marketing of technology intensive products dr. matti j. haverila
TRANSCRIPT
42510011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
Marketing of Technology Intensive Products
Dr. Matti J. Haverila
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Table Contents• Issues for High Tech Companies (1-5)
• Hurdle of Internationalization
• What seems to be the Problem
• Types of New Products
• Strategy Process (1-5)
• Positioning
• Positioning Example
• Differentiation
• Key Points in Strategy Process (1)
• Business Idea
• Key Points in Strategy Process (2-7)
• John Warnock, Adobe
• NPDP
• Stage-Gate NPD (1-7)
• Approaches to NPD
• NPD Strategies
• Marketing- Technology Balance
• Marketing-Mix - Product (1)
• Learning Cycle
• Marketing-Mix - Product (2)
• Degree of Product Modification
• Research Process
• Research Results (1-4)
• Successful vs. Unsuccessful (1-4)
• Conclusion (1-5)
• Recommendations
• Finland vs. California (1-2)
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Issues for High Tech Companies (1)*
Finance related factors Weight of the problem
The difficulty to get financial support 84
High cost of financing 79
Acquisition of financing 72
Total of finance related factors 235
R&D related factorsThe credibility of the company amongst the customers 94The capability to follow the development of technology 65Lack of R&D competence 45The technological ageing of products 10Total of R&D related factors 214
* See Autio et al: Uudet teknologiayritykset...
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Issues for High Tech Companies (2)
Competition related factors Weight of the problem
The competition by replaceable products 64
Domestic competitors 47
International competitors 25
Total of competition related factors 136
Labour related factorsThe acquisition of employees 100The high cost of employees 59Total of labour related factors 159
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Issues for High Tech Companies (3)Management related factors Weight of the problem
Lack of accounting competence 109
The difficulty to get management team 14
The difficulty to get board 14
Total of management related factors 137
Production related factorsThe acquisition of machinery and equipment 66The long production time of the product 63Total of production related factors 129
Other factorsThe bureaucracy of the government and local authority 106The acquisition of factory space 43The attitude of the university 29The attitude of the family 25Total of other factors 203
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Issues for High Tech Companies (4)
Market or marketing related factors Weight of the problem
Minor identity of the company 143
Lack of marketing competence 124
Getting of customers and creating customer relationships 98
The high price of the product or service 88
Difficulty to get to the distribution channels 59
Acquisition of international contacts 52
Total of market or marketing related factors 564
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Issues for High Tech Companies (5)
Issue Area Weight of the problem
Market or marketing related factors 564
Finance related factors 235
R&D related factors 214
Other factors 203
Labour related factors 159
Management related factors 137
Competition related factors 136Total of production related factors 129
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Hurdle of Internationalization
Sales
North-Americantechnologycompanies
Finnish technologycompanies
Hurdle of Internationalization
Technology Companies
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
What seems to be the problem?
Richard M. Cyert, the president of Carnegie-Mellon University:
America's most formidable high-tech problem is not innovation - the problem is marketing new ideas.
Sam Walton
There is only one boss - the customer. And he can fire everybody in the company from the chairman on down, simply by spending his money somewhere else.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
The Types of New Products
Newness to the Company
Newness to the Market
Low High
High
Low
Improvements /Revisions to
Existing Products(26%)
Cost Reductions(11%)
Repositionings(7%)
Additions to Existing
Product Lines(26%)
New Product Lines
(20%)
New to theWorld Products
(10%)
GoTo
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
New Product Development Process (NPDP)
Exploration
Idea Generation
Concept development
Business Analysis
Screening
Protype development
Market testing
Plant Scale-Up
Product Launch
Post Launch Check-Up
Business Strategy
Commercialized Products
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (1)
Idea Gate 1 Stage 1 Gate 2 Stage 2
Gate 3 Stage 3 Gate 4 Stage 4
Gate 5 Stage 5 PLR
Initial Screen Second Screen
Decision on Business case
PostdevelopmentReview
Prelaunch BusinessAnalysis
Post LaunchReview
Preliminary Investigation
Detailed Investigation(build business case)
Development Testing &Validation
Production & Launch
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (2)
Idea Gate 1
Initial Screen
• The company identifies potential wants and needs of each customer segment, examines the external market and competitive trends.
• It offers tangible needs, wants, complaints and problems that customers have about a certain activity, function or product performance.
•In the idea generation stage company generates new ideas, that fit the identified categories, through a variety of problem-solving and creative techniques.
• A good new product idea can make or break a project: ideas are the feedstock of the new product process.
The decision to commit resources to the project.
Evaluation of “must meet and should meet” criteria,
which deal with strategic alignment, project feasibility,
magnitude of opportunity and market attractiveness,
differential advantage, synergy with the company’s
resources, and fit with company policies.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (3)
Stage 1 Gate 2
Second Screen
Preliminary Investigation
• Turning an idea into a concept means giving the idea form, substance and shape. The concept must describe the real, functional or perceived benefits of the new product concept.
