mapping of informal settlements in … of...methodology for listing of informal settlements 5 status...
TRANSCRIPT
Study Report Study Report
MAPPING OF
INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS IN
Muzaffarpur, Bihar
1
Participatory Research in Asia
Content Content
Page
A General Profile of Muzaffarpur City 2
A General Poverty Profile of Muzaffarpur City 3
Methodology for Listing of Informal Settlements 5
Status of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 5
Challenges and Lessons Learned 12
Annexures
Annex.1: Format for Listing of Informal Settlements 14
Annex. 2: List of informal Settlements 16
List of Charts and Figures
Chart 1: Decadal Population Growth of Muzaffarpur City 2
Chart 2: Status of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 6
Chart 3: Ownership of Informal Settlement Lands in Muzaffarpur 6
Chart 4: Surrounding Areas of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 7
Chart 5: Type of Physical Location of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 7
Chart 6: Locational Characteristics of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 8
Chart 7: Type of Structures for Majority of Houses in Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur 8
Chart 8: Approach Road to the Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 9
Chart 9: Type of Internal Roads in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur 9
Chart 10: Distance from Nearest Motorable Road for Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur 10
Chart 11: Presence of Public Institutions in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur 11
Chart 12: Presence of CBOs in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur 11
Chart 13: Presence of NGO Projects in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur 12
Figure 1: Map of Muzaffarpur City Showing All the Wards 3
Figure 2: Map of Muzaffarpur City Showing the Locations of Informal Settlements 4
2
Study Report
A General Profile of Muzaffarpur City
Muzaffarpur, “the Land of Leechi” was created in 1860s for administrative convenience by splitting
up the erstwhile district of Tirhut. The present town of Muzaffarpur came into existence in the 18th
century and was named after Muzaffar Khan, an Amil (Revenue Officer) under British Dynasty.
Muzaffarpur is the administrative headquarter of Muzaffarpur District. The total area under the
jurisdiction of Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation (MMC) is about 26.68 Km2 (2668.44 Ha).
According to 2011 Census, the city has a population of 351,607 with 65,870 households. The city
is divided into 49 wards. Muzaffarpur lies between the Burhi Gandak River and Furdoo Nallah. The
municipal area has been further divided into eight administrative and sanitation circles.
Muzaffarpur has several industries. Prabhat Zarda Factory, Bharat Wagon and Engineering Ltd.,
Bihar Drugs and Organic Chemicals Ltd., Muzaffarpur – a unit of IDPL, units of Leather
Development Corporation, Muzaffarpur Dairy, a unit of the Bihar State Dairy Corporation, thermal
power plant (at present defunct) are the major industries located in Muzaffarpur and its periphery.
The above industries have generated considerable employment and have also been helpful in
establishing a number of small industries including a few cottage industries. The most important
item that is manufactured in Muzaffarpur town is railway wagon. Muzaffarpur town is an important
centre for the wholesale cloth trade. Agro-based Industries are also established in the town.
Muzaffarpur has few potential tourist sites like the Baba Garibnath Temple, Chaturbhujsthan
Temple, Gola Durga Temple, Bangla Mukhi Temple, Pankha Toli Temple, Bishops’ House Church
and European Church apart from litchi plantation/ orchards.1
The city has experienced rapid population growth in the last four decades - from 54,139 in 1951 to
305,525 in 2001 and 351,607 in 2011. The average decadal growth rate has been 28%. There was
56% upsurge in the town’s population growth in 1971-81, thereafter, the growth has stabilised.
According to 2011 census, the average population density is 131.
1 Source: CDP Muzaffarpur (2010-30)
2,41,107
3,05,525
3,54,462
1991 2001 2011
0
50,000
1,00,000
1,50,000
2,00,000
2,50,000
3,00,000
3,50,000
4,00,000
Chart 1: Decadal Population Growth of Muzaffarpur City
3
Participatory Research in Asia
In 2001 civic election, the number of wards increased from 22 to 36 in Muzaffarpur Municipal
Corporation. It was further increased to 49 wards as of today. After 2011 election there were 23
male councillors and 26 female councillors.
