marjorie sykes second memorial lecture 2... · 4 marjorie sykes second memorial lecture ... 8 see,...
TRANSCRIPT
NCERT
Mem
oria
l Lec
ture
Ser
ies
1905-1995
ISBN 978-93-5007-014-7
1892
Marjorie Sykes Second Memorial Lecture
2009
KAMAL DATTA
NCERT
MEMORIAL LECTURE SERIES
Marjorie Sykes Second Memorial Lectureat
Regional Institute of EducationAjmer
28 October 2009
KAMAL DATTA
First Edition ISBN 978-93-5007-014-7
November 2009 Agrahayana 1931
PD 5H BS
© National Council of Educational Research and Training, 2009
Rs. ??.??
Published at the Publication Department by the Secretary, NationalCouncil of Educational Research and Training, Sri Aurobindo Marg,New Delhi 110 016 and printed at .................... ................................................ .
CONTENTS
OBJECTIVES V
SECTION I 1Marjorie Sykes : Educating for Simplicity, Beauty and Equity
SECTION II 11Marjorie Sykes Memorial Lecture : 2009-10What Should We Teach? An Examination of IssuesUnderlying the Design of College Curriculum
ABOUT THE SPEAKER 25
ANNEXURES
I. Memorial Lectures : 2007-08 27II. Memorial Lectures : 2008-09 29
IV
V
OBJECTIVES
The National Council of Educational Research Training(NCERT) is an apex organisation, assisting and advisingthe Central and State Governments by undertakingresearch, survey, and development, training and extensionactivities for all stages of school and teacher education.
One of the objectives of the Council is to act as a clearinghouse and disseminator of ideas relating to school andteacher education. We have initiated the Memorial LectureSeries in order to fulfil this role and to commemorate the lifeand work of great educational thinkers. Our aim is to striveto raise the level of public awareness about the seminalcontributions made in the field of education by eminent menand women of India. We expect that such awareness will setoff a chain of discourse and discussion. This, we hope, willmake education a lively subject of inquiry whilesimultaneously encouraging a sustained public engagementwith this important domain of national life.
The memorial lecture series covers public lecturescommemorating the life and work of nine eminent Indianeducational thinkers and practitioners.
Title Series and Venue of Memorial Lecture Series
Title Venue
Gijubhai Badheka Memorial Madras Institute of DevelopmentLecture Studies, Chennai
Rabindranath Tagore Memorial Regional Institute of EducationLecture Bhubaneswar
Zakir Hussain Memorial Regional Institute of EducationLecture Mysore
VI
Mahadevi Verma Memorial Regional Institute of EducationLecture Bhopal
B.M. Pugh Memorial North East Regional Institute ofLecture Education, Shillong
Savitribai Phule Memorial SNDT, Women�s College, MumbaiLecture
Marjorie Sykes Memorial Regional Institute of EducationLecture Ajmer
Sri Aurobindo Memorial Presidency College, KolkataLecture
Mahatma Gandhi Memorial National Institute of EducationLecture New Delhi
We invite men and women of eminence from academiaand public life to deliver these lectures in English or anyother Indian language. Our intention is to reach a largeaudience consisting in particular of teachers, students,parents, writers, artists, NGOs, government servants andmembers of local communities.
The Annexure I (Memorial Lectures�2007-2008) andAnnexure II (Memorial Lectures�2008-2009) provide asummary of the lectures organised in the years 2007-08and 2008-09.
In due course the lectures will be made available onCompact Discs (CDs) and in the form of printed bookletsin languages other than English or Hindi in which it isoriginally delivered for wider dissemination. Each bookletconsists of II sections : Section I highlights the purpose ofthe memorial lectures and provides a brief sketch of lifeand work of the concerned educational thinker and SectionII gives the lecture in full along with a brief background ofthe speaker.
I acknowledge the contribution of Ms Konsam Diana,Junior Project Fellow for helping me in finalisation of thismanuscript.
We hope these lecture series will be of use to our audienceas well as the public in and outside the country in general.
ANUPAM AHUJA
Convenor
* Anil Sethi is Professor of History at the National Council of EducationalResearch and Training, New Delhi.
1 Quakerism: a Christian movement devoted to peaceful principles,eschewing formal doctrine, sacraments, and ordained ministersand believing in the inward authority of experience. The Quakers�emphasis on spiritual equality made them sensitive to social justice.They were empathetic to the cause of Indian nationalism and manyof them were Mahatma Gandhi�s trusted friends. Sykes was soinfluenced by the movement and its work in India that she authoredthe book, Quakers in India: A Forgotten Century (London, 1980).
SECTION I
MARJORIE SYKES: EDUCATING FOR
SIMPLICITY, BEAUTY AND EQUITY
ANIL SETHI*
Marjorie Sykes (1905-1995) was one of those foreignerswho chose to become Indian because India held out anextraordinary charm for her. She first savoured this throughthe life and work of some of the stalwarts of our nationalmovement. British by birth, Sykes came to India in theautumn of 1928 to teach at Bentick Girls� High School,Madras (now Chennai). She stayed on until the 1990s,absorbed in a wide variety of ideas, activities and projects,inspired as these were by Gandhi, Tagore, C.F. Andrewsand various Christian traditions, notably Quakerism1.
Active and engaging even in her advanced years,Marjorie Sykes painted life on a vast canvas. Spirituality,an involvement with nature, walking and climbing, crafts,languages, dramatics, philosophy, writing, ruraltransformation, the peace movement, diplomacy andnegotiations, Quaker work, the ideas of her mentors � allthese concerns occupied her by day and night. She sought
2 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Education in all these and tried to educate people aboutthem. Her educational ideas, therefore, draw upon manyof these interests but in the ultimate analysis she strove toeducate for simplicity, beauty and equity.
Born in a Yorkshire family of rather modest means, �her father served as Headmaster in poor coal-miningvillage-schools � Marjorie and her two siblings wereraised in comparative poverty but also in thrift,cleanliness and piety. She was educated in the localschools of the Huddersfield area before she was able tojoin Newnham College, Cambridge with a Collegescholarship for the study of English. While in College,she would often work with her father on his projects.Her father would try to design practical working models,simple enough for school children to make and operatethemselves, through which they might learn aboutmachines encountered in daily life. He would producefor the kids booklets of poems chosen for their humour,beauty or mystery. He would retell history in a mannerthat would awaken the reader�s human sympathies. Andin doing all this, he would involve Marjorie who eagerlyjoined in the stitching of the home-made books, neverviewing it as drudgery.2
Sykes finished the English Tripos (Honours degree) atCambridge in the first division with a short thesis onWilliam Blake. She could have easily carried on with higherstudies in English but her fascination for her father�s workled her towards school teaching. She spent another yearat Cambridge, training to be a teacher, at the end of whichshe looked for teaching opportunities in Africa and Asia.When she was offered a position at the Bentick High School
2 The details of Sykes�s life and work have been taken either fromher own writings or from Martha Dart, Marjorie Sykes: Quaker-Gandhian (London, n.d.). Dart�s book is perhaps the only biographyof Marjorie Sykes. I have used the electronic version of the book.It is available through the link to �books on education� atwww.arvindguptatoys.com. Arvind Gupta is an outstandingeducationalist, science-educator and toy maker.
3MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
at Chennai, an institution run by the London MissionarySociety, she gladly accepted it.
Sykes�s upbringing and prior training stood her in goodstead at the Bentick School. Through her parents she hadimbibed how children are zestfully moved by discoveryand achievement, by fun and adventure, by imaginationand compassion. Her father never stereotyped people,social groups or nations. He also taught her �to carry outone�s duty uninfluenced by personal desire. � There�s onlyone thing that matters � learning to be unselfish�3. Marjoriewas to learn more about this later in India in the form of�nishkama karma�. Furthermore, her Cambridge teachershad inspired her to contribute in some way towardsinternational peace and social justice. Many of them hadseen this to be the message of Jesus, to be communicatedto young minds and through an education that made them�think globally but act locally�. In any case, even as a childof nine, Marjorie had abhorred war. She was always toremember the �heavy sense of disaster that hung in the air�when World War I broke out and how the hostilities hadsuddenly transformed a beloved German teacher into an�enemy alien�.4
In 1928 Bentick was a relatively small school (less than350 children from kindergarten to the final class) and aclosely-knit community. It had a hostel although allstudents were not residents. The teachers and studentsknew one another and �cared for one another like a bigfamily�. Given Chennai�s climate, the school kept minimalfurniture and its members rarely wore sandals. Theymoved barefoot and slept on grass mats on the floor. Inthe halls of residence, each child�s clothing and personalarticles fitted into just a small box. Children of variousreligions and castes were admitted on equal terms andresident children ate the same food from the same kitchen,regardless of caste. It was not unusual for Brahmin
3 Martha Dart, Marjorie Sykes: Quaker-Gandhian, p 8.4 Ibid., p. 9.
4 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
students to clear away leaf-plates or clean utensils usedby �low-caste� people.
As Principal, Marjorie Sykes abolished competitionsand prizes and �the self-centred rivalry they provoked�5.She emphasised values of cooperation and instituted asystem that encouraged the quicker children to help theslower ones in their studies � �they did it much moreeffectively than adults could do!�6 Physical educationprogrammes were not planned to train a few starperformers to win laurels, �but to improve every child�shealth and skill�7.
Bentick and Sykes did not draw the distinction between�curricular subjects� and �extra-curricular activities� thatso many Indian schools have always maintained � adistinction that the National Curriculum Framework of2005 seeks to abolish. English and music, for instance,were taught together. The sweeping of floors, cleaning thebuilding, and tending to plants were all as significant aslearning the three Rs. The former were treated as coreeducational concerns, something that Sykes learnt asmuch from Gandhi and Tagore as from her own education.
It was this thinking, followed not only at Bentick butwherever she taught, that made her so excited aboutGandhi�s first public pronouncement of his educationalagenda in 1937. Gandhi�s ideas, advocated and practisedas Nai Talim have received extensive analyses elsewhere.8
5 Jehangir P. Patel and Marjorie Sykes, Gandhi: His Gift of the Fight(Goa, 1987), p. 43.
6 Ibid.7 Ibid., p. 44.8 See, for instance, Marjorie Sykes, The Story of Nai Talim: Fifty Years
of Education at Sevagram; 1937-1987 (Sevagram. 1987); KrishnaKumar, �Listening to Gandhi� in Rajni Kumar, Anil Sethi and ShaliniSikka (Eds.), School, Society, Nation: Popular Essays in Education(Delhi, 2005); G Ramanthan, Education from Dewey to Gandhi: TheTheory of Basic Education (Bombay, 1962); Sitaramayya, BasicEducation: The Need of the Day (Wardha, 1952); and Anil Sethi,�Education for life, Through Life: A Gandhian Paradigm� in ChristopherWinch, First Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Lecture (New Delhi, 2007).
5MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Suffice it to say here, Gandhi urged that the resources ofeveryday living and work be exploited for educativepurposes. Education was meant for understanding andfacing life, whichever way it may unfold. But educationalpractices were also to be constructed through life itself.The Gandhian paradigm implied the learner�s activeinvolvement with his or her existential condition and withher society so that she could work out her emancipationfrom drudgery and exploitation. As Gandhi stressed,�education is that which gives true freedom�9 but this canhappen only when it succeeds in the �the all-round drawingout of the best in child and man � body, mind and spirit�10.The short paragraph that the Mahatma published on thismatter in the Harijan of 31 July 1937 stirred Sykes to thevery depth of her being: �Those few sentences droveeverything else out of my mind. I was excited, I read themagain and again, and I still remember clearly the wordsthat came into my head: �Here is someone talking real senseabout education at last!� I looked eagerly for the nextHarijan, and the next, and followed the controversies whichGandhiji�s proposals had aroused�.11
In 1939 Rabindranath Tagore invited Marjorie Sykesas a �representative of English culture�12 to teach atSantiniketan. This was the chance of a lifetime. Not onlydid Sykes obtain access to Tagore�s experiments ineducation and community living but she could study howthese related to Gandhian methods. There were many linksbetween Tagore and Gandhi and much coming and goingbetween Segaon and Santiniketan. Already well-versedwith Tamil and Hindi, Sykes quickly learnt Bengali andeasily slipped into the cultural and intellectual life of
9 Quoted by J.D. Sethi in �A Gandhian Critique of Modern IndianEducation in Relation to Economic Development�, Gandhi Today(Delhi, 1978), p.126.
10 Harijan, 31 July 1937.11 Martha Dart, Marjorie Sykes: Quaker-Gandhian, p. 22.12 Martha Dart, �Marjorie Sykes 1905-1995� in Jehangir P. Patel and
Marjorie Sykes, Gandhi: His Gift of the Fight (Goa, 1987), p.211.
6 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Santiniketan: flowers and frescoes, weaving and wood-carving, poetry and music, dance and drama and thefreedom of religious dialogue. Her home proved to be aspecial attraction for Christian students and womenstudents. The former would drop by to discuss religiousperplexities or read the Quaker journal, the Friend whilethe latter sought personal guidance and inspiration froma more informed and experienced, yet extremely friendlylady. In the course of time, Sykes�s Bengali became soimpressive that the poet requested her to translate someof his writings into English.
