y a f t e r 1 9 3 0 o r s o C h i l d e s
c r e a t iv e p e r i o d w a s e s s e n ti a l ly o v e r a n d w h y a t t h e e n d o f
h i s li f e h e r e a l i s e d t h a t h i s p r o p h e t h a d p l a y e d h i m f a l s e .
W h e r e a s i n 1 9 4 6 h e c o u l d s ti l l a r g u e ( 1 9 4 6 b : 2 5 1 ) t h a t
t h e r e w a s a p r o s p e c t o f r e a c h i n g g e n e ra l l a w s i n di c a t iv e
o f t h e d i r e c t i o n o f h is t o r i c p r o g r e s s i n h i s V a l e d i c t i o n
h e h a d t o a d m i t t h a t w h i l e M a r x i s m h a d o n c e s e e m e d t o
m a k e i n t e ll i g ib l e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f e a c h c u l t u r e i t
c o m p l e t e l y f a i l e d to e x p l a i n t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n o n e
c u l t u r e a n d a n o t h e r a n d i n d e e d o b l i t e r a t e d o r d i s m i s s e d
t h e d i f f e r e n c e s o b s e r v e d ( 1 9 5 8 : 6 ) [ 1 4 ] .
As Matthew Spriggs has pointed out, Clark
here was simply misquoting Childe, who was
referring to M a r r i s m (the mechanistic Soviet
doctrine) and not to M a r x i s m :
t h e r e i s l i tt l e e v i d e n c e c o n t a i n e d i n C l a r k s a r t i c l e o f a n y
c o n c r e t e u n d e r s t a n d i n g e i t h e r o f C h i l d e o r t h e M a r x i s t
t h e o r i e s h e w a s a t t e m p t i n g t o t e s t a r c h a e o l o g i c a ll y [ 1 5 ] .
Clark also attempted to put down Childe's
work by observing that he was the most bour-
geois person in the wor ld [ 16] while Piggot
suggested that there was a relationship between
Childe's interest in Marxism and the alleged
fact that
H e w a s v e r y u g l y , a n d h e w a s a n A u s t r a l i an . T h e s e t w o
f a c t o rs , c o u p l e d w i t h t h e r e s u l t a n t a w k w a r d n e s s a n d s h y -
n e s s a m o n g a l l b u t a v e r y f e w f r i e n d s a n d f o r v e ry s h o r t
i n t e r v a l s , s e e m t o h a v e d e c i s i v e l y a f f e c t e d h i s i n t e l l e c t u a l
s t a n d p o i n t . H e w a s a n O u t s i d e r , w i t h a f a m i l i a r l o v e - h a te
r e l a t i o n s h i p t o h i s p o s i t i o n , r e s e n t i n g a n d d i s l i k i n g it , b u t
a t t h e s a m e t i m e e x a g g e r a ti n g hi s o d d n e s s b y s u c h m e a n s
a s w e a r i n g e c c e n t r i c b r o a d - b r i m m e d h a t s a n d d e l i b e r a t e l y
m a k i n g h i m s e l f a n i n t e l l e c t u a l s o l i t a r y [ 1 7 t .
Further:
H e m a y w e l l , a s a sh y , i d e a li s ti c , a w k w a r d y o u n g m a n ,
h a v e s e e n in h i s v e r s i o n o f C o m m u n i s m a s t r u c t u r e o f
s o c i e t y in w h i c h h o n o u r e d r e c o g n i t i o n f o r t h e i n t e l l e c tu a l
e n g a g e d i n s oc i al l y j u s t i f i e d w o r k w o u l d b e m o r e p o s s i b l e
t h a n i n t h e E n g l a n d o f t h e 1 9 2 0 s : t h e O u t s i d e r w o u l d b e
m o r e e a si l y a d m i t t e d t o p r i v il e g e i n s u c h a h y p o t h e t i c a l
s o c i e t y [ 1 8 ] .
This crude psychological reductionism is hard
to take seriously, but it did have consequences
for the devel opment of the discipline, most ex-
plicitly stated in Clark's article.
Having dismissed what Childe did after 1930,
Clark goes on to discuss prehi story since Childe.