Figure 1: Map of Muzaffarpur City Showing All the Wards
Source: CDP, Muzaffarpur
A General Poverty Profile of Muzaffarpur City
The Bihar state slum Policy 2011, defines a slum is “a compact area of at least 20 'slum like
households' of poorly built congested tenements, in unhygienic e n v i r onmen t u sua l l y with
i nad equa te i n f ras t ruc tu re and l a ck i ng p rope r sanitation and drinking water facilities”.
The essential characteristic of the slums and slum like inhabitation as laid out in the state slum
policy are as:
High overall household density and predominantly small plot/house; high occupancy rate,
single-room houses, cohabitation by two or more families.
Inadequate availability of settlement level infrastructure - street lighting, storm water
drainage, garbage collection and predominance of narrow and kutcha streets and
inadequate access to education and basic health care facilities.
4
Study Report
The informal settlements are scattered across all 49 wards of the city. However, in Ward No. 17,
34 and 38 the concentration of informal settlements is higher. These are also the old habitations
and primarily inhabited by migrant labour communities.
Figure 2: Map of Muzaffarpur City Showing the Locations of Informal Settlements
Source: CDP Muzaffarpur
The informal settlements in Muzaffarpur exhibit characteristics such as lack of provision of
minimum basic infrastructure, viz. sanitation facility, drainage system, solid waste management,
etc. Most informal settlements are dependent on hand pumps for water supply and a large majority
practice of open defecation. Absence of drainage system and solid waste management results in
unhealthy and unhygienic living conditions.
The urban poor in Muzaffarpur mainly work as labourers and in other informal trades such as
vending vegetables and fruits, as cycle-rickshaw pullers, etc. According to 2011 census there were
105 informal settlements with a population of 31,607 with 5,292 households in the city whereas
the survey conducted by SPUR Programme of state government in 2011, identified 137 informal
settlement having a total of 77,456 population and 7,035 BPL families. However officially MMC has
notified 105 slums as per the definition and characteristics laid out in the State Slum Policy 2011
(Annex.2). The access to basic services such as health, education, water and sanitation in
Muzaffarpur city to the urban poor residing in these informal settlements is limited.
5
Participatory Research in Asia
Methodology for Listing of Informal Settlements The process of mapping informal settlements started with gathering secondary data from different
sources and studying the data for better understanding of the city. The secondary data included
list of notified slums (from Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation), 2011 Census Reports, City
Development Plan of Muzaffarpur and other reports prepared under JNNURM.
It also involved a number of interactions with various stakeholders in the city. The stakeholders
included Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation officials and councillors, ex-councillors, and
community leaders. PRIA team also interacted with media representatives working on smart city
and sanitation issues and different NGOs working in the city. These stakeholder interactions and
analysis of secondary data have helped PRIA team in understanding the city and identifying and
locating the locations of informal settlements in the city.
Right in the beginning, the elected councillor of a particular ward was informed about the purpose
of listing and mapping of informal settlements. The PRIA team members visited and interacted with
the ex-councillors as well as other contestants in the last civic election for seeking information
about the informal settlements and about the active citizens in the informal settlements.
The Anganwadi Centre in an informal settlement is engaged in a lot of activities. The team
consulted the Anganwadi workers which proved to be helpful in identifying the development issues
in informal settlement and the active women groups and youth in the community. A good
relationship with Anganwadi workers also enabled the team to interact candidly with the
community.
The existing community based organisations / associations, youth groups and religious groups
were identified and approached. Some of the community meeting places like shops, tea stalls,
gardens and community centres were also visited. These were the places where the community
people engaged in informal discussions which proved to be good sources of information. A visit to
these places gave a good idea about the community people and happenings in the community.
The team also facilitated a set of Participatory Urban Appraisal tools such as Transect Walk
through informal settlements, conducting Focus Group Discussions, Informal Interviews, Social
and Resource Mapping. During these interactions, the information was collected and verified from
the informal settlement residents.
