maquetación 1 - emta · car ownership rate pt density. the pt area. inhab/km 2, inhab/km 2 (ur-...
TRANSCRIPT
2013D A T A
ForewordThis 9th edition of the Barometer of the As-
sociation of European Metropolitan Transport
Authorities (EMTA) managed by focusing on
key parameters to add particular value to
what transport authorities consider their key
indicators. The Barometer 2013 is conceived
after a thorough review of indicators and
their definitions. This version has now a list
of about 65 indicators.
The scope of organising authorities in mainly
larger metropolitan areas is extended from
urban areas into conurbations and from pu-
blic transit into a broader scope of multi-
modal transport. Their core task includes
governing other modes of transport and a
wider field of competence. Except for so-
cio-demographic indices some key indica-
tors concerning use and demand go beyond
the actual power of members or are pro-
tected by commercial disclaimers.
Despite differences in competence and busi-
ness the new devised Barometer 2013 re-
flects a comprehensive and interesting se-
lection of figures to compare the outcome
of the EMTA membership efforts, mirrored
in a legible and modern layout.
The remit, legal competences and respon-
sibilities of a transport authority are distin-
guishing criteria that greatly define scope
and effectiveness of a PTA in the cooperation
with local operators and the local commu-
nity. It would therefore be helpful to bench-
mark remit and competences of respon-
dents in a next phase.
I hope the 2013 Barometer will give you
food for further thought, debate or study.
“Consistent collection ofmobility indicators helpsto pinpoint trends and
factors that maydetermine the success or
failure of an urban
transport strategy ”Ruud van der Ploeg,
EMTA Secretary general
The Barometer is produced by CRTM Madrid. 1
Evolution of population
9th edition presentationDescription of the PTA(1) areas surveyed
Authority Main city PTA PTA surface PTA urbanised PTA density Annual PTA GDP(2)
responsible population population (km2) surface (km2) (inhab./km2) per capita (€)
Stadsregio Amsterdam 811,185 1,465,478 1,004 807 1,817 31,360 €
Barcelona metropolitan region ATM 1,612,000 5,041,200 3,239 607 8,305 28,800 €
Berlin-Brandenbourg VBB 3,421,829 5,871,022 30,377 3,409 1,722 28,668 €
Bilbao CTB 347,769 1,150,792 2,217 241 4,775 29,249 €
Birmingham CENTRO 1,092,300 2,783,500 899 634 4,390 30,050 €
Brussels metropolitan MRBC 1,163,486 3,319,455 4,300 1,200 2,766 40,758 €
Central Hungarian region (Budapest) BKK 1,735,711 525 358 4,848 20,555 €
Greater Copenhagen MOVIA 671,751 2,523,624 9,176 1,979 1,275 46,803 €
Frankfurt Rhein-Main RMV 701,350 5,102,866 14,000 12,342 413 38,490 €
Helsinki HSL 612,664 1,182,342 1,558 486 2,433 63.706 € (3)
Greater London TFL 8,416,500 8,416,500 1,572 1,042 8,077 47,098 €
Lyon Urban Community SYTRAL 636,302 1,300,000 613 360 3,611 42,830 €
Madrid region CRTM 3,207,247 6,495,551 8,028 1,043 6,228 28,915 €
Greater Montreal AMT 1,959,987 3,931,212 3,980 32,587 €
Oslo Akershus Region RUTER 634,463 1,210,220 5,005 247 4,907 60,362 €
Paris Ile-de-France STIF 2,273,000 11,978,000 12,000 2,530 4,734 51,250 €
Middle Bohemia region (Prague) ROPID 1,244,000 1,882,000 3,100 22,279 €
Metropolitan area The Hague 1,041,800 2,250,000 1,213 440 5,114 36,500 €
Metropolitan area Rotterdam 1,413,600
Stockholm county SL 897,700 2,163,042 6,526 55,347 €
Stuttgart region VRS 604,297 2,419,626 3,011 720 3,363 43,226 €
Turin metropolitan area AMMT 902,137 1,553,232 837 228 6,812 21,354 €
Vienna (Verkehrsverbund Ost Region) VOR 1,766,746 3,679,647 23,563 14,438 255
Vilnius MESP 539,707 700,000 9,731 449 1,559 15,726 €
Warsaw ZTM 1,724,404 2,473,388 2,429 385 6,424 15,511 €(1) PTA: Public Transport Authority. (2) GDP: Growth Domestic Product. (3) GDP value for the main city.