• In gate 2 the project is re-evaluated in the light of the new information obtained in stage 2.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (4)
Stage 2 Gate 3
Decision on Business case
Detailed Investigation(build business case)
• Business analysis requires examining the dynamics of the category and the competition, cost positions, consumer buying patterns and fit with internal strengths in order to develop financial projections.
• Stage 2 is a detailed investigation stage, which clearly defines the product and verifies the attractiveness of the project prior to expenses.
• Gate 3 is the final gate before the development stage, the last point at which the project can be killed before entering heavy spending. In gate 3 the project is re-evaluated based on f.ex. NPV and IRR together with sensitivity analysis, such as portfolio impact assessment through portfolio maps.
The elements of the definition include target market definition, delineation of the product concept, specification of a product positioning strategy, and spelling out essential and desired product features, attributes, requirements and specifications.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (5)
Stage 3 Gate 4
PostdevelopmentReview
Development
• The objective is to design one or more prototypes, that are in final form for customer testing. Company figures accurately the cost of materials and manufacturing.
• Stage 3 witnesses the implementation of the development plan and the physical development of the product. The emphasis is on technical work, but marketing and manufacturing activities proceed in parallel. These activities are iterative, with each development result taken to the customer for assessment and feedback.
The post implementation review is a check on the progress and continued attractiveness or the product and project. The gate revisits the economic aspects via revised financial analysis based on new and more accurate information. The validation plans for next stage are approved for immediate implementation.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (6)
Stage 4 Gate 5
Prelaunch BusinessAnalysis
Testing &Validation
• The objective of the market testing is to determine whether the new product is a winner and what changes need to be made prior to launch. The main advantage is to provide real-life direction on how to improve the positioning, packaging, pricing, advertising, and self placement.
• In the stage 4 company runs tests and validates the entire viability of the project, the product, the production process, customer acceptance, and the economics of the project.
In-house product tests, user or field trials of the product, trial or limited pilot production, pre-test market, test market or trial sell, and revised financial analysis.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Stage-Gate NPD (7)
Stage 5 PLR
Post LaunchReview
Production & Launch
• Timing, coordinated and carefully planned execution and communication are the cornerstones of a successful launch. Identification of the target customer, product positioning, and competitive advantage must be factored into the development of the roll out plan.
• The stage involves implementation of the marketing launch plan and the production plan. The marketing plan outlines company’s objectives, strategies and programs, and guides the product’s entry to the market.
• Marketing planning is an outgoing activity, that occurs formally and informally throughout of the new product process.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Approaches to NPD ProcessConsumer driven Competition driven Technology driven
Concept developmentand consumer screening
Business Analysis
Product development
Consumer/Lab testing
Test marketing
Business Analysis
Prototype development
Production testing
Advanced development
Product development
Concept identificationand screening
Concept developmentand consumer screening
Idea generation Market AnalysisTechnology needs and
application ideas
Market Launching Market Launching Market Launching
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
NPD Strategies
Focused, butweak technology
High-budget,Shotgun
Low budget,conservation
Marketing and technology integrated
Technology driven
SuccessRate
% of company sales from new products
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Marketing - Technology Balance
RelativeEffortAllocation
CuttingEdge
State ofThe Art
Advan-ced
Main-stream
Mature Decline
State of Technology
Engineering efforts
Marketing efforts
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Marketing Mix - Product (1)
Developproduct
Developproduct
Sales-customer feedback
LaunchImprovedProduct
LaunchImprovedProduct
LaunchImprovedProduct
LaunchImprovedProduct
Sales-customer feedback
Sales-customer feedback
Sales-customer feedback
Slow Learning Cycle
Rapid Learning Cycle
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Learning Cycle
Slow Learning Cycle
Rapid Learning Cycle
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Marketing Mix - Product (2)40
20
30
10
Introductory Growth Mature Decline
Product not Modified Product Modified
Market share achieved
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Degree of product modification
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Zone of minimalproductadaptation
Zone of minimalProduct adaptation(minor type)
Zone of minimalProduct adaptation(major type)
CostsIncremental gains
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Research Project
• The % of R&D of the sales Mean = 9,62 Mode = 15 Median = 8,0
• The % of marketing of the salesMean = 10,02 Mode = 10 Median = 8,7
• The % of export share of the sales Mean = 62,4 Mode = 90 Median = 70