The relevant information about each informal settlement was collected in a format which is
presented in Annex.1.
Status of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur Status of informal settlements
The mapping process identified a total of 105 informal settlements. Out of 105 informal settlements
97% were notified and 3% were non-notified informal settlements. The non-notified informal
settlements were located in Ward No. 10 (IB Mohalla), Ward No. 39 (Bhavani Singh Market) and
Ward No. 30 (Aghoriya Bazar Chauk).
6
Study Report
Ownership of informal settlement lands
Sixty eight percent (71) informal settlements were located on private land, 12 percent (13) were
located on municipal lands, 12 percent (13) were located on the lands belonged to the state
government, 4 percent (4) were located on lands belonged to railways. Four percent informal
settlements were located on other categories of lands belonged to institutions such as Wakf Boards
and others. These lands were donated to the residents of informal settlements a long ago,
however, they did not have any legal papers such as deed of registration, deed of gift, or mutation
of land.
Type of surrounding area of the informal settlements in Muzaffarpur
Notified, 97%
Non-notified, 3%
Chart 2: Status of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
4%
12%
68%
12%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Chart 3: Ownership of Informal Settlement Lands in Muzaffarpur
Railway Municipality Private State government Any other
7
Participatory Research in Asia
It was important to understand the surrounding areas of the informal settlements in order to develop
appropriate strategies for enhancing access to services or entitlements as these had social and
legal implications. Ninety percent (95) informal settlements were surrounded by the residential
area. Seven percent (7) informal settlements were surrounded by commercial area and 3 percent
informal settlements were surrounded by other slums.
Type of physical location of informal settlements in Muzaffarpur
It was important to have an understanding on the physical location of the informal settlements as
these locations have had serious implications on the tenability issues. Seventy one percent (74)
informal settlements in Muzaffarpur were located on the roadside, 12 percent (13) were located
alongside nallah, drain, or any other water bodies, 11 percent (12) were located along river bank
or on river bed, and 6 percent (6) along the railway track. The informal settlements located
alongside nallah/drain, river bank/river bed and railway track fall into non tenable category as per
Bihar State Slum Policy.
Locational characteristics of informal settlements in Muzaffarpur
The informal settlements in Muzaffarpur exhibited varied locational characteristics. Sixty two
percent (65) (61.90%) were located within the city centre, 23 percent (24) were located in flood
Residential, 90%
Commercial, 7%Other slums, 3%
Chart 4: Surrounding Areas of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
Alongside nallah/drain/any other
water body12%
River bank/ river bed11%
Along the railway track6%Roadside
71%
Chart 5: Type of Physical Location of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
8
Study Report
water logging prone areas either along the banks of Budi Gandak river or in low lying areas and
remaining 15 percent (16) informal settlements were located alongside city boundary of the city.
Type of structures for majority of houses in informal settlements of Muzaffarpur
Housing is one of the most critical issues among the residents of informal settlements. Only in 8
percent (8) informal settlements majority of the houses were pucca, in 21 percent (22) informal
settlements, majority of the houses were kutcha and in 71 percent (75) informal settlements
majority of the houses were semi-pucca.
Roads in informal settlements of Muzaffarpur
The informal settlements in Muzaffarpur by and large have had access to motorable pucca roads.
Seventy one percent (74) informal settlements can be approached through pucca motorable roads.
Ten percent (11) informal settlements had non-motorable pucca roads. These roads were too
Within the city centre62%
Alongside city boundary/ fringe area
of the city15%
Flood/ water logging prone area
23%
Chart 6: Locational Characteristics of Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
Pucca8%
Kutcha21%
Semi-pucca71%
Chart 7: Type of Structures for Majority of Houses in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur
9
Participatory Research in Asia
narrow to accommodate vehicular traffic and only suitable for two wheelers. Eight percent (8)
informal settlements had motorable kutcha approach roads and 11 percent (12) informal
settlements had non-motorable kutcha approach roads.