He shows that the logical step from Childe's
culture-h istorical system is the ecological ap-
proach, influenced by functionalist anthro-
pology, involving the conce pt of human so-
cieties operating as systems, in which every
component contributed to the functioning of
the whol e [ 19]. Clark claimed that the eco-
logical approach was not only free from, but
was a denial of the dreary dete rminism of some
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
5/8
2 4 9
o f t h e e a r li e r g e o g r a p h i c a l a p p r o a c h e s t o a r c h a e -
o l o g y . T h e r e l a t io n s h i p s b e t w e e n t h e s e v e ra l
d i m e n s i o n s o f h u m a n l if e a n d d i f f e r e n t f a c e ts
o f th e n a t u r a l e n v i r o n m e n t w e re s e en n o t a s
o n e - w a y b u t a s t w o - w a y [ 2 0 ] . B u t d e s p i te
l ip - s e rv i c e b e i n g p a i d t o s o m e k i n d o f f a c i le
c a u sa l i n t e r a c t i o n i s m , t h e ' e co l o g ic a l a p p r o a c h '
a s i t h a s d e v e l o p e d h a s b e e n , i n b o t h B r i t i s h
a n d A m e r i c a n a r c h a e o l o g y , i n c r e as i n g ly r e -
d u c t i v e a n d d e t e r m i n i s t .
B o t h t h e ' p a l a e o e c o n o m y ' s c h o o l a n d
A m e r i c a n c u l t u r a l m a t e r i a l is m h a v e t r e a t e d
s o c i a l r e l a t i o n s a s e s s e n t i a l l y e p i p h e n o m e n a l
t o t h e e c o s y s t e m o r m o r e g e n e r a ll y t o e n v i ro n -
m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s . S o c ia l f a c t o r s h a v e a l w a y s
b e e n m a d e s e c o n d a r y t o t h e i n e x o r a b l e r a t i o -
n a l i ty o f ' a d a p t a t i o n s ' a n d t h e t e l e o l o g y o f t h e
h o m e o s t a t i c s y s t e m . V u l g a r m a t e r i a li s m a s a n
a p p r o a c h h a s a l w a y s b e e n e x t r e m e l y v u l n e r a b l e
t o c r i ti c is m f r o m n o n - r e d u c t i v e a p p r o a c h e s ,
a n d h a s a l m o s t a l w a y s b e e n a r g u e d f o r , n o t a s
a c o n c e p t u a l l y m o r e v i g o u r o u s a lt e r n a ti v e t o
s o m e k i n d o f so c ia l a r c h a e o l o g y , b u t s i m p l y
t h r o u g h j u x t a p o s i t i o n t o p r e v i o u s a r c h a e o lo g y ,
w h i c h i s r e p r e s e n t e d a s h a v in g b e e n p u r e l y
d e s c r i p t i v e a n d p u r e l y c l a s s i f i c a t o r y . I n
A r c h a e o l o g i c a l P e r s p e c t i v e s , a c e n t r a l t e x t
f o r t h e c u l t u r a l m a t e r i a li s t N e w A r c h a e o l o g y ,
B i n f o r d c o u n t e r p o s e d a p r o c e s s - o r i e n t e d e c o -
s y s t e m i c a p p r o a c h t o t h e d i f f u s i o n i s t, tr a d i-
t i o n a l c u l tu r e - h i s to r i c a l a p p r o a c h [ 21 ] . T h e
e n v i r o n m e n t a l d e te r m i n i s t a p p r o a c h d o e s p r o-
v i d e c o n c e p t s a n d e x p l a n a t i o n s o f a c r u d e
f u n c t i o n a l i s t s o r t, a n d c a n t h u s b e r e p r e s e n t e d
a s a p r o g r e s s iv e m o v e f o r w a r d f r o m a c la s si fi -
c a t o r y f r a m e w o r k w h i c h o f f er s n o e x p la n a -
t i o n s a t a ll , b u t o n l y i f t h e p o t e n t i a l a l te r n a t i v e
- t h e s o c ia l p e r s p e c t i v e o p e n e d u p b y C h i l d e -
h a s b e e n e r a s e d . T h i s c l o s u r e i s e s s e n t i a l ly t h e
f u n c t i o n C l a rk , P ig g o t a n d D a n i e l p e r f o r m e d
i n r e j e c t i n g C h i l d e ' s l a t e r w o r k a s u n s e r i o u s
a n d u n i m p o r t a n t . T h i s di sm i s sa l m a d e i t ea s y
f o r m a n y q u e s t i o n s o f t h e e c o l o g ic a l a p p r o a c h
t o r e m a i n u n a s k e d .