• The number of product launches per year (total 536)Mean = 6,6 Mode = 3 Median = 3,0
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Research results (1)Marketing method Rank
1. Personal selling 1
2. Marketing concept 2
3. New product development strategy 3
4. Differentiation 4
5. Product/service specialisation 5
6. Pricing 6
7. Sales promotion 7
8. Market segmentation 8
9. Marketing organisation 9
10. Distribution 10
11. Positioning 11
12. Marketing planning 12
13. Market share 13
14. Publicity 14
15. Market research 15
16. Advertising 16
17. Marketing information systems/ Marketing intelligence 17
18. Marketing consultants 18
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Research results (2)Marketing method Description of importance1. Personal selling Very important2. Marketing concept Very important3. New product development strategy Very important4. Differentiation Very important5. Product/service specialisation Rather important6. Pricing Moderately important7. Sales promotion Moderately important8. Market segmentation Moderately important9. Marketing organisation Moderately important10. Distribution Moderately important11. Positioning Moderately important12. Marketing planning Moderately important13. Market share Moderately important14. Publicity Rather unimportant15. Market research Rather unimportant16. Advertising Very unimportant17. Marketing information systems/ Marketing intelligence Very unimportant18. Marketing consultants Very unimportant
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Research results (3)Marketing method Description of importance1. Personal selling Very important2. Marketing concept Very important3. New product development strategy Very important4. Differentiation Very important5. Product/service specialisation Rather important6. Pricing Moderately important7. Sales promotion Moderately important8. Market segmentation Moderately important9. Marketing organisation Moderately important10. Distribution Moderately important11. Positioning Moderately important12. Marketing planning Moderately important13. Market share Moderately important14. Publicity Rather unimportant15. Market research Rather unimportant16. Advertising Very unimportant17. Marketing information systems/ Marketing intelligence Very unimportant18. Marketing consultants Very unimportant
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Research results (4)Marketing method Description of importance1. Personal selling Very important2. Marketing concept Very important3. New product development strategy Very important4. Differentiation Very important5. Product/service specialisation Rather important6. Pricing Moderately important7. Sales promotion Moderately important8. Market segmentation Moderately important9. Marketing organisation Moderately important10. Distribution Moderately important11. Positioning Moderately important12. Marketing planning Moderately important13. Market share Moderately important14. Publicity Rather unimportant15. Market research Rather unimportant16. Advertising Very unimportant17. Marketing information systems/ Marketing intelligence Very unimportant18. Marketing consultants Very unimportant
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Successful vs. Unsuccesful (1)Successful cases Unsuccessful cases
Marketing method Rank Rank1. Personal selling 1 1
2. NPD strategy 2 53. Marketing concept 3 4
4. Differentiation 4 25. Product/service specialisation 5 6
6. Pricing 6 7
7. Market segmentation 7 98. Sales promotion 8 39. Marketing organisation 9 710. Distribution 10 11
11. Positioning 11 11
12. Marketing planning 12 13
13. Market share 13 914. Market research 14 15
15. Publicity 15 16
16. Advertising 16 16
17. MIS/ Marketing intelligence 17 1418. Marketing consultants 18 16
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Successful vs. Unsuccesful (2)Successful cases Unsuccessful cases
Marketing method Rank Rank1. Personal selling 1 1
2. NPD strategy 2 53. Marketing concept 3 4
4. Differentiation 4 25. Product/service specialisation 5 6
6. Pricing 6 7
7. Market segmentation 7 98. Sales promotion 8 39. Marketing organisation 9 710. Distribution 10 11
11. Positioning 11 11
12. Marketing planning 12 13
13. Market share 13 914. Market research 14 15
15. Publicity 15 16
16. Advertising 16 16
17. MIS/ Marketing intelligence 17 1418. Marketing consultants 18 16
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Successful vs. Unsuccesful (3)Successful cases Unsuccessful cases
Marketing method Rank Rank1. Personal selling 1 1
2. NPD strategy 2 53. Marketing concept 3 4
4. Differentiation 4 25. Product/service specialisation 5 6
6. Pricing 6 7
7. Market segmentation 7 98. Sales promotion 8 39. Marketing organisation 9 710. Distribution 10 11
11. Positioning 11 11
12. Marketing planning 12 13
13. Market share 13 914. Market research 14 15
15. Publicity 15 16
16. Advertising 16 16
17. MIS/ Marketing intelligence 17 1418. Marketing consultants 18 16
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Successful vs. Unsuccesful (4)Successful cases Unsuccessful cases
Marketing method Rank Rank1. Personal selling 1 1
2. NPD strategy 2 53. Marketing concept 3 4
4. Differentiation 4 25. Product/service specialisation 5 6
6. Pricing 6 7
7. Market segmentation 7 98. Sales promotion 8 39. Marketing organisation 9 710. Distribution 10 11
11. Positioning 11 11
12. Marketing planning 12 13
13. Market share 13 914. Market research 14 15
15. Publicity 15 16
16. Advertising 16 16
17. MIS/ Marketing intelligence 17 1418. Marketing consultants 18 16
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Conclusions (1)• The success rate when launching high technology products into the export
markets was in this study 80,41 %.