Apart from Bentick and Santiniketan, Marjorie Sykestaught at Women�s Christian College, Chennai, Sevagramand several other places. From her work, the books shewrote, and from scattered writings about her, one gets theclear impression that she wished to understand andsynthesise the world-views of Tagore and Gandhi,especially their perspectives on education. She viewed thisas a journey of inward excitement and discovery. Since itis also a journey that illumines Sykes�s educationalthought, it is well worth revisiting.
Sykes detected differences in the ideas of �two of thegreatest men then living�13 but she also saw manysimilarities, something biographers and historiansgenerally tend to miss out. For Sykes, the two protagonistsdisplayed a divergence of background, temperament andemphasis but a convergence of spirit and purpose. Tagorewas Krishna the artist, immersed in beauty, while Gandhiwas Rama the knight-errant, passionately devoted to theneedy. Yet, each possessed an element of the other.
Both worked, Sykes argued, in their own distinctiveways for the same goals: the dignity of self-reliance andthe exercise of responsible freedom. Both had a similarvision, that of a free, fearless and rejuvenated humanity.In the tradition of the Upanishads, they regarded outwardachievement to be meaningless unless it helped realise
13 Martha Dart, Marjorie Sykes: Quaker-Gandhian, p. 23.
7MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
inner freedom and joy � for the individual, for localcommunities and for society at large. They often turnedto a particular verse of the Isoupanisad that Sykes toofound appealing:
The whole world is the garment of the LordRenounce it then, and enjoy it,Receiving it back as the gift of God14
For Gandhi and Tagore, enjoyment and renunciationwere dialectical. Like light and darkness, they werecomplementary opposites that lent meaning to each other.For the two men, the motto of life was �renounce andenjoy!�15 This renunciation was not that of the Himalayancave. It meant instead, �a detached and clear-sightedinvolvement in human affairs�16 and led them to engagewith society through work and art, run institutions andmovements and establish dialogue, debate and discussion.
The educational goals of Tagore and Gandhi, and theirmethods, were deeply interfused with this world-view.Lovers of children and �eternal children� themselves, theyvisualised a holistic, integrated, multi-dimensionaleducation where every child�s individuality and talents arerecognised and given full expression in a free and joyouslearning environment. They believed that education shouldhelp relieve tyranny and unfreedom. It should enableus to resist exploitation and the centralisation of authority.It should look upon work as play and focus onconstructive work. It should use the elements of daily lifeand work as educational resources. Thus cotton-growingor Baul music can become the fulcrum of a range ofteaching-learning activities � in the sciences, in geography,history and economics, in art, craft and literature. Whileeducation should create many avenues to the wider world,
14 Jehangir P. Patel and Marjorie Sykes, Gandhi: His Gift of the Fight(Goa, 1987), p. 62.
15 Ibid., p. 63.16 Ibid., p. 64.
8 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
it must be rooted in local needs and culture and must beacquired, at least up to high school, in the mother tongue.For Sykes, then, Segaon and Santiniketan were not as farapart with regard to the essentials as they are often madeout to be.
As a practising teacher at school and college, Sykeslived out these ideas. She honed them through theirimplementation in all the different corners of India: atSantiniketan, Sevagram and elsewhere. Like her mentors,she sharply distinguished between �education� and�schooling�. To her, the flavour of the two words was sodifferent that education may in fact mean de-schooling.Education, Sykes explains, literally means a �leading out�:
I picture someone taking a child gently by thehand, walking alongside at the child�s natural speed,encouraging new growth and new adventure,cooperating with the impulses of the child�s ownnature. But in contrast to this we use the word�schooled� to suggest that the person has beenconditioned to do something one would notnaturally do � some of the poses and movements ofballet, for example. I am not claiming thateducation and schooling are incompatible; I am notsaying that you cannot have them both. But I amsaying that they are different and that we ought torecognise the difference.17
Sykes firmly believed that teachers ought to be firstconcerned with education, not schooling. She likened ateacher to a gardener (for kindergarten is a garden ofchildren) or a nurse (schools are nurseries!) who mustprovide the right environment for the growth of thechildren. Like an able gardener does with plants or asensible nurse with her patients, the wise teacher shouldknow when to leave the children alone so that they get on
17 Marjorie Sykes, �Keynote Address� in Krishna Kumar (Ed.),Democracy and Education in India (New Delhi, 1993), p. xxiv.
9MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
with their own growing, �do their own thing� while theteacher steps back to watch, �concerned to understand butnot to interfere�18. But in stepping back to facilitate, teachersmust help their pupils to refine the habit of questioning,something so natural in humans. They must themselvesinculcate the spirit of enquiry. Children love to poseproblems and solve them and teachers must learn this fromthem.
As educators, do we welcome children�s spontaneousquestions? Through her life and work, Marjorie Sykesreiterated that education was all about questions andproblems and doubts, �about things that don�t fit into thenormal accepted pattern�19. Education is not anaccumulation of dead facts; rather, we should think of it�as a response to a series of challenging questions�20. Herlove of enquiry, of children, of people, of detached socialinvolvement, of beauty, above all her gifts of empathy andfriendship made her into one of the country�s finesteducators. That is why her name always walks brisklyinto any reflections on education.
18 Ibid., p. xxv.19 Ibid., p. xxvii.20 Ibid., p. xxvii.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Anil Sethi is Professor of History at the National Council ofEducational Research and Training (NCERT), New Delhi.He has been a Commonwealth Scholar at St. Catharine�sCollege, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK fromwhere he got his Ph.D for a dissertation that dealt withreligious identities in nineteenth and early twentiethcentury Punjab. He has also been a Centre of ExcellenceFellow at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo,Japan.
Anil Sethi has taught at various universities: DelhiUniversity, Osaka University of Foreign Studies, TokyoUniversity of Foreign Studies, University of North Londonand at the School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi.He has researched the history of communalism, especiallyits linkages with everyday life. He has also helped developan oral archive on the Partition of India. His interestsinclude the social and religious history of modern SouthAsia and History Education.
At the NCERT, Anil Sethi has helped develop variousHistory textbooks. He has written a chapter on thePartition of British India for the Class XII textbook, Themesin Indian History (Delhi, NCERT, 2007). He has alsowritten for the History textbooks of Class VIII and ClassXI. He has lectured and imparted training on HistoryEducation and Social Science Education includingEducation for Peace. His publications include School,Society, Nation. Popular Essays in Education (Delhi,Orient Longman, 2005) that he co-edited with Rajni Kumarand Shalini Sikka.
SECTION II
SECOND MARJORIE SYKES MEMORIAL
LECTURE
WHAT SHOULD WE TEACH? AN EXAMINATION
OF ISSUES UNDERLYING THE DESIGN OF
COLLEGE CURRICULUM
PROFESSOR KAMAL DATTA
ABSTRACT
The College and the University are increasinglybecoming part of wider "educational marketplace". Evenas the larger market of the national and internationaleconomy demands a wider variety of skills for itsefficient working, college education in being seen as astage in the process of acquistion of specific skillsdemanded by the market.
