markus brugger & michael moll

16
EIROFORUM RADHARD Workshop in Lisbon 16-18 March 2010 Markus Brugger & Michael Moll 14 April 2010 – IRRAD Working Group - some comments – Note : A report on the Workshop conclusions is being prepared (to be submitted to management of EIRO members) Note : CERN members of organizing committee (Anghinolfi, Brugger, Moll) have planned to give a presentation at CERN when the report is finalized

Upload: royal

Post on 24-Feb-2016

62 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

14 April 2010 – IRRAD Working Group. EIROFORUM RADHARD Workshop in Lisbon 16-18 March 2010. - some comments – Note : A report on the Workshop conclusions is being prepared (to be submitted to management of EIRO members) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

EIROFORUM RADHARD Workshopin Lisbon 16-18 March 2010

Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

14 April 2010 – IRRAD Working Group

- some comments –

Note: A report on the Workshop conclusions is being prepared (to be submitted to management of EIRO members)

Note: CERN members of organizing committee (Anghinolfi, Brugger, Moll) have planned to give a presentation at CERN when the report is finalized

Page 2: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

What is EIROforum?· EIROforum

· EIROforum is a partnership of Europe's seven largest intergovernmental research organizations. In EIROforum, these organizations pursue joint initiatives, combine resources, and share best practices.

· The seven EIROforum members are:· CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research · EFDA - European Fusion Development Agreement · EMBL - European Molecular Biology Laboratory · ESA - European Space Agency · ESO - European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere · ESRF - European Synchrotron Radiation Facility· ILL - Institut Laue Langevin

· EIROforum Instrumentation Group (1 out of 5 EIRO working groups)The seven intergovernmental organisations involved in EIROforum have extensive expertise in large infrastructures relying on high-technology instrumentation. In the general context of integrated instrumentation systems, the Instrumentation Thematic Working Group develops its activity around two main areas:• Exploring the fields of expertise of the EIROs, and identify areas where cooperation would bring clear added value.• Fostering an efficient information exchange across their organisations by means of specific and dedicated tools such as

schools, workshops and databases. While large audience conferences are organised mainly according to disciplines (synchrotron radiation, fusion, astronomy etc.), these dedicated events will be built up to encourage more targeted networking within the EIROs.

RADHARDWorkshop

Page 3: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Eiroforum Workshop – March 2010

http://radhard2010.ipfn.ist.utl.pt/

Page 4: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

45 ParticipantsSurname Name(s) InstitutionAngelone Maurizio ENEAAnghinolfi Francis CERN Bagatin Marta DEI - University of

Padova Boccardi Andrea CERNBracco Chiara CERNBravin Enrico CERNBrichard Benoît SCK-CEN Brugger Markus CERNCarlier Etienne CERNErd Christian ESAFaccio Federico CERN Farthouat Philippe CERN Fernandes Luis INOVFerrere Didier Uni of Geneva Glaser Maurice Cern Gonçalves Bruno Soares IPFNHernando Montse Felip Fusion for Energy Hessey Nigel NikhefLéon Agustín Fernández ESA Lousã Pedro INOVMoll Michael CERNMurari Andrea JETNieminen Petteri ESAOrtigão Catarina LIPPerna Lorenzo Fusion for EnergyPiedade Fernando INOVPillon Mario ENEA Frascati Plewinski Francois ESS ScandinaviaPoivey Christian ESA

Ravotti Federico CERNRodrigues Pedro LIPSanz Raquel Ibérica del Espacio Semprimoschnig Christopher ESASilva Antonio Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão

NuclearSpiezia Giovanni CERN Syme Brian EFDA CCFE Association

Tavlet Marc CERN Vale Alberto IPFNVarela Paulo IPFN

Vicente Sehila M. Gonzalez de EFDAVillari Rosaria ENEAVincke Helmut CERN Watkins Michael EFDA-JET CSUWijnands Thijs CERN Wong John ESA

38% CERN – HEP (17)47% EFDA – Fusion (21)13% ESA – Space (6) 1 person from ESS

Page 5: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Participation: Facilities Working Group

Facilities working group

members

Presentation on behalf of Working Group

… find a copy of the final version on our website :http://www.cern.ch/irradiation-facilities/

Page 6: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Eiroforum Workshop: Sessions

Welcome and Introduction • CERN, Philippe Farthouat • Joint European Torus - JET, A. Murari• ESA, Chistian Erd• European Spalation Source, Francois Plewinski (ESS) 

1: Radiation Environments; Markus Brugger• Challenges arising from the Super-LHC project -- Nigel Hessey (CERN)• Monte Carlo Simulations of Radiation Fields in Accelerator

Environments -- Markus Brugger (CERN)• Radiation Shielding in Accelerator environments -- Helmut Vincke

(CERN)• Space radiation environment and shielding -- Petteri Nieminen (ESA)• Radiation environment and shielding for fusion – A.Murari (EFDA-JET)• Determining the radiation field in a fusion machine -- B. Syme (EFDA-

JET)  

2: Standardization, Radiation Hardness Assurance & Qualification; Christian Poivey• Space radiation hardness assurance -- Christian Poivey (ESA)• Standardisation & qualification for space -- Jonh Wong (ESA)• Status of ECI and other European qualifcation programs -- J.Wong (ESA)• Radiation hardness policy in LHC experiments -- F.Anghinolfi (CERN)