M o r e r e c e n t ly , t h e n a r r o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l ly
d e t e r m i n i s t a p p r o a c h h a s b e e n e x t e n si v e ly
c r i ti c i s e d [ 2 2 ] , a n d a r c h a e o l o g i c a l w o r k h a s
a p p e a r e d w h i c h h a s t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n
s o c i al r e l a t i o n s in a m o r e s e r i o u s w a y [ 2 3 ] .
C h i l d e 's w o r k h a s t o o m a n y f la w s to b e d e -
p l o y e d a s a p o i n t o f r e f e r e n c e o r a s a s ig n i fi -
c a n t s t i m u l u s f o r th i s c u r r e n t w o r k . M a n y o f
t h e M a r x is t n o t i o n s h e u s e d , s u c h a s t h e
M o r g a n s c h e m a o f s oc ia l e v o l u t i o n a n d t h e
' fa ls e c o n s c i o u s n e s s ' v ie w o f i d e o l o g y , n o
l o n g e r s e e m a s h e u r i s t i c , o r a t l e a s t n o l o n g e r
s e e m t e n a b l e in a n u n m o d i f i e d f o r m . Y e t
C h i l d e ' s w o r k r e m a i n s e x e m p l a r y i n tw o i m -
p o r t a n t r e s p e c t s . F i r s t , C h i l d e c o n s i s t e n t l y
a t t e m p t e d t o p r e s e n t h is in s i gh t s i n a f o r m
a c c es s ib l e a n d i n t e r e s t in g b o t h t o t h o s e o u t -
s i d e h is d i s c i p li n e a n d t o t h o s e o u t s i d e a c a -
d e m i c i n s t it u t i o n s . A t p r e s e n t , w h e n a c a d e m i c
k n o w l e d g e is in c r e a s i n g l y b e i n g p r o f e s s i o n a l -
i z e d , s p e c i a li z e d a n d m a r g i n a l i z e d , t h i s t a s k
i s m o r e u r g e n t t h a n e v e r . I n t e l l e c t u a l s w i t h a
c r i ti c a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s i n a c a d e m i c i n s t i t u t i o n s
s h o u l d n o t m e r e l y p r o d u c e c r it ic a ll y r ig o r o u s
d i s c o u r s e : i t is v i ta l t h a t t h e y a l so a t t a c k t h e
p r o d u c t i o n a n d r e p r o d u c t i o n o f p r e s e n t d iv i-
s i o n s o f k n o w l e d g e , w h i c h f r u s t r a te r e a l u n d e r -
s t a n d i n g a n d f e t i s h i z e d i s c i p l i n a r y b o u n d a r i e s .
S e c o n d l y , C h i ld e d i d n o t n e g l e c t t h e e p i s t e m o -
l o gi c al f o u n d a t i o n s a n d i m p l i c a t io n s o f w h a t
h e w a s d o i n g . I t i s t o t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f h is
p h i lo s o p h i c a l w o r k a n d p h i l o s o p h y i n c o n t e m -
p o r a r y a r c h a e o l o g y t h a t I n o w t u r n .
E M P I R I C IS M N D I D E O L O G Y IN R C H E O L O G Y
T h e c u r r e n t a r c h a e o lo g i c a l o r t h o d o x y s t il l
i n v o l v e s a c r u d e p o s i t i v i s m [ 2 4 ] . T h i s , a l o n g
w i t h t r a d i t io n a l e m p i r i c is t e p i s t e m o l o g y i n
g e n e r a l , h a s t w o b a s i c d e f i c i e n c ie s . F i r s t, i t
f a il s t o a p p r e c i a t e t h e s i g n i fi c a n c e o f t h e o r y i n
t h e k n o w l e d g e - p r o c e s s , a n d s e c o n d l y i t is d e -
v o i d o f a n y n o t i o n o f i d e o lo g y .