MRDH
2013D ATA
5.5% 2.2%
-1.4% 0.6% 3.6% 5.4% 2.0% 4.2% 1.1% 6.6% 7.7% 7.6% 3.6% 6.1% 9.7% 2.1% 6.2%
9.2%
3.2% -15.3% -16.8%
3.2%
1.0% 8.0%
-1.5% 2.8%
7.3% 10.4%
1.0% 6.0%
1.1% 11.8%
13.8% 8.7%
13.6% 10.0%
19.8% 7.6%
11.8% 3.8% 3.8%
16.2% 0.9%
4.2% 7.6%
16.1%
2008 - 2013 evolution
2003 - 2013 evolution
-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Amsterdam Barcelona Berlin Bilbao Birmingham Brussels Budapest Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon Madrid Montreal Oslo Paris Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart Turin Vienna Vilnius Warsaw
The average population of cities isabout 1.6 million inhabitants and 3.3million for the PTA area. The averagefor the PTA area increased 3% in thelast five years and 7% for the last 10years. Regarding the average area forthe main cities is 355 km2 and 6,055km2 for the PTA area, with anurbanized area of 1,775 km2 thatrepresents a 30% of the total PTAsurface. In the case of the main citiesthis percentage rise up to 47%.Finally, average annual GDP in PTAarea is 32,169 €.
It is significant the increase ofpopulation that has occurred in citiessuch as Rotterdam, Oslo andStockholm as opposed to the loss ofpopulation over the years is takingplace in Berlin or Vilnius.
2
Car ownership rate The first image represents the relation between car ownership and urbanized PTA area density. The size of the balls represents the population in thePTA area. The average density for the cities is around 4,000 inhab/km2, but two cities (London and Barcelona) have more than 8,000 inhab/km2 (ur-banized population/area). For the great majority of cities its car ownership rate lies between 350 and 500 cars / 1,000 inhabitants.
The second image represents the relation between car ownership and modal share of private motorized modes in main city. The size of the balls rep-resents the density of the main cities. We can observe that the greater the density, the less use of private car.
In main city10.0
18.9
16.0
20.2
8.5
15.3
37.0
21.0
9.0
26.1
44.3
16.1
31.6
18.0
24.0
20.2
14.8
19.2
24.6
30.3
36.0
32.0
45.0
31.5
68.0
54.2
37.7
33.0
58.0
40.1
33.3
48.6
37.2
69.0
47.0
39.5
54.6
53.2
39.3
37.3
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Active modes (cycling. walking) Public transport Rest of motorized modes
67.0
57.4
39.0
62.3
22.8
40.1
24.7
46.0
37.0
35.6
22.5
43.0
33.5
19.0
34.0
55.4
24.0
48.0
47.0
30.5
33.4
33.0
36.1
21.9
12.0
27.6
21.0
26.8
44.5
26.5
37.0
21.0
12.0
33.8
44.3
21.0
40.1
25.0
30.0
31.8
43.0
14.0
15.0
26.6
25.1
39.0
24.6
54.6
22.0
15.0
40.0
10.9
32.7
33.5
37.7
51.0
30.6
33.3
36.0
26.4
56.0
36.0
12.8
33.0
38.0
38.0
42.9
41.6
28.0
39.3
23.5
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
54.0
49.1
39.0
48.3
23.5
30.6 24.7
46.0
33.0
33.8
22.5
35.3
31.2
13.0
28.0
40.3
30.6
27.6
36.1
32.5
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels Budapest
Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon
Madrid Montreal
Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
Car ownership rate vs density in PTA area
Car ownership rate vs private motorized sharein main city
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000Density of PTA area
Car o
wner
ship
rate
in PT
A ar
ea (c
ars/
1,00
0 inh
abita
nts)
Bilbao Amsterdam
BarcelonaBerlin
Copenhagen
London
Lyon
Oslo
ParisBirmingham
Brussels
Budapest
Madrid
Helsinki
Turin
Vilnius WarsawStuttgart
9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49Modal share of private motorized modes in main city