The internal roads in 65 percent (68) informal settlements were pucca and 35 percent (37) informal
settlements were kutcha. However, even in majority of informal settlements where pucca internal
roads existed most would require maintenance.
Distance from the nearest motorable road in informal settlements of Muzaffarpur
Motorable (Pucca)71%Non-motorable (Pucca)
10%
Motorable (Kutcha) 8%
Non-motorable (Kutcha)
11%
Chart 8: Approach Road to the Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
Pucca65%
Kutcha35%
Chart 9: Type of Internal Roads in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur
10
Study Report
Ninety six percent (101) informal settlements were located with 500 meters from the nearest
motorable roads. Two percent (2) informal settlements were located at a distance between 500
metres to 1 kilometre and two percent (2) at a distance between 1-2 kilometres Overall, the
residents of informal settlements in Muzaffarpur have had access to motorable roads near to their
habitations which had enhanced their mobility in and around the city.
Presence of public institutions in the informal settlements of Muzaffarpur
Presence of public service delivery institutions such as anganwadi, primary and secondary
schools, PDS shops and public health centre in any settlement reflects the accessibility of these
services and quality of life of the urban poor in the city.
In 90 percent (94) informal settlements Anganwadi Centres were present. During discussion some
residents shared that due to lesser number of children in the specified age group some of the
informal settlements had common Anganwadi centre. Seventy seven percent (81) informal
settlements have had access to primary schools within or near the settlements which had been
catering the educational needs for 6-10 years children. However, only 12 percent (13) informal
settlements have had secondary or higher secondary schools. Many residents informed that they
were unable to send their children to secondary school due to distance. Thirteen percent (14)
informal settlement had primary health centres from where they could access health services. The
residents in other informal settlements were primarily dependent on private health institution and
health service providers. Eighty four percent (88) informal settlement had access to Public
Distribution System (PDS). However, discussion with the residents revealed that there were
several issues regarding timings of PDS shops, quality and frequency of supplies.
< 500 Mts.96%
1-2 Km2%
> 500 Mts.-1 Km2%
Chart 10: Distance from the Nearest Motorable Road for Informal Settlements in Muzaffarpur
11
Participatory Research in Asia
Source: SPUR, Muzaffarpur
Seventy three percent (77) informal settlements had the presence of SVS (Samajik Vikas Samiti).
The SVSs were formed by SPUR Muzaffarpur project as community based organisations of the
urban poor. These were formed to collectivise the community and to plan and implement
settlement level development activities (such as construction of toiles, installation of hand pumps,
etc.). However, discussion with the community members and ward councillors revealed that
several issues have had adversely impacted the functioning of these SVSs. Issues such as
practice of nepotism and favouritism in formation of SVSs, irregular meetings, embezzlement of
funds, etc. plagued the effective functioning of SVSs.
90%
77%
12% 13%
84%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Anganwadi Primary School Secondary/HigherSecondary School
Public Health Centre Public DistributionSystem (Ration Shop)
Chart 11: Presence of Public Institutions in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur
Yes73%
No27%
Chart 12: Presence of CBOs in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur
12
Study Report
Only a handful of NGOs had been working in Muzaffarpur city. However, based on the discussion
with community members, it appeared that in 41 percent (43) informal settlements some NGO
activities were present.
Challenges and Lessons Learned PRIA team started interacting and knowing about the efforts of existing community leaders.
There were many doubts and questions among the community members. The team had to
take great efforts in answering all the questions and clarifying all the doubts. At the same time
the team had to make sure that no false promises are given to the community and be clear
about facilitation role in organising the communities.
Most communities expected from PRIA as an NGO to provide some services or deliver the
government schemes. It took a long time for PRIA team to inform and educate the communities
about the project approach which intends to build capacities and organisations of the urban
poor.
There were also negative perceptions about the work of NGOs and the accessibility to
government programmes and schemes. Many community members complained that in the
past, some NGOs have organised meetings, made plans, and gave commitments. However,
they never turned up, which resulted in a breach of trust between community members and
outsiders. Building trust with communities was important task before starting community
mobilisation.