C h i l d e w r o t e l i tt l e r e la t i n g t o t h e f i r st p r o b -
l e m f r o m t h e p o i n t o f v i e w o f a rc h a e o l o g ic a l
e p i s t e m o l o g y , b u t h e c le a r ly r e c o g n i z e d t h a t
k n o w l e d g e w a s a c o n s t r u c t , c o n s t i t u te d o f
c o n c e p t s a n d t h e o r y [ 2 5 ] . I f a d e q u a t e e x p la n a -
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
6/8
2 5 0
t i o n s i n v o l v i n g s o c i a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s a r e t o b e
g e n e r a t e d , w e m u s t b r e a k a w a y f r o m t h e
l i m i t e d p o s i t iv i s t n o t i o n t h a t t h e o r y b u i l d i n g
is s im p l y s o m e t h i n g w h i c h p r e c e d e s t e s t in g .
K r i s t ia n s e n h a s m a d e t h e p o i n t w e l l:
One crucial probl em is concer ned with the relationship
between observed regularities in the archaeological record
and their underlying structural properties . Here most ex-
planations fail to transcend a purely empirical level, which
reflects a widely held positivistic belief that there exists a
testable one-to- one relationship between empirical observa-
tions and th e structural pro perties of prehistoric societies.
However, a mode of produ ction, or an economic system,
is not const ituted by the structur e of the empirical evi-
dence alone. It has to be reconstructed through an intel-
lectual process, using the formal system of theory as a
helping tool [ 26 I.
C h i l d e s m a i n c o n c e r n w a s w i t h t h e so c i a l
n a t u r e o f k n o w l e d g e . H e a d o p t e d t h e K a n t i a n
n o t i o n o f c a t eg o r ie s b u t i n c o r p o r a t e d i t in t o
a M a r x i s t p e r s p e c t iv e b y e m p h a s i z i n g t h e i r
so c i a l o r i g i n :
Space as a category is not that in which things are per-
ceived, but that in which members of a society co-operate
and act together on things [27].
It is owing to their social nature that categories appear
a priori
necessary and eternal. I n this sense they are in
truth anterior to private experience. They are ne ither dis-
covered nor invented by individuals, but imposed by
society [28].
C h i ld e e x t e n d e d t h is c o n c e p t i o n o f k n o w l e d g e
i n t o v a r i o u s a r e a s . F o r i n s t a n c e , h e d i s c u s s e d
t h e r o l e o f s c i e n ce , k n o w l e d g e a n d r e l ig i o n in
t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f so c i e ty [ 2 9 ] . I a m c o n -
c e r n e d o n l y w i t h t h e w a y i n w h i c h t h i s p e r s p e c -
t iv e in f o r m e d s o m e c o m m e n t s C h i l de m a d e o n
t h e p l a c e o f a r c h a e o l o g y i n s o c i e t y . C h i l d e
r e c o g n i se d t h a t h i s t o r y , a s a f o r m o f k n o w l e d g e ,
w a s a n id e o l o g i c a l c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e h i s t o r i a n s
s e l e c t i o n o f e v e n t s
is deter mined to a very small e xten t by his personal idio-
syncracies, but on the whole by t radition an d social inter-
ests. Indeed... the standar d of th e memorable is a social
one, dictated by interests shared by the whole community,
or mor e precisely by the ruling class in each commu nity.
Again, in so far as an historian import s judg ement s
into his narrative, the standard of value will be determined
socially. It is just no good demanding that history shall be
unbiased. The writer cannot help being influenced by the
interests and prejudices of the society to which he belongs
- his class, his nation, his church [30] .
T h e g e n e r a l p o i n t a ls o re l a t e d t o a r c h a e o l o g y ,
a n d C h i l d e w a s p a r t i c u l a r l y c o n c e r n e d b y t h e
u s e o f r a ci al d i f f u s i o n i s t t h e o r i e s o f t h e A r y a n s
i n N a z i i d e o l o g y :
In 1933 it can hardly be alleged that Preh istory is a useless
study, wholely r emote f rom and irrelevant to practical life...