Set against this is the need, essential to the survival ofa democratic form of government and social order, of amass of people not only literate but capable of "criticalthinking.
I would like, in this talk, to examine, in some detail,the notion of "critical thinking" and ask what steps we maytake to inculcate such thinking in young men and women.In doing so, I also examine how our present ways ofthinking the work of some eminent thinkers of the past. Afew of the principles of the design of college curricula thenfall in place in a natural fashion.
12 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Marjorie Sykes (1905-1995) was an Englisheducationist and social worker. Born in England, she cameto India in 1928 after obtaining a degree from CambridgeUniversity followed by a teacher�s diploma. She was ateacher in and subsequently Principal of Bentinck�s Schoolfor Girls in Chennai. She also taught in Women�s ChristianCollege, Chennai, in the school in Sevagram where teachingwas based on Mahatma Gandhi�s Nai Taleem (though shewent there to teach only after the death of Gandhiji) and inVisva Bharati at Santiniketan where Tagore invited her in1939. She was also a social activist associated with VinobaBhave and with the Friends� Rural Centre in Rasulia, M.P.;she assisted Jai Prakash Narain during his peace missionin Nagaland in 1960 and after. She authored several books:biographies of Rabindranath Tagore and C.F. Andrews,on Gandhiji�s and Vinoba Bhave�s work, on the work ofthe Quakers in India and a book titled �Basic Education:its Principles and Practice�. After a lifetime in India, shereturned to England only in 1991 when she was becomingincreasingly infirm.
It would be appropriate that a lecture devoted to thememory of Marjorie Sykes be delivered by one who hasthought long about primary and school education.
I have not. My only excuse for appearing here today isthat I have been either a student or a teacher all my life. Somine has been a life spent in the �business� of education -and in thinking about what I have been engaged in.
CHANGES IN THE �BUSINESS OF EDUCATION�There has been a fundamental change in the process ofeducation over the last 60 years or so that I have beenknown from my own experience. For teachers, it is nowless of a vocation or calling than yet another profession.The person of the teacher is of somewhat low importance.Technical aids to teaching of various kinds must be usedby the teacher. Mastering these is as important as beinglearned, wise or sympathetic to students.
For those who manage or run schools, colleges,
13MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
institutes and universities, the important fact now is thatthey run businesses which must be run on sound businessprinciples. They must advertise, be occasionally overseenby management consultants and, of course, turn inadequate profits on investment.
This last requirement is missing for institutions runon public money. At one time, all institutions in thiscountry ran on public money except for a very few. Thishas changed in the last 30 years or so.
These changes have had far reaching impacts on thecentral question I would like to address: What shouldwe teach?
WHAT SHOULD WE TEACH?There is little I want to say about the early years of
schooling .They are the most important years in educationbut I have never been directly involved in the teaching ofsmall children and I would hesitate to talk at any lengthabout something of which I have no direct experience.
I have been primarily a teacher of young adults, youngmen and women who have begun to acquire very definiteviews about the ways of the world. They are also, mostly,preparing to enter the world of business, administration,the professions as employers, employees and the like.
There is no one size that fits all. There are some whowill finish their education at the senior secondary stage,some at university graduation and some who will gobeyond.
Many will, as they leave their school certificates, havedecided to stick to a clear professional line. They will be(or try to be) administrators or doctors or engineers orarchitects or lawyers or accountants and the like. Whatthey need to be taught is best left to those in their respectiveprofessions.
But in this country there is the vast majority of theundecided. Some are undecided by choice�they don�tknow their minds at the time they leave school. But thelarger numbers are of those who have failed to secure
14 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
places in institutions of professional education. Tothese immense numbers of undecided, often weaklymotivated but intelligent young women and men, whatshould we teach?
There are two schools of thought. One feels that we mustseek out the multiplicity of smaller or lower grade needs ofpresent day society, design courses to meet those needsand concentrate on imparting the skills that are needed tofulfill them. Thus we must have courses on secretarial work,on medical transcription and record keeping, on travelagency work, on design of clothes and objects of dailyuse����The list keeps growing as more and more areasof life require something more than mere common senseand a general education for their management.
There is another school of thought which seeks toimprove the ability of students to think for themselves inwhatever situation they are in. If they can think criticallyon their own and have the basic skills of reading, writingand arithmetic and are literate in computer basics, theycan, so this group feels, master the details of whatever theirjob demands are.
CRITICAL THOUGHT
To favour the second of these alternatives is to run counterto much of today�s accepted opinion. Life, we are told, ismuch too competitive for any deferment in the training ofessential skills. We are constantly reminded how studentsin Korea do better at competitive mathematics, how thelanguage skills of European students are better and soon. Instead of asking if these reports are true andmeaningful, we should be asking: why do we make thesecomparisons at all?
If we believe in the fundamental sanctity of eachindividual�as we must, if we have faith in the humanisticcreed which is the basis of all democratic functioning� wemust allow for the development of each student�sindividuality and prevent the possibility of indoctrination.This in turn implies the possibility, indeed the necessity,
15MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
of independent judgment on important practical,intellectual, moral and ethical issues.
What kind of mental attributes are likely to promote theability to form independent and reasonable judgments onimportant issues on which one may be called upon to decideand, possibly, to act? There can be no simple formulaicanswer. It is necessary to have access to a wide range ofimpartial knowledge. A principal function of all education�and on this surely there is little dispute�must be to makethe young have this knowledge or, more important, theinformation as to where this knowledge may be accessed.But this is not enough. There are certain mental habits thatmust be practised if the accessed knowledge is to be put toprofitable use. In trying to form an independent opinion,there must be the ability to look for and eliminate argumentsput in to deceive and mislead as well as the ability to discardmere eloquence. Looking for an impartial solution, we mustparticularly know how to watch out for our own biases andprejudices and learn to view our own beliefs with somethingof the same detachment with which we often view the beliefsof others and learn to question our own assumptions as wedo those of others. Logic and the ability to reason areimportant but should not be overemphasised. Judgment,which includes the ability to weigh evidence, is as important;for too often we have to form an opinion about matters ofwhich we have incomplete information. Readiness to acceptnew evidence, discard hypotheses which are inadequate and,most importantly, to see the world as it is are mental habitswhich are not difficult but may require reinforcement.
Much of this requires a degree of truthfulness inthought. We are inclined to treat truthfulness mostly inrelation to the events of daily life, in how we treat our family,friends and associates. Such truthfulness is important ifsocial and professional life is to be structured on probity.But truthfulness with regard to modes of thought whenthinking of more abstract questions which do not impingeimmediately on our personal lives is more difficult toacquire. We must learn to distrust our own likes and
16 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
prejudices and not believe that the world must bestructured around our own desires and wishes. Theremust be an awareness of human fallibility, particularlywith regard to our own thought processes and theconclusions we reach on important issues.
THE WORLD AS IT ISAmong the important preconditions for critical thought isto see the world as it is. This must form an essential aspectof what we attempt to teach young minds. Except for avery few exceptionally gifted minds, most of us requireguidance as to how to seek the correct picture of the worldas we know it to be today. This must draw on the worksand thoughts of those who have been the pioneers inshaping the present picture of our physical, mental andmoral universe. To merely list the names of those I regardas being important among the pioneers would be pointless.On the other hand a substantive discussion of their workand thought is far beyond the scope of such a lecture. Iwould like to discuss in a little detail our present pictureof the physical and biological world.
The picture of the physical world which we believe tobe true at the present time has followed from the workof Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and the quantumphysicists such as Werner Heisenberg, ErwinSchrodinger and Paul Dirac.
The picture of the biological world is owed principallyto the work of Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel and thediscoverers of the structure of DNA viz. James Watson,Francis Crick, Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Thepicture we have of our mental world is much more hazyand uncertain. It owes much to the work of SigmundFreud, though little of it is taken as proven truth.
I have been severely selective as I must in a brief lecture.I have no quarrel with a different list of such names. It isastonishing how much of the work of all these naturalscientists is owed to their ability to engage in concentratedand critical thought.
17MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
THE NATURAL WORLD
Our present picture of the natural world combinescausation and chance in an uneasy mixture. Isaac Newtonis generally believed to be the originator of a coherentscientific belief in causality. Born in the year 1643, Newtonwas admitted to Trinity College in Cambridge Universityin 1661 and had an academic record which was none toodistinguished. But he was forced to spend time at homeby himself for almost two years from August 1665 becausethe university had to be closed on account of the greatplague. Thinking alone, he conceived of the universal forceof gravitation holding the planets to the sun, the moon tothe earth and attracting all things thrown up back to theearth�s surface as well as the laws of motion which bearhis name. In the next few years he worked out for himselfthe mathematical proofs showing that if the force betweenthe sun and the earth was, as he proposed, an attractiveone and fell off inversely as the square of the separation,then the trajectory of the earth around the sun would havethe geometrical shape of an ellipse. This Kepler had shownearlier in the century using the astronomical observationsof the Danish astronomer Tycho de Brahe. In constructingthese proofs, Newton used the laws of motion he himselfdiscovered as well as the mathematical tools he needed. Inthe process he discovered his own version of the calculus�the method of fluxions�independently of Leibniz who wasalso discovering the differential calculus in Germany.
For us here, the details of what appeared in Newton�sPrincipia which was published only in 1687 are not asimportant as the fact that it revolutionised the manner inwhich the natural world was viewed. The fact that we canconceive of how the planets are held in their orbits aroundthe sun, that planetary motions are predictable and thatthe heavens move according to laws which we can claim tounderstand is something altogether astounding. It slowlygave rise to the feeling, no doubt exaggerated, that theuniverse is like a clockwork whose complete mechanismawaits our discovery. Such discovery is not, possibly,
18 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
around the corner but may be achievable. The age ofenlightenment, and reason, of Voltaire and Rousseau, andof empiricist philosophers like Berkeley and Hume maybe seen as consequences which flow naturally from theNewtonian revolution.
This causal view of nature was thrown aside bydevelopments in the 20th century. The developmentswhich began with Planck�s discovery of the quantum ofaction in1900 and Einstein�s discovery of the photon in1905 culminated in the discovery of Quantum Mechanicsby Heisenberg, Schrodinger and Dirac in the1920s. Atotally new picture of natural processes at the sub atomiclevel emerged in which it is no longer possible to predictthe motion of sub atomic particles like electrons, protonsand the like with the precision of Newtonian trajectories.There are inherent and irreducible uncertainties in ourknowledge of the positions and velocities of thesesubatomic particles when we seek them at the same timewhich prevents us from following their paths in the samefashion in which Tycho de Brahe followed the positionsof the planets. No increase in the precision of ourobservational instruments will allow us to circumventthese uncertainties. What is even worse, except in veryspecial circumstances, our ability to predict the outcomeof events at the atomic scale has to be couched in thelanguage of probabilities. And yet, because of thesmallness of the constants of the theory�the constantnamed after Planck, the mass of the electron, thesmallness of the electron�s electric charge etc, the apparentcausal behaviour of events at the scale of direct humanperception continues and will continue to be true. Ourability to predict lunar and solar eclipses or of the motionof artificial satellites is not lost because of the calculus ofprobabilities at the subatomic level. This is an astoundingcoherence amidst seeming complexities in the scheme ofthings. It is not that Newton was wrong. Rather, ourpicture of nature must be much more detailed and seemsnever to be finished.
19MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
THE BIOLOGICAL WORLD
It is equally astonishing that the great variety and fecundityof the world of the living which we see around us isamenable to concise description and theoreticalunderstanding. And yet this is what the work of Darwin,Mendel and their successors in modern biology andgenetics have provided us with.
Charles Darwin was born in 1809 in an illustriousscientific family but his early career provided no clue to itslater brilliance and depth. As an undergraduate inCambridge University he whiled away his time in huntingand shooting, as was customary at the time for children ofwell off parents. It was only that he later attached himselfto an outstanding botanist, collected beetles and developedan interest in Geology. He was recommended for a voyageas a gentleman scientist aboard a ship charting the coastof South America that he began collecting biological andgeological specimens whose characteristics he studied inpainstaking detail over the following decades. Again, likeNewton, thinking quietly and critically largely by himself ,as well as performing botanical experiments, he examinedthe variation within species and the evolution of one speciesinto another. Slowly he came to the conclusions which wenow call the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection
He started by noting small variations that exist inmembers of a species in addition to the similarities thatshow them to be members of the same species. Many ofthese variations, in addition to the similarities, areinheritable traits which is how variations keep increasinggeneration to generation. We now know of the mechanismof inheritable characteristics through the DNA in ourcellular material but this was, of course, unknown inDarwin�s time. But he speculated that some of thesevariations within a species allow their possessors betterpossibilities of survival and reproduction because theymake their owners fitter in adapting to the environmentthey find themselves in. More and more members of thespecies then inherit these characteristics and over time new
20 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
species emerge. A common ancestry can therefore be foundfor species that appear to be widely varying and manhimself is no different in this respect from other participantsin the phenomenon of life.
Recent understanding of the genesis of differenceswithin a species point to the essential role of chance in thebiological world as well. Variations within a species mayarise from mutations in genes, from genes transferred fromother parts of the population or other species or fromrandom changes in genetic material, a feature oftenreferred to as genetic drift. This produces random changesin the frequency of particular traits in a species and thusaffects the chances of the particular trait being passed on.What part the essential and irreducible role of chance inthe quantum world plays in this is not as yet clear but thefact of radioactivity induced changes in genetic materialsuggests that it does play some important role.
This view of evolutionary biology is supported by avery wide spectrum of evidence from varieties of life as weknow it now, as well as from palaeontological remains.There is no active biologist, in the recent past or present,who any longer doubts the correctness of the premises orconclusions of the evolutionary process as broadlyconceived by Darwin. There are, however, a large numberof those who hesitate or refuse to see the world as it is orwho are horrified by the thought that we ourselves have acommon ancestry with other mammals, in particular withvarieties of apes. It seems to deny us any elevated andtranscendental origins. But as I have insisted, one of theprincipal functions of education is to teach us to seeourselves and the world with unblinkered eyes. Nothing isgained and much is lost if seek to deny the workings ofnature and those who deny the young such knowledge inany way whatsoever do them a great disservice.
WAYS OF THOUGHT
I described somewhat earlier in this lecture about thoseways of thought which are attributes of the critical mind.
21MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
An understanding of the world as it is, I asserted, wasnecessary for the critical mind but by no means sufficient.How does one show to young minds the way, for instance,to avoid prejudices and question doubtful assumptions,those of others as well as our own? Unless we learn to dothis, at least in some significant measure, much of the worthof learning truthfully about the external world will havebeen lost.
This is, by far, the most difficult part of the educationof the young adult. Through the years of childhood andadolescence with pick up, from the wayside as it were, mostof our mental attitudes and preconceptions about our ownways of life and those of others. From proximity andreinforcement by repetition, we view our own habits, waysof life and thought to be superior to those of others whosubscribe to different religions and nationalities, live inother parts of the world or even other parts of this countryor speak different languages. There is also the obverse:there are other groups to which we, as a group, feelinstinctively and unreasoningly inferior. How do we learnto examine such ways of thought and feeling critically?
This is where we turn to the study of history, literature,and philosophy (which must include varieties of religiousphilosophy). History interests us not only because wehave an interest in how we ourselves were like in the paststarting with our family history. We also have an inherentcuriosity about what societies in other regions are andhave been like. The study of history provides an essentialcorrective to notions that we are or have been unique orthe best. I am aware that of the many uses to which thestudy of history has been put is the intensely nationalisticone of denigrating civilisations and societies other thanour own. This has happened many times in the past inour society and in those of others and is likely to happenagain. This aberration is no reason to cease to engage inthe study of history. We read literature, among otherreasons, for pleasure. The range of literature we canaccess is severely limited by our language abilities even
22 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
though a wider range becomes accessible throughtranslations. But why does good and great literatureplease us? Is it not because it shows us our true selves,many of our innermost thoughts and feelings in ways wecannot ourselves describe? A good poem, a character ina novel written about with power and depth, an essaywhich strikes a chord� are these not ways in which weare made to recognise our own thoughts and feelings?These are the beginnings of that process of selfunderstanding and introspection which may�and I saymay advisedly � lead on to the ways of critical thought.
Some acquaintance with and understanding of theprocesses of philosophical enquiry, secular and religious,is part of this development of the critical attitude. Overtime, philosophers and religious thinkers have soughtanswers to the deepest queries that arise in the humanmind. They have pursued their queries by various means,by logic and introspection, by seeking to enquire into howthe mind operates, how language is structured, howthoughts are guided by language and language bythought. By trying to understand the modes and contentof philosophical queries on all manner of questions do webegin to see what critical modes of thought entail. Morethan this I hesitate to say: the subject is much too vastand prone to much subjectivity.
The study of and acceptance of the rules universe asthey are with that curious mixture of causality and chanceof which we have spoken earlier, as well as the study ofliterature, history and philosophy, properly executed,teaches sobriety of mind and a critical viewpoint wheneverthe mind is exercised. Is there no more to a good education?
THE SKILLS OF MODERN LIFE
I turn now to the last of the problems related to the questionof what we should teach. I have left it for the end becauseI find it to be one of the most intractable and difficult toresolve with any degree of wide ranging agreement.
Following the kind of education whose outlines I have
23MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
been describing, young women and men in their earlytwenties would want to start the process of earning a living.Some may be able to postpone it for a few years by carryingtheir studies a little further but that is a merepostponement of the inevitable. This is a trying time inone�s life: we have all had to pass through it. What skillsmust we bring to make our task simpler than it mightotherwise be?
Will it be enough to convince a prospective employerthat one has learnt to think for oneself and to thinkcritically, without irrational prejudices andpresuppositions? I suspect not. Employers are more hardheaded if not hard hearted people. They like employees tofit into particular slots in their organisations and are likelyto look for people with more specific skills. Even if we leaveout specialisations such as engineering, law and medicinethere are more generalised skills such as familiarity withaccounting, human resource management, fluency in theuse of computers for creating company records on salesand inventory flow and many more and varied demands.Should it be part of the educational process at the collegelevel to impart these some selection of such skills or shouldeducators expect their pupils to pick these skills up quicklyon the job? Educators might wish the skills to be pickedup on the job but would employers agree? I suspect not.Since educators cannot enforce their vision of educationin isolation from the wishes of those who employ theemerging graduates from their institutions, someconcessions have to be made. The crucial question is asfollows: how far should the educational system go incatering to the demands of the commercial marketplace?
I do not see any simple or short answer to this question.A good balance has to be maintained and there does notseem to be a simple formula for finding the right balance.It will differ from one society to another, from one region toanother depending on the socio-economic profile of theregion and depending on the level of technologicaladvancement or retardation. If such factors are not taken
24 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
into consideration in seeking the correct balance, theeducational programme is likely to be skewed one way oranother. It may remain too broad and produce thoughtfuland philosophically inclined individuals who are of littleimmediate use to employers. On the other side, there isthe risk of flooding the marketplace with narrowly skilledworkers who are unable to think for themselves, easilyindoctrinated by passing passions of the moment. Theyare poor citizens and a standing danger to democracy andsociety at large.
CONCLUSION
As I end, it must be clear to you as to where mysympathies lie. I do believe that it is the primaryfunction of education at the higher levels to producethinking women and men who form the bedrock ofa democratic society. However, nobody who thinks ofeducation as a process which must prepare us forleading purposeful lives can afford to ignore the learningof the many skills which grease the cogs of society inmodern times.
How these aims are to be properly interlinked andblended is the challenge that educationists face. They mustprove themselves equal to the challenge and worthy of thetrust placed in them by society.
I end with the heart warming story of The YoungestHeadmaster in the world : 16 year old Babar Ali.
25MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Kamal Datta is a theoretical physicist who retired as aProfessor of Physics from the Department of Physics andAstrophysics, University of Delhi in January 2004 afterserving on its faculty for over 37 years. He was educatedat Presidency College, Kolkata and at Brandeis University,U.S.A. where he obtained his Ph.D. in Theoretical Physicsunder the guidance of the eminent theoretical physicistand historian of science, Professor Silvan Schweber. Hisresearch work covers areas in Theoretical High EnergyPhysics, Mathematical Physics and Foundations ofQuantum Mechanics. He has authored or co-authoredmore than 45 publications in these areas. In addition toteaching a wide variety of courses in Theoretical Physicsat the post-graduate level and to undergraduate honoursstudents, he has lectured at various NCERT summerschools and refresher courses over the past 30 years andhas delivered and continues to deliver popular/semipopular lectures to undergraduates at the Universityof Delhi. He was invited to deliver the annual R.K. Poplimemorial lectures at St. Stephen�s College, University ofDelhi in the year 2001. He has also served as visiting facultyat several universities in the U.S.A.
Additionally, he has been interested in studying andwriting about history of science, science education and inmoral and ethical questions which arise in the course ofscientific activity. His recent publications in the history ofscience include the following:
The Quantum Poisson Bracket and TransformationTheory in Quantum Mechanics: Dirac�s early work inQuantum Theory
26 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Resonance- Journal of Science Education August2003The Early Life of Albert Einstein: Seeking the matureEinstein in his youthResonance- Journal of Science Education September2005The Science and Philosophy of Albert EinsteinPHISPC-CONSSAVYSeries History of Science, Philosophy and Culture inIndian CivilisationVol XIII-Part 6 History of ScienceIndian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi(in print).
27MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
AN
NE
XU
RE I
Mem
ori
al L
ectu
res
: 2007-0
8Name
Date
Venue
Speaker
Theme
Chairperson
Mah
atm
a17 J
an
uary
India
Pro
fess
or
Ch
rist
oph
erIn
div
idu
als
Pro
fess
or M
rin
al
Mir
iG
an
dh
i 2
007
Inte
rnati
onal
Win
chW
ork
ers
or
For
mer
Vic
e-C
ha
nce
llor
Mem
oria
lC
entr
e, N
ew D
elh
iE
du
cati
onal
Cit
izen
s R
efle
ctio
ns
N.E
.H.U
. S
hillo
ng
Lec
ture
Ph
ilos
oph
y an
don
th
e Lim
its
ofPol
icy,
Kin
gs C
olle
geS
choo
l B
ase
dLon
don
, U
.K.
Edu
cati
onal
Ref
orm
Zak
ir H
uss
ain
19 J
an
uary
R.I
.E D
r R
adh
ika
Rel
igio
n,
Edu
cati
onPro
f. B
.L.
Ch
au
dh
ary
Mem
oria
l2
00
7M
yso
reH
erzb
erge
r, D
irec
tor
an
d P
eace
Vic
e-C
ha
nce
llor
Lec
ture
Ris
hi
Valley
Sch
ool
Moh
anla
l Su
kh
adia
Ch
itto
rU
niv
ersi
ty,
Udaip
ur
An
dh
ra P
rades
hR
aja
sth
an
Mah
adev
i17 A
ugu
stR
.I.E
Pro
f. K
aru
na C
han
an
aW
omen
in
In
dia
n P
rof. R
.S.
Sir
ohi
Ver
ma
20
07
Bh
opal
For
mer
Pro
fess
orA
cadem
e; D
iver
sity
Vic
e-C
ha
nce
llor
Mem
oria
l a
t Zakir
Hu
ssain
Cen
tre
Dif
fere
nce
an
dB
ark
atu
lla,
Un
iver
sity
Lec
ture
for
Edu
cati
onal
Stu
die
sIn
equ
ality
in
aB
hop
al
Sch
ool
of S
ocia
l C
onte
sted
Dom
ain
Sci
ence
s, J
.N.U
.
B.
M.
Pu
gh 1
1 M
arc
hLait
um
kh
rah
Sh
ri R
ata
n T
hiy
am
Th
eatr
e Lan
guage
Pro
fess
or
T.
Ao
Mem
oria
l2
00
8 W
omen
�s C
olle
geC
ha
irp
erso
n,
Ch
oru
san
d E
xpre
ssio
nD
ean,
Sch
ool
ofLec
ture
Sh
illo
ng
Rep
erto
ry T
hea
tre
Hu
man
itie
s, N
.E.H
.U.
Imph
al
Sh
illo
ng
28 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Name
Date
Venue
Speaker
Theme
Chairperson
Majo
rie
Syk
es8 A
pri
l R
.I.E
.M
s M
edh
a P
atk
ar
Soc
ialisa
tion
Pro
fess
or M
.S. A
gwan
iM
emor
ial
20
08
Ajm
erS
ocia
l A
ctiv
ist
vs.
Pol
itic
s of
Form
er V
ice
Lec
ture
Jaw
ah
ar
Ran
gE
du
cati
onC
ha
nce
llor
, J.N
.U.
Man
ch,
Ajm
er
Sri
Au
robin
do
2 J
uly
Dor
ozio
Hall
Sh
ri M
an
oj D
as
Edu
cati
on f
or a
Pro
fess
or S
anjib
Gh
osh
Mem
oria
l2
00
8Pre
siden
cy C
olleg
eIn
tern
ati
onal
Cen
tre
Fait
h i
n t
he
Pri
nci
pa
l, P
resi
den
cyLec
ture
Kol
kata
of E
du
cati
onF
utu
reC
olle
ge,
Kol
kata
Sri
Au
robin
do
Ash
ram
Pon
dic
her
ry
Rabin
dra
nath
19 J
uly
R.I
.E.
Pro
fess
or
N.R
. M
enon
Rea
lisi
ng
Equ
ality
Pro
fess
or
Tago
re2
00
8B
hu
ban
esw
ar
Mem
ber
, C
omm
issi
onof
Sta
tus
an
d o
fC
han
dra
shek
har
Rath
Mem
oria
lon
Cen
tre
Sta
teO
ppor
tun
ity:
Rol
e of
Em
inen
t W
rite
rLec
ture
Rel
ati
ons
Gov
ernm
ent,
Ju
dici
ary
an
d C
ivil S
ocie
ty
Giju
bh
ai
11
R.I
.E.
Sh
riM
y W
riti
ng
Pro
fess
or
Badek
ha
Sep
tem
ber
Mys
ore
U.R
. A
nan
tham
urt
hy
My
Tim
esG
.H.