Car o
wner
ship
in ma
in cit
y (ca
rs/1,
000
inhab
itant
s)
Amsterdam
BarcelonaBerlin
London
Oslo
Paris
BrusselsFrankfurt
Prague
Madrid
Helsinki
Vienna
Turin
Vilnius
Warsaw
Stuttgart
180
280
230
330
380
430
480
530
580
630
180
280
230
330
380
430
480
530
580
630
BilB bao AmsA terdamA
BarcelonaBerB lilin
CopC enhagen
LLondonL d
Lyony
Oslos
PParisBirminghamnBirmingham
BruB sselss
Buddapesta
M dMadrid
Hellsinki
TTurinr
VilniusVilnius WWarsawaStuSt ttgartStuttgart
owne
rship
in ma
in cit
y (ca
rs/1,
000
inhab
itant
s)AAmsterdamt
BBarcelonaaBBarcelonaBBerlin
LondonoLLondonoLondon
OOsloo
PParis
BrusselsFrankfurtrtnF kff tF kf t
Pragueg e
MadriddMadriddMadrid
Helsinkikis
Vienna
Turinin
Vilniusu
Warsaw
gStStuttgarttStuttgart
180
280
230
330
380
430
480
530
580
630
Modal share of tripsThe average number of trips per capita and day in selected cities is of 2.7 and 2.8 for the PTA area. Of the latter, 35% is made in active modes, 21%in public transport and 44% by private transport. But in the main cities, public transport raises the average to 30% over other motorized modes, thatgets down to 32%.
The PTA areas of Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Bilbao, Copenhagen, Paris, Vilnius and Warsaw are above the average with respect to the use of al-ternative transport to the car and on the other hand, cities as Birmingham, Brussels, Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Turin use motorized modes above theaverage in the PTA area. Barcelona, Bilbao and Paris are the most sustainable in terms of mobility. Madrid and Warsaw are good examples of a certainbalance on mobility (1/3, 1/3, 1/3) that we should try to get in the whole PTA areas.
In whole PTA area
3
2013D ATA
Public transport demand per inhabitant in PTA areasRegarding the public transport demand, thetrend continues upward in the use of PT. In2011 it was 244 and in 2013 262 journeysper inhabitant, being the bus the most usedtransport mode (120 journeys per inhabi-tant) followed by the metro (83 journeys perinhabitant). Budapest, London, Vilnius andWarsaw remain above the average. In ge-neral in cities with lower population andhigh density the users need to transfer in atrip is much less as opposed to journeysmade in cities with an extended network(and smaller mesh sizes), where makingtransfers is inherent to the network archi-tecture. Some PTA-areas harbouring a re-nowned mega city that attracts a largepotential of business related and touristictravel need to maintain a higher level oftransit capacity than others, the result beingan above average rate of journeys per ca-pita (like in London, Paris and Berlin).
Ticket price for the main city & PTAThe average price for the single ticket in the main city is 2.1 € and 2.8 € in the PTA area. For the monthly pass is 69 € and 85 € respectively. Thedifference in both prices is approximately 30% between the main city and the PTA area. Regarding the monthly pass in the PTA area it should benoted that although most cities have their fares between 30 € and 80 €, there are seven cities that exceed 115 € without a direct relation to neitherthe surface nor the GDP in the PTA area.
The average rate between GDP and monthly pass fare is 2.2% in main city and 3.4% for the PTA area. London continues to be the city with a higherrate, 3.9% (3.8% in 2012) and Frankfurt is in 2013 the city with a lower rate, 0.6% (1.3% in 2012) with respect to the monthly pass.