 

3: Materials; Federico Ravotti • Materials in space environment -- Christopher Semprimoschnig(ESA) • Material damage studies at CERN -- Marc Tavlet (CERN)• In-orbit testing of Materials and Components – C.Semprimoschnig (ESA)

 

 

4: Components; Francis Anghinolfi• Design techniques and tools for the radiation hardening of ASIC and FPGA --

Agustin Fernandez-Leon (ESA)• Radiation related challenges for space applications -- Christian Poivey (ESA)• The technology of CVD diamond detectors for fusion -- Mario Pillon (EFDA)• LHC experiments: a large scale application of HBD for ASICs – F.Faccio

(CERN)  • Radiation damage in optoelectronic components and optical fibers -- Jan Troska

(CERN)• Evaluating SEU sensitivity in the LHC environment -- Federico Faccio (CERN)

 

5: Irradiation facilities; M. Watkins• Irradiation Test facilities and methods for component testing – C.Poivey (ESA)• Present and future Irradiation Facilities at CERN -- Michael Moll (CERN)• Test & Qualification of electronic components for accelerators– T.Wijnands

(CERN)• Irradiation test facilities for fusion -- Sehila M. Gonzalez (EFDA)

 

6: Radiation Monitoring; P.Nieminen• Dosimetry and radiation monitoring(for Instrumentation protection) at CERN --

Thijs Wijnands (CERN)• Dosimetry and radiation monitoring for space applications – P.Nieminen (ESA)• Calculation of shutdown dose rate for fusion devices -- Sara Villari (EFDA-JET)

  

7: Roadmaps (summary by session chairs); C.Erd8: Wrap-up and way forward; Bruno S. Gonçalves

Topics organized in 6 sessions

Page 7: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesChristian Poivey - ESA

· TID, TNID, SEE - testing· Test standards defined for

radiation tests· Standards for TID and SEE

testing available· No standard for TNID

available (under preparation)

Page 8: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesChristian Poivey - ESA

· Long list of facilities covering needs for ESA (TID, TNID and SEE)· To my understanding no need/interest for CERN facilities

Page 9: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Session 5: Irradiation Facilities Sehila M. González de Vicente - EFDA

· Need very high intensity neutron source for material testing of inner wall and other components (14 MeV n up to 3dpa for ITER, up to 20-50 dpa for follow-up reactors)

· Planned Facility: IFMIF in Japan ….. operational in 2020??

250 mA D+ beam

Page 10: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Session 5: Irradiation Facilities Sehila M. González de Vicente - EFDA

· High intensity neutron sources used (e.g. SINQ PSI or nuclear reactors in Petten and Mol where material is placed in reactor core for e.g. one year)

· High intensity gamma sources (e.g. 70 kGy/hr in Petten) and high intensity ion sources for some experiments. (Note: Gif++ has 50 Gy/day at 50cm)

· Example: Ongoing test at High Flux reactor in Petten (NL)

Page 11: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Summary of Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesMichael Watkins – EFDA JET

Page 12: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Summary of Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesMichael Watkins – EFDA JET

Page 13: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Summary of Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesMichael Watkins – EFDA JET

· Outcome of this session (M.Moll view):· CERN on-site facilities seemingly not interesting to EIRO partners· Common interest in SEE testing at facilities outside of CERN· What was lacking to my opinion: Participation of Y.Kadi cancelled –

Target for high flux beams should be of interest to Fusion, CERN and (ESS).

Page 14: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Summary of Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesMichael Watkins – EFDA JET

Page 15: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Summary of Session 5: Irradiation FacilitiesMichael Watkins – EFDA JET

Page 16: Markus Brugger & Michael Moll

Next step …. ongoing

· Create documents for each session identifying:

· Areas of common interest to several organizations

· Areas viable for knowledge transfer from one institution to others

· Areas viable for collaborations (sharing) of infrastructure (both available and investment), possibly providing cross institutional access to infrastructure at the partner institutions

· Areas for collaborations of software utilities/generic parts

· Potential new technical developments with goals common to more than one institution

1 Session: SESSION XY

1.1 Synergies & Common Challenges and Problems - Try to summarize all points that came up during the discussions. - Try to describe common projects & developments, sharing of infrastructure as well as knowledge transfer programs with potential for evolution into concrete projects in more detail below - please provide one section for each potential project/development.

1.2 Name of Potential Technical Development A

1.2.1 Interested Partners - Identify the interested institutions and contact names

1.2.2 Purpose of Development - Describe why the partners need this development - Are there any conflicting interests?

1.2.3 Technical Specifications - Give a detailed description of the required development

1.2.4 Development Steps/Phases

1.2.5 Target Timescales of Intended Availability

1.2.6 Preliminary Schedule

1.2.7 Estimate: Cost and Funding Source/Contributions - Rough Order of Magnitude Estimate

1.2.8 Strategic Way Forward for Implementation - Try to identify strategies to arrive to implementation plans

1.3 Possible Technical Development B

......

1.4 Possible other Collaborations between Organizations · Include list of organizations and respective contribution

Template: