marbury vs. madison digest

3
Summary of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803). Facts On his last day in office, President John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia under the Organic Act. The Organic Act was an attempt by the Federalists to take control of the federal judiciary before Thomas Jefferson took office. The commissions were signed by President Adams and sealed by acting Secretary of State John Marshall (who later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and author of this opinion), but they were not delivered before the expiration of Adams’s term as president. Thomas Jefferson refused to honor the commissions, claiming that they were invalid because they had not been delivered by the end of Adams’s term. William Marbury (P) was an intended recipient of an appointment as justice of the peace. Marbury applied directly to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of mandamus to compel Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison (D), to deliver the commissions. The Judiciary Act of 1789 had granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus “…to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.” Issues 1. Does Marbury have a right to the commission? 2. Does the law grant Marbury a remedy? 3. Does the Supreme Court have the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void? 4. Can Congress expand the scope of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in Article III of the Constitution? 5. Does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus? Holding and Rule (Marshall) 1. Yes. Marbury has a right to the commission. The order granting the commission takes effect when the Executive’s constitutional power of appointment has been exercised, and the power has been exercised when the last act required from the person possessing the power has been performed. The grant of the commission to Marbury became effective when signed by President Adams. 2. Yes. The law grants Marbury a remedy.The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. One of the first

Upload: yanakarunungan

Post on 17-Aug-2015

235 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

n

TRANSCRIPT

Summary of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803).Fact!n h" #at day "n off"c$, %r$"d$nt &ohn 'dam nam$d forty(t)o *ut"c$ of th$ +$ac$ and ",t$$n n$) c"rcu"t court *ut"c$ for th$ -"tr"ct of Co#um."a und$r th$ !r/an"c 'ct. 0h$ !r/an"c 'ct )a an att$m+t .y th$ F$d$ra#"t to ta1$ contro# of th$ f$d$ra# *ud"c"ary .$for$ 0homa &$ff$ron too1 off"c$.0h$ comm""on )$r$ "/n$d .y %r$"d$nt 'dam and $a#$d .y act"n/ S$cr$tary of Stat$ &ohn 2arha## ()ho #at$r .$cam$ Ch"$f &ut"c$ of th$ Su+r$m$ Court and author of th" o+"n"on), .ut th$y )$r$ not d$#"3$r$d .$for$ th$ $,+"rat"on of 'dam4 t$rm a +r$"d$nt. 0homa &$ff$ron r$fu$d to honor th$ comm""on, c#a"m"n/ that th$y )$r$ "n3a#"d .$cau$ th$y had not .$$n d$#"3$r$d .y th$ $nd of 'dam4 t$rm.5"##"am 2ar.ury (%) )a an "nt$nd$d r$c"+"$nt of an a++o"ntm$nt a *ut"c$ of th$ +$ac$. 2ar.ury a++#"$dd"r$ct#y to th$ Su+r$m$ Court of th$ Un"t$d Stat$ for a )r"t of mandamu to com+$# &$ff$ron4 S$cr$taryof Stat$, &am$ 2ad"on (-), to d$#"3$r th$ comm""on. 0h$ &ud"c"ary 'ct of 1786 had /rant$d th$ Su+r$m$ Court or"/"na# *ur"d"ct"on to "u$ )r"t of mandamu 78to any court a++o"nt$d, or +$ron ho#d"n/ off"c$, und$r th$ author"ty of th$ Un"t$d Stat$.9:u$1. -o$ 2ar.ury ha3$ a r"/ht to th$ comm""on;2. -o$ th$ #a) /rant 2ar.ury a r$m$dy;3. -o$ th$ Su+r$m$ Court ha3$ th$ author"ty to r$3"$) act of Con/r$ and d$t$rm"n$ )h$th$r th$y ar$ uncont"tut"ona# and th$r$for$ 3o"d;u#$ (2arha##)1. ?$. 2ar.ury ha a r"/ht to th$ comm""on.0h$ ord$r /rant"n/ th$ comm""on ta1$ $ff$ct )h$n th$ E,$cut"3$4 cont"tut"ona# +o)$r of a++o"ntm$nt ha .$$n $,$rc"$d, and th$ +o)$r ha .$$n $,$rc"$d )h$n th$ #at act r$@u"r$d fromth$ +$ron +o$"n/ th$ +o)$r ha .$$n +$rform$d. 0h$ /rant of th$ comm""on to 2ar.ury .$cam$ $ff$ct"3$ )h$n "/n$d .y %r$"d$nt 'dam.2. ?$. 0h$ #a) /rant 2ar.ury a r$m$dy.0h$ 3$ry $$nc$ of c"3"# #".$rty c$rta"n#y con"t "n th$ r"/ht of $3$ry "nd"3"dua# to c#a"m th$ +rot$ct"on of th$ #a) )h$n$3$r h$ r$c$"3$ an "n*ury. !n$ of th$f"rt dut"$ of /o3$rnm$nt " to afford that +rot$ct"on.5h$r$ a +$c"f"c duty " a"/n$d .y #a), and "nd"3"dua# r"/ht d$+$nd u+on th$ +$rformanc$ of that duty, th$ "nd"3"dua# )ho con"d$r h"m$#f "n*ur$d ha a r"/ht to r$ort to th$ #a) for a r$m$dy. 0h$ %r$"d$nt, .y "/n"n/ th$ comm""on, a++o"nt$d 2ar.ury a *ut"c$ of th$ +$ac$ "n th$ -"tr"ct of Co#um."a. 0h$ $a# of th$ Un"t$d Stat$, aff",$d th$r$to .y th$ S$cr$tary of Stat$, " conc#u"3$ t$t"mony of th$ 3$r"ty of th$ "/natur$, and of th$ com+#$t"on of th$ a++o"ntm$nt. =a3"n/ th" #$/a# r"/ht to th$ off"c$, h$ ha a con$@u$nt r"/ht to th$ comm""on, a r$fua# to d$#"3$r )h"ch " a +#a"n 3"o#at"on of that r"/ht for )h"ch th$ #a) of th$ country afford h"m a r$m$dy.3. ?$. 0h$ Su+r$m$ Court ha th$ author"ty to r$3"$) act of Con/r$ and d$t$rm"n$ )h$th$r th$y ar$ uncont"tut"ona# and th$r$for$ 3o"d.:t " $m+hat"ca##y th$ duty of th$ &ud"c"a# -$+artm$nt to ay )hat th$ #a) ". 0ho$ )ho a++#y th$ ru#$ to +art"cu#ar ca$ mut, of n$c$"ty, $,+ound and "nt$r+r$t th$ ru#$. :f t)o #a) conf#"ct )"th $ach oth$r, th$ Court mut d$c"d$ on th$ o+$rat"on of $ach. :f court ar$ to r$/ard th$ Cont"tut"on, and th$ Cont"tut"on " u+$r"or to any ord"nary act of th$ #$/"#atur$, th$ Cont"tut"on, and not uch ord"nary act, mut /o3$rn th$ ca$ to )h"ch th$y .oth a++#y.