mark w. ranyak, aia, leed ap research facilities design

Undergraduate Facilities fog

FEFPA 2010

r Florida’s STEM Initiatives

Mark W. Ranyak, AIA, LEED APResearch Facilities Designg

WHAT IS OUR PERSPECTIVE?

Research Facilities Design:Research Facilities Design: Laboratory Building Design Consultants

Thirty-Three Architects, Engineers, Designers

Focused 100% on Planning and Design of Laboratories

Collaborated with >125 Architectural Firms

Over 1,000 Projects in 46 States throughout the U.S., Canada, United Kingdom, Kuwait, Malaysiand Egypt

• 275 College and University Clients• 275 College and University Clients• 38 Million GSF of Building Space• $8 Billion Construction Value

FLORIDA CLIENTS: University of Florida Florida Atlantic University The Scripps Research Institute Max Planck Florida Institute Florida Institute of Technology Indian River State College Palm Beach State College St. Johns River Community College Lake Sumter Community College South Florida Community College Eckerd College

ia St. Lucie County VA Medical Center, Miami USDA, Ft. Pierce University of South Florida University of West Florida

Florida’s Focus on STEM Educ

Science, Technology, Engineering

“Closing the Talent Gap”The Florida Council of 100Florida Chamber of Commerce

“…to reach the education level of the 10 most productivemillion adults with baccalaureate degrees (1.3 million mofive years, will need at least 100,000 more science and te

Excerpted from “Closing the Talent Gap”

cation

g, and Math

The Scripps Research Institute

St t U i it S t

e states within the next two decades, Florida will need 4.5 ore than expected at current attainment rates) and, within echnology professionals than we are on track to produce.”

State University System



“Roadmap to Florida’s Future”2010 – 2015 Strategic Plan for Economic DevelopmEnterprise Florida

“A large pool of highly-skilled technical professionals is onemost important ingredients for building an economy basethe creation of new products and ideas. States with ampletrained in the fields of science and engineering will have ag gcompetitive advantage over those that do not.”

“…according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 15 of the 20

FAU Scripps Phase 2

fastest growing jobs through 2014 will require substantial math or science preparation.”

cation

g, and Math

ment

e of the ed on e talent a

Excerpted from “Roadmap to Florida’s Future”



“New Florida” InitiativeBuilding Florida’s Knowledge EconomyState University System of Florida Board of Governors

“The heart of the knowledge and innovation economy is built on the high-technology, high-wage jobs needed in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (of “STEM”)…”

Includes:• $1.75 billion investment in the public universities

over five years

L

• Half the new funding focused on STEM degree programs ($875 million)

• New funding can be used for operations and for construction of facilities

R

cation

g, and Math

Laboratory at FAU-Harbor Branch Research Laboratory IIRendering courtesy PGAL Architects



STEM Facilities are Different

• Space Requirements

• Systems

• Sustainability

• Safety

• Shared Resource

• $Cost

cation

g, and Math

University of San Diego

St. Lawrence University

STEM Facilities Are Different

Space Requirements• Basic Nature of Subject Matter

“Hands On”

University of Kentucky


Typical Classroom


Space Requirements• Basic Nature of Subject Matter

“Hands On”

Albion College


Low Average Hig

General Biology

Lab Size 960 1,260 NSF 1,95Student Seats 16 24 40NSF / Student 40 52.5 NSF/Stu 68Si k Q tit 2 3 4Sink Quantity 2 3 4Fume Hoods Qty 0 1 2FH Length / Student .3 Ft/Stu

U

h

50 08.8

442

John Carroll University

niversity of Notre Dame


Low Average Hig

Microbiology


h

30 0022

4 Mt. Union College

El Camino College


Low Average Hig

Anatomy & Physiology


h

00 22

662 California State University, Stanislaus

El Camino College


Low Average Hig

General Chemistry

Lab Size 1,240 1,300 NSF 3,52Student Seats 18 24 80NSF / Student 44 53.3 NSF/Stu 79Si k Q tit 3 5 6Sink Quantity 3 5 6Fume Hoods Qty 1 6 14FH Length / Student 1.6 Ft/Stu

h

20 09

664


General Chemistry




Low Average Hig

Organic Chemistry

Lab Size 1,230 1,350 NSF 1,89Student Seats 16 20 24NSF / Student 53 73.3 NSF/Stu 84Si k Q tit 3 5 15Sink Quantity 3 5 15Fume Hoods Qty 8 11 14FH Length / Student 3.3 Ft/Stu

