market size or acceleration effects; hypotheses to explain skill biased technical change* mark...
DESCRIPTION
Motivation Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for Economics Annual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28, of 17TRANSCRIPT
Market Size or Acceleration Effects; Hypotheses to Explain Skill Biased Technical Change*
Mark SandersMax Planck Institute for Economics
Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Public PolicyKahlaïsche Strasse 10
D-07745, Jena, [email protected]
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-27 , 2005 1 of 17
Outline
Motivation
The Model
Competing Hypotheses
Agenda for Further Research
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 2 of 17
Motivation
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999
Colle
ge-H
igh Sc
hool
Log W
age R
atio
-1-0.9-0.8-0.7-0.6-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10
Log R
elativ
e Sup
ply In
dex
Males Females College/High School Eq.
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 3 of 17
Motivation
1) The labour market perspective of low skilled workers deteriorated
2) Trade, Technology or something completely different?
3) SBTC, ok but how?
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 4 of 17
MotivationDirection…
Hicks (1942) + Romer (1990) =(Strong) Market Size Hypothesis Acemoglu (1996,1998,2002),Kiley (1999)
…or SpeedNelson&Phelps (1966) + Greenwood&Uysal (2004) =
Acceleration HypothesisAghion (2001), Galor&Tsiddon (1997)
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 5 of 17
Aim(s) of the Paper1) Develop a general model that can
illustrate/evaluate both hypotheses 2) Identify parameter and specification
restrictions 3) Evaluate the available empirical
evidence4) Formulate future empirical research
agenda
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 6 of 17
The Model
0)(
)(log:max dttCeU tρ
tCs.t. )()()()( tAtCtrAtY
)()(
)()(
)()(
tPtP
tEtEρr
tCtC
Consumers:
αnα
icdiicC
1
0)()(:max
s.t. Ediicip
n
0
)()(
PE
Pipic αD 1
1)()(
αα
nαα
diipCEP
1
0
1)(
CEP
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 7 of 17
The Model
s.t.
Producers:)()()()(:max
)(itcipiyiπ
ip )()( iciy D
βSS
DS ilbiy )()(
Sni
SS
DS E
wαβL E
bb
ww
nnE
αβα
S
Sαβαβ
S
S
S
SS
111
1
SSS nEαβiπ /)1()( Sni
},{ LHS
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 8 of 17
The ModelShort-Run Equilibrium:
αβ
L
Hαβ
α
L
H
L
H
L
H
ww
bb
nn
LL
11
1
wH/wL
nH/nL
Relative SupplyShift
PMA-curve
LH/LLZ2 Z1
Z1
Z2
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 9 of 17
The ModelThe Value of Innovation:
t
SτtrS τdτPτπe
tPtv
)()(
)()( )(
Pπ
S
t
τtPPππrSS GGr
tπτdetPtπtPtv
S
)()()()()( ))(//(
Pπ
H
Pπ
LL GGr
tπλGGr
tπtvHL
)()()(
For the Life Cycle Model:
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 10 of 17
The ModelThe “Production” of Innovation:
For the Life Cycle Model λ=1LH
LH
γDD
ζψL
ζψH
ψL
Lγ
RRχφ
Lχφ
Hφ
nnnnnn
RannnnnλRannnn
)1)(1()1(
)1)(1()1( )1(
1010101010
ζψχφγ
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 11 of 17
The ModelInnovators/Entrepreneurs:
DRLLDR
RRHRR
Rwvnπ
Rwvnπ
D
R
:max:max
Lγ
Dζψ
Lζψ
Hψ
DR
Hγ
Rχφ
Lχφ
Hφ
RR
vRnnnaγwvRnnnaγw
1)1)(1()1(
1)1)(1()1(
γ
D
Rγ
H
Lγ
φψ
L
Hγ
χφζψ
L
H
D
R
aa
vv
nn
nn
RR
11
11
11)1()1(
1
Short-Run Equilibrium:
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 12 of 17
The ModelSteady State Equilibrium:
*RRR DR
L
L
H
H
nn
nn
nn
γ
D
Rγ
L
Hγφψ
L
Hγ
χφζψ
L
H
D
R
aa
nnλ
nn
nn
RR
11)1()1(
1
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 13 of 17
The ModelSteady State Equilibrium:
αβαβ
γ
D
Rγ
γ
L
Hγψφ
L
Hγ
ζψχφ
L
Hβ
L
H
L
H
aa
nnλ
nn
nnλ
bb
ww
111)1()1(1
1
wH/wL
nH/nL
PMARDA I
RDA II
RDA III
nH/nL nH/nL
wH/wLwH/wL
PMAPMA
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 14 of 17
Competing HypothesesThe Strong Market Size Effect:1) More likely when intra-sectoral (intertemporal)
spillovers are high.- Evidence is scarce and ambiguous
2) More likely when returns to scale are constant in R&D.- Evidence suggests they are diminishing
3) Requires high and low skilled to be gross substitutes.- Evidence suggests they areMark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 15 of 17
Competing HypothesesThe Acceleration Hypothesis:1) Requires PLC to be present
- Evidence is abundant and unambiguous
2) Insensitive to parameter values and specification of innovation functions.- Evidence is scarce and ambiguous
3) Requires shock in parameters or specification of innovation functions at the arrival of a GPT.- Evidence is scarce and anecdotal
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 16 of 17
Agenda for Research1) Establish PLC Empirically.
- distinguishing workers by education and job types
2) Estimate Innovation Functions - distinguishing radical and incremental innovation or
product and process innovation
3) Estimate Duration of Bias.- how fast or slow do we move over PLC and to what extent
is bias permanent
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 17 of 17
Thank You
Questions and/or Comments?
Mark Sanders, Max Planck Institute for EconomicsAnnual Conference of the European Economic Association, Amsterdam August 24-28 , 2005 18 of 17