market and feasibility study of the implementation of …
TRANSCRIPT
Institut International d’Ingénierie Rue de la Science - 01 BP 594 - Ouagadougou 01 - BURKINA FASO Tél. : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 00 - Fax : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 01 - Mail : [email protected] - www.2ie-edu.org
MARKET AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF A NATIONAL OR
REGIONAL CERTIFICATION FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC
SOLAR PANELS
MEMOIRE POUR L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME D’INGENIEUR 2IE AVEC GRADE DE MASTER
SPECIALITE GENIE ELECTRIQUE ET ENERGETIQUE
------------------------------------------------------------------
Présenté et soutenu publiquement le 29 juin 2017
Côme SIBONIYO (20110332)
Directeur de mémoire : Prof. Yézouma COULIBALY, Maître de conférences CAMES
Encadrant : Dr. Y. Moussa SORO, Maître assistant CAMES
LABORATOIRE ENERGIE SOLAIRE ET ECONOMIE D’ENERGIE (LESEE),2iE, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Promotion [2016/2017]
Jury d’évaluation du stage :
Président : Ing. Francis SEMPORE
Membres et correcteurs : Dr. Yézouma COULIBALY Dr. Yrébégnan Moussa SORO Dr. Daniel YAMEGUEU
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
Institut International d’Ingénierie Rue de la Science - 01 BP 594 - Ouagadougou 01 - BURKINA FASO Tél. : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 00 - Fax : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 01 - Mail : [email protected] - www.2ie-edu.org
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
i Institut International d’Ingénierie Rue de la Science - 01 BP 594 - Ouagadougou 01 - BURKINA FASO Tél. : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 00 - Fax : (+226) 50. 49. 28. 01 - Mail : [email protected] - www.2ie-edu.org
Acknowledgement
This master's thesis was completed at the Solar Energy and Energy Saving Laboratory (LESEE) of the International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering (2iE) on the Kamboinsé site located at15 km from Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso. I would like to thank all those who have contributed to the development of this project. I am particularly grateful:
To Dr Daniel YAMEGUEU, head of the LESEE laboratory, who kindly accepted me into his laboratory for my master's research work,
To Dr Yézouma COULIBALY, for having agreed to supervise the work of this thesis without hesitation. May he find here my gratitude for this mark of attention,
To Dr. Y. Moussa SORO, for having supervised my day-to-day work in the laboratory. Dear supervisor, please find in these lines my gratitude for your availability throughout my internship work,
To engineer Bernard BRES, Director of the 2iE Technopole, for giving me considerable help concerning the project feasibility study; Mr BRES, thank you very much for your open cooperation and for all the efforts you have made to help me complete my internship work properly,
To all the administrative and academic staff of the International Institute for Water and Environment Engineering for the quality of training received,
To all my colleagues in the promotion as well as all those who have contributed in one way or another to the success of my training,
To my dearest parents Alexis MURENGERANTWALI and Monique MUKAMUSONI, and my brothers James and Eric, I express my deepest gratitude. Without you I would not have made it.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
ii
Abstract
The photovoltaic solar industry is growing at interesting rate in West Africa and in the world
in general. Although solar panels are well known, very little is being done about their quality
in the region.
This study explores the quality infrastructure literature, the state of the art in the different
parts of the world through experts’ recommendations and the available documentation and
standards. The implementation of a certification body is studied as a way to improve quality
and reliability of solar panels. The feasibility of the certification body has been studied.
Partners have been established, a scheme has been framed, mission for the new structure have
been proposed and the equipment have been proposed. The price of the lab equipment was
found to be $462 050 that is to say 270 160 635 FCFA.
This study is the first of a long series of other studies that should be done. The results are very
promising and the quality of solar panels and further solar products can be achieved through
regional efforts.
Key words:
1- Certification,
2- Quality
3- Infrastructure,
4- Solar panels,
5- Testing standards
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
iii
Résumé
L'industrie solaire photovoltaïque augmente à un rythme intéressant en Afrique de l'Ouest et
dans le monde en général. Bien que les panneaux solaires soient bien connus, très peu de
choses sur leur qualité sont connues dans la sous-région.
Cette étude explore la littérature sur l'infrastructure de qualité, l'état de l'art dans les
différentes parties du monde à travers les recommandations des experts, à la documentation
et aux normes disponibles. La mise en place d'un organisme de certification est étudiée pour
améliorer la qualité et la fiabilité des panneaux solaires. La faisabilité de l'organisme de
certification a été étudiée. Des partenaires ont été suggérés, un schéma d’infrastructure de
qualité a été mis en place, la mission pour la nouvelle structure a été proposée et l'équipement
nécessaire a été proposé. Le prix du matériel de laboratoire s’élève à 462 050$ soit
270 160 635 FCFA.
Cette étude est la première d'une longue série d'autres études qui devraient être réalisées. Les
résultats sont très prometteurs et la qualité des panneaux solaires et d'autres produits solaires
peut être réalisée grâce à des efforts régionaux.
Mots clés:
1- Certification
2- Infrastructure de qualité,
3- Panneaux solaires,
4- Normes d'essai
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
iv
Acronyms 2iE: International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering
AFRAC: African Accreditation Cooperation
a-Si: Amorphous silicon
BIPM: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures
CRECQ : Comité régional de coordination de la qualité
c-Si: Crystalline Silicon
ECOWAS: Economic Community of West African States
ECOWREX: Observatory for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
ECREE: ECOWAS Center for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
GHG: Green House Gases
IAF: International Accreditation Forum
IEA: International Energy Agency
IEC: International Electrochemical Commission
ILAC: International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation
IRENA: International Renewable Energy Agency
Isc: Short circuit current
ISO: International Organization for Standardization
kWp: kilo watt peak
NOCT: Nominal Operating Cell Temperature
NORMACERQ : Secrétariat régional de la normalisation, de la certification et de la
promotion de la qualité
NREL: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (USA)
OIML: International Organization of Legal Metrology
Pmax: Maximum Power
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
v
PV: Photovoltaic
RE: Renewable Energy
SE4All: Sustainable Energy for All
SOAC : Système Ouest-Africain d’Accréditation
SOAMET : Secrétariat Ouest Africain de Métrologie
STC: Standard Test Conditions
UV: Ultraviolet
Voc: Open Circuit voltage
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
vi
Content Acknowledgement ....................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... ii
Résumé ...................................................................................................................................... iii
Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. iv
List of figures ............................................................................................................................ ix
List of tables .............................................................................................................................. ix
I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Context .............................................................................................................................. 3
1. 2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 4
1.2.1 Global objective ......................................................................................................... 4
1.2.2 Specific objectives ..................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 4
II. Overview of PV panels ....................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Solar panels ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.1.1 Current-Voltage Curve: I-V Characteristics .............................................................. 6
2.1.2 Relative Module Efficiency ....................................................................................... 9
2.1.3 Other components of a solar module ......................................................................... 9
2.2 Solar market .................................................................................................................... 10
2.3 Failures of photovoltaic modules ................................................................................... 11
III. Developing quality infrastructure for PV-panels .......................................................... 13
3.1 Quality infrastructure in general ..................................................................................... 13
3.2 Relationship between quality and market ....................................................................... 13
3.3 Certification programs .................................................................................................... 15
3.4 Standards ........................................................................................................................ 17
3.4.1 Purpose and History ................................................................................................. 17
3.4.2 Crystalline silicon PV modules (IEC norm 61215): ................................................ 18
3.4.3 Thin film PV modules (IEC norm 61646): .............................................................. 18
3.4.4 Concentrator PV modules (IEC norm 62108): ........................................................ 18
3.4.5 Product safety test (IEC norm 61730-1 and 61730-2): ............................................ 18
3.4.6 IEC TS 62257-9-5 .................................................................................................... 19
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
vii
3.4.7 IEC 60068 -2-68 ...................................................................................................... 19
3.4.9 IEC 62782 ................................................................................................................ 19
3.4.10 the laboratory ......................................................................................................... 19
3.5 Quality infrastructure for selected countries and regions ............................................... 19
3.5.1 Kenya ....................................................................................................................... 19
3.5.2 USA .......................................................................................................................... 20
3.5.3 Module Certification and Commercial Services ...................................................... 20
3.6 Benchmarking ................................................................................................................. 20
IV. Technical study of a test laboratory .............................................................................. 22
4.1 Pass criteria ..................................................................................................................... 24
4.2 Brief description of tests ................................................................................................. 24
4.3 Dust and Sand ................................................................................................................. 25
V. Feasibility of the project ................................................................................................... 29
5.1 Legal framework ............................................................................................................. 29
5.2 Market study ................................................................................................................... 29
5.2.1 The challenge ........................................................................................................... 29
5.2.2 Demand .................................................................................................................... 29
5.2.3 Supply ...................................................................................................................... 30
5.2.4 SWOT analysis ............................................................................................................ 30
VI. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................. 32
6.1 Partners ........................................................................................................................... 32