No one wh o has read
M e i n K a m p f
or even the extracts
therefrom in
The Tinzes
can fail to appreciate the profound
effect which theories of tile racial superiority of Aryan s
have exercised on co ntempo rary Germany [31 ].
A r c h a e o l o g i c a l t h e o r i e s c a n f u n c t i o n i n m o r e
o r le ss th e s a m e w a y a s s o c i o b i o l o g y h a s d e m o n -
s t r a b ly d o n e i n l e g i ti m a t i n g ra c ia l a n d o t h e r
f o r m s o f o p p r e s s i o n . A r c h a e o l o g i s t s h a v e a t
p r e s e n t n o n o t i o n o f i d e o lo g y , w h i c h m e a n s
t h a t t h e d i s c i p l i n e c a n n o t b e c r i t i c a l l y s e l f -
c o n s c i o u s , it c a n n o t b e a w a r e o f t h e w a y s in
w h i c h t h e o r i e s a n d s t r u c t u r e s o f i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
c a n f u n c t i o n in w a y s u n i n t e n d e d a n d u n s e e n
b y t h e i r p r o d u c e r s . S o m e f o r m s o f c o n te m p o
r a r y c u l t u r a l m a t e r i a l i s t i n t e r p r e t a t i o n h a v e a
g r e a t d e a l i n c o m m o n w i t h s o c i o b i o lo g y a n d
p r o v i d e e x t r a s u p p o r t f o r i ts p r e m i se s .
A r c h a e o l o g y n o w is i n c r e a s in g l y a r t i c u l a t e d
i n t o w i d e r s o c i a l a c t i v i t i e s t h r o u g h t h e d e v e l -
o p m e n t o f s o -c a ll ed p u b l i c a r c h a e o l o g y a n d
t h r o u g h t h e i n s t i t u t i o n a l i z a t i o n o f v a r io u s
a r c h a e o l o g i c a l p r a c t i c e s i n g o v e r n m e n t d e p a r t -
m e n t s a n d a f f il ia t e d o r g a n i z a t i o n s . W o r k i n th i s
a re a e n ta i ls m a n y p r o b l e m s c o m p a r a b l e t o
t h o s e w h i c h h a v e a r is e n i n a p p l i e d a n t h r o -
p o l o g y : w h a t i s t h e s i g n i f ic a n c e o f k e y t e r m s
d r a w n n o t f r o m t h e o r et ic a l w o r k b u t f r o m
v a r i o u s o t h e r d i s c o u r s e s s u c h a s n a t i o n a l
h e r i t a g e a n d c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s ? A r c h a e o l o g i -
c a l s a lv a ge w o r k m a y b e c o m e m e r e l y p a l l ia t iv e ,
f u n c t i o n i n g e s s e n t i a ll y t o l e g i t im a t e d e v e l o p -
m e n t a n d t h e d e s t r u c t i o n o f s it es ( w i t h w h i c h
a n i n d i g e n o u s g ro u p m a y i d e n t if y ) . T h e c u r-
r e n t f r a m e w o r k f o r t h e c o n s i d e r a t io n o f th e s e
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
7/8
2 5 1
i s s u e s i s e n t i r e l y i n a d e q u a t e ; t h e y a r e c o n -
c e i v e d a s i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c 'e t h i c a l ' c h o i c e s r a t h e r
t h a n a s p o l i t i c a l q u e s t i o n s w i t h p r a c t i c a l c o n s e -
q u e n c e s .
H e n c e , a p a p e r i n o n e o f t h e m a j o r c o l le c -
t io n s o n c u l t u r e r e s o u rc e m a n a g e m e n t u r g e d
a r c h a e o l o g i s t s t o s l l t h e d i s c i p l i n e t o t h e p u b l i c
a n d t o g o v e r n m e n t , w h i le p r e s e n t i n g d e ta i l e d ,
e v a l u a t e d s t ra t e g ie s f o r e f f i c i e n t m a r k e t i n g [ 3 2 ] .
I s t h i s re a ll y t h e k i n d o f r h e t o r i c t h a t a r c h a e -
o l o g is t s s h o u l d p a r t i c i p a t e i n o r e n d o r s e ?