California State University, Stanislaus

h

90 44554

Albion College

University of Notre Dame


Low Average Hig

Advanced Chemistry

Lab Size 560 1,200 NSF 1,57Student Seats 8 14 24NSF / Student 58 76.3 NSF/Stu 11Si k Q tit 2 4 6Sink Quantity 2 4 6Fume Hoods Qty 1 4.5 7FH Length / Student 2.3 Ft/Stu


h

75 40

667

Agnes Scott College


Low Average Hig

Geology & Earth Sciences

Lab Size 1,200 1,240 NSF 1,27Student Seats 24 24 24NSF / Student 50 52.5 NSF/Stu 52.Si k Q tit 0 1 1Sink Quantity 0 1 1Fume Hoods Qty 0 0 0FH Length / Student 0 Ft/Stu

Albion College

h

70 4.9

0University of San Diego

Western State College


Low Average Hig

General Physics

Lab Size 900 1,240 NSF 2,64Student Seats 16 24 48NSF / Student 38.8 51.3 NSF/Stu 68Si k Q tit 0 1 3Sink Quantity 0 1 3Fume Hoods Qty 0 0 3FH Length / Student 0 Ft/Stu

OR

16'W

IHW ICW

LVA100

W

WA4

8W

A42

*

**

+18"+18"+18"

54

3637

WA

48*

*(A

/V)

+18"

+18"

WA

36*

LCDMONITOR

SK2

208V30A

1 PH

WA

48W

A48

2 "

**

54

Upper DivisionPhysics

244

42

WA

48*

LCDMONITOR

LN2

2" EQ@

61 48

*

LAPT

OP

CA

RT

LCDMONITOR

4242

Califo

gh

40 88.9

333

Palomar College

ornia State University, Stanislaus


Low Average Hig

Advanced Physics

Lab Size 630 790 NSF 1,26Student Seats 8 16 24NSF / Student 59.1 78.8 NSF/Stu 98.8Si k Q tit 1 1 2Sink Quantity 1 1 2Fume Hoods Qty 0 1 2FH Length / Student 0 Ft/Stu

University of California, Davis

h

60 48

222



Low Average Hig

Electronics

Lab Size 600 630 NSF 950Student Seats 8 16 24NSF / Student 38.8 58.1 NSF/Stu 75Si k Q tit 0 1 1Sink Quantity 0 1 1Fume Hoods Qty 0 0 0FH Length / Student 0 Ft/Stu

Agnes Scott College

h

0 45

Palomar Community College


Low Average Hig

Engineering

Lab Size 900 1,340 NSF 2,75Student Seats 12 24 60NSF / Student 39.4 59.0 NSF/Stu 106Si k Q tit 0 2 4Sink Quantity 0 2 4Fume Hoods Qty 0 1 3FH Length / Student 0.2 Ft/Stu

h

56 06.7

443

University of New Hampshire


EngineeringUniversity of Kentucky


Engineering

Arizona State University East Polytechnic Campus


Space Requirements – Metrics by

Lab Size (NSF)Lab Size (NSF)