6. 2 West Africa quality assurance framework ..................................................................... 32
6.3 2iE Missions as a reference laboratory ........................................................................... 34
6.4 Equipment, cost and economic model ............................................................................ 35
VII. Conclusion and perspectives ......................................................................................... 40
VIII. Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 41
Annexes .................................................................................................................................... 44
Annex I: Key terms definition for quality infrastructure ...................................................... 45
Annexes II: Key partners ...................................................................................................... 47
International Institutions ................................................................................................... 47
Regional institutions ......................................................................................................... 47
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
viii
Governmental institutions ................................................................................................. 49
Academic and Business partners....................................................................................... 49
Annex III: Specifications for the equipment ........................................................................ 50
Flash Tester/SunSimulator ................................................................................................ 50
Visual Inspection Machine................................................................................................ 51
Electric safety Tester ......................................................................................................... 54
IV-curve tracer .................................................................................................................. 57
Pyrometer .......................................................................................................................... 58
Infrared camera ................................................................................................................. 59
UV preconditioning chamber ............................................................................................ 60
Thermal cycling testing chamber ...................................................................................... 61
Bypass diode thermal test system ..................................................................................... 63
Annex IV: Characteristics of module used as example in tests ......................................................... 64
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
ix
List of figures Figure 1: Total primary energy supply in Africa (IRENA, 2015) ............................................. 1
Figure 3: x-Si cell at right and a-Si cell at left ........................................................................... 5
Figure 5: A typical I-V curve with most important points (Villalva, et al., 2009) ..................... 6
Figure 6: Relative module efficiency at 25°C, 1.5 AM ( (Hanwha Q CELLS, 2014) ............... 9
Figure 7: Solar module components (Dunmore, 2017) ............................................................ 10
Figure 9: Three typical failure scenarios for wafer-based crystalline photovoltaic modules are
shown. Definition of the used abbreviations: LID – light-induced degradation, PID – potential
induced degradation, EVA – ethylene vinyl acetate, j-box – junction box. (IEA, 2014) ........ 12
Figure 10: Failures reported by customers and failures found by measurements (IEA, 2014) 12
Figure 11: Failure rates of 2000 certification projects for IEC 61215 and IEC 61646 type
approval tests for the years 2002 to 2012. The given figures are the annual percentages of IEC
projects with at least 1 module test failure compared to the sum of all (IEA, 2014) ............... 12
Figure 12: Illustration of the relationship quality and market (Duke, et al., 2002) .................. 14
Figure 13: Module qualification sequence IEC 61215 ............................................................. 16
Figure 14: Tests sequence according to IEC 61215 ................................................................. 24
Figure 16: Example of results of NOCT (UL , 2011) .............................................................. 26
Figure 17: Example of results of bypass diode test (UL , 2011) .............................................. 27
Figure 18: Example of results for Outdoor exposure tests (UL , 2011) ................................... 28
Figure 19: Planned projects before 2020(ECREEE) ................................................................ 30
List of tables Table 1: Sensitivity of IV curve ( (Green Rhino Energy, 2013) ................................................ 7
Table 2: Specifications of solar modules usually given by manufactures (Green Rhino Energy,
2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 3: A brief history of standards ........................................................................................ 17
Table 4: Description of tests ..................................................................................................... 24
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
1
I. Introduction
A significant number of people in developing countries are struggling to have access to clean
energy. One of the viable solutions that has the potential to sustainable energy is renewable
energy. However the lack of basic quality infrastructure, among which standards, testing,
certification and accreditation, represents a notable barrier. (Painuly, 2001)
The solar PV as renewable energy has been used extensively in African countries for 30 years
now though critics say it has failed to be marketable as it depends heavily on donors despite a
large number of units already deployed across the continent. (Nygaard, 2009)
Notable improvements on the technology of solar based generation of electricity, remarkable
fall of the prices of solar products, and the availability of solar resources have led to solar PV
to the most promising source of alternative energy. (ECREE, 2012)
In recent years, photovoltaic (PV) implementation has grown of an average of 58 % annually
from end 2006 through 2011 being by far the fastest of all renewable technologies during that
period (VILAR, 2012). This growth is accompanied by the employment in renewable energy
field where solar PV was the largest RE employer with 2.8 million jobs worldwide, an 11%
increase over 2014 (IRENA, 2016).
New areas for developing PV are located in the Sunbelt regions of Africa, Middle East, and
South America. These regions are creating new opportunities dedicated to supplying local
demand. In West Africa alone it is estimated that only 47% of the population has access to
electricity with rate ranging from less than 20 % in counties like Sierra Leone and Burkina
Faso to more than 80 % in Ghana (IEA, 2014). However the overall share of solar PV remains
relatively very small (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Total primary energy supply in Africa (IRENA, 2015)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
2
The Africa’s total cumulative installed capacity of solar PV jumped from around 500 MW in
2013 to around 1 330 MW in 2014 and 2 100 MW at the end of 2015 with a relatively small
participation of West Africa (Figure 2) as this growth is heavily concentrated; with South
Africa and Algeria encompassing 78% of all the growth (IRENA, 2016).
The future looks very promising as the capacity of Africa solar PV is estimated to be 11.5
GW by the year 2030 (IRENA, 2015). The purchasing power and the GDP if African
population are increasing and the prices of solar PV energy1 fall by 62% between 2009 and
2015 and an expected fall of 57% in 10 years from USD 1.8/W in 2015 to USD 0.8/W in
2025 (IRENA, 2016).
Figure 2: ECOWASS planned and operational solar power plants (ECOWREX, 2017)
The solar PV industry in West Africa registers lack of skilled manpower, incentives and
maintenance of solar projects. It also face quality related problems as warranties, aftersales
services, and inspections to name a few. (PVTECH, 2014)
Certification program help:
Buyers, users and consumers through transparency of the market, trust and protection
1 The price here is the total price including but not limited to modules, inverters, racking and mounting and
installation.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
3
Producer or service producer through trust and commercial argument and
The State through the contribution to transparency and market reorganization.
It has been observed in the ECOWASS region that there are poorly established standards and
quality control of locally manufactured and imported technologies. Creating quality assurance
is a precondition for building consumer confidence and in growing the market for renewable
energy. (ECREEE, 2015)
The following work highlights the market and feasibility study of the implementation of a
national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels. It explains the status and trends
of panels quality, explores different certification programs as to learn from experience of
others, different applied standards are explained and tests are fully explored. The
implementation of a testing laboratory is explored at the end with the economics
accompanying it.
1.1 Context In accordance with the program SE4All2, The ECOWAS region has set a clear target to
increase the share of renewable energy in the region’s overall electricity mix to 10% in 2020
and 19% in 2030. Including large hydro, the share would reach 35% in 2020 (10 % for solar
photovoltaic) and 48% in 2030. Around 25% of the rural ECOWAS population will be served
by mini-grids and stand-alone systems by 2030. (ECREEE, 2015)
Despite this ambitious target, the photovoltaic solar market worth to develop in West Africa.
Among the identified obstacles, lack of confidence in the products has been identified as a
major obstacle by domain experts. The establishment of a quality assurance infrastructure,
guaranteeing the performance of distributed products, would allow investors and end users to
consider more serenely long-term investment allowing access to energy reduction energy
costs and GHG emissions. This was a strong recommendation of the workshops that took
place during the AfricaSolar conference in June 2015 in Ouagadougou. Indeed, a Quality
Assurance Infrastructure is an essential instrument for the deployment of renewable energy
technologies. It guarantees a minimum requirements in terms of interoperability, security and
performance is satisfied. Quality Assurance is also a tool that policies and regulations can use
to assess compliance with the standards and associated regulations.
In this context, 2iE through technopole and its partners (IRENA, Penn State University) have
considered doing 2iE a reference center for testing photovoltaic products in West Africa that
2 The Sustainable Energy for All initiative is a multi-stakeholder partnership between governments, the private
sector, and civil society. Launched by the UN Secretary-General in 2011, it has three interlinked objectives to be
achieved by 2030:
Ensure universal access to modern energy services
Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.
Double the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
4
would fit in a broader quality assurance system regarding products related to renewable
energy in West Africa.
1. 2 Objectives
1.2.1 Global objective
This project aims to contribute to the improvement of the quality of life of the rural and peri-
urban populations in West Africa by improving access to solar photovoltaic by contributing to
the establishment of a Quality assurance body in West Africa.
1.2.2 Specific objectives
Produce an analysis of the state of art world-wide (IEC, ISO, IRENA ...) /
benchmarking
Identify potential partners in West Africa and internationally
Propose a framework for quality assurance infrastructure in West Africa
Define the role of 2iE as a reference laboratory (tests, metrology ...)
Analyze equipment needs and search for quotations
1.3 Methodology The study will be performed based on the different elements seen in the literature of
certification and testing processes as explained in scientific articles, main standards
regulations entities, the established laboratories business models and the experience of the
contacted experts.
The implementation of a certification body requires tests to be detailed and the expected
results to be framed.
This approach is best suitable for this subject as it fits with the objectives of the study and also
touches the technical part of the testing laboratory where equipment and price estimation are
needed.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
5
II. Overview of PV panels
2.1 Solar panels A solar panel is an association of solar cells arranged in way so that they can have a certain
power output and a minimum voltage.