1.44
2.00
1.50
1.50
2.66
2.10
1.14 3.23
2.60
2.50
2.78 1.70
1.50
2.19
3.28
1.70 0.87
3.00
3.00
3.89 2.20
1.50
2.20 1.01
1.05
3.00
6.85
1.90
7.00
5.1
0.43
7.10
1.70
1.68
44.00
52.75
78.00 33.90
78.47
55.50
31.07
38.00
46.50
152.56
52.20
55.18 71.08
65.10
22.81
58.70 38.00
48.20
28.96 23.94
118.00
153.00 191.00
45.02
41.00
142.60
57.60
94.90
182.62
57.30 10.86
231.00 231.00
85.40
175.10
49.00
39.90
46.92
12.02
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels Budapest
Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon
Madrid Montreal
Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 €
Main city PTA
Urban and suburban bus Tram/light rail Metro
Suburban railway
60 65 97 47
100 67
340 84 34
152 286 127
95 63
112 106
91 24 24
139 52
100 48
362 226
37 5
40 3
2 39
225
7 48
4 56
2
40 15
74 48 48
22
26 80
107
43 81
101 76
42 179
23 11
54 150
152 86
64 70 128
129 36 36
152 43
25 117
73
28 97
43
13 17
21
86 43
28 4
29 101
4 5 5
38 36
9
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels
Budapest Copenhagen
Frankfurt Helsinki London
Lyon Madrid
Montreal Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
Monthly pass priceSingle trip ticket price
4
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.6
1.6
3.5
12.5
4.0 7.7
9.0
1.5
4.9 5.4
5.6
4.1
5.6
6.1
7.5 7.5
42.5
7.1
1.8
21.4
9.6
6.9
11.9
7.0
2.5
4.9
8.1
8.4
4.2
1.3
39.9
25.8
28.8
23.9
43.5 6.6
51.7
44.4 25.8
77.8
58.3 33.4
41.4
44.6
25.7
46.1
13.0
13.0
58.7
22.9
16.8
9.9
32.5
47.1
8.2
0.5
4.2
0.6 3.9
10.1
4.7
0.3 0.3
2.4
1.10
2.0
3.2
0.7
14.9
5.6
5.6
7.4
4.1 8.5
21.0
3.3
0.2
3.1
17.4
5.8
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels Budapest
Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon
Madrid Montreal
Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw 10 20 30 40 5020 10304050 6070 80
Bus
Tram
Trolley bus MetroTrain
Metro & train vehicle-km per inhabitantBus, tram & trolleybus-km per inhabitant
Vehicle-km per inhabitant and PTA areaThe average number of bus-km per inhabitant is 35.6, seven times more than the number of tram-km per inhabitant that it is 4.5. Just Budapest,Helsinki and London are above this average.
In relation with rail services, metro has an average of 6.8 vehicle-km per inhabitant, double the ratio for commuter train that goes down to 3.4 vehi-cle-km per inhabitant. It is noticeable the high ratio that Helsinki, Vienna and Stockholm have and the low ratio for Brussels or Turin.
Coverage of operational costsThe ratios of coverage of operational costs by fare revenues and by public subsidies continue varying greatly. The size of the balls of the pictureindicate the yearly costs of operation of public transport divided by the population of the PTA area. The average ratio of yearly operational costs perinhabitant for the main cities is about 380 €. Paris, London and Stockholm have the highest rate (more than 700 € per inhabitant and year) andVilnius the minimum (82 € per inhabitant and year).
Most of the cities have a coverage of 40-50% of public subsidies and 45-60% of fare revenues. Related with the coverage of operational costs by farerevenues the average ratio is 47% and 49% for the coverage by public subsidies. Paris has the minimum coverage by public subsidies (19.4%) but it hasa 40% of coverage of operational costs that comes by other revenues (“Versement transport tax”). Prague has the maximum coverage by public subsidieswith 71.3%. We have to take into account that Prague also has the cheapest fares of all the cities so the coverage by fare revenues is only a 28.6%.