Discipline

Western Kentucky University




Student SeatsStudent Seats

Discipline

Central College



NSF / StudentNSF / Student

Discipline

University of Southern Indiana

University of New Hampshire


N t / G A R ti

Space Requirements - Metrics

Net / Gross Area RatioNet Building Area / Gross Building Area

Average: 560.65

0.70

Average: .56

High: .65

L 49

Average0.55

0.50.55

0.60

Low: .49

0.40

0.45

0.50

University of San Diego0.30

0.35

1 2y g

0.620 61

0.65

0.62

54 0.540.53

0.58

0.60

0.58

0.54

0.57

0.51

0.61

0.56

0.51

0.54

0.59

0.54

0.57

0.51

0.56

0.60

0.54

0.56

0.52

0.49

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

PublicPrivate


Laboratory Planning Module


10’-0” 11%10-4” 19%

Module Width

10’-6” 67%10’-8” 4%11’-0” 0%

Module Depth

A

36.0 FT36.0

34.0

36.0

38.0

Average 30.2 FT

28.0 FT

30.0 30.0 30.0

29.0

30.0

29.0

31.0

30.0 30.0

28.5

30.0 30.0

32.0

30.030.3

30.0 30.0

28.0

29.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.030.5

29.0

31.0

26.0

28.0

30.0

32.0

20.0

22.0

24.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Module Area

378 NSF 378

360

380

400

Average 314 NSF

294 NSF

315310

315

300 300305

330

315 315

300 300

310

340

310

320315 315

294297

315 315 315 315320

305

320

280

300

320

340

200

220

240

260

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27



Factors Impacting Volume:• Mechanical System• Structural Systems• Campus Masterplan• Available Land• Building Size• ZoningZoning

California State University, Los Medanos Community College

Recent Benchmark Data -Floor to Floor Height:14’ -0” 17 %14’ – 6” 18 %15’ – 0” 29 %15’ – 6” 25 %

g

16’ – 0” 11 %FAU Davie

Number of Floors:2 Stories 7%3 St i 30%3 Stories 30%4 Stories 52%5 Stories 11%

Stanislaus Harvard University


Structural System - Types

Factors:• Local Labor Skills• Materials Availability

Palm Beach State Colleg

Concrete

• Frame Depth Restrictions• Vibration Criteria

Concrete

FAU / UF Joint Use Facility

Concrete

Recent Benchmark Data:• Concrete 44%• Concrete 44%• Steel 56%

e Florida Institute of Technology

ConcreteConcrete

y, Davie FAU Harbor Branch

Concrete / Steel


Structural System – Floor Stiffness R

Criterion

Vrms Velocity Level

Detail Size Description of Use Floor

Curve rms y

(μm)

p

(kips(μin/s) (dB)

Ref:1μin/s

Workshop (ISO)

32,000 90 N/A Distinctly felt vibration. Appropriate to workshops and non-sensitive areas.

Offi F lt ib ti A i t t ffi dOffice (ISO)

16,000 84 N/A Felt vibration. Appropriate to offices and non-sensitive areas.

Residential Day (ISO)

8,000 78 75

Barely felt vibration. Sleep areas in most instances. Probably adequate for computer equipment, probe test equipment and low-power microscopes (to 20X).

500

Op.Theatre 4 000 72 25

Vibration not felt. Suitable for sensitive sleeping areas. Suitable in most instances for

1 000(ISO)

4,000 72 25 microscopes to l00X and for other equipment of low sensitivity.

1,000

VC-A 2,000 66 8

Adequate in most instances for optical microscopes to 400X, microbalances, optical balances, proximity and projection aligners, etc.

2,000

VC-B 1,000 60 3 Optical microscopes to I000x, inspection and lithography equipment (including steppers) to 3

i t li idth4,000

micron-meter line widths.

VC-C 500 54 1 A good standard for most inspection equipment and lithography to 1 micron micron-meter detail size.

8,000

VC-D 250 48 0.3

Suitable in most instances for the most demanding equipment including electron microscopes (TEMs, SEMs, AFMs) and E-Beam systems operation to the limits of their

16,000

After Ungar, Gordon, Sturtz, Amick 1983-1998

systems, operation to the limits of their capacity.

VC-E 125 42 0.1

A difficult criterion to achieve in most instances. Assumed to be adequate for the most demanding of sensitive systems including long path, laser-based, small target systems and other systems.

