marketing practice final

Upload: lavanya-hatwalne

Post on 29-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Marketing Practice Final

    1/4

    From

    To

    LAVANYA HATWALNE

    DIV : A ROLL NO: 30

    NMIMS FT-MBA CORE Ist YEAR

    DATE: 17/08/2009

    Market Report on LiRil 2000

  • 8/9/2019 Marketing Practice Final

    2/4

    After reading the Liril story in Brand Equity dated 05 August 09, I could relate themetamorphosis of Liril 2000 from Liril to a mythological bird called Phoenix. It is an immortal

    bird that, when it dies, bursts into flames and is reborn from its own ashes to make a miraculouscomeback. The new phoenix is destined to live as long as its old self. This time Liril is living its10 th life per say and Hindustan Unilevers expects it to live its life to the fullest. But thats a bigdebate and a hot topic of discussion in the advertising & marketing community today. The lastattempt to revive the once-popular brand itself is under question here.

    In a brief to recapitulate the events in the life of Liril, Hindustan Levers acted to the fact that the brands market share was down to 1.2%, a far cry from the once 14% share. HULs Liril soapwas first popularized by the signature imagery of a bikini-clad girl under a waterfall and ownedthe proposition of freshness in that category for a long time. However they decided to go throughsweeping change in their advertising strategy with a completely different setting, early morningcharm inside a home claiming to rejuvenate 2,000 body points with every use. Some say its aterrible mistake on HULs part to have changed the idea of Liril altogether and some consider itHUL might be focusing on the new age consumers, who are not very influenced by the earlier

    brand imagery.

    This leads us to answer two probable questions on the Liril 2000 fiasco.

    1. Do you think Liril needs an overhaul? If so why?

    In the Rs 4,000-crore Indian toilet soap market, Lirils share of value has slipped from 3.5 per cent in 2000 to just 1.2 per cent at present. (Source: ACNielsen ORG-MARG). The brand was lying low for a long time. And so, it was time the company built some excitementaround it. But instead of directly saying that the soap is about freshness, the latest TV

    Commercial of Liril, focuses on a family, a married couple with a kid rather than on a femalemodel something most of us would not associate Liril with.HLLs earlier attempts to breathe new life into Liril havent been too successful. In the mid-1990s, it launched variants like Liril Cologne Lime and Liril Active Shower Gel. Both weresoon withdrawn from the market and for some years after that, there was no excitementaround the brand.In 1999, HLL launched yet another Liril variant, Rainfresh, in a blue-coloured pack Lirilsfirst extension since its inception to a non-lime variant. This was followed by Liril IcyCool Mint (variant containing menthol) in April 2002. Rainfresh and two shower gelsintroduced in 2003 have also been withdrawn.Then HUL introduced a highly hyped Orange Splash, which was a new variant in itscategory, it showed good signs, but declined later on.But why is a brand that created the lime category in the Indian soaps market facing suchslippery times? Its not just the entry of new players although there are plenty of those.Cinthol launched its lime variant, Lime Fresh, Nirma followed soon with Nirma Lime, But it

    is telling that apart from Liril, all the other lime soaps are being phased out actually, thefreshness category is declining. The market of lime-based soaps was soaked, washing awayLirils lime hegemony.

    Page 2 of 4

    http://marketingpractice.blogspot.com/2009/06/brand-update-liril.htmlhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Brand-Equity/Brand-Liril-to-Liril-2000/articleshow/4858645.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Brand-Equity/Brand-Liril-to-Liril-2000/articleshow/4858645.cmshttp://marketingpractice.blogspot.com/2009/06/brand-update-liril.html
  • 8/9/2019 Marketing Practice Final

    3/4

    This led the HUL think tanks to create and develop an altogether different image of Liril inthe eyes of the consumer, not only did they introduce a totally different approach to theadvertising but also the entire product was changed. The brand packaging has been changedto dark green and the shape of the soap is changed to rectangle. This overhauling of Liril wasinevitable, but only time can tell how the consumers will react to the new product.

    2. Is the positioning of Liril 2000, a confused one? Is it appropriate for Lever to moveaway from `freshness to `rejuvenate 2000 body parts? Will this help Liril acquire new customers and win back the lost market share?