Coverage of operational costs vs annual operating cost
Coverage by public subsidies (%)
Cove
rage
by fa
re re
venu
es (%
)
Barcelona
Berlin
Copenhagen
LondonLyon
Montreal
Stockholm
RotterdamOslo
Paris
Brussels The Hague
Budapest
Madrid
Warsaw
VilniusAmsterdamFrankfurt
Prague
Helsinki
26.0
31.0
36.0
41.0
46.0
51.0
56.0
61.0
14.0 24.0 34.0 44.0 54.0 64.0
Barcelona
BerlinB
Copenhagen
LLondonLyon
Montreal
Sto khckholmS khkh l
RRotterdammR ddRR tt dlOsloOslo
PParis
Brussels The Ha H gue
Buddaapestp
Madrid
Warsaw
VilniusAmsterdamFrankfurt
Prague
HHelsinki
5
1.43
2.30
2.03
0.01 4.10
0.60 2.59
5.13
2.26
6.11 2.26
5.20
2.23
2.93
2.55
3.24 0.38 0.38
3.36
1.45
3.91
1.78 2.29
2.09 3.57
0.39
0.46 8.56
1.41 0.82
4.63
1.81
0.71
2.54
1.97 0.71 0.71
1.11
1.17
0.61
0.13 2.33
Bus & tram stops/ 1,000 inhabitants in main city and PTA
Bus & tram stops/km2 surface
12.69
12.1111.03
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels Budapest
Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon
Madrid Montreal
Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00
Ratio of bus and tram network lenght Ratio of bus and tram stops
20406080100120140
Metro & train satations/1,000,000 inhabitantsMetro & train satations/100 km2 surface
35.5 64.1
114.6
124.3
24.8 20.8
68.6 8.7
93.5
49.1
75.8 33.1
50.8
30.3
136.3
199.8
148.3
62.6
27.6
27.6
70.7
118.2 66.3
8.5
5.2
10.0
2.2
6.5
7.7
1.6
22.7 0.2
3.4
3.7
40.6
7.0
4.1
3.0
3.3
6.3
9.0
5.1
5.1
2.3
9.5
12.3
3.1
0.9
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels Budapest
Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon
Madrid Montreal
Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
B
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000
887 2,817
4,769
4,939 2,878
174
674
4,110 2,950
1,905
1,015
983 1,612
2,638
2,403 1,012
1,012 4,320
2,554 4,191
4,324
1,292 595
1,295 4,384
922 2,564
8,911
134 2,228
1,130 1,075
1,445 5,432
2,084
1,304
2,633 1,459
1,877 1,877
1,432
2,052 7,777
675 93
606
Bus-tram lenght network/1,000,000 inhabitants
Bus-tram lenght network/1000 km2
Ratio of metro and train networkRatio of metro and train stations
Ratio of bus stops or stationsIt is important when a planner is designing to know the average ratio of number of bus stops or number of railway stations compared to the networklength or surface of the affected territory. Among the cities studied, we can conclude that the average ratio of bus stops per 1,000 inhabitants is 2.63and 3.19 in the case of km2.
Copenhagen, Helsinki and Lyon are above 5 stops per 1,000 inhabitants and Birmingham, Budapest, London and Lyon have a density of stops per km2
well above the average. Regarding the length of bus network, the average is 2,393 km per million inhabitants and 2,320 per 100 km2.
Railway systems are quite different. As average rate, they have 70 stations per million inhabitants and 7 stations per 100 km2 of surface. Londonstands out in terms of number of stations per 100 km2 of surface with 40.6 and Copenhagen, unlike the high ratio of bus stations, has only 0.2stations per 100 km2 of surface. In relation to the number of stations per million inhabitants, there are six cities that are above 100. In contrast to thebus network, the average length of metro and commuter train network per million inhabitants gets down to a tenth, 176, and the same applies per100 km2 of surface that goes down to 226 stations per 100 km2.
6
68
138
482 249
75 42
79
140 306
122
143
23
104
65
139 419
45 45
161
215 221
9
110
438
91
256
10 193
113
106 141
204
539
889
770680
130
263
141 161 161
141 205
67 9
55
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Metro& train network/1,000,000 inhabitants
Metro & train network/100 km2
2013D ATA
Commercial speedThe commercial speed of public transport is one of the main quality issues that city planners have to deal with in urban areas. The average speed forthe urban bus and the tram is about 20 km/h and for the suburban buses the average rises up to 30 km/h. The same happens with the metro andthe commuter train. The metro runs at 35 km/h in average and the commuter train rises up to 30 km/h.