35,000

Requirements

Stiffness KFn

s/in-sec)

– 3,000

0 6 0000 – 6,000

0 – 12,000

0 – 25,000

0 – 50,000

0 – 100,000

Excerpted from Technotes Issue No. 35 RDWI Consulting Engineers & Scientists

0 – 200,000


Mechanical Systems

Instructional Laboratory SystemsInstructional Laboratory Systems• Two-position Constant Air Volume (CAV)

o Low fume hood density locationso Ventilation governed primarily by ACH

Si l to Simpler system• Variable Air Volume (VAV)

o Higher fume hood density locationso Quieter hoods

M lo More complex

Standards and Codes Include:• ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2007, Ventila/ ,

for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality • ASHRAE Handbook, HVAC Applications

(2007), Chapter 14 Laboratories• ANSI/AIHA Z9 5 Laboratory Ventilation (20• ANSI/AIHA Z9.5, Laboratory Ventilation (20• OSHA CFR Part 1910. 332

::

Agnes Scott College

ation

003)003)

Albion College


Mechanical Systems

Almost Always Recirculating Air:Almost Always Recirculating Air:• Computer Sciences• Mathematics• GIS• Astronomy

Sometimes Recirculating Air:• PhysicsPhysics• Engineering• Geology• Earth Science

Almost Never Recirculating Air:• Chemistry• Organic ChemistryOrganic Chemistry• Anatomy & Physiology• Biology


Albion College

Agnes Scott College


Plumbing Systems

Types:Types:• Industrial HW & CW• Domestic HW & CW• Purified Water (Type II)• Tempered Water (60o-80o F)• Compressed Air• Laboratory Vacuum• Natural GasNatural Gas• Laboratory Waste & Vent

S ttl P ifi U i itSeattle Pacific University

Los Medanos College


Plumbing Systems

Types:Types:• Specialty Gases• Process Cooling Water• Seawater

Northwestern UniversitySeattle Pacific University University of California, Davis


Plumbing Systems

Recent Benchmark Data:Recent Benchmark Data:

60%70%80%90%100%

20%30%40%50%60%

0%10%20%

Purified Water

Natural Gas

Lab Vacuum

LabAir

General Biology 82% 76% 65% 47%

Microbiology 95% 93% 76% 36%

Anatomy & Physiology 64% 64% 55% 27%

General Chemistry 88% 88% 76% 18%

Organic Chemistry 92% 47% 82% 18%

Advanced Chemistry 88% 88% 76% 18%

Geology & Earth Sci 43% 0% 14% 14%Geology & Earth Sci 43% 0% 14% 14%

General Physics 29% 43% 14% 43%

Electronics 43% 29% 29% 57%

Engineering 16% 25% 16% 75%

PW

LG

LV

LA



Electrical Systems

Types:Types:• Power

o 120 volt 20 ampo 208 volt 1 phase – special equipment

208 lt 3 h & to 208 volt 3-phase – compressors & motorso 480 volt 3 phase – autoclaves

Mt. Union College

Hope College

s

Arizona State University


Electrical Systems

Types:Types:• Standby Power

o Exhaust / supply (as needed for egress)o Ultralow temperature freezers

A i l f ilitio Animal facilities• Uninterruptible Power

o Dedicated computer workstationso Sensitive instruments

HHope College


Electrical Systems

Recent Benchmark Data – NumbRecent Benchmark Data Numbber of Circuits per Lab:ber of Circuits per Lab:

University of California, San Diego


Electrical Systems

Types:Types:• Lighting

o Classrooms: 30-60 FCo Laboratories: 65-80 FC

S i l i to Special environments• Security

o Fobs / cardswipeso Biometrics Palm Beach State Colleg


Florida Institute of Technologyge



Student Stations

Technology Systems

North Carolina Statee University


Technology Systems

Biology

Chemistry

Direct Data Acquisition

Physics


Technology Systems

Direct Data Acquisition

Samford University

Physics


Technology Systems

Fixed Position Demo / AV Bench


Technology Systems

Table / Rack / Wall Box


Technology Systems

Shared Shared InstrumentationInstrumentation


Technology Systems

Public Connections


LEED Green Building Rating System

Sustainability

LEED Green Building Rating SystemUse of Sustainable Materials & Finishes:• Wood from ‘Certified Sustainable Forest’• Rapidly Renewable Materials • Recycled Materials• Recycled Materials• Finishes: ‘Near-Zero’ VOC Emissions• NAF: No Added Urea Formaldehyde

LEED-NC Version 2.2 Registered Project Checklist

Yes ? No

Sustainable Sites 14 Points

Y Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required

Credit 1 Site Selection 1

Credit 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity 1

Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1

Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1

Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1

Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 1

Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1

Credit 5.1 Site Development, Protect of Restore Habitat 1

Credit 5.2 Site Development, Maximize Open Space 1

Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design, Quantity Control 1

Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design, Quality Control 1

H I l d Eff f

<< enter project name >><< enter city, state, other details >>

Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof 1

Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1

Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1

Yes ? No

Water Efficiency 5 Points

Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% 1

Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1

Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1

Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 1

Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction 1

Yes ? No

Energy & Atmosphere 17 Points

Y Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems Required

Y Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Required

Y Prereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required

Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 to 10

Credit 2 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 to 3

Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 1

C dit 4 E h d R f i t M t 1Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1

Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 1

Credit 6 Green Power 1

continued…

Yes ? No

Materials & Resources 13 Points

Y Prereq 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required

Credit 1.1 Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1

Credit 1.2 Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1

Credit 1 3 Building Reuse Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1

Standards & Project Recognition


Long Term Energy & Cost Savings

Sustainability

• Laboratory ventilation – air change rates

• Fume hood exhaust systems –Low volumeLow volume

• Heat recovery systems• Electrical loads – diversity• Chilled Beams


Fume Hood & Exhaust Air Management

Sustainability

3 Teaching Labs

(6) 8’ CFHs Each

100% Room Exhaust

3 Teaching Lab

(2) 8’ CFHs Eac

100% Room Ex

8 AC/Hr Min

Annual HVAC Energy & Maintenance Cost: +/- $72k

General Chemistry General Chem

8 AC/Hr Min

Annual HVAC EMaintenance C

General Chemistry General Chem

Birmingham Southern College Oregon State

bs

ch

xhaust

3 Teaching Labs

No CFHs

Recirculated Room Air

istry Original General Chemistry Green

nergy & Cost: +/- $24k

Code Min Make-up Air

Annual HVAC Energy & Maintenance Cost: +/- $5k

istry – Original General Chemistry – Green

e University Oregon State University


Fume Hood & Exhaust Air Management

Sustainability

Fume Hood & Exhaust Air ManagementAlternative Exhaust Devices

Cal State Stanislaus

Hope Collegep g

Palomar Community College


Sustainability

Educational OpportunitiesWind & Rain


Educational OpportunitiesD li hti

Sustainability

Daylighting


Sustainability

Vermeer ScieVermeer ScieCentral Colle

Credit: Holabird & Root

Educational Opportunities

Photovoltaics

ence Center,ence Center,ege


Safety

• Regulations

ANSI/AIHA Z9.5, Laboratory V

ANSI Z358.1-2004, American

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 110-1

SOME APPLICABLE RE

Regulations• Space Planning• Containment

G d P ti



ASHRAE 90.1-2007, Standard

ASHRAE Handbook, HVAC App

Biosafety in Microbiological a

• Good Practice Primary Containment for Bioh

Guidelines for Laboratory De

Operations Manual for Labor

NFPA 30, Flammable and Co

NFPA 45, Fire Protection for L

NFPA 101, Life Safety Code (N

NFPA 801, Standard for Fire P

Guidelines for the Laboratory

Guide for the Care and Use o

Prudent Practices in the Labo

NSF 49, Class II (Laminar Flow

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030, Occ

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1450, Occ

OSHA 29 CFR 1990, Identifica

SEFA 1-2002, Laboratory Fum

SEFA 2-1997, Installation of Sc

SEFA 8, Laboratory Furniture,

Industrial Ventilation, A Manu

Handbook of Facilities Planni

Ventilation (AIHA 2003)