Solar cells (Figure 3) use the electronic properties of semi-conductor material to convert
sunlight directly into electricity. The first solar cell saw light in 1941 and had an efficiency of
less than 1 %. Since then, the efficiency has grown up to more than 25% in laboratories.
(Green, 2009)
A solar cell alone can’t provide the required voltage and intensity for practical purposes.
Therefore cells are arranged in series and in parallel to give needed characteristics. In addition
these cells must be protected from the harsh elements of the environment as:
Corrosion of materials, especially metals
Water-vapor intrusion
Delamination of encapsulant materials, especially polymers
Physical damage from wind, hail, and installation
Thermal excursions, including coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation
Deterioration of or damage to external components such as junction boxes, wiring, and
frames.
The set of these solar cells and its protection envelope forms a solar module. It is imperative to
protect the cells. A typical solar packaging take roughly 50% of the total material cost.
(Osterwald & MacMahon, 2008)
A solar cell in Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. can be seen as current source Isc, a
diode Id, a shunt resistor Rs and a load resistor Rp (Masters, 2004)
Figure 3: x-Si cell at right and a-Si cell at left
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
6
Figure 4: Equivalence of a solar cell (Masters, 2004)
The relationship (Figure 5) between I and V of a single cell is then expressed by:
:
With the cell area, A, the intensity of incoming light, H, and the response
factor ξ in units of A / W;temperature, T (in Kelvin), Boltzmann constant
k = 1.38e-23 and the elementary charge e = 1.602e-19.
2.1.1 Current-Voltage Curve: I-V Characteristics
The I-V equation can only be solved iteratively. The figure 5 shows a typical curve.
Figure 5: A typical I-V curve with most important points (Villalva, et al., 2009)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
7
The curve depends highly on:
Table 1: Sensitivity of IV curve ( (Green Rhino Energy, 2013)
Conversion Efficiency Shift to higher currents
Temperature
Higher temperature results in lower open-circuit
voltage, and higher short-circuit current. Overall
result is a shift of the mpp to a lower power.
Reverse saturation
current Higher leakage results in flatter curve.
Serial resistance Higher losses result in lower voltage
Generally, the manufacturers provide the following data:
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
8
Table 2: Specifications of solar modules usually given by manufactures (Green Rhino Energy, 2013)
Short circuit current Current that flows when U = 0
Open circuit voltage Voltage observed when no current is flowing
Maximum power voltage
and maximum power
current
There is one point on the curve that provides for the maximum power output, P = U x I
Temperature coefficient Provides for sensitivity to changes in temperature.
Nominal module
efficiency
This is the conversion efficiency that is observed when the module is subjected to light with intensity
1kW/m2 under standard conditions called nominal efficiency. The peak power of the module is related to
the module area A and nominal efficiency ηnomby:
Ppeak= H0 η nom A with: H0= 1,000 W/m2
The nominal efficiency can be obtained from the manufacturer's data sheet.
Relative module
efficiency3
Should the conditions differ from the standard testing condition, the nominal module efficiency must be
multiplied by a relative module efficiency (Figure 6), ηrel. This factor is dependent on changes in
temperature, intensity of the incoming light and ratio of diffuse radiation to direct radiation. The
instantaneous power supplied by the module is:
Pmodule= H/H0 or: Ppeak=H0 A ηnom ηrel with intensity of incoming light H.
Values for the relative efficiency can be obtained from manufacturer's data sheet.
3 Other specifications that are often found in catalogues are temperature coefficients which are explained in the tests part. Other key factor is the fill factor FF which is a
function only of the open-circuit voltage and in cells of reasonable efficiency and has a value of 0.7 to 0.85. (Turner & Doty, 2007)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
9
2.1.2 Relative Module Efficiency
The efficiency of a solar module varies throughout the day and regions as the light intensity
varies. Taking into account that parameter, many manufacturers gave the relative efficiency
curve to help determine the performance of the solar module accordingly. The curve remains
sensitive to temperatures with the tendency to shift upwards (if colder) or downwards (if
warmer). Silicon is more sensitive to temperature changes than many of the thin-film
materials.
Figure 6: Relative module efficiency at 25°C, 1.5 AM ( (Hanwha Q CELLS, 2014)
2.1.3 Other components of a solar module
It is imperative to talk about other components (Figure 7) of solar panels that are not solar
cells. They protect the solar cells and contribute heavily the life expectancy of the modules. A
number of tests in the standards below are based on these components as a whole. The
encapsulation is to protect the solar cell from oxidation in the outdoor. (Peter Parts
Electronics, 2007)
The usual encapsulation method is glass encapsulation, with a frame to support the whole
solar panel and protect it from damage. Also a junction box to connect the solar panel and the
load by a wire/cable.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
10
Figure 7: Solar module components (Dunmore, 2017)
2.2 Solar market
Photovoltaic solar panels are fully imported in West Africa. Between 2007 and 2011 in
Burkina Faso alone, the main suppliers were in order of importance, France, China, Spain,
Italy, India, Germany, Belgium and South Africa. During the same period, the country
imported marginal quantities from certain African countries such as Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana,
Mali and Togo. Imports have evolved saw tooth between 2007 and 2011, with peaks recorded
in 2008 and 2011. Between 2010 and 2011, import quantities have changed 277%. In value,
imports of solar panels amounted in 2011 to 4,058,000 USD 2 billion 29 million FCFA.
Those from China accounted for 49.11%. Before 2010, the largest share of imports came from
European countries including France, Spain and Germany. China is the largest producer of
solar panels. About 65% of all solar panels are manufactured there. According to a ranking by
the International Energy Agency (IEA), seven of the ten leading manufacturers of solar
modules in the world are now Chinese.(Chambre de Commerce et d'industrie du Burkina
Faso, 2013)
The West African region copes with serious energy security and climate change concerns,
primarily due to the huge dependence of expensive and polluting fossil fuels. Despite being in
its infancy, the West African renewable energy market is emerging with a very promising
potential (Figure 8). The ECREEE target 2 425 MW of renewable energy by in the 2020 of
which 686 MW of PV in the WAPP countries
The potential of PV power in energy mix in West African countries is actually high solar
resource is especially favorable in the northern desert areas of the ECOWAS region in Mali
and Niger and in the North-Eastern part of Nigeria with a potential of 1,700 kWh/installed
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
11
kWp/year. The coastal areas of Liberia, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Nigeria do not benefit to the
same extent from this resource with an average potential of 1,200 kWh/installed kWp/year.
For the remaining areas, the average potential is about 1,500 kWh/kWp/year. (ECREE, 2012)
Figure 8: indicative ranking of re resources by countries (ECREE, 2012)
2.3 Failures of photovoltaic modules A PV module failure is an effect that (1) degrades the module power which is not reversed by
normal operation or (2) creates a safety issue. A purely cosmetic issue which does not have
the consequences of (1) or (2) is not considered as a PV module failure. A PV module failure
is relevant for the warranty when it occurs under conditions the module normally experiences.
One key factor of reducing the costs of photovoltaic systems is to increase the reliability and
the service life time of the PV modules. Today’s statistics show degradation rates of the rated
power for crystalline silicon PV modules of 0.8%/year.
To increase the reliability and the service life of PV modules one has to understand the
challenges involved.
Typically failures of products are divided into the following three categories: Infant-failures,
midlife-failures, and wear-out-failures. (IEA, 2014)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
12
Figure 9: Three typical failure scenarios for wafer-based crystalline photovoltaic modules are shown.
Definition of the used abbreviations: LID – light-induced degradation, PID – potential induced
degradation, EVA – ethylene vinyl acetate, j-box – junction box. (IEA, 2014)
Figure 10: Failures reported by customers and failures found by measurements (IEA, 2014)
Figure 11: Failure rates of 2000 certification projects for IEC 61215 and IEC 61646 type approval
tests for the years 2002 to 2012. The given figures are the annual percentages of IEC projects with at
least 1 module test failure compared to the sum of all (IEA, 2014)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
13
III. Developing quality infrastructure for PV-panels
What we observe in most African PV market is that quality is not really prioritized on small
scale but we observe a certain call for quality in big projects, on the tender notice they specify
standards to be met by the winner as in the tender notice document for Zagtouli solar power
station, Burkina Faso. (SONABEL, 2014)
3.1 Quality infrastructure in general In order to minimize the first technology related risks, modules have to be certified in
accordance with international standards. Unfortunately it is common knowledge that a
successful certification is not enough for predicting the expected lifetime of a module: a
failure in a certification process only suggests that a long life is unlikely. Certification is
therefore a necessity but not sufficient. (IRENA, 2014)
There are 4 principal elements of quality infrastructure:
Standardization
Metrology
Accreditation
Conformity assessment: certification
3.2 Relationship between quality and market It has been observed that not only does poor quality goods lie in amount in which the buyer is
cheated but also in the possibility to drive a legitimate business out of existence. Dishonesty
in business therefore is a serious problem in underdeveloped countries. There is considerable
evidence that quality variation is greater in underdeveloped than in developed areas.