17.5
12.3 19.4
17.0 16.6
18.5 20.0
26.4
13.5 18.6
14.5 24.6
24.6
20.0 18.7
24.0 21.7
17.5 18.7
19.2
36.8
16.3 14.1
23.2
19.0
20.1
14.4
23.8 18.7
21.5 21.5
31.3
15.0 15.7
17.5
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
19.030.0
Amsterdam Barcelona
Berlin Bilbao
Birmingham Brussels
Budapest Copenhagen
Frankfurt Helsinki London
Lyon Madrid
Montreal Oslo Paris
Prague
Rotterdam The Hague
Stockholm Stuttgart
Turin Vienna Vinius
Warsaw
Urban bus speed (km/h) Tram speed (km/h)
ATM · © Marc Vila
ZTM
TFL · © Michael Garnett
STIF © Recoura Christophe
RUTER © Käss Fore
AMSTERDAM © Arjen Vos
VRS © DBRegio AG,
Stollberg
CRTM
RMV
MRBCOSLO
7
41, rue de Châteaudun • F-75009 Paris Tél. + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 00 • Fax + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 33
[email protected] • www.emta.com
Oslo
Stockholm
Amsterdam
BrusselsRotterdam
Birmingham
London
Barcelona
Bilbao
FrankfurtPrague
Helsinki
Montreal
Madrid
Cadiz
Lyon
Paris
TurinVienna
Berlin
Copenhagen
Budapest
Warsaw
Vilnius
Stuttgart
Oslo
Stockholm
Amsterdam
BrusselsRotterdam
Birmingham
London
Barcelona
Bilbao
FrankfurtPrague
Helsinki
Montreal
Madrid
Cadiz
Lyon
Paris
TurinVienna
Berlin
Copenhagen
Budapest
Warsaw
Vilnius
Stuttgart
Oslo
Stockholm
Amsterdam
BrusselsRotterdam
Birmingham
London
Barcelona
Bilbao
FrankfurtPrague
Helsinki
Montreal
Madrid
Cadiz
Lyon
Paris
TurinVienna
Berlin
Copenhagen
Budapest
Warsaw
Vilnius
Stuttgart
Public Transport Authority PTA Web Site
STADSREGIO AMSTERDAM www.stadsregioamsterdam.nl
BARCELONA METROPOLITAN REGION ATM www.atm.cat
BERLIN-BRANDENBOURG VBB www.vbb.de
BILBAO CTB www.cotrabi.com
BIRMINGHAM CENTRO www.centro.org.uk
BRUSSELS METROPOLITAN MRBC www.bruxellesmobilite.irisnet.be
CADIZ BAY CMTBC www.cmtbc.es
CENTRAL HUNGARIAN REGION (BUDAPEST) BKK www.bkk.hu
GREATER COPENHAGEN MOVIA www.movia.dk
FRANKFURT RHEIN-MAIN RMV www.rmv.de
HELSINKI HSL www.hsl.fi
GREATER LONDON TFL www.tfl.gov.uk
LYON URBAN COMMUNITY SYTRAL www.sytral.fr
MADRID REGION CRTM www.crtm.es
GREATER MONTREAL AMT www.amt.qc.ca
OSLO AKERSHUS REGION RUTER www.ruter.no
PARIS ILE-DE-FRANCE STIF www.stif.info
MIDDLE BOHEMIA REGION (PRAGUE) ROPID www.ropid.cz
METROPOLITAN AREA THE HAGUE MRDH www.mrdh.nlMETROPOLITAN AREA ROTTERDAM
STOCKHOLM COUNTY SL www.sl.se
STUTTGART REGION VRS www.region-stuttgart.org
TURIN METROPOLITAN AREA AMMT www.mtm.torino.it
VIENNA (VERKEHRSVERBUND OST REGION) VOR www.vor.at
VILNIUS MESP www.vilniustransport.lt
WARSAW ZTM www.ztm.waw.pl