• Amongst Finnish high technology companies product and sales related factors appear to have greater importance than marketing related factors, when launching new products into the foreign markets.
• Among marketing mix (4 P’s), product factors have the highest utilisation, while the non-personal elements of promotion have the lowest usage ratings. – Personal selling is the most important promotional element. – Pricing and place factors are only moderately important elements in the
marketing mix decision.
• The careful balance between the various marketing methods is important in the successful launch of new high technology product into the export
market.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Conclusions (2)• Publicity, promotion, marketing organisation, market share and
positioning are marketing methods, which are more commonly used in larger companies.
• Advertising, publicity, sales promotion and market share are marketing methods that are more commonly used in companies in which most (>40%) of the sales of the company is sold outside Finland.
• Personal selling and positioning are marketing methods which are more commonly used in companies where the president of the firm has a technical and marketing background, or just marketing background than in companies where the president has only technical background.
• Differentiation is a marketing method which is more commonly used in companies where the senior marketing officer of the firm has a technical and marketing background, or just marketing background than in companies where the senior marketing officer has only technical background.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Conclusions (3)• Publicity, promotion, marketing organisation, market share and
positioning are marketing methods, which are more commonly used in larger companies.
• Product/service specialisation, distribution, and positioning are marketing methods that are more commonly used in companies with more experience on product launches into the export markets.
• There were no significant differences either in absolute or relative
marketing expenditure between large and small companies, nor were there significant differences in marketing expenditure amongst companies with different amount of experience on product launches into the export markets.
• Marketing concept is a marketing method which is more commonly used in successful product launches.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Conclusions (4)• There were significant differences in relative marketing expenditure
among companies with different percentage of the sales of the company sold outside Finland. In companies where the export's share of turnover was less or equal to 40 %, the mean of the marketing expenditure was 7,6%, and in companies where export's share of turnover more than 40 %, the mean of the marketing expenditure was 11,2 %.
• The three factors (the absolute sales volume of the company, the absolute amount of export volume and the absolute amount of marketing expenditure) differentiate effectively the successful and unsuccessful product launches.
• There were no differences in the outcome of product launches between the industries nor were there any differences in the outcome of product launches between the companies with different amount of experience in product launches into the export market.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Conclusions (5)• There were no differences in the outcome of product launches
depending upon the background of the president of the company nor were there any differences in the outcome of product launches depending upon the background of the highest ranking marketing officer of the company.
• Product/service specialisation, distribution, advertising, publicity, promotion, market share, positioning, marketing planning and market research are marketing methods more commonly used by companies with higher relative marketing expenditure.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Recommendations• Study carefully the marketing strategy when launching high tech products. The
launch of a new high tech product into foreign markets is different than the launch of a traditional consumer product.
• Remember that the new product is finished only when the launch process is completed, i.e. the final customer has received the product and is satisfied with it.
• Be aware of the final customers' real needs. Make sure you are able to offer the benefits he is seeking. Try not to compensate for the shortages of the product offering with overly optimistic promotional efforts.
• Be prepared to increase your relative marketing expenditure with a substantial amount while the share of export of your sales increases.
• Implement the marketing concept into your organisation. Involve everybody including the R&D and production personnel.
• Try to achieve critical mass in your export sales and marketing expenditure. Find any, and all means to overcome this obstacle.
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Finland vs. California (1)CA Finland Diff.
Significance MARKETING CONCEPT
1. Marketing concept 3.32 3.95 -0.63 0.02
MARKETING MIX VARIABLES
1. Personal selling 4.22 4.13 0.09 *
2. Product/service specialization2.60 3.70 -1.10 0.0002
3. Pricing 3.07 3.49 -0.42 *4. Sales promotion 4.00 3.26 0.74 *
5. Distribution 3.23 3.10 0.13 *
6. Publicity 4.00 2.48 1.52 0.0001
7. Advertising 3.50 2.33 1.17 0.0005
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
Finland vs. California (2)CA Finland Diff.
Significance
MARKETING ORGANIZATION AND PLANNING
1. NPD strategy 3.48 4.08 -0.60 0.05862. Differentiation 4.85 3.74 1.11 0.00003. Market segmentation 3.09 3.38 -0.29 *4. Marketing organization 3.70 2.90 0.80 0.00015. Positioning 3.37 2.92 0.45 *6. Marketing planning 2.91 2.84 0.07 *7. Market share 2.13 2.51 -0.38 *8. Market research 3.05 2.26 0.79 0.03859. MIS 3.17 2.07 1.10 0.003210. Marketing consultants 1.84 1.74 0.10 *
4251
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy
At Your Service!