This initial phase of interaction has been followed by regular interactions with the community
leaders. These regular interactions and listening to the problems and concerns and answering
questions have been helpful for the team in establishing a good relationship with community
Yes41%
No59%
Chart 13: Presence of NGO Projects in the Informal Settlements of Muzaffarpur
13
Participatory Research in Asia
leaders and communities. One of the processes followed during this initial phase is inviting the
identified leaders to the PRIA office and showing around the office. During this visit, the team
gave lot of examples and success stories from other states. The continuous interactions on
the issues of informal settlement have been helpful in raising critical consciousness of both the
team and these leaders. Another issue that the team felt important was clearly communicating
that we were not from government department and there will not be any financial transactions
between the community and PRIA.
The urban poor residing in these informal settlements were mostly wage earner and it was
difficult to organise any meeting or discussion. However, many community members were
comfortable and available for meetings on Sundays. The team rescheduled timings of
meetings according to the availability of the communities.
Visiting the informal settlement on a regular basis and seeking help from these leaders for
information, taking transect walk through the informal settlement and analysing the problems
during these interactions. These efforts were made over a week before organising first meeting
with the community. In the first meeting, we made it a point to give an opportunity to these
leaders to address the gathering and validate the points or issues raised by these leaders.
These processes helped the team in successfully identifying and building a pool of community
leaders in each of settlement with whom we could work in the coming years.
The process of Identifying and locating notified and non-notified informal settlements has been
a challenge as the city is expanding in all directions. The list of notified informal settlement has
not been reviewed and updated since a long time and hence some of the notified informal
settlements have been transformed into well built up areas since then.
Most of the residents were unaware about the ownership of land on which informal settlements
existed. Many settlements were located on the lands owned by the Forest Department. In the
absence of required inter-departmental coordination, entitlement to lands by the informal
settlement dwellers has remained unresolved for a long time. It would require enabling laws
and policies.
Many informal settlements were located on the hilly terrain and difficult to access in the
absence of proper road. This has also been one of the reasons why city authorities find it
difficult to provide certain services like piped water supply.
Initially, it was also difficult to access and gather information from the Municipal Corporation
officials and elected councillors. However, with persistent efforts, the officials and councillors
got convinced about the project objectives and started cooperating.
14
Study Report
Annex.1 Format for Listing of Informal Settlements
Name: Address/Location:
GPS location coordinates Date of taking GPS location
Latitude- Longitude- ---/----/----
Number of Households in the slum
Names of Mohallas in the slum (if applicable)
1. 4. 2. 5. 3. 6.
Municipal Ward(s) Enter details of all wards if slum is stretched into more than one ward)
Name of ward: Ward Number:
Landmark (for locating it on base map)
Status of slum (tick one only)
A- Notified B- Non notified C- Resettled
Land ownership status (tick one only)
A- Railway B- Airport Authority C- Defense D- Municipality E- Private F- State Government with name(s) of Department
G- Ownership Unknown H- Any other, specify
Type of Area surrounding the slum
A- Residential B- Industrial C- Commercial D- Other slums E- Other
Physical location of the slum
A- Alongside Nallah/ drain/ any other water body B- Along railway track C- River bank/ river bed D- Hilly terrian/ slope E- Open space/ park F- Forest G- Along side land fill site/ garbage dump H- Roadside
Characteristics of slum A- Within city centre B- Alongside boundary/fringe area of city C- In the vicinity/ under HTV power line D- Flood prone area E- Water logging during rainy season (Tick as many as applicable)
Type of structure of majority of houses in the slum
A- Pucca B- Semi Pucca C- Katcha D- No structure
Approach road to slum A- Motorable (Pucca) B- Motrable (Kutcha) C- Non Motorable (Pucca) D- Non Motorable (Kutcha)
Distance from motroable road
A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
Anganwadi centre A- Anganwadi Centre (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
School Facilities
B- Primary school (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
C- Middle school (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km
15
Participatory Research in Asia
C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
D- High school (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
Health facilities E- Primary Health Centre (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
Toilet Facilities
F- Own toilet facilities at home A- Yes for all Households B- For few Households only C- Not available
G- Community toilet (Yes /No)
If Yes, Distance from Slum A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
Drinking water A- Piped Water Supply TapWater (Standpost) (Yes /No)
In case piped water tap is outside the slum area. Distance from Slum: A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
B- Handpump (Yes /No)
In case handpump is outside the slum area. Distance from Slum: A- less than 500 mts B- 500 mts- 1 km C- 1- 2 Kms D- More than 2 Kms
Drainage Drainage System (Yes /No)
If No, method used for waste water disposal
Garbage Collection Garbage collection (Yes /No)
If Yes, by whom A- Municipality B- Private contractor Frequency of garbage collection A- Daily B- Weekly C- Every 15 days D- No regularity
Whether the slum has benefitted from JnNURM/ RAY/any other slum improvement scheme?