Naya
kM
emor
ial
20
09
Jn
an
pit
h A
ward
eeK
an
nada L
iter
ary
Lec
ture
Cri
tic
Savi
trib
ai
12
Dec
emb
erM
an
iben
Dr
Su
nder
ara
man
Sch
ool
as
aD
r. (
Ms)
Vib
hu
ti P
ate
lPh
ule
Mem
oria
l2
00
8N
an
ava
ti W
omen
'sD
irec
tor
Pre
ven
tive
an
dP
rofe
ssor
an
d H
ead
Lec
ture
Col
lege
, M
um
bai
Sta
te H
ealt
hPro
mot
ing
Hea
lth
Dir
ecto
r PG
SK
Sys
tem
Res
ou
rce
Cen
tre
S.N
.D.T
. W
om
en's
Cen
tre
Un
iver
sity
29MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
AN
NE
XU
RE I
I
Mem
ori
al L
ectu
res
: 2008-0
9Name
Date
Venue
Speaker
Theme
Chairperson
Mah
atm
a28 J
an
uary
N.I
.E.
Sh
ri A
nu
pam
Mis
hra
Raj S
am
aj A
ur
Pro
fess
or
Gan
dh
i2
00
9A
udit
oriu
mG
an
dh
i Pea
cePan
iM
. H
. Q
ure
shi
Mem
oria
lN
.C.E
.R.T
.Fou
ndati
onF
orm
er P
rofe
ssor
Lec
ture
New
Del
hi
Del
hi
Geo
graph
y, C
entr
efo
r th
e S
tudy
ofR
egio
nal
Dev
elop
men
tJ
.N.U
.
Zakir
Hu
ssain
30 J
an
uary
R.I
.E.
Pro
fess
or
Padm
ini
Lit
eracy
an
d L
evel
sP
rofe
ssor
Mem
oria
l2
00
9M
yso
reS
wam
inath
an
of F
orm
al
(Gen
eral
B.
Sh
aik
Ali
Lec
ture
Madra
s In
stit
ute
of
an
d P
rofe
ssio
nal)
For
mer
Dev
elopm
ent
Stu
die
sE
du
cati
on o
f th
eV
ice-
Ch
an
cellor
Ch
enn
ai
India
n P
opu
lati
on:
Man
galo
re a
nd G
oaA
Nati
onal
Rep
ort
Un
iver
sity
Card
Mah
adev
i5 J
an
uary
R.I
.E.
Ms
Kalp
an
a S
harm
aC
an
Med
ia T
each
Dr
Pu
shpen
dra
Pal
Ver
ma
20
09
Bh
opal
For
mer
Ch
ief
ofu
s A
nyt
hin
g?S
ingh
Mem
oria
lB
ure
au
, Th
e H
indu
Hea
d,
Dep
art
men
t of
Lec
ture
Mu
mbai
Jou
rnalism
, N
ati
onal
Un
iver
sity
of
Jou
rnalism
an
dC
omm
un
icat
ion
, Bh
opal
30 MARJORIE SYKES SECOND MEMORIAL LECTURE
Name
Date
Venue
Speaker
Theme
Chairperson
Rabin
dra
nath
14 J
an
uary
R.I
.E.
Pro
fess
or
Sw
apan
Edu
cati
on a
sP
rofe
ssor
Tago
re2
00
9B
hu
bn
esw
ar
Maju
mdar
Em
pow
erm
ent T
win
sS
han
tan
u K
um
ar
Mem
oria
lD
irec
tor
Cu
ltu
re a
nd
in S
earc
h o
f an
Ach
ary
aLec
ture
Rel
ati
ons
Alt
ern
ati
veE
min
ent
Wri
ter
Vis
hva
Bh
ara
tiE
du
cati
on
Giju
bh
ai
20 J
an
uary
M.I
.D.S
.Pro
fess
or
T.
S.
Cu
ltu
re a
nd
Pro
fess
or S
. Jan
kar
ajan
Badek
ha
20
09
Ch
enn
ai
Sara
swath
i, F
orm
erD
evel
op
men
tD
irec
tor
Mem
oria
lPro
fess
or,
Mah
ara
jaIm
plica
tion
for
Madra
s In
stit
ute
of
Lec
ture
Saya
ji R
ao
Un
iver
sity
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Dev
elopm
ent
Stu
die
sB
aro
da
Savi
trib
ai
29 J
an
uary
S.N
.D.T
.P
rofe
ssor
Edu
cati
on a
s Tri
tiya
Pro
fess
or
Ch
an
dra
Phu
le M
emor
ial
20
09
Wom
en�s
Univ
ersi
tyShar
mila
Reg
e D
irec
tor
Rat
na:
Tow
ards
Kri
shn
am
urt
hy
Lec
ture
Mu
mbai
Kra
tijy
oti
Savi
trib
ai
Ph
ule
Am
bed
kari
teV
ice-
Ch
an
cellor
Ph
ule
Wom
en�s
Stu
dy
Fem
inis
tS
.N.D
.T.
Wom
en�s
Cen
tre,
Un
iver
sity
of
Padago
gies
Un
iver
sity
Pu
ne
Sri
Au
robin
do
27 M
arc
hPre
siden
cy C
olleg
ePro
fess
or
Jaso
dh
ara
Edu
cati
on fo
r W
omen
Prof
esso
r S
anjib
Gh
osh
Mem
oria
l2
00
9K
olkata
Bag
chi, F
orm
er P
rofe
ssor
an
d W
omen
for
Pri
nic
ipa
lLec
ture
Jadavp
ur
Un
iver
sity
Edu
cati
on :
th
ePre
siden
cy C
olleg
eC
ase
of
Ben
gal
Kol
kata
B.
M.
Pu
gh27 M
arc
hD
on B
osco
Sh
ri P
. S
ain
ath
India
in
th
e A
ge o
fM
s Part
icia
Mem
oria
l2
00
9You
th C
entr
eR
ura
l A
ffa
irIn
equ
ality
: F
arm
Mu
kh
imLec
ture
Sh
illo
ng
Ed
itor
Cri
sis,
Foo
d C
risi
s an
dE
dit
or,
Sh
illo
ng
Th
e H
indu
, M
um
bai
the
Med
iaT
imes
Majo
rie
Syk
es28 O
ctober
R.I
.E.
Pro
fess
or K
am
al
Datt
aPr
ofes
sor
Bh
agir
ath
Sin
ghM
emor
ial
20
09
Ajm
erF
orm
er P
rofe
ssor
Vic
e-C
han
cellor
Lec
ture
Dep
art
men
t of
Ph
ysic
sM
.D.S
. U
niv
ersi
tyD
elh
i U
niv
ersi
tyA
jmer
Wh
at
shou
ld w
eTea
ch?
An
Exa
min
ati
on o
f Is
sues
uder
lyin
g th
e C
olle
geC
urr
icu
lum
.