Numerous institutions arise to counteract the effects of quality uncertainty. The obvious
institutions are guarantees, brand names, chains and certifications (Akerlof, 1970)
Duke et al. studied the effects of the presence of poor quality modules on the market. “Given
perfect information, in $/rated Wp terms, D (low) =0.5D (high). Given a 50% market share
for low quality modules, perfect information about both market shares and the performance of
high and low quality modules, but inability to distinguish which brand is high quality, then
D(pooled)=[D(low)+D(-high)]/2. Adding risk-aversion, D (pooled) falls closer to D (low)”.
The Figure 12 illustrates that information market failure can cause both sales and quality levels
to fall short of the social optimum. Assume that, on average, bad modules produce half of
rated power while good modules produce at their rated levels.
The market falls as many people suspect poor quality modules and high quality modules are
forced to decrease in price to compete with the poor quality modules. However, this changes
with fully informed customers. The incentive to overrate modules disappears and low quality
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
14
modules disappear from the market. This puts upward pressure on prices in terms of $/rated
Wp, though true prices in $/ delivered Wp will fall as overrated modules are eliminated.
(Duke, et al., 2002)
Furthermore bankers and investors in general hate uncertainty. The more quality proven,
reliable is a solar module, the less difficult is to obtain funds for projects.
Figure 12: Illustration of the relationship quality and market (Duke, et al., 2002)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
15
3.3 Certification programs The quality of services and products has become an essential vector of economic success and
a criterion for purchasing for consumers. In an economic context marked by productivity and
market forces, consumers want signs that the products and services they can buy offer all the
guarantees of safety, suitability for use and quality. As for professionals, the recognition by
official processes of the quality of the products and services they market is a powerful lever
for commercial promotion and competitiveness.
According to several experts, certification is an appropriate response to this ambivalent
demand insofar as it ensures both consumers and professionals that the products and services
marketed are valued compared to those that are not certified and can therefore be acquired
with confidence. (ONUDI, 2005)
The government laboratories were the first to introduce tests sequence initially to protect
modules from the environment in the late 1970s. The private sector took over and International
organizations adopted them. With the increase of knowledge and the advancement of
technology, those tests have grown up to be as we know them today. Today the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) test standards are now the only tests (Figure 14) accepted
by both module manufacturers and buyers.
Hoffman and Ross defined the purpose of qualification testing as being a means of rapidly
detecting the presence of known failure or degradation modes in the intended environment(s).
It also provides ‘‘rapid feedback of the relative strengths and acceptability of design
alternatives’’ during product development. It is impossible to equate the stress of tests to the
really stress of the environment as even the longest test today( damp heat) last about a month
and half while the module’s life is usually thought to be between 25 and 30 years.
Nevertheless, some segments of the PV industry desire relatively short testing regimens that
can provide a numeric value for the lifetime of a module or system, or that implies or provides
confidence that a system will last at least a minimum number of years. Regardless of these
desires, the standard sequences are not intended to be life tests.
The samples cause another significant limitation. Tests are performed on less than 10 modules
while the companies produce large amount modules in the time it holds the certificate.
Passing a qualification sequence cannot be used to infer that all production modules will pass.
However, the converse is not true—a failure of even one module during a qualification test is
significant and the module design should be investigated and corrected. (Osterwald &
MacMahon, 2008)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
16
UV Preconditioning 15
kWh/m2
Characterization tests Control module
Initial Preconditioning
5 kWh/m2
Initial performance and
electrical insolation tests
Final Performance and
Electrical Insolation Tests
10 Humidity Freeze cycles
+ 85°C/85% RH to -40°C
Robustness of
Terminations
Outdoor exposure 60
kWh/m2
Bypass Diode Thermal
Test
Hot Spot Endurance
Mechanical Load 2400 Pa
Hail Impact Test 25 mm,
23m/s
200 Thermal Cycles -40°C
to +85°C
1000 h Damp heat
+85°C/85% RH
50 Thermal Cycles -40°C
to +85 °C
1 module 1 module
1 module 1 module 2 modules 2 modules
8 modules
2 modules
Figure 13: Module qualification sequence IEC 61215
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
17
3.4 Standards The guidelines and standards are those of the international standardization organizations such
as the International Standards Organization (ISO) or the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC).
3.4.1 Purpose and History
Research on module reliability has led to a number of tests and standards in use today.
Unfortunately there is no single test to indicate the duration and reliability of a module and it
is almost impossible to design one. The reason for this is that every possible failure
mechanism has to be known and quantified. This condition is impossible to meet because
some failures may not show themselves for many years and because manufacturers
continually introduce new module designs and revise old designs. Instead of a search for a
single test, module reliability testing aims to identify unknown failure mechanisms and
determine whether modules are susceptible to known failure mechanisms.
It is advisable to perform the accelerated tests in parallel with real conditions tests to ensure
that some malfunctions are not to occur in one conditions and not the other. The first tests
were established by The Jet Propulsion laboratory in what was called block V. The European
Union followed later with EC502 sequence which was different from block five. (Markvart &
Castner, 2003)
Table 3: A brief history of standards
Contributor Tests major description
Jet Propulsion Lab Bloc V Temperature cycling
Humidity-freeze cycling
Cyclic pressure loading
Ice ball impact
Electrical isolation (hi-pot)
Hot-spot endurance
Twisted-mounting surface test
European Union CEC 502 sequence UV irradiation
High-temperature storage
High-temperature and high-humidity
storage
Mechanical loading
Underwriters
Laboratory
UL 1703 Temperature cycling
Humidity-freeze cycling
Hot-spot endurance
Other tests
Jet Propulsion Lab Interim Qualification
Tests(IQT)
UL 1703
Surface cut susceptibility
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
18
ground continuity
IEC CEC 502 improvements
1000h damp heat test
USA IEEE 1262 hi pot test
insulation test improvements
IEC IEC 61215
3.4.2 Crystalline silicon PV modules (IEC norm 61215):
- Power output at Standard Test Conditions
- Continuous light simulation test including UV radiation tests
- Climate tests (heat damp, thermal cycling, humidity etc.)
- Mechanical resilience (hail, snow, twist)
3.4.3 Thin film PV modules (IEC norm 61646):
This standard applies to those technology that are very sensible to light exposure and thermal
effects. These are a-Si, CIGS, CdTe, etc. (Arndt & Puto, 2010)
- Power output at Standard Test Conditions
- Continuous light simulation test including UV radiation tests
- Climate tests (heat damp, thermal cycling, humidity etc.)
- Mechanical resilience (hail, snow, twist)
- Thin-film related aging qualities / output degradation
3.4.4 Concentrator PV modules (IEC norm 62108):
- Power output at Standard Test Conditions
- Climate tests (heat damp, thermal cycling, humidity etc.)
- Mechanical resilience (hail, snow, twist)
- Concentration related thermal qualities
3.4.5 Product safety test (IEC norm 61730-1 and 61730-2):
- Minimum requirements for materials, components and construction (part 1)
- Minimum requirements for testing, defining of application and safety class (part 2)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
19
3.4.6 IEC TS 62257-9-5
Which covers pico-solar4 products with solar modules up to 10 watts
3.4.7 IEC 60068 -2-68
For desert and arid (semi-arid) climates and the related problems and challenges.
3.4.8 IEC 60410
To ensure the randomness of samples.
3.4.9 IEC 62782
Dynamic mechanical load
3.4.10 the laboratory
The relevant applicable criteria to the lab are:
• General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories: ISO / IEC /
17025;
• General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection: EN
45004 or ISO / IEC / 17020;
• General requirements for bodies operating product certification: EN 45011 or
ISO / IEC / guide 65;
• General requirements for bodies operating assessment and certification / registration of
quality systems: EN 45012 or ISO / IEC / guide 62;
• General criteria for certification bodies operating certification of persons ISO / IEC 17024.
3.5 Quality infrastructure for selected countries and regions
3.5.1 Kenya
The Solar home systems in 2000s led to a paper by Richard D. Duke et al, 2002 that explored
the photovoltaic module quality in the Kenyan solar home systems market. The authors
explore the relationship between quality and the life standards and education level of the
Kenyan people. At the end they suggest a series of five possible measures to be taken for a
growing PV-market.
1. Signaling through advertising and branding
2. Warranties
3. Performance testing disclosure
4 Pico-solar products are defined as off-grid solar energy systems that have solar photovoltaic (PV) modules that
are rated at 10 watts or less.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
20
4. Certification and labeling
5. Minimum quality standards
This is important case as it details possible measure for a market that relies heavily on
importation. And the conclusion fit perfectly with the IRENA recommendations on The
Quality Infrastructure for renewable energy technologies.
3.5.2 USA
In the 1996, the national Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) published a document about
certification and laboratory accreditation (Photovoltaic Module Certification/Laboratory
accreditation Criteria and Development: Implementation hand book by C.R OSterwald et al).
The documents explains in details which steps should be taken, requirements for personnel,
how reports are done and a business model is given at the end.