    As mentioned earlier, Liril was loosing its domination in the lime-based category, thefreshness category itself was declining in the market. This has left Liril is a state of dilemma and confused like a proverbial drunkard who went to Himalayas to become a sadhu.

    Neither he could become one, nor could he get back to his life of drunkenness!!!. But, I dothink that there has to have a strong reason behind the change where the finest brains in HULmust have agreed to change Lirils persona from freshness to rejuvenate 2000 body

    parts, but the attempt didnt really click like the original and to the expectation of HUL.

    The concept is flawed in a sense that as HUL obviously borrowed Liril 2000 idea from the parents companys Lever 2000 , also the larger issue is about the various failed attempts torevive the brand. A set in the desert, under a different waterfall, in a car wash, in the rain,amongst dolphins did not really create the hype of the first ad . So is it about trying toomany things in ads and a failure of advertising. But the idea of `rejuvenate 2000 body parts is being strongly backed by HUL.

    A HUL spokesperson, explains that while it is good to be iconic, it is critical to remainrelevant to the current consumers. He says with the changing social context, the key issue

    being addressed by the Liril of 70s was no longer relevant to the consumers of today.Changing a customer's mind is another matter since they are very difficult to change. With amodicum of experience in a product category, consumers assume they're right. A perceptionthat exists in the mind is often interpreted as a universal truth. People are seldom, if ever,wrong. At least in their own minds.

    Nothing interesting ever happens unless we take risks. But when you realize you've made amistake, cut your losses. It's just so hard to admit a mistake. Denial is a wonderful thing.

    I completely agree that it was appropriate for Lever to have gone through this muchneeded change . We need to give ourselves the freedom to take risks and try a lot of differentthings. But the obvious corollary here is that not all of those risks will work out. We need tolearn to quickly recognize the ones that don't and take the appropriate action.

    Since decades anybody watching the advertisement for Liril soap could see only a girlromancing with water which was considered to be a sign of

    Page 3 of 4

    http://www.lever2000.com/http://www.lever2000.com/
  • 8/9/2019 Marketing Practice Final

    4/4

    freshness. That was how Liril has being positioned since ages in the minds of the consumers.The Fresh lime concept of Liril had made home in the minds of the consumers. More or lesseverybody felt that this soap was mainly for the ladies and that too the working segment. Themain theme of the advertisement was freshness which revolved around lime.

    HUL wanted to launch new disposition in Liril however it was very difficult for the companyto break this image in the minds of the consumers. The freshness concept of Liril wasstrongly built in the minds of the consumers and changing this brand image was somethingthat was really changeling for HUL when it thought of venturing into other areas.

    With all theses changes the company somehow had to change the commercial so that the brand image also gets changed. Finally HUL with the help of Lintas has made this.

    Gone are the days were one could just see a girl dancing. The company then decided tointroduce a family that cares and look for pleasure by the sense of touch of softer, cleaner skin just to ensure that the brand image of lime or freshness for the Liril gets changed in theminds of the consumers.

    So will this new strategy work for HUL in time to come? The strategy might be negative inthe short-term but looks appealing in the long-term. The problem with not having a focus isthat your customers can only describe you in terms of your past. Liril's Freshness taglineeven reinforces this. It's a fine tagline, but it doesn't say much to me about the future. The

    New Liril is trying to choose rejuvenate 2000 body parts as key benefit around which they build their product message.

    Frankly I liked the concept of rejuvenation and 2000 body points It is a celebration of their 20 years of history. Its a new dawn for Liril, a totally new experience. That may be whatHUL also is hoping for.

    Page 4 of 4

    A fact about Liril - How did Liril ad first came about?

    In the 1970s HLL developed Indian campaigns for multinational type products. The most memorable brand till, possibly, today was Liril soap. They studied the Indian housewife to find out what she thought about when shegot 10 minutes to herself. HLLs research came up with an amazing answer that she dreams of escape froma life of drudgery and responsibility. Her thoughts begin to drift as she begins her bath. She hums a tune from a

    popular Bollywood film and the most popular fantasy of all was Amitabh Bachchan riding on a white horseand carrying her away from workworkwork. They then decided on a freshness soap based on thesefindings. The soap would refresh the housewife as she escapes into her bath. On the basis of that was inventedthe girl in the waterfall. The lala-la jingle became the theme song for young people .in India. The ad was

    partly inspired by Raj Kapoors movies and largely by Tarzan and Jane.