A- Yes B- No
Is there a presence of Slum dwellers association/ community based group (s) in the slum (If more than one group provide details of each group)
C- Yes D- No If yes, please specify- Name of Group: Name of leader: Contact details:
Contact details of community members
Name: Name : Address: Address: Contact number: Contact number:
16
Study Report
Annex. 2 List of informal Settlements
Ward No. Sl. No. Name of the Informal Settlement
1 1 Paswan Tola
2 2 Brahampura Jhitkaiyan, Dusadh Toli
2 3 Rahul Nagar
2 4 Brahampura Dalit Basti
2 5 Muslim Toli, Brahampura
3 6 Turha-Kahar Toli
4 7 Kila Bandh
4 8 Brahampura Kahar Toli
4 9 Brahampura Nunfar
5 10 Kasai Tola
5 11 Mestar Tola, Mal Godown
6 12 Near Sanjay Cinema, Dalit Basti
6 13 Gaffur Basti
6 14 Irani Mohalla
6 15 Darji Tola
6 16 Dalit Basti near Railway Quarter Brahampura
7 17 Govindpuri Muslim Basti
8 18 Kasai Tola-Maripur
8 19 Mallah Tola-Maripur
8 20 Bakshi Colony, Maripur
9 21 Parisadan Road
10 22 IB Muhalla
10 23 PWD Road No-2
11 24 Dalit Basti- Bank Road
11 25 Karbala Dhobi Ghat
11 26 Jogiya Matth Company bagh
11 27 Gandhi Nagar Gujarati Muhalla
12 28 Kila Bandh, Sikandarpur
13 29 Shamshan Ghat Dalit Basti
13 30 Sikandarpur Ambedkar Nagar
14 31 Akhada Ghat, New area Sikandarpur Bandh
15 32 Balughat Ashram Ghat
15 33 Gandhi Ashram Lakdidahi
15 34 Jheel Nagar,Karpuri Nagar
16 35 Lakadidhahi main Raod
16 36 East of Lakadidhahi Pul towards Bandh
16 37 Along the sluice gate of Balughat Bangh
16 38 Kamara Muhalla
18 39 Immamganj
19 40 Nunfar Basti
20 41 Mestar Toli
21 42 Jumma Masjid Chauk
22 43 bharat mata lane,nunfar basti
23 44 kurmi tolla,behind tilak maidan.
23 45 Bum police gali
24 46 Dom toli,shyamnandan road,thana gumti.
17
Participatory Research in Asia
24 47 Kalyanibara,mester toil
24 48 Mester toli,basanti lane
25 49 Pankha toli dalit basti
25 50 Satsang gali,aamgola
25 51 Faqir tolla
26 52 Dalit basti
27 53 Dalit basti,nearmasjid rasalpur
27 54 Majhauliya road,near gumti no-5
28 55 Damu chak,harijan basti
28 56 Shailesh sthan,khabra road
28 57 Speaker chowk,muslim basti
28 58 Mai sthan ,thakur nageshwar lane
29 59 Dhuniya toli,near central school
29 60 Dalit tolla,(near home for homeless)chamrupur
31 61 Paswan Tola
30 62 Aghoriya bazarharizan basti,gannypur hajipur road.