Though standards are very high and there exist many more manufactures of PV modules this
can serve as an example especially on the clarity and easy communications of different actors.
It’s interesting to note the key role of testing laboratories in quality infrastructure. In fact the
most popular standards used for testing solar panels in North America is UL 1703 developed
by Underwriters laboratories.
3.5.3 Module Certification and Commercial Services
Solar module certification nowadays is performed by private laboratories and government
related agencies. The process is not fully global as a module can undergo tests in japan but
when it arrives in Australia it has to e to be certified by the local agency a move some experts
find as to milk to solar industry. However efforts are being made to address this issue. An
example of this is the Global Approval Program for Photovoltaic (PV GAP).
The global key players in the certification of solar PV industry are re are:
TUV Rheinland, Berlin/Brandenburg, Germany
ASU Photovoltaic Testing Laboratory, Mesa, AZ, USA
European Commission Joint Research Centre, Environment Institute,
Renewable Energies Unit, Ispra, Italy
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
VDE Testing and Certification Institute, Offenbach, Germany (Markvart & Castner,
2003)
3.6 Benchmarking It’s important to test the modules according to West African climate and needs though there
are no regional or national standards available in West African countries.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
21
However as many countries and institution has done, we can take from existing standards add
some points according to our needs.
The process is a project itself and requires local experts, authority and industry actors to sit
and set those benchmarks.
Usually it’s a three step process that involves:
Preparatory phase
o Opportunity and feasibility study
o Work scheduling
Technical phase
o Establishment of a technical committee (TC)
o Gathering of basic materials (regulations, studies, standards)
o Drafting of a first draft (Small group of editors, expert)
o Consensus seeking (TB meetings)
Validation phase
o Consultation (public or probationary)
o Check the conformity of the draft standard with the general interest and verify
that it does not raise objections that would prevent its adoption.
o Finalization of final text
o Technical committee vote
o Approval
The benchmarks suggested in this document are the IEE standards ratified with an upgraded
lower temperature for damp heat, heat cycles tests and an addition sand tests combined with
IEC semi-arid standards based. And the test that could not be overlook is dust and sand test.
Further information about the process can be found in ISO/IEC 17007: 2009 Conformity
Assessment- - guidance for drafting normative documents suitable for use for conformity
assessment
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
22
IV. Technical study of a test laboratory
The tests can be subdivided into diagnostics, electrical safety, performance, thermal,
irradiance, environmental and mechanical. Tests are performed in a pre-established sequence
with 8 samples of panels and some tests coming more than once as the sequence progresses
(figure 11). (Arndt & Puto, 2010)
The sequence adopted is from IEC 61 215 (Figure 14) with a slight variation on hail test5.
Additional information concerning thin modules had been added.
The general approach of both standards6 can be summarized in:
Define “major visual defects.”
Define “pass/fail” criteria.
Do initial tests on all samples.
Group samples to undergo test sequences.
Do posttests after single tests, and test sequences (IEC 61215).
Do posttests after single tests, and final light soaking after Test sequences (IEC
61646).
Look for “major visual defects” and check “pass/fail” criteria.
Different samples go through different test sequences in parallel
5 This test is due to due to be replaced by a dust and sand test through benchmarking. 6 IEC 61215 and IEC 61646 as they are the ones globally accepted as test standards by the PV industry actors
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
23
1 module 1 module 2 modules 2 modules 2 modules
10.12 Humidity
freeze test 10
cycles -40°C to
+85°C 85% RH
8 modules
Initial preconditioning 5KWh/m2
10.1 Visual Inspection
10.2 Maximum power
determination
10.3 Insulation test
10.15 Wet leakage current test
Repeat test 10.15 Wet
leakage current test
10.4
Measurement
of temperature
coefficients
10.5 NOCT
10.6 Performance
at STC and NOCT
10.7 Performance
at low irradiance
10.8 Outdoor
exposure test
60 KWhm-2
10.18 Bypass
diode thermal
test
10.9 Hot-spot
endurance test
10.10 UV
Preconditioning
test 15KWhm-2
10.11 Thermal
cycling test 50
cycles -40°C to
+85°C
10.14
Robustness of
terminations
test
10.11 Thermal
cycling test 200
cycles -40°C to
+85°C
10.13 Damp
heat test
1000h -40°C to
+85°C 85% RH
10.15 Wet
leakage
current test
10.16
Mechani
cal load
test
10.17
Hail test
1 module 1 module
1 module
1 module
Control
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
24
Figure 14: Tests sequence according to IEC 61215
4.1 Pass criteria A module design shall be judged to have passed the qualifications tests and therefore be IEC
type approved, if each sample meets the following criteria
The degradation of the maximum power output at stand test conditions does not
exceed 5% after each test nor 8 % after each test sequence
The requirements of Insulation test and leak current test are.
No major visible damage (breakage or cracks in cells or glass, detachment of the
embedding mass, etc.)
No sample has exhibited any open circuit or ground fault during tests
For IEC 61646 only; the measured maximum output power after final light soaking
shall not be less than 90% of the minimum value specified the manufacturer.
4.2 Brief description of tests Table 4: Description of tests
Code Qualification test Test description
10.1 Visual Inspection According to inspection list
10.2 Performance at STC Cell temperature = 25°C
Irradiance = 1000W/m2,
Spectral irradiance distribution according to IEC 60904-3
10.3 Insulation test 1000 VDC + twice the open circuit voltage of the system at
STC for 1 min leakage current ˂50 µA,
isolation resistance ˃40 MΩ at 500 VDC
10.4 Measurements of temperature coefficients
Determination of the temperature coefficients of short
circuit current and open voltage in 40°C interval
10.5 Measurements of NOCT (Figure 16)
Total irradiance=800 W/m2
spectral irradiance according to IEC 60904-3
wind speed = 1m/s
10.6 Performance at NOCT Total irradiance=800 W/m2,
spectral irradiance according to IEC 60904-3
wind speed = 1m/s
10.7 Performance at low irradiance cell temperature=25°C
irradiance = 200W/m2
spectral irradiance according to IEC 60904-3
10.8 Outdoor Exposure test(Figure
18) 60 kWh/m2
10.9 Hot-spot endurance test 5 one hour exposure to 1000W/m2 irradiance in worst-case
hot-spot condition
10.10 UV-Exposure 7.5 kWh/m UV-radiation(280-320 nm and superior or
equal to 15kWh/m2-radiation(280-400 nm) at 60°C module
temperature
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
25
10.11 Thermal cycling 50 and 200 cycles -40°C to +85°C
10.12 humidity freeze test 10cycles -40°C to +85°C, 85%RH
10.13 Damp heat 1000h, -40°C to +85°C, 85%RH
10.14 Robustness of terminations as in IEC 60068-2-1
10.15 Wet leakage current Water spray of terminals and edge immersion with 500V
dc applied to determine leakage current
10.16 Mechanical load test Two cycles of 2400Pauniform load, applied for 1hour to
front and back surfaces in turn
10.17 Hail Test 25 mm diameter ball at 23m/s, directed at 11 impact
locations
10.18 Bypass diode Apply Isc at STC at module temperature of 75°C ± 5°C for
an hour. Repeat the process at the same conditions for
1.25Isc
10.19 Light soaking7 Light exposure of 800W/m2 to 1000w/m2 until Pmax is
stable within 2%
10.20 Annealing8 Heat Soak at 85°C until Pmax is stable within 2%
4.3 Dust and Sand The test has been added through benchmarking to adopt modules the realities of the West
African weather.
More and more test institutes recognize the importance of abrasion resistance testing of PV
modules. Sand Spray Chambers simulate the Abrasion Effect and will most likely be included
in the IEC standards in the near future.
New quality and safety standards that address the various climatic requirements of the many
different deserts with all their own specific characteristics are currently developed.
An existing standard is the IEC 60068 -2-68 (Environmental testing - Part 2-68: Tests -Test L:
Dust and sand).This standard has been designed to measure the impact of particles- and dust-
filled winds on electronics, including solar PV modules. In this test, the module samples are
placed within a dust chamber.
4.4 Examples of results
7 Thin modules through IEC 61646 8 It concerns only thin modules
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
26
Figure 15: Example of results of insulation test (UL , 2011)
Figure 16: Example of results of NOCT (UL , 2011)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
27
Figure 17: Example of results of bypass diode test (UL , 2011)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
28
Figure 18: Example of results for Outdoor exposure tests (UL , 2011)
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
29
V. Feasibility of the project
5.1 Legal framework This project will be a result and an accomplishment of existing rules and regulations and West
African quality policy that are already in place.
• Regulation N ° 03/2010 / CM / UEMOA on the harmonization of the activities of
accreditation, certification, standardization and metrology in UEMOA;
• Article 26.3 (L) of the ECOWAS Revised Treaty (1993), which states: "In order to create a
solid basis for industrialization and to promote collective self-government, Member States
undertake to adopt common standards and Adequate quality control systems ";
• the Common Industrial Policy of West Africa (PICAO) adopted by Act No. 07/02/10 of the
ECOWAS Heads of State and Government during the 38th Ordinary Session of their Summit
Held on 2 July 2010 in Sal (Cape Verde).