National Standard for Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment (ANSI 2004)

995, Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods (ASHRAE 1995)

EGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND REFERENCES:

, g y ( )

992, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (ASHRAE 1981)

999, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality (ASHRAE 1989)

d for Energy Conservation in New Building Design (ASHRAE 2007)

plications, Chapter 14, Laboratories (ASHRAE 2007)

and Biomedical Laboratories (CDC/NIH 2007)

hazards. Selection, Installation and use of Biological Safety Cabinets (CDC/NIH 2000)

esign (DiBerardinis et al. 1993)

ratories. (Safety, Health and Environmental Management Program) (EPA 1998)

ombustible Liquids Code (NFPA 2008)

Laboratories using Chemicals (NFPA 2004)

NFPA 2009)

Protection for Facilities Handling Radioactive Materials (NFPA 2008)

y Use of Chemical Carcinogens (NIH 81-2385)

of Laboratory Animals, No. 86-23 (NRC 1996)

oratory, Handling and Disposal of Chemicals (NRC 1995)

w) Biohazard Cabinetry (NSF 1992)

cupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens (OSHA 1990c)

cupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories (OSHA 1990b)

ation, Classification, and Regulation of Carcinogens (OSHA 1991b)

me Hoods, Recommended Practices (SEFA 2002)

cientific Furniture and Equipment, Recommended Practices (SEFA 1997)

Recommended Practices (SEFA 2007)

ual of Recommended Practices, 24th Edition (ACGIH 2001)

ing, Volume 1, Laboratory Facilities (Ruys 1990)


Safety

• Regulations

2007 FLORIDA BUILDINTABLE 307.1(1) MAXIMUHAZARDOUS MATERI

Regulations• Space Planning• Containment

G d P ti

MATERIAL C

Combustible liquidc, i

Combustible fiber

• Good Practice Consumer fireworks (Class C, Common) Cryogenics flammable Cryogenics, oxidizing

E l i

DivDivDivDivExplosives D

DivDiv

Flammable gas Gli

Flammable liquidc 1BC bi i fl bl li idCombination flammable liquid (1A, 1B, 1C) Flammable solid

Organic peroxide

Oxidizer

Oxidizing gas Gli

GROUP WHEN THE MAXIMUM

STORAGEb USE-CLOSED SYSTEMSbUSE-OPEN SYSTEMSb

Gas Gas

NG CODEUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY PER CONTROL AREA OF IALS POSING A PHYSICAL HAZARD

CLASS

ALLOWABLE QUANTITY

IS EXCEEDED

Solid pounds(cubic feet)

Liquid gallons

(pounds)

(cubic feet at

NTP)


Liquid gallons

(pounds)

(cubic feet at

NTP)


Liquid gallons

(pounds) II

IIIA IIIB

H-2 or H-3 H-2 or H-3

N/A N/A

120d, e 330d, e

13,200e, fN/A N/A

120d 330d

13,200f N/A N/A

30d 80d

3,300f Loose baledo H-3 (100)

(1,000) N/A N/A (100) (1,000) N/A N/A (20)

(200) N/A ( , ) ( , ) ( )

1.4G H-3 125d, e, l N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A H-2 N/A 45d N/A N/A 45d N/A N/A 10d N/A H-3 N/A 45d N/A N/A 45d N/A N/A 10d