A r c h a e o l o g i s t s h a v e o f t e n t a k e n p a r t i sa n
p o s i t i o n s r e g a r d i n g c o n s e r v a t i o n i s s ue s [ 3 3 ] .
H e r e w e s e e t h e c e n t r a l e r r o r o f t h e e c o l o g i c a l
a p p r o a c h in p r e h i s to r y a n d a n t h r o p o l o g y re -
p r o d u c e d i n t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y p o l it ic a l c o n -
t e x t . T h e m o s t c r u c ia l i n a d e q u a c y o f t h e
v a r i o u s e c o l o g i c a l a p p r o a c h e s t i e s i n t h e f a i l u r e
t o a p p r e c i a t e t h e r o l e o f s o c i a l r e l a t i o n s i n
d o m i n a t i n g , i n d e e d c r e a ti n g , p a t t e r n s o f r e-
s o u r c e e x p l o i t a t i o n a n d s u b s i s t e n c e s tr a te g i es .
A s E n z e n b e r g e r h a s a r g u e d i n a d e t a i l e d c r i -
t iq u e o f t h e e c o lo g ic a l m o v e m e n t in c o n t e m -
p o r a r y p o l i ti c s [ 3 4 ] , e n v i r o n m e n t a l is s u es c a n -
n o t b e i s o l a t e d f r o m s o c i a l r e l a t i o n s a n d e c o -
n o m i c s y s t e m s . W h e r e a r c h a e o l o g i s ts a r e i n-
v o l v e d in q u e s t i o n s o f p u b l i c p o l i c y , t h e y
m u s t r e c o g n i z e th e d o m i n a n c e o f c e r ta i n i n te r -
e s ts , a n d t h e c o n s t r a i n t s th i s d o m i n a n c e i m -
p o s e s u p o n t h e p o s s i b il it y o f i n f o r m e d d e c i -
s i o n m a k i n g . I f a r c h a e o l o g i s t s a re t o a c t in a n
a d e q u a t e l y s u b v e r s i v e b u t c o n s t r u c t i v e w a y
i n t h e p u b l i c s p h e r e , c o n f r o n t i n g d e v e l o p e r s ,
t h e n t h e ir p r ac t ic e m u s t b e i n f o r m e d b y a
c r i t i c a l s o c i a l t h e o r y w h i c h s i t u a t e s d e v e l o p e r s
a n d p u b l i c a r c h a e o l o g i s t s , c a p i t a l , a n d t h e
s t a t e r e la t iv e t o e a c h o t h e r , p u t t i n g a r c h a e -
o l o g ic a l k n o w l e d g e w h e r e i t b e l o n g s - i n th e
s e rv i ce o f i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s . A n e w c o h e r e n c e
is n e c e s s a r y b e t w e e n a t h o r o u g h g o i n g s o c ia l
a r c h a e o l o g y a n d a c r i t i c a l s o c i a l p e r s p e c t i v e o n
t h e r o le o f a r c h a e o l o g y a s a f o r m o f k n o w l e d g e
w i t h s p e c i f ic i n s t i t u t i o n a l c o n t e x t s , c a u s e s a n d
c o n s e q u e n c e s i n p o l i c y a n d p o l it ic s .
C h i ld e 's w o r k o p e n e d u p t h e t e r ri to r i es o f
s o c ia l a r c h a e o l o g y a n d t h e s o c ia l lo c a t i o n o f
a r c h a e o l o g y . H i s p o s i t i o n s h a v e b e e n o b s c u r e d ,
d i s m i s se d a n d m i s r e a d , b u t f r o m w i t h i n t h e
p e r s p e c t i v e o f th e s e t e r r i t o r i e s as t h e y h a v e
d e v e l o p e d , w e ca n r e c o g n i z e n o t o n l y h i s
p i o n e e r i n g r o l e , b u t a l s o t h e l o g i c o f i t s d is -
m i s s a l a n d m i s r e a d i n g .