• Texts adopting the ECOWAS Quality Policy and ECOSHAM (Paul, 2013)
ECOWAS QUALITY POLICY (PQC) among the specific objectives to establish functional
conformity assessment infrastructures in the Member States; Provide periodic calibration of
measurement standards and measuring instruments; Establish repair and instrumentation
centers in Member States;
In addition, customs requires imported goods with a certain weight to be quality assessed
which in PV panel’s case is not done as there is no established body to perform those tests and
issue a conformity
5.2 Market study
5.2.1 The challenge
The challenge is to know whether there is enough projects or producers or distributors that
can be interested in our certification program once it is launched. The traditional low of
supply and demand.
5.2.2 Demand
The burden of proof of compliance with standards rest upon:
The manufacturer,
The importer,
Or distributor.
All products that are sold with a mark of conformity (national brand, regional brand or
recognized foreign brand) are presumed to comply with the applicable standards.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
30
Affixing Product regular regional brand. Regular affixing means affixing by an authorized
body in the strict respect of the trademark laws.
166 commercial partners has been identified and the figure below summarize the planned PV
projects in the region.
Figure 19: Planned projects before 2020(ECREEE)
5.2.3 Supply
There is no such program actually in the whole Africa. The UN launched pico solar products
certification in some countries in Africa but as far as goes certifying solar panels, we would
have the advantage especially in West Africa
5.2.4 SWOT analysis The following analysis has been made to help with the decision making and development of a
business model.
It contains strengths and weaknesses as internal factors, and opportunity and threats as
external factors.
The results are summarized in the figure below.
It is worth noting that the statutes of some organizations, particularly laboratories, pose
difficulties for the full development of their activities mainly because of their lack of
management autonomy (recruitment of personnel, purchase of equipment or reagents, etc.)
Most of the organizations that make up the quality infrastructure lack resources at all levels to
carry out their mandates. This is the case, for example, for conformity assessment bodies,
particularly laboratories which have difficulty accessing accreditation due to a lack of
technical, material and financial resources. (Paul, 2013)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Planned projects
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
31
S WTO
Helpful Harmful In
tern
al o
rigi
n
Exte
rnal
ori
gin
The first of its kind on the national and
international level in West Africa
An already existing network of partners
around 2iE sensitized about this stake
A well-known expertise on solar energy
research
Management autonomy
Long process of accreditation of the test
lab and its management system.
Development of other certifications
programs as solar installers, other solar
products and solar systems
Trainings on quality infrastructure
The government entities not enforcing
the laws about quality
Other regional institutions willing to
develop such a program
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
32
VI. Results and Discussion
The results as presented in this part are according to the ground work given at the beginning
of the work.
6.1 Partners A significant number of partners has been identified. Their main activities, nature of
partnerships are summarized in this diagram with 84.26% or 166 being business partners.
The principal players are given in the annexes while a detailed excel sheet with much more
information accompanying this report.
6. 2 West Africa quality assurance framework The following model has been made to convey simply and effectively the key elements of our
quality infrastructure in West Africa.
The model was originally made by the German National Metrology Institute PTB
(Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt) 2014. Since A number of international as IRENA
(IRENA, 2015) has adopted it.
2,03 4,06
7,61 2,03
84,26
Partners
International Institutions Regional Institutions Government intitution
Academic Institutions Business patners
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
33
International Quality
Infrastructure
ECOWASS Regional Quality Infrastructure Value
Chain
Accreditation
Standardization
NORMACERQ
Certification
Solar panels
Inspection
Bodies
Metrology
Calibration Laboratories
SOAMET, NEWMET
Testing Laboratory
IAF,
ILAC AFRAC
Calibration of instruments
Verification of meters,
reference materials
Inspection
BIPM, OIML
Tests,
Analysis
Research
Trac
eab
ility
ISO, IEC
Intercomparison
proficiency tests
ISO/IEC guide 65
IEC 61 215
IEC 61 646
ISO/IEC 17025
ISO/IEC 17020
ISO/IEC 17065
ISO/IEC 17021 ISO/IEC 17024
AFSEC, ARSO
SOAC
MINISTRIES OF ENERGY
Imported
solar
panels
Locally
assembled
panels
Made in ECOWASS
panels
Other solar products
Tech
nic
al r
egu
lati
on
s/M
arke
t su
rvei
llan
ce
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
34
6.3 2iE Missions as a reference laboratory The 2ie new testing lab should be first to promote quality of solar panels in the region. The
main suggestion of the key points of the mission are summarized below
Laboratory with international visibility, significant means to allow to play equally
with their homologous counterparts, attracted the teachers of researchers of
international renown
Certification and testing
Benchmarks that resemble to most standards and let them be the standards in West
Africa.
Help verify the quality of PV industry related goods in or out of West Africa as an
inspection body
The lab may serve to traceability of other labs in region as time goes on
Intensify research in the solar product quality
Have a database of quality verified companies and products available to the general
public to promote quality.
Support the companies and the players of solar photovoltaic in terms of qualities of
photovoltaic modules
Databases of quality infrastructure in solar photovoltaic
Bridge between buyers (users) and sellers / producers
Supplement in training qualities to accompany the high engineers in options renewable
energies
This is very feasible as it has been made before. The Underwriters laboratory standards serve
as reference for the majority of North America.
Missions comparable to other high class labs and laboratory of excellence in the domain.
The key points incorporate the existing missions of the LESEE lab, thus facilitating and
promoting the relations between two bodies
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
35
6.4 Equipment, cost and economic model The brief description above of standards, tests and benchmarks has lead us to choose a
number of equipment that is suitable to our needs.
The equipment choice followed this patterns:
Big enough to hold the panels
Fulfill the required standards for said equipment
A maximum of equipment put together through chamber and system
The total cost of the equipment is $462 050 that is to say 270 160 635 FCFA
The adaptation of chambers for most of the equipment reduce the humor errors that could
arise from operating many mall equipment and any serious design error due to very perfect
tests conditions needed. It make the process of traceability a lot easier as all the equipment
with the attached sensors fulfill the required standards.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
36
Equipment Name Test(s) Reference Price ($)
Flash tester/Sun
simulator
Initial
preconditioning
5KWh/m2
Maximum power
determination
Measurement of
temperature
coefficients
NOCT
Performance at
STC and NOCT
Performance at low
irradiance
YMST-H-B
25 000
Visual Inspection
Machine
Visual Inspection EL defect
detector
33 000
Electric safety tester
Insulation test
Wet leakage
current test
Tester
28 000
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
37
IV curve tracer
Outdoor exposure test 60
KWhm-2
EKO-MP-
160
15 000
Pyrometer
Outdoor exposure test 60
KWhm-2
MS-602
650
Infrared camera Hot-spot endurance test FLIR TG
165
400
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
38
UV preconditioning
Chamber
UV Preconditioning test
15KWhm
HTPV-25DC
55 500
Thermal Cycling Testing
Chamber
Thermal cycling
test 50 cycles -
40°C to +85°C
Humidity freeze
test 10 cycles -
40°C to +85°C
85% RH
Damp heat test
1000h -40°C to
+85°C 85% RH
ENX168
2×150 0009
Robustness of
Terminations Tester
Robustness of
terminations test
Tester
5 000
9 The duration of the test sequence depends heavily on thermal cycling test as some tests as T1000 lasts 1000h. This is almost a month and a half. For the continuity and safety
of the tests it is urged to have two of these chambers. The calculations done on the cost includes a second thermal cycling chamber.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar panels
39
Mechanical load tester
Mechanical load test
MLT12
4 500
Dust chamber
Sand and Dust test H-DTS-640
30 000
Bypass diode thermal
test system
Bypass diode thermal test Bypass diode
thermal test
system
10 00010
462 050
10 Estimation as the company did not want to give details without a written order form
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
40
VII. Conclusion and perspectives
The major players of the quality infrastructure centered on the new 2ie certification and
testing laboratory is an efficient way to convey the regional quality infrastructure together.
They were found to be keen on working on a regional certification body. This shed some light
and give hope on the quality of solar panels and other solar products in the future. To have 2ie
as the center of un-preceded program emphasize the innovation and importance of the study.
The tests descriptions will serve as reference to the development of the laboratory. The damp
heat 1000 hours define the duration of the test period. Chambers are more practical as
equipment for they limit the design on the general test conditions of the room. The overall
equipment cost $462 050 that is to say 270 160 635 FCFA. This cost will serve as a future
reference for most developing countries that want to establish a similar institution. This is an
important piece of information as most labs and institution don’t put it on public display.
As perspectives the feasibility of a certification body done in this study opens more
opportunities in the future like certification of solar installers , certification of pico products
as they have a big market in rural areas and the manufacturing is mainly local, certification of
solar systems, the development of its own standards and its advertisement.
As regional body is more feasible as the price associated with quality may be high for one
country. It is very advisable (by IRENA) to check with experts before setting a test laboratory
or a certification body. As the industry grows, it is also advisable to tighten regulations
requiring adequate equipment certification from the country of origin and to start by solar
installers. This ensures quality at essentially no cost.