vision 1.1vision 1.2vision 1.3vision 1.4

H-1 H-1

H-1 or 2 H 3

1e, g 1e, g 5e, g

50e, g

(1)e, g (1)e, g (5)e, g (50)e, g

N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 0.25g

1g 50g

(0.25)g (0.25)g

(1)g (50)g

N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 0.25g

1g N/A

(0.25)g (0.25)g

(1)g N/ADivision

1.4G vision 1.5vision 1.6

H-3 H-3 H-1 H-1

50e, g

125d, e, l

1e, g 1d, e, g

(50)e, g

N/A (1)e, g N/A

N/AN/A N/A N/A

50g

N/A 0.25g N/A

(50)g

N/A (0.25)g

N/A

N/AN/A N/A N/A

N/AN/A 0.25g N/A

N/A N/A

(0.25)g N/A

Gaseous iquefied H-2 N/A N/A

30d, e 1,000d, e

N/A N/A N/A 30d, e

1,000d, e

N/A N/A N/A

1A B and 1C

H-2 or H-3 N/A 30d, e

120d, e N/A N/A 30d 120d N/A N/A 10d

30d H 2N/A H-2

or H-3 N/A 120d, e, h N/A N/A 120d, h N/A N/A 30d, h

N/A H-3 125d, e N/A N/A 125d N/A N/A 25d N/A UD

I II III IV V

H-1 H-2 H-3 H-3 N/A N/A

1e, g 5d, e

50d, e 125d, e

NL NL

(1)e, g (5)d, e (50)d, e

(125)d, e

NL NL

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 1d

50d 125d N/L N/L

(0.25)g (1)

(50)d (125)d N/L N/L

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 1d 10d 25d NL NL

(0.25)g (1)d

(10)d (25)d NL NL

4 3k 2 1

H-1 H-2 or H-3

H-3 N/A

1e, g (10)d, e

250d, e

4,000e, f

(1)e, g (10)d, e

(250)d, e

(4,000)e,f

N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 2d

250d 4,000f

(0.25)g (2)d

(250)d (4,000)f

N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.25g 2d 50d

1,000f

(0.25)g (2)d

(50)d (1,000)f

Gaseous iquefied H-3 N/A

N/A N/A 15d, e

1,500d, e

N/A N/A N/A

N/A 15d, e

1,500d, e

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A


Safety

• RegulationsRegulations• Space Planning• Containment

G d P ti• Good Practice


Safety


G d P ti• Good Practice

University of Missouri

Palomar College

St. Edwards University


Safety


G d P ti• Good Practice Palomar College

Palm Beach State College UCSD

Valdosta State University

Smith College


Safety


G d P ti• Good PracticeUniversity of Sout

Palm Beach State College Mt. San Antonio

Arizona State East Polytechnicthern California

Kansas State UniversityCommunity College

••

STEM Facilities Are Different•Shared Resource

• Engage & Educate Building Occupants & Visitors• Create a Collaborative Environment• Communicate & Celebrate Function

STEM Facilities Are Different ••

Shared Resource •




Shared Resource •

Agnes Scott College


St. Lawrence University


Shared Resource •




California State University, Stanislaus


Shared Resource •


California S

y

Hope ColleGrinnell College


State University, Stanislaus

ege


Shared Resource •

University o

Albion College


of Missouri Arizona State East Polytechnic

Samford University


Shared Resource •


University of Virginia - Wise


University of Puget Sound


Shared Resource •



Agnes Scott College


Cost – Recent Benchmark Data:• Range: $182/GSF – $592/GSF

• Average: $364/GSF• Average: $364/GSF

$ / GSF

Palm Beach State College


• Range: 0.16 – 0.54

• Average: 0 36

Cost Driver – Recent Benchmark D

• Average: 0.36

L b A / B ildi ALab Area / Building Are

Data:

Northwestern University

ea


• Current Market Conditions: 10%

• Current Escalation Predictions: 2% -

Cost – Recent Tends:

• Current Escalation Predictions: 2% -

FAU HARBOR BRANCH RESEARCH FACILITY FT PIERCE FLFAU HARBOR BRANCH RESEARCH FACILITY , FT. PIERCE, FL$342 / GSF LAB DENSITY = 0.45UNDER CONSTRUCTION (BID 2010)PGAL ARCHITECTSBALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION

% - 20% Discount

- 3% Annually- 3% Annually

FAU-UF JOINT USE FACILITY, DAVIE, FL$336 / GSF LAB DENSITY = 0.27UNDER CONSTRUCTION (BID 2009)SCHENKEL SCHULTZ ARCHITECTSPIRTLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Research Facilities DesignResearch Facilities Design

mark w. ranyak, aia, leed ap research facilities design

Documents