31 63 Atardah
32 64 Sadpura pokhriapir
33 65 Neem Chauk, Saidpura, Durga Sthan
33 66 Dhanukar Tola
33 67 Baswari Tola
33 68 Kasai Tola/Dalit Basti, Sadpura
35 69 Turha Toli
36 70 Paswan Tola/Tatma Tola
37 71 Chapman School Road Basti
37 72 Society Road, Mai Sthan
39 73 BB Jaan Lane
39 74 Near Maharaji Pokhar
39 75 Nunfar Tola
39 76 Bahalkhana Road, Ambedkar Nagar
40 77 Muslim Club
40 78 Chaturbhuj Sthan
39 79 Bhawani Singh Market
41 80 Muslim Toli, Kanhauli Dih
41 81 Dhobi Tola
41 82 Paswan Tola
42 83 Mai Sthan, Malighat, Nakaroad
42 84 Bharat Mata Chauk, Mai Stan
43 85 Bindeshwari Compund
43 86 Hajam Toli, Azad Road
44 87 Mokary Mester Tola
44 88 Nawab Road near Fire Brigade
44 89 Hazam Tola, Darzi Tola
45 90 Chanwara Sodda Godawn
45 91 Dusadh Toli, Amrit Bazar, Chandwara
45 92 Chandwara Panikal Road/Dhobi -Dom Basti
45 93 Lakadi Dhahi/Anand Bagh Colony-Mester-Dusadh Toli
46 94 Ram Bagh Chauri, Near Madarsa,Hazi Khuda Baksh Colony
46 95 Aam Gachhi, Ram Bagh (Hazi Khuda Baksh Colony)
46 96 Ram Bagh Chauri, Near Nahar
18
Study Report
47 97 Nunia Patti Gandhi Nagar
47 98 Ram Janki Mandir, New Police Line
47 99 Patel Nagar, Khadi Bhandar
48 100 Kanhauli Math
48 101 Behind Kanhauli Math
48 102 Durga Sthan (Infront of Chandra Shekhar Bhawan)
48 103 Bangali Tola, Refugee tola
49 104 Bela Chhapra
49 105 Sant Ravidas Nagar
Participatory Research in Asia
About PRIA Established in 1982, PRIA (Participatory Research in Asia) is a global centre for participatory research and training based in New Delhi, India. Currently, PRIA has field offices in several states of India and partnerships with 3000 NGOs across the global North and South to deliver its programmes on the ground. Over 36 years, PRIA has promoted ‘participation as empowerment’, capacity building of community organisations, and people’s participation in governance. Initiatives are undertaken in the overall perspective of ‘making democracy work for all’ – in the political system; democratic culture in families, communities, and society; and participatory democracy with active citizenship. PRIA’s programmes on the ground focus on promotion of participation of the poor, especially women and youth, to claim rights and basic services. Through building knowledge, raising voice and making democracy work for all, PRIA realises its vision – of a world based on values of equity, justice, freedom, peace and solidarity. About Engaged Citizens, Responsive City (ECRC) Engaged Citizens Responsive City is a four-year long intervention supported by the European Union which focuses on strengthening civil society of the urban poor to participate in planning and monitoring of sanitation services. The project works across three cities in India (Ajmer in Rajasthan, Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh, and Muzaffarpur in Bihar). It primarily engages the urban poor through capacity building activities to enable them to become active citizens, and to use the new skills learnt to participate in planning (at city level) and monitoring (at the ward level) of sanitation services. Partners in this change include urban poor and middle-class residents, with leadership of young women and men; mayors, elected councillors and related government departments; traders and market associations; civil society, academia and media; and women sanitation workers. To know more about the programme, please visit here.
ECRC project is funded by
the European Union
ECRC project is
implemented by PRIA
For more information contact
PRIA
42, Tughlakabad Institutional Area
New Delhi- 110062
Ph: +91-11-29960931/32/33
Connect with us:
PRIA_India www.pria.org pria.india