Regional or national standards are very welcome in the sub tropic climate as systems built and
certified for cold climates may be over engineered for non-freezing climates, with
unnecessary tests and a group of experts should conduct a study to adopt the existing
standards to the weather of West Africa.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
41
VIII. Bibliography
Akerlof, G. A., 1970. The market for lemons: Quality uncertainity and market mechanism.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), pp. 488-500.
Arndt, R. & Puto, D. I. R., 2010. Basic Understanding of IEC Standard Testing for
Photovoltaic Panels. IN compliance Magazine, pp. 6-16.
Arndt, R. & Puto, D. I. R., 2010. BAsic Understanding of IEC Standard Testing for
Photovoltaic Panels. Compliance Magazine, pp. 6-20.
Chambre de Commerce et d'industrie du Burkina Faso, 2013. Note sectorielle sur l'énergie
solaire, Ouagadougou: s.n.
Duke, R. D., Jacobson, A. & Kammen, D. M., 2002. Photovoltaic quality in the Kenyan solar
home systems market. Elsevier.
Dunmore, 2017. Solar backsheet & PV backsheet manufacturer - Dunmore. [Online]
Available at: http://www.dunmore.com/products/solar-back-sheet.html
[Accessed 06 June 2017].
ECREE, 2012. Renewable Energy in West Africa Stutus,Experience And Trends. s.l.:s.n.
ECREEE, 2015. ECOWAS Renwable Energy Policy. s.l.:s.n.
Gabor, A. M. et al., 2016. MEchanical load Testing of Solar Panels-Beyond Certification
Testing.
Green Rhino Energy, 2013. Photovoltaics - Electrical characteristics|Solar Power. [Online]
Available at: http://www.greenrhinoenergy.com/solar/technologies/pv_electronics.php
[Accessed 04 june 2017].
Green, M. A., 2009. The Path to 25% Silicon Solar Cell: History of solar cell evolution.
PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, Issue 17, pp. 183-
189.
Hanwha Q CELLS, 2014. Data sheet Q.PEAK-G3 265-280. s.l.:s.n.
IEA, 2014. A review of failures of photovoltaic modules, s.l.: s.n.
IEA, 2014. Africa Energy Outlook A focus on energy prospects in Sub-Saharan Africa.
s.l.:s.n.
IRENA, 2014. Quality infrastructure in support of solarwater heating markets, Cyprus: s.n.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
42
IRENA, 2015. 2015Quality Infrastructure for Renewable Energy Technologies Guidelines for
Policy Makers. s.l.:s.n.
IRENA, 2015. Africa 2030: Roadmap for a renewable energy future. s.l.:s.n.
IRENA, 2016. Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2016. s.l.:s.n.
IRENA, 2016. Solar PV in Africa: Costs and Markets. s.l.:s.n.
Lighting Global, 2016. Product Testing: Step-By-Step. [Online]
Available at: https://www.lightingglobal.org/product-testing-step-by-step/
[Accessed 30 September 2016].
Markvart, T. & Castner, L., 2003. Pratical Handbook of Photovoltaics: Fundamentals and
Application. s.l.:Elsevier.
Masters, G. M., 2004. Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems. New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Niclas, R. & Weimar, D., 2014. TEsting-SINOVOLTAICS. [Online]
Available at: http://sinovoltaics.com/learning-center/testing/
[Accessed 10 October 2016].
Nygaard, I., 2009. The compatibility of rural electrification and promotion of low-carbon
technologies in developping countries-the case of solar PV Sub Saharan Africa. European
review of energy markets, 3(2).
ONUDI, 2005. Accréditation — Certification —Normalisation-Métrologie-Promotion de la
qualité: Contribution à l'étude du droit lié à la qualié dans l'espace UEMOA. s.l.:s.n.
Osterwald, C. R. & MacMahon, T., 2008. History of Accelerated and Qualification Testiing
of Terrestial Photovotaic Modules: A litterature review. Interscience.
Painuly, J., 2001. Barriers for renawabe energypenetration; a framewok for analysis.
Renewable Energy, Issue 24, pp. 73-89.
Paul, K. B. J., 2013. Infrastructure Nationale de la Qualité-Politique nationale Qualité.
Ouagadougou: s.n.
Peter Parts Electronics, 2007. Solar Panels and Modules. s.l.:s.n.
PVTECH, 2014. West African Solar Opportunities. Solar media, p. 4.
SONABEL, 2014. Avis de marché de travaux: Construction clé-en-main de la centrale
photovoltaique de Zagtouli. Ouagadougou: s.n.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
43
Turner, W. C. & Doty, S., 2007. Energy management handbook. Sixth edition ed. s.l.:The
Fairmont Press.
UL , 2011. IEC 61215 Ed2 Test reports for SURANA VENTURES LTD. s.l.:s.n.
VILAR, E., 2012. Renewable energy in West Africa Situation, Experience and Trends. s.l.:s.n.
Villalva, M. G., Filho, E. R. & Gazoli, J. R., 2009. Modeling and circuit-based simulation of
photovoltaic arrays.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
44
Annexes
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
45
Annex I: Key terms definition for quality infrastructure
Accreditation: An independent confirmation of the technical competence of an individual or
an organization delivering services (i.e. calibrations, tests, certifications, inspections).
Calibration: The set of operations which establish, under specified conditions, the
relationship between values indicated by a measuring instrument or measuring system, or
values represented by a material measure, and the corresponding known values of a measured
quantity. The results of a calibration permit the estimation of errors of indication of the
measuring instrument, measuring system, or material measure, or the assignment of values to
marks on arbitrary scales. A calibration may determine other metrological properties. The
result of a calibration shall, for the purposes of this model, be recorded in a document, which
may be either an internal or external calibration certificate, or a calibration report. The results
of calibration operations recorded as values may be referred to as "calibration factors," or, if a
series of calibration values, as a "calibration curve."
Certificate of conformity: A tag, label, nameplate, or document of specified form and
content, affixed or otherwise directly associated with a product or service on delivery to the
buyer, attesting that the product or service is in conformity with the requirements of the
certification program (e.g., with the referenced standards and specifications)
Certification: The formal verification that a product, service and management system of an
organization, or the competence of a person, corresponds to the requirements of a standard.
The certification is realized by conformity assessment bodies, which demand recognition of
their technical competence by an internationally recognized accreditation body.
. A third-party certification is one that is rendered by a technically and otherwise competent
body other than one controlled by the producer or the buyer
Certification body: An impartial body or organization possessing the necessary competence
to develop promulgate, finance, and operate a certification program and to conduct
certifications of conformity. Note: A certification body may operate its own testing and
inspection activities or it may oversee these activities carried out on its behalf by other bodies,
e-g., and an independent testing laboratory.
Certification mark: A generic term intended to include the Listing Mark, Classification
Mark, Recognized Component Mark and Recognized Marking of [the Laboratory].
Authorized use of a Certification Mark by a manufacturer is the manufacturer's declaration
that the product was produced according to [the Laboratory's] requirements. "Label" is
synonymous with "Listing Mark," "Classification Marking," or "Certification Mark.
Inspections: Examinations of the design of products, services, procedures or installations and
evaluate their conformity or non-conformity with requirements, which exist in the form of
laws, technical regulations, standards and specification by private clients, organizations or
government authorities.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
46
Laboratory or testing laboratory: A body or organization that performs tests and provides a
formal, written report of the results. In cases in which the laboratory forms part of an
organization that carries out activities in addition to testing and calibration, the term
laboratory refers only to that part of the organization that actually performs the testing of
photovoltaic modules.
Metrology: The science of measurement, embracing both experimental and theoretical
determinations at any level of uncertainty in any field of science and technology.
Proficiency testing: Regular, periodic determination of the laboratory testing or calibration
performance of unknowns, usually by means of interlaboratory comparisons.
Reference standard: A physical standard, generally of the highest metrological quality
available to the test laboratory, from which measurements made at that location are derived.
Standards: A document, established by consensus and approved by a recognized body,
which provides for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines, or characteristics for
activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of the optimum degree of order in a given
context. Standards can address a wide range of topics, including safety issues, design issues,
performance, reliability, etc. They are defined in a formalized document that determines the
requirements for a product, process or service.
Test method: A documented technical procedure for performing a test. The test method may
be called out in either internal documentation, or, whenever possible, in a published
consensus standard.
Traceability: The property of a result of measurements whereby it can be related to
appropriate physical standards maintained by National Institutes of Standards, or the
appropriate international standards body, through an unbroken chain of comparisons.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
47
Annexes II: Key partners
International Institutions
IRENA
The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) is an intergovernmental organization
that supports countries in their transition to a sustainable energy future, and serves as the
principal platform for international cooperation, a center of excellence, and a repository of
policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge on renewable energy. IRENA promotes
the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including
bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of
sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth
and prosperity.
IEC
The international Electro technical commission (IEC) is an international body specialized in
establishing rules, regulations and standards for electrical equipment and components.