NOT S
1 V . G o rd o n C h i ld e , The Danube in Prehistory ( O x f o r d :
O x f o rd U n iv e r s i ty P res s, 1 9 2 9 ) , p p . v -v i . T h e a p p ro a c h i s
imp l i c i t i n v a r io u s e a r l i er w o rk s : O n th e d a te a n d o r ig in
o f M i n y a n w a r e , Journal of Hellenic Studies vol . 35
(1 9 1 5 ) , p p . 1 9 6 -2 0 7 ; t h e f i r s t e d i t i o n o f The Dawn of
European Civilization (L o n d o n : K e g a n P a u l , T re n c h ,
T ru b n e r a n d C o . , 1 9 2 5 ) ;
TheAryans
(L o n d o n : K e g a n P a u l ,
T re n c h , T ru b n e r a n d C o . , 1 9 2 6 ) .
2 The Danube in Prehistory
p. vi.
3 D e f in i t i o n s s im i l ar t o th a t q u o te d a p p e a r in : The Bronze
Age (C a mb r id g e : C a mb r id g e U n iv e r s i ty P res s, 1 9 3 0 ) , p p .
4 1 - 4 2 ; C h a n g i n g m e t h o d s a n d a i m s i n P r e h i s t o ry , P r o -
ceedings of the Prehistoric Society vol . 1 (1935) , p . 3 ;
Scotland Before the Scots (L o n d o n : Me th u e n , 1 9 4 6 ) , p . 2 ;
Prehistoric Migrations in Europe (O s to : A s c h e h o u g a n d
C o . , 1 9 5 0 ) , p p . 2 -3 ; A Short Introduction to Archaeology
(N e w Y o rk : C o l l i e r , 1 9 5 6 ) , p p . 15-16;Piecing Together
the Past (L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e a n d K e g a n P a u l , 1 9 5 6 ) , p . 1 6 ;
The Prehistory of European Society (London: Casse l l ,
1958), p. 10.
4 The Aryans
p. 81 ;
The Danube in Prehistory
p . 297 ,
p . 348 .
5 The Bronze Age pp . 128--30 , p . 199 .
6 Prehistoric Communities o f the British Isles ( L o n d o n :
C h a m b e rs a n d C o . , 1 9 4 0 ) , p . 9 9 , p . 1 2 8 .
7 T . Mu r ra y h a s d e v e lo p e d a s im i l a r a rg u me n t , a l th o u g h
f ro m a r a th e r d i f f e re n t p o in t o f v i ew . S e e T . Mu r ra y ,
Patterns in Prehistory: Gordon Childe Reconsidered
(U n iv e r s i ty o f S y d n e y , B A (H o n o u rs ) t h e s is , 1 9 7 8 ) .
8 S . P ig g o t, T h e D a w n : a n d a n E p i lo g u e , Antiquity vol .
32 (1958) , p . 77 .
9 S . P i g go t , V e r e G o r d o n C h i l d e : 1 8 9 2 - 1 9 5 7 , Proceed-
ings of the British Academy v o l . 4 4 (1 9 5 8 ) , p . 3 1 2 . T h i s
t e x t w a s d e s c r ib e d b y C la rk a s ' a k e y s o u rc e ' o n C h i ld e .
G . C la rk , P re h i s to ry s in c e C h i ld e , Institute of Archae-
ology Bulletin
vol . 13 (1976) , p . 2 .
1 0 G ly n D a n ie l , One Hundred and Fif ty Years of Archaeology
(L o n d o n : D u c k w o r th , 1 9 7 5 ) , p . 3 7 5 .
11 Cla rk , op . c i t . , 1976 , p . 5 .
12 ibid. p. 4.
13
Ibid.
p. 18.
14 Ibid. p. 3.
1 5 M. S p r ig gs , In t ro d u c t io n , i n M. S p r ig g s ( e d . )A rc h a e o lo g y
and Anthropology: Areas of Mutual lnterest ( O x f o r d :
B r i t i sh A rc h a e o lo g ic a l R e p o r t s , 1 9 7 7 ) , p . 5 .
16 Cla rk , op . cit. 1976 , p . 3 .
1 7 P ig g o t , V e re G o r d o n C h i ld e ,
op. cit.
1958 , p . 310 .
-
8/10/2019 marxism childe archaeology.pdf
8/8