It does not issue any certificates as the certification involves a third party body. This is
contradictory to what is seen on some manufacturer marks ‘’ IEC certified’.
Actually its standards are globally admitted as the ones manufactures should follow in terms
of quality of PV-modules.
ISO
The International Organization for Standardization has standards that are related to quality in
management and the fabrication.
It has a number of standards that are related to solar/photovoltaic industry and certifications
program which ranges from solar energy vocabulary to fundamentals of product certification
guidelines for product certification schemes. Some of these standards are shared by IEC.
Regional institutions
ECREEE
The ECOWASS Center for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency. It was established by
the Ouagadougou Declaration, adopted at the ECOWAS Conference for Peace and Security
on 12 November 2007 in Burkina Faso, articulated the need to establish a regional center to
promote RE&EE. At the conference, the Austrian Minister for European and International
Affairs and UNIDO pledged support for the creation of such an agency. In 2008 the 61st
Session of ECOWAS Council of Ministers adopted the regulation C/REG.23/11/08 and gave
the ECOWAS Regional Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE) a
legal basis.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
48
ECREEE’s mandate is also perfectly aligned with the broader strategic goals of ECOWAS
Vision 2020. It seeks to realize directly two of the components of this vision, namely: (1) ‘A
region that anchors its development on sustainable development, including agricultural and
mineral resource development strategy, and on planned agricultural and industrial strategies; a
region that develops its infrastructure and makes services accessible to its citizens and
enterprises.’ (2) ‘A region that conserves its environment and resources, promotes modes of
equitable and sustainable development in economic, social and environmental fields; a region
which brings its contribution to bear on resolution of the common problems and challenges
confronting the planet.
SOAMET
The “Secretariat Ouest Africain de Métrologie” is the body that governs accreditation in the
UEMEO region.
The SOAMET coordinates metrology activities and the establishment of national metrology
infrastructure in the Union. It can be authorized by Member States to represent them in
international organizations, in metrological work.
The SOAMET is a part of AFRIMETS which is the African Metrology System. AFRIMETS
are to harmonize metrology activities in Africa, an intra-Africa metrology system
(AFRIMETS) was established, based on the regional metrology organisation (RMO) of the
Americas, SIM (Sistema Interamericano de Metrologia). The initiative is supported by the
New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), the Physikalish Technische
Bundesanstalt (PTB), the National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA) and Legal
metrology at the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) of SA.
Its members are divided in 6 sub regions among which SOAMET covered above and
NEWMET which is made of six countries: Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Libya, Nigeria, and
Soudan. Ghana and Nigeria are a part of our study zone.
The SOAMET and NEWMET will be key partners as this project aim the West Africa, and
we can’t talk certification and testing based on the international standards and forget the
metrology.
SOAC
The « Système Ouest-Africain d’Accréditation » issues accreditation certificates in UEMEO.
It also defends the interests of its members in front of international organizations.
The SOAC is responsible for managing the Community policy of accreditation, in strict
compliance with international standards and requirements but consultation with the services
of the Union, States and private operators.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
49
NORMACERQ
The « Secrétariat régional de la normalisation, de la certification et de la promotion de la
qualité » represents conformity assessment in West Africa. The certificate is issued to the
manufacturer after the analysis or compliance tests on a batch of donated products.
This is to affix the regional quality brand recognized on compliant products. The right of use
of the mark is granted by NORMCERQ, upon request, the manufacturer has put in place
provisions to ensure continuous product quality.
NORMCERQ grants a certificate of limited validity in time to such manufacturer and put
under surveillance its manufacturing unit and its certified products.
CRECQ (Comité régional de coordination de la qualité)
The CREQ's missions are to achieve the harmonization and mutual recognition of technical
standards, as well as the certification and certification procedures in force in the Member
States provided for in the UEMOA Treaty.
WAPP the various companies producing and distributing electricity
The West African Power Pool (WAPP) is a cooperation of the national electricity companies
in Western Africa under the auspices of the Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS). Founded in 2000, the members of WAPP are working for establishing a reliable
power grid for the region and a common market for electricity.
Governmental institutions
These are mainly the national electricity agencies and ministry of energies and other related
agencies.
Academic and Business partners
We have identified 166 business partners which exclude personal companies or individuals
that import and distribute solar panels and other solar products. The document is the property
of the technopole 2iE and the content won’t be disclosed here. Through existing 2ie’s
academic partnerships, we have identified some that do PV research or testing based research
which can form the network of experts needed for the success of the program as
recommended by IRENA.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
50
Annex III: Specifications for the equipment
Flash Tester/SunSimulator
Items YDSMT-H-3A YDSMT-H-B
Light Intensity 100mW/cm²(70~120mW/cm² continuous adjustable)
Non-uniformity of
Irradiation ≤±2% [Class A] ≤±3%
Instability of
Irradiation ≤±2% [Class A] ≤±3%
Consistency of
Testing ≤±0.5%A ≤±1%
Lamp Spectrum IEC60904-9 and JISC8933 [Class A]
Pulse Width of
Single Flash 10ms
Effective Testing
Area/Watts 2000mm×1000mm 5W~300W
Measuring
Voltage 0~100V(resolution 1mV) Customized
Measuring
Current 0~20A(resolution 1mA)
Tested Electric
Performances Isc Voc Pmax Vm Im FF EFF Temp Rs Rsh
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
51
Visual Inspection Machine
Place of Origin:
Hubei, China (Mainland)
Brand Name:
KEYLAND solar panel
manufacturing machines
Model Number:
EL defect detector
Power:
Electronic
Usage:
Auto Testing Machine
Type:
Compliance with IEC60904-9 and
JISC8933 standard
Product Name:
100mW/Cm2(20-120mW/Cm2
Effective Testing Area:
1100x2000mm
Resolution:
8.3megapixels/16megapixels
Camera mode:
Camera mode
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
52
Camera brand:
SONY
Monitoring points:
before laminating/after laminating
Image acquisition time:
1 to 60s
Power supply:
220v 10A/110v
PLC:
Mitsubishi/SIEMENS/Beckoff
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
53
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
54
Electric safety Tester
The construction will be carried out to perform following checks on PV-modules:
Wet leakage current test according to IEC 61215/61646 section 10.15
Insulation (Dielectric Withstand Test) test according to MST 16 of IEC 61730-2:2007
Optional
Ground continuity test according to MST 13 of IEC 61730-2:2007
Reverse current overload test according to MST 26 of IEC 61730-2:2007
The tester is made of
Water basin
For the wet part a water basin is provided with drainage.
The water basin allows testing modules with a maximal dimension of 1300 x 2200 x 80mm.
The incorporation of the module is carried out manually. It will be ensured that the connecting
box from the module cannot be plunge in the water basin.
The water basin can be drained by drainage with a valve at the bottom of the water basin.
Temperature controls
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
55
The water temperature in the water basin has to be kept constant at 22 +/-2°C. Therefor we
install a temperature control unit and a pump. The pump is circulating through the basin. The
air cooled thermostat is keeping the temperature at 22 +/-2°C. This temperature control can be
ordered as an option.
Measurements devices
For the measurement of the conductance from the water according to wet leakage current
test, the following measurement device GMH 3431 from the company Greisinger is being
offered.
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
56
For the temperature measurement of the water basin, you will use the same measurement
device as for the conductance.
For the measurement a leakage resistance tester will be provided. The operation is occurring
on the device and you can readout the measurement data directly with the provided software.
The maximal proof voltage from the measurement device is 10000V.
All with a DC current source designed to operate with the tester
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
57
IV-curve tracer
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
58
Pyrometer
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
59
Infrared camera
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
60
UV preconditioning chamber
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
61
Thermal cycling testing chamber
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
62
Robustness of terminations tester
1. Cable test length is 450mm.
2. Pull the leading wire by 4.08kg in 170 o of angle.
3. X-axle: from 170o right swinging to 170o left.
4. Y-axle: from 170o up swinging to 170o down.
5. Z-axle: pull at 170 o and spin.
Features:
1. Tester: 2080W (can be extended to 3070) x 2020Hmm aluminum rack: table surface is
padded by slip-stop pad.
2. Air-electrical combination torque mechanism: pneumatic pump: 1hp; air pressure:
6kg/cm2; circuit & pneumatic control system.
3. Torque control system: left, right & front spinning motor; positioning and rotating arm.
4. Tension force corrector: pneumatic cylinder and torque meter.
5. Accept customized order.
Specification:
Technical Index:
1. Voltage: 220VAC,50Hz
2. Current: 5A
3. Air pressure: 6kg/cm2
4. Tester: 2,080W (can be extended to 3070) x 2,020Hmm
5. Test module dimension: 2,600mm x 2,200mm, adjustable.
6. Wiring:
6.1 Test length: 450mm
6.2 Wire size: Ø 6mm
6.3 Pull in the direction of 17o respective to horizontal plane.
7. Pull force: 4.08kg ± 5%
8. Tension force corrector: pneumatic cylinder and torque meter.
Mechanical load tester
Market and Feasibility study of the implementation of a national or regional certification for Photovoltaic solar
panels
63
Dust chamber
Bypass diode thermal test system